18 December 1979 ([1983] ATS 9); and
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.385
note: References international covenants on human rights
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-18-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18
schema version: 2

18 December 1979 ([1983] ATS 9); and
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.443
note: References international human rights conventions and covenants.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-18-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18-2
schema version: 2

2 April 2026
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.1
note: Compilation information and notes on amendments, applications, and modifications.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The text is a classification of the Fair Work Act 2009 compilation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the text as a compilation of the Fair Work Act 2009.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
premise text: The text describes the compilation date, contents, and notes on amendments.

21 June 2019; and
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.321
note: Employees have an entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entitlement exists
modality: Deontic
operator: has

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21 June 2019; and

25 June 1958 ([1974] ATS 12); and
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.385
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-25-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-25
schema version: 2

25 June 1958; and
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.445
note: Mandatory adherence to ILO Convention (No. 190) concerning the elimination of violence and harassment in the world of work.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-25-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-25-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-25-2
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-25-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a mandatory obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-25-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 25 June 1958; and

27 February 2021
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-27-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27
schema version: 2

28 October 2020; and
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
note: Conditional commencement
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28
schema version: 2

30 September or 31 December.
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.424
curation status: Proposed
has part: 30(1) September or 31 December.
has part: 30(2) September or 31 December.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30
schema version: 2

30 June 2020
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
note: Temporal period starting at the start of a certain point
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-30-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-2
schema version: 2

30 September 2020
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
note: Conditional commencement
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-30-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-3
schema version: 2

30(1) September or 31 December.
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.424
note: Employer must satisfy 10% decline in turnover test for a quarter under specified conditions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-30-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-30-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 30 September or 31 December.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-30-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must satisfy the test
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-30-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30(1) September or 31 December.

30(2) September or 31 December.
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.424
note: Regulations cannot prescribe modifications for paragraph (1)(d) unless jobkeeper payment rules are amended after commencement.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-30-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-30-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-30-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-30-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 30 September or 31 December.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-30-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: unless...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Regulations cannot prescribe modifications after commencement.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (2) The regulations must not prescribe modifications for the purposes of paragraph (1)(d).

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-30-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: unless...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulations cannot prescribe modifications.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: (2) The regulations must not prescribe modifications for the purposes of paragraph (1)(d).

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-30-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: unless...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Regulations cannot prescribe modifications after commencement.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (2) The regulations must not prescribe modifications for the purposes of paragraph (1)(d).

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-30-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30(2) September or 31 December.

31 December 2020
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
curation status: Proposed
has part: 31(1) December 2020
has part: 31(2) December 2020
has part: 31(3) December 2020
has part: 31(4) December 2020
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31
schema version: 2

31(1) December 2020
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
note: Eligible financial service provider must issue a written certificate confirming employer turnover decline.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 31 December 2020

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Within a designated quarter
modality: AllenInterval
operator: WITHIN

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a written certificate
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31(1) December 2020

31(2) December 2020
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
note: Eligible financial service providers cannot issue certificates under subsection (1) in relation to employers with certain relationships.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 31 December 2020

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No certificate issuance
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of issuing certificates
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: Eligible financial service provider relationship

31(3) December 2020
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
note: Employer must provide a 10% decline in turnover certificate
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 31 December 2020

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must provide a 10% decline in turnover certificate
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31(3) December 2020

31(4) December 2020
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
note: Employer must make a statutory declaration to satisfy the 10% decline in turnover test.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 31 December 2020

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The declaration covers a specific time period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has an obligation to make a statutory declaration.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31(4) December 2020

536NL Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.31
note: Guide to this Part
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nl-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nl
schema version: 2

536NM Meaning of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.31
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nm-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nm-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nm
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nm-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key terms.
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nm-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536NM Meaning of employee and employer

536NN FWC to have regard to minimum standards objective
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.31
note: FWC must have regard to minimum standards objective
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nn-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nn-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nn
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nn-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The FWC must have regard to the minimum standards objective

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nn-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536NN FWC to have regard to minimum standards objective

536NP Contravening a road transport contractual chain order
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.32
note: Prohibition on contravening a road transport contractual chain order
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536np-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536np-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536np-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536np-logic-deontic-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536np-logic-deontic-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536np-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536np
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536np-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on contravening a road transport contractual chain order
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: A person must not contravene a term of a road transport contractual chain order.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536np-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on contravening a road transport contractual chain order
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: A person does not contravene a term of a road transport contractual chain order unless the order applies to the person: see subsection 536NQ(1).

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536np-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on contravening a road transport contractual chain order
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: Note 1: This section is a civil remedy provision (see Part 4-1).

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536np-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on contravening a road transport contractual chain order
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: Note 2: A person does not contravene a term of a road transport contractual chain order unless the order applies to the person: see subsection 536NQ(1).

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536np-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on contravening a road transport contractual chain order
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: subsection 536NQ(1)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536np-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536NP Contravening a road transport contractual chain order

536NQ The significance of a road transport contractual chain order
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.32
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536NQ(1) The significance of a road transport contractual chain order
has part: 536NQ(2) The significance of a road transport contractual chain order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nq
schema version: 2

536NQ(1) The significance of a road transport contractual chain order
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.32
note: A person is not obligated to comply with a road transport contractual chain order unless it applies to them.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nq-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nq-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536NQ The significance of a road transport contractual chain order

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person is not obligated to comply with a road transport contractual chain order unless it applies to them.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬O
premise text: A road transport contractual chain order does not impose obligations on a person.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nq-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536NQ(1) The significance of a road transport contractual chain order

536NQ(2) The significance of a road transport contractual chain order
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.32
note: A road transport contractual chain order gives a person an entitlement only if the order applies to the person.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nq-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nq-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536NQ The significance of a road transport contractual chain order

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person has an entitlement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: The order applies to the person.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nq-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536NQ(2) The significance of a road transport contractual chain order

536NR When a road transport contractual chain order applies to a
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.33
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536NR(1) When a road transport contractual chain order applies to a
has part: 536NR(2) When a road transport contractual chain order applies to a
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nr
schema version: 2

536NR(1) When a road transport contractual chain order applies to a
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.33
note: A road transport contractual chain order applies to a regulated road transport contractor or a road transport employee-like worker if certain conditions are met.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nr-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536NR When a road transport contractual chain order applies to a

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the road transport contractual chain order is in operation during the time it covers the regulated road transport contractor or road transport employee-like worker
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The road transport contractual chain order is in operation during the time it covers the regulated road transport contractor or road transport employee-like worker.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (b) the road transport contractual chain order is in operation;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the road transport contractual chain order applies to the regulated road transport contractor or road transport employee-like worker
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If the road transport contractual chain order covers and is in operation, then it applies.
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: (a) the road transport contractual chain order covers the regulated road transport contractor or road transport employee-like worker; (b) the road transport contractual chain order is in operation;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the road transport contractual chain order does not apply to other persons in a road transport contractual chain except when it is in operation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The road transport contractual chain order does not apply to other persons in a road transport contractual chain except when it is in operation.
modality: Deontic
operator: except
premise text: (c) no other provision of this Act provides, or has the effect, that the road transport contractual chain order does not apply to the regulated road transport contractor or road transport employee-like worker.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the road transport contractual chain order applies
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If the road transport contractual chain order covers and is in operation, then it applies.
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: (a) the road transport contractual chain order covers the regulated road transport contractor or road transport employee-like worker; (b) the road transport contractual chain order is in operation;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the road transport contractual chain order applies everywhere it covers the regulated road transport contractor or road transport employee-like worker
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The road transport contractual chain order applies everywhere it covers the regulated road transport contractor or road transport employee-like worker.
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
premise text: (a) the road transport contractual chain order covers the regulated road transport contractor or road transport employee-like worker;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536NR(1) When a road transport contractual chain order applies to a

536NR(2) When a road transport contractual chain order applies to a
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.33
note: A road transport contractual chain order applies to a person in a road transport contractual chain.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nr-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536NR When a road transport contractual chain order applies to a

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The road transport contractual chain order is in operation during the work performed by the employee.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The provision states that the order is in operation during the work performed by the employee.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (c) the road transport contractual chain order is in operation;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A road transport contractual chain order applies to a person in a road transport contractual chain.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision applies to the person.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: (a) the road transport contractual chain order covers the person;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A regulated road transport contractor or an employee-like worker applies to the provision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision applies to a regulated road transport contractor or an employee-like worker.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: (b) a regulated road transport contractor or a road transport employee-like worker to whom the road transport contractual chain order applies, or an employee, performs work for the person;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536NR(2) When a road transport contractual chain order applies to a

536NS When a road transport contractual chain order covers a
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536NS(1) When a road transport contractual chain order covers a
has part: 536NS(2) When a road transport contractual chain order covers a
has part: 536NS(3) When a road transport contractual chain order covers a
has part: 536NS(4) When a road transport contractual chain order covers a
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ns
schema version: 2

536NS(1) When a road transport contractual chain order covers a
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
note: A person is covered by a road transport contractual chain order if the order explicitly covers them.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ns-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536NS When a road transport contractual chain order covers a

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: A person is covered by a road transport contractual chain order if the order explicitly covers them.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536NS(1) When a road transport contractual chain order covers a

536NS(2) When a road transport contractual chain order covers a
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
note: A road transport contractual chain order also covers a person in a road transport contractual chain if any of the following provides, or has the effect, that the order covers the person.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ns-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536NS When a road transport contractual chain order covers a

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536NS(2) When a road transport contractual chain order covers a

536NS(3) When a road transport contractual chain order covers a
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
note: Exempts a person from coverage under a road transport contractual chain order if the order is affected by a provision of this Act, an FWC order made under such a provision, or a court order.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ns-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536NS When a road transport contractual chain order covers a

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the condition under which coverage is exempted due to cessation of operation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: ceased to operate
premise text: Road transport contractual chain orders that have ceased to operate

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a person in a road transport contractual chain order does not cover the person:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits coverage under a road transport contractual chain order
modality: Deontic
operator: exempts
premise text: (3) Despite subsections (1) and (2),

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: or has the effect, that the order does not cover the person:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits coverage under an FWC order made under a provision of this Act
modality: Deontic
operator: exempts
premise text: (b) an FWC order made under a provision of this Act;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: or has the effect, that the order does not cover the person:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits coverage under a court order
modality: Deontic
operator: exempts
premise text: (c) an order of a court.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536NS(3) When a road transport contractual chain order covers a

536NS(4) When a road transport contractual chain order covers a
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
note: A ceased road transport contractual chain order does not cover a person.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ns-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 536NS When a road transport contractual chain order covers a

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The cessation of operation is during the period when the order covers a person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A road transport contractual chain order that has ceased to operate does not cover a person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

536NT When a road transport contractual chain order is in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.35
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536NT(1) When a road transport contractual chain order is in
has part: 536NT(2) When a road transport contractual chain order is in
has part: 536NT(3) When a road transport contractual chain order is in
has part: 536NT(4) When a road transport contractual chain order is in
has part: 536NT(5) When a road transport contractual chain order is in
has part: 536NT(6) When a road transport contractual chain order is in
has part: 536NT(7) When a road transport contractual chain order is in
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nt
schema version: 2

536NT(1) When a road transport contractual chain order is in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.35
note: Road transport contractual chain order comes into operation on specified day.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nt-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536NT When a road transport contractual chain order is in

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The commencement date is a specific point in time
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Commencement occurs on specified day

536NT(2) When a road transport contractual chain order is in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.35
note: The specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the road transport contractual chain order is made.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nt-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536NT When a road transport contractual chain order is in

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on earlier commencement
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: (2) The specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the road transport contractual chain order is made.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536NT(2) When a road transport contractual chain order is in

536NT(3) When a road transport contractual chain order is in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.35
note: Must not be earlier than 12 months after notice of intent publication
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nt-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536NT When a road transport contractual chain order is in

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...12 months after the relevant notice of intent for the order was published.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST NOT
premise text: (3) The specified day must not be earlier than...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536NT(3) When a road transport contractual chain order is in

536NT(4) When a road transport contractual chain order is in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.35
note: FWC may reduce 12-month period for road transport contractual chain order under certain circumstances.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nt-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 536NT When a road transport contractual chain order is in

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to reduce period
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536NT(4) When a road transport contractual chain order is in

536NT(5) When a road transport contractual chain order is in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.35
note: Determination takes effect on specified day
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nt-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 536NT When a road transport contractual chain order is in

536NT(6) When a road transport contractual chain order is in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.35
note: Must not be earlier than the day of determination
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-6-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nt-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 536NT When a road transport contractual chain order is in

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on early commencement
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: (6) The specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the determination is made.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536NT(6) When a road transport contractual chain order is in

536NT(7) When a road transport contractual chain order is in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.35
note: Road transport contractual chain order continues in operation until revoked.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nt-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 536NT When a road transport contractual chain order is in

536NU When road transport contractual chain guidelines cover a
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536NU(1) When road transport contractual chain guidelines cover a
has part: 536NU(2) When road transport contractual chain guidelines cover a
has part: 536NU(3) When road transport contractual chain guidelines cover a
has part: 536NU(4) When road transport contractual chain guidelines cover a
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nu
schema version: 2

536NU(1) When road transport contractual chain guidelines cover a
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
note: A person is covered by road transport contractual chain guidelines if the guidelines explicitly cover them.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nu-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536NU When road transport contractual chain guidelines cover a

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: A person is covered by road transport contractual chain guidelines if the guidelines explicitly cover them.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536NU(1) When road transport contractual chain guidelines cover a

536NU(2) When road transport contractual chain guidelines cover a
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
note: Guidelines cover a person in the transport chain if they affect the guidelines.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nu-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536NU When road transport contractual chain guidelines cover a

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if any of the following provides, or has the effect...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Guidelines apply during the provision or court order.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) Road transport contractual chain guidelines also cover a person...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if any of the following provides, or has the effect...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Guidelines apply during the provision or court order.
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (2) Road transport contractual chain guidelines also cover a person...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if any of the following provides, or has the effect...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Guidelines cover a person in the transport chain.
modality: Deontic
operator: covers
premise text: (2) Road transport contractual chain guidelines also cover a person...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if any of the following provides, or has the effect...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Guidelines diffuse to the person in the transport chain.
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (2) Road transport contractual chain guidelines also cover a person...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if any of the following provides, or has the effect...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Guidelines apply during the provision or court order.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (2) Road transport contractual chain guidelines also cover a person...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536NU(2) When road transport contractual chain guidelines cover a

536NU(3) When road transport contractual chain guidelines cover a
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
note: Guidelines do not cover a person if any provision, FWC order, or court order applies.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nu-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536NU When road transport contractual chain guidelines cover a

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: !
premise text: (a) a provision of this Act;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: !
premise text: (c) an order of a court.

536NU(4) When road transport contractual chain guidelines cover a
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
note: Exempts persons from road transport contractual chain guidelines that have ceased to operate.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nu-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 536NU When road transport contractual chain guidelines cover a

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Excludes coverage by guidelines for persons in a road transport contractual chain during the period of operation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Exclude
premise text: (4) Despite subsections (1) and (2),

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifies the scope of guidelines for persons in a road transport contractual chain.
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
premise text: (4) Despite subsections (1) and (2),

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits coverage by guidelines for persons in a road transport contractual chain.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (4) Despite subsections (1) and (2),

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Excludes coverage by guidelines for persons in a road transport contractual chain during the period of operation.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Exclude
premise text: (4) Despite subsections (1) and (2),

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Excludes coverage by guidelines for persons in a road transport contractual chain during the period of operation.
modality: LTL
operator: Exclude
premise text: (4) Despite subsections (1) and (2),

536NV When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536NV(1) When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in
has part: 536NV(2) When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in
has part: 536NV(3) When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in
has part: 536NV(4) When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in
has part: 536NV(5) When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nv
schema version: 2

536NV(1) When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37
note: Guidelines come into operation on a specified day.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nv-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nv-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536NV When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in

536NV(2) When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37
note: Must not be earlier than the day on which guidelines are made.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nv-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nv-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nv-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536NV When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nv-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Before
premise text: (2) The specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the road transport contractual chain guidelines are made.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: (2) The specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the road transport contractual chain guidelines are made.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nv-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536NV(2) When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in

536NV(3) When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37
note: Determination takes effect on specified day
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nv-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nv-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536NV When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in

536NV(4) When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37
note: Road transport contractual chain guidelines must not be earlier than the day of determination.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nv-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nv-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nv-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nv-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nv-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 536NV When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nv-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The specified day must be before the day of determination.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Before
premise text: (4) The specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the determination is made.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nv-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Road transport contractual chain guidelines must not be earlier than the day of determination.
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: (4) The specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the determination is made.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nv-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The road transport contractual chain guidelines operate until revoked.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (4) The specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the determination is made.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nv-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536NV(4) When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in

536NV(5) When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37
note: Guidelines continue in operation until revoked
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nv-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nv-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 536NV When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in

536NW Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.38
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536NW(1) Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
has part: 536NW(2) Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
has part: 536NW(3) Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
has part: 536NW(4) Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
has part: 536NW(5) Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nw
schema version: 2

536NW(1) Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.38
note: Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws from affecting road transport contractual chain rights, entitlements, obligations, and liabilities.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nw-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536NW Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excludes certain State and Territory laws from affecting road transport contractual chain rights, entitlements, obligations, and liabilities.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines a class hierarchy for workplace relations matters.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassHierarchy

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536NW(1) Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws

536NW(2) Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.38
note: No effect on contractual chain rights and entitlements from State or Territory laws specified in regulations.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nw-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536NW Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No effect on obligations
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion

536NW(3) Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.38
note: Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nw-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536NW Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <>
premise text: Division 3, Section 536NX

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

536NW(4) Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.38
note: Clarifies effect of subsection (2) despite other laws
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nw-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 536NW Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...section 536NX, are not workplace relations matters.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Clarifies effect of subsection (2)
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: (4) To avoid doubt, subsection (2) has effect even if...

536NW(5) Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.38
note: References a law of a State or Territory include regulations and other instruments made pursuant to the law.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-5-logic-ltl-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-5-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-5-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nw-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 536NW Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The regulation is in effect during the same time period as the law.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation during
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (b) is a reference to a law of a State or Territory as in force from time to time.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-5-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The regulation is included in the CogAI.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Inclusion relation
modality: CogAI
operator: includes
premise text: (a) includes a reference to a regulation, rule or other instrument made pursuant to, or for the purposes of, a law of a State or Territory.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The regulation is included in the reference.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion relation
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (a) includes a reference to a regulation, rule or other instrument made pursuant to, or for the purposes of, a law of a State or Territory.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The regulation is subsumed by the law.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subsumption relation
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subsumes
premise text: (a) includes a reference to a law of a State or Territory as in force from time to time.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-5-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The regulation is included in the diffusion.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Inclusion relation
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
premise text: (a) includes a reference to a regulation, rule or other instrument made pursuant to, or for the purposes of, a law of a State or Territory.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-5-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The regulation is in effect until the same time period as the law.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation until
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (b) is a reference to a law of a State or Territory as in force from time to time.

536NX What are workplace relations matters
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.39
note: Defines workplace relations matter
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nx-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nx
schema version: 2

536NY What is an unfairness ground
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.40
note: Defines unfairness ground in services contract
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ny-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ny-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ny
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ny-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: unfairness ground
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

536NZ Interaction of road transport contractual chain orders with
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.40
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536NZ(1) Interaction of road transport contractual chain orders with
has part: 536NZ(2) Interaction of road transport contractual chain orders with
has part: 536NZ(3) Interaction of road transport contractual chain orders with
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nz
schema version: 2

536NZ(1) Interaction of road transport contractual chain orders with
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.40
note: A road transport contractual chain order prevails over a law of a State or Territory to the extent of any inconsistency.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nz-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536NZ Interaction of road transport contractual chain orders with

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: (1) A road transport contractual chain order prevails over a law of a State or Territory, to the extent of any inconsistency.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Influence
modality: CogAI
operator: influences
premise text: (1) A road transport contractual chain order prevails over a law of a State or Territory, to the extent of any inconsistency.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: prevails
premise text: (1) A road transport contractual chain order prevails over a law of a State or Territory, to the extent of any inconsistency.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (1) A road transport contractual chain order prevails over a law of a State or Territory, to the extent of any inconsistency.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal overlap
modality: LTL
operator: overlaps
premise text: (1) A road transport contractual chain order prevails over a law of a State or Territory, to the extent of any inconsistency.

536NZ(2) Interaction of road transport contractual chain orders with
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.40
note: Interaction of road transport contractual chain orders with State/Territory law
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nz-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536NZ Interaction of road transport contractual chain orders with

536NZ(3) Interaction of road transport contractual chain orders with
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.40
note: References a law of a State or Territory include regulations, rules, and other instruments made pursuant to or for the purposes of that law.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nz-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536NZ Interaction of road transport contractual chain orders with

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes a reference to a regulation, rule or other instrument.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Is a reference to a law of a State or Territory as in force from time to time.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is a reference to

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536NZ(3) Interaction of road transport contractual chain orders with

536P Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.40
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536P(1) Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
has part: 536P(2) Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536p
schema version: 2

536P(1) Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.40
note: Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536p-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536p-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536P Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows conduct under specified conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

536P(2) Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.40
note: Conduct is not specified or authorised if it contains a cartel provision or boycott conduct.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536p-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536p-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536P Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conduct containing cartel provisions or boycott conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

536PB Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.42
note: Guide to this Part of the Act
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pb-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pb
schema version: 2

536PC Meaning of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.42
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pc-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pc-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pc
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key terms.
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pc-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536PC Meaning of employee and employer

536PD Road transport contractual chain orders
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.43
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536PD(1) Road transport contractual chain orders
has part: 536PD(2) Road transport contractual chain orders
has part: 536PD(3) Road transport contractual chain orders
has part: 536PD(4) Road transport contractual chain orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pd
schema version: 2

536PD(1) Road transport contractual chain orders
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.43
note: The FWC may make an order setting standards for regulated road transport contractors and others.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pd-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536PD Road transport contractual chain orders

536PD(2) Road transport contractual chain orders
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.43
note: Cannot confer rights or impose obligations on an employee
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pd-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536PD Road transport contractual chain orders

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employee's employment period overlaps with the contractual chain order
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Employee's employment period overlaps with contractual chain order
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) A road transport contractual chain order cannot confer rights or impose obligations on a person in the capacity of an employee.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No right or obligation can be conferred on an employee
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of conferring rights or imposing obligations on an employee
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: (2) A road transport contractual chain order cannot confer rights or impose obligations on a person in the capacity of an employee.

536PD(3) Road transport contractual chain orders
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.43
note: FWC may make a road transport contractual chain order on its own initiative or on application under subsection 536PE(1).
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pd-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pd-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536PD Road transport contractual chain orders

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make a road transport contractual chain order
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pd-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536PD(3) Road transport contractual chain orders

536PD(4) Road transport contractual chain orders
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.43
note: FWC must not make a road transport contractual chain order that covers road transport employee-like workers unless the FWC considers it appropriate.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pd-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pd-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 536PD Road transport contractual chain orders

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC must not make a road transport contractual chain order that covers road transport employee-like workers.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pd-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536PD(4) Road transport contractual chain orders

536PE Applications for road transport contractual chain orders
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.43
note: Organisations and regulated businesses can apply for road transport contractual chain orders.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pe-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pe-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pe
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pe-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Can apply
modality: Deontic
operator: can

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pe-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536PE Applications for road transport contractual chain orders

536PF Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.45
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536PF(1) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
has part: 536PF(2) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pf
schema version: 2

536PF(1) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.45
note: FWC must consider certain matters when making a road transport contractual chain order
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pf-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536PF Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) This section applies if:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for consideration of matters by the FWC
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (a) an application is made for a road transport contractual chain order under subsection 536PE(1) or for a variation of a road transport contractual chain order under section 536PS; or (b) the FWC is considering making or varying a road transport contractual chain order on its own initiative.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) This section applies if:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory consideration of certain matters
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) an application is made for a road transport contractual chain order under subsection 536PE(1) or for a variation of a road transport contractual chain order under section 536PS; or (b) the FWC is considering making or varying a road transport contractual chain order on its own initiative.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) This section applies if:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring consideration of matters by the FWC
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (a) an application is made for a road transport contractual chain order under subsection 536PE(1) or for a variation of a road transport contractual chain order under section 536PS; or (b) the FWC is considering making or varying a road transport contractual chain order on its own initiative.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536PF(1) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a

536PF(2) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.45
note: FWC must engage with parties and consult the Road Transport Advisory Group before making or varying a road transport contractual chain order.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pf-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536PF Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC must make or vary a road transport contractual chain order after genuine engagement with parties and consultation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: FWC must make or vary a road transport contractual chain order after genuine engagement with parties and consultation with the Road Transport Advisory Group.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (2) The FWC: (a) must not make or vary the road transport contractual chain order unless there has been genuine engagement with the parties to be covered;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC must engage with parties.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to engage with parties and consult the Road Transport Advisory Group.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) The FWC: (a) must not make or vary the road transport contractual chain order unless there has been genuine engagement with the parties to be covered;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC must consult the Road Transport Advisory Group.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consult the Road Transport Advisory Group.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) The FWC: (b) must not make or vary the road transport contractual chain order unless the Road Transport Advisory Group has been consulted;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC must make or vary a road transport contractual chain order at some point in time after genuine engagement with parties and consultation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: FWC must make or vary a road transport contractual chain order at some point in time after genuine engagement with parties and consultation with the Road Transport Advisory Group.
modality: LTL
operator: >=
premise text: (2) The FWC: (a) must not make or vary the road transport contractual chain order unless there has been genuine engagement with the parties to be covered;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536PF(2) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a

536PG FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.46
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536PG(1) FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport
has part: 536PG(2) FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pg
schema version: 2

536PG(1) FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.46
note: Publish a notice and draft of proposed road transport contractual chain order.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pg-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pg-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536PG FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Publish a notice and draft of proposed road transport contractual chain order.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536PG(1) FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport

536PG(2) FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.46
note: FWC must publish notice and draft on website and other means.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pg-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pg-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pg-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536PG FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pg-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of provision
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536PG(2) FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport

536PH Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.47
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536PH(1) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
has part: 536PH(1A) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
has part: 536PH(2) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
has part: 536PH(3) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ph
schema version: 2

536PH(1) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.47
note: Affected entities must make written submissions to the FWC.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ph-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536PH Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty
modality: Deontic
operator: OBLIGES

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536PH(1) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make

536PH(1A) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.47
note: A reasonable opportunity to make written submissions may be required.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1a-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ph-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 536PH Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes a temporal interval.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (1A) To avoid doubt, if the draft is of a time-sensitive road transport contractual chain order, a short period to make written submissions may be a reasonable opportunity.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes a cognitive process.
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (1A) To avoid doubt, if the draft is of a time-sensitive road transport contractual chain order, a short period to make written submissions may be a reasonable opportunity.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May require a reasonable opportunity.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
premise text: (1A) To avoid doubt, if the draft is of a time-sensitive road transport contractual chain order, a short period to make written submissions may be a reasonable opportunity.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes a diffusion process.
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (1A) To avoid doubt, if the draft is of a time-sensitive road transport contractual chain order, a short period to make written submissions may be a reasonable opportunity.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes a temporal interval.
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (1A) To avoid doubt, if the draft is of a time-sensitive road transport contractual chain order, a short period to make written submissions may be a reasonable opportunity.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536PH(1A) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make

536PH(2) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.47
note: The FWC must publish submissions made to the FWC.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ph-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536PH Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish submissions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536PH(2) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make

536PH(3) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.47
note: The FWC may decide not to publish confidential or commercially sensitive information.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ph-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536PH Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to withhold publication
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Summary of confidential information
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
premise text: (i) a summary of the information which contains sufficient detail

536PJ Finalising draft order
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.48
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536PJ(1) Finalising draft order
has part: 536PJ(2) Finalising draft order
has part: 536PJ(3) Finalising draft order
has part: 536PJ(4) Finalising draft order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pj
schema version: 2

536PJ(1) Finalising draft order
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.48
note: The FWC may make changes to a draft road transport contractual chain order.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pj-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pj-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536PJ Finalising draft order

536PJ(2) Finalising draft order
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.48
note: If changes made under subsection (1) are significant, the FWC must decide not to make the road transport contractual chain order based on the draft.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pj-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pj-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536PJ Finalising draft order

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC must decide not to make the road transport contractual chain order based on the draft.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

536PJ(3) Finalising draft order
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.48
note: Defines the period of consultation for a revised draft road transport contractual chain order
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pj-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pj-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536PJ Finalising draft order

536PJ(4) Finalising draft order
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.48
note: FWC may reduce 12-month period for time-sensitive road transport contractual chain order.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pj-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pj-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pj-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 536PJ Finalising draft order

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pj-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC obligation to reduce period
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pj-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536PJ(4) Finalising draft order

536PK Decision not to make order based on the draft
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.49
note: Publish notice of decision on website and other means.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pk-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pk-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pk-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pk
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pk-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pk-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subdivision D—Decisions on road transport contractual chain orders and related matters
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASSOF

536PL Decisions on applications for road transport contractual
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.49
note: The FWC may decide on an application for a road transport contractual chain order.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pl-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pl-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pl
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pl-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may decide on an application.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pl-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536PL Decisions on applications for road transport contractual

536PM Terms that must be included in a road transport contractual
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.50
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536PM(1) Terms that must be included in a road transport contractual
has part: 536PM(2) Terms that must be included in a road transport contractual
has part: 536PM(3) Terms that must be included in a road transport contractual
has part: 536PM(4) Terms that must be included in a road transport contractual
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pm
schema version: 2

536PM(1) Terms that must be included in a road transport contractual
type: Concept
description: road transport industry coverage, persons in the road transport industry
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.50
note: Road transport contractual chain order must include terms setting out work and persons covered.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pm-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536PM Terms that must be included in a road transport contractual

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must include terms
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536PM(1) Terms that must be included in a road transport contractual

536PM(2) Terms that must be included in a road transport contractual
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.50
note: Must include persons in a road transport contractual chain
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pm-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536PM Terms that must be included in a road transport contractual

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expressed to cover persons
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536PM(2) Terms that must be included in a road transport contractual

536PM(3) Terms that must be included in a road transport contractual
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.50
note: Specify persons in a road transport contractual chain by name or class.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pm-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536PM Terms that must be included in a road transport contractual

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: and (b) regulated road transport contractors and road transport employee-like workers must be specified by inclusion in a specified class or specified classes.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specify persons in a road transport contractual chain within a specified class or classes.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (a) persons in a road transport contractual chain other than regulated road transport contractors or road transport employee-like workers may be specified by name or by inclusion in a specified class or specified classes;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: and (b) regulated road transport contractors and road transport employee-like workers must be specified by inclusion in a specified class or specified classes.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Specify persons in a road transport contractual chain within a specified class or classes.
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (a) persons in a road transport contractual chain other than regulated road transport contractors or road transport employee-like workers may be specified by name or by inclusion in a specified class or specified classes;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: persons in a road transport contractual chain other than regulated road transport contractors or road transport employee-like workers may be specified by name or by inclusion in a specified class or specified classes;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify persons in a road transport contractual chain.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) For the purposes of subsection (2):

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: and (b) regulated road transport contractors and road transport employee-like workers must be specified by inclusion in a specified class or specified classes.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Specify persons in a road transport contractual chain within a specified class or classes.
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (a) persons in a road transport contractual chain other than regulated road transport contractors or road transport employee-like workers may be specified by name or by inclusion in a specified class or specified classes;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: and (b) regulated road transport contractors and road transport employee-like workers must be specified by inclusion in a specified class or specified classes.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Specify persons in a road transport contractual chain within a specified class or classes.
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (a) persons in a road transport contractual chain other than regulated road transport contractors or road transport employee-like workers may be specified by name or by inclusion in a specified class or specified classes;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536PM(3) Terms that must be included in a road transport contractual

536PM(4) Terms that must be included in a road transport contractual
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.50
note: Class description for road transport contractual chain
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pm-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 536PM Terms that must be included in a road transport contractual

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536PM(4) Terms that must be included in a road transport contractual

536PN Road transport contractual chain order must include term
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.51
note: Road transport contractual chain order must include provision specifying effect of inconsistency with minimum standards order.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pn-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pn-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pn
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pn-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to include provision
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pn-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536PN Road transport contractual chain order must include term

536PP Term about settling disputes must be included in a road
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.51
note: A road transport contractual chain order must include a term that provides a procedure for settling disputes about any matters arising under the order.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pp-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pp-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pp
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pp-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to include a dispute settlement procedure
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pp-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536PP Term about settling disputes must be included in a road

536PQ Terms that may be included in a road transport contractual
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.51
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536PQ(1) Terms that may be included in a road transport contractual
has part: 536PQ(2) Terms that may be included in a road transport contractual
has part: 536PQ(3) Terms that may be included in a road transport contractual
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pq
schema version: 2

536PQ(1) Terms that may be included in a road transport contractual
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.51
note: Payment times, fuel levies, rate reviews, termination, and cost recovery terms may be included in a road transport contractual chain order.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pq-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536PQ Terms that may be included in a road transport contractual

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes terms about payment times, fuel levies, rate reviews, termination, and cost recovery.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (1) A road transport contractual chain order...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536PQ(1) Terms that may be included in a road transport contractual

536PQ(2) Terms that may be included in a road transport contractual
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.51
note: No limitation on terms in non-time-sensitive road transport contractual chain orders.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pq-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536PQ Terms that may be included in a road transport contractual

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Non-time-sensitive road transport contractual chain orders are included in the subsection.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal inclusion of non-time-sensitive road transport contractual chain orders
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
premise text: The subsection includes non-time-sensitive road transport contractual chain orders.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Non-time-sensitive road transport contractual chain orders are included in the subsection.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal inclusion of non-time-sensitive road transport contractual chain orders (CogAI)
modality: CogAI
operator: includes
premise text: The subsection includes non-time-sensitive road transport contractual chain orders.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The terms are imposed by the subsection.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposition of terms in a road transport contractual chain order
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes
premise text: The subsection imposes no limitation on the terms.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Non-time-sensitive road transport contractual chain orders are included in the subsection.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal inclusion of non-time-sensitive road transport contractual chain orders (Diffusion)
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
premise text: The subsection includes non-time-sensitive road transport contractual chain orders.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Non-time-sensitive road transport contractual chain orders are included in the subsection.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal inclusion of non-time-sensitive road transport contractual chain orders (LTl)
modality: LTL
operator: includes
premise text: The subsection includes non-time-sensitive road transport contractual chain orders.

536PQ(3) Terms that may be included in a road transport contractual
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.51
note: FWC must remove a term from a road transport contractual chain order
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pq-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536PQ Terms that may be included in a road transport contractual

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory action
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536PQ(3) Terms that may be included in a road transport contractual

536PR Terms that must not be included in a road transport
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.53
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536PR(1) Terms that must not be included in a road transport
has part: 536PR(2) Terms that must not be included in a road transport
has part: 536PR(3) Terms that must not be included in a road transport
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pr
schema version: 2

536PR(1) Terms that must not be included in a road transport
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.53
note: Terms about overtime rates, rostering arrangements, and work health and safety are prohibited in road transport contractual chain orders.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pr-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536PR Terms that must not be included in a road transport

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits certain terms in road transport contractual chain orders.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A road transport contractual chain order must not include terms about any of the following matters:

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536PR(1) Terms that must not be included in a road transport

536PR(2) Terms that must not be included in a road transport
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.53
note: Terms about road transport that are comprehensively dealt with by another law must not be included.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pr-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536PR Terms that must not be included in a road transport

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...by another law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Terms about road transport that are comprehensively dealt with by another law overlap.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (ii) by another law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...terms about any of the following matters:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits including terms about road transport that are comprehensively dealt with by another law.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) A road transport contractual chain order must not include terms...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...terms about any of the following matters:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits including terms about road transport that are comprehensively dealt with by another law.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) a matter prescribed by the regulations, or included in a class of matter prescribed by the regulations.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...by another law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Terms about road transport that are comprehensively dealt with by another law recur.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (ii) by another law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536PR(2) Terms that must not be included in a road transport

536PR(3) Terms that must not be included in a road transport
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.53
note: Matters not dealt with in road transport regulations
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pr-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536PR Terms that must not be included in a road transport

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulations must exclude certain matters
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(d):

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Matters not dealt with in road transport regulations
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: (a) the regulations may specify that a particular matter, or a matter included in a class of matters, is, or is not, dealt with

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536PR(3) Terms that must not be included in a road transport

536PS Applications to vary or revoke road transport contractual
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.54
note: Applications for varying or revoking a road transport contractual chain order
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ps-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ps-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ps
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ps-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applications for varying or revoking a road transport contractual chain order
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

536PT FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.55
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536PT(1) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
has part: 536PT(2) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
has part: 536PT(3) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
has part: 536PT(4) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
has part: 536PT(5) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pt
schema version: 2

536PT(1) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.55
note: FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain order if consistent with minimum standards objective and road transport objective.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pt-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536PT FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536PT(1) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain

536PT(2) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.55
note: FWC may not make a variation to the extent that it would result in the order covering persons who are not regulated road transport contractors or road transport employee-like workers.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pt-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536PT FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of variation for non-regulated persons
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536PT(2) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain

536PT(3) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.55
note: FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pt-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536PT FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536PT(3) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain

536PT(4) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.55
note: FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain order
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pt-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 536PT FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC has the authority to modify or terminate road transport contractual chain orders at any time
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the temporal scope of the FWC's power to vary or revoke road transport contractual chain orders
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: The FWC may make a determination varying or revoking a road transport contractual chain order

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC's authority to modify or terminate road transport contractual chain orders can be automated using AI
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes how the FWC's power to vary or revoke road transport contractual chain orders can be applied using artificial intelligence
modality: CogAI
operator: Applicable
premise text: The FWC may make a determination varying or revoking a road transport contractual chain order

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC has the authority to modify or terminate road transport contractual chain orders
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Describes the FWC's power to vary or revoke road transport contractual chain orders
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: The FWC may make a determination varying or revoking a road transport contractual chain order

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC's authority to modify or terminate road transport contractual chain orders is not limited by the actions of other entities
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes how the FWC's power to vary or revoke road transport contractual chain orders spreads to other entities
modality: Diffusion
operator: Applicable
premise text: The FWC may make a determination varying or revoking a road transport contractual chain order

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC has the authority to modify or terminate road transport contractual chain orders
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Describes the FWC's power to vary or revoke road transport contractual chain orders in a linear fashion
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Applicable
premise text: The FWC may make a determination varying or revoking a road transport contractual chain order

536PT(5) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.55
note: FWC must not vary or revoke road transport contractual chain without considering it appropriate.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pt-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 536PT FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on varying or revoking road transport contractual chain.
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536PT(5) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain

536PU Minister may make a declaration deferring the operation or
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.57
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536PU(1) Minister may make a declaration deferring the operation or
has part: 536PU(2) Minister may make a declaration deferring the operation or
has part: 536PU(3) Minister may make a declaration deferring the operation or
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pu
schema version: 2

536PU(1) Minister may make a declaration deferring the operation or
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.57
note: Minister may make a declaration deferring the operation or application of certain road transport contractual chain orders.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pu-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pu-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536PU Minister may make a declaration deferring the operation or

536PU(2) Minister may make a declaration deferring the operation or
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.57
note: Declaration of deferral for road transport contractual chain order
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pu-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pu-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536PU Minister may make a declaration deferring the operation or

536PU(3) Minister may make a declaration deferring the operation or
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.57
note: Declaration of deferral for road transport contractual chain order
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pu-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pu-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536PU Minister may make a declaration deferring the operation or

536PV Limitations on making a deferral declaration
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.58
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536PV(1) Limitations on making a deferral declaration
has part: 536PV(2) Limitations on making a deferral declaration
has part: 536PV(3) Limitations on making a deferral declaration
has part: 536PV(4) Limitations on making a deferral declaration
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pv
schema version: 2

536PV(1) Limitations on making a deferral declaration
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.58
note: Cannot make a deferral declaration for an operational road transport contractual chain order
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pv-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536PV Limitations on making a deferral declaration

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: deferral declaration
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot make a deferral declaration
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: Minister must not

536PV(2) Limitations on making a deferral declaration
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.58
note: Limitations on making a deferral declaration
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pv-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536PV Limitations on making a deferral declaration

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to a particular road transport contractual chain order at any time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for deferral declaration
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: (2) The Minister may only make one full deferral declaration...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if a deferral determination has previously been made by the FWC
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot make full deferral declaration if previous determination made
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) The Minister must not make a full deferral declaration...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to a particular road transport contractual chain order
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May make one full deferral declaration per road transport contractual chain order
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (2) The Minister may only make one full deferral declaration...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for each road transport contractual chain order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for deferral declarations
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: More than one part deferral declaration is permitted

536PV(3) Limitations on making a deferral declaration
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.58
note: The Minister may make more than one deferral declaration in relation to a particular road transport contractual chain order.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pv-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536PV Limitations on making a deferral declaration

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Minister may make more than one deferral declaration.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536PV(3) Limitations on making a deferral declaration

536PV(4) Limitations on making a deferral declaration
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.58
note: Cannot defer application of terms to persons already affected or previously deferred
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-4-logic-dialectical-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pv-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 536PV Limitations on making a deferral declaration

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must not have the effect of deferring, or purporting to defer...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Restricts application of terms to persons already affected or previously deferred within a temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Restrict
premise text: (4) If more than one part deferral declaration...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must not have the effect of deferring, or purporting to defer...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits deferring application of terms to persons already affected or previously deferred
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (4) If more than one part deferral declaration...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-4-logic-dialectical-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must not have the effect of deferring, or purporting to defer...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dialectical
logic summary: Restricts application of terms to persons already affected or previously deferred
modality: Dialectical
operator: Restrict
premise text: (4) If more than one part deferral declaration...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must not have the effect of deferring, or purporting to defer...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Restricts application of terms to persons already affected or previously deferred through diffusion
modality: Diffusion
operator: Restrict
premise text: (4) If more than one part deferral declaration...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must not have the effect of deferring, or purporting to defer...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Prohibits deferring application of terms to persons already affected or previously deferred
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (4) If more than one part deferral declaration...

536PW Operation of a road transport contractual chain order
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.59
note: Road transport contractual chain order not in operation during deferral declaration.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pw-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pw-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pw
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pw-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

536PX Minister may make a declaration suspending a road
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.59
note: Minister may make a declaration suspending a road transport contractual chain order
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536px-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536px-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536px
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536px-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to make a declaration
modality: Deontic
operator: may

536PY Suspension declaration must generally be made within 12
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.62
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536PY(1) Suspension declaration must generally be made within 12
has part: 536PY(2) Suspension declaration must generally be made within 12
has part: 536PY(3) Suspension declaration must generally be made within 12
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536py
schema version: 2

536PY(1) Suspension declaration must generally be made within 12
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.62
note: Suspension declaration timing
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536py-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536py-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536PY Suspension declaration must generally be made within 12

536PY(2) Suspension declaration must generally be made within 12
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.62
note: Suspension declaration must be made within a specified period.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536py-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536py-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536py-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536py-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536PY Suspension declaration must generally be made within 12

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536py-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be made within the relevant period.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536py-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Relates to a specified class of persons or terms.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart

536PY(3) Suspension declaration must generally be made within 12
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.62
note: Relevant period for a road transport contractual chain order
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536py-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536py-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536PY Suspension declaration must generally be made within 12

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536py-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536PY(3) Suspension declaration must generally be made within 12

536PZ Operation of a road transport contractual chain order
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.63
note: Road transport contractual chain order not in operation during full suspension declaration.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pz-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pz-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536pz
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pz-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

536Q Consultation requirements
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.63
note: No consultation required for deferral declarations or suspension declarations.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536q-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536q-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536q
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536q-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits consultation for deferral declarations or suspension declarations.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

536QA Applications for a deferral determination for a road
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.64
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536QA(1) Applications for a deferral determination for a road
has part: 536QA(2) Applications for a deferral determination for a road
has part: 536QA(3) Applications for a deferral determination for a road
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qa
schema version: 2

536QA(1) Applications for a deferral determination for a road
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.64
note: Application for deferral determination under subsection 536QB(1)
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536QA Applications for a deferral determination for a road

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536QA(1) Applications for a deferral determination for a road

536QA(2) Applications for a deferral determination for a road
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.64
note: Eligible parties can apply for a deferral determination
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536QA Applications for a deferral determination for a road

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Eligible parties can apply for a deferral determination
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536QA(2) Applications for a deferral determination for a road

536QA(3) Applications for a deferral determination for a road
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.64
note: No application for deferral determination can be made in relation to a road transport contractual chain order that has already come into operation.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qa-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536QA Applications for a deferral determination for a road

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The provision specifies a temporal relationship between the application and the road transport contractual chain order.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Precedes
premise text: (3) An application for a deferral determination must not be made in relation to a road transport contractual chain order that has already come into operation.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The provision does not require any cognitive or artificial intelligence capabilities.
modality: CogAI
operator: None
premise text: (3) An application for a deferral determination must not be made in relation to a road transport contractual chain order that has already come into operation.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of making an application for a deferral determination in relation to a road transport contractual chain order that has already come into operation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) An application for a deferral determination must not be made in relation to a road transport contractual chain order that has already come into operation.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The provision does not specify any diffusion of information or responsibility.
modality: Diffusion
operator: None
premise text: (3) An application for a deferral determination must not be made in relation to a road transport contractual chain order that has already come into operation.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The provision specifies a temporal relationship between the application and the road transport contractual chain order.
modality: LTL
operator: Precedes
premise text: (3) An application for a deferral determination must not be made in relation to a road transport contractual chain order that has already come into operation.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536QA(3) Applications for a deferral determination for a road

536QB FWC may make a determination deferring the operation or
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.64
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536QB(1) FWC may make a determination deferring the operation or
has part: 536QB(2) FWC may make a determination deferring the operation or
has part: 536QB(3) FWC may make a determination deferring the operation or
has part: 536QB(4) FWC may make a determination deferring the operation or
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qb
schema version: 2

536QB(1) FWC may make a determination deferring the operation or
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.64
note: FWC may make a determination deferring the operation or application of certain road transport contractual chain orders.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qb-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536QB FWC may make a determination deferring the operation or

536QB(2) FWC may make a determination deferring the operation or
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.64
note: Definition of deferral determination
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qb-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536QB FWC may make a determination deferring the operation or

536QB(3) FWC may make a determination deferring the operation or
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.64
note: FWC may make a determination deferring the operation or revocation of a road transport contractual chain order.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qb-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qb-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536QB FWC may make a determination deferring the operation or

536QB(4) FWC may make a determination deferring the operation or
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.64
note: The FWC may describe a class by reference to an industry or sector.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qb-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qb-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 536QB FWC may make a determination deferring the operation or

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qb-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536QB(4) FWC may make a determination deferring the operation or

536QC Limitations on making a deferral determination
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.65
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536QC(1) Limitations on making a deferral determination
has part: 536QC(2) Limitations on making a deferral determination
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qc
schema version: 2

536QC(1) Limitations on making a deferral determination
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.65
note: No deferral determination for operational road transport chain orders
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qc-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536QC Limitations on making a deferral determination

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qc-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536QC(1) Limitations on making a deferral determination

536QC(2) Limitations on making a deferral determination
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.65
note: Limitations on making a deferral determination
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qc-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536QC Limitations on making a deferral determination

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536QC(2) Limitations on making a deferral determination

536QD Decision on an application for a deferral determination in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.66
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536QD(1) Decision on an application for a deferral determination in
has part: 536QD(2) Decision on an application for a deferral determination in
has part: 536QD(3) Decision on an application for a deferral determination in
has part: 536QD(4) Decision on an application for a deferral determination in
has part: 536QD(5) Decision on an application for a deferral determination in
has part: 536QD(6) Decision on an application for a deferral determination in
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qd
schema version: 2

536QD(1) Decision on an application for a deferral determination in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.66
note: FWC must consider and consult on an application for a deferral determination.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536QD Decision on an application for a deferral determination in

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider and consult.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536QD(1) Decision on an application for a deferral determination in

536QD(2) Decision on an application for a deferral determination in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.66
note: FWC may treat application as if it were an application for suspension determination if road transport contractual chain order comes into operation before FWC makes a decision.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536QD Decision on an application for a deferral determination in

536QD(3) Decision on an application for a deferral determination in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.66
note: The FWC may make a deferral determination under subsection 536QB(1) or decide not to.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qd-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536QD Decision on an application for a deferral determination in

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a permission or obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

536QD(4) Decision on an application for a deferral determination in
type: Concept
description: (a) significant new facts or evidence, (b) demonstration of lack of safety net.
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.66
note: FWC must make deferral determination under specified conditions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qd-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 536QD Decision on an application for a deferral determination in

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the FWC is satisfied that...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for deferral determination
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (4) The FWC must make the deferral determination if...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the road transport contractual chain order will not provide an appropriate safety net
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of new facts or evidence on deferral determination
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (a) the applicant has provided significant new facts or evidence

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the FWC is satisfied that...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make deferral determination
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (4) The FWC must...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the FWC is satisfied that...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Conditional deferral determination
modality: Diffusion
operator: IF
premise text: (4) The FWC must make the deferral determination if...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536QD(4) Decision on an application for a deferral determination in

536QD(5) Decision on an application for a deferral determination in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.66
note: Consider previous applications for variation or revocation of the road transport contractual chain order
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qd-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 536QD Decision on an application for a deferral determination in

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the FWC may have regard to...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Consideration of previous applications
modality: Deontic
operator: regard
premise text: (5) In considering...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536QD(5) Decision on an application for a deferral determination in

536QD(6) Decision on an application for a deferral determination in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.66
note: Publish deferral determination on website and other means
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-6-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qd-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 536QD Decision on an application for a deferral determination in

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Publish on website and other means
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: PUBLISH

536QE Operation of a road transport contractual chain order
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.67
note: Minimum standards for persons in a road transport contractual chain
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qe-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qe
schema version: 2

536QF Applications for a suspension determination for a road
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.68
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536QF(1) Applications for a suspension determination for a road
has part: 536QF(2) Applications for a suspension determination for a road
has part: 536QF(3) Applications for a suspension determination for a road
has part: 536QF(4) Applications for a suspension determination for a road
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qf
schema version: 2

536QF(1) Applications for a suspension determination for a road
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.68
note: Application for suspension determination under subsection 536QG(1)
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qf-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qf-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536QF Applications for a suspension determination for a road

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qf-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536QF(1) Applications for a suspension determination for a road

536QF(2) Applications for a suspension determination for a road
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.68
note: Eligible parties can make an application for a suspension determination.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qf-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qf-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536QF Applications for a suspension determination for a road

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Eligible parties can make an application for a suspension determination.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

536QF(3) Applications for a suspension determination for a road
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.68
note: Application for suspension determination must be made within 12 months of order operation.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qf-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qf-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536QF Applications for a suspension determination for a road

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application deadline is a requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qf-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536QF(3) Applications for a suspension determination for a road

536QF(4) Applications for a suspension determination for a road
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.68
note: Application deadline for a part suspension determination for a road
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qf-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qf-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qf-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qf-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 536QF Applications for a suspension determination for a road

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qf-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be made within 12 months of the applicable day
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qf-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of persons into classes for suspension determination
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qf-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536QF(4) Applications for a suspension determination for a road

536QG FWC may make a determination suspending a road
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.70
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536QG(1) FWC may make a determination suspending a road
has part: 536QG(2) FWC may make a determination suspending a road
has part: 536QG(3) FWC may make a determination suspending a road
has part: 536QG(4) FWC may make a determination suspending a road
has part: 536QG(5) FWC may make a determination suspending a road
has part: 536QG(5A) FWC may make a determination suspending a road
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qg
schema version: 2

536QG(1) FWC may make a determination suspending a road
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.70
note: FWC may make a determination suspending a road
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qg-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qg-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536QG FWC may make a determination suspending a road

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to suspend a road transport contractual chain order
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536QG(1) FWC may make a determination suspending a road

536QG(2) FWC may make a determination suspending a road
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.70
note: Suspension determination must specify period of suspension
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qg-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qg-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536QG FWC may make a determination suspending a road

536QG(3) FWC may make a determination suspending a road
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.70
note: Suspension of road transport contractual chain orders must specify a period not longer than the relevant period and start after the determination is made.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qg-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qg-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536QG FWC may make a determination suspending a road

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of suspension without proper notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qg-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536QG(3) FWC may make a determination suspending a road

536QG(4) FWC may make a determination suspending a road
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.70
note: Suspension period ends immediately after specified end date.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qg-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qg-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 536QG FWC may make a determination suspending a road

536QG(5) FWC may make a determination suspending a road
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.70
note: Determination of suspension period
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qg-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qg-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 536QG FWC may make a determination suspending a road

536QG(5A) FWC may make a determination suspending a road
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.70
note: Defines the relevant period for a road transport contractual chain order.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qg-ss-5a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qg-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qg-ss-5a-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qg-ss-5a
schema version: 2
part of: 536QG FWC may make a determination suspending a road

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qg-ss-5a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qg-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the relevant period for a road transport contractual chain order.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qg-ss-5a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536QG(5A) FWC may make a determination suspending a road

536QH Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.72
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536QH(1) Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
has part: 536QH(2) Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
has part: 536QH(3) Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
has part: 536QH(4) Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
has part: 536QH(5) Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
has part: 536QH(6) Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
has part: 536QH(7) Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qh
schema version: 2

536QH(1) Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.72
note: FWC must consider and consult on an application for suspension determination.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qh-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536QH Decision on an application for a suspension determination in

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Consideration and consultation occur within the same timeframe
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (1) If an application for a suspension determination in relation to a road transport contractual chain order is made...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must consider the application
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) If an application for a suspension determination in relation to a road transport contractual chain order is made...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Consideration and consultation are concurrent actions
modality: LinearLogic
operator: AND
premise text: (1) If an application for a suspension determination in relation to a road transport contractual chain order is made...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536QH(1) Decision on an application for a suspension determination in

536QH(2) Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.72
note: Decision on an application for a suspension determination
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qh-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536QH Decision on an application for a suspension determination in

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) decide not to make the suspension determination.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Decision to make or not make suspension determination
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: (2) The FWC may:

536QH(3) Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
type: Concept
description: (a) significant new facts or evidence not available at the time of decision; (b) significant new facts or evidence demonstrating lack of safety net for road transport industry.
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.72
note: Must make suspension determination under specified conditions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qh-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536QH Decision on an application for a suspension determination in

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must make suspension determination
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

536QH(4) Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.72
note: Consider previous applications when deciding on a suspension determination.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qh-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 536QH Decision on an application for a suspension determination in

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536QH(4) Decision on an application for a suspension determination in

536QH(5) Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.72
note: Ensure no person is unfairly affected by the suspension.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qh-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 536QH Decision on an application for a suspension determination in

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May make orders to ensure fairness.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

536QH(6) Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.72
note: Publish suspension determination on website and other means
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-6-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qh-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 536QH Decision on an application for a suspension determination in

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Publish on website and other means
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: PUBLISH

536QH(7) Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.72
note: No effect on pre-existing rights or liabilities
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-7-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qh-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 536QH Decision on an application for a suspension determination in

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No effect on pre-existing rights or liabilities
modality: Deontic
operator: no-effect
premise text: (7) The making of a suspension determination does not affect any right or liability that a person acquired, accrued or incurred before the suspension determination is made.

