1 July 2014; and
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.288
note: Provide information with substantiating estimate.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1
schema version: 2

1 January 2014;
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.290
note: List of provisions related to carbon tax and greenhouse gas charges.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-1-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-2
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Provisions commence on January 1, 2014.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for commencement of provisions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <
premise text: Commencement date is January 1, 2014

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The listed provisions include obligations and prohibitions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies obligations and prohibitions
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: Some provisions impose duties or bans conduct

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-1-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The listed provisions are from the specified Acts.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies provisions by Act and section
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Provisions listed are from the following Acts:

1 Section 1
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.387
note: Percentage values
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-1-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-3
schema version: 2

1 January 2026.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.408
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-1-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-4
schema version: 2

1 If an application is not made to the
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.447
note: Application must be made on the day of notice
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-1-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-5
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 July 2014; and

10 Section 10
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.325
curation status: Proposed
has part: 10(1B) Section 10
has part: 10(1C) Section 10
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10
schema version: 2

10(1B) Section 10
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.325
note: Calculates compensation for breach of contract
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-10-ss-1b-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-10-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 10 Section 10

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-10-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to pay compensation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-10-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10(1B) Section 10

10(1C) Section 10
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.325
note: Defines amounts for a specific purpose
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-10-ss-1c-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-10-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-ss-1c
schema version: 2
part of: 10 Section 10

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-10-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: $10,000,000
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a value
modality: Deontic
operator: =

100 Evidentiary provisions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.517
curation status: Proposed
has part: 100(1) Evidentiary provisions
has part: 100(2) Evidentiary provisions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100
schema version: 2

100(1) Evidentiary provisions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.517
note: Presumption of reason for defendant's action
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 100 Evidentiary provisions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defendant became aware of matter or circumstance capable of constituting reason for their action within 6 months before the time of the action
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (c) during the period of 6 months immediately before the time when the defendant so acted, the defendant became aware of a matter or circumstance capable of constituting a reason referred to in paragraph 96(3)(d) or (e) for the defendant’s so acting;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: then, subject to subsection (2), it shall be presumed, unless the contrary is established, that that matter or circumstance was the reason for the defendant’s so acting.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defendant has a duty to provide reason for their action
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (a) the defendant has acted, in relation to the plaintiff, as mentioned in paragraph 98(1)(a), (b), (c) or (d);

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defendant is permitted to act as mentioned in paragraph 98(1)(a), (b), (c) or (d)
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (a) the defendant has acted, in relation to the plaintiff, as mentioned in paragraph 98(1)(a), (b), (c) or (d);

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defendant has an obligation to provide reason for their action
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (a) the defendant has acted, in relation to the plaintiff, as mentioned in paragraph 98(1)(a), (b), (c) or (d);

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 100(1) Evidentiary provisions

100(2) Evidentiary provisions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.517
note: Exemption from evidentiary provisions under certain conditions
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 100 Evidentiary provisions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...but the terms disadvantageous to the plaintiff, or the less favourable treatment of the plaintiff...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Exemption applies during certain conditions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The defendant requires only a requirement by the defendant as to Chapter 6

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...but the terms disadvantageous to the plaintiff, or the less favourable treatment of the plaintiff...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Exemption applies if certain conditions are met
modality: CogAI
operator: if and only if
premise text: The defendant requires only a requirement by the defendant as to Chapter 6

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if certain conditions are met.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemption from evidentiary provisions
modality: Deontic
operator: exempts
premise text: The defendant is exempt from the requirement...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...but the terms disadvantageous to the plaintiff, or the less favourable treatment of the plaintiff...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Exemption applies if certain conditions are met
modality: Diffusion
operator: if and only if
premise text: The plaintiff establishes the matter mentioned in paragraph 98(1)(b) or (c)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...but the terms disadvantageous to the plaintiff, or the less favourable treatment of the plaintiff...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Exemption applies during certain conditions
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: The defendant requires only a requirement by the defendant as to Chapter 6

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 100(2) Evidentiary provisions

100A Applications for review
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.519
curation status: Proposed
has part: 100A(1) Applications for review
has part: 100A(2) Applications for review
has part: 100A(3) Applications for review
has part: 100A(4) Applications for review
has part: 100A(5) Applications for review
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100a
schema version: 2

100A(1) Applications for review
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.519
note: Section applies if a provision of this Act provides that a person may apply under this Division for review of a decision of the Commission.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 100A Applications for review

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies if...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: A provision of this Act provides that a person may apply under this Division for review of a decision of the Commission.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 100A(1) Applications for review

100A(2) Applications for review
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.519
note: Must apply for review within a time limit.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 100A Applications for review

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to apply for review
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 100A(2) Applications for review

100A(3) Applications for review
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.519
note: Requirements for making applications for review may be determined by the Minister.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 100A Applications for review

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to determine requirements
modality: Deontic
operator: May

100A(4) Applications for review
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.519
note: The Tribunal must review the decision.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 100A Applications for review

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must review the decision.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

100A(5) Applications for review
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.519
note: Applicability of the Act to the Tribunal
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 100A Applications for review

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Similar applicability
modality: Deontic
operator: like manner

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 100A(5) Applications for review

100B Functions and powers of Tribunal
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.519
note: Tribunal may make decisions and exercise Commission's powers during review
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100b-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100b
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Tribunal has the power to make decisions
modality: Deontic
operator: may

100C Applications for review
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.521
curation status: Proposed
has part: 100C(1) Applications for review
has part: 100C(2) Applications for review
has part: 100C(3) Applications for review
has part: 100C(4) Applications for review
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100c
schema version: 2

100C(1) Applications for review
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.521
note: A person can apply for a review of an acquisition determination within 14 days.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 100C Applications for review

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Possibility
modality: Deontic
operator: can

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 100C(1) Applications for review

100C(2) Applications for review
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.521
note: Requirements for making an application may be determined by legislative instrument.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 100C Applications for review

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: determination
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requirements determined during applications
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requirements for making an application may be determined by legislative instrument.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

100C(3) Applications for review
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.521
note: Allow person to apply for review of determination
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 100C Applications for review

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allow application
modality: Deontic
operator: allow

100C(4) Applications for review
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.521
note: Consideration of factors before allowing an application to the Tribunal
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100c-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 100C Applications for review

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the application has any reasonable prospects of success; and...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal consideration of factors
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (4) In considering whether to allow a person to apply to the Tribunal under subsection (3),

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the application has any reasonable prospects of success; and...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal consideration of factors
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (4) In considering whether to allow a person to apply to the Tribunal under subsection (3),

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person’s interest in the matter; and...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory consideration of factors
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
premise text: Tribunal must have regard to...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the application has any reasonable prospects of success; and...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal consideration of factors
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (4) In considering whether to allow a person to apply to the Tribunal under subsection (3),

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the application has any reasonable prospects of success; and...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal consideration of factors
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (4) In considering whether to allow a person to apply to the Tribunal under subsection (3),

100D Further information and documents in relation to applications
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.522
curation status: Proposed
has part: 100D(1) Further information and documents in relation to applications
has part: 100D(2) Further information and documents in relation to applications
has part: 100D(3) Further information and documents in relation to applications
has part: 100D(4) Further information and documents in relation to applications
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100d
schema version: 2

100D(1) Further information and documents in relation to applications
type: Concept
description: true
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.522
note: Must provide information or documents to the Tribunal.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100d-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 100D Further information and documents in relation to applications

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information or documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 100D(1) Further information and documents in relation to applications

100D(2) Further information and documents in relation to applications
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.522
note: The Minister may determine information or documents in relation to an application.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100d-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 100D Further information and documents in relation to applications

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to determine information or documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

100D(3) Further information and documents in relation to applications
type: Concept
description: yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.522
note: Provide information or documents within 30 days of applying for review.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100d-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 100D Further information and documents in relation to applications

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information or documents within 30 days.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

100D(4) Further information and documents in relation to applications
type: Concept
description: information or documents
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.522
note: Failure to provide information or documents within 30 days results in withdrawal of application.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100d-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100d-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 100D Further information and documents in relation to applications

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits failure to provide information or documents within 30 days.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

100E Applicants may withdraw applications
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.522
curation status: Proposed
has part: 100E(1) Applicants may withdraw applications
has part: 100E(2) Applicants may withdraw applications
has part: 100E(3) Applicants may withdraw applications
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100e
schema version: 2

100E(1) Applicants may withdraw applications
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.522
note: Applicant may withdraw application at any time
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 100E Applicants may withdraw applications

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to withdraw
modality: Deontic
operator: May

100E(2) Applicants may withdraw applications
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.522
note: Participant may apply for reinstatement of withdrawn application within 7 days.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 100E Applicants may withdraw applications

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Participant may apply for reinstatement.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Participant must know about withdrawal notice.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Must know

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Reinstatement application must be made within 7 days.
modality: LTL
operator: Until

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 100E(2) Applicants may withdraw applications

100E(3) Applicants may withdraw applications
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.522
note: Tribunal may reinstate application for review under certain circumstances.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-3-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100e-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 100E Applicants may withdraw applications

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (3) If: (a) a participant applies under subsection (2); and (b) the Tribunal believes it to be appropriate to reinstate the application for review;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between events or periods
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <>

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (3) If: (a) a participant applies under subsection (2); and (b) the Tribunal believes it to be appropriate to reinstate the application for review;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes a process or system that can reason about the law
modality: CogAI
operator: <>

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Tribunal may reinstate the application and make such orders as appear to the Tribunal to be appropriate in the circumstances.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or allowance
modality: Deontic
operator: May

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (3) If: (a) a participant applies under subsection (2); and (b) the Tribunal believes it to be appropriate to reinstate the application for review;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes a condition or restriction on an action
modality: LTL
operator: <>

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-3-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (3) If: (a) a participant applies under subsection (2); and (b) the Tribunal believes it to be appropriate to reinstate the application for review;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Describes a set of constraints on data or behavior
modality: SHACL
operator: <>

100F Tribunal may dismiss applications if parties consent
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.523
note: Tribunal may dismiss applications with party consent
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100f-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100f-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100f
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May dismiss application
modality: Deontic
operator: may

100G Tribunal may dismiss applications if fees not paid
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.523
note: Failure to pay fees may result in dismissal of application.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100g-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100g-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100g
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on non-payment of fees.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

100H Tribunal may dismiss applications if applicants fail to comply
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.523
note: Failure to comply with order or Act results in dismissal of application.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100h-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100h-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100h-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100h-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100h-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100h-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100h
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100h-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The two events are temporally related.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Non-compliance with order or Act overlaps with dismissal of application.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The non-compliance with order or Act occurs before the dismissal of application.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100h-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The non-compliance with order or Act leads to the dismissal of application.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Non-compliance with order or Act implies dismissal of application.
modality: CogAI
operator: Implication
premise text: If the applicant fails to comply with order or Act, then the Tribunal may dismiss the application.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100h-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Dismissal of application.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of non-compliance with order or Act.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Failure to comply with order or Act.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100h-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The non-compliance with order or Act leads to the dismissal of application.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Non-compliance with order or Act implies dismissal of application.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Implication
premise text: If the applicant fails to comply with order or Act, then the Tribunal may dismiss the application.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100h-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The two events are temporally related.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Non-compliance with order or Act overlaps with dismissal of application.
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The non-compliance with order or Act occurs before the dismissal of application.

100J Tribunal may dismiss application if frivolous, vexatious etc.
type: Concept
references: sec-111
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.523
note: Dismiss application if frivolous, vexatious etc.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100j-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100j-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100j
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100j-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Dismiss application
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Application is frivolous, vexatious etc.

100K Certain participants may seek to withdraw from being
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.524
curation status: Proposed
has part: 100K(1) Certain participants may seek to withdraw from being
has part: 100K(2) Certain participants may seek to withdraw from being
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100k
schema version: 2

100K(1) Certain participants may seek to withdraw from being
type: Concept
description: Written notice
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.524
note: Participant must provide written notice to cease participation.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100k-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100k-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 100K Certain participants may seek to withdraw from being

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide written notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

100K(2) Certain participants may seek to withdraw from being
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.524
note: The applicant may withdraw their application under certain circumstances.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100k-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100k-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 100K Certain participants may seek to withdraw from being

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to withdraw an application
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100k-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 100K(2) Certain participants may seek to withdraw from being

100L Notice of withdrawals and dismissals
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.524
note: Notice of withdrawal or dismissal to Commission and participants
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100l-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100l-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100l
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100l-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Tribunal must give notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

100M Tribunal not to review determinations while Commission
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.524
curation status: Proposed
has part: 100M(1) Tribunal not to review determinations while Commission
has part: 100M(2) Tribunal not to review determinations while Commission
has part: 100M(3) Tribunal not to review determinations while Commission
has part: 100M(4) Tribunal not to review determinations while Commission
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100m
schema version: 2

100M(1) Tribunal not to review determinations while Commission
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.524
note: No review of acquisition determination under subsection 51ABZE(1) if public benefit application has been made and Commission has not decided to cease considering it.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100m-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 100M Tribunal not to review determinations while Commission

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The review is overlapped with the public benefit application.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlap between review and public benefit application
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: A public benefit application has been made in relation to the notification.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission and public benefit application are entities classified as such.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Entity classification of Commission and public benefit application
modality: CogAI
operator: Entity
premise text: The Commission has not decided under section 51ABZV to cease considering the public benefit application.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No review is allowed.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of review under subsection 51ABZE(1)
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: A public benefit application has been made.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is a recurring trace between the Commission and the public benefit application.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace between Commission and public benefit application
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: The Commission has not decided under section 51ABZV to cease considering the public benefit application.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is a constraint on the review of the acquisition determination.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Constraint on review of acquisition determination
modality: SHACL
operator: Constraint
premise text: A public benefit application has been made in relation to the notification.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 100M(1) Tribunal not to review determinations while Commission

100M(2) Tribunal not to review determinations while Commission
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.524
note: No review of acquisition determination while public benefit application is made or Commission decides to cease considering it.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100m-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 100M Tribunal not to review determinations while Commission

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of review
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

100M(3) Tribunal not to review determinations while Commission
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.524
note: Tribunal must cease review proceedings until Commission decides on public benefit application.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100m-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 100M Tribunal not to review determinations while Commission

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Tribunal must cease review proceedings.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (3) If...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 100M(3) Tribunal not to review determinations while Commission

100M(4) Tribunal not to review determinations while Commission
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.524
note: No review of acquisition determination while public benefit application is made
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100m-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 100M Tribunal not to review determinations while Commission

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No review allowed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prevents review of acquisition determination
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Public benefit application made

100N Functions and powers of Tribunal
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.526
curation status: Proposed
has part: 100N(1) Functions and powers of Tribunal
has part: 100N(2) Functions and powers of Tribunal
has part: 100N(3) Functions and powers of Tribunal
has part: 100N(4) Functions and powers of Tribunal
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100n
schema version: 2

100N(1) Functions and powers of Tribunal
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.526
note: May make a determination affirming, setting aside or varying the determination.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100n-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100n-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 100N Functions and powers of Tribunal

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May perform all functions and exercise all powers.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

100N(2) Functions and powers of Tribunal
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.526
note: Applicability of Commission's provisions to Tribunal
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100n-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100n-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 100N Functions and powers of Tribunal

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicability of Commission's provisions to Tribunal
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
premise text: (whichever is relevant) applies in relation to the Tribunal in the same way as it applies in relation to the Commission.

100N(3) Functions and powers of Tribunal
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.526
note: Tribunal may make acquisition determination by consent of applicant, notifying party, and intervenors.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100n-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100n-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 100N Functions and powers of Tribunal

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to make acquisition determination
modality: Deontic
operator: May

100N(4) Functions and powers of Tribunal
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.526
note: Commission's determination is binding on other authorities.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100n-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100n-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100n-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 100N Functions and powers of Tribunal

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100n-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to follow Commission's decision.
modality: Deontic
operator: binding
premise text: Commission's determination is binding on other authorities.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100n-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 100N(4) Functions and powers of Tribunal

100P Time within which Tribunal must make determination on
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.527
curation status: Proposed
has part: 100P(1) Time within which Tribunal must make determination on
has part: 100P(2) Time within which Tribunal must make determination on
has part: 100P(3) Time within which Tribunal must make determination on
has part: 100P(4) Time within which Tribunal must make determination on
has part: 100P(5) Time within which Tribunal must make determination on
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100p
schema version: 2

100P(1) Time within which Tribunal must make determination on
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.527
note: Tribunal must make determination within a specified timeframe.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100p-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 100P Time within which Tribunal must make determination on

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The Tribunal's determination must be made within a temporal interval of at least 45 days after the Commission makes its acquisition determination.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: ⊆

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a determination within the specified timeframe.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Tribunal must make determination within the specified timeframe.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: If the Commission makes an acquisition determination, then the Tribunal must make its determination within the specified timeframe.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ⇒
premise text: Commission makes acquisition determination

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 100P(1) Time within which Tribunal must make determination on

100P(2) Time within which Tribunal must make determination on
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.527
note: Tribunal must make determination within 90 days after application and additional information are provided.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100p-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 100P Time within which Tribunal must make determination on

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Time period for Tribunal's decision
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
premise text: (2) Subject to subsections (3) and (5), the Tribunal must make its determination on a review of an acquisition determination under this Division no later than 90 days after the later of: (a) the last day on which an application for review of the determination could have been made under subsection 100C(1); and (b) the day the applicant gives to the Tribunal the additional information or documents required under subsection 100D(1). Note: See also subsections 100M(3) and (4) if a public benefit application is made. Extensions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Tribunal must make determination
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Tribunal must make determination within specified time period
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) Subject to subsections (3) and (5), the Tribunal must make its determination on a review of an acquisition determination under this Division no later than 90 days after the later of: (a) the last day on which an application for review of the determination could have been made under subsection 100C(1); and (b) the day the applicant gives to the Tribunal the additional information or documents required under subsection 100D(1). Note: See also subsections 100M(3) and (4) if a public benefit application is made. Extensions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Time period for Tribunal's decision
modality: LTL
operator: within
premise text: (2) Subject to subsections (3) and (5), the Tribunal must make its determination on a review of an acquisition determination under this Division no later than 90 days after the later of: (a) the last day on which an application for review of the determination could have been made under subsection 100C(1); and (b) the day the applicant gives to the Tribunal the additional information or documents required under subsection 100D(1). Note: See also subsections 100M(3) and (4) if a public benefit application is made. Extensions

100P(3) Time within which Tribunal must make determination on
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.527
note: Tribunal may extend review period by 60 days
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100p-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 100P Time within which Tribunal must make determination on

100P(4) Time within which Tribunal must make determination on
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.527
note: Tribunal must make determination within a specified time period
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100p-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 100P Time within which Tribunal must make determination on

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to act within a timeframe
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

100P(5) Time within which Tribunal must make determination on
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.527
note: Tribunal's period for making determination extended under subsection (3)
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100p-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 100P Time within which Tribunal must make determination on

100Q Technical experts
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.528
note: The Tribunal may ask questions of a technical expert or seek information, documents or evidence.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100q-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100q-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100q
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100q-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Tribunal may do something.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

100R Commission information
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.528
curation status: Proposed
has part: 100R(1) Commission information
has part: 100R(2) Commission information
has part: 100R(3) Commission information
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100r
schema version: 2

100R(1) Commission information
type: Concept
description: true
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.528
note: Commission must provide information to Tribunal upon request.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100r-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 100R Commission information

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires Commission to provide information.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 100R(1) Commission information

100R(2) Commission information
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.528
note: Commission may consider information furnished to the Commission in connection with a determination.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100r-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 100R Commission information

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The Commission considers the information during its making.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) For the purposes of a review under this Division, the Tribunal may have regard to any information furnished...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: The Commission considers the information in its making.
modality: Argumentation
operator: consider
premise text: (2) For the purposes of a review under this Division, the Tribunal may have regard to any information furnished...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The Commission considers the information in its making.
modality: CogAI
operator: in connection with
premise text: (2) For the purposes of a review under this Division, the Tribunal may have regard to any information furnished...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Tribunal may regard the information.
modality: Deontic
operator: regard
premise text: (2) For the purposes of a review under this Division, the Tribunal may have regard to any information furnished...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The Commission considers the information in its making.
modality: Diffusion
operator: in connection with
premise text: (2) For the purposes of a review under this Division, the Tribunal may have regard to any information furnished...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 100R(2) Commission information

100R(3) Commission information
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.528
note: Commission is not permitted to have regard in making determination.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100r-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 100R Commission information

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits Commission from having regard.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (3) Subsection (2)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 100R(3) Commission information

100S Information gathering etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.529
curation status: Proposed
has part: 100S(1) Information gathering etc.
has part: 100S(2) Information gathering etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100s
schema version: 2

100S(1) Information gathering etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.529
note: Tribunal may consult consumer associations and have regard to information furnished.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100s-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100s-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 100S Information gathering etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Tribunal may consult consumer associations.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

100S(2) Information gathering etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.529
note: Allow new information, documents or evidence to be provided under certain conditions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100s-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100s-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 100S Information gathering etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to provide new information
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow

100T Information etc. to which Tribunal may have regard
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.530
note: Limitation on information considered by Tribunal in review under Division
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100t-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100t-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100t-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100t-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100t-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100t-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100t
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100t-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Tribunal must not consider certain information
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Section 100N

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100t-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Tribunal may consider additional information under certain circumstances
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: Subsections 100Q(b)(ii), 100R(2)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100t-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Tribunal must provide information to certain persons under subsection 100S(2)
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Subsection 100S(2)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100t-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Tribunal must provide information to certain persons under subsection 100D(1)
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Subsection 100D(1)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100t-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Tribunal must provide information to Commission under subsection 100B(5)
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Subsection 100B(5)

101 Applications for review
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.531
curation status: Proposed
has part: 101(1) Applications for review
has part: 101(1A) Applications for review
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-101
schema version: 2

101(1) Applications for review
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.531
note: A person may apply to the Tribunal for a review of a determination.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-101-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 101 Applications for review

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: A person may apply to the Tribunal for a review of a determination.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 101(1) Applications for review

101(1A) Applications for review
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.531
note: Tribunal may make a determination by consent of applicant, Commission, and interveners.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101-ss-1a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-101-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 101 Applications for review

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Tribunal may make a determination.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

101A Application for review of notices under Division 2 of Part VII
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.533
note: A person may apply for a review of a notice within the time allowed by or under regulations.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101a-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-101a
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101a-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Indicates a condition for application.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Within the time allowed by or under regulations

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 101A Application for review of notices under Division 2 of Part VII

101B Application for review of notice under section 95AB
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.533
curation status: Proposed
has part: 101B(1) Application for review of notice under section 95AB
has part: 101B(2) Application for review of notice under section 95AB
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-101b
schema version: 2

101B(1) Application for review of notice under section 95AB
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.533
note: A person may apply to the Tribunal for a review of notice under section 95AB.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101b-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101b-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-101b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 101B Application for review of notice under section 95AB

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101b-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Specifies a condition for application.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Within the time allowed by or under regulations

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Expresses a temporal condition.
modality: LTL
operator: As prescribed and within the time allowed by or under regulations

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 101B(1) Application for review of notice under section 95AB

101B(2) Application for review of notice under section 95AB
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.533
note: Tribunal must review notice if person has sufficient interest
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101b-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101b-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-101b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 101B Application for review of notice under section 95AB

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101b-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Review occurs after notice was given
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Review must occur after notice was given
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Person has sufficient interest

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Tribunal reviews notice
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Tribunal must review notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Person has sufficient interest

102 Functions and powers of Tribunal
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.533
note: Tribunal may perform all functions and exercise all powers of Commission during review.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-102-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-102-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-102
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-102-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Tribunal may perform functions and exercise powers.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

102A Reviews are re-hearings
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.543
note: A review by the Tribunal under this Part is a re-hearing of the matter, unless it is a review of certain determinations.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-102a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-102a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-102a
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-102a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the Tribunal.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-102a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 102A Reviews are re-hearings

103 Procedure generally
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.543
curation status: Proposed
has part: 103(1) Procedure generally
has part: 103(2) Procedure generally
has part: 103(3) Procedure generally
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-103
schema version: 2

103(1) Procedure generally
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.543
note: Tribunal has discretion in proceedings
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-103-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-103-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-103-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 103 Procedure generally

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-103-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Procedure flexibility
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-103-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 103(1) Procedure generally

103(2) Procedure generally
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.543
note: Exercise of powers by a presidential member
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-103-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-103-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-103-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 103 Procedure generally

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-103-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The powers may be exercised by a presidential member.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Power exercise
modality: Deontic
operator: exercise
premise text: (2) The powers of the Tribunal...

103(3) Procedure generally
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.543
note: Exercise powers regardless of Tribunal constitution
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-103-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-103-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-103-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 103 Procedure generally

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-103-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to exercise powers
modality: Deontic
operator: May
premise text: (3) The powers mentioned in subsection (2)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-103-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 103(3) Procedure generally

104 Regulations as to certain matters
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.544
note: Regulations for securing material facts and considerations in proceedings before the Tribunal or Commission.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-104-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-104-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-104-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-104
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-104-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulations must secure material facts and considerations.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-104-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of regulations for securing material facts and considerations.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-104-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 104 Regulations as to certain matters

105 Power to take evidence on oath
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.544
curation status: Proposed
has part: 105(1) Power to take evidence on oath
has part: 105(2) Power to take evidence on oath
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-105
schema version: 2

105(1) Power to take evidence on oath
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.544
note: The Tribunal may take evidence on oath or affirmation.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-105-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-105-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-105-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 105 Power to take evidence on oath

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-105-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to take evidence on oath or affirmation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

105(2) Power to take evidence on oath
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.544
note: Summoning a person to appear before the Tribunal and produce documents.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-105-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-105-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-105-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 105 Power to take evidence on oath

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-105-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Summoning a person to appear before the Tribunal.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-105-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 105(2) Power to take evidence on oath

106 Hearings to be in public except in special circumstances
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.544
curation status: Proposed
has part: 106(1) Hearings to be in public except in special circumstances
has part: 106(2) Hearings to be in public except in special circumstances
has part: 106(3) Hearings to be in public except in special circumstances
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-106
schema version: 2

106(1) Hearings to be in public except in special circumstances
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.544
note: Hearings must be in public except in special circumstances
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-106-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-106-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-106-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 106 Hearings to be in public except in special circumstances

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-106-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide public hearings
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) Subject to this section, the hearing of proceedings before the Tribunal shall be in public.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-106-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 106(1) Hearings to be in public except in special circumstances

106(2) Hearings to be in public except in special circumstances
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.544
note: Publication of evidence given before the Tribunal is prohibited.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-106-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-106-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-106-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-106-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-106-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-106-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-106-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 106 Hearings to be in public except in special circumstances

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-106-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Restrict publication to private hearings
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Restriction
premise text: (2) Where the Tribunal is satisfied that it is desirable to do so by reason of the confidential nature of any evidence or matter...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-106-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classification of evidence as confidential
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
premise text: (2) Where the Tribunal is satisfied that it is desirable to do so by reason of the confidential nature of any evidence or matter...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-106-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-106-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Restrict publication of evidence given before the Tribunal
modality: Diffusion
operator: Restriction
premise text: (2) Where the Tribunal is satisfied that it is desirable to do so by reason of the confidential nature of any evidence or matter...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-106-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Restrict publication to private hearings
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Restriction
premise text: (2) Where the Tribunal is satisfied that it is desirable to do so by reason of the confidential nature of any evidence or matter...

106(3) Hearings to be in public except in special circumstances
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.544
note: Powers of Tribunal may be exercised by the Tribunal as constituted for the purposes of the hearing or by the Tribunal constituted by a presidential member.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-106-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-106-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 106 Hearings to be in public except in special circumstances

107 Evidence in form of written statement
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.545
note: Permit witness to give evidence by written statement
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-107-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107
schema version: 2

108 Taking of evidence by single member
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.545
note: Authority to take evidence on behalf of the Tribunal
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-108-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-108-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-108-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-108
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-108-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Evidence taken during the authority period
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Evidence taken within the authority period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
premise text: Authority is given for a limited time

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-108-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Presidential member takes evidence on behalf of the Tribunal
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Presidential member has authority to take evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: has authority
premise text: Tribunal authorizes presidential member

109 Participants in proceedings before Tribunal
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.545
note: Entitlement to participate in proceedings before Tribunal
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-109-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-109-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-109-logic-ltl-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-109-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-109-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-109
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-109-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1AA) A notifying party of a notification of an acquisition is entitled to participate in any proceedings before the Tribunal under Division 1B instituted by another person for review of an acquisition determination in respect of the notification.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has right to participate
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
premise text: (1) A person to whom an authorisation under Division 1 of Part VII was granted is entitled to participate in any proceedings before the Tribunal instituted by another person in relation to that authorisation.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-109-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1AA) A notifying party of a notification of an acquisition is entitled to participate in any proceedings before the Tribunal under Division 1B instituted by another person for review of an acquisition determination in respect of the notification.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has permission to participate
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermission
premise text: (1) A person to whom an authorisation under Division 1 of Part VII was granted is entitled to participate in any proceedings before the Tribunal instituted by another person in relation to that authorisation.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-109-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1AA) A notifying party of a notification of an acquisition is entitled to participate in any proceedings before the Tribunal under Division 1B instituted by another person for review of an acquisition determination in respect of the notification.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has obligation to permit participation
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
premise text: (1) A person to whom an authorisation under Division 1 of Part VII was granted is entitled to participate in any proceedings before the Tribunal instituted by another person in relation to that authorisation.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-109-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A notifying party of a notification of an acquisition is entitled to participate in any proceedings before the Tribunal under Division 1B instituted by another person for review of an acquisition determination in respect of the notification.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Has temporal relation with acquisition determination
modality: LTL
operator: hasTemporalRelation
premise text: (1) A person to whom an authorisation under Division 1 of Part VII was granted is entitled to participate in any proceedings before the Tribunal instituted by another person in relation to that authorisation.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-109-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: NaturalPerson
part of: 109 Participants in proceedings before Tribunal

110 Representation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.546
note: Representation in proceedings before the Tribunal
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-110-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-110-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-110-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-110-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-110-logic-alleninterval-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-110-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for representation approval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: Tribunal approves representation at some point in time

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-110-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must appear in person
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Natural person may appear in person

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-110-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May be represented by an employee or a director
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY BE REPRESENTED BY
premise text: Body corporate may be represented by an employee or a director

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-110-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be approved by the Tribunal
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Employee, director, or officer must be approved by the Tribunal

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-110-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 110 Representation

111 Tribunal may order costs be awarded
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.546
curation status: Proposed
has part: 111(1) Tribunal may order costs be awarded
has part: 111(2) Tribunal may order costs be awarded
has part: 111(3) Tribunal may order costs be awarded
has part: 111(4) Tribunal may order costs be awarded
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-111
schema version: 2

111(1) Tribunal may order costs be awarded
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.546
note: Tribunal may order costs be awarded to another participant.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-111-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-111-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-111-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 111 Tribunal may order costs be awarded

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-111-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-111-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 111(1) Tribunal may order costs be awarded

111(2) Tribunal may order costs be awarded
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.546
note: Tribunal may make further orders regarding costs assessment or taxation.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-111-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-111-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-111-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 111 Tribunal may order costs be awarded

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-111-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies a possible obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

111(3) Tribunal may order costs be awarded
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.546
note: Minister may make provision for fees payable for assessment or taxation of costs ordered by the Tribunal to be paid.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-111-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-111-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 111 Tribunal may order costs be awarded

111(4) Tribunal may order costs be awarded
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.546
note: Participant must pay costs ordered by tribunal.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-111-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-111-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-111-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 111 Tribunal may order costs be awarded

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-111-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Participant has a duty to pay costs.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-111-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 111(4) Tribunal may order costs be awarded

112 Tribunal may charge fees
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.547
curation status: Proposed
has part: 112(1) Tribunal may charge fees
has part: 112(2) Tribunal may charge fees
has part: 112(3) Tribunal may charge fees
has part: 112(4) Tribunal may charge fees
has part: 112(5) Tribunal may charge fees
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-112
schema version: 2

112(1) Tribunal may charge fees
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.547
note: Tribunal may charge fees on behalf of the Commonwealth.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-112-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-112-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-112-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 112 Tribunal may charge fees

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-112-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-112-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 112(1) Tribunal may charge fees

112(2) Tribunal may charge fees
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.547
note: Determine fees for purposes of subsection (1)
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-112-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-112-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-112-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 112 Tribunal may charge fees

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-112-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission
modality: Deontic
operator: may

112(3) Tribunal may charge fees
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.547
note: Fees for Tribunal applications and proceedings
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-112-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-112-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-112-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 112 Tribunal may charge fees

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-112-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits fees for certain Tribunal actions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) A determination under subsection (2)

