Prepared by the Office of Parliamentary Counsel, Canberra Fair Work Act 2009
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 28 of 2009
date: 2 April 2026
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

2 April 2026
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2
note: Compilation information and notes on amendments, applications, and modifications.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the text as a compilation of the Fair Work Act 2009.
premise text: The text describes the compilation date, contents, and notes on amendments.
conclusion text: The text is a classification of the Fair Work Act 2009 compilation.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NL Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nl
note: Guide to this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.31
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nl-norm

536NM Meaning of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nm
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.31
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nm-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nm-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nm-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536NM Meaning of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nm-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines key terms.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NN FWC to have regard to minimum standards objective
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nn
note: FWC must have regard to minimum standards objective
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.31
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nn-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nn-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nn-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536NN FWC to have regard to minimum standards objective
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nn-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: The FWC must have regard to the minimum standards objective
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NP Contravening a road transport contractual chain order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536np
note: Prohibition on contravening a road transport contractual chain order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.32
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536np-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536np-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536np-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536np-logic-deontic-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536np-logic-deontic-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536np-logic-deontic-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536np-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 536NP Contravening a road transport contractual chain order
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536np-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition on contravening a road transport contractual chain order
premise text: A person must not contravene a term of a road transport contractual chain order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536np-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition on contravening a road transport contractual chain order
premise text: A person does not contravene a term of a road transport contractual chain order unless the order applies to the person: see subsection 536NQ(1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536np-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition on contravening a road transport contractual chain order
premise text: Note 1: This section is a civil remedy provision (see Part 4-1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536np-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition on contravening a road transport contractual chain order
premise text: Note 2: A person does not contravene a term of a road transport contractual chain order unless the order applies to the person: see subsection 536NQ(1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536np-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition on contravening a road transport contractual chain order
premise text: subsection 536NQ(1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536NQ The significance of a road transport contractual chain order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nq
has part: 536NQ(1) The significance of a road transport contractual chain order
has part: 536NQ(2) The significance of a road transport contractual chain order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.32

536NQ(1) The significance of a road transport contractual chain order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nq-ss-1
part of: 536NQ The significance of a road transport contractual chain order
note: A person is not obligated to comply with a road transport contractual chain order unless it applies to them.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.32
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nq-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nq-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536NQ(1) The significance of a road transport contractual chain order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬O
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: A road transport contractual chain order does not impose obligations on a person.
conclusion text: A person is not obligated to comply with a road transport contractual chain order unless it applies to them.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NQ(2) The significance of a road transport contractual chain order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nq-ss-2
part of: 536NQ The significance of a road transport contractual chain order
note: A road transport contractual chain order gives a person an entitlement only if the order applies to the person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.32
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nq-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nq-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536NQ(2) The significance of a road transport contractual chain order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: The order applies to the person.
conclusion text: The person has an entitlement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NR When a road transport contractual chain order applies to a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nr
has part: 536NR(1) When a road transport contractual chain order applies to a
has part: 536NR(2) When a road transport contractual chain order applies to a
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.33

536NR(1) When a road transport contractual chain order applies to a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nr-ss-1
part of: 536NR When a road transport contractual chain order applies to a
note: A road transport contractual chain order applies to a regulated road transport contractor or a road transport employee-like worker if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.33
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536NR(1) When a road transport contractual chain order applies to a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: If the road transport contractual chain order covers and is in operation, then it applies.
premise text: (a) the road transport contractual chain order covers the regulated road transport contractor or road transport employee-like worker; (b) the road transport contractual chain order is in operation;
conclusion text: the road transport contractual chain order applies to the regulated road transport contractor or road transport employee-like worker
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The road transport contractual chain order is in operation during the time it covers the regulated road transport contractor or road transport employee-like worker.
premise text: (b) the road transport contractual chain order is in operation;
conclusion text: the road transport contractual chain order is in operation during the time it covers the regulated road transport contractor or road transport employee-like worker
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
logic summary: The road transport contractual chain order applies everywhere it covers the regulated road transport contractor or road transport employee-like worker.
premise text: (a) the road transport contractual chain order covers the regulated road transport contractor or road transport employee-like worker;
conclusion text: the road transport contractual chain order applies everywhere it covers the regulated road transport contractor or road transport employee-like worker
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: except
logic summary: The road transport contractual chain order does not apply to other persons in a road transport contractual chain except when it is in operation.
premise text: (c) no other provision of this Act provides, or has the effect, that the road transport contractual chain order does not apply to the regulated road transport contractor or road transport employee-like worker.
conclusion text: the road transport contractual chain order does not apply to other persons in a road transport contractual chain except when it is in operation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: If the road transport contractual chain order covers and is in operation, then it applies.
premise text: (a) the road transport contractual chain order covers the regulated road transport contractor or road transport employee-like worker; (b) the road transport contractual chain order is in operation;
conclusion text: the road transport contractual chain order applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NR(2) When a road transport contractual chain order applies to a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nr-ss-2
part of: 536NR When a road transport contractual chain order applies to a
note: A road transport contractual chain order applies to a person in a road transport contractual chain.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.33
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-2-logic-deontic-3

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536NR(2) When a road transport contractual chain order applies to a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: The provision applies to the person.
premise text: (a) the road transport contractual chain order covers the person;
conclusion text: A road transport contractual chain order applies to a person in a road transport contractual chain.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The provision states that the order is in operation during the work performed by the employee.
premise text: (c) the road transport contractual chain order is in operation;
conclusion text: The road transport contractual chain order is in operation during the work performed by the employee.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nr-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: The provision applies to a regulated road transport contractor or an employee-like worker.
premise text: (b) a regulated road transport contractor or a road transport employee-like worker to whom the road transport contractual chain order applies, or an employee, performs work for the person;
conclusion text: A regulated road transport contractor or an employee-like worker applies to the provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NS When a road transport contractual chain order covers a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ns
has part: 536NS(1) When a road transport contractual chain order covers a
has part: 536NS(2) When a road transport contractual chain order covers a
has part: 536NS(3) When a road transport contractual chain order covers a
has part: 536NS(4) When a road transport contractual chain order covers a
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34

536NS(1) When a road transport contractual chain order covers a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ns-ss-1
part of: 536NS When a road transport contractual chain order covers a
note: A person is covered by a road transport contractual chain order if the order explicitly covers them.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536NS(1) When a road transport contractual chain order covers a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: A person is covered by a road transport contractual chain order if the order explicitly covers them.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NS(2) When a road transport contractual chain order covers a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ns-ss-2
part of: 536NS When a road transport contractual chain order covers a
note: A road transport contractual chain order also covers a person in a road transport contractual chain if any of the following provides, or has the effect, that the order covers the person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-2-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536NS(2) When a road transport contractual chain order covers a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536NS(3) When a road transport contractual chain order covers a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ns-ss-3
part of: 536NS When a road transport contractual chain order covers a
note: Exempts a person from coverage under a road transport contractual chain order if the order is affected by a provision of this Act, an FWC order made under such a provision, or a court order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 536NS(3) When a road transport contractual chain order covers a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exempts
logic summary: Prohibits coverage under a road transport contractual chain order
premise text: (3) Despite subsections (1) and (2),
conclusion text: a person in a road transport contractual chain order does not cover the person:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exempts
logic summary: Prohibits coverage under an FWC order made under a provision of this Act
premise text: (b) an FWC order made under a provision of this Act;
conclusion text: or has the effect, that the order does not cover the person:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exempts
logic summary: Prohibits coverage under a court order
premise text: (c) an order of a court.
conclusion text: or has the effect, that the order does not cover the person:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: ceased to operate
logic summary: Describes the condition under which coverage is exempted due to cessation of operation
premise text: Road transport contractual chain orders that have ceased to operate
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NS(4) When a road transport contractual chain order covers a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ns-ss-4
part of: 536NS When a road transport contractual chain order covers a
note: A ceased road transport contractual chain order does not cover a person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
conclusion text: A road transport contractual chain order that has ceased to operate does not cover a person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ns-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
conclusion text: The cessation of operation is during the period when the order covers a person.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NT When a road transport contractual chain order is in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nt
has part: 536NT(1) When a road transport contractual chain order is in
has part: 536NT(2) When a road transport contractual chain order is in
has part: 536NT(3) When a road transport contractual chain order is in
has part: 536NT(4) When a road transport contractual chain order is in
has part: 536NT(5) When a road transport contractual chain order is in
has part: 536NT(6) When a road transport contractual chain order is in
has part: 536NT(7) When a road transport contractual chain order is in
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.35

536NT(1) When a road transport contractual chain order is in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nt-ss-1
part of: 536NT When a road transport contractual chain order is in
note: Road transport contractual chain order comes into operation on specified day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.35
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for commencement
premise text: Commencement occurs on specified day
conclusion text: The commencement date is a specific point in time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536NT(2) When a road transport contractual chain order is in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nt-ss-2
part of: 536NT When a road transport contractual chain order is in
note: The specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the road transport contractual chain order is made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.35
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536NT(2) When a road transport contractual chain order is in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Prohibition on earlier commencement
premise text: (2) The specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the road transport contractual chain order is made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NT(3) When a road transport contractual chain order is in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nt-ss-3
part of: 536NT When a road transport contractual chain order is in
note: Must not be earlier than 12 months after notice of intent publication
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.35
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536NT(3) When a road transport contractual chain order is in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST NOT
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (3) The specified day must not be earlier than...
conclusion text: ...12 months after the relevant notice of intent for the order was published.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NT(4) When a road transport contractual chain order is in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nt-ss-4
part of: 536NT When a road transport contractual chain order is in
note: FWC may reduce 12-month period for road transport contractual chain order under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.35
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536NT(4) When a road transport contractual chain order is in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to reduce period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NT(5) When a road transport contractual chain order is in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nt-ss-5
part of: 536NT When a road transport contractual chain order is in
note: Determination takes effect on specified day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.35
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-5-norm

536NT(6) When a road transport contractual chain order is in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nt-ss-6
part of: 536NT When a road transport contractual chain order is in
note: Must not be earlier than the day of determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.35
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-6-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536NT(6) When a road transport contractual chain order is in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Prohibition on early commencement
premise text: (6) The specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the determination is made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NT(7) When a road transport contractual chain order is in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nt-ss-7
part of: 536NT When a road transport contractual chain order is in
note: Road transport contractual chain order continues in operation until revoked.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.35
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nt-ss-7-norm

536NU When road transport contractual chain guidelines cover a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nu
has part: 536NU(1) When road transport contractual chain guidelines cover a
has part: 536NU(2) When road transport contractual chain guidelines cover a
has part: 536NU(3) When road transport contractual chain guidelines cover a
has part: 536NU(4) When road transport contractual chain guidelines cover a
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36

536NU(1) When road transport contractual chain guidelines cover a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nu-ss-1
part of: 536NU When road transport contractual chain guidelines cover a
note: A person is covered by road transport contractual chain guidelines if the guidelines explicitly cover them.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536NU(1) When road transport contractual chain guidelines cover a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: A person is covered by road transport contractual chain guidelines if the guidelines explicitly cover them.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NU(2) When road transport contractual chain guidelines cover a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nu-ss-2
part of: 536NU When road transport contractual chain guidelines cover a
note: Guidelines cover a person in the transport chain if they affect the guidelines.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536NU(2) When road transport contractual chain guidelines cover a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: covers
logic summary: Guidelines cover a person in the transport chain.
premise text: (2) Road transport contractual chain guidelines also cover a person...
conclusion text: ...if any of the following provides, or has the effect...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Guidelines apply during the provision or court order.
premise text: (2) Road transport contractual chain guidelines also cover a person...
conclusion text: ...if any of the following provides, or has the effect...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Guidelines apply during the provision or court order.
premise text: (2) Road transport contractual chain guidelines also cover a person...
conclusion text: ...if any of the following provides, or has the effect...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Guidelines diffuse to the person in the transport chain.
premise text: (2) Road transport contractual chain guidelines also cover a person...
conclusion text: ...if any of the following provides, or has the effect...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Guidelines apply during the provision or court order.
premise text: (2) Road transport contractual chain guidelines also cover a person...
conclusion text: ...if any of the following provides, or has the effect...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NU(3) When road transport contractual chain guidelines cover a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nu-ss-3
part of: 536NU When road transport contractual chain guidelines cover a
note: Guidelines do not cover a person if any provision, FWC order, or court order applies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (a) a provision of this Act;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (c) an order of a court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NU(4) When road transport contractual chain guidelines cover a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nu-ss-4
part of: 536NU When road transport contractual chain guidelines cover a
note: Exempts persons from road transport contractual chain guidelines that have ceased to operate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits coverage by guidelines for persons in a road transport contractual chain.
premise text: (4) Despite subsections (1) and (2),
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Exclude
logic summary: Excludes coverage by guidelines for persons in a road transport contractual chain during the period of operation.
premise text: (4) Despite subsections (1) and (2),
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Exclude
logic summary: Excludes coverage by guidelines for persons in a road transport contractual chain during the period of operation.
premise text: (4) Despite subsections (1) and (2),
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Exclude
logic summary: Excludes coverage by guidelines for persons in a road transport contractual chain during the period of operation.
premise text: (4) Despite subsections (1) and (2),
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nu-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies the scope of guidelines for persons in a road transport contractual chain.
premise text: (4) Despite subsections (1) and (2),
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NV When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nv
has part: 536NV(1) When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in
has part: 536NV(2) When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in
has part: 536NV(3) When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in
has part: 536NV(4) When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in
has part: 536NV(5) When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37

536NV(1) When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nv-ss-1
part of: 536NV When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in
note: Guidelines come into operation on a specified day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nv-ss-1-norm

536NV(2) When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nv-ss-2
part of: 536NV When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in
note: Must not be earlier than the day on which guidelines are made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nv-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nv-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nv-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536NV(2) When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (2) The specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the road transport contractual chain guidelines are made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nv-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Before
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: (2) The specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the road transport contractual chain guidelines are made.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NV(3) When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nv-ss-3
part of: 536NV When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in
note: Determination takes effect on specified day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nv-ss-3-norm

536NV(4) When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nv-ss-4
part of: 536NV When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in
note: Road transport contractual chain guidelines must not be earlier than the day of determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nv-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nv-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nv-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nv-ss-4-logic-ltl-3

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nv-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536NV(4) When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nv-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Road transport contractual chain guidelines must not be earlier than the day of determination.
premise text: (4) The specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the determination is made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nv-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Before
logic summary: The specified day must be before the day of determination.
premise text: (4) The specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the determination is made.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nv-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: The road transport contractual chain guidelines operate until revoked.
premise text: (4) The specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the determination is made.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NV(5) When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nv-ss-5
part of: 536NV When road transport contractual chain guidelines are in
note: Guidelines continue in operation until revoked
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nv-ss-5-norm

536NW Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nw
has part: 536NW(1) Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
has part: 536NW(2) Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
has part: 536NW(3) Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
has part: 536NW(4) Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
has part: 536NW(5) Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.38

536NW(1) Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nw-ss-1
part of: 536NW Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
note: Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws from affecting road transport contractual chain rights, entitlements, obligations, and liabilities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.38
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536NW(1) Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Excludes certain State and Territory laws from affecting road transport contractual chain rights, entitlements, obligations, and liabilities.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassHierarchy
logic summary: Defines a class hierarchy for workplace relations matters.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NW(2) Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nw-ss-2
part of: 536NW Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
note: No effect on contractual chain rights and entitlements from State or Territory laws specified in regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.38
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: No effect on obligations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NW(3) Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nw-ss-3
part of: 536NW Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
note: Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.38
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <>
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
premise text: Division 3, Section 536NX
conclusion text: Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NW(4) Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nw-ss-4
part of: 536NW Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
note: Clarifies effect of subsection (2) despite other laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.38
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Clarifies effect of subsection (2)
premise text: (4) To avoid doubt, subsection (2) has effect even if...
conclusion text: ...section 536NX, are not workplace relations matters.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536NW(5) Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nw-ss-5
part of: 536NW Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
note: References a law of a State or Territory include regulations and other instruments made pursuant to the law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.38
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-5-logic-ltl-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-5-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-5-logic-cogai-6

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion relation
premise text: (a) includes a reference to a regulation, rule or other instrument made pursuant to, or for the purposes of, a law of a State or Territory.
conclusion text: The regulation is included in the reference.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subsumes
logic summary: Subsumption relation
premise text: (a) includes a reference to a law of a State or Territory as in force from time to time.
conclusion text: The regulation is subsumed by the law.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation during
premise text: (b) is a reference to a law of a State or Territory as in force from time to time.
conclusion text: The regulation is in effect during the same time period as the law.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-5-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal relation until
premise text: (b) is a reference to a law of a State or Territory as in force from time to time.
conclusion text: The regulation is in effect until the same time period as the law.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-5-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion relation
premise text: (a) includes a reference to a regulation, rule or other instrument made pursuant to, or for the purposes of, a law of a State or Territory.
conclusion text: The regulation is included in the diffusion.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nw-ss-5-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion relation
premise text: (a) includes a reference to a regulation, rule or other instrument made pursuant to, or for the purposes of, a law of a State or Territory.
conclusion text: The regulation is included in the CogAI.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NX What are workplace relations matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nx
note: Defines workplace relations matter
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.39
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nx-norm

536NY What is an unfairness ground
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ny
note: Defines unfairness ground in services contract
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.40
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ny-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ny-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ny-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines a term
conclusion text: unfairness ground
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NZ Interaction of road transport contractual chain orders with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nz
has part: 536NZ(1) Interaction of road transport contractual chain orders with
has part: 536NZ(2) Interaction of road transport contractual chain orders with
has part: 536NZ(3) Interaction of road transport contractual chain orders with
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.40

536NZ(1) Interaction of road transport contractual chain orders with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nz-ss-1
part of: 536NZ Interaction of road transport contractual chain orders with
note: A road transport contractual chain order prevails over a law of a State or Territory to the extent of any inconsistency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.40
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prevails
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: (1) A road transport contractual chain order prevails over a law of a State or Territory, to the extent of any inconsistency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap
premise text: (1) A road transport contractual chain order prevails over a law of a State or Territory, to the extent of any inconsistency.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap
premise text: (1) A road transport contractual chain order prevails over a law of a State or Territory, to the extent of any inconsistency.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion
premise text: (1) A road transport contractual chain order prevails over a law of a State or Territory, to the extent of any inconsistency.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: influences
logic summary: Influence
premise text: (1) A road transport contractual chain order prevails over a law of a State or Territory, to the extent of any inconsistency.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NZ(2) Interaction of road transport contractual chain orders with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nz-ss-2
part of: 536NZ Interaction of road transport contractual chain orders with
note: Interaction of road transport contractual chain orders with State/Territory law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.40
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-2-norm

536NZ(3) Interaction of road transport contractual chain orders with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nz-ss-3
part of: 536NZ Interaction of road transport contractual chain orders with
note: References a law of a State or Territory include regulations, rules, and other instruments made pursuant to or for the purposes of that law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.40
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536NZ(3) Interaction of road transport contractual chain orders with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes a reference to a regulation, rule or other instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nz-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is a reference to
logic summary: Is a reference to a law of a State or Territory as in force from time to time.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536P Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536p
has part: 536P(1) Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
has part: 536P(2) Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.40

536P(1) Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536p-ss-1
part of: 536P Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
note: Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.40
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536p-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows conduct under specified conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536P(2) Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536p-ss-2
part of: 536P Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
note: Conduct is not specified or authorised if it contains a cartel provision or boycott conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.40
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536p-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits conduct containing cartel provisions or boycott conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536PB Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pb
note: Guide to this Part of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.42
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pb-norm

536PC Meaning of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pc
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.42
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pc-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pc-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pc-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536PC Meaning of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines key terms.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536PD Road transport contractual chain orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pd
has part: 536PD(1) Road transport contractual chain orders
has part: 536PD(2) Road transport contractual chain orders
has part: 536PD(3) Road transport contractual chain orders
has part: 536PD(4) Road transport contractual chain orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.43

536PD(1) Road transport contractual chain orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pd-ss-1
part of: 536PD Road transport contractual chain orders
note: The FWC may make an order setting standards for regulated road transport contractors and others.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.43
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pd-ss-1-norm

536PD(2) Road transport contractual chain orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pd-ss-2
part of: 536PD Road transport contractual chain orders
note: Cannot confer rights or impose obligations on an employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.43
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pd-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of conferring rights or imposing obligations on an employee
premise text: (2) A road transport contractual chain order cannot confer rights or impose obligations on a person in the capacity of an employee.
conclusion text: No right or obligation can be conferred on an employee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Employee's employment period overlaps with contractual chain order
premise text: (2) A road transport contractual chain order cannot confer rights or impose obligations on a person in the capacity of an employee.
conclusion text: The employee's employment period overlaps with the contractual chain order
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536PD(3) Road transport contractual chain orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pd-ss-3
part of: 536PD Road transport contractual chain orders
note: FWC may make a road transport contractual chain order on its own initiative or on application under subsection 536PE(1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.43
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pd-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pd-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536PD(3) Road transport contractual chain orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to make a road transport contractual chain order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536PD(4) Road transport contractual chain orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pd-ss-4
part of: 536PD Road transport contractual chain orders
note: FWC must not make a road transport contractual chain order that covers road transport employee-like workers unless the FWC considers it appropriate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.43
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pd-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pd-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 536PD(4) Road transport contractual chain orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
conclusion text: FWC must not make a road transport contractual chain order that covers road transport employee-like workers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536PE Applications for road transport contractual chain orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pe
note: Organisations and regulated businesses can apply for road transport contractual chain orders.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.43
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pe-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pe-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pe-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536PE Applications for road transport contractual chain orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pe-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Can apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536PF Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pf
has part: 536PF(1) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
has part: 536PF(2) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.45

536PF(1) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pf-ss-1
part of: 536PF Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
note: FWC must consider certain matters when making a road transport contractual chain order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.45
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536PF(1) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Mandatory consideration of certain matters
premise text: (a) an application is made for a road transport contractual chain order under subsection 536PE(1) or for a variation of a road transport contractual chain order under section 536PS; or (b) the FWC is considering making or varying a road transport contractual chain order on its own initiative.
conclusion text: (1) This section applies if:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for consideration of matters by the FWC
premise text: (a) an application is made for a road transport contractual chain order under subsection 536PE(1) or for a variation of a road transport contractual chain order under section 536PS; or (b) the FWC is considering making or varying a road transport contractual chain order on its own initiative.
conclusion text: (1) This section applies if:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Recurring consideration of matters by the FWC
premise text: (a) an application is made for a road transport contractual chain order under subsection 536PE(1) or for a variation of a road transport contractual chain order under section 536PS; or (b) the FWC is considering making or varying a road transport contractual chain order on its own initiative.
conclusion text: (1) This section applies if:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536PF(2) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pf-ss-2
part of: 536PF Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
note: FWC must engage with parties and consult the Road Transport Advisory Group before making or varying a road transport contractual chain order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.45
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-2-logic-ltl-4

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536PF(2) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to engage with parties and consult the Road Transport Advisory Group.
premise text: (2) The FWC: (a) must not make or vary the road transport contractual chain order unless there has been genuine engagement with the parties to be covered;
conclusion text: FWC must engage with parties.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consult the Road Transport Advisory Group.
premise text: (2) The FWC: (b) must not make or vary the road transport contractual chain order unless the Road Transport Advisory Group has been consulted;
conclusion text: FWC must consult the Road Transport Advisory Group.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: FWC must make or vary a road transport contractual chain order after genuine engagement with parties and consultation with the Road Transport Advisory Group.
premise text: (2) The FWC: (a) must not make or vary the road transport contractual chain order unless there has been genuine engagement with the parties to be covered;
conclusion text: FWC must make or vary a road transport contractual chain order after genuine engagement with parties and consultation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pf-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: FWC must make or vary a road transport contractual chain order at some point in time after genuine engagement with parties and consultation with the Road Transport Advisory Group.
premise text: (2) The FWC: (a) must not make or vary the road transport contractual chain order unless there has been genuine engagement with the parties to be covered;
conclusion text: FWC must make or vary a road transport contractual chain order at some point in time after genuine engagement with parties and consultation.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536PG FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pg
has part: 536PG(1) FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport
has part: 536PG(2) FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.46

536PG(1) FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pg-ss-1
part of: 536PG FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport
note: Publish a notice and draft of proposed road transport contractual chain order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.46
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pg-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536PG(1) FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Publish a notice and draft of proposed road transport contractual chain order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536PG(2) FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pg-ss-2
part of: 536PG FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport
note: FWC must publish notice and draft on website and other means.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.46
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pg-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pg-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536PG(2) FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pg-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
logic summary: Classification of provision
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536PH Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ph
has part: 536PH(1) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
has part: 536PH(1A) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
has part: 536PH(2) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
has part: 536PH(3) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.47

536PH(1) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ph-ss-1
part of: 536PH Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
note: Affected entities must make written submissions to the FWC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.47
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536PH(1) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: OBLIGES
logic summary: Duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536PH(1A) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ph-ss-1a
part of: 536PH Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
note: A reasonable opportunity to make written submissions may be required.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.47
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1a-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536PH(1A) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May require a reasonable opportunity.
premise text: (1A) To avoid doubt, if the draft is of a time-sensitive road transport contractual chain order, a short period to make written submissions may be a reasonable opportunity.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Describes a temporal interval.
premise text: (1A) To avoid doubt, if the draft is of a time-sensitive road transport contractual chain order, a short period to make written submissions may be a reasonable opportunity.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Describes a temporal interval.
premise text: (1A) To avoid doubt, if the draft is of a time-sensitive road transport contractual chain order, a short period to make written submissions may be a reasonable opportunity.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Describes a diffusion process.
premise text: (1A) To avoid doubt, if the draft is of a time-sensitive road transport contractual chain order, a short period to make written submissions may be a reasonable opportunity.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-1a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Describes a cognitive process.
premise text: (1A) To avoid doubt, if the draft is of a time-sensitive road transport contractual chain order, a short period to make written submissions may be a reasonable opportunity.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536PH(2) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ph-ss-2
part of: 536PH Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
note: The FWC must publish submissions made to the FWC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.47
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536PH(2) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish submissions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536PH(3) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ph-ss-3
part of: 536PH Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
note: The FWC may decide not to publish confidential or commercially sensitive information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.47
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to withhold publication
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ph-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Summary of confidential information
premise text: (i) a summary of the information which contains sufficient detail
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536PJ Finalising draft order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pj
has part: 536PJ(1) Finalising draft order
has part: 536PJ(2) Finalising draft order
has part: 536PJ(3) Finalising draft order
has part: 536PJ(4) Finalising draft order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.48

536PJ(1) Finalising draft order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pj-ss-1
part of: 536PJ Finalising draft order
note: The FWC may make changes to a draft road transport contractual chain order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.48
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pj-ss-1-norm

536PJ(2) Finalising draft order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pj-ss-2
part of: 536PJ Finalising draft order
note: If changes made under subsection (1) are significant, the FWC must decide not to make the road transport contractual chain order based on the draft.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.48
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pj-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The FWC must decide not to make the road transport contractual chain order based on the draft.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536PJ(3) Finalising draft order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pj-ss-3
part of: 536PJ Finalising draft order
note: Defines the period of consultation for a revised draft road transport contractual chain order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.48
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pj-ss-3-norm

536PJ(4) Finalising draft order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pj-ss-4
part of: 536PJ Finalising draft order
note: FWC may reduce 12-month period for time-sensitive road transport contractual chain order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.48
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pj-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pj-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pj-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536PJ(4) Finalising draft order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pj-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: FWC obligation to reduce period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536PK Decision not to make order based on the draft
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pk
note: Publish notice of decision on website and other means.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.49
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pk-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pk-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pk-logic-descriptionlogic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pk-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pk-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASSOF
logic summary: Subdivision D—Decisions on road transport contractual chain orders and related matters
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536PL Decisions on applications for road transport contractual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pl
note: The FWC may decide on an application for a road transport contractual chain order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.49
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pl-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pl-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pl-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536PL Decisions on applications for road transport contractual
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pl-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: The FWC may decide on an application.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536PM Terms that must be included in a road transport contractual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pm
has part: 536PM(1) Terms that must be included in a road transport contractual
has part: 536PM(2) Terms that must be included in a road transport contractual
has part: 536PM(3) Terms that must be included in a road transport contractual
has part: 536PM(4) Terms that must be included in a road transport contractual
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.50

536PM(1) Terms that must be included in a road transport contractual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pm-ss-1
part of: 536PM Terms that must be included in a road transport contractual
note: Road transport contractual chain order must include terms setting out work and persons covered.
description: road transport industry coverage, persons in the road transport industry
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.50
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536PM(1) Terms that must be included in a road transport contractual
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must include terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536PM(2) Terms that must be included in a road transport contractual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pm-ss-2
part of: 536PM Terms that must be included in a road transport contractual
note: Must include persons in a road transport contractual chain
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.50
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536PM(2) Terms that must be included in a road transport contractual
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expressed to cover persons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536PM(3) Terms that must be included in a road transport contractual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pm-ss-3
part of: 536PM Terms that must be included in a road transport contractual
note: Specify persons in a road transport contractual chain by name or class.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.50
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536PM(3) Terms that must be included in a road transport contractual
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Specify persons in a road transport contractual chain.
premise text: (3) For the purposes of subsection (2):
conclusion text: persons in a road transport contractual chain other than regulated road transport contractors or road transport employee-like workers may be specified by name or by inclusion in a specified class or specified classes;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Specify persons in a road transport contractual chain within a specified class or classes.
premise text: (a) persons in a road transport contractual chain other than regulated road transport contractors or road transport employee-like workers may be specified by name or by inclusion in a specified class or specified classes;
conclusion text: and (b) regulated road transport contractors and road transport employee-like workers must be specified by inclusion in a specified class or specified classes.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Specify persons in a road transport contractual chain within a specified class or classes.
premise text: (a) persons in a road transport contractual chain other than regulated road transport contractors or road transport employee-like workers may be specified by name or by inclusion in a specified class or specified classes;
conclusion text: and (b) regulated road transport contractors and road transport employee-like workers must be specified by inclusion in a specified class or specified classes.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Specify persons in a road transport contractual chain within a specified class or classes.
premise text: (a) persons in a road transport contractual chain other than regulated road transport contractors or road transport employee-like workers may be specified by name or by inclusion in a specified class or specified classes;
conclusion text: and (b) regulated road transport contractors and road transport employee-like workers must be specified by inclusion in a specified class or specified classes.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Specify persons in a road transport contractual chain within a specified class or classes.
premise text: (a) persons in a road transport contractual chain other than regulated road transport contractors or road transport employee-like workers may be specified by name or by inclusion in a specified class or specified classes;
conclusion text: and (b) regulated road transport contractors and road transport employee-like workers must be specified by inclusion in a specified class or specified classes.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536PM(4) Terms that must be included in a road transport contractual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pm-ss-4
part of: 536PM Terms that must be included in a road transport contractual
note: Class description for road transport contractual chain
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.50
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-4-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pm-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536PM(4) Terms that must be included in a road transport contractual
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536PN Road transport contractual chain order must include term
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pn
note: Road transport contractual chain order must include provision specifying effect of inconsistency with minimum standards order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.51
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pn-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pn-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pn-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536PN Road transport contractual chain order must include term
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pn-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Obligation to include provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536PP Term about settling disputes must be included in a road
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pp
note: A road transport contractual chain order must include a term that provides a procedure for settling disputes about any matters arising under the order.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.51
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pp-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pp-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pp-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536PP Term about settling disputes must be included in a road
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pp-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to include a dispute settlement procedure
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536PQ Terms that may be included in a road transport contractual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pq
has part: 536PQ(1) Terms that may be included in a road transport contractual
has part: 536PQ(2) Terms that may be included in a road transport contractual
has part: 536PQ(3) Terms that may be included in a road transport contractual
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.51

536PQ(1) Terms that may be included in a road transport contractual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pq-ss-1
part of: 536PQ Terms that may be included in a road transport contractual
note: Payment times, fuel levies, rate reviews, termination, and cost recovery terms may be included in a road transport contractual chain order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.51
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536PQ(1) Terms that may be included in a road transport contractual
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes terms about payment times, fuel levies, rate reviews, termination, and cost recovery.
premise text: (1) A road transport contractual chain order...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536PQ(2) Terms that may be included in a road transport contractual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pq-ss-2
part of: 536PQ Terms that may be included in a road transport contractual
note: No limitation on terms in non-time-sensitive road transport contractual chain orders.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.51
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes
logic summary: Imposition of terms in a road transport contractual chain order
premise text: The subsection imposes no limitation on the terms.
conclusion text: The terms are imposed by the subsection.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Temporal inclusion of non-time-sensitive road transport contractual chain orders
premise text: The subsection includes non-time-sensitive road transport contractual chain orders.
conclusion text: Non-time-sensitive road transport contractual chain orders are included in the subsection.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: includes
logic summary: Temporal inclusion of non-time-sensitive road transport contractual chain orders (LTl)
premise text: The subsection includes non-time-sensitive road transport contractual chain orders.
conclusion text: Non-time-sensitive road transport contractual chain orders are included in the subsection.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
logic summary: Temporal inclusion of non-time-sensitive road transport contractual chain orders (Diffusion)
premise text: The subsection includes non-time-sensitive road transport contractual chain orders.
conclusion text: Non-time-sensitive road transport contractual chain orders are included in the subsection.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: includes
logic summary: Temporal inclusion of non-time-sensitive road transport contractual chain orders (CogAI)
premise text: The subsection includes non-time-sensitive road transport contractual chain orders.
conclusion text: Non-time-sensitive road transport contractual chain orders are included in the subsection.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536PQ(3) Terms that may be included in a road transport contractual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pq-ss-3
part of: 536PQ Terms that may be included in a road transport contractual
note: FWC must remove a term from a road transport contractual chain order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.51
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536PQ(3) Terms that may be included in a road transport contractual
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536PR Terms that must not be included in a road transport
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pr
has part: 536PR(1) Terms that must not be included in a road transport
has part: 536PR(2) Terms that must not be included in a road transport
has part: 536PR(3) Terms that must not be included in a road transport
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.53

536PR(1) Terms that must not be included in a road transport
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pr-ss-1
part of: 536PR Terms that must not be included in a road transport
note: Terms about overtime rates, rostering arrangements, and work health and safety are prohibited in road transport contractual chain orders.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.53
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 536PR(1) Terms that must not be included in a road transport
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits certain terms in road transport contractual chain orders.
premise text: (1) A road transport contractual chain order must not include terms about any of the following matters:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536PR(2) Terms that must not be included in a road transport
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pr-ss-2
part of: 536PR Terms that must not be included in a road transport
note: Terms about road transport that are comprehensively dealt with by another law must not be included.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.53
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 536PR(2) Terms that must not be included in a road transport
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits including terms about road transport that are comprehensively dealt with by another law.
premise text: (2) A road transport contractual chain order must not include terms...
conclusion text: ...terms about any of the following matters:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Terms about road transport that are comprehensively dealt with by another law overlap.
premise text: (ii) by another law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory;
conclusion text: ...by another law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Terms about road transport that are comprehensively dealt with by another law recur.
premise text: (ii) by another law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory;
conclusion text: ...by another law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits including terms about road transport that are comprehensively dealt with by another law.
premise text: (b) a matter prescribed by the regulations, or included in a class of matter prescribed by the regulations.
conclusion text: ...terms about any of the following matters:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536PR(3) Terms that must not be included in a road transport
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pr-ss-3
part of: 536PR Terms that must not be included in a road transport
note: Matters not dealt with in road transport regulations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.53
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 536PR(3) Terms that must not be included in a road transport
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Regulations must exclude certain matters
premise text: (3) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(d):
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pr-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Matters not dealt with in road transport regulations
premise text: (a) the regulations may specify that a particular matter, or a matter included in a class of matters, is, or is not, dealt with
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536PS Applications to vary or revoke road transport contractual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ps
note: Applications for varying or revoking a road transport contractual chain order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.54
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ps-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ps-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ps-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Applications for varying or revoking a road transport contractual chain order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536PT FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pt
has part: 536PT(1) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
has part: 536PT(2) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
has part: 536PT(3) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
has part: 536PT(4) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
has part: 536PT(5) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.55

536PT(1) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pt-ss-1
part of: 536PT FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
note: FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain order if consistent with minimum standards objective and road transport objective.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.55
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-1-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536PT(1) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536PT(2) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pt-ss-2
part of: 536PT FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
note: FWC may not make a variation to the extent that it would result in the order covering persons who are not regulated road transport contractors or road transport employee-like workers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.55
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 536PT(2) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of variation for non-regulated persons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536PT(3) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pt-ss-3
part of: 536PT FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
note: FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.55
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-3-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536PT(3) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536PT(4) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pt-ss-4
part of: 536PT FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
note: FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.55
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes the FWC's power to vary or revoke road transport contractual chain orders
premise text: The FWC may make a determination varying or revoking a road transport contractual chain order
conclusion text: The FWC has the authority to modify or terminate road transport contractual chain orders
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes the FWC's power to vary or revoke road transport contractual chain orders in a linear fashion
premise text: The FWC may make a determination varying or revoking a road transport contractual chain order
conclusion text: The FWC has the authority to modify or terminate road transport contractual chain orders
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes the temporal scope of the FWC's power to vary or revoke road transport contractual chain orders
premise text: The FWC may make a determination varying or revoking a road transport contractual chain order
conclusion text: The FWC has the authority to modify or terminate road transport contractual chain orders at any time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes how the FWC's power to vary or revoke road transport contractual chain orders spreads to other entities
premise text: The FWC may make a determination varying or revoking a road transport contractual chain order
conclusion text: The FWC's authority to modify or terminate road transport contractual chain orders is not limited by the actions of other entities
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes how the FWC's power to vary or revoke road transport contractual chain orders can be applied using artificial intelligence
premise text: The FWC may make a determination varying or revoking a road transport contractual chain order
conclusion text: The FWC's authority to modify or terminate road transport contractual chain orders can be automated using AI
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536PT(5) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pt-ss-5
part of: 536PT FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
note: FWC must not vary or revoke road transport contractual chain without considering it appropriate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.55
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536PT(5) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pt-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Prohibition on varying or revoking road transport contractual chain.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536PU Minister may make a declaration deferring the operation or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pu
has part: 536PU(1) Minister may make a declaration deferring the operation or
has part: 536PU(2) Minister may make a declaration deferring the operation or
has part: 536PU(3) Minister may make a declaration deferring the operation or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.57

536PU(1) Minister may make a declaration deferring the operation or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pu-ss-1
part of: 536PU Minister may make a declaration deferring the operation or
note: Minister may make a declaration deferring the operation or application of certain road transport contractual chain orders.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.57
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pu-ss-1-norm

536PU(2) Minister may make a declaration deferring the operation or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pu-ss-2
part of: 536PU Minister may make a declaration deferring the operation or
note: Declaration of deferral for road transport contractual chain order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.57
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pu-ss-2-norm

536PU(3) Minister may make a declaration deferring the operation or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pu-ss-3
part of: 536PU Minister may make a declaration deferring the operation or
note: Declaration of deferral for road transport contractual chain order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.57
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pu-ss-3-norm

536PV Limitations on making a deferral declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pv
has part: 536PV(1) Limitations on making a deferral declaration
has part: 536PV(2) Limitations on making a deferral declaration
has part: 536PV(3) Limitations on making a deferral declaration
has part: 536PV(4) Limitations on making a deferral declaration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.58

536PV(1) Limitations on making a deferral declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pv-ss-1
part of: 536PV Limitations on making a deferral declaration
note: Cannot make a deferral declaration for an operational road transport contractual chain order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.58
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Cannot make a deferral declaration
premise text: Minister must not
conclusion text: deferral declaration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536PV(2) Limitations on making a deferral declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pv-ss-2
part of: 536PV Limitations on making a deferral declaration
note: Limitations on making a deferral declaration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.58
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-2-logic-ltl-4

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Cannot make full deferral declaration if previous determination made
premise text: (2) The Minister must not make a full deferral declaration...
conclusion text: ...if a deferral determination has previously been made by the FWC
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: May make one full deferral declaration per road transport contractual chain order
premise text: (2) The Minister may only make one full deferral declaration...
conclusion text: ...in relation to a particular road transport contractual chain order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval for deferral declaration
premise text: (2) The Minister may only make one full deferral declaration...
conclusion text: ...in relation to a particular road transport contractual chain order at any time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Recurring trace for deferral declarations
premise text: More than one part deferral declaration is permitted
conclusion text: ...for each road transport contractual chain order.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536PV(3) Limitations on making a deferral declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pv-ss-3
part of: 536PV Limitations on making a deferral declaration
note: The Minister may make more than one deferral declaration in relation to a particular road transport contractual chain order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.58
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536PV(3) Limitations on making a deferral declaration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The Minister may make more than one deferral declaration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536PV(4) Limitations on making a deferral declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pv-ss-4
part of: 536PV Limitations on making a deferral declaration
note: Cannot defer application of terms to persons already affected or previously deferred
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.58
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-4-logic-dialectical-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits deferring application of terms to persons already affected or previously deferred
premise text: (4) If more than one part deferral declaration...
conclusion text: ...must not have the effect of deferring, or purporting to defer...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits deferring application of terms to persons already affected or previously deferred
premise text: (4) If more than one part deferral declaration...
conclusion text: ...must not have the effect of deferring, or purporting to defer...
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-4-logic-dialectical-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Dialectical
operator: Restrict
logic summary: Restricts application of terms to persons already affected or previously deferred
premise text: (4) If more than one part deferral declaration...
conclusion text: ...must not have the effect of deferring, or purporting to defer...
execution surface: modalities::dialectical
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Restrict
logic summary: Restricts application of terms to persons already affected or previously deferred within a temporal interval
premise text: (4) If more than one part deferral declaration...
conclusion text: ...must not have the effect of deferring, or purporting to defer...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pv-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Restrict
logic summary: Restricts application of terms to persons already affected or previously deferred through diffusion
premise text: (4) If more than one part deferral declaration...
conclusion text: ...must not have the effect of deferring, or purporting to defer...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536PW Operation of a road transport contractual chain order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pw
note: Road transport contractual chain order not in operation during deferral declaration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.59
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pw-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pw-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pw-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536PX Minister may make a declaration suspending a road
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536px
note: Minister may make a declaration suspending a road transport contractual chain order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.59
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536px-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536px-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536px-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to make a declaration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536PY Suspension declaration must generally be made within 12
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536py
has part: 536PY(1) Suspension declaration must generally be made within 12
has part: 536PY(2) Suspension declaration must generally be made within 12
has part: 536PY(3) Suspension declaration must generally be made within 12
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.62

536PY(1) Suspension declaration must generally be made within 12
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536py-ss-1
part of: 536PY Suspension declaration must generally be made within 12
note: Suspension declaration timing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.62
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536py-ss-1-norm

536PY(2) Suspension declaration must generally be made within 12
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536py-ss-2
part of: 536PY Suspension declaration must generally be made within 12
note: Suspension declaration must be made within a specified period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.62
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536py-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536py-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536py-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536py-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be made within the relevant period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536py-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Relates to a specified class of persons or terms.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536PY(3) Suspension declaration must generally be made within 12
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536py-ss-3
part of: 536PY Suspension declaration must generally be made within 12
note: Relevant period for a road transport contractual chain order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.62
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536py-ss-3-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536py-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536PY(3) Suspension declaration must generally be made within 12
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536PZ Operation of a road transport contractual chain order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536pz
note: Road transport contractual chain order not in operation during full suspension declaration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.63
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pz-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pz-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536pz-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536Q Consultation requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536q
note: No consultation required for deferral declarations or suspension declarations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.63
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536q-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536q-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536q-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits consultation for deferral declarations or suspension declarations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536QA Applications for a deferral determination for a road
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qa
has part: 536QA(1) Applications for a deferral determination for a road
has part: 536QA(2) Applications for a deferral determination for a road
has part: 536QA(3) Applications for a deferral determination for a road
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.64

536QA(1) Applications for a deferral determination for a road
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qa-ss-1
part of: 536QA Applications for a deferral determination for a road
note: Application for deferral determination under subsection 536QB(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.64
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-1-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536QA(1) Applications for a deferral determination for a road
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536QA(2) Applications for a deferral determination for a road
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qa-ss-2
part of: 536QA Applications for a deferral determination for a road
note: Eligible parties can apply for a deferral determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.64
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536QA(2) Applications for a deferral determination for a road
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Eligible parties can apply for a deferral determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536QA(3) Applications for a deferral determination for a road
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qa-ss-3
part of: 536QA Applications for a deferral determination for a road
note: No application for deferral determination can be made in relation to a road transport contractual chain order that has already come into operation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.64
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 536QA(3) Applications for a deferral determination for a road
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of making an application for a deferral determination in relation to a road transport contractual chain order that has already come into operation.
premise text: (3) An application for a deferral determination must not be made in relation to a road transport contractual chain order that has already come into operation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Precedes
logic summary: The provision specifies a temporal relationship between the application and the road transport contractual chain order.
premise text: (3) An application for a deferral determination must not be made in relation to a road transport contractual chain order that has already come into operation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Precedes
logic summary: The provision specifies a temporal relationship between the application and the road transport contractual chain order.
premise text: (3) An application for a deferral determination must not be made in relation to a road transport contractual chain order that has already come into operation.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: None
logic summary: The provision does not specify any diffusion of information or responsibility.
premise text: (3) An application for a deferral determination must not be made in relation to a road transport contractual chain order that has already come into operation.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qa-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: None
logic summary: The provision does not require any cognitive or artificial intelligence capabilities.
premise text: (3) An application for a deferral determination must not be made in relation to a road transport contractual chain order that has already come into operation.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536QB FWC may make a determination deferring the operation or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qb
has part: 536QB(1) FWC may make a determination deferring the operation or
has part: 536QB(2) FWC may make a determination deferring the operation or
has part: 536QB(3) FWC may make a determination deferring the operation or
has part: 536QB(4) FWC may make a determination deferring the operation or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.64

536QB(1) FWC may make a determination deferring the operation or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qb-ss-1
part of: 536QB FWC may make a determination deferring the operation or
note: FWC may make a determination deferring the operation or application of certain road transport contractual chain orders.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.64
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qb-ss-1-norm

536QB(2) FWC may make a determination deferring the operation or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qb-ss-2
part of: 536QB FWC may make a determination deferring the operation or
note: Definition of deferral determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.64
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qb-ss-2-norm

536QB(3) FWC may make a determination deferring the operation or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qb-ss-3
part of: 536QB FWC may make a determination deferring the operation or
note: FWC may make a determination deferring the operation or revocation of a road transport contractual chain order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.64
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qb-ss-3-norm

536QB(4) FWC may make a determination deferring the operation or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qb-ss-4
part of: 536QB FWC may make a determination deferring the operation or
note: The FWC may describe a class by reference to an industry or sector.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.64
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qb-ss-4-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qb-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536QB(4) FWC may make a determination deferring the operation or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536QC Limitations on making a deferral determination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qc
has part: 536QC(1) Limitations on making a deferral determination
has part: 536QC(2) Limitations on making a deferral determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.65

536QC(1) Limitations on making a deferral determination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qc-ss-1
part of: 536QC Limitations on making a deferral determination
note: No deferral determination for operational road transport chain orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.65
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qc-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qc-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 536QC(1) Limitations on making a deferral determination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536QC(2) Limitations on making a deferral determination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qc-ss-2
part of: 536QC Limitations on making a deferral determination
note: Limitations on making a deferral determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.65
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qc-ss-2-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536QC(2) Limitations on making a deferral determination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536QD Decision on an application for a deferral determination in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qd
has part: 536QD(1) Decision on an application for a deferral determination in
has part: 536QD(2) Decision on an application for a deferral determination in
has part: 536QD(3) Decision on an application for a deferral determination in
has part: 536QD(4) Decision on an application for a deferral determination in
has part: 536QD(5) Decision on an application for a deferral determination in
has part: 536QD(6) Decision on an application for a deferral determination in
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.66

536QD(1) Decision on an application for a deferral determination in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qd-ss-1
part of: 536QD Decision on an application for a deferral determination in
note: FWC must consider and consult on an application for a deferral determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.66
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536QD(1) Decision on an application for a deferral determination in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider and consult.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536QD(2) Decision on an application for a deferral determination in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qd-ss-2
part of: 536QD Decision on an application for a deferral determination in
note: FWC may treat application as if it were an application for suspension determination if road transport contractual chain order comes into operation before FWC makes a decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.66
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-2-norm

536QD(3) Decision on an application for a deferral determination in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qd-ss-3
part of: 536QD Decision on an application for a deferral determination in
note: The FWC may make a deferral determination under subsection 536QB(1) or decide not to.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.66
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses a permission or obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536QD(4) Decision on an application for a deferral determination in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qd-ss-4
part of: 536QD Decision on an application for a deferral determination in
note: FWC must make deferral determination under specified conditions.
description: (a) significant new facts or evidence, (b) demonstration of lack of safety net.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.66
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536QD(4) Decision on an application for a deferral determination in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make deferral determination
premise text: (4) The FWC must...
conclusion text: ...the FWC is satisfied that...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for deferral determination
premise text: (4) The FWC must make the deferral determination if...
conclusion text: ...the FWC is satisfied that...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Implication of new facts or evidence on deferral determination
premise text: (a) the applicant has provided significant new facts or evidence
conclusion text: ...the road transport contractual chain order will not provide an appropriate safety net
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IF
logic summary: Conditional deferral determination
premise text: (4) The FWC must make the deferral determination if...
conclusion text: ...the FWC is satisfied that...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536QD(5) Decision on an application for a deferral determination in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qd-ss-5
part of: 536QD Decision on an application for a deferral determination in
note: Consider previous applications for variation or revocation of the road transport contractual chain order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.66
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536QD(5) Decision on an application for a deferral determination in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: regard
logic summary: Consideration of previous applications
premise text: (5) In considering...
conclusion text: ...the FWC may have regard to...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536QD(6) Decision on an application for a deferral determination in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qd-ss-6
part of: 536QD Decision on an application for a deferral determination in
note: Publish deferral determination on website and other means
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.66
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-6-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qd-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: PUBLISH
logic summary: Publish on website and other means
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536QE Operation of a road transport contractual chain order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qe
note: Minimum standards for persons in a road transport contractual chain
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.67
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qe-norm

536QF Applications for a suspension determination for a road
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qf
has part: 536QF(1) Applications for a suspension determination for a road
has part: 536QF(2) Applications for a suspension determination for a road
has part: 536QF(3) Applications for a suspension determination for a road
has part: 536QF(4) Applications for a suspension determination for a road
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.68

536QF(1) Applications for a suspension determination for a road
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qf-ss-1
part of: 536QF Applications for a suspension determination for a road
note: Application for suspension determination under subsection 536QG(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.68
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qf-ss-1-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qf-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536QF(1) Applications for a suspension determination for a road
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536QF(2) Applications for a suspension determination for a road
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qf-ss-2
part of: 536QF Applications for a suspension determination for a road
note: Eligible parties can make an application for a suspension determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.68
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qf-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Eligible parties can make an application for a suspension determination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536QF(3) Applications for a suspension determination for a road
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qf-ss-3
part of: 536QF Applications for a suspension determination for a road
note: Application for suspension determination must be made within 12 months of order operation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.68
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qf-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qf-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536QF(3) Applications for a suspension determination for a road
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application deadline is a requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536QF(4) Applications for a suspension determination for a road
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qf-ss-4
part of: 536QF Applications for a suspension determination for a road
note: Application deadline for a part suspension determination for a road
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.68
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qf-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qf-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qf-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qf-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536QF(4) Applications for a suspension determination for a road
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qf-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be made within 12 months of the applicable day
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qf-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
logic summary: Classification of persons into classes for suspension determination
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536QG FWC may make a determination suspending a road
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qg
has part: 536QG(1) FWC may make a determination suspending a road
has part: 536QG(2) FWC may make a determination suspending a road
has part: 536QG(3) FWC may make a determination suspending a road
has part: 536QG(4) FWC may make a determination suspending a road
has part: 536QG(5) FWC may make a determination suspending a road
has part: 536QG(5A) FWC may make a determination suspending a road
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.70

536QG(1) FWC may make a determination suspending a road
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qg-ss-1
part of: 536QG FWC may make a determination suspending a road
note: FWC may make a determination suspending a road
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.70
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qg-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536QG(1) FWC may make a determination suspending a road
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to suspend a road transport contractual chain order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536QG(2) FWC may make a determination suspending a road
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qg-ss-2
part of: 536QG FWC may make a determination suspending a road
note: Suspension determination must specify period of suspension
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.70
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qg-ss-2-norm

536QG(3) FWC may make a determination suspending a road
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qg-ss-3
part of: 536QG FWC may make a determination suspending a road
note: Suspension of road transport contractual chain orders must specify a period not longer than the relevant period and start after the determination is made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.70
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qg-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qg-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 536QG(3) FWC may make a determination suspending a road
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of suspension without proper notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536QG(4) FWC may make a determination suspending a road
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qg-ss-4
part of: 536QG FWC may make a determination suspending a road
note: Suspension period ends immediately after specified end date.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.70
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qg-ss-4-norm

536QG(5) FWC may make a determination suspending a road
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qg-ss-5
part of: 536QG FWC may make a determination suspending a road
note: Determination of suspension period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.70
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qg-ss-5-norm

536QG(5A) FWC may make a determination suspending a road
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qg-ss-5a
part of: 536QG FWC may make a determination suspending a road
note: Defines the relevant period for a road transport contractual chain order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.70
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qg-ss-5a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qg-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qg-ss-5a-logic-alleninterval-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qg-ss-5a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536QG(5A) FWC may make a determination suspending a road
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qg-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Defines the relevant period for a road transport contractual chain order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qg-ss-5a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536QH Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qh
has part: 536QH(1) Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
has part: 536QH(2) Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
has part: 536QH(3) Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
has part: 536QH(4) Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
has part: 536QH(5) Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
has part: 536QH(6) Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
has part: 536QH(7) Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.72

536QH(1) Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qh-ss-1
part of: 536QH Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
note: FWC must consider and consult on an application for suspension determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.72
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536QH(1) Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must consider the application
premise text: (1) If an application for a suspension determination in relation to a road transport contractual chain order is made...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: AND
logic summary: Consideration and consultation are concurrent actions
premise text: (1) If an application for a suspension determination in relation to a road transport contractual chain order is made...
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Consideration and consultation occur within the same timeframe
premise text: (1) If an application for a suspension determination in relation to a road transport contractual chain order is made...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536QH(2) Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qh-ss-2
part of: 536QH Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
note: Decision on an application for a suspension determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.72
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Decision to make or not make suspension determination
premise text: (2) The FWC may:
conclusion text: (b) decide not to make the suspension determination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536QH(3) Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qh-ss-3
part of: 536QH Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
note: Must make suspension determination under specified conditions.
description: (a) significant new facts or evidence not available at the time of decision; (b) significant new facts or evidence demonstrating lack of safety net for road transport industry.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.72
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must make suspension determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536QH(4) Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qh-ss-4
part of: 536QH Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
note: Consider previous applications when deciding on a suspension determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.72
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-4-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536QH(4) Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536QH(5) Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qh-ss-5
part of: 536QH Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
note: Ensure no person is unfairly affected by the suspension.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.72
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May make orders to ensure fairness.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536QH(6) Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qh-ss-6
part of: 536QH Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
note: Publish suspension determination on website and other means
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.72
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-6-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: PUBLISH
logic summary: Publish on website and other means
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536QH(7) Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qh-ss-7
part of: 536QH Decision on an application for a suspension determination in
note: No effect on pre-existing rights or liabilities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.72
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-7-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qh-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: no-effect
logic summary: No effect on pre-existing rights or liabilities
premise text: (7) The making of a suspension determination does not affect any right or liability that a person acquired, accrued or incurred before the suspension determination is made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536QJ Operation of a road transport contractual chain order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qj
note: Road transport contractual chain order not in operation during full suspension determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.73
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qj-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qj-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qj-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative assertion of a prohibition.
conclusion text: A road transport contractual chain order is not in operation during any period when a full suspension determination is in operation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536QK FWC must consider whether to vary or revoke a road
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qk
note: FWC must consider varying or revoking a road transport contractual chain order that has been deferred or suspended.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.73
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qk-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qk-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qk-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536QK FWC must consider whether to vary or revoke a road
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qk-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to consider
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536QL FWC to prepare and publish a notice relating to proposed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ql
has part: 536QL(1) FWC to prepare and publish a notice relating to proposed
has part: 536QL(2) FWC to prepare and publish a notice relating to proposed
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.76

536QL(1) FWC to prepare and publish a notice relating to proposed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ql-ss-1
part of: 536QL FWC to prepare and publish a notice relating to proposed
note: Publish notice of intent before varying or revoking road transport contractual chain order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.76
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ql-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ql-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ql-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ql-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536QL(1) FWC to prepare and publish a notice relating to proposed
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ql-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Publish notice of intent before varying or revoking road transport contractual chain order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ql-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEFORE
logic summary: Publish notice of intent before varying or revoking road transport contractual chain order
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536QL(2) FWC to prepare and publish a notice relating to proposed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ql-ss-2
part of: 536QL FWC to prepare and publish a notice relating to proposed
note: FWC must publish notice and draft order on website and other means.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.76
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ql-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ql-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ql-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ql-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536QL(2) FWC to prepare and publish a notice relating to proposed
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ql-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish notice and draft order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ql-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS OF
logic summary: Classifies as obligation to publish notice and draft order.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536QM Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qm
has part: 536QM(1) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
has part: 536QM(1A) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
has part: 536QM(2) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
has part: 536QM(3) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
has part: 536QM(4) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
has part: 536QM(5) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
has part: 536QM(6) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.76

536QM(1) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qm-ss-1
part of: 536QM Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
note: Affected entities must make written submissions to the FWC for consideration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.76
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536QM(1) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536QM(1A) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qm-ss-1a
part of: 536QM Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
note: A reasonable opportunity to make written submissions may be required.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.76
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-1a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536QM(1A) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May require a reasonable opportunity.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536QM(2) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qm-ss-2
part of: 536QM Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
note: The FWC must publish submissions made to the FWC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.76
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536QM(2) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish submissions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536QM(3) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qm-ss-3
part of: 536QM Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
note: The FWC may decide not to publish confidential or commercially sensitive information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.76
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to withhold publication
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Classification of information
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536QM(4) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qm-ss-4
part of: 536QM Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
note: Publish material on FWC's website and other means.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.76
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536QM(4) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish material on FWC's website and other means.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
logic summary: Classification of publication method.
premise text: (4) The publishing of material under subsections (2) and (3)
conclusion text: must be on the FWC’s website and by any other means the FWC considers appropriate.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for publication.
premise text: (4) The publishing of material under subsections (2) and (3)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536QM(5) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qm-ss-5
part of: 536QM Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
note: A reference to a submission under this section includes a reference to a summary or statement referred to in paragraph (3)(b).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.76
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-5-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536QM(5) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536QM(6) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qm-ss-6
part of: 536QM Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
note: Affected entities must be notified of proposed variation or revocation of road transport contractual chain order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.76
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-6-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-6-logic-ltl-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-6-logic-shacl-6