536QJ Operation of a road transport contractual chain order
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.73
note: Road transport contractual chain order not in operation during full suspension determination.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qj-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qj-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qj
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qj-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A road transport contractual chain order is not in operation during any period when a full suspension determination is in operation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative assertion of a prohibition.
modality: Deontic
operator: not

536QK FWC must consider whether to vary or revoke a road
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.73
note: FWC must consider varying or revoking a road transport contractual chain order that has been deferred or suspended.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qk-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qk-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qk
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qk-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to consider
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qk-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536QK FWC must consider whether to vary or revoke a road

536QL FWC to prepare and publish a notice relating to proposed
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.76
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536QL(1) FWC to prepare and publish a notice relating to proposed
has part: 536QL(2) FWC to prepare and publish a notice relating to proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ql
schema version: 2

536QL(1) FWC to prepare and publish a notice relating to proposed
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.76
note: Publish notice of intent before varying or revoking road transport contractual chain order
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ql-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ql-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ql-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ql-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536QL FWC to prepare and publish a notice relating to proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ql-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Publish notice of intent before varying or revoking road transport contractual chain order
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEFORE

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ql-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Publish notice of intent before varying or revoking road transport contractual chain order
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ql-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536QL(1) FWC to prepare and publish a notice relating to proposed

536QL(2) FWC to prepare and publish a notice relating to proposed
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.76
note: FWC must publish notice and draft order on website and other means.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ql-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ql-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ql-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ql-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536QL FWC to prepare and publish a notice relating to proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ql-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish notice and draft order.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ql-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies as obligation to publish notice and draft order.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS OF

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ql-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536QL(2) FWC to prepare and publish a notice relating to proposed

536QM Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.76
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536QM(1) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
has part: 536QM(1A) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
has part: 536QM(2) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
has part: 536QM(3) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
has part: 536QM(4) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
has part: 536QM(5) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
has part: 536QM(6) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qm
schema version: 2

536QM(1) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.76
note: Affected entities must make written submissions to the FWC for consideration.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qm-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536QM Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536QM(1) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make

536QM(1A) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.76
note: A reasonable opportunity to make written submissions may be required.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-1a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qm-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 536QM Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May require a reasonable opportunity.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536QM(1A) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make

536QM(2) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.76
note: The FWC must publish submissions made to the FWC.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qm-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536QM Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish submissions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536QM(2) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make

536QM(3) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.76
note: The FWC may decide not to publish confidential or commercially sensitive information.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qm-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536QM Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to withhold publication
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of information
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart

536QM(4) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.76
note: Publish material on FWC's website and other means.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qm-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 536QM Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for publication.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (4) The publishing of material under subsections (2) and (3)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish material on FWC's website and other means.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must be on the FWC’s website and by any other means the FWC considers appropriate.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of publication method.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
premise text: (4) The publishing of material under subsections (2) and (3)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536QM(4) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make

536QM(5) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.76
note: A reference to a submission under this section includes a reference to a summary or statement referred to in paragraph (3)(b).
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qm-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 536QM Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536QM(5) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make

536QM(6) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.76
note: Affected entities must be notified of proposed variation or revocation of road transport contractual chain order.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-6-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-6-logic-ltl-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-6-logic-shacl-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qm-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 536QM Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notification must occur before the proposed variation or revocation takes effect
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Notification must occur before the proposed variation or revocation takes effect
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Proposed variation or revocation is conditional on publication of notice

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The regulation is designed to ensure that affected entities are notified of proposed variation or revocation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The regulation is designed to ensure that affected entities are notified of proposed variation or revocation
modality: CogAI
operator: IS-A
premise text: Regulation is intended to protect the interests of affected entities

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Affected entity must be notified
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be notified
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Proposed variation or revocation

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Affected entity has a right to notification
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Notification is a requirement for affected entities
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS-A
premise text: Affected entity likely to be affected by proposed variation or revocation

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-6-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notification must be provided to affected entities within a reasonable timeframe
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Notification must be provided to affected entities within a reasonable timeframe
modality: LTL
operator: <=
premise text: Affected entity has a right to notification

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-6-logic-shacl-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The notification requirement is a key aspect of the regulation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: The notification requirement is a key aspect of the regulation
modality: SHACL
operator: IS-A
premise text: Regulation is designed to protect the interests of affected entities

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536QM(6) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make

536QN Finalising draft order
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.78
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536QN(1) Finalising draft order
has part: 536QN(2) Finalising draft order
has part: 536QN(3) Finalising draft order
has part: 536QN(4) Finalising draft order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qn
schema version: 2

536QN(1) Finalising draft order
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.78
note: The FWC may make changes to a draft road transport contractual chain order.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qn-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qn-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536QN Finalising draft order

536QN(2) Finalising draft order
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.78
note: FWC must decide not to vary the road transport contractual chain order based on a revised draft, publish a subsequent notice of intent, and follow a process.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qn-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qn-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qn-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536QN Finalising draft order

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qn-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The FWC's decision overlaps with the publication of a subsequent notice of intent.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC has an obligation to decide not to vary the road transport contractual chain order.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

536QN(3) Finalising draft order
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.78
note: Defines the period of consultation for a revised draft road transport contractual chain order.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qn-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qn-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536QN Finalising draft order

536QN(4) Finalising draft order
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.78
note: FWC may reduce 12-month period for time-sensitive road transport contractual chain orders.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qn-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qn-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 536QN Finalising draft order

536QP Road transport contractual chain guidelines
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.79
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536QP(1) Road transport contractual chain guidelines
has part: 536QP(2) Road transport contractual chain guidelines
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qp
schema version: 2

536QP(1) Road transport contractual chain guidelines
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.79
note: Guidelines for regulated road transport contractors and employees.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qp-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qp-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536QP Road transport contractual chain guidelines

536QP(2) Road transport contractual chain guidelines
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.79
note: FWC may make road transport contractual chain guidelines on its own initiative or on application under section 536QQ.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qp-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qp-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536QP Road transport contractual chain guidelines

536QQ Applications for road transport contractual chain guidelines
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.79
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536QQ(1) Applications for road transport contractual chain guidelines
has part: 536QQ(2) Applications for road transport contractual chain guidelines
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qq
schema version: 2

536QQ(1) Applications for road transport contractual chain guidelines
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.79
note: Any organisation or person may apply for the making of road transport contractual chain guidelines.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qq-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qq-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536QQ Applications for road transport contractual chain guidelines

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May apply
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qq-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536QQ(1) Applications for road transport contractual chain guidelines

536QQ(2) Applications for road transport contractual chain guidelines
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.79
note: Application for road transport contractual chain guidelines must specify class of persons to be covered.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qq-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qq-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qq-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536QQ Applications for road transport contractual chain guidelines

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application is required.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qq-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class of persons must be specified.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qq-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536QQ(2) Applications for road transport contractual chain guidelines

536QR Decisions on applications for road transport contractual
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.80
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536QR(1) Decisions on applications for road transport contractual
has part: 536QR(2) Decisions on applications for road transport contractual
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qr
schema version: 2

536QR(1) Decisions on applications for road transport contractual
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.80
note: The FWC may decide to refuse, make guidelines, or make an order.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qr-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536QR Decisions on applications for road transport contractual

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may decide to refuse, make guidelines, or make an order.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536QR(1) Decisions on applications for road transport contractual

536QR(2) Decisions on applications for road transport contractual
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.80
note: Refusal of application based on prioritisation direction
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qr-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536QR Decisions on applications for road transport contractual

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the application is not consistent with a direction of the President under subsection 582(4D) prior to the FWC's consideration
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for prioritisation direction
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the application is not consistent with a direction of the President under subsection 582(4D) in classification prior to the FWC's consideration
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classification of applications based on prioritisation direction by CogAI
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the FWC may refuse to consider the application
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the application is not consistent with a direction of the President under subsection 582(4D) in diffusion prior to the FWC's consideration
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of prioritisation direction
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the application is not consistent with a direction of the President under subsection 582(4D) in recurring traces prior to the FWC's consideration
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for prioritisation direction
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536QR(2) Decisions on applications for road transport contractual

536QS Road transport contractual chain guidelines not to be made
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.80
note: FWC must not make road transport contractual chain guidelines that cover the same persons in a road transport contractual chain in relation to the same matters as a road transport contractual chain order.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qs-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qs-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qs
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qs-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of making guidelines that cover the same persons in a road transport contractual chain.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qs-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536QS Road transport contractual chain guidelines not to be made

536QT Terms that must be included in road transport contractual
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.81
note: Road transport contractual chain guidelines must include terms setting out the same matters in relation to road transport contractual chain orders.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qt-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qt-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qt
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qt-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a mandatory requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qt-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536QT Terms that must be included in road transport contractual

536QU Terms that may be included in road transport contractual
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.81
note: Road transport contractual chain guidelines may include terms about any of the matters that may be included in road transport contractual chain orders under section 536PQ.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qu-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qu
schema version: 2

536QV Terms that must not be included in road transport
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.81
note: Terms about matters that must not be included in road transport
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qv-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qv
schema version: 2

536QW FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.81
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536QW(1) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
has part: 536QW(2) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
has part: 536QW(3) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qw
schema version: 2

536QW(1) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.81
note: FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain guidelines
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qw-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qw-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536QW FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qw-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536QW(1) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain

536QW(2) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.81
note: FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qw-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qw-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536QW FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain

536QW(3) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.81
note: FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qw-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qw-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qw-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qw-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qw-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qw-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qw-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536QW FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qw-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC may make a determination varying road transport contractual chain guidelines at any time
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the temporal scope of the FWC's power to vary or revoke road transport contractual chain guidelines
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Chapter 3B Minimum standards for persons in a road transport contractual chain

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qw-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC may make a determination varying road transport contractual chain guidelines for any person or entity
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes the scope of the FWC's power to vary or revoke road transport contractual chain guidelines
modality: CogAI
operator: Applicable
premise text: Chapter 3B Minimum standards for persons in a road transport contractual chain

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qw-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC may make a determination varying road transport contractual chain guidelines
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Describes the FWC's power to vary or revoke road transport contractual chain guidelines
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: Chapter 3B Minimum standards for persons in a road transport contractual chain

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qw-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC may make a determination varying road transport contractual chain guidelines for any person or entity
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes the scope of the FWC's power to vary or revoke road transport contractual chain guidelines
modality: Diffusion
operator: Applicable
premise text: Chapter 3B Minimum standards for persons in a road transport contractual chain

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qw-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC may make a determination varying road transport contractual chain guidelines at any time
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes the temporal scope of the FWC's power to vary or revoke road transport contractual chain guidelines
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: Chapter 3B Minimum standards for persons in a road transport contractual chain

536QX Applications to vary or revoke road transport contractual
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.82
note: Any of the following may apply for a determination varying or revoking road transport contractual chain guidelines.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qx-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536qx
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qx-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536QX Applications to vary or revoke road transport contractual

537 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.84
note: Civil remedies may be sought in relation to contraventions of these civil remedy provisions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-537-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-537-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-537
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-537-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligations on certain persons.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

538 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.85
note: Defines employee and employer terms
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-538-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-538-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-538
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-538-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key terms
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-538-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 538 Meanings of employee and employer

539 Applications for orders in relation to contraventions of civil
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.86
curation status: Proposed
has part: 539(1) Applications for orders in relation to contraventions of civil
has part: 539(2) Applications for orders in relation to contraventions of civil
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-539
schema version: 2

539(1) Applications for orders in relation to contraventions of civil
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.86
note: A provision referred to in column 1 of an item in the table is a civil remedy provision.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-539-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-539-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-539-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-539-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-539-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-539-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-539-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 539 Applications for orders in relation to contraventions of civil

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-539-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is related to a provision during subsection (2)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between provisions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) A provision referred to in column 1 of an item in the table...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-539-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...can be applied using artificial intelligence.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
modality: CogAI
operator: and
premise text: (1) A provision referred to in column 1 of an item in the table...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-539-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is a civil remedy provision.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of a civil remedy provision
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (1) A provision referred to in column 1 of an item in the table...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-539-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...can be classified as multiple types of provisions.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Multiple classifications
modality: Diffusion
operator: and
premise text: (1) A provision referred to in column 1 of an item in the table...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-539-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...meets multiple conditions for classification as a civil remedy provision.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Multiple conditions for classification
modality: LTL
operator: and
premise text: (1) A provision referred to in column 1 of an item in the table...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-539-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 539(1) Applications for orders in relation to contraventions of civil

539(2) Applications for orders in relation to contraventions of civil
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.86
note: Persons may apply for orders in relation to contraventions of civil remedy provisions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-539-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-539-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-539-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 539 Applications for orders in relation to contraventions of civil

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-539-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to apply for orders
modality: Deontic
operator: May

540 Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.120
curation status: Proposed
has part: 540(1) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
has part: 540(2) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
has part: 540(3) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
has part: 540(4) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
has part: 540(5) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
has part: 540(6) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
has part: 540(7) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-540
schema version: 2

540(1) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.120
note: Only specific persons may apply for an order under this Division.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-540-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 540 Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...may apply for an order under this Division.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restriction on who may apply for an order
modality: Deontic
operator: onlyIf
premise text: (1) The following persons...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 540(1) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.

540(2) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.120
note: Employee organisations and associations can apply for orders under this Division if an employee is affected by a contravention or proposed contravention.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-540-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 540 Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Can apply for orders
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to apply for orders
modality: Deontic
operator: can
premise text: The organisation or association is entitled to represent the industrial interests of the employee.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must represent industrial interests of employee
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Organisation must represent industrial interests of employee
modality: Deontic
operator: must represent
premise text: The organisation or association is entitled to represent the industrial interests of the employee.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Can apply for orders if conditions met
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to apply for orders if conditions met
modality: Deontic
operator: can
premise text: (a) The employee is affected by the contravention, or will be affected by the proposed contravention; and (b) The organisation or association is entitled to represent the industrial interests of the employee.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must apply for orders
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation on organisations and associations to apply for orders
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: (a) The employee is affected by the contravention, or will be affected by the proposed contravention; and (b) The organisation or association is entitled to represent the industrial interests of the employee.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 540(2) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.

540(3) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.120
note: Exemptions from subsection (2)
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-540-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 540 Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 540(3) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.

540(4) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.120
note: Only employee organisations entitled to represent outworker interests can apply for orders.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-540-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 540 Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Can apply for orders.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: onlyIf
premise text: Employee organisation is entitled to represent industrial interests of outworker.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must provide information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory application condition
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: Employee organisation is entitled to represent industrial interests of outworker.

540(5) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.120
note: Employer organisations can apply for orders under this Division if a member is affected by the contravention.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-540-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 540 Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer organisations can apply for orders under this Division.
modality: Deontic
operator: can

540(6) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.120
note: An industrial association may apply for an order under this Division only if affected by the contravention.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-6-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-6-logic-deontic-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-6-logic-deontic-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-6-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-540-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 540 Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The industrial association may apply for an order under this Division.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Industrial association has right to apply for order
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightToApply
premise text: The industrial association is affected by the contravention.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The industrial association may apply for an order under this Division.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Industrial association has permission to apply for order
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermissionToApply
premise text: The industrial association is entitled to represent the industrial interests of the person.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-6-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The industrial association may apply for an order under this Division.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Industrial association has right to represent the industrial interests of the person
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightToRepresent
premise text: The industrial association is entitled to represent the industrial interests of the person.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-6-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The industrial association may apply for an order under this Division.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Industrial association has right to apply for order
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightToApplyForOrder
premise text: The industrial association is affected by the contravention or will be affected by the proposed contravention.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-6-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The industrial association may apply for an order under this Division.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Industrial association has right to apply for order if affected
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightToApplyForOrderIfAffected
premise text: The industrial association is affected by the contravention or will be affected by the proposed contravention.

540(7) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.120
note: Employee organisations, registered employee associations or employer organisations may apply for an order under certain conditions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-540-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 540 Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-7-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 540(7) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.

541 Applications for orders in relation to safety net contractual
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.123
curation status: Proposed
has part: 541(1) Applications for orders in relation to safety net contractual
has part: 541(2) Applications for orders in relation to safety net contractual
has part: 541(3) Applications for orders in relation to safety net contractual
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-541
schema version: 2

541(1) Applications for orders in relation to safety net contractual
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.123
note: Employer must comply with provision or term if inspector applies for order.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-541-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 541 Applications for orders in relation to safety net contractual

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Inspector applies for order after employer contravenes provision or term.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Inspector applies for order after employer contravenes provision or term.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Section 541(1) applies if an inspector applies to a court for an order.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employer complies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must comply.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Inspector applies for order.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Inspector does not have authority to apply for order unless employer contravenes provision or term.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inspector does not have authority to apply for order unless employer contravenes provision or term.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST NOT
premise text: Section 541(1) applies if an inspector applies to a court for an order.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employer must comply with provision or term.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must comply with provision or term if inspector applies for order.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Section 541(1) applies to an employer's contravention or proposed contravention of a provision or term referred to in subsection (3).

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employer must comply with provision or term before inspector applies for order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Employer must comply with provision or term before inspector applies for order.
modality: LTL
operator: <=
premise text: Section 541(1) applies if an inspector applies to a court for an order.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 541(1) Applications for orders in relation to safety net contractual

541(2) Applications for orders in relation to safety net contractual
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.123
note: Inspector may apply to court for order in relation to employer's contravention of safety net contractual entitlement.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-541-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 541 Applications for orders in relation to safety net contractual

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inspector may apply to court
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 541(2) Applications for orders in relation to safety net contractual

541(3) Applications for orders in relation to safety net contractual
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.123
note: List of provisions and terms that must be included in safety net contractual applications.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-541-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 541 Applications for orders in relation to safety net contractual

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must include specific provisions and terms.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 541(3) Applications for orders in relation to safety net contractual

542 Entitlements under contracts
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.123
curation status: Proposed
has part: 542(1) Entitlements under contracts
has part: 542(2) Entitlements under contracts
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-542
schema version: 2

542(1) Entitlements under contracts
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.123
note: Entitlement of national system employer or employee under this Act
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-542-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-542-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-542-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 542 Entitlements under contracts

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-542-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer/employee entitlement
modality: Deontic
operator: has

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-542-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 542(1) Entitlements under contracts

542(2) Entitlements under contracts
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.123
note: Entitlements under contracts subject to modifications by laws or instruments of the safety net.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-542-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-542-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 542 Entitlements under contracts

543 Applications for orders in relation to statutory entitlements
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.123
note: Application for orders in relation to statutory entitlements
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-543-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-543
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-543-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 543 Applications for orders in relation to statutory entitlements

544 Time limit on applications
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.124
note: Time limit for applications related to contraventions
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-544-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-544
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-544-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 544 Time limit on applications

545 Orders that can be made by particular courts
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.124
curation status: Proposed
has part: 545(1) Orders that can be made by particular courts
has part: 545(2) Orders that can be made by particular courts
has part: 545(3) Orders that can be made by particular courts
has part: 545(3A) Orders that can be made by particular courts
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-545
schema version: 2

545(1) Orders that can be made by particular courts
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.124
note: Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia may make orders if a person has contravened a civil remedy provision.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-545-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 545 Orders that can be made by particular courts

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If a person has contravened a civil remedy provision, the court may not make an order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits making orders if a person has contravened a civil remedy provision.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The court may make any order the court considers appropriate.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Injunctions are not granted in relation to industrial action under subsections 417(3) and 421(3).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits granting injunctions in relation to industrial action under subsections 417(3) and 421(3).
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The Federal Court and the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) may grant injunctions in relation to industrial action.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Orders are not allowed if a person has contravened subsection 463(1) or (2).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: There are limitations on orders that can be made in relation to contraventions of subsection 463(1) or (2).
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: There are limitations on orders that can be made in relation to contraventions of subsection 463(1) or (2).

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Orders are recurring if a person has contravened a civil remedy provision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Orders can be made if a person has contravened a civil remedy provision.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: The court may make any order the court considers appropriate if the court is satisfied that a person has contravened, or proposes to contravene, a civil remedy provision.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 545(1) Orders that can be made by particular courts

545(2) Orders that can be made by particular courts
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.124
note: Orders that can be made by particular courts
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-545-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 545 Orders that can be made by particular courts

545(3) Orders that can be made by particular courts
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.124
note: Employer must pay amount to employee if court is satisfied employer has contravened civil remedy provision.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-545-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 545 Orders that can be made by particular courts

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must pay amount to employee.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 545(3) Orders that can be made by particular courts

545(3A) Orders that can be made by particular courts
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.124
note: Outworker entity must pay amount to outworker if required by modern award and failed to do so
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-3a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-3a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-3a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-3a-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-545-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 545 Orders that can be made by particular courts

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Outworker entity must pay amount within a certain temporal interval after failing to do so
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between outworker entity's failure to pay and court order
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
premise text: Court orders outworker entity to pay amount on behalf of outworker if required by modern award and failed to do so

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-3a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Outworker entity is liable for payment if required by modern award and failed to do so
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of outworker entity's liability for payment
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: Outworker entity has contravened civil remedy provision by failing to pay amount

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Outworker entity must pay amount to outworker if failed to do so
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of non-payment by outworker entity
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Outworker entity required to pay amount under modern award

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-3a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Outworker entity must pay amount to outworker if required by modern award and failed to do so
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation from court to outworker entity
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
premise text: Court orders outworker entity to pay amount on behalf of outworker if required by modern award and failed to do so

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-3a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Outworker entity must pay amount on a recurring basis after failing to do so
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring obligation of outworker entity to pay amount to outworker if required by modern award and failed to do so
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: Outworker entity is liable for payment if required by modern award and failed to do so

545A Orders relating to casual loading amounts
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.126
curation status: Proposed
has part: 545A(1) Orders relating to casual loading amounts
has part: 545A(2) Orders relating to casual loading amounts
has part: 545A(3) Orders relating to casual loading amounts
has part: 545A(4) Orders relating to casual loading amounts
has part: 545A(5) Orders relating to casual loading amounts
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-545a
schema version: 2

545A(1) Orders relating to casual loading amounts
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.126
note: Employer must pay casual loading amount if applicable
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-545a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 545A Orders relating to casual loading amounts

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employer must pay casual loading amount
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to pay casual loading amount
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Employer pays identifiable amount for not having relevant entitlements

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 545A(1) Orders relating to casual loading amounts

545A(2) Orders relating to casual loading amounts
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.126
note: Court must reduce claim amount by loading amount.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-545a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 545A Orders relating to casual loading amounts

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Reduce claim amount by loading amount.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to reduce claim amount.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Court making orders in relation to claim.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 545A(2) Orders relating to casual loading amounts

545A(3) Orders relating to casual loading amounts
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.126
note: Court may reduce claim amount by proportion of loading amount
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-545a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 545A Orders relating to casual loading amounts

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court has permission to reduce claim amount
modality: Deontic
operator: May

545A(4) Orders relating to casual loading amounts
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.126
note: References relevant entitlements under National Employment Standards, fair work instruments, or contracts of employment.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-545a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 545A Orders relating to casual loading amounts

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies relevant entitlements
modality: Deontic
operator: refers to

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 545A(4) Orders relating to casual loading amounts

545A(5) Orders relating to casual loading amounts
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.126
note: Entitlement includes accrued but untaken entitlements.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-545a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 545A Orders relating to casual loading amounts

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Entitlement includes accrued but untaken entitlements.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval inclusion
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
premise text: Entitlement accrues before being taken

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entitlement includes accrued but untaken entitlements.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Entitlement includes accrued but untaken entitlements.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Entitlement is a class/subclass relationship

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 545A(5) Orders relating to casual loading amounts

546 Pecuniary penalty orders
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.128
curation status: Proposed
has part: 546(1) Pecuniary penalty orders
has part: 546(2) Pecuniary penalty orders
has part: 546(2A) Pecuniary penalty orders
has part: 546(3) Pecuniary penalty orders
has part: 546(4) Pecuniary penalty orders
has part: 546(5) Pecuniary penalty orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-546
schema version: 2

546(1) Pecuniary penalty orders
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.128
note: Pecuniary penalty orders cannot be made in relation to conduct that contravenes a term of an enterprise agreement only because of the retrospective effect of an amendment made under paragraph 227B(3)(b).
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-546-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 546 Pecuniary penalty orders

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 546(1) Pecuniary penalty orders

546(2) Pecuniary penalty orders
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.128
note: Maximum pecuniary penalty amount
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-546-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 546 Pecuniary penalty orders

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The pecuniary penalty is within the specified range
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Limits pecuniary penalty to within a specific range
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: (2) Subject to this section, the pecuniary penalty must not be more...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The analysis reveals a specific pecuniary penalty amount
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Analyzes pecuniary penalty amount based on individual or corporate status
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
premise text: (a) if the person is an individual—the maximum number of...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The pecuniary penalty must not exceed...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits exceeding maximum pecuniary penalty amount
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) Subject to this section, the pecuniary penalty must not be more...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The limitation applies to all individuals and corporations
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spreads limitation of pecuniary penalty across different individuals or corporations
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
premise text: (a) if the person is an individual—the maximum number of...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The pecuniary penalty follows a recurring pattern
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Limits pecuniary penalty to a recurring pattern
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (2) Subject to this section, the pecuniary penalty must not be more...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 546(2) Pecuniary penalty orders

546(2A) Pecuniary penalty orders
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.128
note: Maximum penalty for pecuniary order not to exceed greater of underpayment amount or three times the underpayment amount.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-2a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-546-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 546 Pecuniary penalty orders

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Maximum penalty for pecuniary order not to exceed greater of underpayment amount or three times the underpayment amount.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

546(3) Pecuniary penalty orders
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.128
note: Specify who can receive pecuniary penalty payments.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-546-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 546 Pecuniary penalty orders

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specify time frame for payment
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify payment recipients
modality: Deontic
operator: can

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Combine alternatives for payment recipients
modality: LinearLogic
operator: or

546(4) Pecuniary penalty orders
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.128
note: The pecuniary penalty may be recovered as a debt due to the person to whom the penalty is payable.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-546-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 546 Pecuniary penalty orders

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to recover the penalty as a debt.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 546(4) Pecuniary penalty orders

546(5) Pecuniary penalty orders
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.128
note: Court may make pecuniary penalty order in addition to other orders.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-546-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 546 Pecuniary penalty orders

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court may make pecuniary penalty order.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 546(5) Pecuniary penalty orders

546A Underpayment amounts associated with contravention of civil
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.130
curation status: Proposed
has part: 546A(1) Underpayment amounts associated with contravention of civil
has part: 546A(2) Underpayment amounts associated with contravention of civil
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-546a
schema version: 2

546A(1) Underpayment amounts associated with contravention of civil
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.130
note: Employer must pay underpayment amount to employee if required.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546a-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-546a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 546A Underpayment amounts associated with contravention of civil

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Failure to pay required amount occurs on or before due date.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Failure to pay required amount occurs on or before due date.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The conduct results in a failure to pay the required amount.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employer must pay underpayment amount.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must pay underpayment amount.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Employer is required to pay an amount.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employer's conduct must result in underpayment amount.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Employer's conduct must result in underpayment amount.
modality: LTL
operator: OR
premise text: The employer engages in conduct.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 546A(1) Underpayment amounts associated with contravention of civil

546A(2) Underpayment amounts associated with contravention of civil
type: Concept
description: (2) The underpayment amount the contravention is associated with is, to the extent it can be determined by the court, the difference between: (a) the required amount mentioned in paragraph (1)(a); and (b) the amount (including a nil amount) the employer actually paid to, on behalf of, or for the benefit of, the employee on account of the required amount.
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.130
note: Determine underpayment amount associated with contravention of civil
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546a-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-546a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 546A Underpayment amounts associated with contravention of civil

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to determine underpayment amounts
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 546A(2) Underpayment amounts associated with contravention of civil

547 Interest up to judgment
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.130
curation status: Proposed
has part: 547(1) Interest up to judgment
has part: 547(2) Interest up to judgment
has part: 547(3) Interest up to judgment
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-547
schema version: 2

547(1) Interest up to judgment
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.130
note: Person required to pay amount under Act or fair work instrument
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-547-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-547-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-547-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 547 Interest up to judgment

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-547-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires payment of amount
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-547-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 547(1) Interest up to judgment

547(2) Interest up to judgment
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.130
note: Court must include interest in sum ordered unless good cause is shown.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-547-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-547-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-547-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 547 Interest up to judgment

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-547-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must include interest.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-547-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 547(2) Interest up to judgment

547(3) Interest up to judgment
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.130
note: Court must consider period between Compliance and enforcement when determining interest amount.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-547-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-547-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-547-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 547 Interest up to judgment

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-547-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Interest amount determination
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must consider period
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Subsection (2)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-547-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 547(3) Interest up to judgment

548 Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.132
curation status: Proposed
has part: 548(1) Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
has part: 548(1A) Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
has part: 548(1B) Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
has part: 548(1C) Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
has part: 548(2) Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
has part: 548(2A) Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-548
schema version: 2

548(1) Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.132
note: Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-548-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 548 Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (1) Proceedings are to be dealt with as small claims proceedings under this section if:

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 548(1) Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure

548(1A) Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.132
note: Employer and outworker entity obligations regarding employee payments.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-1a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-548-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 548 Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to pay employee
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employers must pay employees
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: Section 548(1A)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 548(1A) Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure

548(1B) Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.132
note: Proceedings may be dealt with as small claims proceedings if certain conditions are met.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-1b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-548-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 548 Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure

548(1C) Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.132
note: Small claims procedure applies to certain proceedings
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-1c-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-548-ss-1c
schema version: 2
part of: 548 Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to apply small claims procedure
modality: Deontic
operator: may

548(2) Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.132
note: Court may not award more than $100,000 in small claims proceedings.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-548-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 548 Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court may not award more than $100,000.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

548(2A) Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.132
note: Interest awarded under section 547 does not count towards the maximum amount that the court may award.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-2a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-548-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 548 Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure

549 Contravening a civil remedy provision is not an offence
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.136
note: No offence for contravening civil remedy provision
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-549-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-549
schema version: 2

550 Involvement in contravention treated in same way as actual
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.136
curation status: Proposed
has part: 550(1) Involvement in contravention treated in same way as actual
has part: 550(2) Involvement in contravention treated in same way as actual
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-550
schema version: 2

550(1) Involvement in contravention treated in same way as actual
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.136
note: A person involved in a contravention of a civil remedy provision is taken to have contravened that provision.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-550-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-550-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-550-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 550 Involvement in contravention treated in same way as actual

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-550-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Contravened provision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If involved in a contravention, then obligation is met.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Involved person

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-550-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 550(1) Involvement in contravention treated in same way as actual

550(2) Involvement in contravention treated in same way as actual
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.136
note: A person is involved in a contravention if they meet certain conditions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-550-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-550-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-550-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-550-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-550-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-550-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 550 Involvement in contravention treated in same way as actual

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-550-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: or (d) has conspired with others to effect the contravention.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship for involvement in contravention
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (c) has been in any way, by act or omission, directly or indirectly, knowingly concerned in or party to the contravention;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-550-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if, and only if, the person meets certain conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Involvement in contravention
modality: Deontic
operator: involvement
premise text: (2) A person is involved in a contravention of a civil remedy provision...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-550-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: or (d) has conspired with others to effect the contravention.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Involvement in contravention
modality: Deontic
operator: involvement
premise text: (c) has been in any way, by act or omission, directly or indirectly, knowingly concerned in or party to the contravention;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-550-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: or (b) has induced the contravention...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for involvement in contravention
modality: LTL
operator: occursIf
premise text: (a) has aided, abetted, counselled or procured the contravention;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-550-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 550(2) Involvement in contravention treated in same way as actual

551 Civil evidence and procedure rules for proceedings relating to
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.136
note: Court must apply rules of evidence and procedure for civil matters when hearing proceedings relating to a contravention or proposed contravention of a civil remedy provision.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-551-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-551-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-551
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-551-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must apply rules of evidence and procedure.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-551-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 551 Civil evidence and procedure rules for proceedings relating to

552 Civil proceedings after criminal proceedings
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.137
note: Court cannot impose pecuniary penalty order on person convicted of related offence.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-552-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-552-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-552
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-552-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-552-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 552 Civil proceedings after criminal proceedings

553 Criminal proceedings during civil proceedings
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.137
curation status: Proposed
has part: 553(1) Criminal proceedings during civil proceedings
has part: 553(2) Criminal proceedings during civil proceedings
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-553
schema version: 2

553(1) Criminal proceedings during civil proceedings
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.137
note: Stay of proceedings for pecuniary penalty order against a person for contravention of civil remedy provision if criminal proceedings are commenced or have already commenced against the person for an offence.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-553-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-553-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-553-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-553-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-553-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-553-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-553-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 553 Criminal proceedings during civil proceedings

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-553-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if criminal proceedings are commenced or have already commenced against the person for an offence; and
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The excerpt describes a temporal overlap between criminal and civil proceedings.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (1) Proceedings for a pecuniary penalty order against a person for a contravention of a civil remedy provision are stayed...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-553-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if criminal proceedings are commenced or have already commenced against the person for an offence; and
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: The excerpt implies that if criminal proceedings are commenced or have already commenced against a person, then proceedings for pecuniary penalty order against the person for contravention of civil remedy provision should be stayed.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (1) Proceedings for a pecuniary penalty order against a person for a contravention of a civil remedy provision are stayed...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-553-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if criminal proceedings are commenced or have already commenced against the person for an offence; and
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of proceedings for pecuniary penalty order against a person for contravention of civil remedy provision if criminal proceedings are commenced or have already commenced against the person for an offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (1) Proceedings for a pecuniary penalty order against a person for a contravention of a civil remedy provision are stayed...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-553-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if criminal proceedings are commenced or have already commenced against the person for an offence; and
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: There is an obligation to stay proceedings for pecuniary penalty order against a person for contravention of civil remedy provision if criminal proceedings are commenced or have already commenced against the person for an offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) Proceedings for a pecuniary penalty order against a person for a contravention of a civil remedy provision are stayed...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-553-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if criminal proceedings are commenced or have already commenced against the person for an offence; and
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The excerpt describes a recurring relationship between criminal and civil proceedings.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
premise text: (1) Proceedings for a pecuniary penalty order against a person for a contravention of a civil remedy provision are stayed...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-553-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 553(1) Criminal proceedings during civil proceedings

553(2) Criminal proceedings during civil proceedings
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.137
note: Proceedings for order may be resumed if not convicted.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-553-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-553-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-553-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 553 Criminal proceedings during civil proceedings

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-553-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the proceedings for the order are dismissed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Resume proceedings
modality: Deontic
operator: resume
premise text: (2) The proceedings for the order may be resumed...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-553-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 553(2) Criminal proceedings during civil proceedings

554 Criminal proceedings after civil proceedings
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.137
note: Criminal proceedings may be commenced against a person for conduct substantially the same as a civil remedy provision
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-554-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-554-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-554
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-554-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to commence criminal proceedings
modality: Deontic
operator: May

555 Evidence given in proceedings for pecuniary penalty not
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.137
note: Evidence of information given or documents produced by an individual is not admissible in criminal proceedings if the individual previously gave the information or produced the documents in proceedings for a pecuniary penalty order.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-555-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-555-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-555
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-555-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the admissibility of evidence in criminal proceedings.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

556 Civil double jeopardy
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.138
note: No double liability for pecuniary penalties under different laws.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-556-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-556-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-556-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-556
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-556-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ¬A ∨ ¬B
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No double liability implies no liability.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: If A, then B

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-556-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ~(A ∧ B)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No double liability prohibits other laws from imposing pecuniary penalties.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibits
premise text: If A, then B

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-556-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 556 Civil double jeopardy

557 Course of conduct
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.138
curation status: Proposed
has part: 557(1) Course of conduct
has part: 557(2) Course of conduct
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-557
schema version: 2

557(1) Course of conduct
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.138
note: Multiple contraventions of a civil remedy provision constitute a single contravention if committed by the same person and arising out of a course of conduct.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-557-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 557 Course of conduct

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The course of conduct overlaps with the contraventions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Course of conduct overlaps with multiple contraventions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: (a) the contraventions are committed by the same person; and (b) the contraventions arose out of a course of conduct.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The course of conduct implies the contraventions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Course of conduct implies multiple contraventions.
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (a) the contraventions are committed by the same person; and (b) the contraventions arose out of a course of conduct.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The contraventions constitute a single contravention.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Multiple contraventions constitute a single obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: constitutes
premise text: (a) the contraventions are committed by the same person; and (b) the contraventions arose out of a course of conduct.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The course of conduct constitutes a single obligation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Course of conduct constitutes a single obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: constitutes
premise text: (a) the contraventions are committed by the same person; and (b) the contraventions arose out of a course of conduct.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The contraventions are combined using conjunction.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Multiple contraventions are combined using conjunction.
modality: LTL
operator: and
premise text: (a) the contraventions are committed by the same person; and (b) the contraventions arose out of a course of conduct.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 557(1) Course of conduct

557(2) Course of conduct
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.138
note: List of civil remedy provisions
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-557-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 557 Course of conduct

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes all relevant sections
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 557(2) Course of conduct

557A Serious contravention of civil remedy provisions
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.141
curation status: Proposed
has part: 557A(1) Serious contravention of civil remedy provisions
has part: 557A(2) Serious contravention of civil remedy provisions
has part: 557A(5A) Serious contravention of civil remedy provisions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-557a
schema version: 2

557A(1) Serious contravention of civil remedy provisions
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.141
note: A contravention of a civil remedy provision is a serious contravention if the person knowingly or recklessly contravened the provision.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-557a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 557A Serious contravention of civil remedy provisions

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Non-compliance is a serious contravention.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with civil remedy provisions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The provision requires compliance.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compliance is required.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on non-compliance with civil remedy provisions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Non-compliance is a serious contravention.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 557A(1) Serious contravention of civil remedy provisions

557A(2) Serious contravention of civil remedy provisions
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.141
note: Reckless disregard for risk of contravention
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-2-logic-epistemic-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-557a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 557A Serious contravention of civil remedy provisions

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must take reasonable care to avoid recklessness.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to avoid reckless disregard
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (a) the person is aware of a substantial risk that the contravention would occur; and (b) having regard to the circumstances known to the person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must exercise reasonable care to mitigate the risk.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to act with due diligence
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (a) the person is aware of a substantial risk that the contravention would occur; and (b) having regard to the circumstances known to the person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must report their recklessness.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to report reckless disregard
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (a) the person is aware of a substantial risk that the contravention would occur; and (b) having regard to the circumstances known to the person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-2-logic-epistemic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person knows they are taking an unjustifiable risk.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Knowledge of substantial risk implies reckless disregard
modality: Epistemic
operator: knowledge
premise text: (a) the person is aware of a substantial risk that the contravention would occur; and (b) having regard to the circumstances known to the person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: [Time interval during which recklessness applies]
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval of recklessness
modality: LTL
operator: interval
premise text: (a) the person is aware of a substantial risk that the contravention would occur; and (b) having regard to the circumstances known to the person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 557A(2) Serious contravention of civil remedy provisions

557A(5A) Serious contravention of civil remedy provisions
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.141
note: Knew of serious contravention by principal
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-5a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-5a-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-5a-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-557a-ss-5a
schema version: 2
part of: 557A Serious contravention of civil remedy provisions

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Serious contravention by principal
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Knowledge of serious contravention
modality: Deontic
operator: Knew
premise text: Involved person knew the principal's contravention was a serious contravention.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-5a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Serious contravention by principal
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Knowledge of serious contravention required
modality: Deontic
operator: Must know
premise text: Involved person must know the principal's contravention was a serious contravention.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-5a-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Serious contravention by principal
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Involved person has obligation to report serious contravention
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation to report
premise text: Involved person must know the principal's contravention was a serious contravention.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-5a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 557A(5A) Serious contravention of civil remedy provisions

557B Liability of bodies corporate for serious contravention
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.142
curation status: Proposed
has part: 557B(1) Liability of bodies corporate for serious contravention
has part: 557B(2) Liability of bodies corporate for serious contravention
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-557b
schema version: 2

557B(1) Liability of bodies corporate for serious contravention
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.142
note: Body corporate must authorise contravention for liability to apply
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557b-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557b-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-557b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 557B Liability of bodies corporate for serious contravention

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval between authorisation and contravention relevant for liability
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between authorisation and contravention relevant for liability
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: (1) For the purposes of subsection 557A(1), a body corporate knowingly contravenes a civil remedy provision if the body corporate expressly, tacitly or impliedly authorised the contravention.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Body corporate must authorise contravention for liability to apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Express, tacit or implied authorisation required for liability
modality: Deontic
operator: authorisation
premise text: (1) For the purposes of subsection 557A(1), a body corporate knowingly contravenes a civil remedy provision if the body corporate expressly, tacitly or impliedly authorised the contravention.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557b-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Express, tacit or implied authorisation required for liability to apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Express, tacit or implied authorisation required for liability to apply
modality: Deontic
operator: authorisation
premise text: (1) For the purposes of subsection 557A(1), a body corporate knowingly contravenes a civil remedy provision if the body corporate expressly, tacitly or impliedly authorised the contravention.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Ordered trace of authorisation and contravention relevant for liability
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Ordered trace of authorisation and contravention relevant for liability
modality: LTL
operator: ordered trace
premise text: (1) For the purposes of subsection 557A(1), a body corporate knowingly contravenes a civil remedy provision if the body corporate expressly, tacitly or impliedly authorised the contravention.

557B(2) Liability of bodies corporate for serious contravention
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.142
note: Liability of bodies corporate for serious contravention
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557b-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-557b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 557B Liability of bodies corporate for serious contravention

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to provide liability for serious contravention
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section does not limit section 793
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (2) This section does not limit section 793.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 557B(2) Liability of bodies corporate for serious contravention

557C Presumption where records not provided
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.142
curation status: Proposed
has part: 557C(1) Presumption where records not provided
has part: 557C(2) Presumption where records not provided
has part: 557C(3) Presumption where records not provided
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-557c
schema version: 2

557C(1) Presumption where records not provided
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.142
note: Employer has burden of disproving allegation if records not provided
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-557c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 557C Presumption where records not provided

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employer's failure to provide records occurs during the proceedings
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Employer's failure to provide records occurs during the proceedings
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Employer failed to comply with the requirement

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employer's obligation implies employer must disprove allegation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Employer's obligation implies employer must disprove allegation
modality: Argumentation
operator: implication
premise text: Employer has burden of disproving the allegation

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: CogAI recognizes employer's obligation to provide records
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: CogAI recognizes employer's obligation to provide records
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: Employer required to make and keep a record

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employer must provide records
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has obligation to provide records
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: Employer required to make and keep a record

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Allegation diffuses to employer's obligation to provide records
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Allegation diffuses to employer's obligation to provide records
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: Employer required to make and keep a record

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 557C(1) Presumption where records not provided

557C(2) Presumption where records not provided
type: Concept
description: reasonable excuse
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.142
note: Employer must provide a reasonable excuse for non-compliance with subsection 557C(1)(b).
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-557c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 557C Presumption where records not provided

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has an obligation to provide a reasonable excuse.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 557C(2) Presumption where records not provided

557C(3) Presumption where records not provided
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.142
note: Presumption where records not provided
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-557c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 557C Presumption where records not provided

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Presumption of certain civil remedy provisions
modality: Deontic
operator: presumption

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 557C(3) Presumption where records not provided

558 Regulations dealing with infringement notices
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.143
note: Alternative to civil proceedings for alleged infringement
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-558
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows Commonwealth to permit alternative to civil proceedings
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 558 Regulations dealing with infringement notices

558A Meaning of franchisee entity and responsible franchisor entity
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.145
curation status: Proposed
has part: 558A(1) Meaning of franchisee entity and responsible franchisor entity
has part: 558A(2) Meaning of franchisee entity and responsible franchisor entity
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-558a
schema version: 2

558A(1) Meaning of franchisee entity and responsible franchisor entity
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.145
note: Definition of franchisee entity
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558a-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-558a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 558A Meaning of franchisee entity and responsible franchisor entity

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 558A(1) Meaning of franchisee entity and responsible franchisor entity

558A(2) Meaning of franchisee entity and responsible franchisor entity
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.145
note: Person is a responsible franchisor entity for a franchisee entity if they have significant influence or control over the franchisee's affairs.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558a-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-558a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 558A Meaning of franchisee entity and responsible franchisor entity

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if they have significant influence or control over the franchisee's affairs.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of responsible franchisor entity
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (2) A person is a responsible franchisor entity for a franchisee entity...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 558A(2) Meaning of franchisee entity and responsible franchisor entity

558B Responsibility of responsible franchisor entities and holding
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.145
note: Responsible franchisor entities must comply with civil remedy provisions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558b-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-558b
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 558B Responsibility of responsible franchisor entities and holding

558C Right of responsible franchisor entity or holding company to
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.149
curation status: Proposed
has part: 558C(1) Right of responsible franchisor entity or holding company to
has part: 558C(2) Right of responsible franchisor entity or holding company to
has part: 558C(3) Right of responsible franchisor entity or holding company to
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-558c
schema version: 2

558C(1) Right of responsible franchisor entity or holding company to
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.149
note: Right of responsible franchisor entity or holding company to recover amount paid by employee
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558c-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558c-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-558c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 558C Right of responsible franchisor entity or holding company to

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The recovery must occur during the same period as the payment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Recovery must occur during the same period as payment
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (a) a person pays an amount to, or on behalf of, an employee

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person has the right to recover the amount.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right exists
modality: Deontic
operator: has-right-to
premise text: (a) a person pays an amount to, or on behalf of, an employee

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558c-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The recovery applies everywhere.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recovery applies everywhere
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
premise text: (a) a person pays an amount to, or on behalf of, an employee

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558c-ss-1-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: NaturalPerson
part of: 558C(1) Right of responsible franchisor entity or holding company to

558C(2) Right of responsible franchisor entity or holding company to
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.149
note: Right to recover unrecovered amount from employer
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558c-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-558c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 558C Right of responsible franchisor entity or holding company to

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person has the right to recover
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has the right to recover
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
premise text: (2) The person may commence proceedings...

558C(3) Right of responsible franchisor entity or holding company to
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.149
note: Proceedings may be commenced in specified courts.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558c-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-558c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 558C Right of responsible franchisor entity or holding company to

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes a right for the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558c-ss-3-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: State
part of: 558C(3) Right of responsible franchisor entity or holding company to

559 Unclaimed money
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.151
curation status: Proposed
has part: 559(1) Unclaimed money
has part: 559(2) Unclaimed money
has part: 559(3) Unclaimed money
has part: 559(3A) Unclaimed money
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-559
schema version: 2

559(1) Unclaimed money
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.151
note: Employer obligation to pay unclaimed money
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-559-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-559-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-559-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 559 Unclaimed money

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-559-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has an obligation to pay unclaimed money
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-559-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 559(1) Unclaimed money

559(2) Unclaimed money
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.151
note: Employer's discharge from liability to employee for amount paid
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-559-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-559-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-559-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 559 Unclaimed money

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-559-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Payment of the amount is a sufficient discharge
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-559-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 559(2) Unclaimed money

559(3) Unclaimed money
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.151
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman must pay an amount to a person if they are entitled.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-559-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-559-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-559-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 559 Unclaimed money

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-559-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-559-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 559(3) Unclaimed money

559(3A) Unclaimed money
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.151
note: Payment of unclaimed money
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-559-ss-3a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-559-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-559-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 559 Unclaimed money

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-559-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Payment obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: has

560 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.153
note: Guide to this Part
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-560-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-560
schema version: 2

561 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.153
note: Defines employee and employer terms
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-561-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-561-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-561
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-561-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key terms
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-561-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 561 Meanings of employee and employer

562 Conferring jurisdiction on the Federal Court
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.154
note: Jurisdiction is conferred on the Federal Court in relation to any matter arising under this Act.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-562-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-562-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-562
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-562-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has jurisdiction
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-562-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 562 Conferring jurisdiction on the Federal Court

563 Exercising jurisdiction in the Fair Work Division of the Federal
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.154
note: Jurisdiction of the Federal Court in exercising jurisdiction in the Fair Work Division of the Federal Court.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-563-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-563-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-563
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-563-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Federal Court has jurisdiction in exercising jurisdiction in the Fair Work Division of the Federal Court.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-563-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 563 Exercising jurisdiction in the Fair Work Division of the Federal

564 No limitation on Federal Court’s powers
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.155
note: Federal Court's powers are not limited by this Act.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-564-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-564
schema version: 2

565 Appeals from eligible State or Territory courts
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.155
curation status: Proposed
has part: 565(1) Appeals from eligible State or Territory courts
has part: 565(1A) Appeals from eligible State or Territory courts
has part: 565(1B) Appeals from eligible State or Territory courts
has part: 565(1C) Appeals from eligible State or Territory courts
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-565
schema version: 2

565(1) Appeals from eligible State or Territory courts
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.155
note: Appeal to Federal Court from eligible State or Territory court decision
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-565-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-565-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-565-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 565 Appeals from eligible State or Territory courts

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-565-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An appeal lies to the Federal Court from a decision of an eligible State or Territory court exercising jurisdiction under this Act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation on State or Territory courts
modality: Deontic
operator: has

565(1A) Appeals from eligible State or Territory courts
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.155
note: No appeal from eligible State or Territory court decisions under certain conditions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-565-ss-1a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-565-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-565-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 565 Appeals from eligible State or Territory courts

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-565-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...except...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits appeals from eligible State or Territory court decisions under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1A) No appeal lies...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-565-ss-1a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 565(1A) Appeals from eligible State or Territory courts

565(1B) Appeals from eligible State or Territory courts
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.155
note: Appeal from eligible State or Territory court decision
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-565-ss-1b-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-565-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-565-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 565 Appeals from eligible State or Territory courts

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-565-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has obligation to appeal
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
premise text: (1B) An appeal lies...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-565-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 565(1B) Appeals from eligible State or Territory courts

565(1C) Appeals from eligible State or Territory courts
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.155
note: No appeal lies from a decision to which subsection (1B) applies, except an appeal as provided for by that subsection.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-565-ss-1c-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-565-ss-1c
schema version: 2
part of: 565 Appeals from eligible State or Territory courts

566 Conferring jurisdiction on the Federal Circuit and Family
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.157
note: Jurisdiction is conferred on the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) in relation to any civil matter arising under this Act.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-566-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-566-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-566-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-566-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-566-logic-deontic-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-566-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-566
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-566-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, jurisdiction is conferred during the period in which this Act applies
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Jurisdiction is conferred during the period in which this Act applies
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: This Act confers jurisdiction on the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) in relation to any civil matter arising under this Act

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-566-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, the State has jurisdiction over the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The State has jurisdiction over the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction
premise text: This Act confers jurisdiction on the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-566-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, the State must provide jurisdiction over the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) in relation to any civil matter arising under this Act
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The State must provide jurisdiction over the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) in relation to any civil matter arising under this Act
modality: Deontic
operator: mustProvide
premise text: This Act confers jurisdiction on the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) in relation to any civil matter arising under this Act

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-566-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, the scope of jurisdiction for the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) is defined by this Act
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The scope of jurisdiction for the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) is defined by this Act
modality: Deontic
operator: hasScope
premise text: This Act confers jurisdiction on the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) in relation to any civil matter arising under this Act

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-566-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, jurisdiction is applicable everywhere within the scope of the Act
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Jurisdiction is applicable everywhere within the scope of the Act
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
premise text: This Act confers jurisdiction on the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) in relation to any civil matter arising under this Act

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-566-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 566 Conferring jurisdiction on the Federal Circuit and Family

567 Exercising jurisdiction in the Fair Work Division of the Federal
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.157
note: Jurisdiction of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) in relation to matters arising under this Act.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-567-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-567-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-567-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-567-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-567-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-567-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-567
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-567-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The jurisdiction of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) overlaps with the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The jurisdiction of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) overlaps with the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: Section 566

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-567-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The jurisdiction of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) is defined by section 566.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The jurisdiction of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) is defined by section 566.
modality: CogAI
operator: isDefinedBy
premise text: Section 567

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-567-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) has jurisdiction over matters arising under this Act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) has jurisdiction over matters arising under this Act.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction
premise text: Section 566

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-567-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The jurisdiction of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) diffuses into the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The jurisdiction of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) diffuses into the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusesInto
premise text: Section 566

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-567-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The jurisdiction of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) occurs before the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The jurisdiction of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) occurs before the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
modality: LTL
operator: occursBefore
premise text: Section 566

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-567-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 567 Exercising jurisdiction in the Fair Work Division of the Federal

568 No limitation on powers of the Federal Circuit and Family
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.157
note: Nothing in this Act limits the powers of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) under Chapter 4.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-568-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-568
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-568-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 568 No limitation on powers of the Federal Circuit and Family

569 Minister’s entitlement to intervene
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.159
curation status: Proposed
has part: 569(1) Minister’s entitlement to intervene
has part: 569(2) Minister’s entitlement to intervene
has part: 569(3) Minister’s entitlement to intervene
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-569
schema version: 2

569(1) Minister’s entitlement to intervene
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.159
note: The Minister has an obligation to intervene on behalf of the Commonwealth in court proceedings.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-569-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 569 Minister’s entitlement to intervene

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Minister has an obligation to intervene.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

569(2) Minister’s entitlement to intervene
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.159
note: Minister's entitlement to intervene in proceedings
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-569-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 569 Minister’s entitlement to intervene

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Minister is taken to be a party to the proceedings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister is taken to be a party to proceedings
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) If the Minister intervenes...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Minister is taken to be a party to the proceedings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Minister's intervention implies being a party to proceedings
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
premise text: (2) If the Minister intervenes...

569(3) Minister’s entitlement to intervene
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.159
note: Court may order costs against Commonwealth if Minister intervenes or institutes appeal.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-569-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 569 Minister’s entitlement to intervene

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

569A State or Territory Minister’s entitlement to intervene
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.159
curation status: Proposed
has part: 569A(1) State or Territory Minister’s entitlement to intervene
has part: 569A(2) State or Territory Minister’s entitlement to intervene
has part: 569A(3) State or Territory Minister’s entitlement to intervene
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-569a
schema version: 2

569A(1) State or Territory Minister’s entitlement to intervene
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.159
note: Minister's obligation to intervene in court proceedings
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569a-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-569a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 569A State or Territory Minister’s entitlement to intervene

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to intervene
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

569A(2) State or Territory Minister’s entitlement to intervene
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.159
note: Minister's intervention in proceedings is considered a party to the appeal.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569a-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-569a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 569A State or Territory Minister’s entitlement to intervene

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: he or she is taken to be a party...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Minister's intervention overlaps with appeal proceedings.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) If the Minister intervenes...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: he or she is taken to be a party...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister's intervention is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) If the Minister intervenes...