112(4) Tribunal may charge fees
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.547
note: Determination of fee payment circumstances, who must pay, time for payment, and remittal/refund waiver
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-112-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-112-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-112-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 112 Tribunal may charge fees

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-112-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Determines fee payment circumstances
modality: Deontic
operator: determines

112(5) Tribunal may charge fees
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.547
note: Determination may determine fees for particular classes of applications, costs or proceedings.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-112-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-112-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 112 Tribunal may charge fees

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-112-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 112(5) Tribunal may charge fees

113 Standing of Commission to seek judicial review
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.548
curation status: Proposed
has part: 113(1) Standing of Commission to seek judicial review
has part: 113(2) Standing of Commission to seek judicial review
has part: 113(3) Standing of Commission to seek judicial review
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-113
schema version: 2

113(1) Standing of Commission to seek judicial review
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.548
note: Commission can seek judicial review of decisions under this Part
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-113-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-113-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-113-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 113 Standing of Commission to seek judicial review

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-113-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to seek judicial review
modality: Deontic
operator: can

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-113-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 113(1) Standing of Commission to seek judicial review

113(2) Standing of Commission to seek judicial review
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.548
note: Commission is taken to be a person aggrieved by the decision, failure or conduct.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-113-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-113-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-113-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 113 Standing of Commission to seek judicial review

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-113-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a person aggrieved by the decision, failure or conduct.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission is taken to be a person aggrieved
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (2) The Commission

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-113-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 113(2) Standing of Commission to seek judicial review

113(3) Standing of Commission to seek judicial review
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.548
note: Commission's standing to seek judicial review
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-113-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-113-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-113-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 113 Standing of Commission to seek judicial review

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-113-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: same meaning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Same meaning as the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977
modality: Deontic
operator: same meaning
premise text: (3)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-113-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 113(3) Standing of Commission to seek judicial review

2 Section 2
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.387
note: Percentage values
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2
schema version: 2

2 If an application is made to the
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.448
curation status: Proposed
has part: 2(5) If an application is made to the
has part: 2(6) If an application is made to the
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-2
schema version: 2

2(5) If an application is made to the
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.448
note: Commission may determine an alternative period for the corporation.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-2-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-2-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-2-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 2 If an application is made to the

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-2-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-2-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission may determine an alternative period for the corporation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

2(6) If an application is made to the
type: Concept
description: yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.448
note: The Commission must provide a written statement of its reasons for giving notice.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-2-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-2-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 2 If an application is made to the

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-2-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commission must provide a written statement of its reasons for giving notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

27 May 2026
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.1
note: Compilation information and notes on amendments.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-27-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-27-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-27-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-27-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Describes the compilation's purpose and scope.
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-27-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the text as a compilation of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable

3 Section 3
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.387
note: Percentage distribution
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3
schema version: 2

30 September or 31 December.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.378
note: Prohibition on smoking
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-30-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: =

31 May.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.494
note: Adjusts applicable period for response notice
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-31-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31
schema version: 2

4 Section 4
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.387
note: Percentage values
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4
schema version: 2

5 Section 5
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.387
note: Percentage threshold
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5
schema version: 2

55 Object of this Part
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.27
note: Ensure payment surcharges are not excessive and reflect cost of using payment methods.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure payment surcharges are not excessive and reflect cost of using payment methods.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55 Object of this Part

55A Definitions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.27
note: Defines payment surcharge and infringement notice compliance period
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55a-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55a-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55a
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes a legal obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55a-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines terms used in the Act
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definedBy

55B Payment surcharges must not be excessive
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.29
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55B(1) Payment surcharges must not be excessive
has part: 55B(2) Payment surcharges must not be excessive
has part: 55B(3) Payment surcharges must not be excessive
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55b
schema version: 2

55B(1) Payment surcharges must not be excessive
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.29
note: Payment surcharges must not be excessive.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55B Payment surcharges must not be excessive

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Payment surcharges must not be excessive during trade or commerce.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal scope of prohibition
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) A corporation must not, in trade or commerce, charge a payment surcharge that is excessive.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Payment surcharges must not be excessive.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: CogAI
operator: not
premise text: (1) A corporation must not, in trade or commerce, charge a payment surcharge that is excessive.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Payment surcharges must not be excessive.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (1) A corporation must not, in trade or commerce, charge a payment surcharge that is excessive.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Payment surcharges must not be excessive.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Diffusion
operator: not
premise text: (1) A corporation must not, in trade or commerce, charge a payment surcharge that is excessive.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Payment surcharges must not be excessive.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: LinearLogic
operator: not
premise text: (1) A corporation must not, in trade or commerce, charge a payment surcharge that is excessive.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55B(1) Payment surcharges must not be excessive

55B(2) Payment surcharges must not be excessive
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.29
note: Payment surcharge must not be excessive
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55B Payment surcharges must not be excessive

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of excessive payment surcharge
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) A payment surcharge is excessive if...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of payment surcharges based on standards and regulations
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: (a) the surcharge is for a kind of payment covered by...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55B(2) Payment surcharges must not be excessive

55B(3) Payment surcharges must not be excessive
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.29
note: Payment surcharges must not be excessive
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55B Payment surcharges must not be excessive

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of excessive payment surcharges
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: (3) Subsection (1) does not apply to a corporation who is exempted from its operation by the regulations.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55B(3) Payment surcharges must not be excessive

55C Surcharge information notices
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.30
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55C(1) Surcharge information notices
has part: 55C(2) Surcharge information notices
has part: 55C(3) Surcharge information notices
has part: 55C(4) Surcharge information notices
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55c
schema version: 2

55C(1) Surcharge information notices
type: Concept
description: true
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.30
note: Require surcharge participant to provide information or documents
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55C Surcharge information notices

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a requirement
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55C(1) Surcharge information notices

55C(2) Surcharge information notices
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.30
note: Corporation must be a surcharge participant if it charges or processes payment surcharges.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55C Surcharge information notices

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the corporation must be a surcharge participant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Corporation's charging or processing of payment surcharges implies surcharge participation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (2) A corporation is a surcharge participant if...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the corporation must be a surcharge participant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Corporation's charging or processing of payment surcharges implies surcharge participation
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
premise text: (2) A corporation is a surcharge participant if...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the corporation must be a surcharge participant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be a surcharge participant
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) A corporation is a surcharge participant if...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the corporation must be a surcharge participant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Corporation's charging or processing of payment surcharges implies surcharge participation
modality: Diffusion
operator: IF
premise text: (2) A corporation is a surcharge participant if...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the corporation must be a surcharge participant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Corporation's charging or processing of payment surcharges implies surcharge participation
modality: LTL
operator: >=
premise text: (2) A corporation is a surcharge participant if...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55C(2) Surcharge information notices

55C(3) Surcharge information notices
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.30
note: Notice must be a surcharge information notice.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55C Surcharge information notices

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST BE

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55C(3) Surcharge information notices

55C(4) Surcharge information notices
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.30
note: Must specify surcharge information notice details
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55c-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 55C Surcharge information notices

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify required details
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55C(4) Surcharge information notices

55D Extending periods for complying with notices
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.30
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55D(1) Extending periods for complying with notices
has part: 55D(2) Extending periods for complying with notices
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55d
schema version: 2

55D(1) Extending periods for complying with notices
type: Concept
description: written application to the Commission
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.30
note: Participant can apply for extension of notice period within 21 days
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55d-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55D Extending periods for complying with notices

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Extension period overlaps with notice period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Participant has permission to apply for extension
modality: Deontic
operator: can

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55D(1) Extending periods for complying with notices

55D(2) Extending periods for complying with notices
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.30
note: Commission may extend period for complying with notices
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55d-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55D Extending periods for complying with notices

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to extend period
modality: Deontic
operator: May

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55d-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55D(2) Extending periods for complying with notices

55E Participant must comply with notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.31
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55E(1) Participant must comply with notice
has part: 55E(2) Participant must comply with notice
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55e
schema version: 2

55E(1) Participant must comply with notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.31
note: Fail to comply with notice within period or commit offence.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55e-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55e-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55e-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55e-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55E Participant must comply with notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...fail to comply with the notice within the period for so complying.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) A surcharge participant commits an offence if...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55e-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...fail to comply with the notice within the period for so complying.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on failing to comply with notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (1) A surcharge participant commits an offence if...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55e-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the surcharge participant fails to comply with the notice within the period for so complying.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay penalty.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Penalty: 30 penalty units.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55e-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the surcharge participant fails to comply with the notice within the period for so complying.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on failing to pay penalty.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Penalty: 30 penalty units.

55E(2) Participant must comply with notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.31
note: Participant must comply with notice
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55e-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55E Participant must comply with notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compliance required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide compliance
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Strict liability offence

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55E(2) Participant must comply with notice

55F Purpose and effect of this Division
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.32
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55F(1) Purpose and effect of this Division
has part: 55F(2) Purpose and effect of this Division
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55f
schema version: 2

55F(1) Purpose and effect of this Division
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.32
note: Issue of infringement notice as an alternative to proceedings for a pecuniary penalty
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55f-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55f-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55F Purpose and effect of this Division

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State to issue an infringement notice
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55f-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55F(1) Purpose and effect of this Division

55F(2) Purpose and effect of this Division
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.32
note: Does not require an infringement notice to be issued for a contravention of section 55B.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55f-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55f-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55f-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55f-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55f-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55F Purpose and effect of this Division

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55f-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conditions are temporally included.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal inclusion
modality: AllenInterval
operator: ⊆
premise text: (i) an infringement notice is not issued to the person for the contravention; or (ii) an infringement notice issued to the person for the contravention is withdrawn under section 55N;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No infringement notice is required.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
premise text: This Division does not require an infringement notice to be issued.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55f-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No infringement notice is required.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
premise text: (ii) an infringement notice issued to the person for the contravention is withdrawn under section 55N;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55f-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conditions are temporally included.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal inclusion
modality: LTL
operator: ⊆
premise text: (i) an infringement notice is not issued to the person for the contravention; or (ii) an infringement notice issued to the person for the contravention is withdrawn under section 55N;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55F(2) Purpose and effect of this Division

55G Issuing an infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.32
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55G(1) Issuing an infringement notice
has part: 55G(2) Issuing an infringement notice
has part: 55G(3) Issuing an infringement notice
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55g
schema version: 2

55G(1) Issuing an infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.32
note: Commission may issue infringement notice to a person with reasonable grounds to believe contravention of section 55B.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55g-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55G Issuing an infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission may issue infringement notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55G(1) Issuing an infringement notice

55G(2) Issuing an infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.32
note: Commission must not issue more than one infringement notice for the same alleged contravention of section 55B.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55g-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55G Issuing an infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55G(2) Issuing an infringement notice

55G(3) Issuing an infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.32
note: Infringement notice has no effect if issued more than 12 months after alleged contravention of section 55B.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55g-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55G Issuing an infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Notice issued more than 12 months after alleged contravention.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (a) is issued more than 12 months after the day that the

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits issuing infringement notice more than 12 months after alleged contravention.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (3) The infringement notice does not have any effect if the notice:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits issuing infringement notice relating to more than one alleged contravention.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (b) relates to more than one alleged contravention of section 55B by the person.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Notice relates to more than one alleged contravention of section 55B.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (b) relates to more than one alleged contravention of section 55B by the person.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55G(3) Issuing an infringement notice

55H Matters to be included in an infringement notice
type: Concept
description: a unique number, day of issue, name and address, Commission contact details, alleged contravention details, penalty information, payment instructions
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.33
note: Infringement notice requirements
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55h-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55h-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55h
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55h-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide required information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55h-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55H Matters to be included in an infringement notice

55J Amount of penalty
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.33
note: Penalty amount for infringement notice
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55j-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55j-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55j
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55j-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits penalty units
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

55K Effect of compliance with an infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.33
note: Compliance with an infringement notice triggers this section.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55k-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55k-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55k
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55k-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section applies if certain conditions are met.
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: Chapter 4 provisions relating to particular industries, payment surcharges etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55k-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55K Effect of compliance with an infringement notice

55L Effect of failure to comply with an infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.34
note: Failure to comply with infringement notice results in liability for alleged contravention.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55l-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55l-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55l
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55l-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with infringement notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55l-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55L Effect of failure to comply with an infringement notice

55M Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.34
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55M(1) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
has part: 55M(2) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
has part: 55M(3) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
has part: 55M(4) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
has part: 55M(5) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
has part: 55M(6) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55m
schema version: 2

55M(1) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.34
note: Defines infringement notice compliance period
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55m-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55M Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice

55M(2) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.34
note: Commission may extend infringement notice compliance period
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55m-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55M Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to extend compliance period
modality: Deontic
operator: May

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55M(2) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice

55M(3) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.34
note: Maximum extension period for infringement notice compliance
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55m-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55M Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: overlaps-with(extension-duration, [0, 28])
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between two intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps-with
premise text: (3) Only one extension may be given and the extension must not be for longer than 28 days.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: asserts(extension-duration < 28)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes a statement or assertion made by an artificial agent
modality: CogAI
operator: asserts
premise text: (3) Only one extension may be given and the extension must not be for longer than 28 days.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (extension-duration < 28)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limits the maximum duration of an extension
modality: Deontic
operator: max
premise text: (3) Only one extension may be given and the extension must not be for longer than 28 days.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: diffuses(extension-duration < 28)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes a process of spreading or disseminating information
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (3) Only one extension may be given and the extension must not be for longer than 28 days.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: holds-for-all(extension, (extension-duration < 28))
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes a property that holds for all elements of a set
modality: LTL
operator: holds-for-all
premise text: (3) Only one extension may be given and the extension must not be for longer than 28 days.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55M(3) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice

55M(4) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
description: Notice of extension
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.34
note: Must provide notice of extension to the person issued the infringement notice.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55m-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 55M Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice of extension
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55M(4) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice

55M(5) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.34
note: Failure to comply with subsection (4) does not affect the validity of the extension.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55m-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 55M Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55M(5) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice

55M(6) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.34
note: Reference to extended infringement notice compliance period
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55m-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 55M Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55M(6) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice

55N Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.35
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55N(1) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
has part: 55N(2) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
has part: 55N(3) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
has part: 55N(4) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55n
schema version: 2

55N(1) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
description: Written representations
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.35
note: Right to withdraw infringement notice
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55n-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55n-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55N Withdrawal of an infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right to withdraw
modality: Deontic
operator: can

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55n-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55N(1) Withdrawal of an infringement notice

55N(2) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.35
note: Protection from self-incrimination in proceedings
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55n-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55n-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55N Withdrawal of an infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to protect self-incrimination
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55n-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55N(2) Withdrawal of an infringement notice

55N(3) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.35
note: Commission may withdraw infringement notice upon request.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55n-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55n-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55N Withdrawal of an infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to withdraw infringement notice
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55n-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55N(3) Withdrawal of an infringement notice

55N(4) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.35
note: Subsection (3) applies regardless of representations made for withdrawal.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55n-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55n-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55n-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 55N Withdrawal of an infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55n-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Subsection (3) applies regardless of representations made.
modality: Deontic
operator: Always

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55n-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55N(4) Withdrawal of an infringement notice

56AA Object of this Part
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.37
note: To enable consumers in certain sectors of the Australian economy to require information relating to themselves.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aa-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aa-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56aa
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aa-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56AA Object of this Part

56AB Simplified outline
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.37
note: Rules made under this Part may relate to particular industries and payment surcharges.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ab-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ab
schema version: 2

56AC Designated sectors subject to the consumer data right
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.39
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56AC(1) Designated sectors subject to the consumer data right
has part: 56AC(2) Designated sectors subject to the consumer data right
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ac
schema version: 2

56AC(1) Designated sectors subject to the consumer data right
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.39
note: Defines designated sector under subsection (2)
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ac-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ac-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56AC Designated sectors subject to the consumer data right

56AC(2) Designated sectors subject to the consumer data right
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.39
note: The Minister may designate a sector of the Australian economy by specifying classes of information, persons who hold information, and other details.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ac-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ac-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56AC Designated sectors subject to the consumer data right

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to designate a sector
modality: Deontic
operator: May

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ac-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56AC(2) Designated sectors subject to the consumer data right

56AD Minister’s tasks before designating a sector or declaring
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.41
note: Consider all relevant factors before making an instrument.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ad-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ad-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ad-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ad
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ad-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Consider all factors before making an instrument.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEFORE
premise text: (1)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ad-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must consider all relevant factors.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

56AE Secretary must arrange for analysis, consultation and report
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.43
note: The Secretary must arrange for analysis, consultation and report on an instrument proposing to designate a sector or declare actions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ae-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ae-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ae-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ae
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ae-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Secretary must comply with the section.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ae-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of industries and actions.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION

56AF Information Commissioner must analyse and report about an
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.44
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56AF(1) Information Commissioner must analyse and report about an
has part: 56AF(2) Information Commissioner must analyse and report about an
has part: 56AF(3) Information Commissioner must analyse and report about an
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56af
schema version: 2

56AF(1) Information Commissioner must analyse and report about an
type: Concept
description: Analysis and report to the Minister
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.44
note: Must analyse and report about the likely effect of an instrument on consumer privacy.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56af-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56AF Information Commissioner must analyse and report about an

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56AF(1) Information Commissioner must analyse and report about an

56AF(2) Information Commissioner must analyse and report about an
type: Concept
description: report
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.44
note: Information Commissioner must publish report on website
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56af-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56AF Information Commissioner must analyse and report about an

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56AF(2) Information Commissioner must analyse and report about an

56AF(3) Information Commissioner must analyse and report about an
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.44
note: Information Commissioner must consider certain factors when deciding whether to exclude part of report from publication.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56af-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56AF Information Commissioner must analyse and report about an

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for consideration
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (3) In deciding whether or not to exclude a part of the report from publication, the Information Commissioner must: (a) have regard to the need to prevent the matters in subsection 33(2) of the Privacy Act 1988; and

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider certain factors
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) In deciding whether or not to exclude a part of the report from publication, the Information Commissioner must:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to balance competing interests
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) In deciding whether or not to exclude a part of the report from publication, the Information Commissioner must: (a) have regard to the need to prevent the matters in subsection 33(2) of the Privacy Act 1988; and (b) try to achieve an appropriate balance between the need to prevent those matters and the desirability of ensuring that interested persons are sufficiently informed of the Information Commissioner’s analysis in the report.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to prevent certain matters
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) In deciding whether or not to exclude a part of the report from publication, the Information Commissioner must: (a) have regard to the need to prevent the matters in subsection 33(2) of the Privacy Act 1988; and

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to achieve balance
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) In deciding whether or not to exclude a part of the report from publication, the Information Commissioner must: (b) try to achieve an appropriate balance between the need to prevent those matters and the desirability of ensuring that interested persons are sufficiently informed of the Information Commissioner’s analysis in the report.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56AF(3) Information Commissioner must analyse and report about an

56AH Other matters
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.45
note: Exemptions from invalidation of instruments
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ah-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ah
schema version: 2

56AI Meanings of CDR data, directly or indirectly derived and CDR
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.45
note: Defines CDR data and its meaning.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ai-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ai-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ai-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ai-logic-descriptionlogic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ai
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ai-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines CDR data and its meaning.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ai-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information derived from information covered by paragraph (a) or (aa)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Information covered by paragraph (a) or (aa)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ai-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information derived from information covered by paragraph (b)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Information covered by paragraph (b)

56AJ Meaning of data holder
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.47
note: A person is a data holder if they hold CDR data within a specified class and on or after the earliest holding day.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aj-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56aj
schema version: 2

56AK Meaning of accredited data recipient
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.50
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56AK(1) Meaning of accredited data recipient
has part: 56AK(2) Meaning of accredited data recipient
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ak
schema version: 2

56AK(1) Meaning of accredited data recipient
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.50
note: A person is an accredited data recipient if they meet certain conditions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ak-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ak-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ak-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ak-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ak-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ak-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56AK Meaning of accredited data recipient

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ak-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is a temporal interval between when the CDR data was disclosed to the person and when it was held by or on behalf of them.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >
premise text: The CDR data is not being held by or on behalf of the person as an action service provider for a type of CDR action.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ak-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person has permission to hold the CDR data.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to hold CDR data
modality: Deontic
operator: >
premise text: The person is neither a data holder nor a designated gateway for the first-mentioned CDR data.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ak-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person cannot be a data holder.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on being a data holder
modality: Deontic
operator: <
premise text: The person is neither a data holder nor a designated gateway for the first-mentioned CDR data.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ak-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person has a right to hold the CDR data.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right to hold CDR data
modality: Deontic
operator: >
premise text: The CDR data is held by or on behalf of the person.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ak-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56AK(1) Meaning of accredited data recipient

56AK(2) Meaning of accredited data recipient
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.50
note: Authorisation required for using or disclosing CDR data
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ak-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ak-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ak-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56AK Meaning of accredited data recipient

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ak-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The CDR data can be used or disclosed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has authorisation
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: The person is authorised by the consumer data rules

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ak-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56AK(2) Meaning of accredited data recipient

56AL Meanings of CDR participant and designated gateway
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.51
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56AL(1) Meanings of CDR participant and designated gateway
has part: 56AL(2) Meanings of CDR participant and designated gateway
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56al
schema version: 2

56AL(1) Meanings of CDR participant and designated gateway
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.51
note: Defines CDR participant and designated gateway.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56al-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56al-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56al-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56AL Meanings of CDR participant and designated gateway

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56al-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning.
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56al-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56AL(1) Meanings of CDR participant and designated gateway

56AL(2) Meanings of CDR participant and designated gateway
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.51
note: A person is a designated gateway if specified in an instrument and meets certain conditions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56al-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56al-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56al-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56al-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56AL Meanings of CDR participant and designated gateway

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56al-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: CDR data is disclosed to the person under consumer data rules

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56al-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: A person is a designated gateway if specified in an instrument and meets certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56al-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56AL(2) Meanings of CDR participant and designated gateway

56AM Meanings of chargeable CDR data, chargeable circumstances
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.52
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56AM(1) Meanings of chargeable CDR data, chargeable circumstances
has part: 56AM(2) Meanings of chargeable CDR data, chargeable circumstances
has part: 56AM(3) Meanings of chargeable CDR data, chargeable circumstances
has part: 56AM(4) Meanings of chargeable CDR data, chargeable circumstances
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56am
schema version: 2

56AM(1) Meanings of chargeable CDR data, chargeable circumstances
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.52
note: A person is an action service provider for a type of CDR action if the person meets certain conditions. CDR data is chargeable if specified in an instrument designation instrument Defines a CDR action as an action declared under section 56ACA.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-deontic-7
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-8
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-deontic-9
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-10
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-11
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-argumentation-12
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-diffusion-13
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56am-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56AM Meanings of chargeable CDR data, chargeable circumstances

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-11
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A CDR action occurs during its declaration under section 56ACA.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between a CDR action and its declaration under section 56ACA.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) A CDR action is an action of a type declared under section 56ACA.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is an action service provider for that type of CDR action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The data holder has been declared as a class of data holders for at least one type of CDR action.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-8
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: sector under subsection
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: 56AC(2)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-argumentation-12
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If a CDR action exists, it implies a declaration under section 56ACA.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Establishes the logical connection between a CDR action and its declaration under section 56ACA.
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (1) A CDR action is an action of a type declared under section 56ACA.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is an action service provider for that type of CDR action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: The person must meet the conditions to be an action service provider.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is an action service provider for that type of CDR action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: The data holder must meet the conditions to be declared as a class of data holders.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-deontic-7
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: CDR data is chargeable if specified in an instrument designation instrument
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-deontic-9
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A CDR action is an obligation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies a CDR action as an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (1) A CDR action is an action of a type declared under section 56ACA.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is an action service provider for that type of CDR action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: The data holder is within a class of data holders declared in the CDR declaration.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is an action service provider for that type of CDR action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: The data holder is a voluntary action service provider for that type of CDR action.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-diffusion-13
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If a CDR action exists, it implies information about its declaration under section 56ACA.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes the spread or dissemination of information about a CDR action and its declaration under section 56ACA.
modality: Diffusion
operator: implies
premise text: (1) A CDR action is an action of a type declared under section 56ACA.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-10
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If a CDR action exists, it implies a declaration under section 56ACA.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Establishes the relationship between a CDR action and its declaration under section 56ACA.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implies
premise text: (1) A CDR action is an action of a type declared under section 56ACA.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is an action service provider for that type of CDR action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace
modality: LTL
operator: <=
premise text: The data holder has been declared as a class of data holders for at least one type of CDR action.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56AM(1) Meanings of chargeable CDR data, chargeable circumstances

56AM(2) Meanings of chargeable CDR data, chargeable circumstances
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.52
note: Definition of CDR declaration for a type of CDR action Disclose chargeable CDR data in specified circumstances. Definition of voluntary action service provider for CDR actions
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-6
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-logic-deontic-7
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-8
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56am-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56AM Meanings of chargeable CDR data, chargeable circumstances

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for disclosure
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: (2) The chargeable CDR data is disclosed in chargeable circumstances if it is disclosed in circumstances specified:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for that type of CDR action
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for application to be approved
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The person will need to have applied to be approved as an action service provider...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (2) The chargeable CDR data is disclosed in chargeable circumstances if it is disclosed in circumstances specified:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and the person holds an approval under the consumer data rules
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional permission based on accreditation
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: (2) A person is a voluntary action service provider if...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-logic-deontic-7
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and the person’s accreditation authorises the person to initiate that type of CDR action
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of accredited action initiator
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: A person is an accredited action initiator for a type of CDR action if...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of chargeable CDR data
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classifies
premise text: (2) The chargeable CDR data is disclosed in chargeable circumstances if it is disclosed in circumstances specified:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and the person holds an approval under the consumer data rules
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Person is a voluntary action service provider if...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-8
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...including about different levels of accreditation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: The consumer data rules may include rules about accreditation...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56AM(2) Meanings of chargeable CDR data, chargeable circumstances

56AM(3) Meanings of chargeable CDR data, chargeable circumstances
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.52
note: Chargeable CDR data is used in chargeable circumstances if it meets specified conditions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56am-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56AM Meanings of chargeable CDR data, chargeable circumstances

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: it meets specified conditions
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: chargeable CDR data is used in chargeable circumstances

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: it is used in chargeable circumstances for that class of information
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: chargeable CDR data is of class information

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56AM(3) Meanings of chargeable CDR data, chargeable circumstances

56AM(4) Meanings of chargeable CDR data, chargeable circumstances
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.52
note: CDR data is fee-free under certain circumstances.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56am-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 56AM Meanings of chargeable CDR data, chargeable circumstances

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56AM(4) Meanings of chargeable CDR data, chargeable circumstances

56AN Extension to external Territories
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: Extends provisions of this Part and other Acts to external Territories
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56an-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56an-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56an
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56an-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Extends provisions of this Part and other Acts to external Territories
modality: Deontic
operator: extends

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56an-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56AN Extension to external Territories

56AO Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.54
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56AO(1) Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions
has part: 56AO(2) Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions
has part: 56AO(3) Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions
has part: 56AO(3A) Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions
has part: 56AO(3B) Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ao
schema version: 2

56AO(1) Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: CDR provisions extend to acts, omissions, matters and things outside Australia.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ao-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56AO Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Extends to acts, omissions, matters and things outside Australia.
modality: Deontic
operator: extends

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56AO(1) Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions

56AO(2) Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: CDR provisions apply to all persons, including foreign persons, in relation to CDR data held within Australia.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ao-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56AO Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: all persons, including foreign persons
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicability of CDR provisions to all persons
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
premise text: CDR data held within Australia

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56AO(2) Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions

56AO(3) Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: CDR provisions apply to acts or omissions by Australian persons, within Australia, or causing financial disadvantage outside Australia.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ao-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56AO Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: CDR provisions apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: (a) the act or omission is by (or on behalf of) an Australian person

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: CDR provisions apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: (b) the act or omission occurs wholly or partly in Australia, or wholly or partly on board an Australian aircraft or an Australian ship

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: CDR provisions apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: (c) the act or omission occurs wholly outside Australia, and an Australian person suffers, or is likely to suffer, financial or other disadvantage as a result of the act or omission

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56AO(3) Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions

56AO(3A) Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: CDR provisions apply to all persons, including foreign persons, within Australia.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-3a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ao-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 56AO Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The CDR provisions apply in relation to all persons (including foreign persons).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicability of CDR provisions
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
premise text: CDR provisions have effect in relation to a CDR action to be performed within Australia.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56AO(3A) Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions

56AO(3B) Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-3b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ao-ss-3b
schema version: 2
part of: 56AO Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-3b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56AO(3B) Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions

56AP Geographical application of offences
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.57
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ap-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ap
schema version: 2

56AQ CDR provisions bind the Crown
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.57
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56AQ(1) CDR provisions bind the Crown
has part: 56AQ(2) CDR provisions bind the Crown
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56aq
schema version: 2

56AQ(1) CDR provisions bind the Crown
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.57
note: The CDR provisions bind the Crown in each of its capacities.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-1-logic-dialectical-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56aq-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56AQ CDR provisions bind the Crown

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The CDR provisions apply to the Crown's capacities from the time they come into effect until they are repealed or amended.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The CDR provisions bind the Crown during its various capacities.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) The CDR provisions bind the Crown in each of its capacities.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Crown must take specific actions to comply with the CDR provisions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The CDR provisions require the Crown to take specific actions.
modality: CogAI
operator: requires
premise text: (1) The CDR provisions bind the Crown in each of its capacities.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Crown is obligated to comply with the CDR provisions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The CDR provisions impose an obligation on the Crown.
modality: Deontic
operator: binds
premise text: (1) The CDR provisions bind the Crown in each of its capacities.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-1-logic-dialectical-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Crown's compliance with the CDR provisions is implied by their binding nature.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dialectical
logic summary: The CDR provisions imply a duty on the Crown to comply with them.
modality: Dialectical
operator: implies
premise text: (1) The CDR provisions bind the Crown in each of its capacities.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Crown's compliance with the CDR provisions is entailed by their binding nature.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: The CDR provisions entail a duty on the Crown to comply with them.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: entails
premise text: (1) The CDR provisions bind the Crown in each of its capacities.

56AQ(2) CDR provisions bind the Crown
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.57
note: The Crown is not subject to certain remedies under specified laws.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56aq-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56AQ CDR provisions bind the Crown

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Crown is not subject to a pecuniary penalty.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: CDR provisions do not make the Crown liable to a pecuniary penalty.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Crown is not subject to a remedy under section 56EY.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: CDR provisions do not make the Crown subject to a remedy under section 56EY.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Crown is not subject to a remedy under Part VI other than section 87B.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: CDR provisions do not make the Crown subject to a remedy under Part VI other than section 87B.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Crown is not subject to a remedy under Part 4 or section 7 of the Regulatory Powers Act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: CDR provisions do not make the Crown subject to a remedy under Part 4 or section 7 of the Regulatory Powers Act.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Crown is not subject to Part XID of this Act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: CDR provisions do not make the Crown subject to Part XID of this Act.