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536QM(6) Affected entities to have a reasonable opportunity to make
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be notified
premise text: Proposed variation or revocation
conclusion text: Affected entity must be notified
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS-A
logic summary: Notification is a requirement for affected entities
premise text: Affected entity likely to be affected by proposed variation or revocation
conclusion text: Affected entity has a right to notification
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Notification must occur before the proposed variation or revocation takes effect
premise text: Proposed variation or revocation is conditional on publication of notice
conclusion text: Notification must occur before the proposed variation or revocation takes effect
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-6-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: Notification must be provided to affected entities within a reasonable timeframe
premise text: Affected entity has a right to notification
conclusion text: Notification must be provided to affected entities within a reasonable timeframe
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS-A
logic summary: The regulation is designed to ensure that affected entities are notified of proposed variation or revocation
premise text: Regulation is intended to protect the interests of affected entities
conclusion text: The regulation is designed to ensure that affected entities are notified of proposed variation or revocation
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qm-ss-6-logic-shacl-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: IS-A
logic summary: The notification requirement is a key aspect of the regulation
premise text: Regulation is designed to protect the interests of affected entities
conclusion text: The notification requirement is a key aspect of the regulation
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536QN Finalising draft order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qn
has part: 536QN(1) Finalising draft order
has part: 536QN(2) Finalising draft order
has part: 536QN(3) Finalising draft order
has part: 536QN(4) Finalising draft order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.78

536QN(1) Finalising draft order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qn-ss-1
part of: 536QN Finalising draft order
note: The FWC may make changes to a draft road transport contractual chain order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.78
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qn-ss-1-norm

536QN(2) Finalising draft order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qn-ss-2
part of: 536QN Finalising draft order
note: FWC must decide not to vary the road transport contractual chain order based on a revised draft, publish a subsequent notice of intent, and follow a process.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.78
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qn-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qn-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: FWC has an obligation to decide not to vary the road transport contractual chain order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qn-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The FWC's decision overlaps with the publication of a subsequent notice of intent.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536QN(3) Finalising draft order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qn-ss-3
part of: 536QN Finalising draft order
note: Defines the period of consultation for a revised draft road transport contractual chain order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.78
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qn-ss-3-norm

536QN(4) Finalising draft order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qn-ss-4
part of: 536QN Finalising draft order
note: FWC may reduce 12-month period for time-sensitive road transport contractual chain orders.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.78
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qn-ss-4-norm

536QP Road transport contractual chain guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qp
has part: 536QP(1) Road transport contractual chain guidelines
has part: 536QP(2) Road transport contractual chain guidelines
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.79

536QP(1) Road transport contractual chain guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qp-ss-1
part of: 536QP Road transport contractual chain guidelines
note: Guidelines for regulated road transport contractors and employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.79
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qp-ss-1-norm

536QP(2) Road transport contractual chain guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qp-ss-2
part of: 536QP Road transport contractual chain guidelines
note: FWC may make road transport contractual chain guidelines on its own initiative or on application under section 536QQ.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.79
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qp-ss-2-norm

536QQ Applications for road transport contractual chain guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qq
has part: 536QQ(1) Applications for road transport contractual chain guidelines
has part: 536QQ(2) Applications for road transport contractual chain guidelines
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.79

536QQ(1) Applications for road transport contractual chain guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qq-ss-1
part of: 536QQ Applications for road transport contractual chain guidelines
note: Any organisation or person may apply for the making of road transport contractual chain guidelines.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.79
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qq-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qq-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536QQ(1) Applications for road transport contractual chain guidelines
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536QQ(2) Applications for road transport contractual chain guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qq-ss-2
part of: 536QQ Applications for road transport contractual chain guidelines
note: Application for road transport contractual chain guidelines must specify class of persons to be covered.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.79
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qq-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qq-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qq-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536QQ(2) Applications for road transport contractual chain guidelines
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application is required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qq-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Class of persons must be specified.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536QR Decisions on applications for road transport contractual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qr
has part: 536QR(1) Decisions on applications for road transport contractual
has part: 536QR(2) Decisions on applications for road transport contractual
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.80

536QR(1) Decisions on applications for road transport contractual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qr-ss-1
part of: 536QR Decisions on applications for road transport contractual
note: The FWC may decide to refuse, make guidelines, or make an order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.80
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536QR(1) Decisions on applications for road transport contractual
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: The FWC may decide to refuse, make guidelines, or make an order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536QR(2) Decisions on applications for road transport contractual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qr-ss-2
part of: 536QR Decisions on applications for road transport contractual
note: Refusal of application based on prioritisation direction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.80
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 536QR(2) Decisions on applications for road transport contractual
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1)
conclusion text: the FWC may refuse to consider the application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for prioritisation direction
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1)
conclusion text: the application is not consistent with a direction of the President under subsection 582(4D) prior to the FWC's consideration
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for prioritisation direction
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1)
conclusion text: the application is not consistent with a direction of the President under subsection 582(4D) in recurring traces prior to the FWC's consideration
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of prioritisation direction
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1)
conclusion text: the application is not consistent with a direction of the President under subsection 582(4D) in diffusion prior to the FWC's consideration
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qr-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
logic summary: Classification of applications based on prioritisation direction by CogAI
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1)
conclusion text: the application is not consistent with a direction of the President under subsection 582(4D) in classification prior to the FWC's consideration
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536QS Road transport contractual chain guidelines not to be made
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qs
note: FWC must not make road transport contractual chain guidelines that cover the same persons in a road transport contractual chain in relation to the same matters as a road transport contractual chain order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.80
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qs-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qs-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qs-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 536QS Road transport contractual chain guidelines not to be made
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qs-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of making guidelines that cover the same persons in a road transport contractual chain.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536QT Terms that must be included in road transport contractual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qt
note: Road transport contractual chain guidelines must include terms setting out the same matters in relation to road transport contractual chain orders.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.81
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qt-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qt-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qt-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536QT Terms that must be included in road transport contractual
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qt-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a mandatory requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536QU Terms that may be included in road transport contractual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qu
note: Road transport contractual chain guidelines may include terms about any of the matters that may be included in road transport contractual chain orders under section 536PQ.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.81
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qu-norm

536QV Terms that must not be included in road transport
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qv
note: Terms about matters that must not be included in road transport
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.81
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qv-norm

536QW FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qw
has part: 536QW(1) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
has part: 536QW(2) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
has part: 536QW(3) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.81

536QW(1) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qw-ss-1
part of: 536QW FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
note: FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain guidelines
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.81
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qw-ss-1-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qw-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536QW(1) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536QW(2) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qw-ss-2
part of: 536QW FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
note: FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.81
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qw-ss-2-norm

536QW(3) FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qw-ss-3
part of: 536QW FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
note: FWC may vary or revoke road transport contractual chain
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.81
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qw-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qw-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qw-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qw-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qw-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qw-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qw-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes the FWC's power to vary or revoke road transport contractual chain guidelines
premise text: Chapter 3B Minimum standards for persons in a road transport contractual chain
conclusion text: FWC may make a determination varying road transport contractual chain guidelines
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qw-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes the temporal scope of the FWC's power to vary or revoke road transport contractual chain guidelines
premise text: Chapter 3B Minimum standards for persons in a road transport contractual chain
conclusion text: The FWC may make a determination varying road transport contractual chain guidelines at any time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qw-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes the temporal scope of the FWC's power to vary or revoke road transport contractual chain guidelines
premise text: Chapter 3B Minimum standards for persons in a road transport contractual chain
conclusion text: The FWC may make a determination varying road transport contractual chain guidelines at any time
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qw-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes the scope of the FWC's power to vary or revoke road transport contractual chain guidelines
premise text: Chapter 3B Minimum standards for persons in a road transport contractual chain
conclusion text: The FWC may make a determination varying road transport contractual chain guidelines for any person or entity
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qw-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes the scope of the FWC's power to vary or revoke road transport contractual chain guidelines
premise text: Chapter 3B Minimum standards for persons in a road transport contractual chain
conclusion text: The FWC may make a determination varying road transport contractual chain guidelines for any person or entity
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536QX Applications to vary or revoke road transport contractual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536qx
note: Any of the following may apply for a determination varying or revoking road transport contractual chain guidelines.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.82
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qx-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-536qx-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536QX Applications to vary or revoke road transport contractual
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

537 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-537
note: Civil remedies may be sought in relation to contraventions of these civil remedy provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.84
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-537-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-537-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-537-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligations on certain persons.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

538 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-538
note: Defines employee and employer terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.85
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-538-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-538-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-538-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 538 Meanings of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-538-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines key terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

539 Applications for orders in relation to contraventions of civil
type: Concept
realized by: sec-539
has part: 539(1) Applications for orders in relation to contraventions of civil
has part: 539(2) Applications for orders in relation to contraventions of civil
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.86

539(1) Applications for orders in relation to contraventions of civil
type: Concept
realized by: sec-539-ss-1
part of: 539 Applications for orders in relation to contraventions of civil
note: A provision referred to in column 1 of an item in the table is a civil remedy provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.86
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-539-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-539-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-539-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-539-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-539-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-539-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-539-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 539(1) Applications for orders in relation to contraventions of civil
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-539-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of a civil remedy provision
premise text: (1) A provision referred to in column 1 of an item in the table...
conclusion text: ...is a civil remedy provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-539-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between provisions
premise text: (1) A provision referred to in column 1 of an item in the table...
conclusion text: ...is related to a provision during subsection (2)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-539-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: and
logic summary: Multiple conditions for classification
premise text: (1) A provision referred to in column 1 of an item in the table...
conclusion text: ...meets multiple conditions for classification as a civil remedy provision.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-539-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: and
logic summary: Multiple classifications
premise text: (1) A provision referred to in column 1 of an item in the table...
conclusion text: ...can be classified as multiple types of provisions.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-539-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: and
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
premise text: (1) A provision referred to in column 1 of an item in the table...
conclusion text: ...can be applied using artificial intelligence.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

539(2) Applications for orders in relation to contraventions of civil
type: Concept
realized by: sec-539-ss-2
part of: 539 Applications for orders in relation to contraventions of civil
note: Persons may apply for orders in relation to contraventions of civil remedy provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.86
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-539-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-539-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-539-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to apply for orders
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

540 Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-540
has part: 540(1) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
has part: 540(2) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
has part: 540(3) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
has part: 540(4) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
has part: 540(5) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
has part: 540(6) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
has part: 540(7) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.120

540(1) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-540-ss-1
part of: 540 Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
note: Only specific persons may apply for an order under this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.120
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 540(1) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: onlyIf
logic summary: Restriction on who may apply for an order
premise text: (1) The following persons...
conclusion text: ...may apply for an order under this Division.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

540(2) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-540-ss-2
part of: 540 Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
note: Employee organisations and associations can apply for orders under this Division if an employee is affected by a contravention or proposed contravention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.120
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 540(2) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Permission to apply for orders
premise text: The organisation or association is entitled to represent the industrial interests of the employee.
conclusion text: Can apply for orders
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must represent
logic summary: Organisation must represent industrial interests of employee
premise text: The organisation or association is entitled to represent the industrial interests of the employee.
conclusion text: Must represent industrial interests of employee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Permission to apply for orders if conditions met
premise text: (a) The employee is affected by the contravention, or will be affected by the proposed contravention; and (b) The organisation or association is entitled to represent the industrial interests of the employee.
conclusion text: Can apply for orders if conditions met
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Obligation on organisations and associations to apply for orders
premise text: (a) The employee is affected by the contravention, or will be affected by the proposed contravention; and (b) The organisation or association is entitled to represent the industrial interests of the employee.
conclusion text: Must apply for orders
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

540(3) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-540-ss-3
part of: 540 Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
note: Exemptions from subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.120
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-3-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 540(3) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

540(4) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-540-ss-4
part of: 540 Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
note: Only employee organisations entitled to represent outworker interests can apply for orders.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.120
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-4-logic-deontic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: onlyIf
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: Employee organisation is entitled to represent industrial interests of outworker.
conclusion text: Can apply for orders.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory application condition
premise text: Employee organisation is entitled to represent industrial interests of outworker.
conclusion text: Must provide information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

540(5) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-540-ss-5
part of: 540 Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
note: Employer organisations can apply for orders under this Division if a member is affected by the contravention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.120
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Employer organisations can apply for orders under this Division.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

540(6) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-540-ss-6
part of: 540 Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
note: An industrial association may apply for an order under this Division only if affected by the contravention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.120
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-6-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-6-logic-deontic-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-6-logic-deontic-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-6-logic-deontic-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightToApply
logic summary: Industrial association has right to apply for order
premise text: The industrial association is affected by the contravention.
conclusion text: The industrial association may apply for an order under this Division.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermissionToApply
logic summary: Industrial association has permission to apply for order
premise text: The industrial association is entitled to represent the industrial interests of the person.
conclusion text: The industrial association may apply for an order under this Division.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-6-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightToRepresent
logic summary: Industrial association has right to represent the industrial interests of the person
premise text: The industrial association is entitled to represent the industrial interests of the person.
conclusion text: The industrial association may apply for an order under this Division.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-6-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightToApplyForOrder
logic summary: Industrial association has right to apply for order
premise text: The industrial association is affected by the contravention or will be affected by the proposed contravention.
conclusion text: The industrial association may apply for an order under this Division.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-6-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightToApplyForOrderIfAffected
logic summary: Industrial association has right to apply for order if affected
premise text: The industrial association is affected by the contravention or will be affected by the proposed contravention.
conclusion text: The industrial association may apply for an order under this Division.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

540(7) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-540-ss-7
part of: 540 Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
note: Employee organisations, registered employee associations or employer organisations may apply for an order under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.120
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-7-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-540-ss-7-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 540(7) Limitations on who may apply for orders etc.
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

541 Applications for orders in relation to safety net contractual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-541
has part: 541(1) Applications for orders in relation to safety net contractual
has part: 541(2) Applications for orders in relation to safety net contractual
has part: 541(3) Applications for orders in relation to safety net contractual
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.123

541(1) Applications for orders in relation to safety net contractual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-541-ss-1
part of: 541 Applications for orders in relation to safety net contractual
note: Employer must comply with provision or term if inspector applies for order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.123
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 541(1) Applications for orders in relation to safety net contractual
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must comply.
premise text: Inspector applies for order.
conclusion text: Employer complies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Inspector applies for order after employer contravenes provision or term.
premise text: Section 541(1) applies if an inspector applies to a court for an order.
conclusion text: Inspector applies for order after employer contravenes provision or term.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: Employer must comply with provision or term before inspector applies for order.
premise text: Section 541(1) applies if an inspector applies to a court for an order.
conclusion text: Employer must comply with provision or term before inspector applies for order.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST NOT
logic summary: Inspector does not have authority to apply for order unless employer contravenes provision or term.
premise text: Section 541(1) applies if an inspector applies to a court for an order.
conclusion text: Inspector does not have authority to apply for order unless employer contravenes provision or term.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must comply with provision or term if inspector applies for order.
premise text: Section 541(1) applies to an employer's contravention or proposed contravention of a provision or term referred to in subsection (3).
conclusion text: Employer must comply with provision or term.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

541(2) Applications for orders in relation to safety net contractual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-541-ss-2
part of: 541 Applications for orders in relation to safety net contractual
note: Inspector may apply to court for order in relation to employer's contravention of safety net contractual entitlement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.123
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 541(2) Applications for orders in relation to safety net contractual
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Inspector may apply to court
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

541(3) Applications for orders in relation to safety net contractual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-541-ss-3
part of: 541 Applications for orders in relation to safety net contractual
note: List of provisions and terms that must be included in safety net contractual applications.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.123
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 541(3) Applications for orders in relation to safety net contractual
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-541-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Must include specific provisions and terms.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

542 Entitlements under contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-542
has part: 542(1) Entitlements under contracts
has part: 542(2) Entitlements under contracts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.123

542(1) Entitlements under contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-542-ss-1
part of: 542 Entitlements under contracts
note: Entitlement of national system employer or employee under this Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.123
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-542-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-542-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-542-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 542(1) Entitlements under contracts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-542-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Employer/employee entitlement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

542(2) Entitlements under contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-542-ss-2
part of: 542 Entitlements under contracts
note: Entitlements under contracts subject to modifications by laws or instruments of the safety net.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.123
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-542-ss-2-norm

543 Applications for orders in relation to statutory entitlements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-543
note: Application for orders in relation to statutory entitlements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.123
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-543-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-543-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 543 Applications for orders in relation to statutory entitlements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

544 Time limit on applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-544
note: Time limit for applications related to contraventions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.124
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-544-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-544-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 544 Time limit on applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

545 Orders that can be made by particular courts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-545
has part: 545(1) Orders that can be made by particular courts
has part: 545(2) Orders that can be made by particular courts
has part: 545(3) Orders that can be made by particular courts
has part: 545(3A) Orders that can be made by particular courts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.124

545(1) Orders that can be made by particular courts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-545-ss-1
part of: 545 Orders that can be made by particular courts
note: Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia may make orders if a person has contravened a civil remedy provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.124
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 545(1) Orders that can be made by particular courts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making orders if a person has contravened a civil remedy provision.
premise text: The court may make any order the court considers appropriate.
conclusion text: If a person has contravened a civil remedy provision, the court may not make an order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits granting injunctions in relation to industrial action under subsections 417(3) and 421(3).
premise text: The Federal Court and the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) may grant injunctions in relation to industrial action.
conclusion text: Injunctions are not granted in relation to industrial action under subsections 417(3) and 421(3).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Orders can be made if a person has contravened a civil remedy provision.
premise text: The court may make any order the court considers appropriate if the court is satisfied that a person has contravened, or proposes to contravene, a civil remedy provision.
conclusion text: Orders are recurring if a person has contravened a civil remedy provision.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: There are limitations on orders that can be made in relation to contraventions of subsection 463(1) or (2).
premise text: There are limitations on orders that can be made in relation to contraventions of subsection 463(1) or (2).
conclusion text: Orders are not allowed if a person has contravened subsection 463(1) or (2).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

545(2) Orders that can be made by particular courts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-545-ss-2
part of: 545 Orders that can be made by particular courts
note: Orders that can be made by particular courts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.124
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-2-norm

545(3) Orders that can be made by particular courts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-545-ss-3
part of: 545 Orders that can be made by particular courts
note: Employer must pay amount to employee if court is satisfied employer has contravened civil remedy provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.124
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 545(3) Orders that can be made by particular courts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must pay amount to employee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

545(3A) Orders that can be made by particular courts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-545-ss-3a
part of: 545 Orders that can be made by particular courts
note: Outworker entity must pay amount to outworker if required by modern award and failed to do so
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.124
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-3a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-3a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-3a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-3a-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of non-payment by outworker entity
premise text: Outworker entity required to pay amount under modern award
conclusion text: Outworker entity must pay amount to outworker if failed to do so
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
logic summary: Temporal interval between outworker entity's failure to pay and court order
premise text: Court orders outworker entity to pay amount on behalf of outworker if required by modern award and failed to do so
conclusion text: Outworker entity must pay amount within a certain temporal interval after failing to do so
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-3a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring obligation of outworker entity to pay amount to outworker if required by modern award and failed to do so
premise text: Outworker entity is liable for payment if required by modern award and failed to do so
conclusion text: Outworker entity must pay amount on a recurring basis after failing to do so
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-3a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation from court to outworker entity
premise text: Court orders outworker entity to pay amount on behalf of outworker if required by modern award and failed to do so
conclusion text: Outworker entity must pay amount to outworker if required by modern award and failed to do so
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545-ss-3a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognition of outworker entity's liability for payment
premise text: Outworker entity has contravened civil remedy provision by failing to pay amount
conclusion text: Outworker entity is liable for payment if required by modern award and failed to do so
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

545A Orders relating to casual loading amounts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-545a
has part: 545A(1) Orders relating to casual loading amounts
has part: 545A(2) Orders relating to casual loading amounts
has part: 545A(3) Orders relating to casual loading amounts
has part: 545A(4) Orders relating to casual loading amounts
has part: 545A(5) Orders relating to casual loading amounts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.126

545A(1) Orders relating to casual loading amounts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-545a-ss-1
part of: 545A Orders relating to casual loading amounts
note: Employer must pay casual loading amount if applicable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.126
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 545A(1) Orders relating to casual loading amounts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has a duty to pay casual loading amount
premise text: Employer pays identifiable amount for not having relevant entitlements
conclusion text: Employer must pay casual loading amount
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

545A(2) Orders relating to casual loading amounts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-545a-ss-2
part of: 545A Orders relating to casual loading amounts
note: Court must reduce claim amount by loading amount.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.126
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 545A(2) Orders relating to casual loading amounts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to reduce claim amount.
premise text: Court making orders in relation to claim.
conclusion text: Reduce claim amount by loading amount.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

545A(3) Orders relating to casual loading amounts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-545a-ss-3
part of: 545A Orders relating to casual loading amounts
note: Court may reduce claim amount by proportion of loading amount
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.126
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Court has permission to reduce claim amount
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

545A(4) Orders relating to casual loading amounts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-545a-ss-4
part of: 545A Orders relating to casual loading amounts
note: References relevant entitlements under National Employment Standards, fair work instruments, or contracts of employment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.126
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 545A(4) Orders relating to casual loading amounts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: refers to
logic summary: Identifies relevant entitlements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

545A(5) Orders relating to casual loading amounts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-545a-ss-5
part of: 545A Orders relating to casual loading amounts
note: Entitlement includes accrued but untaken entitlements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.126
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 545A(5) Orders relating to casual loading amounts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Entitlement includes accrued but untaken entitlements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Entitlement is a class/subclass relationship
conclusion text: Entitlement includes accrued but untaken entitlements.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-545a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Temporal interval inclusion
premise text: Entitlement accrues before being taken
conclusion text: Entitlement includes accrued but untaken entitlements.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

546 Pecuniary penalty orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-546
has part: 546(1) Pecuniary penalty orders
has part: 546(2) Pecuniary penalty orders
has part: 546(2A) Pecuniary penalty orders
has part: 546(3) Pecuniary penalty orders
has part: 546(4) Pecuniary penalty orders
has part: 546(5) Pecuniary penalty orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.128

546(1) Pecuniary penalty orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-546-ss-1
part of: 546 Pecuniary penalty orders
note: Pecuniary penalty orders cannot be made in relation to conduct that contravenes a term of an enterprise agreement only because of the retrospective effect of an amendment made under paragraph 227B(3)(b).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.128
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-1-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 546(1) Pecuniary penalty orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

546(2) Pecuniary penalty orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-546-ss-2
part of: 546 Pecuniary penalty orders
note: Maximum pecuniary penalty amount
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.128
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 546(2) Pecuniary penalty orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits exceeding maximum pecuniary penalty amount
premise text: (2) Subject to this section, the pecuniary penalty must not be more...
conclusion text: The pecuniary penalty must not exceed...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Limits pecuniary penalty to within a specific range
premise text: (2) Subject to this section, the pecuniary penalty must not be more...
conclusion text: The pecuniary penalty is within the specified range
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Limits pecuniary penalty to a recurring pattern
premise text: (2) Subject to this section, the pecuniary penalty must not be more...
conclusion text: The pecuniary penalty follows a recurring pattern
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Spreads limitation of pecuniary penalty across different individuals or corporations
premise text: (a) if the person is an individual—the maximum number of...
conclusion text: The limitation applies to all individuals and corporations
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
logic summary: Analyzes pecuniary penalty amount based on individual or corporate status
premise text: (a) if the person is an individual—the maximum number of...
conclusion text: The analysis reveals a specific pecuniary penalty amount
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

546(2A) Pecuniary penalty orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-546-ss-2a
part of: 546 Pecuniary penalty orders
note: Maximum penalty for pecuniary order not to exceed greater of underpayment amount or three times the underpayment amount.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.128
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-2a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Maximum penalty for pecuniary order not to exceed greater of underpayment amount or three times the underpayment amount.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

546(3) Pecuniary penalty orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-546-ss-3
part of: 546 Pecuniary penalty orders
note: Specify who can receive pecuniary penalty payments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.128
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Specify payment recipients
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: or
logic summary: Combine alternatives for payment recipients
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Specify time frame for payment
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

546(4) Pecuniary penalty orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-546-ss-4
part of: 546 Pecuniary penalty orders
note: The pecuniary penalty may be recovered as a debt due to the person to whom the penalty is payable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.128
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 546(4) Pecuniary penalty orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to recover the penalty as a debt.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

546(5) Pecuniary penalty orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-546-ss-5
part of: 546 Pecuniary penalty orders
note: Court may make pecuniary penalty order in addition to other orders.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.128
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 546(5) Pecuniary penalty orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Court may make pecuniary penalty order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

546A Underpayment amounts associated with contravention of civil
type: Concept
realized by: sec-546a
has part: 546A(1) Underpayment amounts associated with contravention of civil
has part: 546A(2) Underpayment amounts associated with contravention of civil
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.130

546A(1) Underpayment amounts associated with contravention of civil
type: Concept
realized by: sec-546a-ss-1
part of: 546A Underpayment amounts associated with contravention of civil
note: Employer must pay underpayment amount to employee if required.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.130
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546a-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 546A(1) Underpayment amounts associated with contravention of civil
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must pay underpayment amount.
premise text: Employer is required to pay an amount.
conclusion text: Employer must pay underpayment amount.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Failure to pay required amount occurs on or before due date.
premise text: The conduct results in a failure to pay the required amount.
conclusion text: Failure to pay required amount occurs on or before due date.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: OR
logic summary: Employer's conduct must result in underpayment amount.
premise text: The employer engages in conduct.
conclusion text: Employer's conduct must result in underpayment amount.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

546A(2) Underpayment amounts associated with contravention of civil
type: Concept
realized by: sec-546a-ss-2
part of: 546A Underpayment amounts associated with contravention of civil
note: Determine underpayment amount associated with contravention of civil
description: (2) The underpayment amount the contravention is associated with is, to the extent it can be determined by the court, the difference between: (a) the required amount mentioned in paragraph (1)(a); and (b) the amount (including a nil amount) the employer actually paid to, on behalf of, or for the benefit of, the employee on account of the required amount.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.130
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546a-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 546A(2) Underpayment amounts associated with contravention of civil
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-546a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to determine underpayment amounts
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

547 Interest up to judgment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-547
has part: 547(1) Interest up to judgment
has part: 547(2) Interest up to judgment
has part: 547(3) Interest up to judgment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.130

547(1) Interest up to judgment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-547-ss-1
part of: 547 Interest up to judgment
note: Person required to pay amount under Act or fair work instrument
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.130
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-547-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-547-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-547-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 547(1) Interest up to judgment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-547-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires payment of amount
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

547(2) Interest up to judgment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-547-ss-2
part of: 547 Interest up to judgment
note: Court must include interest in sum ordered unless good cause is shown.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.130
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-547-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-547-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-547-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 547(2) Interest up to judgment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-547-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must include interest.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

547(3) Interest up to judgment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-547-ss-3
part of: 547 Interest up to judgment
note: Court must consider period between Compliance and enforcement when determining interest amount.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.130
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-547-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-547-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-547-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 547(3) Interest up to judgment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-547-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must consider period
premise text: Subsection (2)
conclusion text: Interest amount determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

548 Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-548
has part: 548(1) Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
has part: 548(1A) Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
has part: 548(1B) Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
has part: 548(1C) Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
has part: 548(2) Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
has part: 548(2A) Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.132

548(1) Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-548-ss-1
part of: 548 Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
note: Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.132
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 548(1) Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: (1) Proceedings are to be dealt with as small claims proceedings under this section if:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

548(1A) Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-548-ss-1a
part of: 548 Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
note: Employer and outworker entity obligations regarding employee payments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.132
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-1a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 548(1A) Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Employers must pay employees
premise text: Section 548(1A)
conclusion text: Obligation to pay employee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

548(1B) Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-548-ss-1b
part of: 548 Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
note: Proceedings may be dealt with as small claims proceedings if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.132
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-1b-norm

548(1C) Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-548-ss-1c
part of: 548 Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
note: Small claims procedure applies to certain proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.132
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-1c-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to apply small claims procedure
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

548(2) Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-548-ss-2
part of: 548 Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
note: Court may not award more than $100,000 in small claims proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.132
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
conclusion text: Court may not award more than $100,000.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

548(2A) Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-548-ss-2a
part of: 548 Plaintiffs may choose small claims procedure
note: Interest awarded under section 547 does not count towards the maximum amount that the court may award.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.132
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-548-ss-2a-norm

549 Contravening a civil remedy provision is not an offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-549
note: No offence for contravening civil remedy provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.136
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-549-norm

550 Involvement in contravention treated in same way as actual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-550
has part: 550(1) Involvement in contravention treated in same way as actual
has part: 550(2) Involvement in contravention treated in same way as actual
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.136

550(1) Involvement in contravention treated in same way as actual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-550-ss-1
part of: 550 Involvement in contravention treated in same way as actual
note: A person involved in a contravention of a civil remedy provision is taken to have contravened that provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.136
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-550-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-550-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-550-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 550(1) Involvement in contravention treated in same way as actual
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-550-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If involved in a contravention, then obligation is met.
premise text: Involved person
conclusion text: Contravened provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

550(2) Involvement in contravention treated in same way as actual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-550-ss-2
part of: 550 Involvement in contravention treated in same way as actual
note: A person is involved in a contravention if they meet certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.136
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-550-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-550-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-550-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-550-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-550-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-550-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 550(2) Involvement in contravention treated in same way as actual
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-550-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: involvement
logic summary: Involvement in contravention
premise text: (2) A person is involved in a contravention of a civil remedy provision...
conclusion text: if, and only if, the person meets certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-550-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship for involvement in contravention
premise text: (c) has been in any way, by act or omission, directly or indirectly, knowingly concerned in or party to the contravention;
conclusion text: or (d) has conspired with others to effect the contravention.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-550-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: occursIf
logic summary: Recurring trace for involvement in contravention
premise text: (a) has aided, abetted, counselled or procured the contravention;
conclusion text: or (b) has induced the contravention...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-550-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: involvement
logic summary: Involvement in contravention
premise text: (c) has been in any way, by act or omission, directly or indirectly, knowingly concerned in or party to the contravention;
conclusion text: or (d) has conspired with others to effect the contravention.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

551 Civil evidence and procedure rules for proceedings relating to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-551
note: Court must apply rules of evidence and procedure for civil matters when hearing proceedings relating to a contravention or proposed contravention of a civil remedy provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.136
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-551-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-551-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-551-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 551 Civil evidence and procedure rules for proceedings relating to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-551-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must apply rules of evidence and procedure.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

552 Civil proceedings after criminal proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-552
note: Court cannot impose pecuniary penalty order on person convicted of related offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.137
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-552-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-552-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-552-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 552 Civil proceedings after criminal proceedings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-552-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

553 Criminal proceedings during civil proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-553
has part: 553(1) Criminal proceedings during civil proceedings
has part: 553(2) Criminal proceedings during civil proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.137

553(1) Criminal proceedings during civil proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-553-ss-1
part of: 553 Criminal proceedings during civil proceedings
note: Stay of proceedings for pecuniary penalty order against a person for contravention of civil remedy provision if criminal proceedings are commenced or have already commenced against the person for an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.137
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-553-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-553-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-553-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-553-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-553-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-553-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-553-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 553(1) Criminal proceedings during civil proceedings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-553-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of proceedings for pecuniary penalty order against a person for contravention of civil remedy provision if criminal proceedings are commenced or have already commenced against the person for an offence.
premise text: (1) Proceedings for a pecuniary penalty order against a person for a contravention of a civil remedy provision are stayed...
conclusion text: ...if criminal proceedings are commenced or have already commenced against the person for an offence; and
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-553-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The excerpt describes a temporal overlap between criminal and civil proceedings.
premise text: (1) Proceedings for a pecuniary penalty order against a person for a contravention of a civil remedy provision are stayed...
conclusion text: ...if criminal proceedings are commenced or have already commenced against the person for an offence; and
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-553-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: The excerpt describes a recurring relationship between criminal and civil proceedings.
premise text: (1) Proceedings for a pecuniary penalty order against a person for a contravention of a civil remedy provision are stayed...
conclusion text: ...if criminal proceedings are commenced or have already commenced against the person for an offence; and
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-553-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: There is an obligation to stay proceedings for pecuniary penalty order against a person for contravention of civil remedy provision if criminal proceedings are commenced or have already commenced against the person for an offence.
premise text: (1) Proceedings for a pecuniary penalty order against a person for a contravention of a civil remedy provision are stayed...
conclusion text: ...if criminal proceedings are commenced or have already commenced against the person for an offence; and
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-553-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: The excerpt implies that if criminal proceedings are commenced or have already commenced against a person, then proceedings for pecuniary penalty order against the person for contravention of civil remedy provision should be stayed.
premise text: (1) Proceedings for a pecuniary penalty order against a person for a contravention of a civil remedy provision are stayed...
conclusion text: ...if criminal proceedings are commenced or have already commenced against the person for an offence; and
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

553(2) Criminal proceedings during civil proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-553-ss-2
part of: 553 Criminal proceedings during civil proceedings
note: Proceedings for order may be resumed if not convicted.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.137
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-553-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-553-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-553-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 553(2) Criminal proceedings during civil proceedings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-553-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: resume
logic summary: Resume proceedings
premise text: (2) The proceedings for the order may be resumed...
conclusion text: ...the proceedings for the order are dismissed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

554 Criminal proceedings after civil proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-554
note: Criminal proceedings may be commenced against a person for conduct substantially the same as a civil remedy provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.137
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-554-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-554-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-554-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to commence criminal proceedings
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

555 Evidence given in proceedings for pecuniary penalty not
type: Concept
realized by: sec-555
note: Evidence of information given or documents produced by an individual is not admissible in criminal proceedings if the individual previously gave the information or produced the documents in proceedings for a pecuniary penalty order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.137
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-555-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-555-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-555-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits the admissibility of evidence in criminal proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

556 Civil double jeopardy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-556
note: No double liability for pecuniary penalties under different laws.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.138
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-556-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-556-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-556-logic-deontic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-556-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 556 Civil double jeopardy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-556-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: No double liability implies no liability.
premise text: If A, then B
conclusion text: ¬A ∨ ¬B
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-556-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibits
logic summary: No double liability prohibits other laws from imposing pecuniary penalties.
premise text: If A, then B
conclusion text: ~(A ∧ B)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

557 Course of conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-557
has part: 557(1) Course of conduct
has part: 557(2) Course of conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.138

557(1) Course of conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-557-ss-1
part of: 557 Course of conduct
note: Multiple contraventions of a civil remedy provision constitute a single contravention if committed by the same person and arising out of a course of conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.138
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 557(1) Course of conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: constitutes
logic summary: Multiple contraventions constitute a single obligation.
premise text: (a) the contraventions are committed by the same person; and (b) the contraventions arose out of a course of conduct.
conclusion text: The contraventions constitute a single contravention.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Course of conduct overlaps with multiple contraventions.
premise text: (a) the contraventions are committed by the same person; and (b) the contraventions arose out of a course of conduct.
conclusion text: The course of conduct overlaps with the contraventions.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: and
logic summary: Multiple contraventions are combined using conjunction.
premise text: (a) the contraventions are committed by the same person; and (b) the contraventions arose out of a course of conduct.
conclusion text: The contraventions are combined using conjunction.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: constitutes
logic summary: Course of conduct constitutes a single obligation.
premise text: (a) the contraventions are committed by the same person; and (b) the contraventions arose out of a course of conduct.
conclusion text: The course of conduct constitutes a single obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Course of conduct implies multiple contraventions.
premise text: (a) the contraventions are committed by the same person; and (b) the contraventions arose out of a course of conduct.
conclusion text: The course of conduct implies the contraventions.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

557(2) Course of conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-557-ss-2
part of: 557 Course of conduct
note: List of civil remedy provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.138
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 557(2) Course of conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes all relevant sections
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

557A Serious contravention of civil remedy provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-557a
has part: 557A(1) Serious contravention of civil remedy provisions
has part: 557A(2) Serious contravention of civil remedy provisions
has part: 557A(5A) Serious contravention of civil remedy provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.141

557A(1) Serious contravention of civil remedy provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-557a-ss-1
part of: 557A Serious contravention of civil remedy provisions
note: A contravention of a civil remedy provision is a serious contravention if the person knowingly or recklessly contravened the provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.141
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 557A(1) Serious contravention of civil remedy provisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with civil remedy provisions.
premise text: The provision requires compliance.
conclusion text: Non-compliance is a serious contravention.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on non-compliance with civil remedy provisions.
premise text: Non-compliance is a serious contravention.
conclusion text: Compliance is required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

557A(2) Serious contravention of civil remedy provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-557a-ss-2
part of: 557A Serious contravention of civil remedy provisions
note: Reckless disregard for risk of contravention
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.141
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-2-logic-epistemic-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 557A(2) Serious contravention of civil remedy provisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Duty to avoid reckless disregard
premise text: (a) the person is aware of a substantial risk that the contravention would occur; and (b) having regard to the circumstances known to the person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk.
conclusion text: The person must take reasonable care to avoid recklessness.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Duty to act with due diligence
premise text: (a) the person is aware of a substantial risk that the contravention would occur; and (b) having regard to the circumstances known to the person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk.
conclusion text: The person must exercise reasonable care to mitigate the risk.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-2-logic-epistemic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: knowledge
logic summary: Knowledge of substantial risk implies reckless disregard
premise text: (a) the person is aware of a substantial risk that the contravention would occur; and (b) having regard to the circumstances known to the person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk.
conclusion text: The person knows they are taking an unjustifiable risk.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: interval
logic summary: Temporal interval of recklessness
premise text: (a) the person is aware of a substantial risk that the contravention would occur; and (b) having regard to the circumstances known to the person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk.
conclusion text: [Time interval during which recklessness applies]
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Duty to report reckless disregard
premise text: (a) the person is aware of a substantial risk that the contravention would occur; and (b) having regard to the circumstances known to the person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk.
conclusion text: The person must report their recklessness.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

557A(5A) Serious contravention of civil remedy provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-557a-ss-5a
part of: 557A Serious contravention of civil remedy provisions
note: Knew of serious contravention by principal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.141
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-5a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-5a-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-5a-logic-deontic-3

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-5a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 557A(5A) Serious contravention of civil remedy provisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Knew
logic summary: Knowledge of serious contravention
premise text: Involved person knew the principal's contravention was a serious contravention.
conclusion text: Serious contravention by principal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-5a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must know
logic summary: Knowledge of serious contravention required
premise text: Involved person must know the principal's contravention was a serious contravention.
conclusion text: Serious contravention by principal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557a-ss-5a-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation to report
logic summary: Involved person has obligation to report serious contravention
premise text: Involved person must know the principal's contravention was a serious contravention.
conclusion text: Serious contravention by principal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

557B Liability of bodies corporate for serious contravention
type: Concept
realized by: sec-557b
has part: 557B(1) Liability of bodies corporate for serious contravention
has part: 557B(2) Liability of bodies corporate for serious contravention
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.142

557B(1) Liability of bodies corporate for serious contravention
type: Concept
realized by: sec-557b-ss-1
part of: 557B Liability of bodies corporate for serious contravention
note: Body corporate must authorise contravention for liability to apply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.142
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557b-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557b-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: authorisation
logic summary: Express, tacit or implied authorisation required for liability
premise text: (1) For the purposes of subsection 557A(1), a body corporate knowingly contravenes a civil remedy provision if the body corporate expressly, tacitly or impliedly authorised the contravention.
conclusion text: Body corporate must authorise contravention for liability to apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval between authorisation and contravention relevant for liability
premise text: (1) For the purposes of subsection 557A(1), a body corporate knowingly contravenes a civil remedy provision if the body corporate expressly, tacitly or impliedly authorised the contravention.
conclusion text: Temporal interval between authorisation and contravention relevant for liability
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ordered trace
logic summary: Ordered trace of authorisation and contravention relevant for liability
premise text: (1) For the purposes of subsection 557A(1), a body corporate knowingly contravenes a civil remedy provision if the body corporate expressly, tacitly or impliedly authorised the contravention.
conclusion text: Ordered trace of authorisation and contravention relevant for liability
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557b-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: authorisation
logic summary: Express, tacit or implied authorisation required for liability to apply
premise text: (1) For the purposes of subsection 557A(1), a body corporate knowingly contravenes a civil remedy provision if the body corporate expressly, tacitly or impliedly authorised the contravention.
conclusion text: Express, tacit or implied authorisation required for liability to apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

557B(2) Liability of bodies corporate for serious contravention
type: Concept
realized by: sec-557b-ss-2
part of: 557B Liability of bodies corporate for serious contravention
note: Liability of bodies corporate for serious contravention
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.142
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557b-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 557B(2) Liability of bodies corporate for serious contravention
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Section does not limit section 793
premise text: (2) This section does not limit section 793.
conclusion text: Obligation to provide liability for serious contravention
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

557C Presumption where records not provided
type: Concept
realized by: sec-557c
has part: 557C(1) Presumption where records not provided
has part: 557C(2) Presumption where records not provided
has part: 557C(3) Presumption where records not provided
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.142

557C(1) Presumption where records not provided
type: Concept
realized by: sec-557c-ss-1
part of: 557C Presumption where records not provided
note: Employer has burden of disproving allegation if records not provided
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.142
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 557C(1) Presumption where records not provided
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Employer has obligation to provide records
premise text: Employer required to make and keep a record
conclusion text: Employer must provide records
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Employer's failure to provide records occurs during the proceedings
premise text: Employer failed to comply with the requirement
conclusion text: Employer's failure to provide records occurs during the proceedings
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implication
logic summary: Employer's obligation implies employer must disprove allegation
premise text: Employer has burden of disproving the allegation
conclusion text: Employer's obligation implies employer must disprove allegation
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Allegation diffuses to employer's obligation to provide records
premise text: Employer required to make and keep a record
conclusion text: Allegation diffuses to employer's obligation to provide records
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: CogAI recognizes employer's obligation to provide records
premise text: Employer required to make and keep a record
conclusion text: CogAI recognizes employer's obligation to provide records
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

557C(2) Presumption where records not provided
type: Concept
realized by: sec-557c-ss-2
part of: 557C Presumption where records not provided
note: Employer must provide a reasonable excuse for non-compliance with subsection 557C(1)(b).
description: reasonable excuse
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.142
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 557C(2) Presumption where records not provided
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Employer has an obligation to provide a reasonable excuse.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

557C(3) Presumption where records not provided
type: Concept
realized by: sec-557c-ss-3
part of: 557C Presumption where records not provided
note: Presumption where records not provided
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.142
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 557C(3) Presumption where records not provided
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-557c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: presumption
logic summary: Presumption of certain civil remedy provisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

558 Regulations dealing with infringement notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-558
note: Alternative to civil proceedings for alleged infringement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.143
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 558 Regulations dealing with infringement notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows Commonwealth to permit alternative to civil proceedings
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

558A Meaning of franchisee entity and responsible franchisor entity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-558a
has part: 558A(1) Meaning of franchisee entity and responsible franchisor entity
has part: 558A(2) Meaning of franchisee entity and responsible franchisor entity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.145

558A(1) Meaning of franchisee entity and responsible franchisor entity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-558a-ss-1
part of: 558A Meaning of franchisee entity and responsible franchisor entity
note: Definition of franchisee entity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.145
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558a-ss-1-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 558A(1) Meaning of franchisee entity and responsible franchisor entity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

558A(2) Meaning of franchisee entity and responsible franchisor entity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-558a-ss-2
part of: 558A Meaning of franchisee entity and responsible franchisor entity
note: Person is a responsible franchisor entity for a franchisee entity if they have significant influence or control over the franchisee's affairs.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.145
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558a-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 558A(2) Meaning of franchisee entity and responsible franchisor entity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of responsible franchisor entity
premise text: (2) A person is a responsible franchisor entity for a franchisee entity...
conclusion text: if they have significant influence or control over the franchisee's affairs.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

558B Responsibility of responsible franchisor entities and holding
type: Concept
realized by: sec-558b
note: Responsible franchisor entities must comply with civil remedy provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.145
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558b-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558b-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 558B Responsibility of responsible franchisor entities and holding
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

558C Right of responsible franchisor entity or holding company to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-558c
has part: 558C(1) Right of responsible franchisor entity or holding company to
has part: 558C(2) Right of responsible franchisor entity or holding company to
has part: 558C(3) Right of responsible franchisor entity or holding company to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.149

558C(1) Right of responsible franchisor entity or holding company to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-558c-ss-1
part of: 558C Right of responsible franchisor entity or holding company to
note: Right of responsible franchisor entity or holding company to recover amount paid by employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.149
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558c-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558c-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558c-ss-1-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 558C(1) Right of responsible franchisor entity or holding company to
held by: NaturalPerson
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has-right-to
logic summary: Right exists
premise text: (a) a person pays an amount to, or on behalf of, an employee
conclusion text: The person has the right to recover the amount.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Recovery must occur during the same period as payment
premise text: (a) a person pays an amount to, or on behalf of, an employee
conclusion text: The recovery must occur during the same period as the payment.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558c-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
logic summary: Recovery applies everywhere
premise text: (a) a person pays an amount to, or on behalf of, an employee
conclusion text: The recovery applies everywhere.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

558C(2) Right of responsible franchisor entity or holding company to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-558c-ss-2
part of: 558C Right of responsible franchisor entity or holding company to
note: Right to recover unrecovered amount from employer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.149
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558c-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Has the right to recover
premise text: (2) The person may commence proceedings...
conclusion text: The person has the right to recover
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

558C(3) Right of responsible franchisor entity or holding company to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-558c-ss-3
part of: 558C Right of responsible franchisor entity or holding company to
note: Proceedings may be commenced in specified courts.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.149
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558c-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558c-ss-3-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 558C(3) Right of responsible franchisor entity or holding company to
held by: State
scope note: held by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-558c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Establishes a right for the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

559 Unclaimed money
type: Concept
realized by: sec-559
has part: 559(1) Unclaimed money
has part: 559(2) Unclaimed money
has part: 559(3) Unclaimed money
has part: 559(3A) Unclaimed money
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.151

559(1) Unclaimed money
type: Concept
realized by: sec-559-ss-1
part of: 559 Unclaimed money
note: Employer obligation to pay unclaimed money
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.151
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-559-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-559-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-559-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 559(1) Unclaimed money
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-559-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Employer has an obligation to pay unclaimed money
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

559(2) Unclaimed money
type: Concept
realized by: sec-559-ss-2
part of: 559 Unclaimed money
note: Employer's discharge from liability to employee for amount paid
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.151
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-559-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-559-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-559-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 559(2) Unclaimed money
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-559-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Payment of the amount is a sufficient discharge
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

559(3) Unclaimed money
type: Concept
realized by: sec-559-ss-3
part of: 559 Unclaimed money
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman must pay an amount to a person if they are entitled.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.151
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-559-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-559-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-559-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 559(3) Unclaimed money
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-559-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

559(3A) Unclaimed money
type: Concept
realized by: sec-559-ss-3a
part of: 559 Unclaimed money
note: Payment of unclaimed money
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.151
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-559-ss-3a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-559-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-559-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Payment obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

560 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-560
note: Guide to this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.153
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-560-norm

561 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-561
note: Defines employee and employer terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.153
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-561-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-561-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-561-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 561 Meanings of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-561-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines key terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

562 Conferring jurisdiction on the Federal Court
type: Concept
realized by: sec-562
note: Jurisdiction is conferred on the Federal Court in relation to any matter arising under this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.154
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-562-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-562-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-562-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 562 Conferring jurisdiction on the Federal Court
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-562-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction
logic summary: Has jurisdiction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

563 Exercising jurisdiction in the Fair Work Division of the Federal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-563
note: Jurisdiction of the Federal Court in exercising jurisdiction in the Fair Work Division of the Federal Court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.154
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-563-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-563-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-563-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 563 Exercising jurisdiction in the Fair Work Division of the Federal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-563-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction
logic summary: The Federal Court has jurisdiction in exercising jurisdiction in the Fair Work Division of the Federal Court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

564 No limitation on Federal Court’s powers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-564
note: Federal Court's powers are not limited by this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.155
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-564-norm

565 Appeals from eligible State or Territory courts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-565
has part: 565(1) Appeals from eligible State or Territory courts
has part: 565(1A) Appeals from eligible State or Territory courts
has part: 565(1B) Appeals from eligible State or Territory courts
has part: 565(1C) Appeals from eligible State or Territory courts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.155

565(1) Appeals from eligible State or Territory courts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-565-ss-1
part of: 565 Appeals from eligible State or Territory courts
note: Appeal to Federal Court from eligible State or Territory court decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.155
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-565-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-565-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-565-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Obligation on State or Territory courts
conclusion text: An appeal lies to the Federal Court from a decision of an eligible State or Territory court exercising jurisdiction under this Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

565(1A) Appeals from eligible State or Territory courts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-565-ss-1a
part of: 565 Appeals from eligible State or Territory courts
note: No appeal from eligible State or Territory court decisions under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.155
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-565-ss-1a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-565-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-565-ss-1a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 565(1A) Appeals from eligible State or Territory courts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-565-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits appeals from eligible State or Territory court decisions under certain conditions.
premise text: (1A) No appeal lies...
conclusion text: ...except...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

565(1B) Appeals from eligible State or Territory courts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-565-ss-1b
part of: 565 Appeals from eligible State or Territory courts
note: Appeal from eligible State or Territory court decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.155
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-565-ss-1b-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-565-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-565-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 565(1B) Appeals from eligible State or Territory courts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-565-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Has obligation to appeal
premise text: (1B) An appeal lies...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

565(1C) Appeals from eligible State or Territory courts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-565-ss-1c
part of: 565 Appeals from eligible State or Territory courts
note: No appeal lies from a decision to which subsection (1B) applies, except an appeal as provided for by that subsection.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.155
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-565-ss-1c-norm

566 Conferring jurisdiction on the Federal Circuit and Family
type: Concept
realized by: sec-566
note: Jurisdiction is conferred on the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) in relation to any civil matter arising under this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.157
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-566-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-566-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-566-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-566-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-566-logic-deontic-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-566-logic-deontic-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-566-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 566 Conferring jurisdiction on the Federal Circuit and Family
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-566-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction
logic summary: The State has jurisdiction over the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)
premise text: This Act confers jurisdiction on the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)
conclusion text: Therefore, the State has jurisdiction over the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-566-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Jurisdiction is conferred during the period in which this Act applies
premise text: This Act confers jurisdiction on the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) in relation to any civil matter arising under this Act
conclusion text: Therefore, jurisdiction is conferred during the period in which this Act applies
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-566-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
logic summary: Jurisdiction is applicable everywhere within the scope of the Act
premise text: This Act confers jurisdiction on the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) in relation to any civil matter arising under this Act
conclusion text: Therefore, jurisdiction is applicable everywhere within the scope of the Act
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-566-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mustProvide
logic summary: The State must provide jurisdiction over the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) in relation to any civil matter arising under this Act
premise text: This Act confers jurisdiction on the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) in relation to any civil matter arising under this Act
conclusion text: Therefore, the State must provide jurisdiction over the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) in relation to any civil matter arising under this Act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-566-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasScope
logic summary: The scope of jurisdiction for the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) is defined by this Act
premise text: This Act confers jurisdiction on the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) in relation to any civil matter arising under this Act
conclusion text: Therefore, the scope of jurisdiction for the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) is defined by this Act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

567 Exercising jurisdiction in the Fair Work Division of the Federal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-567
note: Jurisdiction of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) in relation to matters arising under this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.157
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-567-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-567-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-567-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-567-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-567-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-567-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-567-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 567 Exercising jurisdiction in the Fair Work Division of the Federal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-567-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction
logic summary: The Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) has jurisdiction over matters arising under this Act.
premise text: Section 566
conclusion text: The Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) has jurisdiction over matters arising under this Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-567-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: The jurisdiction of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) overlaps with the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
premise text: Section 566
conclusion text: The jurisdiction of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) overlaps with the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-567-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: occursBefore
logic summary: The jurisdiction of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) occurs before the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
premise text: Section 566
conclusion text: The jurisdiction of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) occurs before the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-567-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusesInto
logic summary: The jurisdiction of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) diffuses into the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
premise text: Section 566
conclusion text: The jurisdiction of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) diffuses into the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-567-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: isDefinedBy
logic summary: The jurisdiction of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) is defined by section 566.
premise text: Section 567
conclusion text: The jurisdiction of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) is defined by section 566.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

568 No limitation on powers of the Federal Circuit and Family
type: Concept
realized by: sec-568
note: Nothing in this Act limits the powers of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) under Chapter 4.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.157
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-568-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-568-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 568 No limitation on powers of the Federal Circuit and Family
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

569 Minister’s entitlement to intervene
type: Concept
realized by: sec-569
has part: 569(1) Minister’s entitlement to intervene
has part: 569(2) Minister’s entitlement to intervene
has part: 569(3) Minister’s entitlement to intervene
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.159

569(1) Minister’s entitlement to intervene
type: Concept
realized by: sec-569-ss-1
part of: 569 Minister’s entitlement to intervene
note: The Minister has an obligation to intervene on behalf of the Commonwealth in court proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.159
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The Minister has an obligation to intervene.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

569(2) Minister’s entitlement to intervene
type: Concept
realized by: sec-569-ss-2
part of: 569 Minister’s entitlement to intervene
note: Minister's entitlement to intervene in proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.159
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Minister is taken to be a party to proceedings
premise text: (2) If the Minister intervenes...
conclusion text: ...the Minister is taken to be a party to the proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: Minister's intervention implies being a party to proceedings
premise text: (2) If the Minister intervenes...
conclusion text: ...the Minister is taken to be a party to the proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

569(3) Minister’s entitlement to intervene
type: Concept
realized by: sec-569-ss-3
part of: 569 Minister’s entitlement to intervene
note: Court may order costs against Commonwealth if Minister intervenes or institutes appeal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.159
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

569A State or Territory Minister’s entitlement to intervene
type: Concept
realized by: sec-569a
has part: 569A(1) State or Territory Minister’s entitlement to intervene
has part: 569A(2) State or Territory Minister’s entitlement to intervene
has part: 569A(3) State or Territory Minister’s entitlement to intervene
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.159

569A(1) State or Territory Minister’s entitlement to intervene
type: Concept
realized by: sec-569a-ss-1
part of: 569A State or Territory Minister’s entitlement to intervene
note: Minister's obligation to intervene in court proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.159
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569a-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to intervene
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

569A(2) State or Territory Minister’s entitlement to intervene
type: Concept
realized by: sec-569a-ss-2
part of: 569A State or Territory Minister’s entitlement to intervene
note: Minister's intervention in proceedings is considered a party to the appeal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.159
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569a-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Minister's intervention is an obligation.
premise text: (2) If the Minister intervenes...
conclusion text: he or she is taken to be a party...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Minister's intervention overlaps with appeal proceedings.
premise text: (2) If the Minister intervenes...
conclusion text: he or she is taken to be a party...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

569A(3) State or Territory Minister’s entitlement to intervene
type: Concept
realized by: sec-569a-ss-3
part of: 569A State or Territory Minister’s entitlement to intervene
note: Court may order costs against State or Territory if Minister intervenes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.159
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569a-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay costs
premise text: Minister intervenes
conclusion text: Court orders costs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: before
logic summary: Minister's intervention occurs before court orders costs
premise text: Court orders costs after Minister intervenes
conclusion text: Minister's intervention is a prerequisite for court order
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: before
logic summary: Minister's intervention occurs before court orders costs
premise text: Court orders costs after Minister intervenes
conclusion text: Minister's intervention is a prerequisite for court order
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-569a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
logic summary: Minister's intervention spreads to affect costs
premise text: Minister intervenes in workplace relations matters
conclusion text: Court orders costs due to Minister's intervention
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

570 Costs only if proceedings instituted vexatiously etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-570
has part: 570(1) Costs only if proceedings instituted vexatiously etc.
has part: 570(2) Costs only if proceedings instituted vexatiously etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.160

570(1) Costs only if proceedings instituted vexatiously etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-570-ss-1
part of: 570 Costs only if proceedings instituted vexatiously etc.
note: Party may be ordered to pay costs incurred by another party.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.160
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-570-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-570-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-570-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay costs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

570(2) Costs only if proceedings instituted vexatiously etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-570-ss-2
part of: 570 Costs only if proceedings instituted vexatiously etc.
note: Party must pay costs only under specific conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.160
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-570-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-570-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-570-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits paying costs unless conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

571 No imprisonment for failure to pay pecuniary penalty
type: Concept
realized by: sec-571
has part: 571(1) No imprisonment for failure to pay pecuniary penalty
has part: 571(2) No imprisonment for failure to pay pecuniary penalty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.160

571(1) No imprisonment for failure to pay pecuniary penalty
type: Concept
realized by: sec-571-ss-1
part of: 571 No imprisonment for failure to pay pecuniary penalty
note: Court cannot order imprisonment for failure to pay pecuniary penalty.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.160
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-571-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-571-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-571-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 571(1) No imprisonment for failure to pay pecuniary penalty
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-571-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Court cannot order imprisonment.
premise text: State can order imprisonment.
conclusion text: Court cannot order imprisonment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

571(2) No imprisonment for failure to pay pecuniary penalty
type: Concept
realized by: sec-571-ss-2
part of: 571 No imprisonment for failure to pay pecuniary penalty
note: No imprisonment for failure to pay pecuniary penalty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.160
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-571-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-571-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-571-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-571-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-571-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-571-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-571-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Implies no imprisonment for failure to pay pecuniary penalty
premise text: No imprisonment for failure to pay pecuniary penalty
conclusion text: Despite any other law, this section applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-571-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Excludes
logic summary: Excludes imprisonment for failure to pay pecuniary penalty
premise text: Imprisonment is not a consequence of failing to pay pecuniary penalty
conclusion text: This section excludes imprisonment for failure to pay pecuniary penalty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-571-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: And
logic summary: Combines with other laws to determine applicability
premise text: This section combines with other laws to determine applicability
conclusion text: Despite any other law, this section applies.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-571-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Overlaps with other laws that do not apply despite other laws
premise text: This section overlaps with other laws that do not apply despite other laws
conclusion text: Despite any other law, this section applies.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-571-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Recognizes the applicability of this section despite other laws
premise text: This section is recognized as applicable despite other laws
conclusion text: Despite any other law, this section applies.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

572 Regulations dealing with matters relating to court proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-572
note: Fees for court proceedings under this Act may be provided by regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.160
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-572-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-572-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-572-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 572 Regulations dealing with matters relating to court proceedings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-572-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Regulations can impose obligations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

573 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-573
note: Guide to this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.161
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-573-norm

574 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-574
note: Defines employee and employer terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.162
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-574-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-574-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-574-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 574 Meanings of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-574-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines key terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

575 Establishment of the Fair Work Commission
type: Concept
realized by: sec-575
has part: 575(1) Establishment of the Fair Work Commission
has part: 575(2) Establishment of the Fair Work Commission
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.163

575(1) Establishment of the Fair Work Commission
type: Concept
realized by: sec-575-ss-1
part of: 575 Establishment of the Fair Work Commission
note: Continuation of Fair Work Australia as the Fair Work Commission
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.163
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-575-ss-1-norm

575(2) Establishment of the Fair Work Commission
type: Concept
realized by: sec-575-ss-2
part of: 575 Establishment of the Fair Work Commission
note: Establishment of the Fair Work Commission
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.163
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-575-ss-2-norm

576 Functions of the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-576
note: List of functions conferred by the Act on the FWC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.163
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-576-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-576-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-576-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 576 Functions of the FWC
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-576-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Functionality of the FWC
premise text: The FWC has functions conferred by this Act
conclusion text: The FWC must perform these functions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

577 Performance of functions etc. by the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-577
has part: 577(1) Performance of functions etc. by the FWC
has part: 577(2) Performance of functions etc. by the FWC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.165

577(1) Performance of functions etc. by the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-577-ss-1
part of: 577 Performance of functions etc. by the FWC
note: The FWC must perform its functions in a fair, just, quick, informal, open, and transparent manner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.165
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-577-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-577-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-577-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 577(1) Performance of functions etc. by the FWC
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-577-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to perform functions in a fair and just manner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577(2) Performance of functions etc. by the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-577-ss-2
part of: 577 Performance of functions etc. by the FWC
note: Must have regard to guidelines and community outreach in multiple languages
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.165
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-577-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-577-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-577-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to have regard
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