569A(3) State or Territory Minister’s entitlement to intervene
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.159
note: Court may order costs against State or Territory if Minister intervenes
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569a-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-569a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 569A State or Territory Minister’s entitlement to intervene

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister's intervention is a prerequisite for court order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Minister's intervention occurs before court orders costs
modality: AllenInterval
operator: before
premise text: Court orders costs after Minister intervenes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court orders costs
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay costs
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: Minister intervenes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court orders costs due to Minister's intervention
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Minister's intervention spreads to affect costs
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
premise text: Minister intervenes in workplace relations matters

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister's intervention is a prerequisite for court order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Minister's intervention occurs before court orders costs
modality: LTL
operator: before
premise text: Court orders costs after Minister intervenes

570 Costs only if proceedings instituted vexatiously etc.
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.160
curation status: Proposed
has part: 570(1) Costs only if proceedings instituted vexatiously etc.
has part: 570(2) Costs only if proceedings instituted vexatiously etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-570
schema version: 2

570(1) Costs only if proceedings instituted vexatiously etc.
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.160
note: Party may be ordered to pay costs incurred by another party.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-570-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-570-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-570-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 570 Costs only if proceedings instituted vexatiously etc.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-570-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay costs
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

570(2) Costs only if proceedings instituted vexatiously etc.
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.160
note: Party must pay costs only under specific conditions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-570-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-570-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-570-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 570 Costs only if proceedings instituted vexatiously etc.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-570-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits paying costs unless conditions are met.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

571 No imprisonment for failure to pay pecuniary penalty
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.160
curation status: Proposed
has part: 571(1) No imprisonment for failure to pay pecuniary penalty
has part: 571(2) No imprisonment for failure to pay pecuniary penalty
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-571
schema version: 2

571(1) No imprisonment for failure to pay pecuniary penalty
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.160
note: Court cannot order imprisonment for failure to pay pecuniary penalty.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-571-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-571-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-571-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 571 No imprisonment for failure to pay pecuniary penalty

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-571-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court cannot order imprisonment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court cannot order imprisonment.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: State can order imprisonment.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-571-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 571(1) No imprisonment for failure to pay pecuniary penalty

571(2) No imprisonment for failure to pay pecuniary penalty
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.160
note: No imprisonment for failure to pay pecuniary penalty
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-571-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-571-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-571-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-571-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-571-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-571-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-571-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 571 No imprisonment for failure to pay pecuniary penalty

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-571-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Despite any other law, this section applies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlaps with other laws that do not apply despite other laws
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: This section overlaps with other laws that do not apply despite other laws

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-571-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Despite any other law, this section applies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes the applicability of this section despite other laws
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: This section is recognized as applicable despite other laws

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-571-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Despite any other law, this section applies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies no imprisonment for failure to pay pecuniary penalty
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: No imprisonment for failure to pay pecuniary penalty

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-571-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section excludes imprisonment for failure to pay pecuniary penalty.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excludes imprisonment for failure to pay pecuniary penalty
modality: Deontic
operator: Excludes
premise text: Imprisonment is not a consequence of failing to pay pecuniary penalty

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-571-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Despite any other law, this section applies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Combines with other laws to determine applicability
modality: LinearLogic
operator: And
premise text: This section combines with other laws to determine applicability

572 Regulations dealing with matters relating to court proceedings
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.160
note: Fees for court proceedings under this Act may be provided by regulations.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-572-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-572-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-572
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-572-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulations can impose obligations.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-572-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 572 Regulations dealing with matters relating to court proceedings

573 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.161
note: Guide to this Part
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-573-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-573
schema version: 2

574 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.162
note: Defines employee and employer terms
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-574-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-574-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-574
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-574-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key terms
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-574-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 574 Meanings of employee and employer

575 Establishment of the Fair Work Commission
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.163
curation status: Proposed
has part: 575(1) Establishment of the Fair Work Commission
has part: 575(2) Establishment of the Fair Work Commission
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-575
schema version: 2

575(1) Establishment of the Fair Work Commission
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.163
note: Continuation of Fair Work Australia as the Fair Work Commission
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-575-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-575-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 575 Establishment of the Fair Work Commission

575(2) Establishment of the Fair Work Commission
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.163
note: Establishment of the Fair Work Commission
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-575-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-575-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 575 Establishment of the Fair Work Commission

576 Functions of the FWC
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.163
note: List of functions conferred by the Act on the FWC
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-576-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-576-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-576
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-576-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC must perform these functions
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Functionality of the FWC
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: The FWC has functions conferred by this Act

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-576-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 576 Functions of the FWC

577 Performance of functions etc. by the FWC
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.165
curation status: Proposed
has part: 577(1) Performance of functions etc. by the FWC
has part: 577(2) Performance of functions etc. by the FWC
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-577
schema version: 2

577(1) Performance of functions etc. by the FWC
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.165
note: The FWC must perform its functions in a fair, just, quick, informal, open, and transparent manner.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-577-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-577-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-577-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 577 Performance of functions etc. by the FWC

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-577-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to perform functions in a fair and just manner.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-577-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 577(1) Performance of functions etc. by the FWC

577(2) Performance of functions etc. by the FWC
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.165
note: Must have regard to guidelines and community outreach in multiple languages
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-577-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-577-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-577-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 577 Performance of functions etc. by the FWC

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-577-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to have regard
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

578 Matters the FWC must take into account in performing
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.165
note: FWC must consider certain matters when performing functions or exercising powers.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-578-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-578-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-578
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-578-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider certain matters
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-578-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 578 Matters the FWC must take into account in performing

579 FWC has privileges and immunities of the Crown
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.166
note: The FWC has privileges and immunities of the Crown.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-579-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-579
schema version: 2

580 Protection of FWC Members
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.166
note: Protection of FWC Members
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-580-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-580-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-580
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-580-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Possession of protection and immunity
modality: Deontic
operator: has

581 Functions of the President
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.166
note: Ensure efficient and adequate performance of FWC functions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-581
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The President MUST ensure efficiency and adequacy.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure efficiency and adequacy
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The President is responsible for ensuring that the FWC performs its functions.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The President MUST ensure adequate service to employers, employees, and persons covered by Chapters 3A and 3B.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure adequate service to employers, employees, and persons covered by Chapters 3A and 3B
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The President is responsible for ensuring that the FWC performs its functions and exercises its powers in a manner that: (a) is efficient; and (b) adequately serves the needs of employers and employees throughout Australia; and (c) adequately serves the needs of persons covered by Chapter 3A; and (d) adequately serves the needs of persons covered by Chapter 3B.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The President MUST facilitate cooperation with prescribed State industrial authorities.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Facilitate cooperation with prescribed State industrial authorities
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The President must perform his or her own functions and exercise his or her own powers in a manner that facilitates cooperation with prescribed State industrial authorities.

581A Dealing with a complaint about an FWC Member
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.167
curation status: Proposed
has part: 581A(1) Dealing with a complaint about an FWC Member
has part: 581A(2) Dealing with a complaint about an FWC Member
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-581a
schema version: 2

581A(1) Dealing with a complaint about an FWC Member
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.167
note: The President may deal with a complaint about an FWC Member's performance.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581a-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-581a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 581A Dealing with a complaint about an FWC Member

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The President has the obligation to deal with a complaint.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

581A(2) Dealing with a complaint about an FWC Member
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.167
note: The President must deal with a complaint about an FWC Member.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581a-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-581a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 581A Dealing with a complaint about an FWC Member

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The President must deal with a complaint.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

581B Code of Conduct
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.169
curation status: Proposed
has part: 581B(1) Code of Conduct
has part: 581B(2) Code of Conduct
has part: 581B(3) Code of Conduct
has part: 581B(4) Code of Conduct
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-581b
schema version: 2

581B(1) Code of Conduct
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.169
note: Determine a Code of Conduct for FWC Members
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581b-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-581b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 581B Code of Conduct

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

581B(2) Code of Conduct
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.169
note: Does not limit section 582 regarding Presidential directions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581b-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-581b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 581B Code of Conduct

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: does not limit section 582
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excludes limitation on Presidential direction
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
premise text: (2) Subsection (1)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 581B(2) Code of Conduct

581B(3) Code of Conduct
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.169
note: Publish Code of Conduct on FWC's website or by other means considered appropriate.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581b-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581b-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-581b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 581B Code of Conduct

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish Code of Conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581b-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classify as obligation to publish Code of Conduct
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 581B(3) Code of Conduct

581B(4) Code of Conduct
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.169
note: A determination under subsection (1) is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581b-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-581b-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 581B Code of Conduct

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581b-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 581B(4) Code of Conduct

582 Directions by the President
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.169
curation status: Proposed
has part: 582(1) Directions by the President
has part: 582(2) Directions by the President
has part: 582(3) Directions by the President
has part: 582(4) Directions by the President
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-582
schema version: 2

582(1) Directions by the President
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.169
note: The President may give directions on how to perform FWC functions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-582-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 582 Directions by the President

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by the President.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 582(1) Directions by the President

582(2) Directions by the President
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.169
note: The President may give a direction that is of a general nature, or relates to a particular matter, to one or more of the following persons.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-582-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 582 Directions by the President

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to give a direction
modality: Deontic
operator: May

582(3) Directions by the President
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.169
note: The direction must not relate to a decision by the FWC.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-582-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 582 Directions by the President

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The direction must not relate to a decision by the FWC.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: The direction must relate to a decision by the FWC.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 582(3) Directions by the President

582(4) Directions by the President
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.169
note: Directions about modern award terms and exercise of powers
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-582-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 582 Directions by the President

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During 4 yearly reviews of default fund terms
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (aa) a direction about the conduct of 4 yearly reviews of default fund terms of modern awards under Division 4A of Part 2-3;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (aa) a direction about the conduct of 4 yearly reviews of default fund terms of modern awards under Division 4A of Part 2-3;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires direction about conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (4) Without limiting subsection (2)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (ab) a direction about the exercise of modern award powers in accordance with Division 5 of Part 2-3;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires direction about exercise of powers
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (4) Without limiting subsection (2)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: During exercise of modern award powers
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (ab) a direction about the exercise of modern award powers in accordance with Division 5 of Part 2-3;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 582(4) Directions by the President

583 President not subject to direction
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.171
note: The President is not subject to direction by or on behalf of the Commonwealth.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-583-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-583-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-583
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-583-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The President is not subject to direction.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

584 Delegation of functions and powers of the President
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.171
note: The President may delegate certain functions or powers to a Vice President or Deputy President.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-584
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for delegation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: in writing

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by the President.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

584B Protection of persons involved in handling etc. complaints
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.172
curation status: Proposed
has part: 584B(1) Protection of persons involved in handling etc. complaints
has part: 584B(2) Protection of persons involved in handling etc. complaints
has part: 584B(3) Protection of persons involved in handling etc. complaints
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-584b
schema version: 2

584B(1) Protection of persons involved in handling etc. complaints
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.172
note: Protection of persons exercising powers or functions under FWC Member relations
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-584b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 584B Protection of persons involved in handling etc. complaints

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to a complaint about an FWC Member, or assisting in exercising those powers or performing those functions...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During exercise of powers or performance of functions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) A person who is exercising powers or performing functions...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...has the same protection and immunity as a Justice of the High Court.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Entails protection and immunity for persons exercising powers or functions
modality: Argumentation
operator: entails
premise text: (1) A person who is exercising powers or performing functions...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...has the same protection and immunity as a Justice of the High Court.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes protection and immunity for persons exercising powers or functions
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (1) A person who is exercising powers or performing functions...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...has the same protection and immunity as a Justice of the High Court.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Same protection and immunity as a Justice of the High Court
modality: Deontic
operator: hasSameProtectionAndImmunityAs
premise text: (1) A person who is exercising powers or performing functions...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to a complaint about an FWC Member, or assisting in exercising those powers or performing those functions...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses protection and immunity for persons exercising powers or functions
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (1) A person who is exercising powers or performing functions...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 584B(1) Protection of persons involved in handling etc. complaints

584B(2) Protection of persons involved in handling etc. complaints
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.172
note: Protection of witnesses in handling complaints
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-584b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 584B Protection of persons involved in handling etc. complaints

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...has the same protection, and is subject to the same liabilities...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between witness attendance and liability
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporalRelation
premise text: (2) A witness requested to attend, or appearing, before a complaint handler...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...has the same protection, and is subject to the same liabilities...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Same protection as a witness in High Court proceedings
modality: Deontic
operator: hasSameProtection
premise text: (2) A witness requested to attend, or appearing, before a complaint handler...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is subject to the same liabilities...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Same liabilities as a witness in High Court proceedings
modality: Deontic
operator: sameLiabilities
premise text: (2) A witness requested to attend, or appearing, before a complaint handler...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...has the same protection, and is subject to the same liabilities...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Ordered trace of witness attendance
modality: LTL
operator: orderedTrace
premise text: (2) A witness requested to attend, or appearing, before a complaint handler...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 584B(2) Protection of persons involved in handling etc. complaints

584B(3) Protection of persons involved in handling etc. complaints
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.172
note: Protection of persons involved in handling complaints
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-584b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 584B Protection of persons involved in handling etc. complaints

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: during proceedings in the High Court.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Protection during proceedings
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) A lawyer assisting, or appearing on behalf of a person before, a complaint handler...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: entails immunity for the person involved in handling complaints.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Protection entails immunity
modality: Argumentation
operator: entails
premise text: (3) A lawyer assisting, or appearing on behalf of a person before, a complaint handler...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: recognizes the protection afforded to persons involved in handling complaints.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Protection recognized by AI systems
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (3) A lawyer assisting, or appearing on behalf of a person before, a complaint handler...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: has the same protection and immunity as a barrister has in appearing for a party in proceedings in the High Court.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Same protection and immunity as a barrister
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: (3) A lawyer assisting, or appearing on behalf of a person before, a complaint handler...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: diffuses immunity to the persons involved in handling complaints.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Immunity diffuses to persons involved
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (3) A lawyer assisting, or appearing on behalf of a person before, a complaint handler...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 584B(3) Protection of persons involved in handling etc. complaints

585 Applications in accordance with procedural rules
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.173
note: Application must comply with procedural rules.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-585-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-585-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-585
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-585-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-585-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 585 Applications in accordance with procedural rules

586 Correcting and amending applications and documents etc.
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.173
note: Allow correction or amendment of applications and documents
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-586-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-586-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-586-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-586
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-586-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-586-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allow correction or amendment of applications and documents
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

587 Dismissing applications
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.173
curation status: Proposed
has part: 587(1) Dismissing applications
has part: 587(2) Dismissing applications
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-587
schema version: 2

587(1) Dismissing applications
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.173
note: Dismissing applications without limiting FWC's power
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-587-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-587-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-587-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-587-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 587 Dismissing applications

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-587-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for dismissal
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-587-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits dismissing applications
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

587(2) Dismissing applications
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.173
note: FWC cannot dismiss certain applications
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-587-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-587-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-587-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 587 Dismissing applications

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-587-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of dismissal
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

588 Discontinuing applications
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174
note: A person may discontinue an application to the FWC.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-588-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-588-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-588
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-588-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ability to discontinue
modality: Deontic
operator: can

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-588-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 588 Discontinuing applications

589 Procedural and interim decisions
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174
curation status: Proposed
has part: 589(1) Procedural and interim decisions
has part: 589(2) Procedural and interim decisions
has part: 589(3) Procedural and interim decisions
has part: 589(4) Procedural and interim decisions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-589
schema version: 2

589(1) Procedural and interim decisions
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174
note: The FWC may make decisions as to how, when and where a matter is to be dealt with.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-589-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 589 Procedural and interim decisions

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may make decisions
modality: Deontic
operator: May

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 589(1) Procedural and interim decisions

589(2) Procedural and interim decisions
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174
note: The FWC may make an interim decision in relation to a matter before it.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-589-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 589 Procedural and interim decisions

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may make an interim decision.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 589(2) Procedural and interim decisions

589(3) Procedural and interim decisions
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174
note: The FWC may make a decision under this section on its own initiative or on application.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-589-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 589 Procedural and interim decisions

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to make a decision
modality: Deontic
operator: May

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 589(3) Procedural and interim decisions

589(4) Procedural and interim decisions
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174
note: Limits FWC's power to make decisions
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-4-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-589-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 589 Procedural and interim decisions

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limits FWC's power
modality: Deontic
operator: Limitation

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-4-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Certainty of limitation
modality: Epistemic
operator: Certainty

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 589(4) Procedural and interim decisions

590 Powers of the FWC to inform itself
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174
curation status: Proposed
has part: 590(1) Powers of the FWC to inform itself
has part: 590(2) Powers of the FWC to inform itself
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-590
schema version: 2

590(1) Powers of the FWC to inform itself
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174
note: The FWC may inform itself in relation to any matter before it.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-590-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-590-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-590-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-590-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 590 Powers of the FWC to inform itself

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-590-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may inform itself.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-590-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: The FWC has knowledge about the matter.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Knowledge

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-590-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 590(1) Powers of the FWC to inform itself

590(2) Powers of the FWC to inform itself
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174
note: The FWC may inform itself in various ways.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-590-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-590-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-590-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 590 Powers of the FWC to inform itself

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-590-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May inform itself
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-590-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 590(2) Powers of the FWC to inform itself

591 FWC not bound by rules of evidence and procedure
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.175
note: FWC is not bound by rules of evidence and procedure.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-591-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-591-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-591-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-591-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-591-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-591-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-591
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-591-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: It implies that FWC's exemption applies during its proceedings.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: FWC's exemption applies during its proceedings.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: The FWC is not bound by the rules of evidence and procedure.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-591-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: It implies that the FWC is exempt from these rules.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC's exemption from rules of evidence and procedure.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: The FWC is not bound by the rules of evidence and procedure.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-591-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: It implies that the FWC is exempt from these rules.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC is exempt from rules of evidence and procedure.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exempts
premise text: The FWC is not bound by the rules of evidence and procedure.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-591-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: It implies that FWC's exemption diffuses to other entities.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: FWC's exemption diffuses to other entities.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: The FWC is not bound by the rules of evidence and procedure.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-591-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: It implies that these rules are excluded by FWC's exemption.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Rules of evidence and procedure are excluded by FWC's exemption.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ExcludedBy
premise text: The FWC is not bound by the rules of evidence and procedure.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-591-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 591 FWC not bound by rules of evidence and procedure

592 Conferences
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.175
note: The FWC may direct a person to attend a conference.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-592-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-592-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-592
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-592-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Directing someone to attend a conference is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-592-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 592 Conferences

593 Hearings
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.176
curation status: Proposed
has part: 593(1) Hearings
has part: 593(2) Hearings
has part: 593(3) Hearings
has part: 593(4) Hearings
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-593
schema version: 2

593(1) Hearings
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.176
note: The FWC is not required to hold a hearing in performing functions or exercising powers, except as provided by this Act.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-593-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-593-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-593-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 593 Hearings

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-593-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to hold a hearing
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-593-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 593(1) Hearings

593(2) Hearings
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.176
note: Hearing must be held in public, except as provided by subsection (3).
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-593-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-593-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-593-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 593 Hearings

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-593-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to hold public hearing
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-593-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 593(2) Hearings

593(3) Hearings
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.176
note: Restrictions on publication of hearing evidence and documents
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-593-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-593-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-593-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 593 Hearings

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-593-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restricts publication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) The FWC may make the following orders...

593(4) Hearings
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.176
note: Exemption from subsection (3) for annual wage review submissions
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-593-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-593-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-593-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 593 Hearings

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-593-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts publication of submissions from subsection (3)
modality: Deontic
operator: Exempts

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-593-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 593(4) Hearings

594 Confidential evidence
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.177
curation status: Proposed
has part: 594(1) Confidential evidence
has part: 594(2) Confidential evidence
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-594
schema version: 2

594(1) Confidential evidence
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.177
note: Order prohibiting or restricting publication of confidential evidence
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-594-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-594-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-594-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 594 Confidential evidence

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-594-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits publication of confidential evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

594(2) Confidential evidence
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.177
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for publication of submissions to FWC in annual wage review
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-594-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-594-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-594-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-594-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 594 Confidential evidence

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-594-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between submission and annual wage review
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Submission made before or during annual wage review

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-594-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemption from subsection (1) for publication of submissions to FWC in annual wage review
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

595 FWC’s power to deal with disputes
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.177
curation status: Proposed
has part: 595(1) FWC’s power to deal with disputes
has part: 595(2) FWC’s power to deal with disputes
has part: 595(3) FWC’s power to deal with disputes
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-595
schema version: 2

595(1) FWC’s power to deal with disputes
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.177
note: FWC must be expressly authorised to deal with disputes.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-595-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 595 FWC’s power to deal with disputes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Express authorization is required.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 595(1) FWC’s power to deal with disputes

595(2) FWC’s power to deal with disputes
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.177
note: FWC may deal with a dispute as it considers appropriate.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-595-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 595 FWC’s power to deal with disputes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 595(2) FWC’s power to deal with disputes

595(3) FWC’s power to deal with disputes
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.177
note: FWC may deal with disputes by arbitration only if authorized under another provision.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-595-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 595 FWC’s power to deal with disputes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC's power to deal with disputes by arbitration is limited to the authorized period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Dispute resolution must occur during authorized period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Authorized period for dispute resolution.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC's power to deal with disputes by arbitration is implied by expressed authorization.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Expressed authorization implies FWC's power to deal with disputes by arbitration.
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: Authorization implies power.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC's power to deal with disputes by arbitration is enabled by artificial intelligence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: FWC's power to deal with disputes by arbitration is exercised through AI.
modality: CogAI
operator: by
premise text: Artificial intelligence in FWC.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to deal with disputes by arbitration.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorization is required.
modality: Deontic
operator: can
premise text: Expressed authorization

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC's power to deal with disputes by arbitration allows for dissemination of dispute resolution information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Dispute resolution information may be disseminated through FWC.
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
premise text: Dispute resolution information.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 595(3) FWC’s power to deal with disputes

596 Representation by lawyers and paid agents
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.178
curation status: Proposed
has part: 596(1) Representation by lawyers and paid agents
has part: 596(2) Representation by lawyers and paid agents
has part: 596(3) Representation by lawyers and paid agents
has part: 596(4) Representation by lawyers and paid agents
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-596
schema version: 2

596(1) Representation by lawyers and paid agents
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.178
note: Permission required for representation by lawyer or paid agent
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-596-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 596 Representation by lawyers and paid agents

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission required
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM

596(2) Representation by lawyers and paid agents
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.178
note: Grant permission for representation by lawyers or paid agents under certain conditions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-596-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 596 Representation by lawyers and paid agents

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission for representation by lawyers or paid agents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

596(3) Representation by lawyers and paid agents
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.178
note: No FWC permission required for representation by lawyers or paid agents in certain submissions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-596-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 596 Representation by lawyers and paid agents

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 596(3) Representation by lawyers and paid agents

596(4) Representation by lawyers and paid agents
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.178
note: A person is not represented by a lawyer or paid agent if the lawyer or paid agent meets certain conditions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-596-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 596 Representation by lawyers and paid agents

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: or (b) is an employee or officer of...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between lawyer/paid agent and person
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (a) is an employee or officer of the person;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the lawyer or paid agent meets certain conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Conditional representation
modality: Argumentation
operator: if-then
premise text: (4) For the purposes of this section, a person is taken not to be represented by a lawyer or paid agent if...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the lawyer or paid agent meets certain conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Conditional representation and cognitive processing
modality: CogAI
operator: if-then
premise text: (4) For the purposes of this section, a person is taken not to be represented by a lawyer or paid agent if...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if the lawyer or paid agent meets certain conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (4) For the purposes of this section, a person is taken not to be represented by a lawyer or paid agent...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the lawyer or paid agent meets certain conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Conditional representation and diffusion of information
modality: Diffusion
operator: if-then
premise text: (4) For the purposes of this section, a person is taken not to be represented by a lawyer or paid agent if...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 596(4) Representation by lawyers and paid agents

597 Minister’s entitlement to make submissions
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.179
curation status: Proposed
has part: 597(1) Minister’s entitlement to make submissions
has part: 597(2) Minister’s entitlement to make submissions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-597
schema version: 2

597(1) Minister’s entitlement to make submissions
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.179
note: Minister's entitlement to make submissions for matters before the FWC
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-597-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 597 Minister’s entitlement to make submissions

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister has a right to make submissions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has a right to make submissions
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
premise text: The Minister is entitled to make a submission

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister has permission to make submissions for matters before the FWC
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has permission to make submissions for matters before the FWC
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermission
premise text: The Minister is entitled to make a submission

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister has a right to make submissions for matters involving public sector employment
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has a right to make submissions for matters involving public sector employment
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
premise text: The matter involves public sector employment

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister has a right to make submissions for matters before the FWC if in the public interest
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has a right to make submissions for matters before the FWC if in the public interest
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
premise text: The matter is before a Full Bench and it is in the public interest for the Minister to make a submission

597(2) Minister’s entitlement to make submissions
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.179
note: Minister's entitlement to make submissions
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-597-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 597 Minister’s entitlement to make submissions

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: has

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 597(2) Minister’s entitlement to make submissions

597A State or Territory Minister’s entitlement to make submissions
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.179
note: Minister's entitlement to make submissions for consideration in relation to a matter before the FWC.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597a-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597a-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597a-logic-ltl-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597a-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-597a
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597a-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister of a State or Territory who has responsibility for workplace relations matters is entitled to make a submission for consideration in relation to a matter before the FWC.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Minister's submissions are related to a specific temporal interval.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: hasTemporalRelationTo
premise text: (a) the matter is before a Full Bench; and (b) it is in the public interest of the State or Territory for the Minister of the State or Territory to make a submission.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister of a State or Territory who has responsibility for workplace relations matters is entitled to make a submission for consideration in relation to a matter before the FWC.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has entitlement to make submissions.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEntitlement
premise text: (a) the matter is before a Full Bench; and (b) it is in the public interest of the State or Territory for the Minister of the State or Territory to make a submission.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister of a State or Territory who has responsibility for workplace relations matters is entitled to make a submission for consideration in relation to a matter before the FWC.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has responsibility for workplace relations matters.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasResponsibility
premise text: (b) it is in the public interest of the State or Territory for the Minister of the State or Territory to make a submission.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597a-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister of a State or Territory who has responsibility for workplace relations matters is entitled to make a submission for consideration in relation to a matter before the FWC.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to make submissions.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligationToMakeSubmission
premise text: (a) the matter is before a Full Bench; and (b) it is in the public interest of the State or Territory for the Minister of the State or Territory to make a submission.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597a-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister of a State or Territory who has responsibility for workplace relations matters is entitled to make a submission for consideration in relation to a matter before the FWC.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Minister's submissions have a recurring trace.
modality: LTL
operator: hasRecurringTrace
premise text: (a) the matter is before a Full Bench; and (b) it is in the public interest of the State or Territory for the Minister of the State or Territory to make a submission.

598 Decisions of the FWC
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.180
curation status: Proposed
has part: 598(1) Decisions of the FWC
has part: 598(2) Decisions of the FWC
has part: 598(3) Decisions of the FWC
has part: 598(4) Decisions of the FWC
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-598
schema version: 2

598(1) Decisions of the FWC
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.180
note: Definition of FWC decision
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-598-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 598 Decisions of the FWC

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Examples of decisions that the FWC makes include making modern awards...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal scope
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
premise text: A reference in this Part to a decision of the FWC includes any...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Examples of decisions that the FWC makes include making modern awards...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines scope of obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: A reference in this Part to a decision of the FWC includes any...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Examples of decisions that the FWC makes include making modern awards...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines scope of obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: However, to avoid doubt, a reference to a decision of the FWC does not include...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Examples of decisions that the FWC makes include making modern awards...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Identifies specific decisions
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: A reference in this Part to a decision of the FWC includes any...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Examples of decisions that the FWC makes include making modern awards...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Excludes certain statements and outcomes
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: However, to avoid doubt, a reference to a decision of the FWC does not include...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Examples of decisions that the FWC makes include making modern awards...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines temporal scope
modality: LTL
operator: includes
premise text: A reference in this Part to a decision of the FWC includes any...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 598(1) Decisions of the FWC

598(2) Decisions of the FWC
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.180
note: Incorporates FWC's decision to make or vary an instrument into a reference to its decision.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-598-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 598 Decisions of the FWC

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Incorporates FWC's decision into a reference.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: References an instrument as part of the FWC's decision-making process.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 598(2) Decisions of the FWC

598(3) Decisions of the FWC
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.180
note: Decision must be made by order
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-598-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 598 Decisions of the FWC

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval for making decision: (3)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Contains temporal interval for making decision
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (3) A decision of the FWC that is described as an order must be made by order.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Decision must be made by order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be done
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) A decision of the FWC that is described as an order must be made by order.

598(4) Decisions of the FWC
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.180
note: A decision of the FWC that is not described as an order may be made by order.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-598-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 598 Decisions of the FWC

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 598(4) Decisions of the FWC

599 FWC not required to decide an application in terms applied for
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.180
note: FWC is not required to make a decision in relation to an application.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-599-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-599-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-599
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-599-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-599-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 599 FWC not required to decide an application in terms applied for

600 Determining matters in the absence of a person
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.181
note: The FWC may determine a matter before it in the absence of a person who has been required to attend.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-600-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-600
schema version: 2

601 Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.181
curation status: Proposed
has part: 601(1) Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions
has part: 601(2) Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions
has part: 601(3) Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions
has part: 601(4) Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions
has part: 601(5) Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-601
schema version: 2

601(1) Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.181
note: Writing and publication requirements for FWC decisions
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-601-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 601 Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to write and publish FWC decisions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 601(1) Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions

601(2) Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.181
note: The FWC must provide written reasons for its decisions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-601-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 601 Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC must provide written reasons.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

601(3) Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.181
note: Decision must be expressed in plain English and easy to understand.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-601-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 601 Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Express decision in plain English.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST Express

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 601(3) Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions

601(4) Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions
type: Concept
description: true
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.181
note: Publish FWC decisions and enterprise agreements on website or by other means.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-601-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 601 Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish FWC decisions and enterprise agreements.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Publishing is a requirement for the FWC's decisions.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBJECT-PREDICATE RELATIONSHIP

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 601(4) Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions

601(5) Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.181
note: Exemptions from subsection (4) apply to certain decisions
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-601-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 601 Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 601(5) Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions

602 Correcting obvious errors etc. in relation to the FWC’s
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182
curation status: Proposed
has part: 602(1) Correcting obvious errors etc. in relation to the FWC’s
has part: 602(2) Correcting obvious errors etc. in relation to the FWC’s
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-602
schema version: 2

602(1) Correcting obvious errors etc. in relation to the FWC’s
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182
note: The FWC may correct or amend obvious errors in its decisions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-602-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 602 Correcting obvious errors etc. in relation to the FWC’s

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC has the obligation to correct errors.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 602(1) Correcting obvious errors etc. in relation to the FWC’s

602(2) Correcting obvious errors etc. in relation to the FWC’s
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182
note: The FWC may correct or amend errors, defects, or irregularities.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-602-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 602 Correcting obvious errors etc. in relation to the FWC’s

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may correct or amend errors, defects, or irregularities.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 602(2) Correcting obvious errors etc. in relation to the FWC’s

602A Validation of approval of enterprise agreement
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182
curation status: Proposed
has part: 602A(1) Validation of approval of enterprise agreement
has part: 602A(2) Validation of approval of enterprise agreement
has part: 602A(3) Validation of approval of enterprise agreement
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-602a
schema version: 2

602A(1) Validation of approval of enterprise agreement
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182
note: The FWC may determine that the approval is as valid and effective, and is taken to have been as valid and effective, as it would have been if certain conditions were met.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-602a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 602A Validation of approval of enterprise agreement

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the FWC does not have a duty to determine that the approval is as valid and effective, and is taken to have been as valid and effective, as it would have been if...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC has a duty to determine that the approval is as valid and effective, and is taken to have been as valid and effective, as it would have been if certain conditions were met.
modality: Deontic
operator: >
premise text: the requirements set out in subsection 185(2) or section 185A had not been met in relation to the application

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the FWC does not have a duty to determine that the approval is as valid and effective, and is taken to have been as valid and effective, as it would have been if...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC has a duty to determine that the approval is as valid and effective, and is taken to have been as valid and effective, as it would have been if certain conditions were met.
modality: Deontic
operator: <
premise text: the requirements set out in subsection 185(2) or section 185A had not been met in relation to the application

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the FWC's determination is not valid after a certain period of time.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The FWC's determination is only valid for a certain period of time.
modality: LTL
operator: <
premise text: the requirements set out in subsection 185(2) or section 185A had been met in relation to the application

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 602A(1) Validation of approval of enterprise agreement

602A(2) Validation of approval of enterprise agreement
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182
note: FWC may make a determination under subsection (1)
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-602a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 602A Validation of approval of enterprise agreement

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make a determination
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 602A(2) Validation of approval of enterprise agreement

602A(3) Validation of approval of enterprise agreement
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182
note: Publish enterprise agreement on website or by other means
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-602a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 602A Validation of approval of enterprise agreement

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subject to publication on website or by other means
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBJECT

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 602A(3) Validation of approval of enterprise agreement

602B Validation of approval of variation of enterprise agreement
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.183
note: Duty to correct erroneous application for approval of variation
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602b-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-602b
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Correction required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to correct erroneous application
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Erroneous application made

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 602B Validation of approval of variation of enterprise agreement

603 Varying and revoking the FWC’s decisions
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.184
curation status: Proposed
has part: 603(1) Varying and revoking the FWC’s decisions
has part: 603(2) Varying and revoking the FWC’s decisions
has part: 603(3) Varying and revoking the FWC’s decisions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-603
schema version: 2

603(1) Varying and revoking the FWC’s decisions
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.184
note: The FWC may vary or revoke its decisions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-603-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-603-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-603-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 603 Varying and revoking the FWC’s decisions

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-603-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to vary or revoke
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-603-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 603(1) Varying and revoking the FWC’s decisions

603(2) Varying and revoking the FWC’s decisions
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.184
note: The FWC may vary or revoke a decision on its own initiative or upon application by an affected person.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-603-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-603-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-603-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-603-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 603 Varying and revoking the FWC’s decisions

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-603-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may vary or revoke a decision.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-603-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: The FWC's decisions are classified by the regulations.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classifies

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-603-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 603(2) Varying and revoking the FWC’s decisions

603(3) Varying and revoking the FWC’s decisions
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.184
note: Prohibition on varying or revoking certain FWC decisions
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-603-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-603-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-603-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 603 Varying and revoking the FWC’s decisions

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-603-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...vary or revoke any of the following decisions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot vary or revoke specified decisions
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: (3) The FWC must not...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-603-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 603(3) Varying and revoking the FWC’s decisions

604 Appeal of decisions
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.185
curation status: Proposed
has part: 604(1) Appeal of decisions
has part: 604(2) Appeal of decisions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-604
schema version: 2

604(1) Appeal of decisions
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.185
note: Permission to appeal a decision made by FWC or General Manager
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-604-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-604-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-604-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 604 Appeal of decisions

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-604-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to appeal
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM

604(2) Appeal of decisions
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.185
note: FWC must grant permission if in public interest.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-604-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-604-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-604-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 604 Appeal of decisions

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-604-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC MUST grant permission
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to grant permission
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: FWC may grant permission

605 Minister’s entitlement to apply for review of a decision
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.186
curation status: Proposed
has part: 605(1) Minister’s entitlement to apply for review of a decision
has part: 605(2) Minister’s entitlement to apply for review of a decision
has part: 605(3) Minister’s entitlement to apply for review of a decision
has part: 605(4) Minister’s entitlement to apply for review of a decision
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-605
schema version: 2

605(1) Minister’s entitlement to apply for review of a decision
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.186
note: Minister's entitlement to apply for review of a decision
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-605-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-605-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-605-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 605 Minister’s entitlement to apply for review of a decision

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-605-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Can apply for review
modality: Deontic
operator: can

605(2) Minister’s entitlement to apply for review of a decision
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.186
note: FWC must conduct a review of the decision if it is in the public interest.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-605-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-605-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-605-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 605 Minister’s entitlement to apply for review of a decision

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-605-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to conduct a review
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-605-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 605(2) Minister’s entitlement to apply for review of a decision

605(3) Minister’s entitlement to apply for review of a decision
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.186
note: Minister's entitlement to make submissions for consideration in the review.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-605-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-605-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-605-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 605 Minister’s entitlement to apply for review of a decision

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-605-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has a right to make submissions.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight

605(4) Minister’s entitlement to apply for review of a decision
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.186
note: Right of appeal or power of FWC under section 604 or 607 is unaffected.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-605-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-605-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-605-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 605 Minister’s entitlement to apply for review of a decision

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-605-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right of appeal or power of FWC under section 604 or 607 is unaffected.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-605-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 605(4) Minister’s entitlement to apply for review of a decision

606 Staying decisions that are appealed or reviewed
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.186
curation status: Proposed
has part: 606(1) Staying decisions that are appealed or reviewed
has part: 606(2) Staying decisions that are appealed or reviewed
has part: 606(3) Staying decisions that are appealed or reviewed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-606
schema version: 2

606(1) Staying decisions that are appealed or reviewed
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.186
note: Order staying operation of decision until appeal or review is made
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-606-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-606-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-606-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 606 Staying decisions that are appealed or reviewed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-606-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes duty on FWC to stay operation of decision
modality: Deontic
operator: order

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-606-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 606(1) Staying decisions that are appealed or reviewed

606(2) Staying decisions that are appealed or reviewed
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.186
note: Who can make an order under subsection (1) in relation to the appeal or review?
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-606-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-606-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-606-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-606-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 606 Staying decisions that are appealed or reviewed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-606-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the timing of when an order can be made
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-606-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies the agent making the order
modality: Deontic
operator: who

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-606-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 606(2) Staying decisions that are appealed or reviewed

606(3) Staying decisions that are appealed or reviewed
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.186
note: Section does not apply in relation to a decision to make a protected action ballot order.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-606-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-606-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 606 Staying decisions that are appealed or reviewed

607 Process for appealing or reviewing decisions
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.187
curation status: Proposed
has part: 607(1) Process for appealing or reviewing decisions
has part: 607(2) Process for appealing or reviewing decisions
has part: 607(3) Process for appealing or reviewing decisions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-607
schema version: 2

607(1) Process for appealing or reviewing decisions
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.187
note: Appeal or review can be heard without a hearing under certain conditions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-607-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-607-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-607-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 607 Process for appealing or reviewing decisions

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-607-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permitted action
modality: Deontic
operator: can

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-607-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 607(1) Process for appealing or reviewing decisions

607(2) Process for appealing or reviewing decisions
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.187
note: The FWC may admit further evidence and take into account other information or evidence.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-607-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-607-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-607-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 607 Process for appealing or reviewing decisions

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-607-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may admit further evidence and take into account other information or evidence.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-607-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 607(2) Process for appealing or reviewing decisions

607(3) Process for appealing or reviewing decisions
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.187
note: The FWC may confirm, quash or vary a decision.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-607-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-607-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-607-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 607 Process for appealing or reviewing decisions

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-607-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May do
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-607-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 607(3) Process for appealing or reviewing decisions

608 Referring questions of law to the Federal Court
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.188
curation status: Proposed
has part: 608(1) Referring questions of law to the Federal Court
has part: 608(2) Referring questions of law to the Federal Court
has part: 608(3) Referring questions of law to the Federal Court
has part: 608(4) Referring questions of law to the Federal Court
has part: 608(5) Referring questions of law to the Federal Court
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-608
schema version: 2

608(1) Referring questions of law to the Federal Court
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.188
note: The President may refer a question of law arising in a matter before the FWC for the opinion of the Federal Court.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-608-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-608-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-608-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 608 Referring questions of law to the Federal Court

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-608-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to refer a question of law
modality: Deontic
operator: may

608(2) Referring questions of law to the Federal Court
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.188
note: The Full Court of the Federal Court must determine a question of law referred under subsection (1).
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-608-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-608-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-608-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 608 Referring questions of law to the Federal Court

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-608-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Federal Court must determine the question.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

608(3) Referring questions of law to the Federal Court
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.188
note: FWC may make a decision in relation to the matter even if the Federal Court is determining the question of law, except if the question is whether the FWC may exercise powers in relation to the matter.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-608-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-608-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 608 Referring questions of law to the Federal Court

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-608-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 608(3) Referring questions of law to the Federal Court

608(4) Referring questions of law to the Federal Court
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.188
note: FWC must make a decision not inconsistent with Federal Court's opinion
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-608-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-608-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-608-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 608 Referring questions of law to the Federal Court

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-608-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make a decision not inconsistent with Federal Court's opinion
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-608-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 608(4) Referring questions of law to the Federal Court

608(5) Referring questions of law to the Federal Court
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.188
note: Must vary decision to make it consistent with Federal Court's opinion.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-608-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-608-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-608-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 608 Referring questions of law to the Federal Court

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-608-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to vary decision
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

609 Procedural rules
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.188
curation status: Proposed
has part: 609(1) Procedural rules
has part: 609(2) Procedural rules
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-609
schema version: 2

609(1) Procedural rules
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.188
note: President may make procedural rules by legislative instrument.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-609-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-609-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-609-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 609 Procedural rules

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-609-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-609-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 609(1) Procedural rules

609(2) Procedural rules
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.188
note: Procedural rules for applications to the FWC
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-609-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-609-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-609-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 609 Procedural rules

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-609-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application requirements
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-609-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 609(2) Procedural rules

610 Regulations dealing with any FWC matters
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.189
note: Regulations may provide for any matter that procedural rules may provide for.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-610-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-610
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-610-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 610 Regulations dealing with any FWC matters

611 Costs
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.189
curation status: Proposed
has part: 611(1) Costs
has part: 611(2) Costs
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-611
schema version: 2

611(1) Costs
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.189
note: Must bear own costs in relation to a matter before the FWC.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-611-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-611-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-611-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 611 Costs

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-611-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must bear own costs
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: A person must bear the person’s own costs in relation to a matter before the FWC.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-611-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 611(1) Costs

611(2) Costs
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.189
note: The FWC may order a person to bear some or all of the costs of another person.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-611-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-611-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 611 Costs

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-611-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 611(2) Costs

612 FWC’s functions etc. may generally be performed by single
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.191
curation status: Proposed
has part: 612(1) FWC’s functions etc. may generally be performed by single
has part: 612(2) FWC’s functions etc. may generally be performed by single
has part: 612(3) FWC’s functions etc. may generally be performed by single
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-612
schema version: 2

612(1) FWC’s functions etc. may generally be performed by single
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.191
note: The FWC may perform its functions by a single member, as directed by the President.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-612-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 612 FWC’s functions etc. may generally be performed by single

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The President gives directions under section 582.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval of performance
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: A single FWC Member (other than an Expert Panel Member) may perform a function as directed by the President.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A single member can perform the function.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ability to perform a function
modality: Deontic
operator: can
premise text: The FWC may perform its functions.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The President gives directions under section 582.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval of performance
modality: LTL
operator: <=
premise text: A single FWC Member (other than an Expert Panel Member) may perform a function as directed by the President.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 612(1) FWC’s functions etc. may generally be performed by single

612(2) FWC’s functions etc. may generally be performed by single
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.191
note: Action must be taken by a Vice President or Deputy President
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-612-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 612 FWC’s functions etc. may generally be performed by single

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Action must be taken
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Action must be taken
modality: LinearLogic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 612(2) FWC’s functions etc. may generally be performed by single

612(3) FWC’s functions etc. may generally be performed by single
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.191
note: The power of the President to delegate a function or power of the FWC under section 625 is not limited.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-612-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 612 FWC’s functions etc. may generally be performed by single

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The President has the obligation to delegate a function or power of the FWC.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 612(3) FWC’s functions etc. may generally be performed by single

613 Appeal of decisions
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.191
curation status: Proposed
has part: 613(1) Appeal of decisions
has part: 613(2) Appeal of decisions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-613
schema version: 2

613(1) Appeal of decisions
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.191
note: Full Bench must decide to grant permission to appeal a decision.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-613-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-613-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-613-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 613 Appeal of decisions

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-613-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must decide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-613-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 613(1) Appeal of decisions

613(2) Appeal of decisions
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.191
note: Grant permission to appeal decisions under section 604
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-613-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-613-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-613-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 613 Appeal of decisions

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-613-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted
modality: Deontic
operator: may

614 Review of decisions by a Full Bench
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.192
note: Must decide whether to conduct a review of a decision and if so, conduct the review in accordance with section 607.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-614-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-614-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-614-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-614-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-614
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-614-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The Full Bench must decide under section 605 whether to conduct a review of a decision between the time it was made and the time it is reviewed.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-614-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must decide whether to conduct a review of a decision and if so, conduct the review in accordance with section 607.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-614-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The Full Bench must decide under section 605 whether to conduct a review of a decision between the time it was made and the time it is reviewed.
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN

615 The President may direct a Full Bench to perform function etc.
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.192
curation status: Proposed
has part: 615(1) The President may direct a Full Bench to perform function etc.
has part: 615(2) The President may direct a Full Bench to perform function etc.
has part: 615(3) The President may direct a Full Bench to perform function etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-615
schema version: 2

615(1) The President may direct a Full Bench to perform function etc.
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.192
note: The President may direct a Full Bench to perform certain functions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-615-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 615 The President may direct a Full Bench to perform function etc.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The President has the power to direct a Full Bench.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

615(2) The President may direct a Full Bench to perform function etc.
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.192
note: The President may direct a Full Bench to perform function etc.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-615-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 615 The President may direct a Full Bench to perform function etc.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission or obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class description
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: general

615(3) The President may direct a Full Bench to perform function etc.
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.192
note: May direct a Full Bench to perform function etc.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-615-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 615 The President may direct a Full Bench to perform function etc.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Directs an obligation on the President
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 618
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Includes a reference to more than one Full Bench
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
premise text: Section 615(3)

615A When the President must direct a Full Bench to perform
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.193
curation status: Proposed
has part: 615A(1) When the President must direct a Full Bench to perform
has part: 615A(2) When the President must direct a Full Bench to perform
has part: 615A(3) When the President must direct a Full Bench to perform
has part: 615A(4) When the President must direct a Full Bench to perform
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-615a
schema version: 2

615A(1) When the President must direct a Full Bench to perform
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.193
note: The President must direct a Full Bench to perform a function or exercise a power in relation to a matter if an application is made under subsection (2) and the President is satisfied that it is in the public interest to do so.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-615a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 615A When the President must direct a Full Bench to perform

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The President's direction must occur between the time of the application and the satisfaction that it is in the public interest to do so.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The President's direction must occur between the time of the application and the satisfaction that it is in the public interest to do so.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: An application is made under subsection (2).

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The President must direct a Full Bench to perform a function or exercise a power in relation to a matter.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The President must direct a Full Bench.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: An application is made under subsection (2).

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The President must direct a Full Bench to perform a function or exercise a power in relation to a matter if an application is made under subsection (2) and the President is satisfied that it is in the public interest to do so.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The President is satisfied that it is in the public interest to do so.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The President is satisfied that it is in the public interest to do so.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The President must direct a Full Bench to perform a function or exercise a power in relation to a matter if an application is made under subsection (2) and the President is satisfied that it is in the public interest to do so.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The President must direct a Full Bench if an application is made under subsection (2) and the President is satisfied that it is in the public interest to do so.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: An application is made under subsection (2).

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The President's direction must occur between the time of the application and the satisfaction that it is in the public interest to do so.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The President's direction must occur between the time of the application and the satisfaction that it is in the public interest to do so.
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: An application is made under subsection (2).

615A(2) When the President must direct a Full Bench to perform
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.193
note: Application for Full Bench direction
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-615a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 615A When the President must direct a Full Bench to perform

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 615A(2) When the President must direct a Full Bench to perform

615A(3) When the President must direct a Full Bench to perform
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.193
note: The President must direct a Full Bench to perform a function or exercise a power in relation to a matter arising under section 226.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-615a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 615A When the President must direct a Full Bench to perform

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The President must direct a Full Bench.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

615A(4) When the President must direct a Full Bench to perform
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.193
note: The FWC Member must direct a Full Bench to perform if the enterprise agreement does not cover employees.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-615a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 615A When the President must direct a Full Bench to perform

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the enterprise agreement does not cover employees.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to direct a Full Bench
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The FWC Member is satisfied that...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 615A(4) When the President must direct a Full Bench to perform

615B Transfer to a Full Bench from an FWC Member
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.194
curation status: Proposed
has part: 615B(1) Transfer to a Full Bench from an FWC Member
has part: 615B(2) Transfer to a Full Bench from an FWC Member
has part: 615B(3) Transfer to a Full Bench from an FWC Member
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-615b
schema version: 2

615B(1) Transfer to a Full Bench from an FWC Member
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.194
note: Transfer of function from FWC Member to Full Bench
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615b-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-615b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 615B Transfer to a Full Bench from an FWC Member

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 615B(1) Transfer to a Full Bench from an FWC Member

615B(2) Transfer to a Full Bench from an FWC Member
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.194
note: Revocation of earlier direction
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615b-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-615b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 615B Transfer to a Full Bench from an FWC Member

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Direction revocation
modality: Deontic
operator: Revocation
premise text: (2) The President is taken to have revoked the earlier direction.

615B(3) Transfer to a Full Bench from an FWC Member
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.194
note: Must consider past actions of FWC and its own actions in relation to the matter before it.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615b-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615b-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-615b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 615B Transfer to a Full Bench from an FWC Member

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...take into account everything that occurred before the FWC; and (b) everything that the FWC did;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Relation between identifiable temporal intervals.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (3) The Full Bench must...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615b-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...take into account everything that occurred before the FWC; and (b) everything that the FWC did;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: CogAI logic applies to cognitive processes.
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (3) The Full Bench must...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...take into account everything that occurred before the FWC; and (b) everything that the FWC did;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider past actions of FWC and its own actions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) The Full Bench must...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...take into account everything that occurred before the FWC; and (b) everything that the FWC did;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion logic applies to information flow.
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (3) The Full Bench must...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...take into account everything that occurred before the FWC; and (b) everything that the FWC did;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Ordered or recurring trace.
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (3) The Full Bench must...

615C Transfer to the President from an FWC Member or a Full
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.194
curation status: Proposed
has part: 615C(1) Transfer to the President from an FWC Member or a Full
has part: 615C(2) Transfer to the President from an FWC Member or a Full
has part: 615C(3) Transfer to the President from an FWC Member or a Full
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-615c
schema version: 2

615C(1) Transfer to the President from an FWC Member or a Full
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.194
note: The President must give a direction to an FWC Member or Full Bench before performing a function or exercising a power.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615c-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-615c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 615C Transfer to the President from an FWC Member or a Full

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The President must give a direction.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 615C(1) Transfer to the President from an FWC Member or a Full

615C(2) Transfer to the President from an FWC Member or a Full
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.194
note: The President is taken to have revoked the earlier direction.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615c-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-615c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 615C Transfer to the President from an FWC Member or a Full

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Revocation of an earlier direction
modality: Deontic
operator: Revocation
premise text: (2) The President is taken to have revoked the earlier direction.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 615C(2) Transfer to the President from an FWC Member or a Full

615C(3) Transfer to the President from an FWC Member or a Full
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.194
note: The President must consider past actions of the FWC when performing a function or exercising power.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615c-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615c-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615c-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-615c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 615C Transfer to the President from an FWC Member or a Full

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...take into account everything that occurred...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The provision specifies a temporal interval for consideration by the President.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (a) everything that occurred before the FWC;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must take into account...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The President must consider past actions of the FWC.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) The President...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615c-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...take into account...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision imposes a duty on the President to consider past actions of the FWC.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) The President...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615c-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...take into account everything that the FWC did...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The provision specifies a temporal interval for consideration by the President.
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (b) everything that the FWC did;

616 FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.195
curation status: Proposed
has part: 616(1) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench
has part: 616(2A) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench
has part: 616(3A) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench
has part: 616(3B) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench
has part: 616(3C) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-616
schema version: 2

616(1) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.195
note: A modern award must be made by a Full Bench.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-616-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-616-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-616-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 616 FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-616-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be performed
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-616-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 616(1) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench

616(2A) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.195
note: A Full Bench must conduct a 4 yearly review of default fund terms of modern awards.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-616-ss-2a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-616-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-616-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 616 FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-616-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to conduct a review
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

616(3A) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.195
note: A Full Bench must make a determination that varies a default fund term of a modern award.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-616-ss-3a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-616-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-616-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 616 FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-616-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make determination by Full Bench
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-616-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 616(3A) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench

616(3B) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.195
note: A Full Bench must make a determination to revoke a modern award.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-616-ss-3b-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-616-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-616-ss-3b
schema version: 2
part of: 616 FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-616-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-616-ss-3b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 616(3B) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench

616(3C) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.195
note: Determination that varies a modern award under Division 5 of Part 2-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-616-ss-3c-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-616-ss-3c
schema version: 2
part of: 616 FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-616-ss-3c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 616(3C) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench

617 FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by an Expert
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.197
curation status: Proposed
has part: 617(1) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by an Expert
has part: 617(2) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by an Expert
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-617
schema version: 2

617(1) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by an Expert
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.197
note: Annual wage review must be conducted by an Expert Panel.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-617-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 617 FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by an Expert

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to conduct annual wage review
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

617(2) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by an Expert
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.197
note: A national minimum wage order must be made by an Expert Panel.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-617-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 617 FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by an Expert

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a national minimum wage order.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

617A President may direct investigations and reports
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.203
curation status: Proposed
has part: 617A(1) President may direct investigations and reports
has part: 617A(2) President may direct investigations and reports
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-617a
schema version: 2

617A(1) President may direct investigations and reports
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.203
note: The President may direct investigations and reports on matters relevant to the function of an Expert Panel.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617a-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-617a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 617A President may direct investigations and reports

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The President has a duty to direct investigations and reports.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

617A(2) President may direct investigations and reports
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.203
note: Direct investigations and reports may be given to specified entities.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617a-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617a-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-617a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 617A President may direct investigations and reports

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for investigation and reporting
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) The direction may be given to:

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (2) The direction may be given to:

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617a-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of entities for investigation and reporting
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: (a) an Expert Panel; or (b) an Expert Panel Member; or (c) a Commissioner; or (d) a Full Bench that includes one or more Expert Panel Members.

617AA Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.202
curation status: Proposed
has part: 617AA(1) Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership
has part: 617AA(2) Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership
has part: 617AA(3) Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership
has part: 617AA(4) Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership
has part: 617AA(5) Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-617aa
schema version: 2

617AA(1) Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.202
note: Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership is required.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-617aa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 617AA Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal intervals are required to be the same for Full Bench and Expert Panel.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: same
premise text: (1) This section applies if a Full Bench and an Expert Panel consist of the same FWC Members.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Requires Full Bench and Expert Panel to have identical membership for argumentation purposes.
modality: Argumentation
operator: requires
premise text: (1) This section applies if a Full Bench and an Expert Panel consist of the same FWC Members.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: CogAI is required to be the same for Full Bench and Expert Panel.
modality: CogAI
operator: same
premise text: (1) This section applies if a Full Bench and an Expert Panel consist of the same FWC Members.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires Full Bench and Expert Panel to have identical membership.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (1) This section applies if a Full Bench and an Expert Panel consist of the same FWC Members.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion is required to be the same for Full Bench and Expert Panel.
modality: Diffusion
operator: same
premise text: (1) This section applies if a Full Bench and an Expert Panel consist of the same FWC Members.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 617AA(1) Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership

617AA(2) Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.202
note: The Full Bench is not limited by the functions or powers of the Expert Panel.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-617aa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 617AA Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Full Bench is not limited by the functions or powers of the Expert Panel.
modality: Deontic
operator: notLimitedBy

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 617AA(2) Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership

617AA(3) Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.202
note: The Expert Panel is not limited by the functions or powers of the Full Bench.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-617aa-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 617AA Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The Expert Panel's functions are not limited by the Full Bench's functions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalRelation
premise text: (3) In performing its functions or exercising its powers, the Expert Panel is not limited by the functions or powers of the Full Bench.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The Expert Panel's functions are not limited by the Full Bench's functions.
modality: CogAI
operator: TemporalRelation
premise text: (3) In performing its functions or exercising its powers, the Expert Panel is not limited by the functions or powers of the Full Bench.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Expert Panel is not limited by the Full Bench.
modality: Deontic
operator: NotLimitedBy
premise text: (3) In performing its functions or exercising its powers, the Expert Panel is not limited by the functions or powers of the Full Bench.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The Expert Panel's functions are not limited by the Full Bench's functions.
modality: Diffusion
operator: TemporalRelation
premise text: (3) In performing its functions or exercising its powers, the Expert Panel is not limited by the functions or powers of the Full Bench.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The Expert Panel's functions are not limited by the Full Bench's functions.
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalRelation
premise text: (3) In performing its functions or exercising its powers, the Expert Panel is not limited by the functions or powers of the Full Bench.