56AR Government entities may participate under this Part
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.57
note: Entities subject to CDR provisions
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ar-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ar-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ar
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ar-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entities subject to CDR provisions
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

56AS Participating government entities of a State or Territory—
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.59
note: The Minister may declare an entity as a participating entity.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56as-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56as-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56as
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56as-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration of participation is obligatory.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56as-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56AS Participating government entities of a State or Territory—

56AT Participating government entities of a State or Territory—
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.60
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56AT(1) Participating government entities of a State or Territory—
has part: 56AT(2) Participating government entities of a State or Territory—
has part: 56AT(3) Participating government entities of a State or Territory—
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56at
schema version: 2

56AT(1) Participating government entities of a State or Territory—
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.60
note: Revocation of declaration of participating entity
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56at-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56AT Participating government entities of a State or Territory—

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...revokes a declaration made under subsection 56AS(1)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval of revocation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1) The Minister may, by notifiable instrument...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...revokes a declaration made under subsection 56AS(1)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Applies reasoning to revocation of declarations
modality: CogAI
operator: Reasoning
premise text: (1) The Minister may, by notifiable instrument...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...revokes a declaration made under subsection 56AS(1)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits revoking a declaration
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) The Minister may, by notifiable instrument...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...revokes a declaration made under subsection 56AS(1)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses revocation to participating entities
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (1) The Minister may, by notifiable instrument...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...revokes a declaration made under subsection 56AS(1)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines temporal interval of revocation
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1) The Minister may, by notifiable instrument...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56AT(1) Participating government entities of a State or Territory—

56AT(2) Participating government entities of a State or Territory—
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.60
note: Minister must revoke declaration as soon as practicable upon request.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56at-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56AT Participating government entities of a State or Territory—

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has a duty to revoke declaration.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

56AT(3) Participating government entities of a State or Territory—
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.60
note: Continues to apply to entity in relation to acquired, accrued or incurred rights, privileges, obligations or liabilities after revocation of declaration.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56at-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56AT Participating government entities of a State or Territory—

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Entity continues to be subject to subsection 56AR(2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Subsection 56AR(2) applies between declaration revocation and entity's rights, privileges, obligations or liabilities.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
premise text: Declaration revocation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection 56AR(2) applies
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity continues to be subject to obligations after revocation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Continues
premise text: Revocation of declaration

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Entity continues to be subject to subsection 56AR(2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Subsection 56AR(2) applies despite declaration revocation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Despite
premise text: Revocation of declaration

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Entity continues to be subject to subsection 56AR(2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Subsection 56AR(2) applies recurring to entity in relation to acquired, accrued or incurred rights, privileges, obligations or liabilities.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: Declaration revocation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56AT(3) Participating government entities of a State or Territory—

56AU Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of CDR entities
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.61
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56AU(1) Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of CDR entities
has part: 56AU(2) Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of CDR entities
has part: 56AU(3) Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of CDR entities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56au
schema version: 2

56AU(1) Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of CDR entities
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.61
note: Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of CDR entities are obligations for the CDR entity.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56au-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56AU Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of CDR entities

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation relation
modality: Deontic
operator: :

56AU(2) Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of CDR entities
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.61
note: Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of CDR entities
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56au-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56AU Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of CDR entities

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the agent who: (a) is acting on behalf of a CDR entity; and (b) is so acting within the agent’s actual or apparent authority;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes relation between temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Relates to temporal intervals
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Part and the consumer data rules, if an act is done by a person in relation to another person...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the agent who: (a) is acting on behalf of a CDR entity; and (b) is so acting within the agent’s actual or apparent authority;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes relation between CogAI
modality: CogAI
operator: Relates to CogAI
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Part and the consumer data rules, if an act is done by a person in relation to another person...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the act is taken to have also been done in relation to the CDR entity.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Part and the consumer data rules, if an act is done by a person in relation to another person...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the agent who: (a) is acting on behalf of a CDR entity; and (b) is so acting within the agent’s actual or apparent authority;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes relation between diffusion
modality: Diffusion
operator: Relates to diffusion
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Part and the consumer data rules, if an act is done by a person in relation to another person...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the agent who: (a) is acting on behalf of a CDR entity; and (b) is so acting within the agent’s actual or apparent authority;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes relation between traces
modality: LTL
operator: Relates to trace
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Part and the consumer data rules, if an act is done by a person in relation to another person...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56AU(2) Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of CDR entities

56AU(3) Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of CDR entities
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.61
note: Definition of CDR entity
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56au-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56AU Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of CDR entities

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines a class hierarchy for CDR entities
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definition

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56AU(3) Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of CDR entities

56BA Minister may make consumer data rules
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.62
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56BA(1) Minister may make consumer data rules
has part: 56BA(2) Minister may make consumer data rules
has part: 56BA(3) Minister may make consumer data rules
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ba
schema version: 2

56BA(1) Minister may make consumer data rules
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.62
note: Minister must make consumer data rules including deletion of CDR data Minister has obligation to make consumer data rules.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ba-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56BA Minister may make consumer data rules

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make consumer data rules
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: has

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56BA(1) Minister may make consumer data rules

56BA(2) Minister may make consumer data rules
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.62
note: Consumer data rules must include requirements for deleting CDR data on request from consumer Cannot delete CDR data under certain conditions
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-2-logic-ltl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ba-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56BA Minister may make consumer data rules

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The rule cannot require deletion of all or part of the CDR data
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: CDR data must be retained by or under an Australian law or court/tribunal order
modality: AllenInterval
operator: \u2262
premise text: The accredited data recipient is required to retain the CDR data

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The rule cannot require deletion of all or part of the CDR data
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: CDR data relates to current or anticipated legal proceedings
modality: AllenInterval
operator: \u2262
premise text: The CDR data relates to any current or anticipated legal proceedings

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide requirements for deleting CDR data on request from consumer
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The rule cannot require deletion of all or part of the CDR data
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot delete CDR data under certain conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: \u2262
premise text: The accredited data recipient is required to retain the CDR data

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-2-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The rule cannot require deletion of all or part of the CDR data
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: CDR data must be retained by or under an Australian law or court/tribunal order
modality: LTL
operator: \u2262
premise text: The accredited data recipient is required to retain the CDR data

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56BA(2) Minister may make consumer data rules

56BA(3) Minister may make consumer data rules
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.62
note: Rules for consumer data deletion
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ba-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56BA Minister may make consumer data rules

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the CDR data covered in a valid request;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal intervals for deletion
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: when a request ceases to be a valid request;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the requirement:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply with rules
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The consumer data rules may include...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the rules about how the requirement is to be complied with
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class of CDR data requested
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS OF
premise text: depending on the class of CDR data requested to be deleted;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56BA(3) Minister may make consumer data rules

56BB Matters that the consumer data rules may deal with
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.64
note: Matters that the consumer data rules may deal with
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bb-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bb
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bb-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56BB Matters that the consumer data rules may deal with

56BC Rules about disclosure, collection, use, accuracy, storage,
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.65
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56BC(1) Rules about disclosure, collection, use, accuracy, storage,
has part: 56BC(2) Rules about disclosure, collection, use, accuracy, storage,
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bc
schema version: 2

56BC(1) Rules about disclosure, collection, use, accuracy, storage,
type: Concept
description: CDR data upon request
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.65
note: Disclosure requirements for CDR data
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bc-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56BC Rules about disclosure, collection, use, accuracy, storage,

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide CDR data
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

56BC(2) Rules about disclosure, collection, use, accuracy, storage,
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.65
note: Rules about disclosure, collection, use, accuracy, storage
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bc-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56BC Rules about disclosure, collection, use, accuracy, storage,

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56BC(2) Rules about disclosure, collection, use, accuracy, storage,

56BD Limitations for rules about CDR data for which there are
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.67
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56BD(1) Limitations for rules about CDR data for which there are
has part: 56BD(2) Limitations for rules about CDR data for which there are
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bd
schema version: 2

56BD(1) Limitations for rules about CDR data for which there are
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.67
note: Disclosure of CDR data is only required for certain types of consumers.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bd-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bd-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56BD Limitations for rules about CDR data for which there are

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires disclosure for specified types of consumers.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bd-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclass of consumer data rules that require disclosure.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56BD(1) Limitations for rules about CDR data for which there are

56BD(2) Limitations for rules about CDR data for which there are
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.67
note: No fee can be charged for certain industries and payment surcharges.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bd-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bd-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bd-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bd-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56BD Limitations for rules about CDR data for which there are

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Prohibition on charging fees during the specified time period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) The consumer data rules cannot allow a fee to be charged for: Chapter 4 Provisions relating to particular industries, payment surcharges etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bd-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Prohibition on charging fees during the specified time period.
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (2) The consumer data rules cannot allow a fee to be charged for: Chapter 4 Provisions relating to particular industries, payment surcharges etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on charging fees for certain industries and payment surcharges.
modality: Deontic
operator: not allow
premise text: (2) The consumer data rules cannot allow a fee to be charged for: Chapter 4 Provisions relating to particular industries, payment surcharges etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bd-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Prohibition on charging fees during the specified time period.
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (2) The consumer data rules cannot allow a fee to be charged for: Chapter 4 Provisions relating to particular industries, payment surcharges etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bd-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Prohibition on charging fees during the specified time period.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (2) The consumer data rules cannot allow a fee to be charged for: Chapter 4 Provisions relating to particular industries, payment surcharges etc.

56BE Rules about disclosure, collection, use, accuracy, storage,
type: Concept
description: CDR data upon request
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.68
note: Requirements for CDR data disclosure
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56be-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56be-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56be
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56be-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to disclose CDR data
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

56BF Limitations for rules about product data
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.69
note: Only certain kinds of product data can be required to be disclosed.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bf-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bf
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bf-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56BF Limitations for rules about product data

56BG Rules about designated gateways
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.70
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56BG(1) Rules about designated gateways
has part: 56BG(2) Rules about designated gateways
has part: 56BG(3) Rules about designated gateways
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bg
schema version: 2

56BG(1) Rules about designated gateways
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.70
note: Rules about designated gateways for CDR data
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bg-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bg-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56BG Rules about designated gateways

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits acting between the CDR consumer and the CDR participant in the making of a valid request
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) Without limiting paragraph 56BB(c), if there is a designated gateway for CDR data for which there are one or more CDR consumers, the consumer data rules may include the following rules:

56BG(2) Rules about designated gateways
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.70
note: Rules for designated gateways
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bg-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bg-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56BG Rules about designated gateways

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56BG(2) Rules about designated gateways

56BG(3) Rules about designated gateways
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.70
note: Rules about designated gateways can only include rules affecting the designated gateway if they relate to a disclosure described in paragraph (a) of this subsection.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bg-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bg-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56BG Rules about designated gateways

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bg-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56BG(3) Rules about designated gateways

56BH Rules about accreditation for the purposes of this Part
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.75
note: Rules about accreditation for the purposes of this Part
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bh-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bh
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bh-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56BH Rules about accreditation for the purposes of this Part

56BI Rules about reporting, record keeping and auditing
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.79
note: Power for CDR consumer to direct reports about valid requests and disclosures
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bi-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bi-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bi
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bi-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Power

56BJ Rules about incidental or related matters
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.81
note: Rules about incidental or related matters
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bj-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bj-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bj
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bj-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The obligation is lifted under certain circumstances
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applies to the obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: The text states that persons are relieved from complying with requirements

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bj-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56BJ Rules about incidental or related matters

56BK Further limitations on the consumer data rules
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.83
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56BK(1) Further limitations on the consumer data rules
has part: 56BK(2) Further limitations on the consumer data rules
has part: 56BK(4) Further limitations on the consumer data rules
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bk
schema version: 2

56BK(1) Further limitations on the consumer data rules
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.83
note: No retrospective commencement or application for consumer data rules
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-1-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bk-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56BK Further limitations on the consumer data rules

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: No overlapping temporal intervals for retrospective commencement or application
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Does not overlap
premise text: (1) The consumer data rules cannot impose on a person a requirement that has a retrospective commencement or application.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-1-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: No CogAI logic applicable due to lack of temporal intervals
modality: CogAI
operator: Does not apply
premise text: (1) The consumer data rules cannot impose on a person a requirement that has a retrospective commencement or application.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of retrospective commencement or application
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: (1) The consumer data rules cannot impose on a person a requirement that has a retrospective commencement or application.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of consumer data rules as having no retrospective commencement or application
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classifies
premise text: (1) The consumer data rules cannot impose on a person a requirement that has a retrospective commencement or application.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: No diffusion logic applicable due to lack of temporal intervals
modality: Diffusion
operator: Does not apply
premise text: (1) The consumer data rules cannot impose on a person a requirement that has a retrospective commencement or application.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: No LTL logic applicable due to lack of temporal intervals
modality: LTL
operator: Does not apply
premise text: (1) The consumer data rules cannot impose on a person a requirement that has a retrospective commencement or application.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56BK(1) Further limitations on the consumer data rules

56BK(2) Further limitations on the consumer data rules
type: Concept
description: Disclosure of CDR data
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.83
note: A person must disclose CDR data if they are a data holder, accredited person, or given a valid request.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bk-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56BK Further limitations on the consumer data rules

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Data holder, accredited person, or valid request

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Classification of persons
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of persons
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
premise text: Data holder, accredited person, or valid request

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56BK(2) Further limitations on the consumer data rules

56BK(4) Further limitations on the consumer data rules
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.83
note: Despite other provisions, subsection (1) applies.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bk-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 56BK Further limitations on the consumer data rules

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (1) applies
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation despite other provisions
modality: Deontic
operator: Despite
premise text: Other provisions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56BK(4) Further limitations on the consumer data rules

56BL Obligation to comply with consumer data rules
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.84
note: Consumer data rules may provide for civil penalty provisions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bl-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bl-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bl
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bl-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bl-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56BL Obligation to comply with consumer data rules

56BM Infringement notices
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.84
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56BM(1) Infringement notices
has part: 56BM(2) Infringement notices
has part: 56BM(3) Infringement notices
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bm
schema version: 2

56BM(1) Infringement notices
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.84
note: Division 5 of Part XI applies to a civil penalty provision in a corresponding way.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bm-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bm-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56BM Infringement notices

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Division applies to a civil penalty provision.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bm-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56BM(1) Infringement notices

56BM(2) Infringement notices
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.84
note: Substitutions for references in Division 5 of Part XI
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bm-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bm-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56BM Infringement notices

56BM(3) Infringement notices
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.84
note: Section does not limit application of section 56GF to Division 5 of Part XI.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bm-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bm-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bm-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bm-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bm-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bm-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56BM Infringement notices

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bm-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 56GF applies to Division 5 of Part XI within its temporal scope.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for section 56GF includes Division 5 of Part XI.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
premise text: Division 2 of Part XI describes the extended application of Division 5 of Part XI.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bm-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 56GF applies to Division 5 of Part XI within its temporal scope.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal interval for section 56GF includes Division 5 of Part XI.
modality: CogAI
operator: within
premise text: Division 2 of Part XI describes the extended application of Division 5 of Part XI.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 56GF can be applied to Division 5 of Part XI.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: does not
premise text: Division 2 of Part XI does not limit the application of section 56GF.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bm-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 56GF applies to Division 5 of Part XI within its temporal scope.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal interval for section 56GF includes Division 5 of Part XI.
modality: Diffusion
operator: within
premise text: Division 2 of Part XI describes the extended application of Division 5 of Part XI.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bm-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 56GF applies to Division 5 of Part XI within its temporal scope.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for section 56GF includes Division 5 of Part XI.
modality: LTL
operator: within
premise text: Division 2 of Part XI describes the extended application of Division 5 of Part XI.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bm-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56BM(3) Infringement notices

56BN Misleading or deceptive conduct—offence
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.85
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56BN(1) Misleading or deceptive conduct—offence
has part: 56BN(2) Misleading or deceptive conduct—offence
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bn
schema version: 2

56BN(1) Misleading or deceptive conduct—offence
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.85
note: Engaging in misleading or deceptive conduct is an offence.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bn-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bn-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56BN Misleading or deceptive conduct—offence

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bn-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56BN(1) Misleading or deceptive conduct—offence

56BN(2) Misleading or deceptive conduct—offence
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.85
note: Exemption from subsection (1) if conduct is not misleading or deceptive in a material particular.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bn-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bn-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56BN Misleading or deceptive conduct—offence

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...conduct is not misleading or deceptive in a material particular.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from obligations
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply if...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bn-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56BN(2) Misleading or deceptive conduct—offence

56BO Misleading or deceptive conduct—civil penalty
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.86
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56BO(1) Misleading or deceptive conduct—civil penalty
has part: 56BO(2) Misleading or deceptive conduct—civil penalty
has part: 56BO(3) Misleading or deceptive conduct—civil penalty
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bo
schema version: 2

56BO(1) Misleading or deceptive conduct—civil penalty
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.86
note: Misleading or deceptive conduct is prohibited.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bo-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56BO Misleading or deceptive conduct—civil penalty

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56BO(1) Misleading or deceptive conduct—civil penalty

56BO(2) Misleading or deceptive conduct—civil penalty
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.86
note: Exemption from civil penalty for non-misleading conduct
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-2-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-2-logic-n3logic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bo-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56BO Misleading or deceptive conduct—civil penalty

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The CogAI recognizes the exemption
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes the concept of exemption in the conduct that is not misleading or deceptive in a material particular
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if the conduct is not misleading or deceptive in a material particular.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conduct is exempt from the civil penalty
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts conduct from civil penalty
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply if the conduct is not misleading or deceptive in a material particular.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-2-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The diffusion of exemption applies to the conduct
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses the concept of exemption to the conduct that is not misleading or deceptive in a material particular
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if the conduct is not misleading or deceptive in a material particular.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conduct implies exemption from the civil penalty
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implies that the conduct is exempt from the civil penalty if it is not misleading or deceptive in a material particular
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implies
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if the conduct is not misleading or deceptive in a material particular.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-2-logic-n3logic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The N3Logic subsumes the exemption
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
logic summary: Subsumes the concept of exemption under the conduct that is not misleading or deceptive in a material particular
modality: N3Logic
operator: subsumes
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if the conduct is not misleading or deceptive in a material particular.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56BO(2) Misleading or deceptive conduct—civil penalty

56BO(3) Misleading or deceptive conduct—civil penalty
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.86
note: Bears burden of adducing evidence to suggest a reasonable possibility that conduct is not misleading or deceptive.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bo-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56BO Misleading or deceptive conduct—civil penalty

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Bearing the burden of adducing evidence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: A reasonable possibility that conduct is not misleading or deceptive.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Possibility

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56BO(3) Misleading or deceptive conduct—civil penalty

56BP Minister’s tasks before making the rules
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.87
note: Consider certain matters before making consumer data rules.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bp-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bp-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bp-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bp
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bp-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider matters
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Minister must:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bp-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Consider kinds of matters
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
premise text: Paragraphs 56AD(1)(a) and (b)

56BQ Secretary must arrange for consultation and report before the
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.88
note: Secretary must arrange for consultation and report before making rules.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bq-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bq-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bq-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bq
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bq-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bq-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of rules
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bq-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56BQ Secretary must arrange for consultation and report before the

56BR Commission and Information Commissioner must analyse the
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.88
note: Commission and Information Commissioner must analyse proposed rules.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56br-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56br-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56br
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56br-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide analysis
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56br-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56BR Commission and Information Commissioner must analyse the

56BS Emergency rules: public consultation not required etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.89
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56BS(1) Emergency rules: public consultation not required etc.
has part: 56BS(2) Emergency rules: public consultation not required etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bs
schema version: 2

56BS(1) Emergency rules: public consultation not required etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.89
note: The Minister may make consumer data rules without consulting the Commission and Information Commissioner under certain circumstances.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bs-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56BS Emergency rules: public consultation not required etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: without complying with paragraph 56BP(b) or (c); but after consulting the Commission and Information Commissioner;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for consultation not required.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: None
premise text: (1) The Minister may make consumer data rules under subsection 56BA(1):

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: without complying with paragraph 56BP(b) or (c); but after consulting the Commission and Information Commissioner;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to make consumer data rules without consulting the Commission and Information Commissioner.
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: The Minister may make consumer data rules under subsection 56BA(1):

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the efficiency, integrity or stability of any aspect of the Australian economy; or the interests of consumers;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with certain conditions when making consumer data rules.
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: if the Minister believes (whether or not that belief is reasonable) that it is necessary to do so in order to avoid a risk of serious harm to:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: without complying with paragraph 56BP(b) or (c); but after consulting the Commission and Information Commissioner;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for consultation not required.
modality: LTL
operator: None
premise text: (1) The Minister may make consumer data rules under subsection 56BA(1):

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56BS(1) Emergency rules: public consultation not required etc.

56BS(2) Emergency rules: public consultation not required etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.89
note: Failure to comply with section does not invalidate consumer data rules.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bs-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56BS Emergency rules: public consultation not required etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The limited life of consumer data rules overlaps with the duration of section 56BS(2).
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Consumer data rules have a limited life.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Revision or update is required for consumer data rules.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The limited life of consumer data rules implies that they are subject to revision or update.
modality: CogAI
operator: Implication
premise text: Consumer data rules have a limited life.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Invalidation of consumer data rules is not justified.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Failure to comply implies invalidation of consumer data rules.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Compliance with section is required.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Public consultation is required for other rules.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Public consultation is implied to be required for non-consumer data rules.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Implication
premise text: Consumer data rules do not require public consultation.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The emergency rules in section 56BS(2) overlap with the consumer data rules.
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Emergency rules are temporary.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56BS(2) Emergency rules: public consultation not required etc.

56BT Emergency rules: consequences if made
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.89
note: Emergency rules cease after 6 months if made without consulting Commission or Information Commissioner.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bt-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bt-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bt
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bt-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits emergency rules made without consulting Commission or Information Commissioner.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

56BU Charging a fee in inappropriate circumstances when required
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.90
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56BU(1) Charging a fee in inappropriate circumstances when required
has part: 56BU(2) Charging a fee in inappropriate circumstances when required
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bu
schema version: 2

56BU(1) Charging a fee in inappropriate circumstances when required
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.90
note: Charging a fee for disclosure or use of CDR data in certain circumstances is prohibited.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bu-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56BU Charging a fee in inappropriate circumstances when required

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person charges (or causes to be charged)...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlapping of charging a fee for disclosure or use of CDR data in certain circumstances with other provisions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (1) A person contravenes this subsection...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person charges (or causes to be charged)...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of charging a fee for disclosure or use of CDR data in certain circumstances.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (1) A person contravenes this subsection...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person charges (or causes to be charged)...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of charging a fee for disclosure or use of CDR data in certain circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person contravenes this subsection...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person charges (or causes to be charged)...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagating the prohibition of charging a fee for disclosure or use of CDR data in certain circumstances.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (1) A person contravenes this subsection...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person charges (or causes to be charged)...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring charging a fee for disclosure or use of CDR data in certain circumstances.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (1) A person contravenes this subsection...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56BU(1) Charging a fee in inappropriate circumstances when required

56BU(2) Charging a fee in inappropriate circumstances when required
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.90
note: Charging a fee in inappropriate circumstances when required is prohibited. Prohibition on charging a fee in inappropriate circumstances when required
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-2-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bu-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56BU Charging a fee in inappropriate circumstances when required

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for charging a fee in inappropriate circumstances.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) This subsection applies if: (a) any fee (the reasonable fee): (i) that has been determined under subsection 56BV(1) or

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of charging a fee in inappropriate circumstances.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: (2) This subsection applies if: (a) any fee (the reasonable fee): (i) that has been determined under subsection 56BV(1) or

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of charging a fee in inappropriate circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) This subsection applies if: (a) any fee (the reasonable fee): (i) that has been determined under subsection 56BV(1) or

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-2-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids charging a fee in certain circumstances
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of charging a fee in inappropriate circumstances.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (2) This subsection applies if: (a) any fee (the reasonable fee): (i) that has been determined under subsection 56BV(1) or

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal trace for charging a fee in inappropriate circumstances.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
premise text: (2) This subsection applies if: (a) any fee (the reasonable fee): (i) that has been determined under subsection 56BV(1) or

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56BU(2) Charging a fee in inappropriate circumstances when required

56BV Commission may intervene if fee for disclosing or using
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.91
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56BV(1) Commission may intervene if fee for disclosing or using
has part: 56BV(2) Commission may intervene if fee for disclosing or using
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bv
schema version: 2

56BV(1) Commission may intervene if fee for disclosing or using
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.91
note: Commission may determine fee for disclosing or using CDR data
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bv-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bv-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bv-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56BV Commission may intervene if fee for disclosing or using

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to pay fee
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bv-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Fee determination
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bv-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56BV(1) Commission may intervene if fee for disclosing or using

56BV(2) Commission may intervene if fee for disclosing or using
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.91
note: Commission may determine a fee for disclosing or using chargeable CDR data.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bv-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56bv-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56BV Commission may intervene if fee for disclosing or using

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission may determine a fee
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bv-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56BV(2) Commission may intervene if fee for disclosing or using

56CA Granting accreditations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.102
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56CA(1) Granting accreditations
has part: 56CA(2) Granting accreditations
has part: 56CA(3) Granting accreditations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ca
schema version: 2

56CA(1) Granting accreditations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.102
note: Granting accreditation to a person if criteria are met
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ca-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ca-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56CA Granting accreditations

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted
modality: Deontic
operator: may

56CA(2) Granting accreditations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.102
note: Granting accreditations to individuals not meeting certain citizenship requirements.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ca-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ca-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56CA Granting accreditations

56CA(3) Granting accreditations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.102
note: No compensation is payable if accreditation is varied, transferred, suspended, or revoked.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ca-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ca-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ca-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56CA Granting accreditations

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ca-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting of accreditation imposes an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ca-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56CA(3) Granting accreditations

56CB Review of decisions refusing to accredit
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.102
note: Application for review of decision refusing accreditation
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cb-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cb-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56cb
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cb-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Application for review
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to review decisions
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Subsection 56CA(1)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cb-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56CB Review of decisions refusing to accredit

56CE Register of Accredited Persons
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.102
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56CE(1) Register of Accredited Persons
has part: 56CE(2) Register of Accredited Persons
has part: 56CE(3) Register of Accredited Persons
has part: 56CE(4) Register of Accredited Persons
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ce
schema version: 2

56CE(1) Register of Accredited Persons
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.102
note: Establish and maintain a register for the purposes of this Part.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ce-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ce-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ce-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56CE Register of Accredited Persons

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ce-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establish and maintain a register.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ce-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56CE(1) Register of Accredited Persons

56CE(2) Register of Accredited Persons
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.102
note: The Accreditation Registrar must maintain the register by electronic means.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ce-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ce-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56CE Register of Accredited Persons

56CE(3) Register of Accredited Persons
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.102
note: The register is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ce-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ce-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ce-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56CE Register of Accredited Persons

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ce-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The register is not a legislative instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative assertion of obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

56CE(4) Register of Accredited Persons
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.102
note: The consumer data rules may make provision for or in relation to the inclusion of entries for accredited persons.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ce-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ce-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ce-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 56CE Register of Accredited Persons

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ce-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The consumer data rules must make provision for or in relation to the inclusion of entries for accredited persons.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ce-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56CE(4) Register of Accredited Persons

56CF Evidentiary value of the register
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.103
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56CF(1) Evidentiary value of the register
has part: 56CF(2) Evidentiary value of the register
has part: 56CF(3) Evidentiary value of the register
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56cf
schema version: 2

56CF(1) Evidentiary value of the register
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.103
note: The register is admissible as prima facie evidence.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cf-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56cf-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56CF Evidentiary value of the register

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Admission of the register as evidence.
modality: Deontic
operator: admission

56CF(2) Evidentiary value of the register
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.103
note: The Accreditation Registrar must issue a document containing the details of a matter taken from the register.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cf-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56cf-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56CF Evidentiary value of the register

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to issue a document
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56CF(2) Evidentiary value of the register

56CF(3) Evidentiary value of the register
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.103
note: Exhibit admissible as prima facie evidence
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cf-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56cf-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56CF Evidentiary value of the register

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: document admissible in any proceedings
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Admission of document as evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: admission
premise text: (2) issued under subsection (2)

56CG Appointment of the CDR Accreditor
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.103
note: The Minister must appoint a CDR Accreditor.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cg-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cg-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56cg
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cg-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to appoint
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cg-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56CG Appointment of the CDR Accreditor

56CH Functions, powers and annual report
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.104
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56CH(1) Functions, powers and annual report
has part: 56CH(2) Functions, powers and annual report
has part: 56CH(3) Functions, powers and annual report
has part: 56CH(4) Functions, powers and annual report
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ch
schema version: 2

56CH(1) Functions, powers and annual report
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.104
note: The CDR Accreditor has specific functions to accredit persons.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ch-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ch-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ch-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56CH Functions, powers and annual report

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ch-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The CDR Accreditor has specific functions.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ch-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56CH(1) Functions, powers and annual report

56CH(2) Functions, powers and annual report
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.104
note: The CDR Accreditor has the power to do all other things necessary or convenient.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ch-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ch-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ch-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56CH Functions, powers and annual report

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ch-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The CDR Accreditor has the power to do all other things necessary or convenient.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ch-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56CH(2) Functions, powers and annual report

56CH(3) Functions, powers and annual report
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.104
note: Functions and powers of CDR Accreditor are taken to include certain functions and powers.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ch-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ch-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56CH Functions, powers and annual report

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ch-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56CH(3) Functions, powers and annual report

56CH(4) Functions, powers and annual report
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.104
note: Annual report must include information about the performance of the CDR Accreditor’s functions and powers.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ch-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ch-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ch-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 56CH Functions, powers and annual report

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ch-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The CDR Accreditor must prepare an annual report.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide annual report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ch-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56CH(4) Functions, powers and annual report

56CI Directions by Minister
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.105
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56CI(1) Directions by Minister
has part: 56CI(2) Directions by Minister
has part: 56CI(3) Directions by Minister
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ci
schema version: 2

56CI(1) Directions by Minister
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.105
note: The Minister may give written directions to the CDR Accreditor.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ci-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ci-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ci-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56CI Directions by Minister

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ci-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by the Minister.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

56CI(2) Directions by Minister
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.105
note: A direction under subsection (1) must be of a general nature only.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ci-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ci-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56CI Directions by Minister

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ci-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56CI(2) Directions by Minister

56CI(3) Directions by Minister
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.105
note: Comply with direction from Minister
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ci-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ci-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ci-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56CI Directions by Minister

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ci-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

56CJ Delegation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.105
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56CJ(1) Delegation
has part: 56CJ(2) Delegation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56cj
schema version: 2

56CJ(1) Delegation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.105
note: Delegation of functions or powers to SES employees and APS employees
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cj-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56cj-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56CJ Delegation

56CJ(2) Delegation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.105
note: Delegate must comply with directions of CDR Accreditor.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cj-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56cj-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56CJ Delegation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cj-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56CJ(2) Delegation

56CK Appointment of the Accreditation Registrar
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.106
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56CK(1) Appointment of the Accreditation Registrar
has part: 56CK(2) Appointment of the Accreditation Registrar
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ck
schema version: 2

56CK(1) Appointment of the Accreditation Registrar
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.106
note: Minister must appoint Accreditation Registrar
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ck-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ck-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ck-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ck-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56CK Appointment of the Accreditation Registrar

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ck-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for appointment
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (1) The Minister may, by written instrument, appoint as the Accreditation Registrar a person who:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ck-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide appointment
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ck-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56CK(1) Appointment of the Accreditation Registrar

56CK(2) Appointment of the Accreditation Registrar
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.106
note: Minister can terminate appointment by written instrument.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ck-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ck-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ck-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56CK Appointment of the Accreditation Registrar

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ck-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ability to terminate appointment
modality: Deontic
operator: can

56CL Functions, powers and annual report
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.106
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56CL(1) Functions, powers and annual report
has part: 56CL(2) Functions, powers and annual report
has part: 56CL(3) Functions, powers and annual report
has part: 56CL(4) Functions, powers and annual report
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56cl
schema version: 2

56CL(1) Functions, powers and annual report
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.106
note: List of functions of the Accreditation Registrar
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56cl-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56CL Functions, powers and annual report

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56CL(1) Functions, powers and annual report

56CL(2) Functions, powers and annual report
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.106
note: The Accreditation Registrar has power to perform necessary tasks.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56cl-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56CL Functions, powers and annual report

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Accreditation Registrar performs during.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During performance of functions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: duringPerformance
premise text: (2) The Accreditation Registrar has the power to do all other things necessary or convenient...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Accreditation Registrar can do.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Can perform tasks.
modality: Argumentation
operator: canDo
premise text: (2) The Accreditation Registrar has the power to do all other things necessary or convenient...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Accreditation Registrar can do.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Can perform tasks.
modality: CogAI
operator: canDo
premise text: (2) The Accreditation Registrar has the power to do all other things necessary or convenient...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Accreditation Registrar has power.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has the power to perform tasks.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower
premise text: (2) The Accreditation Registrar has the power...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Accreditation Registrar can do.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Can perform tasks.
modality: Diffusion
operator: canDo
premise text: (2) The Accreditation Registrar has the power to do all other things necessary or convenient...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56CL(2) Functions, powers and annual report

56CL(3) Functions, powers and annual report
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.106
note: Clarifies functions and powers of the Accreditation Registrar
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56cl-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56CL Functions, powers and annual report

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: both: (a) the person’s functions and powers in their capacity other than as the Accreditation Registrar; and (b) if the person is not a body corporate—the functions that may be performed, and the powers that may be exercised by anyone appointed under a Commonwealth law to act as the person in that primary capacity
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Functions and powers during Accreditation Registrar role
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, for a person who is the Accreditation Registrar

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) the functions that may be performed, and the powers that may be exercised by anyone appointed under a Commonwealth law to act as the person in that primary capacity
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes functions and powers of other roles
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (a) the person’s functions and powers in their capacity other than as the Accreditation Registrar

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: both: (a) the person’s functions and powers in their capacity other than as the Accreditation Registrar; and (b) if the person is not a body corporate—the functions that may be performed, and the powers that may be exercised by anyone appointed under a Commonwealth law to act as the person in that primary capacity
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Functions and powers during Accreditation Registrar role
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, for a person who is the Accreditation Registrar

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56CL(3) Functions, powers and annual report

56CL(4) Functions, powers and annual report
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.106
note: Annual report must include information about Accreditation Registrar's functions and powers.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56cl-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 56CL Functions, powers and annual report

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information about Accreditation Registrar's functions and powers.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56CL(4) Functions, powers and annual report

56CM Directions by Minister
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.107
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56CM(1) Directions by Minister
has part: 56CM(2) Directions by Minister
has part: 56CM(3) Directions by Minister
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56cm
schema version: 2

56CM(1) Directions by Minister
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.107
note: The Minister may give written directions to the Accreditation Registrar.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cm-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56cm-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56CM Directions by Minister

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by the Minister
modality: Deontic
operator: may

56CM(2) Directions by Minister
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.107
note: Direction must be of a general nature only.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cm-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56cm-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56CM Directions by Minister

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide direction of general nature
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) A direction under subsection (1) must be of a general nature only.