578 Matters the FWC must take into account in performing
type: Concept
realized by: sec-578
note: FWC must consider certain matters when performing functions or exercising powers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.165
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-578-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-578-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-578-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 578 Matters the FWC must take into account in performing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-578-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider certain matters
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

579 FWC has privileges and immunities of the Crown
type: Concept
realized by: sec-579
note: The FWC has privileges and immunities of the Crown.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.166
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-579-norm

580 Protection of FWC Members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-580
note: Protection of FWC Members
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.166
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-580-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-580-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-580-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Possession of protection and immunity
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

581 Functions of the President
type: Concept
realized by: sec-581
note: Ensure efficient and adequate performance of FWC functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.166
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581-logic-deontic-3

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Ensure efficiency and adequacy
premise text: The President is responsible for ensuring that the FWC performs its functions.
conclusion text: The President MUST ensure efficiency and adequacy.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Ensure adequate service to employers, employees, and persons covered by Chapters 3A and 3B
premise text: The President is responsible for ensuring that the FWC performs its functions and exercises its powers in a manner that: (a) is efficient; and (b) adequately serves the needs of employers and employees throughout Australia; and (c) adequately serves the needs of persons covered by Chapter 3A; and (d) adequately serves the needs of persons covered by Chapter 3B.
conclusion text: The President MUST ensure adequate service to employers, employees, and persons covered by Chapters 3A and 3B.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Facilitate cooperation with prescribed State industrial authorities
premise text: The President must perform his or her own functions and exercise his or her own powers in a manner that facilitates cooperation with prescribed State industrial authorities.
conclusion text: The President MUST facilitate cooperation with prescribed State industrial authorities.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

581A Dealing with a complaint about an FWC Member
type: Concept
realized by: sec-581a
has part: 581A(1) Dealing with a complaint about an FWC Member
has part: 581A(2) Dealing with a complaint about an FWC Member
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.167

581A(1) Dealing with a complaint about an FWC Member
type: Concept
realized by: sec-581a-ss-1
part of: 581A Dealing with a complaint about an FWC Member
note: The President may deal with a complaint about an FWC Member's performance.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.167
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581a-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: The President has the obligation to deal with a complaint.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

581A(2) Dealing with a complaint about an FWC Member
type: Concept
realized by: sec-581a-ss-2
part of: 581A Dealing with a complaint about an FWC Member
note: The President must deal with a complaint about an FWC Member.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.167
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581a-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The President must deal with a complaint.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

581B Code of Conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-581b
has part: 581B(1) Code of Conduct
has part: 581B(2) Code of Conduct
has part: 581B(3) Code of Conduct
has part: 581B(4) Code of Conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.169

581B(1) Code of Conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-581b-ss-1
part of: 581B Code of Conduct
note: Determine a Code of Conduct for FWC Members
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.169
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581b-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

581B(2) Code of Conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-581b-ss-2
part of: 581B Code of Conduct
note: Does not limit section 582 regarding Presidential directions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.169
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581b-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 581B(2) Code of Conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Excludes limitation on Presidential direction
premise text: (2) Subsection (1)
conclusion text: does not limit section 582
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

581B(3) Code of Conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-581b-ss-3
part of: 581B Code of Conduct
note: Publish Code of Conduct on FWC's website or by other means considered appropriate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.169
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581b-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581b-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 581B(3) Code of Conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish Code of Conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581b-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
logic summary: Classify as obligation to publish Code of Conduct
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

581B(4) Code of Conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-581b-ss-4
part of: 581B Code of Conduct
note: A determination under subsection (1) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.169
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581b-ss-4-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-581b-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 581B(4) Code of Conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

582 Directions by the President
type: Concept
realized by: sec-582
has part: 582(1) Directions by the President
has part: 582(2) Directions by the President
has part: 582(3) Directions by the President
has part: 582(4) Directions by the President
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.169

582(1) Directions by the President
type: Concept
realized by: sec-582-ss-1
part of: 582 Directions by the President
note: The President may give directions on how to perform FWC functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.169
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 582(1) Directions by the President
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted by the President.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

582(2) Directions by the President
type: Concept
realized by: sec-582-ss-2
part of: 582 Directions by the President
note: The President may give a direction that is of a general nature, or relates to a particular matter, to one or more of the following persons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.169
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to give a direction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

582(3) Directions by the President
type: Concept
realized by: sec-582-ss-3
part of: 582 Directions by the President
note: The direction must not relate to a decision by the FWC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.169
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 582(3) Directions by the President
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: The direction must relate to a decision by the FWC.
conclusion text: The direction must not relate to a decision by the FWC.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

582(4) Directions by the President
type: Concept
realized by: sec-582-ss-4
part of: 582 Directions by the President
note: Directions about modern award terms and exercise of powers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.169
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-4-logic-ltl-4

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 582(4) Directions by the President
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires direction about conduct
premise text: (4) Without limiting subsection (2)
conclusion text: (aa) a direction about the conduct of 4 yearly reviews of default fund terms of modern awards under Division 4A of Part 2-3;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires direction about exercise of powers
premise text: (4) Without limiting subsection (2)
conclusion text: (ab) a direction about the exercise of modern award powers in accordance with Division 5 of Part 2-3;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During 4 yearly reviews of default fund terms
premise text: (aa) a direction about the conduct of 4 yearly reviews of default fund terms of modern awards under Division 4A of Part 2-3;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-582-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: During exercise of modern award powers
premise text: (ab) a direction about the exercise of modern award powers in accordance with Division 5 of Part 2-3;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

583 President not subject to direction
type: Concept
realized by: sec-583
note: The President is not subject to direction by or on behalf of the Commonwealth.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.171
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-583-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-583-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-583-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
conclusion text: The President is not subject to direction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

584 Delegation of functions and powers of the President
type: Concept
realized by: sec-584
note: The President may delegate certain functions or powers to a Vice President or Deputy President.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.171
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584-logic-alleninterval-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted by the President.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: in writing
logic summary: Temporal interval for delegation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

584B Protection of persons involved in handling etc. complaints
type: Concept
realized by: sec-584b
has part: 584B(1) Protection of persons involved in handling etc. complaints
has part: 584B(2) Protection of persons involved in handling etc. complaints
has part: 584B(3) Protection of persons involved in handling etc. complaints
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.172

584B(1) Protection of persons involved in handling etc. complaints
type: Concept
realized by: sec-584b-ss-1
part of: 584B Protection of persons involved in handling etc. complaints
note: Protection of persons exercising powers or functions under FWC Member relations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.172
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 584B(1) Protection of persons involved in handling etc. complaints
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasSameProtectionAndImmunityAs
logic summary: Same protection and immunity as a Justice of the High Court
premise text: (1) A person who is exercising powers or performing functions...
conclusion text: ...has the same protection and immunity as a Justice of the High Court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During exercise of powers or performance of functions
premise text: (1) A person who is exercising powers or performing functions...
conclusion text: ...in relation to a complaint about an FWC Member, or assisting in exercising those powers or performing those functions...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: entails
logic summary: Entails protection and immunity for persons exercising powers or functions
premise text: (1) A person who is exercising powers or performing functions...
conclusion text: ...has the same protection and immunity as a Justice of the High Court.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses protection and immunity for persons exercising powers or functions
premise text: (1) A person who is exercising powers or performing functions...
conclusion text: ...in relation to a complaint about an FWC Member, or assisting in exercising those powers or performing those functions...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Recognizes protection and immunity for persons exercising powers or functions
premise text: (1) A person who is exercising powers or performing functions...
conclusion text: ...has the same protection and immunity as a Justice of the High Court.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

584B(2) Protection of persons involved in handling etc. complaints
type: Concept
realized by: sec-584b-ss-2
part of: 584B Protection of persons involved in handling etc. complaints
note: Protection of witnesses in handling complaints
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.172
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 584B(2) Protection of persons involved in handling etc. complaints
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasSameProtection
logic summary: Same protection as a witness in High Court proceedings
premise text: (2) A witness requested to attend, or appearing, before a complaint handler...
conclusion text: ...has the same protection, and is subject to the same liabilities...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: orderedTrace
logic summary: Ordered trace of witness attendance
premise text: (2) A witness requested to attend, or appearing, before a complaint handler...
conclusion text: ...has the same protection, and is subject to the same liabilities...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: sameLiabilities
logic summary: Same liabilities as a witness in High Court proceedings
premise text: (2) A witness requested to attend, or appearing, before a complaint handler...
conclusion text: ...is subject to the same liabilities...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporalRelation
logic summary: Temporal relation between witness attendance and liability
premise text: (2) A witness requested to attend, or appearing, before a complaint handler...
conclusion text: ...has the same protection, and is subject to the same liabilities...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

584B(3) Protection of persons involved in handling etc. complaints
type: Concept
realized by: sec-584b-ss-3
part of: 584B Protection of persons involved in handling etc. complaints
note: Protection of persons involved in handling complaints
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.172
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 584B(3) Protection of persons involved in handling etc. complaints
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Same protection and immunity as a barrister
premise text: (3) A lawyer assisting, or appearing on behalf of a person before, a complaint handler...
conclusion text: has the same protection and immunity as a barrister has in appearing for a party in proceedings in the High Court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Protection during proceedings
premise text: (3) A lawyer assisting, or appearing on behalf of a person before, a complaint handler...
conclusion text: during proceedings in the High Court.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: entails
logic summary: Protection entails immunity
premise text: (3) A lawyer assisting, or appearing on behalf of a person before, a complaint handler...
conclusion text: entails immunity for the person involved in handling complaints.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Immunity diffuses to persons involved
premise text: (3) A lawyer assisting, or appearing on behalf of a person before, a complaint handler...
conclusion text: diffuses immunity to the persons involved in handling complaints.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-584b-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Protection recognized by AI systems
premise text: (3) A lawyer assisting, or appearing on behalf of a person before, a complaint handler...
conclusion text: recognizes the protection afforded to persons involved in handling complaints.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

585 Applications in accordance with procedural rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-585
note: Application must comply with procedural rules.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.173
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-585-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-585-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-585-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 585 Applications in accordance with procedural rules
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-585-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

586 Correcting and amending applications and documents etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-586
note: Allow correction or amendment of applications and documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.173
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-586-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-586-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-586-logic-alleninterval-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-586-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allow correction or amendment of applications and documents
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-586-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

587 Dismissing applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-587
has part: 587(1) Dismissing applications
has part: 587(2) Dismissing applications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.173

587(1) Dismissing applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-587-ss-1
part of: 587 Dismissing applications
note: Dismissing applications without limiting FWC's power
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.173
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-587-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-587-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-587-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-587-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits dismissing applications
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-587-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for dismissal
premise text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

587(2) Dismissing applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-587-ss-2
part of: 587 Dismissing applications
note: FWC cannot dismiss certain applications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.173
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-587-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-587-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-587-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of dismissal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

588 Discontinuing applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-588
note: A person may discontinue an application to the FWC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-588-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-588-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-588-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 588 Discontinuing applications
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-588-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Ability to discontinue
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

589 Procedural and interim decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-589
has part: 589(1) Procedural and interim decisions
has part: 589(2) Procedural and interim decisions
has part: 589(3) Procedural and interim decisions
has part: 589(4) Procedural and interim decisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174

589(1) Procedural and interim decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-589-ss-1
part of: 589 Procedural and interim decisions
note: The FWC may make decisions as to how, when and where a matter is to be dealt with.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 589(1) Procedural and interim decisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The FWC may make decisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

589(2) Procedural and interim decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-589-ss-2
part of: 589 Procedural and interim decisions
note: The FWC may make an interim decision in relation to a matter before it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 589(2) Procedural and interim decisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The FWC may make an interim decision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

589(3) Procedural and interim decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-589-ss-3
part of: 589 Procedural and interim decisions
note: The FWC may make a decision under this section on its own initiative or on application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 589(3) Procedural and interim decisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to make a decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

589(4) Procedural and interim decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-589-ss-4
part of: 589 Procedural and interim decisions
note: Limits FWC's power to make decisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-4-logic-epistemic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 589(4) Procedural and interim decisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Limitation
logic summary: Limits FWC's power
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-589-ss-4-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Certainty
logic summary: Certainty of limitation
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

590 Powers of the FWC to inform itself
type: Concept
realized by: sec-590
has part: 590(1) Powers of the FWC to inform itself
has part: 590(2) Powers of the FWC to inform itself
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174

590(1) Powers of the FWC to inform itself
type: Concept
realized by: sec-590-ss-1
part of: 590 Powers of the FWC to inform itself
note: The FWC may inform itself in relation to any matter before it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-590-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-590-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-590-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-590-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 590(1) Powers of the FWC to inform itself
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-590-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The FWC may inform itself.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-590-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Knowledge
logic summary: The FWC has knowledge about the matter.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

590(2) Powers of the FWC to inform itself
type: Concept
realized by: sec-590-ss-2
part of: 590 Powers of the FWC to inform itself
note: The FWC may inform itself in various ways.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-590-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-590-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-590-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 590(2) Powers of the FWC to inform itself
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-590-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May inform itself
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

591 FWC not bound by rules of evidence and procedure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-591
note: FWC is not bound by rules of evidence and procedure.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.175
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-591-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-591-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-591-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-591-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-591-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-591-logic-diffusion-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-591-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 591 FWC not bound by rules of evidence and procedure
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-591-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: FWC's exemption from rules of evidence and procedure.
premise text: The FWC is not bound by the rules of evidence and procedure.
conclusion text: It implies that the FWC is exempt from these rules.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-591-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exempts
logic summary: FWC is exempt from rules of evidence and procedure.
premise text: The FWC is not bound by the rules of evidence and procedure.
conclusion text: It implies that the FWC is exempt from these rules.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-591-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ExcludedBy
logic summary: Rules of evidence and procedure are excluded by FWC's exemption.
premise text: The FWC is not bound by the rules of evidence and procedure.
conclusion text: It implies that these rules are excluded by FWC's exemption.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-591-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: FWC's exemption applies during its proceedings.
premise text: The FWC is not bound by the rules of evidence and procedure.
conclusion text: It implies that FWC's exemption applies during its proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-591-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: FWC's exemption diffuses to other entities.
premise text: The FWC is not bound by the rules of evidence and procedure.
conclusion text: It implies that FWC's exemption diffuses to other entities.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

592 Conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-592
note: The FWC may direct a person to attend a conference.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.175
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-592-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-592-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-592-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 592 Conferences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-592-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Directing someone to attend a conference is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

593 Hearings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-593
has part: 593(1) Hearings
has part: 593(2) Hearings
has part: 593(3) Hearings
has part: 593(4) Hearings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.176

593(1) Hearings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-593-ss-1
part of: 593 Hearings
note: The FWC is not required to hold a hearing in performing functions or exercising powers, except as provided by this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.176
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-593-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-593-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-593-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 593(1) Hearings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-593-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to hold a hearing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

593(2) Hearings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-593-ss-2
part of: 593 Hearings
note: Hearing must be held in public, except as provided by subsection (3).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.176
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-593-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-593-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-593-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 593(2) Hearings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-593-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to hold public hearing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

593(3) Hearings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-593-ss-3
part of: 593 Hearings
note: Restrictions on publication of hearing evidence and documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.176
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-593-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-593-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-593-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Restricts publication
premise text: (3) The FWC may make the following orders...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

593(4) Hearings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-593-ss-4
part of: 593 Hearings
note: Exemption from subsection (3) for annual wage review submissions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.176
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-593-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-593-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-593-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 593(4) Hearings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-593-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exempts
logic summary: Exempts publication of submissions from subsection (3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

594 Confidential evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-594
has part: 594(1) Confidential evidence
has part: 594(2) Confidential evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.177

594(1) Confidential evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-594-ss-1
part of: 594 Confidential evidence
note: Order prohibiting or restricting publication of confidential evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.177
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-594-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-594-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-594-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits publication of confidential evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

594(2) Confidential evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-594-ss-2
part of: 594 Confidential evidence
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for publication of submissions to FWC in annual wage review
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.177
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-594-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-594-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-594-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-594-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Exemption from subsection (1) for publication of submissions to FWC in annual wage review
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-594-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between submission and annual wage review
premise text: Submission made before or during annual wage review
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

595 FWC’s power to deal with disputes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-595
has part: 595(1) FWC’s power to deal with disputes
has part: 595(2) FWC’s power to deal with disputes
has part: 595(3) FWC’s power to deal with disputes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.177

595(1) FWC’s power to deal with disputes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-595-ss-1
part of: 595 FWC’s power to deal with disputes
note: FWC must be expressly authorised to deal with disputes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.177
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 595(1) FWC’s power to deal with disputes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Express authorization is required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

595(2) FWC’s power to deal with disputes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-595-ss-2
part of: 595 FWC’s power to deal with disputes
note: FWC may deal with a dispute as it considers appropriate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.177
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 595(2) FWC’s power to deal with disputes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

595(3) FWC’s power to deal with disputes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-595-ss-3
part of: 595 FWC’s power to deal with disputes
note: FWC may deal with disputes by arbitration only if authorized under another provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.177
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 595(3) FWC’s power to deal with disputes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Authorization is required.
premise text: Expressed authorization
conclusion text: Obligation to deal with disputes by arbitration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Dispute resolution must occur during authorized period.
premise text: Authorized period for dispute resolution.
conclusion text: FWC's power to deal with disputes by arbitration is limited to the authorized period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Expressed authorization implies FWC's power to deal with disputes by arbitration.
premise text: Authorization implies power.
conclusion text: FWC's power to deal with disputes by arbitration is implied by expressed authorization.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
logic summary: Dispute resolution information may be disseminated through FWC.
premise text: Dispute resolution information.
conclusion text: FWC's power to deal with disputes by arbitration allows for dissemination of dispute resolution information.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-595-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: by
logic summary: FWC's power to deal with disputes by arbitration is exercised through AI.
premise text: Artificial intelligence in FWC.
conclusion text: FWC's power to deal with disputes by arbitration is enabled by artificial intelligence.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

596 Representation by lawyers and paid agents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-596
has part: 596(1) Representation by lawyers and paid agents
has part: 596(2) Representation by lawyers and paid agents
has part: 596(3) Representation by lawyers and paid agents
has part: 596(4) Representation by lawyers and paid agents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.178

596(1) Representation by lawyers and paid agents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-596-ss-1
part of: 596 Representation by lawyers and paid agents
note: Permission required for representation by lawyer or paid agent
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.178
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM
logic summary: Permission required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

596(2) Representation by lawyers and paid agents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-596-ss-2
part of: 596 Representation by lawyers and paid agents
note: Grant permission for representation by lawyers or paid agents under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.178
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grant permission for representation by lawyers or paid agents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

596(3) Representation by lawyers and paid agents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-596-ss-3
part of: 596 Representation by lawyers and paid agents
note: No FWC permission required for representation by lawyers or paid agents in certain submissions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.178
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 596(3) Representation by lawyers and paid agents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission granted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

596(4) Representation by lawyers and paid agents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-596-ss-4
part of: 596 Representation by lawyers and paid agents
note: A person is not represented by a lawyer or paid agent if the lawyer or paid agent meets certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.178
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 596(4) Representation by lawyers and paid agents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (4) For the purposes of this section, a person is taken not to be represented by a lawyer or paid agent...
conclusion text: if the lawyer or paid agent meets certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between lawyer/paid agent and person
premise text: (a) is an employee or officer of the person;
conclusion text: or (b) is an employee or officer of...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional representation
premise text: (4) For the purposes of this section, a person is taken not to be represented by a lawyer or paid agent if...
conclusion text: the lawyer or paid agent meets certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional representation and diffusion of information
premise text: (4) For the purposes of this section, a person is taken not to be represented by a lawyer or paid agent if...
conclusion text: the lawyer or paid agent meets certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-596-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional representation and cognitive processing
premise text: (4) For the purposes of this section, a person is taken not to be represented by a lawyer or paid agent if...
conclusion text: the lawyer or paid agent meets certain conditions.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

597 Minister’s entitlement to make submissions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-597
has part: 597(1) Minister’s entitlement to make submissions
has part: 597(2) Minister’s entitlement to make submissions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.179

597(1) Minister’s entitlement to make submissions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-597-ss-1
part of: 597 Minister’s entitlement to make submissions
note: Minister's entitlement to make submissions for matters before the FWC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.179
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Minister has a right to make submissions
premise text: The Minister is entitled to make a submission
conclusion text: The Minister has a right to make submissions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermission
logic summary: Minister has permission to make submissions for matters before the FWC
premise text: The Minister is entitled to make a submission
conclusion text: The Minister has permission to make submissions for matters before the FWC
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Minister has a right to make submissions for matters involving public sector employment
premise text: The matter involves public sector employment
conclusion text: The Minister has a right to make submissions for matters involving public sector employment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Minister has a right to make submissions for matters before the FWC if in the public interest
premise text: The matter is before a Full Bench and it is in the public interest for the Minister to make a submission
conclusion text: The Minister has a right to make submissions for matters before the FWC if in the public interest
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

597(2) Minister’s entitlement to make submissions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-597-ss-2
part of: 597 Minister’s entitlement to make submissions
note: Minister's entitlement to make submissions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.179
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 597(2) Minister’s entitlement to make submissions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Minister has an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

597A State or Territory Minister’s entitlement to make submissions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-597a
note: Minister's entitlement to make submissions for consideration in relation to a matter before the FWC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.179
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597a-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597a-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597a-logic-ltl-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597a-logic-deontic-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEntitlement
logic summary: Minister has entitlement to make submissions.
premise text: (a) the matter is before a Full Bench; and (b) it is in the public interest of the State or Territory for the Minister of the State or Territory to make a submission.
conclusion text: The Minister of a State or Territory who has responsibility for workplace relations matters is entitled to make a submission for consideration in relation to a matter before the FWC.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasResponsibility
logic summary: Minister has responsibility for workplace relations matters.
premise text: (b) it is in the public interest of the State or Territory for the Minister of the State or Territory to make a submission.
conclusion text: The Minister of a State or Territory who has responsibility for workplace relations matters is entitled to make a submission for consideration in relation to a matter before the FWC.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597a-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: hasTemporalRelationTo
logic summary: Minister's submissions are related to a specific temporal interval.
premise text: (a) the matter is before a Full Bench; and (b) it is in the public interest of the State or Territory for the Minister of the State or Territory to make a submission.
conclusion text: The Minister of a State or Territory who has responsibility for workplace relations matters is entitled to make a submission for consideration in relation to a matter before the FWC.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597a-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: hasRecurringTrace
logic summary: Minister's submissions have a recurring trace.
premise text: (a) the matter is before a Full Bench; and (b) it is in the public interest of the State or Territory for the Minister of the State or Territory to make a submission.
conclusion text: The Minister of a State or Territory who has responsibility for workplace relations matters is entitled to make a submission for consideration in relation to a matter before the FWC.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-597a-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligationToMakeSubmission
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to make submissions.
premise text: (a) the matter is before a Full Bench; and (b) it is in the public interest of the State or Territory for the Minister of the State or Territory to make a submission.
conclusion text: The Minister of a State or Territory who has responsibility for workplace relations matters is entitled to make a submission for consideration in relation to a matter before the FWC.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

598 Decisions of the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-598
has part: 598(1) Decisions of the FWC
has part: 598(2) Decisions of the FWC
has part: 598(3) Decisions of the FWC
has part: 598(4) Decisions of the FWC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.180

598(1) Decisions of the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-598-ss-1
part of: 598 Decisions of the FWC
note: Definition of FWC decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.180
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-1-logic-deontic-6

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 598(1) Decisions of the FWC
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Identifies specific decisions
premise text: A reference in this Part to a decision of the FWC includes any...
conclusion text: Examples of decisions that the FWC makes include making modern awards...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Excludes certain statements and outcomes
premise text: However, to avoid doubt, a reference to a decision of the FWC does not include...
conclusion text: Examples of decisions that the FWC makes include making modern awards...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Defines temporal scope
premise text: A reference in this Part to a decision of the FWC includes any...
conclusion text: Examples of decisions that the FWC makes include making modern awards...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: includes
logic summary: Defines temporal scope
premise text: A reference in this Part to a decision of the FWC includes any...
conclusion text: Examples of decisions that the FWC makes include making modern awards...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines scope of obligation
premise text: A reference in this Part to a decision of the FWC includes any...
conclusion text: Examples of decisions that the FWC makes include making modern awards...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines scope of obligation
premise text: However, to avoid doubt, a reference to a decision of the FWC does not include...
conclusion text: Examples of decisions that the FWC makes include making modern awards...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

598(2) Decisions of the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-598-ss-2
part of: 598 Decisions of the FWC
note: Incorporates FWC's decision to make or vary an instrument into a reference to its decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.180
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 598(2) Decisions of the FWC
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Incorporates FWC's decision into a reference.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: References an instrument as part of the FWC's decision-making process.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

598(3) Decisions of the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-598-ss-3
part of: 598 Decisions of the FWC
note: Decision must be made by order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.180
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be done
premise text: (3) A decision of the FWC that is described as an order must be made by order.
conclusion text: Decision must be made by order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Contains temporal interval for making decision
premise text: (3) A decision of the FWC that is described as an order must be made by order.
conclusion text: Temporal interval for making decision: (3)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

598(4) Decisions of the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-598-ss-4
part of: 598 Decisions of the FWC
note: A decision of the FWC that is not described as an order may be made by order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.180
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-4-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-598-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 598(4) Decisions of the FWC
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

599 FWC not required to decide an application in terms applied for
type: Concept
realized by: sec-599
note: FWC is not required to make a decision in relation to an application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.180
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-599-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-599-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-599-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 599 FWC not required to decide an application in terms applied for
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-599-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

600 Determining matters in the absence of a person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-600
note: The FWC may determine a matter before it in the absence of a person who has been required to attend.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.181
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-600-norm

601 Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-601
has part: 601(1) Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions
has part: 601(2) Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions
has part: 601(3) Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions
has part: 601(4) Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions
has part: 601(5) Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.181

601(1) Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-601-ss-1
part of: 601 Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions
note: Writing and publication requirements for FWC decisions
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.181
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 601(1) Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to write and publish FWC decisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

601(2) Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-601-ss-2
part of: 601 Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions
note: The FWC must provide written reasons for its decisions.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.181
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The FWC must provide written reasons.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

601(3) Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-601-ss-3
part of: 601 Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions
note: Decision must be expressed in plain English and easy to understand.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.181
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 601(3) Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST Express
logic summary: Express decision in plain English.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

601(4) Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-601-ss-4
part of: 601 Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions
note: Publish FWC decisions and enterprise agreements on website or by other means.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.181
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 601(4) Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish FWC decisions and enterprise agreements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBJECT-PREDICATE RELATIONSHIP
logic summary: Publishing is a requirement for the FWC's decisions.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

601(5) Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-601-ss-5
part of: 601 Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions
note: Exemptions from subsection (4) apply to certain decisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.181
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-5-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-601-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 601(5) Writing and publication requirements for the FWC’s decisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

602 Correcting obvious errors etc. in relation to the FWC’s
type: Concept
realized by: sec-602
has part: 602(1) Correcting obvious errors etc. in relation to the FWC’s
has part: 602(2) Correcting obvious errors etc. in relation to the FWC’s
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182

602(1) Correcting obvious errors etc. in relation to the FWC’s
type: Concept
realized by: sec-602-ss-1
part of: 602 Correcting obvious errors etc. in relation to the FWC’s
note: The FWC may correct or amend obvious errors in its decisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 602(1) Correcting obvious errors etc. in relation to the FWC’s
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The FWC has the obligation to correct errors.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

602(2) Correcting obvious errors etc. in relation to the FWC’s
type: Concept
realized by: sec-602-ss-2
part of: 602 Correcting obvious errors etc. in relation to the FWC’s
note: The FWC may correct or amend errors, defects, or irregularities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 602(2) Correcting obvious errors etc. in relation to the FWC’s
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The FWC may correct or amend errors, defects, or irregularities.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

602A Validation of approval of enterprise agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-602a
has part: 602A(1) Validation of approval of enterprise agreement
has part: 602A(2) Validation of approval of enterprise agreement
has part: 602A(3) Validation of approval of enterprise agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182

602A(1) Validation of approval of enterprise agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-602a-ss-1
part of: 602A Validation of approval of enterprise agreement
note: The FWC may determine that the approval is as valid and effective, and is taken to have been as valid and effective, as it would have been if certain conditions were met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 602A(1) Validation of approval of enterprise agreement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: The FWC has a duty to determine that the approval is as valid and effective, and is taken to have been as valid and effective, as it would have been if certain conditions were met.
premise text: the requirements set out in subsection 185(2) or section 185A had not been met in relation to the application
conclusion text: the FWC does not have a duty to determine that the approval is as valid and effective, and is taken to have been as valid and effective, as it would have been if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <
logic summary: The FWC's determination is only valid for a certain period of time.
premise text: the requirements set out in subsection 185(2) or section 185A had been met in relation to the application
conclusion text: the FWC's determination is not valid after a certain period of time.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: <
logic summary: The FWC has a duty to determine that the approval is as valid and effective, and is taken to have been as valid and effective, as it would have been if certain conditions were met.
premise text: the requirements set out in subsection 185(2) or section 185A had not been met in relation to the application
conclusion text: the FWC does not have a duty to determine that the approval is as valid and effective, and is taken to have been as valid and effective, as it would have been if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

602A(2) Validation of approval of enterprise agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-602a-ss-2
part of: 602A Validation of approval of enterprise agreement
note: FWC may make a determination under subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 602A(2) Validation of approval of enterprise agreement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to make a determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

602A(3) Validation of approval of enterprise agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-602a-ss-3
part of: 602A Validation of approval of enterprise agreement
note: Publish enterprise agreement on website or by other means
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 602A(3) Validation of approval of enterprise agreement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBJECT
logic summary: Subject to publication on website or by other means
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

602B Validation of approval of variation of enterprise agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-602b
note: Duty to correct erroneous application for approval of variation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.183
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602b-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602b-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 602B Validation of approval of variation of enterprise agreement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-602b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to correct erroneous application
premise text: Erroneous application made
conclusion text: Correction required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

603 Varying and revoking the FWC’s decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-603
has part: 603(1) Varying and revoking the FWC’s decisions
has part: 603(2) Varying and revoking the FWC’s decisions
has part: 603(3) Varying and revoking the FWC’s decisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.184

603(1) Varying and revoking the FWC’s decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-603-ss-1
part of: 603 Varying and revoking the FWC’s decisions
note: The FWC may vary or revoke its decisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.184
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-603-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-603-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-603-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 603(1) Varying and revoking the FWC’s decisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-603-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to vary or revoke
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

603(2) Varying and revoking the FWC’s decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-603-ss-2
part of: 603 Varying and revoking the FWC’s decisions
note: The FWC may vary or revoke a decision on its own initiative or upon application by an affected person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.184
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-603-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-603-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-603-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-603-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 603(2) Varying and revoking the FWC’s decisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-603-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The FWC may vary or revoke a decision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-603-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classifies
logic summary: The FWC's decisions are classified by the regulations.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

603(3) Varying and revoking the FWC’s decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-603-ss-3
part of: 603 Varying and revoking the FWC’s decisions
note: Prohibition on varying or revoking certain FWC decisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.184
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-603-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-603-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-603-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 603(3) Varying and revoking the FWC’s decisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-603-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Cannot vary or revoke specified decisions
premise text: (3) The FWC must not...
conclusion text: ...vary or revoke any of the following decisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

604 Appeal of decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-604
has part: 604(1) Appeal of decisions
has part: 604(2) Appeal of decisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.185

604(1) Appeal of decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-604-ss-1
part of: 604 Appeal of decisions
note: Permission to appeal a decision made by FWC or General Manager
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.185
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-604-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-604-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-604-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM
logic summary: Permission to appeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

604(2) Appeal of decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-604-ss-2
part of: 604 Appeal of decisions
note: FWC must grant permission if in public interest.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.185
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-604-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-604-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-604-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to grant permission
premise text: FWC may grant permission
conclusion text: FWC MUST grant permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

605 Minister’s entitlement to apply for review of a decision
type: Concept
realized by: sec-605
has part: 605(1) Minister’s entitlement to apply for review of a decision
has part: 605(2) Minister’s entitlement to apply for review of a decision
has part: 605(3) Minister’s entitlement to apply for review of a decision
has part: 605(4) Minister’s entitlement to apply for review of a decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.186

605(1) Minister’s entitlement to apply for review of a decision
type: Concept
realized by: sec-605-ss-1
part of: 605 Minister’s entitlement to apply for review of a decision
note: Minister's entitlement to apply for review of a decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.186
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-605-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-605-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-605-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Can apply for review
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

605(2) Minister’s entitlement to apply for review of a decision
type: Concept
realized by: sec-605-ss-2
part of: 605 Minister’s entitlement to apply for review of a decision
note: FWC must conduct a review of the decision if it is in the public interest.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.186
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-605-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-605-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-605-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 605(2) Minister’s entitlement to apply for review of a decision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-605-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to conduct a review
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

605(3) Minister’s entitlement to apply for review of a decision
type: Concept
realized by: sec-605-ss-3
part of: 605 Minister’s entitlement to apply for review of a decision
note: Minister's entitlement to make submissions for consideration in the review.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.186
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-605-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-605-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-605-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Minister has a right to make submissions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

605(4) Minister’s entitlement to apply for review of a decision
type: Concept
realized by: sec-605-ss-4
part of: 605 Minister’s entitlement to apply for review of a decision
note: Right of appeal or power of FWC under section 604 or 607 is unaffected.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.186
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-605-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-605-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-605-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 605(4) Minister’s entitlement to apply for review of a decision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-605-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Right of appeal or power of FWC under section 604 or 607 is unaffected.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

606 Staying decisions that are appealed or reviewed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-606
has part: 606(1) Staying decisions that are appealed or reviewed
has part: 606(2) Staying decisions that are appealed or reviewed
has part: 606(3) Staying decisions that are appealed or reviewed
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.186

606(1) Staying decisions that are appealed or reviewed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-606-ss-1
part of: 606 Staying decisions that are appealed or reviewed
note: Order staying operation of decision until appeal or review is made
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.186
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-606-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-606-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-606-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 606(1) Staying decisions that are appealed or reviewed
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-606-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: order
logic summary: Imposes duty on FWC to stay operation of decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

606(2) Staying decisions that are appealed or reviewed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-606-ss-2
part of: 606 Staying decisions that are appealed or reviewed
note: Who can make an order under subsection (1) in relation to the appeal or review?
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.186
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-606-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-606-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-606-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-606-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 606(2) Staying decisions that are appealed or reviewed
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-606-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: who
logic summary: Identifies the agent making the order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-606-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes the timing of when an order can be made
premise text: (2)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

606(3) Staying decisions that are appealed or reviewed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-606-ss-3
part of: 606 Staying decisions that are appealed or reviewed
note: Section does not apply in relation to a decision to make a protected action ballot order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.186
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-606-ss-3-norm

607 Process for appealing or reviewing decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-607
has part: 607(1) Process for appealing or reviewing decisions
has part: 607(2) Process for appealing or reviewing decisions
has part: 607(3) Process for appealing or reviewing decisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.187

607(1) Process for appealing or reviewing decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-607-ss-1
part of: 607 Process for appealing or reviewing decisions
note: Appeal or review can be heard without a hearing under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.187
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-607-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-607-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-607-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 607(1) Process for appealing or reviewing decisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-607-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Permitted action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

607(2) Process for appealing or reviewing decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-607-ss-2
part of: 607 Process for appealing or reviewing decisions
note: The FWC may admit further evidence and take into account other information or evidence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.187
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-607-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-607-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-607-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 607(2) Process for appealing or reviewing decisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-607-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The FWC may admit further evidence and take into account other information or evidence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

607(3) Process for appealing or reviewing decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-607-ss-3
part of: 607 Process for appealing or reviewing decisions
note: The FWC may confirm, quash or vary a decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.187
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-607-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-607-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-607-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 607(3) Process for appealing or reviewing decisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-607-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May do
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

608 Referring questions of law to the Federal Court
type: Concept
realized by: sec-608
has part: 608(1) Referring questions of law to the Federal Court
has part: 608(2) Referring questions of law to the Federal Court
has part: 608(3) Referring questions of law to the Federal Court
has part: 608(4) Referring questions of law to the Federal Court
has part: 608(5) Referring questions of law to the Federal Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.188

608(1) Referring questions of law to the Federal Court
type: Concept
realized by: sec-608-ss-1
part of: 608 Referring questions of law to the Federal Court
note: The President may refer a question of law arising in a matter before the FWC for the opinion of the Federal Court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.188
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-608-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-608-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-608-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to refer a question of law
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

608(2) Referring questions of law to the Federal Court
type: Concept
realized by: sec-608-ss-2
part of: 608 Referring questions of law to the Federal Court
note: The Full Court of the Federal Court must determine a question of law referred under subsection (1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.188
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-608-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-608-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-608-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Federal Court must determine the question.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

608(3) Referring questions of law to the Federal Court
type: Concept
realized by: sec-608-ss-3
part of: 608 Referring questions of law to the Federal Court
note: FWC may make a decision in relation to the matter even if the Federal Court is determining the question of law, except if the question is whether the FWC may exercise powers in relation to the matter.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.188
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-608-ss-3-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-608-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 608(3) Referring questions of law to the Federal Court
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

608(4) Referring questions of law to the Federal Court
type: Concept
realized by: sec-608-ss-4
part of: 608 Referring questions of law to the Federal Court
note: FWC must make a decision not inconsistent with Federal Court's opinion
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.188
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-608-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-608-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-608-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 608(4) Referring questions of law to the Federal Court
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-608-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to make a decision not inconsistent with Federal Court's opinion
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

608(5) Referring questions of law to the Federal Court
type: Concept
realized by: sec-608-ss-5
part of: 608 Referring questions of law to the Federal Court
note: Must vary decision to make it consistent with Federal Court's opinion.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.188
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-608-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-608-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-608-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to vary decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

609 Procedural rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-609
has part: 609(1) Procedural rules
has part: 609(2) Procedural rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.188

609(1) Procedural rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-609-ss-1
part of: 609 Procedural rules
note: President may make procedural rules by legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.188
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-609-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-609-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-609-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 609(1) Procedural rules
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-609-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

609(2) Procedural rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-609-ss-2
part of: 609 Procedural rules
note: Procedural rules for applications to the FWC
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.188
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-609-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-609-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-609-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 609(2) Procedural rules
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-609-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application requirements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

610 Regulations dealing with any FWC matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-610
note: Regulations may provide for any matter that procedural rules may provide for.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.189
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-610-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-610-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 610 Regulations dealing with any FWC matters
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

611 Costs
type: Concept
realized by: sec-611
has part: 611(1) Costs
has part: 611(2) Costs
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.189

611(1) Costs
type: Concept
realized by: sec-611-ss-1
part of: 611 Costs
note: Must bear own costs in relation to a matter before the FWC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.189
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-611-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-611-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-611-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 611(1) Costs
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-611-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must bear own costs
premise text: A person must bear the person’s own costs in relation to a matter before the FWC.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

611(2) Costs
type: Concept
realized by: sec-611-ss-2
part of: 611 Costs
note: The FWC may order a person to bear some or all of the costs of another person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.189
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-611-ss-2-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-611-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 611(2) Costs
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

612 FWC’s functions etc. may generally be performed by single
type: Concept
realized by: sec-612
has part: 612(1) FWC’s functions etc. may generally be performed by single
has part: 612(2) FWC’s functions etc. may generally be performed by single
has part: 612(3) FWC’s functions etc. may generally be performed by single
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.191

612(1) FWC’s functions etc. may generally be performed by single
type: Concept
realized by: sec-612-ss-1
part of: 612 FWC’s functions etc. may generally be performed by single
note: The FWC may perform its functions by a single member, as directed by the President.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.191
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 612(1) FWC’s functions etc. may generally be performed by single
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Ability to perform a function
premise text: The FWC may perform its functions.
conclusion text: A single member can perform the function.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval of performance
premise text: A single FWC Member (other than an Expert Panel Member) may perform a function as directed by the President.
conclusion text: The President gives directions under section 582.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: Temporal interval of performance
premise text: A single FWC Member (other than an Expert Panel Member) may perform a function as directed by the President.
conclusion text: The President gives directions under section 582.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

612(2) FWC’s functions etc. may generally be performed by single
type: Concept
realized by: sec-612-ss-2
part of: 612 FWC’s functions etc. may generally be performed by single
note: Action must be taken by a Vice President or Deputy President
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.191
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 612(2) FWC’s functions etc. may generally be performed by single
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Action must be taken
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Action must be taken
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

612(3) FWC’s functions etc. may generally be performed by single
type: Concept
realized by: sec-612-ss-3
part of: 612 FWC’s functions etc. may generally be performed by single
note: The power of the President to delegate a function or power of the FWC under section 625 is not limited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.191
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 612(3) FWC’s functions etc. may generally be performed by single
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-612-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The President has the obligation to delegate a function or power of the FWC.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

613 Appeal of decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-613
has part: 613(1) Appeal of decisions
has part: 613(2) Appeal of decisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.191

613(1) Appeal of decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-613-ss-1
part of: 613 Appeal of decisions
note: Full Bench must decide to grant permission to appeal a decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.191
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-613-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-613-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-613-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 613(1) Appeal of decisions
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-613-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must decide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

613(2) Appeal of decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-613-ss-2
part of: 613 Appeal of decisions
note: Grant permission to appeal decisions under section 604
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.191
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-613-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-613-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-613-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

614 Review of decisions by a Full Bench
type: Concept
realized by: sec-614
note: Must decide whether to conduct a review of a decision and if so, conduct the review in accordance with section 607.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.192
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-614-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-614-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-614-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-614-logic-ltl-3

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-614-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must decide whether to conduct a review of a decision and if so, conduct the review in accordance with section 607.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-614-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: The Full Bench must decide under section 605 whether to conduct a review of a decision between the time it was made and the time it is reviewed.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-614-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: The Full Bench must decide under section 605 whether to conduct a review of a decision between the time it was made and the time it is reviewed.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

615 The President may direct a Full Bench to perform function etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-615
has part: 615(1) The President may direct a Full Bench to perform function etc.
has part: 615(2) The President may direct a Full Bench to perform function etc.
has part: 615(3) The President may direct a Full Bench to perform function etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.192

615(1) The President may direct a Full Bench to perform function etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-615-ss-1
part of: 615 The President may direct a Full Bench to perform function etc.
note: The President may direct a Full Bench to perform certain functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.192
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The President has the power to direct a Full Bench.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

615(2) The President may direct a Full Bench to perform function etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-615-ss-2
part of: 615 The President may direct a Full Bench to perform function etc.
note: The President may direct a Full Bench to perform function etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.192
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission or obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: general
logic summary: Class description
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

615(3) The President may direct a Full Bench to perform function etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-615-ss-3
part of: 615 The President may direct a Full Bench to perform function etc.
note: May direct a Full Bench to perform function etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.192
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Directs an obligation on the President
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes a reference to more than one Full Bench
premise text: Section 615(3)
conclusion text: Section 618
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

615A When the President must direct a Full Bench to perform
type: Concept
realized by: sec-615a
has part: 615A(1) When the President must direct a Full Bench to perform
has part: 615A(2) When the President must direct a Full Bench to perform
has part: 615A(3) When the President must direct a Full Bench to perform
has part: 615A(4) When the President must direct a Full Bench to perform
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.193

615A(1) When the President must direct a Full Bench to perform
type: Concept
realized by: sec-615a-ss-1
part of: 615A When the President must direct a Full Bench to perform
note: The President must direct a Full Bench to perform a function or exercise a power in relation to a matter if an application is made under subsection (2) and the President is satisfied that it is in the public interest to do so.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.193
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The President must direct a Full Bench.
premise text: An application is made under subsection (2).
conclusion text: The President must direct a Full Bench to perform a function or exercise a power in relation to a matter.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The President is satisfied that it is in the public interest to do so.
premise text: The President is satisfied that it is in the public interest to do so.
conclusion text: The President must direct a Full Bench to perform a function or exercise a power in relation to a matter if an application is made under subsection (2) and the President is satisfied that it is in the public interest to do so.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: The President's direction must occur between the time of the application and the satisfaction that it is in the public interest to do so.
premise text: An application is made under subsection (2).
conclusion text: The President's direction must occur between the time of the application and the satisfaction that it is in the public interest to do so.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: The President's direction must occur between the time of the application and the satisfaction that it is in the public interest to do so.
premise text: An application is made under subsection (2).
conclusion text: The President's direction must occur between the time of the application and the satisfaction that it is in the public interest to do so.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The President must direct a Full Bench if an application is made under subsection (2) and the President is satisfied that it is in the public interest to do so.
premise text: An application is made under subsection (2).
conclusion text: The President must direct a Full Bench to perform a function or exercise a power in relation to a matter if an application is made under subsection (2) and the President is satisfied that it is in the public interest to do so.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

615A(2) When the President must direct a Full Bench to perform
type: Concept
realized by: sec-615a-ss-2
part of: 615A When the President must direct a Full Bench to perform
note: Application for Full Bench direction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.193
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-2-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 615A(2) When the President must direct a Full Bench to perform
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

615A(3) When the President must direct a Full Bench to perform
type: Concept
realized by: sec-615a-ss-3
part of: 615A When the President must direct a Full Bench to perform
note: The President must direct a Full Bench to perform a function or exercise a power in relation to a matter arising under section 226.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.193
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The President must direct a Full Bench.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

615A(4) When the President must direct a Full Bench to perform
type: Concept
realized by: sec-615a-ss-4
part of: 615A When the President must direct a Full Bench to perform
note: The FWC Member must direct a Full Bench to perform if the enterprise agreement does not cover employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.193
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 615A(4) When the President must direct a Full Bench to perform
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to direct a Full Bench
premise text: The FWC Member is satisfied that...
conclusion text: ...the enterprise agreement does not cover employees.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

615B Transfer to a Full Bench from an FWC Member
type: Concept
realized by: sec-615b
has part: 615B(1) Transfer to a Full Bench from an FWC Member
has part: 615B(2) Transfer to a Full Bench from an FWC Member
has part: 615B(3) Transfer to a Full Bench from an FWC Member
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.194

615B(1) Transfer to a Full Bench from an FWC Member
type: Concept
realized by: sec-615b-ss-1
part of: 615B Transfer to a Full Bench from an FWC Member
note: Transfer of function from FWC Member to Full Bench
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.194
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615b-ss-1-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 615B(1) Transfer to a Full Bench from an FWC Member
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

615B(2) Transfer to a Full Bench from an FWC Member
type: Concept
realized by: sec-615b-ss-2
part of: 615B Transfer to a Full Bench from an FWC Member
note: Revocation of earlier direction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.194
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615b-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Revocation
logic summary: Direction revocation
premise text: (2) The President is taken to have revoked the earlier direction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

615B(3) Transfer to a Full Bench from an FWC Member
type: Concept
realized by: sec-615b-ss-3
part of: 615B Transfer to a Full Bench from an FWC Member
note: Must consider past actions of FWC and its own actions in relation to the matter before it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.194
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615b-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615b-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider past actions of FWC and its own actions.
premise text: (3) The Full Bench must...
conclusion text: ...take into account everything that occurred before the FWC; and (b) everything that the FWC did;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Relation between identifiable temporal intervals.
premise text: (3) The Full Bench must...
conclusion text: ...take into account everything that occurred before the FWC; and (b) everything that the FWC did;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Ordered or recurring trace.
premise text: (3) The Full Bench must...
conclusion text: ...take into account everything that occurred before the FWC; and (b) everything that the FWC did;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Diffusion logic applies to information flow.
premise text: (3) The Full Bench must...
conclusion text: ...take into account everything that occurred before the FWC; and (b) everything that the FWC did;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615b-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: CogAI logic applies to cognitive processes.
premise text: (3) The Full Bench must...
conclusion text: ...take into account everything that occurred before the FWC; and (b) everything that the FWC did;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

615C Transfer to the President from an FWC Member or a Full
type: Concept
realized by: sec-615c
has part: 615C(1) Transfer to the President from an FWC Member or a Full
has part: 615C(2) Transfer to the President from an FWC Member or a Full
has part: 615C(3) Transfer to the President from an FWC Member or a Full
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.194

615C(1) Transfer to the President from an FWC Member or a Full
type: Concept
realized by: sec-615c-ss-1
part of: 615C Transfer to the President from an FWC Member or a Full
note: The President must give a direction to an FWC Member or Full Bench before performing a function or exercising a power.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.194
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615c-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 615C(1) Transfer to the President from an FWC Member or a Full
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The President must give a direction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

615C(2) Transfer to the President from an FWC Member or a Full
type: Concept
realized by: sec-615c-ss-2
part of: 615C Transfer to the President from an FWC Member or a Full
note: The President is taken to have revoked the earlier direction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.194
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615c-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 615C(2) Transfer to the President from an FWC Member or a Full
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Revocation
logic summary: Revocation of an earlier direction
premise text: (2) The President is taken to have revoked the earlier direction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

615C(3) Transfer to the President from an FWC Member or a Full
type: Concept
realized by: sec-615c-ss-3
part of: 615C Transfer to the President from an FWC Member or a Full
note: The President must consider past actions of the FWC when performing a function or exercising power.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.194
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615c-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615c-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615c-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The President must consider past actions of the FWC.
premise text: (3) The President...
conclusion text: must take into account...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: The provision specifies a temporal interval for consideration by the President.
premise text: (a) everything that occurred before the FWC;
conclusion text: ...take into account everything that occurred...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615c-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: The provision specifies a temporal interval for consideration by the President.
premise text: (b) everything that the FWC did;
conclusion text: ...take into account everything that the FWC did...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-615c-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The provision imposes a duty on the President to consider past actions of the FWC.
premise text: (3) The President...
conclusion text: ...take into account...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

616 FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench
type: Concept
realized by: sec-616
has part: 616(1) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench
has part: 616(2A) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench
has part: 616(3A) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench
has part: 616(3B) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench
has part: 616(3C) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.195

616(1) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench
type: Concept
realized by: sec-616-ss-1
part of: 616 FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench
note: A modern award must be made by a Full Bench.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.195
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-616-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-616-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-616-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 616(1) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-616-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be performed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

616(2A) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench
type: Concept
realized by: sec-616-ss-2a
part of: 616 FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench
note: A Full Bench must conduct a 4 yearly review of default fund terms of modern awards.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.195
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-616-ss-2a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-616-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-616-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to conduct a review
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

616(3A) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench
type: Concept
realized by: sec-616-ss-3a
part of: 616 FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench
note: A Full Bench must make a determination that varies a default fund term of a modern award.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.195
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-616-ss-3a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-616-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-616-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 616(3A) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-616-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make determination by Full Bench
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

616(3B) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench
type: Concept
realized by: sec-616-ss-3b
part of: 616 FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench
note: A Full Bench must make a determination to revoke a modern award.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.195
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-616-ss-3b-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-616-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-616-ss-3b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 616(3B) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-616-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

616(3C) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench
type: Concept
realized by: sec-616-ss-3c
part of: 616 FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench
note: Determination that varies a modern award under Division 5 of Part 2-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.195
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-616-ss-3c-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-616-ss-3c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 616(3C) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by a Full Bench
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

617 FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by an Expert
type: Concept
realized by: sec-617
has part: 617(1) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by an Expert
has part: 617(2) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by an Expert
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.197

617(1) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by an Expert
type: Concept
realized by: sec-617-ss-1
part of: 617 FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by an Expert
note: Annual wage review must be conducted by an Expert Panel.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.197
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to conduct annual wage review
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

617(2) FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by an Expert
type: Concept
realized by: sec-617-ss-2
part of: 617 FWC’s functions etc. that must be performed by an Expert
note: A national minimum wage order must be made by an Expert Panel.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.197
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a national minimum wage order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

617AA Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership
type: Concept
realized by: sec-617aa
has part: 617AA(1) Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership
has part: 617AA(2) Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership
has part: 617AA(3) Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership
has part: 617AA(4) Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership
has part: 617AA(5) Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.202

617AA(1) Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership
type: Concept
realized by: sec-617aa-ss-1
part of: 617AA Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership
note: Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership is required.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.202
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 617AA(1) Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires Full Bench and Expert Panel to have identical membership.
premise text: (1) This section applies if a Full Bench and an Expert Panel consist of the same FWC Members.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: same
logic summary: Temporal intervals are required to be the same for Full Bench and Expert Panel.
premise text: (1) This section applies if a Full Bench and an Expert Panel consist of the same FWC Members.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires Full Bench and Expert Panel to have identical membership for argumentation purposes.
premise text: (1) This section applies if a Full Bench and an Expert Panel consist of the same FWC Members.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: same
logic summary: Diffusion is required to be the same for Full Bench and Expert Panel.
premise text: (1) This section applies if a Full Bench and an Expert Panel consist of the same FWC Members.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: same
logic summary: CogAI is required to be the same for Full Bench and Expert Panel.
premise text: (1) This section applies if a Full Bench and an Expert Panel consist of the same FWC Members.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

617AA(2) Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership
type: Concept
realized by: sec-617aa-ss-2
part of: 617AA Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership
note: The Full Bench is not limited by the functions or powers of the Expert Panel.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.202
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 617AA(2) Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: notLimitedBy
logic summary: The Full Bench is not limited by the functions or powers of the Expert Panel.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

617AA(3) Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership
type: Concept
realized by: sec-617aa-ss-3
part of: 617AA Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership
note: The Expert Panel is not limited by the functions or powers of the Full Bench.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.202
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: NotLimitedBy
logic summary: The Expert Panel is not limited by the Full Bench.
premise text: (3) In performing its functions or exercising its powers, the Expert Panel is not limited by the functions or powers of the Full Bench.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalRelation
logic summary: The Expert Panel's functions are not limited by the Full Bench's functions.
premise text: (3) In performing its functions or exercising its powers, the Expert Panel is not limited by the functions or powers of the Full Bench.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalRelation
logic summary: The Expert Panel's functions are not limited by the Full Bench's functions.
premise text: (3) In performing its functions or exercising its powers, the Expert Panel is not limited by the functions or powers of the Full Bench.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: TemporalRelation
logic summary: The Expert Panel's functions are not limited by the Full Bench's functions.
premise text: (3) In performing its functions or exercising its powers, the Expert Panel is not limited by the functions or powers of the Full Bench.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: TemporalRelation
logic summary: The Expert Panel's functions are not limited by the Full Bench's functions.
premise text: (3) In performing its functions or exercising its powers, the Expert Panel is not limited by the functions or powers of the Full Bench.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

617AA(4) Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership
type: Concept
realized by: sec-617aa-ss-4
part of: 617AA Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership
note: List of functions and powers that a reference to performing includes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.202
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-4-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 617AA(4) Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

617AA(5) Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership
type: Concept
realized by: sec-617aa-ss-5
part of: 617AA Full Bench and Expert Panel with identical membership
note: Provision for avoidance of doubt
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.202
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617aa-ss-5-norm

617A President may direct investigations and reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-617a
has part: 617A(1) President may direct investigations and reports
has part: 617A(2) President may direct investigations and reports
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.203

617A(1) President may direct investigations and reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-617a-ss-1
part of: 617A President may direct investigations and reports
note: The President may direct investigations and reports on matters relevant to the function of an Expert Panel.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.203
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617a-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: The President has a duty to direct investigations and reports.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

617A(2) President may direct investigations and reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-617a-ss-2
part of: 617A President may direct investigations and reports
note: Direct investigations and reports may be given to specified entities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.203
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617a-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617a-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission granted
premise text: (2) The direction may be given to:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617a-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of entities for investigation and reporting
premise text: (a) an Expert Panel; or (b) an Expert Panel Member; or (c) a Commissioner; or (d) a Full Bench that includes one or more Expert Panel Members.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for investigation and reporting
premise text: (2) The direction may be given to:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

617B Research must be published
type: Concept
realized by: sec-617b
has part: 617B(1) Research must be published
has part: 617B(2) Research must be published
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.204

617B(1) Research must be published
type: Concept
realized by: sec-617b-ss-1
part of: 617B Research must be published
note: Publishing of reports by FWC upon presidential direction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.204
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617b-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 617B(1) Research must be published
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

617B(2) Research must be published
type: Concept
realized by: sec-617b-ss-2
part of: 617B Research must be published
note: Publication of research must be done by the FWC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.204
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617b-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617b-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 617B(2) Research must be published
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish research
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-617b-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS OF
logic summary: Publication is a subclass of FWC's obligations
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

618 Constitution and decision-making of a Full Bench
type: Concept
realized by: sec-618
has part: 618(1) Constitution and decision-making of a Full Bench
has part: 618(2) Constitution and decision-making of a Full Bench
has part: 618(3) Constitution and decision-making of a Full Bench
has part: 618(4) Constitution and decision-making of a Full Bench
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.204

618(1) Constitution and decision-making of a Full Bench
type: Concept
realized by: sec-618-ss-1
part of: 618 Constitution and decision-making of a Full Bench
note: A Full Bench must consist of at least 3 FWC Members, including the President, Vice President, or Deputy President.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.204
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 618(1) Constitution and decision-making of a Full Bench
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must exist
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

618(2) Constitution and decision-making of a Full Bench
type: Concept
realized by: sec-618-ss-2
part of: 618 Constitution and decision-making of a Full Bench
note: Determine FWC Members for a Full Bench
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.204
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-2-norm

618(3) Constitution and decision-making of a Full Bench
type: Concept
realized by: sec-618-ss-3
part of: 618 Constitution and decision-making of a Full Bench
note: Decision of a majority of FWC Members on the Full Bench prevails.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.204
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 618(3) Constitution and decision-making of a Full Bench
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prevails
logic summary: Decision of a majority prevails.
premise text: (3) A decision of a majority of the FWC Members on the Full Bench prevails.
conclusion text: A decision of a majority of the FWC Members on the Full Bench prevails.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: prevails
logic summary: Decision of a majority prevails.
premise text: (3) A decision of a majority of the FWC Members on the Full Bench prevails.
conclusion text: A decision of a majority of the FWC Members on the Full Bench prevails.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: prevails
logic summary: Decision of a majority prevails.
premise text: (3) A decision of a majority of the FWC Members on the Full Bench prevails.
conclusion text: A decision of a majority of the FWC Members on the Full Bench prevails.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: prevails
logic summary: Decision of a majority prevails.
premise text: (3) A decision of a majority of the FWC Members on the Full Bench prevails.
conclusion text: A decision of a majority of the FWC Members on the Full Bench prevails.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: prevails
logic summary: Decision of a majority prevails.
premise text: (3) A decision of a majority of the FWC Members on the Full Bench prevails.
conclusion text: A decision of a majority of the FWC Members on the Full Bench prevails.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

618(4) Constitution and decision-making of a Full Bench
type: Concept
realized by: sec-618-ss-4
part of: 618 Constitution and decision-making of a Full Bench
note: Decision of FWC Member with seniority prevails in case of no majority.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.204
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 618(4) Constitution and decision-making of a Full Bench
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-618-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prevails
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: (4)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

619 Seniority of FWC Members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-619
has part: 619(1) Seniority of FWC Members
has part: 619(2) Seniority of FWC Members
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.204