617AA(4) Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.202
note: List of functions and powers that a reference to performing includes
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-617aa-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 617AA Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 617AA(4) Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership

617AA(5) Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.202
note: Provision for avoidance of doubt
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-617aa-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 617AA Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership

617B Research must be published
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.204
curation status: Proposed
has part: 617B(1) Research must be published
has part: 617B(2) Research must be published
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-617b
schema version: 2

617B(1) Research must be published
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.204
note: Publishing of reports by FWC upon presidential direction.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617b-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-617b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 617B Research must be published

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 617B(1) Research must be published

617B(2) Research must be published
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.204
note: Publication of research must be done by the FWC.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617b-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617b-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-617b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 617B Research must be published

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to publish research
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617b-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Publication is a subclass of FWC's obligations
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS OF

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 617B(2) Research must be published

618 Constitution and decision-making of a Full Bench
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.204
curation status: Proposed
has part: 618(1) Constitution and decision-making of a Full Bench
has part: 618(2) Constitution and decision-making of a Full Bench
has part: 618(3) Constitution and decision-making of a Full Bench
has part: 618(4) Constitution and decision-making of a Full Bench
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-618
schema version: 2

618(1) Constitution and decision-making of a Full Bench
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.204
note: A Full Bench must consist of at least 3 FWC Members, including the President, Vice President, or Deputy President.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-618-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 618 Constitution and decision-making of a Full Bench

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must exist
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 618(1) Constitution and decision-making of a Full Bench

618(2) Constitution and decision-making of a Full Bench
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.204
note: Determine FWC Members for a Full Bench
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-618-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 618 Constitution and decision-making of a Full Bench

618(3) Constitution and decision-making of a Full Bench
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.204
note: Decision of a majority of FWC Members on the Full Bench prevails.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-618-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 618 Constitution and decision-making of a Full Bench

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A decision of a majority of the FWC Members on the Full Bench prevails.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Decision of a majority prevails.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: prevails
premise text: (3) A decision of a majority of the FWC Members on the Full Bench prevails.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A decision of a majority of the FWC Members on the Full Bench prevails.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Decision of a majority prevails.
modality: Deontic
operator: prevails
premise text: (3) A decision of a majority of the FWC Members on the Full Bench prevails.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A decision of a majority of the FWC Members on the Full Bench prevails.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Decision of a majority prevails.
modality: Diffusion
operator: prevails
premise text: (3) A decision of a majority of the FWC Members on the Full Bench prevails.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A decision of a majority of the FWC Members on the Full Bench prevails.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Decision of a majority prevails.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: prevails
premise text: (3) A decision of a majority of the FWC Members on the Full Bench prevails.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A decision of a majority of the FWC Members on the Full Bench prevails.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Decision of a majority prevails.
modality: LTL
operator: prevails
premise text: (3) A decision of a majority of the FWC Members on the Full Bench prevails.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 618(3) Constitution and decision-making of a Full Bench

618(4) Constitution and decision-making of a Full Bench
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.204
note: Decision of FWC Member with seniority prevails in case of no majority.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-618-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 618 Constitution and decision-making of a Full Bench

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: prevails
premise text: (4)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 618(4) Constitution and decision-making of a Full Bench

619 Seniority of FWC Members
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.204
curation status: Proposed
has part: 619(1) Seniority of FWC Members
has part: 619(2) Seniority of FWC Members
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-619
schema version: 2

619(1) Seniority of FWC Members
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.204
note: Establishes seniority order for FWC Members
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-619-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 619 Seniority of FWC Members

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Vice President appointments overlap based on precedence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines overlapping intervals for FWC Member appointments
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: (ab) if 2 appointments as Vice Presidents took effect on the same day—the Vice Presidents, according to the precedence assigned to them in their instruments of appointment;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The President has a role that implies seniority.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Establishes implication between seniority and FWC Member roles
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (a) the President;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the President has seniority.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the order of seniority for FWC Members
modality: Deontic
operator: hasSeniority
premise text: (a) the President;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Seniority diffuses among Deputy Presidents based on precedence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Defines diffusion of seniority among FWC Members
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (c) if 2 or more appointments as Deputy Presidents took effect on the same day—the Deputy Presidents, according to the precedence assigned to them in their instruments of appointment;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Deputy President appointments end based on appointment date.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for FWC Member appointments
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (b) the Deputy Presidents, according to the days on which their appointments as Deputy Presidents took effect;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 619(1) Seniority of FWC Members

619(2) Seniority of FWC Members
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.204
note: FWC Member with seniority has a deciding vote and is responsible for managing the Full Bench.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-619-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 619 Seniority of FWC Members

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Deciding vote
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has a deciding vote
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: No majority

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Management responsibility
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Manages the Full Bench
modality: Deontic
operator: is responsible for
premise text: Performing functions and exercising powers

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 619(2) Seniority of FWC Members

620 Constitution and decision-making of an Expert Panel
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.205
note: Expert Panel must consist of 7 FWC Members with specific knowledge and experience.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-620-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-620-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-620
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-620-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Membership requirements
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-620-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 620 Constitution and decision-making of an Expert Panel

621 Reconstitution of the FWC when single FWC Member becomes
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.209
curation status: Proposed
has part: 621(1) Reconstitution of the FWC when single FWC Member becomes
has part: 621(2) Reconstitution of the FWC when single FWC Member becomes
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-621
schema version: 2

621(1) Reconstitution of the FWC when single FWC Member becomes
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.209
note: Duty to complete matter before becoming unavailable
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-621-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-621-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-621-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-621-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-621-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-621-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 621 Reconstitution of the FWC when single FWC Member becomes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-621-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC Member's availability overlaps with their unavailability
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between availability and unavailability
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (b) the FWC Member becomes unavailable to continue dealing with the matter before the matter is completely dealt with.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-621-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC Member must complete the matter before becoming unavailable
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory duty
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (a) an FWC Member is dealing with a matter (other than by forming part of a Full Bench or an Expert Panel in relation to a matter); and (b) the FWC Member becomes unavailable to continue dealing with the matter before the matter is completely dealt with.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-621-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC Member may choose to complete the matter if they are available
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Optional duty to complete matter
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (a) an FWC Member is dealing with a matter (other than by forming part of a Full Bench or an Expert Panel in relation to a matter); and

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-621-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC Member's unavailability occurs until the matter is completed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between availability and completion of matter
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (b) the FWC Member becomes unavailable to continue dealing with the matter before the matter is completely dealt with.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-621-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 621(1) Reconstitution of the FWC when single FWC Member becomes

621(2) Reconstitution of the FWC when single FWC Member becomes
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.209
note: The President must direct another FWC Member to constitute the FWC.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-621-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-621-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-621-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 621 Reconstitution of the FWC when single FWC Member becomes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-621-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The President must direct another FWC Member.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

622 Reconstitution of the FWC when FWC Member of a Full Bench
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.209
note: Reconstitution of FWC when Expert Panel becomes unavailable
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-622-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-622
schema version: 2

623 When new FWC Members begin to deal with matters
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.211
note: Must consider past FWC actions and events when dealing with a matter.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-623-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-623-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-623
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-623-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider past FWC actions and events.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

624 FWC’s decisions not invalid when improperly constituted
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.211
note: FWC decisions are not invalid due to improper constitution.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-624-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-624-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-624
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-624-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Impossibility of invalidation
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-624-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 624 FWC’s decisions not invalid when improperly constituted

625 Delegation by the President of functions and powers of the FWC
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.211
curation status: Proposed
has part: 625(1) Delegation by the President of functions and powers of the FWC
has part: 625(2) Delegation by the President of functions and powers of the FWC
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-625
schema version: 2

625(1) Delegation by the President of functions and powers of the FWC
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.211
note: Delegation of powers by the President to the FWC
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-625-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-625-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-625-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 625 Delegation by the President of functions and powers of the FWC

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-625-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Power delegation
modality: Deontic
operator: canDelegate

625(2) Delegation by the President of functions and powers of the FWC
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.211
note: Delegation of FWC functions and powers to a person
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-625-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-625-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 625 Delegation by the President of functions and powers of the FWC

626 Appointment of FWC Members
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.213
curation status: Proposed
has part: 626(1) Appointment of FWC Members
has part: 626(2) Appointment of FWC Members
has part: 626(3) Appointment of FWC Members
has part: 626(4) Appointment of FWC Members
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-626
schema version: 2

626(1) Appointment of FWC Members
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.213
note: FWC Member must be appointed by Governor-General
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-626-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 626 Appointment of FWC Members

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC Member is appointed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to appoint FWC Member
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Governor-General must appoint FWC Member

626(2) Appointment of FWC Members
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.213
note: Specify FWC Member position in appointment instrument
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-626-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 626 Appointment of FWC Members

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires specification of FWC Member position
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 626(2) Appointment of FWC Members

626(3) Appointment of FWC Members
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.213
note: Assign precedence to FWC Member upon appointment as Vice President or Deputy President.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-626-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 626 Appointment of FWC Members

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or (b) the FWC Member and one or more other FWC Members are appointed as Deputy Presidents on the same day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between appointments.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (a) the FWC Member and one other FWC Member are appointed as Vice Presidents on the same day;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the FWC Member and one other FWC Member are appointed as Vice Presidents on the same day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Assigns precedence to FWC Member upon appointment.
modality: CogAI
operator: Assigns
premise text: (3) The instrument of appointment must assign a precedence...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the FWC Member and one other FWC Member are appointed as Vice Presidents on the same day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Assigns precedence to FWC Member upon appointment.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (3) The instrument of appointment must assign a precedence...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or (b) the FWC Member and one or more other FWC Members are appointed as Deputy Presidents on the same day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses precedence to subsequent appointments.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (a) the FWC Member and one other FWC Member are appointed as Vice Presidents on the same day;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or (b) the FWC Member and one or more other FWC Members are appointed as Deputy Presidents on the same day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between appointments.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (a) the FWC Member and one other FWC Member are appointed as Vice Presidents on the same day;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 626(3) Appointment of FWC Members

626(4) Appointment of FWC Members
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.213
note: Cannot hold two appointments simultaneously
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-626-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 626 Appointment of FWC Members

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between appointments
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: (4) The same person must not hold, at the same time, an appointment as both: (a) an Expert Panel Member; and (b) the President, a Vice President, a Deputy President or a Commissioner.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence recognizes simultaneous appointments
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (4) The same person must not hold, at the same time, an appointment as both: (a) an Expert Panel Member; and (b) the President, a Vice President, a Deputy President or a Commissioner.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of simultaneous appointments
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: (4) The same person must not hold, at the same time, an appointment as both: (a) an Expert Panel Member; and (b) the President, a Vice President, a Deputy President or a Commissioner.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of information about simultaneous appointments
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (4) The same person must not hold, at the same time, an appointment as both: (a) an Expert Panel Member; and (b) the President, a Vice President, a Deputy President or a Commissioner.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between appointments
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (4) The same person must not hold, at the same time, an appointment as both: (a) an Expert Panel Member; and (b) the President, a Vice President, a Deputy President or a Commissioner.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 626(4) Appointment of FWC Members

627 Qualifications for appointment of FWC Members
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.213
note: The Minister must be satisfied that the person is or has been a Judge of a court created by the Parliament.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-627-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-627-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-627
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-627-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Minister must be satisfied that the person is or has been a Judge of a court created by the Parliament.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

628 Basis of appointment of FWC Members
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.215
curation status: Proposed
has part: 628(1) Basis of appointment of FWC Members
has part: 628(2) Basis of appointment of FWC Members
has part: 628(3) Basis of appointment of FWC Members
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-628
schema version: 2

628(1) Basis of appointment of FWC Members
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.215
note: The President, a Vice President, a Deputy President or a Commissioner must hold office on a full-time basis.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-628-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-628-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-628-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 628 Basis of appointment of FWC Members

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-628-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must hold office on a full-time basis
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-628-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 628(1) Basis of appointment of FWC Members

628(2) Basis of appointment of FWC Members
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.215
note: Deputy President or Commissioner may perform duties on a part-time basis with approval.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-628-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-628-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-628-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 628 Basis of appointment of FWC Members

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-628-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to perform duties on a part-time basis
modality: Deontic
operator: may

628(3) Basis of appointment of FWC Members
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.215
note: Expert Panel Member holds office on a part-time basis.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-628-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-628-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 628 Basis of appointment of FWC Members

629 Period of appointment of FWC Members
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.216
curation status: Proposed
has part: 629(1) Period of appointment of FWC Members
has part: 629(2) Period of appointment of FWC Members
has part: 629(3) Period of appointment of FWC Members
has part: 629(4) Period of appointment of FWC Members
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-629
schema version: 2

629(1) Period of appointment of FWC Members
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.216
note: Members of a prescribed State industrial authority hold office until resignation or termination.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-629-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 629 Period of appointment of FWC Members

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: until resignation or termination.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Holds office
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: (1) The President, a Vice President, a Deputy President or a Commissioner holds office until...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 629(1) Period of appointment of FWC Members

629(2) Period of appointment of FWC Members
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.216
note: A person from a prescribed State industrial authority may be appointed as Deputy President or Commissioner for a specified period.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-629-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 629 Period of appointment of FWC Members

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 629(2) Period of appointment of FWC Members

629(3) Period of appointment of FWC Members
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.216
note: Term of appointment for FWC Members
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-629-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 629 Period of appointment of FWC Members

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) the person ceases to be a member of the prescribed State industrial authority;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Holds office until specified period ends or ceases to be a member of prescribed State industrial authority
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: (a) the specified period ends;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Holds office until resignation or appointment termination under this Part
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: (c) the person resigns or the appointment is terminated under this Part.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 629(3) Period of appointment of FWC Members

629(4) Period of appointment of FWC Members
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.216
note: Expert Panel Member must hold office for a period not exceeding 5 years.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-629-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 629 Period of appointment of FWC Members

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Expert Panel Member must hold office for a period not exceeding 5 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Term of office is within a specified interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Expert Panel Member is appointed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Expert Panel Member must justify their reappointment eligibility
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Expert Panel Member must justify their reappointment eligibility
modality: Argumentation
operator: must justify
premise text: Expert Panel Member is eligible for reappointment

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Expert Panel Member must hold office for a period not exceeding 5 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expert Panel Member holds office
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: Expert Panel Member is appointed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Expert Panel Member must justify their reappointment eligibility
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Reappointment eligibility information is disseminated
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: Expert Panel Member is eligible for reappointment

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 629(4) Period of appointment of FWC Members

629A Status of the President
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.217
note: The President has the same status as a Judge of the Federal Court.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-629a
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The President is equal to a Judge of the Federal Court.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Same status
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: The President has the same status as a Judge of the Federal Court.

630 Appointment of a Judge not to affect tenure etc.
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.217
curation status: Proposed
has part: 630(1) Appointment of a Judge not to affect tenure etc.
has part: 630(2) Appointment of a Judge not to affect tenure etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-630
schema version: 2

630(1) Appointment of a Judge not to affect tenure etc.
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.217
note: The appointment of a Judge does not affect their tenure.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-630-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-630-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-630-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 630 Appointment of a Judge not to affect tenure etc.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-630-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: does not affect

630(2) Appointment of a Judge not to affect tenure etc.
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.217
note: The Judge's service as FWC Member is taken to be service as a Judge.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-630-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-630-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-630-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 630 Appointment of a Judge not to affect tenure etc.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-630-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: takes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-630-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 630(2) Appointment of a Judge not to affect tenure etc.

631 Dual federal and State appointments of Deputy Presidents or
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.217
curation status: Proposed
has part: 631(1) Dual federal and State appointments of Deputy Presidents or
has part: 631(2) Dual federal and State appointments of Deputy Presidents or
has part: 631(3) Dual federal and State appointments of Deputy Presidents or
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-631
schema version: 2

631(1) Dual federal and State appointments of Deputy Presidents or
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.217
note: Permits Deputy President or Commissioner to hold office in State industrial authority with President's approval.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-631-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-631-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-631-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 631 Dual federal and State appointments of Deputy Presidents or

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-631-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits action
modality: Deontic
operator: PERMITS

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-631-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 631(1) Dual federal and State appointments of Deputy Presidents or

631(2) Dual federal and State appointments of Deputy Presidents or
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.217
note: Allows a member of a prescribed State industrial authority to hold office as Deputy President or Commissioner.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-631-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-631-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-631-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 631 Dual federal and State appointments of Deputy Presidents or

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-631-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits simultaneous appointment and holding of office
modality: Deontic
operator: allows

631(3) Dual federal and State appointments of Deputy Presidents or
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.217
note: Subsections (1) and (2) have effect subject to any law of the relevant State.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-631-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-631-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-631-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 631 Dual federal and State appointments of Deputy Presidents or

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-631-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: relevant State
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Effect of subsections subject to State law
modality: Deontic
operator: Subjunctive Materia Medici
premise text: (1) and (2)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-631-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 631(3) Dual federal and State appointments of Deputy Presidents or

632 Dual federal and Territory appointments of Deputy Presidents
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.218
note: Deputy President or Commissioner may hold additional offices with President's approval.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-632-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-632
schema version: 2

633 Outside work of FWC Members
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.218
curation status: Proposed
has part: 633(1) Outside work of FWC Members
has part: 633(2) Outside work of FWC Members
has part: 633(3) Outside work of FWC Members
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-633
schema version: 2

633(1) Outside work of FWC Members
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.218
note: Prohibition on paid work outside office duties without President's approval
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-633-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-633-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-633-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 633 Outside work of FWC Members

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-633-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-633-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 633(1) Outside work of FWC Members

633(2) Outside work of FWC Members
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.218
note: No presidential approval required for Defence Force appointments.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-633-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-633-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-633-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 633 Outside work of FWC Members

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-633-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

633(3) Outside work of FWC Members
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.218
note: No paid work that conflicts with duties.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-633-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-633-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-633-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 633 Outside work of FWC Members

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-633-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

634 Oath or affirmation of office
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.218
note: Take an oath or affirmation before beginning office duties
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-634-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-634-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-634
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-634-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to take oath or affirmation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

635 Remuneration of the President
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.219
curation status: Proposed
has part: 635(1) Remuneration of the President
has part: 635(2) Remuneration of the President
has part: 635(3) Remuneration of the President
has part: 635(4) Remuneration of the President
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-635
schema version: 2

635(1) Remuneration of the President
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.219
note: The President must be paid a salary and travelling allowances.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-635-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-635-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-635-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 635 Remuneration of the President

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-635-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay the President a salary and travelling allowances.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-635-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 635(1) Remuneration of the President

635(2) Remuneration of the President
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.219
note: Must pay additional allowance if salary as Judge is less than as President
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-635-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-635-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-635-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 635 Remuneration of the President

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-635-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must pay additional allowance
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-635-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 635(2) Remuneration of the President

635(3) Remuneration of the President
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.219
note: The amount of the allowance is calculated as the difference between the Judge's salary and the President's salary.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-635-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-635-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-635-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 635 Remuneration of the President

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-635-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Calculates allowance amount
modality: Deontic
operator: =

635(4) Remuneration of the President
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.219
note: The President or former President must be paid a certain amount.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-635-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-635-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-635-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 635 Remuneration of the President

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-635-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay the President or former President.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-635-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 635(4) Remuneration of the President

636 Application of Judges’ Pensions Act to the President
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.219
note: The Judges' Pensions Act does not apply to the President if he/she was a member of a public sector superannuation scheme immediately before being appointed.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-636-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-636-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-636
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-636-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Judges' Pensions Act does not apply to the President.
modality: Deontic
operator: does not apply

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-636-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 636 Application of Judges’ Pensions Act to the President

637 Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
curation status: Proposed
has part: 637(1) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
has part: 637(2) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
has part: 637(3) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
has part: 637(4) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
has part: 637(5) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
has part: 637(6) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
has part: 637(7) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-637
schema version: 2

637(1) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
note: FWC Member must be paid remuneration determined by Remuneration Tribunal or prescribed by regulations.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-637-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 637 Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay remuneration
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 637(1) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President

637(2) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
note: FWC Member must be paid prescribed allowances.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-637-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 637 Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay prescribed allowances.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 637(2) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President

637(3) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
note: Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President is subject to the Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-637-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 637 Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 637(3) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President

637(4) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
note: No remuneration for Deputy President or Commissioner, except travel allowance.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-637-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 637 Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No remuneration for Deputy President or Commissioner.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 637(4) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President

637(5) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
note: FWC Member Judge must be paid additional allowance if salary as Judge is less than FWC Member salary
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-637-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 637 Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay additional allowance
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 637(5) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President

637(6) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
note: Determine FWC Member allowance amount based on Judge's salary
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-6-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-6-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-637-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 637 Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the salary that is payable to the FWC Member under subsection (1).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specify temporal interval for allowance calculation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <
premise text: (6) The amount of the allowance...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-6-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the salary that is payable to the FWC Member under subsection (1).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Justify allowance calculation method
modality: Argumentation
operator: !
premise text: (6) The amount of the allowance...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the salary that is payable to the FWC Member under subsection (1).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Justify allowance calculation method
modality: CogAI
operator: !
premise text: (6) The amount of the allowance...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the salary that is payable to the FWC Member under subsection (1).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (6) The amount of the allowance is...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the salary that is payable to the FWC Member under subsection (1).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Justify allowance calculation method
modality: Diffusion
operator: !
premise text: (6) The amount of the allowance...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 637(6) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President

637(7) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
note: Exemption for the President from this section
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-7-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-637-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 637 Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The President is exempted from this section
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The President is exempted from the remuneration of FWC members
modality: Deontic
operator: Exempts
premise text: This section does not apply to the President.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 637(7) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President

638 Remuneration of Deputy Presidents or Commissioners
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.221
curation status: Proposed
has part: 638(1) Remuneration of Deputy Presidents or Commissioners
has part: 638(2) Remuneration of Deputy Presidents or Commissioners
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-638
schema version: 2

638(1) Remuneration of Deputy Presidents or Commissioners
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.221
note: Agreement for part-time duties proportion
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-638-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-638-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 638 Remuneration of Deputy Presidents or Commissioners

638(2) Remuneration of Deputy Presidents or Commissioners
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.221
note: Variation of agreed proportion by written agreement between President and part-time member
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-638-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-638-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 638 Remuneration of Deputy Presidents or Commissioners

639 Leave of absence of FWC Members other than the President
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.222
curation status: Proposed
has part: 639(1) Leave of absence of FWC Members other than the President
has part: 639(2) Leave of absence of FWC Members other than the President
has part: 639(3) Leave of absence of FWC Members other than the President
has part: 639(4) Leave of absence of FWC Members other than the President
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-639
schema version: 2

639(1) Leave of absence of FWC Members other than the President
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.222
note: FWC Member has recreation leave entitlements determined by the Remuneration Tribunal.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-639-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-639-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-639-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 639 Leave of absence of FWC Members other than the President

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-639-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entitlement exists
modality: Deontic
operator: has

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-639-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 639(1) Leave of absence of FWC Members other than the President

639(2) Leave of absence of FWC Members other than the President
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.222
note: Grant of leave of absence by President
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-639-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-639-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 639 Leave of absence of FWC Members other than the President

639(3) Leave of absence of FWC Members other than the President
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.222
note: Consider past employment when determining leave of absence
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-639-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-639-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-639-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 639 Leave of absence of FWC Members other than the President

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-639-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Leave of absence determination
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Consider past employment
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
premise text: Past employment

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-639-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 639(3) Leave of absence of FWC Members other than the President

639(4) Leave of absence of FWC Members other than the President
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.222
note: This section does not apply to the President.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-639-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-639-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 639 Leave of absence of FWC Members other than the President

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-639-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 639(4) Leave of absence of FWC Members other than the President

640 Disclosure of interests by FWC Members other than the
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.222
curation status: Proposed
has part: 640(1) Disclosure of interests by FWC Members other than the
has part: 640(2) Disclosure of interests by FWC Members other than the
has part: 640(4) Disclosure of interests by FWC Members other than the
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-640
schema version: 2

640(1) Disclosure of interests by FWC Members other than the
type: Concept
description: Disclosure of interests
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.222
note: FWC Member must disclose interests that conflict with their functions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-640-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-640-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-640-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 640 Disclosure of interests by FWC Members other than the

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-640-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-640-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 640(1) Disclosure of interests by FWC Members other than the

640(2) Disclosure of interests by FWC Members other than the
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.222
note: Disclosure of potential conflict to certain persons
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-640-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-640-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-640-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 640 Disclosure of interests by FWC Members other than the

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-640-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must disclose
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

640(4) Disclosure of interests by FWC Members other than the
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.222
note: Prohibit FWC Member from dealing with matter if President considers conflict of interest.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-640-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-640-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-640-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 640 Disclosure of interests by FWC Members other than the

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-640-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC Member must not deal with matter
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: President gives direction to FWC Member

641 Termination of appointment on grounds of misbehaviour or
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.223
note: Governor-General may terminate appointment on grounds of misbehaviour or incapacity.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-641-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-641-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-641
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-641-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Governor-General may terminate appointment.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-641-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 641 Termination of appointment on grounds of misbehaviour or

641A Minister may handle complaints about FWC Members
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.223
note: Minister may handle complaints about FWC Members
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-641a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-641a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-641a
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-641a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister can handle complaints
modality: Deontic
operator: can

641B Modified application of the Judicial Misbehaviour and
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.224
curation status: Proposed
has part: 641B(1) Modified application of the Judicial Misbehaviour and
has part: 641B(2) Modified application of the Judicial Misbehaviour and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-641b
schema version: 2

641B(1) Modified application of the Judicial Misbehaviour and
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.224
note: Allow a Commission to be established by the Houses of Parliament to investigate and report on alleged misbehaviour or incapacity of an FWC Member.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-641b-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-641b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-641b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 641B Modified application of the Judicial Misbehaviour and

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-641b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allow a Commission to be established.
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-641b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 641B(1) Modified application of the Judicial Misbehaviour and

641B(2) Modified application of the Judicial Misbehaviour and
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.224
note: Modified application of the Judicial Misbehaviour and Incapacity (Parliamentary Commissions) Act 2012
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-641b-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-641b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-641b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 641B Modified application of the Judicial Misbehaviour and

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-641b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to apply the JMIPC Act as modified
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-641b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 641B(2) Modified application of the Judicial Misbehaviour and

642 Suspension on grounds of misbehaviour or incapacity
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.231
curation status: Proposed
has part: 642(1) Suspension on grounds of misbehaviour or incapacity
has part: 642(2) Suspension on grounds of misbehaviour or incapacity
has part: 642(3) Suspension on grounds of misbehaviour or incapacity
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-642
schema version: 2

642(1) Suspension on grounds of misbehaviour or incapacity
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.231
note: Governor-General may suspend FWC Member from office for misbehaviour or incapacity.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-642-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-642-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-642-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 642 Suspension on grounds of misbehaviour or incapacity

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-642-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-642-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 642(1) Suspension on grounds of misbehaviour or incapacity

642(2) Suspension on grounds of misbehaviour or incapacity
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.231
note: Minister must table a statement after suspension
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-642-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-642-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-642-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 642 Suspension on grounds of misbehaviour or incapacity

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-642-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister must table a statement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-642-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 642(2) Suspension on grounds of misbehaviour or incapacity

642(3) Suspension on grounds of misbehaviour or incapacity
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.231
note: A House of the Parliament may suspend a member within 15 sitting days.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-642-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-642-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-642-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 642 Suspension on grounds of misbehaviour or incapacity

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-642-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

643 Termination of appointment for bankruptcy, etc.
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.232
note: Termination of appointment for bankruptcy, etc.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-643-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-643-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-643-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-643
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-643-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Absence for 14 consecutive days
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: FWC Member is absent, except on leave of absence, for 14 consecutive days

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-643-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-643-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 643 Termination of appointment for bankruptcy, etc.

644 Termination of appointment for outside work
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.232
curation status: Proposed
has part: 644(1) Termination of appointment for outside work
has part: 644(2) Termination of appointment for outside work
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-644
schema version: 2

644(1) Termination of appointment for outside work
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.232
note: Termination of appointment for outside work
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-644-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-644-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-644-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 644 Termination of appointment for outside work

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-644-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Termination of appointment
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Engaging in paid work outside the duties of his or her office

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-644-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 644(1) Termination of appointment for outside work

644(2) Termination of appointment for outside work
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.232
note: Termination of appointment for outside work due to conflict with duties
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-644-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-644-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-644-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 644 Termination of appointment for outside work

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-644-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Termination required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of conflicting work
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Conflict with duties

645 Resignation of FWC Members
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.233
curation status: Proposed
has part: 645(1) Resignation of FWC Members
has part: 645(2) Resignation of FWC Members
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-645
schema version: 2

645(1) Resignation of FWC Members
type: Concept
description: written resignation
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.233
note: FWC member must provide written resignation to Governor-General upon resigning.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-645-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-645-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-645-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 645 Resignation of FWC Members

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-645-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide written resignation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-645-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 645(1) Resignation of FWC Members

645(2) Resignation of FWC Members
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.233
note: Resignation takes effect on specified day or immediately upon receipt by Governor-General.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-645-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-645-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-645-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 645 Resignation of FWC Members

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-645-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Resignation takes effect on specified day.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between intervals.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Later day specified in resignation.

646 Other terms and conditions of FWC Members
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.233
note: Terms and conditions of FWC Members
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-646-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-646
schema version: 2

647 Appointment of acting President and Vice President
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.233
note: Appointment of Vice President by Governor-General
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-647-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-647-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-647
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-647-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Governor-General may appoint Vice President
modality: Deontic
operator: may

648 Appointment of acting Deputy Presidents and Commissioners
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.234
curation status: Proposed
has part: 648(1) Appointment of acting Deputy Presidents and Commissioners
has part: 648(1A) Appointment of acting Deputy Presidents and Commissioners
has part: 648(2) Appointment of acting Deputy Presidents and Commissioners
has part: 648(3) Appointment of acting Deputy Presidents and Commissioners
has part: 648(4) Appointment of acting Deputy Presidents and Commissioners
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-648
schema version: 2

648(1) Appointment of acting Deputy Presidents and Commissioners
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.234
note: Governor-General may appoint a person to act as Deputy President for a specified period.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-648-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 648 Appointment of acting Deputy Presidents and Commissioners

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Governor-General has the power to appoint.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

648(1A) Appointment of acting Deputy Presidents and Commissioners
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.234
note: Governor-General may appoint a person to act as Commissioner for a specified period.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-1a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-648-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 648 Appointment of acting Deputy Presidents and Commissioners

648(2) Appointment of acting Deputy Presidents and Commissioners
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.234
note: The Minister must be satisfied that the appointment is necessary.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-648-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 648 Appointment of acting Deputy Presidents and Commissioners

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for satisfaction
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) Before the Governor-General appoints a person under subsection (1) or (1A), the Minister must be satisfied that the appointment is necessary to enable the FWC to perform its functions effectively.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Minister's obligation
modality: Argumentation
operator: must
premise text: (2) Before the Governor-General appoints a person under subsection (1) or (1A), the Minister must be satisfied that the appointment is necessary to enable the FWC to perform its functions effectively.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Minister's assertion of necessity
modality: CogAI
operator: asserts
premise text: (2) Before the Governor-General appoints a person under subsection (1) or (1A), the Minister must be satisfied that the appointment is necessary to enable the FWC to perform its functions effectively.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to satisfy
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Minister's satisfaction as a diffusion event
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (2) Before the Governor-General appoints a person under subsection (1) or (1A), the Minister must be satisfied that the appointment is necessary to enable the FWC to perform its functions effectively.

648(3) Appointment of acting Deputy Presidents and Commissioners
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.234
note: Anything done by or in relation to a person purporting to act under an appointment is not invalid.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-648-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 648 Appointment of acting Deputy Presidents and Commissioners

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Not invalid
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Validity of actions under appointments
modality: Deontic
operator: Validity
premise text: (3) Anything done by or in relation to a person purporting to act under an appointment is not invalid.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Permitted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Actions under appointments are permitted
modality: Deontic
operator: Permissibility
premise text: (3) Anything done by or in relation to a person purporting to act under an appointment is not invalid.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Valid
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Actions under appointments are valid
modality: Deontic
operator: Validity
premise text: (3) Anything done by or in relation to a person purporting to act under an appointment is not invalid.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Part of a recurring trace
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Actions under appointments are part of a recurring trace
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (3) Anything done by or in relation to a person purporting to act under an appointment is not invalid.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 648(3) Appointment of acting Deputy Presidents and Commissioners

648(4) Appointment of acting Deputy Presidents and Commissioners
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.234
note: No disqualification for age over 65
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-648-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 648 Appointment of acting Deputy Presidents and Commissioners

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: !

649 President to cooperate with prescribed State industrial
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.236
curation status: Proposed
has part: 649(1) President to cooperate with prescribed State industrial
has part: 649(2) President to cooperate with prescribed State industrial
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-649
schema version: 2

649(1) President to cooperate with prescribed State industrial
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.236
note: The President must cooperate with prescribed State industrial authorities.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-649-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-649-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-649-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 649 President to cooperate with prescribed State industrial

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-649-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to cooperate
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

649(2) President to cooperate with prescribed State industrial
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.236
note: The President may invite State industrial authorities to meet and discuss matters of mutual interest.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-649-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-649-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-649-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 649 President to cooperate with prescribed State industrial

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-649-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to invite State industrial authorities
modality: Deontic
operator: May

650 Provision of administrative support
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.236
note: The President may make an arrangement with a State industrial authority for administrative support.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-650-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-650
schema version: 2

651 Seals
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237
curation status: Proposed
has part: 651(1) Seals
has part: 651(2) Seals
has part: 651(3) Seals
has part: 651(4) Seals
has part: 651(5) Seals
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-651
schema version: 2

651(1) Seals
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237
note: The FWC must have a seal with the words “The Seal of the Fair Work Commission”.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-651-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 651 Seals

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to have a seal
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST HAVE

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 651(1) Seals

651(2) Seals
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237
note: Duplicate seals of the FWC to be maintained.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-651-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 651 Seals

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to maintain duplicate seals.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 651(2) Seals

651(3) Seals
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237
note: A document with a duplicate seal of the FWC is considered to have the original seal.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-651-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 651 Seals

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Seal ownership
modality: Deontic
operator: has

651(4) Seals
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237
note: Seal of FWC must not be used except as authorised by the President.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-651-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 651 Seals

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits use of seal without presidential authorisation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

651(5) Seals
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237
note: Courts, judges and persons acting judicially must take notice of the seal and presume it was sealed.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-651-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 651 Seals

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Courts must take notice
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to take notice of the seal
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The FWC seal is a standard

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 651(5) Seals

652 Annual report
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.238
curation status: Proposed
has part: 652(1) Annual report
has part: 652(1A) Annual report
has part: 652(2) Annual report
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-652
schema version: 2

652(1) Annual report
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.238
note: The President must prepare an annual report on the operations of the FWC.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-652-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-652-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-652-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 652 Annual report

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-652-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The President must prepare an annual report.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-652-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 652(1) Annual report

652(1A) Annual report
type: Concept
description: true
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.238
note: Annual report must be given to the Minister by a certain date.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-652-ss-1a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-652-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-652-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 652 Annual report

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-652-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide annual report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-652-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 652(1A) Annual report

652(2) Annual report
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.238
note: No disclosure of information for Privacy Act 1988 purposes required
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-652-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-652-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-652-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 652 Annual report

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-652-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No disclosure of information
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Privacy Act 1988

653 Reports about making enterprise agreements, individual
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.238
note: Review and research on enterprise agreements, flexibility arrangements, and National Employment Standards.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-653-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-653-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-653
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-653-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: General Manager must review developments and conduct research.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

653A Arrangements with the Federal Court and the Federal Circuit
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
note: General Manager may make written arrangement with Federal Court and Family Court of Australia for FWC to provide administrative support.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-653a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-653a
schema version: 2

654 President must provide certain information etc. to the Minister
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
curation status: Proposed
has part: 654(1) President must provide certain information etc. to the Minister
has part: 654(2) President must provide certain information etc. to the Minister
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-654
schema version: 2

654(1) President must provide certain information etc. to the Minister
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
note: The President must provide information to the Minister and Fair Work Ombudsman.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-654-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-654-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-654-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 654 President must provide certain information etc. to the Minister

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-654-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

654(2) President must provide certain information etc. to the Minister
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
note: The regulations may prescribe certain information about FWC decisions and notices.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-654-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-654-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-654-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 654 President must provide certain information etc. to the Minister

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-654-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulations may prescribe certain information
modality: Deontic
operator: may prescribe

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-654-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 654(2) President must provide certain information etc. to the Minister

655 Disclosure of information by the FWC
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
note: Disclosure of information by the FWC
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-655-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-655-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-655
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-655-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must disclose information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-655-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 655 Disclosure of information by the FWC

656 Establishment
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242
note: Establishment of General Manager at Fair Work Commission
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-656-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-656-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-656
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-656-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: General Manager appointment starts on [date]
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for General Manager appointment
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: General Manager appointment starts on establishment date

657 Functions and powers of the General Manager
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242
curation status: Proposed
has part: 657(1) Functions and powers of the General Manager
has part: 657(1A) Functions and powers of the General Manager
has part: 657(2) Functions and powers of the General Manager
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-657
schema version: 2

657(1) Functions and powers of the General Manager
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242
note: The General Manager must assist the President.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-657-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-657-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-657-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 657 Functions and powers of the General Manager

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-657-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The General Manager must assist the President.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide assistance
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-657-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 657(1) Functions and powers of the General Manager

657(1A) Functions and powers of the General Manager
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242
note: The General Manager has certain functions conferred upon him by law.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-657-ss-1a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-657-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-657-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 657 Functions and powers of the General Manager

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-657-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to perform function.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: General Manager has certain functions.
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: Function conferred by law.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-657-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 657(1A) Functions and powers of the General Manager

657(2) Functions and powers of the General Manager
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242
note: Power to perform functions
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-657-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-657-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-657-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 657 Functions and powers of the General Manager

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-657-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: General Manager has power
modality: Deontic
operator: has power
premise text: (2) The General Manager has power to do all things necessary or convenient...

658 Directions from the President
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242
note: The General Manager is not required to comply with a direction by the President.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-658-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-658-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-658
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-658-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses the General Manager's exemption from compliance
modality: Deontic
operator: !

659 General Manager not otherwise subject to direction
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.243
note: General Manager is subject to direction by or on behalf of the Commonwealth.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-659-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-659-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-659-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-659
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-659-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The General Manager is obligated.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Direction implies General Manager's obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: The Commonwealth directs the General Manager.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-659-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The General Manager is exempt.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No direction implies no obligation for the General Manager.
modality: Deontic
operator: NotImplication
premise text: The General Manager is not subject to direction.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-659-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 659 General Manager not otherwise subject to direction

660 Appointment of the General Manager
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.243
curation status: Proposed
has part: 660(1) Appointment of the General Manager
has part: 660(2) Appointment of the General Manager
has part: 660(3) Appointment of the General Manager
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-660
schema version: 2

660(1) Appointment of the General Manager
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.243
note: The General Manager must be appointed by the Governor-General.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-660-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 660 Appointment of the General Manager

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The appointment must be made
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The General Manager is to be appointed by the Governor-General

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 660(1) Appointment of the General Manager

660(2) Appointment of the General Manager
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.243
note: The General Manager holds office on a full-time basis.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-660-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 660 Appointment of the General Manager

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The General Manager's term is during his holding office.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: General Manager's term is during his holding office
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) The General Manager holds office on a full-time basis.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The General Manager has the capability of holding office.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: General Manager has the capability of holding office
modality: CogAI
operator: has
premise text: (2) The General Manager holds office on a full-time basis.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The General Manager must hold office on a full-time basis.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: General Manager has an obligation to hold office
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: (2) The General Manager holds office on a full-time basis.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The appointment of the General Manager implies that he must hold office.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Appointment of the General Manager implies that he must hold office
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implies
premise text: (2) The General Manager holds office on a full-time basis.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The General Manager has the property of being a public official.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: General Manager has the property of being a public official
modality: SHACL
operator: has
premise text: (2) The General Manager holds office on a full-time basis.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 660(2) Appointment of the General Manager

660(3) Appointment of the General Manager
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.243
note: General Manager must hold office for a specified period not exceeding 5 years.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-660-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 660 Appointment of the General Manager

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: General Manager holds office
modality: Deontic
operator: holds

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 660(3) Appointment of the General Manager

661 Remuneration of the General Manager
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.243
note: General Manager must be paid remuneration determined by the Remuneration Tribunal or prescribed by regulations.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-661-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-661-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-661
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-661-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: General Manager must be paid remuneration.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-661-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 661 Remuneration of the General Manager

662 Leave of absence of the General Manager
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.244
curation status: Proposed
has part: 662(1) Leave of absence of the General Manager
has part: 662(2) Leave of absence of the General Manager
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-662
schema version: 2

662(1) Leave of absence of the General Manager
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.244
note: Recreation leave entitlements determined by the Remuneration Tribunal.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-662-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-662-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-662-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 662 Leave of absence of the General Manager

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-662-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: General Manager has recreation leave entitlements.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

662(2) Leave of absence of the General Manager
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.244
note: Grant of leave of absence by Minister
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-662-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-662-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 662 Leave of absence of the General Manager

663 Outside work of the General Manager
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.244
note: No paid work outside office duties without President's approval.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-663-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-663-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-663
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-663-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: President's approval required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of paid work outside office duties.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: General Manager's duties

664 Disclosure of interests to the President
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.244
curation status: Proposed
has part: 664(1) Disclosure of interests to the President
has part: 664(2) Disclosure of interests to the President
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-664
schema version: 2

664(1) Disclosure of interests to the President
type: Concept
description: written notice
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.244
note: Disclosure of personal interests to the President
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-664-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-664-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-664-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 664 Disclosure of interests to the President

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-664-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to disclose personal interests
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

664(2) Disclosure of interests to the President
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.244
note: Duty to disclose interests does not apply to the General Manager.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-664-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-664-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-664-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 664 Disclosure of interests to the President

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-664-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: General Manager exempt from duty to disclose interests.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption

665 Resignation of the General Manager
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.244
curation status: Proposed
has part: 665(1) Resignation of the General Manager
has part: 665(2) Resignation of the General Manager
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-665
schema version: 2

665(1) Resignation of the General Manager
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.244
note: The General Manager must provide a written resignation to the Governor-General.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-665-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-665-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-665-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 665 Resignation of the General Manager

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-665-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The General Manager must provide a written resignation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

665(2) Resignation of the General Manager
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.244
note: Resignation takes effect on specified day or immediately upon receipt by Governor-General.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-665-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-665-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-665-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 665 Resignation of the General Manager

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-665-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Resignation takes effect on specified day or immediately upon receipt by Governor-General.
modality: Deontic
operator: takes effect

666 Termination of appointment of the General Manager
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.245
curation status: Proposed
has part: 666(1) Termination of appointment of the General Manager
has part: 666(2) Termination of appointment of the General Manager
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-666
schema version: 2

666(1) Termination of appointment of the General Manager
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.245
note: The Governor-General may terminate the appointment of the General Manager.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-666-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-666-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-666-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 666 Termination of appointment of the General Manager

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-666-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to terminate appointment
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-666-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 666(1) Termination of appointment of the General Manager

666(2) Termination of appointment of the General Manager
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.245
note: Termination of General Manager's appointment under certain conditions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-666-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-666-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-666-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 666 Termination of appointment of the General Manager

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-666-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the General Manager if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: General Manager's appointment terminated under specified conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: The Governor-General must terminate...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-666-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 666(2) Termination of appointment of the General Manager

667 Other terms and conditions of the General Manager
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.245
note: The General Manager's terms and conditions are determined by the Governor-General.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-667-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-667-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-667-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-667-logic-n3logic-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-667-logic-shacl-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-667-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-667
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-667-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: null
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Classifies temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: The General Manager holds office on the terms and conditions (if any) in relation to matters not covered by this Act that are determined by the Governor-General.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-667-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: null
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifies artificial intelligence application
modality: CogAI
operator: Applicable
premise text: The General Manager holds office on the terms and conditions (if any) in relation to matters not covered by this Act that are determined by the Governor-General.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-667-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies deontic type
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: The General Manager holds office on the terms and conditions (if any) in relation to matters not covered by this Act that are determined by the Governor-General.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-667-logic-n3logic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: null
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
logic summary: Classifies subject-predicate-object triple
modality: N3Logic
operator: Applicable
premise text: The General Manager holds office on the terms and conditions (if any) in relation to matters not covered by this Act that are determined by the Governor-General.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-667-logic-shacl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: null
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Classifies data schema
modality: SHACL
operator: Applicable
premise text: The General Manager holds office on the terms and conditions (if any) in relation to matters not covered by this Act that are determined by the Governor-General.

668 Appointment of acting General Manager
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.245
note: The Minister has an obligation to appoint a person as General Manager.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-668-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-668-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-668
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-668-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Minister has an obligation to appoint a person as General Manager.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation

669 Minister to consult the President
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246
note: Consultation requirement before determining terms and conditions under section 667.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-669-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-669-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-669
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-669-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consult the President
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Minister must consult the President before terms and conditions are determined under section 667.

670 Staff
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246
curation status: Proposed
has part: 670(1) Staff
has part: 670(2) Staff
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-670
schema version: 2

670(1) Staff
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246
note: Staff must be persons engaged under the Public Service Act 1999.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-670-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-670-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-670-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 670 Staff

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-670-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Staff must be persons engaged under the Public Service Act 1999.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-670-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 670(1) Staff

670(2) Staff
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246
note: Designates General Manager and staff as a Statutory Agency.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-670-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-670-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-670-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-670-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-670-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 670 Staff

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-670-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the General Manager and the staff of the FWC together constitute a Statutory Agency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency designation
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (2) For the purposes of the Public Service Act 1999:

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-670-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the General Manager is the Head of that Statutory Agency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency head designation
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (2) For the purposes of the Public Service Act 1999:

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-670-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the General Manager and the staff of the FWC together constitute a Statutory Agency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency formation
modality: Deontic
operator: constitutes
premise text: (2) For the purposes of the Public Service Act 1999:

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-670-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 670(2) Staff

671 Delegation by General Manager to staff
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246
curation status: Proposed
has part: 671(1) Delegation by General Manager to staff
has part: 671(2) Delegation by General Manager to staff
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-671
schema version: 2

671(1) Delegation by General Manager to staff
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246
note: Delegation of functions or powers to staff members
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-671-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-671-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 671 Delegation by General Manager to staff

671(2) Delegation by General Manager to staff
type: Concept
references: sec-34AA
references: sec-34AB
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246
note: Delegate must comply with General Manager's directions
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-671-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-671-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-671-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 671 Delegation by General Manager to staff

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-671-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply with directions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

672 Persons assisting the FWC
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.247
note: The FWC may be assisted by employees of Agencies, officers and employees of a State or Territory, or authorities of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-672-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-672-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-672
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-672-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to assist
modality: Deontic
operator: May

673 Consultants
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.247
note: The General Manager may engage persons having suitable qualifications and experience as consultants.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-673-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-673-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-673
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-673-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The General Manager may engage persons...
modality: Deontic
operator: May

673A Application of the finance law
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.247
note: List of persons considered a listed entity for the finance law
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-673a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-673a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-673a
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-673a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ListedEntity
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of listed entity
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: Finance law applies to the following group of persons

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-673a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 673A Application of the finance law

674 Offences in relation to the FWC
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.249
curation status: Proposed
has part: 674(1) Offences in relation to the FWC
has part: 674(2) Offences in relation to the FWC
has part: 674(3) Offences in relation to the FWC
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-674
schema version: 2

674(1) Offences in relation to the FWC
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.249
note: Insulting conduct towards FWC Members is prohibited.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-674-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 674 Offences in relation to the FWC

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Offence committed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of insulting conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Insulting language is used

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 674(1) Offences in relation to the FWC

674(2) Offences in relation to the FWC
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.249
note: Using insulting language towards an FWC Member is prohibited.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-674-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 674 Offences in relation to the FWC

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between insulting language and FWC Member's duties
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person uses insulting language towards another person; and (b) the person is reckless as to whether the language is insulting;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of insulting language
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) the person uses insulting language towards another person;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of reckless behavior towards FWC Members
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (c) the other person is an FWC Member performing functions, or exercising powers, as an FWC Member.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of interrupting FWC proceedings
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 12 months. Interrupting matters before the FWC

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring nature of FWC Member's duties and insulting language
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person uses insulting language towards another person; and (b) the person is reckless as to whether the language is insulting;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 674(2) Offences in relation to the FWC

674(3) Offences in relation to the FWC
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.249
note: Engaging in conduct that interrupts a matter before the FWC is an offence.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-674-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 674 Offences in relation to the FWC

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Conduct meets the condition of interrupting a matter before the FWC.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Meets
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct; and (b) the person’s conduct interrupts a matter before the FWC.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Conduct is recognized as interrupting a matter before the FWC by the FWC.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct; and (b) the person’s conduct interrupts a matter before the FWC.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to not engage in conduct that interrupts a matter before the FWC.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct; and (b) the person’s conduct interrupts a matter before the FWC.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Conduct spreads to other matters before the FWC.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spreads
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct; and (b) the person’s conduct interrupts a matter before the FWC.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Conduct repeats the pattern of interrupting a matter before the FWC.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct; and (b) the person’s conduct interrupts a matter before the FWC.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 674(3) Offences in relation to the FWC

675 Contravening an FWC order
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.251
curation status: Proposed
has part: 675(1) Contravening an FWC order
has part: 675(2) Contravening an FWC order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-675
schema version: 2

675(1) Contravening an FWC order
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.251
note: Engaging in conduct that contravenes an FWC order is an offence.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-675-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-675-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-675-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-675-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-675-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-675-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-675-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 675 Contravening an FWC order

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-675-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (d) the conduct contravenes...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relation between the making of an FWC order and its contravention.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if:

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-675-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conduct that contravenes an FWC order.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (a) the FWC has made an order under this Act;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-675-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on individuals to comply with FWC orders.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (a) the FWC has made an order under this Act;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-675-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or (ii) a term of the order applies to the person;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission to individuals to engage in conduct that does not contravene an FWC order.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (b) either of the following applies:

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-675-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (d) the conduct contravenes...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Establishes a recurring trace of FWC orders and their contravention.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if:

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-675-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 675(1) Contravening an FWC order

675(2) Contravening an FWC order
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.251
note: Exemptions from FWC order
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-675-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-675-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-675-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 675 Contravening an FWC order

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-675-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative permission
modality: Deontic
operator: !

676 Intimidation etc.
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.252
note: Threatening, intimidating, coercing or prejudicing another person because they have given information to the FWC is an offence.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-676-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-676-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-676
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-676-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits threatening, intimidating, coercing or prejudicing another person.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-676-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 676 Intimidation etc.

677 Offences in relation to attending before the FWC
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.253
curation status: Proposed
has part: 677(1) Offences in relation to attending before the FWC
has part: 677(2) Offences in relation to attending before the FWC
has part: 677(3) Offences in relation to attending before the FWC
has part: 677(4) Offences in relation to attending before the FWC
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-677
schema version: 2

677(1) Offences in relation to attending before the FWC
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.253
note: Failure to attend before FWC is an offence.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-677-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 677 Offences in relation to attending before the FWC

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to attend before FWC.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 677(1) Offences in relation to attending before the FWC

677(2) Offences in relation to attending before the FWC
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.253
note: Refusal to take oath or affirmation when required
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-677-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 677 Offences in relation to attending before the FWC

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is a temporal overlap between the refusal and the requirement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between refusal and requirement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The person refuses or fails to be sworn or to make an affirmation as required; and the FWC requires the person to take an oath or make an affirmation.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if they refuse or fail to be sworn or to make an affirmation as required.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of refusing to take oath or affirmation
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: The person refuses or fails to be sworn or to make an affirmation as required.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person has an obligation to take an oath or make an affirmation when required by the FWC.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to take oath or affirmation when required
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The FWC requires the person to take an oath or make an affirmation; and the person refuses or fails to be sworn or to make an affirmation as required.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is prohibited from failing to comply with the requirement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of failure to comply with requirement
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: The FWC requires the person to take an oath or make an affirmation; and the person refuses or fails to be sworn or to make an affirmation as required.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 677(2) Offences in relation to attending before the FWC

677(3) Offences in relation to attending before the FWC
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.253
note: Refusal to answer question or produce document when required by FWC.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-677-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 677 Offences in relation to attending before the FWC

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of refusing to answer question or produce document.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 677(3) Offences in relation to attending before the FWC

677(4) Offences in relation to attending before the FWC
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.253
note: Defendant bears evidential burden for reasonable excuse
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-4-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-677-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 677 Offences in relation to attending before the FWC

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defendant has an obligation to provide a reasonable excuse
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-4-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Defendant believes they have a reasonable excuse
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 677(4) Offences in relation to attending before the FWC

678 False or misleading evidence
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.254
curation status: Proposed
has part: 678(1) False or misleading evidence
has part: 678(2) False or misleading evidence
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-678
schema version: 2

678(1) False or misleading evidence
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.254
note: Giving false or misleading evidence in certain matters is an offence.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-678-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-678-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-678-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-678-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-678-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-678-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 678 False or misleading evidence

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-678-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The witness commits an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of giving false or misleading evidence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The witness gives sworn or affirmed evidence.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-678-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The witness commits an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of giving false or misleading evidence in certain matters.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The witness gives evidence as a witness in a matter before the FWC.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-678-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision specifies the conditions under which the conduct is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of inducing or coercing another person to give false or misleading evidence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The provision defines the conduct that is prohibited.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-678-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The witness commits an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of giving false or misleading evidence in matters before a person taking evidence on behalf of the FWC.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The witness gives evidence as a witness in a matter that the witness will start by application to the FWC.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-678-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 678(1) False or misleading evidence

678(2) False or misleading evidence
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.254
note: Inducing, threatening or intimidating a witness to give false evidence is prohibited.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-678-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-678-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-678-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 678 False or misleading evidence

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-678-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No false evidence shall be given.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of inducing, threatening or intimidating a witness.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The offender induces, threatens or intimidates the witness.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-678-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 678(2) False or misleading evidence

679 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.255
note: Promoting and monitoring compliance with this Act.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-679-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-679
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-679-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 679 Guide to this Part

680 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.255
note: Defines employee and employer terms
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-680-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-680-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-680
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-680-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key terms
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-680-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 680 Meanings of employee and employer

681 Establishment
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.256
note: Establishment of Fair Work Ombudsman
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-681-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-681
schema version: 2

682 Functions of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.256
curation status: Proposed
has part: 682(1) Functions of the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 682(1A) Functions of the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 682(2) Functions of the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 682(3) Functions of the Fair Work Ombudsman
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-682
schema version: 2

682(1) Functions of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.256
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman has various functions to promote compliance and enforce the Act.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-682-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-682-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-682-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 682 Functions of the Fair Work Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-682-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Fair Work Ombudsman has functions.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-682-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 682(1) Functions of the Fair Work Ombudsman

682(1A) Functions of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.256
note: Must have regard to guidelines and community outreach in multiple languages.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-682-ss-1a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-682-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-682-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 682 Functions of the Fair Work Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-682-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider guidelines and community outreach
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST HAVE REGARD TO
premise text: (1A) In performing functions under paragraph (1)(a)

682(2) Functions of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.256
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman must consult with the FWC in producing guidance material.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-682-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-682-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-682-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 682 Functions of the Fair Work Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-682-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consult
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-682-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 682(2) Functions of the Fair Work Ombudsman

682(3) Functions of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.256
note: Consultation with the National Workplace Relations Consultative Council before publishing a compliance and enforcement policy. The Fair Work Ombudsman has a duty to provide education, assistance and advice.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-682-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-682-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-682-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-682-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 682 Functions of the Fair Work Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-682-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to consult
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-682-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Fair Work Ombudsman has a duty.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-682-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 682(3) Functions of the Fair Work Ombudsman

683 Delegation by the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.258
curation status: Proposed
has part: 683(1) Delegation by the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 683(1A) Delegation by the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 683(1B) Delegation by the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 683(2) Delegation by the Fair Work Ombudsman
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-683
schema version: 2

683(1) Delegation by the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.258
note: Delegation of functions or powers to staff members or inspectors
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-683-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-683-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 683 Delegation by the Fair Work Ombudsman

683(1A) Delegation by the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.258
note: Delegation of functions or powers as an inspector is prohibited.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-683-ss-1a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-683-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-683-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 683 Delegation by the Fair Work Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-683-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...his or her functions or powers as an inspector.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of delegation
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman must not delegate...

683(1B) Delegation by the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.258
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman may delegate certain powers to SES employees.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-683-ss-1b-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-683-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-683-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 683 Delegation by the Fair Work Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-683-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting power
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-683-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 683(1B) Delegation by the Fair Work Ombudsman

683(2) Delegation by the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.258
note: Delegate must comply with directions of the Fair Work Ombudsman.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-683-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-683-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-683-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 683 Delegation by the Fair Work Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-683-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply with directions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

684 Directions from the Minister
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.258
curation status: Proposed
has part: 684(1) Directions from the Minister
has part: 684(2) Directions from the Minister
has part: 684(3) Directions from the Minister
has part: 684(4) Directions from the Minister
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-684
schema version: 2

684(1) Directions from the Minister
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.258
note: The Minister may give written directions to the Fair Work Ombudsman.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-684-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-684-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-684-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 684 Directions from the Minister

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-684-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by the Minister.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

684(2) Directions from the Minister
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.258
note: Direction must be of a general nature only.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-684-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-684-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-684-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 684 Directions from the Minister

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-684-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide direction of a general nature.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) The direction must be of a general nature only.

684(3) Directions from the Minister
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.258
note: Must comply with direction from the Minister
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-684-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-684-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-684-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 684 Directions from the Minister

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-684-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Fair Work Ombudsman must comply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Minister has given a direction

684(4) Directions from the Minister
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.258
note: Exemption from compliance with Minister's directions
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-684-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-684-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-684-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 684 Directions from the Minister

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-684-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excludes compliance with certain directions
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion

685 Minister may require reports
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.259
curation status: Proposed
has part: 685(1) Minister may require reports
has part: 685(2) Minister may require reports
has part: 685(3) Minister may require reports
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-685
schema version: 2

685(1) Minister may require reports
type: Concept
description: specified reports relating to the Fair Work Ombudsman’s functions
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.259
note: The Minister may require reports from the Fair Work Ombudsman.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-685-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-685-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-685-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 685 Minister may require reports

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-685-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

685(2) Minister may require reports
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.259
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman must comply with the direction.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-685-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-685-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-685-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 685 Minister may require reports

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-685-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman must comply with the direction.