56CM(3) Directions by Minister
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.107
note: The Accreditation Registrar must comply with a direction under subsection (1).
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cm-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56cm-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56CM Directions by Minister

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cm-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56CM(3) Directions by Minister

56CN Delegation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.107
note: Delegation of Accreditation Registrar's functions or powers
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cn-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56cn
schema version: 2

56DA Minister may recognise external dispute resolution schemes
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.109
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56DA(1) Minister may recognise external dispute resolution schemes
has part: 56DA(2) Minister may recognise external dispute resolution schemes
has part: 56DA(3) Minister may recognise external dispute resolution schemes
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56da
schema version: 2

56DA(1) Minister may recognise external dispute resolution schemes
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.109
note: Minister may recognise external dispute resolution schemes
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56da-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56da-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56da-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56DA Minister may recognise external dispute resolution schemes

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56da-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to recognise external dispute resolution schemes
modality: Deontic
operator: May

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56da-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56DA(1) Minister may recognise external dispute resolution schemes

56DA(2) Minister may recognise external dispute resolution schemes
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.109
note: The Minister must specify a period for recognition and conditions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56da-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56da-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56da-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56DA Minister may recognise external dispute resolution schemes

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56da-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Minister must specify a period and conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

56DA(3) Minister may recognise external dispute resolution schemes
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.109
note: Consideration before recognising external dispute resolution scheme
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56da-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56da-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56da-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56da-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56DA Minister may recognise external dispute resolution schemes

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56da-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Consideration period is before recognising scheme
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for consideration
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Minister must consider before recognising scheme

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56da-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Before recognising scheme, Minister considers Chapter 4 provisions
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Minister must consider Chapter 4 provisions

56EA Simplified outline
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.111
note: Failure to comply with privacy safeguards may lead to consequences.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ea-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ea-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ea-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ea
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ea-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with privacy safeguards.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ea-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies data holders, gateways, and service providers as entities subject to privacy safeguards.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ea-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EA Simplified outline

56EB Kinds of CDR data to which the privacy safeguards apply
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.111
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56EB(1) Kinds of CDR data to which the privacy safeguards apply
has part: 56EB(2) Kinds of CDR data to which the privacy safeguards apply
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56eb
schema version: 2

56EB(1) Kinds of CDR data to which the privacy safeguards apply
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.111
note: Privacy safeguards apply only to CDR data with identifiable persons
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eb-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56eb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56EB Kinds of CDR data to which the privacy safeguards apply

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Privacy safeguards apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: onlyIf
premise text: There is a CDR consumer

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EB(1) Kinds of CDR data to which the privacy safeguards apply

56EB(2) Kinds of CDR data to which the privacy safeguards apply
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.111
note: Privacy safeguards apply to CDR data regardless of truth value.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eb-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56eb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56EB Kinds of CDR data to which the privacy safeguards apply

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: CDR data is subject to privacy safeguards during these periods
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Applicable to temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Privacy safeguards are in effect during certain periods

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Privacy safeguards apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to protect CDR data
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: CDR data is subject to privacy safeguards

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EB(2) Kinds of CDR data to which the privacy safeguards apply

56EC Relationship with other laws
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.112
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56EC(1) Relationship with other laws
has part: 56EC(2) Relationship with other laws
has part: 56EC(3) Relationship with other laws
has part: 56EC(4) Relationship with other laws
has part: 56EC(5) Relationship with other laws
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ec
schema version: 2

56EC(1) Relationship with other laws
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.112
note: Precedence of privacy safeguards over consumer data rules in case of inconsistency.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ec-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56EC Relationship with other laws

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Inconsistency resolved by prioritizing privacy safeguards.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Precedence
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
premise text: Privacy safeguards prevail over consumer data rules.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EC(1) Relationship with other laws

56EC(2) Relationship with other laws
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.112
note: Consumer data rules must be consistent with privacy safeguards.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ec-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56EC Relationship with other laws

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Privacy safeguards are not covered by consumer data rules.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Consistency obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: Consumer data rules must be consistent with privacy safeguards.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Consumer data rules are a subclass of privacy safeguards.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclass relationship
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
premise text: The consumer data rules are taken to be consistent with the privacy safeguards.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EC(2) Relationship with other laws

56EC(3) Relationship with other laws
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.112
note: Part IIIA of Privacy Act 1988 applies to CDR data under specified circumstances.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ec-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56EC Relationship with other laws

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifies temporal overlap between regulations and declared conditions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3) This Division does not limit Part IIIA (about credit reporting) of the Privacy Act 1988.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the regulations.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Specifies implications for regulations under declared conditions.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Implicates
premise text: (3) This Division does not limit Part IIIA (about credit reporting) of the Privacy Act 1988.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Specifies temporal relationship between regulations and declared conditions.
modality: LTL
operator: Contains
premise text: However, the regulations may declare that in specified circumstances that Part applies in relation to CDR data as if specified provisions of that Part were omitted, modified or varied as specified in the declaration.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EC(3) Relationship with other laws

56EC(4) Relationship with other laws
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.112
note: Australian Privacy Principles do not apply to certain individuals in relation to CDR data.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ec-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 56EC Relationship with other laws

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prevents application of Australian Privacy Principles.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies individuals as exempt from Australian Privacy Principles.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EC(4) Relationship with other laws

56EC(5) Relationship with other laws
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.112
note: No effect on Australian Privacy Principles for certain entities
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ec-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 56EC Relationship with other laws

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to maintain privacy principles
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: !
premise text: No effect on Australian Privacy Principles

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Classification
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Entity classification
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Entity type

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EC(5) Relationship with other laws

56ED Privacy safeguard 1—open and transparent management of
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.114
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56ED(1) Privacy safeguard 1—open and transparent management of
has part: 56ED(2) Privacy safeguard 1—open and transparent management of
has part: 56ED(3) Privacy safeguard 1—open and transparent management of
has part: 56ED(4) Privacy safeguard 1—open and transparent management of
has part: 56ED(5) Privacy safeguard 1—open and transparent management of
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ed
schema version: 2

56ED(1) Privacy safeguard 1—open and transparent management of
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.114
note: Ensure open and transparent management of CDR data
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ed-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56ED Privacy safeguard 1—open and transparent management of

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of data holders
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
premise text: (a) is a data holder of CDR data; or (b) is an accredited person...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56ED(1) Privacy safeguard 1—open and transparent management of

56ED(2) Privacy safeguard 1—open and transparent management of
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.114
note: Implement practices, procedures and systems to comply with the Part and consumer data rules.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ed-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56ED Privacy safeguard 1—open and transparent management of

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: to implement practices, procedures and systems that will ensure that the CDR entity complies with this Part and the consumer data rules.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Implement practices, procedures and systems within a reasonable timeframe
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (2) The CDR entity must take such steps as are reasonable in the circumstances

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: to implement practices, procedures and systems that will ensure that the CDR entity complies with this Part and the consumer data rules.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure compliance
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The CDR entity must take such steps as are reasonable in the circumstances

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: to enable the CDR entity to deal with inquiries or complaints from a CDR consumer for the CDR data about the CDR entity’s compliance with this Part or the consumer data rules.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Enable dealing with inquiries or complaints
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
premise text: (2) The CDR entity must take such steps as are reasonable in the circumstances

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: to implement practices, procedures and systems that will ensure that the CDR entity complies with this Part and the consumer data rules.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Implement practices, procedures and systems within a reasonable timeframe
modality: LTL
operator: >=
premise text: (2) The CDR entity must take such steps as are reasonable in the circumstances

56ED(3) Privacy safeguard 1—open and transparent management of
type: Concept
description: (a) is about the CDR entity’s management of CDR data; (b) is in a form approved in accordance with the consumer data rules; (c) contains the information required by subsections (4), (5), (6) and (6A)
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.114
note: Must have and maintain a clearly expressed policy on CDR data management
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ed-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56ED Privacy safeguard 1—open and transparent management of

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must have a policy
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST HAVE
premise text: (3)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must maintain a policy
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST MAINTAIN
premise text: (3)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Policy contains required information
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTAINS INFORMATION
premise text: (c)

56ED(4) Privacy safeguard 1—open and transparent management of
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.114
note: Mandatory disclosure of CDR data access and complaint procedures
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ed-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 56ED Privacy safeguard 1—open and transparent management of

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

56ED(5) Privacy safeguard 1—open and transparent management of
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.114
note: CDR entity must provide certain information to accredited data recipients
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ed-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 56ED Privacy safeguard 1—open and transparent management of

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

56EE Privacy safeguard 2—anonymity and pseudonymity
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.117
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56EE(1) Privacy safeguard 2—anonymity and pseudonymity
has part: 56EE(2) Privacy safeguard 2—anonymity and pseudonymity
has part: 56EE(3) Privacy safeguard 2—anonymity and pseudonymity
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ee
schema version: 2

56EE(1) Privacy safeguard 2—anonymity and pseudonymity
type: Concept
description: true
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.117
note: Must provide option to use pseudonym or not identify when dealing with CDR data.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ee-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ee-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ee-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56EE Privacy safeguard 2—anonymity and pseudonymity

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ee-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide option to use pseudonym or not identify when dealing with CDR data.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ee-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EE(1) Privacy safeguard 2—anonymity and pseudonymity

56EE(2) Privacy safeguard 2—anonymity and pseudonymity
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.117
note: Option for CDR data access through designated gateway
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ee-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ee-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56EE Privacy safeguard 2—anonymity and pseudonymity

56EE(3) Privacy safeguard 2—anonymity and pseudonymity
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.117
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for consumer data rules
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ee-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ee-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56EE Privacy safeguard 2—anonymity and pseudonymity

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ee-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EE(3) Privacy safeguard 2—anonymity and pseudonymity

56EF Privacy safeguard 3—soliciting CDR data from participants
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.118
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56EF(1) Privacy safeguard 3—soliciting CDR data from participants
has part: 56EF(2) Privacy safeguard 3—soliciting CDR data from participants
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ef
schema version: 2

56EF(1) Privacy safeguard 3—soliciting CDR data from participants
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.118
note: Do not seek to collect CDR data from another person without valid request and compliance with consumer data rules.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ef-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ef-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ef-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ef-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56EF Privacy safeguard 3—soliciting CDR data from participants

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ef-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ef-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of CDR data collection
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ef-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EF(1) Privacy safeguard 3—soliciting CDR data from participants

56EF(2) Privacy safeguard 3—soliciting CDR data from participants
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.118
note: Collection of CDR data from participants must comply with consumer data rules.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ef-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ef-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ef-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ef-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56EF Privacy safeguard 3—soliciting CDR data from participants

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ef-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Collection must occur between valid request and designated gateway
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ef-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ef-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EF(2) Privacy safeguard 3—soliciting CDR data from participants

56EG Privacy safeguard 4—dealing with unsolicited CDR data from
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.119
note: Destroy CDR data as soon as practicable after collecting it if certain conditions are met.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eg-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eg-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eg-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eg-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eg-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56eg
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eg-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Destroy CDR data as soon as practicable after collecting it if certain conditions are met.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for destruction
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: The collector collected the CDR data while covered by column 1 of an item of the table, and from a person covered by column 2 of that item.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eg-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Destroy CDR data as soon as practicable after collecting it.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to destroy CDR data
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The collector collected the CDR data while covered by column 1 of an item of the table, and from a person covered by column 2 of that item.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eg-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Destroy CDR data as soon as practicable after collecting it if certain conditions are met.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on destroying CDR data under certain conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST_NOT
premise text: The collector collected the CDR data not as the result of seeking to collect the CDR data under the consumer data rules.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eg-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Destroy CDR data as soon as practicable after collecting it if certain conditions are met.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring obligation to destroy CDR data
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
premise text: The collector collected the CDR data while covered by column 1 of an item of the table, and from a person covered by column 2 of that item.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eg-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EG Privacy safeguard 4—dealing with unsolicited CDR data from

56EH Privacy safeguard 5—notifying of the collection of CDR data
type: Concept
description: Notification to CDR consumers
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.120
note: Accredited data recipient must notify CDR consumers of collection
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eh-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eh-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56eh
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eh-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notification
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eh-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EH Privacy safeguard 5—notifying of the collection of CDR data

56EI Privacy safeguard 6—use or disclosure of CDR data by
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.121
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56EI(1) Privacy safeguard 6—use or disclosure of CDR data by
has part: 56EI(2) Privacy safeguard 6—use or disclosure of CDR data by
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ei
schema version: 2

56EI(1) Privacy safeguard 6—use or disclosure of CDR data by
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.121
note: Use or disclosure of CDR data is prohibited unless certain conditions are met.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ei-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ei-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ei-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56EI Privacy safeguard 6—use or disclosure of CDR data by

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ei-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of use or disclosure.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ei-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EI(1) Privacy safeguard 6—use or disclosure of CDR data by

56EI(2) Privacy safeguard 6—use or disclosure of CDR data by
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.121
note: No use or disclosure of CDR data without authorisation under consumer data rules.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ei-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ei-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ei-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ei-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ei-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ei-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ei-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56EI Privacy safeguard 6—use or disclosure of CDR data by

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ei-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and the designated gateway makes a written note of the use or disclosure in accordance with the consumer data rules.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for written note of use or disclosure.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) A designated gateway for CDR data must not use or disclose it unless: (a) in the case of a disclosure—the disclosure is required under the consumer data rules; or (b) the use or disclosure is authorised under the consumer data rules; or (c) the use or disclosure is required or authorised by or under:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ei-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and the designated gateway makes a written note of the use or disclosure in accordance with the consumer data rules.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge representation for CDR data handling.
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
premise text: (2) A designated gateway for CDR data must not use or disclose it unless: (a) in the case of a disclosure—the disclosure is required under the consumer data rules; or (b) the use or disclosure is authorised under the consumer data rules; or (c) the use or disclosure is required or authorised by or under:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ei-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless: (a) in the case of a disclosure—the disclosure is required under the consumer data rules; or (b) the use or disclosure is authorised under the consumer data rules; or (c) the use or disclosure is required or authorised by or under:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of use or disclosure without authorisation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) A designated gateway for CDR data must not use or disclose it...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ei-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and the designated gateway makes a written note of the use or disclosure in accordance with the consumer data rules.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of CDR data handling requirements.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: (2) A designated gateway for CDR data must not use or disclose it unless: (a) in the case of a disclosure—the disclosure is required under the consumer data rules; or (b) the use or disclosure is authorised under the consumer data rules; or (c) the use or disclosure is required or authorised by or under:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ei-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and the designated gateway makes a written note of the use or disclosure in accordance with the consumer data rules.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for CDR data handling.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (2) A designated gateway for CDR data must not use or disclose it unless: (a) in the case of a disclosure—the disclosure is required under the consumer data rules; or (b) the use or disclosure is authorised under the consumer data rules; or (c) the use or disclosure is required or authorised by or under:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ei-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EI(2) Privacy safeguard 6—use or disclosure of CDR data by

56EJ Privacy safeguard 7—use or disclosure of CDR data for direct
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.122
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56EJ(1) Privacy safeguard 7—use or disclosure of CDR data for direct
has part: 56EJ(2) Privacy safeguard 7—use or disclosure of CDR data for direct
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ej
schema version: 2

56EJ(1) Privacy safeguard 7—use or disclosure of CDR data for direct
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.122
note: Use or disclosure of CDR data for direct marketing without consent is prohibited.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ej-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ej-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ej-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56EJ Privacy safeguard 7—use or disclosure of CDR data for direct

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ej-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of use or disclosure for direct marketing.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) An accredited data recipient of CDR data must not use or disclose it...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ej-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EJ(1) Privacy safeguard 7—use or disclosure of CDR data for direct

56EJ(2) Privacy safeguard 7—use or disclosure of CDR data for direct
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.122
note: No direct marketing use or disclosure of CDR data without authorization under consumer data rules.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ej-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ej-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ej-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ej-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ej-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ej-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ej-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56EJ Privacy safeguard 7—use or disclosure of CDR data for direct

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ej-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless: (a) in the case of a disclosure—the disclosure is required under the consumer data rules; or (b) the use or disclosure is authorised under the consumer data rules.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for prohibition on direct marketing use or disclosure of CDR data.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) A designated gateway for CDR data must not...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ej-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless: (a) in the case of a disclosure—the disclosure is required under the consumer data rules; or (b) the use or disclosure is authorised under the consumer data rules.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Justification for prohibition on direct marketing use or disclosure of CDR data.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
premise text: (2) A designated gateway for CDR data must not...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ej-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless: (a) in the case of a disclosure—the disclosure is required under the consumer data rules; or (b) the use or disclosure is authorised under the consumer data rules.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of direct marketing use or disclosure of CDR data.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) A designated gateway for CDR data must not...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ej-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless: (a) in the case of a disclosure—the disclosure is required under the consumer data rules; or (b) the use or disclosure is authorised under the consumer data rules.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of prohibition on direct marketing use or disclosure of CDR data.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: (2) A designated gateway for CDR data must not...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ej-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless: (a) in the case of a disclosure—the disclosure is required under the consumer data rules; or (b) the use or disclosure is authorised under the consumer data rules.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for prohibition on direct marketing use or disclosure of CDR data.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (2) A designated gateway for CDR data must not...

56EK Privacy safeguard 8—overseas disclosure of CDR data by
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.122
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56EK(1) Privacy safeguard 8—overseas disclosure of CDR data by
has part: 56EK(2) Privacy safeguard 8—overseas disclosure of CDR data by
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ek
schema version: 2

56EK(1) Privacy safeguard 8—overseas disclosure of CDR data by
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.122
note: Must not disclose CDR data unless certain conditions are met.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ek-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ek-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ek-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56EK Privacy safeguard 8—overseas disclosure of CDR data by

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ek-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory disclosure restriction
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

56EK(2) Privacy safeguard 8—overseas disclosure of CDR data by
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.122
note: Disclosure of CDR data to new recipient is allowed under certain conditions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ek-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ek-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ek-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56EK Privacy safeguard 8—overseas disclosure of CDR data by

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ek-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows disclosure of CDR data to new recipient.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (2) If...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ek-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EK(2) Privacy safeguard 8—overseas disclosure of CDR data by

56EL Privacy safeguard 9—adoption or disclosure of government
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.124
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56EL(1) Privacy safeguard 9—adoption or disclosure of government
has part: 56EL(2) Privacy safeguard 9—adoption or disclosure of government
has part: 56EL(3) Privacy safeguard 9—adoption or disclosure of government
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56el
schema version: 2

56EL(1) Privacy safeguard 9—adoption or disclosure of government
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.124
note: Do not adopt or use government related identifier without authorization.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56el-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56el-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56el-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56el-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56EL Privacy safeguard 9—adoption or disclosure of government

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56el-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (c) is not met
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) and (b)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56el-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) is an individual's own identifier
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Government related identifier classification
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: (b) is a government related identifier

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56el-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EL(1) Privacy safeguard 9—adoption or disclosure of government

56EL(2) Privacy safeguard 9—adoption or disclosure of government
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.124
note: Disclosing government-related identifier without authorization is prohibited.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56el-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56el-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56el-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56el-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56EL Privacy safeguard 9—adoption or disclosure of government

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56el-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must not include the government related identifier in the disclosure unless...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) If...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56el-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person must not include the government related identifier in the disclosure unless...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of disclosure requirements
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: (2) If...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56el-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EL(2) Privacy safeguard 9—adoption or disclosure of government

56EL(3) Privacy safeguard 9—adoption or disclosure of government
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.124
note: Disregard APPs not applying to certain purposes
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56el-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56el-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56el-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56EL Privacy safeguard 9—adoption or disclosure of government

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56el-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disregard APPs not applying
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ignoring the restriction
modality: Deontic
operator: Ignore
premise text: APPs not applying

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56el-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EL(3) Privacy safeguard 9—adoption or disclosure of government

56EM Privacy safeguard 10—notifying of the disclosure of CDR
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.125
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56EM(1) Privacy safeguard 10—notifying of the disclosure of CDR
has part: 56EM(2) Privacy safeguard 10—notifying of the disclosure of CDR
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56em
schema version: 2

56EM(1) Privacy safeguard 10—notifying of the disclosure of CDR
type: Concept
description: notification specified in consumer data rules
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.125
note: Notify CDR consumers of disclosure of CDR data
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56em-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56em-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56em-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56EM Privacy safeguard 10—notifying of the disclosure of CDR

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56em-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notification
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

56EM(2) Privacy safeguard 10—notifying of the disclosure of CDR
type: Concept
description: Notification
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.125
note: Accredited data recipient must notify disclosure of CDR data.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56em-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56em-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56em-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56EM Privacy safeguard 10—notifying of the disclosure of CDR

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56em-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notification
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56em-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EM(2) Privacy safeguard 10—notifying of the disclosure of CDR

56EN Privacy safeguard 11—quality of CDR data
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.127
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56EN(1) Privacy safeguard 11—quality of CDR data
has part: 56EN(2) Privacy safeguard 11—quality of CDR data
has part: 56EN(2A) Privacy safeguard 11—quality of CDR data
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56en
schema version: 2

56EN(1) Privacy safeguard 11—quality of CDR data
type: Concept
description: reasonable steps
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.127
note: Ensure accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of CDR data upon disclosure.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56en-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56EN Privacy safeguard 11—quality of CDR data

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to take reasonable steps
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

56EN(2) Privacy safeguard 11—quality of CDR data
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.127
note: Accredited data recipient must ensure CDR data is accurate, up to date and complete when disclosing it.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56en-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56EN Privacy safeguard 11—quality of CDR data

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the CDR data is accurate, up to date and complete.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: CDR data must be accurate, up to date and complete within a certain timeframe.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (2) If an accredited data recipient of CDR data...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the accredited data recipient must take reasonable steps...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Accredited data recipient must ensure CDR data is accurate, up to date and complete if required or authorized under the consumer data rules.
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (2) If an accredited data recipient of CDR data...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the accredited data recipient must take reasonable steps...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must ensure CDR data is accurate, up to date and complete.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) If an accredited data recipient of CDR data...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the CDR data is accurate, up to date and complete.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: CDR data must be accurate, up to date and complete in a spreading manner.
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
premise text: (2) If an accredited data recipient of CDR data...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the CDR data is accurate, up to date and complete.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: CDR data must be accurate, up to date and complete in a recursive manner.
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
premise text: (2) If an accredited data recipient of CDR data...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EN(2) Privacy safeguard 11—quality of CDR data

56EN(2A) Privacy safeguard 11—quality of CDR data
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.127
note: Ensure CDR data is accurate, up to date and complete
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-2a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-2a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56en-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 56EN Privacy safeguard 11—quality of CDR data

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide accurate CDR data
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-2a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: CDR data must have a value
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Ensure CDR data has a value
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasValue
premise text: CDR data is held for a purpose

56EO Privacy safeguard 12—security of CDR data, and destruction
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.129
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56EO(1) Privacy safeguard 12—security of CDR data, and destruction
has part: 56EO(2) Privacy safeguard 12—security of CDR data, and destruction
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56eo
schema version: 2

56EO(1) Privacy safeguard 12—security of CDR data, and destruction
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.129
note: Protect CDR data from misuse, interference and loss.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eo-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56eo-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56EO Privacy safeguard 12—security of CDR data, and destruction

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for protection of CDR data
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: (1) Each person (a CDR entity) who is:...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: take the steps specified in the consumer data rules to protect the CDR data from misuse, interference and loss.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must protect CDR data
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) an accredited data recipient of CDR data; or (b) a designated gateway for CDR data;

56EO(2) Privacy safeguard 12—security of CDR data, and destruction
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.129
note: Destroy redundant CDR data if no longer needed for permitted purposes and not required by law or court order.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eo-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eo-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eo-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eo-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56eo-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56EO Privacy safeguard 12—security of CDR data, and destruction

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eo-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The CDR entity will destroy the redundant data during the period it retains it.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between the CDR entity's retention of redundant data and its destruction
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: the CDR entity must take the steps specified in the consumer data rules to destroy the redundant data or to ensure that the redundant data is de-identified.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The CDR entity has an obligation to destroy the redundant data.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory duty
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: the CDR entity must take the steps specified in the consumer data rules to destroy the redundant data or to ensure that the redundant data is de-identified.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eo-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The CDR entity has an obligation to ensure that the redundant data is de-identified.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory duty for the CDR entity to ensure that the redundant data is de-identified
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: the CDR entity must take the steps specified in the consumer data rules to destroy the redundant data or to ensure that the redundant data is de-identified.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eo-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The CDR entity has an obligation to destroy the redundant data.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory duty for the CDR entity to destroy redundant data if not required by law or court order
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: the CDR entity is not required to retain the redundant data by or under an Australian law or a court/tribunal order.

56EP Privacy safeguard 13—correction of CDR data
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.130
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56EP(1) Privacy safeguard 13—correction of CDR data
has part: 56EP(2) Privacy safeguard 13—correction of CDR data
has part: 56EP(3) Privacy safeguard 13—correction of CDR data
has part: 56EP(4) Privacy safeguard 13—correction of CDR data
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ep
schema version: 2

56EP(1) Privacy safeguard 13—correction of CDR data
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.130
note: CDR entity must respond to request to correct CDR data
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ep-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ep-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ep-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ep-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56EP Privacy safeguard 13—correction of CDR data

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ep-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide response
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ep-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Correcting CDR data
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclass of consumer data rules
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS OF
premise text: Consumer data rules

56EP(2) Privacy safeguard 13—correction of CDR data
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.130
note: Accredited data recipient must respond to correction request
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ep-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ep-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ep-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56EP Privacy safeguard 13—correction of CDR data

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ep-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must respond to correction request
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ep-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EP(2) Privacy safeguard 13—correction of CDR data

56EP(3) Privacy safeguard 13—correction of CDR data
type: Concept
description: Notice of correction or statement, or notice of why a correction or statement is unnecessary or inappropriate.
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.130
note: Correct CDR data or provide a statement with it to ensure accuracy and completeness.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ep-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ep-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ep-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56EP Privacy safeguard 13—correction of CDR data

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ep-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to correct CDR data
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ep-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EP(3) Privacy safeguard 13—correction of CDR data

56EP(4) Privacy safeguard 13—correction of CDR data
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.130
note: Disregard purpose of holding CDR data for disclosure under consumer data rules
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ep-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ep-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ep-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 56EP Privacy safeguard 13—correction of CDR data

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ep-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes duty on the state to disregard purpose for disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ep-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EP(4) Privacy safeguard 13—correction of CDR data

56EQ Information Commissioner to promote compliance etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.131
note: Information Commissioner's functions include promoting compliance and protection of CDR data.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eq-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56eq
schema version: 2

56ER Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.132
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56ER(1) Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment
has part: 56ER(1A) Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment
has part: 56ER(1B) Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment
has part: 56ER(2) Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment
has part: 56ER(3) Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56er
schema version: 2

56ER(1) Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.132
note: The Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment to ensure compliance with privacy safeguards and consumer data rules.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56er-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56ER Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner must conduct an assessment.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56ER(1) Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment

56ER(1A) Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.132
note: The Information Commissioner may assess an accredited person's compliance with privacy safeguard 1 and consumer data rules.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56er-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 56ER Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56ER(1A) Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment

56ER(1B) Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.132
note: The Information Commissioner may assess if an action service provider is maintaining and handling CDR data in accordance with privacy safeguards.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1b-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1b-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1b-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1b-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1b-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1b-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56er-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 56ER Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1b-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...who has been or may be disclosed CDR data under the consumer data rules, is maintaining and handling the CDR data in accordance with:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The action service provider must have maintained and handled CDR data for at least one time period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (1B) The Information Commissioner may assess...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1b-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...who has been or may be disclosed CDR data under the consumer data rules, is maintaining and handling the CDR data in accordance with:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The action service provider defaults to maintaining and handling CDR data if no specific rule applies.
modality: CogAI
operator: DEFAULTS_TO
premise text: (1B) The Information Commissioner may assess...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is maintaining and handling the CDR data in accordance with:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner must assess if an action service provider is maintaining and handling CDR data in accordance with privacy safeguards.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1B) The Information Commissioner may assess...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1b-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...who has been or may be disclosed CDR data under the consumer data rules, is maintaining and handling the CDR data in accordance with:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: The action service provider is a type of entity that must maintain and handle CDR data.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
premise text: (1B) The Information Commissioner may assess...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1b-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...who has been or may be disclosed CDR data under the consumer data rules, is maintaining and handling the CDR data in accordance with:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The action service provider must maintain and handle CDR data inherently.
modality: Diffusion
operator: INHERENTLY
premise text: (1B) The Information Commissioner may assess...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1b-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...who has been or may be disclosed CDR data under the consumer data rules, is maintaining and handling the CDR data in accordance with:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The action service provider must maintain and handle CDR data for all time periods.
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
premise text: (1B) The Information Commissioner may assess...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56ER(1B) Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment

56ER(2) Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.132
note: Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment under subsection (1), (1A) or (1B)
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56er-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56ER Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment

56ER(3) Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.132
note: Must report assessments to specified parties
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56er-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56ER Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

56ES Notification of CDR data security breaches
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.133
note: Notification of CDR data security breaches
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56es-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56es-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56es
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56es-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56es-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56ES Notification of CDR data security breaches

56ET Investigating breaches of the privacy safeguards etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.135
note: Investigating breaches of privacy safeguards
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56et-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56et-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56et
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56et-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to investigate breaches of privacy safeguards
modality: Deontic
operator: shall

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56et-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56ET Investigating breaches of the privacy safeguards etc.