619(1) Seniority of FWC Members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-619-ss-1
part of: 619 Seniority of FWC Members
note: Establishes seniority order for FWC Members
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.204
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 619(1) Seniority of FWC Members
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasSeniority
logic summary: Defines the order of seniority for FWC Members
premise text: (a) the President;
conclusion text: the President has seniority.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Defines overlapping intervals for FWC Member appointments
premise text: (ab) if 2 appointments as Vice Presidents took effect on the same day—the Vice Presidents, according to the precedence assigned to them in their instruments of appointment;
conclusion text: Vice President appointments overlap based on precedence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for FWC Member appointments
premise text: (b) the Deputy Presidents, according to the days on which their appointments as Deputy Presidents took effect;
conclusion text: Deputy President appointments end based on appointment date.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Defines diffusion of seniority among FWC Members
premise text: (c) if 2 or more appointments as Deputy Presidents took effect on the same day—the Deputy Presidents, according to the precedence assigned to them in their instruments of appointment;
conclusion text: Seniority diffuses among Deputy Presidents based on precedence.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Establishes implication between seniority and FWC Member roles
premise text: (a) the President;
conclusion text: The President has a role that implies seniority.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

619(2) Seniority of FWC Members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-619-ss-2
part of: 619 Seniority of FWC Members
note: FWC Member with seniority has a deciding vote and is responsible for managing the Full Bench.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.204
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 619(2) Seniority of FWC Members
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Has a deciding vote
premise text: No majority
conclusion text: Deciding vote
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-619-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is responsible for
logic summary: Manages the Full Bench
premise text: Performing functions and exercising powers
conclusion text: Management responsibility
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

620 Constitution and decision-making of an Expert Panel
type: Concept
realized by: sec-620
note: Expert Panel must consist of 7 FWC Members with specific knowledge and experience.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.205
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-620-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-620-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-620-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 620 Constitution and decision-making of an Expert Panel
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-620-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Membership requirements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

621 Reconstitution of the FWC when single FWC Member becomes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-621
has part: 621(1) Reconstitution of the FWC when single FWC Member becomes
has part: 621(2) Reconstitution of the FWC when single FWC Member becomes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.209

621(1) Reconstitution of the FWC when single FWC Member becomes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-621-ss-1
part of: 621 Reconstitution of the FWC when single FWC Member becomes
note: Duty to complete matter before becoming unavailable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.209
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-621-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-621-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-621-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-621-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-621-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-621-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 621(1) Reconstitution of the FWC when single FWC Member becomes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-621-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Mandatory duty
premise text: (a) an FWC Member is dealing with a matter (other than by forming part of a Full Bench or an Expert Panel in relation to a matter); and (b) the FWC Member becomes unavailable to continue dealing with the matter before the matter is completely dealt with.
conclusion text: The FWC Member must complete the matter before becoming unavailable
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-621-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between availability and unavailability
premise text: (b) the FWC Member becomes unavailable to continue dealing with the matter before the matter is completely dealt with.
conclusion text: The FWC Member's availability overlaps with their unavailability
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-621-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Temporal relationship between availability and completion of matter
premise text: (b) the FWC Member becomes unavailable to continue dealing with the matter before the matter is completely dealt with.
conclusion text: The FWC Member's unavailability occurs until the matter is completed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-621-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Optional duty to complete matter
premise text: (a) an FWC Member is dealing with a matter (other than by forming part of a Full Bench or an Expert Panel in relation to a matter); and
conclusion text: The FWC Member may choose to complete the matter if they are available
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

621(2) Reconstitution of the FWC when single FWC Member becomes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-621-ss-2
part of: 621 Reconstitution of the FWC when single FWC Member becomes
note: The President must direct another FWC Member to constitute the FWC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.209
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-621-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-621-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-621-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The President must direct another FWC Member.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

622 Reconstitution of the FWC when FWC Member of a Full Bench
type: Concept
realized by: sec-622
note: Reconstitution of FWC when Expert Panel becomes unavailable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.209
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-622-norm

623 When new FWC Members begin to deal with matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-623
note: Must consider past FWC actions and events when dealing with a matter.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.211
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-623-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-623-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-623-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider past FWC actions and events.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

624 FWC’s decisions not invalid when improperly constituted
type: Concept
realized by: sec-624
note: FWC decisions are not invalid due to improper constitution.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.211
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-624-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-624-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-624-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 624 FWC’s decisions not invalid when improperly constituted
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-624-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: Impossibility of invalidation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

625 Delegation by the President of functions and powers of the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-625
has part: 625(1) Delegation by the President of functions and powers of the FWC
has part: 625(2) Delegation by the President of functions and powers of the FWC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.211

625(1) Delegation by the President of functions and powers of the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-625-ss-1
part of: 625 Delegation by the President of functions and powers of the FWC
note: Delegation of powers by the President to the FWC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.211
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-625-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-625-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-625-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: canDelegate
logic summary: Power delegation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

625(2) Delegation by the President of functions and powers of the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-625-ss-2
part of: 625 Delegation by the President of functions and powers of the FWC
note: Delegation of FWC functions and powers to a person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.211
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-625-ss-2-norm

626 Appointment of FWC Members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-626
has part: 626(1) Appointment of FWC Members
has part: 626(2) Appointment of FWC Members
has part: 626(3) Appointment of FWC Members
has part: 626(4) Appointment of FWC Members
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.213

626(1) Appointment of FWC Members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-626-ss-1
part of: 626 Appointment of FWC Members
note: FWC Member must be appointed by Governor-General
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.213
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to appoint FWC Member
premise text: Governor-General must appoint FWC Member
conclusion text: FWC Member is appointed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

626(2) Appointment of FWC Members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-626-ss-2
part of: 626 Appointment of FWC Members
note: Specify FWC Member position in appointment instrument
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.213
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 626(2) Appointment of FWC Members
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires specification of FWC Member position
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

626(3) Appointment of FWC Members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-626-ss-3
part of: 626 Appointment of FWC Members
note: Assign precedence to FWC Member upon appointment as Vice President or Deputy President.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.213
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 626(3) Appointment of FWC Members
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Assigns precedence to FWC Member upon appointment.
premise text: (3) The instrument of appointment must assign a precedence...
conclusion text: ...the FWC Member and one other FWC Member are appointed as Vice Presidents on the same day.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between appointments.
premise text: (a) the FWC Member and one other FWC Member are appointed as Vice Presidents on the same day;
conclusion text: ...or (b) the FWC Member and one or more other FWC Members are appointed as Deputy Presidents on the same day.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Temporal relationship between appointments.
premise text: (a) the FWC Member and one other FWC Member are appointed as Vice Presidents on the same day;
conclusion text: ...or (b) the FWC Member and one or more other FWC Members are appointed as Deputy Presidents on the same day.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses precedence to subsequent appointments.
premise text: (a) the FWC Member and one other FWC Member are appointed as Vice Presidents on the same day;
conclusion text: ...or (b) the FWC Member and one or more other FWC Members are appointed as Deputy Presidents on the same day.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Assigns
logic summary: Assigns precedence to FWC Member upon appointment.
premise text: (3) The instrument of appointment must assign a precedence...
conclusion text: ...the FWC Member and one other FWC Member are appointed as Vice Presidents on the same day.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

626(4) Appointment of FWC Members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-626-ss-4
part of: 626 Appointment of FWC Members
note: Cannot hold two appointments simultaneously
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.213
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 626(4) Appointment of FWC Members
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of simultaneous appointments
premise text: (4) The same person must not hold, at the same time, an appointment as both: (a) an Expert Panel Member; and (b) the President, a Vice President, a Deputy President or a Commissioner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between appointments
premise text: (4) The same person must not hold, at the same time, an appointment as both: (a) an Expert Panel Member; and (b) the President, a Vice President, a Deputy President or a Commissioner.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal relationship between appointments
premise text: (4) The same person must not hold, at the same time, an appointment as both: (a) an Expert Panel Member; and (b) the President, a Vice President, a Deputy President or a Commissioner.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Spread of information about simultaneous appointments
premise text: (4) The same person must not hold, at the same time, an appointment as both: (a) an Expert Panel Member; and (b) the President, a Vice President, a Deputy President or a Commissioner.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-626-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Artificial intelligence recognizes simultaneous appointments
premise text: (4) The same person must not hold, at the same time, an appointment as both: (a) an Expert Panel Member; and (b) the President, a Vice President, a Deputy President or a Commissioner.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

627 Qualifications for appointment of FWC Members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-627
note: The Minister must be satisfied that the person is or has been a Judge of a court created by the Parliament.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.213
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-627-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-627-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-627-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Minister must be satisfied that the person is or has been a Judge of a court created by the Parliament.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

628 Basis of appointment of FWC Members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-628
has part: 628(1) Basis of appointment of FWC Members
has part: 628(2) Basis of appointment of FWC Members
has part: 628(3) Basis of appointment of FWC Members
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.215

628(1) Basis of appointment of FWC Members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-628-ss-1
part of: 628 Basis of appointment of FWC Members
note: The President, a Vice President, a Deputy President or a Commissioner must hold office on a full-time basis.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.215
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-628-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-628-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-628-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 628(1) Basis of appointment of FWC Members
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-628-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must hold office on a full-time basis
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

628(2) Basis of appointment of FWC Members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-628-ss-2
part of: 628 Basis of appointment of FWC Members
note: Deputy President or Commissioner may perform duties on a part-time basis with approval.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.215
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-628-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-628-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-628-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to perform duties on a part-time basis
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

628(3) Basis of appointment of FWC Members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-628-ss-3
part of: 628 Basis of appointment of FWC Members
note: Expert Panel Member holds office on a part-time basis.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.215
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-628-ss-3-norm

629 Period of appointment of FWC Members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-629
has part: 629(1) Period of appointment of FWC Members
has part: 629(2) Period of appointment of FWC Members
has part: 629(3) Period of appointment of FWC Members
has part: 629(4) Period of appointment of FWC Members
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.216

629(1) Period of appointment of FWC Members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-629-ss-1
part of: 629 Period of appointment of FWC Members
note: Members of a prescribed State industrial authority hold office until resignation or termination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.216
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 629(1) Period of appointment of FWC Members
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Holds office
premise text: (1) The President, a Vice President, a Deputy President or a Commissioner holds office until...
conclusion text: until resignation or termination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

629(2) Period of appointment of FWC Members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-629-ss-2
part of: 629 Period of appointment of FWC Members
note: A person from a prescribed State industrial authority may be appointed as Deputy President or Commissioner for a specified period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.216
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-2-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 629(2) Period of appointment of FWC Members
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

629(3) Period of appointment of FWC Members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-629-ss-3
part of: 629 Period of appointment of FWC Members
note: Term of appointment for FWC Members
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.216
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 629(3) Period of appointment of FWC Members
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Holds office until specified period ends or ceases to be a member of prescribed State industrial authority
premise text: (a) the specified period ends;
conclusion text: (b) the person ceases to be a member of the prescribed State industrial authority;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Holds office until resignation or appointment termination under this Part
premise text: (c) the person resigns or the appointment is terminated under this Part.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

629(4) Period of appointment of FWC Members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-629-ss-4
part of: 629 Period of appointment of FWC Members
note: Expert Panel Member must hold office for a period not exceeding 5 years.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.216
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 629(4) Period of appointment of FWC Members
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Expert Panel Member holds office
premise text: Expert Panel Member is appointed
conclusion text: Expert Panel Member must hold office for a period not exceeding 5 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Term of office is within a specified interval
premise text: Expert Panel Member is appointed
conclusion text: Expert Panel Member must hold office for a period not exceeding 5 years.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: must justify
logic summary: Expert Panel Member must justify their reappointment eligibility
premise text: Expert Panel Member is eligible for reappointment
conclusion text: Expert Panel Member must justify their reappointment eligibility
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Reappointment eligibility information is disseminated
premise text: Expert Panel Member is eligible for reappointment
conclusion text: Expert Panel Member must justify their reappointment eligibility
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

629A Status of the President
type: Concept
realized by: sec-629a
note: The President has the same status as a Judge of the Federal Court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.217
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629a-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-629a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Same status
premise text: The President has the same status as a Judge of the Federal Court.
conclusion text: The President is equal to a Judge of the Federal Court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

630 Appointment of a Judge not to affect tenure etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-630
has part: 630(1) Appointment of a Judge not to affect tenure etc.
has part: 630(2) Appointment of a Judge not to affect tenure etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.217

630(1) Appointment of a Judge not to affect tenure etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-630-ss-1
part of: 630 Appointment of a Judge not to affect tenure etc.
note: The appointment of a Judge does not affect their tenure.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.217
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-630-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-630-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-630-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: does not affect
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

630(2) Appointment of a Judge not to affect tenure etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-630-ss-2
part of: 630 Appointment of a Judge not to affect tenure etc.
note: The Judge's service as FWC Member is taken to be service as a Judge.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.217
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-630-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-630-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-630-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 630(2) Appointment of a Judge not to affect tenure etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-630-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

631 Dual federal and State appointments of Deputy Presidents or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-631
has part: 631(1) Dual federal and State appointments of Deputy Presidents or
has part: 631(2) Dual federal and State appointments of Deputy Presidents or
has part: 631(3) Dual federal and State appointments of Deputy Presidents or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.217

631(1) Dual federal and State appointments of Deputy Presidents or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-631-ss-1
part of: 631 Dual federal and State appointments of Deputy Presidents or
note: Permits Deputy President or Commissioner to hold office in State industrial authority with President's approval.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.217
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-631-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-631-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-631-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 631(1) Dual federal and State appointments of Deputy Presidents or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-631-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: PERMITS
logic summary: Permits action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

631(2) Dual federal and State appointments of Deputy Presidents or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-631-ss-2
part of: 631 Dual federal and State appointments of Deputy Presidents or
note: Allows a member of a prescribed State industrial authority to hold office as Deputy President or Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.217
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-631-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-631-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-631-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: allows
logic summary: Permits simultaneous appointment and holding of office
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

631(3) Dual federal and State appointments of Deputy Presidents or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-631-ss-3
part of: 631 Dual federal and State appointments of Deputy Presidents or
note: Subsections (1) and (2) have effect subject to any law of the relevant State.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.217
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-631-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-631-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-631-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 631(3) Dual federal and State appointments of Deputy Presidents or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-631-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Subjunctive Materia Medici
logic summary: Effect of subsections subject to State law
premise text: (1) and (2)
conclusion text: relevant State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

632 Dual federal and Territory appointments of Deputy Presidents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-632
note: Deputy President or Commissioner may hold additional offices with President's approval.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.218
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-632-norm

633 Outside work of FWC Members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-633
has part: 633(1) Outside work of FWC Members
has part: 633(2) Outside work of FWC Members
has part: 633(3) Outside work of FWC Members
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.218

633(1) Outside work of FWC Members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-633-ss-1
part of: 633 Outside work of FWC Members
note: Prohibition on paid work outside office duties without President's approval
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.218
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-633-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-633-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-633-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 633(1) Outside work of FWC Members
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-633-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

633(2) Outside work of FWC Members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-633-ss-2
part of: 633 Outside work of FWC Members
note: No presidential approval required for Defence Force appointments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.218
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-633-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-633-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-633-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

633(3) Outside work of FWC Members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-633-ss-3
part of: 633 Outside work of FWC Members
note: No paid work that conflicts with duties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.218
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-633-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-633-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-633-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

634 Oath or affirmation of office
type: Concept
realized by: sec-634
note: Take an oath or affirmation before beginning office duties
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.218
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-634-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-634-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-634-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to take oath or affirmation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

635 Remuneration of the President
type: Concept
realized by: sec-635
has part: 635(1) Remuneration of the President
has part: 635(2) Remuneration of the President
has part: 635(3) Remuneration of the President
has part: 635(4) Remuneration of the President
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.219

635(1) Remuneration of the President
type: Concept
realized by: sec-635-ss-1
part of: 635 Remuneration of the President
note: The President must be paid a salary and travelling allowances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.219
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-635-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-635-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-635-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 635(1) Remuneration of the President
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-635-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to pay the President a salary and travelling allowances.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

635(2) Remuneration of the President
type: Concept
realized by: sec-635-ss-2
part of: 635 Remuneration of the President
note: Must pay additional allowance if salary as Judge is less than as President
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.219
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-635-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-635-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-635-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 635(2) Remuneration of the President
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-635-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must pay additional allowance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

635(3) Remuneration of the President
type: Concept
realized by: sec-635-ss-3
part of: 635 Remuneration of the President
note: The amount of the allowance is calculated as the difference between the Judge's salary and the President's salary.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.219
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-635-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-635-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-635-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Calculates allowance amount
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

635(4) Remuneration of the President
type: Concept
realized by: sec-635-ss-4
part of: 635 Remuneration of the President
note: The President or former President must be paid a certain amount.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.219
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-635-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-635-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-635-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 635(4) Remuneration of the President
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-635-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to pay the President or former President.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

636 Application of Judges’ Pensions Act to the President
type: Concept
realized by: sec-636
note: The Judges' Pensions Act does not apply to the President if he/she was a member of a public sector superannuation scheme immediately before being appointed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.219
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-636-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-636-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-636-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 636 Application of Judges’ Pensions Act to the President
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-636-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: does not apply
logic summary: The Judges' Pensions Act does not apply to the President.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

637 Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
type: Concept
realized by: sec-637
has part: 637(1) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
has part: 637(2) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
has part: 637(3) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
has part: 637(4) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
has part: 637(5) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
has part: 637(6) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
has part: 637(7) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220

637(1) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
type: Concept
realized by: sec-637-ss-1
part of: 637 Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
note: FWC Member must be paid remuneration determined by Remuneration Tribunal or prescribed by regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 637(1) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to pay remuneration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

637(2) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
type: Concept
realized by: sec-637-ss-2
part of: 637 Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
note: FWC Member must be paid prescribed allowances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 637(2) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to pay prescribed allowances.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

637(3) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
type: Concept
realized by: sec-637-ss-3
part of: 637 Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
note: Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President is subject to the Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 637(3) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

637(4) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
type: Concept
realized by: sec-637-ss-4
part of: 637 Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
note: No remuneration for Deputy President or Commissioner, except travel allowance.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 637(4) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No remuneration for Deputy President or Commissioner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

637(5) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
type: Concept
realized by: sec-637-ss-5
part of: 637 Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
note: FWC Member Judge must be paid additional allowance if salary as Judge is less than FWC Member salary
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 637(5) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay additional allowance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

637(6) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
type: Concept
realized by: sec-637-ss-6
part of: 637 Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
note: Determine FWC Member allowance amount based on Judge's salary
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-6-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-6-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-6-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 637(6) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Specify obligation
premise text: (6) The amount of the allowance is...
conclusion text: ...the salary that is payable to the FWC Member under subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <
logic summary: Specify temporal interval for allowance calculation
premise text: (6) The amount of the allowance...
conclusion text: ...the salary that is payable to the FWC Member under subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-6-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: !
logic summary: Justify allowance calculation method
premise text: (6) The amount of the allowance...
conclusion text: ...the salary that is payable to the FWC Member under subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: !
logic summary: Justify allowance calculation method
premise text: (6) The amount of the allowance...
conclusion text: ...the salary that is payable to the FWC Member under subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: !
logic summary: Justify allowance calculation method
premise text: (6) The amount of the allowance...
conclusion text: ...the salary that is payable to the FWC Member under subsection (1).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

637(7) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
type: Concept
realized by: sec-637-ss-7
part of: 637 Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
note: Exemption for the President from this section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-7-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 637(7) Remuneration of FWC Members other than the President
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-637-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exempts
logic summary: The President is exempted from the remuneration of FWC members
premise text: This section does not apply to the President.
conclusion text: The President is exempted from this section
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

638 Remuneration of Deputy Presidents or Commissioners
type: Concept
realized by: sec-638
has part: 638(1) Remuneration of Deputy Presidents or Commissioners
has part: 638(2) Remuneration of Deputy Presidents or Commissioners
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.221

638(1) Remuneration of Deputy Presidents or Commissioners
type: Concept
realized by: sec-638-ss-1
part of: 638 Remuneration of Deputy Presidents or Commissioners
note: Agreement for part-time duties proportion
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.221
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-638-ss-1-norm

638(2) Remuneration of Deputy Presidents or Commissioners
type: Concept
realized by: sec-638-ss-2
part of: 638 Remuneration of Deputy Presidents or Commissioners
note: Variation of agreed proportion by written agreement between President and part-time member
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.221
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-638-ss-2-norm

639 Leave of absence of FWC Members other than the President
type: Concept
realized by: sec-639
has part: 639(1) Leave of absence of FWC Members other than the President
has part: 639(2) Leave of absence of FWC Members other than the President
has part: 639(3) Leave of absence of FWC Members other than the President
has part: 639(4) Leave of absence of FWC Members other than the President
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.222

639(1) Leave of absence of FWC Members other than the President
type: Concept
realized by: sec-639-ss-1
part of: 639 Leave of absence of FWC Members other than the President
note: FWC Member has recreation leave entitlements determined by the Remuneration Tribunal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.222
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-639-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-639-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-639-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 639(1) Leave of absence of FWC Members other than the President
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-639-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Entitlement exists
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

639(2) Leave of absence of FWC Members other than the President
type: Concept
realized by: sec-639-ss-2
part of: 639 Leave of absence of FWC Members other than the President
note: Grant of leave of absence by President
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.222
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-639-ss-2-norm

639(3) Leave of absence of FWC Members other than the President
type: Concept
realized by: sec-639-ss-3
part of: 639 Leave of absence of FWC Members other than the President
note: Consider past employment when determining leave of absence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.222
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-639-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-639-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-639-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 639(3) Leave of absence of FWC Members other than the President
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-639-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
logic summary: Consider past employment
premise text: Past employment
conclusion text: Leave of absence determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

639(4) Leave of absence of FWC Members other than the President
type: Concept
realized by: sec-639-ss-4
part of: 639 Leave of absence of FWC Members other than the President
note: This section does not apply to the President.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.222
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-639-ss-4-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-639-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 639(4) Leave of absence of FWC Members other than the President
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

640 Disclosure of interests by FWC Members other than the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-640
has part: 640(1) Disclosure of interests by FWC Members other than the
has part: 640(2) Disclosure of interests by FWC Members other than the
has part: 640(4) Disclosure of interests by FWC Members other than the
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.222

640(1) Disclosure of interests by FWC Members other than the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-640-ss-1
part of: 640 Disclosure of interests by FWC Members other than the
note: FWC Member must disclose interests that conflict with their functions.
description: Disclosure of interests
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.222
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-640-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-640-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-640-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 640(1) Disclosure of interests by FWC Members other than the
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-640-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory disclosure
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

640(2) Disclosure of interests by FWC Members other than the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-640-ss-2
part of: 640 Disclosure of interests by FWC Members other than the
note: Disclosure of potential conflict to certain persons
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.222
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-640-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-640-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-640-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must disclose
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

640(4) Disclosure of interests by FWC Members other than the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-640-ss-4
part of: 640 Disclosure of interests by FWC Members other than the
note: Prohibit FWC Member from dealing with matter if President considers conflict of interest.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.222
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-640-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-640-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-640-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: President gives direction to FWC Member
conclusion text: FWC Member must not deal with matter
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

641 Termination of appointment on grounds of misbehaviour or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-641
note: Governor-General may terminate appointment on grounds of misbehaviour or incapacity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.223
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-641-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-641-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-641-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 641 Termination of appointment on grounds of misbehaviour or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-641-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Governor-General may terminate appointment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

641A Minister may handle complaints about FWC Members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-641a
note: Minister may handle complaints about FWC Members
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.223
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-641a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-641a-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-641a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Minister can handle complaints
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

641B Modified application of the Judicial Misbehaviour and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-641b
has part: 641B(1) Modified application of the Judicial Misbehaviour and
has part: 641B(2) Modified application of the Judicial Misbehaviour and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.224

641B(1) Modified application of the Judicial Misbehaviour and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-641b-ss-1
part of: 641B Modified application of the Judicial Misbehaviour and
note: Allow a Commission to be established by the Houses of Parliament to investigate and report on alleged misbehaviour or incapacity of an FWC Member.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.224
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-641b-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-641b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-641b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 641B(1) Modified application of the Judicial Misbehaviour and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-641b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow
logic summary: Allow a Commission to be established.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

641B(2) Modified application of the Judicial Misbehaviour and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-641b-ss-2
part of: 641B Modified application of the Judicial Misbehaviour and
note: Modified application of the Judicial Misbehaviour and Incapacity (Parliamentary Commissions) Act 2012
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.224
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-641b-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-641b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-641b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 641B(2) Modified application of the Judicial Misbehaviour and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-641b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to apply the JMIPC Act as modified
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

642 Suspension on grounds of misbehaviour or incapacity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-642
has part: 642(1) Suspension on grounds of misbehaviour or incapacity
has part: 642(2) Suspension on grounds of misbehaviour or incapacity
has part: 642(3) Suspension on grounds of misbehaviour or incapacity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.231

642(1) Suspension on grounds of misbehaviour or incapacity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-642-ss-1
part of: 642 Suspension on grounds of misbehaviour or incapacity
note: Governor-General may suspend FWC Member from office for misbehaviour or incapacity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.231
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-642-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-642-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-642-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 642(1) Suspension on grounds of misbehaviour or incapacity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-642-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

642(2) Suspension on grounds of misbehaviour or incapacity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-642-ss-2
part of: 642 Suspension on grounds of misbehaviour or incapacity
note: Minister must table a statement after suspension
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.231
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-642-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-642-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-642-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 642(2) Suspension on grounds of misbehaviour or incapacity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-642-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
conclusion text: The Minister must table a statement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

642(3) Suspension on grounds of misbehaviour or incapacity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-642-ss-3
part of: 642 Suspension on grounds of misbehaviour or incapacity
note: A House of the Parliament may suspend a member within 15 sitting days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.231
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-642-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-642-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-642-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

643 Termination of appointment for bankruptcy, etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-643
note: Termination of appointment for bankruptcy, etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.232
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-643-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-643-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-643-logic-alleninterval-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-643-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 643 Termination of appointment for bankruptcy, etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-643-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-643-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Absence for 14 consecutive days
premise text: FWC Member is absent, except on leave of absence, for 14 consecutive days
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

644 Termination of appointment for outside work
type: Concept
realized by: sec-644
has part: 644(1) Termination of appointment for outside work
has part: 644(2) Termination of appointment for outside work
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.232

644(1) Termination of appointment for outside work
type: Concept
realized by: sec-644-ss-1
part of: 644 Termination of appointment for outside work
note: Termination of appointment for outside work
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.232
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-644-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-644-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-644-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 644(1) Termination of appointment for outside work
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-644-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: Engaging in paid work outside the duties of his or her office
conclusion text: Termination of appointment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

644(2) Termination of appointment for outside work
type: Concept
realized by: sec-644-ss-2
part of: 644 Termination of appointment for outside work
note: Termination of appointment for outside work due to conflict with duties
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.232
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-644-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-644-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-644-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of conflicting work
premise text: Conflict with duties
conclusion text: Termination required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

645 Resignation of FWC Members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-645
has part: 645(1) Resignation of FWC Members
has part: 645(2) Resignation of FWC Members
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.233

645(1) Resignation of FWC Members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-645-ss-1
part of: 645 Resignation of FWC Members
note: FWC member must provide written resignation to Governor-General upon resigning.
description: written resignation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.233
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-645-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-645-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-645-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 645(1) Resignation of FWC Members
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-645-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide written resignation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

645(2) Resignation of FWC Members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-645-ss-2
part of: 645 Resignation of FWC Members
note: Resignation takes effect on specified day or immediately upon receipt by Governor-General.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.233
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-645-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-645-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-645-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between intervals.
premise text: Later day specified in resignation.
conclusion text: Resignation takes effect on specified day.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

646 Other terms and conditions of FWC Members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-646
note: Terms and conditions of FWC Members
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.233
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-646-norm

647 Appointment of acting President and Vice President
type: Concept
realized by: sec-647
note: Appointment of Vice President by Governor-General
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.233
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-647-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-647-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-647-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Governor-General may appoint Vice President
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

648 Appointment of acting Deputy Presidents and Commissioners
type: Concept
realized by: sec-648
has part: 648(1) Appointment of acting Deputy Presidents and Commissioners
has part: 648(1A) Appointment of acting Deputy Presidents and Commissioners
has part: 648(2) Appointment of acting Deputy Presidents and Commissioners
has part: 648(3) Appointment of acting Deputy Presidents and Commissioners
has part: 648(4) Appointment of acting Deputy Presidents and Commissioners
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.234

648(1) Appointment of acting Deputy Presidents and Commissioners
type: Concept
realized by: sec-648-ss-1
part of: 648 Appointment of acting Deputy Presidents and Commissioners
note: Governor-General may appoint a person to act as Deputy President for a specified period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.234
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Governor-General has the power to appoint.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

648(1A) Appointment of acting Deputy Presidents and Commissioners
type: Concept
realized by: sec-648-ss-1a
part of: 648 Appointment of acting Deputy Presidents and Commissioners
note: Governor-General may appoint a person to act as Commissioner for a specified period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.234
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-1a-norm

648(2) Appointment of acting Deputy Presidents and Commissioners
type: Concept
realized by: sec-648-ss-2
part of: 648 Appointment of acting Deputy Presidents and Commissioners
note: The Minister must be satisfied that the appointment is necessary.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.234
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to satisfy
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for satisfaction
premise text: (2) Before the Governor-General appoints a person under subsection (1) or (1A), the Minister must be satisfied that the appointment is necessary to enable the FWC to perform its functions effectively.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: must
logic summary: Minister's obligation
premise text: (2) Before the Governor-General appoints a person under subsection (1) or (1A), the Minister must be satisfied that the appointment is necessary to enable the FWC to perform its functions effectively.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Minister's satisfaction as a diffusion event
premise text: (2) Before the Governor-General appoints a person under subsection (1) or (1A), the Minister must be satisfied that the appointment is necessary to enable the FWC to perform its functions effectively.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: asserts
logic summary: Minister's assertion of necessity
premise text: (2) Before the Governor-General appoints a person under subsection (1) or (1A), the Minister must be satisfied that the appointment is necessary to enable the FWC to perform its functions effectively.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

648(3) Appointment of acting Deputy Presidents and Commissioners
type: Concept
realized by: sec-648-ss-3
part of: 648 Appointment of acting Deputy Presidents and Commissioners
note: Anything done by or in relation to a person purporting to act under an appointment is not invalid.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.234
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 648(3) Appointment of acting Deputy Presidents and Commissioners
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Validity
logic summary: Validity of actions under appointments
premise text: (3) Anything done by or in relation to a person purporting to act under an appointment is not invalid.
conclusion text: Not invalid
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permissibility
logic summary: Actions under appointments are permitted
premise text: (3) Anything done by or in relation to a person purporting to act under an appointment is not invalid.
conclusion text: Permitted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Actions under appointments are part of a recurring trace
premise text: (3) Anything done by or in relation to a person purporting to act under an appointment is not invalid.
conclusion text: Part of a recurring trace
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Validity
logic summary: Actions under appointments are valid
premise text: (3) Anything done by or in relation to a person purporting to act under an appointment is not invalid.
conclusion text: Valid
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

648(4) Appointment of acting Deputy Presidents and Commissioners
type: Concept
realized by: sec-648-ss-4
part of: 648 Appointment of acting Deputy Presidents and Commissioners
note: No disqualification for age over 65
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.234
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-648-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

649 President to cooperate with prescribed State industrial
type: Concept
realized by: sec-649
has part: 649(1) President to cooperate with prescribed State industrial
has part: 649(2) President to cooperate with prescribed State industrial
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.236

649(1) President to cooperate with prescribed State industrial
type: Concept
realized by: sec-649-ss-1
part of: 649 President to cooperate with prescribed State industrial
note: The President must cooperate with prescribed State industrial authorities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.236
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-649-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-649-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-649-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to cooperate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

649(2) President to cooperate with prescribed State industrial
type: Concept
realized by: sec-649-ss-2
part of: 649 President to cooperate with prescribed State industrial
note: The President may invite State industrial authorities to meet and discuss matters of mutual interest.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.236
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-649-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-649-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-649-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to invite State industrial authorities
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

650 Provision of administrative support
type: Concept
realized by: sec-650
note: The President may make an arrangement with a State industrial authority for administrative support.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.236
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-650-norm

651 Seals
type: Concept
realized by: sec-651
has part: 651(1) Seals
has part: 651(2) Seals
has part: 651(3) Seals
has part: 651(4) Seals
has part: 651(5) Seals
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237

651(1) Seals
type: Concept
realized by: sec-651-ss-1
part of: 651 Seals
note: The FWC must have a seal with the words “The Seal of the Fair Work Commission”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 651(1) Seals
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST HAVE
logic summary: Obligation to have a seal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

651(2) Seals
type: Concept
realized by: sec-651-ss-2
part of: 651 Seals
note: Duplicate seals of the FWC to be maintained.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 651(2) Seals
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to maintain duplicate seals.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

651(3) Seals
type: Concept
realized by: sec-651-ss-3
part of: 651 Seals
note: A document with a duplicate seal of the FWC is considered to have the original seal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Seal ownership
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

651(4) Seals
type: Concept
realized by: sec-651-ss-4
part of: 651 Seals
note: Seal of FWC must not be used except as authorised by the President.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits use of seal without presidential authorisation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

651(5) Seals
type: Concept
realized by: sec-651-ss-5
part of: 651 Seals
note: Courts, judges and persons acting judicially must take notice of the seal and presume it was sealed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 651(5) Seals
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-651-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to take notice of the seal
premise text: The FWC seal is a standard
conclusion text: Courts must take notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

652 Annual report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-652
has part: 652(1) Annual report
has part: 652(1A) Annual report
has part: 652(2) Annual report
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.238

652(1) Annual report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-652-ss-1
part of: 652 Annual report
note: The President must prepare an annual report on the operations of the FWC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.238
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-652-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-652-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-652-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 652(1) Annual report
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-652-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The President must prepare an annual report.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

652(1A) Annual report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-652-ss-1a
part of: 652 Annual report
note: Annual report must be given to the Minister by a certain date.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.238
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-652-ss-1a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-652-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-652-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 652(1A) Annual report
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-652-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide annual report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

652(2) Annual report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-652-ss-2
part of: 652 Annual report
note: No disclosure of information for Privacy Act 1988 purposes required
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.238
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-652-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-652-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-652-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No disclosure of information
premise text: Privacy Act 1988
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

653 Reports about making enterprise agreements, individual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-653
note: Review and research on enterprise agreements, flexibility arrangements, and National Employment Standards.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.238
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-653-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-653-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-653-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: General Manager must review developments and conduct research.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

653A Arrangements with the Federal Court and the Federal Circuit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-653a
note: General Manager may make written arrangement with Federal Court and Family Court of Australia for FWC to provide administrative support.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-653a-norm

654 President must provide certain information etc. to the Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-654
has part: 654(1) President must provide certain information etc. to the Minister
has part: 654(2) President must provide certain information etc. to the Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240

654(1) President must provide certain information etc. to the Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-654-ss-1
part of: 654 President must provide certain information etc. to the Minister
note: The President must provide information to the Minister and Fair Work Ombudsman.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-654-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-654-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-654-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

654(2) President must provide certain information etc. to the Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-654-ss-2
part of: 654 President must provide certain information etc. to the Minister
note: The regulations may prescribe certain information about FWC decisions and notices.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-654-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-654-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-654-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 654(2) President must provide certain information etc. to the Minister
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-654-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may prescribe
logic summary: Regulations may prescribe certain information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

655 Disclosure of information by the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-655
note: Disclosure of information by the FWC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-655-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-655-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-655-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 655 Disclosure of information by the FWC
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-655-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must disclose information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

656 Establishment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-656
note: Establishment of General Manager at Fair Work Commission
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-656-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-656-logic-alleninterval-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-656-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for General Manager appointment
premise text: General Manager appointment starts on establishment date
conclusion text: General Manager appointment starts on [date]
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

657 Functions and powers of the General Manager
type: Concept
realized by: sec-657
has part: 657(1) Functions and powers of the General Manager
has part: 657(1A) Functions and powers of the General Manager
has part: 657(2) Functions and powers of the General Manager
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242

657(1) Functions and powers of the General Manager
type: Concept
realized by: sec-657-ss-1
part of: 657 Functions and powers of the General Manager
note: The General Manager must assist the President.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-657-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-657-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-657-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 657(1) Functions and powers of the General Manager
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-657-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide assistance
conclusion text: The General Manager must assist the President.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

657(1A) Functions and powers of the General Manager
type: Concept
realized by: sec-657-ss-1a
part of: 657 Functions and powers of the General Manager
note: The General Manager has certain functions conferred upon him by law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-657-ss-1a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-657-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-657-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 657(1A) Functions and powers of the General Manager
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-657-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: General Manager has certain functions.
premise text: Function conferred by law.
conclusion text: Obligation to perform function.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

657(2) Functions and powers of the General Manager
type: Concept
realized by: sec-657-ss-2
part of: 657 Functions and powers of the General Manager
note: Power to perform functions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-657-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-657-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-657-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has power
logic summary: General Manager has power
premise text: (2) The General Manager has power to do all things necessary or convenient...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

658 Directions from the President
type: Concept
realized by: sec-658
note: The General Manager is not required to comply with a direction by the President.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-658-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-658-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-658-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Expresses the General Manager's exemption from compliance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

659 General Manager not otherwise subject to direction
type: Concept
realized by: sec-659
note: General Manager is subject to direction by or on behalf of the Commonwealth.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.243
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-659-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-659-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-659-logic-deontic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-659-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 659 General Manager not otherwise subject to direction
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-659-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Direction implies General Manager's obligation.
premise text: The Commonwealth directs the General Manager.
conclusion text: The General Manager is obligated.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-659-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: NotImplication
logic summary: No direction implies no obligation for the General Manager.
premise text: The General Manager is not subject to direction.
conclusion text: The General Manager is exempt.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

660 Appointment of the General Manager
type: Concept
realized by: sec-660
has part: 660(1) Appointment of the General Manager
has part: 660(2) Appointment of the General Manager
has part: 660(3) Appointment of the General Manager
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.243

660(1) Appointment of the General Manager
type: Concept
realized by: sec-660-ss-1
part of: 660 Appointment of the General Manager
note: The General Manager must be appointed by the Governor-General.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.243
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 660(1) Appointment of the General Manager
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
premise text: The General Manager is to be appointed by the Governor-General
conclusion text: The appointment must be made
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

660(2) Appointment of the General Manager
type: Concept
realized by: sec-660-ss-2
part of: 660 Appointment of the General Manager
note: The General Manager holds office on a full-time basis.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.243
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-2-logic-shacl-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 660(2) Appointment of the General Manager
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: General Manager has an obligation to hold office
premise text: (2) The General Manager holds office on a full-time basis.
conclusion text: The General Manager must hold office on a full-time basis.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implies
logic summary: Appointment of the General Manager implies that he must hold office
premise text: (2) The General Manager holds office on a full-time basis.
conclusion text: The appointment of the General Manager implies that he must hold office.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: General Manager's term is during his holding office
premise text: (2) The General Manager holds office on a full-time basis.
conclusion text: The General Manager's term is during his holding office.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: has
logic summary: General Manager has the capability of holding office
premise text: (2) The General Manager holds office on a full-time basis.
conclusion text: The General Manager has the capability of holding office.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: has
logic summary: General Manager has the property of being a public official
premise text: (2) The General Manager holds office on a full-time basis.
conclusion text: The General Manager has the property of being a public official.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

660(3) Appointment of the General Manager
type: Concept
realized by: sec-660-ss-3
part of: 660 Appointment of the General Manager
note: General Manager must hold office for a specified period not exceeding 5 years.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.243
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 660(3) Appointment of the General Manager
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-660-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: General Manager holds office
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

661 Remuneration of the General Manager
type: Concept
realized by: sec-661
note: General Manager must be paid remuneration determined by the Remuneration Tribunal or prescribed by regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.243
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-661-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-661-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-661-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 661 Remuneration of the General Manager
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-661-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: General Manager must be paid remuneration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

662 Leave of absence of the General Manager
type: Concept
realized by: sec-662
has part: 662(1) Leave of absence of the General Manager
has part: 662(2) Leave of absence of the General Manager
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.244

662(1) Leave of absence of the General Manager
type: Concept
realized by: sec-662-ss-1
part of: 662 Leave of absence of the General Manager
note: Recreation leave entitlements determined by the Remuneration Tribunal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.244
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-662-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-662-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-662-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: General Manager has recreation leave entitlements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

662(2) Leave of absence of the General Manager
type: Concept
realized by: sec-662-ss-2
part of: 662 Leave of absence of the General Manager
note: Grant of leave of absence by Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.244
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-662-ss-2-norm

663 Outside work of the General Manager
type: Concept
realized by: sec-663
note: No paid work outside office duties without President's approval.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.244
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-663-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-663-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-663-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of paid work outside office duties.
premise text: General Manager's duties
conclusion text: President's approval required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

664 Disclosure of interests to the President
type: Concept
realized by: sec-664
has part: 664(1) Disclosure of interests to the President
has part: 664(2) Disclosure of interests to the President
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.244

664(1) Disclosure of interests to the President
type: Concept
realized by: sec-664-ss-1
part of: 664 Disclosure of interests to the President
note: Disclosure of personal interests to the President
description: written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.244
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-664-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-664-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-664-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to disclose personal interests
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

664(2) Disclosure of interests to the President
type: Concept
realized by: sec-664-ss-2
part of: 664 Disclosure of interests to the President
note: Duty to disclose interests does not apply to the General Manager.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.244
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-664-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-664-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-664-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: General Manager exempt from duty to disclose interests.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

665 Resignation of the General Manager
type: Concept
realized by: sec-665
has part: 665(1) Resignation of the General Manager
has part: 665(2) Resignation of the General Manager
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.244

665(1) Resignation of the General Manager
type: Concept
realized by: sec-665-ss-1
part of: 665 Resignation of the General Manager
note: The General Manager must provide a written resignation to the Governor-General.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.244
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-665-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-665-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-665-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The General Manager must provide a written resignation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

665(2) Resignation of the General Manager
type: Concept
realized by: sec-665-ss-2
part of: 665 Resignation of the General Manager
note: Resignation takes effect on specified day or immediately upon receipt by Governor-General.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.244
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-665-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-665-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-665-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes effect
logic summary: Resignation takes effect on specified day or immediately upon receipt by Governor-General.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

666 Termination of appointment of the General Manager
type: Concept
realized by: sec-666
has part: 666(1) Termination of appointment of the General Manager
has part: 666(2) Termination of appointment of the General Manager
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.245

666(1) Termination of appointment of the General Manager
type: Concept
realized by: sec-666-ss-1
part of: 666 Termination of appointment of the General Manager
note: The Governor-General may terminate the appointment of the General Manager.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.245
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-666-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-666-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-666-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 666(1) Termination of appointment of the General Manager
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-666-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to terminate appointment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

666(2) Termination of appointment of the General Manager
type: Concept
realized by: sec-666-ss-2
part of: 666 Termination of appointment of the General Manager
note: Termination of General Manager's appointment under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.245
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-666-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-666-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-666-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 666(2) Termination of appointment of the General Manager
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-666-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: General Manager's appointment terminated under specified conditions.
premise text: The Governor-General must terminate...
conclusion text: ...the General Manager if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

667 Other terms and conditions of the General Manager
type: Concept
realized by: sec-667
note: The General Manager's terms and conditions are determined by the Governor-General.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.245
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-667-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-667-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-667-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-667-logic-n3logic-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-667-logic-shacl-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-667-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-667-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies deontic type
premise text: The General Manager holds office on the terms and conditions (if any) in relation to matters not covered by this Act that are determined by the Governor-General.
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-667-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies temporal interval
premise text: The General Manager holds office on the terms and conditions (if any) in relation to matters not covered by this Act that are determined by the Governor-General.
conclusion text: null
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-667-logic-n3logic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: N3Logic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies subject-predicate-object triple
premise text: The General Manager holds office on the terms and conditions (if any) in relation to matters not covered by this Act that are determined by the Governor-General.
conclusion text: null
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-667-logic-shacl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies data schema
premise text: The General Manager holds office on the terms and conditions (if any) in relation to matters not covered by this Act that are determined by the Governor-General.
conclusion text: null
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-667-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies artificial intelligence application
premise text: The General Manager holds office on the terms and conditions (if any) in relation to matters not covered by this Act that are determined by the Governor-General.
conclusion text: null
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

668 Appointment of acting General Manager
type: Concept
realized by: sec-668
note: The Minister has an obligation to appoint a person as General Manager.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.245
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-668-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-668-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-668-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: The Minister has an obligation to appoint a person as General Manager.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

669 Minister to consult the President
type: Concept
realized by: sec-669
note: Consultation requirement before determining terms and conditions under section 667.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-669-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-669-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-669-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consult the President
premise text: The Minister must consult the President before terms and conditions are determined under section 667.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

670 Staff
type: Concept
realized by: sec-670
has part: 670(1) Staff
has part: 670(2) Staff
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246

670(1) Staff
type: Concept
realized by: sec-670-ss-1
part of: 670 Staff
note: Staff must be persons engaged under the Public Service Act 1999.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-670-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-670-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-670-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 670(1) Staff
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-670-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Staff must be persons engaged under the Public Service Act 1999.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

670(2) Staff
type: Concept
realized by: sec-670-ss-2
part of: 670 Staff
note: Designates General Manager and staff as a Statutory Agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-670-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-670-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-670-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-670-ss-2-logic-deontic-3

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-670-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 670(2) Staff
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-670-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Agency designation
premise text: (2) For the purposes of the Public Service Act 1999:
conclusion text: the General Manager and the staff of the FWC together constitute a Statutory Agency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-670-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Agency head designation
premise text: (2) For the purposes of the Public Service Act 1999:
conclusion text: the General Manager is the Head of that Statutory Agency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-670-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: constitutes
logic summary: Agency formation
premise text: (2) For the purposes of the Public Service Act 1999:
conclusion text: the General Manager and the staff of the FWC together constitute a Statutory Agency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

671 Delegation by General Manager to staff
type: Concept
realized by: sec-671
has part: 671(1) Delegation by General Manager to staff
has part: 671(2) Delegation by General Manager to staff
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246

671(1) Delegation by General Manager to staff
type: Concept
realized by: sec-671-ss-1
part of: 671 Delegation by General Manager to staff
note: Delegation of functions or powers to staff members
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-671-ss-1-norm

671(2) Delegation by General Manager to staff
type: Concept
realized by: sec-671-ss-2
part of: 671 Delegation by General Manager to staff
note: Delegate must comply with General Manager's directions
references: sec-34AA
references: sec-34AB
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-671-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-671-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-671-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with directions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

672 Persons assisting the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-672
note: The FWC may be assisted by employees of Agencies, officers and employees of a State or Territory, or authorities of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.247
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-672-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-672-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-672-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to assist
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

673 Consultants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-673
note: The General Manager may engage persons having suitable qualifications and experience as consultants.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.247
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-673-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-673-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-673-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The General Manager may engage persons...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

673A Application of the finance law
type: Concept
realized by: sec-673a
note: List of persons considered a listed entity for the finance law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.247
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-673a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-673a-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-673a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 673A Application of the finance law
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-673a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of listed entity
premise text: Finance law applies to the following group of persons
conclusion text: ListedEntity
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

674 Offences in relation to the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-674
has part: 674(1) Offences in relation to the FWC
has part: 674(2) Offences in relation to the FWC
has part: 674(3) Offences in relation to the FWC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.249

674(1) Offences in relation to the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-674-ss-1
part of: 674 Offences in relation to the FWC
note: Insulting conduct towards FWC Members is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.249
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 674(1) Offences in relation to the FWC
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of insulting conduct
premise text: Insulting language is used
conclusion text: Offence committed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

674(2) Offences in relation to the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-674-ss-2
part of: 674 Offences in relation to the FWC
note: Using insulting language towards an FWC Member is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.249
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 674(2) Offences in relation to the FWC
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of insulting language
premise text: (a) the person uses insulting language towards another person;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of reckless behavior towards FWC Members
premise text: (c) the other person is an FWC Member performing functions, or exercising powers, as an FWC Member.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between insulting language and FWC Member's duties
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person uses insulting language towards another person; and (b) the person is reckless as to whether the language is insulting;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring nature of FWC Member's duties and insulting language
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person uses insulting language towards another person; and (b) the person is reckless as to whether the language is insulting;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of interrupting FWC proceedings
premise text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 12 months. Interrupting matters before the FWC
conclusion text: The person commits an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

674(3) Offences in relation to the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-674-ss-3
part of: 674 Offences in relation to the FWC
note: Engaging in conduct that interrupts a matter before the FWC is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.249
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 674(3) Offences in relation to the FWC
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to not engage in conduct that interrupts a matter before the FWC.
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct; and (b) the person’s conduct interrupts a matter before the FWC.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Meets
logic summary: Conduct meets the condition of interrupting a matter before the FWC.
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct; and (b) the person’s conduct interrupts a matter before the FWC.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Conduct repeats the pattern of interrupting a matter before the FWC.
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct; and (b) the person’s conduct interrupts a matter before the FWC.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spreads
logic summary: Conduct spreads to other matters before the FWC.
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct; and (b) the person’s conduct interrupts a matter before the FWC.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-674-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Conduct is recognized as interrupting a matter before the FWC by the FWC.
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct; and (b) the person’s conduct interrupts a matter before the FWC.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

675 Contravening an FWC order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-675
has part: 675(1) Contravening an FWC order
has part: 675(2) Contravening an FWC order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.251

675(1) Contravening an FWC order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-675-ss-1
part of: 675 Contravening an FWC order
note: Engaging in conduct that contravenes an FWC order is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.251
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-675-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-675-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-675-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-675-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-675-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-675-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-675-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 675(1) Contravening an FWC order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-675-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits conduct that contravenes an FWC order.
premise text: (a) the FWC has made an order under this Act;
conclusion text: A person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-675-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on individuals to comply with FWC orders.
premise text: (a) the FWC has made an order under this Act;
conclusion text: A person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-675-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relation between the making of an FWC order and its contravention.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if:
conclusion text: ...and (d) the conduct contravenes...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-675-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Establishes a recurring trace of FWC orders and their contravention.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if:
conclusion text: ...and (d) the conduct contravenes...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-675-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Grants permission to individuals to engage in conduct that does not contravene an FWC order.
premise text: (b) either of the following applies:
conclusion text: ...or (ii) a term of the order applies to the person;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

675(2) Contravening an FWC order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-675-ss-2
part of: 675 Contravening an FWC order
note: Exemptions from FWC order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.251
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-675-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-675-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-675-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

676 Intimidation etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-676
note: Threatening, intimidating, coercing or prejudicing another person because they have given information to the FWC is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.252
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-676-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-676-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-676-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 676 Intimidation etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-676-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits threatening, intimidating, coercing or prejudicing another person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

677 Offences in relation to attending before the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-677
has part: 677(1) Offences in relation to attending before the FWC
has part: 677(2) Offences in relation to attending before the FWC
has part: 677(3) Offences in relation to attending before the FWC
has part: 677(4) Offences in relation to attending before the FWC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.253

677(1) Offences in relation to attending before the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-677-ss-1
part of: 677 Offences in relation to attending before the FWC
note: Failure to attend before FWC is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.253
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 677(1) Offences in relation to attending before the FWC
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to attend before FWC.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

677(2) Offences in relation to attending before the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-677-ss-2
part of: 677 Offences in relation to attending before the FWC
note: Refusal to take oath or affirmation when required
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.253
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 677(2) Offences in relation to attending before the FWC
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of refusing to take oath or affirmation
premise text: The person refuses or fails to be sworn or to make an affirmation as required.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if they refuse or fail to be sworn or to make an affirmation as required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to take oath or affirmation when required
premise text: The FWC requires the person to take an oath or make an affirmation; and the person refuses or fails to be sworn or to make an affirmation as required.
conclusion text: The person has an obligation to take an oath or make an affirmation when required by the FWC.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between refusal and requirement
premise text: The person refuses or fails to be sworn or to make an affirmation as required; and the FWC requires the person to take an oath or make an affirmation.
conclusion text: There is a temporal overlap between the refusal and the requirement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of failure to comply with requirement
premise text: The FWC requires the person to take an oath or make an affirmation; and the person refuses or fails to be sworn or to make an affirmation as required.
conclusion text: The person is prohibited from failing to comply with the requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

677(3) Offences in relation to attending before the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-677-ss-3
part of: 677 Offences in relation to attending before the FWC
note: Refusal to answer question or produce document when required by FWC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.253
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 677(3) Offences in relation to attending before the FWC
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of refusing to answer question or produce document.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

677(4) Offences in relation to attending before the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-677-ss-4
part of: 677 Offences in relation to attending before the FWC
note: Defendant bears evidential burden for reasonable excuse
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.253
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-4-logic-epistemic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 677(4) Offences in relation to attending before the FWC
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defendant has an obligation to provide a reasonable excuse
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-677-ss-4-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
logic summary: Defendant believes they have a reasonable excuse
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

678 False or misleading evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-678
has part: 678(1) False or misleading evidence
has part: 678(2) False or misleading evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.254

678(1) False or misleading evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-678-ss-1
part of: 678 False or misleading evidence
note: Giving false or misleading evidence in certain matters is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.254
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-678-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-678-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-678-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-678-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-678-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-678-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 678(1) False or misleading evidence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-678-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of giving false or misleading evidence.
premise text: The witness gives sworn or affirmed evidence.
conclusion text: The witness commits an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-678-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of giving false or misleading evidence in certain matters.
premise text: The witness gives evidence as a witness in a matter before the FWC.
conclusion text: The witness commits an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-678-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of inducing or coercing another person to give false or misleading evidence.
premise text: The provision defines the conduct that is prohibited.
conclusion text: The provision specifies the conditions under which the conduct is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-678-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of giving false or misleading evidence in matters before a person taking evidence on behalf of the FWC.
premise text: The witness gives evidence as a witness in a matter that the witness will start by application to the FWC.
conclusion text: The witness commits an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

678(2) False or misleading evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-678-ss-2
part of: 678 False or misleading evidence
note: Inducing, threatening or intimidating a witness to give false evidence is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.254
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-678-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-678-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-678-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 678(2) False or misleading evidence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-678-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of inducing, threatening or intimidating a witness.
premise text: The offender induces, threatens or intimidates the witness.
conclusion text: No false evidence shall be given.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

679 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-679
note: Promoting and monitoring compliance with this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.255
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-679-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-679-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 679 Guide to this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

680 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-680
note: Defines employee and employer terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.255
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-680-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-680-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-680-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 680 Meanings of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-680-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines key terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

681 Establishment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-681
note: Establishment of Fair Work Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.256
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-681-norm

682 Functions of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-682
has part: 682(1) Functions of the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 682(1A) Functions of the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 682(2) Functions of the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 682(3) Functions of the Fair Work Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.256

682(1) Functions of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-682-ss-1
part of: 682 Functions of the Fair Work Ombudsman
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman has various functions to promote compliance and enforce the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.256
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-682-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-682-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-682-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 682(1) Functions of the Fair Work Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-682-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: The Fair Work Ombudsman has functions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

682(1A) Functions of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-682-ss-1a
part of: 682 Functions of the Fair Work Ombudsman
note: Must have regard to guidelines and community outreach in multiple languages.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.256
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-682-ss-1a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-682-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-682-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST HAVE REGARD TO
logic summary: Obligation to consider guidelines and community outreach
premise text: (1A) In performing functions under paragraph (1)(a)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

682(2) Functions of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-682-ss-2
part of: 682 Functions of the Fair Work Ombudsman
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman must consult with the FWC in producing guidance material.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.256
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-682-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-682-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-682-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 682(2) Functions of the Fair Work Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-682-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consult
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

682(3) Functions of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-682-ss-3
part of: 682 Functions of the Fair Work Ombudsman
note: Consultation with the National Workplace Relations Consultative Council before publishing a compliance and enforcement policy. The Fair Work Ombudsman has a duty to provide education, assistance and advice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.256
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-682-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-682-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-682-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-682-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 682(3) Functions of the Fair Work Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-682-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to consult
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-682-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: The Fair Work Ombudsman has a duty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

683 Delegation by the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-683
has part: 683(1) Delegation by the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 683(1A) Delegation by the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 683(1B) Delegation by the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 683(2) Delegation by the Fair Work Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.258

683(1) Delegation by the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-683-ss-1
part of: 683 Delegation by the Fair Work Ombudsman
note: Delegation of functions or powers to staff members or inspectors
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.258
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-683-ss-1-norm

683(1A) Delegation by the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-683-ss-1a
part of: 683 Delegation by the Fair Work Ombudsman
note: Delegation of functions or powers as an inspector is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.258
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-683-ss-1a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-683-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-683-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of delegation
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman must not delegate...
conclusion text: ...his or her functions or powers as an inspector.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

683(1B) Delegation by the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-683-ss-1b
part of: 683 Delegation by the Fair Work Ombudsman
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman may delegate certain powers to SES employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.258
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-683-ss-1b-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-683-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-683-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 683(1B) Delegation by the Fair Work Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-683-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Granting power
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

683(2) Delegation by the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-683-ss-2
part of: 683 Delegation by the Fair Work Ombudsman
note: Delegate must comply with directions of the Fair Work Ombudsman.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.258
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-683-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-683-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-683-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with directions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

684 Directions from the Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-684
has part: 684(1) Directions from the Minister
has part: 684(2) Directions from the Minister
has part: 684(3) Directions from the Minister
has part: 684(4) Directions from the Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.258

684(1) Directions from the Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-684-ss-1
part of: 684 Directions from the Minister
note: The Minister may give written directions to the Fair Work Ombudsman.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.258
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-684-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-684-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-684-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted by the Minister.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

684(2) Directions from the Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-684-ss-2
part of: 684 Directions from the Minister
note: Direction must be of a general nature only.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.258
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-684-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-684-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-684-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide direction of a general nature.
premise text: (2) The direction must be of a general nature only.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

684(3) Directions from the Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-684-ss-3
part of: 684 Directions from the Minister
note: Must comply with direction from the Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.258
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-684-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-684-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-684-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
premise text: The Minister has given a direction
conclusion text: The Fair Work Ombudsman must comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

684(4) Directions from the Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-684-ss-4
part of: 684 Directions from the Minister
note: Exemption from compliance with Minister's directions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.258
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-684-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-684-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-684-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Excludes compliance with certain directions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

685 Minister may require reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-685
has part: 685(1) Minister may require reports
has part: 685(2) Minister may require reports
has part: 685(3) Minister may require reports
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.259

685(1) Minister may require reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-685-ss-1
part of: 685 Minister may require reports
note: The Minister may require reports from the Fair Work Ombudsman.
description: specified reports relating to the Fair Work Ombudsman’s functions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.259
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-685-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-685-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-685-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Implies an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

685(2) Minister may require reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-685-ss-2
part of: 685 Minister may require reports
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman must comply with the direction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.259
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-685-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-685-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-685-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman must comply with the direction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

685(3) Minister may require reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-685-ss-3
part of: 685 Minister may require reports
note: Minister must provide reports
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.259
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-685-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-685-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-685-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

686 Annual report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-686
note: No disclosure of information for Privacy Act 1988 purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.259
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-686-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-686-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-686-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 686 Annual report
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-686-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information for Privacy Act 1988 purposes
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

687 Appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-687
has part: 687(1) Appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 687(2) Appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 687(3) Appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 687(4) Appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.260

687(1) Appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-687-ss-1
part of: 687 Appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman must be appointed by the Governor-General.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.260
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 687(1) Appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to appoint
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

687(2) Appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-687-ss-2
part of: 687 Appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
note: Minister must be satisfied that person has suitable qualifications or experience and is of good character before appointing as Fair Work Ombudsman.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.260
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 687(2) Appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister must satisfy conditions before appointment.
premise text: (2) Before the Governor-General appoints a person as the Fair Work Ombudsman, the Minister...
conclusion text: The Minister MUST be satisfied that the person has suitable qualifications or experience; and is of good character.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

687(3) Appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-687-ss-3
part of: 687 Appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman must hold office on a full-time basis.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.260
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 687(3) Appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: =>
logic summary: Implication
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