685(3) Minister may require reports
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.259
note: Minister must provide reports
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-685-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-685-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-685-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 685 Minister may require reports

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-685-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

686 Annual report
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.259
note: No disclosure of information for Privacy Act 1988 purposes
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-686-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-686-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-686
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-686-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information for Privacy Act 1988 purposes
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-686-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 686 Annual report

687 Appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.260
curation status: Proposed
has part: 687(1) Appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 687(2) Appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 687(3) Appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 687(4) Appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-687
schema version: 2

687(1) Appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.260
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman must be appointed by the Governor-General.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-687-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 687 Appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to appoint
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 687(1) Appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman

687(2) Appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.260
note: Minister must be satisfied that person has suitable qualifications or experience and is of good character before appointing as Fair Work Ombudsman.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-687-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 687 Appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister MUST be satisfied that the person has suitable qualifications or experience; and is of good character.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must satisfy conditions before appointment.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) Before the Governor-General appoints a person as the Fair Work Ombudsman, the Minister...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 687(2) Appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman

687(3) Appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.260
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman must hold office on a full-time basis.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-687-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 687 Appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Argumentation
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: =>

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 687(3) Appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman

687(4) Appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.260
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman must hold office for a period not exceeding 5 years.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-687-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 687 Appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Holds office obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: holds

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 687(4) Appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman

688 Remuneration of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.260
curation status: Proposed
has part: 688(1) Remuneration of the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 688(2) Remuneration of the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 688(3) Remuneration of the Fair Work Ombudsman
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-688
schema version: 2

688(1) Remuneration of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.260
note: Fair Work Ombudsman must be paid remuneration determined by the Remuneration Tribunal or prescribed by regulations.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-688-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-688-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-688-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 688 Remuneration of the Fair Work Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-688-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay remuneration
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-688-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 688(1) Remuneration of the Fair Work Ombudsman

688(2) Remuneration of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.260
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman must be paid the allowances prescribed by regulations.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-688-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-688-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-688-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 688 Remuneration of the Fair Work Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-688-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay allowances
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-688-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 688(2) Remuneration of the Fair Work Ombudsman

688(3) Remuneration of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.260
note: Remuneration of the Fair Work Ombudsman subject to the Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-688-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-688-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-688-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 688 Remuneration of the Fair Work Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-688-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies section as an Undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: Section has effect subject to another Act

689 Leave of absence of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.260
curation status: Proposed
has part: 689(1) Leave of absence of the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 689(2) Leave of absence of the Fair Work Ombudsman
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-689
schema version: 2

689(1) Leave of absence of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.260
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman has recreation leave entitlements determined by the Remuneration Tribunal.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-689-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-689-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-689-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 689 Leave of absence of the Fair Work Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-689-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Fair Work Ombudsman has a duty to provide recreation leave entitlements.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-689-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 689(1) Leave of absence of the Fair Work Ombudsman

689(2) Leave of absence of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.260
note: Grant leave of absence on terms and conditions determined by the Minister.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-689-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-689-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-689-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 689 Leave of absence of the Fair Work Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-689-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to grant leave of absence
modality: Deontic
operator: grant

690 Outside work of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261
note: No paid work outside office duties without Minister's approval
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-690-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-690-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-690
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-690-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister's approval required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of paid work outside office duties
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Fair Work Ombudsman's duty

692 Resignation of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261
curation status: Proposed
has part: 692(1) Resignation of the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 692(2) Resignation of the Fair Work Ombudsman
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-692
schema version: 2

692(1) Resignation of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman must resign by giving the Governor-General a written resignation.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-692-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-692-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-692-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 692 Resignation of the Fair Work Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-692-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Fair Work Ombudsman must resign.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a mandatory obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

692(2) Resignation of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261
note: Resignation takes effect on specified day
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-692-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-692-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 692 Resignation of the Fair Work Ombudsman

693 Termination of appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261
curation status: Proposed
has part: 693(1) Termination of appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 693(2) Termination of appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-693
schema version: 2

693(1) Termination of appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261
note: The Governor-General may terminate the appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-693-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-693-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-693-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 693 Termination of appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-693-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to terminate appointment
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-693-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 693(1) Termination of appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman

693(2) Termination of appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261
note: Termination of appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman under certain conditions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-693-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-693-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-693-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-693-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-693-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 693 Termination of appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-693-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for 14 consecutive days or for 28 days in any 12 months
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Absence condition overlaps with bankruptcy
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (b) the Fair Work Ombudsman is absent...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-693-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of appointment termination
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) The Governor-General must terminate...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-693-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for 14 consecutive days or for 28 days in any 12 months
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Absence condition prohibits appointment termination
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (b) the Fair Work Ombudsman is absent...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-693-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 693(2) Termination of appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman

694 Other terms and conditions of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.262
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman holds office on terms and conditions determined by the Governor-General.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-694-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-694-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-694-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-694-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-694-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-694-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-694
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-694-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the temporal interval of the Fair Work Ombudsman's office as determined by the Governor-General
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman holds office on the terms and conditions (if any) in relation to matters not covered by this Act that are determined by the Governor-General.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-694-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes the Fair Work Ombudsman's office as a matter of terms and conditions
modality: CogAI
operator: Applicable
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman holds office on the terms and conditions (if any) in relation to matters not covered by this Act that are determined by the Governor-General.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-694-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Describes the Fair Work Ombudsman's office as a matter of terms and conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman holds office on the terms and conditions (if any) in relation to matters not covered by this Act that are determined by the Governor-General.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-694-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes the Fair Work Ombudsman's office as a matter of terms and conditions
modality: Diffusion
operator: Applicable
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman holds office on the terms and conditions (if any) in relation to matters not covered by this Act that are determined by the Governor-General.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-694-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes the temporal interval of the Fair Work Ombudsman's office as determined by the Governor-General
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman holds office on the terms and conditions (if any) in relation to matters not covered by this Act that are determined by the Governor-General.

695 Appointment of acting Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.262
curation status: Proposed
has part: 695(1) Appointment of acting Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 695(2) Appointment of acting Fair Work Ombudsman
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-695
schema version: 2

695(1) Appointment of acting Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.262
note: The Minister may appoint a person to act as the Fair Work Ombudsman.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-695-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-695-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-695-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 695 Appointment of acting Fair Work Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-695-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by the Minister
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-695-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 695(1) Appointment of acting Fair Work Ombudsman

695(2) Appointment of acting Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.262
note: Anything done by or in relation to a person purporting to act under an appointment is not invalid.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-695-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-695-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-695-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-695-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-695-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-695-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-695-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 695 Appointment of acting Fair Work Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-695-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The action relates to the appointment's temporal interval.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Relates to the temporal intervals of appointments.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: RelatesTo
premise text: (2) Anything done by or in relation to a person purporting to act under an appointment is not invalid.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-695-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The action is valid.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Validates the validity of actions taken under an appointment using cognitive AI.
modality: CogAI
operator: Validates
premise text: (2) Anything done by or in relation to a person purporting to act under an appointment is not invalid.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-695-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The action is valid.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Validates the validity of actions taken under an appointment.
modality: Deontic
operator: Validates
premise text: (2) Anything done by or in relation to a person purporting to act under an appointment is not invalid.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-695-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The action applies to the diffusion.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Applies to the diffusion of actions taken under an appointment.
modality: Diffusion
operator: AppliesTo
premise text: (2) Anything done by or in relation to a person purporting to act under an appointment is not invalid.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-695-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The action is valid over time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Validates the validity of actions taken under an appointment over time.
modality: LTL
operator: Validates
premise text: (2) Anything done by or in relation to a person purporting to act under an appointment is not invalid.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-695-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 695(2) Appointment of acting Fair Work Ombudsman

696 Establishment of the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.263
curation status: Proposed
has part: 696(1) Establishment of the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 696(2) Establishment of the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 696(3) Establishment of the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-696
schema version: 2

696(1) Establishment of the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.263
note: Establishes the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-696-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-696-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-696-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 696 Establishment of the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-696-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman is established.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Creates an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: establishes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-696-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 696(1) Establishment of the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman

696(2) Establishment of the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.263
note: List of entities composing the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-696-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-696-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 696 Establishment of the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman

696(3) Establishment of the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.263
note: Listed entity and accountable authority
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-696-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-696-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-696-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-696-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-696-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-696-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-696-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 696 Establishment of the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-696-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman is a listed entity during the period of the finance law;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) For the purposes of the finance law (within the meaning of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013):

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-696-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Fair Work Ombudsman is accountable for the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Inference from classification
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (3) For the purposes of the finance law (within the meaning of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013):

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-696-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman is a listed entity;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity classification
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (3) For the purposes of the finance law (within the meaning of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013):

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-696-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Fair Work Ombudsman is the accountable authority of the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Accountable authority classification
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (3) For the purposes of the finance law (within the meaning of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013):

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-696-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the following persons are officials of the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman:...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Official classification
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (3) For the purposes of the finance law (within the meaning of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013):

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-696-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 696(3) Establishment of the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman

697 Staff
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.264
curation status: Proposed
has part: 697(1) Staff
has part: 697(2) Staff
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-697
schema version: 2

697(1) Staff
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.264
note: Staff must be persons engaged under the Public Service Act 1999.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-697-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-697-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-697-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 697 Staff

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-697-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Staff must be persons engaged under the Public Service Act 1999.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-697-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 697(1) Staff

697(2) Staff
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.264
note: Designates Fair Work Ombudsman as Head of Statutory Agency
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-697-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-697-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-697-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-697-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-697-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-697-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 697 Staff

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-697-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Fair Work Ombudsman is the Head of that Statutory Agency during the period of its designation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between agency designation and commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) For the purposes of the Public Service Act 1999:

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-697-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Fair Work Ombudsman is the Head of that Statutory Agency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency designation
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (2) For the purposes of the Public Service Act 1999:

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-697-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Fair Work Ombudsman is the Head of that Statutory Agency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency designation
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (b) the Fair Work Ombudsman is the Head of that Statutory Agency.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-697-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Fair Work Ombudsman and the staff of the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman are a Statutory Agency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency classification
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (a) the Fair Work Ombudsman and the staff of the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman together constitute a Statutory Agency;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-697-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 697(2) Staff

698 Persons assisting the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.264
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman may be assisted by employees of certain agencies and authorities.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-698-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-698-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-698-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-698-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-698-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-698-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-698
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-698-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between the services provided by agencies and authorities and the Fair Work Ombudsman's functions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: whose services are made available to the Fair Work Ombudsman in connection with the performance of any of his or her functions.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-698-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of assistance by agencies and authorities on the Fair Work Ombudsman's functions
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman may also be assisted...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-698-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Inference of assistance by agencies and authorities based on the Fair Work Ombudsman's functions
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman may also be assisted...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-698-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to assist the Fair Work Ombudsman
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman may also be assisted...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-698-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagated information about assistance by agencies and authorities to the Fair Work Ombudsman's functions
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: For example, State or Territory employees could be made available...

699 Consultants
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.264
note: Engage persons with suitable qualifications and experience as consultants.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-699-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-699-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-699
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-699-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to engage consultants
modality: Deontic
operator: May

700 Appointment of Fair Work Inspectors
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.265
curation status: Proposed
has part: 700(1) Appointment of Fair Work Inspectors
has part: 700(2) Appointment of Fair Work Inspectors
has part: 700(3) Appointment of Fair Work Inspectors
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-700
schema version: 2

700(1) Appointment of Fair Work Inspectors
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.265
note: Appointment of Fair Work Inspectors
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-700-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-700-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-700-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 700 Appointment of Fair Work Inspectors

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-700-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: may

700(2) Appointment of Fair Work Inspectors
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.265
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman must appoint a person as a Fair Work Inspector if satisfied with their character.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-700-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-700-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-700-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 700 Appointment of Fair Work Inspectors

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-700-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person as a Fair Work Inspector
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman must appoint...

700(3) Appointment of Fair Work Inspectors
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.265
note: Fair Work Inspector must be appointed for a period not exceeding 4 years.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-700-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-700-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-700-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 700 Appointment of Fair Work Inspectors

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-700-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be appointed
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-700-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 700(3) Appointment of Fair Work Inspectors

701 Fair Work Ombudsman is a Fair Work Inspector
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.265
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman is a Fair Work Inspector.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-701-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-701-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-701
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-701-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Fair Work Ombudsman is a Fair Work Inspector.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Assertion of existence
modality: Deontic
operator: is

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-701-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 701 Fair Work Ombudsman is a Fair Work Inspector

702 Identity cards
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.265
curation status: Proposed
has part: 702(1) Identity cards
has part: 702(2) Identity cards
has part: 702(3) Identity cards
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-702
schema version: 2

702(1) Identity cards
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.265
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman must issue an identity card to an inspector appointed under section 700.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-702-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-702-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-702-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 702 Identity cards

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-702-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to issue an identity card
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-702-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 702(1) Identity cards

702(2) Identity cards
type: Concept
description: Form of identity card
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.265
note: Minister must issue identity card to Fair Work Ombudsman.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-702-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-702-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-702-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 702 Identity cards

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-702-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to issue identity card
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-702-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 702(2) Identity cards

702(3) Identity cards
type: Concept
description: true
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.265
note: Identity card must be in approved form and contain recent photograph of inspector.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-702-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-702-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-702-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-702-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 702 Identity cards

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-702-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be in approved form
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-702-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Contain recent photograph of inspector
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTAIN

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-702-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 702(3) Identity cards

703 Conditions and restrictions on functions and powers
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.266
curation status: Proposed
has part: 703(1) Conditions and restrictions on functions and powers
has part: 703(2) Conditions and restrictions on functions and powers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-703
schema version: 2

703(1) Conditions and restrictions on functions and powers
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.266
note: Conditions and restrictions on functions and powers
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-703-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-703-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-703-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 703 Conditions and restrictions on functions and powers

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-703-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has condition
modality: Deontic
operator: hasCondition

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-703-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 703(1) Conditions and restrictions on functions and powers

703(2) Conditions and restrictions on functions and powers
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.266
note: Power to apply for FWO notice under section 712AA and give FWO notice under section 712AD are not compliance powers.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-703-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-703-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-703-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-703-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-703-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 703 Conditions and restrictions on functions and powers

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-703-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: These actions occur during the period when these powers are not compliance powers.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between prohibition and other provisions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) To avoid doubt, the power to apply for the issue of an FWO notice under section 712AA and the power to give an FWO notice under section 712AD are not compliance powers.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-703-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: These actions are not compliance powers.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits application for FWO notice under section 712AA and giving FWO notice under section 712AD.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (2) To avoid doubt, the power to apply for the issue of an FWO notice under section 712AA and the power to give an FWO notice under section 712AD are not compliance powers.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-703-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: These actions occur during the period when these powers are not compliance powers.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between prohibition and other provisions.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (2) To avoid doubt, the power to apply for the issue of an FWO notice under section 712AA and the power to give an FWO notice under section 712AD are not compliance powers.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-703-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 703(2) Conditions and restrictions on functions and powers

704 General directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267
curation status: Proposed
has part: 704(1) General directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 704(2) General directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 704(3) General directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-704
schema version: 2

704(1) General directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman may give a written direction to inspectors.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-704-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-704-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-704-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 704 General directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-704-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

704(2) General directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267
note: General directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman must be of a general nature only.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-704-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-704-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-704-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 704 General directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-704-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide general directions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

704(3) General directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267
note: Inspector must comply with direction.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-704-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-704-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-704-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-704-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-704-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 704 General directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-704-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An inspector BEFORER the direction MUST comply.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Inspector's compliance is before the direction
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEFORE
premise text: (3) An inspector must comply with the direction.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-704-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If an inspector MUST comply, then the direction exists.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Compliance implies direction
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (3) An inspector must comply with the direction.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-704-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An inspector MUST comply with the direction.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) An inspector must comply with the direction.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-704-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 704(3) General directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman

705 Particular directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267
curation status: Proposed
has part: 705(1) Particular directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 705(2) Particular directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 705(3) Particular directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-705
schema version: 2

705(1) Particular directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman may give a direction to an inspector.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-705-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-705-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-705-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 705 Particular directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-705-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

705(2) Particular directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267
note: Inspector must comply with direction.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-705-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-705-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-705-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-705-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 705 Particular directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-705-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The inspector's compliance IS BEFORE the direction.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Inspector's compliance before direction
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEFORE
premise text: (2) The inspector must comply with the direction.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-705-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The inspector MUST comply with the direction.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) The inspector must comply with the direction.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-705-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 705(2) Particular directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman

705(3) Particular directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267
note: Direction in writing is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-705-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-705-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-705-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 705 Particular directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-705-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The direction is not a legislative instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Rejection of legislative instrument status
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (3) If a direction is in writing, the direction is not a legislative instrument.

706 Purpose for which powers of inspectors may be exercised
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267
note: Inspector may exercise compliance powers for specified purposes.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-706-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-706-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-706
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-706-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inspector can exercise compliance powers.
modality: Deontic
operator: can

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-706-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 706 Purpose for which powers of inspectors may be exercised

707 When powers of inspectors may be exercised
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.268
note: Inspector may exercise compliance powers at any time during working hours or when necessary for compliance purposes.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707-logic-alleninterval-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-707
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Compliance powers can be exercised during working hours or at any other time.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Inspector can use argumentation to justify exercising compliance powers.
modality: Argumentation
operator: can

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inspector can exercise compliance powers.
modality: Deontic
operator: can

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Inspector must believe it is necessary to exercise compliance powers.
modality: Epistemic
operator: must believe

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Compliance powers can be exercised until the inspector reasonably believes it is no longer necessary.
modality: LTL
operator: until

707A Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.268
curation status: Proposed
has part: 707A(1) Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and
has part: 707A(2) Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and
has part: 707A(3) Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-707a
schema version: 2

707A(1) Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.268
note: Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and its staff
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-707a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 707A Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman is prohibited
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and its staff
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman has a duty to perform its functions

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Hindering or obstructing is prohibited
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and its staff
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The text states that a person must not hinder or obstruct the Fair Work Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Hindering or obstructing implies a violation of a duty
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implication of hindering or obstructing on a person's actions
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
premise text: If a person hinders or obstructs the Fair Work Ombudsman, they must not perform their duties

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 707A(1) Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and

707A(2) Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.268
note: Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman is not an offense if the person has a reasonable excuse.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-707a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 707A Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No offense is committed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemption from obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: The person has a reasonable excuse.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The excuse is valid.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Knowledge of the reasonableness of the excuse
modality: Epistemic
operator: knowledge
premise text: The person knows they have a reasonable excuse.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 707A(2) Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and

707A(3) Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.268
note: Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and its delegates is prohibited.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-707a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 707A Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal intervals of hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and its delegates overlaps with the power to enter premises.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between the power to enter premises and hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and its delegates.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The power to enter premises is a temporal interval.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Fair Work Ombudsman is recognized as a cogent AI entity.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of the Fair Work Ombudsman as a cogent AI entity.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman is an agent of the State.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and its delegates is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and its delegates.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman has the power to enter premises.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Fair Work Ombudsman is a state entity.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of the Fair Work Ombudsman as a state entity.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman is an agent of the State.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The diffusion of the prohibition on hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and its delegates is related to the power to enter premises.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of the prohibition on hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and its delegates.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman has the power to enter premises.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval of hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and its delegates contains the power to enter premises.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal containment between the power to enter premises and hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and its delegates.
modality: LTL
operator: Contains
premise text: The power to enter premises is a temporal interval.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 707A(3) Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and

708 Power of inspectors to enter premises
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.269
curation status: Proposed
has part: 708(1) Power of inspectors to enter premises
has part: 708(2) Power of inspectors to enter premises
has part: 708(3) Power of inspectors to enter premises
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-708
schema version: 2

708(1) Power of inspectors to enter premises
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.269
note: Inspectors may enter premises without force for compliance purposes.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-708-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-708-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-708-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 708 Power of inspectors to enter premises

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-708-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits inspectors to enter premises
modality: Deontic
operator: May

708(2) Power of inspectors to enter premises
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.269
note: Inspection of premises with residential use is prohibited unless reasonable belief in work being performed.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-708-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-708-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-708-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 708 Power of inspectors to enter premises

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-708-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Inspection is not allowed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of inspection
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Inspector's entry is prohibited

708(3) Power of inspectors to enter premises
type: Concept
description: Identity card
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.269
note: Must show identity card upon request
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-708-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-708-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-708-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 708 Power of inspectors to enter premises

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-708-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to show identity card
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

709 Powers of inspectors while on premises
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.269
note: Inspector may exercise certain powers while on premises.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-709-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-709
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-709-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 709 Powers of inspectors while on premises

710 Persons assisting inspectors
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.270
curation status: Proposed
has part: 710(1) Persons assisting inspectors
has part: 710(2) Persons assisting inspectors
has part: 710(3) Persons assisting inspectors
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-710
schema version: 2

710(1) Persons assisting inspectors
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.270
note: Assistant may accompany inspector under certain conditions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-710-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-710-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-710-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 710 Persons assisting inspectors

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-710-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The assistant may accompany the inspector.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to assist inspector
modality: Deontic
operator: May
premise text: (a) the assistance is necessary and reasonable; (b) the assistant has suitable qualifications and experience

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-710-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 710(1) Persons assisting inspectors

710(2) Persons assisting inspectors
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.270
note: Assistant must assist inspector within power limits.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-710-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-710-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-710-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 710 Persons assisting inspectors

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-710-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Assistant must do such things as required.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Assistant has a duty to assist the inspector.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Inspector requires assistance.

710(3) Persons assisting inspectors
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.270
note: Anything done by an assistant is taken for all purposes to have been done by the inspector.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-710-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-710-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-710-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 710 Persons assisting inspectors

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-710-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to perform actions as if done by the inspector.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

711 Power to ask for person’s name and address
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.271
curation status: Proposed
has part: 711(1) Power to ask for person’s name and address
has part: 711(2) Power to ask for person’s name and address
has part: 711(3) Power to ask for person’s name and address
has part: 711(4) Power to ask for person’s name and address
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-711
schema version: 2

711(1) Power to ask for person’s name and address
type: Concept
description: true
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.271
note: Inspector may require person to provide name and address if inspector reasonably believes contravention has occurred.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-711-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 711 Power to ask for person’s name and address

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inspector may require person to provide information.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 711(1) Power to ask for person’s name and address

711(2) Power to ask for person’s name and address
type: Concept
description: true
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.271
note: Inspector may require person to provide evidence of correct name or address. Inspector must ask for person's name and address if advised of civil remedy provision
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-711-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 711 Power to ask for person’s name and address

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must ask for person's name and address
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 711(2) Power to ask for person’s name and address

711(3) Power to ask for person’s name and address
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.271
note: Must comply with a requirement under subsection (1) or
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-711-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 711 Power to ask for person’s name and address

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply with a requirement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 711(3) Power to ask for person’s name and address

711(4) Power to ask for person’s name and address
type: Concept
description: Name and Address
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.271
note: No reasonable excuse is required to provide name and address.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-711-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 711 Power to ask for person’s name and address

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No reasonable excuse is required.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory provision
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 711(4) Power to ask for person’s name and address

712 Power to require persons to produce records or documents
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.271
curation status: Proposed
has part: 712(1) Power to require persons to produce records or documents
has part: 712(2) Power to require persons to produce records or documents
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712
schema version: 2

712(1) Power to require persons to produce records or documents
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.271
note: Inspector may require a person to produce records or documents.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 712 Power to require persons to produce records or documents

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide records or documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: require

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 712(1) Power to require persons to produce records or documents

712(2) Power to require persons to produce records or documents
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.271
note: Notice must be in writing, served on person, and require production of record or document within a specified period.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 712 Power to require persons to produce records or documents

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to produce records or documents
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 712(2) Power to require persons to produce records or documents

712A Minister may nominate ART President or Deputy President to
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.272
curation status: Proposed
has part: 712A(1) Minister may nominate ART President or Deputy President to
has part: 712A(2) Minister may nominate ART President or Deputy President to
has part: 712A(3) Minister may nominate ART President or Deputy President to
has part: 712A(4) Minister may nominate ART President or Deputy President to
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712a
schema version: 2

712A(1) Minister may nominate ART President or Deputy President to
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.272
note: Minister may nominate ART President or Deputy President to issue written notices.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 712A Minister may nominate ART President or Deputy President to

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

712A(2) Minister may nominate ART President or Deputy President to
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.272
note: Minister must nominate ART President or Deputy President with consent from Judge.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 712A Minister may nominate ART President or Deputy President to

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has a duty to nominate ART President or Deputy President.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

712A(3) Minister may nominate ART President or Deputy President to
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.272
note: Nomination ceases to have effect under certain conditions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 712A Minister may nominate ART President or Deputy President to

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The nomination ceases to have effect during the time period of either condition.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal overlap between conditions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (a) and (b)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Nomination ceases to have effect.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the nomination from taking effect.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (a) or (b)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister's power to withdraw the nomination diffuses throughout the system.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes propagation of the prohibition.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Minister

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The nomination ceases to have effect until either condition is met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between conditions.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (a) or (b)

712A(4) Minister may nominate ART President or Deputy President to
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.272
note: Protection and immunity for nominated ART President or Deputy President
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 712A Minister may nominate ART President or Deputy President to

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the same protection and immunity as a Justice of the High Court has...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Protection and immunity
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: (4) A nominated ART President or Deputy President has...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 712A(4) Minister may nominate ART President or Deputy President to

712AA Fair Work Ombudsman may apply to nominated ART
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.272
curation status: Proposed
has part: 712AA(1) Fair Work Ombudsman may apply to nominated ART
has part: 712AA(2) Fair Work Ombudsman may apply to nominated ART
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712aa
schema version: 2

712AA(1) Fair Work Ombudsman may apply to nominated ART
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.272
note: Fair Work Ombudsman may apply to nominated ART President or Deputy President for the issue of an FWO notice.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712aa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 712AA Fair Work Ombudsman may apply to nominated ART

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to apply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

712AA(2) Fair Work Ombudsman may apply to nominated ART
type: Concept
description: true
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.272
note: Must provide information to Fair Work Ombudsman or staff member.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712aa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 712AA Fair Work Ombudsman may apply to nominated ART

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 712AA(2) Fair Work Ombudsman may apply to nominated ART

712AB Issue of FWO notice
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.275
note: Issue FWO notice if certain conditions met
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ab-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ab-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ab-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ab-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ab-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712ab
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ab-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the inspector must have commenced the investigation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Inspector must have commenced investigation before issuing FWO notice
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (a) that an inspector has commenced the investigation (or investigations) to which the application relates;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ab-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must issue the FWO notice if the conditions are met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must issue FWO notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) A nominated ART President or Deputy President to whom an application for an FWO notice has been made...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ab-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the state must ensure the FWO notice is issued.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State must ensure FWO notice is issued if conditions met
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (f) any other matter prescribed by the regulations.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ab-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the inspector must have tried other methods.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Inspector must have tried other methods before issuing FWO notice
modality: LTL
operator: >=
premise text: (c) that any other method of obtaining the information, documents or evidence: (i) has been attempted and has been unsuccessful;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ab-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 712AB Issue of FWO notice

712AC Form and content of FWO notice
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.276
note: FWO notice must comply with specified requirements
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ac-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ac-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712ac
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ac-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWO notice must comply with regulations
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information and documents
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Regulations prescribe requirements

712AD Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.277
curation status: Proposed
has part: 712AD(1) Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in
has part: 712AD(2) Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in
has part: 712AD(3) Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in
has part: 712AD(4) Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in
has part: 712AD(5) Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in
has part: 712AD(6) Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712ad
schema version: 2

712AD(1) Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.277
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman must give a notice to a person
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712ad-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 712AD Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Give notice to person
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: FWO notice issued

712AD(2) Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.277
note: Notice ceases to have effect after 3 months if not given within that time.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712ad-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 712AD Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notice ceases to have effect
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notice ceases to have effect
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
premise text: FWO notice not given within 3 months

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 712AD(2) Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in

712AD(3) Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in
type: Concept
description: true
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.277
note: Must provide notice to person within 14 days of FWO notice.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712ad-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 712AD Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice within specified time frame.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

712AD(4) Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.277
note: Notice to person of a later time
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712ad-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 712AD Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May give notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

712AD(5) Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.277
note: Notice period for FWO action must be at least 14 days after notice is given.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712ad-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 712AD Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notice period must be at least 14 days after FWO notice is given
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between notice and FWO action
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: FWO notice is given to the person

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notice period must be at least 14 days
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice period
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: FWO must give notice

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Person must receive notice within a certain time period
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
premise text: FWO gives notice to the person

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notice period must be at least 14 days after FWO notice is given
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation between notice and FWO action
modality: LTL
operator: >=
premise text: FWO notice is given to the person

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 712AD(5) Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in

712AD(6) Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.277
note: FWO notice has effect as if the later time were the specified time.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-6-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712ad-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 712AD Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: specified time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWO notice has effect
modality: Deontic
operator: has effect as
premise text: later time

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 712AD(6) Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in

712AE Conduct of examination
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278
curation status: Proposed
has part: 712AE(1) Conduct of examination
has part: 712AE(2) Conduct of examination
has part: 712AE(3) Conduct of examination
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712ae
schema version: 2

712AE(1) Conduct of examination
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278
note: Right to be represented by a lawyer during examination.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ae-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712ae-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 712AE Conduct of examination

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right to representation
modality: Deontic
operator: Can

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ae-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 712AE(1) Conduct of examination

712AE(2) Conduct of examination
type: Concept
description: Information or answers
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278
note: Require information or answers to be verified by oath or affirmation.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ae-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ae-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ae-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ae-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ae-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712ae-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 712AE Conduct of examination

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ae-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the Fair Work Ombudsman and staff.
modality: Deontic
operator: require

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ae-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the Fair Work Ombudsman and staff to administer oaths or affirmations.
modality: Deontic
operator: administer

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ae-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Verifies information or answers for accuracy.
modality: Epistemic
operator: verify

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ae-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Traces the origin of information or answers.
modality: LTL
operator: trace

712AE(3) Conduct of examination
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278
note: The oath or affirmation must be true.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ae-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ae-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712ae-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 712AE Conduct of examination

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ae-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to tell the truth
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ae-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 712AE(3) Conduct of examination

712B Requirement to comply with FWO notice
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278
curation status: Proposed
has part: 712B(1) Requirement to comply with FWO notice
has part: 712B(2) Requirement to comply with FWO notice
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712b
schema version: 2

712B(1) Requirement to comply with FWO notice
type: Concept
description: Information or document, answer questions, take oath/affirmation
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278
note: Must comply with FWO notice requirements.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712b-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 712B Requirement to comply with FWO notice

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply with FWO notice requirements.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 712B(1) Requirement to comply with FWO notice

712B(2) Requirement to comply with FWO notice
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278
note: Exemption from compliance with FWO notice
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712b-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 712B Requirement to comply with FWO notice

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts persons from complying with the requirement
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 712B(2) Requirement to comply with FWO notice

712C Payment for expenses incurred in attending as required by an
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.279
curation status: Proposed
has part: 712C(1) Payment for expenses incurred in attending as required by an
has part: 712C(2) Payment for expenses incurred in attending as required by an
has part: 712C(3) Payment for expenses incurred in attending as required by an
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712c
schema version: 2

712C(1) Payment for expenses incurred in attending as required by an
type: Concept
description: Reasonable expenses (including legal expenses)
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.279
note: Entitlement to payment for expenses incurred attending as required
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 712C Payment for expenses incurred in attending as required by an

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entitlement to payment
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight

712C(2) Payment for expenses incurred in attending as required by an
type: Concept
description: sufficient evidence to establish that the person incurred the expenses
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.279
note: Payment for expenses incurred in attending as required is conditional on application and evidence.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 712C Payment for expenses incurred in attending as required by an

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for application and evidence submission
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: The person must apply, in writing, to the Fair Work Ombudsman for payment of the expenses within 3 months after the attendance.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Conditional payment based on application and evidence
modality: CogAI
operator: if-then
premise text: The person is not entitled to be paid for expenses under this section unless the person applies, in writing, to the Fair Work Ombudsman for payment of the expenses within 3 months after the attendance.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Payment for expenses incurred in attending as required unless application and evidence are provided.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional payment obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Conditional payment based on application and evidence
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
premise text: The person is not entitled to be paid for expenses under this section unless the person applies, in writing, to the Fair Work Ombudsman for payment of the expenses within 3 months after the attendance.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for application and evidence submission
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: The person must apply, in writing, to the Fair Work Ombudsman for payment of the expenses within 3 months after the attendance.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 712C(2) Payment for expenses incurred in attending as required by an

712C(3) Payment for expenses incurred in attending as required by an
type: Concept
description: Form and information
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.279
note: Application must be in prescribed form and include required information.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 712C Payment for expenses incurred in attending as required by an

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prescribed form requirement
modality: Deontic
operator: mustBeIn

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 712C(3) Payment for expenses incurred in attending as required by an

712D Protection from liability relating to FWO notices
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.279
note: Protection from liability for providing information under FWO notices
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712d-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712d-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712d
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Immunity from liability
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information under FWO notices
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Good faith provision of information

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712d-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 712D Protection from liability relating to FWO notices

712E Fair Work Ombudsman must notify Commonwealth
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.279
note: Notify Commonwealth of FWO notice issue
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712e-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712e-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712e
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify Commonwealth
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

712F Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
curation status: Proposed
has part: 712F(1) Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
has part: 712F(2) Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
has part: 712F(3) Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
has part: 712F(4) Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
has part: 712F(5) Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
has part: 712F(6) Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
has part: 712F(7) Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712f
schema version: 2

712F(1) Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
type: Concept
description: True
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
note: Must provide report, video recording, and transcript after examination completion.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712f-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 712F Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide report, video recording, and transcript.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

712F(2) Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
note: Report must include specific information
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712f-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 712F Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

712F(3) Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
note: Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712f-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 712F Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to review and report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

712F(4) Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
note: The Commonwealth Ombudsman has the power to review under this section as if it were an investigation by the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1976.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712f-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 712F Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commonwealth Ombudsman has the power to review under this section.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 712F(4) Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman

712F(5) Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
note: The Commonwealth Ombudsman must report to Parliament.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712f-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 712F Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commonwealth Ombudsman must report to Parliament.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

712F(6) Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
note: Commonwealth Ombudsman must prepare and present a report to Parliament about examinations conducted during each quarter.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-6-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712f-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 712F Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to prepare and present a report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

712F(7) Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
note: The Commonwealth Ombudsman must prepare and present reports to Parliament.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-7-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-712f-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 712F Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

713 Self-incrimination etc.
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.282
curation status: Proposed
has part: 713(1) Self-incrimination etc.
has part: 713(2) Self-incrimination etc.
has part: 713(3) Self-incrimination etc.
has part: 713(4) Self-incrimination etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-713
schema version: 2

713(1) Self-incrimination etc.
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.282
note: No excuse from providing information or answering questions under certain conditions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-713-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 713 Self-incrimination etc.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information or answer questions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 713(1) Self-incrimination etc.

713(2) Self-incrimination etc.
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.282
note: Exempts certain records and documents from being used as evidence in criminal proceedings.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-713-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 713 Self-incrimination etc.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of certain records and documents as evidence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 713(2) Self-incrimination etc.

713(3) Self-incrimination etc.
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.282
note: Information given under FWO notice cannot be used against the individual in certain proceedings.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-713-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 713 Self-incrimination etc.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits use of information against the individual in certain proceedings.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 713(3) Self-incrimination etc.

713(4) Self-incrimination etc.
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.282
note: Exemptions from self-incrimination
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-713-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 713 Self-incrimination etc.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts certain employee records from self-incrimination
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 713(4) Self-incrimination etc.

713A Certain records and documents are inadmissible
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.283
curation status: Proposed
has part: 713A(1) Certain records and documents are inadmissible
has part: 713A(2) Certain records and documents are inadmissible
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-713a
schema version: 2

713A(1) Certain records and documents are inadmissible
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.283
note: Records and documents with certain access restrictions are not admissible in evidence.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713a-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-713a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 713A Certain records and documents are inadmissible

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the admission of certain records and documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 713A(1) Certain records and documents are inadmissible

713A(2) Certain records and documents are inadmissible
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.283
note: Exemptions from inadmissibility of certain records and documents
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713a-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-713a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 713A Certain records and documents are inadmissible

713AA Legal professional privilege
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.284
note: No person is required to produce a document that would disclose information subject to legal professional privilege.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713aa-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-713aa
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713aa-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 713AA Legal professional privilege

714 Power to keep records or documents
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.284
curation status: Proposed
has part: 714(1) Power to keep records or documents
has part: 714(2) Power to keep records or documents
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-714
schema version: 2

714(1) Power to keep records or documents
type: Concept
description: Records or documents
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.284
note: Inspect and copy records or documents produced to the Fair Work Ombudsman.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-714-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 714 Power to keep records or documents

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allow inspection and copying of records or documents
modality: Deontic
operator: can

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 714(1) Power to keep records or documents

714(2) Power to keep records or documents
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.284
note: Inspection and copying of records or documents by authorized persons.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-714-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 714 Power to keep records or documents

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...at all reasonable times:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifying temporal intervals.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) While the Fair Work Ombudsman, an inspector or any other person keeps a record or document...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...he or she must allow the following persons to inspect, or make copies of, the record or document...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to inspect or copy records.
modality: Deontic
operator: allow
premise text: (2) While the Fair Work Ombudsman, an inspector or any other person keeps a record or document...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...he or she must allow the following persons to inspect, or make copies of, the record or document at all reasonable times:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposing a duty.
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: (2) While the Fair Work Ombudsman, an inspector or any other person keeps a record or document...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...at all reasonable times:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Specifying temporal intervals.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (2) While the Fair Work Ombudsman, an inspector or any other person keeps a record or document...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 714(2) Power to keep records or documents

714A Reports not to include information relating to an individual’s
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.284
curation status: Proposed
has part: 714A(1) Reports not to include information relating to an individual’s
has part: 714A(2) Reports not to include information relating to an individual’s
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-714a
schema version: 2

714A(1) Reports not to include information relating to an individual’s
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.284
note: Information about an individual's affairs cannot be included in certain reports.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714a-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-714a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 714A Reports not to include information relating to an individual’s

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits including information about an individual's affairs in certain reports.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 714A(1) Reports not to include information relating to an individual’s

714A(2) Reports not to include information relating to an individual’s
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.284
note: Context and publicly available information must be considered when applying paragraph (1)(b) to individual affairs.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714a-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-714a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 714A Reports not to include information relating to an individual’s

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 714A(2) Reports not to include information relating to an individual’s

715 Enforceable undertakings relating to contraventions of civil
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.285
curation status: Proposed
has part: 715(1) Enforceable undertakings relating to contraventions of civil
has part: 715(2) Enforceable undertakings relating to contraventions of civil
has part: 715(3) Enforceable undertakings relating to contraventions of civil
has part: 715(4) Enforceable undertakings relating to contraventions of civil
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-715
schema version: 2

715(1) Enforceable undertakings relating to contraventions of civil
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.285
note: Accepting an undertaking in case of contravention of civil remedy provision
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-715-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 715 Enforceable undertakings relating to contraventions of civil

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The undertaking is related to the contravention
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between undertaking and contravention
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (1) This section applies if the Fair Work Ombudsman reasonably believes...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The undertaking is represented in the knowledge base
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge representation of undertakings and contraventions
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
premise text: (1) This section applies if the Fair Work Ombudsman reasonably believes...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Accepting an undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to accept an undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman reasonably believes...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The undertaking is diffused to the contravention
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of undertakings and contraventions
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: (1) This section applies if the Fair Work Ombudsman reasonably believes...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is a recurring trace between undertakings and contraventions
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of undertakings and contraventions
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (1) This section applies if the Fair Work Ombudsman reasonably believes...

715(2) Enforceable undertakings relating to contraventions of civil
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.285
note: Acceptance of written undertaking given by person in relation to contravention
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-715-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 715 Enforceable undertakings relating to contraventions of civil

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide written undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 715(2) Enforceable undertakings relating to contraventions of civil

715(3) Enforceable undertakings relating to contraventions of civil
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.285
note: Consent required for withdrawal or variation of enforceable undertaking.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-715-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 715 Enforceable undertakings relating to contraventions of civil

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Enforceable undertaking obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 715(3) Enforceable undertakings relating to contraventions of civil

715(4) Enforceable undertakings relating to contraventions of civil
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.285
note: Inspector must not apply for an order under Division 2 of
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-715-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 715 Enforceable undertakings relating to contraventions of civil

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 715(4) Enforceable undertakings relating to contraventions of civil

716 Compliance notices
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.286
note: Inspector may issue compliance notices for contraventions of specified laws and regulations.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-716-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-716-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-716-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-716-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-716-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-716-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-716
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-716-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval defined.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Jobkeeper enabling direction is a temporal interval.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within the meaning of
premise text: ...(h) a jobkeeper enabling direction (within the meaning of...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-716-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Inspector's belief is sufficient to issue a compliance notice.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Inspector reasonably believes a person has contravened one or more provisions.
modality: Argumentation
operator: if
premise text: This section applies if an inspector reasonably believes...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-716-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compliance notice issued.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inspector may issue compliance notices.
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Inspector reasonably believes a person has contravened one or more provisions.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-716-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section cited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Section may be cited in other laws and regulations.
modality: Diffusion
operator: may be cited
premise text: ...(f) a term of an equal remuneration order;...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-716-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Ordered trace defined.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Jobkeeper enabling direction is an ordered trace.
modality: LTL
operator: within the meaning of
premise text: ...(h) a jobkeeper enabling direction (within the meaning of...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-716-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 716 Compliance notices

717 Review of compliance notices
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.289
curation status: Proposed
has part: 717(1) Review of compliance notices
has part: 717(2) Review of compliance notices
has part: 717(3) Review of compliance notices
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-717
schema version: 2

717(1) Review of compliance notices
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.289
note: Right to review compliance notices
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-717-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 717 Review of compliance notices

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right to review compliance notices
modality: Deontic
operator: has right

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717-ss-1-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: NaturalPerson
part of: 717(1) Review of compliance notices

717(2) Review of compliance notices
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.289
note: Court may stay operation of notice on terms and conditions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-717-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 717 Review of compliance notices

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May impose obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 717(2) Review of compliance notices

717(3) Review of compliance notices
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.289
note: Court may confirm, cancel or vary compliance notice after review.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-717-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 717 Review of compliance notices

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to confirm, cancel or vary notice
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 717(3) Review of compliance notices

717A Effect of cooperation agreement
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.289
curation status: Proposed
has part: 717A(1) Effect of cooperation agreement
has part: 717A(2) Effect of cooperation agreement
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-717a
schema version: 2

717A(1) Effect of cooperation agreement
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.289
note: Cannot refer conduct to DPP or AFP while cooperation agreement is in force.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717a-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-717a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 717A Effect of cooperation agreement

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot refer conduct to DPP or AFP.
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot

717A(2) Effect of cooperation agreement
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.289
note: Exemptions from subsection (1)
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717a-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-717a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 717A Effect of cooperation agreement

717B Entry into cooperation agreement
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.289
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman may enter into a written agreement with a person covering specified conduct
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-717b
schema version: 2

717C When a cooperation agreement is in force
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.290
note: Cooperation agreement is in force until terminated or withdrawn.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717c-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-717c
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agreement is in force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Holds true when the agreement is in force.
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: The cooperation agreement is entered into.

717D Termination of cooperation agreement by Fair Work
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.291
curation status: Proposed
has part: 717D(1) Termination of cooperation agreement by Fair Work
has part: 717D(2) Termination of cooperation agreement by Fair Work
has part: 717D(3) Termination of cooperation agreement by Fair Work
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-717d
schema version: 2

717D(1) Termination of cooperation agreement by Fair Work
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.291
note: Termination of cooperation agreement by Fair Work Ombudsman
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-717d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 717D Termination of cooperation agreement by Fair Work

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Fair Work Ombudsman may not terminate the cooperation agreement without written notice.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of terminating cooperation agreement without notice
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: None

717D(2) Termination of cooperation agreement by Fair Work
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.291
note: Allowing for alternative dispute resolution
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-717d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 717D Termination of cooperation agreement by Fair Work

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Termination may be followed by an application for an order
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describing the temporal relationship between termination and application
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: Application must occur after termination grounds are established

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An order may be inferred from these circumstances
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describing the inference of an order from specific circumstances
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
premise text: Fair Work Ombudsman has grounds for terminating the agreement and applying for an order

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: May apply for alternative dispute resolution
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to apply for an order
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Fair Work Ombudsman has grounds for terminating the agreement

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information about alternative dispute resolution may be disseminated widely
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describing the dissemination of information about alternative dispute resolution
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
premise text: Application is not limited to a single court or jurisdiction

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Fair Work Ombudsman may reapply for an order under specific circumstances
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describing the recurring nature of the Fair Work Ombudsman's discretion
modality: LTL
operator: Recur
premise text: Application is not a one-time event

717D(3) Termination of cooperation agreement by Fair Work
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.291
note: Court may make orders if ground exists
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-717d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 717D Termination of cooperation agreement by Fair Work

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 717D(3) Termination of cooperation agreement by Fair Work

717E Withdrawal from cooperation agreement
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.292
note: Consent required for withdrawal from cooperation agreement
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717e-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717e-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717e-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717e-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717e-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717e-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-717e
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717e-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is an overlap in time between the granting of consent and the withdrawal from a cooperation agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between consent and withdrawal
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The withdrawal must occur after obtaining consent.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717e-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The withdrawal of a person from a cooperation agreement implies that they have obtained the required consent.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Withdrawal implies consent
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: If a person withdraws from a cooperation agreement, then they have obtained consent.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717e-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Based on the key 'sec-717e', it can be inferred that a person must obtain consent from the Fair Work Ombudsman to withdraw from a cooperation agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Automated inference of withdrawal requirements
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: The key 'sec-717e' provides sufficient information for automated inference of the withdrawal process.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person must obtain consent from the Fair Work Ombudsman to withdraw from a cooperation agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to obtain consent for withdrawal
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman has the power to grant or refuse consent.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717e-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The consent granted by the Fair Work Ombudsman propagates to all parties involved in the cooperation agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Consent propagates to all parties involved
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman's consent is binding on all parties to the cooperation agreement.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717e-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 717E Withdrawal from cooperation agreement

717F Variation of cooperation agreement
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.292
note: Parties may vary cooperation agreement with mutual consent and in writing.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717f-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-717f
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717f-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 717F Variation of cooperation agreement

717G Relationship with other powers
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.292
curation status: Proposed
has part: 717G(1) Relationship with other powers
has part: 717G(2) Relationship with other powers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-717g
schema version: 2

717G(1) Relationship with other powers
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.292
note: The power of the Fair Work Ombudsman is not affected by a cooperation agreement.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717g-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717g-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717g-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717g-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717g-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-717g-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 717G Relationship with other powers

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717g-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the power of the Fair Work Ombudsman to accept an enforceable undertaking under section 715 in relation to the conduct; or...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The cooperation agreement does not affect the temporal relationship between powers.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (1) Whether a cooperation agreement is in force...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the power of the Fair Work Ombudsman to accept an enforceable undertaking under section 715...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The power of the Fair Work Ombudsman continues despite a cooperation agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
premise text: (1) Whether a cooperation agreement is in force...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717g-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the power of an inspector to give a notice under section 716...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The power of an inspector continues despite a cooperation agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
premise text: (1) Whether a cooperation agreement is in force...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717g-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...any other power or function of the Fair Work Ombudsman or an inspector that is not mentioned in subsection 717A(1).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Other powers or functions are not affected by a cooperation agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
premise text: (1) Whether a cooperation agreement is in force...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717g-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the power of an inspector to give a notice under section 716 in relation to the conduct; or...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The cooperation agreement does not affect the repetition of powers.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (1) Whether a cooperation agreement is in force...

717G(2) Relationship with other powers
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.292
note: An enforceable undertaking has no effect to the extent that it is inconsistent with a cooperation agreement.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717g-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-717g-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 717G Relationship with other powers

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inconsistency with a cooperation agreement
modality: Deontic
operator: inconsistentWith
premise text: cooperationAgreement

718 Disclosure of information by the Office of the Fair Work
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.293
curation status: Proposed
has part: 718(1) Disclosure of information by the Office of the Fair Work
has part: 718(2) Disclosure of information by the Office of the Fair Work
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-718
schema version: 2

718(1) Disclosure of information by the Office of the Fair Work
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.293
note: Disclosure of certain information is required or necessary for administration or enforcement.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-718-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 718 Disclosure of information by the Office of the Fair Work

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 718(1) Disclosure of information by the Office of the Fair Work

718(2) Disclosure of information by the Office of the Fair Work
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.293
note: Disclosure of information by the Office of the Fair Work
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-718-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 718 Disclosure of information by the Office of the Fair Work

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: information disclosure is authorized
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorization to disclose information
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Fair Work Ombudsman may disclose

718A False or misleading information or documents
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.294
curation status: Proposed
has part: 718A(1) False or misleading information or documents
has part: 718A(2) False or misleading information or documents
has part: 718A(3) False or misleading information or documents
has part: 718A(4) False or misleading information or documents
has part: 718A(5) False or misleading information or documents
has part: 718A(6) False or misleading information or documents
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-718a
schema version: 2

718A(1) False or misleading information or documents
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.294
note: Giving false or misleading information to the Fair Work Ombudsman is prohibited.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-718a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 718A False or misleading information or documents

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must not give information or produce a document.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval of recklessness implies a duty to ensure accuracy.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The person is reckless as to whether the information is false or misleading for an unspecified period.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must not give information or produce a document.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Recklessness implies a duty to ensure accuracy through argumentation.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: The person is reckless as to whether the information is false or misleading.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must not give information or produce a document.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of providing false or misleading information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The person knows, or is reckless as to whether, the information is false or misleading.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must not give information or produce a document.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Recklessness implies a duty to ensure accuracy.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The person is reckless as to whether the information is false or misleading.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must not give information or produce a document.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: No diffusion of responsibility applies in this context.
modality: Diffusion
operator: None
premise text: The person is the sole responsible party for providing accurate information.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 718A(1) False or misleading information or documents

718A(2) False or misleading information or documents
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.294
note: Exemption from subsection (1) if information or document is not false or misleading in a material particular.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-718a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 718A False or misleading information or documents

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemption from subsection (1) if information or document is not false or misleading in a material particular.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 718A(2) False or misleading information or documents

718A(3) False or misleading information or documents
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.294
note: Exemption from subsection (1) if information is not misleading in a material particular.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-718a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 718A False or misleading information or documents

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if the information did not omit any matter or thing without which the information is misleading in a material particular.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval: exemption from subsection (1)
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if the information did not omit any matter or thing without which the information is misleading in a material particular.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: CogAI recognizes exemptions from subsection (1)
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if the information did not omit any matter or thing without which the information is misleading in a material particular.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from obligations
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if the information did not omit any matter or thing without which the information is misleading in a material particular.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusing exemptions from subsection (1)
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if the information did not omit any matter or thing without which the information is misleading in a material particular.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval: exemption from subsection (1)
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 718A(3) False or misleading information or documents

718A(4) False or misleading information or documents
type: Concept
description: written statement signed by the person or competent officer of the body corporate
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.294
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for documents accompanied by a written statement
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-718a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 718A False or misleading information or documents

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to produce false or misleading documents
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission

718A(5) False or misleading information or documents
type: Concept
description: Information about potential liability
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.294
note: Official must inform person of potential liability before providing false or misleading information.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-718a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 718A False or misleading information or documents

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person may be liable for contravening subsection (1).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Official has an obligation to inform the person.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The official must take reasonable steps to inform the person.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 718A(5) False or misleading information or documents

718A(6) False or misleading information or documents
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.294
note: Granting permission for civil remedy
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-6-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-718a-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 718A False or misleading information or documents

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to be liable
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

719 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.296
note: Guide to this Part
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-719-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-719
schema version: 2

720 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.296
note: Defines employee and employer terms
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-720-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-720
schema version: 2

721 Equal remuneration applications
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.297
note: FWC must not deal with an equal remuneration order if adequate alternative remedy exists.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-721-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-721-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-721
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-721-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC must not deal with application
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of dealing with equal remuneration applications
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Available alternative remedy exists

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-721-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 721 Equal remuneration applications

722 Notification and consultation requirements applications
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.297
note: FWC cannot make an order under certain conditions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-722-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-722-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-722
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-722-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of making orders
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: Alternative remedy available

723 Unlawful termination applications
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.298
note: Making an unlawful termination application in relation to conduct is prohibited if the person can make a general protections court application.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-723-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-723-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-723-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-723
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-723-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Making an unlawful termination application is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The person is entitled to make a general protections court application.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-723-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Making an unlawful termination application is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of the action
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The person can make a general protections court application.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-723-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 723 Unlawful termination applications

724 Equal remuneration applications
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.299
note: FWC must not deal with equal remuneration applications if proceedings for alternative remedies have commenced.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-724-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-724-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-724
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-724-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of dealing with equal remuneration applications
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-724-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 724 Equal remuneration applications

725 General rule
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.300
note: Cannot make an application or complaint after dismissal if another section applies.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-725-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-725-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-725
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-725-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot make an application or complaint
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: Section 725

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-725-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 725 General rule

726 Dismissal remedy bargaining order applications
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.300
curation status: Proposed
has part: 726(1) Dismissal remedy bargaining order applications
has part: 726(2) Dismissal remedy bargaining order applications
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-726
schema version: 2

726(1) Dismissal remedy bargaining order applications
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.300
note: Application for dismissal remedy bargaining order must be made within certain conditions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-726-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 726 Dismissal remedy bargaining order applications

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The application MUST BE MADE BETWEEN (a) and (b).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Application must be made within a certain time frame
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (a) a dismissal remedy bargaining order application has been made by, or on behalf of, the person in relation to the dismissal;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The application MUST be made.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be made
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The application has not been withdrawn by the person who made it.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The application MUST NOT BE WITHDRAWN BY THE PERSON WHO MADE IT.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must not be withdrawn by the person who made it.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST NOT
premise text: (i) been withdrawn by the person who made the application;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The application MUST NOT FAIL FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must not fail for want of jurisdiction.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (ii) failed for want of jurisdiction.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The application MUST BE MADE BETWEEN (a) and (b).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Application must be made within a certain time frame
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (a) a dismissal remedy bargaining order application has been made by, or on behalf of, the person in relation to the dismissal;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 726(1) Dismissal remedy bargaining order applications

726(2) Dismissal remedy bargaining order applications
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.300
note: Application for bargaining order due to good faith bargaining requirement violation
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-726-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 726 Dismissal remedy bargaining order applications

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between application and requirement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (2) A dismissal remedy bargaining order application is an application for a bargaining order made on the ground that the person was dismissed in contravention of the good faith bargaining requirement in paragraph 228(1)(e).

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classification of entities involved (State, LegalPerson)
modality: CogAI
operator: Entity classification
premise text: (2) A dismissal remedy bargaining order application is an application for a bargaining order made on the ground that the person was dismissed in contravention of the good faith bargaining requirement in paragraph 228(1)(e).

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application for a specific type of order due to violation of an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) A dismissal remedy bargaining order application is an application for a bargaining order made on the ground that the person was dismissed in contravention of the good faith bargaining requirement in paragraph 228(1)(e).

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace between application and requirement
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (2) A dismissal remedy bargaining order application is an application for a bargaining order made on the ground that the person was dismissed in contravention of the good faith bargaining requirement in paragraph 228(1)(e).

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validation against a schema for application classification
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema validation
premise text: (2) A dismissal remedy bargaining order application is an application for a bargaining order made on the ground that the person was dismissed in contravention of the good faith bargaining requirement in paragraph 228(1)(e).