56EU Civil penalty provisions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.139
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56EU(1) Civil penalty provisions
has part: 56EU(2) Civil penalty provisions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56eu
schema version: 2

56EU(1) Civil penalty provisions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.139
note: List of civil penalty provisions
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eu-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56eu-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56EU Civil penalty provisions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits certain actions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

56EU(2) Civil penalty provisions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.139
note: Each privacy safeguard penalty provision is enforceable under Part 4 of the Regulatory Powers Act.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eu-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eu-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eu-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eu-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56eu-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56EU Civil penalty provisions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eu-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The privacy safeguard penalty provision can be enforced under Part 4 of the Regulatory Powers Act during its effective period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval during which enforcement is allowed
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Part 4 of the Regulatory Powers Act allows a civil penalty provision to be enforced by obtaining an order for a person to pay a pecuniary penalty for the contravention of the provision.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The privacy safeguard penalty provision is enforceable under Part 4 of the Regulatory Powers Act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Enforceability obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: enforceable
premise text: Part 4 of the Regulatory Powers Act allows a civil penalty provision to be enforced by obtaining an order for a person to pay a pecuniary penalty for the contravention of the provision.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eu-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The privacy safeguard penalty provision is allowed under Part 4 of the Regulatory Powers Act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Enforcement allowed by Part 4 of the Regulatory Powers Act
modality: Deontic
operator: allowedBy
premise text: Part 4 of the Regulatory Powers Act allows a civil penalty provision to be enforced by obtaining an order for a person to pay a pecuniary penalty for the contravention of the provision.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eu-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The privacy safeguard penalty provision can be enforced under Part 4 of the Regulatory Powers Act during its effective period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval during which enforcement is allowed
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: Part 4 of the Regulatory Powers Act allows a civil penalty provision to be enforced by obtaining an order for a person to pay a pecuniary penalty for the contravention of the provision.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eu-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EU(2) Civil penalty provisions

56EV Civil penalty provisions—maximum amount of penalty
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.141
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56EV(1) Civil penalty provisions—maximum amount of penalty
has part: 56EV(2) Civil penalty provisions—maximum amount of penalty
has part: 56EV(4) Civil penalty provisions—maximum amount of penalty
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ev
schema version: 2

56EV(1) Civil penalty provisions—maximum amount of penalty
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.141
note: Maximum amount of civil penalty for a body corporate
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ev-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56EV Civil penalty provisions—maximum amount of penalty

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The pecuniary penalty payable must not be more than...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits exceeding maximum civil penalty amount
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) Despite subsection 82(5) of the Regulatory Powers Act...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EV(1) Civil penalty provisions—maximum amount of penalty

56EV(2) Civil penalty provisions—maximum amount of penalty
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.141
note: Maximum penalty amount for contravention of privacy safeguard penalty provision
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ev-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56EV Civil penalty provisions—maximum amount of penalty

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...10% of the adjusted turnover of the body corporate during the 12-month period ending at the end of the month in which the contravention happened or began.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Limits maximum penalty to within 12-month period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the maximum penalty amount for a contravention by a body corporate of a privacy safeguard penalty provision is...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if that court cannot determine the value of that benefit—10% of the adjusted turnover of the body corporate during the 12-month period ending at the end of the month in which the contravention happened or began.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Analyzes benefit value for calculation
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the maximum penalty amount for a contravention by a body corporate of a privacy safeguard penalty provision is...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the greater of the following:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits contravention of privacy safeguard penalty provision
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the maximum penalty amount for a contravention by a body corporate of a privacy safeguard penalty provision is...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and that is reasonably attributable to the contravention—3 times the value of that benefit;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spreads calculation to related bodies corporate
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the maximum penalty amount for a contravention by a body corporate of a privacy safeguard penalty provision is...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...3 times the value of that benefit;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for calculation of benefit value
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the maximum penalty amount for a contravention by a body corporate of a privacy safeguard penalty provision is...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EV(2) Civil penalty provisions—maximum amount of penalty

56EV(4) Civil penalty provisions—maximum amount of penalty
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.141
note: Maximum penalty amount for contravention of privacy safeguard penalty provision
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ev-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 56EV Civil penalty provisions—maximum amount of penalty

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: $500,000
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines maximum penalty amount
modality: Deontic
operator: max

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EV(4) Civil penalty provisions—maximum amount of penalty

56EW Enforceable undertakings
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.142
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56EW(1) Enforceable undertakings
has part: 56EW(2) Enforceable undertakings
has part: 56EW(3) Enforceable undertakings
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ew
schema version: 2

56EW(1) Enforceable undertakings
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.142
note: Each provision of the privacy safeguards is enforceable under Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ew-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ew-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ew-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ew-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ew-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ew-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ew-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56EW Enforceable undertakings

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ew-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act creates a framework for accepting and enforcing undertakings relating to compliance with provisions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Provision is enforceable under Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act within the temporal interval of Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: withinTemporalInterval
premise text: (1) Each provision of the privacy safeguards is enforceable under Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ew-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act creates a framework for accepting and enforcing undertakings relating to compliance with provisions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Provision is enforceable under Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act.
modality: Deontic
operator: isEnforceable
premise text: (1) Each provision of the privacy safeguards is enforceable under Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ew-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act creates a framework for accepting and enforcing undertakings relating to compliance with provisions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Provision is enforceable under Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act as part of its framework.
modality: Deontic
operator: isFrameworkFor
premise text: (1) Each provision of the privacy safeguards is enforceable under Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ew-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act creates a framework for accepting and enforcing undertakings relating to compliance with provisions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Provision is enforceable under Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act.
modality: Deontic
operator: isEnforceableUnder
premise text: (1) Each provision of the privacy safeguards is enforceable under Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ew-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act creates a framework for accepting and enforcing undertakings relating to compliance with provisions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Provision is enforceable under Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act within the temporal interval of Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act.
modality: LTL
operator: withinTemporalInterval
premise text: (1) Each provision of the privacy safeguards is enforceable under Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ew-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EW(1) Enforceable undertakings

56EW(2) Enforceable undertakings
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.142
note: Authorises Information Commissioner as authorised person for provisions under subsection (1)
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ew-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ew-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ew-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56EW Enforceable undertakings

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ew-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authority to act
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: Information Commissioner is an authorised person

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ew-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EW(2) Enforceable undertakings

56EW(3) Enforceable undertakings
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.142
note: List of relevant courts for enforcement of provisions under Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ew-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ew-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56EW Enforceable undertakings

56EX Injunctions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.142
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56EX(1) Injunctions
has part: 56EX(2) Injunctions
has part: 56EX(3) Injunctions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ex
schema version: 2

56EX(1) Injunctions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.142
note: Enforceability of privacy safeguards under Part 7 of the Regulatory Powers Act.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ex-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56EX Injunctions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The enforcement applies during this temporal interval.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval during which enforcement applies
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Each provision of the privacy safeguards is enforceable under Part 7 of the Regulatory Powers Act.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The artificial intelligence mechanism fulfills this obligation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence mechanism through which obligations are fulfilled
modality: CogAI
operator: through
premise text: Each provision of the privacy safeguards is enforceable under Part 7 of the Regulatory Powers Act.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Privacy safeguards are enforceable under Part 7 of the Regulatory Powers Act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Enforceability obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: enforces
premise text: Part 7 of the Regulatory Powers Act creates a framework for using injunctions to enforce provisions.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The enforcement mechanism fulfills this obligation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Enforcement mechanism through which obligations are fulfilled
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
premise text: Each provision of the privacy safeguards is enforceable under Part 7 of the Regulatory Powers Act.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The enforcement applies during this temporal interval.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval during which enforcement applies
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: Each provision of the privacy safeguards is enforceable under Part 7 of the Regulatory Powers Act.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EX(1) Injunctions

56EX(2) Injunctions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.142
note: Authorises Information Commissioner as authorised person for provisions under subsection (1)
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ex-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56EX Injunctions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authority to act
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: Information Commissioner is an authorised person

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EX(2) Injunctions

56EX(3) Injunctions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.142
note: List of relevant courts for a provision in the Regulatory Powers Act
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ex-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56EX Injunctions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: These courts overlap with the concept of a relevant court
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The list of relevant courts overlaps with the concept 'relevant court'
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: The Federal Court, Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2), and State or Territory courts are mentioned as examples

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: These courts are recognized by the provision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The list of relevant courts is recognized by the provision
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: The Federal Court, Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2), and State or Territory courts are mentioned as examples

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: These courts must be considered when applying the provision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: List of relevant courts is a condition for the provision
modality: Deontic
operator: inclusion
premise text: The Federal Court, Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2), and State or Territory courts are mentioned

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: These courts diffuse into the concept of a relevant court
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The list of relevant courts diffuses into the concept 'relevant court'
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: The Federal Court, Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2), and State or Territory courts are mentioned as examples

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: These courts have a specific order in relation to the provision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The list of relevant courts is ordered by jurisdiction
modality: LTL
operator: orderedBy
premise text: State or Territory courts are mentioned after Federal Court and Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EX(3) Injunctions

56EY Actions for damages
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.143
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56EY(1) Actions for damages
has part: 56EY(2) Actions for damages
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ey
schema version: 2

56EY(1) Actions for damages
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.143
note: Recovery of damages for contravention of privacy safeguards or consumer data rules
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ey-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56EY Actions for damages

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: by action against that other person or against any person involved in the contravention.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for recovery of damages
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: (1) A person who suffers loss or damage (within the meaning of subsection 25(1) of the Privacy Act 1988)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: may recover the amount of the loss or damage by action against that other person or against any person involved in the contravention.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Recovery of damages entails a claim for damages
modality: Argumentation
operator: entails
premise text: (1) A person who suffers loss or damage (within the meaning of subsection 25(1) of the Privacy Act 1988)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: may recover the amount of the loss or damage by action against that other person or against any person involved in the contravention.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to recover damages for contravention of privacy safeguards or consumer data rules
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (1) A person who suffers loss or damage (within the meaning of subsection 25(1) of the Privacy Act 1988)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: may recover the amount of the loss or damage by action against that other person or against any person involved in the contravention.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Recovery of damages diffuses to all persons involved
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (1) A person who suffers loss or damage (within the meaning of subsection 25(1) of the Privacy Act 1988)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: may recover the amount of the loss or damage by action against that other person or against any person involved in the contravention.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recovery of damages applies everywhere
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
premise text: (1) A person who suffers loss or damage (within the meaning of subsection 25(1) of the Privacy Act 1988)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EY(1) Actions for damages

56EY(2) Actions for damages
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.143
note: Action for damages can be commenced within 6 years after the contravention happened or began.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ey-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56EY Actions for damages

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between events
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to commence action within a time limit
modality: Deontic
operator: can

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56EY(2) Actions for damages

56EZ Delegation to the Commission etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.145
note: Delegation of functions and powers
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ez-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ez
schema version: 2

56FA Making data standards
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.147
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56FA(1) Making data standards
has part: 56FA(2) Making data standards
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fa
schema version: 2

56FA(1) Making data standards
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.147
note: The Data Standards Chair may make data standards about various matters.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fa-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fa-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fa-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fa-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fa-ss-1-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56FA Making data standards

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The Data Standards Chair's power to make data standards is within their authority.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: (1) The Data Standards Chair may, by writing, make one or more data standards about each of the following matters:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fa-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: The making of data standards implies a duty on the part of the Data Standards Chair.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implicates
premise text: (1) The Data Standards Chair may, by writing, make one or more data standards about each of the following matters:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fa-ss-1-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The making of data standards implies a duty on the part of the Data Standards Chair to provide clear and consistent rules.
modality: CogAI
operator: Implicates
premise text: (1) The Data Standards Chair may, by writing, make one or more data standards about each of the following matters:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Data Standards Chair has the power to make data standards.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fa-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: The Data Standards Chair classifies matters for which data standards are made.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classifies
premise text: (a) the format and description of CDR data;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fa-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The making of data standards implies a duty on the part of the Data Standards Chair to diffuse their authority.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Implicates
premise text: (1) The Data Standards Chair may, by writing, make one or more data standards about each of the following matters:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56FA(1) Making data standards

56FA(2) Making data standards
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.147
note: Comply with consumer data rules when making, varying or revoking a data standard
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fa-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56FA Making data standards

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with consumer data rules
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

56FB What data standards can set out etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.148
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56FB(1) What data standards can set out etc.
has part: 56FB(2) What data standards can set out etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fb
schema version: 2

56FB(1) What data standards can set out etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.148
note: A single data standard may set out different provisions for different designated sectors, classes of CDR data, types of CDR actions, classes of persons, classes of action service providers, and classes of accredited persons.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fb-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56FB What data standards can set out etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May set out different provisions
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56FB(1) What data standards can set out etc.

56FB(2) What data standards can set out etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.148
note: A separate data standard could deal with each of the different classes or types referred to in any of paragraphs (1)(b) to (d) of this section.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fb-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56FB What data standards can set out etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56FB(2) What data standards can set out etc.

56FC Data standards must be published
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.149
note: Publish data standards on the internet
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fc-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fc-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fc
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish data standards
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

56FD Legal effect of data standards
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.149
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56FD(1) Legal effect of data standards
has part: 56FD(2) Legal effect of data standards
has part: 56FD(2A) Legal effect of data standards
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fd
schema version: 2

56FD(1) Legal effect of data standards
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.149
note: Agrees to observe standard and engage in conduct required by the standard.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-1-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56FD Legal effect of data standards

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (d) agrees to engage in conduct that the person is required by the standard to engage in.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The contract is in force between the data holder and accredited persons during the overlap of their engagement with the standard.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (c) agrees to observe the standard to the extent that the standard applies to the person;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-1-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (d) agrees to engage in conduct that the person is required by the standard to engage in.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The state enforces the obligations of the data holder and accredited persons to observe the standard and engage in conduct required by it.
modality: CogAI
operator: Enforces
premise text: A contract is taken to be in force between: (a) a data holder of CDR data to which a binding data standard applies;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (d) agrees to engage in conduct that the person is required by the standard to engage in.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agreement to observe standard and engage in conduct required by the standard.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (a) a data holder of CDR data to which a binding data standard applies;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: and (b) each accredited person;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Data holder and accredited persons are part of a class included in the data standard.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
premise text: (a) a data holder of CDR data to which a binding data standard applies;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) each accredited person;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The data holder and accredited persons diffuse their obligations to observe the standard and engage in conduct required by it.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (a) a data holder of CDR data to which a binding data standard applies;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (d) agrees to engage in conduct that the person is required by the standard to engage in.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The contract is in force until the data holder and accredited persons cease to observe the standard and engage in conduct required by it.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (c) agrees to observe the standard to the extent that the standard applies to the person;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56FD(1) Legal effect of data standards

56FD(2) Legal effect of data standards
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.149
note: Agrees to observe standard and engage in conduct required by the standard.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56FD Legal effect of data standards

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person engages in conduct during the applicable period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Agrees to engage in conduct during the applicable period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (e) agrees to engage in conduct that the person is required by the standard to engage in;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person agrees to observe the standard and engage in conduct.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Agrees to observe standard implies engagement in conduct.
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (d) agrees to observe the standard to the extent that the standard applies to the person; (e) agrees to engage in conduct that the person is required by the standard to engage in;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the data holder asserts that the standard applies to them.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Data holder asserts standard applies to themselves.
modality: CogAI
operator: asserts
premise text: (d) agrees to observe the standard to the extent that the standard applies to the person;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (d) agrees to observe the standard to the extent that the standard applies to the person; and (e) agrees to engage in conduct that the person is required by the standard to engage in.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agrees to observe standard and engage in conduct required by the standard.
modality: Deontic
operator: obliges
premise text: (a) a data holder of the CDR data; (b) the designated gateway for the CDR data; (c) each accredited person;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the standard applies to the person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Standard applies to the person.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: appliesTo
premise text: (d) agrees to observe the standard to the extent that the standard applies to the person;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the data holder's agreement diffuses through the gateway and accredited persons.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Data holder's agreement diffuses through gateway and accredited persons.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (a) a data holder of the CDR data; (b) the designated gateway for the CDR data; (c) each accredited person;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56FD(2) Legal effect of data standards

56FD(2A) Legal effect of data standards
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.149
note: Contract in force between action service provider and data standard
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fd-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 56FD Legal effect of data standards

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Binding data standard applies
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (2A) A contract is taken to be in force between:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Type of CDR action
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
premise text: a type of CDR action to which a binding data standard applies

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56FD(2A) Legal effect of data standards

56FE Enforcement of binding data standards
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.150
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56FE(1) Enforcement of binding data standards
has part: 56FE(2) Enforcement of binding data standards
has part: 56FE(3) Enforcement of binding data standards
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fe
schema version: 2

56FE(1) Enforcement of binding data standards
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.150
note: Failure to comply with binding data standard obligation
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fe-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fe-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fe-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56FE Enforcement of binding data standards

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fe-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Fails to meet obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Fail

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fe-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56FE(1) Enforcement of binding data standards

56FE(2) Enforcement of binding data standards
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.150
note: Court may give directions to comply with binding data standard
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fe-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fe-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fe-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56FE Enforcement of binding data standards

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fe-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide compliance direction
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fe-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56FE(2) Enforcement of binding data standards

56FE(3) Enforcement of binding data standards
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.150
note: An obligation to comply with a binding data standard includes an obligation arising under a contract.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fe-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fe-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fe-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fe-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56FE Enforcement of binding data standards

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fe-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion relation for obligations.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fe-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subdivision relation for data standards chair.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subdivision

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fe-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56FE(3) Enforcement of binding data standards

56FF Data Standards Chair
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.151
note: There is an obligation to have a Data Standards Chair.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ff-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ff-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ff
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ff-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is a Data Standards Chair.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Existence of an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: has

56FG Appointment of the Data Standards Chair
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.151
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56FG(1) Appointment of the Data Standards Chair
has part: 56FG(2) Appointment of the Data Standards Chair
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fg
schema version: 2

56FG(1) Appointment of the Data Standards Chair
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.151
note: Appointment of Data Standards Chair
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fg-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fg-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fg-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fg-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fg-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fg-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56FG Appointment of the Data Standards Chair

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fg-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...by the Minister by written instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for appointment
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
premise text: (1) The Data Standards Chair is to be appointed, on a full-time basis or...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fg-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...by the Minister by written instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Minister's authority for appointment
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (1) The Data Standards Chair is to be appointed, on a full-time basis or...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fg-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...by the Minister by written instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Appointment basis inference
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: (1) The Data Standards Chair is to be appointed, on a full-time basis or...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...by the Minister by written instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Appointment duty
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) The Data Standards Chair is to be appointed...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fg-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...by the Minister by written instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Appointment basis classification
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (1) The Data Standards Chair is to be appointed, on a full-time basis or...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56FG(1) Appointment of the Data Standards Chair

56FG(2) Appointment of the Data Standards Chair
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.151
note: Data Standards Chair must hold office for a specified period not exceeding 3 years.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fg-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fg-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56FG Appointment of the Data Standards Chair

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Data Standards Chair holds office
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: (2) The Data Standards Chair...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56FG(2) Appointment of the Data Standards Chair

56FH Functions and powers of the Data Standards Chair
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.151
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56FH(1) Functions and powers of the Data Standards Chair
has part: 56FH(2) Functions and powers of the Data Standards Chair
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fh
schema version: 2

56FH(1) Functions and powers of the Data Standards Chair
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.151
note: The Data Standards Chair has specific functions to make and review standards.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fh-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fh-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56FH Functions and powers of the Data Standards Chair

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Data Standards Chair has specific functions.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fh-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56FH(1) Functions and powers of the Data Standards Chair

56FH(2) Functions and powers of the Data Standards Chair
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.151
note: Establishment of committees, advisory panels and consultative groups.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fh-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fh-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56FH Functions and powers of the Data Standards Chair

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has the power to establish committees, advisory panels and consultative groups.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fh-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56FH(2) Functions and powers of the Data Standards Chair

56FI Directions by Minister
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.151
note: The Minister may give written directions to the Data Standards Chair.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fi-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fi-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fi
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fi-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to direct
modality: Deontic
operator: may

56FJ Appointment of the Data Standards Body
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.152
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56FJ(1) Appointment of the Data Standards Body
has part: 56FJ(2) Appointment of the Data Standards Body
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fj
schema version: 2

56FJ(1) Appointment of the Data Standards Body
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.152
note: The Minister has the obligation to appoint a Data Standards Body.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fj-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fj-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56FJ Appointment of the Data Standards Body

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Minister has an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

56FJ(2) Appointment of the Data Standards Body
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.152
note: Minister may terminate appointment by written instrument.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fj-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fj-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56FJ Appointment of the Data Standards Body

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

56FK Function and powers of the Data Standards Body
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.152
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56FK(1) Function and powers of the Data Standards Body
has part: 56FK(2) Function and powers of the Data Standards Body
has part: 56FK(3) Function and powers of the Data Standards Body
has part: 56FK(4) Function and powers of the Data Standards Body
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fk
schema version: 2

56FK(1) Function and powers of the Data Standards Body
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.152
note: The Data Standards Body must assist the Data Standards Chair.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fk-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fk-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56FK Function and powers of the Data Standards Body

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide assistance
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

56FK(2) Function and powers of the Data Standards Body
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.152
note: Power to perform necessary or convenient actions
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fk-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fk-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56FK Function and powers of the Data Standards Body

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ability to perform actions
modality: Deontic
operator: can

56FK(3) Function and powers of the Data Standards Body
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.152
note: Comply with consumer data rules when assisting the Data Standards Chair.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fk-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fk-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fk-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56FK Function and powers of the Data Standards Body

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fk-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply with consumer data rules.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

56FK(4) Function and powers of the Data Standards Body
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.152
note: Functions and powers of the Data Standards Body are taken to include other functions and powers.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fk-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fk-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 56FK Function and powers of the Data Standards Body

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fk-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56FK(4) Function and powers of the Data Standards Body

56FL Acting appointments
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.153
note: The Minister may appoint a person to act as Data Standards Chair.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fl-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fl-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fl
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fl-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to act
modality: Deontic
operator: May

56FM Terms and conditions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.153
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56FM(1) Terms and conditions
has part: 56FM(2) Terms and conditions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fm
schema version: 2

56FM(1) Terms and conditions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.153
note: Terms and conditions for Data Standards Chair office
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fm-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fm-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56FM Terms and conditions

56FM(2) Terms and conditions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.153
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for the Data Standards Chair while Minister.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fm-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fm-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56FM Terms and conditions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fm-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56FM(2) Terms and conditions

56FN Remuneration
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.153
note: Data Standards Chair must be paid remuneration determined by the Remuneration Tribunal or prescribed by regulations.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fn-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fn-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fn
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fn-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be paid remuneration
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fn-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56FN Remuneration

56FO Leave
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.154
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56FO(1) Leave
has part: 56FO(2) Leave
has part: 56FO(3) Leave
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fo
schema version: 2

56FO(1) Leave
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.154
note: Recreation leave entitlements for Data Standards Chair appointed on a full-time basis.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fo-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fo-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fo-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fo-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fo-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56FO Leave

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: entitlements apply during the term of appointment
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Recreation leave entitlements apply during term of appointment
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Data Standards Chair appointed on a full-time basis for a specified term

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fo-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: recreation leave entitlements imply certain rights
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Recreation leave entitlements imply data standards chair has certain rights
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: Data Standards Chair appointed on a full-time basis implies certain rights and entitlements

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fo-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: recreation leave entitlements imply certain capabilities
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recreation leave entitlements imply data standards chair has certain capabilities
modality: CogAI
operator: implies
premise text: Data Standards Chair appointed on a full-time basis implies certain capabilities and abilities

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: entitled to recreation leave
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Recreation leave entitlements
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: Data Standards Chair appointed on a full-time basis

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fo-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: recreation leave entitlements imply certain responsibilities
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Recreation leave entitlements imply data standards chair has certain responsibilities
modality: Diffusion
operator: implies
premise text: Data Standards Chair appointed on a full-time basis implies certain responsibilities and obligations

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fo-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56FO(1) Leave

56FO(2) Leave
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.154
note: Minister may grant Data Standards Chair leave of absence
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fo-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fo-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56FO Leave

56FO(3) Leave
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.154
note: Secretary may grant leave of absence to Data Standards Chair on terms and conditions determined by Secretary.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fo-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fo-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fo-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56FO Leave

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fo-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting leave is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fo-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56FO(3) Leave

56FP Application of the finance law etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.154
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56FP(1) Application of the finance law etc.
has part: 56FP(2) Application of the finance law etc.
has part: 56FP(3) Application of the finance law etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fp
schema version: 2

56FP(1) Application of the finance law etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.154
note: The Data Standards Chair is taken to be an official of the Department.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fp-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fp-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56FP Application of the finance law etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...an official of the Department.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classification as an official
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: Data Standards Chair is taken to be...

56FP(2) Application of the finance law etc.
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.154
note: Must include information about performance and exercise of Data Standards Chair's functions in annual report.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fp-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fp-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56FP Application of the finance law etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a mandatory requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fp-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56FP(2) Application of the finance law etc.

56FP(3) Application of the finance law etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.154
note: Annual report must include information about the Data Standards Chair's functions and powers.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fp-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fp-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fp-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56FP Application of the finance law etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information about the Data Standards Chair's functions and powers.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fp-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Annual report must contain information about the Data Standards Chair's functions and powers.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CONTAINS

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fp-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56FP(3) Application of the finance law etc.

56FQ Resignation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.155
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56FQ(1) Resignation
has part: 56FQ(2) Resignation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fq
schema version: 2

56FQ(1) Resignation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.155
note: Resignation obligation of Data Standards Chair
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fq-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fq-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56FQ Resignation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Data Standards Chair must resign
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

56FQ(2) Resignation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.155
note: Resignation takes effect on specified day
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fq-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fq-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56FQ Resignation

56FR Termination of appointment
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.155
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56FR(1) Termination of appointment
has part: 56FR(2) Termination of appointment
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fr
schema version: 2

56FR(1) Termination of appointment
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.155
note: Minister may terminate appointment of Data Standards Chair for misbehaviour or incapacity.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fr-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fr-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56FR Termination of appointment

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fr-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56FR(1) Termination of appointment

56FR(2) Termination of appointment
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.155
note: Termination of appointment under certain conditions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fr-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fr-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fr-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56FR Termination of appointment

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fr-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The termination can occur within this time frame.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for termination.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) The Minister may terminate the appointment...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Data Standards Chair's appointment can be terminated only under these conditions.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits termination without specified grounds.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) The Minister may terminate the appointment...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fr-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56FR(2) Termination of appointment

56FS Delegation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.156
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56FS(1) Delegation
has part: 56FS(2) Delegation
has part: 56FS(3) Delegation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fs
schema version: 2

56FS(1) Delegation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.156
note: Delegation of functions or powers to SES employees, APS employees, and others.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fs-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fs-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fs-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56FS Delegation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fs-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifies the temporal interval during which delegation can occur
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

56FS(2) Delegation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.156
note: Exempts Data Standards Chair from subsection (1) application
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fs-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fs-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56FS Delegation

56FS(3) Delegation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.156
note: Delegate must comply with Data Standards Chair directions
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fs-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fs-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56fs-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56FS Delegation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fs-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Comply with Data Standards Chair directions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Delegate under subsection (1)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fs-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56FS(3) Delegation

56GA CDR functions of the Information Commissioner
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.158
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56GA(1) CDR functions of the Information Commissioner
has part: 56GA(2) CDR functions of the Information Commissioner
has part: 56GA(1A) CDR functions of the Information Commissioner
has part: 56GA(1B) CDR functions of the Information Commissioner
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ga
schema version: 2

56GA(1) CDR functions of the Information Commissioner
type: Concept
references: Acts Interpretation Act 1901
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.158
note: The Information Commissioner has certain functions and may consult with others about matters relevant to the operation of this Part. Delegation of functions or powers under this Part
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ga-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56GA CDR functions of the Information Commissioner

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The Information Commissioner may consult with others about matters relevant to the operation of this Part during certain times.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (b) to consult with or advise any of the following:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner has certain functions.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner may consult with others about matters relevant to the operation of this Part.
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: (b) to consult with or advise any of the following:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner must consult with others about matters relevant to the operation of this Part.
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: (b) to consult with or advise any of the following:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner may delegate certain functions to others.
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Note: The Commission may also delegate to the Information Commissioner any of the Commission’s functions relating to this Part (see subsection 26(3)).

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56GA(1) CDR functions of the Information Commissioner

56GA(1A) CDR functions of the Information Commissioner
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.158
note: Delegate Minister's functions to SES employees or acting SES employees.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1a-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1a-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ga-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 56GA CDR functions of the Information Commissioner

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...functions or powers included: (a) as described in paragraph 56BHA(1)(j); and (b) in the consumer data rules;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for delegation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1A) The Minister may, in writing...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1a-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...delegate all or any of the Minister’s functions or powers included...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Permissive language for delegation.
modality: Argumentation
operator: may
premise text: (1A) The Minister may, in writing...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...SES employee, or an acting SES employee, in the Department or in the Commission.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Delegation within the Commission.
modality: CogAI
operator: in
premise text: (1A) The Minister may, in writing...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to an SES employee, or an acting SES employee.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission for delegation.
modality: Deontic
operator: delegate
premise text: The Minister may delegate...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...SES employee, or an acting SES employee, in the Department or in the Commission.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Delegation to SES employees.
modality: Diffusion
operator: to
premise text: (1A) The Minister may, in writing...

56GA(1B) CDR functions of the Information Commissioner
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.158
note: Delegation by the Secretary must comply with written directions of the Minister.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1b-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ga-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 56GA CDR functions of the Information Commissioner

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56GA(1B) CDR functions of the Information Commissioner

56GA(2) CDR functions of the Information Commissioner
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.158
note: Request or initiative for performing functions Delegate must comply with written directions of the Secretary.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ga-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56GA CDR functions of the Information Commissioner

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to perform functions
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56GA(2) CDR functions of the Information Commissioner

56GB Referring to instruments as in force from time to time
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.159
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56GB(1) Referring to instruments as in force from time to time
has part: 56GB(2) Referring to instruments as in force from time to time
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56gb
schema version: 2

56GB(1) Referring to instruments as in force from time to time
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.159
note: List of instruments subject to this section
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gb-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56gb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56GB Referring to instruments as in force from time to time

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56GB(1) Referring to instruments as in force from time to time

56GB(2) Referring to instruments as in force from time to time
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.159
note: Allows instruments to incorporate or adopt provisions from other instruments or writings.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gb-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56gb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56GB Referring to instruments as in force from time to time

56GC Complying with CDR requirements etc.: protection from
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.160
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56GC(1) Complying with CDR requirements etc.: protection from
has part: 56GC(2) Complying with CDR requirements etc.: protection from
has part: 56GC(3) Complying with CDR requirements etc.: protection from
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56gc
schema version: 2

56GC(1) Complying with CDR requirements etc.: protection from
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.160
note: Protection from liability for complying with CDR requirements
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56gc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56GC Complying with CDR requirements etc.: protection from

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Not liable for actions or proceedings
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with CDR requirements
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Acting in good faith and compliance with CDR provisions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Protection from liability
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of CDR entities
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classifies
premise text: CDR entity acting as described in an item of the table

56GC(2) Complying with CDR requirements etc.: protection from
type: Concept
description: Evidence
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.160
note: Evidential burden for relying on subsection (1) in civil actions or proceedings
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56gc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56GC Complying with CDR requirements etc.: protection from

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person who wishes to rely on subsection (1) in relation to a civil action or civil proceeding bears an evidential burden...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for evidentiial burden
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal interval

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person who wishes to rely on subsection (1) in relation to a civil action or civil proceeding bears an evidential burden...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Burden of proof for relying on subsection (1)
modality: Argumentation
operator: burden of proof

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person who wishes to rely on subsection (1) in relation to a civil action or civil proceeding bears an evidential burden...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person who wishes to rely on subsection (1) in relation to a civil action or civil proceeding bears an evidential burden...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Evidential burden for relying on subsection (1)
modality: Epistemic
operator: evidential burden

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person who wishes to rely on subsection (1) in relation to a civil action or civil proceeding bears an evidential burden...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Trace of evidential burden for relying on subsection (1)
modality: LTL
operator: trace

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56GC(2) Complying with CDR requirements etc.: protection from

56GC(3) Complying with CDR requirements etc.: protection from
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.160
note: Definition of evidential burden
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56gc-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56GC Complying with CDR requirements etc.: protection from

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to provide evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines evidential burden for clarity and precision
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Definition

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56GC(3) Complying with CDR requirements etc.: protection from

56GD Exemptions by the Commission
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.161
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56GD(1) Exemptions by the Commission
has part: 56GD(2) Exemptions by the Commission
has part: 56GD(3) Exemptions by the Commission
has part: 56GD(4) Exemptions by the Commission
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56gd
schema version: 2

56GD(1) Exemptions by the Commission
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.161
note: Exemptions by the Commission
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gd-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56gd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56GD Exemptions by the Commission

56GD(2) Exemptions by the Commission
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.161
note: Commission may exempt a person from provisions covered by this section.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gd-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56gd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56GD Exemptions by the Commission

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gd-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56GD(2) Exemptions by the Commission

56GD(3) Exemptions by the Commission
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.161
note: Exemptions under subsection (2) may be limited to a specified period or apply unconditionally.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gd-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56gd-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56GD Exemptions by the Commission

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gd-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56GD(3) Exemptions by the Commission

56GD(4) Exemptions by the Commission
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.161
note: Commission must publish exemption details on its website.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gd-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56gd-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 56GD Exemptions by the Commission

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gd-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56GD(4) Exemptions by the Commission

56GE Exemptions and modifications by regulations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.162
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56GE(1) Exemptions and modifications by regulations
has part: 56GE(2) Exemptions and modifications by regulations
has part: 56GE(3) Exemptions and modifications by regulations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ge
schema version: 2

56GE(1) Exemptions and modifications by regulations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.162
note: Exemptions and modifications by regulations
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ge-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ge-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56GE Exemptions and modifications by regulations

56GE(2) Exemptions and modifications by regulations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.162
note: Exemptions and modifications by regulations
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ge-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ge-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56GE Exemptions and modifications by regulations

56GE(3) Exemptions and modifications by regulations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.162
note: Exemptions and modifications by regulations may be limited to a specified period or apply unconditionally.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ge-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56ge-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56GE Exemptions and modifications by regulations

56GF Application of the CDR provisions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.163
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56GF(1) Application of the CDR provisions
has part: 56GF(2) Application of the CDR provisions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56gf
schema version: 2

56GF(1) Application of the CDR provisions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.163
note: A person is subject to the CDR provisions if they act or omit to act in a way that affects a corporation's activities.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gf-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56gf-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56GF Application of the CDR provisions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) The CDR provisions apply to a person if: (a) the person is a corporation; or (b) the person is not a corporation, but the person: (i) acts; or (ii) omits to act; in a way that affects, is capable of affecting or is taken with intent to affect the activities, functions, relationships or business of a corporation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to act or omit to act in a way that affects a corporation's activities.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) The CDR provisions apply to a person if: (a) the person is a corporation; or (b) the person is not a corporation, but the person: (i) acts; or (ii) omits to act; in a way that affects, is capable of affecting or is taken with intent to affect the activities, functions, relationships or business of a corporation.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gf-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56GF(1) Application of the CDR provisions