687(4) Appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-687-ss-4
part of: 687 Appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman must hold office for a period not exceeding 5 years.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.260
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 687(4) Appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-687-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Holds office obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

688 Remuneration of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-688
has part: 688(1) Remuneration of the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 688(2) Remuneration of the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 688(3) Remuneration of the Fair Work Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.260

688(1) Remuneration of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-688-ss-1
part of: 688 Remuneration of the Fair Work Ombudsman
note: Fair Work Ombudsman must be paid remuneration determined by the Remuneration Tribunal or prescribed by regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.260
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-688-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-688-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-688-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 688(1) Remuneration of the Fair Work Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-688-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to pay remuneration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

688(2) Remuneration of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-688-ss-2
part of: 688 Remuneration of the Fair Work Ombudsman
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman must be paid the allowances prescribed by regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.260
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-688-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-688-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-688-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 688(2) Remuneration of the Fair Work Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-688-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to pay allowances
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

688(3) Remuneration of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-688-ss-3
part of: 688 Remuneration of the Fair Work Ombudsman
note: Remuneration of the Fair Work Ombudsman subject to the Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.260
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-688-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-688-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-688-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies section as an Undertaking
premise text: Section has effect subject to another Act
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

689 Leave of absence of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-689
has part: 689(1) Leave of absence of the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 689(2) Leave of absence of the Fair Work Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.260

689(1) Leave of absence of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-689-ss-1
part of: 689 Leave of absence of the Fair Work Ombudsman
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman has recreation leave entitlements determined by the Remuneration Tribunal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.260
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-689-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-689-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-689-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 689(1) Leave of absence of the Fair Work Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-689-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: The Fair Work Ombudsman has a duty to provide recreation leave entitlements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

689(2) Leave of absence of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-689-ss-2
part of: 689 Leave of absence of the Fair Work Ombudsman
note: Grant leave of absence on terms and conditions determined by the Minister.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.260
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-689-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-689-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-689-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: grant
logic summary: Permission to grant leave of absence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

690 Outside work of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-690
note: No paid work outside office duties without Minister's approval
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-690-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-690-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-690-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of paid work outside office duties
premise text: Fair Work Ombudsman's duty
conclusion text: Minister's approval required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

692 Resignation of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-692
has part: 692(1) Resignation of the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 692(2) Resignation of the Fair Work Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261

692(1) Resignation of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-692-ss-1
part of: 692 Resignation of the Fair Work Ombudsman
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman must resign by giving the Governor-General a written resignation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-692-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-692-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-692-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a mandatory obligation.
conclusion text: The Fair Work Ombudsman must resign.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

692(2) Resignation of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-692-ss-2
part of: 692 Resignation of the Fair Work Ombudsman
note: Resignation takes effect on specified day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-692-ss-2-norm

693 Termination of appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-693
has part: 693(1) Termination of appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 693(2) Termination of appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261

693(1) Termination of appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-693-ss-1
part of: 693 Termination of appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
note: The Governor-General may terminate the appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-693-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-693-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-693-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 693(1) Termination of appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-693-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to terminate appointment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

693(2) Termination of appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-693-ss-2
part of: 693 Termination of appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
note: Termination of appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-693-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-693-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-693-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-693-ss-2-logic-deontic-3

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-693-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 693(2) Termination of appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-693-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of appointment termination
premise text: (2) The Governor-General must terminate...
conclusion text: ...the appointment of the Fair Work Ombudsman
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-693-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Absence condition overlaps with bankruptcy
premise text: (b) the Fair Work Ombudsman is absent...
conclusion text: ...for 14 consecutive days or for 28 days in any 12 months
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-693-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Absence condition prohibits appointment termination
premise text: (b) the Fair Work Ombudsman is absent...
conclusion text: ...for 14 consecutive days or for 28 days in any 12 months
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

694 Other terms and conditions of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-694
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman holds office on terms and conditions determined by the Governor-General.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.262
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-694-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-694-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-694-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-694-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-694-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-694-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-694-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes the Fair Work Ombudsman's office as a matter of terms and conditions
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman holds office on the terms and conditions (if any) in relation to matters not covered by this Act that are determined by the Governor-General.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-694-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes the temporal interval of the Fair Work Ombudsman's office as determined by the Governor-General
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman holds office on the terms and conditions (if any) in relation to matters not covered by this Act that are determined by the Governor-General.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-694-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes the temporal interval of the Fair Work Ombudsman's office as determined by the Governor-General
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman holds office on the terms and conditions (if any) in relation to matters not covered by this Act that are determined by the Governor-General.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-694-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes the Fair Work Ombudsman's office as a matter of terms and conditions
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman holds office on the terms and conditions (if any) in relation to matters not covered by this Act that are determined by the Governor-General.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-694-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes the Fair Work Ombudsman's office as a matter of terms and conditions
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman holds office on the terms and conditions (if any) in relation to matters not covered by this Act that are determined by the Governor-General.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

695 Appointment of acting Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-695
has part: 695(1) Appointment of acting Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 695(2) Appointment of acting Fair Work Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.262

695(1) Appointment of acting Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-695-ss-1
part of: 695 Appointment of acting Fair Work Ombudsman
note: The Minister may appoint a person to act as the Fair Work Ombudsman.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.262
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-695-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-695-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-695-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 695(1) Appointment of acting Fair Work Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-695-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted by the Minister
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

695(2) Appointment of acting Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-695-ss-2
part of: 695 Appointment of acting Fair Work Ombudsman
note: Anything done by or in relation to a person purporting to act under an appointment is not invalid.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.262
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-695-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-695-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-695-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-695-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-695-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-695-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-695-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 695(2) Appointment of acting Fair Work Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-695-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Validates
logic summary: Validates the validity of actions taken under an appointment.
premise text: (2) Anything done by or in relation to a person purporting to act under an appointment is not invalid.
conclusion text: The action is valid.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-695-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: RelatesTo
logic summary: Relates to the temporal intervals of appointments.
premise text: (2) Anything done by or in relation to a person purporting to act under an appointment is not invalid.
conclusion text: The action relates to the appointment's temporal interval.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-695-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Validates
logic summary: Validates the validity of actions taken under an appointment over time.
premise text: (2) Anything done by or in relation to a person purporting to act under an appointment is not invalid.
conclusion text: The action is valid over time.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-695-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: AppliesTo
logic summary: Applies to the diffusion of actions taken under an appointment.
premise text: (2) Anything done by or in relation to a person purporting to act under an appointment is not invalid.
conclusion text: The action applies to the diffusion.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-695-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Validates
logic summary: Validates the validity of actions taken under an appointment using cognitive AI.
premise text: (2) Anything done by or in relation to a person purporting to act under an appointment is not invalid.
conclusion text: The action is valid.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

696 Establishment of the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-696
has part: 696(1) Establishment of the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 696(2) Establishment of the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 696(3) Establishment of the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.263

696(1) Establishment of the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-696-ss-1
part of: 696 Establishment of the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman
note: Establishes the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.263
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-696-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-696-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-696-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 696(1) Establishment of the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-696-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: establishes
logic summary: Creates an obligation
conclusion text: The Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman is established.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

696(2) Establishment of the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-696-ss-2
part of: 696 Establishment of the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman
note: List of entities composing the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.263
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-696-ss-2-norm

696(3) Establishment of the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-696-ss-3
part of: 696 Establishment of the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman
note: Listed entity and accountable authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.263
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-696-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-696-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-696-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-696-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-696-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-696-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-696-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 696(3) Establishment of the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-696-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Entity classification
premise text: (3) For the purposes of the finance law (within the meaning of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013):
conclusion text: the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman is a listed entity;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-696-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Accountable authority classification
premise text: (3) For the purposes of the finance law (within the meaning of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013):
conclusion text: the Fair Work Ombudsman is the accountable authority of the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-696-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Official classification
premise text: (3) For the purposes of the finance law (within the meaning of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013):
conclusion text: the following persons are officials of the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman:...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-696-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: (3) For the purposes of the finance law (within the meaning of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013):
conclusion text: the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman is a listed entity during the period of the finance law;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-696-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Inference from classification
premise text: (3) For the purposes of the finance law (within the meaning of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013):
conclusion text: the Fair Work Ombudsman is accountable for the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman;
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

697 Staff
type: Concept
realized by: sec-697
has part: 697(1) Staff
has part: 697(2) Staff
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.264

697(1) Staff
type: Concept
realized by: sec-697-ss-1
part of: 697 Staff
note: Staff must be persons engaged under the Public Service Act 1999.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.264
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-697-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-697-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-697-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 697(1) Staff
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-697-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Staff must be persons engaged under the Public Service Act 1999.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

697(2) Staff
type: Concept
realized by: sec-697-ss-2
part of: 697 Staff
note: Designates Fair Work Ombudsman as Head of Statutory Agency
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.264
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-697-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-697-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-697-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-697-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-697-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-697-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 697(2) Staff
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-697-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Agency designation
premise text: (2) For the purposes of the Public Service Act 1999:
conclusion text: the Fair Work Ombudsman is the Head of that Statutory Agency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-697-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Agency designation
premise text: (b) the Fair Work Ombudsman is the Head of that Statutory Agency.
conclusion text: the Fair Work Ombudsman is the Head of that Statutory Agency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-697-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between agency designation and commencement
premise text: (2) For the purposes of the Public Service Act 1999:
conclusion text: the Fair Work Ombudsman is the Head of that Statutory Agency during the period of its designation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-697-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Agency classification
premise text: (a) the Fair Work Ombudsman and the staff of the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman together constitute a Statutory Agency;
conclusion text: the Fair Work Ombudsman and the staff of the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman are a Statutory Agency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

698 Persons assisting the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-698
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman may be assisted by employees of certain agencies and authorities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.264
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-698-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-698-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-698-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-698-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-698-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-698-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-698-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to assist the Fair Work Ombudsman
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman may also be assisted...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-698-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between the services provided by agencies and authorities and the Fair Work Ombudsman's functions
premise text: whose services are made available to the Fair Work Ombudsman in connection with the performance of any of his or her functions.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-698-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of assistance by agencies and authorities on the Fair Work Ombudsman's functions
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman may also be assisted...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-698-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagated information about assistance by agencies and authorities to the Fair Work Ombudsman's functions
premise text: For example, State or Territory employees could be made available...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-698-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Inference of assistance by agencies and authorities based on the Fair Work Ombudsman's functions
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman may also be assisted...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

699 Consultants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-699
note: Engage persons with suitable qualifications and experience as consultants.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.264
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-699-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-699-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-699-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to engage consultants
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

700 Appointment of Fair Work Inspectors
type: Concept
realized by: sec-700
has part: 700(1) Appointment of Fair Work Inspectors
has part: 700(2) Appointment of Fair Work Inspectors
has part: 700(3) Appointment of Fair Work Inspectors
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.265

700(1) Appointment of Fair Work Inspectors
type: Concept
realized by: sec-700-ss-1
part of: 700 Appointment of Fair Work Inspectors
note: Appointment of Fair Work Inspectors
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.265
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-700-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-700-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-700-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Granting permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

700(2) Appointment of Fair Work Inspectors
type: Concept
realized by: sec-700-ss-2
part of: 700 Appointment of Fair Work Inspectors
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman must appoint a person as a Fair Work Inspector if satisfied with their character.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.265
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-700-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-700-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-700-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman must appoint...
conclusion text: A person as a Fair Work Inspector
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

700(3) Appointment of Fair Work Inspectors
type: Concept
realized by: sec-700-ss-3
part of: 700 Appointment of Fair Work Inspectors
note: Fair Work Inspector must be appointed for a period not exceeding 4 years.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.265
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-700-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-700-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-700-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 700(3) Appointment of Fair Work Inspectors
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-700-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be appointed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

701 Fair Work Ombudsman is a Fair Work Inspector
type: Concept
realized by: sec-701
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman is a Fair Work Inspector.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.265
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-701-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-701-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-701-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 701 Fair Work Ombudsman is a Fair Work Inspector
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-701-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Assertion of existence
conclusion text: The Fair Work Ombudsman is a Fair Work Inspector.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

702 Identity cards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-702
has part: 702(1) Identity cards
has part: 702(2) Identity cards
has part: 702(3) Identity cards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.265

702(1) Identity cards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-702-ss-1
part of: 702 Identity cards
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman must issue an identity card to an inspector appointed under section 700.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.265
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-702-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-702-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-702-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 702(1) Identity cards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-702-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to issue an identity card
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

702(2) Identity cards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-702-ss-2
part of: 702 Identity cards
note: Minister must issue identity card to Fair Work Ombudsman.
description: Form of identity card
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.265
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-702-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-702-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-702-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 702(2) Identity cards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-702-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to issue identity card
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

702(3) Identity cards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-702-ss-3
part of: 702 Identity cards
note: Identity card must be in approved form and contain recent photograph of inspector.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.265
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-702-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-702-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-702-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-702-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 702(3) Identity cards
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-702-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be in approved form
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-702-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTAIN
logic summary: Contain recent photograph of inspector
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

703 Conditions and restrictions on functions and powers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-703
has part: 703(1) Conditions and restrictions on functions and powers
has part: 703(2) Conditions and restrictions on functions and powers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.266

703(1) Conditions and restrictions on functions and powers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-703-ss-1
part of: 703 Conditions and restrictions on functions and powers
note: Conditions and restrictions on functions and powers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.266
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-703-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-703-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-703-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 703(1) Conditions and restrictions on functions and powers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-703-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasCondition
logic summary: Has condition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

703(2) Conditions and restrictions on functions and powers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-703-ss-2
part of: 703 Conditions and restrictions on functions and powers
note: Power to apply for FWO notice under section 712AA and give FWO notice under section 712AD are not compliance powers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.266
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-703-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-703-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-703-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-703-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-703-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 703(2) Conditions and restrictions on functions and powers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-703-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits application for FWO notice under section 712AA and giving FWO notice under section 712AD.
premise text: (2) To avoid doubt, the power to apply for the issue of an FWO notice under section 712AA and the power to give an FWO notice under section 712AD are not compliance powers.
conclusion text: These actions are not compliance powers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-703-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between prohibition and other provisions.
premise text: (2) To avoid doubt, the power to apply for the issue of an FWO notice under section 712AA and the power to give an FWO notice under section 712AD are not compliance powers.
conclusion text: These actions occur during the period when these powers are not compliance powers.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-703-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between prohibition and other provisions.
premise text: (2) To avoid doubt, the power to apply for the issue of an FWO notice under section 712AA and the power to give an FWO notice under section 712AD are not compliance powers.
conclusion text: These actions occur during the period when these powers are not compliance powers.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

704 General directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-704
has part: 704(1) General directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 704(2) General directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 704(3) General directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267

704(1) General directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-704-ss-1
part of: 704 General directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman may give a written direction to inspectors.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-704-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-704-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-704-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

704(2) General directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-704-ss-2
part of: 704 General directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
note: General directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman must be of a general nature only.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-704-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-704-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-704-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide general directions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

704(3) General directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-704-ss-3
part of: 704 General directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
note: Inspector must comply with direction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-704-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-704-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-704-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-704-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-704-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 704(3) General directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-704-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
premise text: (3) An inspector must comply with the direction.
conclusion text: An inspector MUST comply with the direction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-704-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEFORE
logic summary: Inspector's compliance is before the direction
premise text: (3) An inspector must comply with the direction.
conclusion text: An inspector BEFORER the direction MUST comply.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-704-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Compliance implies direction
premise text: (3) An inspector must comply with the direction.
conclusion text: If an inspector MUST comply, then the direction exists.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

705 Particular directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-705
has part: 705(1) Particular directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 705(2) Particular directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
has part: 705(3) Particular directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267

705(1) Particular directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-705-ss-1
part of: 705 Particular directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman may give a direction to an inspector.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-705-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-705-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-705-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

705(2) Particular directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-705-ss-2
part of: 705 Particular directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
note: Inspector must comply with direction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-705-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-705-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-705-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-705-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 705(2) Particular directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-705-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
premise text: (2) The inspector must comply with the direction.
conclusion text: The inspector MUST comply with the direction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-705-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEFORE
logic summary: Inspector's compliance before direction
premise text: (2) The inspector must comply with the direction.
conclusion text: The inspector's compliance IS BEFORE the direction.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

705(3) Particular directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-705-ss-3
part of: 705 Particular directions by the Fair Work Ombudsman
note: Direction in writing is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-705-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-705-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-705-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Rejection of legislative instrument status
premise text: (3) If a direction is in writing, the direction is not a legislative instrument.
conclusion text: The direction is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

706 Purpose for which powers of inspectors may be exercised
type: Concept
realized by: sec-706
note: Inspector may exercise compliance powers for specified purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-706-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-706-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-706-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 706 Purpose for which powers of inspectors may be exercised
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-706-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Inspector can exercise compliance powers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

707 When powers of inspectors may be exercised
type: Concept
realized by: sec-707
note: Inspector may exercise compliance powers at any time during working hours or when necessary for compliance purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.268
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707-logic-alleninterval-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Inspector can exercise compliance powers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: must believe
logic summary: Inspector must believe it is necessary to exercise compliance powers.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Compliance powers can be exercised until the inspector reasonably believes it is no longer necessary.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: can
logic summary: Inspector can use argumentation to justify exercising compliance powers.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Compliance powers can be exercised during working hours or at any other time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

707A Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-707a
has part: 707A(1) Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and
has part: 707A(2) Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and
has part: 707A(3) Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.268

707A(1) Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-707a-ss-1
part of: 707A Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and
note: Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and its staff
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.268
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 707A(1) Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and its staff
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman has a duty to perform its functions
conclusion text: Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman is prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and its staff
premise text: The text states that a person must not hinder or obstruct the Fair Work Ombudsman
conclusion text: Hindering or obstructing is prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implication of hindering or obstructing on a person's actions
premise text: If a person hinders or obstructs the Fair Work Ombudsman, they must not perform their duties
conclusion text: Hindering or obstructing implies a violation of a duty
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

707A(2) Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-707a-ss-2
part of: 707A Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and
note: Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman is not an offense if the person has a reasonable excuse.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.268
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 707A(2) Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemption from obligation
premise text: The person has a reasonable excuse.
conclusion text: No offense is committed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: knowledge
logic summary: Knowledge of the reasonableness of the excuse
premise text: The person knows they have a reasonable excuse.
conclusion text: The excuse is valid.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

707A(3) Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-707a-ss-3
part of: 707A Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and
note: Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and its delegates is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.268
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-3-logic-cogai-6

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 707A(3) Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and its delegates.
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman has the power to enter premises.
conclusion text: Hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and its delegates is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of the Fair Work Ombudsman as a state entity.
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman is an agent of the State.
conclusion text: The Fair Work Ombudsman is a state entity.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between the power to enter premises and hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and its delegates.
premise text: The power to enter premises is a temporal interval.
conclusion text: The temporal intervals of hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and its delegates overlaps with the power to enter premises.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Contains
logic summary: Temporal containment between the power to enter premises and hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and its delegates.
premise text: The power to enter premises is a temporal interval.
conclusion text: The temporal interval of hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and its delegates contains the power to enter premises.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of the prohibition on hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and its delegates.
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman has the power to enter premises.
conclusion text: The diffusion of the prohibition on hindering or obstructing the Fair Work Ombudsman and its delegates is related to the power to enter premises.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-707a-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Recognition of the Fair Work Ombudsman as a cogent AI entity.
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman is an agent of the State.
conclusion text: The Fair Work Ombudsman is recognized as a cogent AI entity.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

708 Power of inspectors to enter premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-708
has part: 708(1) Power of inspectors to enter premises
has part: 708(2) Power of inspectors to enter premises
has part: 708(3) Power of inspectors to enter premises
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.269

708(1) Power of inspectors to enter premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-708-ss-1
part of: 708 Power of inspectors to enter premises
note: Inspectors may enter premises without force for compliance purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.269
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-708-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-708-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-708-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permits inspectors to enter premises
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

708(2) Power of inspectors to enter premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-708-ss-2
part of: 708 Power of inspectors to enter premises
note: Inspection of premises with residential use is prohibited unless reasonable belief in work being performed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.269
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-708-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-708-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-708-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of inspection
premise text: Inspector's entry is prohibited
conclusion text: Inspection is not allowed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

708(3) Power of inspectors to enter premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-708-ss-3
part of: 708 Power of inspectors to enter premises
note: Must show identity card upon request
description: Identity card
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.269
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-708-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-708-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-708-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to show identity card
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

709 Powers of inspectors while on premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-709
note: Inspector may exercise certain powers while on premises.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.269
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-709-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-709-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 709 Powers of inspectors while on premises
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

710 Persons assisting inspectors
type: Concept
realized by: sec-710
has part: 710(1) Persons assisting inspectors
has part: 710(2) Persons assisting inspectors
has part: 710(3) Persons assisting inspectors
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.270

710(1) Persons assisting inspectors
type: Concept
realized by: sec-710-ss-1
part of: 710 Persons assisting inspectors
note: Assistant may accompany inspector under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.270
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-710-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-710-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-710-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 710(1) Persons assisting inspectors
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-710-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to assist inspector
premise text: (a) the assistance is necessary and reasonable; (b) the assistant has suitable qualifications and experience
conclusion text: The assistant may accompany the inspector.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

710(2) Persons assisting inspectors
type: Concept
realized by: sec-710-ss-2
part of: 710 Persons assisting inspectors
note: Assistant must assist inspector within power limits.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.270
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-710-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-710-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-710-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Assistant has a duty to assist the inspector.
premise text: Inspector requires assistance.
conclusion text: Assistant must do such things as required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

710(3) Persons assisting inspectors
type: Concept
realized by: sec-710-ss-3
part of: 710 Persons assisting inspectors
note: Anything done by an assistant is taken for all purposes to have been done by the inspector.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.270
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-710-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-710-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-710-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to perform actions as if done by the inspector.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

711 Power to ask for person’s name and address
type: Concept
realized by: sec-711
has part: 711(1) Power to ask for person’s name and address
has part: 711(2) Power to ask for person’s name and address
has part: 711(3) Power to ask for person’s name and address
has part: 711(4) Power to ask for person’s name and address
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.271

711(1) Power to ask for person’s name and address
type: Concept
realized by: sec-711-ss-1
part of: 711 Power to ask for person’s name and address
note: Inspector may require person to provide name and address if inspector reasonably believes contravention has occurred.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.271
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 711(1) Power to ask for person’s name and address
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Inspector may require person to provide information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

711(2) Power to ask for person’s name and address
type: Concept
realized by: sec-711-ss-2
part of: 711 Power to ask for person’s name and address
note: Inspector may require person to provide evidence of correct name or address. Inspector must ask for person's name and address if advised of civil remedy provision
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.271
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 711(2) Power to ask for person’s name and address
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must ask for person's name and address
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

711(3) Power to ask for person’s name and address
type: Concept
realized by: sec-711-ss-3
part of: 711 Power to ask for person’s name and address
note: Must comply with a requirement under subsection (1) or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.271
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 711(3) Power to ask for person’s name and address
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with a requirement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

711(4) Power to ask for person’s name and address
type: Concept
realized by: sec-711-ss-4
part of: 711 Power to ask for person’s name and address
note: No reasonable excuse is required to provide name and address.
description: Name and Address
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.271
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 711(4) Power to ask for person’s name and address
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-711-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory provision
conclusion text: No reasonable excuse is required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

712 Power to require persons to produce records or documents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712
has part: 712(1) Power to require persons to produce records or documents
has part: 712(2) Power to require persons to produce records or documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.271

712(1) Power to require persons to produce records or documents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712-ss-1
part of: 712 Power to require persons to produce records or documents
note: Inspector may require a person to produce records or documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.271
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 712(1) Power to require persons to produce records or documents
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: Obligation to provide records or documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

712(2) Power to require persons to produce records or documents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712-ss-2
part of: 712 Power to require persons to produce records or documents
note: Notice must be in writing, served on person, and require production of record or document within a specified period.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.271
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 712(2) Power to require persons to produce records or documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to produce records or documents
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

712A Minister may nominate ART President or Deputy President to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712a
has part: 712A(1) Minister may nominate ART President or Deputy President to
has part: 712A(2) Minister may nominate ART President or Deputy President to
has part: 712A(3) Minister may nominate ART President or Deputy President to
has part: 712A(4) Minister may nominate ART President or Deputy President to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.272

712A(1) Minister may nominate ART President or Deputy President to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712a-ss-1
part of: 712A Minister may nominate ART President or Deputy President to
note: Minister may nominate ART President or Deputy President to issue written notices.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.272
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

712A(2) Minister may nominate ART President or Deputy President to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712a-ss-2
part of: 712A Minister may nominate ART President or Deputy President to
note: Minister must nominate ART President or Deputy President with consent from Judge.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.272
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister has a duty to nominate ART President or Deputy President.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

712A(3) Minister may nominate ART President or Deputy President to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712a-ss-3
part of: 712A Minister may nominate ART President or Deputy President to
note: Nomination ceases to have effect under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.272
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits the nomination from taking effect.
premise text: (a) or (b)
conclusion text: Nomination ceases to have effect.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Describes temporal overlap between conditions.
premise text: (a) and (b)
conclusion text: The nomination ceases to have effect during the time period of either condition.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between conditions.
premise text: (a) or (b)
conclusion text: The nomination ceases to have effect until either condition is met.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Describes propagation of the prohibition.
premise text: Minister
conclusion text: The Minister's power to withdraw the nomination diffuses throughout the system.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

712A(4) Minister may nominate ART President or Deputy President to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712a-ss-4
part of: 712A Minister may nominate ART President or Deputy President to
note: Protection and immunity for nominated ART President or Deputy President
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.272
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 712A(4) Minister may nominate ART President or Deputy President to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Protection and immunity
premise text: (4) A nominated ART President or Deputy President has...
conclusion text: ...the same protection and immunity as a Justice of the High Court has...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

712AA Fair Work Ombudsman may apply to nominated ART
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712aa
has part: 712AA(1) Fair Work Ombudsman may apply to nominated ART
has part: 712AA(2) Fair Work Ombudsman may apply to nominated ART
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.272

712AA(1) Fair Work Ombudsman may apply to nominated ART
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712aa-ss-1
part of: 712AA Fair Work Ombudsman may apply to nominated ART
note: Fair Work Ombudsman may apply to nominated ART President or Deputy President for the issue of an FWO notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.272
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

712AA(2) Fair Work Ombudsman may apply to nominated ART
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712aa-ss-2
part of: 712AA Fair Work Ombudsman may apply to nominated ART
note: Must provide information to Fair Work Ombudsman or staff member.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.272
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 712AA(2) Fair Work Ombudsman may apply to nominated ART
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

712AB Issue of FWO notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712ab
note: Issue FWO notice if certain conditions met
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.275
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ab-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ab-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ab-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ab-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ab-logic-deontic-4

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ab-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 712AB Issue of FWO notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ab-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must issue FWO notice
premise text: (1) A nominated ART President or Deputy President to whom an application for an FWO notice has been made...
conclusion text: ...must issue the FWO notice if the conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ab-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Inspector must have commenced investigation before issuing FWO notice
premise text: (a) that an inspector has commenced the investigation (or investigations) to which the application relates;
conclusion text: ...the inspector must have commenced the investigation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ab-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: Inspector must have tried other methods before issuing FWO notice
premise text: (c) that any other method of obtaining the information, documents or evidence: (i) has been attempted and has been unsuccessful;
conclusion text: ...the inspector must have tried other methods.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ab-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: State must ensure FWO notice is issued if conditions met
premise text: (f) any other matter prescribed by the regulations.
conclusion text: ...the state must ensure the FWO notice is issued.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

712AC Form and content of FWO notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712ac
note: FWO notice must comply with specified requirements
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.276
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ac-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ac-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ac-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information and documents
premise text: Regulations prescribe requirements
conclusion text: FWO notice must comply with regulations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

712AD Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712ad
has part: 712AD(1) Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in
has part: 712AD(2) Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in
has part: 712AD(3) Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in
has part: 712AD(4) Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in
has part: 712AD(5) Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in
has part: 712AD(6) Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.277

712AD(1) Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712ad-ss-1
part of: 712AD Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman must give a notice to a person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.277
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice
premise text: FWO notice issued
conclusion text: Give notice to person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

712AD(2) Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712ad-ss-2
part of: 712AD Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in
note: Notice ceases to have effect after 3 months if not given within that time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.277
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 712AD(2) Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
logic summary: Notice ceases to have effect
premise text: FWO notice not given within 3 months
conclusion text: Notice ceases to have effect
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

712AD(3) Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712ad-ss-3
part of: 712AD Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in
note: Must provide notice to person within 14 days of FWO notice.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.277
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice within specified time frame.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

712AD(4) Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712ad-ss-4
part of: 712AD Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in
note: Notice to person of a later time
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.277
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May give notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

712AD(5) Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712ad-ss-5
part of: 712AD Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in
note: Notice period for FWO action must be at least 14 days after notice is given.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.277
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 712AD(5) Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice period
premise text: FWO must give notice
conclusion text: Notice period must be at least 14 days
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal relation between notice and FWO action
premise text: FWO notice is given to the person
conclusion text: Notice period must be at least 14 days after FWO notice is given
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal relation between notice and FWO action
premise text: FWO notice is given to the person
conclusion text: Notice period must be at least 14 days after FWO notice is given
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Diffusion of information
premise text: FWO gives notice to the person
conclusion text: Person must receive notice within a certain time period
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

712AD(6) Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712ad-ss-6
part of: 712AD Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in
note: FWO notice has effect as if the later time were the specified time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.277
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-6-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 712AD(6) Fair Work Ombudsman may give FWO notice to person in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ad-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has effect as
logic summary: FWO notice has effect
premise text: later time
conclusion text: specified time
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

712AE Conduct of examination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712ae
has part: 712AE(1) Conduct of examination
has part: 712AE(2) Conduct of examination
has part: 712AE(3) Conduct of examination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278

712AE(1) Conduct of examination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712ae-ss-1
part of: 712AE Conduct of examination
note: Right to be represented by a lawyer during examination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ae-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ae-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 712AE(1) Conduct of examination
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Can
logic summary: Right to representation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

712AE(2) Conduct of examination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712ae-ss-2
part of: 712AE Conduct of examination
note: Require information or answers to be verified by oath or affirmation.
description: Information or answers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ae-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ae-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ae-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ae-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ae-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ae-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the Fair Work Ombudsman and staff.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ae-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: verify
logic summary: Verifies information or answers for accuracy.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ae-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: trace
logic summary: Traces the origin of information or answers.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ae-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: administer
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the Fair Work Ombudsman and staff to administer oaths or affirmations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

712AE(3) Conduct of examination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712ae-ss-3
part of: 712AE Conduct of examination
note: The oath or affirmation must be true.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ae-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ae-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ae-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 712AE(3) Conduct of examination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712ae-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Obligation to tell the truth
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

712B Requirement to comply with FWO notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712b
has part: 712B(1) Requirement to comply with FWO notice
has part: 712B(2) Requirement to comply with FWO notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278

712B(1) Requirement to comply with FWO notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712b-ss-1
part of: 712B Requirement to comply with FWO notice
note: Must comply with FWO notice requirements.
description: Information or document, answer questions, take oath/affirmation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712b-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 712B(1) Requirement to comply with FWO notice
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with FWO notice requirements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

712B(2) Requirement to comply with FWO notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712b-ss-2
part of: 712B Requirement to comply with FWO notice
note: Exemption from compliance with FWO notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712b-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 712B(2) Requirement to comply with FWO notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts persons from complying with the requirement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

712C Payment for expenses incurred in attending as required by an
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712c
has part: 712C(1) Payment for expenses incurred in attending as required by an
has part: 712C(2) Payment for expenses incurred in attending as required by an
has part: 712C(3) Payment for expenses incurred in attending as required by an
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.279

712C(1) Payment for expenses incurred in attending as required by an
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712c-ss-1
part of: 712C Payment for expenses incurred in attending as required by an
note: Entitlement to payment for expenses incurred attending as required
description: Reasonable expenses (including legal expenses)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.279
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Entitlement to payment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

712C(2) Payment for expenses incurred in attending as required by an
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712c-ss-2
part of: 712C Payment for expenses incurred in attending as required by an
note: Payment for expenses incurred in attending as required is conditional on application and evidence.
description: sufficient evidence to establish that the person incurred the expenses
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.279
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 712C(2) Payment for expenses incurred in attending as required by an
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Conditional payment obligation
conclusion text: Payment for expenses incurred in attending as required unless application and evidence are provided.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval for application and evidence submission
premise text: The person must apply, in writing, to the Fair Work Ombudsman for payment of the expenses within 3 months after the attendance.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal interval for application and evidence submission
premise text: The person must apply, in writing, to the Fair Work Ombudsman for payment of the expenses within 3 months after the attendance.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional payment based on application and evidence
premise text: The person is not entitled to be paid for expenses under this section unless the person applies, in writing, to the Fair Work Ombudsman for payment of the expenses within 3 months after the attendance.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional payment based on application and evidence
premise text: The person is not entitled to be paid for expenses under this section unless the person applies, in writing, to the Fair Work Ombudsman for payment of the expenses within 3 months after the attendance.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

712C(3) Payment for expenses incurred in attending as required by an
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712c-ss-3
part of: 712C Payment for expenses incurred in attending as required by an
note: Application must be in prescribed form and include required information.
description: Form and information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.279
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 712C(3) Payment for expenses incurred in attending as required by an
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mustBeIn
logic summary: Prescribed form requirement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

712D Protection from liability relating to FWO notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712d
note: Protection from liability for providing information under FWO notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.279
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712d-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712d-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712d-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 712D Protection from liability relating to FWO notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide information under FWO notices
premise text: Good faith provision of information
conclusion text: Immunity from liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

712E Fair Work Ombudsman must notify Commonwealth
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712e
note: Notify Commonwealth of FWO notice issue
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.279
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712e-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712e-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify Commonwealth
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

712F Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712f
has part: 712F(1) Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
has part: 712F(2) Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
has part: 712F(3) Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
has part: 712F(4) Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
has part: 712F(5) Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
has part: 712F(6) Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
has part: 712F(7) Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280

712F(1) Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712f-ss-1
part of: 712F Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
note: Must provide report, video recording, and transcript after examination completion.
description: True
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide report, video recording, and transcript.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

712F(2) Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712f-ss-2
part of: 712F Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
note: Report must include specific information
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

712F(3) Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712f-ss-3
part of: 712F Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
note: Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to review and report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

712F(4) Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712f-ss-4
part of: 712F Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
note: The Commonwealth Ombudsman has the power to review under this section as if it were an investigation by the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1976.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 712F(4) Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower
logic summary: The Commonwealth Ombudsman has the power to review under this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

712F(5) Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712f-ss-5
part of: 712F Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
note: The Commonwealth Ombudsman must report to Parliament.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
conclusion text: The Commonwealth Ombudsman must report to Parliament.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

712F(6) Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712f-ss-6
part of: 712F Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
note: Commonwealth Ombudsman must prepare and present a report to Parliament about examinations conducted during each quarter.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-6-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to prepare and present a report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

712F(7) Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-712f-ss-7
part of: 712F Review and report by Commonwealth Ombudsman
note: The Commonwealth Ombudsman must prepare and present reports to Parliament.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-7-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-712f-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

713 Self-incrimination etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-713
has part: 713(1) Self-incrimination etc.
has part: 713(2) Self-incrimination etc.
has part: 713(3) Self-incrimination etc.
has part: 713(4) Self-incrimination etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.282

713(1) Self-incrimination etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-713-ss-1
part of: 713 Self-incrimination etc.
note: No excuse from providing information or answering questions under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.282
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 713(1) Self-incrimination etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide information or answer questions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

713(2) Self-incrimination etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-713-ss-2
part of: 713 Self-incrimination etc.
note: Exempts certain records and documents from being used as evidence in criminal proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.282
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 713(2) Self-incrimination etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits the use of certain records and documents as evidence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

713(3) Self-incrimination etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-713-ss-3
part of: 713 Self-incrimination etc.
note: Information given under FWO notice cannot be used against the individual in certain proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.282
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 713(3) Self-incrimination etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits use of information against the individual in certain proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

713(4) Self-incrimination etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-713-ss-4
part of: 713 Self-incrimination etc.
note: Exemptions from self-incrimination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.282
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 713(4) Self-incrimination etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts certain employee records from self-incrimination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

713A Certain records and documents are inadmissible
type: Concept
realized by: sec-713a
has part: 713A(1) Certain records and documents are inadmissible
has part: 713A(2) Certain records and documents are inadmissible
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.283

713A(1) Certain records and documents are inadmissible
type: Concept
realized by: sec-713a-ss-1
part of: 713A Certain records and documents are inadmissible
note: Records and documents with certain access restrictions are not admissible in evidence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.283
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713a-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 713A(1) Certain records and documents are inadmissible
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the admission of certain records and documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

713A(2) Certain records and documents are inadmissible
type: Concept
realized by: sec-713a-ss-2
part of: 713A Certain records and documents are inadmissible
note: Exemptions from inadmissibility of certain records and documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.283
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713a-ss-2-norm

713AA Legal professional privilege
type: Concept
realized by: sec-713aa
note: No person is required to produce a document that would disclose information subject to legal professional privilege.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.284
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713aa-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-713aa-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 713AA Legal professional privilege
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

714 Power to keep records or documents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-714
has part: 714(1) Power to keep records or documents
has part: 714(2) Power to keep records or documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.284

714(1) Power to keep records or documents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-714-ss-1
part of: 714 Power to keep records or documents
note: Inspect and copy records or documents produced to the Fair Work Ombudsman.
description: Records or documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.284
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 714(1) Power to keep records or documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Allow inspection and copying of records or documents
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

714(2) Power to keep records or documents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-714-ss-2
part of: 714 Power to keep records or documents
note: Inspection and copying of records or documents by authorized persons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.284
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 714(2) Power to keep records or documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: allow
logic summary: Granting permission to inspect or copy records.
premise text: (2) While the Fair Work Ombudsman, an inspector or any other person keeps a record or document...
conclusion text: ...he or she must allow the following persons to inspect, or make copies of, the record or document...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Specifying temporal intervals.
premise text: (2) While the Fair Work Ombudsman, an inspector or any other person keeps a record or document...
conclusion text: ...at all reasonable times:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Specifying temporal intervals.
premise text: (2) While the Fair Work Ombudsman, an inspector or any other person keeps a record or document...
conclusion text: ...at all reasonable times:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Imposing a duty.
premise text: (2) While the Fair Work Ombudsman, an inspector or any other person keeps a record or document...
conclusion text: ...he or she must allow the following persons to inspect, or make copies of, the record or document at all reasonable times:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

714A Reports not to include information relating to an individual’s
type: Concept
realized by: sec-714a
has part: 714A(1) Reports not to include information relating to an individual’s
has part: 714A(2) Reports not to include information relating to an individual’s
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.284

714A(1) Reports not to include information relating to an individual’s
type: Concept
realized by: sec-714a-ss-1
part of: 714A Reports not to include information relating to an individual’s
note: Information about an individual's affairs cannot be included in certain reports.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.284
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714a-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 714A(1) Reports not to include information relating to an individual’s
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits including information about an individual's affairs in certain reports.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

714A(2) Reports not to include information relating to an individual’s
type: Concept
realized by: sec-714a-ss-2
part of: 714A Reports not to include information relating to an individual’s
note: Context and publicly available information must be considered when applying paragraph (1)(b) to individual affairs.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.284
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714a-ss-2-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-714a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 714A(2) Reports not to include information relating to an individual’s
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

715 Enforceable undertakings relating to contraventions of civil
type: Concept
realized by: sec-715
has part: 715(1) Enforceable undertakings relating to contraventions of civil
has part: 715(2) Enforceable undertakings relating to contraventions of civil
has part: 715(3) Enforceable undertakings relating to contraventions of civil
has part: 715(4) Enforceable undertakings relating to contraventions of civil
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.285

715(1) Enforceable undertakings relating to contraventions of civil
type: Concept
realized by: sec-715-ss-1
part of: 715 Enforceable undertakings relating to contraventions of civil
note: Accepting an undertaking in case of contravention of civil remedy provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.285
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to accept an undertaking
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman reasonably believes...
conclusion text: Accepting an undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between undertaking and contravention
premise text: (1) This section applies if the Fair Work Ombudsman reasonably believes...
conclusion text: The undertaking is related to the contravention
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of undertakings and contraventions
premise text: (1) This section applies if the Fair Work Ombudsman reasonably believes...
conclusion text: There is a recurring trace between undertakings and contraventions
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of undertakings and contraventions
premise text: (1) This section applies if the Fair Work Ombudsman reasonably believes...
conclusion text: The undertaking is diffused to the contravention
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation of undertakings and contraventions
premise text: (1) This section applies if the Fair Work Ombudsman reasonably believes...
conclusion text: The undertaking is represented in the knowledge base
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

715(2) Enforceable undertakings relating to contraventions of civil
type: Concept
realized by: sec-715-ss-2
part of: 715 Enforceable undertakings relating to contraventions of civil
note: Acceptance of written undertaking given by person in relation to contravention
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.285
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 715(2) Enforceable undertakings relating to contraventions of civil
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide written undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

715(3) Enforceable undertakings relating to contraventions of civil
type: Concept
realized by: sec-715-ss-3
part of: 715 Enforceable undertakings relating to contraventions of civil
note: Consent required for withdrawal or variation of enforceable undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.285
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 715(3) Enforceable undertakings relating to contraventions of civil
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Enforceable undertaking obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

715(4) Enforceable undertakings relating to contraventions of civil
type: Concept
realized by: sec-715-ss-4
part of: 715 Enforceable undertakings relating to contraventions of civil
note: Inspector must not apply for an order under Division 2 of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.285
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 715(4) Enforceable undertakings relating to contraventions of civil
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-715-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

716 Compliance notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-716
note: Inspector may issue compliance notices for contraventions of specified laws and regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.286
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-716-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-716-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-716-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-716-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-716-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-716-logic-argumentation-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-716-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 716 Compliance notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-716-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Inspector may issue compliance notices.
premise text: Inspector reasonably believes a person has contravened one or more provisions.
conclusion text: Compliance notice issued.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-716-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within the meaning of
logic summary: Jobkeeper enabling direction is a temporal interval.
premise text: ...(h) a jobkeeper enabling direction (within the meaning of...
conclusion text: Temporal interval defined.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-716-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: within the meaning of
logic summary: Jobkeeper enabling direction is an ordered trace.
premise text: ...(h) a jobkeeper enabling direction (within the meaning of...
conclusion text: Ordered trace defined.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-716-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: may be cited
logic summary: Section may be cited in other laws and regulations.
premise text: ...(f) a term of an equal remuneration order;...
conclusion text: Section cited.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-716-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: if
logic summary: Inspector reasonably believes a person has contravened one or more provisions.
premise text: This section applies if an inspector reasonably believes...
conclusion text: Inspector's belief is sufficient to issue a compliance notice.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

717 Review of compliance notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-717
has part: 717(1) Review of compliance notices
has part: 717(2) Review of compliance notices
has part: 717(3) Review of compliance notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.289

717(1) Review of compliance notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-717-ss-1
part of: 717 Review of compliance notices
note: Right to review compliance notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.289
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717-ss-1-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 717(1) Review of compliance notices
held by: NaturalPerson
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has right
logic summary: Right to review compliance notices
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

717(2) Review of compliance notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-717-ss-2
part of: 717 Review of compliance notices
note: Court may stay operation of notice on terms and conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.289
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 717(2) Review of compliance notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May impose obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

717(3) Review of compliance notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-717-ss-3
part of: 717 Review of compliance notices
note: Court may confirm, cancel or vary compliance notice after review.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.289
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 717(3) Review of compliance notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to confirm, cancel or vary notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

717A Effect of cooperation agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-717a
has part: 717A(1) Effect of cooperation agreement
has part: 717A(2) Effect of cooperation agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.289

717A(1) Effect of cooperation agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-717a-ss-1
part of: 717A Effect of cooperation agreement
note: Cannot refer conduct to DPP or AFP while cooperation agreement is in force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.289
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717a-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Cannot refer conduct to DPP or AFP.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

717A(2) Effect of cooperation agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-717a-ss-2
part of: 717A Effect of cooperation agreement
note: Exemptions from subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.289
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717a-ss-2-norm

717B Entry into cooperation agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-717b
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman may enter into a written agreement with a person covering specified conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.289
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717b-norm

717C When a cooperation agreement is in force
type: Concept
realized by: sec-717c
note: Cooperation agreement is in force until terminated or withdrawn.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.290
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717c-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717c-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Holds true when the agreement is in force.
premise text: The cooperation agreement is entered into.
conclusion text: The agreement is in force.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

717D Termination of cooperation agreement by Fair Work
type: Concept
realized by: sec-717d
has part: 717D(1) Termination of cooperation agreement by Fair Work
has part: 717D(2) Termination of cooperation agreement by Fair Work
has part: 717D(3) Termination of cooperation agreement by Fair Work
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.291

717D(1) Termination of cooperation agreement by Fair Work
type: Concept
realized by: sec-717d-ss-1
part of: 717D Termination of cooperation agreement by Fair Work
note: Termination of cooperation agreement by Fair Work Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.291
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of terminating cooperation agreement without notice
premise text: None
conclusion text: The Fair Work Ombudsman may not terminate the cooperation agreement without written notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

717D(2) Termination of cooperation agreement by Fair Work
type: Concept
realized by: sec-717d-ss-2
part of: 717D Termination of cooperation agreement by Fair Work
note: Allowing for alternative dispute resolution
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.291
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission to apply for an order
premise text: Fair Work Ombudsman has grounds for terminating the agreement
conclusion text: May apply for alternative dispute resolution
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Describing the temporal relationship between termination and application
premise text: Application must occur after termination grounds are established
conclusion text: Termination may be followed by an application for an order
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recur
logic summary: Describing the recurring nature of the Fair Work Ombudsman's discretion
premise text: Application is not a one-time event
conclusion text: Fair Work Ombudsman may reapply for an order under specific circumstances
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Describing the dissemination of information about alternative dispute resolution
premise text: Application is not limited to a single court or jurisdiction
conclusion text: Information about alternative dispute resolution may be disseminated widely
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
logic summary: Describing the inference of an order from specific circumstances
premise text: Fair Work Ombudsman has grounds for terminating the agreement and applying for an order
conclusion text: An order may be inferred from these circumstances
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

717D(3) Termination of cooperation agreement by Fair Work
type: Concept
realized by: sec-717d-ss-3
part of: 717D Termination of cooperation agreement by Fair Work
note: Court may make orders if ground exists
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.291
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 717D(3) Termination of cooperation agreement by Fair Work
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

717E Withdrawal from cooperation agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-717e
note: Consent required for withdrawal from cooperation agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.292
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717e-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717e-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717e-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717e-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717e-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717e-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717e-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 717E Withdrawal from cooperation agreement
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to obtain consent for withdrawal
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman has the power to grant or refuse consent.
conclusion text: A person must obtain consent from the Fair Work Ombudsman to withdraw from a cooperation agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717e-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between consent and withdrawal
premise text: The withdrawal must occur after obtaining consent.
conclusion text: There is an overlap in time between the granting of consent and the withdrawal from a cooperation agreement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717e-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Withdrawal implies consent
premise text: If a person withdraws from a cooperation agreement, then they have obtained consent.
conclusion text: The withdrawal of a person from a cooperation agreement implies that they have obtained the required consent.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717e-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Consent propagates to all parties involved
premise text: The Fair Work Ombudsman's consent is binding on all parties to the cooperation agreement.
conclusion text: The consent granted by the Fair Work Ombudsman propagates to all parties involved in the cooperation agreement.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717e-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Automated inference of withdrawal requirements
premise text: The key 'sec-717e' provides sufficient information for automated inference of the withdrawal process.
conclusion text: Based on the key 'sec-717e', it can be inferred that a person must obtain consent from the Fair Work Ombudsman to withdraw from a cooperation agreement.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

717F Variation of cooperation agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-717f
note: Parties may vary cooperation agreement with mutual consent and in writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.292
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717f-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717f-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 717F Variation of cooperation agreement
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

717G Relationship with other powers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-717g
has part: 717G(1) Relationship with other powers
has part: 717G(2) Relationship with other powers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.292

717G(1) Relationship with other powers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-717g-ss-1
part of: 717G Relationship with other powers
note: The power of the Fair Work Ombudsman is not affected by a cooperation agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.292
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717g-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717g-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717g-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717g-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717g-ss-1-logic-ltl-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
logic summary: The power of the Fair Work Ombudsman continues despite a cooperation agreement.
premise text: (1) Whether a cooperation agreement is in force...
conclusion text: ...the power of the Fair Work Ombudsman to accept an enforceable undertaking under section 715...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717g-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
logic summary: The power of an inspector continues despite a cooperation agreement.
premise text: (1) Whether a cooperation agreement is in force...
conclusion text: ...the power of an inspector to give a notice under section 716...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717g-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
logic summary: Other powers or functions are not affected by a cooperation agreement.
premise text: (1) Whether a cooperation agreement is in force...
conclusion text: ...any other power or function of the Fair Work Ombudsman or an inspector that is not mentioned in subsection 717A(1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717g-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The cooperation agreement does not affect the temporal relationship between powers.
premise text: (1) Whether a cooperation agreement is in force...
conclusion text: ...the power of the Fair Work Ombudsman to accept an enforceable undertaking under section 715 in relation to the conduct; or...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717g-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: The cooperation agreement does not affect the repetition of powers.
premise text: (1) Whether a cooperation agreement is in force...
conclusion text: ...the power of an inspector to give a notice under section 716 in relation to the conduct; or...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

717G(2) Relationship with other powers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-717g-ss-2
part of: 717G Relationship with other powers
note: An enforceable undertaking has no effect to the extent that it is inconsistent with a cooperation agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.292
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717g-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-717g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: inconsistentWith
logic summary: Inconsistency with a cooperation agreement
premise text: cooperationAgreement
conclusion text: undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

718 Disclosure of information by the Office of the Fair Work
type: Concept
realized by: sec-718
has part: 718(1) Disclosure of information by the Office of the Fair Work
has part: 718(2) Disclosure of information by the Office of the Fair Work
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.293

718(1) Disclosure of information by the Office of the Fair Work
type: Concept
realized by: sec-718-ss-1
part of: 718 Disclosure of information by the Office of the Fair Work
note: Disclosure of certain information is required or necessary for administration or enforcement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.293
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 718(1) Disclosure of information by the Office of the Fair Work
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide disclosure
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

718(2) Disclosure of information by the Office of the Fair Work
type: Concept
realized by: sec-718-ss-2
part of: 718 Disclosure of information by the Office of the Fair Work
note: Disclosure of information by the Office of the Fair Work
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.293
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Authorization to disclose information
premise text: Fair Work Ombudsman may disclose
conclusion text: information disclosure is authorized
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

718A False or misleading information or documents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-718a
has part: 718A(1) False or misleading information or documents
has part: 718A(2) False or misleading information or documents
has part: 718A(3) False or misleading information or documents
has part: 718A(4) False or misleading information or documents
has part: 718A(5) False or misleading information or documents
has part: 718A(6) False or misleading information or documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.294

718A(1) False or misleading information or documents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-718a-ss-1
part of: 718A False or misleading information or documents
note: Giving false or misleading information to the Fair Work Ombudsman is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.294
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 718A(1) False or misleading information or documents
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of providing false or misleading information.
premise text: The person knows, or is reckless as to whether, the information is false or misleading.
conclusion text: The person must not give information or produce a document.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Recklessness implies a duty to ensure accuracy.
premise text: The person is reckless as to whether the information is false or misleading.
conclusion text: The person must not give information or produce a document.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval of recklessness implies a duty to ensure accuracy.
premise text: The person is reckless as to whether the information is false or misleading for an unspecified period.
conclusion text: The person must not give information or produce a document.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Recklessness implies a duty to ensure accuracy through argumentation.
premise text: The person is reckless as to whether the information is false or misleading.
conclusion text: The person must not give information or produce a document.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: None
logic summary: No diffusion of responsibility applies in this context.
premise text: The person is the sole responsible party for providing accurate information.
conclusion text: The person must not give information or produce a document.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

718A(2) False or misleading information or documents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-718a-ss-2
part of: 718A False or misleading information or documents
note: Exemption from subsection (1) if information or document is not false or misleading in a material particular.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.294
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 718A(2) False or misleading information or documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Exemption from subsection (1) if information or document is not false or misleading in a material particular.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

718A(3) False or misleading information or documents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-718a-ss-3
part of: 718A False or misleading information or documents
note: Exemption from subsection (1) if information is not misleading in a material particular.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.294
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 718A(3) False or misleading information or documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from obligations
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply...
conclusion text: ...if the information did not omit any matter or thing without which the information is misleading in a material particular.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval: exemption from subsection (1)
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply...
conclusion text: ...if the information did not omit any matter or thing without which the information is misleading in a material particular.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal interval: exemption from subsection (1)
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply...
conclusion text: ...if the information did not omit any matter or thing without which the information is misleading in a material particular.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffusing exemptions from subsection (1)
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply...
conclusion text: ...if the information did not omit any matter or thing without which the information is misleading in a material particular.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: CogAI recognizes exemptions from subsection (1)
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply...
conclusion text: ...if the information did not omit any matter or thing without which the information is misleading in a material particular.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

718A(4) False or misleading information or documents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-718a-ss-4
part of: 718A False or misleading information or documents
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for documents accompanied by a written statement
description: written statement signed by the person or competent officer of the body corporate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.294
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Granting permission to produce false or misleading documents
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

718A(5) False or misleading information or documents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-718a-ss-5
part of: 718A False or misleading information or documents
note: Official must inform person of potential liability before providing false or misleading information.
description: Information about potential liability
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.294
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 718A(5) False or misleading information or documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Official has an obligation to inform the person.
premise text: The official must take reasonable steps to inform the person.
conclusion text: The person may be liable for contravening subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

718A(6) False or misleading information or documents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-718a-ss-6
part of: 718A False or misleading information or documents
note: Granting permission for civil remedy
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.294
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-6-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-718a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to be liable
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

719 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-719
note: Guide to this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.296
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-719-norm

720 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-720
note: Defines employee and employer terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.296
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-720-norm

721 Equal remuneration applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-721
note: FWC must not deal with an equal remuneration order if adequate alternative remedy exists.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.297
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-721-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-721-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-721-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 721 Equal remuneration applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-721-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of dealing with equal remuneration applications
premise text: Available alternative remedy exists
conclusion text: FWC must not deal with application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

722 Notification and consultation requirements applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-722
note: FWC cannot make an order under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.297
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-722-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-722-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-722-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of making orders
premise text: Alternative remedy available
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

723 Unlawful termination applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-723
note: Making an unlawful termination application in relation to conduct is prohibited if the person can make a general protections court application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.298
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-723-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-723-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-723-logic-deontic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-723-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 723 Unlawful termination applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-723-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of conduct
premise text: The person is entitled to make a general protections court application.
conclusion text: Making an unlawful termination application is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-723-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of the action
premise text: The person can make a general protections court application.
conclusion text: Making an unlawful termination application is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

724 Equal remuneration applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-724
note: FWC must not deal with equal remuneration applications if proceedings for alternative remedies have commenced.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.299
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-724-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-724-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-724-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 724 Equal remuneration applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-724-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of dealing with equal remuneration applications
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

725 General rule
type: Concept
realized by: sec-725
note: Cannot make an application or complaint after dismissal if another section applies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.300
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-725-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-725-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-725-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 725 General rule
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-725-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Cannot make an application or complaint
premise text: Section 725
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

726 Dismissal remedy bargaining order applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-726
has part: 726(1) Dismissal remedy bargaining order applications
has part: 726(2) Dismissal remedy bargaining order applications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.300

726(1) Dismissal remedy bargaining order applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-726-ss-1
part of: 726 Dismissal remedy bargaining order applications
note: Application for dismissal remedy bargaining order must be made within certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.300
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 726(1) Dismissal remedy bargaining order applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be made
premise text: The application has not been withdrawn by the person who made it.
conclusion text: The application MUST be made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Application must be made within a certain time frame
premise text: (a) a dismissal remedy bargaining order application has been made by, or on behalf of, the person in relation to the dismissal;
conclusion text: The application MUST BE MADE BETWEEN (a) and (b).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Application must be made within a certain time frame
premise text: (a) a dismissal remedy bargaining order application has been made by, or on behalf of, the person in relation to the dismissal;
conclusion text: The application MUST BE MADE BETWEEN (a) and (b).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST NOT
logic summary: Application must not be withdrawn by the person who made it.
premise text: (i) been withdrawn by the person who made the application;
conclusion text: The application MUST NOT BE WITHDRAWN BY THE PERSON WHO MADE IT.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must not fail for want of jurisdiction.
premise text: (ii) failed for want of jurisdiction.
conclusion text: The application MUST NOT FAIL FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

726(2) Dismissal remedy bargaining order applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-726-ss-2
part of: 726 Dismissal remedy bargaining order applications
note: Application for bargaining order due to good faith bargaining requirement violation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.300
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-2-logic-shacl-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 726(2) Dismissal remedy bargaining order applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Application for a specific type of order due to violation of an obligation
premise text: (2) A dismissal remedy bargaining order application is an application for a bargaining order made on the ground that the person was dismissed in contravention of the good faith bargaining requirement in paragraph 228(1)(e).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between application and requirement
premise text: (2) A dismissal remedy bargaining order application is an application for a bargaining order made on the ground that the person was dismissed in contravention of the good faith bargaining requirement in paragraph 228(1)(e).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace between application and requirement
premise text: (2) A dismissal remedy bargaining order application is an application for a bargaining order made on the ground that the person was dismissed in contravention of the good faith bargaining requirement in paragraph 228(1)(e).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Entity classification
logic summary: Classification of entities involved (State, LegalPerson)
premise text: (2) A dismissal remedy bargaining order application is an application for a bargaining order made on the ground that the person was dismissed in contravention of the good faith bargaining requirement in paragraph 228(1)(e).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-726-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema validation
logic summary: Validation against a schema for application classification
premise text: (2) A dismissal remedy bargaining order application is an application for a bargaining order made on the ground that the person was dismissed in contravention of the good faith bargaining requirement in paragraph 228(1)(e).
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

727 General protections FWC applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-727
has part: 727(1) General protections FWC applications
has part: 727(1A) General protections FWC applications
has part: 727(2) General protections FWC applications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.300

727(1) General protections FWC applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-727-ss-1
part of: 727 General protections FWC applications
note: General protections FWC applications must be made within certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.300
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 727(1) General protections FWC applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a general protections FWC application within certain conditions.
premise text: (a) a general protections FWC application has been made by, or on behalf of, the person in relation to the dismissal;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: The application must be made within a certain time period.
premise text: (b) the application has not: (i) been withdrawn by the person who made the application;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: The application must be made within a certain time period.
premise text: (b) the application has not: (i) been withdrawn by the person who made the application;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: The application must be made within a certain time period.
premise text: (b) the application has not: (i) been withdrawn by the person who made the application;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: The application must be made within a certain time period.
premise text: (b) the application has not: (i) been withdrawn by the person who made the application;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

727(1A) General protections FWC applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-727-ss-1a
part of: 727 General protections FWC applications
note: General protections FWC applications apply under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.300
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 727(1A) General protections FWC applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: General protections FWC applications apply under certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