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 726(2) Dismissal remedy bargaining order applications

727 General protections FWC applications
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.300
curation status: Proposed
has part: 727(1) General protections FWC applications
has part: 727(1A) General protections FWC applications
has part: 727(2) General protections FWC applications
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-727
schema version: 2

727(1) General protections FWC applications
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.300
note: General protections FWC applications must be made within certain conditions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-727-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 727 General protections FWC applications

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The application must be made within a certain time period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (b) the application has not: (i) been withdrawn by the person who made the application;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The application must be made within a certain time period.
modality: CogAI
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (b) the application has not: (i) been withdrawn by the person who made the application;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a general protections FWC application within certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) a general protections FWC application has been made by, or on behalf of, the person in relation to the dismissal;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The application must be made within a certain time period.
modality: Diffusion
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (b) the application has not: (i) been withdrawn by the person who made the application;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The application must be made within a certain time period.
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (b) the application has not: (i) been withdrawn by the person who made the application;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 727(1) General protections FWC applications

727(1A) General protections FWC applications
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.300
note: General protections FWC applications apply under certain conditions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-727-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 727 General protections FWC applications

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: General protections FWC applications apply under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 727(1A) General protections FWC applications

727(2) General protections FWC applications
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.300
note: General protections FWC applications are subject to dismissal.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-727-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 727 General protections FWC applications

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: x occurs during a specific time period
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Application occurs during a specific time period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) A general protections FWC application is an application under section 365 for the FWC to deal with a dispute that relates to dismissal.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: x is a general protections FWC application
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application is a general protections FWC application.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (2) A general protections FWC application is an application under section 365 for the FWC to deal with a dispute that relates to dismissal.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: x is a general protections FWC application
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Application is related to a specific type of application.
modality: Diffusion
operator: is
premise text: (2) A general protections FWC application is an application under section 365 for the FWC to deal with a dispute that relates to dismissal.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: x is a general protections FWC application
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Application is a specific type of FWC application.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: is
premise text: (2) A general protections FWC application is an application under section 365 for the FWC to deal with a dispute that relates to dismissal.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: x has a temporal relationship with a specific event
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Application has a temporal relationship with a specific event.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (2) A general protections FWC application is an application under section 365 for the FWC to deal with a dispute that relates to dismissal.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 727(2) General protections FWC applications

728 General protections court applications
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.301
note: General protections court applications
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-728-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-728
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-728-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 728 General protections court applications

729 Unfair dismissal applications
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
curation status: Proposed
has part: 729(1) Unfair dismissal applications
has part: 729(2) Unfair dismissal applications
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-729
schema version: 2

729(1) Unfair dismissal applications
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
note: Unfair dismissal applications must be made within specified conditions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-729-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-729-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-729-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-729-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-729-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 729 Unfair dismissal applications

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-729-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Application must be made within a specified time frame
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (b) the application has not: (i) been withdrawn by the person who made the application;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-729-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a reason for dismissal
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) an unfair dismissal application has been made by the person in relation to the dismissal;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-729-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Application must be made within a specified time frame
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (b) the application has not: (ii) failed for want of jurisdiction;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-729-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 729(1) Unfair dismissal applications

729(2) Unfair dismissal applications
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
note: Definition of unfair dismissal application
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-729-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-729-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-729-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 729 Unfair dismissal applications

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-729-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An unfair dismissal application is an application under subsection 394(1) for a remedy for unfair dismissal.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a specific term
modality: Deontic
operator: =

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-729-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 729(2) Unfair dismissal applications

730 Unlawful termination FWC applications
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
curation status: Proposed
has part: 730(1) Unlawful termination FWC applications
has part: 730(1A) Unlawful termination FWC applications
has part: 730(2) Unlawful termination FWC applications
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-730
schema version: 2

730(1) Unlawful termination FWC applications
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
note: Unlawful termination FWC applications must be withdrawn or result in a certificate under paragraph 776(3)(a).
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-730-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 730 Unlawful termination FWC applications

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the application was made before the specified time period.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The application must be made within a certain time period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (b) the application has not: (i) been withdrawn by the person who made the application;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the application must be withdrawn or result in a certificate under paragraph 776(3)(a).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be withdrawn or result in a certificate.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) an unlawful termination FWC application has been made by, nor on behalf of, the person in relation to the dismissal;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the application must not fail for want of jurisdiction.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must not fail for want of jurisdiction.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (b) the application has not: (i) been withdrawn by the person who made the application;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the application must not result in the issue of a certificate under paragraph 776(3)(a).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must not result in the issue of a certificate under paragraph 776(3)(a).
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (b) the application has not: (ii) failed for want of jurisdiction; or (iii) resulted in the issue of a certificate under paragraph 776(3)(a);

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the application was made before the specified time period.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The application must be made within a certain time period.
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (b) the application has not: (ii) failed for want of jurisdiction; or (iii) resulted in the issue of a certificate under paragraph 776(3)(a);

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 730(1) Unlawful termination FWC applications

730(1A) Unlawful termination FWC applications
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
note: Unlawful termination FWC applications must be made by the person in relation to the dismissal and not withdrawn or failed for jurisdiction.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-1a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-730-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 730 Unlawful termination FWC applications

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make FWC application
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 730(1A) Unlawful termination FWC applications

730(2) Unlawful termination FWC applications
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
note: Unlawful termination FWC applications are prohibited.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-730-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 730 Unlawful termination FWC applications

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits unlawful termination FWC applications.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

731 Unlawful termination court applications
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.303
note: Unlawful termination court applications must be made by or on behalf of the person in relation to the dismissal, and not withdrawn or failed for want of jurisdiction.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-731-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-731-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-731
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-731-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be made by or on behalf of the person in relation to the dismissal
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-731-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 731 Unlawful termination court applications

732 Applications and complaints under other laws
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.303
note: Application or complaint under another law has been made
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-732-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-732
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-732-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 732 Applications and complaints under other laws

733 Dismissal does not include failure to provide benefits
type: Concept
description: Benefits
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304
note: Employer must provide benefits to dismissed person
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-733-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-733-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-733
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-733-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to provide benefits
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-733-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 733 Dismissal does not include failure to provide benefits

734 General rule
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304
curation status: Proposed
has part: 734(1) General rule
has part: 734(2) General rule
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-734
schema version: 2

734(1) General rule
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304
note: No general protections court application can be made for conduct not involving dismissal if an anti-discrimination law complaint has been made.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-734-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 734 General rule

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No general protections court application can be made.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of general protections court applications for certain conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: An application or complaint under an anti-discrimination law has been made.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 734(1) General rule

734(2) General rule
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304
note: No application under anti-discrimination law can be made for conduct not involving dismissal if a general protections court application has been made.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-734-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 734 General rule

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if a general protections court application has been made by, or on behalf of, the person in relation to the conduct;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No application can be made for conduct not involving dismissal.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) A person must not make an application or complaint...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 734(2) General rule

734A Sexual harassment court applications—interaction with sexual
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.305
note: Cannot make sexual harassment court application under certain conditions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734a-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734a-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-734a
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734a-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...that they agree to the FWC arbitrating the dispute
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for notification
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <
premise text: 2 or more of the parties (the notifying parties) have jointly notified the FWC...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must not make a sexual harassment court application...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on making court application
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: A person who alleges they have been sexually harassed...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 734A Sexual harassment court applications—interaction with sexual

734B Sexual harassment FWC applications and sexual harassment
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.306
curation status: Proposed
has part: 734B(1) Sexual harassment FWC applications and sexual harassment
has part: 734B(2) Sexual harassment FWC applications and sexual harassment
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-734b
schema version: 2

734B(1) Sexual harassment FWC applications and sexual harassment
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.306
note: Cannot make certain applications if an anti-discrimination complaint has been made or jurisdiction has failed.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734b-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-734b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 734B Sexual harassment FWC applications and sexual harassment

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cannot make application
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Application cannot be made during anti-discrimination complaint or jurisdiction failure
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Anti-discrimination complaint or jurisdiction failure

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cannot make application
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of certain applications
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: Application made in contravention of anti-discrimination law

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734b-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 734B(1) Sexual harassment FWC applications and sexual harassment

734B(2) Sexual harassment FWC applications and sexual harassment
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.306
note: Cannot make an application or complaint under anti-discrimination law if a sexual harassment FWC application has been made.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734b-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-734b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 734B Sexual harassment FWC applications and sexual harassment

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cannot make an application or complaint.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of making an application or complaint under anti-discrimination law.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: Application has been made for sexual harassment FWC application.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734b-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 734B(2) Sexual harassment FWC applications and sexual harassment

734BA Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.307
curation status: Proposed
has part: 734BA(1) Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair
has part: 734BA(2) Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair
has part: 734BA(3) Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-734ba
schema version: 2

734BA(1) Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.307
note: Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair deactivation
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734ba-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734ba-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734ba-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734ba-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734ba-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-734ba-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 734BA Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734ba-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the other deactivation proceedings: (a) have been discontinued by the person who commenced them; or (b) have failed for want of jurisdiction.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires overlap between other deactivation proceedings and the application under Division 5 of Part 3A-3
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (1) An application under Division 5 of Part 3A-3 (unfair deactivation or unfair termination of regulated workers) in relation to deactivation of a person from a digital labour platform must not be made...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734ba-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the other deactivation proceedings: (a) have been discontinued by the person who commenced them; or (b) have failed for want of jurisdiction.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifies applications under Division 5 of Part 3A-3 as prohibited based on other deactivation proceedings
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
premise text: (1) An application under Division 5 of Part 3A-3 (unfair deactivation or unfair termination of regulated workers) in relation to deactivation of a person from a digital labour platform must not be made...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the other deactivation proceedings: (a) have been discontinued by the person who commenced them; or (b) have failed for want of jurisdiction.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits making an application under Division 5 of Part 3A-3
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) An application under Division 5 of Part 3A-3 (unfair deactivation or unfair termination of regulated workers) in relation to deactivation of a person from a digital labour platform must not be made...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734ba-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the other deactivation proceedings: (a) have been discontinued by the person who commenced them; or (b) have failed for want of jurisdiction.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Requires overlap between other deactivation proceedings and the application under Division 5 of Part 3A-3
modality: Diffusion
operator: Overlap
premise text: (1) An application under Division 5 of Part 3A-3 (unfair deactivation or unfair termination of regulated workers) in relation to deactivation of a person from a digital labour platform must not be made...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734ba-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the other deactivation proceedings: (a) have been discontinued by the person who commenced them; or (b) have failed for want of jurisdiction.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Requires overlap between other deactivation proceedings and the application under Division 5 of Part 3A-3
modality: LTL
operator: Overlap
premise text: (1) An application under Division 5 of Part 3A-3 (unfair deactivation or unfair termination of regulated workers) in relation to deactivation of a person from a digital labour platform must not be made...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734ba-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 734BA(1) Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair

734BA(2) Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.307
note: No other deactivation proceedings can be commenced unless the application has been discontinued or failed for want of jurisdiction.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734ba-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-734ba-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 734BA Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on commencing other deactivation proceedings.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734ba-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 734BA(2) Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair

734BA(3) Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.307
note: Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734ba-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-734ba-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 734BA Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair

734BB Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.308
curation status: Proposed
has part: 734BB(1) Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair
has part: 734BB(2) Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-734bb
schema version: 2

734BB(1) Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.308
note: Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair termination of regulated workers
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734bb-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734bb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734bb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734bb-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734bb-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734bb-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-734bb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 734BB Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734bb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the other termination proceedings: (a) have been discontinued by the person who commenced them; or (b) have failed for want of jurisdiction.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal overlap between commencement of new application and existing termination proceedings
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal overlap
premise text: (1) An application under Division 5 of Part 3A-3 (unfair deactivation or unfair termination of regulated workers) in relation to termination of a services contract must not be made if other termination proceedings have been commenced...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734bb-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the other termination proceedings: (a) have been discontinued by the person who commenced them; or (b) have failed for want of jurisdiction.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifies the person who commenced the other termination proceedings as either responsible or not responsible
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
premise text: (a) have been discontinued by the person who commenced them; or (b) have failed for want of jurisdiction.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734bb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the other termination proceedings: (a) have been discontinued by the person who commenced them; or (b) have failed for want of jurisdiction.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits making an application under Division 5 of Part 3A-3
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) An application under Division 5 of Part 3A-3 (unfair deactivation or unfair termination of regulated workers) in relation to termination of a services contract must not be made...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734bb-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the other termination proceedings: (a) have been discontinued by the person who commenced them; or (b) have failed for want of jurisdiction.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses responsibility to the person who commenced the other termination proceedings
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (a) have been discontinued by the person who commenced them; or (b) have failed for want of jurisdiction.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734bb-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the other termination proceedings: (a) have been discontinued by the person who commenced them; or (b) have failed for want of jurisdiction.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Requires a recurring trace between new application and existing termination proceedings
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (1) An application under Division 5 of Part 3A-3 (unfair deactivation or unfair termination of regulated workers) in relation to termination of a services contract must not be made if other termination proceedings have been commenced...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734bb-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 734BB(1) Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair

734BB(2) Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.308
note: Must not commence other termination proceedings in relation to a services contract
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734bb-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734bb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-734bb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 734BB Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734bb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of commencement of other termination proceedings
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) A person must not commence other termination proceedings in relation to a services contract

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734bb-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 734BB(2) Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair

734C Limitation on applications for review of services contracts—
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.308
note: Limitation on applications for review of services contracts—
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734c-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-734c
schema version: 2

735 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.310
note: Deals with disputes between employees and employers, regulated workers and businesses, and persons in a road transport contractual chain.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-735-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-735
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-735-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 735 Guide to this Part

736 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.310
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-736-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-736
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-736-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 736 Meanings of employee and employer

737 Model term about dealing with disputes
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.311
curation status: Proposed
has part: 737(1) Model term about dealing with disputes
has part: 737(2) Model term about dealing with disputes
has part: 737(3) Model term about dealing with disputes
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-737
schema version: 2

737(1) Model term about dealing with disputes
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.311
note: Determine a model term for dealing with disputes for enterprise agreements.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-737-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-737-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-737-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 737 Model term about dealing with disputes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-737-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to determine a model term
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-737-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 737(1) Model term about dealing with disputes

737(2) Model term about dealing with disputes
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.311
note: Ensure model term consistency with requirements and consider various factors.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-737-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-737-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-737-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 737 Model term about dealing with disputes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-737-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure model term consistency with requirements.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) In determining the model term, the FWC must:

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-737-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 737(2) Model term about dealing with disputes

737(3) Model term about dealing with disputes
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.311
note: Determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-737-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-737-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-737-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 737 Model term about dealing with disputes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-737-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a legislative instrument
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Legislative instrument
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (3) A determination under subsection (1)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-737-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 737(3) Model term about dealing with disputes

738 Application of this Division
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.312
note: Procedure for dealing with disputes in various types of agreements and contracts.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-738-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-738-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-738-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-738-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-738
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-738-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-738-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Procedure for dealing with disputes in various types of agreements and contracts.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-738-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-738-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 738 Application of this Division

739 Disputes dealt with by the FWC
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.312
curation status: Proposed
has part: 739(1) Disputes dealt with by the FWC
has part: 739(3) Disputes dealt with by the FWC
has part: 739(4) Disputes dealt with by the FWC
has part: 739(5) Disputes dealt with by the FWC
has part: 739(6) Disputes dealt with by the FWC
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-739
schema version: 2

739(1) Disputes dealt with by the FWC
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.312
note: The FWC must deal with disputes if a term requires or allows it.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-739-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 739 Disputes dealt with by the FWC

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to deal with disputes
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 739(1) Disputes dealt with by the FWC

739(3) Disputes dealt with by the FWC
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.312
note: FWC must not exercise powers limited by the term.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-739-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 739 Disputes dealt with by the FWC

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC must not exercise powers
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of exercising powers
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: FWC must exercise powers

739(4) Disputes dealt with by the FWC
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.312
note: FWC may arbitrate a dispute if parties agree to it.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-739-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 739 Disputes dealt with by the FWC

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May arbitrate
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 739(4) Disputes dealt with by the FWC

739(5) Disputes dealt with by the FWC
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.312
note: FWC must not make inconsistent decisions with the Act or a fair work instrument.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-739-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 739 Disputes dealt with by the FWC

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with the Act and fair work instrument.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 739(5) Disputes dealt with by the FWC

739(6) Disputes dealt with by the FWC
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.312
note: FWC may deal with a dispute on application by a party.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-6-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-739-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 739 Disputes dealt with by the FWC

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to deal with disputes on application.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 739(6) Disputes dealt with by the FWC

740 Dispute dealt with by persons other than the FWC
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.313
curation status: Proposed
has part: 740(1) Dispute dealt with by persons other than the FWC
has part: 740(3) Dispute dealt with by persons other than the FWC
has part: 740(4) Dispute dealt with by persons other than the FWC
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-740
schema version: 2

740(1) Dispute dealt with by persons other than the FWC
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.313
note: Section applies if a term requires or allows another person to deal with a dispute.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-740-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-740-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-740-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 740 Dispute dealt with by persons other than the FWC

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-740-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires another person to deal with a dispute.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-740-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 740(1) Dispute dealt with by persons other than the FWC

740(3) Dispute dealt with by persons other than the FWC
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.313
note: Permits arbitration of disputes by persons other than the FWC.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-740-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-740-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-740-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 740 Dispute dealt with by persons other than the FWC

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-740-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits action
modality: Deontic
operator: May

740(4) Dispute dealt with by persons other than the FWC
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.313
note: Must not make a decision inconsistent with the Act or a fair work instrument.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-740-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-740-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-740-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 740 Dispute dealt with by persons other than the FWC

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-740-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits making decisions inconsistent with the Act.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-740-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 740(4) Dispute dealt with by persons other than the FWC

741 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.314
note: Guide to this Part
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-741-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-741
schema version: 2

742 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.314
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-742-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-742-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-742
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-742-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning.
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-742-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 742 Meanings of employee and employer

743 Object of this Division
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.315
note: Object of this Division is to give effect, or further effect, to the ILO Convention and Recommendation concerning Equal Opportunities and Family Responsibilities.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-743-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-743-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-743
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-743-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-743-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 743 Object of this Division

744 Extending the entitlement to unpaid parental leave and related
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.315
note: Extending entitlements for non-national system employees
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-744-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-744
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-744-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 744 Extending the entitlement to unpaid parental leave and related

745 Contravening the extended parental leave provisions
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.317
note: Cannot contravene extended parental leave provisions
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-745-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-745-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-745
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-745-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of action
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot

746 References to the National Employment Standards include
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.317
note: References to National Employment Standards include extended parental leave provisions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-746-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-746-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-746-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-746
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-746-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: References to National Employment Standards are obligations
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-746-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies references to National Employment Standards
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes

747 State and Territory laws that are not excluded
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.317
note: Exclusion of State laws on employee entitlements related to birth or adoption of children.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-747-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-747-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-747
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-747-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclusion clause
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes

748 Non-national system employees are not award/agreement free
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.317
note: Non-national system employees are not award/agreement free.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-748-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-748
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-748-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 748 Non-national system employees are not award/agreement free

749 Modification of meaning of base rate of pay for pieceworkers
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.317
note: Adds Chapter 6 Miscellaneous at the end of subsection 16(2)
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-749-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-749
schema version: 2

750 Modification of meaning of full rate of pay for pieceworkers
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.318
note: Employee's full rate of pay for extended parental leave provisions
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-750-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-750-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-750
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-750-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation on the state to determine employee's full rate of pay
modality: Deontic
operator: has

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-750-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 750 Modification of meaning of full rate of pay for pieceworkers

751 Modification of meaning of ordinary hours of work—if
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.318
note: Employee's ordinary hours of work are determined by State industrial instrument.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-751-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-751
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-751-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 751 Modification of meaning of ordinary hours of work—if

752 Modification of meaning of ordinary hours of work—if not
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.318
note: References to an award/agreement free employee also include non-national system employees.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-752-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-752
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-752-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 752 Modification of meaning of ordinary hours of work—if not

753 Modification of meaning of ordinary hours of work—regulations
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.319
note: Regulations may prescribe usual weekly hours for non-national system employees without specified ordinary hours of work.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-753-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-753
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-753-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 753 Modification of meaning of ordinary hours of work—regulations

754 Modification of meaning of pieceworker
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.319
note: Prescribes a class of employees for extended parental leave provisions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-754-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-754
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-754-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 754 Modification of meaning of pieceworker

755 Modification of provision about interaction with paid leave
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.319
note: Section 79 applies as if subsections 79(2) and (3) were omitted.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-755-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-755-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-755
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-755-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section 79 applies as if subsections 79(2) and (3) were omitted.
modality: Deontic
operator: Subsumption

756 Modification of provision about relationship between National
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.319
note: References to non-national systems are included in employee references.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-756-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-756-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-756
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-756-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employment Standards
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to include non-national systems
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: State

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-756-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 756 Modification of provision about relationship between National

757 Modification of power to make regulations
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.320
note: Permits non-national system employers and employees to agree on matters that would or might otherwise be contrary to an extended parental leave provision.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-757
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits non-national system employers and employees to agree on matters that would or might otherwise be contrary to an extended parental leave provision.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

757A Object of this Division
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.321
note: Object of this Division is to give effect, or further effect, to paragraph (f) of Article 10 of the ILO Convention (No. 190)
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-757a
schema version: 2

757B Extending the entitlement to paid family and domestic violence
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.321
note: Extending entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave for non-national system employees
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757b-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-757b
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusive extension of entitlement
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 757B Extending the entitlement to paid family and domestic violence

757BA Employer obligations in relation to pay slips
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.323
note: Employer must not include certain information on pay slip.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757ba-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757ba-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-757ba
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757ba-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not

757C Contravening the extended paid family and domestic violence
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.323
note: Employer cannot contravene extended paid family and domestic violence leave provisions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757c-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-757c
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of contravening extended paid family and domestic violence leave provisions.
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757c-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 757C Contravening the extended paid family and domestic violence

757D References to the National Employment Standards include
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
note: References to National Employment Standards include extended paid family and domestic violence leave provisions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757d-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757d-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757d-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-757d
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes references to National Employment Standards
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757d-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: References to the National Employment Standards refer to extended paid family and domestic violence leave provisions
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: refers to

757E State and Territory laws that are not excluded
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
note: Exclusion of State laws on employee entitlements related to family and domestic violence.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757e-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757e-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-757e
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclusion of laws
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
premise text: State and Territory laws not excluded

757F Non-national system employees are not award/agreement free
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
note: Non-national system employees are not entitled to award/agreement free leave.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757f-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757f-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-757f
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Non-national system employees are not entitled to award/agreement free leave.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757f-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 757F Non-national system employees are not award/agreement free

757G Modification of meaning of full rate of pay for pieceworkers
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
note: Employee's full rate of pay for extended paid family and domestic violence leave provisions must be determined by regulations.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757g-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757g-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-757g
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to determine employee's full rate of pay.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757g-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 757G Modification of meaning of full rate of pay for pieceworkers

757H Modification of meaning of pieceworker
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.325
note: Prescribes a class of employees for extended paid family and domestic violence leave provisions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757h-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757h-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757h-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-757h
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757h-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prescribes a class of employees
modality: Deontic
operator: prescribes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757h-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies employees for leave provisions
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757h-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 757H Modification of meaning of pieceworker

757J Modification of provision about relationship between National
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.325
note: Modifies section 128's references to include non-national systems.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757j-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-757j
schema version: 2

757K Modification of power to make regulations
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.325
note: Permits agreement on matters that would otherwise be contrary to an extended paid family and domestic violence leave provision.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757k-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-757k
schema version: 2

758 Object of this Division
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.326
note: Object of this Division is to give effect, or further effect, to the ILO Convention and Recommendation.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-758-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-758
schema version: 2

759 Extending entitlement to notice of termination or payment in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.326
curation status: Proposed
has part: 759(1) Extending entitlement to notice of termination or payment in
has part: 759(2) Extending entitlement to notice of termination or payment in
has part: 759(3) Extending entitlement to notice of termination or payment in
has part: 759(4) Extending entitlement to notice of termination or payment in
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-759
schema version: 2

759(1) Extending entitlement to notice of termination or payment in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.326
note: Extends entitlement to notice of termination or payment in lieu of notice for non-national system employees.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-759-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-759-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-759-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-759-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-759-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 759 Extending entitlement to notice of termination or payment in

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-759-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the provisions to a national system employee also included a reference to a non-national system employee.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Includes references to national system employees and employers
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
premise text: Any reference in the provisions to a national system employer also included a reference to a non-national system employer.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-759-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provisions apply to non-national system employees as if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Extends entitlement
modality: Deontic
operator: extends
premise text: Subdivision A of Division 11 of Part 2-2 provides for notice of termination or payment in lieu of notice.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-759-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the provisions also included a reference to a non-national system employer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes references to national system employees and employers
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: The provisions of Subdivision A of Division 11 of Part 2-2 provide for notice of termination or payment in lieu of notice.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-759-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 759(1) Extending entitlement to notice of termination or payment in

759(2) Extending entitlement to notice of termination or payment in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.326
note: Extending entitlement to notice of termination or payment in relation to Subdivision A of Division 11 of Part 2-2 as it applies because of subsection (1)
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-759-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-759-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 759 Extending entitlement to notice of termination or payment in

759(3) Extending entitlement to notice of termination or payment in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.326
note: Modifications to extended notice of termination provisions
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-759-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-759-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 759 Extending entitlement to notice of termination or payment in

759(4) Extending entitlement to notice of termination or payment in
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.326
note: Applicable regulations must comply with subsection (1)
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-759-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-759-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-759-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 759 Extending entitlement to notice of termination or payment in

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-759-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Regulations must comply with subsection (1)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulations must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: Subsection (1) applies to regulations

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-759-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 759(4) Extending entitlement to notice of termination or payment in

760 Contravening the extended notice of termination provisions
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.327
note: Cannot contravene extended notice of termination provisions
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-760-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-760-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-760
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-760-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on action
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot

761 References to the National Employment Standards include
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.328
note: References to National Employment Standards include extended notice of termination provisions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-761-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-761-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-761
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-761-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This excerpt is classified as an Undertaking because it provides descriptive information.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies descriptive clause
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
premise text: Descriptive clauses are used to provide additional information about a provision.

762 State and Territory laws that are not excluded
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.328
note: Exclusion of State and Territory laws on employee entitlements
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-762-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-762-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-762-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-762-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-762-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-762
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-762-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: and provide entitlements for those employees that are more beneficial than the entitlements under the extended notice of termination provisions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal applicability
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: to the extent that those laws apply to non-national system employees

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-762-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: to the exclusion of laws of a State or Territory
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclusion of State and Territory laws
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
premise text: This Act is not intended to apply

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-762-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: that are more beneficial than the entitlements under the extended notice of termination provisions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Provision of employee entitlements
modality: Deontic
operator: provides
premise text: those laws provide entitlements for those employees

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-762-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: and provide entitlements for those employees that are more beneficial than the entitlements under the extended notice of termination provisions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal applicability
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: to the extent that those laws apply to non-national system employees

763 Non-national system employees are not award/agreement free
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.328
note: Non-national system employees are not award/agreement free.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-763-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-763
schema version: 2

764 Modification of meaning of full rate of pay for pieceworkers
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.328
note: Employee's full rate of pay for purposes of extended notice provisions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-764-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-764
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-764-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 764 Modification of meaning of full rate of pay for pieceworkers

765 Modification of meaning of pieceworker
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.329
note: Prescribes a class of employees for extended notice of termination provisions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-765-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-765-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-765-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-765
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-765-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prescribes a class of employees for extended notice of termination provisions.
modality: Deontic
operator: prescribes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-765-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies employees into a specific category.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-765-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 765 Modification of meaning of pieceworker

766 Modification of provision about notice of termination by
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.329
note: A State industrial instrument may include terms specifying the period of notice a non-national system employee must give in order to terminate his or her employment.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-766-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-766-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-766
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-766-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision includes a duty.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-766-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 766 Modification of provision about notice of termination by

767 Modification of provision about relationship between National
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.329
note: References to non-national systems are included in employee agreements.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-767-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-767-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-767
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-767-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employment Standards
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusive obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: State

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-767-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 767 Modification of provision about relationship between National

768 Modification of power to make regulations
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.329
note: Permits non-national system employers and employees to agree on matters contrary to an extended notice of termination provision.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows non-national system employers and employees to agree on matters contrary to an extended notice of termination provision.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768 Modification of power to make regulations

768AA Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.331
note: Defines terms and conditions of employment transfer
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aa-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768aa
schema version: 2

768AB Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.331
note: Defines employee and employer terms
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ab-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ab
schema version: 2

768AC What this Division is about
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.332
note: Describes the purpose of this Division.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ac-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ac
schema version: 2

768AD When does a transfer of business occur?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.332
curation status: Proposed
has part: 768AD(1) When does a transfer of business occur?
has part: 768AD(2) When does a transfer of business occur?
has part: 768AD(3) When does a transfer of business occur?
has part: 768AD(4) When does a transfer of business occur?
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ad
schema version: 2

768AD(1) When does a transfer of business occur?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.332
note: Transfer of business from non-national system employer to national system employer requires specific conditions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ad-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 768AD When does a transfer of business occur?

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the transfer of business occurs within 3 months after the termination
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Occurs during employment termination and new employment.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (a) the employment of a person who is a State public sector employee of the old State employer has terminated;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: there is a transfer of business from a non-national system employer to a national system employer
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires specific conditions for transfer of business.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (a) the employment of a person who is a State public sector employee of the old State employer has terminated;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the transfer of business requires a connection between the old and new employers
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires connection between old and new employers.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (d) there is a connection between the old State employer and the new employer as described in subsection (2), (3) or (4).

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the transfer of business occurs throughout the employment relationship
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Occurs everywhere in the employment relationship.
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
premise text: (b) within 3 months after the termination, the person becomes employed by the new employer;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AD(1) When does a transfer of business occur?

768AD(2) When does a transfer of business occur?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.332
note: The new employer must have the beneficial use of some or all of the assets.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ad-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 768AD When does a transfer of business occur?

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Describes the assets that relate to or are used in connection with the transferring work.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AD(2) When does a transfer of business occur?

768AD(3) When does a transfer of business occur?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.332
note: Transfer of business occurs when old State employer outsources work to new employer.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ad-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 768AD When does a transfer of business occur?

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Transfer of business occurs when old State employer outsources work to new employer.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AD(3) When does a transfer of business occur?

768AD(4) When does a transfer of business occur?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.332
note: Transfer of business occurs when new employer is associated entity of old State employer
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ad-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 768AD When does a transfer of business occur?

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: connection between old and new employers
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between old and new employers
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: new employer employs transferring employee

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Transfer of business occurs when new employer is associated entity of old State employer
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AD(4) When does a transfer of business occur?

768AE Meaning of transferring employee, termination time and
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.333
curation status: Proposed
has part: 768AE(1) Meaning of transferring employee, termination time and
has part: 768AE(2) Meaning of transferring employee, termination time and
has part: 768AE(3) Meaning of transferring employee, termination time and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ae
schema version: 2

768AE(1) Meaning of transferring employee, termination time and
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.333
note: Defines transferring employee in relation to business transfer.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ae-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ae-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 768AE Meaning of transferring employee, termination time and

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is a transferring employee in relation to the transfer of business.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies a transferring employee.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (1) The person referred to in paragraph 768AD(1)(a)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ae-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AE(1) Meaning of transferring employee, termination time and

768AE(2) Meaning of transferring employee, termination time and
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.333
note: Termination time of a transferring employee is the start of the day employment is terminated by the old State employer.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ae-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ae-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 768AE Meaning of transferring employee, termination time and

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ae-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AE(2) Meaning of transferring employee, termination time and

768AE(3) Meaning of transferring employee, termination time and
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.333
note: Defines re-employment time of a transferring employee
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ae-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ae-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 768AE Meaning of transferring employee, termination time and

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ae-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AE(3) Meaning of transferring employee, termination time and

768AF What this Division is about
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.334
note: Defines copied State instruments for transferring employees.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768af-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768af
schema version: 2

768AG Contravening a copied State instrument
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.334
note: Prohibition on contravening a copied State instrument for a transferring employee.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ag-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ag-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ag-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ag-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ag-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ag-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ag
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ag-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: for a transferring employee that applies to the person
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between contravention and prohibition
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: A person must not contravene a term of a copied State instrument

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ag-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: for a transferring employee that applies to the person
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Prohibition implies duty to comply
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: A person must not contravene a term of a copied State instrument

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ag-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: for a transferring employee that applies to the person
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Prohibition recognized by AI systems
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: A person must not contravene a term of a copied State instrument

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ag-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: contravene a term of a copied State instrument
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on contravening
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: A person must not

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ag-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: for a transferring employee that applies to the person
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Prohibition diffuses responsibility for compliance
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: A person must not contravene a term of a copied State instrument

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ag-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AG Contravening a copied State instrument

768AH What is a copied State instrument?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.335
note: A copied State instrument for a transferring employee is defined.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ah-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ah
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ah-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AH What is a copied State instrument?

768AI What is a copied State award?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.335
note: A copied State award comes into operation immediately after the termination time.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ai-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ai-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ai-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ai-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ai-logic-deontic-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ai-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ai
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ai-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...then a copied State award for the transferring employee is taken to come into operation immediately after the termination time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The copied State award comes into effect during the termination time.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (b) the original State award covered (however described in the original State award or a relevant law of the State) the old State employer and the transferring employee;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ai-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a copied State award for the transferring employee is taken to come into operation immediately after the termination time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The copied State award comes into operation immediately after the termination time.
modality: Deontic
operator: takes effect
premise text: (1) If, immediately before the termination time of a transferring employee:...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ai-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...then the State’s interaction rules that were in force immediately before the termination time apply for the purposes of working out the interaction between the copied State award and the copied State employment agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The employee or another person must enforce the copied State award.
modality: Deontic
operator: must be enforced
premise text: ...it will not be enforceable by the employee or another person (for example, the new employer) unless and until it applies to the employee or other person.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ai-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...then the State’s interaction rules that were in force immediately before the termination time apply for the purposes of working out the interaction between the copied State award and the copied State employment agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The copied State award must be applied to the employee or new employer.
modality: Deontic
operator: must be applied
premise text: ...it will not apply to the employee or new employer before the employee becomes employed by the new employer.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ai-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...then the State’s interaction rules that were in force immediately before the termination time apply for the purposes of working out the interaction between the copied State award and the copied State employment agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The copied State award comes into effect until the employee becomes employed by the new employer.
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: ...it will not apply to the employee or new employer before the employee becomes employed by the new employer.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ai-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AI What is a copied State award?

768AJ What is a State award?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.336
curation status: Proposed
has part: 768AJ(1) What is a State award?
has part: 768AJ(2) What is a State award?
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768aj
schema version: 2

768AJ(1) What is a State award?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.336
note: Regulates terms and conditions of employment
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aj-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aj-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768aj-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 768AJ What is a State award?

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aj-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for award applicability
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: (1) A State award is an instrument in relation to which the following conditions are satisfied:

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligations on employment terms and conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: regulates
premise text: (1) A State award is an instrument in relation to which the following conditions are satisfied:

768AJ(2) What is a State award?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.336
note: An instrument may be a State award or not.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aj-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768aj-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 768AJ What is a State award?

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State award or not
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulations may provide
modality: Deontic
operator: may-provide
premise text: An instrument of a specified kind

768AK What is a copied State employment agreement?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.336
curation status: Proposed
has part: 768AK(1) What is a copied State employment agreement?
has part: 768AK(2) What is a copied State employment agreement?
has part: 768AK(3) What is a copied State employment agreement?
has part: 768AK(4) What is a copied State employment agreement?
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ak
schema version: 2

768AK(1) What is a copied State employment agreement?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.336
note: A copied State employment agreement comes into operation immediately after the termination time.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ak-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 768AK What is a copied State employment agreement?

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: A copied State employment agreement comes into operation immediately after the termination time.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AK(1) What is a copied State employment agreement?

768AK(2) What is a copied State employment agreement?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.336
note: Employment agreement terms are included in the copied State employment agreement.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ak-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 768AK What is a copied State employment agreement?

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AK(2) What is a copied State employment agreement?

768AK(3) What is a copied State employment agreement?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.336
note: Terms of copied State employment agreement affected by state industrial body or court decisions
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ak-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 768AK What is a copied State employment agreement?

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AK(3) What is a copied State employment agreement?

768AK(4) What is a copied State employment agreement?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.336
note: A copied State collective employment agreement must be a copy of the original agreement.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-4-logic-cogai-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-4-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ak-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 768AK What is a copied State employment agreement?

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, the copied agreement must also be entered into on that same date.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relationship between the original and copied agreements.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
premise text: The original agreement was entered into on a specific date.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-4-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, the copied agreement must also include these provisions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Analyzes the language to identify potential AI-related concepts.
modality: CogAI
operator: =
premise text: The agreement includes provisions related to artificial intelligence.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, the copied agreement must also meet these requirements.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State to ensure the copied agreement meets the requirements of a collective employment agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: The original agreement is a collective agreement.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, the copied agreement must also be entered into after the original agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relationship between the original and copied agreements.
modality: LTL
operator: =
premise text: The original agreement was entered into before the copied agreement.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-4-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, the copied agreement must also meet these requirements.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validates the structure of the agreement against a set of rules.
modality: SHACL
operator: =
premise text: The agreement includes specific requirements for formatting and content.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AK(4) What is a copied State employment agreement?

768AL What is a State employment agreement?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.338
curation status: Proposed
has part: 768AL(1) What is a State employment agreement?
has part: 768AL(2) What is a State employment agreement?
has part: 768AL(3) What is a State employment agreement?
has part: 768AL(4) What is a State employment agreement?
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768al
schema version: 2

768AL(1) What is a State employment agreement?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.338
note: Defines a State employment agreement
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768al-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768al-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768al-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 768AL What is a State employment agreement?

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768al-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: States the conditions under which an agreement is valid
modality: Deontic
operator: implies

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768al-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AL(1) What is a State employment agreement?

768AL(2) What is a State employment agreement?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.338
note: An instrument of a specified kind may be considered a State employment agreement.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768al-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768al-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 768AL What is a State employment agreement?

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768al-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AL(2) What is a State employment agreement?

768AL(3) What is a State employment agreement?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.338
note: A State employment agreement is a collective employment agreement unless it meets certain conditions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768al-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768al-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 768AL What is a State employment agreement?

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768al-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AL(3) What is a State employment agreement?

768AL(4) What is a State employment agreement?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.338
note: A State individual employment agreement is a State employment agreement.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768al-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768al-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768al-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 768AL What is a State employment agreement?

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768al-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State individual employment agreement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies the type of employment agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: is

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768al-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AL(4) What is a State employment agreement?

768AM When does a copied State instrument apply to a person?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.339
curation status: Proposed
has part: 768AM(1) When does a copied State instrument apply to a person?
has part: 768AM(2) When does a copied State instrument apply to a person?
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768am
schema version: 2

768AM(1) When does a copied State instrument apply to a person?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.339
note: A copied State instrument applies to a person if certain conditions are met.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768am-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768am-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768am-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768am-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 768AM When does a copied State instrument apply to a person?

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768am-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768am-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: A copied State instrument applies to a person if certain conditions are met.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768am-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AM(1) When does a copied State instrument apply to a person?

768AM(2) When does a copied State instrument apply to a person?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.339
note: A copied State instrument applies to an employer if it covers the employer and is in operation.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768am-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768am-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768am-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 768AM When does a copied State instrument apply to a person?

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768am-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the instrument applies to the employer
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: (a) the instrument covers the employer; and (b) the instrument is in operation;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768am-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AM(2) When does a copied State instrument apply to a person?

768AN When does a copied State instrument cover a person?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.340
curation status: Proposed
has part: 768AN(1) When does a copied State instrument cover a person?
has part: 768AN(2) When does a copied State instrument cover a person?
has part: 768AN(3) When does a copied State instrument cover a person?
has part: 768AN(4) When does a copied State instrument cover a person?
has part: 768AN(5) When does a copied State instrument cover a person?
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768an
schema version: 2

768AN(1) When does a copied State instrument cover a person?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.340
note: Employee and new employer covered in relation to transferring work.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768an-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 768AN When does a copied State instrument cover a person?

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee and new employer covered in relation to transferring work
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Provision of coverage
modality: Deontic
operator: covers
premise text: (1) A copied State instrument for a transferring employee

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AN(1) When does a copied State instrument cover a person?

768AN(2) When does a copied State instrument cover a person?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.340
note: An employee organisation is covered by a copied State instrument if the instrument covers the employee and the original State award or agreement covered the organisation.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768an-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 768AN When does a copied State instrument cover a person?

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: An employee organisation is covered by a copied State instrument if the instrument covers the employee and the original State award or agreement covered the organisation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AN(2) When does a copied State instrument cover a person?

768AN(3) When does a copied State instrument cover a person?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.340
note: An employer organisation is covered by a copied State instrument if certain conditions are met.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768an-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 768AN When does a copied State instrument cover a person?

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Original State award or agreement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Employee's termination time

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: An employer organisation is covered by a copied State instrument if certain conditions are met.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AN(3) When does a copied State instrument cover a person?

768AN(4) When does a copied State instrument cover a person?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.340
note: A copied State instrument covers a person if it provides or has the effect of covering them under certain provisions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768an-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 768AN When does a copied State instrument cover a person?

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: covered by the instrument
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Circumstances when a person is covered
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: court order

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: covers a person
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Provision of this Act or FWC order implies coverage
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: (a) provision of this Act or (b) FWC order

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AN(4) When does a copied State instrument cover a person?

768AN(5) When does a copied State instrument cover a person?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.340
note: A copied State instrument does not cover a person if any of the Chapter 6 Miscellaneous provisions apply.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768an-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 768AN When does a copied State instrument cover a person?

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: covers a person
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: does not
premise text: State instrument

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AN(5) When does a copied State instrument cover a person?

768AO When is a copied State instrument in operation?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.342
curation status: Proposed
has part: 768AO(1) When is a copied State instrument in operation?
has part: 768AO(2) When is a copied State instrument in operation?
has part: 768AO(3) When is a copied State instrument in operation?
has part: 768AO(4) When is a copied State instrument in operation?
has part: 768AO(5) When is a copied State instrument in operation?
has part: 768AO(6) When is a copied State instrument in operation?
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ao
schema version: 2

768AO(1) When is a copied State instrument in operation?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.342
note: A copied State instrument for a transferring employee comes into operation immediately after the employee’s termination time.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ao-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 768AO When is a copied State instrument in operation?

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The event occurs within this interval.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Occurs during the employee's termination time.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) A copied State instrument for a transferring employee comes into operation immediately after the employee’s termination time.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the instrument is in place, it must operate at termination.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implies that the instrument operates at termination.
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (1) A copied State instrument for a transferring employee comes into operation immediately after the employee’s termination time.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The system acknowledges this as a normal process.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes the instrument's operation as a standard procedure.
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (1) A copied State instrument for a transferring employee comes into operation immediately after the employee’s termination time.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The State is obligated to ensure the instrument operates at termination.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes
premise text: (1) A copied State instrument for a transferring employee comes into operation immediately after the employee’s termination time.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The information spreads that the instrument operates at termination.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses information about the instrument's operation.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (1) A copied State instrument for a transferring employee comes into operation immediately after the employee’s termination time.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AO(1) When is a copied State instrument in operation?

768AO(2) When is a copied State instrument in operation?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.342
note: Award operates for a period longer than the default period if FWC makes an order.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ao-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 768AO When is a copied State instrument in operation?

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Award operates for a period longer than the default period if FWC makes an order.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Default period applies unless FWC makes an order.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: !

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AO(2) When is a copied State instrument in operation?

768AO(3) When is a copied State instrument in operation?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.342
note: Regulations may prescribe circumstances for FWC to make an order.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ao-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 768AO When is a copied State instrument in operation?

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulations may prescribe circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AO(3) When is a copied State instrument in operation?

768AO(4) When is a copied State instrument in operation?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.342
note: A copied State employment agreement ceases to operate when it is terminated.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ao-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 768AO When is a copied State instrument in operation?

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Termination obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: cease

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AO(4) When is a copied State instrument in operation?

768AO(5) When is a copied State instrument in operation?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.342
note: Cannot operate again after ceasing operation
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ao-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 768AO When is a copied State instrument in operation?

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...can never operate again
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of operating again
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: (5) The nominal expiry date...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AO(5) When is a copied State instrument in operation?

768AO(6) When is a copied State instrument in operation?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.342
note: A copied State instrument for a transferring employee that has ceased to operate can never operate again.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-6-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ao-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 768AO When is a copied State instrument in operation?

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between cessation and operation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (6) A copied State instrument for a transferring employee that has ceased to operate can never operate again.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of operation
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: (6) A copied State instrument for a transferring employee that has ceased to operate can never operate again.

768AP What this Division is about
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.344
note: Describes purpose of Division
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ap-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ap
schema version: 2

768AQ Interaction between the NES and a copied State instrument
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.344
note: Term of copied State instrument is of no effect if detrimental to employee under NES.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aq-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aq-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aq-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768aq
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aq-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Term of instrument has no effect.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Term of instrument overlaps with 'no effect' if detrimental.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Term of instrument is detrimental to employee.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aq-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Term of instrument has no effect.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If term is detrimental, then it has no effect.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Term of instrument is detrimental to employee.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aq-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AQ Interaction between the NES and a copied State instrument

768AR Provisions of the NES that allow instruments to contain
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.344
curation status: Proposed
has part: 768AR(1) Provisions of the NES that allow instruments to contain
has part: 768AR(2) Provisions of the NES that allow instruments to contain
has part: 768AR(3) Provisions of the NES that allow instruments to contain
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ar
schema version: 2

768AR(1) Provisions of the NES that allow instruments to contain
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.344
note: Terms about paid annual leave and personal/carer’s leave
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ar-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ar-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ar-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 768AR Provisions of the NES that allow instruments to contain

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ar-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes terms about paid annual leave and personal/carer’s leave
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ar-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AR(1) Provisions of the NES that allow instruments to contain

768AR(2) Provisions of the NES that allow instruments to contain
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.344
note: If a copied State instrument includes terms that do not include requirements, then the instrument is taken to include those requirements.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ar-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ar-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ar-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ar-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 768AR Provisions of the NES that allow instruments to contain

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ar-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: States the obligation to include requirements
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ar-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies terms included in an instrument
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ar-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AR(2) Provisions of the NES that allow instruments to contain

768AR(3) Provisions of the NES that allow instruments to contain
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.344
note: If a copied State instrument applies to the employee, subsections 87(3) to (5) have effect.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ar-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ar-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ar-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 768AR Provisions of the NES that allow instruments to contain

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ar-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffect

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ar-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AR(3) Provisions of the NES that allow instruments to contain

768AS Modern awards and copied State awards
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.346
curation status: Proposed
has part: 768AS(1) Modern awards and copied State awards
has part: 768AS(2) Modern awards and copied State awards
has part: 768AS(3) Modern awards and copied State awards
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768as
schema version: 2

768AS(1) Modern awards and copied State awards
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.346
note: A modern award does not cover an employee, employer or other person in relation to the employee if a copied State award covers them.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768as-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768as-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768as-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768as-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768as-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768as-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 768AS Modern awards and copied State awards

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768as-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a modern award will start to cover the employee, or an employer or other person in relation to the employee.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between copied State awards and modern awards.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: When the copied State award for a transferring employee ceases to cover the employee, a modern award will start to cover the employee,...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768as-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a modern award does not cover the employee, or the employer or other person in relation to the employee.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits modern awards from covering employees covered by copied State awards.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (1) While a copied State award for a transferring employee:...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768as-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a modern award will start to cover the employee, or an employer or other person in relation to the employee.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes condition under which copied State awards cease to apply.
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
premise text: When the copied State award for a transferring employee ceases to cover the employee,...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768as-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a modern award does not cover the employee, or the employer or other person in relation to the employee.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between copied State awards and modern awards.
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: ...a modern award will start to cover the employee, or an employer or other person in relation to the employee.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768as-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AS(1) Modern awards and copied State awards

768AS(2) Modern awards and copied State awards
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.346
note: Exempts modern awards from better off overall test for enterprise agreements
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768as-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768as-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768as-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 768AS Modern awards and copied State awards

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768as-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on State
modality: Deontic
operator: !