56GF(2) Application of the CDR provisions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.163
note: The CDR provisions apply to certain businesses and services.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gf-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gf-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56gf-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56GF Application of the CDR provisions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gf-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between CDR provisions and industries/services
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) The CDR provisions also apply to:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicability of the CDR provisions
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
premise text: (2) The CDR provisions also apply to:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56GF(2) Application of the CDR provisions

56GG Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.165
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56GG(1) Compensation for acquisition of property
has part: 56GG(2) Compensation for acquisition of property
has part: 56GG(3) Compensation for acquisition of property
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56gg
schema version: 2

56GG(1) Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.165
note: Compensation for acquisition of property on just terms
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gg-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56gg-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56GG Compensation for acquisition of property

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide compensation
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56GG(1) Compensation for acquisition of property

56GG(2) Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.165
note: Person acquiring property must pay reasonable compensation to first-mentioned person.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gg-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56gg-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56GG Compensation for acquisition of property

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to pay compensation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56GG(2) Compensation for acquisition of property

56GG(3) Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.165
note: Compensation for acquisition of property: proceedings in Federal Court or Supreme Court
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gg-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56gg-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56GG Compensation for acquisition of property

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide compensation
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gg-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56GG(3) Compensation for acquisition of property

56GH Review of the operation of this Part
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.165
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56GH(1) Review of the operation of this Part
has part: 56GH(2) Review of the operation of this Part
has part: 56GH(3) Review of the operation of this Part
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56gh
schema version: 2

56GH(1) Review of the operation of this Part
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.165
note: The Minister must conduct an independent review of the operation of this Part.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gh-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56gh-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56GH Review of the operation of this Part

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Minister must conduct an independent review.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gh-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56GH(1) Review of the operation of this Part

56GH(2) Review of the operation of this Part
type: Concept
description: Written report
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.165
note: Must complete review report before July 1, 2022.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gh-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56gh-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56GH Review of the operation of this Part

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to complete review
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gh-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56GH(2) Review of the operation of this Part

56GH(3) Review of the operation of this Part
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.165
note: Minister must table report in each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gh-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56gh-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56GH Review of the operation of this Part

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must perform action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

57AA Objects of Part
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.166
note: Promote competition, establish fair playing field, and protect safety information.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57aa-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57aa-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57aa
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Promote competition
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57aa-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57AA Objects of Part

57AB Simplified outline
type: Concept
description: Fair market value
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.166
note: Supply of scheme information to Australian repairers and scheme RTOs is required.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ab-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ab-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ab-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ab-logic-linearlogic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57ab
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ab-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide scheme information at fair market value.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ab-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Data providers must protect individuals accessing scheme information from civil claims.
modality: Deontic
operator: SHALL

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ab-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Multiple obligations apply to data providers and Australian repairers/scheme RTOs.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: AND

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ab-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57AB Simplified outline

57BA Meaning of scheme vehicle
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.168
note: Definition of scheme vehicle
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ba-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ba-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ba-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ba-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57ba
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ba-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: vehicle was manufactured before this date if it does not meet the criteria
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: vehicles manufactured on or after January 1, 2002, meet the criteria

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ba-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: vehicle is a scheme vehicle if it meets these criteria
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of scheme vehicle
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: scheme rules prescribe definitions and categories for vehicles

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ba-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: vehicle is a scheme vehicle if it meets these criteria
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: scheme rules prescribe definitions and categories for vehicles

57BB Meaning of Australian repairer
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.168
note: A person is an Australian repairer if they carry on or actively seek to carry on a business involving diagnosing faults with, servicing, repairing, modifying or dismantling scheme vehicles.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bb-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bb-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bb-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bb-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bb-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bb-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57bb
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bb-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The business activities occur during the period of diagnosis
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between business activities and diagnosis
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: A person carries on or actively seeks to carry on a business...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bb-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is an Australian repairer if they carry on or actively seek to carry on such a business
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Business activities imply Australian repairer status
modality: Argumentation
operator: if-then
premise text: A person carries on or actively seeks to carry on a business...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bb-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person has the cognitive abilities required for an Australian repairer
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Business activities imply cognitive abilities
modality: CogAI
operator: has
premise text: A person carries on or actively seeks to carry on a business...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bb-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person carries on or actively seeks to carry on a business...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of Australian repairer
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: A person is an Australian repairer to the extent that...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bb-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person has multiple characteristics of an Australian repairer
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Multiple conditions for Australian repairer status
modality: Diffusion
operator: and
premise text: A person carries on or actively seeks to carry on a business...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bb-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57BB Meaning of Australian repairer

57BC Meaning of scheme RTO and RTO course
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.168
note: Defines what an RTO course is.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bc-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57bc
schema version: 2

57BD Meaning of scheme information
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.169
curation status: Proposed
has part: 57BD(1) Meaning of scheme information
has part: 57BD(2) Meaning of scheme information
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57bd
schema version: 2

57BD(1) Meaning of scheme information
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.169
note: Defines scheme information for manufacturers and their related bodies corporate.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bd-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57bd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 57BD Meaning of scheme information

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57BD(1) Meaning of scheme information

57BD(2) Meaning of scheme information
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.169
note: Excluded from scheme information
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bd-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57bd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 57BD Meaning of scheme information

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: !
premise text: None

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57BD(2) Meaning of scheme information

57BE Meaning of data provider
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.170
note: Definition of data provider
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57be-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57be
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57be-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57BE Meaning of data provider

57BF Meaning of safety and security information
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.170
curation status: Proposed
has part: 57BF(1) Meaning of safety and security information
has part: 57BF(2) Meaning of safety and security information
has part: 57BF(3) Meaning of safety and security information
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57bf
schema version: 2

57BF(1) Meaning of safety and security information
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.170
note: Safety and security information must be provided for a scheme vehicle.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bf-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57bf-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 57BF Meaning of safety and security information

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide safety and security information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bf-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57BF(1) Meaning of safety and security information

57BF(2) Meaning of safety and security information
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.170
note: Defines safety information for a scheme vehicle
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bf-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57bf-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 57BF Meaning of safety and security information

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...of a kind prescribed by the scheme rules:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires provision of safety information
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (2) Safety information, for a scheme vehicle...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57BF(2) Meaning of safety and security information

57BF(3) Meaning of safety and security information
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.170
note: Prescribes security information for a scheme vehicle
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bf-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57bf-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 57BF Meaning of safety and security information

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state to provide security information
modality: Deontic
operator: prescribes

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bf-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57BF(3) Meaning of safety and security information

57BG Supply of scheme information between related bodies
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.171
note: Supply of scheme information between related bodies
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bg-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bg-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57bg
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bg-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide scheme information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bg-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57BG Supply of scheme information between related bodies

57CA Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.172
curation status: Proposed
has part: 57CA(1) Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers
has part: 57CA(2) Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers
has part: 57CA(3) Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers
has part: 57CA(4) Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers
has part: 57CA(5) Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57ca
schema version: 2

57CA(1) Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.172
note: Main obligation for supplying scheme information to Australian repairers or RTOs.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57ca-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 57CA Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must supply scheme information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57CA(1) Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers

57CA(2) Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers
type: Concept
description: true
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.172
note: Must provide scheme information to Australian repairers and RTOs in a specified form.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57ca-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 57CA Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide scheme information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57CA(2) Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers

57CA(3) Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.172
note: Scheme information must be supplied on terms and conditions that include provision for the supply of scheme information.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57ca-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 57CA Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide scheme information on specified terms and conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57CA(3) Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers

57CA(4) Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers
type: Concept
description: true
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.172
note: Must provide scheme information at a fair market value price
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57ca-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 57CA Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide scheme information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57CA(4) Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers

57CA(5) Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.172
note: Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57ca-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 57CA Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide scheme information
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: scheme information for supply to Australian repairers
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of scheme information
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
premise text: scheme vehicle make, model and year

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57CA(5) Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers

57CB Scheme information—supply on request by Australian
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.174
curation status: Proposed
has part: 57CB(1) Scheme information—supply on request by Australian
has part: 57CB(2) Scheme information—supply on request by Australian
has part: 57CB(3) Scheme information—supply on request by Australian
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57cb
schema version: 2

57CB(1) Scheme information—supply on request by Australian
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.174
note: Request for supply of scheme information
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57cb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 57CB Scheme information—supply on request by Australian

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (c) the Australian repairer or scheme RTO requests,...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between data provider's offer and request
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (a) a data provider makes, or is required to make, a scheme offer...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the data provider must supply the scheme information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Request implies payment for scheme information
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (d) the Australian repairer or scheme RTO pays, or offers to pay,...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Australian repairer or scheme RTO pays, or offers to pay,...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide scheme information
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (a) a data provider makes, or is required to make, a scheme offer...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...an Australian repairer has a need to access the scheme information...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to access scheme information for business purposes
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (b) either:...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the data provider must supply the scheme information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Scheme information transmission from data provider to requestor
modality: Diffusion
operator: Transmission
premise text: (c) the Australian repairer or scheme RTO requests,...

57CB(2) Scheme information—supply on request by Australian
type: Concept
description: true
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.174
note: Supply scheme information to Australian repairer or RTO within specified terms and conditions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57cb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 57CB Scheme information—supply on request by Australian

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply with section 57CC
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

57CB(3) Scheme information—supply on request by Australian
type: Concept
description: true
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.174
note: Scheme information must be provided upon payment or offer of the scheme price.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57cb-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 57CB Scheme information—supply on request by Australian

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The period covered by this subsection starts when the Australian repairer or scheme RTO pays or offers to pay the scheme price.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (payment or offer time)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: If the Australian repairer or scheme RTO pays or offers to pay the scheme price, then scheme information must be provided.
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (payment or offer time)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide scheme information upon payment or offer.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The provision of scheme information upon payment or offer diffuses to the relevant parties.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (payment or offer time)

57CC Scheme information—terms and conditions of supply and use
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.177
note: Terms and conditions of supply generally allow data providers to supply scheme information for diagnostic purposes.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cc-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cc-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57cc
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits access to scheme information for diagnostic purposes.
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cc-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57CC Scheme information—terms and conditions of supply and use

57CD Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.178
curation status: Proposed
has part: 57CD(1) Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and
has part: 57CD(2) Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and
has part: 57CD(3) Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and
has part: 57CD(4) Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and
has part: 57CD(5) Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57cd
schema version: 2

57CD(1) Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.178
note: Data provider must comply with obligation under this Part in relation to scheme information.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57cd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 57CD Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Data provider must comply with obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57CD(1) Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and

57CD(2) Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.178
note: Supply of scheme information infringes copyright without just terms
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57cd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 57CD Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...apart from this section, the infringement would constitute an acquisition of property otherwise than on just terms
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlaps with copyright infringement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (c) the supply constitutes or results in an infringement of the copyright of the third party claimant;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...apart from this section, the infringement would constitute an acquisition of property otherwise than on just terms
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes copyright infringement through scheme information supply
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: (c) the supply constitutes or results in an infringement of the copyright of the third party claimant;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the infringement would constitute an acquisition of property otherwise than on just terms
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits supply of scheme information infringing copyright
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) Subsection (3) applies if...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...apart from this section, the infringement would constitute an acquisition of property otherwise than on just terms
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses copyright infringement through supply of scheme information
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (b) a person (the third party claimant) holds copyright in relation to some or all of the scheme information that is the subject of the supply;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...some or all of the scheme information that is the subject of the supply;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring supply of scheme information infringes copyright
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (a) a data provider supplies scheme information to an Australian repairer or scheme RTO under this Part;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57CD(2) Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and

57CD(3) Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and
type: Concept
description: true
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.178
note: Data provider must pay compensation to third party claimant.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57cd-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 57CD Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Data provider has an obligation to pay compensation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

57CD(4) Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.178
note: Debt due by data provider to third party claimant
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-4-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57cd-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 57CD Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: due

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-4-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Recoverable claim
modality: Epistemic
operator: recoverable

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Ordered recovery in court
modality: LTL
operator: ordered recovery

57CD(5) Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.178
note: Data provider must prove defence in civil action for copyright infringement.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57cd-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 57CD Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: must

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57CD(5) Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and

57DA Safety and security information—packaging
type: Concept
description: yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.181
note: Separate safety and security information from other scheme information.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57da-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57da-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57da
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57da-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide separate safety and security information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

57DB Safety and security information—supply to Australian
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.181
curation status: Proposed
has part: 57DB(1) Safety and security information—supply to Australian
has part: 57DB(2) Safety and security information—supply to Australian
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57db
schema version: 2

57DB(1) Safety and security information—supply to Australian
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.181
note: Must not supply safety and security information for a scheme vehicle unless certain conditions are met.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57db-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57db-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57db-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57db-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57db-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57db-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57db-ss-1-logic-argumentation-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57db-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 57DB Safety and security information—supply to Australian

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57db-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless certain conditions are met.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for supplying safety and security information
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1) A data provider must not supply scheme information under this Part that is, or includes, safety and security information for a scheme vehicle...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57db-ss-1-logic-argumentation-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless certain conditions are met.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of supplying safety and security information
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (1) A data provider must not supply scheme information under this Part that is, or includes, safety and security information for a scheme vehicle...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57db-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless certain conditions are met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of supplying safety and security information
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: data provider must not supply scheme information under this Part that is, or includes, safety and security information for a scheme vehicle...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57db-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless certain conditions are met.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to not supply safety and security information
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) A data provider must not supply scheme information under this Part that is, or includes, safety and security information for a scheme vehicle...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57db-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless certain conditions are met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of safety and security information
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: (1) A data provider must not supply scheme information under this Part that is, or includes, safety and security information for a scheme vehicle...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57db-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless certain conditions are met.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of supplying safety and security information
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (1) A data provider must not supply scheme information under this Part that is, or includes, safety and security information for a scheme vehicle...

57DB(2) Safety and security information—supply to Australian
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.181
note: Safety and security information must be used for the purposes of the Australian repairer's business.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57db-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57db-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57db-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 57DB Safety and security information—supply to Australian

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57db-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide safety and security information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

57DC Safety and security information—use or disclosure of sensitive
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.183
note: Use or disclosure of sensitive information is restricted for certain individuals and small business operators.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dc-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dc-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dc-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dc-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dc-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57dc
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dc-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Use or disclosure of sensitive information is restricted to specific time periods.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Restricts use or disclosure to specific time periods.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Restriction
premise text: The data provider is a small business operator within the meaning of the Privacy Act 1988; and that Act would not, apart from this section, apply to the data provider in relation to the information about the individual.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Use or disclosure of sensitive information is restricted.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restricts use or disclosure of sensitive information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Restrict
premise text: The data provider is a small business operator within the meaning of the Privacy Act 1988.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dc-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Use or disclosure of sensitive information is restricted for specific individuals.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restricts use or disclosure of sensitive information for specific individuals.
modality: Deontic
operator: Restrict
premise text: The information is about an individual mentioned in paragraph 57DB(2)(a); and the data provider is a small business operator within the meaning of the Privacy Act 1988.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dc-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Use or disclosure of sensitive information is restricted to recurring patterns.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Restricts use or disclosure to recurring patterns.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Restriction
premise text: The data provider is a small business operator within the meaning of the Privacy Act 1988; and that Act would not, apart from this section, apply to the data provider in relation to the information about the individual.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dc-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57DC Safety and security information—use or disclosure of sensitive

57DD Safety and security information—storage of, and access to,
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.184
curation status: Proposed
has part: 57DD(1) Safety and security information—storage of, and access to,
has part: 57DD(2) Safety and security information—storage of, and access to,
has part: 57DD(3) Safety and security information—storage of, and access to,
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57dd
schema version: 2

57DD(1) Safety and security information—storage of, and access to,
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.184
note: Sensitive information must be stored in Australia.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dd-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57dd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 57DD Safety and security information—storage of, and access to,

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must store sensitive information in Australia.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57DD(1) Safety and security information—storage of, and access to,

57DD(2) Safety and security information—storage of, and access to,
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.184
note: Must store sensitive information in Australia or an external Territory.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dd-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57dd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 57DD Safety and security information—storage of, and access to,

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must store sensitive information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

57DD(3) Safety and security information—storage of, and access to,
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.184
note: Do not access sensitive information outside Australia
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dd-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57dd-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 57DD Safety and security information—storage of, and access to,

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Do not access outside Australia
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Sensitive information

57DE Security information—records of access
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.185
curation status: Proposed
has part: 57DE(1) Security information—records of access
has part: 57DE(2) Security information—records of access
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57de
schema version: 2

57DE(1) Security information—records of access
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.185
note: Record-keeping requirement for security information
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57de-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57de-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57de-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 57DE Security information—records of access

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57de-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide record-keeping requirement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57de-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57DE(1) Security information—records of access

57DE(2) Security information—records of access
type: Concept
description: yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.185
note: Maintain records of security information supply for 5 years
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57de-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57de-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57de-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 57DE Security information—records of access

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57de-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must maintain records
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

57EA Scope of Division
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.186
note: Scope of Division
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ea-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57ea
schema version: 2

57EB Resolving disputes
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.186
note: A party may initiate action to resolve a dispute.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eb-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eb-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57eb
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eb-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eb-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57EB Resolving disputes

57EC Right to bring proceedings unaffected
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.186
note: Right to bring proceedings unaffected
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ec-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57ec
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ec-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: State
part of: 57EC Right to bring proceedings unaffected

57ED Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.186
curation status: Proposed
has part: 57ED(1) Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation
has part: 57ED(2) Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation
has part: 57ED(3) Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation
has part: 57ED(4) Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation
has part: 57ED(5) Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57ed
schema version: 2

57ED(1) Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation
type: Concept
description: yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.186
note: Initiating party must provide written notice to responding party before initiating action.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57ed-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 57ED Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide written notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57ED(1) Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation

57ED(2) Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.186
note: Parties must try to resolve the dispute.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57ed-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 57ED Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must try to resolve the dispute.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57ED(2) Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation

57ED(3) Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.186
note: Parties must refer dispute to mediator if unable to agree within 2 business days.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57ed-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 57ED Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Either party may refer the matter to a mediator for mediation under this Division.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for dispute resolution
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (3) If the parties cannot agree how to resolve the dispute within 2 business days...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Either party may refer the matter to a mediator for mediation under this Division.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide mediation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) If the parties cannot agree how to resolve the dispute within 2 business days...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Either party may refer the matter to a mediator for mediation under this Division.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May refer dispute to mediator
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
premise text: (3) If the parties cannot agree how to resolve the dispute within 2 business days...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Either party may refer the matter to a mediator for mediation under this Division.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for dispute resolution
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (3) If the parties cannot agree how to resolve the dispute within 2 business days...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57ED(3) Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation

57ED(4) Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.186
note: Either party may request the scheme adviser to nominate a mediator.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57ed-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 57ED Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to request mediation
modality: Deontic
operator: May

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57ED(4) Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation

57ED(5) Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.186
note: Scheme adviser must nominate a mediator for the dispute within 2 business days after a request is made under subsection (4).
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57ed-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 57ED Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to nominate a mediator
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57ED(5) Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation

57EE When is a party taken to have tried to resolve a dispute?
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.187
note: A party is taken to have tried to resolve a dispute if they approach it in a reconciliatory manner.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ee-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ee-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57ee
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ee-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Party's actions are obligations.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ee-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57EE When is a party taken to have tried to resolve a dispute?

57EF Mediation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.187
curation status: Proposed
has part: 57EF(1) Mediation
has part: 57EF(2) Mediation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57ef
schema version: 2

57EF(1) Mediation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.187
note: Mediator appointed by parties decides time and place for mediation.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ef-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ef-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ef-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57ef-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 57EF Mediation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ef-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mediator has the obligation to decide.
modality: Deontic
operator: Decide

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ef-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Mediator's decision implies mediation will occur.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ef-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57EF(1) Mediation

57EF(2) Mediation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.187
note: Allow parties to appoint a technical expert with agreement.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ef-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ef-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57ef-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 57EF Mediation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ef-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

57EG Termination of mediation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.188
curation status: Proposed
has part: 57EG(1) Termination of mediation
has part: 57EG(2) Termination of mediation
has part: 57EG(3) Termination of mediation
has part: 57EG(4) Termination of mediation
has part: 57EG(5) Termination of mediation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57eg
schema version: 2

57EG(1) Termination of mediation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.188
note: Dispute must be resolved within 30 days after mediation starts.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57eg-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 57EG Termination of mediation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to resolve dispute within 30 days.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57EG(1) Termination of mediation

57EG(2) Termination of mediation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.188
note: Mediator may terminate mediation at any time unless a resolution is imminent.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57eg-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 57EG Termination of mediation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mediator's power to terminate mediation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57EG(2) Termination of mediation

57EG(3) Termination of mediation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.188
note: Mediator must terminate mediation upon request.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57eg-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 57EG Termination of mediation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to terminate mediation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57EG(3) Termination of mediation

57EG(4) Termination of mediation
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.188
note: Mediator must issue a certificate after terminating mediation.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57eg-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 57EG Termination of mediation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a certificate
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57EG(4) Termination of mediation

57EG(5) Termination of mediation
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.188
note: Mediator must provide a copy of the certificate to parties and scheme adviser.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57eg-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 57EG Termination of mediation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57EG(5) Termination of mediation

57EH Costs of mediation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.189
curation status: Proposed
has part: 57EH(1) Costs of mediation
has part: 57EH(2) Costs of mediation
has part: 57EH(3) Costs of mediation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57eh
schema version: 2

57EH(1) Costs of mediation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.189
note: Parties are equally liable for mediation costs unless they agree otherwise.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57eh-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 57EH Costs of mediation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The cost of mediation is between the parties.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: (1) The parties are equally liable for the costs of mediation under this Division unless they agree otherwise.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: If the parties do not agree on the cost, one party may be liable.
modality: Argumentation
operator: implication
premise text: (1) The parties are equally liable for the costs of mediation under this Division unless they agree otherwise.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The parties have a cognitive obligation to pay mediation costs.
modality: CogAI
operator: cognitive
premise text: (1) The parties are equally liable for the costs of mediation under this Division unless they agree otherwise.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Parties have an obligation to pay mediation costs.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The cost of mediation is diffused between the parties.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
premise text: (1) The parties are equally liable for the costs of mediation under this Division unless they agree otherwise.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57EH(1) Costs of mediation

57EH(2) Costs of mediation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.189
note: Parties must pay their own costs of attending mediation.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57eh-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 57EH Costs of mediation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must pay own costs
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57EH(2) Costs of mediation

57EH(3) Costs of mediation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.189
note: Excludes costs of mediation from the definition of 'costs'
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57eh-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 57EH Costs of mediation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excludes costs of mediation from the definition of 'costs'
modality: Deontic
operator: exclusion

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57EH(3) Costs of mediation

57FA Scheme adviser—establishment and appointment
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.190
curation status: Proposed
has part: 57FA(1) Scheme adviser—establishment and appointment
has part: 57FA(2) Scheme adviser—establishment and appointment
has part: 57FA(3) Scheme adviser—establishment and appointment
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57fa
schema version: 2

57FA(1) Scheme adviser—establishment and appointment
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.190
note: Establishment and appointment of a motor vehicle service and repair information scheme adviser.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fa-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57fa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 57FA Scheme adviser—establishment and appointment

57FA(2) Scheme adviser—establishment and appointment
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.190
note: Minister may appoint a person to be the scheme adviser.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fa-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57fa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 57FA Scheme adviser—establishment and appointment

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by Minister
modality: Deontic
operator: May

57FA(3) Scheme adviser—establishment and appointment
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.190
note: No payment is allowed to the scheme adviser.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fa-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57fa-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 57FA Scheme adviser—establishment and appointment

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits payment to the scheme adviser.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fa-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57FA(3) Scheme adviser—establishment and appointment

57FB Scheme adviser—functions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.190
curation status: Proposed
has part: 57FB(1) Scheme adviser—functions
has part: 57FB(2) Scheme adviser—functions
has part: 57FB(3) Scheme adviser—functions
has part: 57FB(4) Scheme adviser—functions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57fb
schema version: 2

57FB(1) Scheme adviser—functions
type: Concept
description: Annual reports, information about inquiries and disputes, resolution rates for disputes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.190
note: The scheme adviser must report to the Minister and the Commission on various matters.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57fb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 57FB Scheme adviser—functions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The scheme adviser has a duty to report to the Minister and the Commission.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: The scheme adviser's functions are defined in this section.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57FB(1) Scheme adviser—functions

57FB(2) Scheme adviser—functions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.190
note: Information about contract terms is not confidential to the extent it identifies parties.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57fb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 57FB Scheme adviser—functions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information is not confidential
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to disclose contract terms
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Contract terms are notified to the scheme adviser

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57FB(2) Scheme adviser—functions

57FB(3) Scheme adviser—functions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.190
note: Scheme adviser has necessary powers for office functions
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57fb-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 57FB Scheme adviser—functions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Possession of power
modality: Deontic
operator: has

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57FB(3) Scheme adviser—functions

57FB(4) Scheme adviser—functions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.190
note: Exempts reports from Section 34C of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57fb-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 57FB Scheme adviser—functions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Reports are exempt from Section 34C.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section 34C exemption
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: Section 34C of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 requires periodic reports.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57FB(4) Scheme adviser—functions

57GA Civil penalty provisions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.192
note: Defines civil penalty provisions
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ga-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57ga
schema version: 2

57GB Infringement notices
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.192
curation status: Proposed
has part: 57GB(1) Infringement notices
has part: 57GB(2) Infringement notices
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57gb
schema version: 2

57GB(1) Infringement notices
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.192
note: Division 2A of Part IVB applies to alleged contraventions of civil penalty provisions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gb-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gb-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gb-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gb-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57gb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 57GB Infringement notices

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: in relation to an alleged contravention of a civil penalty provision mentioned in an item in the table in subsection (2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Division applies within specified intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: applies
premise text: (1) Division 2A of Part IVB

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gb-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: in relation to an alleged contravention of a civil penalty provision mentioned in an item in the table in subsection (2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Division applies through specified channels
modality: CogAI
operator: applies
premise text: (1) Division 2A of Part IVB

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: in relation to an alleged contravention of a civil penalty provision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Division applies to alleged contraventions
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: (1) Division 2A of Part IVB

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gb-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: in relation to an alleged contravention of a civil penalty provision mentioned in an item in the table in subsection (2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Division applies through specified channels
modality: Diffusion
operator: applies
premise text: (1) Division 2A of Part IVB

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gb-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: in relation to an alleged contravention of a civil penalty provision mentioned in an item in the table in subsection (2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Division applies within specified intervals
modality: LTL
operator: applies
premise text: (1) Division 2A of Part IVB

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57GB(1) Infringement notices

57GB(2) Infringement notices
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.192
note: Specify penalty for infringement notices
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gb-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57gb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 57GB Infringement notices

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

57GC Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.194
note: States and Territories can operate concurrently with this Part unless directly inconsistent.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gc-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gc-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57gc
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: States and Territories can operate concurrently.
modality: Deontic
operator: can

57GD Acquisition of property
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.194
curation status: Proposed
has part: 57GD(1) Acquisition of property
has part: 57GD(2) Acquisition of property
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57gd
schema version: 2

57GD(1) Acquisition of property
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.194
note: Defines scope of section 57GD(1)
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gd-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57gd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 57GD Acquisition of property

57GD(2) Acquisition of property
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.194
note: No effect if acquisition of property occurs on just terms
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gd-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gd-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gd-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gd-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57gd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 57GD Acquisition of property

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...from a person otherwise than on just terms (within the meaning of that paragraph).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between provision and acquisition of property
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) The provision has no effect to the extent (if any) to which its operation would result in the acquisition of property...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gd-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...from a person otherwise than on just terms (within the meaning of that paragraph).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of provision's effect on acquisition of property
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (2) The provision has no effect to the extent (if any) to which its operation would result in the acquisition of property...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...from a person otherwise than on just terms (within the meaning of that paragraph).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits effect if acquisition of property occurs on just terms
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) The provision has no effect to the extent (if any) to which its operation would result in the acquisition of property...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gd-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...from a person otherwise than on just terms (within the meaning of that paragraph).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusing effect of provision to acquisition of property
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (2) The provision has no effect to the extent (if any) to which its operation would result in the acquisition of property...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gd-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...from a person otherwise than on just terms (within the meaning of that paragraph).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Repeating pattern between provision and acquisition of property
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (2) The provision has no effect to the extent (if any) to which its operation would result in the acquisition of property...

57GE Scheme rules
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.195
curation status: Proposed
has part: 57GE(1) Scheme rules
has part: 57GE(2) Scheme rules
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57ge
schema version: 2

57GE(1) Scheme rules
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.195
note: Minister may make rules by legislative instrument.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ge-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ge-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57ge-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 57GE Scheme rules

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ge-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to make rules
modality: Deontic
operator: May

57GE(2) Scheme rules
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.195
note: Rules cannot create an offence, civil penalty, or impose certain powers.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ge-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ge-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ge-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57ge-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 57GE Scheme rules

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ge-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The rules are restricted to specific temporal intervals.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal restrictions on rule application
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: (2) To avoid doubt, the rules may not...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ge-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The rules cannot create an offence or civil penalty.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (2) To avoid doubt, the rules may not...

58AA Object of this Part
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.196
note: Prevent and respond to scams impacting natural persons in Australia or those who carry on small businesses in Australia.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58aa-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58aa-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58aa
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to prevent and respond to scams
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58aa-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58AA Object of this Part

58AB Simplified outline of this Part
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.196
note: Framework requirements for service providers in selected sectors of the economy to combat scams.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ab-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ab
schema version: 2

58AC Regulated sectors subject to the Scams Prevention Framework
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.197
note: Designation of regulated sectors by the Minister.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ac-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ac
schema version: 2

58AD Regulated entities for regulated sectors and their regulated
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.198
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58AD(1) Regulated entities for regulated sectors and their regulated
has part: 58AD(2) Regulated entities for regulated sectors and their regulated
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ad
schema version: 2

58AD(1) Regulated entities for regulated sectors and their regulated
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.198
note: A regulated entity for a sector includes a business or service covered by paragraph 58AC(2)(a), (b) or (c).
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ad-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58AD Regulated entities for regulated sectors and their regulated

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Regulated entity for the sector
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Business or service covered by paragraph 58AC(2)(a), (b) or (c)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to be a regulated entity
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: Person who carries on or provides that business or service is a regulated entity for the sector

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to provide a regulated service
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: That business or service is a regulated service of the regulated entity for the sector

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Regulated entity for the sector
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Regulated sector includes a business or service

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58AD(1) Regulated entities for regulated sectors and their regulated

58AD(2) Regulated entities for regulated sectors and their regulated
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.198
note: List of regulated entities and their services for a regulated sector
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ad-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58AD Regulated entities for regulated sectors and their regulated

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
premise text: (a) carrying on or providing a business or service that is part of the regulated sector; and (b) acting using a postal, telegraphic, telephonic or other like service so much of that business or service as relates to the person acting in that way.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of regulated entity
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: a corporation that carries on or provides a business or service that is part of the regulated sector that business or service.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of person acting in a way
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: a person to the extent that the person is both (a) carrying on or providing a business or service that is part of the regulated sector; and (b) acting using a postal, telegraphic, telephonic or other like service so much of that business or service as relates to the person acting in that way.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of trade or commerce
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: a kind of trade or commerce mentioned in subsection (3)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Other regulated entities, and their regulated services, for the regulated sector

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58AD(2) Regulated entities for regulated sectors and their regulated

58AE Minister must consider matters, and consult, before
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.201
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58AE(1) Minister must consider matters, and consult, before
has part: 58AE(2) Minister must consider matters, and consult, before
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ae
schema version: 2

58AE(1) Minister must consider matters, and consult, before
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.201
note: Minister must consider matters and consult before making an instrument about a sector of the economy.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ae-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58AE Minister must consider matters, and consult, before

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must consider matters and consult.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) Before making an instrument under subsection 58AC(1) about a sector of the economy, the Minister must:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must consult businesses or services making up the sector.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (b) Consult the businesses or services making up the sector, or such associations or other bodies representing them as the Minister thinks appropriate;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must consult persons who would be SPF consumers of regulated services for the sector.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (c) Consult such associations or other bodies representing the persons referred to in subparagraph (a)(iii) as the Minister thinks appropriate.

58AE(2) Minister must consider matters, and consult, before
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.201
note: Minister must consider matters and consult before taking action.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ae-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58AE Minister must consider matters, and consult, before

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for consideration and consultation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (2) A failure to comply with subsection (1) does not invalidate an instrument made under subsection 58AC(1).

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Consultation implies consideration.
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (2) A failure to comply with subsection (1) does not invalidate an instrument made under subsection 58AC(1).

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence relevant.
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
premise text: (2) A failure to comply with subsection (1) does not invalidate an instrument made under subsection 58AC(1).