727(2) General protections FWC applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-727-ss-2
part of: 727 General protections FWC applications
note: General protections FWC applications are subject to dismissal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.300
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 727(2) General protections FWC applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Application is a general protections FWC application.
premise text: (2) A general protections FWC application is an application under section 365 for the FWC to deal with a dispute that relates to dismissal.
conclusion text: x is a general protections FWC application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: is
logic summary: Application is a specific type of FWC application.
premise text: (2) A general protections FWC application is an application under section 365 for the FWC to deal with a dispute that relates to dismissal.
conclusion text: x is a general protections FWC application
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Application occurs during a specific time period.
premise text: (2) A general protections FWC application is an application under section 365 for the FWC to deal with a dispute that relates to dismissal.
conclusion text: x occurs during a specific time period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Application has a temporal relationship with a specific event.
premise text: (2) A general protections FWC application is an application under section 365 for the FWC to deal with a dispute that relates to dismissal.
conclusion text: x has a temporal relationship with a specific event
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-727-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: is
logic summary: Application is related to a specific type of application.
premise text: (2) A general protections FWC application is an application under section 365 for the FWC to deal with a dispute that relates to dismissal.
conclusion text: x is a general protections FWC application
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

728 General protections court applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-728
note: General protections court applications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.301
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-728-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-728-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 728 General protections court applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

729 Unfair dismissal applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-729
has part: 729(1) Unfair dismissal applications
has part: 729(2) Unfair dismissal applications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302

729(1) Unfair dismissal applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-729-ss-1
part of: 729 Unfair dismissal applications
note: Unfair dismissal applications must be made within specified conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-729-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-729-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-729-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-729-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-729-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 729(1) Unfair dismissal applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-729-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a reason for dismissal
premise text: (a) an unfair dismissal application has been made by the person in relation to the dismissal;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-729-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Application must be made within a specified time frame
premise text: (b) the application has not: (i) been withdrawn by the person who made the application;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-729-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Application must be made within a specified time frame
premise text: (b) the application has not: (ii) failed for want of jurisdiction;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

729(2) Unfair dismissal applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-729-ss-2
part of: 729 Unfair dismissal applications
note: Definition of unfair dismissal application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-729-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-729-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-729-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 729(2) Unfair dismissal applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-729-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines a specific term
conclusion text: An unfair dismissal application is an application under subsection 394(1) for a remedy for unfair dismissal.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

730 Unlawful termination FWC applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-730
has part: 730(1) Unlawful termination FWC applications
has part: 730(1A) Unlawful termination FWC applications
has part: 730(2) Unlawful termination FWC applications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302

730(1) Unlawful termination FWC applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-730-ss-1
part of: 730 Unlawful termination FWC applications
note: Unlawful termination FWC applications must be withdrawn or result in a certificate under paragraph 776(3)(a).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-1-logic-ltl-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 730(1) Unlawful termination FWC applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be withdrawn or result in a certificate.
premise text: (a) an unlawful termination FWC application has been made by, nor on behalf of, the person in relation to the dismissal;
conclusion text: the application must be withdrawn or result in a certificate under paragraph 776(3)(a).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must not fail for want of jurisdiction.
premise text: (b) the application has not: (i) been withdrawn by the person who made the application;
conclusion text: the application must not fail for want of jurisdiction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must not result in the issue of a certificate under paragraph 776(3)(a).
premise text: (b) the application has not: (ii) failed for want of jurisdiction; or (iii) resulted in the issue of a certificate under paragraph 776(3)(a);
conclusion text: the application must not result in the issue of a certificate under paragraph 776(3)(a).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: The application must be made within a certain time period.
premise text: (b) the application has not: (i) been withdrawn by the person who made the application;
conclusion text: the application was made before the specified time period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: The application must be made within a certain time period.
premise text: (b) the application has not: (ii) failed for want of jurisdiction; or (iii) resulted in the issue of a certificate under paragraph 776(3)(a);
conclusion text: the application was made before the specified time period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

730(1A) Unlawful termination FWC applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-730-ss-1a
part of: 730 Unlawful termination FWC applications
note: Unlawful termination FWC applications must be made by the person in relation to the dismissal and not withdrawn or failed for jurisdiction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-1a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 730(1A) Unlawful termination FWC applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make FWC application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

730(2) Unlawful termination FWC applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-730-ss-2
part of: 730 Unlawful termination FWC applications
note: Unlawful termination FWC applications are prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-730-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits unlawful termination FWC applications.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

731 Unlawful termination court applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-731
note: Unlawful termination court applications must be made by or on behalf of the person in relation to the dismissal, and not withdrawn or failed for want of jurisdiction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.303
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-731-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-731-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-731-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 731 Unlawful termination court applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-731-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be made by or on behalf of the person in relation to the dismissal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

732 Applications and complaints under other laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-732
note: Application or complaint under another law has been made
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.303
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-732-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-732-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 732 Applications and complaints under other laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

733 Dismissal does not include failure to provide benefits
type: Concept
realized by: sec-733
note: Employer must provide benefits to dismissed person
description: Benefits
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-733-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-733-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-733-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 733 Dismissal does not include failure to provide benefits
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-733-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Employer has a duty to provide benefits
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

734 General rule
type: Concept
realized by: sec-734
has part: 734(1) General rule
has part: 734(2) General rule
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304

734(1) General rule
type: Concept
realized by: sec-734-ss-1
part of: 734 General rule
note: No general protections court application can be made for conduct not involving dismissal if an anti-discrimination law complaint has been made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 734(1) General rule
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of general protections court applications for certain conduct.
premise text: An application or complaint under an anti-discrimination law has been made.
conclusion text: No general protections court application can be made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

734(2) General rule
type: Concept
realized by: sec-734-ss-2
part of: 734 General rule
note: No application under anti-discrimination law can be made for conduct not involving dismissal if a general protections court application has been made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 734(2) General rule
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No application can be made for conduct not involving dismissal.
premise text: (2) A person must not make an application or complaint...
conclusion text: ...if a general protections court application has been made by, or on behalf of, the person in relation to the conduct;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

734A Sexual harassment court applications—interaction with sexual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-734a
note: Cannot make sexual harassment court application under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.305
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734a-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734a-logic-deontic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 734A Sexual harassment court applications—interaction with sexual
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734a-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <
logic summary: Temporal interval for notification
premise text: 2 or more of the parties (the notifying parties) have jointly notified the FWC...
conclusion text: ...that they agree to the FWC arbitrating the dispute
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Prohibition on making court application
premise text: A person who alleges they have been sexually harassed...
conclusion text: ...must not make a sexual harassment court application...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

734B Sexual harassment FWC applications and sexual harassment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-734b
has part: 734B(1) Sexual harassment FWC applications and sexual harassment
has part: 734B(2) Sexual harassment FWC applications and sexual harassment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.306

734B(1) Sexual harassment FWC applications and sexual harassment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-734b-ss-1
part of: 734B Sexual harassment FWC applications and sexual harassment
note: Cannot make certain applications if an anti-discrimination complaint has been made or jurisdiction has failed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.306
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734b-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734b-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 734B(1) Sexual harassment FWC applications and sexual harassment
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition of certain applications
premise text: Application made in contravention of anti-discrimination law
conclusion text: Cannot make application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Application cannot be made during anti-discrimination complaint or jurisdiction failure
premise text: Anti-discrimination complaint or jurisdiction failure
conclusion text: Cannot make application
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

734B(2) Sexual harassment FWC applications and sexual harassment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-734b-ss-2
part of: 734B Sexual harassment FWC applications and sexual harassment
note: Cannot make an application or complaint under anti-discrimination law if a sexual harassment FWC application has been made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.306
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734b-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734b-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 734B(2) Sexual harassment FWC applications and sexual harassment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of making an application or complaint under anti-discrimination law.
premise text: Application has been made for sexual harassment FWC application.
conclusion text: Cannot make an application or complaint.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

734BA Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair
type: Concept
realized by: sec-734ba
has part: 734BA(1) Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair
has part: 734BA(2) Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair
has part: 734BA(3) Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.307

734BA(1) Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair
type: Concept
realized by: sec-734ba-ss-1
part of: 734BA Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair
note: Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair deactivation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.307
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734ba-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734ba-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734ba-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734ba-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734ba-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734ba-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 734BA(1) Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making an application under Division 5 of Part 3A-3
premise text: (1) An application under Division 5 of Part 3A-3 (unfair deactivation or unfair termination of regulated workers) in relation to deactivation of a person from a digital labour platform must not be made...
conclusion text: ...unless the other deactivation proceedings: (a) have been discontinued by the person who commenced them; or (b) have failed for want of jurisdiction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734ba-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Requires overlap between other deactivation proceedings and the application under Division 5 of Part 3A-3
premise text: (1) An application under Division 5 of Part 3A-3 (unfair deactivation or unfair termination of regulated workers) in relation to deactivation of a person from a digital labour platform must not be made...
conclusion text: ...unless the other deactivation proceedings: (a) have been discontinued by the person who commenced them; or (b) have failed for want of jurisdiction.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734ba-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Requires overlap between other deactivation proceedings and the application under Division 5 of Part 3A-3
premise text: (1) An application under Division 5 of Part 3A-3 (unfair deactivation or unfair termination of regulated workers) in relation to deactivation of a person from a digital labour platform must not be made...
conclusion text: ...unless the other deactivation proceedings: (a) have been discontinued by the person who commenced them; or (b) have failed for want of jurisdiction.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734ba-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Requires overlap between other deactivation proceedings and the application under Division 5 of Part 3A-3
premise text: (1) An application under Division 5 of Part 3A-3 (unfair deactivation or unfair termination of regulated workers) in relation to deactivation of a person from a digital labour platform must not be made...
conclusion text: ...unless the other deactivation proceedings: (a) have been discontinued by the person who commenced them; or (b) have failed for want of jurisdiction.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734ba-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies applications under Division 5 of Part 3A-3 as prohibited based on other deactivation proceedings
premise text: (1) An application under Division 5 of Part 3A-3 (unfair deactivation or unfair termination of regulated workers) in relation to deactivation of a person from a digital labour platform must not be made...
conclusion text: ...unless the other deactivation proceedings: (a) have been discontinued by the person who commenced them; or (b) have failed for want of jurisdiction.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

734BA(2) Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair
type: Concept
realized by: sec-734ba-ss-2
part of: 734BA Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair
note: No other deactivation proceedings can be commenced unless the application has been discontinued or failed for want of jurisdiction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.307
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734ba-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734ba-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 734BA(2) Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on commencing other deactivation proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

734BA(3) Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair
type: Concept
realized by: sec-734ba-ss-3
part of: 734BA Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair
note: Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.307
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734ba-ss-3-norm

734BB Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair
type: Concept
realized by: sec-734bb
has part: 734BB(1) Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair
has part: 734BB(2) Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.308

734BB(1) Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair
type: Concept
realized by: sec-734bb-ss-1
part of: 734BB Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair
note: Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair termination of regulated workers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.308
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734bb-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734bb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734bb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734bb-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734bb-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734bb-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734bb-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 734BB(1) Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734bb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making an application under Division 5 of Part 3A-3
premise text: (1) An application under Division 5 of Part 3A-3 (unfair deactivation or unfair termination of regulated workers) in relation to termination of a services contract must not be made...
conclusion text: ...unless the other termination proceedings: (a) have been discontinued by the person who commenced them; or (b) have failed for want of jurisdiction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734bb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal overlap
logic summary: Requires temporal overlap between commencement of new application and existing termination proceedings
premise text: (1) An application under Division 5 of Part 3A-3 (unfair deactivation or unfair termination of regulated workers) in relation to termination of a services contract must not be made if other termination proceedings have been commenced...
conclusion text: ...unless the other termination proceedings: (a) have been discontinued by the person who commenced them; or (b) have failed for want of jurisdiction.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734bb-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Requires a recurring trace between new application and existing termination proceedings
premise text: (1) An application under Division 5 of Part 3A-3 (unfair deactivation or unfair termination of regulated workers) in relation to termination of a services contract must not be made if other termination proceedings have been commenced...
conclusion text: ...unless the other termination proceedings: (a) have been discontinued by the person who commenced them; or (b) have failed for want of jurisdiction.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734bb-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses responsibility to the person who commenced the other termination proceedings
premise text: (a) have been discontinued by the person who commenced them; or (b) have failed for want of jurisdiction.
conclusion text: ...unless the other termination proceedings: (a) have been discontinued by the person who commenced them; or (b) have failed for want of jurisdiction.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734bb-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies the person who commenced the other termination proceedings as either responsible or not responsible
premise text: (a) have been discontinued by the person who commenced them; or (b) have failed for want of jurisdiction.
conclusion text: ...unless the other termination proceedings: (a) have been discontinued by the person who commenced them; or (b) have failed for want of jurisdiction.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

734BB(2) Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair
type: Concept
realized by: sec-734bb-ss-2
part of: 734BB Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair
note: Must not commence other termination proceedings in relation to a services contract
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.308
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734bb-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734bb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734bb-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 734BB(2) Limitation on applications for remedy for unfair
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734bb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of commencement of other termination proceedings
premise text: (2) A person must not commence other termination proceedings in relation to a services contract
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

734C Limitation on applications for review of services contracts—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-734c
note: Limitation on applications for review of services contracts—
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.308
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-734c-norm

735 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-735
note: Deals with disputes between employees and employers, regulated workers and businesses, and persons in a road transport contractual chain.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.310
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-735-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-735-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 735 Guide to this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

736 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-736
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.310
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-736-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-736-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 736 Meanings of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

737 Model term about dealing with disputes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-737
has part: 737(1) Model term about dealing with disputes
has part: 737(2) Model term about dealing with disputes
has part: 737(3) Model term about dealing with disputes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.311

737(1) Model term about dealing with disputes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-737-ss-1
part of: 737 Model term about dealing with disputes
note: Determine a model term for dealing with disputes for enterprise agreements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.311
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-737-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-737-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-737-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 737(1) Model term about dealing with disputes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-737-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to determine a model term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

737(2) Model term about dealing with disputes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-737-ss-2
part of: 737 Model term about dealing with disputes
note: Ensure model term consistency with requirements and consider various factors.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.311
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-737-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-737-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-737-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 737(2) Model term about dealing with disputes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-737-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Ensure model term consistency with requirements.
premise text: (2) In determining the model term, the FWC must:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

737(3) Model term about dealing with disputes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-737-ss-3
part of: 737 Model term about dealing with disputes
note: Determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.311
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-737-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-737-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-737-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 737(3) Model term about dealing with disputes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-737-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Legislative instrument
premise text: (3) A determination under subsection (1)
conclusion text: a legislative instrument
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

738 Application of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-738
note: Procedure for dealing with disputes in various types of agreements and contracts.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.312
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-738-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-738-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-738-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-738-logic-alleninterval-3

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-738-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 738 Application of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-738-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Procedure for dealing with disputes in various types of agreements and contracts.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-738-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-738-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

739 Disputes dealt with by the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-739
has part: 739(1) Disputes dealt with by the FWC
has part: 739(3) Disputes dealt with by the FWC
has part: 739(4) Disputes dealt with by the FWC
has part: 739(5) Disputes dealt with by the FWC
has part: 739(6) Disputes dealt with by the FWC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.312

739(1) Disputes dealt with by the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-739-ss-1
part of: 739 Disputes dealt with by the FWC
note: The FWC must deal with disputes if a term requires or allows it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.312
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 739(1) Disputes dealt with by the FWC
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to deal with disputes
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

739(3) Disputes dealt with by the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-739-ss-3
part of: 739 Disputes dealt with by the FWC
note: FWC must not exercise powers limited by the term.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.312
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of exercising powers
premise text: FWC must exercise powers
conclusion text: FWC must not exercise powers
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

739(4) Disputes dealt with by the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-739-ss-4
part of: 739 Disputes dealt with by the FWC
note: FWC may arbitrate a dispute if parties agree to it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.312
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 739(4) Disputes dealt with by the FWC
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May arbitrate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

739(5) Disputes dealt with by the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-739-ss-5
part of: 739 Disputes dealt with by the FWC
note: FWC must not make inconsistent decisions with the Act or a fair work instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.312
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 739(5) Disputes dealt with by the FWC
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Obligation to comply with the Act and fair work instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

739(6) Disputes dealt with by the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-739-ss-6
part of: 739 Disputes dealt with by the FWC
note: FWC may deal with a dispute on application by a party.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.312
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-6-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 739(6) Disputes dealt with by the FWC
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-739-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to deal with disputes on application.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

740 Dispute dealt with by persons other than the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-740
has part: 740(1) Dispute dealt with by persons other than the FWC
has part: 740(3) Dispute dealt with by persons other than the FWC
has part: 740(4) Dispute dealt with by persons other than the FWC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.313

740(1) Dispute dealt with by persons other than the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-740-ss-1
part of: 740 Dispute dealt with by persons other than the FWC
note: Section applies if a term requires or allows another person to deal with a dispute.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.313
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-740-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-740-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-740-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 740(1) Dispute dealt with by persons other than the FWC
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-740-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires another person to deal with a dispute.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

740(3) Dispute dealt with by persons other than the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-740-ss-3
part of: 740 Dispute dealt with by persons other than the FWC
note: Permits arbitration of disputes by persons other than the FWC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.313
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-740-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-740-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-740-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permits action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

740(4) Dispute dealt with by persons other than the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-740-ss-4
part of: 740 Dispute dealt with by persons other than the FWC
note: Must not make a decision inconsistent with the Act or a fair work instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.313
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-740-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-740-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-740-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 740(4) Dispute dealt with by persons other than the FWC
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-740-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits making decisions inconsistent with the Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

741 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-741
note: Guide to this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.314
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-741-norm

742 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-742
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.314
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-742-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-742-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-742-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 742 Meanings of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-742-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

743 Object of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-743
note: Object of this Division is to give effect, or further effect, to the ILO Convention and Recommendation concerning Equal Opportunities and Family Responsibilities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.315
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-743-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-743-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-743-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 743 Object of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-743-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

744 Extending the entitlement to unpaid parental leave and related
type: Concept
realized by: sec-744
note: Extending entitlements for non-national system employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.315
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-744-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-744-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 744 Extending the entitlement to unpaid parental leave and related
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

745 Contravening the extended parental leave provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-745
note: Cannot contravene extended parental leave provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.317
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-745-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-745-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-745-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

746 References to the National Employment Standards include
type: Concept
realized by: sec-746
note: References to National Employment Standards include extended parental leave provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.317
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-746-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-746-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-746-logic-deontic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-746-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Classifies references to National Employment Standards
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-746-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: References to National Employment Standards are obligations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

747 State and Territory laws that are not excluded
type: Concept
realized by: sec-747
note: Exclusion of State laws on employee entitlements related to birth or adoption of children.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.317
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-747-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-747-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-747-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
logic summary: Exclusion clause
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

748 Non-national system employees are not award/agreement free
type: Concept
realized by: sec-748
note: Non-national system employees are not award/agreement free.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.317
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-748-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-748-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 748 Non-national system employees are not award/agreement free
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

749 Modification of meaning of base rate of pay for pieceworkers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-749
note: Adds Chapter 6 Miscellaneous at the end of subsection 16(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.317
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-749-norm

750 Modification of meaning of full rate of pay for pieceworkers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-750
note: Employee's full rate of pay for extended parental leave provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.318
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-750-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-750-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-750-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 750 Modification of meaning of full rate of pay for pieceworkers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-750-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Obligation on the state to determine employee's full rate of pay
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

751 Modification of meaning of ordinary hours of work—if
type: Concept
realized by: sec-751
note: Employee's ordinary hours of work are determined by State industrial instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.318
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-751-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-751-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 751 Modification of meaning of ordinary hours of work—if
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

752 Modification of meaning of ordinary hours of work—if not
type: Concept
realized by: sec-752
note: References to an award/agreement free employee also include non-national system employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.318
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-752-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-752-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 752 Modification of meaning of ordinary hours of work—if not
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

753 Modification of meaning of ordinary hours of work—regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-753
note: Regulations may prescribe usual weekly hours for non-national system employees without specified ordinary hours of work.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.319
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-753-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-753-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 753 Modification of meaning of ordinary hours of work—regulations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

754 Modification of meaning of pieceworker
type: Concept
realized by: sec-754
note: Prescribes a class of employees for extended parental leave provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.319
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-754-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-754-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 754 Modification of meaning of pieceworker
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

755 Modification of provision about interaction with paid leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-755
note: Section 79 applies as if subsections 79(2) and (3) were omitted.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.319
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-755-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-755-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-755-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Subsumption
logic summary: Section 79 applies as if subsections 79(2) and (3) were omitted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

756 Modification of provision about relationship between National
type: Concept
realized by: sec-756
note: References to non-national systems are included in employee references.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.319
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-756-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-756-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-756-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 756 Modification of provision about relationship between National
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-756-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Obligation to include non-national systems
premise text: State
conclusion text: Employment Standards
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

757 Modification of power to make regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-757
note: Permits non-national system employers and employees to agree on matters that would or might otherwise be contrary to an extended parental leave provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.320
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permits non-national system employers and employees to agree on matters that would or might otherwise be contrary to an extended parental leave provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

757A Object of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-757a
note: Object of this Division is to give effect, or further effect, to paragraph (f) of Article 10 of the ILO Convention (No. 190)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.321
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757a-norm

21 June 2019; and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21
note: Employees have an entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.321
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21 June 2019; and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Entitlement exists
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

757B Extending the entitlement to paid family and domestic violence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-757b
note: Extending entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave for non-national system employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.321
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757b-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757b-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 757B Extending the entitlement to paid family and domestic violence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusive extension of entitlement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

757BA Employer obligations in relation to pay slips
type: Concept
realized by: sec-757ba
note: Employer must not include certain information on pay slip.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.323
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757ba-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757ba-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757ba-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

757C Contravening the extended paid family and domestic violence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-757c
note: Employer cannot contravene extended paid family and domestic violence leave provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.323
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757c-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757c-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757c-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 757C Contravening the extended paid family and domestic violence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of contravening extended paid family and domestic violence leave provisions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

757D References to the National Employment Standards include
type: Concept
realized by: sec-757d
note: References to National Employment Standards include extended paid family and domestic violence leave provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757d-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757d-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757d-logic-descriptionlogic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes references to National Employment Standards
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757d-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: refers to
logic summary: References to the National Employment Standards refer to extended paid family and domestic violence leave provisions
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

757E State and Territory laws that are not excluded
type: Concept
realized by: sec-757e
note: Exclusion of State laws on employee entitlements related to family and domestic violence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757e-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757e-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
logic summary: Exclusion of laws
premise text: State and Territory laws not excluded
conclusion text: Obligation to apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

757F Non-national system employees are not award/agreement free
type: Concept
realized by: sec-757f
note: Non-national system employees are not entitled to award/agreement free leave.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757f-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757f-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757f-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 757F Non-national system employees are not award/agreement free
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
conclusion text: Non-national system employees are not entitled to award/agreement free leave.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

757G Modification of meaning of full rate of pay for pieceworkers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-757g
note: Employee's full rate of pay for extended paid family and domestic violence leave provisions must be determined by regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757g-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757g-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757g-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 757G Modification of meaning of full rate of pay for pieceworkers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to determine employee's full rate of pay.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

757H Modification of meaning of pieceworker
type: Concept
realized by: sec-757h
note: Prescribes a class of employees for extended paid family and domestic violence leave provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.325
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757h-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757h-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757h-logic-descriptionlogic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757h-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 757H Modification of meaning of pieceworker
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757h-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prescribes
logic summary: Prescribes a class of employees
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757h-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies
logic summary: Classifies employees for leave provisions
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

757J Modification of provision about relationship between National
type: Concept
realized by: sec-757j
note: Modifies section 128's references to include non-national systems.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.325
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757j-norm

757K Modification of power to make regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-757k
note: Permits agreement on matters that would otherwise be contrary to an extended paid family and domestic violence leave provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.325
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-757k-norm

758 Object of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-758
note: Object of this Division is to give effect, or further effect, to the ILO Convention and Recommendation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.326
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-758-norm

759 Extending entitlement to notice of termination or payment in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-759
has part: 759(1) Extending entitlement to notice of termination or payment in
has part: 759(2) Extending entitlement to notice of termination or payment in
has part: 759(3) Extending entitlement to notice of termination or payment in
has part: 759(4) Extending entitlement to notice of termination or payment in
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.326

759(1) Extending entitlement to notice of termination or payment in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-759-ss-1
part of: 759 Extending entitlement to notice of termination or payment in
note: Extends entitlement to notice of termination or payment in lieu of notice for non-national system employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.326
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-759-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-759-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-759-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-759-ss-1-logic-deontic-3

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-759-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 759(1) Extending entitlement to notice of termination or payment in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-759-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: extends
logic summary: Extends entitlement
premise text: Subdivision A of Division 11 of Part 2-2 provides for notice of termination or payment in lieu of notice.
conclusion text: The provisions apply to non-national system employees as if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-759-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes references to national system employees and employers
premise text: Any reference in the provisions to a national system employer also included a reference to a non-national system employer.
conclusion text: ...the provisions to a national system employee also included a reference to a non-national system employee.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-759-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes references to national system employees and employers
premise text: The provisions of Subdivision A of Division 11 of Part 2-2 provide for notice of termination or payment in lieu of notice.
conclusion text: ...the provisions also included a reference to a non-national system employer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

759(2) Extending entitlement to notice of termination or payment in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-759-ss-2
part of: 759 Extending entitlement to notice of termination or payment in
note: Extending entitlement to notice of termination or payment in relation to Subdivision A of Division 11 of Part 2-2 as it applies because of subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.326
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-759-ss-2-norm

759(3) Extending entitlement to notice of termination or payment in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-759-ss-3
part of: 759 Extending entitlement to notice of termination or payment in
note: Modifications to extended notice of termination provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.326
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-759-ss-3-norm

759(4) Extending entitlement to notice of termination or payment in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-759-ss-4
part of: 759 Extending entitlement to notice of termination or payment in
note: Applicable regulations must comply with subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.326
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-759-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-759-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-759-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 759(4) Extending entitlement to notice of termination or payment in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-759-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Regulations must comply
premise text: Subsection (1) applies to regulations
conclusion text: Regulations must comply with subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

760 Contravening the extended notice of termination provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-760
note: Cannot contravene extended notice of termination provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.327
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-760-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-760-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-760-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

761 References to the National Employment Standards include
type: Concept
realized by: sec-761
note: References to National Employment Standards include extended notice of termination provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.328
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-761-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-761-logic-descriptionlogic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-761-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies descriptive clause
premise text: Descriptive clauses are used to provide additional information about a provision.
conclusion text: This excerpt is classified as an Undertaking because it provides descriptive information.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

762 State and Territory laws that are not excluded
type: Concept
realized by: sec-762
note: Exclusion of State and Territory laws on employee entitlements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.328
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-762-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-762-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-762-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-762-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-762-logic-ltl-4

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-762-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
logic summary: Exclusion of State and Territory laws
premise text: This Act is not intended to apply
conclusion text: to the exclusion of laws of a State or Territory
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-762-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: provides
logic summary: Provision of employee entitlements
premise text: those laws provide entitlements for those employees
conclusion text: that are more beneficial than the entitlements under the extended notice of termination provisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-762-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal applicability
premise text: to the extent that those laws apply to non-national system employees
conclusion text: and provide entitlements for those employees that are more beneficial than the entitlements under the extended notice of termination provisions
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-762-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal applicability
premise text: to the extent that those laws apply to non-national system employees
conclusion text: and provide entitlements for those employees that are more beneficial than the entitlements under the extended notice of termination provisions
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

763 Non-national system employees are not award/agreement free
type: Concept
realized by: sec-763
note: Non-national system employees are not award/agreement free.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.328
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-763-norm

764 Modification of meaning of full rate of pay for pieceworkers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-764
note: Employee's full rate of pay for purposes of extended notice provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.328
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-764-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-764-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 764 Modification of meaning of full rate of pay for pieceworkers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

765 Modification of meaning of pieceworker
type: Concept
realized by: sec-765
note: Prescribes a class of employees for extended notice of termination provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.329
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-765-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-765-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-765-logic-descriptionlogic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-765-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 765 Modification of meaning of pieceworker
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-765-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prescribes
logic summary: Prescribes a class of employees for extended notice of termination provisions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-765-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies
logic summary: Classifies employees into a specific category.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

766 Modification of provision about notice of termination by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-766
note: A State industrial instrument may include terms specifying the period of notice a non-national system employee must give in order to terminate his or her employment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.329
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-766-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-766-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-766-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 766 Modification of provision about notice of termination by
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-766-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: The provision includes a duty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

767 Modification of provision about relationship between National
type: Concept
realized by: sec-767
note: References to non-national systems are included in employee agreements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.329
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-767-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-767-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-767-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 767 Modification of provision about relationship between National
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-767-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusive obligation
premise text: State
conclusion text: Employment Standards
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768 Modification of power to make regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768
note: Permits non-national system employers and employees to agree on matters contrary to an extended notice of termination provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.329
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 768 Modification of power to make regulations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
logic summary: Allows non-national system employers and employees to agree on matters contrary to an extended notice of termination provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768AA Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768aa
note: Defines terms and conditions of employment transfer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.331
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aa-norm

768AB Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ab
note: Defines employee and employer terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.331
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ab-norm

768AC What this Division is about
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ac
note: Describes the purpose of this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.332
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ac-norm

768AD When does a transfer of business occur?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ad
has part: 768AD(1) When does a transfer of business occur?
has part: 768AD(2) When does a transfer of business occur?
has part: 768AD(3) When does a transfer of business occur?
has part: 768AD(4) When does a transfer of business occur?
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.332

768AD(1) When does a transfer of business occur?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ad-ss-1
part of: 768AD When does a transfer of business occur?
note: Transfer of business from non-national system employer to national system employer requires specific conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.332
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AD(1) When does a transfer of business occur?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires specific conditions for transfer of business.
premise text: (a) the employment of a person who is a State public sector employee of the old State employer has terminated;
conclusion text: there is a transfer of business from a non-national system employer to a national system employer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Occurs during employment termination and new employment.
premise text: (a) the employment of a person who is a State public sector employee of the old State employer has terminated;
conclusion text: the transfer of business occurs within 3 months after the termination
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
logic summary: Occurs everywhere in the employment relationship.
premise text: (b) within 3 months after the termination, the person becomes employed by the new employer;
conclusion text: the transfer of business occurs throughout the employment relationship
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires connection between old and new employers.
premise text: (d) there is a connection between the old State employer and the new employer as described in subsection (2), (3) or (4).
conclusion text: the transfer of business requires a connection between the old and new employers
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768AD(2) When does a transfer of business occur?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ad-ss-2
part of: 768AD When does a transfer of business occur?
note: The new employer must have the beneficial use of some or all of the assets.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.332
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AD(2) When does a transfer of business occur?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Describes the assets that relate to or are used in connection with the transferring work.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768AD(3) When does a transfer of business occur?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ad-ss-3
part of: 768AD When does a transfer of business occur?
note: Transfer of business occurs when old State employer outsources work to new employer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.332
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AD(3) When does a transfer of business occur?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Transfer of business occurs when old State employer outsources work to new employer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768AD(4) When does a transfer of business occur?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ad-ss-4
part of: 768AD When does a transfer of business occur?
note: Transfer of business occurs when new employer is associated entity of old State employer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.332
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AD(4) When does a transfer of business occur?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Transfer of business occurs when new employer is associated entity of old State employer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ad-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between old and new employers
premise text: new employer employs transferring employee
conclusion text: connection between old and new employers
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768AE Meaning of transferring employee, termination time and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ae
has part: 768AE(1) Meaning of transferring employee, termination time and
has part: 768AE(2) Meaning of transferring employee, termination time and
has part: 768AE(3) Meaning of transferring employee, termination time and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.333

768AE(1) Meaning of transferring employee, termination time and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ae-ss-1
part of: 768AE Meaning of transferring employee, termination time and
note: Defines transferring employee in relation to business transfer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.333
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ae-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ae-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AE(1) Meaning of transferring employee, termination time and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Identifies a transferring employee.
premise text: (1) The person referred to in paragraph 768AD(1)(a)
conclusion text: is a transferring employee in relation to the transfer of business.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

768AE(2) Meaning of transferring employee, termination time and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ae-ss-2
part of: 768AE Meaning of transferring employee, termination time and
note: Termination time of a transferring employee is the start of the day employment is terminated by the old State employer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.333
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ae-ss-2-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ae-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AE(2) Meaning of transferring employee, termination time and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

768AE(3) Meaning of transferring employee, termination time and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ae-ss-3
part of: 768AE Meaning of transferring employee, termination time and
note: Defines re-employment time of a transferring employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.333
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ae-ss-3-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ae-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AE(3) Meaning of transferring employee, termination time and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

768AF What this Division is about
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768af
note: Defines copied State instruments for transferring employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.334
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768af-norm

768AG Contravening a copied State instrument
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ag
note: Prohibition on contravening a copied State instrument for a transferring employee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.334
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ag-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ag-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ag-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ag-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ag-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ag-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ag-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AG Contravening a copied State instrument
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ag-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition on contravening
premise text: A person must not
conclusion text: contravene a term of a copied State instrument
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ag-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval between contravention and prohibition
premise text: A person must not contravene a term of a copied State instrument
conclusion text: for a transferring employee that applies to the person
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ag-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Prohibition implies duty to comply
premise text: A person must not contravene a term of a copied State instrument
conclusion text: for a transferring employee that applies to the person
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ag-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Prohibition diffuses responsibility for compliance
premise text: A person must not contravene a term of a copied State instrument
conclusion text: for a transferring employee that applies to the person
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ag-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Prohibition recognized by AI systems
premise text: A person must not contravene a term of a copied State instrument
conclusion text: for a transferring employee that applies to the person
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768AH What is a copied State instrument?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ah
note: A copied State instrument for a transferring employee is defined.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.335
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ah-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ah-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AH What is a copied State instrument?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

768AI What is a copied State award?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ai
note: A copied State award comes into operation immediately after the termination time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.335
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ai-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ai-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ai-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ai-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ai-logic-deontic-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ai-logic-deontic-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ai-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AI What is a copied State award?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ai-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes effect
logic summary: The copied State award comes into operation immediately after the termination time.
premise text: (1) If, immediately before the termination time of a transferring employee:...
conclusion text: ...a copied State award for the transferring employee is taken to come into operation immediately after the termination time.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ai-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The copied State award comes into effect during the termination time.
premise text: (b) the original State award covered (however described in the original State award or a relevant law of the State) the old State employer and the transferring employee;
conclusion text: ...then a copied State award for the transferring employee is taken to come into operation immediately after the termination time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ai-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: The copied State award comes into effect until the employee becomes employed by the new employer.
premise text: ...it will not apply to the employee or new employer before the employee becomes employed by the new employer.
conclusion text: ...then the State’s interaction rules that were in force immediately before the termination time apply for the purposes of working out the interaction between the copied State award and the copied State employment agreement.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ai-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must be enforced
logic summary: The employee or another person must enforce the copied State award.
premise text: ...it will not be enforceable by the employee or another person (for example, the new employer) unless and until it applies to the employee or other person.
conclusion text: ...then the State’s interaction rules that were in force immediately before the termination time apply for the purposes of working out the interaction between the copied State award and the copied State employment agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ai-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must be applied
logic summary: The copied State award must be applied to the employee or new employer.
premise text: ...it will not apply to the employee or new employer before the employee becomes employed by the new employer.
conclusion text: ...then the State’s interaction rules that were in force immediately before the termination time apply for the purposes of working out the interaction between the copied State award and the copied State employment agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768AJ What is a State award?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768aj
has part: 768AJ(1) What is a State award?
has part: 768AJ(2) What is a State award?
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.336

768AJ(1) What is a State award?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768aj-ss-1
part of: 768AJ What is a State award?
note: Regulates terms and conditions of employment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.336
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aj-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aj-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: regulates
logic summary: Imposes obligations on employment terms and conditions
premise text: (1) A State award is an instrument in relation to which the following conditions are satisfied:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aj-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for award applicability
premise text: (1) A State award is an instrument in relation to which the following conditions are satisfied:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768AJ(2) What is a State award?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768aj-ss-2
part of: 768AJ What is a State award?
note: An instrument may be a State award or not.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.336
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aj-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may-provide
logic summary: Regulations may provide
premise text: An instrument of a specified kind
conclusion text: State award or not
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768AK What is a copied State employment agreement?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ak
has part: 768AK(1) What is a copied State employment agreement?
has part: 768AK(2) What is a copied State employment agreement?
has part: 768AK(3) What is a copied State employment agreement?
has part: 768AK(4) What is a copied State employment agreement?
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.336

768AK(1) What is a copied State employment agreement?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ak-ss-1
part of: 768AK What is a copied State employment agreement?
note: A copied State employment agreement comes into operation immediately after the termination time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.336
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AK(1) What is a copied State employment agreement?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: A copied State employment agreement comes into operation immediately after the termination time.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768AK(2) What is a copied State employment agreement?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ak-ss-2
part of: 768AK What is a copied State employment agreement?
note: Employment agreement terms are included in the copied State employment agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.336
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-2-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AK(2) What is a copied State employment agreement?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

768AK(3) What is a copied State employment agreement?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ak-ss-3
part of: 768AK What is a copied State employment agreement?
note: Terms of copied State employment agreement affected by state industrial body or court decisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.336
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-3-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AK(3) What is a copied State employment agreement?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

768AK(4) What is a copied State employment agreement?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ak-ss-4
part of: 768AK What is a copied State employment agreement?
note: A copied State collective employment agreement must be a copy of the original agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.336
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-4-logic-cogai-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-4-logic-shacl-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AK(4) What is a copied State employment agreement?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State to ensure the copied agreement meets the requirements of a collective employment agreement.
premise text: The original agreement is a collective agreement.
conclusion text: Therefore, the copied agreement must also meet these requirements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relationship between the original and copied agreements.
premise text: The original agreement was entered into on a specific date.
conclusion text: Therefore, the copied agreement must also be entered into on that same date.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: =
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relationship between the original and copied agreements.
premise text: The original agreement was entered into before the copied agreement.
conclusion text: Therefore, the copied agreement must also be entered into after the original agreement.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-4-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: =
logic summary: Analyzes the language to identify potential AI-related concepts.
premise text: The agreement includes provisions related to artificial intelligence.
conclusion text: Therefore, the copied agreement must also include these provisions.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ak-ss-4-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: =
logic summary: Validates the structure of the agreement against a set of rules.
premise text: The agreement includes specific requirements for formatting and content.
conclusion text: Therefore, the copied agreement must also meet these requirements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768AL What is a State employment agreement?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768al
has part: 768AL(1) What is a State employment agreement?
has part: 768AL(2) What is a State employment agreement?
has part: 768AL(3) What is a State employment agreement?
has part: 768AL(4) What is a State employment agreement?
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.338

768AL(1) What is a State employment agreement?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768al-ss-1
part of: 768AL What is a State employment agreement?
note: Defines a State employment agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.338
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768al-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768al-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768al-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AL(1) What is a State employment agreement?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768al-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: States the conditions under which an agreement is valid
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768AL(2) What is a State employment agreement?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768al-ss-2
part of: 768AL What is a State employment agreement?
note: An instrument of a specified kind may be considered a State employment agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.338
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768al-ss-2-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768al-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AL(2) What is a State employment agreement?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

768AL(3) What is a State employment agreement?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768al-ss-3
part of: 768AL What is a State employment agreement?
note: A State employment agreement is a collective employment agreement unless it meets certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.338
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768al-ss-3-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768al-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AL(3) What is a State employment agreement?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

768AL(4) What is a State employment agreement?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768al-ss-4
part of: 768AL What is a State employment agreement?
note: A State individual employment agreement is a State employment agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.338
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768al-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768al-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768al-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AL(4) What is a State employment agreement?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768al-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Identifies the type of employment agreement.
conclusion text: State individual employment agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768AM When does a copied State instrument apply to a person?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768am
has part: 768AM(1) When does a copied State instrument apply to a person?
has part: 768AM(2) When does a copied State instrument apply to a person?
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.339

768AM(1) When does a copied State instrument apply to a person?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768am-ss-1
part of: 768AM When does a copied State instrument apply to a person?
note: A copied State instrument applies to a person if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.339
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768am-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768am-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768am-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768am-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AM(1) When does a copied State instrument apply to a person?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768am-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: A copied State instrument applies to a person if certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768am-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768AM(2) When does a copied State instrument apply to a person?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768am-ss-2
part of: 768AM When does a copied State instrument apply to a person?
note: A copied State instrument applies to an employer if it covers the employer and is in operation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.339
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768am-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768am-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768am-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AM(2) When does a copied State instrument apply to a person?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768am-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: (a) the instrument covers the employer; and (b) the instrument is in operation;
conclusion text: the instrument applies to the employer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768AN When does a copied State instrument cover a person?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768an
has part: 768AN(1) When does a copied State instrument cover a person?
has part: 768AN(2) When does a copied State instrument cover a person?
has part: 768AN(3) When does a copied State instrument cover a person?
has part: 768AN(4) When does a copied State instrument cover a person?
has part: 768AN(5) When does a copied State instrument cover a person?
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.340

768AN(1) When does a copied State instrument cover a person?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768an-ss-1
part of: 768AN When does a copied State instrument cover a person?
note: Employee and new employer covered in relation to transferring work.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.340
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AN(1) When does a copied State instrument cover a person?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: covers
logic summary: Provision of coverage
premise text: (1) A copied State instrument for a transferring employee
conclusion text: Employee and new employer covered in relation to transferring work
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768AN(2) When does a copied State instrument cover a person?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768an-ss-2
part of: 768AN When does a copied State instrument cover a person?
note: An employee organisation is covered by a copied State instrument if the instrument covers the employee and the original State award or agreement covered the organisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.340
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AN(2) When does a copied State instrument cover a person?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: An employee organisation is covered by a copied State instrument if the instrument covers the employee and the original State award or agreement covered the organisation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768AN(3) When does a copied State instrument cover a person?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768an-ss-3
part of: 768AN When does a copied State instrument cover a person?
note: An employer organisation is covered by a copied State instrument if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.340
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AN(3) When does a copied State instrument cover a person?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: An employer organisation is covered by a copied State instrument if certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: Employee's termination time
conclusion text: Original State award or agreement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768AN(4) When does a copied State instrument cover a person?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768an-ss-4
part of: 768AN When does a copied State instrument cover a person?
note: A copied State instrument covers a person if it provides or has the effect of covering them under certain provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.340
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AN(4) When does a copied State instrument cover a person?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Provision of this Act or FWC order implies coverage
premise text: (a) provision of this Act or (b) FWC order
conclusion text: covers a person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Circumstances when a person is covered
premise text: court order
conclusion text: covered by the instrument
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768AN(5) When does a copied State instrument cover a person?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768an-ss-5
part of: 768AN When does a copied State instrument cover a person?
note: A copied State instrument does not cover a person if any of the Chapter 6 Miscellaneous provisions apply.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.340
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AN(5) When does a copied State instrument cover a person?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768an-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: does not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: State instrument
conclusion text: covers a person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768AO When is a copied State instrument in operation?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ao
has part: 768AO(1) When is a copied State instrument in operation?
has part: 768AO(2) When is a copied State instrument in operation?
has part: 768AO(3) When is a copied State instrument in operation?
has part: 768AO(4) When is a copied State instrument in operation?
has part: 768AO(5) When is a copied State instrument in operation?
has part: 768AO(6) When is a copied State instrument in operation?
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.342

768AO(1) When is a copied State instrument in operation?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ao-ss-1
part of: 768AO When is a copied State instrument in operation?
note: A copied State instrument for a transferring employee comes into operation immediately after the employee’s termination time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.342
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AO(1) When is a copied State instrument in operation?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
premise text: (1) A copied State instrument for a transferring employee comes into operation immediately after the employee’s termination time.
conclusion text: The State is obligated to ensure the instrument operates at termination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Occurs during the employee's termination time.
premise text: (1) A copied State instrument for a transferring employee comes into operation immediately after the employee’s termination time.
conclusion text: The event occurs within this interval.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Implies that the instrument operates at termination.
premise text: (1) A copied State instrument for a transferring employee comes into operation immediately after the employee’s termination time.
conclusion text: If the instrument is in place, it must operate at termination.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses information about the instrument's operation.
premise text: (1) A copied State instrument for a transferring employee comes into operation immediately after the employee’s termination time.
conclusion text: The information spreads that the instrument operates at termination.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Recognizes the instrument's operation as a standard procedure.
premise text: (1) A copied State instrument for a transferring employee comes into operation immediately after the employee’s termination time.
conclusion text: The system acknowledges this as a normal process.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768AO(2) When is a copied State instrument in operation?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ao-ss-2
part of: 768AO When is a copied State instrument in operation?
note: Award operates for a period longer than the default period if FWC makes an order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.342
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AO(2) When is a copied State instrument in operation?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Award operates for a period longer than the default period if FWC makes an order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: !
logic summary: Default period applies unless FWC makes an order.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

768AO(3) When is a copied State instrument in operation?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ao-ss-3
part of: 768AO When is a copied State instrument in operation?
note: Regulations may prescribe circumstances for FWC to make an order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.342
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AO(3) When is a copied State instrument in operation?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Regulations may prescribe circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

768AO(4) When is a copied State instrument in operation?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ao-ss-4
part of: 768AO When is a copied State instrument in operation?
note: A copied State employment agreement ceases to operate when it is terminated.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.342
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AO(4) When is a copied State instrument in operation?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
logic summary: Termination obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768AO(5) When is a copied State instrument in operation?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ao-ss-5
part of: 768AO When is a copied State instrument in operation?
note: Cannot operate again after ceasing operation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.342
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AO(5) When is a copied State instrument in operation?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of operating again
premise text: (5) The nominal expiry date...
conclusion text: ...can never operate again
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768AO(6) When is a copied State instrument in operation?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ao-ss-6
part of: 768AO When is a copied State instrument in operation?
note: A copied State instrument for a transferring employee that has ceased to operate can never operate again.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.342
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-6-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of operation
premise text: (6) A copied State instrument for a transferring employee that has ceased to operate can never operate again.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ao-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal relationship between cessation and operation
premise text: (6) A copied State instrument for a transferring employee that has ceased to operate can never operate again.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768AP What this Division is about
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ap
note: Describes purpose of Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.344
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ap-norm

768AQ Interaction between the NES and a copied State instrument
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768aq
note: Term of copied State instrument is of no effect if detrimental to employee under NES.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.344
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aq-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aq-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aq-logic-alleninterval-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aq-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AQ Interaction between the NES and a copied State instrument
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aq-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If term is detrimental, then it has no effect.
premise text: Term of instrument is detrimental to employee.
conclusion text: Term of instrument has no effect.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aq-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Term of instrument overlaps with 'no effect' if detrimental.
premise text: Term of instrument is detrimental to employee.
conclusion text: Term of instrument has no effect.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768AR Provisions of the NES that allow instruments to contain
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ar
has part: 768AR(1) Provisions of the NES that allow instruments to contain
has part: 768AR(2) Provisions of the NES that allow instruments to contain
has part: 768AR(3) Provisions of the NES that allow instruments to contain
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.344

768AR(1) Provisions of the NES that allow instruments to contain
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ar-ss-1
part of: 768AR Provisions of the NES that allow instruments to contain
note: Terms about paid annual leave and personal/carer’s leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.344
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ar-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ar-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ar-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AR(1) Provisions of the NES that allow instruments to contain
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ar-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes terms about paid annual leave and personal/carer’s leave
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768AR(2) Provisions of the NES that allow instruments to contain
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ar-ss-2
part of: 768AR Provisions of the NES that allow instruments to contain
note: If a copied State instrument includes terms that do not include requirements, then the instrument is taken to include those requirements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.344
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ar-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ar-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ar-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ar-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AR(2) Provisions of the NES that allow instruments to contain
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ar-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Classifies terms included in an instrument
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ar-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes
logic summary: States the obligation to include requirements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768AR(3) Provisions of the NES that allow instruments to contain
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ar-ss-3
part of: 768AR Provisions of the NES that allow instruments to contain
note: If a copied State instrument applies to the employee, subsections 87(3) to (5) have effect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.344
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ar-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ar-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ar-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AR(3) Provisions of the NES that allow instruments to contain
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ar-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffect
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768AS Modern awards and copied State awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768as
has part: 768AS(1) Modern awards and copied State awards
has part: 768AS(2) Modern awards and copied State awards
has part: 768AS(3) Modern awards and copied State awards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.346

768AS(1) Modern awards and copied State awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768as-ss-1
part of: 768AS Modern awards and copied State awards
note: A modern award does not cover an employee, employer or other person in relation to the employee if a copied State award covers them.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.346
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768as-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768as-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768as-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768as-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768as-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768as-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AS(1) Modern awards and copied State awards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768as-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits modern awards from covering employees covered by copied State awards.
premise text: (1) While a copied State award for a transferring employee:...
conclusion text: ...a modern award does not cover the employee, or the employer or other person in relation to the employee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768as-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between copied State awards and modern awards.
premise text: When the copied State award for a transferring employee ceases to cover the employee, a modern award will start to cover the employee,...
conclusion text: ...a modern award will start to cover the employee, or an employer or other person in relation to the employee.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768as-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between copied State awards and modern awards.
premise text: ...a modern award will start to cover the employee, or an employer or other person in relation to the employee.
conclusion text: ...a modern award does not cover the employee, or the employer or other person in relation to the employee.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768as-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: Describes condition under which copied State awards cease to apply.
premise text: When the copied State award for a transferring employee ceases to cover the employee,...
conclusion text: ...a modern award will start to cover the employee, or an employer or other person in relation to the employee.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

768AS(2) Modern awards and copied State awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768as-ss-2
part of: 768AS Modern awards and copied State awards
note: Exempts modern awards from better off overall test for enterprise agreements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.346
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768as-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768as-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768as-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AS(2) Modern awards and copied State awards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768as-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Imposes obligation on State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768AS(3) Modern awards and copied State awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768as-ss-3
part of: 768AS Modern awards and copied State awards
note: Subject to FWC order about coverage under subsection 768BA(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.346
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768as-ss-3-norm

768AT Modern awards and copied State employment agreements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768at
has part: 768AT(1) Modern awards and copied State employment agreements
has part: 768AT(2) Modern awards and copied State employment agreements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.346

768AT(1) Modern awards and copied State employment agreements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768at-ss-1
part of: 768AT Modern awards and copied State employment agreements
note: If a copied State collective employment agreement and a modern award both apply, the copied agreement prevails over the modern award to the extent of any inconsistency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.346
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768at-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768at-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768at-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AT(1) Modern awards and copied State employment agreements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768at-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
logic summary: Priority of agreements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768AT(2) Modern awards and copied State employment agreements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768at-ss-2
part of: 768AT Modern awards and copied State employment agreements
note: Modern award does not apply to the employee, employer or other person in relation to the employee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.346
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768at-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768at-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768at-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768at-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768at-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AT(2) Modern awards and copied State employment agreements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768at-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Obligation on the employer to ensure the base rate of pay is not less than the modern award rate
premise text: The copied State individual employment agreement must not be less than the modern award rate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768at-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ?
logic summary: Obligation on the employer to ensure the base rate of pay is not less than the modern award rate in certain situations
premise text: The new employer has transferred business to another employer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768at-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal relation between the transfer of business and the application of the obligation
premise text: The new employer has transferred business to another employer
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

768AU Enterprise agreements and copied State instruments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768au
has part: 768AU(1) Enterprise agreements and copied State instruments
has part: 768AU(2) Enterprise agreements and copied State instruments
has part: 768AU(3) Enterprise agreements and copied State instruments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.348

768AU(1) Enterprise agreements and copied State instruments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768au-ss-1
part of: 768AU Enterprise agreements and copied State instruments
note: Enterprise agreement does not cover employee in relation to transferring work.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.348
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-1-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AU(1) Enterprise agreements and copied State instruments
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

768AU(2) Enterprise agreements and copied State instruments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768au-ss-2
part of: 768AU Enterprise agreements and copied State instruments
note: Copied State instrument ceases to cover employee and new employer after another enterprise agreement starts.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.348
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AU(2) Enterprise agreements and copied State instruments
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the copied State instrument from covering employee and new employer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768AU(3) Enterprise agreements and copied State instruments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768au-ss-3
part of: 768AU Enterprise agreements and copied State instruments
note: Subject to FWC order about coverage under subsection 768BA(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.348
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AU(3) Enterprise agreements and copied State instruments
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Subjunctive
logic summary: Depends on FWC order
premise text: FWC order about coverage under subsection 768BA(1)
conclusion text: This section has effect subject to the FWC order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap with FWC order
premise text: FWC order about coverage under subsection 768BA(1)
conclusion text: This section overlaps in time with the FWC order
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Contains
logic summary: Contains temporal information
premise text: This section has effect subject to any FWC order about coverage under subsection 768BA(1)
conclusion text: The FWC order contains the temporal information
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses FWC order
premise text: This section has effect subject to any FWC order about coverage under subsection 768BA(1)
conclusion text: The diffusion of the FWC order is contained in this section
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768au-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Recognizes FWC order
premise text: This section has effect subject to any FWC order about coverage under subsection 768BA(1)
conclusion text: The CogAI recognizes the FWC order in this section
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

768AV What this Division is about
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768av
note: Sets out when a copied State instrument may be varied or terminated.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.349
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768av-norm

768AW Variation in limited circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768aw
note: Variation of copied State instrument for transferring employee is restricted
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.349
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aw-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aw-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768aw-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Restricts variation of copied State instrument
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768AX Variation of copied State instruments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ax
note: Section applies if there is or is likely to be a transfer of business.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.349
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ax-norm

768AY Termination in limited circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ay
has part: 768AY(1) Termination in limited circumstances
has part: 768AY(2) Termination in limited circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.352

768AY(1) Termination in limited circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ay-ss-1
part of: 768AY Termination in limited circumstances
note: Cannot be terminated except under certain circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.352
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ay-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ay-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ay-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AY(1) Termination in limited circumstances
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ay-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768AY(2) Termination in limited circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ay-ss-2
part of: 768AY Termination in limited circumstances
note: A copied State instrument for a transferring employee that has been terminated ceases to operate and can never operate again.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.352
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ay-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ay-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ay-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the operation of a copied State instrument after termination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768AZ What this Division is about
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768az
has part: 768AZ(1) What this Division is about
has part: 768AZ(2) What this Division is about
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.353

768AZ(1) What this Division is about
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768az-ss-1
part of: 768AZ What this Division is about
note: Provides for orders to be made if there is, or is likely to be, a transfer of business.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.353
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768az-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768az-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768az-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: provides
logic summary: Establishes the existence of an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768AZ(2) What this Division is about
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768az-ss-2
part of: 768AZ What this Division is about
note: Allowing for the making of orders before certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.353
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768az-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768az-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768az-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 768AZ(2) What this Division is about
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768az-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission to make orders.
premise text: (2) An order may be made under this Division...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BA FWC orders about coverage for transferring employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ba
has part: 768BA(1) FWC orders about coverage for transferring employees
has part: 768BA(2) FWC orders about coverage for transferring employees
has part: 768BA(3) FWC orders about coverage for transferring employees
has part: 768BA(4) FWC orders about coverage for transferring employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.354

768BA(1) FWC orders about coverage for transferring employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ba-ss-1
part of: 768BA FWC orders about coverage for transferring employees
note: FWC may make orders regarding coverage for transferring employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.354
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-1-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BA(1) FWC orders about coverage for transferring employees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

768BA(2) FWC orders about coverage for transferring employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ba-ss-2
part of: 768BA FWC orders about coverage for transferring employees
note: The FWC may make an order under subsection (1) on its own initiative or on application by certain parties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.354
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BA(2) FWC orders about coverage for transferring employees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: The FWC may make an order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BA(3) FWC orders about coverage for transferring employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ba-ss-3
part of: 768BA FWC orders about coverage for transferring employees
note: Consider views of employees and new employer when making an order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.354
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BA(3) FWC orders about coverage for transferring employees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to consider views of employees and new employer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BA(4) FWC orders about coverage for transferring employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ba-ss-4
part of: 768BA FWC orders about coverage for transferring employees
note: Order must not come into operation before transferring employee's re-employment time or the day the order is made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.354
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-4-logic-deontic-3

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BA(4) FWC orders about coverage for transferring employees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Prohibition on premature operation of orders
premise text: (4) An order under subsection (1) must not come into operation in relation to a particular transferring employee before the later of the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Prohibition on premature operation of orders
premise text: (a) the transferring employee’s re-employment time;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ba-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Prohibition on premature operation of orders
premise text: (b) the day on which the order is made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BB FWC orders about coverage for employee organisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bb
note: FWC may make an order about coverage for employee organisations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.355
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bb-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bb-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bb-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BB FWC orders about coverage for employee organisations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bb-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BC What this Division is about
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bc
note: This Division allows the FWC to consolidate various workplace instruments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.357
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bc-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bc-logic-alleninterval-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bc-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal intervals for instrument consolidation
premise text: Consolidation orders made
conclusion text: Orders have temporal intervals
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BD Consolidation orders in relation to transferring employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bd
has part: 768BD(1) Consolidation orders in relation to transferring employees
has part: 768BD(2) Consolidation orders in relation to transferring employees
has part: 768BD(3) Consolidation orders in relation to transferring employees
has part: 768BD(4) Consolidation orders in relation to transferring employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.358

768BD(1) Consolidation orders in relation to transferring employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bd-ss-1
part of: 768BD Consolidation orders in relation to transferring employees
note: The FWC may make an order that a copied State instrument for one or more other transferring employees is also a copied State instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.358
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BD(1) Consolidation orders in relation to transferring employees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The FWC may make an order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BD(2) Consolidation orders in relation to transferring employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bd-ss-2
part of: 768BD Consolidation orders in relation to transferring employees
note: The FWC may make a consolidation order under subsection (1) on its own initiative or on application by certain parties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.358
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BD(2) Consolidation orders in relation to transferring employees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: The FWC may make a consolidation order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BD(3) Consolidation orders in relation to transferring employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bd-ss-3
part of: 768BD Consolidation orders in relation to transferring employees
note: Consider views of employees and new employer when deciding to make a consolidation order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.358
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BD(3) Consolidation orders in relation to transferring employees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
logic summary: Consider the views of employees and new employer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BD(4) Consolidation orders in relation to transferring employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bd-ss-4
part of: 768BD Consolidation orders in relation to transferring employees
note: Consolidation order must not come into operation before transferring employee's re-employment time or the day the order is made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.358
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-4-logic-ltl-4

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BD(4) Consolidation orders in relation to transferring employees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Prohibition on operation before specified conditions
premise text: (4) A consolidation order under subsection (1) must not come into operation in relation to a particular transferring employee...
conclusion text: ...before the later of the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Obligation on operation after specified conditions
premise text: (4) A consolidation order under subsection (1) must not come into operation in relation to a particular transferring employee...
conclusion text: ...the later of the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
logic summary: Temporal relationship between re-employment time and order day
premise text: (4) A consolidation order under subsection (1) must not come into operation in relation to a particular transferring employee...
conclusion text: ...the later of the following:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bd-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of employees based on re-employment time and order day
premise text: (4) A consolidation order under subsection (1) must not come into operation in relation to a particular transferring employee...
conclusion text: ...the later of the following:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

768BE Consolidation order to deal with application and coverage
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768be
note: Consolidation order specifies application and coverage of copied State instrument for employee A
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.359
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768be-norm

768BF Effect of this Act after a consolidation order is made
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bf
note: Effect of this Act after a consolidation order is made
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.360
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bf-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bf-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BF Effect of this Act after a consolidation order is made
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

768BG Consolidation orders in relation to non-transferring
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bg
has part: 768BG(1) Consolidation orders in relation to non-transferring
has part: 768BG(2) Consolidation orders in relation to non-transferring
has part: 768BG(3) Consolidation orders in relation to non-transferring
has part: 768BG(4) Consolidation orders in relation to non-transferring
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.360