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768as-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AS(2) Modern awards and copied State awards

768AS(3) Modern awards and copied State awards
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.346
note: Subject to FWC order about coverage under subsection 768BA(1)
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768as-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768as-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 768AS Modern awards and copied State awards

768AT Modern awards and copied State employment agreements
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.346
curation status: Proposed
has part: 768AT(1) Modern awards and copied State employment agreements
has part: 768AT(2) Modern awards and copied State employment agreements
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768at
schema version: 2

768AT(1) Modern awards and copied State employment agreements
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.346
note: If a copied State collective employment agreement and a modern award both apply, the copied agreement prevails over the modern award to the extent of any inconsistency.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768at-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768at-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768at-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 768AT Modern awards and copied State employment agreements

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768at-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Priority of agreements
modality: Deontic
operator: >=

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768at-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AT(1) Modern awards and copied State employment agreements

768AT(2) Modern awards and copied State employment agreements
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.346
note: Modern award does not apply to the employee, employer or other person in relation to the employee.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768at-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768at-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768at-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768at-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768at-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 768AT Modern awards and copied State employment agreements

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768at-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between the transfer of business and the application of the obligation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
premise text: The new employer has transferred business to another employer

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768at-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation on the employer to ensure the base rate of pay is not less than the modern award rate
modality: Deontic
operator: !
premise text: The copied State individual employment agreement must not be less than the modern award rate

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768at-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation on the employer to ensure the base rate of pay is not less than the modern award rate in certain situations
modality: Deontic
operator: ?
premise text: The new employer has transferred business to another employer

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768at-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AT(2) Modern awards and copied State employment agreements

768AU Enterprise agreements and copied State instruments
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.348
curation status: Proposed
has part: 768AU(1) Enterprise agreements and copied State instruments
has part: 768AU(2) Enterprise agreements and copied State instruments
has part: 768AU(3) Enterprise agreements and copied State instruments
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768au
schema version: 2

768AU(1) Enterprise agreements and copied State instruments
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.348
note: Enterprise agreement does not cover employee in relation to transferring work.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768au-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 768AU Enterprise agreements and copied State instruments

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AU(1) Enterprise agreements and copied State instruments

768AU(2) Enterprise agreements and copied State instruments
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.348
note: Copied State instrument ceases to cover employee and new employer after another enterprise agreement starts.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768au-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 768AU Enterprise agreements and copied State instruments

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the copied State instrument from covering employee and new employer.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AU(2) Enterprise agreements and copied State instruments

768AU(3) Enterprise agreements and copied State instruments
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.348
note: Subject to FWC order about coverage under subsection 768BA(1)
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768au-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 768AU Enterprise agreements and copied State instruments

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section overlaps in time with the FWC order
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap with FWC order
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: FWC order about coverage under subsection 768BA(1)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The CogAI recognizes the FWC order in this section
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes FWC order
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: This section has effect subject to any FWC order about coverage under subsection 768BA(1)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section has effect subject to the FWC order
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Depends on FWC order
modality: Deontic
operator: Subjunctive
premise text: FWC order about coverage under subsection 768BA(1)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The diffusion of the FWC order is contained in this section
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses FWC order
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: This section has effect subject to any FWC order about coverage under subsection 768BA(1)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC order contains the temporal information
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Contains temporal information
modality: LTL
operator: Contains
premise text: This section has effect subject to any FWC order about coverage under subsection 768BA(1)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AU(3) Enterprise agreements and copied State instruments

768AV What this Division is about
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.349
note: Sets out when a copied State instrument may be varied or terminated.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768av-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768av
schema version: 2

768AW Variation in limited circumstances
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.349
note: Variation of copied State instrument for transferring employee is restricted
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aw-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aw-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768aw
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aw-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restricts variation of copied State instrument
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

768AX Variation of copied State instruments
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.349
note: Section applies if there is or is likely to be a transfer of business.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ax-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ax
schema version: 2

768AY Termination in limited circumstances
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.352
curation status: Proposed
has part: 768AY(1) Termination in limited circumstances
has part: 768AY(2) Termination in limited circumstances
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ay
schema version: 2

768AY(1) Termination in limited circumstances
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.352
note: Cannot be terminated except under certain circumstances
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ay-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ay-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ay-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 768AY Termination in limited circumstances

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ay-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ay-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AY(1) Termination in limited circumstances

768AY(2) Termination in limited circumstances
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.352
note: A copied State instrument for a transferring employee that has been terminated ceases to operate and can never operate again.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ay-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ay-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ay-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 768AY Termination in limited circumstances

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ay-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the operation of a copied State instrument after termination.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

768AZ What this Division is about
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.353
curation status: Proposed
has part: 768AZ(1) What this Division is about
has part: 768AZ(2) What this Division is about
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768az
schema version: 2

768AZ(1) What this Division is about
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.353
note: Provides for orders to be made if there is, or is likely to be, a transfer of business.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768az-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768az-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768az-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 768AZ What this Division is about

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768az-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes the existence of an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: provides

768AZ(2) What this Division is about
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.353
note: Allowing for the making of orders before certain conditions are met.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768az-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768az-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768az-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 768AZ What this Division is about

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768az-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to make orders.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (2) An order may be made under this Division...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768az-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768AZ(2) What this Division is about

768BA FWC orders about coverage for transferring employees
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.354
curation status: Proposed
has part: 768BA(1) FWC orders about coverage for transferring employees
has part: 768BA(2) FWC orders about coverage for transferring employees
has part: 768BA(3) FWC orders about coverage for transferring employees
has part: 768BA(4) FWC orders about coverage for transferring employees
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ba
schema version: 2

768BA(1) FWC orders about coverage for transferring employees
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.354
note: FWC may make orders regarding coverage for transferring employees.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ba-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 768BA FWC orders about coverage for transferring employees

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BA(1) FWC orders about coverage for transferring employees

768BA(2) FWC orders about coverage for transferring employees
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.354
note: The FWC may make an order under subsection (1) on its own initiative or on application by certain parties.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ba-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 768BA FWC orders about coverage for transferring employees

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may make an order
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BA(2) FWC orders about coverage for transferring employees

768BA(3) FWC orders about coverage for transferring employees
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.354
note: Consider views of employees and new employer when making an order.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ba-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 768BA FWC orders about coverage for transferring employees

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider views of employees and new employer.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BA(3) FWC orders about coverage for transferring employees

768BA(4) FWC orders about coverage for transferring employees
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.354
note: Order must not come into operation before transferring employee's re-employment time or the day the order is made.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ba-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 768BA FWC orders about coverage for transferring employees

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on premature operation of orders
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: (4) An order under subsection (1) must not come into operation in relation to a particular transferring employee before the later of the following:

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on premature operation of orders
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: (a) the transferring employee’s re-employment time;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on premature operation of orders
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: (b) the day on which the order is made.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BA(4) FWC orders about coverage for transferring employees

768BB FWC orders about coverage for employee organisations
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.355
note: FWC may make an order about coverage for employee organisations.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bb-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bb-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bb
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bb-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bb-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BB FWC orders about coverage for employee organisations

768BC What this Division is about
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.357
note: This Division allows the FWC to consolidate various workplace instruments.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bc-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bc-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bc
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bc-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Orders have temporal intervals
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal intervals for instrument consolidation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Consolidation orders made

768BD Consolidation orders in relation to transferring employees
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.358
curation status: Proposed
has part: 768BD(1) Consolidation orders in relation to transferring employees
has part: 768BD(2) Consolidation orders in relation to transferring employees
has part: 768BD(3) Consolidation orders in relation to transferring employees
has part: 768BD(4) Consolidation orders in relation to transferring employees
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bd
schema version: 2

768BD(1) Consolidation orders in relation to transferring employees
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.358
note: The FWC may make an order that a copied State instrument for one or more other transferring employees is also a copied State instrument.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 768BD Consolidation orders in relation to transferring employees

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may make an order.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BD(1) Consolidation orders in relation to transferring employees

768BD(2) Consolidation orders in relation to transferring employees
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.358
note: The FWC may make a consolidation order under subsection (1) on its own initiative or on application by certain parties.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 768BD Consolidation orders in relation to transferring employees

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may make a consolidation order.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BD(2) Consolidation orders in relation to transferring employees

768BD(3) Consolidation orders in relation to transferring employees
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.358
note: Consider views of employees and new employer when deciding to make a consolidation order.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bd-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 768BD Consolidation orders in relation to transferring employees

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Consider the views of employees and new employer.
modality: Deontic
operator: consider

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BD(3) Consolidation orders in relation to transferring employees

768BD(4) Consolidation orders in relation to transferring employees
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.358
note: Consolidation order must not come into operation before transferring employee's re-employment time or the day the order is made.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bd-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 768BD Consolidation orders in relation to transferring employees

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the later of the following:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between re-employment time and order day
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
premise text: (4) A consolidation order under subsection (1) must not come into operation in relation to a particular transferring employee...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...before the later of the following:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on operation before specified conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: (4) A consolidation order under subsection (1) must not come into operation in relation to a particular transferring employee...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the later of the following:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation on operation after specified conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (4) A consolidation order under subsection (1) must not come into operation in relation to a particular transferring employee...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the later of the following:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of employees based on re-employment time and order day
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (4) A consolidation order under subsection (1) must not come into operation in relation to a particular transferring employee...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BD(4) Consolidation orders in relation to transferring employees

768BE Consolidation order to deal with application and coverage
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.359
note: Consolidation order specifies application and coverage of copied State instrument for employee A
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768be-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768be
schema version: 2

768BF Effect of this Act after a consolidation order is made
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.360
note: Effect of this Act after a consolidation order is made
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bf-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bf
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bf-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BF Effect of this Act after a consolidation order is made

768BG Consolidation orders in relation to non-transferring
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.360
curation status: Proposed
has part: 768BG(1) Consolidation orders in relation to non-transferring
has part: 768BG(2) Consolidation orders in relation to non-transferring
has part: 768BG(3) Consolidation orders in relation to non-transferring
has part: 768BG(4) Consolidation orders in relation to non-transferring
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bg
schema version: 2

768BG(1) Consolidation orders in relation to non-transferring
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.360
note: The FWC may make an order that a copied State instrument for one employee also is or will be a copied State instrument for one or more non-transferring employees.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bg-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 768BG Consolidation orders in relation to non-transferring

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may make an order
modality: Deontic
operator: May

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BG(1) Consolidation orders in relation to non-transferring

768BG(2) Consolidation orders in relation to non-transferring
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.360
note: Definition of non-transferring employee
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bg-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 768BG Consolidation orders in relation to non-transferring

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BG(2) Consolidation orders in relation to non-transferring

768BG(3) Consolidation orders in relation to non-transferring
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.360
note: The FWC may make a consolidation order under subsection (1) on its own initiative or on application by certain parties.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bg-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 768BG Consolidation orders in relation to non-transferring

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may make a consolidation order.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BG(3) Consolidation orders in relation to non-transferring

768BG(4) Consolidation orders in relation to non-transferring
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.360
note: Consider views of employees and new employer when deciding to make a consolidation order.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bg-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 768BG Consolidation orders in relation to non-transferring

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the nominal expiry date of the agreement.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Consider the nominal expiry date of the agreement.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: consider
premise text: The FWC must take into account...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the views of the employees who would be affected by the order.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classify the consolidation order as a consolidation order.
modality: CogAI
operator: classify
premise text: The FWC must take into account...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the views of the employees who would be affected by the order.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Consider the views of employees and new employer.
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
premise text: The FWC must take into account...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the new employer or a person who is likely to be the new employer.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Consider the views of the new employer or a person likely to be the new employer.
modality: Diffusion
operator: consider
premise text: The FWC must take into account...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...whether any employees would be disadvantaged by the order in relation to their terms and conditions of employment.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Consider the impact on employee terms and conditions.
modality: LTL
operator: consider
premise text: The FWC must take into account...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BG(4) Consolidation orders in relation to non-transferring

768BH Consolidation order to deal with application and coverage
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.362
curation status: Proposed
has part: 768BH(1) Consolidation order to deal with application and coverage
has part: 768BH(2) Consolidation order to deal with application and coverage
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bh
schema version: 2

768BH(1) Consolidation order to deal with application and coverage
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.362
note: A consolidation order must specify when an employee instrument applies to and covers certain employees.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bh-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bh-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 768BH Consolidation order to deal with application and coverage

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must specify conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bh-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BH(1) Consolidation order to deal with application and coverage

768BH(2) Consolidation order to deal with application and coverage
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.362
note: Specify that an enterprise agreement does not cover the non-transferring employee, new employer, and certain employee organisations.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bh-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bh-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bh-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bh-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bh-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bh-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 768BH Consolidation order to deal with application and coverage

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bh-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exclusion is conditional on the enterprise agreement covering the non-transferring employee.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the order and the exclusion of entities
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <>
premise text: (2) If an enterprise agreement covers...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bh-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exclusion is applied to the new employer and certain employee organisations.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes the application of the exclusion to related entities
modality: CogAI
operator: <>
premise text: ...the order must also specify that...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The non-transferring employee, new employer, and certain employee organisations are not covered.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies a prohibition on covering the specified entities
modality: Deontic
operator: !
premise text: The order must also specify that...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bh-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exclusion is propagated to the new employer and certain employee organisations.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes the propagation of the exclusion to related entities
modality: Diffusion
operator: <>
premise text: ...the order must also specify that...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bh-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exclusion is conditional on the enterprise agreement covering the non-transferring employee.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the order and the exclusion of entities
modality: LTL
operator: <>
premise text: (2) If an enterprise agreement covers...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bh-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BH(2) Consolidation order to deal with application and coverage

768BI Effect of this Act after a consolidation order is made
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.363
note: This Act has effect in relation to a particular non-transferring employee, from the time the order comes into operation in relation to that employee.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bi-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bi-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bi
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bi-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Act has a direct obligation on the State to apply its provisions.
modality: Deontic
operator: has effect

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bi-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BI Effect of this Act after a consolidation order is made

768BJ What this Division is about
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.364
note: Model term prescribed by regulations is a term of the instrument in case of dispute settlement
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bj-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bj-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bj-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bj-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bj
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bj-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The model term prescribed by regulations is taken to be a term of the instrument in that case.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Subdivision B deals with the case where a copied State instrument for a transferring employee does not have a term about settling disputes about matters arising under the instrument.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bj-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The model term prescribed by regulations is an obligation on the copied State instrument.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: In that case, the model term prescribed by regulations is taken to be a term of the instrument.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bj-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The model term prescribed by regulations is taken to be a term of the instrument in that case, which may recur.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace
modality: LTL
operator: <=
premise text: Subdivision B deals with the case where a copied State instrument for a transferring employee does not have a term about settling disputes about matters arising under the instrument.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bj-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BJ What this Division is about

768BK Where no term dealing with disputes
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.365
curation status: Proposed
has part: 768BK(1) Where no term dealing with disputes
has part: 768BK(1A) Where no term dealing with disputes
has part: 768BK(2) Where no term dealing with disputes
has part: 768BK(3) Where no term dealing with disputes
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bk
schema version: 2

768BK(1) Where no term dealing with disputes
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.365
note: Model term for settling disputes about matters arising under a copied State instrument for a transferring employee is included if not present in the original instrument.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bk-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bk-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bk-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 768BK Where no term dealing with disputes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bk-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Model term is applicable during the transfer period
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Model term applies during the transfer period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Transfer period starts when the employee transfers

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Model term is included
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Model term obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: Instrument does not include procedure for settling disputes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bk-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BK(1) Where no term dealing with disputes

768BK(1A) Where no term dealing with disputes
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.365
note: FWC must determine a model term for disputes
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bk-ss-1a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bk-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bk-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 768BK Where no term dealing with disputes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bk-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to determine a model term
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bk-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BK(1A) Where no term dealing with disputes

768BK(2) Where no term dealing with disputes
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.365
note: Model term for copied State award may be same or different from model term for copied State employment agreement.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bk-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bk-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 768BK Where no term dealing with disputes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bk-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BK(2) Where no term dealing with disputes

768BK(3) Where no term dealing with disputes
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.365
note: Consideration of factors when determining the model term
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bk-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bk-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 768BK Where no term dealing with disputes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bk-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BK(3) Where no term dealing with disputes

768BL Service for the purposes of this Act
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.366
curation status: Proposed
has part: 768BL(1) Service for the purposes of this Act
has part: 768BL(2) Service for the purposes of this Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bl
schema version: 2

768BL(1) Service for the purposes of this Act
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.366
note: Service of old employer counts as service for new employer
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bl-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bl-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 768BL Service for the purposes of this Act

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Service provision
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bl-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BL(1) Service for the purposes of this Act

768BL(2) Service for the purposes of this Act
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.366
note: Employee's continuous service with the new employer is not broken by a period of time between termination and re-employment.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bl-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bl-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bl-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bl-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 768BL Service for the purposes of this Act

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bl-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This period is included in the employee's continuous service with the new employer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval inclusion
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
premise text: The period of time between termination and re-employment does not break the employee's continuous service with the new employer.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bl-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is an obligation on the employee to provide this information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: The employee must provide this information to the new employer.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bl-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BL(2) Service for the purposes of this Act

768BM NES—working out non-accruing entitlements
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.367
curation status: Proposed
has part: 768BM(1) NES—working out non-accruing entitlements
has part: 768BM(2) NES—working out non-accruing entitlements
has part: 768BM(3) NES—working out non-accruing entitlements
has part: 768BM(4) NES—working out non-accruing entitlements
has part: 768BM(5) NES—working out non-accruing entitlements
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bm
schema version: 2

768BM(1) NES—working out non-accruing entitlements
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.367
note: This section applies for the purposes of determining entitlements.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bm-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 768BM NES—working out non-accruing entitlements

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section applies to entitlements
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BM(1) NES—working out non-accruing entitlements

768BM(2) NES—working out non-accruing entitlements
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.367
note: Prevents counting of old State employer's period of service when calculating employee's entitlements.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bm-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 768BM NES—working out non-accruing entitlements

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prevents counting of old State employer's period of service.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BM(2) NES—working out non-accruing entitlements

768BM(3) NES—working out non-accruing entitlements
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.367
note: No initial qualifying period of service is required for long service leave.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bm-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 768BM NES—working out non-accruing entitlements

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: !

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BM(3) NES—working out non-accruing entitlements

768BM(4) NES—working out non-accruing entitlements
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.367
note: No entitlement to redundancy pay if terms and conditions did not provide for it.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-4-logic-ltl-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bm-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 768BM NES—working out non-accruing entitlements

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No entitlement to redundancy pay.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If no entitlement, then no obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Terms and conditions did not provide for redundancy pay.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-4-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No entitlement to redundancy pay.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Redundancy pay applies until terms and conditions change.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: Terms and conditions did not provide for redundancy pay.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BM(4) NES—working out non-accruing entitlements

768BM(5) NES—working out non-accruing entitlements
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.367
note: If a State industrial body could have made an order giving the employee an entitlement to redundancy pay, then the employee is entitled to redundancy pay.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bm-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 768BM NES—working out non-accruing entitlements

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide redundancy pay
modality: Deontic
operator: >

768BN NES—working out accruing entitlements
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.368
curation status: Proposed
has part: 768BN(1) NES—working out accruing entitlements
has part: 768BN(2) NES—working out accruing entitlements
has part: 768BN(3) NES—working out accruing entitlements
has part: 768BN(4) NES—working out accruing entitlements
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bn
schema version: 2

768BN(1) NES—working out accruing entitlements
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.368
note: Employee's accrued entitlement to paid annual leave or personal/ carer’s leave
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bn-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 768BN NES—working out accruing entitlements

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has an obligation to receive accrued entitlements
modality: Deontic
operator: has

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BN(1) NES—working out accruing entitlements

768BN(2) NES—working out accruing entitlements
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.368
note: Minimum standard for accrued leave after re-employment
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bn-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 768BN NES—working out accruing entitlements

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to provide minimum standards for accrued leave
modality: Deontic
operator: obliges

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Applies the National Employment Standards as a minimum standard
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: applies-as

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BN(2) NES—working out accruing entitlements

768BN(3) NES—working out accruing entitlements
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.368
note: Reduction of accrued leave amount if old employer paid
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bn-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 768BN NES—working out accruing entitlements

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reduction of accrued leave amount if old employer paid
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BN(3) NES—working out accruing entitlements

768BN(4) NES—working out accruing entitlements
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.368
note: It does not matter whether entitlement accrued under original State award or agreement.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bn-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 768BN NES—working out accruing entitlements

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: !

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BN(4) NES—working out accruing entitlements

768BO Copied State instrument—service
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.369
curation status: Proposed
has part: 768BO(1) Copied State instrument—service
has part: 768BO(2) Copied State instrument—service
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bo
schema version: 2

768BO(1) Copied State instrument—service
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.369
note: Service of employee with old and new employer counts towards application of copied State instrument.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bo-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bo-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bo-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bo-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bo-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 768BO Copied State instrument—service

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...also counts as service of the employee with the new employer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between service and re-employment
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: (b) counted for the purposes of the application...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bo-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and counted for the purposes of the application...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Service obligation implies right to re-employment
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (a) occurred before the employee’s termination time;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bo-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...counts as service of the employee with the new employer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Service obligation recognized by AI system
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (1) Service of a transferring employee...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...counts as service of the employee with the new employer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Service obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: (1) Service of a transferring employee...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bo-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...also counts as service of the employee with the new employer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Service obligation diffuses to new employer
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (b) counted for the purposes of the application...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bo-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BO(1) Copied State instrument—service

768BO(2) Copied State instrument—service
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.369
note: Employee's continuous service with new employer
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bo-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bo-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 768BO Copied State instrument—service

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bo-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BO(2) Copied State instrument—service

768BP Copied State instrument—working out non-accruing
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.370
curation status: Proposed
has part: 768BP(1) Copied State instrument—working out non-accruing
has part: 768BP(2) Copied State instrument—working out non-accruing
has part: 768BP(3) Copied State instrument—working out non-accruing
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bp
schema version: 2

768BP(1) Copied State instrument—working out non-accruing
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.370
note: No double entitlement to annual leave or personal leave or carer’s leave under the copied State instrument.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bp-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 768BP Copied State instrument—working out non-accruing

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits double entitlement to specified leave types.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BP(1) Copied State instrument—working out non-accruing

768BP(2) Copied State instrument—working out non-accruing
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.370
note: Prevents counting of old State employer's period of service when calculating employee's entitlements under copied State instrument.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bp-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 768BP Copied State instrument—working out non-accruing

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Prevents counting of old State employer's period of service when calculating employee's entitlements.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Disjointness
premise text: (2) If, before or after the employee’s termination time, the employee has the benefit of an entitlement...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Prevents counting of old State employer's period of service when calculating employee's entitlements.
modality: CogAI
operator: No Change
premise text: (2) If, before or after the employee’s termination time, the employee has the benefit of an entitlement...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prevents counting of old State employer's period of service.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Prevents counting of old State employer's period of service when calculating employee's entitlements.
modality: Diffusion
operator: No Change
premise text: (2) If, before or after the employee’s termination time, the employee has the benefit of an entitlement...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Prevents counting of old State employer's period of service when calculating employee's entitlements.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (2) If, before or after the employee’s termination time, the employee has the benefit of an entitlement...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BP(2) Copied State instrument—working out non-accruing

768BP(3) Copied State instrument—working out non-accruing
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.370
note: No initial qualifying period of service for long service leave is required.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bp-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 768BP Copied State instrument—working out non-accruing

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: !

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BP(3) Copied State instrument—working out non-accruing

768BQ Copied State instrument—working out accruing entitlements
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.371
curation status: Proposed
has part: 768BQ(1) Copied State instrument—working out accruing entitlements
has part: 768BQ(2) Copied State instrument—working out accruing entitlements
has part: 768BQ(3) Copied State instrument—working out accruing entitlements
has part: 768BQ(4) Copied State instrument—working out accruing entitlements
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bq
schema version: 2

768BQ(1) Copied State instrument—working out accruing entitlements
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.371
note: Employee entitlements for annual leave and personal leave
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bq-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 768BQ Copied State instrument—working out accruing entitlements

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee entitlements exist
modality: Deontic
operator: has

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BQ(1) Copied State instrument—working out accruing entitlements

768BQ(2) Copied State instrument—working out accruing entitlements
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.371
note: Accrued entitlements taken to have accrued under copied State instrument
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bq-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 768BQ Copied State instrument—working out accruing entitlements

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: >

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BQ(2) Copied State instrument—working out accruing entitlements

768BQ(3) Copied State instrument—working out accruing entitlements
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.371
note: Reduction of accrued leave amount if old employer paid employee
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bq-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 768BQ Copied State instrument—working out accruing entitlements

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the amount of accrued leave is reduced accordingly.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Reduction of accrued leave amount overlaps with payment by old employer
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3) However, if before or after the employee’s termination time...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the amount of accrued leave is reduced accordingly.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Reduction of accrued leave amount is inferentially related to payment by old employer
modality: CogAI
operator: Inferential
premise text: (3) However, if before or after the employee’s termination time...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the amount of accrued leave is reduced accordingly.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to reduce accrued leave amount
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (3) However, if before or after the employee’s termination time...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the amount of accrued leave is reduced accordingly.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Reduction of accrued leave amount diffuses to payment by old employer
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (3) However, if before or after the employee’s termination time...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the amount of accrued leave is reduced accordingly.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Reduction of accrued leave amount is recurrently applied
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
premise text: (3) However, if before or after the employee’s termination time...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BQ(3) Copied State instrument—working out accruing entitlements

768BQ(4) Copied State instrument—working out accruing entitlements
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.371
note: It does not matter whether leave accrued under the original State award or original State agreement for the copied State instrument.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bq-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 768BQ Copied State instrument—working out accruing entitlements

768BR Cessation not intended to result in reduction in take-home
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.372
curation status: Proposed
has part: 768BR(1) Cessation not intended to result in reduction in take-home
has part: 768BR(2) Cessation not intended to result in reduction in take-home
has part: 768BR(3) Cessation not intended to result in reduction in take-home
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768br
schema version: 2

768BR(1) Cessation not intended to result in reduction in take-home
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.372
note: Employee's take-home pay is not reduced due to cessation of copied State award.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-1-logic-n3logic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768br-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 768BR Cessation not intended to result in reduction in take-home

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cessation is not intended to result in reduction
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The excerpt describes a temporal relationship between the cessation and the reduction.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Cessation of copied State award occurs before reduction in take-home pay

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee's take-home pay is not reduced due to cessation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: The excerpt implies a relationship between the cessation and the reduction.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: Cessation of copied State award

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee's take-home pay is not reduced
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If a condition is met, an obligation is created.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Cessation of copied State award

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee's take-home pay is not reduced due to cessation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The excerpt describes a process where the obligation is propagated.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: Cessation of copied State award for transferring employee

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-1-logic-n3logic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee's take-home pay is not reduced due to cessation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
logic summary: The excerpt describes a relationship between the cessation and the reduction using RDF.
modality: N3Logic
operator: RDF
premise text: Cessation of copied State award for transferring employee

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BR(1) Cessation not intended to result in reduction in take-home

768BR(2) Cessation not intended to result in reduction in take-home
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.372
note: Employee's take-home pay calculation
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768br-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 768BR Cessation not intended to result in reduction in take-home

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has a right to their take-home pay
modality: Deontic
operator: holds

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BR(2) Cessation not intended to result in reduction in take-home

768BR(3) Cessation not intended to result in reduction in take-home
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.372
note: Reduction in take-home pay is only allowed under specific conditions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768br-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 768BR Cessation not intended to result in reduction in take-home

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reduction in take-home pay is only allowed under specific conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BR(3) Cessation not intended to result in reduction in take-home

768BS Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.373
curation status: Proposed
has part: 768BS(1) Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay
has part: 768BS(2) Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay
has part: 768BS(3) Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay
has part: 768BS(4) Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay
has part: 768BS(5) Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bs
schema version: 2

768BS(1) Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay
type: Concept
description: Payment of take-home pay
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.373
note: FWC may make order requiring payment of take-home pay to employee
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bs-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 768BS Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make order
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BS(1) Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay

768BS(2) Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.373
note: FWC may make a take-home pay order on its own initiative or on application by transferring employee or organisation.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bs-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 768BS Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC may make a take-home pay order.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BS(2) Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay

768BS(3) Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.373
note: FWC cannot make a take-home pay order under certain conditions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bs-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 768BS Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC must not make a take-home pay order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of making a take-home pay order
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: FWC has the power to make take-home pay orders

768BS(4) Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.373
note: Ensure take-home pay order does not apply to transferring employees unless they have suffered a reduction in pay.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bs-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 768BS Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure take-home pay order meets obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BS(4) Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay

768BS(5) Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.373
note: Dismiss any later application for take-home pay if an earlier one has already been made in relation to the same employee.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bs-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 768BS Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits making a later application for take-home pay if an earlier one has already been made in relation to the same employee.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BS(5) Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay

768BT Contravening a take-home pay order
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.374
note: Prohibition on contravening a take-home pay order
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bt-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bt-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bt
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bt-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must not contravene the term.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: A person must not contravene a term of a take-home pay order that applies to the person.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bt-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BT Contravening a take-home pay order

768BU How long a take-home pay order continues to apply
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.374
note: Take-home pay order continues in relation to employee for as long as modern award applies.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bu-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bu-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bu
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bu-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Holds in relation to employee
modality: Deontic
operator: holds

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bu-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BU How long a take-home pay order continues to apply

768BV Interaction of take-home pay orders with modern awards
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.374
note: A term of a modern award or an enterprise agreement is less beneficial to the employee than a term of a take-home pay order if it applies to the employee.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bv-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bv-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bv-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bv-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bv-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bv-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bv
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bv-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is less beneficial than a term of a take-home pay order that applies to the employee.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The benefits of a modern award or enterprise agreement may overlap with those of a take-home pay order.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps-with
premise text: Term of a modern award or an enterprise agreement

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bv-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is less beneficial than a term of a take-home pay order that applies to the employee.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: A CogAI system may recognize that a modern award or enterprise agreement is less beneficial than a take-home pay order.
modality: CogAI
operator: cognizes
premise text: Term of a modern award or an enterprise agreement

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bv-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is less beneficial than a term of a take-home pay order that applies to the employee.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation of a modern award or enterprise agreement to be at least as beneficial as a take-home pay order.
modality: Deontic
operator: less-than-or-equal-to
premise text: Term of a modern award or an enterprise agreement

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bv-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is less beneficial than a term of a take-home pay order that applies to the employee.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The benefits of a modern award or enterprise agreement may diffuse into those of a take-home pay order.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: Term of a modern award or an enterprise agreement

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bv-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is less beneficial than a term of a take-home pay order that applies to the employee.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The benefits of a modern award or enterprise agreement may overlap with those of a take-home pay order in terms of time.
modality: LTL
operator: overlaps-with
premise text: Term of a modern award or an enterprise agreement

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bv-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BV Interaction of take-home pay orders with modern awards

768BW Application of this Act to take-home pay orders
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.374
note: This Act applies as if certain provisions included a reference to take-home pay orders.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bw-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bw-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bw
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bw-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion of provisions
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bw-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BW Application of this Act to take-home pay orders

768BX Modification of this Act for copied State instruments
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.374
note: Modifies the Act for copied State instruments
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bx-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bx-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bx
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bx-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Identifies temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes

768BY Modification of the Transitional Act for copied State
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.376
note: Modifies transitional provisions for copied State instruments
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768by-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768by
schema version: 2

768BZ Modification of the Registered Organisations Act for copied
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.380
curation status: Proposed
has part: 768BZ(1) Modification of the Registered Organisations Act for copied
has part: 768BZ(2) Modification of the Registered Organisations Act for copied
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bz
schema version: 2

768BZ(1) Modification of the Registered Organisations Act for copied
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.380
note: Modify Registered Organisations Act for copied State awards and employment agreements.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bz-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bz-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 768BZ Modification of the Registered Organisations Act for copied

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bz-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768BZ(1) Modification of the Registered Organisations Act for copied

768BZ(2) Modification of the Registered Organisations Act for copied
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.380
note: Relating to how the Registered Organisations Act applies in relation to a transferring employee.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bz-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768bz-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 768BZ Modification of the Registered Organisations Act for copied

768CA Regulations
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.382
curation status: Proposed
has part: 768CA(1) Regulations
has part: 768CA(2) Regulations
has part: 768CA(3) Regulations
has part: 768CA(4) Regulations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ca
schema version: 2

768CA(1) Regulations
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.382
note: Regulations for transition from State awards and State employment agreements to copied State instruments.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ca-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ca-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 768CA Regulations

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulations may make provision in relation to...
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ca-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768CA(1) Regulations

768CA(2) Regulations
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.382
note: Regulations may modify or apply provisions of the Act.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ca-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ca-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ca-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 768CA Regulations

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ca-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulations can modify provisions.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ca-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768CA(2) Regulations

768CA(3) Regulations
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.382
note: Regulations cannot modify provisions to impose an obligation or create new offences.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ca-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ca-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ca-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 768CA Regulations

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ca-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulations cannot modify provisions to impose an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ca-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 768CA(3) Regulations

768CA(4) Regulations
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.382
note: Provisions for regulations do not limit each other.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ca-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-768ca-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 768CA Regulations

769 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.384
note: Guide to this Part
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-769-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-769
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-769-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 769 Guide to this Part

770 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.384
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-770-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-770-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-770
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-770-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key terms.
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-770-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 770 Meanings of employee and employer

771 Object of this Division
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.385
note: Object of this Division is to give effect, or further effect, to the ILO Convention (No. 111) concerning Discrimination in respect of Employment and Occupation.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-771-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-771
schema version: 2

772 Employment not to be terminated on certain grounds
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.386
curation status: Proposed
has part: 772(1) Employment not to be terminated on certain grounds
has part: 772(2) Employment not to be terminated on certain grounds
has part: 772(3) Employment not to be terminated on certain grounds
has part: 772(4) Employment not to be terminated on certain grounds
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-772
schema version: 2

772(1) Employment not to be terminated on certain grounds
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.386
note: Employer must not terminate employment for certain reasons.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-772-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-772-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-772-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 772 Employment not to be terminated on certain grounds

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-772-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits termination of employment under specified conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-772-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 772(1) Employment not to be terminated on certain grounds

772(2) Employment not to be terminated on certain grounds
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.386
note: Employment cannot be terminated on certain grounds.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-772-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-772-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-772-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 772 Employment not to be terminated on certain grounds

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-772-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits termination of employment based on certain grounds.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-772-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 772(2) Employment not to be terminated on certain grounds

772(3) Employment not to be terminated on certain grounds
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.386
note: Employment cannot be terminated for absence during parental leave.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-772-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-772-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-772-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 772 Employment not to be terminated on certain grounds

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-772-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits termination of employment for absence during parental leave.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-772-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 772(3) Employment not to be terminated on certain grounds

772(4) Employment not to be terminated on certain grounds
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.386
note: Employment cannot be terminated on certain grounds
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-772-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-772-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-772-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 772 Employment not to be terminated on certain grounds

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-772-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits employment termination
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-772-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 772(4) Employment not to be terminated on certain grounds

773 Application for the FWC to deal with a dispute
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.387
note: Employee may apply for FWC to deal with dispute over termination.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-773-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-773-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-773
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-773-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has a right to apply for FWC to deal with dispute.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-773-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 773 Application for the FWC to deal with a dispute

774 Time for application
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.387
note: Application must be made within 21 days after employment termination.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-774-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-774-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-774
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-774-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be made within a specified time frame.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: None

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-774-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 774 Time for application

775 Application fees
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388
curation status: Proposed
has part: 775(1) Application fees
has part: 775(2) Application fees
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-775
schema version: 2

775(1) Application fees
type: Concept
description: Fee
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388
note: Application must be accompanied by a prescribed fee.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-775-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-775-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-775-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 775 Application fees

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-775-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide fee
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-775-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 775(1) Application fees

775(2) Application fees
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388
note: Application fee regulation
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-775-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-775-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-775-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 775 Application fees

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-775-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires payment of application fee
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-775-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 775(2) Application fees

776 Dealing with a dispute (other than by arbitration)
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388
curation status: Proposed
has part: 776(1) Dealing with a dispute (other than by arbitration)
has part: 776(2) Dealing with a dispute (other than by arbitration)
has part: 776(3) Dealing with a dispute (other than by arbitration)
has part: 776(4) Dealing with a dispute (other than by arbitration)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-776
schema version: 2

776(1) Dealing with a dispute (other than by arbitration)
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388
note: FWC must deal with a dispute (other than by arbitration)
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-776-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-776-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-776-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 776 Dealing with a dispute (other than by arbitration)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-776-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must deal with the dispute
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-776-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 776(1) Dealing with a dispute (other than by arbitration)

776(2) Dealing with a dispute (other than by arbitration)
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388
note: Conferences must be conducted in private
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-776-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-776-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-776-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 776 Dealing with a dispute (other than by arbitration)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-776-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of public conferences
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

776(3) Dealing with a dispute (other than by arbitration)
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388
note: FWC must issue certificate if dispute resolution attempts are unsuccessful
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-776-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-776-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-776-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 776 Dealing with a dispute (other than by arbitration)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-776-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to issue certificate
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-776-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 776(3) Dealing with a dispute (other than by arbitration)

776(4) Dealing with a dispute (other than by arbitration)
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388
note: An unlawful termination court application is an obligation to apply to a court under Division 2 of Part 4-1 for orders in relation to a contravention of subsection 772(1).
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-776-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-776-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 776 Dealing with a dispute (other than by arbitration)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-776-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 776(4) Dealing with a dispute (other than by arbitration)

777 Dealing with a dispute by arbitration
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.389
note: Notification of FWC arbitration agreement within 14 days after certificate issuance.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-777-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-777-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-777
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-777-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Agreement to arbitration.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notification obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Notification given within 14 days.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-777-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 777 Dealing with a dispute by arbitration

778 Taking a dispute to court
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.390
note: A person who is entitled to apply under section 773 for the FWC to deal with a dispute must not make an unlawful termination court application in relation to the dispute unless certain conditions are met.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-778-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-778-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-778-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-778-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-778-logic-ltl-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-778-logic-deontic-5
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-778-logic-descriptionlogic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-778
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-778-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: [0, 14]
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for making an unlawful termination court application in relation to the dispute.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: unlawful termination court application is made within 14 days after the day the certificate is issued, or within such period as the court allows on an application made during or after those 14 days

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-778-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: unlawful termination court application must not be made
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of making an unlawful termination court application in relation to the dispute unless certain conditions are met.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: FWC has issued a certificate under paragraph 776(3)(a) in relation to the dispute

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-778-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: obligation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make an unlawful termination court application in relation to the dispute unless certain conditions are met.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: A person who is entitled to apply under section 773 for the FWC to deal with a dispute must not make an unlawful termination court application in relation to the dispute unless certain conditions are met.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-778-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prohibition
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of the provision as a prohibition.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: A person who is entitled to apply under section 773 for the FWC to deal with a dispute must not make an unlawful termination court application in relation to the dispute unless certain conditions are met.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-778-logic-descriptionlogic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of the provision as an obligation.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: A person who is entitled to apply under section 773 for the FWC to deal with a dispute must not make an unlawful termination court application in relation to the dispute unless certain conditions are met.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-778-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: [0, ∞)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for making an unlawful termination court application in relation to the dispute.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: unlawful termination court application is made within 14 days after the day the certificate is issued, or within such period as the court allows on an application made during or after those 14 days

779 Appeal rights
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.391
curation status: Proposed
has part: 779(1) Appeal rights
has part: 779(2) Appeal rights
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-779
schema version: 2

779(1) Appeal rights
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.391
note: FWC cannot grant permission to appeal from a decision made by the FWC under subsection 777(2) unless it is in the public interest.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-779-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 779 Appeal rights

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on granting permission to appeal
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

779(2) Appeal rights
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.391
note: Appeal rights limited
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-779-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 779 Appeal rights

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: can only, to the extent that it is an appeal on a question of fact
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limits appeal on question of fact
modality: Deontic
operator: Limitation
premise text: (2) Despite subsection 604(1)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 779(2) Appeal rights

779A Costs orders against parties
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.391
curation status: Proposed
has part: 779A(1) Costs orders against parties
has part: 779A(2) Costs orders against parties
has part: 779A(3) Costs orders against parties
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-779a
schema version: 2

779A(1) Costs orders against parties
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.391
note: The FWC may order costs against a party to a dispute if they caused the other party's costs.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-779a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 779A Costs orders against parties

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is an Allen interval between the application and the costs.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between two events
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: The FWC is satisfied that the first party caused those costs...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The CogAI recognizes the obligation to pay costs.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of obligations
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: The FWC may make an order for costs...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A party must pay costs incurred by the other party.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay costs
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: The FWC may make an order for costs...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The obligation to pay costs diffuses from the FWC to the first party.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of obligations
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: The FWC may make an order for costs...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is an ordered trace between the application and the costs.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Ordered trace of events
modality: LTL
operator: ordered
premise text: The FWC is satisfied that the first party caused those costs...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 779A(1) Costs orders against parties

779A(2) Costs orders against parties
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.391
note: The FWC may make an order only if the other party applies for it.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-779a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 779A Costs orders against parties

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May make an order
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 779A(2) Costs orders against parties

779A(3) Costs orders against parties
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.391
note: Does not limit FWC's power to order costs under section 611.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-779a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 779A Costs orders against parties

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Does not limit FWC's power to order costs under section 611.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limits FWC's power to order costs
modality: Deontic
operator: does not imply
premise text: Section 611

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 779A(3) Costs orders against parties

780 Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.391
note: Prohibition on costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-780-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-780-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-780
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-780-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

781 Applications for costs orders
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.392
note: Application for costs order must be made within 14 days after FWC finishes dealing with dispute.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-781
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be made within 14 days.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 781 Applications for costs orders

781A Schedule of costs
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.392
curation status: Proposed
has part: 781A(1) Schedule of costs
has part: 781A(2) Schedule of costs
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-781a
schema version: 2

781A(1) Schedule of costs
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.392
note: A schedule of costs may be prescribed in relation to items of expenditure likely to be incurred.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781a-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-781a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 781A Schedule of costs

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 781A(1) Schedule of costs

781A(2) Schedule of costs
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.392
note: Cannot award costs at a rate or amount exceeding the schedule.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781a-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-781a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 781A Schedule of costs

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must not award costs in relation to that item at a rate or of an amount exceeding...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Limits cost awards within the specified time frame.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: (2) If a schedule of costs is prescribed...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must not award costs in relation to that item at a rate or of an amount exceeding...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Restricts cost awards based on the schedule.
modality: CogAI
operator: Restriction
premise text: (2) If a schedule of costs is prescribed...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must not award costs in relation to that item...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits awarding costs at a rate or amount exceeding the schedule.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) If a schedule of costs is prescribed...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must not award costs in relation to that item at a rate or of an amount exceeding...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Limits cost awards within the specified scope.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Limitation
premise text: (2) If a schedule of costs is prescribed...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must not award costs in relation to that item at a rate or of an amount exceeding...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Limits cost awards to recurring items within the schedule.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (2) If a schedule of costs is prescribed...

782 Contravening costs orders
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.393
note: Prohibition on contravening costs orders
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-782-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-782-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-782
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-782-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids contravention of costs orders
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: None

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-782-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 782 Contravening costs orders

783 Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.393
curation status: Proposed
has part: 783(1) Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise
has part: 783(2) Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-783
schema version: 2

783(1) Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.393
note: Presumption of reason for action in contravention cases
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-783-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-783-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-783-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-783-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-783-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-783-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-783-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 783 Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-783-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...would constitute a contravention of subsection 772(1);
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Relates action to reason for action
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relation between temporal intervals
premise text: (a) in an application...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-783-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...would constitute a contravention of subsection 772(1);
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Applies to automated decision-making processes
modality: CogAI
operator: artificial intelligence application
premise text: (a) in an application...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-783-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the person proves otherwise.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Presumes a reason for action unless proven otherwise
modality: Deontic
operator: presumption
premise text: (1) If:...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-783-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...would constitute a contravention of subsection 772(1);
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spreads the presumption to related cases
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion of information
premise text: (b) taking that action for that reason...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-783-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...would constitute a contravention of subsection 772(1);
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Establishes a causal relationship between action and reason
modality: LTL
operator: ordered trace
premise text: (a) in an application...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-783-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 783(1) Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise

783(2) Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.393
note: Prevents application of subsection (1) to interim injunction orders
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-783-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-783-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 783 Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise

784 Object of this Division
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.394
note: Requirement to notify Centrelink
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-784-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-784-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-784
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-784-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory notification
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-784-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 784 Object of this Division

785 Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.394
curation status: Proposed
has part: 785(1) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations
has part: 785(2) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations
has part: 785(3) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations
has part: 785(4) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations
has part: 785(5) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-785
schema version: 2

785(1) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations
type: Concept
description: Written notice
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.394
note: Employer must notify Centrelink of proposed terminations.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-785-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-785-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-785-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 785 Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-785-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must provide written notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-785-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 785(1) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations

785(2) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations
type: Concept
description: Reasons for termination, number and categories of employees likely to be affected, time when or period over which termination is intended.
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.394
note: Employer must notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-785-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-785-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-785-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 785 Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-785-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to notify Centrelink.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-785-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 785(2) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations

785(3) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations
type: Concept
description: Notice
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.394
note: Employer must notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-785-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-785-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-785-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 785 Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-785-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must provide notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

785(4) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.394
note: Employer must notify Centrelink of proposed terminations.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-785-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-785-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-785-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 785 Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-785-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply with the section.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

785(5) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.394
note: Employer must not terminate employment without Centrelink's permission.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-785-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-785-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-785-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 785 Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-785-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to notify Centrelink.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

786 FWC may make orders where failure to notify or consult
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.395
note: FWC may make orders where failure to notify or consult registered employee associations about terminations.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-786-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-786-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-786
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-786-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-786-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 786 FWC may make orders where failure to notify or consult

787 Orders that the FWC may make
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.397
curation status: Proposed
has part: 787(1) Orders that the FWC may make
has part: 787(2) Orders that the FWC may make
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-787
schema version: 2

787(1) Orders that the FWC may make
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.397
note: The FWC may make orders to put employees in the same position as if the employer had complied with subsections 786(2) and (3).
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-787-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-787-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-787-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 787 Orders that the FWC may make

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-787-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may make orders.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-787-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 787(1) Orders that the FWC may make

787(2) Orders that the FWC may make
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.397
note: Prohibition on certain orders by FWC
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-787-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-787-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-787-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 787 Orders that the FWC may make

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-787-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits actions
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

788 Application to the FWC for order
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.397
note: Application for order by employees
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-788-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-788
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-788-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 788 Application to the FWC for order

789 Limits on scope of this Division
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.398
curation status: Proposed
has part: 789(1) Limits on scope of this Division
has part: 789(2) Limits on scope of this Division
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789
schema version: 2

789(1) Limits on scope of this Division
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.398
note: Employees exempt from this Division's scope
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 789 Limits on scope of this Division

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employees exempt from this Division's scope
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789(1) Limits on scope of this Division

789(2) Limits on scope of this Division
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.398
note: Exempts employment from Division application if substantial reason for employing the employee was to avoid the application of this Division.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 789 Limits on scope of this Division

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for exemption from Division application.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) Paragraph (1)(a) does not prevent this Division from applying in relation to an employee if a substantial reason for employing the employee as described in that paragraph was to avoid the application of this Division.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes artificial intelligence process for exemption from Division application.
modality: CogAI
operator: Artificial Intelligence
premise text: (2) Paragraph (1)(a) does not prevent this Division from applying in relation to an employee if a substantial reason for employing the employee as described in that paragraph was to avoid the application of this Division.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts employment from Division application.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: (2) Paragraph (1)(a) does not prevent this Division from applying in relation to an employee if a substantial reason for employing the employee as described in that paragraph was to avoid the application of this Division.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes diffusive process for exemption from Division application.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusive Process
premise text: (2) Paragraph (1)(a) does not prevent this Division from applying in relation to an employee if a substantial reason for employing the employee as described in that paragraph was to avoid the application of this Division.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for exemption from Division application.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (2) Paragraph (1)(a) does not prevent this Division from applying in relation to an employee if a substantial reason for employing the employee as described in that paragraph was to avoid the application of this Division.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789(2) Limits on scope of this Division

789AA Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.399
note: Guide to this Part
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789aa-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789aa
schema version: 2

789AB Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.399
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ab-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ab-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789ab
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ab-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key terms.
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ab-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789AB Meanings of employee and employer

789AC Objects of this Part
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.399
note: Ensure secure, safe and fair systems of work for outworkers
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ac-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ac-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789ac
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ac-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure secure, safe and fair systems of work for outworkers
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ac-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789AC Objects of this Part

789BA Provisions covered by this Division
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.401
curation status: Proposed
has part: 789BA(1) Provisions covered by this Division
has part: 789BA(2) Provisions covered by this Division
has part: 789BA(3) Provisions covered by this Division
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789ba
schema version: 2

789BA(1) Provisions covered by this Division
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.401
note: Exemptions from coverage of this Division
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ba-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789ba-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 789BA Provisions covered by this Division

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ba-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789BA(1) Provisions covered by this Division

789BA(2) Provisions covered by this Division
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.401
note: Provisions not covered by this Division are to be interpreted disregarding the effect of this Division in relation to other provisions of this Act.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ba-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ba-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ba-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ba-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ba-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789ba-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 789BA Provisions covered by this Division

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ba-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...are to be interpreted disregarding the effect of this Division in relation to other provisions of this Act.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Provisions not covered by this Division overlap with other provisions of the Act.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) Provisions of this Act that are not covered by this Division...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ba-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...are to be interpreted disregarding the effect of this Division in relation to other provisions of this Act.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Provisions not covered by this Division are classified as part of the Act.
modality: CogAI
operator: Classifies
premise text: (2) Provisions of this Act that are not covered by this Division...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...are to be interpreted disregarding the effect of this Division in relation to other provisions of this Act.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to interpret provisions not covered by this Division disregarding the effect of this Division.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) Provisions of this Act that are not covered by this Division...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ba-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...are to be interpreted disregarding the effect of this Division in relation to other provisions of this Act.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Provisions not covered by this Division diffuse into other provisions of the Act.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (2) Provisions of this Act that are not covered by this Division...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ba-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...are to be interpreted disregarding the effect of this Division in relation to other provisions of this Act.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Provisions not covered by this Division are recurrently related to other provisions of the Act.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
premise text: (2) Provisions of this Act that are not covered by this Division...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ba-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789BA(2) Provisions covered by this Division

789BA(3) Provisions covered by this Division
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.401
note: Interpretation of excluded provisions
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ba-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789ba-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 789BA Provisions covered by this Division

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ba-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789BA(3) Provisions covered by this Division

789BB TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.402
curation status: Proposed
has part: 789BB(1) TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain
has part: 789BB(2) TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain
has part: 789BB(3) TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain
has part: 789BB(4) TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain
has part: 789BB(5) TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789bb
schema version: 2

789BB(1) TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.402
note: TCF contract outworker is taken to be an employee in certain circumstances.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789bb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 789BB TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes a legal relationship
modality: Deontic
operator: takes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789BB(1) TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain

789BB(2) TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.402
note: TCF contract outworker is an employee under certain conditions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789bb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 789BB TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Outwork performed by TCF contract outworker occurs during employment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between employment and outwork
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) A TCF contract outworker is a TCF outworker who performs work other than as an employee.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Outwork performed by TCF contract outworker occurs during employment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal relationship between employment and outwork
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (2) A TCF contract outworker is a TCF outworker who performs work other than as an employee.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: TCF contract outworker is an employee under certain conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of TCF contract outworker
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (2) A TCF contract outworker is a TCF outworker who performs work other than as an employee.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Outwork performed by TCF contract outworker occurs during employment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal relationship between employment and outwork
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (2) A TCF contract outworker is a TCF outworker who performs work other than as an employee.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Outwork performed by TCF contract outworker occurs during employment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between employment and outwork
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (2) A TCF contract outworker is a TCF outworker who performs work other than as an employee.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789BB(2) TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain

789BB(3) TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.402
note: Interpretation preference
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789bb-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 789BB TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789BB(3) TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain

789BB(4) TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.402
note: Outworker has same rights and obligations as an employee
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789bb-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 789BB TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Outworker has same rights and obligations as an employee
modality: Deontic
operator: hasSameRightsAndObligationsAs

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-4-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: NaturalPerson
part of: 789BB(4) TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain

789BB(5) TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.402
note: This section has effect subject to regulations made for the purposes of section 789BC.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789bb-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 789BB TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789BB(5) TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain

789BC Regulations relating to TCF outworkers who are taken to be
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.403
curation status: Proposed
has part: 789BC(1) Regulations relating to TCF outworkers who are taken to be
has part: 789BC(2) Regulations relating to TCF outworkers who are taken to be
has part: 789BC(3) Regulations relating to TCF outworkers who are taken to be
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789bc
schema version: 2

789BC(1) Regulations relating to TCF outworkers who are taken to be
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.403
note: Regulations may provide specified modifications to provisions covered by this Division for deemed employees and deemed employers.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bc-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789bc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 789BC Regulations relating to TCF outworkers who are taken to be

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789BC(1) Regulations relating to TCF outworkers who are taken to be

789BC(2) Regulations relating to TCF outworkers who are taken to be
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.403
note: Regulations may provide differently for different provisions or situations.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bc-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789bc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 789BC Regulations relating to TCF outworkers who are taken to be

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789BC(2) Regulations relating to TCF outworkers who are taken to be

789BC(3) Regulations relating to TCF outworkers who are taken to be
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.403
note: Regulations cannot modify provisions that create an offence or impose a duty that constitutes an offence.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bc-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789bc-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 789BC Regulations relating to TCF outworkers who are taken to be

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of modifying provisions that create an offence or impose a duty.
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot

789CA When this Division applies
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.404
curation status: Proposed
has part: 789CA(1) When this Division applies
has part: 789CA(2) When this Division applies
has part: 789CA(3) When this Division applies
has part: 789CA(4) When this Division applies
has part: 789CA(5) When this Division applies
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789ca
schema version: 2

789CA(1) When this Division applies
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.404
note: Responsible person must pay unpaid amount to outworker or another person for the benefit of the outworker.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789ca-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 789CA When this Division applies

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Responsible person must pay unpaid amount.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789CA(1) When this Division applies

789CA(2) When this Division applies
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.404
note: Amounts payable by way of remuneration or commission, leave, contributions to a superannuation fund, and reimbursement for expenses incurred.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789ca-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 789CA When this Division applies

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The unpaid amount relates to the TCF work during a period.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During a period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) Without limiting paragraph (1)(b), the unpaid amount may...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The unpaid amount is an obligation.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Has obligation
modality: CogAI
operator: hasObligation
premise text: (2) Without limiting paragraph (1)(b), the unpaid amount may...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The unpaid amount is an amount payable by way of remuneration or commission.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
premise text: (2) Without limiting paragraph (1)(b), the unpaid amount may...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The unpaid amount is everywhere in the TCF work.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Everywhere in the TCF work
modality: Diffusion
operator: everywhere
premise text: (2) Without limiting paragraph (1)(b), the unpaid amount may...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The unpaid amount is everywhere in the TCF work.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Everywhere in the TCF work
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
premise text: (2) Without limiting paragraph (1)(b), the unpaid amount may...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789CA(2) When this Division applies

789CA(3) When this Division applies
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.404
note: A person is an indirectly responsible entity in relation to the TCF work if certain conditions are met.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789ca-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 789CA When this Division applies

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789CA(3) When this Division applies

789CA(4) When this Division applies
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.404
note: Entity is indirectly responsible for part of TCF work if subsection (3) is satisfied.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789ca-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 789CA When this Division applies

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Part of TCF work has temporal relation to subsection (3).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <
premise text: (4) If subsection (3) is satisfied in relation to a Commonwealth outworker entity and part only of the TCF work:

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Unpaid amount is attributed to part of TCF work.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Part of TCF work attribution
modality: Deontic
operator: >
premise text: The unpaid amount is so much only of the amount referred to in paragraph (1)(b) as is attributable to that part of the TCF work.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Entity is classified as indirectly responsible.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity classification
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: The entity is an indirectly responsible entity in relation to that part of the TCF work.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Part of TCF work has temporal trace.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval trace
modality: LTL
operator: <
premise text: (4) If subsection (3) is satisfied in relation to a Commonwealth outworker entity and part only of the TCF work:

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789CA(4) When this Division applies

789CA(5) When this Division applies
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.404
note: Division applies under certain conditions
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789ca-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 789CA When this Division applies

789CB Liability of indirectly responsible entity for unpaid amount
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.406
curation status: Proposed
has part: 789CB(1) Liability of indirectly responsible entity for unpaid amount
has part: 789CB(3) Liability of indirectly responsible entity for unpaid amount
has part: 789CB(4) Liability of indirectly responsible entity for unpaid amount
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789cb
schema version: 2

789CB(1) Liability of indirectly responsible entity for unpaid amount
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.406
note: Each indirectly responsible entity is liable to pay the unpaid amount.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789cb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 789CB Liability of indirectly responsible entity for unpaid amount

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between entities
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalRelation
premise text: (1) Each indirectly responsible entity (or the indirectly responsible entity, if there is only one) is liable to pay the unpaid amount.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of liability on entities
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (1) Each indirectly responsible entity (or the indirectly responsible entity, if there is only one) is liable to pay the unpaid amount.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge representation of liability
modality: CogAI
operator: KnowledgeRepresentation
premise text: (1) Each indirectly responsible entity (or the indirectly responsible entity, if there is only one) is liable to pay the unpaid amount.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity liability
modality: Deontic
operator: Liability
premise text: (1) Each indirectly responsible entity (or the indirectly responsible entity, if there is only one) is liable to pay the unpaid amount.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagated liability
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (1) Each indirectly responsible entity (or the indirectly responsible entity, if there is only one) is liable to pay the unpaid amount.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789CB(1) Liability of indirectly responsible entity for unpaid amount

789CB(3) Liability of indirectly responsible entity for unpaid amount
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.406
note: Entities are jointly and severally liable for payment.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789cb-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 789CB Liability of indirectly responsible entity for unpaid amount

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...those entities are jointly and severally liable for the payment of the unpaid amount.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (3) If there are 2 or more indirectly responsible entities...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...those entities are jointly and severally liable for the payment of the unpaid amount.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Entity classification
modality: CogAI
operator: EntityClassification
premise text: (3) If there are 2 or more indirectly responsible entities...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...those entities are jointly and severally liable for the payment of the unpaid amount.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Joint liability
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (3) If there are 2 or more indirectly responsible entities...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...those entities are jointly and severally liable for the payment of the unpaid amount.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Joint liability diffusion
modality: Diffusion
operator: JointLiability
premise text: (3) If there are 2 or more indirectly responsible entities...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...those entities are jointly and severally liable for the payment of the unpaid amount.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace
modality: LTL
operator: RecurringTrace
premise text: (3) If there are 2 or more indirectly responsible entities...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789CB(3) Liability of indirectly responsible entity for unpaid amount

789CB(4) Liability of indirectly responsible entity for unpaid amount
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.406
note: Responsible person still liable for unpaid amount despite section's effect on indirectly responsible entity.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789cb-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 789CB Liability of indirectly responsible entity for unpaid amount

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The responsible person is still liable for the unpaid amount.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section does not affect liability of responsible person.
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
premise text: This section does not affect the liability of the responsible person to pay the unpaid amount.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The section's effect on the indirectly responsible entity is limited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section's effect on indirectly responsible entity is limited.
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
premise text: Subject to subsection 789CE(1A), this section does not affect the liability of the responsible person to pay the unpaid amount.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The section cannot be used to exempt the indirectly responsible entity from liability.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section cannot be used to exempt indirectly responsible entities from liability.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: This section does not affect the liability of the responsible person to pay the unpaid amount.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The section allows for a limited exemption of the indirectly responsible entity from liability.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section allows for limited exemption of indirectly responsible entities from liability.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: Subject to subsection 789CE(1A), this section does not affect the liability of the responsible person to pay the unpaid amount.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The section creates a right in the responsible person to receive payment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section creates a right in the responsible person to receive payment.
modality: Deontic
operator: Right
premise text: This section does not affect the liability of the responsible person to pay the unpaid amount.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789CB(4) Liability of indirectly responsible entity for unpaid amount

789CC Demand for payment from an apparent indirectly
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.406
curation status: Proposed
has part: 789CC(1) Demand for payment from an apparent indirectly
has part: 789CC(2) Demand for payment from an apparent indirectly
has part: 789CC(3) Demand for payment from an apparent indirectly
has part: 789CC(4) Demand for payment from an apparent indirectly
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789cc
schema version: 2

789CC(1) Demand for payment from an apparent indirectly
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.406
note: Demand for payment from an apparent indirectly responsible entity
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cc-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789cc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 789CC Demand for payment from an apparent indirectly

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to demand payment
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

789CC(2) Demand for payment from an apparent indirectly
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.406
note: An entity is an apparent indirectly responsible entity in relation to the TCF work if the TCF outworker reasonably believes that the entity is an indirectly responsible entity in relation to the TCF work.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cc-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789cc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 789CC Demand for payment from an apparent indirectly

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: entity is an apparent indirectly responsible entity
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity classification
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: TCF outworker reasonably believes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789CC(2) Demand for payment from an apparent indirectly

789CC(3) Demand for payment from an apparent indirectly
type: Concept
description: yes
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.406
note: Demand must specify amount, responsible person, and particulars of TCF work.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cc-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789cc-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 789CC Demand for payment from an apparent indirectly

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity must provide demand information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

789CC(4) Demand for payment from an apparent indirectly
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.406
note: Minimum time for demand before payment is due
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cc-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789cc-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 789CC Demand for payment from an apparent indirectly

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must not be less than 14 days after the demand is given to the entity.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Time must be at least 14 days after demand
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
premise text: (4) The time specified for the purpose of paragraph (3)(c)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cc-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789CC(4) Demand for payment from an apparent indirectly

789CD Court order for entity to pay amount demanded
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.407
curation status: Proposed
has part: 789CD(1) Court order for entity to pay amount demanded
has part: 789CD(2) Court order for entity to pay amount demanded
has part: 789CD(3) Court order for entity to pay amount demanded
has part: 789CD(4) Court order for entity to pay amount demanded
has part: 789CD(5) Court order for entity to pay amount demanded
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789cd
schema version: 2

789CD(1) Court order for entity to pay amount demanded
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.407
note: Entity must pay amount demanded if not paid by specified time.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789cd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 789CD Court order for entity to pay amount demanded

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) If: (a) in accordance with section 789CC, an apparent indirectly responsible entity has been given a demand for payment of a specified amount; and (b) the amount has not been paid in full by the time specified in the demand; a person or organisation specified in subsection (2) (the applicant) may commence proceedings for an order requiring the entity to pay the specified amount.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: (1) If: (a) in accordance with section 789CC, an apparent indirectly responsible entity has been given a demand for payment of a specified amount; and (b) the amount has not been paid in full by the time specified in the demand; a person or organisation specified in subsection (2) (the applicant) may commence proceedings for an order requiring the entity to pay the specified amount.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) If: (a) in accordance with section 789CC, an apparent indirectly responsible entity has been given a demand for payment of a specified amount; and (b) the amount has not been paid in full by the time specified in the demand; a person or organisation specified in subsection (2) (the applicant) may commence proceedings for an order requiring the entity to pay the specified amount.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Defines a claim.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Applicable
premise text: (1) If: (a) in accordance with section 789CC, an apparent indirectly responsible entity has been given a demand for payment of a specified amount; and (b) the amount has not been paid in full by the time specified in the demand; a person or organisation specified in subsection (2) (the applicant) may commence proceedings for an order requiring the entity to pay the specified amount.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) If: (a) in accordance with section 789CC, an apparent indirectly responsible entity has been given a demand for payment of a specified amount; and (b) the amount has not been paid in full by the time specified in the demand; a person or organisation specified in subsection (2) (the applicant) may commence proceedings for an order requiring the entity to pay the specified amount.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity must pay amount demanded.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) If: (a) in accordance with section 789CC, an apparent indirectly responsible entity has been given a demand for payment of a specified amount; and (b) the amount has not been paid in full by the time specified in the demand; a person or organisation specified in subsection (2) (the applicant) may commence proceedings for an order requiring the entity to pay the specified amount.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) If: (a) in accordance with section 789CC, an apparent indirectly responsible entity has been given a demand for payment of a specified amount; and (b) the amount has not been paid in full by the time specified in the demand; a person or organisation specified in subsection (2) (the applicant) may commence proceedings for an order requiring the entity to pay the specified amount.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a duty.
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: (1) If: (a) in accordance with section 789CC, an apparent indirectly responsible entity has been given a demand for payment of a specified amount; and (b) the amount has not been paid in full by the time specified in the demand; a person or organisation specified in subsection (2) (the applicant) may commence proceedings for an order requiring the entity to pay the specified amount.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) If: (a) in accordance with section 789CC, an apparent indirectly responsible entity has been given a demand for payment of a specified amount; and (b) the amount has not been paid in full by the time specified in the demand; a person or organisation specified in subsection (2) (the applicant) may commence proceedings for an order requiring the entity to pay the specified amount.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval.
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: (1) If: (a) in accordance with section 789CC, an apparent indirectly responsible entity has been given a demand for payment of a specified amount; and (b) the amount has not been paid in full by the time specified in the demand; a person or organisation specified in subsection (2) (the applicant) may commence proceedings for an order requiring the entity to pay the specified amount.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789CD(1) Court order for entity to pay amount demanded

789CD(2) Court order for entity to pay amount demanded
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.407
note: Court order to pay amount demanded
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789cd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 789CD Court order for entity to pay amount demanded

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...pay the amount demanded.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between commencement and payment
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (2) The proceedings may be commenced...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...pay the amount demanded.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to pay
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) The proceedings may be commenced...