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider matters and consult.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) A failure to comply with subsection (1) does not invalidate an instrument made under subsection 58AC(1).

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information relevant.
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
premise text: (2) A failure to comply with subsection (1) does not invalidate an instrument made under subsection 58AC(1).

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58AE(2) Minister must consider matters, and consult, before

58AF Delegation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.201
note: Delegation of power to another Minister
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58af-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58af
schema version: 2

58AG Meaning of scam
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.202
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58AG(1) Meaning of scam
has part: 58AG(2) Meaning of scam
has part: 58AG(3) Meaning of scam
has part: 58AG(4) Meaning of scam
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ag
schema version: 2

58AG(1) Meaning of scam
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.202
note: Definition of scam
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ag-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ag-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ag-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58AG Meaning of scam

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ag-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a scam is defined
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of a scam is provided
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (1) A scam is a direct or indirect attempt (whether or not successful)...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ag-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58AG(1) Meaning of scam

58AG(2) Meaning of scam
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.202
note: Deception in attempt to scam
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ag-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ag-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ag-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58AG Meaning of scam

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ag-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulated service
modality: Deontic
operator: >
premise text: (2) The attempt involves deception if the attempt:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ag-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58AG(2) Meaning of scam

58AG(3) Meaning of scam
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.202
note: The attempt may be a single act or a course of conduct.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ag-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ag-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58AG Meaning of scam

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ag-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58AG(3) Meaning of scam

58AG(4) Meaning of scam
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.202
note: The attempt is not a scam if it meets the SPF rules.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ag-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ag-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 58AG Meaning of scam

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ag-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58AG(4) Meaning of scam

58AH Meaning of SPF consumer
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.202
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58AH(1) Meaning of SPF consumer
has part: 58AH(2) Meaning of SPF consumer
has part: 58AH(3) Meaning of SPF consumer
has part: 58AH(4) Meaning of SPF consumer
has part: 58AH(5) Meaning of SPF consumer
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ah
schema version: 2

58AH(1) Meaning of SPF consumer
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.202
note: Defines who is considered an SPF consumer.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ah-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58AH Meaning of SPF consumer

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision applies to consumers within Australia and those provided services outside Australia by a regulated entity.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of the obligation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
premise text: (1) An SPF consumer, of a regulated service, is any of the following:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision relies on the definition of an SPF consumer to establish the scope of the obligation.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Establishes the basis for the obligation.
modality: Argumentation
operator: =
premise text: (1) An SPF consumer, of a regulated service, is any of the following:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision uses clear and concise language to define who must be considered an SPF consumer.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes how the obligation is processed.
modality: CogAI
operator: =
premise text: (1) An SPF consumer, of a regulated service, is any of the following:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision defines who must be considered an SPF consumer.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes the scope of the obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (1) An SPF consumer, of a regulated service, is any of the following:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision explicitly states who must be considered an SPF consumer.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes how the obligation is communicated.
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
premise text: (1) An SPF consumer, of a regulated service, is any of the following:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58AH(1) Meaning of SPF consumer

58AH(2) Meaning of SPF consumer
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.202
note: Residency requirements for SPF consumer
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ah-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58AH Meaning of SPF consumer

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58AH(2) Meaning of SPF consumer

58AH(3) Meaning of SPF consumer
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.202
note: Regulated service provision to a person is included in the meaning of SPF consumer.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ah-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58AH Meaning of SPF consumer

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion relation
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (3) Subsection (1) includes the provision or purported provision of a regulated service:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Substantial inclusion
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: substantially
premise text: (3) Subsection (1) includes the provision or purported provision of a regulated service:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58AH(3) Meaning of SPF consumer

58AH(4) Meaning of SPF consumer
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.202
note: Person is not an SPF consumer if a condition applies to them.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ah-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 58AH Meaning of SPF consumer

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Not an SPF consumer
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (4)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58AH(4) Meaning of SPF consumer

58AH(5) Meaning of SPF consumer
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.202
note: Defines annual turnover for SPF consumer
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ah-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 58AH Meaning of SPF consumer

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: annual turnover for SPF consumer
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

58AI Meaning of actionable scam intelligence
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.204
note: Identify or have actionable scam intelligence if there are reasonable grounds to suspect a communication, transaction, or activity is a scam.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ai-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ai-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ai
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ai-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity must identify or have actionable scam intelligence.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

58AJ Extension to external Territories and outside of Australia
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.205
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58AJ(1) Extension to external Territories and outside of Australia
has part: 58AJ(2) Extension to external Territories and outside of Australia
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58aj
schema version: 2

58AJ(1) Extension to external Territories and outside of Australia
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.205
note: Extends provisions of this Part to external Territories and outside Australia.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58aj-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58aj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58aj-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58AJ Extension to external Territories and outside of Australia

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58aj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Extends provisions of this Part to external Territories and outside Australia.
modality: Deontic
operator: extends

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58aj-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58AJ(1) Extension to external Territories and outside of Australia

58AJ(2) Extension to external Territories and outside of Australia
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.205
note: Extension of SPF provisions to acts outside Australia
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58aj-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58aj-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58AJ Extension to external Territories and outside of Australia

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58aj-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58AJ(2) Extension to external Territories and outside of Australia

58AK Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of regulated entities
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.205
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58AK(1) Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of regulated entities
has part: 58AK(2) Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of regulated entities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ak
schema version: 2

58AK(1) Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of regulated entities
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.205
note: Section applies SPF provisions to regulated entities in a corresponding way.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ak-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ak-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ak-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58AK Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of regulated entities

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ak-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section applies to regulated entities.
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability

58AK(2) Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of regulated entities
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.205
note: Regulated entities' agents must comply with SPF provisions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ak-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ak-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ak-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58AK Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of regulated entities

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ak-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Regulated entities' agents must comply with SPF provisions.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ak-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58AK(2) Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of regulated entities

58BA Simplified outline of this Division
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.207
note: Each regulated entity must comply with the Scams Prevention Framework principles.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ba-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ba-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ba
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ba-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulated entities must comply with the framework.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ba-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58BA Simplified outline of this Division

58BB Meaning of reasonable steps
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.207
note: Matters relevant to determining reasonable steps for regulated entities
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bb-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bb
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bb-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58BB Meaning of reasonable steps

58BC Simplified outline of this Subdivision
type: Concept
description: Records of compliance, annual certification by senior officer
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.208
note: Governance policies and procedures must be implemented and reviewed annually.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bc-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bc-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bc
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulated entity must implement governance policies and procedures.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

58BD Documenting and implementing governance policies and
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.208
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58BD(1) Documenting and implementing governance policies and
has part: 58BD(2) Documenting and implementing governance policies and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bd
schema version: 2

58BD(1) Documenting and implementing governance policies and
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.208
note: Document governance policies and procedures about scams prevention, implement them, and develop performance metrics.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bd-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58BD Documenting and implementing governance policies and

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity must document and implement governance policies.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

58BD(2) Documenting and implementing governance policies and
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.208
note: Civil penalty provision
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bd-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bd-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58BD Documenting and implementing governance policies and

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies a civil penalty provision
modality: Deontic
operator: is

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bd-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies as a principle for section 58FJ
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has subclass

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58BD(2) Documenting and implementing governance policies and

58BE Annual certification about SPF governance policies,
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.209
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58BE(1) Annual certification about SPF governance policies,
has part: 58BE(2) Annual certification about SPF governance policies,
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58be
schema version: 2

58BE(1) Annual certification about SPF governance policies,
type: Concept
description: Certification from senior officer within 12 months or 7 days after each 12-month anniversary
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.209
note: Annual certification about SPF governance policies is required.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58be-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58be-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58be-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58BE Annual certification about SPF governance policies,

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58be-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulated entity must provide certification
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

58BE(2) Annual certification about SPF governance policies,
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.209
note: Annual certification about SPF governance policies is a civil penalty provision.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58be-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58be-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58be-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58be-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58BE Annual certification about SPF governance policies,

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58be-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Subsection (1) is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (2)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58be-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subsection (1) has the class of a civil penalty provision.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass
premise text: (2)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58be-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58BE(2) Annual certification about SPF governance policies,

58BF Record keeping of compliance with SPF provisions—civil
type: Concept
description: Records of SPF governance policies, procedures, metrics and targets
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.209
note: Failure to keep records of material information for at least 6 years after activity
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bf-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bf-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bf
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bf-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulated entity has an obligation to keep records
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

58BG Reporting about compliance with this Subdivision—civil
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.210
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58BG(1) Reporting about compliance with this Subdivision—civil
has part: 58BG(2) Reporting about compliance with this Subdivision—civil
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bg
schema version: 2

58BG(1) Reporting about compliance with this Subdivision—civil
type: Concept
description: Records requested by the SPF general regulator or sector regulator
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.210
note: Failure to comply with written request for records within 10 business days or longer period allowed by regulator.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bg-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bg-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58BG Reporting about compliance with this Subdivision—civil

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of non-compliance with written request for records
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bg-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58BG(1) Reporting about compliance with this Subdivision—civil

58BG(2) Reporting about compliance with this Subdivision—civil
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.210
note: Reporting about compliance with this Subdivision—civil
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bg-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bg-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bg-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58BG Reporting about compliance with this Subdivision—civil

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reporting obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: has

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bg-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of subsection (1)
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58BG(2) Reporting about compliance with this Subdivision—civil

58BH Sector-specific details can be set out in SPF codes
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.211
note: Regulated entity must include sector-specific provisions in governance policies and procedures.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bh-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bh-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bh
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bh-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulated entity must include sector-specific provisions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bh-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58BH Sector-specific details can be set out in SPF codes

58BI Simplified outline of this Subdivision
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.211
note: Take reasonable steps to prevent scams
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bi-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bi-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bi
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bi-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Take reasonable steps to prevent scams
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to take action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: sector-specific provisions for this principle

58BJ Taking reasonable steps to prevent scams from being
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.211
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58BJ(1) Taking reasonable steps to prevent scams from being
has part: 58BJ(2) Taking reasonable steps to prevent scams from being
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bj
schema version: 2

58BJ(1) Taking reasonable steps to prevent scams from being
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.211
note: Failing to prevent scams from being committed
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bj-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bj-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58BJ Taking reasonable steps to prevent scams from being

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Failure to do so is a contravention
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to prevent scams
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: Regulated entity must take reasonable steps

58BJ(2) Taking reasonable steps to prevent scams from being
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.211
note: Taking reasonable steps to prevent scams from being
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bj-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bj-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58BJ Taking reasonable steps to prevent scams from being

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bj-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58BJ(2) Taking reasonable steps to prevent scams from being

58BK Further detail about certain concepts
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.212
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58BK(1) Further detail about certain concepts
has part: 58BK(2) Further detail about certain concepts
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bk
schema version: 2

58BK(1) Further detail about certain concepts
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.212
note: Requires regulated entities to take reasonable steps beyond actionable scam intelligence.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bk-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bk-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58BK Further detail about certain concepts

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bk-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58BK(1) Further detail about certain concepts

58BK(2) Further detail about certain concepts
type: Concept
description: Information about scams to identified consumers
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.212
note: Identify SPF consumers at risk of being targeted by a scam
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bk-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bk-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58BK Further detail about certain concepts

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to identify SPF consumers
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

58BL Simplified outline of this Subdivision
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.212
note: Must take reasonable steps to detect scams
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bl-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bl-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bl-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bl-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bl-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bl-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bl-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bl
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bl-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must take reasonable steps to detect scams within a timely way
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval: Must take reasonable steps to detect scams within a timely way
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Timely way is a temporal interval

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bl-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Identifying consumers impacted by scams may be implied by investigating activities
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Investigating activities may imply identifying consumers impacted by scams
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: Investigating activities implies taking action

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bl-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Scam detection is an AI application
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Scam detection is a type of artificial intelligence application
modality: CogAI
operator: IS-A
premise text: Artificial intelligence applications are used for scam detection

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bl-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must take reasonable steps to detect scams
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to take action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Regulated entity for a regulated sector must detect scams

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bl-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Scam detection is an obligation for regulated entities
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy: Obligation -> Action -> Scam Detection
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS-A
premise text: Scam detection is a type of action

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bl-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Regulated entity must detect scams and identify impacted consumers
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Multiple obligations: Regulated entity must detect scams and identify impacted consumers
modality: Diffusion
operator: AND
premise text: Regulated entity has multiple obligations

58BM Taking reasonable steps to detect scams—civil penalty
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.213
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58BM(1) Taking reasonable steps to detect scams—civil penalty
has part: 58BM(2) Taking reasonable steps to detect scams—civil penalty
has part: 58BM(3) Taking reasonable steps to detect scams—civil penalty
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bm
schema version: 2

58BM(1) Taking reasonable steps to detect scams—civil penalty
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.213
note: Failing to take reasonable steps to detect scams is a contravention.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bm-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bm-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58BM Taking reasonable steps to detect scams—civil penalty

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Failure to do so is a contravention
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to take reasonable steps
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Regulated entity must take reasonable steps

58BM(2) Taking reasonable steps to detect scams—civil penalty
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.213
note: Civil penalty for taking reasonable steps to detect scams
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bm-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bm-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bm-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58BM Taking reasonable steps to detect scams—civil penalty

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (1) is a civil penalty provision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation on the state
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: Section 58FJ (about civil penalties)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bm-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (1) is a civil penalty provision of an SPF principle
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of subsection (1)
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
premise text: SPF principle for the purposes of section 58FJ

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bm-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58BM(2) Taking reasonable steps to detect scams—civil penalty

58BM(3) Taking reasonable steps to detect scams—civil penalty
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.213
note: Fails to take reasonable steps to detect scams
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bm-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bm-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bm-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bm-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58BM Taking reasonable steps to detect scams—civil penalty

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bm-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The obligation applies within a specific time frame.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The obligation applies within a specific time frame
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: The obligation to take reasonable steps to detect scams applies within a specific time frame.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The regulated entity fails to take reasonable steps to detect scams.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Failure to perform an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Fail
premise text: Taking reasonable steps to detect scams is an obligation.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bm-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The obligation is recurring.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The obligation is recurring
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: The regulated entity must take reasonable steps to detect scams repeatedly.

58BN Investigating actionable scam intelligence—civil penalty
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.213
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58BN(1) Investigating actionable scam intelligence—civil penalty
has part: 58BN(2) Investigating actionable scam intelligence—civil penalty
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bn
schema version: 2

58BN(1) Investigating actionable scam intelligence—civil penalty
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.213
note: Failing to investigate actionable scam intelligence within a 28-day period is an obligation.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bn-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bn-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58BN Investigating actionable scam intelligence—civil penalty

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Fails to investigate within 28-day period
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to investigate
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: Regulated entity has actionable scam intelligence

58BN(2) Investigating actionable scam intelligence—civil penalty
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.213
note: Civil penalty provision
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bn-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bn-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bn-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58BN Investigating actionable scam intelligence—civil penalty

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (1) is a civil penalty provision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies a civil penalty provision
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is a civil penalty provision.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bn-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (1) is a civil penalty provision of an SPF principle for the purposes of section 58FJ.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Identifies a principle for the purposes of section 58FJ
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is a civil penalty provision of an SPF principle for the purposes of section 58FJ.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bn-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58BN(2) Investigating actionable scam intelligence—civil penalty

58BO Identifying impacted SPF consumers—civil penalty provision
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.213
note: Civil penalty for contravening subsection
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bo-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bo-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bo
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bo-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits regulated entity from contravening subsection
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

58BP Sector-specific details can be set out in SPF codes
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.214
note: Regulated sector may include sector-specific provisions describing reasonable steps and time.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bp-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bp-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bp
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bp-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...sector-specific provisions describing...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes sector-specific provisions
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: SPF code for a regulated sector may include...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bp-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58BP Sector-specific details can be set out in SPF codes

58BQ Simplified outline of this Subdivision
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.214
note: Must provide reports on actionable intelligence and scams to SPF regulators.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bq-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bq-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bq
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bq-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide reports
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

58BR Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.215
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58BR(1) Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—
has part: 58BR(2) Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—
has part: 58BR(3) Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—
has part: 58BR(4) Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—
has part: 58BR(5) Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58br
schema version: 2

58BR(1) Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.215
note: Reporting of actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators is required.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58br-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58BR Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory reporting
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

58BR(2) Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—
type: Concept
description: True
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.215
note: Entity must report actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulator within prescribed period and manner.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58br-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58BR Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity must report actionable scam intelligence.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58BR(2) Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—

58BR(3) Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.215
note: Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58br-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58BR Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 58FJ
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subsection (2) is a civil penalty provision
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS OF
premise text: SPF principle

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58BR(3) Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—

58BR(4) Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.215
note: Entity exempt from reporting if circumstances apply
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58br-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 58BR Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58BR(4) Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—

58BR(5) Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—
type: Concept
description: report, sources/evidence
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.215
note: Reporting requirements for actionable scam intelligence
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58br-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 58BR Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reporting requirement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58BR(5) Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—

58BS Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.216
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58BS(1) Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
has part: 58BS(2) Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
has part: 58BS(3) Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
has part: 58BS(4) Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
has part: 58BS(5) Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
has part: 58BS(6) Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bs
schema version: 2

58BS(1) Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.216
note: Regulated entity must provide report to SPF regulator upon request.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bs-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58BS Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulated entity must provide report.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58BS(1) Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions

58BS(2) Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.216
note: Entity must report scam information to SPF regulator within specified period and manner.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bs-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58BS Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity must report scam information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58BS(2) Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions

58BS(3) Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.216
note: Civil penalty provision for reporting scams to SPF regulators
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-3-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bs-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58BS Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (2) occurs during the application of section 58FJ.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between subsection (2) and section 58FJ
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: It applies to section 58FJ about civil penalties.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-3-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (2) implies that reporting scams to SPF regulators is necessary.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Establishes a logical connection between subsection (2) and reporting scams to SPF regulators
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: Reporting scams to SPF regulators is required by law.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (2) is a rule for artificial intelligence systems.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes the artificial intelligence aspect of subsection (2)
modality: CogAI
operator: is
premise text: This provision is part of an SPF principle.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: It is an obligation to report scams to SPF regulators.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies a civil penalty provision
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: Subsection (2) is a civil penalty provision.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (2) is a principle for section 58FJ.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies subsection (2) as a principle for section 58FJ
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
premise text: This means subsection (2) is a civil penalty provision of an SPF principle.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (2) applies to all cases where a scam is reported to SPF regulators.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Identifies the scope of subsection (2)
modality: Diffusion
operator: is
premise text: This applies to all cases where a scam is reported to SPF regulators.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58BS(3) Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions

58BS(4) Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
type: Concept
description: true
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.216
note: Request for report format and content
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bs-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 58BS Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: true
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Request for report format and content
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

58BS(5) Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.216
note: Entity must de-identify personal information unless SPF regulator believes it's necessary.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bs-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 58BS Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity must de-identify personal information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58BS(5) Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions

58BS(6) Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
type: Concept
description: True
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.216
note: A regulated entity must provide a later scam report that references an earlier report to another SPF regulator.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-6-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bs-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 58BS Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The later scam report is related in time to the earlier scam report.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (b) another SPF regulator later requests a scam report under this section from the regulated entity about the same matters;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-6-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: The regulated entity's obligation to provide the later scam report implies that it must state the earlier scam report.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (a) a regulated entity gives a scam report to an SPF regulator under this section;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The regulated entity's obligation to provide the later scam report is inferred from its earlier action.
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: (a) a regulated entity gives a scam report to an SPF regulator under this section;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The regulated entity must provide the later scam report.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The obligation to provide the later scam report is propagated from the first-mentioned SPF regulator.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (b) another SPF regulator later requests a scam report under this section from the regulated entity about the same matters;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58BS(6) Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions

58BT Authorised third party data gateways, portals or websites for
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.217
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58BT(1) Authorised third party data gateways, portals or websites for
has part: 58BT(2) Authorised third party data gateways, portals or websites for
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bt
schema version: 2

58BT(1) Authorised third party data gateways, portals or websites for
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.217
note: Authorises third parties to operate data gateways, portals or websites.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bt-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bt-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58BT Authorised third party data gateways, portals or websites for

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bt-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58BT(1) Authorised third party data gateways, portals or websites for

58BT(2) Authorised third party data gateways, portals or websites for
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.217
note: Authorisation criteria and conditions for SPF general regulator
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bt-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bt-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bt-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58BT Authorised third party data gateways, portals or websites for

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bt-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Risk-based authorisation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <>
premise text: Provisions providing that authorisations may be granted at different levels corresponding to different risks

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bt-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58BT(2) Authorised third party data gateways, portals or websites for

58BU Relationship with other duties and obligations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.218
note: Duty of confidence is overridden by conflicting obligations.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bu-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bu-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bu
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bu-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Conflicting obligation takes precedence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation override
modality: Deontic
operator: overriddenBy
premise text: Duty of confidence

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bu-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58BU Relationship with other duties and obligations

58BV SPF general regulator may share information relating to
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.218
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58BV(1) SPF general regulator may share information relating to
has part: 58BV(2) SPF general regulator may share information relating to
has part: 58BV(3) SPF general regulator may share information relating to
has part: 58BV(4) SPF general regulator may share information relating to
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bv
schema version: 2

58BV(1) SPF general regulator may share information relating to
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.218
note: Disclosure of information relating to scamming actions is prohibited.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-1-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bv-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58BV SPF general regulator may share information relating to

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between disclosure and de-identification
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: Note 1: This includes disclosing SPF personal information, but such information may first need to be de-identified (see subsection (4))

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-1-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Construction of knowledge graph about disclosure and de-identification
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge graph construction
premise text: Note 1: This includes disclosing SPF personal information, but such information may first need to be de-identified (see subsection (4))

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: to an entity mentioned in subsection (2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: SPF general regulator may disclose information

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: see subsection (4)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of information as personal or non-personal
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: This includes disclosing SPF personal information, but such information may first need to be de-identified

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of information about disclosure and de-identification
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread of information
premise text: Note 1: This includes disclosing SPF personal information, but such information may first need to be de-identified (see subsection (4))

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of disclosure and de-identification
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: Note 1: This includes disclosing SPF personal information, but such information may first need to be de-identified (see subsection (4))

58BV(2) SPF general regulator may share information relating to
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.218
note: Entities that may share information relating to SPF general regulator
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bv-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58BV SPF general regulator may share information relating to

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to share
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Sharing obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: shares
premise text: Entities may share information

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58BV(2) SPF general regulator may share information relating to

58BV(3) SPF general regulator may share information relating to
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.218
note: SPF general regulator may share information relating to a foreign agency if certain conditions are met.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bv-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58BV SPF general regulator may share information relating to

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The agency is obligated to control the storage and handling of the information.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligates

58BV(4) SPF general regulator may share information relating to
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.218
note: Disclosure of personal information under certain conditions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bv-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 58BV SPF general regulator may share information relating to

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure of personal information must be made under subsection (1) unless de-identification is deemed necessary.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to disclose personal information under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: SPF general regulator may share information relating to SPF personal information.

58BW Simplified outline of this Subdivision
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.220
note: Must take reasonable steps to disrupt scam activities and prevent losses.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bw-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bw-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bw
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bw-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to take action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

58BX Taking reasonable steps to disrupt activities that are the
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.220
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58BX(1) Taking reasonable steps to disrupt activities that are the
has part: 58BX(2) Taking reasonable steps to disrupt activities that are the
has part: 58BX(3) Taking reasonable steps to disrupt activities that are the
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bx
schema version: 2

58BX(1) Taking reasonable steps to disrupt activities that are the
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.220
note: Failing to disrupt or prevent loss from scam activity is an obligation.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bx-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58BX Taking reasonable steps to disrupt activities that are the

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Failing to act is a contravention.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to disrupt or prevent loss from scam activity.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: Regulated entity has actionable scam intelligence.

58BX(2) Taking reasonable steps to disrupt activities that are the
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.220
note: Disrupt activities that are the subject of a civil penalty provision.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-2-logic-shacl-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bx-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58BX Taking reasonable steps to disrupt activities that are the

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Disrupts activities that are the subject of a civil penalty provision at a reasonable time.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Disruption
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is a civil penalty provision.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Disrupts activities that are the subject of a civil penalty provision in a reasonable manner.
modality: CogAI
operator: Reasonable Disruption
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is a civil penalty provision.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits activities that are the subject of a civil penalty provision.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is a civil penalty provision.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies subsection (1) as a civil penalty provision.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: This means subsection (1) is a civil penalty provision of an SPF principle for the purposes of section 58FJ.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Disrupts activities that are the subject of a civil penalty provision repeatedly.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Disruption
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is a civil penalty provision.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-2-logic-shacl-6
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validates that the disruption of activities is reasonable.
modality: SHACL
operator: Validate Disruption
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is a civil penalty provision.

58BX(3) Taking reasonable steps to disrupt activities that are the
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.220
note: Taking reasonable steps to disrupt activities that are the actionable scam intelligence.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bx-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58BX Taking reasonable steps to disrupt activities that are the

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Take proportionate steps
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Should take reasonable steps
modality: Deontic
operator: should
premise text: The entity has actionable scam intelligence

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58BX(3) Taking reasonable steps to disrupt activities that are the

58BY Reporting about the outcomes of investigations of activities
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.221
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58BY(1) Reporting about the outcomes of investigations of activities
has part: 58BY(2) Reporting about the outcomes of investigations of activities
has part: 58BY(3) Reporting about the outcomes of investigations of activities
has part: 58BY(4) Reporting about the outcomes of investigations of activities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58by
schema version: 2

58BY(1) Reporting about the outcomes of investigations of activities
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.221
note: Reporting about outcomes of investigations of activities related to regulated services
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58by-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58by-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58by-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58BY Reporting about the outcomes of investigations of activities

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58by-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reporting obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

58BY(2) Reporting about the outcomes of investigations of activities
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.221
note: Entity must report actionable scam intelligence to SPF general regulator within prescribed timeframe and format.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58by-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58by-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58by-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58BY Reporting about the outcomes of investigations of activities

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58by-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity must report actionable scam intelligence.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58by-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58BY(2) Reporting about the outcomes of investigations of activities

58BY(3) Reporting about the outcomes of investigations of activities
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.221
note: Reporting about investigation outcomes is a civil penalty provision.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58by-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58by-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58by-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58by-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58BY Reporting about the outcomes of investigations of activities

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58by-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must report investigation outcomes.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58by-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subsection (2) is a civil penalty provision.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS OF

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58by-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58BY(3) Reporting about the outcomes of investigations of activities

58BY(4) Reporting about the outcomes of investigations of activities
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.221
note: Rules for reporting outcomes of investigations
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58by-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58by-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58by-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 58BY Reporting about the outcomes of investigations of activities

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58by-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the SPF rules may prescribe
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reporting obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (4) For the purposes of (but without limiting) subsection (2)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58by-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58BY(4) Reporting about the outcomes of investigations of activities

58BZ Sector-specific details can be set out in SPF codes
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.222
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58BZ(1) Sector-specific details can be set out in SPF codes
has part: 58BZ(2) Sector-specific details can be set out in SPF codes
has part: 58BZ(3) Sector-specific details can be set out in SPF codes
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bz
schema version: 2

58BZ(1) Sector-specific details can be set out in SPF codes
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.222
note: Regulated entities must have actionable scam intelligence about certain activities.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bz-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bz-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58BZ Sector-specific details can be set out in SPF codes

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulated entities must have actionable scam intelligence.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

58BZ(2) Sector-specific details can be set out in SPF codes
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.222
note: The regulated entity is not liable for taking action to disrupt an activity if it is taken in good faith, compliance with SPF provisions, and proportionate to the activity.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bz-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bz-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bz-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bz-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bz-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58BZ Sector-specific details can be set out in SPF codes

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bz-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The action must end before 28 days after the entity reasonably believes that the activity is or is not a scam.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The action must be taken during the period when the intelligence becomes actionable scam intelligence for the entity.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The action must start on the day that the intelligence becomes actionable scam intelligence for the entity.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The regulated entity is not liable.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The regulated entity has an obligation not to be liable for taking action to disrupt an activity.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The action must be taken in good faith, compliance with SPF provisions, and proportionate to the activity.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bz-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The regulated entity has permission to take action to disrupt an activity.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The regulated entity has permission to take action to disrupt an activity if it is taken in good faith, compliance with SPF provisions, and proportionate to the activity.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: The action must be taken in good faith, compliance with SPF provisions, and proportionate to the activity.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bz-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The action must be reversed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The action must be promptly reversed if the entity identifies that the activity is not a scam.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: The entity identifies that the activity is not a scam.

58BZ(3) Sector-specific details can be set out in SPF codes
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.222
note: Must have an accessible mechanism for consumers to report scams and a transparent internal dispute resolution mechanism.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bz-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bz-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58bz-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58BZ Sector-specific details can be set out in SPF codes

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bz-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must have an accessible mechanism for consumers to report scams and a transparent internal dispute resolution mechanism.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

58CA Simplified outline of this Division
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.230
note: Minister may make code for regulated sector with sector-specific provisions based on Scams Prevention Framework principles.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ca-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ca-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ca
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ca-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Code implementation starts now
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for code implementation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Minister may make code

58CB Sector-specific codes (SPF codes)
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.230
note: The Minister may make a code for a regulated sector.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cb-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58cb
schema version: 2

58CC Content of SPF codes
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.230
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58CC(1) Content of SPF codes
has part: 58CC(2) Content of SPF codes
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58cc
schema version: 2

58CC(1) Content of SPF codes
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.230
note: SPF code must be consistent with SPF principles and deal with specific themes or matters.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cc-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58cc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58CC Content of SPF codes

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: SPF code must be consistent with SPF principles.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58CC(1) Content of SPF codes

58CC(2) Content of SPF codes
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.230
note: Regulated sector may include specific provisions regarding services, consumers, and requirements.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cc-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cc-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cc-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cc-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cc-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58cc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58CC Content of SPF codes

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cc-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Provisions regarding services and consumers from a certain point in time
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Includes provisions for specific dates or periods
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (2) Without limiting subparagraph (1)(b)(ii), an SPF code for a regulated sector may include the following:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cc-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The regulator has power to enforce provisions regarding services and consumers
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Grants powers to the regulator or another person
modality: CogAI
operator: has power
premise text: (d) a provision that: (i) confers powers on the SPF sector regulator for the sector or on another person; or

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Provisions regarding services and consumers
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes specific provisions
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (2) Without limiting subparagraph (1)(b)(ii), an SPF code for a regulated sector may include the following:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cc-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: All regulated entities must comply with provisions regarding services and consumers
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Applies to all regulated entities
modality: LTL
operator: for all
premise text: (2) Without limiting subparagraph (1)(b)(ii), an SPF code for a regulated sector may include the following:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cc-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Specific requirements must be met for exercising powers under the SPF code
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validates specific requirements
modality: SHACL
operator: validates
premise text: (f) provisions about the manner or form in which persons or bodies: (i) may exercise powers under the SPF code; or

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58CC(2) Content of SPF codes

58CD Delegation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.232
note: Delegation of power under section 58CB
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cd-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58cd
schema version: 2

58DA Simplified outline of this Division
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.234
note: Authorise external dispute resolution schemes for consumer complaints about scams.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58da-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58da-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58da
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58da-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorise external dispute resolution schemes for consumer complaints about scams.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

58DB Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.234
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58DB(1) Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes
has part: 58DB(2) Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes
has part: 58DB(3) Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes
has part: 58DB(4) Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes
has part: 58DB(5) Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58db
schema version: 2

58DB(1) Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.234
note: Authorise external dispute resolution schemes
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58db-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58db-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58db-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58DB Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58db-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission to authorise external dispute resolution schemes
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: The Minister may, by legislative instrument...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58db-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58DB(1) Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes

58DB(2) Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.234
note: Minister must consider certain factors before authorizing an external dispute resolution scheme.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58db-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58db-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58db-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58db-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58DB Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58db-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The Minister must consider factors within a certain timeframe.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (2) Before authorising a scheme, the Minister...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58db-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must consider certain factors.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) Before authorising a scheme, the Minister...