768BG(1) Consolidation orders in relation to non-transferring
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bg-ss-1
part of: 768BG Consolidation orders in relation to non-transferring
note: The FWC may make an order that a copied State instrument for one employee also is or will be a copied State instrument for one or more non-transferring employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.360
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BG(1) Consolidation orders in relation to non-transferring
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The FWC may make an order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BG(2) Consolidation orders in relation to non-transferring
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bg-ss-2
part of: 768BG Consolidation orders in relation to non-transferring
note: Definition of non-transferring employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.360
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-2-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BG(2) Consolidation orders in relation to non-transferring
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

768BG(3) Consolidation orders in relation to non-transferring
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bg-ss-3
part of: 768BG Consolidation orders in relation to non-transferring
note: The FWC may make a consolidation order under subsection (1) on its own initiative or on application by certain parties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.360
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BG(3) Consolidation orders in relation to non-transferring
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: The FWC may make a consolidation order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BG(4) Consolidation orders in relation to non-transferring
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bg-ss-4
part of: 768BG Consolidation orders in relation to non-transferring
note: Consider views of employees and new employer when deciding to make a consolidation order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.360
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BG(4) Consolidation orders in relation to non-transferring
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
logic summary: Consider the views of employees and new employer.
premise text: The FWC must take into account...
conclusion text: ...the views of the employees who would be affected by the order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: consider
logic summary: Consider the nominal expiry date of the agreement.
premise text: The FWC must take into account...
conclusion text: ...the nominal expiry date of the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: consider
logic summary: Consider the impact on employee terms and conditions.
premise text: The FWC must take into account...
conclusion text: ...whether any employees would be disadvantaged by the order in relation to their terms and conditions of employment.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: consider
logic summary: Consider the views of the new employer or a person likely to be the new employer.
premise text: The FWC must take into account...
conclusion text: ...the new employer or a person who is likely to be the new employer.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bg-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: classify
logic summary: Classify the consolidation order as a consolidation order.
premise text: The FWC must take into account...
conclusion text: ...the views of the employees who would be affected by the order.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

768BH Consolidation order to deal with application and coverage
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bh
has part: 768BH(1) Consolidation order to deal with application and coverage
has part: 768BH(2) Consolidation order to deal with application and coverage
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.362

768BH(1) Consolidation order to deal with application and coverage
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bh-ss-1
part of: 768BH Consolidation order to deal with application and coverage
note: A consolidation order must specify when an employee instrument applies to and covers certain employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.362
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bh-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bh-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BH(1) Consolidation order to deal with application and coverage
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must specify conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BH(2) Consolidation order to deal with application and coverage
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bh-ss-2
part of: 768BH Consolidation order to deal with application and coverage
note: Specify that an enterprise agreement does not cover the non-transferring employee, new employer, and certain employee organisations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.362
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bh-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bh-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bh-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bh-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bh-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bh-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BH(2) Consolidation order to deal with application and coverage
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Implies a prohibition on covering the specified entities
premise text: The order must also specify that...
conclusion text: The non-transferring employee, new employer, and certain employee organisations are not covered.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bh-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <>
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the order and the exclusion of entities
premise text: (2) If an enterprise agreement covers...
conclusion text: The exclusion is conditional on the enterprise agreement covering the non-transferring employee.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bh-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <>
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the order and the exclusion of entities
premise text: (2) If an enterprise agreement covers...
conclusion text: The exclusion is conditional on the enterprise agreement covering the non-transferring employee.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bh-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: <>
logic summary: Describes the propagation of the exclusion to related entities
premise text: ...the order must also specify that...
conclusion text: The exclusion is propagated to the new employer and certain employee organisations.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bh-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: <>
logic summary: Describes the application of the exclusion to related entities
premise text: ...the order must also specify that...
conclusion text: The exclusion is applied to the new employer and certain employee organisations.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BI Effect of this Act after a consolidation order is made
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bi
note: This Act has effect in relation to a particular non-transferring employee, from the time the order comes into operation in relation to that employee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.363
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bi-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bi-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bi-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BI Effect of this Act after a consolidation order is made
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bi-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has effect
logic summary: The Act has a direct obligation on the State to apply its provisions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BJ What this Division is about
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bj
note: Model term prescribed by regulations is a term of the instrument in case of dispute settlement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.364
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bj-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bj-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bj-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bj-logic-ltl-3

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bj-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BJ What this Division is about
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bj-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: Subdivision B deals with the case where a copied State instrument for a transferring employee does not have a term about settling disputes about matters arising under the instrument.
conclusion text: The model term prescribed by regulations is taken to be a term of the instrument in that case.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bj-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: In that case, the model term prescribed by regulations is taken to be a term of the instrument.
conclusion text: The model term prescribed by regulations is an obligation on the copied State instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bj-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: Recurring trace
premise text: Subdivision B deals with the case where a copied State instrument for a transferring employee does not have a term about settling disputes about matters arising under the instrument.
conclusion text: The model term prescribed by regulations is taken to be a term of the instrument in that case, which may recur.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

768BK Where no term dealing with disputes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bk
has part: 768BK(1) Where no term dealing with disputes
has part: 768BK(1A) Where no term dealing with disputes
has part: 768BK(2) Where no term dealing with disputes
has part: 768BK(3) Where no term dealing with disputes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.365

768BK(1) Where no term dealing with disputes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bk-ss-1
part of: 768BK Where no term dealing with disputes
note: Model term for settling disputes about matters arising under a copied State instrument for a transferring employee is included if not present in the original instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.365
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bk-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bk-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bk-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BK(1) Where no term dealing with disputes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Model term obligation
premise text: Instrument does not include procedure for settling disputes
conclusion text: Model term is included
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bk-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Model term applies during the transfer period
premise text: Transfer period starts when the employee transfers
conclusion text: Model term is applicable during the transfer period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BK(1A) Where no term dealing with disputes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bk-ss-1a
part of: 768BK Where no term dealing with disputes
note: FWC must determine a model term for disputes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.365
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bk-ss-1a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bk-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bk-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BK(1A) Where no term dealing with disputes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bk-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to determine a model term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BK(2) Where no term dealing with disputes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bk-ss-2
part of: 768BK Where no term dealing with disputes
note: Model term for copied State award may be same or different from model term for copied State employment agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.365
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bk-ss-2-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bk-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BK(2) Where no term dealing with disputes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

768BK(3) Where no term dealing with disputes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bk-ss-3
part of: 768BK Where no term dealing with disputes
note: Consideration of factors when determining the model term
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.365
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bk-ss-3-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bk-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BK(3) Where no term dealing with disputes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

768BL Service for the purposes of this Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bl
has part: 768BL(1) Service for the purposes of this Act
has part: 768BL(2) Service for the purposes of this Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.366

768BL(1) Service for the purposes of this Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bl-ss-1
part of: 768BL Service for the purposes of this Act
note: Service of old employer counts as service for new employer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.366
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bl-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bl-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BL(1) Service for the purposes of this Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Service provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BL(2) Service for the purposes of this Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bl-ss-2
part of: 768BL Service for the purposes of this Act
note: Employee's continuous service with the new employer is not broken by a period of time between termination and re-employment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.366
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bl-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bl-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bl-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bl-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BL(2) Service for the purposes of this Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bl-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Temporal interval inclusion
premise text: The period of time between termination and re-employment does not break the employee's continuous service with the new employer.
conclusion text: This period is included in the employee's continuous service with the new employer.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bl-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: The employee must provide this information to the new employer.
conclusion text: There is an obligation on the employee to provide this information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BM NES—working out non-accruing entitlements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bm
has part: 768BM(1) NES—working out non-accruing entitlements
has part: 768BM(2) NES—working out non-accruing entitlements
has part: 768BM(3) NES—working out non-accruing entitlements
has part: 768BM(4) NES—working out non-accruing entitlements
has part: 768BM(5) NES—working out non-accruing entitlements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.367

768BM(1) NES—working out non-accruing entitlements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bm-ss-1
part of: 768BM NES—working out non-accruing entitlements
note: This section applies for the purposes of determining entitlements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.367
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BM(1) NES—working out non-accruing entitlements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Section applies to entitlements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BM(2) NES—working out non-accruing entitlements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bm-ss-2
part of: 768BM NES—working out non-accruing entitlements
note: Prevents counting of old State employer's period of service when calculating employee's entitlements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.367
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BM(2) NES—working out non-accruing entitlements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prevents counting of old State employer's period of service.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BM(3) NES—working out non-accruing entitlements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bm-ss-3
part of: 768BM NES—working out non-accruing entitlements
note: No initial qualifying period of service is required for long service leave.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.367
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BM(3) NES—working out non-accruing entitlements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BM(4) NES—working out non-accruing entitlements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bm-ss-4
part of: 768BM NES—working out non-accruing entitlements
note: No entitlement to redundancy pay if terms and conditions did not provide for it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.367
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-4-logic-ltl-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BM(4) NES—working out non-accruing entitlements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If no entitlement, then no obligation.
premise text: Terms and conditions did not provide for redundancy pay.
conclusion text: No entitlement to redundancy pay.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-4-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Redundancy pay applies until terms and conditions change.
premise text: Terms and conditions did not provide for redundancy pay.
conclusion text: No entitlement to redundancy pay.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

768BM(5) NES—working out non-accruing entitlements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bm-ss-5
part of: 768BM NES—working out non-accruing entitlements
note: If a State industrial body could have made an order giving the employee an entitlement to redundancy pay, then the employee is entitled to redundancy pay.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.367
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bm-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Obligation to provide redundancy pay
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BN NES—working out accruing entitlements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bn
has part: 768BN(1) NES—working out accruing entitlements
has part: 768BN(2) NES—working out accruing entitlements
has part: 768BN(3) NES—working out accruing entitlements
has part: 768BN(4) NES—working out accruing entitlements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.368

768BN(1) NES—working out accruing entitlements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bn-ss-1
part of: 768BN NES—working out accruing entitlements
note: Employee's accrued entitlement to paid annual leave or personal/ carer’s leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.368
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BN(1) NES—working out accruing entitlements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Employee has an obligation to receive accrued entitlements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BN(2) NES—working out accruing entitlements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bn-ss-2
part of: 768BN NES—working out accruing entitlements
note: Minimum standard for accrued leave after re-employment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.368
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BN(2) NES—working out accruing entitlements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obliges
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to provide minimum standards for accrued leave
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: applies-as
logic summary: Applies the National Employment Standards as a minimum standard
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BN(3) NES—working out accruing entitlements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bn-ss-3
part of: 768BN NES—working out accruing entitlements
note: Reduction of accrued leave amount if old employer paid
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.368
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BN(3) NES—working out accruing entitlements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Reduction of accrued leave amount if old employer paid
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

768BN(4) NES—working out accruing entitlements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bn-ss-4
part of: 768BN NES—working out accruing entitlements
note: It does not matter whether entitlement accrued under original State award or agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.368
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BN(4) NES—working out accruing entitlements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bn-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BO Copied State instrument—service
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bo
has part: 768BO(1) Copied State instrument—service
has part: 768BO(2) Copied State instrument—service
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.369

768BO(1) Copied State instrument—service
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bo-ss-1
part of: 768BO Copied State instrument—service
note: Service of employee with old and new employer counts towards application of copied State instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.369
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bo-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bo-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bo-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bo-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bo-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BO(1) Copied State instrument—service
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Service obligation
premise text: (1) Service of a transferring employee...
conclusion text: ...counts as service of the employee with the new employer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between service and re-employment
premise text: (b) counted for the purposes of the application...
conclusion text: ...also counts as service of the employee with the new employer.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bo-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Service obligation implies right to re-employment
premise text: (a) occurred before the employee’s termination time;
conclusion text: ...and counted for the purposes of the application...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bo-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Service obligation diffuses to new employer
premise text: (b) counted for the purposes of the application...
conclusion text: ...also counts as service of the employee with the new employer.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bo-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Service obligation recognized by AI system
premise text: (1) Service of a transferring employee...
conclusion text: ...counts as service of the employee with the new employer.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BO(2) Copied State instrument—service
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bo-ss-2
part of: 768BO Copied State instrument—service
note: Employee's continuous service with new employer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.369
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bo-ss-2-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bo-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BO(2) Copied State instrument—service
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

768BP Copied State instrument—working out non-accruing
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bp
has part: 768BP(1) Copied State instrument—working out non-accruing
has part: 768BP(2) Copied State instrument—working out non-accruing
has part: 768BP(3) Copied State instrument—working out non-accruing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.370

768BP(1) Copied State instrument—working out non-accruing
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bp-ss-1
part of: 768BP Copied State instrument—working out non-accruing
note: No double entitlement to annual leave or personal leave or carer’s leave under the copied State instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.370
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BP(1) Copied State instrument—working out non-accruing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits double entitlement to specified leave types.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BP(2) Copied State instrument—working out non-accruing
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bp-ss-2
part of: 768BP Copied State instrument—working out non-accruing
note: Prevents counting of old State employer's period of service when calculating employee's entitlements under copied State instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.370
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BP(2) Copied State instrument—working out non-accruing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prevents counting of old State employer's period of service.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Disjointness
logic summary: Prevents counting of old State employer's period of service when calculating employee's entitlements.
premise text: (2) If, before or after the employee’s termination time, the employee has the benefit of an entitlement...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Prevents counting of old State employer's period of service when calculating employee's entitlements.
premise text: (2) If, before or after the employee’s termination time, the employee has the benefit of an entitlement...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: No Change
logic summary: Prevents counting of old State employer's period of service when calculating employee's entitlements.
premise text: (2) If, before or after the employee’s termination time, the employee has the benefit of an entitlement...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: No Change
logic summary: Prevents counting of old State employer's period of service when calculating employee's entitlements.
premise text: (2) If, before or after the employee’s termination time, the employee has the benefit of an entitlement...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BP(3) Copied State instrument—working out non-accruing
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bp-ss-3
part of: 768BP Copied State instrument—working out non-accruing
note: No initial qualifying period of service for long service leave is required.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.370
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BP(3) Copied State instrument—working out non-accruing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BQ Copied State instrument—working out accruing entitlements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bq
has part: 768BQ(1) Copied State instrument—working out accruing entitlements
has part: 768BQ(2) Copied State instrument—working out accruing entitlements
has part: 768BQ(3) Copied State instrument—working out accruing entitlements
has part: 768BQ(4) Copied State instrument—working out accruing entitlements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.371

768BQ(1) Copied State instrument—working out accruing entitlements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bq-ss-1
part of: 768BQ Copied State instrument—working out accruing entitlements
note: Employee entitlements for annual leave and personal leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.371
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BQ(1) Copied State instrument—working out accruing entitlements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Employee entitlements exist
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BQ(2) Copied State instrument—working out accruing entitlements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bq-ss-2
part of: 768BQ Copied State instrument—working out accruing entitlements
note: Accrued entitlements taken to have accrued under copied State instrument
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.371
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BQ(2) Copied State instrument—working out accruing entitlements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BQ(3) Copied State instrument—working out accruing entitlements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bq-ss-3
part of: 768BQ Copied State instrument—working out accruing entitlements
note: Reduction of accrued leave amount if old employer paid employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.371
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BQ(3) Copied State instrument—working out accruing entitlements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to reduce accrued leave amount
premise text: (3) However, if before or after the employee’s termination time...
conclusion text: ...the amount of accrued leave is reduced accordingly.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Reduction of accrued leave amount overlaps with payment by old employer
premise text: (3) However, if before or after the employee’s termination time...
conclusion text: ...the amount of accrued leave is reduced accordingly.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: Reduction of accrued leave amount is recurrently applied
premise text: (3) However, if before or after the employee’s termination time...
conclusion text: ...the amount of accrued leave is reduced accordingly.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Reduction of accrued leave amount diffuses to payment by old employer
premise text: (3) However, if before or after the employee’s termination time...
conclusion text: ...the amount of accrued leave is reduced accordingly.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inferential
logic summary: Reduction of accrued leave amount is inferentially related to payment by old employer
premise text: (3) However, if before or after the employee’s termination time...
conclusion text: ...the amount of accrued leave is reduced accordingly.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

768BQ(4) Copied State instrument—working out accruing entitlements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bq-ss-4
part of: 768BQ Copied State instrument—working out accruing entitlements
note: It does not matter whether leave accrued under the original State award or original State agreement for the copied State instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.371
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bq-ss-4-norm

768BR Cessation not intended to result in reduction in take-home
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768br
has part: 768BR(1) Cessation not intended to result in reduction in take-home
has part: 768BR(2) Cessation not intended to result in reduction in take-home
has part: 768BR(3) Cessation not intended to result in reduction in take-home
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.372

768BR(1) Cessation not intended to result in reduction in take-home
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768br-ss-1
part of: 768BR Cessation not intended to result in reduction in take-home
note: Employee's take-home pay is not reduced due to cessation of copied State award.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.372
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-1-logic-n3logic-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BR(1) Cessation not intended to result in reduction in take-home
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If a condition is met, an obligation is created.
premise text: Cessation of copied State award
conclusion text: Employee's take-home pay is not reduced
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The excerpt describes a temporal relationship between the cessation and the reduction.
premise text: Cessation of copied State award occurs before reduction in take-home pay
conclusion text: Cessation is not intended to result in reduction
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: The excerpt implies a relationship between the cessation and the reduction.
premise text: Cessation of copied State award
conclusion text: Employee's take-home pay is not reduced due to cessation
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: The excerpt describes a process where the obligation is propagated.
premise text: Cessation of copied State award for transferring employee
conclusion text: Employee's take-home pay is not reduced due to cessation
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-1-logic-n3logic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: N3Logic
operator: RDF
logic summary: The excerpt describes a relationship between the cessation and the reduction using RDF.
premise text: Cessation of copied State award for transferring employee
conclusion text: Employee's take-home pay is not reduced due to cessation
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BR(2) Cessation not intended to result in reduction in take-home
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768br-ss-2
part of: 768BR Cessation not intended to result in reduction in take-home
note: Employee's take-home pay calculation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.372
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BR(2) Cessation not intended to result in reduction in take-home
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Employee has a right to their take-home pay
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BR(3) Cessation not intended to result in reduction in take-home
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768br-ss-3
part of: 768BR Cessation not intended to result in reduction in take-home
note: Reduction in take-home pay is only allowed under specific conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.372
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BR(3) Cessation not intended to result in reduction in take-home
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768br-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: Reduction in take-home pay is only allowed under specific conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BS Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bs
has part: 768BS(1) Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay
has part: 768BS(2) Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay
has part: 768BS(3) Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay
has part: 768BS(4) Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay
has part: 768BS(5) Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.373

768BS(1) Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bs-ss-1
part of: 768BS Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay
note: FWC may make order requiring payment of take-home pay to employee
description: Payment of take-home pay
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.373
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BS(1) Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Obligation to make order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BS(2) Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bs-ss-2
part of: 768BS Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay
note: FWC may make a take-home pay order on its own initiative or on application by transferring employee or organisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.373
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BS(2) Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: FWC may make a take-home pay order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BS(3) Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bs-ss-3
part of: 768BS Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay
note: FWC cannot make a take-home pay order under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.373
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of making a take-home pay order
premise text: FWC has the power to make take-home pay orders
conclusion text: FWC must not make a take-home pay order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BS(4) Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bs-ss-4
part of: 768BS Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay
note: Ensure take-home pay order does not apply to transferring employees unless they have suffered a reduction in pay.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.373
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BS(4) Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Ensure take-home pay order meets obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BS(5) Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bs-ss-5
part of: 768BS Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay
note: Dismiss any later application for take-home pay if an earlier one has already been made in relation to the same employee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.373
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BS(5) Orders remedying reductions in take-home pay
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bs-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making a later application for take-home pay if an earlier one has already been made in relation to the same employee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BT Contravening a take-home pay order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bt
note: Prohibition on contravening a take-home pay order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.374
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bt-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bt-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bt-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BT Contravening a take-home pay order
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bt-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: A person must not contravene a term of a take-home pay order that applies to the person.
conclusion text: The person must not contravene the term.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BU How long a take-home pay order continues to apply
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bu
note: Take-home pay order continues in relation to employee for as long as modern award applies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.374
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bu-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bu-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bu-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BU How long a take-home pay order continues to apply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bu-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Holds in relation to employee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BV Interaction of take-home pay orders with modern awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bv
note: A term of a modern award or an enterprise agreement is less beneficial to the employee than a term of a take-home pay order if it applies to the employee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.374
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bv-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bv-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bv-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bv-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bv-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bv-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bv-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BV Interaction of take-home pay orders with modern awards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bv-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: less-than-or-equal-to
logic summary: Obligation of a modern award or enterprise agreement to be at least as beneficial as a take-home pay order.
premise text: Term of a modern award or an enterprise agreement
conclusion text: is less beneficial than a term of a take-home pay order that applies to the employee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bv-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps-with
logic summary: The benefits of a modern award or enterprise agreement may overlap with those of a take-home pay order.
premise text: Term of a modern award or an enterprise agreement
conclusion text: is less beneficial than a term of a take-home pay order that applies to the employee.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bv-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: overlaps-with
logic summary: The benefits of a modern award or enterprise agreement may overlap with those of a take-home pay order in terms of time.
premise text: Term of a modern award or an enterprise agreement
conclusion text: is less beneficial than a term of a take-home pay order that applies to the employee.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bv-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: The benefits of a modern award or enterprise agreement may diffuse into those of a take-home pay order.
premise text: Term of a modern award or an enterprise agreement
conclusion text: is less beneficial than a term of a take-home pay order that applies to the employee.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bv-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: cognizes
logic summary: A CogAI system may recognize that a modern award or enterprise agreement is less beneficial than a take-home pay order.
premise text: Term of a modern award or an enterprise agreement
conclusion text: is less beneficial than a term of a take-home pay order that applies to the employee.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

768BW Application of this Act to take-home pay orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bw
note: This Act applies as if certain provisions included a reference to take-home pay orders.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.374
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bw-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bw-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bw-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BW Application of this Act to take-home pay orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bw-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion of provisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BX Modification of this Act for copied State instruments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bx
note: Modifies the Act for copied State instruments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.374
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bx-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bx-logic-alleninterval-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bx-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Identifies temporal interval relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768BY Modification of the Transitional Act for copied State
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768by
note: Modifies transitional provisions for copied State instruments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.376
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768by-norm

768BZ Modification of the Registered Organisations Act for copied
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bz
has part: 768BZ(1) Modification of the Registered Organisations Act for copied
has part: 768BZ(2) Modification of the Registered Organisations Act for copied
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.380

768BZ(1) Modification of the Registered Organisations Act for copied
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bz-ss-1
part of: 768BZ Modification of the Registered Organisations Act for copied
note: Modify Registered Organisations Act for copied State awards and employment agreements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.380
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bz-ss-1-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bz-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768BZ(1) Modification of the Registered Organisations Act for copied
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

768BZ(2) Modification of the Registered Organisations Act for copied
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768bz-ss-2
part of: 768BZ Modification of the Registered Organisations Act for copied
note: Relating to how the Registered Organisations Act applies in relation to a transferring employee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.380
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768bz-ss-2-norm

768CA Regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ca
has part: 768CA(1) Regulations
has part: 768CA(2) Regulations
has part: 768CA(3) Regulations
has part: 768CA(4) Regulations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.382

768CA(1) Regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ca-ss-1
part of: 768CA Regulations
note: Regulations for transition from State awards and State employment agreements to copied State instruments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.382
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ca-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ca-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768CA(1) Regulations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Regulations may make provision in relation to...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768CA(2) Regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ca-ss-2
part of: 768CA Regulations
note: Regulations may modify or apply provisions of the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.382
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ca-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ca-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ca-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768CA(2) Regulations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ca-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Regulations can modify provisions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768CA(3) Regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ca-ss-3
part of: 768CA Regulations
note: Regulations cannot modify provisions to impose an obligation or create new offences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.382
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ca-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ca-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ca-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 768CA(3) Regulations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ca-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Regulations cannot modify provisions to impose an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768CA(4) Regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-768ca-ss-4
part of: 768CA Regulations
note: Provisions for regulations do not limit each other.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.382
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-768ca-ss-4-norm

769 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-769
note: Guide to this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.384
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-769-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-769-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 769 Guide to this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

770 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-770
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.384
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-770-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-770-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-770-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 770 Meanings of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-770-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines key terms.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

771 Object of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-771
note: Object of this Division is to give effect, or further effect, to the ILO Convention (No. 111) concerning Discrimination in respect of Employment and Occupation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.385
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-771-norm

25 June 1958 ([1974] ATS 12); and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.385
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-25-norm

18 December 1979 ([1983] ATS 9); and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18
note: References international covenants on human rights
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.385
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-18-norm

772 Employment not to be terminated on certain grounds
type: Concept
realized by: sec-772
has part: 772(1) Employment not to be terminated on certain grounds
has part: 772(2) Employment not to be terminated on certain grounds
has part: 772(3) Employment not to be terminated on certain grounds
has part: 772(4) Employment not to be terminated on certain grounds
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.386

772(1) Employment not to be terminated on certain grounds
type: Concept
realized by: sec-772-ss-1
part of: 772 Employment not to be terminated on certain grounds
note: Employer must not terminate employment for certain reasons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.386
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-772-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-772-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-772-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 772(1) Employment not to be terminated on certain grounds
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-772-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits termination of employment under specified conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

772(2) Employment not to be terminated on certain grounds
type: Concept
realized by: sec-772-ss-2
part of: 772 Employment not to be terminated on certain grounds
note: Employment cannot be terminated on certain grounds.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.386
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-772-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-772-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-772-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 772(2) Employment not to be terminated on certain grounds
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-772-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits termination of employment based on certain grounds.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

772(3) Employment not to be terminated on certain grounds
type: Concept
realized by: sec-772-ss-3
part of: 772 Employment not to be terminated on certain grounds
note: Employment cannot be terminated for absence during parental leave.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.386
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-772-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-772-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-772-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 772(3) Employment not to be terminated on certain grounds
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-772-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits termination of employment for absence during parental leave.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

772(4) Employment not to be terminated on certain grounds
type: Concept
realized by: sec-772-ss-4
part of: 772 Employment not to be terminated on certain grounds
note: Employment cannot be terminated on certain grounds
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.386
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-772-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-772-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-772-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 772(4) Employment not to be terminated on certain grounds
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-772-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits employment termination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

773 Application for the FWC to deal with a dispute
type: Concept
realized by: sec-773
note: Employee may apply for FWC to deal with dispute over termination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.387
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-773-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-773-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-773-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 773 Application for the FWC to deal with a dispute
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-773-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Employee has a right to apply for FWC to deal with dispute.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

774 Time for application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-774
note: Application must be made within 21 days after employment termination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.387
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-774-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-774-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-774-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 774 Time for application
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-774-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be made within a specified time frame.
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

775 Application fees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-775
has part: 775(1) Application fees
has part: 775(2) Application fees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388

775(1) Application fees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-775-ss-1
part of: 775 Application fees
note: Application must be accompanied by a prescribed fee.
description: Fee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-775-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-775-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-775-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 775(1) Application fees
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-775-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide fee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

775(2) Application fees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-775-ss-2
part of: 775 Application fees
note: Application fee regulation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-775-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-775-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-775-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 775(2) Application fees
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-775-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires payment of application fee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

776 Dealing with a dispute (other than by arbitration)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-776
has part: 776(1) Dealing with a dispute (other than by arbitration)
has part: 776(2) Dealing with a dispute (other than by arbitration)
has part: 776(3) Dealing with a dispute (other than by arbitration)
has part: 776(4) Dealing with a dispute (other than by arbitration)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388

776(1) Dealing with a dispute (other than by arbitration)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-776-ss-1
part of: 776 Dealing with a dispute (other than by arbitration)
note: FWC must deal with a dispute (other than by arbitration)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-776-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-776-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-776-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 776(1) Dealing with a dispute (other than by arbitration)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-776-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must deal with the dispute
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

776(2) Dealing with a dispute (other than by arbitration)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-776-ss-2
part of: 776 Dealing with a dispute (other than by arbitration)
note: Conferences must be conducted in private
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-776-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-776-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-776-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of public conferences
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

776(3) Dealing with a dispute (other than by arbitration)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-776-ss-3
part of: 776 Dealing with a dispute (other than by arbitration)
note: FWC must issue certificate if dispute resolution attempts are unsuccessful
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-776-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-776-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-776-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 776(3) Dealing with a dispute (other than by arbitration)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-776-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to issue certificate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

776(4) Dealing with a dispute (other than by arbitration)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-776-ss-4
part of: 776 Dealing with a dispute (other than by arbitration)
note: An unlawful termination court application is an obligation to apply to a court under Division 2 of Part 4-1 for orders in relation to a contravention of subsection 772(1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-776-ss-4-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-776-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 776(4) Dealing with a dispute (other than by arbitration)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

777 Dealing with a dispute by arbitration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-777
note: Notification of FWC arbitration agreement within 14 days after certificate issuance.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.389
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-777-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-777-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-777-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 777 Dealing with a dispute by arbitration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-777-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Notification obligation
premise text: Notification given within 14 days.
conclusion text: Agreement to arbitration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

778 Taking a dispute to court
type: Concept
realized by: sec-778
note: A person who is entitled to apply under section 773 for the FWC to deal with a dispute must not make an unlawful termination court application in relation to the dispute unless certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.390
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-778-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-778-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-778-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-778-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-778-logic-ltl-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-778-logic-deontic-5
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-778-logic-descriptionlogic-6

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-778-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of making an unlawful termination court application in relation to the dispute unless certain conditions are met.
premise text: FWC has issued a certificate under paragraph 776(3)(a) in relation to the dispute
conclusion text: unlawful termination court application must not be made
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-778-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of the provision as a prohibition.
premise text: A person who is entitled to apply under section 773 for the FWC to deal with a dispute must not make an unlawful termination court application in relation to the dispute unless certain conditions are met.
conclusion text: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-778-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for making an unlawful termination court application in relation to the dispute.
premise text: unlawful termination court application is made within 14 days after the day the certificate is issued, or within such period as the court allows on an application made during or after those 14 days
conclusion text: [0, 14]
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-778-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for making an unlawful termination court application in relation to the dispute.
premise text: unlawful termination court application is made within 14 days after the day the certificate is issued, or within such period as the court allows on an application made during or after those 14 days
conclusion text: [0, ∞)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-778-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to make an unlawful termination court application in relation to the dispute unless certain conditions are met.
premise text: A person who is entitled to apply under section 773 for the FWC to deal with a dispute must not make an unlawful termination court application in relation to the dispute unless certain conditions are met.
conclusion text: obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-778-logic-descriptionlogic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of the provision as an obligation.
premise text: A person who is entitled to apply under section 773 for the FWC to deal with a dispute must not make an unlawful termination court application in relation to the dispute unless certain conditions are met.
conclusion text: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

779 Appeal rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-779
has part: 779(1) Appeal rights
has part: 779(2) Appeal rights
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.391

779(1) Appeal rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-779-ss-1
part of: 779 Appeal rights
note: FWC cannot grant permission to appeal from a decision made by the FWC under subsection 777(2) unless it is in the public interest.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.391
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on granting permission to appeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

779(2) Appeal rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-779-ss-2
part of: 779 Appeal rights
note: Appeal rights limited
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.391
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 779(2) Appeal rights
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Limitation
logic summary: Limits appeal on question of fact
premise text: (2) Despite subsection 604(1)
conclusion text: can only, to the extent that it is an appeal on a question of fact
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

779A Costs orders against parties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-779a
has part: 779A(1) Costs orders against parties
has part: 779A(2) Costs orders against parties
has part: 779A(3) Costs orders against parties
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.391

779A(1) Costs orders against parties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-779a-ss-1
part of: 779A Costs orders against parties
note: The FWC may order costs against a party to a dispute if they caused the other party's costs.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.391
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 779A(1) Costs orders against parties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay costs
premise text: The FWC may make an order for costs...
conclusion text: A party must pay costs incurred by the other party.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval between two events
premise text: The FWC is satisfied that the first party caused those costs...
conclusion text: There is an Allen interval between the application and the costs.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ordered
logic summary: Ordered trace of events
premise text: The FWC is satisfied that the first party caused those costs...
conclusion text: There is an ordered trace between the application and the costs.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of obligations
premise text: The FWC may make an order for costs...
conclusion text: The obligation to pay costs diffuses from the FWC to the first party.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Recognition of obligations
premise text: The FWC may make an order for costs...
conclusion text: The CogAI recognizes the obligation to pay costs.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

779A(2) Costs orders against parties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-779a-ss-2
part of: 779A Costs orders against parties
note: The FWC may make an order only if the other party applies for it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.391
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 779A(2) Costs orders against parties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May make an order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

779A(3) Costs orders against parties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-779a-ss-3
part of: 779A Costs orders against parties
note: Does not limit FWC's power to order costs under section 611.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.391
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 779A(3) Costs orders against parties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-779a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: does not imply
logic summary: Limits FWC's power to order costs
premise text: Section 611
conclusion text: Does not limit FWC's power to order costs under section 611.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

780 Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-780
note: Prohibition on costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.391
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-780-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-780-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-780-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

781 Applications for costs orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-781
note: Application for costs order must be made within 14 days after FWC finishes dealing with dispute.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.392
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 781 Applications for costs orders
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be made within 14 days.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

781A Schedule of costs
type: Concept
realized by: sec-781a
has part: 781A(1) Schedule of costs
has part: 781A(2) Schedule of costs
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.392

781A(1) Schedule of costs
type: Concept
realized by: sec-781a-ss-1
part of: 781A Schedule of costs
note: A schedule of costs may be prescribed in relation to items of expenditure likely to be incurred.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.392
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781a-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 781A(1) Schedule of costs
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

781A(2) Schedule of costs
type: Concept
realized by: sec-781a-ss-2
part of: 781A Schedule of costs
note: Cannot award costs at a rate or amount exceeding the schedule.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.392
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781a-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits awarding costs at a rate or amount exceeding the schedule.
premise text: (2) If a schedule of costs is prescribed...
conclusion text: ...must not award costs in relation to that item...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Limits cost awards within the specified time frame.
premise text: (2) If a schedule of costs is prescribed...
conclusion text: ...must not award costs in relation to that item at a rate or of an amount exceeding...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Limits cost awards to recurring items within the schedule.
premise text: (2) If a schedule of costs is prescribed...
conclusion text: ...must not award costs in relation to that item at a rate or of an amount exceeding...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Limitation
logic summary: Limits cost awards within the specified scope.
premise text: (2) If a schedule of costs is prescribed...
conclusion text: ...must not award costs in relation to that item at a rate or of an amount exceeding...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-781a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Restriction
logic summary: Restricts cost awards based on the schedule.
premise text: (2) If a schedule of costs is prescribed...
conclusion text: ...must not award costs in relation to that item at a rate or of an amount exceeding...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

782 Contravening costs orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-782
note: Prohibition on contravening costs orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.393
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-782-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-782-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-782-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 782 Contravening costs orders
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-782-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids contravention of costs orders
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

783 Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise
type: Concept
realized by: sec-783
has part: 783(1) Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise
has part: 783(2) Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.393

783(1) Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise
type: Concept
realized by: sec-783-ss-1
part of: 783 Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise
note: Presumption of reason for action in contravention cases
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.393
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-783-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-783-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-783-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-783-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-783-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-783-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-783-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 783(1) Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-783-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: presumption
logic summary: Presumes a reason for action unless proven otherwise
premise text: (1) If:...
conclusion text: ...unless the person proves otherwise.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-783-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relation between temporal intervals
logic summary: Relates action to reason for action
premise text: (a) in an application...
conclusion text: ...would constitute a contravention of subsection 772(1);
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-783-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ordered trace
logic summary: Establishes a causal relationship between action and reason
premise text: (a) in an application...
conclusion text: ...would constitute a contravention of subsection 772(1);
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-783-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion of information
logic summary: Spreads the presumption to related cases
premise text: (b) taking that action for that reason...
conclusion text: ...would constitute a contravention of subsection 772(1);
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-783-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: artificial intelligence application
logic summary: Applies to automated decision-making processes
premise text: (a) in an application...
conclusion text: ...would constitute a contravention of subsection 772(1);
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

783(2) Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise
type: Concept
realized by: sec-783-ss-2
part of: 783 Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise
note: Prevents application of subsection (1) to interim injunction orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.393
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-783-ss-2-norm

784 Object of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-784
note: Requirement to notify Centrelink
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.394
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-784-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-784-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-784-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 784 Object of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-784-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Mandatory notification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

785 Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-785
has part: 785(1) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations
has part: 785(2) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations
has part: 785(3) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations
has part: 785(4) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations
has part: 785(5) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.394

785(1) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-785-ss-1
part of: 785 Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations
note: Employer must notify Centrelink of proposed terminations.
description: Written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.394
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-785-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-785-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-785-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 785(1) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-785-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must provide written notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

785(2) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-785-ss-2
part of: 785 Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations
note: Employer must notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations.
description: Reasons for termination, number and categories of employees likely to be affected, time when or period over which termination is intended.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.394
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-785-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-785-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-785-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 785(2) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-785-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has a duty to notify Centrelink.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

785(3) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-785-ss-3
part of: 785 Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations
note: Employer must notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations.
description: Notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.394
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-785-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-785-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-785-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must provide notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

785(4) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-785-ss-4
part of: 785 Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations
note: Employer must notify Centrelink of proposed terminations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.394
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-785-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-785-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-785-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with the section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

785(5) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-785-ss-5
part of: 785 Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed terminations
note: Employer must not terminate employment without Centrelink's permission.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.394
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-785-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-785-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-785-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Employer has a duty to notify Centrelink.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

786 FWC may make orders where failure to notify or consult
type: Concept
realized by: sec-786
note: FWC may make orders where failure to notify or consult registered employee associations about terminations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.395
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-786-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-786-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-786-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 786 FWC may make orders where failure to notify or consult
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-786-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

787 Orders that the FWC may make
type: Concept
realized by: sec-787
has part: 787(1) Orders that the FWC may make
has part: 787(2) Orders that the FWC may make
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.397

787(1) Orders that the FWC may make
type: Concept
realized by: sec-787-ss-1
part of: 787 Orders that the FWC may make
note: The FWC may make orders to put employees in the same position as if the employer had complied with subsections 786(2) and (3).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.397
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-787-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-787-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-787-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 787(1) Orders that the FWC may make
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-787-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The FWC may make orders.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

787(2) Orders that the FWC may make
type: Concept
realized by: sec-787-ss-2
part of: 787 Orders that the FWC may make
note: Prohibition on certain orders by FWC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.397
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-787-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-787-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-787-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits actions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

788 Application to the FWC for order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-788
note: Application for order by employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.397
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-788-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-788-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 788 Application to the FWC for order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

789 Limits on scope of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789
has part: 789(1) Limits on scope of this Division
has part: 789(2) Limits on scope of this Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.398

789(1) Limits on scope of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789-ss-1
part of: 789 Limits on scope of this Division
note: Employees exempt from this Division's scope
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.398
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789(1) Limits on scope of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Employees exempt from this Division's scope
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789(2) Limits on scope of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789-ss-2
part of: 789 Limits on scope of this Division
note: Exempts employment from Division application if substantial reason for employing the employee was to avoid the application of this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.398
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789(2) Limits on scope of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Exempts employment from Division application.
premise text: (2) Paragraph (1)(a) does not prevent this Division from applying in relation to an employee if a substantial reason for employing the employee as described in that paragraph was to avoid the application of this Division.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for exemption from Division application.
premise text: (2) Paragraph (1)(a) does not prevent this Division from applying in relation to an employee if a substantial reason for employing the employee as described in that paragraph was to avoid the application of this Division.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for exemption from Division application.
premise text: (2) Paragraph (1)(a) does not prevent this Division from applying in relation to an employee if a substantial reason for employing the employee as described in that paragraph was to avoid the application of this Division.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusive Process
logic summary: Describes diffusive process for exemption from Division application.
premise text: (2) Paragraph (1)(a) does not prevent this Division from applying in relation to an employee if a substantial reason for employing the employee as described in that paragraph was to avoid the application of this Division.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Artificial Intelligence
logic summary: Describes artificial intelligence process for exemption from Division application.
premise text: (2) Paragraph (1)(a) does not prevent this Division from applying in relation to an employee if a substantial reason for employing the employee as described in that paragraph was to avoid the application of this Division.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789AA Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789aa
note: Guide to this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.399
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789aa-norm

789AB Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789ab
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.399
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ab-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ab-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ab-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789AB Meanings of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ab-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines key terms.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789AC Objects of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789ac
note: Ensure secure, safe and fair systems of work for outworkers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.399
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ac-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ac-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ac-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789AC Objects of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ac-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Ensure secure, safe and fair systems of work for outworkers
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789BA Provisions covered by this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789ba
has part: 789BA(1) Provisions covered by this Division
has part: 789BA(2) Provisions covered by this Division
has part: 789BA(3) Provisions covered by this Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.401

789BA(1) Provisions covered by this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789ba-ss-1
part of: 789BA Provisions covered by this Division
note: Exemptions from coverage of this Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.401
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ba-ss-1-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ba-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789BA(1) Provisions covered by this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

789BA(2) Provisions covered by this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789ba-ss-2
part of: 789BA Provisions covered by this Division
note: Provisions not covered by this Division are to be interpreted disregarding the effect of this Division in relation to other provisions of this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.401
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ba-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ba-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ba-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ba-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ba-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ba-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789BA(2) Provisions covered by this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to interpret provisions not covered by this Division disregarding the effect of this Division.
premise text: (2) Provisions of this Act that are not covered by this Division...
conclusion text: ...are to be interpreted disregarding the effect of this Division in relation to other provisions of this Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ba-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Provisions not covered by this Division overlap with other provisions of the Act.
premise text: (2) Provisions of this Act that are not covered by this Division...
conclusion text: ...are to be interpreted disregarding the effect of this Division in relation to other provisions of this Act.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ba-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: Provisions not covered by this Division are recurrently related to other provisions of the Act.
premise text: (2) Provisions of this Act that are not covered by this Division...
conclusion text: ...are to be interpreted disregarding the effect of this Division in relation to other provisions of this Act.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ba-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Provisions not covered by this Division diffuse into other provisions of the Act.
premise text: (2) Provisions of this Act that are not covered by this Division...
conclusion text: ...are to be interpreted disregarding the effect of this Division in relation to other provisions of this Act.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ba-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classifies
logic summary: Provisions not covered by this Division are classified as part of the Act.
premise text: (2) Provisions of this Act that are not covered by this Division...
conclusion text: ...are to be interpreted disregarding the effect of this Division in relation to other provisions of this Act.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

789BA(3) Provisions covered by this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789ba-ss-3
part of: 789BA Provisions covered by this Division
note: Interpretation of excluded provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.401
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ba-ss-3-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ba-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789BA(3) Provisions covered by this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

789BB TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789bb
has part: 789BB(1) TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain
has part: 789BB(2) TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain
has part: 789BB(3) TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain
has part: 789BB(4) TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain
has part: 789BB(5) TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.402

789BB(1) TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789bb-ss-1
part of: 789BB TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain
note: TCF contract outworker is taken to be an employee in certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.402
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789BB(1) TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: Establishes a legal relationship
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789BB(2) TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789bb-ss-2
part of: 789BB TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain
note: TCF contract outworker is an employee under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.402
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789BB(2) TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of TCF contract outworker
premise text: (2) A TCF contract outworker is a TCF outworker who performs work other than as an employee.
conclusion text: TCF contract outworker is an employee under certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between employment and outwork
premise text: (2) A TCF contract outworker is a TCF outworker who performs work other than as an employee.
conclusion text: Outwork performed by TCF contract outworker occurs during employment.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between employment and outwork
premise text: (2) A TCF contract outworker is a TCF outworker who performs work other than as an employee.
conclusion text: Outwork performed by TCF contract outworker occurs during employment.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between employment and outwork
premise text: (2) A TCF contract outworker is a TCF outworker who performs work other than as an employee.
conclusion text: Outwork performed by TCF contract outworker occurs during employment.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between employment and outwork
premise text: (2) A TCF contract outworker is a TCF outworker who performs work other than as an employee.
conclusion text: Outwork performed by TCF contract outworker occurs during employment.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789BB(3) TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789bb-ss-3
part of: 789BB TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain
note: Interpretation preference
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.402
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-3-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789BB(3) TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

789BB(4) TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789bb-ss-4
part of: 789BB TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain
note: Outworker has same rights and obligations as an employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.402
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-4-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 789BB(4) TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain
held by: NaturalPerson
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasSameRightsAndObligationsAs
logic summary: Outworker has same rights and obligations as an employee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789BB(5) TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789bb-ss-5
part of: 789BB TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain
note: This section has effect subject to regulations made for the purposes of section 789BC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.402
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-5-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bb-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789BB(5) TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

789BC Regulations relating to TCF outworkers who are taken to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789bc
has part: 789BC(1) Regulations relating to TCF outworkers who are taken to be
has part: 789BC(2) Regulations relating to TCF outworkers who are taken to be
has part: 789BC(3) Regulations relating to TCF outworkers who are taken to be
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.403

789BC(1) Regulations relating to TCF outworkers who are taken to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789bc-ss-1
part of: 789BC Regulations relating to TCF outworkers who are taken to be
note: Regulations may provide specified modifications to provisions covered by this Division for deemed employees and deemed employers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.403
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bc-ss-1-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789BC(1) Regulations relating to TCF outworkers who are taken to be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

789BC(2) Regulations relating to TCF outworkers who are taken to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789bc-ss-2
part of: 789BC Regulations relating to TCF outworkers who are taken to be
note: Regulations may provide differently for different provisions or situations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.403
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bc-ss-2-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789BC(2) Regulations relating to TCF outworkers who are taken to be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

789BC(3) Regulations relating to TCF outworkers who are taken to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789bc-ss-3
part of: 789BC Regulations relating to TCF outworkers who are taken to be
note: Regulations cannot modify provisions that create an offence or impose a duty that constitutes an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.403
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bc-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789bc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of modifying provisions that create an offence or impose a duty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789CA When this Division applies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789ca
has part: 789CA(1) When this Division applies
has part: 789CA(2) When this Division applies
has part: 789CA(3) When this Division applies
has part: 789CA(4) When this Division applies
has part: 789CA(5) When this Division applies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.404

789CA(1) When this Division applies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789ca-ss-1
part of: 789CA When this Division applies
note: Responsible person must pay unpaid amount to outworker or another person for the benefit of the outworker.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.404
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789CA(1) When this Division applies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Responsible person must pay unpaid amount.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789CA(2) When this Division applies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789ca-ss-2
part of: 789CA When this Division applies
note: Amounts payable by way of remuneration or commission, leave, contributions to a superannuation fund, and reimbursement for expenses incurred.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.404
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789CA(2) When this Division applies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Has obligation
premise text: (2) Without limiting paragraph (1)(b), the unpaid amount may...
conclusion text: The unpaid amount is an amount payable by way of remuneration or commission.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During a period
premise text: (2) Without limiting paragraph (1)(b), the unpaid amount may...
conclusion text: The unpaid amount relates to the TCF work during a period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
logic summary: Everywhere in the TCF work
premise text: (2) Without limiting paragraph (1)(b), the unpaid amount may...
conclusion text: The unpaid amount is everywhere in the TCF work.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: everywhere
logic summary: Everywhere in the TCF work
premise text: (2) Without limiting paragraph (1)(b), the unpaid amount may...
conclusion text: The unpaid amount is everywhere in the TCF work.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Has obligation
premise text: (2) Without limiting paragraph (1)(b), the unpaid amount may...
conclusion text: The unpaid amount is an obligation.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

789CA(3) When this Division applies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789ca-ss-3
part of: 789CA When this Division applies
note: A person is an indirectly responsible entity in relation to the TCF work if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.404
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-3-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789CA(3) When this Division applies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

789CA(4) When this Division applies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789ca-ss-4
part of: 789CA When this Division applies
note: Entity is indirectly responsible for part of TCF work if subsection (3) is satisfied.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.404
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-4-logic-deontic-4

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789CA(4) When this Division applies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Part of TCF work attribution
premise text: The unpaid amount is so much only of the amount referred to in paragraph (1)(b) as is attributable to that part of the TCF work.
conclusion text: Unpaid amount is attributed to part of TCF work.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
premise text: (4) If subsection (3) is satisfied in relation to a Commonwealth outworker entity and part only of the TCF work:
conclusion text: Part of TCF work has temporal relation to subsection (3).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <
logic summary: Temporal interval trace
premise text: (4) If subsection (3) is satisfied in relation to a Commonwealth outworker entity and part only of the TCF work:
conclusion text: Part of TCF work has temporal trace.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Entity classification
premise text: The entity is an indirectly responsible entity in relation to that part of the TCF work.
conclusion text: Entity is classified as indirectly responsible.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789CA(5) When this Division applies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789ca-ss-5
part of: 789CA When this Division applies
note: Division applies under certain conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.404
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ca-ss-5-norm

789CB Liability of indirectly responsible entity for unpaid amount
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789cb
has part: 789CB(1) Liability of indirectly responsible entity for unpaid amount
has part: 789CB(3) Liability of indirectly responsible entity for unpaid amount
has part: 789CB(4) Liability of indirectly responsible entity for unpaid amount
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.406

789CB(1) Liability of indirectly responsible entity for unpaid amount
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789cb-ss-1
part of: 789CB Liability of indirectly responsible entity for unpaid amount
note: Each indirectly responsible entity is liable to pay the unpaid amount.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.406
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789CB(1) Liability of indirectly responsible entity for unpaid amount
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Liability
logic summary: Entity liability
premise text: (1) Each indirectly responsible entity (or the indirectly responsible entity, if there is only one) is liable to pay the unpaid amount.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalRelation
logic summary: Temporal relation between entities
premise text: (1) Each indirectly responsible entity (or the indirectly responsible entity, if there is only one) is liable to pay the unpaid amount.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of liability on entities
premise text: (1) Each indirectly responsible entity (or the indirectly responsible entity, if there is only one) is liable to pay the unpaid amount.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagated liability
premise text: (1) Each indirectly responsible entity (or the indirectly responsible entity, if there is only one) is liable to pay the unpaid amount.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: KnowledgeRepresentation
logic summary: Knowledge representation of liability
premise text: (1) Each indirectly responsible entity (or the indirectly responsible entity, if there is only one) is liable to pay the unpaid amount.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

789CB(3) Liability of indirectly responsible entity for unpaid amount
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789cb-ss-3
part of: 789CB Liability of indirectly responsible entity for unpaid amount
note: Entities are jointly and severally liable for payment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.406
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789CB(3) Liability of indirectly responsible entity for unpaid amount
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Joint liability
premise text: (3) If there are 2 or more indirectly responsible entities...
conclusion text: ...those entities are jointly and severally liable for the payment of the unpaid amount.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap
premise text: (3) If there are 2 or more indirectly responsible entities...
conclusion text: ...those entities are jointly and severally liable for the payment of the unpaid amount.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RecurringTrace
logic summary: Recurring trace
premise text: (3) If there are 2 or more indirectly responsible entities...
conclusion text: ...those entities are jointly and severally liable for the payment of the unpaid amount.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: JointLiability
logic summary: Joint liability diffusion
premise text: (3) If there are 2 or more indirectly responsible entities...
conclusion text: ...those entities are jointly and severally liable for the payment of the unpaid amount.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: EntityClassification
logic summary: Entity classification
premise text: (3) If there are 2 or more indirectly responsible entities...
conclusion text: ...those entities are jointly and severally liable for the payment of the unpaid amount.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789CB(4) Liability of indirectly responsible entity for unpaid amount
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789cb-ss-4
part of: 789CB Liability of indirectly responsible entity for unpaid amount
note: Responsible person still liable for unpaid amount despite section's effect on indirectly responsible entity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.406
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-4-logic-deontic-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789CB(4) Liability of indirectly responsible entity for unpaid amount
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
logic summary: Section does not affect liability of responsible person.
premise text: This section does not affect the liability of the responsible person to pay the unpaid amount.
conclusion text: The responsible person is still liable for the unpaid amount.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
logic summary: Section's effect on indirectly responsible entity is limited.
premise text: Subject to subsection 789CE(1A), this section does not affect the liability of the responsible person to pay the unpaid amount.
conclusion text: The section's effect on the indirectly responsible entity is limited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Section cannot be used to exempt indirectly responsible entities from liability.
premise text: This section does not affect the liability of the responsible person to pay the unpaid amount.
conclusion text: The section cannot be used to exempt the indirectly responsible entity from liability.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Section allows for limited exemption of indirectly responsible entities from liability.
premise text: Subject to subsection 789CE(1A), this section does not affect the liability of the responsible person to pay the unpaid amount.
conclusion text: The section allows for a limited exemption of the indirectly responsible entity from liability.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cb-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Right
logic summary: Section creates a right in the responsible person to receive payment.
premise text: This section does not affect the liability of the responsible person to pay the unpaid amount.
conclusion text: The section creates a right in the responsible person to receive payment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789CC Demand for payment from an apparent indirectly
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789cc
has part: 789CC(1) Demand for payment from an apparent indirectly
has part: 789CC(2) Demand for payment from an apparent indirectly
has part: 789CC(3) Demand for payment from an apparent indirectly
has part: 789CC(4) Demand for payment from an apparent indirectly
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.406

789CC(1) Demand for payment from an apparent indirectly
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789cc-ss-1
part of: 789CC Demand for payment from an apparent indirectly
note: Demand for payment from an apparent indirectly responsible entity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.406
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cc-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to demand payment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789CC(2) Demand for payment from an apparent indirectly
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789cc-ss-2
part of: 789CC Demand for payment from an apparent indirectly
note: An entity is an apparent indirectly responsible entity in relation to the TCF work if the TCF outworker reasonably believes that the entity is an indirectly responsible entity in relation to the TCF work.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.406
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cc-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789CC(2) Demand for payment from an apparent indirectly
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Entity classification
premise text: TCF outworker reasonably believes
conclusion text: entity is an apparent indirectly responsible entity
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789CC(3) Demand for payment from an apparent indirectly
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789cc-ss-3
part of: 789CC Demand for payment from an apparent indirectly
note: Demand must specify amount, responsible person, and particulars of TCF work.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.406
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cc-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Entity must provide demand information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789CC(4) Demand for payment from an apparent indirectly
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789cc-ss-4
part of: 789CC Demand for payment from an apparent indirectly
note: Minimum time for demand before payment is due
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.406
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cc-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cc-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789CC(4) Demand for payment from an apparent indirectly
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
logic summary: Time must be at least 14 days after demand
premise text: (4) The time specified for the purpose of paragraph (3)(c)
conclusion text: must not be less than 14 days after the demand is given to the entity.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789CD Court order for entity to pay amount demanded
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789cd
has part: 789CD(1) Court order for entity to pay amount demanded
has part: 789CD(2) Court order for entity to pay amount demanded
has part: 789CD(3) Court order for entity to pay amount demanded
has part: 789CD(4) Court order for entity to pay amount demanded
has part: 789CD(5) Court order for entity to pay amount demanded
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.407

789CD(1) Court order for entity to pay amount demanded
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789cd-ss-1
part of: 789CD Court order for entity to pay amount demanded
note: Entity must pay amount demanded if not paid by specified time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.407
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789CD(1) Court order for entity to pay amount demanded
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Entity must pay amount demanded.
premise text: (1) If: (a) in accordance with section 789CC, an apparent indirectly responsible entity has been given a demand for payment of a specified amount; and (b) the amount has not been paid in full by the time specified in the demand; a person or organisation specified in subsection (2) (the applicant) may commence proceedings for an order requiring the entity to pay the specified amount.
conclusion text: (1) If: (a) in accordance with section 789CC, an apparent indirectly responsible entity has been given a demand for payment of a specified amount; and (b) the amount has not been paid in full by the time specified in the demand; a person or organisation specified in subsection (2) (the applicant) may commence proceedings for an order requiring the entity to pay the specified amount.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval.
premise text: (1) If: (a) in accordance with section 789CC, an apparent indirectly responsible entity has been given a demand for payment of a specified amount; and (b) the amount has not been paid in full by the time specified in the demand; a person or organisation specified in subsection (2) (the applicant) may commence proceedings for an order requiring the entity to pay the specified amount.
conclusion text: (1) If: (a) in accordance with section 789CC, an apparent indirectly responsible entity has been given a demand for payment of a specified amount; and (b) the amount has not been paid in full by the time specified in the demand; a person or organisation specified in subsection (2) (the applicant) may commence proceedings for an order requiring the entity to pay the specified amount.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval.
premise text: (1) If: (a) in accordance with section 789CC, an apparent indirectly responsible entity has been given a demand for payment of a specified amount; and (b) the amount has not been paid in full by the time specified in the demand; a person or organisation specified in subsection (2) (the applicant) may commence proceedings for an order requiring the entity to pay the specified amount.
conclusion text: (1) If: (a) in accordance with section 789CC, an apparent indirectly responsible entity has been given a demand for payment of a specified amount; and (b) the amount has not been paid in full by the time specified in the demand; a person or organisation specified in subsection (2) (the applicant) may commence proceedings for an order requiring the entity to pay the specified amount.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines a duty.
premise text: (1) If: (a) in accordance with section 789CC, an apparent indirectly responsible entity has been given a demand for payment of a specified amount; and (b) the amount has not been paid in full by the time specified in the demand; a person or organisation specified in subsection (2) (the applicant) may commence proceedings for an order requiring the entity to pay the specified amount.
conclusion text: (1) If: (a) in accordance with section 789CC, an apparent indirectly responsible entity has been given a demand for payment of a specified amount; and (b) the amount has not been paid in full by the time specified in the demand; a person or organisation specified in subsection (2) (the applicant) may commence proceedings for an order requiring the entity to pay the specified amount.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines a claim.
premise text: (1) If: (a) in accordance with section 789CC, an apparent indirectly responsible entity has been given a demand for payment of a specified amount; and (b) the amount has not been paid in full by the time specified in the demand; a person or organisation specified in subsection (2) (the applicant) may commence proceedings for an order requiring the entity to pay the specified amount.
conclusion text: (1) If: (a) in accordance with section 789CC, an apparent indirectly responsible entity has been given a demand for payment of a specified amount; and (b) the amount has not been paid in full by the time specified in the demand; a person or organisation specified in subsection (2) (the applicant) may commence proceedings for an order requiring the entity to pay the specified amount.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789CD(2) Court order for entity to pay amount demanded
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789cd-ss-2
part of: 789CD Court order for entity to pay amount demanded
note: Court order to pay amount demanded
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.407
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to pay
premise text: (2) The proceedings may be commenced...
conclusion text: ...pay the amount demanded.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between commencement and payment
premise text: (2) The proceedings may be commenced...
conclusion text: ...pay the amount demanded.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789CD(3) Court order for entity to pay amount demanded
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789cd-ss-3
part of: 789CD Court order for entity to pay amount demanded
note: Court order for entity to pay amount demanded
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.407
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789CD(3) Court order for entity to pay amount demanded
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to pay an amount demanded
premise text: (3) The proceedings may be commenced...
conclusion text: ...the entity must pay the amount demanded.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Specifies the temporal intervals for commencement of proceedings
premise text: (a) the Federal Court; or (b) the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2); or (c) an eligible State or Territory court.
conclusion text: ...the proceedings may be commenced at any time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Specifies the recurring trace for commencement of proceedings
premise text: (a) the Federal Court; or (b) the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2); or (c) an eligible State or Territory court.
conclusion text: ...the proceedings may be commenced repeatedly.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Specifies the diffusion of information about commencement of proceedings
premise text: (a) the Federal Court; or (b) the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2); or (c) an eligible State or Territory court.
conclusion text: ...the information is diffused to all relevant parties.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Specifies the recognition of entities for commencement of proceedings
premise text: (a) the Federal Court; or (b) the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2); or (c) an eligible State or Territory court.
conclusion text: ...the entity is recognized as a party to the proceedings.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789CD(4) Court order for entity to pay amount demanded
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789cd-ss-4
part of: 789CD Court order for entity to pay amount demanded
note: Court order requiring entity to pay amount demanded
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.407
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May make an order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789CD(5) Court order for entity to pay amount demanded
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789cd-ss-5
part of: 789CD Court order for entity to pay amount demanded
note: Court must not make order if entity is not liable under section 789CB
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.407
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789CD(5) Court order for entity to pay amount demanded
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Court cannot make order if entity is not liable
premise text: Section 789CB
conclusion text: No liability under section 789CB
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cd-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Court order and entity's liability under section 789CB overlap in time
premise text: Section 789CB
conclusion text: No overlap in time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789CE Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789ce
has part: 789CE(1) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
has part: 789CE(1A) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
has part: 789CE(2) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
has part: 789CE(3) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
has part: 789CE(4) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
has part: 789CE(5) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
has part: 789CE(6) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
has part: 789CE(7) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
has part: 789CE(8) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408