789CD(3) Court order for entity to pay amount demanded
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.407
note: Court order for entity to pay amount demanded
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789cd-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 789CD Court order for entity to pay amount demanded

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the proceedings may be commenced at any time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifies the temporal intervals for commencement of proceedings
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (a) the Federal Court; or (b) the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2); or (c) an eligible State or Territory court.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the entity is recognized as a party to the proceedings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Specifies the recognition of entities for commencement of proceedings
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (a) the Federal Court; or (b) the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2); or (c) an eligible State or Territory court.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the entity must pay the amount demanded.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to pay an amount demanded
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (3) The proceedings may be commenced...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the information is diffused to all relevant parties.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Specifies the diffusion of information about commencement of proceedings
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (a) the Federal Court; or (b) the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2); or (c) an eligible State or Territory court.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the proceedings may be commenced repeatedly.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Specifies the recurring trace for commencement of proceedings
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
premise text: (a) the Federal Court; or (b) the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2); or (c) an eligible State or Territory court.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789CD(3) Court order for entity to pay amount demanded

789CD(4) Court order for entity to pay amount demanded
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.407
note: Court order requiring entity to pay amount demanded
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789cd-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 789CD Court order for entity to pay amount demanded

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May make an order
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

789CD(5) Court order for entity to pay amount demanded
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.407
note: Court must not make order if entity is not liable under section 789CB
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789cd-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 789CD Court order for entity to pay amount demanded

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No overlap in time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Court order and entity's liability under section 789CB overlap in time
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Section 789CB

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No liability under section 789CB
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court cannot make order if entity is not liable
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: Section 789CB

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789CD(5) Court order for entity to pay amount demanded

789CE Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408
curation status: Proposed
has part: 789CE(1) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
has part: 789CE(1A) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
has part: 789CE(2) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
has part: 789CE(3) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
has part: 789CE(4) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
has part: 789CE(5) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
has part: 789CE(6) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
has part: 789CE(7) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
has part: 789CE(8) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789ce
schema version: 2

789CE(1) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408
note: Entity's right to payment in discharge of liability
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789ce-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 789CE Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Entity fulfills obligation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Payment as a liability discharge
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes duty
premise text: Entity pays amount in discharge of liability

789CE(1A) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408
note: Entity's right to recover an equivalent amount from the responsible person
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-1a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789ce-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 789CE Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to

789CE(2) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408
note: Entity may recover from responsible person an amount equal to the sum of the amount paid and any interest paid.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789ce-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 789CE Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity has an obligation to recover from responsible person.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789CE(2) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to

789CE(3) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408
note: Entity's right to recover amount
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789ce-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 789CE Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity has a right
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight

789CE(4) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408
note: Entity may commence proceedings against responsible person for payment.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789ce-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 789CE Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity has the right to commence proceedings.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

789CE(5) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408
note: Court may order responsible person to pay entity recoverable amount.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789ce-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 789CE Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if the court is satisfied that: ...the recoverable amount (or so much of it as is still owing)...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Recoverable amount owed between entity and responsible person.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: (5) The court may make an order requiring the responsible person...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if the court is satisfied that: ...the entity has not otherwise recovered the recoverable amount in full from the responsible person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Entity recognized as having right to payment.
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (5) The court may make an order requiring the responsible person...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...pay the entity the recoverable amount (or so much of it as is still owing)...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court obligation to order payment.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (5) The court may make an order requiring the responsible person...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...pay the entity the recoverable amount (or so much of it as is still owing)...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Payment obligation diffused to responsible person.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (5) The court may make an order requiring the responsible person...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if the court is satisfied that: ...the entity has not otherwise recovered the recoverable amount in full from the responsible person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recoverable amount owed in ordered sequence.
modality: LTL
operator: ordered
premise text: (5) The court may make an order requiring the responsible person...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789CE(5) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to

789CE(6) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408
note: Court must include interest in sum ordered unless good cause is shown.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-6-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789ce-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 789CE Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must include interest in sum ordered.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789CE(6) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to

789CE(7) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408
note: Court must consider period between payment and order date when determining interest amount.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-7-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789ce-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 789CE Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must consider period
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789CE(7) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to

789CE(8) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408
note: No proceedings can be commenced more than 6 years after payment.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-8-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789ce-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 789CE Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No proceedings can be commenced.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

789CF Division does not limit other liabilities or rights
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.409
note: Nothing in this Division limits any other liability or right
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cf-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789cf
schema version: 2

789DA Regulations may provide for a code
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.411
note: Regulations may prescribe a code dealing with standards of conduct and practice.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789da-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789da
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789da-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789DA Regulations may provide for a code

789DB Matters that may be dealt with in TCF outwork code
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.411
curation status: Proposed
has part: 789DB(1) Matters that may be dealt with in TCF outwork code
has part: 789DB(2) Matters that may be dealt with in TCF outwork code
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789db
schema version: 2

789DB(1) Matters that may be dealt with in TCF outwork code
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.411
note: Matters that may be dealt with in TCF outwork code
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789db-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 789DB Matters that may be dealt with in TCF outwork code

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the following:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval during which matters that may be dealt with in TCF outwork code apply
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) The matters that may be dealt with in the TCF outwork code include...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the following:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: List of matters that may be dealt with in TCF outwork code
modality: CogAI
operator: includes
premise text: (1) The matters that may be dealt with in the TCF outwork code include...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the following:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: List of matters that may be dealt with in TCF outwork code
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (1) The matters that may be dealt with in the TCF outwork code include...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the following:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: List of matters that may be dealt with in TCF outwork code
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
premise text: (1) The matters that may be dealt with in the TCF outwork code include...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the following:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval during which matters that may be dealt with in TCF outwork code apply
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (1) The matters that may be dealt with in the TCF outwork code include...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789DB(1) Matters that may be dealt with in TCF outwork code

789DB(2) Matters that may be dealt with in TCF outwork code
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.411
note: TCF outwork code must not specify wages or entitlements.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789db-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 789DB Matters that may be dealt with in TCF outwork code

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: TCF outwork code does not specify wages or entitlements during its implementation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) The TCF outwork code must not specify wages or other entitlements for TCF outworkers.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: TCF outwork code does not specify wages or entitlements during its implementation.
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (2) The TCF outwork code must not specify wages or other entitlements for TCF outworkers.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of specifying wages or entitlements.
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (2) The TCF outwork code must not specify wages or other entitlements for TCF outworkers.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: TCF outwork code does not diffuse specifying wages or entitlements during its implementation.
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (2) The TCF outwork code must not specify wages or other entitlements for TCF outworkers.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: TCF outwork code does not specify wages or entitlements during its implementation.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (2) The TCF outwork code must not specify wages or other entitlements for TCF outworkers.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789DB(2) Matters that may be dealt with in TCF outwork code

789DC Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.412
curation status: Proposed
has part: 789DC(1) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
has part: 789DC(2) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
has part: 789DC(3) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
has part: 789DC(4) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
has part: 789DC(5) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
has part: 789DC(6) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789dc
schema version: 2

789DC(1) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.412
note: Only impose obligations on a person if certain conditions apply.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789dc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 789DC Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The TCF outwork code may only impose obligations on a person if one or more of subsections (2) to (5) applies to the person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval application
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The TCF outwork code may only impose obligations on a person if one or more of subsections (2) to (5) applies to the person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal interval application
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (1)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The TCF outwork code may impose obligations on a person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: onlyIf
premise text: (2) to (5) applies to the person.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The TCF outwork code may only impose obligations on a person if one or more of subsections (2) to (5) applies to the person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal interval application
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (1)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The TCF outwork code may only impose obligations on a person if one or more of subsections (2) to (5) applies to the person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval application
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (1)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789DC(1) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF

789DC(2) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.412
note: National system employers that employ TCF outworkers are subject to obligations.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789dc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 789DC Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation applies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Subject-predicate relation
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: Person is a national system employer that employs TCF outworkers.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789DC(2) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF

789DC(3) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.412
note: Person subject to obligation if arranges for TCF work performed by outworkers
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789dc-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 789DC Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation imposed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Condition for obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: Person arranges for TCF work performed by outworkers

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789DC(3) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF

789DC(4) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.412
note: Person subject to obligations if they arrange for TCF work to be performed by outworkers or of a kind often performed by them.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789dc-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 789DC Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person's arrangement for TCF work occurs during a specific period of time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval: Person arranges for TCF work during a period of time
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (a) the person arranges for TCF work to be performed; and (b) the work is to be performed indirectly...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is subject to obligations if they arrange for TCF work to be performed by outworkers or of a kind often performed by them.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation based on arrangement for TCF work
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: (a) the person arranges for TCF work to be performed; and (b) the work is to be performed indirectly...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person's indirect performance of the work by outworkers imposes obligations.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation based on type of work performed
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: (b) the work is to be performed indirectly...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person's indirect performance of the work by a Commonwealth outworker entity or a constitutional corporation imposes obligations.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation based on type of entity performing the work
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: (c) the work is to be performed indirectly: (i) for another person, being a Commonwealth outworker entity; and (ii) if that Commonwealth outworker entity is a constitutional corporation...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person's arrangement for TCF work and the indirect performance of the work by outworkers form a recurring trace.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace: Person arranges for TCF work and the work is performed indirectly by outworkers
modality: LTL
operator: and
premise text: (a) the person arranges for TCF work to be performed; and (b) the work is to be performed indirectly...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789DC(4) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF

789DC(5) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.412
note: Person subject to obligation if constitutional corporation sells goods produced by TCF work.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789dc-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 789DC Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Person subject to obligation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval: Person subject to obligation while selling goods produced by TCF work
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Person is a constitutional corporation that sells goods produced by TCF work.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Person subject to obligation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Rational basis for obligation: Person is a constitutional corporation that sells goods produced by TCF work
modality: Argumentation
operator: if
premise text: Person is a constitutional corporation that sells goods produced by TCF work.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Person subject to obligation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: Person is a constitutional corporation that sells goods produced by TCF work.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Person subject to obligation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Obligation diffuses from State to Person
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
premise text: State imposes obligation on Person

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789DC(5) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF

789DC(6) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.412
note: Limitations on obligations imposed by TCF outwork code
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-6-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789dc-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 789DC Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: obligations relating to the person's employment of TCF outworkers
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: subsection (2) applies to the person

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limitations on obligations imposed by TCF outwork code
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789DC(6) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF

789DD Other general matters relating to content of TCF outwork
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.413
curation status: Proposed
has part: 789DD(1) Other general matters relating to content of TCF outwork
has part: 789DD(2) Other general matters relating to content of TCF outwork
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789dd
schema version: 2

789DD(1) Other general matters relating to content of TCF outwork
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.413
note: TCF outwork code applies to persons and TCF work
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dd-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dd-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789dd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 789DD Other general matters relating to content of TCF outwork

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: TCF outwork code applies to persons and TCF work
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dd-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class of person or TCF work may be identified by reference to a particular sector
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: identifies

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789DD(1) Other general matters relating to content of TCF outwork

789DD(2) Other general matters relating to content of TCF outwork
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.413
note: Provides for different classes of persons covered by section 789DC
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dd-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789dd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 789DD Other general matters relating to content of TCF outwork

789DE Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.414
curation status: Proposed
has part: 789DE(1) Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
has part: 789DE(2) Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
has part: 789DE(3) Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
has part: 789DE(4) Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
has part: 789DE(5) Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
has part: 789DE(6) Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789de
schema version: 2

789DE(1) Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.414
note: A TCF award prevails over the TCF outwork code.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789de-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 789DE Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (TCF outwork code)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Precedence of TCF awards over the TCF outwork code.
modality: Deontic
operator: prevails-over
premise text: (TCF award)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789DE(1) Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other

789DE(2) Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.414
note: The TCF outwork code prevails over other codes in case of inconsistency.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789de-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 789DE Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: over any of the following
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Priority
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
premise text: The TCF outwork code prevails.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789DE(2) Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other

789DE(3) Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.414
note: The TCF outwork code may make provision in relation to a matter by applying, adopting or incorporating any matter contained in an instrument or other writing as in force or existing from time to time.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789de-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 789DE Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to make provision in relation to a matter.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

789DE(4) Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.414
note: List of instruments that can be referenced by the TCF outwork code
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789de-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 789DE Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789DE(4) Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other

789DE(5) Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.414
note: The TCF outwork code cannot make provision by reference to certain documents.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789de-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 789DE Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: by reference to any of the following:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for when provision cannot be made by reference.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (5) The TCF outwork code cannot make provision as mentioned in subsection (3)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: by reference to any of the following:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifies documents that cannot be made provision by reference using artificial intelligence.
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
premise text: (5) The TCF outwork code cannot make provision as mentioned in subsection (3)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: by reference to any of the following:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits making provision by reference to certain documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (5) The TCF outwork code cannot make provision as mentioned in subsection (3)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: by reference to any of the following:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses information about documents that cannot be made provision by reference.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (5) The TCF outwork code cannot make provision as mentioned in subsection (3)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: by reference to any of the following:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines a recurring trace for when provision cannot be made by reference.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (5) The TCF outwork code cannot make provision as mentioned in subsection (3)

789DE(6) Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.414
note: Subsections (3) and (4) have effect despite subsection 14(2) of the Legislation Act 2003.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789de-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 789DE Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789DE(6) Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other

789EA Part not intended to exclude or limit State or Territory laws
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.416
curation status: Proposed
has part: 789EA(1) Part not intended to exclude or limit State or Territory laws
has part: 789EA(2) Part not intended to exclude or limit State or Territory laws
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789ea
schema version: 2

789EA(1) Part not intended to exclude or limit State or Territory laws
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.416
note: Part not intended to exclude or limit State or Territory laws
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ea-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ea-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ea-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ea-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ea-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ea-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789ea-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 789EA Part not intended to exclude or limit State or Territory laws

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ea-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to the extent that the law (or instrument) relates to outworkers and is capable of operating concurrently with this Part.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between State laws and this Part
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: (1) This Part is not intended to exclude or limit the operation of a law of a State or Territory...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ea-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to the extent that the law (or instrument) relates to outworkers and is capable of operating concurrently with this Part.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Inclusion of State laws in this Part
modality: CogAI
operator: includes
premise text: (1) This Part is not intended to exclude or limit the operation of a law of a State or Territory...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ea-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to the extent that the law (or instrument) relates to outworkers and is capable of operating concurrently with this Part.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclusion of State laws
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
premise text: (1) This Part is not intended to exclude or limit the operation of a law of a State or Territory...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ea-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to the extent that the law (or instrument) relates to outworkers and is capable of operating concurrently with this Part.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of State laws into this Part
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (1) This Part is not intended to exclude or limit the operation of a law of a State or Territory...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ea-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to the extent that the law (or instrument) relates to outworkers and is capable of operating concurrently with this Part.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal overlap between State laws and this Part
modality: LTL
operator: overlaps
premise text: (1) This Part is not intended to exclude or limit the operation of a law of a State or Territory...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ea-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789EA(1) Part not intended to exclude or limit State or Territory laws

789EA(2) Part not intended to exclude or limit State or Territory laws
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.416
note: Reference to regulations made for this Part
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ea-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789ea-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 789EA Part not intended to exclude or limit State or Territory laws

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ea-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789EA(2) Part not intended to exclude or limit State or Territory laws

789FA Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.417
note: Worker can apply for order to stop bullying.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fa-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fa-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789fa
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses ability to do something.
modality: Deontic
operator: can

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fa-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789FA Guide to this Part

789FB Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.417
note: Defines employee and employer terms
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fb-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789fb
schema version: 2

789FC Application for an FWC order to stop bullying
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.418
curation status: Proposed
has part: 789FC(1) Application for an FWC order to stop bullying
has part: 789FC(2) Application for an FWC order to stop bullying
has part: 789FC(3) Application for an FWC order to stop bullying
has part: 789FC(4) Application for an FWC order to stop bullying
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789fc
schema version: 2

789FC(1) Application for an FWC order to stop bullying
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.418
note: Worker may apply for FWC order to stop bullying
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789fc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 789FC Application for an FWC order to stop bullying

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May apply
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Reasonable belief of bullying
modality: Epistemic
operator: REASONABLY BELIEVES

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Order to stop bullying
modality: LTL
operator: ORDER

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789FC(1) Application for an FWC order to stop bullying

789FC(2) Application for an FWC order to stop bullying
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.418
note: Defines worker for Work Health and Safety Act 2011 purposes
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789fc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 789FC Application for an FWC order to stop bullying

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusive definition of worker
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789FC(2) Application for an FWC order to stop bullying

789FC(3) Application for an FWC order to stop bullying
type: Concept
description: Fee prescribed by regulations
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.418
note: Must provide fee prescribed by regulations with application.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789fc-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 789FC Application for an FWC order to stop bullying

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide fee
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789FC(3) Application for an FWC order to stop bullying

789FC(4) Application for an FWC order to stop bullying
type: Concept
description: (a) a fee, (b) a method for indexing the fee, and (c) circumstances for fee waiver or refund
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.418
note: Fee for application to FWC under section
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789fc-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 789FC Application for an FWC order to stop bullying

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) a fee for making an application
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the FWC to prescribe a fee
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits the FWC to waive or refund the fee under certain circumstances
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (c) the circumstances in which all or part of the fee may be waived or refunded

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires the FWC to prescribe a method for indexing the fee
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (b) a method for indexing the fee

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789FC(4) Application for an FWC order to stop bullying

789FD When is a worker bullied at work?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.418
curation status: Proposed
has part: 789FD(1) When is a worker bullied at work?
has part: 789FD(2) When is a worker bullied at work?
has part: 789FD(3) When is a worker bullied at work?
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789fd
schema version: 2

789FD(1) When is a worker bullied at work?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.418
note: A worker is bullied at work if an individual or group repeatedly behaves unreasonably towards the worker.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789fd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 789FD When is a worker bullied at work?

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Repeated behavior creates risk to health and safety
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: and that behaviour creates a risk to health and safety.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Worker is bullied at work
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (1) A worker is bullied at work if...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789FD(1) When is a worker bullied at work?

789FD(2) When is a worker bullied at work?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.418
note: No bullying by reasonable management action
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789fd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 789FD When is a worker bullied at work?

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on bullying
modality: Deontic
operator: !
premise text: (2) To avoid doubt, subsection (1) does not apply to reasonable management action carried out in a reasonable manner.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission for reasonable management action
modality: Deontic
operator: ~
premise text: (2) To avoid doubt, subsection (1) does not apply to reasonable management action carried out in a reasonable manner.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right to reasonable management action
modality: Deontic
operator: ?
premise text: (2) To avoid doubt, subsection (1) does not apply to reasonable management action carried out in a reasonable manner.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Undertaking for reasonable management action
modality: Deontic
operator: ^
premise text: (2) To avoid doubt, subsection (1) does not apply to reasonable management action carried out in a reasonable manner.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789FD(2) When is a worker bullied at work?

789FD(3) When is a worker bullied at work?
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.418
note: Business or undertaking is constitutionally-covered if it meets certain conditions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789fd-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 789FD When is a worker bullied at work?

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789FD(3) When is a worker bullied at work?

789FE FWC to deal with applications promptly
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.419
curation status: Proposed
has part: 789FE(1) FWC to deal with applications promptly
has part: 789FE(2) FWC to deal with applications promptly
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789fe
schema version: 2

789FE(1) FWC to deal with applications promptly
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.419
note: FWC must deal with applications within 14 days
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789fe-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 789FE FWC to deal with applications promptly

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide prompt response
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implication of timely response
modality: LinearLogic
operator: →

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789FE(1) FWC to deal with applications promptly

789FE(2) FWC to deal with applications promptly
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.419
note: FWC may dismiss application under section 789FC if it relates to certain matters.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789fe-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 789FE FWC to deal with applications promptly

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or (b) Australia’s national security;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlap between matters related to Australia's defence and covert operations
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (a) Australia’s defence; or (c) an existing or future covert operation;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or (b) Australia’s national security;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of matters related to Australia's defence and covert operations
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: (a) Australia’s defence; or (c) an existing or future covert operation;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if the FWC considers that the application might involve matters that relate to...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of dismissing applications under section 789FC
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) However, the FWC may dismiss an application...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or (b) Australia’s national security;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of matters related to Australia's defence and covert operations
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (a) Australia’s defence; or (c) an existing or future covert operation;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or (b) Australia’s national security;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of matters related to Australia's defence and covert operations
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (a) Australia’s defence; or (c) an existing or future covert operation;

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789FE(2) FWC to deal with applications promptly

789FF FWC may make orders to stop bullying
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.420
curation status: Proposed
has part: 789FF(1) FWC may make orders to stop bullying
has part: 789FF(2) FWC may make orders to stop bullying
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789ff
schema version: 2

789FF(1) FWC may make orders to stop bullying
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.420
note: FWC may make orders to stop bullying at work.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ff-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ff-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789ff-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 789FF FWC may make orders to stop bullying

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ff-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ff-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789FF(1) FWC may make orders to stop bullying

789FF(2) FWC may make orders to stop bullying
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.420
note: FWC must consider certain outcomes and procedures when making an order.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ff-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ff-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789ff-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 789FF FWC may make orders to stop bullying

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ff-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Consideration of outcomes and procedures is a duty.
modality: Deontic
operator: consider

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ff-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789FF(2) FWC may make orders to stop bullying

789FG Contravening an order to stop bullying
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.420
note: Must not contravene a term of the order.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fg-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fg-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fg-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789fg
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fg-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Contravening the order is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on contravention
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: Order to stop bullying

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fg-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Contravening an order term is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on contravention of order terms
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: Order term

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fg-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789FG Contravening an order to stop bullying

789FH Actions under work health and safety laws permitted
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.420
note: Exempts application under section 789FC from prohibition by Work Health and Safety Act 2011.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fh-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fh-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fh-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fh-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fh-logic-cogai-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fh-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789fh
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fh-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 789FC does not apply to section 115 of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Section 115 of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 overlaps with section 789FC
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Section 115 of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fh-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 789FI is included in Miscellaneous Chapter 6 using knowledge graph
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Includes section 789FI in Miscellaneous Chapter 6 using knowledge graph
modality: CogAI
operator: KnowledgeGraph
premise text: Corresponding provisions of corresponding WHS laws

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fh-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 789FC exemption
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Removes prohibition by Work Health and Safety Act 2011.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: Section 115 of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fh-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 789FC is a recurring trace for section 115 of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Section 789FC is a recurring trace for section 115 of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011
modality: LTL
operator: RecurringTrace
premise text: Section 789FC

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fh-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 789FC is valid according to SHACL
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validates section 789FC against SHACL
modality: SHACL
operator: Validation
premise text: Section 789FC

789FI This Part is not to prejudice Australia’s defence, national
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.421
note: Prejudicial actions prohibited
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fi-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fi-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789fi
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fi-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if the taking of the action, or the refraining from taking the action, would be, or could reasonably be expected to be, prejudicial to:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits taking or refraining from action that may be prejudicial to specified interests
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: Nothing in this Part requires or permits a person to take, or to refrain from taking, any action

789FJ Declarations by the Chief of the Defence Force
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.421
curation status: Proposed
has part: 789FJ(1) Declarations by the Chief of the Defence Force
has part: 789FJ(2) Declarations by the Chief of the Defence Force
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789fj
schema version: 2

789FJ(1) Declarations by the Chief of the Defence Force
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.421
note: The Chief of the Defence Force may declare exemptions from certain provisions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fj-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fj-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fj-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fj-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fj-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789fj-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 789FJ Declarations by the Chief of the Defence Force

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fj-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for declaration
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) Without limiting section 789FI, the Chief of the Defence Force may, by legislative instrument, declare that all or specified provisions of this Part do not apply in relation to a specified activity.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fj-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial declaration mechanism
modality: CogAI
operator: by
premise text: (1) Without limiting section 789FI, the Chief of the Defence Force may, by legislative instrument, declare that all or specified provisions of this Part do not apply in relation to a specified activity.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to exempt
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fj-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Declaration mechanism
modality: Diffusion
operator: by
premise text: (1) Without limiting section 789FI, the Chief of the Defence Force may, by legislative instrument, declare that all or specified provisions of this Part do not apply in relation to a specified activity.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fj-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for declaration
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (1) Without limiting section 789FI, the Chief of the Defence Force may, by legislative instrument, declare that all or specified provisions of this Part do not apply in relation to a specified activity.

789FJ(2) Declarations by the Chief of the Defence Force
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.421
note: Approval required for declaration under subsection (1)
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fj-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789fj-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 789FJ Declarations by the Chief of the Defence Force

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires approval from the Minister
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fj-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789FJ(2) Declarations by the Chief of the Defence Force

789FK Declarations by the Director-General of Security
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.422
curation status: Proposed
has part: 789FK(1) Declarations by the Director-General of Security
has part: 789FK(2) Declarations by the Director-General of Security
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789fk
schema version: 2

789FK(1) Declarations by the Director-General of Security
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.422
note: The Director-General may declare exemptions from certain provisions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fk-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789fk-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 789FK Declarations by the Director-General of Security

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to exempt
modality: Deontic
operator: may

789FK(2) Declarations by the Director-General of Security
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.422
note: Approval required for declaration under subsection (1)
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fk-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789fk-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 789FK Declarations by the Director-General of Security

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires approval from the Minister
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fk-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789FK(2) Declarations by the Director-General of Security

789FL Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.422
curation status: Proposed
has part: 789FL(1) Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
has part: 789FL(2) Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789fl
schema version: 2

789FL(1) Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.422
note: Exempts work for the Director-General from certain provisions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fl-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789fl-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 789FL Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

789FL(2) Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.422
note: Approval required for declaration under subsection (1)
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fl-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fl-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789fl-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 789FL Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fl-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires approval from the Minister
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fl-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789FL(2) Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS

789GC Definitions
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.423
note: Definitions for Part 1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gc-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789gc
schema version: 2

789GR Service
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.428
curation status: Proposed
has part: 789GR(1) Service
has part: 789GR(2) Service
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789gr
schema version: 2

789GR(1) Service
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.428
note: Counts jobkeeper enabling direction as service for employees.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gr-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gr-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gr-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789gr-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 789GR Service

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gr-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (period overlaps with jobkeeper enabling direction during a period)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Period overlaps with jobkeeper enabling direction.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: (jobkeeper enabling direction during a period) & (employee subject to jobkeeper enabling direction during a period)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gr-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (service is required)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Service is required.
modality: Argumentation
operator: implication
premise text: (employee subject to jobkeeper enabling direction during a period) -> (period counts as service)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (period counts as service)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Service is obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: (jobkeeper enabling direction during a period) -> (period counts as service)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gr-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789GR(1) Service

789GR(2) Service
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.428
note: Section 22 has effect in addition to subsection (1)
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gr-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789gr-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 789GR Service

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gr-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789GR(2) Service

789GS Accrual rules
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.429
curation status: Proposed
has part: 789GS(1) Accrual rules
has part: 789GS(2) Accrual rules
has part: 789GS(3) Accrual rules
has part: 789GS(4) Accrual rules
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789gs
schema version: 2

789GS(1) Accrual rules
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.429
note: Employee accrues leave entitlements if jobkeeper enabling direction applies
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789gs-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 789GS Accrual rules

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: employee accrues leave entitlements
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Employee accrues leave entitlements during the jobkeeper enabling direction period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (jobkeeper enabling stand down) or (repealed section 789GDC)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: employee accrues leave entitlements
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Employee accrues leave entitlements during the jobkeeper enabling direction period
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (jobkeeper enabling stand down) or (repealed section 789GDC)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: employee accrues leave entitlements
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If a jobkeeper enabling direction applies, then employee accrues leave entitlements
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: (jobkeeper enabling stand down) or (repealed section 789GDC)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: employee accrues leave entitlements
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Employee accrues leave entitlements during the jobkeeper enabling direction period
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (jobkeeper enabling stand down) or (repealed section 789GDC)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: employee accrues leave entitlements
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Employee accrues leave entitlements during the jobkeeper enabling direction period
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (jobkeeper enabling stand down) or (repealed section 789GDC)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789GS(1) Accrual rules

789GS(2) Accrual rules
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.429
note: Calculate redundancy pay and payment in lieu of notice as if the direction had not been given.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789gs-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 789GS Accrual rules

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The following are to be calculated...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to calculate redundancy pay and payment in lieu of notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (2) If a jobkeeper enabling direction...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789GS(2) Accrual rules

789GS(3) Accrual rules
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.429
note: Accrual of leave entitlements if agreement under repealed subsection 789GJ(2) is taken
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789gs-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 789GS Accrual rules

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Accrues leave entitlements as if the agreement had not been made
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for accrual of leave entitlements
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Employee takes paid annual leave in accordance with an agreement under repealed subsection 789GJ(2)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Accrues leave entitlements as if the agreement had not been made
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Cognitive AI logic for accrual of leave entitlements
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: Employee takes paid annual leave in accordance with an agreement under repealed subsection 789GJ(2)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Accrues leave entitlements as if the agreement had not been made
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: Employee takes paid annual leave in accordance with an agreement under repealed subsection 789GJ(2)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Accrues leave entitlements as if the agreement had not been made
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion logic for accrual of leave entitlements
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: Employee takes paid annual leave in accordance with an agreement under repealed subsection 789GJ(2)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Accrues leave entitlements as if the agreement had not been made
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal logic for accrual of leave entitlements
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: Employee takes paid annual leave in accordance with an agreement under repealed subsection 789GJ(2)

789GS(4) Accrual rules
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.429
note: Employee's redundancy pay and payment in lieu of notice of termination are recalculated if they took paid annual leave under a repealed agreement.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789gs-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 789GS Accrual rules

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the following are to be calculated as if the agreement had not been made:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Paid annual leave is a temporal interval that affects employee's entitlements
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal interval
premise text: (4) If an employee takes paid annual leave in accordance with an agreement...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the following are to be calculated as if the agreement had not been made:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: CogAI analyzes the impact of repealed agreements on employee entitlements
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyzes
premise text: (4) If an employee takes paid annual leave in accordance with an agreement...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the following are to be calculated as if the agreement had not been made:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repealed agreement affects employee's entitlements
modality: Deontic
operator: Recalculates
premise text: (4) If an employee takes paid annual leave in accordance with an agreement under repealed subsection 789GJ(2), the following are to be calculated...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the following are to be calculated as if the agreement had not been made:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Repealed agreement diffuses its effects on employee's entitlements
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (4) If an employee takes paid annual leave in accordance with an agreement...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the following are to be calculated as if the agreement had not been made:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Paid annual leave is a recurring trace that affects employee's entitlements
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (4) If an employee takes paid annual leave in accordance with an agreement...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789GS(4) Accrual rules

789GV FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.430
curation status: Proposed
has part: 789GV(1) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
has part: 789GV(2) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
has part: 789GV(3) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
has part: 789GV(4) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
has part: 789GV(5) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
has part: 789GV(6) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
has part: 789GV(7) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789gv
schema version: 2

789GV(1) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.430
note: The FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789gv-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 789GV FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May deal with a dispute
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789GV(1) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this

789GV(2) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.430
note: FWC may deal with a dispute by arbitration.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789gv-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 789GV FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789GV(2) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this

789GV(3) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.430
note: FWC may deal with a dispute only on application by specified parties.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789gv-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 789GV FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restricts FWC's discretion to deal with disputes.
modality: Deontic
operator: only

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789GV(3) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this

789GV(4) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.430
note: FWC may make orders regarding jobkeeper enabling directions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789gv-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 789GV FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May make orders
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789GV(4) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this

789GV(5) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.430
note: FWC cannot make an order after March 29, 2021.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789gv-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 789GV FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789GV(5) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this

789GV(6) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.430
note: Ceases to have effect at the start of 29 March 2021.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-6-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789gv-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 789GV FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: (6) An order made by the FWC under paragraph (4)(a) ceases to have effect at the start of 29 March 2021.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies a provision as Undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: (6) An order made by the FWC under paragraph (4)(a) ceases to have effect at the start of 29 March 2021.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Requires an ordered or recurring trace
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: (6) An order made by the FWC under paragraph (4)(a) ceases to have effect at the start of 29 March 2021.

789GV(7) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.430
note: FWC must consider fairness between parties in dispute resolution.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-7-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789gv-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 789GV FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: considering fairness is a duty
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to consider fairness
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: FWC must deal with dispute

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789GV(7) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this

789GW Contravening an FWC order dealing with a dispute about
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.431
note: Prohibition on contravening an FWC order dealing with a dispute about the operation of this Part.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gw-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gw-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789gw
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gw-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on contravening an FWC order.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gw-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789GW Contravening an FWC order dealing with a dispute about

789GY Protection of workplace rights
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.435
note: Workplace rights include benefits from employer obligations, flexible work arrangements, and paid annual leave.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gy-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gy-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gy-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gy-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gy-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789gy
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gy-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Agreeing to take paid annual leave at different times
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Paid annual leave can occur at different times.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: Repealed subsection 789GJ(2)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gy-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Right to benefits
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer obligations create rights for employees.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: Section 789GD

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gy-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Right to benefits
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Employer obligations can diffuse to employees.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: Section 789GD

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gy-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Agreeing to perform duties on different days
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Flexible work arrangements can occur on different days.
modality: LTL
operator: occurs
premise text: Repealed subsection 789GG(2)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gy-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: State
part of: 789GY Protection of workplace rights

789GZ Relationship with other laws etc.
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.435
note: Relationship with other laws etc.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gz-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789gz
schema version: 2

789HA Constitutional basis of this Division
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.443
note: Relies on Commonwealth's legislative powers under paragraph 51(xxix) (external affairs) of the Constitution.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ha-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ha-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789ha
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ha-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to give effect to Australia's obligations
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Relies on Commonwealth's legislative powers
modality: Deontic
operator: Relies on
premise text: Paragraph 51(xxix) (external affairs)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ha-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789HA Constitutional basis of this Division

789HB Extension of anti-discrimination rules
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.443
curation status: Proposed
has part: 789HB(1) Extension of anti-discrimination rules
has part: 789HB(2) Extension of anti-discrimination rules
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789hb
schema version: 2

789HB(1) Extension of anti-discrimination rules
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.443
note: Applicable anti-discrimination rules for breastfeeding, gender identity, or intersex status.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hb-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hb-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hb-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hb-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789hb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 789HB Extension of anti-discrimination rules

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (3) applies during the operation of the provisions identified in subsection (2).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Applicable during operation of provisions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) applies for the purposes of the operation of the provisions identified in subsection (2)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hb-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provisions identified in subsection (2) are for the purpose of applying subsection (3).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: For the purposes of the operation of provisions
modality: CogAI
operator: for
premise text: (3) applies for the purposes of the operation of the provisions identified in subsection (2)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (3) applies for the purposes of the operation of the provisions identified in subsection (2) in relation to breastfeeding, gender identity or intersex status.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicable anti-discrimination rules
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: (3) applies for the purposes of the operation of the provisions identified in subsection (2)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hb-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The operation of the provisions identified in subsection (2) is for the purpose of applying subsection (3).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: For the purposes of the operation of provisions
modality: Diffusion
operator: for
premise text: (3) applies for the purposes of the operation of the provisions identified in subsection (2)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hb-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (3) is applicable during the operation of the provisions identified in subsection (2).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Applicable during operation of provisions
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (3) applies for the purposes of the operation of the provisions identified in subsection (2)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789HB(1) Extension of anti-discrimination rules

789HB(2) Extension of anti-discrimination rules
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.443
note: Extension of anti-discrimination rules
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hb-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789hb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 789HB Extension of anti-discrimination rules

789HC Constitutional basis of this Division
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.445
note: Relies on Commonwealth's legislative powers under paragraph 51(xxix) (external affairs) of the Constitution.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hc-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hc-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789hc
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to give effect to Australia's obligations
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Relies on Commonwealth's legislative powers
modality: Deontic
operator: Relies on
premise text: Paragraph 51(xxix) (external affairs)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hc-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789HC Constitutional basis of this Division

789HD Extension of anti-discrimination rules
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.445
curation status: Proposed
has part: 789HD(1) Extension of anti-discrimination rules
has part: 789HD(2) Extension of anti-discrimination rules
has part: 789HD(3) Extension of anti-discrimination rules
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789hd
schema version: 2

789HD(1) Extension of anti-discrimination rules
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.445
note: Applicable for the purposes of operation of provisions in relation to family and domestic violence.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hd-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hd-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hd-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hd-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789hd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 789HD Extension of anti-discrimination rules

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (3) relates to family and domestic violence.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Establishes a relation between temporal intervals.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relatesTo
premise text: (1) Subsection (3) applies for the purposes of the operation of the provisions identified in subsection (2)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hd-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Applicability is justified by the context.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Justifies applicability based on context.
modality: Argumentation
operator: justifies
premise text: (1) Subsection (3) applies for the purposes of the operation of the provisions identified in subsection (2)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hd-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Applicability is recognized by semantic analysis.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes applicability based on semantic analysis.
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (1) Subsection (3) applies for the purposes of the operation of the provisions identified in subsection (2)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (3) is applicable for the purposes of the operation of the provisions identified in subsection (2).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Indicates applicability of obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: applicable
premise text: (1) Subsection (3) applies for the purposes of the operation of the provisions identified in subsection (2)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hd-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Applicability is diffused to other provisions.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses applicability to related provisions.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (1) Subsection (3) applies for the purposes of the operation of the provisions identified in subsection (2)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789HD(1) Extension of anti-discrimination rules

789HD(2) Extension of anti-discrimination rules
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.445
note: Extension of anti-discrimination rules
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hd-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789hd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 789HD Extension of anti-discrimination rules

789HD(3) Extension of anti-discrimination rules
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.445
note: Assume that certain matters are not excluded subjects for the purposes of specific laws and divisions.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hd-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-789hd-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 789HD Extension of anti-discrimination rules

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hd-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 789HD(3) Extension of anti-discrimination rules

790 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.447
note: Guide to this Part
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-790-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-790
schema version: 2

791 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.447
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-791-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-791
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-791-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 791 Meanings of employee and employer

792 Delegation by Minister
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
curation status: Proposed
has part: 792(1) Delegation by Minister
has part: 792(2) Delegation by Minister
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-792
schema version: 2

792(1) Delegation by Minister
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
note: Delegation of minister's functions or powers
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-792-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-792-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-792-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 792 Delegation by Minister

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-792-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorization
modality: Deontic
operator: canDelegate

792(2) Delegation by Minister
type: Concept
references: sec-34AA
references: sec-34AB
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
note: Delegation by Minister must comply with directions
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-792-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-792-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-792-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 792 Delegation by Minister

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-792-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply with directions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

793 Liability of bodies corporate
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
curation status: Proposed
has part: 793(1) Liability of bodies corporate
has part: 793(2) Liability of bodies corporate
has part: 793(3) Liability of bodies corporate
has part: 793(3A) Liability of bodies corporate
has part: 793(4) Liability of bodies corporate
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-793
schema version: 2

793(1) Liability of bodies corporate
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
note: Liability of bodies corporate
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-793-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 793 Liability of bodies corporate

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Any conduct engaged in on behalf of the body corporate is taken to have been engaged in also by the body.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
premise text: The body corporate has a duty to ensure its officials act within their authority.

793(2) Liability of bodies corporate
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
note: Establishing state of mind of a body corporate
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-793-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 793 Liability of bodies corporate

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) that the conduct was engaged in by a person referred to in paragraph (1)(a) or (b); and (b) that the person had that state of mind.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Establishing state of mind during conduct
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) If, for the purposes of this Act...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) that the conduct was engaged in by a person referred to in paragraph (1)(a) or (b); and (b) that the person had that state of mind.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Establishing state of mind of a body corporate
modality: Argumentation
operator: establishes
premise text: (2) If, for the purposes of this Act...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) that the conduct was engaged in by a person referred to in paragraph (1)(a) or (b); and (b) that the person had that state of mind.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishs the state of mind of a body corporate
modality: Deontic
operator: establishes
premise text: (2) If, for the purposes of this Act...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) that the conduct was engaged in by a person referred to in paragraph (1)(a) or (b); and (b) that the person had that state of mind.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Establishing state of mind during conduct
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (2) If, for the purposes of this Act...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) that the conduct was engaged in by a person referred to in paragraph (1)(a) or (b); and (b) that the person had that state of mind.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Establishing state of mind during conduct
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (2) If, for the purposes of this Act...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 793(2) Liability of bodies corporate

793(3) Liability of bodies corporate
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
note: Knowledge and reasons for intention, opinion, belief or purpose are part of a person's state of mind.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-793-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 793 Liability of bodies corporate

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes knowledge and reasons for intention, opinion, belief or purpose.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclass of state of mind.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 793(3) Liability of bodies corporate

793(3A) Liability of bodies corporate
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
note: Disapplication of Part 2.5 of the Criminal Code for certain offences
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-3a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-3a-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-793-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 793 Liability of bodies corporate

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disapplication of Part 2.5 of the Criminal Code
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclude subsections from Part 2.5 Criminal Code
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
premise text: (3A) Subsections (1) and (2)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-3a-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disapplication of Part 2.5 of the Criminal Code
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Combine exclusion with subclass relations
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Conjunction
premise text: (3A) Subsections (1) and (2)

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 793(3A) Liability of bodies corporate

793(4) Liability of bodies corporate
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
note: Exempts certain offences from Part 2.5 of Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-793-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 793 Liability of bodies corporate

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts certain offences from Part 2.5 of Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption

794 Signature on behalf of body corporate
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.449
note: Document may be signed on behalf of a body corporate by an authorised officer.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-794
schema version: 2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to sign documents on behalf of a body corporate.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

794A Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.450
curation status: Proposed
has part: 794A(1) Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
has part: 794A(2) Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
has part: 794A(3) Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
has part: 794A(4) Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
has part: 794A(5) Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
has part: 794A(6) Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
has part: 794A(7) Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-794a
schema version: 2

794A(1) Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.450
note: Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-794a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 794A Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on Australian governments
modality: Deontic
operator: obliges

794A(2) Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.450
note: Definition of Australian government
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-794a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 794A Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Conduct of Australian governments
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of Australian government
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (2) Each of the following is an Australian government:

794A(3) Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.450
note: Government liable for conduct of officials within apparent authority
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-794a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 794A Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Government liable
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on government for conduct of officials
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Official's apparent authority

794A(4) Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.450
note: Establishing state of mind of an Australian government in relation to conduct
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-794a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 794A Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conduct occurred during the time when the official had the established state of mind.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Establishes temporal relationship between conduct and state of mind
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (a) that the conduct was engaged in by an official of the government; and (b) that the official had that state of mind.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Australian government is obligated to establish the state of mind of its officials in relation to particular conduct.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishs obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: establishes
premise text: (a) that the conduct was engaged in by an official of the government; and (b) that the official had that state of mind.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Australian government is obligated to determine penalty amounts based on its established state of mind.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes obligation to determine penalty amounts
modality: Deontic
operator: establishes
premise text: (4) If, for the purposes of this Act or the procedural rules, it is necessary to establish the state of mind of an Australian government in relation to particular conduct.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Australian government is obligated to provide information on penalty amounts based on its established state of mind.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes obligation to provide information on penalty amounts
modality: Deontic
operator: establishes
premise text: (4) If, for the purposes of this Act or the procedural rules, it is necessary to establish the state of mind of an Australian government in relation to particular conduct.

794A(5) Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.450
note: Pecuniary penalty for contravening a civil remedy provision
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-794a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 794A Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the pecuniary penalty that government may be ordered to pay under a pecuniary penalty order is the penalty applicable to a body corporate.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for pecuniary penalty
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal interval
premise text: (5) If an Australian government contravenes a civil remedy provision,

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the pecuniary penalty that government may be ordered to pay under a pecuniary penalty order is the penalty applicable to a body corporate.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Cognitive agent for pecuniary penalty
modality: CogAI
operator: cognitive agent
premise text: (5) If an Australian government contravenes a civil remedy provision,

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the pecuniary penalty that government may be ordered to pay under a pecuniary penalty order is the penalty applicable to a body corporate.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay pecuniary penalty
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (5) If an Australian government contravenes a civil remedy provision,

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the pecuniary penalty that government may be ordered to pay under a pecuniary penalty order is the penalty applicable to a body corporate.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion for pecuniary penalty
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
premise text: (5) If an Australian government contravenes a civil remedy provision,

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the pecuniary penalty that government may be ordered to pay under a pecuniary penalty order is the penalty applicable to a body corporate.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for pecuniary penalty
modality: LTL
operator: recurring trace
premise text: (5) If an Australian government contravenes a civil remedy provision,

794A(6) Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.450
note: Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-6-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-794a-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 794A Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on Australian government
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

794A(7) Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.450
note: Definition of employee for liability purposes
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-7-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-794a-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 794A Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: employee
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key term
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 794A(7) Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy

794B Liability of the Commonwealth for certain offences
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451
curation status: Proposed
has part: 794B(1) Liability of the Commonwealth for certain offences
has part: 794B(2) Liability of the Commonwealth for certain offences
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-794b
schema version: 2

794B(1) Liability of the Commonwealth for certain offences
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451
note: Liability of the Commonwealth for certain offences
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794b-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-794b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 794B Liability of the Commonwealth for certain offences

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the State
modality: Deontic
operator: obliges

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 794B(1) Liability of the Commonwealth for certain offences

794B(2) Liability of the Commonwealth for certain offences
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451
note: Liability of the Commonwealth for certain offences
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794b-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-794b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 794B Liability of the Commonwealth for certain offences

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes liability on the Commonwealth
modality: Deontic
operator: Imposes

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 794B(2) Liability of the Commonwealth for certain offences

794C Responsible agencies for Australian governments
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.453
curation status: Proposed
has part: 794C(1) Responsible agencies for Australian governments
has part: 794C(2) Responsible agencies for Australian governments
has part: 794C(3) Responsible agencies for Australian governments
has part: 794C(4) Responsible agencies for Australian governments
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-794c
schema version: 2

794C(1) Responsible agencies for Australian governments
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.453
note: Specify responsible agency for proceedings against Australian government or Commonwealth
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794c-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-794c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 794C Responsible agencies for Australian governments

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify responsible agency
modality: Deontic
operator: specify

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 794C(1) Responsible agencies for Australian governments

794C(2) Responsible agencies for Australian governments
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.453
note: Responsible agency has procedural rights and obligations in proceedings.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794c-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-794c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 794C Responsible agencies for Australian governments

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity has obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 794C(2) Responsible agencies for Australian governments

794C(3) Responsible agencies for Australian governments
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.453
note: Permit person to change responsible agency during proceedings.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794c-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-794c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 794C Responsible agencies for Australian governments

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM
premise text: (3) With the court’s leave, the following person may change...

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794c-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 794C(3) Responsible agencies for Australian governments

794C(4) Responsible agencies for Australian governments
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.453
note: Identifies responsible agency for Australian governments
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794c-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-794c-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 794C Responsible agencies for Australian governments

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Responsible agency identification
modality: Deontic
operator: is

794D Liability of the Commonwealth to pay civil and criminal
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.454
curation status: Proposed
has part: 794D(1) Liability of the Commonwealth to pay civil and criminal
has part: 794D(2) Liability of the Commonwealth to pay civil and criminal
has part: 794D(3) Liability of the Commonwealth to pay civil and criminal
has part: 794D(4) Liability of the Commonwealth to pay civil and criminal
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-794d
schema version: 2

794D(1) Liability of the Commonwealth to pay civil and criminal
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.454
note: Liability of the Commonwealth to pay civil and criminal penalties
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794d-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-794d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 794D Liability of the Commonwealth to pay civil and criminal

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commonwealth is obligated to pay civil and criminal penalties
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) This section applies if...

794D(2) Liability of the Commonwealth to pay civil and criminal
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.454
note: Notional liability of Commonwealth to pay pecuniary penalty
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794d-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-794d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 794D Liability of the Commonwealth to pay civil and criminal

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses intention of Commonwealth to be liable
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 794D(2) Liability of the Commonwealth to pay civil and criminal

794D(3) Liability of the Commonwealth to pay civil and criminal
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.454
note: The Finance Minister may give written directions for carrying out or giving effect to subsection (2)
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794d-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-794d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 794D Liability of the Commonwealth to pay civil and criminal

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by the Finance Minister
modality: Deontic
operator: May

794D(4) Liability of the Commonwealth to pay civil and criminal
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.454
note: Directions must be complied with despite other Commonwealth law.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794d-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-794d-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 794D Liability of the Commonwealth to pay civil and criminal

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply with directions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794d-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 794D(4) Liability of the Commonwealth to pay civil and criminal

795 Public sector employer to act through employing authority
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.455
curation status: Proposed
has part: 795(1) Public sector employer to act through employing authority
has part: 795(2) Public sector employer to act through employing authority
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-795
schema version: 2

795(1) Public sector employer to act through employing authority
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.455
note: Employer must act through employing authority on behalf of the employer.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-795-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-795-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-795-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 795 Public sector employer to act through employing authority

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-795-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must act through employing authority.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-795-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 795(1) Public sector employer to act through employing authority

795(2) Public sector employer to act through employing authority
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.455
note: Anything done by or to a public sector employee's employing authority is taken to have been done by the employer.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-795-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-795-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-795-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 795 Public sector employer to act through employing authority

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-795-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: TakenTo

795A The Schedules
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457
note: The Schedules have effect.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-795a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-795a
schema version: 2

796 Regulations—general
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457
curation status: Proposed
has part: 796(1) Regulations—general
has part: 796(2) Regulations—general
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-796
schema version: 2

796(1) Regulations—general
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457
note: Governor-General may make regulations
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-796-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-796-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 796 Regulations—general

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-796-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 796(1) Regulations—general

796(2) Regulations—general
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457
note: Regulations made under this Act prevail over procedural rules.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-796-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-796-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-796-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-796-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-796-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-796-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-796-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 796 Regulations—general

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-796-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Regulations made under this Act are in effect during the duration of procedural rules.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) Regulations made under this Act prevail over procedural rules made under this Act, to the extent of any inconsistency.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-796-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Regulations made under this Act influence procedural rules.
modality: CogAI
operator: influences
premise text: (2) Regulations made under this Act prevail over procedural rules made under this Act, to the extent of any inconsistency.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-796-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulations made under this Act prevail over procedural rules.
modality: Deontic
operator: prevails-over
premise text: (2) Regulations made under this Act prevail over procedural rules made under this Act, to the extent of any inconsistency.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-796-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Regulations made under this Act diffuse their effect to procedural rules.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (2) Regulations made under this Act prevail over procedural rules made under this Act, to the extent of any inconsistency.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-796-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Regulations made under this Act imply that they prevail over procedural rules.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implies
premise text: (2) Regulations made under this Act prevail over procedural rules made under this Act, to the extent of any inconsistency.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-796-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 796(2) Regulations—general

796A Regulations conferring functions
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457
note: Regulations may confer functions on FWC and General Manager.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-796a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-796a
schema version: 2

797 Regulations dealing with offences
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457
curation status: Proposed
has part: 797(1) Regulations dealing with offences
has part: 797(2) Regulations dealing with offences
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-797
schema version: 2

797(1) Regulations dealing with offences
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457
note: The regulations may provide for offences against the regulations.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-797-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-797-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-797-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 797 Regulations dealing with offences

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-797-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May provide for offences
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-797-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 797(1) Regulations dealing with offences

797(2) Regulations dealing with offences
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457
note: Maximum penalty for offences
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-797-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-797-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-797-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 797 Regulations dealing with offences

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-797-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Maximum penalty
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Penalty cap
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
premise text: 20 penalty units

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-797-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 797(2) Regulations dealing with offences

798 Regulations dealing with civil penalties
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.458
curation status: Proposed
has part: 798(1) Regulations dealing with civil penalties
has part: 798(2) Regulations dealing with civil penalties
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-798
schema version: 2

798(1) Regulations dealing with civil penalties
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.458
note: Regulations may provide for civil penalties for contravention of the regulations.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-798-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-798-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-798-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 798 Regulations dealing with civil penalties

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-798-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to regulate
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May provide
modality: Deontic
operator: may

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-798-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 798(1) Regulations dealing with civil penalties

798(2) Regulations dealing with civil penalties
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.458
note: Maximum penalty for contravention
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-798-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-798-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-798-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-798-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 798 Regulations dealing with civil penalties

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-798-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: 20 penalty units or 100 penalty units
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal bounds on penalties
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <=
premise text: (2) The penalties for contravention must not be more than:

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-798-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: 20 penalty units or 100 penalty units
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Upper bound on penalties
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
premise text: (2) The penalties for contravention must not be more than:

799 Regulations dealing with infringement notices
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.458
curation status: Proposed
has part: 799(1) Regulations dealing with infringement notices
has part: 799(2) Regulations dealing with infringement notices
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-799
schema version: 2

799(1) Regulations dealing with infringement notices
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.458
note: Alternative to prosecution for alleged offenders
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-799-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-799-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-799-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 799 Regulations dealing with infringement notices

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-799-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows Commonwealth to permit alternative to prosecution
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

799(2) Regulations dealing with infringement notices
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.458
note: Maximum penalty for infringement notices must not exceed one-fifth of the maximum prescribed by regulations.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-799-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-799-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-799-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-799-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-799-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-799-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-799-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 799 Regulations dealing with infringement notices

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-799-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval for calculating the maximum penalty is one-fifth of the maximum prescribed by regulations.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for maximum penalty calculation defined as one-fifth of the maximum prescribed by regulations.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
premise text: (2) The penalty must not exceed one-fifth of the maximum penalty prescribed by the regulations for that offence.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-799-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The maximum penalty calculation involves a cognitive process with one-fifth of the maximum prescribed by regulations.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Maximum penalty calculation defined as a cognitive process involving one-fifth of the maximum prescribed by regulations.
modality: CogAI
operator: =
premise text: (2) The penalty must not exceed one-fifth of the maximum penalty prescribed by the regulations for that offence.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-799-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The penalty must not exceed one-fifth of the maximum penalty prescribed by the regulations.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Maximum penalty must not exceed one-fifth of the maximum prescribed by regulations.
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
premise text: (2) The penalty must not exceed one-fifth of the maximum penalty prescribed by the regulations for that offence.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-799-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The maximum penalty for infringement notices is a diffusion from the maximum prescribed by regulations.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Maximum penalty for infringement notices defined as a diffusion from the maximum prescribed by regulations.
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
premise text: (2) The penalty must not exceed one-fifth of the maximum penalty prescribed by the regulations for that offence.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-799-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval for calculating the maximum penalty is one-fifth of the maximum prescribed by regulations.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for maximum penalty calculation defined as one-fifth of the maximum prescribed by regulations.
modality: LTL
operator: =
premise text: (2) The penalty must not exceed one-fifth of the maximum penalty prescribed by the regulations for that offence.

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-799-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 799(2) Regulations dealing with infringement notices

800 Regulations dealing with exhibiting fair work instruments
type: Concept
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.458
note: Regulations may provide for exhibiting fair work instruments on employer premises.
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-800-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-800
schema version: 2

Prepared by the Office of Parliamentary Counsel, Canberra Fair Work Act 2009
type: Document
date: 2 April 2026
identifier: No. 28 of 2009
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
category: AU