789CE(1) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789ce-ss-1
part of: 789CE Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
note: Entity's right to payment in discharge of liability
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes duty
logic summary: Payment as a liability discharge
premise text: Entity pays amount in discharge of liability
conclusion text: Entity fulfills obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789CE(1A) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789ce-ss-1a
part of: 789CE Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
note: Entity's right to recover an equivalent amount from the responsible person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-1a-norm

789CE(2) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789ce-ss-2
part of: 789CE Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
note: Entity may recover from responsible person an amount equal to the sum of the amount paid and any interest paid.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789CE(2) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Entity has an obligation to recover from responsible person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789CE(3) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789ce-ss-3
part of: 789CE Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
note: Entity's right to recover amount
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Entity has a right
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789CE(4) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789ce-ss-4
part of: 789CE Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
note: Entity may commence proceedings against responsible person for payment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Entity has the right to commence proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789CE(5) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789ce-ss-5
part of: 789CE Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
note: Court may order responsible person to pay entity recoverable amount.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789CE(5) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Court obligation to order payment.
premise text: (5) The court may make an order requiring the responsible person...
conclusion text: ...pay the entity the recoverable amount (or so much of it as is still owing)...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Recoverable amount owed between entity and responsible person.
premise text: (5) The court may make an order requiring the responsible person...
conclusion text: ...if the court is satisfied that: ...the recoverable amount (or so much of it as is still owing)...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ordered
logic summary: Recoverable amount owed in ordered sequence.
premise text: (5) The court may make an order requiring the responsible person...
conclusion text: ...if the court is satisfied that: ...the entity has not otherwise recovered the recoverable amount in full from the responsible person.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Payment obligation diffused to responsible person.
premise text: (5) The court may make an order requiring the responsible person...
conclusion text: ...pay the entity the recoverable amount (or so much of it as is still owing)...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Entity recognized as having right to payment.
premise text: (5) The court may make an order requiring the responsible person...
conclusion text: ...if the court is satisfied that: ...the entity has not otherwise recovered the recoverable amount in full from the responsible person.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789CE(6) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789ce-ss-6
part of: 789CE Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
note: Court must include interest in sum ordered unless good cause is shown.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-6-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789CE(6) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must include interest in sum ordered.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789CE(7) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789ce-ss-7
part of: 789CE Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
note: Court must consider period between payment and order date when determining interest amount.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-7-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789CE(7) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must consider period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789CE(8) Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789ce-ss-8
part of: 789CE Effect of payment by entity (including entity’s right to
note: No proceedings can be commenced more than 6 years after payment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-8-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ce-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No proceedings can be commenced.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789CF Division does not limit other liabilities or rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789cf
note: Nothing in this Division limits any other liability or right
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.409
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789cf-norm

789DA Regulations may provide for a code
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789da
note: Regulations may prescribe a code dealing with standards of conduct and practice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.411
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789da-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789da-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789DA Regulations may provide for a code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

789DB Matters that may be dealt with in TCF outwork code
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789db
has part: 789DB(1) Matters that may be dealt with in TCF outwork code
has part: 789DB(2) Matters that may be dealt with in TCF outwork code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.411

789DB(1) Matters that may be dealt with in TCF outwork code
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789db-ss-1
part of: 789DB Matters that may be dealt with in TCF outwork code
note: Matters that may be dealt with in TCF outwork code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.411
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789DB(1) Matters that may be dealt with in TCF outwork code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: List of matters that may be dealt with in TCF outwork code
premise text: (1) The matters that may be dealt with in the TCF outwork code include...
conclusion text: ...the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval during which matters that may be dealt with in TCF outwork code apply
premise text: (1) The matters that may be dealt with in the TCF outwork code include...
conclusion text: ...the following:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval during which matters that may be dealt with in TCF outwork code apply
premise text: (1) The matters that may be dealt with in the TCF outwork code include...
conclusion text: ...the following:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
logic summary: List of matters that may be dealt with in TCF outwork code
premise text: (1) The matters that may be dealt with in the TCF outwork code include...
conclusion text: ...the following:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: includes
logic summary: List of matters that may be dealt with in TCF outwork code
premise text: (1) The matters that may be dealt with in the TCF outwork code include...
conclusion text: ...the following:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

789DB(2) Matters that may be dealt with in TCF outwork code
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789db-ss-2
part of: 789DB Matters that may be dealt with in TCF outwork code
note: TCF outwork code must not specify wages or entitlements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.411
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 789DB(2) Matters that may be dealt with in TCF outwork code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Prohibition of specifying wages or entitlements.
premise text: (2) The TCF outwork code must not specify wages or other entitlements for TCF outworkers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: TCF outwork code does not specify wages or entitlements during its implementation.
premise text: (2) The TCF outwork code must not specify wages or other entitlements for TCF outworkers.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: TCF outwork code does not specify wages or entitlements during its implementation.
premise text: (2) The TCF outwork code must not specify wages or other entitlements for TCF outworkers.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: TCF outwork code does not diffuse specifying wages or entitlements during its implementation.
premise text: (2) The TCF outwork code must not specify wages or other entitlements for TCF outworkers.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789db-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: TCF outwork code does not specify wages or entitlements during its implementation.
premise text: (2) The TCF outwork code must not specify wages or other entitlements for TCF outworkers.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789DC Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789dc
has part: 789DC(1) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
has part: 789DC(2) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
has part: 789DC(3) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
has part: 789DC(4) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
has part: 789DC(5) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
has part: 789DC(6) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.412

789DC(1) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789dc-ss-1
part of: 789DC Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
note: Only impose obligations on a person if certain conditions apply.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.412
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789DC(1) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: onlyIf
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: (2) to (5) applies to the person.
conclusion text: The TCF outwork code may impose obligations on a person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval application
premise text: (1)
conclusion text: The TCF outwork code may only impose obligations on a person if one or more of subsections (2) to (5) applies to the person.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval application
premise text: (1)
conclusion text: The TCF outwork code may only impose obligations on a person if one or more of subsections (2) to (5) applies to the person.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval application
premise text: (1)
conclusion text: The TCF outwork code may only impose obligations on a person if one or more of subsections (2) to (5) applies to the person.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval application
premise text: (1)
conclusion text: The TCF outwork code may only impose obligations on a person if one or more of subsections (2) to (5) applies to the person.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789DC(2) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789dc-ss-2
part of: 789DC Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
note: National system employers that employ TCF outworkers are subject to obligations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.412
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789DC(2) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Subject-predicate relation
premise text: Person is a national system employer that employs TCF outworkers.
conclusion text: Obligation applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789DC(3) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789dc-ss-3
part of: 789DC Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
note: Person subject to obligation if arranges for TCF work performed by outworkers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.412
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789DC(3) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Condition for obligation
premise text: Person arranges for TCF work performed by outworkers
conclusion text: Obligation imposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789DC(4) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789dc-ss-4
part of: 789DC Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
note: Person subject to obligations if they arrange for TCF work to be performed by outworkers or of a kind often performed by them.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.412
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-4-logic-deontic-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789DC(4) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation based on arrangement for TCF work
premise text: (a) the person arranges for TCF work to be performed; and (b) the work is to be performed indirectly...
conclusion text: The person is subject to obligations if they arrange for TCF work to be performed by outworkers or of a kind often performed by them.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval: Person arranges for TCF work during a period of time
premise text: (a) the person arranges for TCF work to be performed; and (b) the work is to be performed indirectly...
conclusion text: The person's arrangement for TCF work occurs during a specific period of time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: and
logic summary: Recurring trace: Person arranges for TCF work and the work is performed indirectly by outworkers
premise text: (a) the person arranges for TCF work to be performed; and (b) the work is to be performed indirectly...
conclusion text: The person's arrangement for TCF work and the indirect performance of the work by outworkers form a recurring trace.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation based on type of work performed
premise text: (b) the work is to be performed indirectly...
conclusion text: The person's indirect performance of the work by outworkers imposes obligations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation based on type of entity performing the work
premise text: (c) the work is to be performed indirectly: (i) for another person, being a Commonwealth outworker entity; and (ii) if that Commonwealth outworker entity is a constitutional corporation...
conclusion text: The person's indirect performance of the work by a Commonwealth outworker entity or a constitutional corporation imposes obligations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789DC(5) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789dc-ss-5
part of: 789DC Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
note: Person subject to obligation if constitutional corporation sells goods produced by TCF work.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.412
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789DC(5) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: Person is a constitutional corporation that sells goods produced by TCF work.
conclusion text: Person subject to obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval: Person subject to obligation while selling goods produced by TCF work
premise text: Person is a constitutional corporation that sells goods produced by TCF work.
conclusion text: Person subject to obligation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: if
logic summary: Rational basis for obligation: Person is a constitutional corporation that sells goods produced by TCF work
premise text: Person is a constitutional corporation that sells goods produced by TCF work.
conclusion text: Person subject to obligation
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
logic summary: Obligation diffuses from State to Person
premise text: State imposes obligation on Person
conclusion text: Person subject to obligation
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789DC(6) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789dc-ss-6
part of: 789DC Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
note: Limitations on obligations imposed by TCF outwork code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.412
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-6-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789DC(6) Persons on whom obligations may be imposed by TCF
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Limitations on obligations imposed by TCF outwork code
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dc-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: subsection (2) applies to the person
conclusion text: obligations relating to the person's employment of TCF outworkers
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789DD Other general matters relating to content of TCF outwork
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789dd
has part: 789DD(1) Other general matters relating to content of TCF outwork
has part: 789DD(2) Other general matters relating to content of TCF outwork
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.413

789DD(1) Other general matters relating to content of TCF outwork
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789dd-ss-1
part of: 789DD Other general matters relating to content of TCF outwork
note: TCF outwork code applies to persons and TCF work
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.413
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dd-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dd-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789DD(1) Other general matters relating to content of TCF outwork
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: TCF outwork code applies to persons and TCF work
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dd-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: identifies
logic summary: Class of person or TCF work may be identified by reference to a particular sector
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789DD(2) Other general matters relating to content of TCF outwork
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789dd-ss-2
part of: 789DD Other general matters relating to content of TCF outwork
note: Provides for different classes of persons covered by section 789DC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.413
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789dd-ss-2-norm

789DE Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789de
has part: 789DE(1) Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
has part: 789DE(2) Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
has part: 789DE(3) Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
has part: 789DE(4) Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
has part: 789DE(5) Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
has part: 789DE(6) Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.414

789DE(1) Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789de-ss-1
part of: 789DE Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
note: A TCF award prevails over the TCF outwork code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.414
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789DE(1) Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prevails-over
logic summary: Precedence of TCF awards over the TCF outwork code.
premise text: (TCF award)
conclusion text: (TCF outwork code)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789DE(2) Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789de-ss-2
part of: 789DE Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
note: The TCF outwork code prevails over other codes in case of inconsistency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.414
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789DE(2) Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
logic summary: Priority
premise text: The TCF outwork code prevails.
conclusion text: over any of the following
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789DE(3) Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789de-ss-3
part of: 789DE Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
note: The TCF outwork code may make provision in relation to a matter by applying, adopting or incorporating any matter contained in an instrument or other writing as in force or existing from time to time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.414
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to make provision in relation to a matter.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789DE(4) Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789de-ss-4
part of: 789DE Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
note: List of instruments that can be referenced by the TCF outwork code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.414
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-4-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789DE(4) Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

789DE(5) Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789de-ss-5
part of: 789DE Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
note: The TCF outwork code cannot make provision by reference to certain documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.414
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making provision by reference to certain documents.
premise text: (5) The TCF outwork code cannot make provision as mentioned in subsection (3)
conclusion text: by reference to any of the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for when provision cannot be made by reference.
premise text: (5) The TCF outwork code cannot make provision as mentioned in subsection (3)
conclusion text: by reference to any of the following:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines a recurring trace for when provision cannot be made by reference.
premise text: (5) The TCF outwork code cannot make provision as mentioned in subsection (3)
conclusion text: by reference to any of the following:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses information about documents that cannot be made provision by reference.
premise text: (5) The TCF outwork code cannot make provision as mentioned in subsection (3)
conclusion text: by reference to any of the following:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies documents that cannot be made provision by reference using artificial intelligence.
premise text: (5) The TCF outwork code cannot make provision as mentioned in subsection (3)
conclusion text: by reference to any of the following:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789DE(6) Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789de-ss-6
part of: 789DE Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
note: Subsections (3) and (4) have effect despite subsection 14(2) of the Legislation Act 2003.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.414
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-6-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789de-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789DE(6) Relationship between the TCF outwork code and other
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

789EA Part not intended to exclude or limit State or Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789ea
has part: 789EA(1) Part not intended to exclude or limit State or Territory laws
has part: 789EA(2) Part not intended to exclude or limit State or Territory laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.416

789EA(1) Part not intended to exclude or limit State or Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789ea-ss-1
part of: 789EA Part not intended to exclude or limit State or Territory laws
note: Part not intended to exclude or limit State or Territory laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.416
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ea-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ea-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ea-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ea-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ea-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ea-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ea-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789EA(1) Part not intended to exclude or limit State or Territory laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ea-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
logic summary: Exclusion of State laws
premise text: (1) This Part is not intended to exclude or limit the operation of a law of a State or Territory...
conclusion text: ...to the extent that the law (or instrument) relates to outworkers and is capable of operating concurrently with this Part.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ea-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between State laws and this Part
premise text: (1) This Part is not intended to exclude or limit the operation of a law of a State or Territory...
conclusion text: ...to the extent that the law (or instrument) relates to outworkers and is capable of operating concurrently with this Part.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ea-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between State laws and this Part
premise text: (1) This Part is not intended to exclude or limit the operation of a law of a State or Territory...
conclusion text: ...to the extent that the law (or instrument) relates to outworkers and is capable of operating concurrently with this Part.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ea-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of State laws into this Part
premise text: (1) This Part is not intended to exclude or limit the operation of a law of a State or Territory...
conclusion text: ...to the extent that the law (or instrument) relates to outworkers and is capable of operating concurrently with this Part.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ea-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion of State laws in this Part
premise text: (1) This Part is not intended to exclude or limit the operation of a law of a State or Territory...
conclusion text: ...to the extent that the law (or instrument) relates to outworkers and is capable of operating concurrently with this Part.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

789EA(2) Part not intended to exclude or limit State or Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789ea-ss-2
part of: 789EA Part not intended to exclude or limit State or Territory laws
note: Reference to regulations made for this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.416
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ea-ss-2-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ea-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789EA(2) Part not intended to exclude or limit State or Territory laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

789FA Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789fa
note: Worker can apply for order to stop bullying.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.417
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fa-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fa-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fa-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789FA Guide to this Part
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Expresses ability to do something.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789FB Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789fb
note: Defines employee and employer terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.417
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fb-norm

789FC Application for an FWC order to stop bullying
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789fc
has part: 789FC(1) Application for an FWC order to stop bullying
has part: 789FC(2) Application for an FWC order to stop bullying
has part: 789FC(3) Application for an FWC order to stop bullying
has part: 789FC(4) Application for an FWC order to stop bullying
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.418

789FC(1) Application for an FWC order to stop bullying
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789fc-ss-1
part of: 789FC Application for an FWC order to stop bullying
note: Worker may apply for FWC order to stop bullying
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.418
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789FC(1) Application for an FWC order to stop bullying
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: REASONABLY BELIEVES
logic summary: Reasonable belief of bullying
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ORDER
logic summary: Order to stop bullying
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789FC(2) Application for an FWC order to stop bullying
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789fc-ss-2
part of: 789FC Application for an FWC order to stop bullying
note: Defines worker for Work Health and Safety Act 2011 purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.418
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789FC(2) Application for an FWC order to stop bullying
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusive definition of worker
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

789FC(3) Application for an FWC order to stop bullying
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789fc-ss-3
part of: 789FC Application for an FWC order to stop bullying
note: Must provide fee prescribed by regulations with application.
description: Fee prescribed by regulations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.418
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789FC(3) Application for an FWC order to stop bullying
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide fee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789FC(4) Application for an FWC order to stop bullying
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789fc-ss-4
part of: 789FC Application for an FWC order to stop bullying
note: Fee for application to FWC under section
description: (a) a fee, (b) a method for indexing the fee, and (c) circumstances for fee waiver or refund
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.418
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-4-logic-deontic-3

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789FC(4) Application for an FWC order to stop bullying
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the FWC to prescribe a fee
conclusion text: (a) a fee for making an application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permits the FWC to waive or refund the fee under certain circumstances
premise text: (c) the circumstances in which all or part of the fee may be waived or refunded
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fc-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Requires the FWC to prescribe a method for indexing the fee
premise text: (b) a method for indexing the fee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

789FD When is a worker bullied at work?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789fd
has part: 789FD(1) When is a worker bullied at work?
has part: 789FD(2) When is a worker bullied at work?
has part: 789FD(3) When is a worker bullied at work?
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.418

789FD(1) When is a worker bullied at work?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789fd-ss-1
part of: 789FD When is a worker bullied at work?
note: A worker is bullied at work if an individual or group repeatedly behaves unreasonably towards the worker.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.418
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789FD(1) When is a worker bullied at work?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Worker is bullied at work
premise text: (1) A worker is bullied at work if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Repeated behavior creates risk to health and safety
premise text: and that behaviour creates a risk to health and safety.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789FD(2) When is a worker bullied at work?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789fd-ss-2
part of: 789FD When is a worker bullied at work?
note: No bullying by reasonable management action
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.418
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789FD(2) When is a worker bullied at work?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Prohibition on bullying
premise text: (2) To avoid doubt, subsection (1) does not apply to reasonable management action carried out in a reasonable manner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ~
logic summary: Permission for reasonable management action
premise text: (2) To avoid doubt, subsection (1) does not apply to reasonable management action carried out in a reasonable manner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ?
logic summary: Right to reasonable management action
premise text: (2) To avoid doubt, subsection (1) does not apply to reasonable management action carried out in a reasonable manner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ^
logic summary: Undertaking for reasonable management action
premise text: (2) To avoid doubt, subsection (1) does not apply to reasonable management action carried out in a reasonable manner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

789FD(3) When is a worker bullied at work?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789fd-ss-3
part of: 789FD When is a worker bullied at work?
note: Business or undertaking is constitutionally-covered if it meets certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.418
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-3-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fd-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789FD(3) When is a worker bullied at work?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

789FE FWC to deal with applications promptly
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789fe
has part: 789FE(1) FWC to deal with applications promptly
has part: 789FE(2) FWC to deal with applications promptly
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.419

789FE(1) FWC to deal with applications promptly
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789fe-ss-1
part of: 789FE FWC to deal with applications promptly
note: FWC must deal with applications within 14 days
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.419
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789FE(1) FWC to deal with applications promptly
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide prompt response
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: →
logic summary: Implication of timely response
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789FE(2) FWC to deal with applications promptly
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789fe-ss-2
part of: 789FE FWC to deal with applications promptly
note: FWC may dismiss application under section 789FC if it relates to certain matters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.419
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 789FE(2) FWC to deal with applications promptly
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of dismissing applications under section 789FC
premise text: (2) However, the FWC may dismiss an application...
conclusion text: ...if the FWC considers that the application might involve matters that relate to...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlap between matters related to Australia's defence and covert operations
premise text: (a) Australia’s defence; or (c) an existing or future covert operation;
conclusion text: ...or (b) Australia’s national security;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of matters related to Australia's defence and covert operations
premise text: (a) Australia’s defence; or (c) an existing or future covert operation;
conclusion text: ...or (b) Australia’s national security;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffusion of matters related to Australia's defence and covert operations
premise text: (a) Australia’s defence; or (c) an existing or future covert operation;
conclusion text: ...or (b) Australia’s national security;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fe-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognition of matters related to Australia's defence and covert operations
premise text: (a) Australia’s defence; or (c) an existing or future covert operation;
conclusion text: ...or (b) Australia’s national security;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789FF FWC may make orders to stop bullying
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789ff
has part: 789FF(1) FWC may make orders to stop bullying
has part: 789FF(2) FWC may make orders to stop bullying
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.420

789FF(1) FWC may make orders to stop bullying
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789ff-ss-1
part of: 789FF FWC may make orders to stop bullying
note: FWC may make orders to stop bullying at work.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.420
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ff-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ff-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ff-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789FF(1) FWC may make orders to stop bullying
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ff-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789FF(2) FWC may make orders to stop bullying
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789ff-ss-2
part of: 789FF FWC may make orders to stop bullying
note: FWC must consider certain outcomes and procedures when making an order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.420
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ff-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ff-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ff-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789FF(2) FWC may make orders to stop bullying
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ff-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
logic summary: Consideration of outcomes and procedures is a duty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789FG Contravening an order to stop bullying
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789fg
note: Must not contravene a term of the order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.420
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fg-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fg-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fg-logic-deontic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fg-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789FG Contravening an order to stop bullying
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fg-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Prohibition on contravention
premise text: Order to stop bullying
conclusion text: Contravening the order is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fg-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Prohibition on contravention of order terms
premise text: Order term
conclusion text: Contravening an order term is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789FH Actions under work health and safety laws permitted
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789fh
note: Exempts application under section 789FC from prohibition by Work Health and Safety Act 2011.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.420
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fh-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fh-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fh-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fh-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fh-logic-cogai-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fh-logic-shacl-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fh-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Removes prohibition by Work Health and Safety Act 2011.
premise text: Section 115 of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011
conclusion text: Section 789FC exemption
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fh-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Section 115 of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 overlaps with section 789FC
premise text: Section 115 of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011
conclusion text: Section 789FC does not apply to section 115 of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fh-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RecurringTrace
logic summary: Section 789FC is a recurring trace for section 115 of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011
premise text: Section 789FC
conclusion text: Section 789FC is a recurring trace for section 115 of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fh-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: KnowledgeGraph
logic summary: Includes section 789FI in Miscellaneous Chapter 6 using knowledge graph
premise text: Corresponding provisions of corresponding WHS laws
conclusion text: Section 789FI is included in Miscellaneous Chapter 6 using knowledge graph
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fh-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validation
logic summary: Validates section 789FC against SHACL
premise text: Section 789FC
conclusion text: Section 789FC is valid according to SHACL
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

789FI This Part is not to prejudice Australia’s defence, national
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789fi
note: Prejudicial actions prohibited
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.421
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fi-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fi-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fi-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits taking or refraining from action that may be prejudicial to specified interests
premise text: Nothing in this Part requires or permits a person to take, or to refrain from taking, any action
conclusion text: if the taking of the action, or the refraining from taking the action, would be, or could reasonably be expected to be, prejudicial to:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789FJ Declarations by the Chief of the Defence Force
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789fj
has part: 789FJ(1) Declarations by the Chief of the Defence Force
has part: 789FJ(2) Declarations by the Chief of the Defence Force
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.421

789FJ(1) Declarations by the Chief of the Defence Force
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789fj-ss-1
part of: 789FJ Declarations by the Chief of the Defence Force
note: The Chief of the Defence Force may declare exemptions from certain provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.421
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fj-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fj-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fj-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fj-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fj-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to exempt
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fj-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for declaration
premise text: (1) Without limiting section 789FI, the Chief of the Defence Force may, by legislative instrument, declare that all or specified provisions of this Part do not apply in relation to a specified activity.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fj-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal interval for declaration
premise text: (1) Without limiting section 789FI, the Chief of the Defence Force may, by legislative instrument, declare that all or specified provisions of this Part do not apply in relation to a specified activity.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fj-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: by
logic summary: Declaration mechanism
premise text: (1) Without limiting section 789FI, the Chief of the Defence Force may, by legislative instrument, declare that all or specified provisions of this Part do not apply in relation to a specified activity.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fj-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: by
logic summary: Artificial declaration mechanism
premise text: (1) Without limiting section 789FI, the Chief of the Defence Force may, by legislative instrument, declare that all or specified provisions of this Part do not apply in relation to a specified activity.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

789FJ(2) Declarations by the Chief of the Defence Force
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789fj-ss-2
part of: 789FJ Declarations by the Chief of the Defence Force
note: Approval required for declaration under subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.421
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fj-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fj-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789FJ(2) Declarations by the Chief of the Defence Force
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires approval from the Minister
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789FK Declarations by the Director-General of Security
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789fk
has part: 789FK(1) Declarations by the Director-General of Security
has part: 789FK(2) Declarations by the Director-General of Security
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.422

789FK(1) Declarations by the Director-General of Security
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789fk-ss-1
part of: 789FK Declarations by the Director-General of Security
note: The Director-General may declare exemptions from certain provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.422
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fk-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to exempt
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

789FK(2) Declarations by the Director-General of Security
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789fk-ss-2
part of: 789FK Declarations by the Director-General of Security
note: Approval required for declaration under subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.422
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fk-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fk-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789FK(2) Declarations by the Director-General of Security
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires approval from the Minister
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789FL Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789fl
has part: 789FL(1) Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
has part: 789FL(2) Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.422

789FL(1) Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789fl-ss-1
part of: 789FL Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
note: Exempts work for the Director-General from certain provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.422
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fl-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grants permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789FL(2) Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789fl-ss-2
part of: 789FL Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
note: Approval required for declaration under subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.422
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fl-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fl-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fl-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789FL(2) Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789fl-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires approval from the Minister
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789GC Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789gc
note: Definitions for Part 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.423
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gc-norm

30 September or 31 December.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30
has part: 30(1) September or 31 December.
has part: 30(2) September or 31 December.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.424

30(1) September or 31 December.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-ss-1
part of: 30 September or 31 December.
note: Employer must satisfy 10% decline in turnover test for a quarter under specified conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.424
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-30-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-30-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-30-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30(1) September or 31 December.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-30-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must satisfy the test
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30(2) September or 31 December.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-ss-2
part of: 30 September or 31 December.
note: Regulations cannot prescribe modifications for paragraph (1)(d) unless jobkeeper payment rules are amended after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.424
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-30-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-30-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-30-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-30-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-30-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30(2) September or 31 December.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-30-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Regulations cannot prescribe modifications.
premise text: (2) The regulations must not prescribe modifications for the purposes of paragraph (1)(d).
conclusion text: unless...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-30-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Regulations cannot prescribe modifications after commencement.
premise text: (2) The regulations must not prescribe modifications for the purposes of paragraph (1)(d).
conclusion text: unless...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-30-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Regulations cannot prescribe modifications after commencement.
premise text: (2) The regulations must not prescribe modifications for the purposes of paragraph (1)(d).
conclusion text: unless...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

30 June 2020
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-2
note: Temporal period starting at the start of a certain point
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-30-2-norm

28 October 2020; and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28
note: Conditional commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-norm

27 February 2021
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-27-norm

30 September 2020
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-3
note: Conditional commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-30-3-norm

31 December 2020
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31
has part: 31(1) December 2020
has part: 31(2) December 2020
has part: 31(3) December 2020
has part: 31(4) December 2020
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426

31(1) December 2020
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31-ss-1
part of: 31 December 2020
note: Eligible financial service provider must issue a written certificate confirming employer turnover decline.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31(1) December 2020
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a written certificate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: WITHIN
logic summary: Within a designated quarter
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31(2) December 2020
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31-ss-2
part of: 31 December 2020
note: Eligible financial service providers cannot issue certificates under subsection (1) in relation to employers with certain relationships.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of issuing certificates
premise text: Eligible financial service provider relationship
conclusion text: No certificate issuance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31(3) December 2020
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31-ss-3
part of: 31 December 2020
note: Employer must provide a 10% decline in turnover certificate
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31(3) December 2020
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must provide a 10% decline in turnover certificate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31(4) December 2020
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31-ss-4
part of: 31 December 2020
note: Employer must make a statutory declaration to satisfy the 10% decline in turnover test.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31(4) December 2020
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Employer has an obligation to make a statutory declaration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The declaration covers a specific time period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789GR Service
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789gr
has part: 789GR(1) Service
has part: 789GR(2) Service
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.428

789GR(1) Service
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789gr-ss-1
part of: 789GR Service
note: Counts jobkeeper enabling direction as service for employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.428
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gr-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gr-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gr-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gr-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789GR(1) Service
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Service is obligation.
premise text: (jobkeeper enabling direction during a period) -> (period counts as service)
conclusion text: (period counts as service)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gr-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Period overlaps with jobkeeper enabling direction.
premise text: (jobkeeper enabling direction during a period) & (employee subject to jobkeeper enabling direction during a period)
conclusion text: (period overlaps with jobkeeper enabling direction during a period)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gr-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implication
logic summary: Service is required.
premise text: (employee subject to jobkeeper enabling direction during a period) -> (period counts as service)
conclusion text: (service is required)
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789GR(2) Service
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789gr-ss-2
part of: 789GR Service
note: Section 22 has effect in addition to subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.428
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gr-ss-2-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gr-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789GR(2) Service
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

789GS Accrual rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789gs
has part: 789GS(1) Accrual rules
has part: 789GS(2) Accrual rules
has part: 789GS(3) Accrual rules
has part: 789GS(4) Accrual rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.429

789GS(1) Accrual rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789gs-ss-1
part of: 789GS Accrual rules
note: Employee accrues leave entitlements if jobkeeper enabling direction applies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.429
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789GS(1) Accrual rules
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: If a jobkeeper enabling direction applies, then employee accrues leave entitlements
premise text: (jobkeeper enabling stand down) or (repealed section 789GDC)
conclusion text: employee accrues leave entitlements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Employee accrues leave entitlements during the jobkeeper enabling direction period
premise text: (jobkeeper enabling stand down) or (repealed section 789GDC)
conclusion text: employee accrues leave entitlements
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Employee accrues leave entitlements during the jobkeeper enabling direction period
premise text: (jobkeeper enabling stand down) or (repealed section 789GDC)
conclusion text: employee accrues leave entitlements
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Employee accrues leave entitlements during the jobkeeper enabling direction period
premise text: (jobkeeper enabling stand down) or (repealed section 789GDC)
conclusion text: employee accrues leave entitlements
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Employee accrues leave entitlements during the jobkeeper enabling direction period
premise text: (jobkeeper enabling stand down) or (repealed section 789GDC)
conclusion text: employee accrues leave entitlements
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789GS(2) Accrual rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789gs-ss-2
part of: 789GS Accrual rules
note: Calculate redundancy pay and payment in lieu of notice as if the direction had not been given.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.429
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789GS(2) Accrual rules
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to calculate redundancy pay and payment in lieu of notice.
premise text: (2) If a jobkeeper enabling direction...
conclusion text: The following are to be calculated...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789GS(3) Accrual rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789gs-ss-3
part of: 789GS Accrual rules
note: Accrual of leave entitlements if agreement under repealed subsection 789GJ(2) is taken
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.429
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: Employee takes paid annual leave in accordance with an agreement under repealed subsection 789GJ(2)
conclusion text: Accrues leave entitlements as if the agreement had not been made
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for accrual of leave entitlements
premise text: Employee takes paid annual leave in accordance with an agreement under repealed subsection 789GJ(2)
conclusion text: Accrues leave entitlements as if the agreement had not been made
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal logic for accrual of leave entitlements
premise text: Employee takes paid annual leave in accordance with an agreement under repealed subsection 789GJ(2)
conclusion text: Accrues leave entitlements as if the agreement had not been made
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Diffusion logic for accrual of leave entitlements
premise text: Employee takes paid annual leave in accordance with an agreement under repealed subsection 789GJ(2)
conclusion text: Accrues leave entitlements as if the agreement had not been made
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Cognitive AI logic for accrual of leave entitlements
premise text: Employee takes paid annual leave in accordance with an agreement under repealed subsection 789GJ(2)
conclusion text: Accrues leave entitlements as if the agreement had not been made
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789GS(4) Accrual rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789gs-ss-4
part of: 789GS Accrual rules
note: Employee's redundancy pay and payment in lieu of notice of termination are recalculated if they took paid annual leave under a repealed agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.429
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789GS(4) Accrual rules
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Recalculates
logic summary: Repealed agreement affects employee's entitlements
premise text: (4) If an employee takes paid annual leave in accordance with an agreement under repealed subsection 789GJ(2), the following are to be calculated...
conclusion text: ...the following are to be calculated as if the agreement had not been made:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal interval
logic summary: Paid annual leave is a temporal interval that affects employee's entitlements
premise text: (4) If an employee takes paid annual leave in accordance with an agreement...
conclusion text: ...the following are to be calculated as if the agreement had not been made:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Paid annual leave is a recurring trace that affects employee's entitlements
premise text: (4) If an employee takes paid annual leave in accordance with an agreement...
conclusion text: ...the following are to be calculated as if the agreement had not been made:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Repealed agreement diffuses its effects on employee's entitlements
premise text: (4) If an employee takes paid annual leave in accordance with an agreement...
conclusion text: ...the following are to be calculated as if the agreement had not been made:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gs-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyzes
logic summary: CogAI analyzes the impact of repealed agreements on employee entitlements
premise text: (4) If an employee takes paid annual leave in accordance with an agreement...
conclusion text: ...the following are to be calculated as if the agreement had not been made:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789GV FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789gv
has part: 789GV(1) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
has part: 789GV(2) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
has part: 789GV(3) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
has part: 789GV(4) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
has part: 789GV(5) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
has part: 789GV(6) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
has part: 789GV(7) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.430

789GV(1) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789gv-ss-1
part of: 789GV FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
note: The FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.430
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789GV(1) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May deal with a dispute
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789GV(2) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789gv-ss-2
part of: 789GV FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
note: FWC may deal with a dispute by arbitration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.430
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789GV(2) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789GV(3) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789gv-ss-3
part of: 789GV FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
note: FWC may deal with a dispute only on application by specified parties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.430
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789GV(3) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: only
logic summary: Restricts FWC's discretion to deal with disputes.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789GV(4) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789gv-ss-4
part of: 789GV FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
note: FWC may make orders regarding jobkeeper enabling directions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.430
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789GV(4) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May make orders
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789GV(5) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789gv-ss-5
part of: 789GV FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
note: FWC cannot make an order after March 29, 2021.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.430
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-5-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 789GV(5) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

789GV(6) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789gv-ss-6
part of: 789GV FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
note: Ceases to have effect at the start of 29 March 2021.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.430
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-6-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-6-logic-ltl-3

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
premise text: (6) An order made by the FWC under paragraph (4)(a) ceases to have effect at the start of 29 March 2021.
conclusion text: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies a provision as Undertaking
premise text: (6) An order made by the FWC under paragraph (4)(a) ceases to have effect at the start of 29 March 2021.
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires an ordered or recurring trace
premise text: (6) An order made by the FWC under paragraph (4)(a) ceases to have effect at the start of 29 March 2021.
conclusion text: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

789GV(7) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789gv-ss-7
part of: 789GV FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
note: FWC must consider fairness between parties in dispute resolution.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.430
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-7-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789GV(7) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gv-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to consider fairness
premise text: FWC must deal with dispute
conclusion text: considering fairness is a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789GW Contravening an FWC order dealing with a dispute about
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789gw
note: Prohibition on contravening an FWC order dealing with a dispute about the operation of this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.431
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gw-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gw-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gw-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 789GW Contravening an FWC order dealing with a dispute about
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gw-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on contravening an FWC order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789GY Protection of workplace rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789gy
note: Workplace rights include benefits from employer obligations, flexible work arrangements, and paid annual leave.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.435
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gy-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gy-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gy-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gy-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gy-logic-diffusion-4

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gy-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 789GY Protection of workplace rights
held by: State
scope note: held by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gy-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Employer obligations create rights for employees.
premise text: Section 789GD
conclusion text: Right to benefits
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gy-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Paid annual leave can occur at different times.
premise text: Repealed subsection 789GJ(2)
conclusion text: Agreeing to take paid annual leave at different times
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gy-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: occurs
logic summary: Flexible work arrangements can occur on different days.
premise text: Repealed subsection 789GG(2)
conclusion text: Agreeing to perform duties on different days
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gy-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Employer obligations can diffuse to employees.
premise text: Section 789GD
conclusion text: Right to benefits
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789GZ Relationship with other laws etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789gz
note: Relationship with other laws etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.435
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789gz-norm

789HA Constitutional basis of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789ha
note: Relies on Commonwealth's legislative powers under paragraph 51(xxix) (external affairs) of the Constitution.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.443
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ha-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ha-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ha-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789HA Constitutional basis of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789ha-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Relies on
logic summary: Relies on Commonwealth's legislative powers
premise text: Paragraph 51(xxix) (external affairs)
conclusion text: Obligation to give effect to Australia's obligations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

18 December 1979 ([1983] ATS 9); and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18-2
note: References international human rights conventions and covenants.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.443
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-18-2-norm

789HB Extension of anti-discrimination rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789hb
has part: 789HB(1) Extension of anti-discrimination rules
has part: 789HB(2) Extension of anti-discrimination rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.443

789HB(1) Extension of anti-discrimination rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789hb-ss-1
part of: 789HB Extension of anti-discrimination rules
note: Applicable anti-discrimination rules for breastfeeding, gender identity, or intersex status.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.443
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hb-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hb-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hb-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hb-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789HB(1) Extension of anti-discrimination rules
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Applicable anti-discrimination rules
premise text: (3) applies for the purposes of the operation of the provisions identified in subsection (2)
conclusion text: Subsection (3) applies for the purposes of the operation of the provisions identified in subsection (2) in relation to breastfeeding, gender identity or intersex status.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Applicable during operation of provisions
premise text: (3) applies for the purposes of the operation of the provisions identified in subsection (2)
conclusion text: Subsection (3) applies during the operation of the provisions identified in subsection (2).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hb-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Applicable during operation of provisions
premise text: (3) applies for the purposes of the operation of the provisions identified in subsection (2)
conclusion text: Subsection (3) is applicable during the operation of the provisions identified in subsection (2).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hb-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: for
logic summary: For the purposes of the operation of provisions
premise text: (3) applies for the purposes of the operation of the provisions identified in subsection (2)
conclusion text: The operation of the provisions identified in subsection (2) is for the purpose of applying subsection (3).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hb-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: for
logic summary: For the purposes of the operation of provisions
premise text: (3) applies for the purposes of the operation of the provisions identified in subsection (2)
conclusion text: The provisions identified in subsection (2) are for the purpose of applying subsection (3).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789HB(2) Extension of anti-discrimination rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789hb-ss-2
part of: 789HB Extension of anti-discrimination rules
note: Extension of anti-discrimination rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.443
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hb-ss-2-norm

789HC Constitutional basis of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789hc
note: Relies on Commonwealth's legislative powers under paragraph 51(xxix) (external affairs) of the Constitution.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.445
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hc-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hc-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hc-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789HC Constitutional basis of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Relies on
logic summary: Relies on Commonwealth's legislative powers
premise text: Paragraph 51(xxix) (external affairs)
conclusion text: Obligation to give effect to Australia's obligations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

25 June 1958; and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25-2
note: Mandatory adherence to ILO Convention (No. 190) concerning the elimination of violence and harassment in the world of work.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.445
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-25-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-25-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-25-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 25 June 1958; and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-25-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a mandatory obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

789HD Extension of anti-discrimination rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789hd
has part: 789HD(1) Extension of anti-discrimination rules
has part: 789HD(2) Extension of anti-discrimination rules
has part: 789HD(3) Extension of anti-discrimination rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.445

789HD(1) Extension of anti-discrimination rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789hd-ss-1
part of: 789HD Extension of anti-discrimination rules
note: Applicable for the purposes of operation of provisions in relation to family and domestic violence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.445
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hd-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hd-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hd-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hd-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789HD(1) Extension of anti-discrimination rules
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applicable
logic summary: Indicates applicability of obligation.
premise text: (1) Subsection (3) applies for the purposes of the operation of the provisions identified in subsection (2)
conclusion text: Subsection (3) is applicable for the purposes of the operation of the provisions identified in subsection (2).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relatesTo
logic summary: Establishes a relation between temporal intervals.
premise text: (1) Subsection (3) applies for the purposes of the operation of the provisions identified in subsection (2)
conclusion text: Subsection (3) relates to family and domestic violence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hd-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: justifies
logic summary: Justifies applicability based on context.
premise text: (1) Subsection (3) applies for the purposes of the operation of the provisions identified in subsection (2)
conclusion text: Applicability is justified by the context.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hd-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses applicability to related provisions.
premise text: (1) Subsection (3) applies for the purposes of the operation of the provisions identified in subsection (2)
conclusion text: Applicability is diffused to other provisions.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hd-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Recognizes applicability based on semantic analysis.
premise text: (1) Subsection (3) applies for the purposes of the operation of the provisions identified in subsection (2)
conclusion text: Applicability is recognized by semantic analysis.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

789HD(2) Extension of anti-discrimination rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789hd-ss-2
part of: 789HD Extension of anti-discrimination rules
note: Extension of anti-discrimination rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.445
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hd-ss-2-norm

789HD(3) Extension of anti-discrimination rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-789hd-ss-3
part of: 789HD Extension of anti-discrimination rules
note: Assume that certain matters are not excluded subjects for the purposes of specific laws and divisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.445
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hd-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hd-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 789HD(3) Extension of anti-discrimination rules
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-789hd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

790 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-790
note: Guide to this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.447
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-790-norm

791 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-791
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.447
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-791-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-791-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 791 Meanings of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

792 Delegation by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-792
has part: 792(1) Delegation by Minister
has part: 792(2) Delegation by Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448

792(1) Delegation by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-792-ss-1
part of: 792 Delegation by Minister
note: Delegation of minister's functions or powers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-792-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-792-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-792-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: canDelegate
logic summary: Authorization
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

792(2) Delegation by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-792-ss-2
part of: 792 Delegation by Minister
note: Delegation by Minister must comply with directions
references: sec-34AA
references: sec-34AB
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-792-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-792-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-792-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with directions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

793 Liability of bodies corporate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-793
has part: 793(1) Liability of bodies corporate
has part: 793(2) Liability of bodies corporate
has part: 793(3) Liability of bodies corporate
has part: 793(3A) Liability of bodies corporate
has part: 793(4) Liability of bodies corporate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448

793(1) Liability of bodies corporate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-793-ss-1
part of: 793 Liability of bodies corporate
note: Liability of bodies corporate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Has obligation
premise text: The body corporate has a duty to ensure its officials act within their authority.
conclusion text: Any conduct engaged in on behalf of the body corporate is taken to have been engaged in also by the body.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

793(2) Liability of bodies corporate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-793-ss-2
part of: 793 Liability of bodies corporate
note: Establishing state of mind of a body corporate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 793(2) Liability of bodies corporate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: establishes
logic summary: Establishs the state of mind of a body corporate
premise text: (2) If, for the purposes of this Act...
conclusion text: (a) that the conduct was engaged in by a person referred to in paragraph (1)(a) or (b); and (b) that the person had that state of mind.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Establishing state of mind during conduct
premise text: (2) If, for the purposes of this Act...
conclusion text: (a) that the conduct was engaged in by a person referred to in paragraph (1)(a) or (b); and (b) that the person had that state of mind.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Establishing state of mind during conduct
premise text: (2) If, for the purposes of this Act...
conclusion text: (a) that the conduct was engaged in by a person referred to in paragraph (1)(a) or (b); and (b) that the person had that state of mind.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Establishing state of mind during conduct
premise text: (2) If, for the purposes of this Act...
conclusion text: (a) that the conduct was engaged in by a person referred to in paragraph (1)(a) or (b); and (b) that the person had that state of mind.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: establishes
logic summary: Establishing state of mind of a body corporate
premise text: (2) If, for the purposes of this Act...
conclusion text: (a) that the conduct was engaged in by a person referred to in paragraph (1)(a) or (b); and (b) that the person had that state of mind.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

793(3) Liability of bodies corporate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-793-ss-3
part of: 793 Liability of bodies corporate
note: Knowledge and reasons for intention, opinion, belief or purpose are part of a person's state of mind.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 793(3) Liability of bodies corporate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes knowledge and reasons for intention, opinion, belief or purpose.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Subclass of state of mind.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

793(3A) Liability of bodies corporate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-793-ss-3a
part of: 793 Liability of bodies corporate
note: Disapplication of Part 2.5 of the Criminal Code for certain offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-3a-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-3a-logic-linearlogic-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 793(3A) Liability of bodies corporate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Exclude subsections from Part 2.5 Criminal Code
premise text: (3A) Subsections (1) and (2)
conclusion text: Disapplication of Part 2.5 of the Criminal Code
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-3a-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Conjunction
logic summary: Combine exclusion with subclass relations
premise text: (3A) Subsections (1) and (2)
conclusion text: Disapplication of Part 2.5 of the Criminal Code
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

793(4) Liability of bodies corporate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-793-ss-4
part of: 793 Liability of bodies corporate
note: Exempts certain offences from Part 2.5 of Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-793-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Exempts certain offences from Part 2.5 of Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

794 Signature on behalf of body corporate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-794
note: Document may be signed on behalf of a body corporate by an authorised officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.449
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to sign documents on behalf of a body corporate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

794A Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-794a
has part: 794A(1) Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
has part: 794A(2) Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
has part: 794A(3) Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
has part: 794A(4) Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
has part: 794A(5) Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
has part: 794A(6) Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
has part: 794A(7) Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.450

794A(1) Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-794a-ss-1
part of: 794A Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
note: Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.450
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obliges
logic summary: Imposes obligation on Australian governments
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

794A(2) Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-794a-ss-2
part of: 794A Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
note: Definition of Australian government
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.450
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of Australian government
premise text: (2) Each of the following is an Australian government:
conclusion text: Conduct of Australian governments
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

794A(3) Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-794a-ss-3
part of: 794A Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
note: Government liable for conduct of officials within apparent authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.450
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on government for conduct of officials
premise text: Official's apparent authority
conclusion text: Government liable
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

794A(4) Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-794a-ss-4
part of: 794A Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
note: Establishing state of mind of an Australian government in relation to conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.450
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-4-logic-deontic-4

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: establishes
logic summary: Establishs obligation
premise text: (a) that the conduct was engaged in by an official of the government; and (b) that the official had that state of mind.
conclusion text: The Australian government is obligated to establish the state of mind of its officials in relation to particular conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: establishes
logic summary: Establishes obligation to determine penalty amounts
premise text: (4) If, for the purposes of this Act or the procedural rules, it is necessary to establish the state of mind of an Australian government in relation to particular conduct.
conclusion text: The Australian government is obligated to determine penalty amounts based on its established state of mind.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Establishes temporal relationship between conduct and state of mind
premise text: (a) that the conduct was engaged in by an official of the government; and (b) that the official had that state of mind.
conclusion text: The conduct occurred during the time when the official had the established state of mind.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: establishes
logic summary: Establishes obligation to provide information on penalty amounts
premise text: (4) If, for the purposes of this Act or the procedural rules, it is necessary to establish the state of mind of an Australian government in relation to particular conduct.
conclusion text: The Australian government is obligated to provide information on penalty amounts based on its established state of mind.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

794A(5) Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-794a-ss-5
part of: 794A Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
note: Pecuniary penalty for contravening a civil remedy provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.450
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-5-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay pecuniary penalty
premise text: (5) If an Australian government contravenes a civil remedy provision,
conclusion text: the pecuniary penalty that government may be ordered to pay under a pecuniary penalty order is the penalty applicable to a body corporate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for pecuniary penalty
premise text: (5) If an Australian government contravenes a civil remedy provision,
conclusion text: the pecuniary penalty that government may be ordered to pay under a pecuniary penalty order is the penalty applicable to a body corporate.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for pecuniary penalty
premise text: (5) If an Australian government contravenes a civil remedy provision,
conclusion text: the pecuniary penalty that government may be ordered to pay under a pecuniary penalty order is the penalty applicable to a body corporate.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion for pecuniary penalty
premise text: (5) If an Australian government contravenes a civil remedy provision,
conclusion text: the pecuniary penalty that government may be ordered to pay under a pecuniary penalty order is the penalty applicable to a body corporate.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: cognitive agent
logic summary: Cognitive agent for pecuniary penalty
premise text: (5) If an Australian government contravenes a civil remedy provision,
conclusion text: the pecuniary penalty that government may be ordered to pay under a pecuniary penalty order is the penalty applicable to a body corporate.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

794A(6) Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-794a-ss-6
part of: 794A Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
note: Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.450
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-6-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on Australian government
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

794A(7) Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-794a-ss-7
part of: 794A Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
note: Definition of employee for liability purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.450
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-7-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 794A(7) Liability of Australian governments under civil remedy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines key term
conclusion text: employee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

794B Liability of the Commonwealth for certain offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-794b
has part: 794B(1) Liability of the Commonwealth for certain offences
has part: 794B(2) Liability of the Commonwealth for certain offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451

794B(1) Liability of the Commonwealth for certain offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-794b-ss-1
part of: 794B Liability of the Commonwealth for certain offences
note: Liability of the Commonwealth for certain offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794b-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 794B(1) Liability of the Commonwealth for certain offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obliges
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

794B(2) Liability of the Commonwealth for certain offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-794b-ss-2
part of: 794B Liability of the Commonwealth for certain offences
note: Liability of the Commonwealth for certain offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794b-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 794B(2) Liability of the Commonwealth for certain offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Imposes
logic summary: Imposes liability on the Commonwealth
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

794C Responsible agencies for Australian governments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-794c
has part: 794C(1) Responsible agencies for Australian governments
has part: 794C(2) Responsible agencies for Australian governments
has part: 794C(3) Responsible agencies for Australian governments
has part: 794C(4) Responsible agencies for Australian governments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.453

794C(1) Responsible agencies for Australian governments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-794c-ss-1
part of: 794C Responsible agencies for Australian governments
note: Specify responsible agency for proceedings against Australian government or Commonwealth
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.453
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794c-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 794C(1) Responsible agencies for Australian governments
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: specify
logic summary: Specify responsible agency
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

794C(2) Responsible agencies for Australian governments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-794c-ss-2
part of: 794C Responsible agencies for Australian governments
note: Responsible agency has procedural rights and obligations in proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.453
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794c-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 794C(2) Responsible agencies for Australian governments
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Entity has obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

794C(3) Responsible agencies for Australian governments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-794c-ss-3
part of: 794C Responsible agencies for Australian governments
note: Permit person to change responsible agency during proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.453
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794c-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794c-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 794C(3) Responsible agencies for Australian governments
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM
logic summary: Grant permission
premise text: (3) With the court’s leave, the following person may change...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

794C(4) Responsible agencies for Australian governments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-794c-ss-4
part of: 794C Responsible agencies for Australian governments
note: Identifies responsible agency for Australian governments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.453
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794c-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Responsible agency identification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

794D Liability of the Commonwealth to pay civil and criminal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-794d
has part: 794D(1) Liability of the Commonwealth to pay civil and criminal
has part: 794D(2) Liability of the Commonwealth to pay civil and criminal
has part: 794D(3) Liability of the Commonwealth to pay civil and criminal
has part: 794D(4) Liability of the Commonwealth to pay civil and criminal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.454

794D(1) Liability of the Commonwealth to pay civil and criminal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-794d-ss-1
part of: 794D Liability of the Commonwealth to pay civil and criminal
note: Liability of the Commonwealth to pay civil and criminal penalties
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.454
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794d-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Commonwealth is obligated to pay civil and criminal penalties
premise text: (1) This section applies if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

794D(2) Liability of the Commonwealth to pay civil and criminal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-794d-ss-2
part of: 794D Liability of the Commonwealth to pay civil and criminal
note: Notional liability of Commonwealth to pay pecuniary penalty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.454
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794d-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 794D(2) Liability of the Commonwealth to pay civil and criminal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Expresses intention of Commonwealth to be liable
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

794D(3) Liability of the Commonwealth to pay civil and criminal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-794d-ss-3
part of: 794D Liability of the Commonwealth to pay civil and criminal
note: The Finance Minister may give written directions for carrying out or giving effect to subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.454
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794d-ss-3-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission granted by the Finance Minister
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

794D(4) Liability of the Commonwealth to pay civil and criminal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-794d-ss-4
part of: 794D Liability of the Commonwealth to pay civil and criminal
note: Directions must be complied with despite other Commonwealth law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.454
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794d-ss-4-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794d-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 794D(4) Liability of the Commonwealth to pay civil and criminal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-794d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with directions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

795 Public sector employer to act through employing authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-795
has part: 795(1) Public sector employer to act through employing authority
has part: 795(2) Public sector employer to act through employing authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.455

795(1) Public sector employer to act through employing authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-795-ss-1
part of: 795 Public sector employer to act through employing authority
note: Employer must act through employing authority on behalf of the employer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.455
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-795-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-795-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-795-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 795(1) Public sector employer to act through employing authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-795-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must act through employing authority.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

795(2) Public sector employer to act through employing authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-795-ss-2
part of: 795 Public sector employer to act through employing authority
note: Anything done by or to a public sector employee's employing authority is taken to have been done by the employer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.455
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-795-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-795-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-795-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: TakenTo
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

795A The Schedules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-795a
note: The Schedules have effect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-795a-norm

796 Regulations—general
type: Concept
realized by: sec-796
has part: 796(1) Regulations—general
has part: 796(2) Regulations—general
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457

796(1) Regulations—general
type: Concept
realized by: sec-796-ss-1
part of: 796 Regulations—general
note: Governor-General may make regulations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-796-ss-1-norm

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-796-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 796(1) Regulations—general
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

796(2) Regulations—general
type: Concept
realized by: sec-796-ss-2
part of: 796 Regulations—general
note: Regulations made under this Act prevail over procedural rules.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-796-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-796-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-796-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-796-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-796-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-796-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-796-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 796(2) Regulations—general
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-796-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prevails-over
logic summary: Regulations made under this Act prevail over procedural rules.
premise text: (2) Regulations made under this Act prevail over procedural rules made under this Act, to the extent of any inconsistency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-796-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implies
logic summary: Regulations made under this Act imply that they prevail over procedural rules.
premise text: (2) Regulations made under this Act prevail over procedural rules made under this Act, to the extent of any inconsistency.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-796-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Regulations made under this Act are in effect during the duration of procedural rules.
premise text: (2) Regulations made under this Act prevail over procedural rules made under this Act, to the extent of any inconsistency.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-796-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Regulations made under this Act diffuse their effect to procedural rules.
premise text: (2) Regulations made under this Act prevail over procedural rules made under this Act, to the extent of any inconsistency.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-796-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: influences
logic summary: Regulations made under this Act influence procedural rules.
premise text: (2) Regulations made under this Act prevail over procedural rules made under this Act, to the extent of any inconsistency.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

796A Regulations conferring functions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-796a
note: Regulations may confer functions on FWC and General Manager.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-796a-norm

797 Regulations dealing with offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-797
has part: 797(1) Regulations dealing with offences
has part: 797(2) Regulations dealing with offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457

797(1) Regulations dealing with offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-797-ss-1
part of: 797 Regulations dealing with offences
note: The regulations may provide for offences against the regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-797-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-797-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-797-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 797(1) Regulations dealing with offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-797-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May provide for offences
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

797(2) Regulations dealing with offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-797-ss-2
part of: 797 Regulations dealing with offences
note: Maximum penalty for offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-797-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-797-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-797-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 797(2) Regulations dealing with offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-797-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
logic summary: Penalty cap
premise text: 20 penalty units
conclusion text: Maximum penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

798 Regulations dealing with civil penalties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-798
has part: 798(1) Regulations dealing with civil penalties
has part: 798(2) Regulations dealing with civil penalties
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.458

798(1) Regulations dealing with civil penalties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-798-ss-1
part of: 798 Regulations dealing with civil penalties
note: Regulations may provide for civil penalties for contravention of the regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.458
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-798-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-798-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-798-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 798(1) Regulations dealing with civil penalties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-798-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May provide
conclusion text: Obligation to regulate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

798(2) Regulations dealing with civil penalties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-798-ss-2
part of: 798 Regulations dealing with civil penalties
note: Maximum penalty for contravention
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.458
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-798-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-798-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-798-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-798-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
logic summary: Upper bound on penalties
premise text: (2) The penalties for contravention must not be more than:
conclusion text: 20 penalty units or 100 penalty units
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-798-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <=
logic summary: Temporal bounds on penalties
premise text: (2) The penalties for contravention must not be more than:
conclusion text: 20 penalty units or 100 penalty units
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

799 Regulations dealing with infringement notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-799
has part: 799(1) Regulations dealing with infringement notices
has part: 799(2) Regulations dealing with infringement notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.458

799(1) Regulations dealing with infringement notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-799-ss-1
part of: 799 Regulations dealing with infringement notices
note: Alternative to prosecution for alleged offenders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.458
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-799-ss-1-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-799-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-799-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows Commonwealth to permit alternative to prosecution
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

799(2) Regulations dealing with infringement notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-799-ss-2
part of: 799 Regulations dealing with infringement notices
note: Maximum penalty for infringement notices must not exceed one-fifth of the maximum prescribed by regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.458
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-799-ss-2-norm
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-799-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-799-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-799-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-799-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-799-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-799-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 799(2) Regulations dealing with infringement notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-799-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
logic summary: Maximum penalty must not exceed one-fifth of the maximum prescribed by regulations.
premise text: (2) The penalty must not exceed one-fifth of the maximum penalty prescribed by the regulations for that offence.
conclusion text: The penalty must not exceed one-fifth of the maximum penalty prescribed by the regulations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-799-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal interval for maximum penalty calculation defined as one-fifth of the maximum prescribed by regulations.
premise text: (2) The penalty must not exceed one-fifth of the maximum penalty prescribed by the regulations for that offence.
conclusion text: The temporal interval for calculating the maximum penalty is one-fifth of the maximum prescribed by regulations.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-799-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal interval for maximum penalty calculation defined as one-fifth of the maximum prescribed by regulations.
premise text: (2) The penalty must not exceed one-fifth of the maximum penalty prescribed by the regulations for that offence.
conclusion text: The temporal interval for calculating the maximum penalty is one-fifth of the maximum prescribed by regulations.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-799-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
logic summary: Maximum penalty for infringement notices defined as a diffusion from the maximum prescribed by regulations.
premise text: (2) The penalty must not exceed one-fifth of the maximum penalty prescribed by the regulations for that offence.
conclusion text: The maximum penalty for infringement notices is a diffusion from the maximum prescribed by regulations.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-799-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: =
logic summary: Maximum penalty calculation defined as a cognitive process involving one-fifth of the maximum prescribed by regulations.
premise text: (2) The penalty must not exceed one-fifth of the maximum penalty prescribed by the regulations for that offence.
conclusion text: The maximum penalty calculation involves a cognitive process with one-fifth of the maximum prescribed by regulations.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

800 Regulations dealing with exhibiting fair work instruments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-800
note: Regulations may provide for exhibiting fair work instruments on employer premises.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.458
asserts: prepared-by-the-office-of-parliamentary-counsel-canberra-fair-work-act-2009-sec-800-norm