58DB(3) Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.234
note: Authorisation of external dispute resolution schemes may be subject to conditions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58db-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58db-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58db-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58DB Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58db-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to authorise external dispute resolution schemes.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

58DB(4) Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.234
note: Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58db-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58db-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 58DB Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes

58DB(5) Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.234
note: Authorise multiple external dispute resolution schemes
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58db-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58db-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58db-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 58DB Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58db-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission to authorise schemes
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow

58DC Content, including requirements, of a scheme that is not
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.235
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58DC(1) Content, including requirements, of a scheme that is not
has part: 58DC(2) Content, including requirements, of a scheme that is not
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58dc
schema version: 2

58DC(1) Content, including requirements, of a scheme that is not
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.235
note: Requirements for a scheme that is not exempt from the SPF rules
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dc-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dc-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dc-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58dc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58DC Content, including requirements, of a scheme that is not

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dc-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...requirements for how the scheme is to operate:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires organisational requirements for membership of the scheme
modality: AllenInterval
operator: requires
premise text: (a) organisational requirements for membership of the scheme;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...requirements for a scheme that is not exempt from the SPF rules
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires a scheme to meet certain standards
modality: Deontic
operator: prescribes
premise text: (1) The SPF rules may prescribe...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dc-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...requirements for making changes to the scheme
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Requires requirements for making changes to the scheme
modality: LTL
operator: requires
premise text: (e) requirements for making changes to the scheme.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58DC(1) Content, including requirements, of a scheme that is not

58DC(2) Content, including requirements, of a scheme that is not
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.235
note: Provisions for powers under the scheme
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dc-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58dc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58DC Content, including requirements, of a scheme that is not

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58DC(2) Content, including requirements, of a scheme that is not

58DD Scheme operator to report to SPF regulators
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.236
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58DD(1) Scheme operator to report to SPF regulators
has part: 58DD(2) Scheme operator to report to SPF regulators
has part: 58DD(3) Scheme operator to report to SPF regulators
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58dd
schema version: 2

58DD(1) Scheme operator to report to SPF regulators
type: Concept
description: particulars of the contravention, failure or issue
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.236
note: Operator must report to regulators on serious contraventions, failures, or systemic issues
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dd-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58dd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58DD Scheme operator to report to SPF regulators

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: report particulars of contravention, failure or issue
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Operator has a duty to report
modality: Deontic
operator: must

58DD(2) Scheme operator to report to SPF regulators
type: Concept
description: De-identifying any SPF personal information
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.236
note: Operator must report settlement particulars to SPF regulators
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dd-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58dd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58DD Scheme operator to report to SPF regulators

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: De-identifying any SPF personal information
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Operator must report settlement particulars to SPF regulators
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

58DD(3) Scheme operator to report to SPF regulators
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.236
note: Operator must de-identify SPF personal information unless reasonable belief that doing so would not achieve object of Part.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dd-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58dd-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58DD Scheme operator to report to SPF regulators

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory action
modality: Deontic
operator: must

58DE Disclosing information to the operator of an SPF EDR scheme
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.237
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58DE(1) Disclosing information to the operator of an SPF EDR scheme
has part: 58DE(2) Disclosing information to the operator of an SPF EDR scheme
has part: 58DE(3) Disclosing information to the operator of an SPF EDR scheme
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58de
schema version: 2

58DE(1) Disclosing information to the operator of an SPF EDR scheme
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.237
note: Disclosure of information to the operator of an SPF EDR scheme for enabling or assisting its functions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58de-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58de-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58de-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58DE Disclosing information to the operator of an SPF EDR scheme

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58de-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to disclose information
modality: Deontic
operator: may

58DE(2) Disclosing information to the operator of an SPF EDR scheme
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.237
note: Operator must comply with conditions imposed by the regulator.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58de-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58de-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58de-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58DE Disclosing information to the operator of an SPF EDR scheme

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58de-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Operator must comply.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory compliance
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: The regulator may impose conditions.

58DE(3) Disclosing information to the operator of an SPF EDR scheme
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.237
note: Must de-identify personal information unless reasonable belief that doing so would not achieve the object of this Part.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58de-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58de-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58de-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58DE Disclosing information to the operator of an SPF EDR scheme

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58de-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory action
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

58EA Simplified outline of this Division
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.238
note: The Commission is the regulator of most aspects of the Scams Prevention Framework.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ea-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ea
schema version: 2

58EB General regulator of the Scams Prevention Framework
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.238
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58EB(1) General regulator of the Scams Prevention Framework
has part: 58EB(2) General regulator of the Scams Prevention Framework
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58eb
schema version: 2

58EB(1) General regulator of the Scams Prevention Framework
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.238
note: Commission is the general regulator for SPF provisions apart from SPF codes.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eb-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58eb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58EB General regulator of the Scams Prevention Framework

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission is the general regulator.
modality: Deontic
operator: is

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58EB(1) General regulator of the Scams Prevention Framework

58EB(2) General regulator of the Scams Prevention Framework
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.238
note: The SPF general regulator has obligations to review, advise, monitor, investigate and enforce compliance with the SPF provisions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eb-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eb-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58eb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58EB General regulator of the Scams Prevention Framework

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The regulator has obligations.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eb-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: The regulator's powers are part of the SPF provisions.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58EB(2) General regulator of the Scams Prevention Framework

58EC Delegation of the SPF general regulator’s functions and
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.239
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58EC(1) Delegation of the SPF general regulator’s functions and
has part: 58EC(2) Delegation of the SPF general regulator’s functions and
has part: 58EC(3) Delegation of the SPF general regulator’s functions and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ec
schema version: 2

58EC(1) Delegation of the SPF general regulator’s functions and
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.239
note: Delegation of SPF general regulator’s functions and powers
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ec-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ec-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58EC Delegation of the SPF general regulator’s functions and

58EC(2) Delegation of the SPF general regulator’s functions and
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.239
note: Delegation of powers under section 155 to a designated person.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ec-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ec-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58EC Delegation of the SPF general regulator’s functions and

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ec-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58EC(2) Delegation of the SPF general regulator’s functions and

58EC(3) Delegation of the SPF general regulator’s functions and
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.239
note: Delegation of certain functions to Commission members and employees
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ec-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ec-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58EC Delegation of the SPF general regulator’s functions and

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ec-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58EC(3) Delegation of the SPF general regulator’s functions and

58ED Regulator of a regulated sector
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.240
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58ED(1) Regulator of a regulated sector
has part: 58ED(2) Regulator of a regulated sector
has part: 58ED(3) Regulator of a regulated sector
has part: 58ED(4) Regulator of a regulated sector
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ed
schema version: 2

58ED(1) Regulator of a regulated sector
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.240
note: The Minister may designate an entity as the sector regulator.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ed-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58ED Regulator of a regulated sector

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The designation must be made within the meaning of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Designation is a power of the Minister.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58ED(1) Regulator of a regulated sector

58ED(2) Regulator of a regulated sector
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.240
note: The Commission is the SPF sector regulator for a regulated sector if no instrument under subsection (1) is in force for the sector.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ed-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58ED Regulator of a regulated sector

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission regulates the sector while no instrument under subsection (1) is in force
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relationship between the Commission's designation and its regulation of the sector
modality: AllenInterval
operator: while
premise text: No instrument under subsection (1) is in force for the sector

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission must regulate the sector if no instrument under subsection (1) is in force
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes a conditional obligation on the Commission to regulate the sector
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: No instrument under subsection (1) is in force for the sector

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission is the SPF sector regulator for a regulated sector
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the Commission as the SPF sector regulator
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: The Commission is designated under subsection (1)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission must regulate the sector if no instrument under subsection (1) is in force
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Establishes a conditional relationship between the Commission's designation and its regulation of the sector
modality: LinearLogic
operator: if
premise text: No instrument under subsection (1) is in force for the sector

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58ED(2) Regulator of a regulated sector

58ED(3) Regulator of a regulated sector
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.240
note: Regulator of a regulated sector must monitor, investigate and enforce compliance with the provisions of the SPF code for the sector.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ed-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58ED Regulator of a regulated sector

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulator must perform actions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58ED(3) Regulator of a regulated sector

58ED(4) Regulator of a regulated sector
type: Concept
references: Acts Interpretation Act 1901
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.240
note: The Minister may delegate power to another Minister in writing.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ed-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 58ED Regulator of a regulated sector

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

58EE Delegation of an SPF sector regulator’s functions and powers
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.241
note: Delegation of SPF sector regulator's functions and powers
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ee-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ee
schema version: 2

58EF Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.242
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58EF(1) Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention
has part: 58EF(2) Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention
has part: 58EF(3) Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention
has part: 58EF(4) Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention
has part: 58EF(5) Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ef
schema version: 2

58EF(1) Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.242
note: SPF general regulator and sector regulators must enter into an arrangement for regulation and enforcement. Publish a statement on its website summarising roles and responsibilities.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ef-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58EF Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to enter into an arrangement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish a statement on its website.
modality: Deontic
operator: must

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58EF(1) Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention

58EF(2) Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.242
note: The SPF general regulator may choose to comply with subsection (1) by entering into a single arrangement or separate arrangements with one or more sector regulators. Must consult entities before publishing statement
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ef-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58EF Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Consultation must occur before publishing statement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Consultation must occur before publishing statement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEFORE
premise text: The SPF general regulator must consult the entities mentioned in subsection (1) before publishing the statement

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Publication of statement implies consultation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Consultation implies publication of statement
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: The SPF general regulator must consult the entities mentioned in subsection (1) before publishing the statement

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Consultation is an essential requirement for publication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Consultation is an essential requirement for publication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
premise text: The SPF general regulator must consult the entities mentioned in subsection (1) before publishing the statement

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is an obligation to consult entities
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consult entities
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The SPF general regulator must consult the entities mentioned in subsection (1)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Consultation is a necessary condition for publication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Consultation is a necessary condition for publication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
premise text: The SPF general regulator must consult the entities mentioned in subsection (1) before publishing the statement

58EF(3) Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.242
note: The statement is not a legislative instrument. Provisions relating to matters prescribed by the SPF rules must be included in arrangements.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ef-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58EF Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The statement is not a legislative instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: relating to matters prescribed by the SPF rules
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes provisions
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: Arrangements must include provisions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58EF(3) Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention

58EF(4) Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention
type: Concept
description: Arrangement details
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.242
note: Publish arrangement on website
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ef-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 58EF Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

58EF(5) Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.242
note: Failure to comply does not invalidate regulatory actions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ef-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 58EF Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from compliance
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: Regulatory actions are not invalidated by non-compliance.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58EF(5) Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention

58EG SPF regulators may disclose information to each other
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.244
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58EG(1) SPF regulators may disclose information to each other
has part: 58EG(2) SPF regulators may disclose information to each other
has part: 58EG(3) SPF regulators may disclose information to each other
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58eg
schema version: 2

58EG(1) SPF regulators may disclose information to each other
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.244
note: Disclosure of information between SPF regulators
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eg-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58eg-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58EG SPF regulators may disclose information to each other

58EG(2) SPF regulators may disclose information to each other
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.244
note: Disclosure of information by SPF regulators to each other is permitted.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eg-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eg-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58eg-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58EG SPF regulators may disclose information to each other

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eg-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: 59DB
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Related provisions apply
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
premise text: 155AAA(1)(b)

58EG(3) SPF regulators may disclose information to each other
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.244
note: Disclosure of SPF personal information to each other
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eg-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58eg-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58EG SPF regulators may disclose information to each other

58EH Regard must be had to the object of this Part when
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.244
note: Must consider object of Part when deciding to make disclosure
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eh-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eh-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58eh
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eh-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: when deciding whether to make a disclosure under this Subdivision
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider object of Part
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: SPF regulator must have regard to the object of this Part

58EI Notice need not be given of a collection, use or disclosure of
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.244
note: No notification required for certain actions under this Part
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ei-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ei-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ei
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ei-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No obligation to notify
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulator's obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: -
premise text: The SPF regulator plans to make a disclosure of information or documents under this Part

58EJ Information that need not be disclosed
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.245
note: No disclosure of certain information required
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ej-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ej
schema version: 2

58FA Simplified outline of this Division
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.246
note: The Commission may monitor and investigate compliance with the Scams Prevention Framework.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fa-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fa-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fa
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commission may perform an action.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

58FB Appointment of inspectors
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.247
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58FB(1) Appointment of inspectors
has part: 58FB(2) Appointment of inspectors
has part: 58FB(3) Appointment of inspectors
has part: 58FB(4) Appointment of inspectors
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fb
schema version: 2

58FB(1) Appointment of inspectors
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.247
note: Appointment of inspectors
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fb-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58FB Appointment of inspectors

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorization to appoint inspectors
modality: Deontic
operator: may

58FB(2) Appointment of inspectors
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.247
note: Must appoint inspector with appropriate qualifications
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fb-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58FB Appointment of inspectors

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the SPF regulator is satisfied...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to appoint inspector
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: SPF regulator must not appoint...

58FB(3) Appointment of inspectors
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.247
note: Comply with administrative directions as an inspector.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fb-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fb-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58FB Appointment of inspectors

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory compliance.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fb-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58FB(3) Appointment of inspectors

58FB(4) Appointment of inspectors
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.247
note: SPF regulator acts as inspector if no appointments are in force
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fb-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fb-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 58FB Appointment of inspectors

58FC Multiple remedies can be sought for a single contravention
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.248
note: Court's powers under other provisions not limited
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fc-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fc
schema version: 2

58FD Preference must be given to compensation for victims
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.248
note: Court must give preference to compensation over pecuniary penalty if defendant cannot pay both.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fd-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fd-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fd
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fd-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compensation takes precedence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must prioritize compensation over pecuniary penalty.
modality: Deontic
operator: Preference
premise text: Defendant cannot pay both penalties.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fd-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58FD Preference must be given to compensation for victims

58FE Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.248
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58FE(1) Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default
has part: 58FE(2) Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default
has part: 58FE(3) Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default
has part: 58FE(4) Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fe
schema version: 2

58FE(1) Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.248
note: Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fe-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58FE Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between sections
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: Section 58FE (1) and Chapter 4 Scams Prevention Framework Part IVF

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to monitor compliance with an SPF code—default
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) This section applies for the SPF code for a regulated sector unless...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58FE(1) Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default

58FE(2) Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.248
note: Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fe-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58FE Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: includes powers of entry and inspection
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Part of a framework for monitoring compliance
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASSOF
premise text: Part 2 of the Regulatory Powers Act

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58FE(2) Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default

58FE(3) Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.248
note: Monitoring of compliance with SPF code
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fe-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58FE Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to monitor compliance
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Part 2
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Part of Regulatory Powers Act framework
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
premise text: Regulatory Powers Act

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58FE(3) Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default

58FE(4) Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.248
note: Defines roles and courts for SPF sector regulator
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fe-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 58FE Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (i) the Federal Court
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for courts
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: Each of the following courts is a relevant court: (i) the Federal Court; (ii) the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2); (iii) a court of a State or Territory that has jurisdiction in relation to the matter.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The inspector of the SPF sector regulator is an authorised applicant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines inspector's role
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: An inspector of the SPF sector regulator is an authorised person.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The magistrate is an issuing officer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines magistrate's role
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: A magistrate is an issuing officer.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The magistrate is an issuing officer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines magistrate's role
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
premise text: A magistrate is an issuing officer.

58FF Investigating compliance with an SPF code—default
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.250
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58FF(1) Investigating compliance with an SPF code—default
has part: 58FF(2) Investigating compliance with an SPF code—default
has part: 58FF(3) Investigating compliance with an SPF code—default
has part: 58FF(4) Investigating compliance with an SPF code—default
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ff
schema version: 2

58FF(1) Investigating compliance with an SPF code—default
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.250
note: Default provision for investigating compliance with an SPF code
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ff-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58FF Investigating compliance with an SPF code—default

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts from default provision
modality: Deontic
operator: !
premise text: (ACMA, ASIC or Commission is sector regulator)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58FF(1) Investigating compliance with an SPF code—default

58FF(2) Investigating compliance with an SPF code—default
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.250
note: Each civil penalty provision of the SPF code is subject to investigation under Part 3 of the Regulatory Powers Act.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ff-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58FF Investigating compliance with an SPF code—default

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Includes powers of entry, search and seizure
modality: AllenInterval
operator: MEETS
premise text: Part 3 of the Regulatory Powers Act includes powers of entry, search and seizure.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Subject to investigation
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBJECT
premise text: (2) Each civil penalty provision of the SPF code is subject to investigation under Part 3 of the Regulatory Powers Act.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Part 3 of the Regulatory Powers Act creates a framework for investigating whether a provision has been contravened
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS_OF
premise text: Part 3 of the Regulatory Powers Act creates a framework for investigating whether a provision has been contravened.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58FF(2) Investigating compliance with an SPF code—default

58FF(3) Investigating compliance with an SPF code—default
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.250
note: Authorises inspector of SPF sector regulator to investigate compliance with SPF code
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ff-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58FF Investigating compliance with an SPF code—default

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: SPF sector regulator authorises inspector to investigate compliance with SPF code
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: Inspector is authorised applicant

58FF(4) Investigating compliance with an SPF code—default
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.250
note: Delegate powers and functions to an SES employee or acting SES employee of the SPF sector regulator
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ff-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 58FF Investigating compliance with an SPF code—default

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to delegate powers and functions
modality: Deontic
operator: delegate

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58FF(4) Investigating compliance with an SPF code—default

58FG Monitoring or investigating—the ACMA
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.252
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58FG(1) Monitoring or investigating—the ACMA
has part: 58FG(2) Monitoring or investigating—the ACMA
has part: 58FG(3) Monitoring or investigating—the ACMA
has part: 58FG(4) Monitoring or investigating—the ACMA
has part: 58FG(5) Monitoring or investigating—the ACMA
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fg
schema version: 2

58FG(1) Monitoring or investigating—the ACMA
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.252
note: The ACMA must monitor or investigate if it is the sector regulator.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fg-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fg-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58FG Monitoring or investigating—the ACMA

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to monitor or investigate
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

58FG(2) Monitoring or investigating—the ACMA
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.252
note: Monitoring or investigating—the ACMA
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fg-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fg-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fg-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58FG Monitoring or investigating—the ACMA

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fg-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlaps with the Telecommunications Act 1997
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (2) Part 26 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 also applies:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the contravention of the SPF code for the sector
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) Part 26 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 also applies:

58FG(3) Monitoring or investigating—the ACMA
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.252
note: The Minister may specify modifications to remove doubt about how provisions apply in relation to the SPF code. Part 27 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 applies to ACMA in its capacity as SPF sector regulator and in relation to performance of functions under SPF code.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fg-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fg-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58FG Monitoring or investigating—the ACMA

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Part applies to ACMA
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Part applies to ACMA
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: ACMA is the SPF sector regulator

58FG(4) Monitoring or investigating—the ACMA
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.252
note: Instrument has effect accordingly.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fg-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fg-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 58FG Monitoring or investigating—the ACMA

58FG(5) Monitoring or investigating—the ACMA
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.252
note: Defines terms for ACMA's telecommunications functions and powers.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fg-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fg-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 58FG Monitoring or investigating—the ACMA

58FH Monitoring or investigating—ASIC
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.253
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58FH(1) Monitoring or investigating—ASIC
has part: 58FH(2) Monitoring or investigating—ASIC
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fh
schema version: 2

58FH(1) Monitoring or investigating—ASIC
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.253
note: Applicability condition for ASIC as sector regulator
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fh-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fh-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58FH Monitoring or investigating—ASIC

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies if ASIC is the SPF sector regulator for a regulated sector.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional applicability
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: ASIC is the SPF sector regulator for a regulated sector.

58FH(2) Monitoring or investigating—ASIC
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.253
note: ASIC must monitor or investigate
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fh-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fh-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58FH Monitoring or investigating—ASIC

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to monitor or investigate
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

58FI Monitoring or investigating—Minister may declare that
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.255
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58FI(1) Monitoring or investigating—Minister may declare that
has part: 58FI(2) Monitoring or investigating—Minister may declare that
has part: 58FI(3) Monitoring or investigating—Minister may declare that
has part: 58FI(4) Monitoring or investigating—Minister may declare that
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fi
schema version: 2

58FI(1) Monitoring or investigating—Minister may declare that
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.255
note: The Minister may declare that the provisions of another law provide an entity with powers to monitor compliance or investigate provisions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fi-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fi-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58FI Monitoring or investigating—Minister may declare that

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Minister may declare that the provisions of another law provide an entity with powers.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

58FI(2) Monitoring or investigating—Minister may declare that
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.255
note: Minister may declare alternative power provisions apply to entity in its capacity as sector regulator and in relation to specified provisions of the SPF code.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fi-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fi-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58FI Monitoring or investigating—Minister may declare that

58FI(3) Monitoring or investigating—Minister may declare that
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.255
note: Modifications for alternative power provisions
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fi-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fi-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58FI Monitoring or investigating—Minister may declare that

58FI(4) Monitoring or investigating—Minister may declare that
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.255
note: The Minister may declare that the instrument has effect accordingly.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fi-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fi-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fi-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 58FI Monitoring or investigating—Minister may declare that

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fi-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration of obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

58FJ Civil penalty provisions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.256
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58FJ(1) Civil penalty provisions
has part: 58FJ(2) Civil penalty provisions
has part: 58FJ(3) Civil penalty provisions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fj
schema version: 2

58FJ(1) Civil penalty provisions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.256
note: Civil penalty provisions enforceable under Part 4 of the Regulatory Powers Act
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fj-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fj-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fj-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fj-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58FJ Civil penalty provisions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision is enforceable under Part 4
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation enforcement
modality: Deontic
operator: enforceable
premise text: Part 4 of the Regulatory Powers Act allows a civil penalty provision to be enforced

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fj-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision is allowed under Part 4
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation allowance
modality: Deontic
operator: allowed
premise text: Part 4 of the Regulatory Powers Act allows a civil penalty provision to be enforced

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fj-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The applicant is authorized to enforce the provision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation authorization
modality: Deontic
operator: authorized
premise text: Part 4 of the Regulatory Powers Act allows an authorized applicant to enforce a civil penalty provision

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fj-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58FJ(1) Civil penalty provisions

58FJ(2) Civil penalty provisions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.256
note: SPF general regulator and sector regulator are authorised applicants for civil penalty provisions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fj-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fj-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58FJ Civil penalty provisions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: are authorized applicants
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorized applicant
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: SPF general regulator and sector regulator are SPF applicants

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fj-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58FJ(2) Civil penalty provisions

58FJ(3) Civil penalty provisions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.256
note: List of relevant courts for purposes of Part 4 of the Regulatory Powers Act
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fj-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fj-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fj-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58FJ Civil penalty provisions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fj-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: List of relevant courts for purposes of Part 4 of the Regulatory Powers Act
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fj-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58FJ(3) Civil penalty provisions

58FK Maximum penalty for tier 1 contraventions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.257
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58FK(1) Maximum penalty for tier 1 contraventions
has part: 58FK(2) Maximum penalty for tier 1 contraventions
has part: 58FK(3) Maximum penalty for tier 1 contraventions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fk
schema version: 2

58FK(1) Maximum penalty for tier 1 contraventions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.257
note: Maximum penalty for tier 1 contraventions
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fk-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fk-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58FK Maximum penalty for tier 1 contraventions

58FK(2) Maximum penalty for tier 1 contraventions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.257
note: Maximum penalty for tier 1 contraventions
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fk-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fk-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58FK Maximum penalty for tier 1 contraventions

58FK(3) Maximum penalty for tier 1 contraventions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.257
note: Maximum penalty for tier 1 contraventions
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fk-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fk-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fk-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fk-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58FK Maximum penalty for tier 1 contraventions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fk-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: 7,990 penalty units
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for penalty units
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (3) For the purposes of subsection (1)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fk-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: 7,990 penalty units
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits penalty units for tier 1 contraventions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (3) For the purposes of subsection (1)

58FL Maximum penalty for tier 2 contraventions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.257
note: Maximum penalty for tier 2 contraventions
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fl-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fl
schema version: 2

58FM Civil penalty double jeopardy
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.258
note: No liability for pecuniary penalty in respect of particular conduct
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fm-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fm-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fm
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fm-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: =

58FN Purpose and effect of this Subdivision
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.259
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58FN(1) Purpose and effect of this Subdivision
has part: 58FN(2) Purpose and effect of this Subdivision
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fn
schema version: 2

58FN(1) Purpose and effect of this Subdivision
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.259
note: Issue of infringement notice for alleged contravention of civil penalty provision
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fn-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fn-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fn-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58FN Purpose and effect of this Subdivision

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Issue of infringement notice
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) The purpose of this Subdivision is to provide for the issue of an infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fn-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Issue of infringement notice for alleged contravention of civil penalty provision
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (b) a civil penalty provision of an SPF code;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fn-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58FN(1) Purpose and effect of this Subdivision

58FN(2) Purpose and effect of this Subdivision
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.259
note: Exemptions from liability for SPF infringement notices
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fn-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fn-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fn-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fn-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fn-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58FN Purpose and effect of this Subdivision

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person is exempt from liability.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts from liability
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: (2) This Subdivision does not: (a) require an SPF infringement notice to be issued for an alleged contravention of such a civil penalty provision;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fn-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The subdivision permits the withdrawal of the infringement notice.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits withdrawal of infringement notice
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
premise text: (2) This Subdivision does not: (ii) an SPF infringement notice issued to the person for the crime is withdrawn under section 58FU;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fn-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The subdivision permits non-compliance with the notice.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits non-compliance with notice
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
premise text: (2) This Subdivision does not: (c) prevent a court from imposing a higher penalty than the penalty specified in the SPF infringement notice if the person does not comply with the notice.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fn-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The subdivision combines exemptions and permissions.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Combines exemptions and permissions
modality: LinearLogic
operator: and
premise text: (2) This Subdivision does not: (a) require an SPF infringement notice to be issued for an alleged contravention of such a civil penalty provision; or (b) affect a person’s liability to proceedings for an SPF civil penalty order in relation to an alleged contravention of a civil penalty provision if:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fn-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58FN(2) Purpose and effect of this Subdivision

58FO Issuing an SPF infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.260
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58FO(1) Issuing an SPF infringement notice
has part: 58FO(2) Issuing an SPF infringement notice
has part: 58FO(3) Issuing an SPF infringement notice
has part: 58FO(4) Issuing an SPF infringement notice
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fo
schema version: 2

58FO(1) Issuing an SPF infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.260
note: Inspector may issue notice to person for contravention of SPF principle.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fo-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fo-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58FO Issuing an SPF infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May issue notice
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fo-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58FO(1) Issuing an SPF infringement notice

58FO(2) Issuing an SPF infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.260
note: Inspector may issue notice for contravention of civil penalty provision.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fo-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fo-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58FO Issuing an SPF infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits issuing notice for contravention.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fo-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58FO(2) Issuing an SPF infringement notice

58FO(3) Issuing an SPF infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.260
note: Inspectors must not issue more than one infringement notice for the same contravention.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fo-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fo-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fo-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58FO Issuing an SPF infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fo-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of issuing multiple infringement notices.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not

58FO(4) Issuing an SPF infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.260
note: Notice has no effect if issued more than 12 months after alleged contravention.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fo-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fo-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fo-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 58FO Issuing an SPF infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fo-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notice has no effect if issued more than 12 months after alleged contravention.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

58FP Matters to be included in an SPF infringement notice
type: Concept
description: a unique number, day of issue, name of person to whom issued, inspector's details, alleged contravention details, penalty information, and payment instructions
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.260
note: Mandatory requirements for an SPF infringement notice
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fp-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fp-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fp
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fp-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a unique number, day of issue, name of person to whom issued, inspector's details, alleged contravention details, penalty information, and payment instructions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory requirements for an SPF infringement notice
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

58FQ Amount of penalty
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.261
note: Penalty amount for SPF infringement notice
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fq-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fq-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fq
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fq-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must equal the following amount:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Equality condition
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: The penalty to be specified in an SPF infringement notice...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fq-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58FQ Amount of penalty

58FR Effect of compliance with an SPF infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.261
note: Compliance with an SPF infringement notice results in no further action.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fr-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fr-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fr
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fr-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Compliance with an SPF infringement notice results in no further action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fr-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58FR Effect of compliance with an SPF infringement notice

58FS Effect of failure to comply with an SPF infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.262
note: Failure to pay penalty results in liability for SPF civil penalty order.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fs-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fs-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fs-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fs
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fs-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compliance period overlaps with infringement notice period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Compliance period must be within infringement notice period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
premise text: Notice specifies compliance period.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fs-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Failure to comply results in liability.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay penalty
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: Notice specifies penalty amount and compliance period.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fs-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58FS Effect of failure to comply with an SPF infringement notice

58FT Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.262
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58FT(1) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
has part: 58FT(2) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
has part: 58FT(3) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
has part: 58FT(4) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
has part: 58FT(5) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ft
schema version: 2

58FT(1) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.262
note: Infringement notice compliance period obligation
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ft-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58FT Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with infringement notice
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58FT(1) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice

58FT(2) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.262
note: SPF regulator may extend infringement notice compliance period
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ft-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58FT Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to extend compliance period
modality: Deontic
operator: may

58FT(3) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.262
note: Maximum extension period for infringement notice compliance
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ft-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58FT Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Extension period overlaps with 28 days
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: (3) Only one extension may be given and the extension must not be for longer than 28 days.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State has knowledge of maximum extension period
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes a knowledge relationship
modality: CogAI
operator: hasKnowledgeOf
premise text: (3) Only one extension may be given and the extension must not be for longer than 28 days.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (extension < 28 days)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limits the maximum extension period
modality: Deontic
operator: max
premise text: (3) Only one extension may be given and the extension must not be for longer than 28 days.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Extension period diffuses within 28 days
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes a spreading relationship
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (3) Only one extension may be given and the extension must not be for longer than 28 days.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Extension period holds within 28 days for all cases
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes a universal property
modality: LTL
operator: holdsForAll
premise text: (3) Only one extension may be given and the extension must not be for longer than 28 days.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58FT(3) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice

58FT(4) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.262
note: Failure to provide written notice of extension does not affect its validity.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ft-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 58FT Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The obligation to provide notice remains unaffected.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice remains unaffected.
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
premise text: (4) A failure to give the person written notice of the extension does not affect the validity of the extension.

58FT(5) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.262
note: Reference to extended infringement notice compliance period
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ft-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 58FT Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58FT(5) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice

58FU Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.263
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58FU(1) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
has part: 58FU(2) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
has part: 58FU(3) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
has part: 58FU(4) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
has part: 58FU(5) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fu
schema version: 2

58FU(1) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.263
note: Right to make written representations seeking withdrawal of infringement notice
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fu-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58FU Withdrawal of an infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right to make written representations
modality: Deontic
operator: can

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58FU(1) Withdrawal of an infringement notice

58FU(2) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.263
note: Withdrawal of an infringement notice
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fu-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58FU Withdrawal of an infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to withdraw infringement notice
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

58FU(3) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.263
note: SPF regulator may withdraw infringement notice upon request.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fu-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58FU Withdrawal of an infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits action by the SPF regulator.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

58FU(4) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.263
note: Content of withdrawal notices must be provided
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fu-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 58FU Withdrawal of an infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide content of withdrawal notices
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58FU(4) Withdrawal of an infringement notice

58FU(5) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
description: Withdrawal notice
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.263
note: Must state name and address of the person
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fu-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 58FU Withdrawal of an infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must state name and address of the person
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58FU(5) Withdrawal of an infringement notice

58FV Enforceable undertakings
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.264
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58FV(1) Enforceable undertakings
has part: 58FV(2) Enforceable undertakings
has part: 58FV(3) Enforceable undertakings
has part: 58FV(4) Enforceable undertakings
has part: 58FV(5) Enforceable undertakings
has part: 58FV(6) Enforceable undertakings
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fv
schema version: 2

58FV(1) Enforceable undertakings
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.264
note: Acceptance of written undertakings for compliance with SPF principles
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fv-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58FV Enforceable undertakings

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Acceptance of undertakings
modality: Deontic
operator: accepts

58FV(2) Enforceable undertakings
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.264
note: Written undertaking for compliance with SPF code provision
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fv-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58FV Enforceable undertakings

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Accepts written undertakings
modality: Deontic
operator: accepts

58FV(3) Enforceable undertakings
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.264
note: Consent required for withdrawal or variation of enforceable undertaking
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fv-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58FV Enforceable undertakings

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: with the consent of the SPF regulator who accepted it.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Consent required for withdrawal
modality: Deontic
operator: Withdrawal
premise text: (3) The person who gave the undertaking may withdraw or vary it at any time

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: with the consent of the SPF regulator who accepted it.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Consent required for variation
modality: Deontic
operator: Variation
premise text: (3) The person who gave the undertaking may withdraw or vary it at any time

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: with the consent of the SPF regulator who accepted it.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: SPF regulator has obligation to accept enforceable undertakings
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (3) The person who gave the undertaking may withdraw or vary it at any time

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: with the consent of the SPF regulator who accepted it.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: SPF regulator has permission to accept enforceable undertakings
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (3) The person who gave the undertaking may withdraw or vary it at any time

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Orders for enforcing the undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: SPF regulator has right to enforce undertakings
modality: Deontic
operator: Right
premise text: (3) The person who gave the undertaking may withdraw or vary it at any time

58FV(4) Enforceable undertakings
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.264
note: SPF regulator may apply to Court for order if undertaking is breached.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fv-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 58FV Enforceable undertakings

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: (4) If an SPF regulator considers that the person who gave the SPF regulator an undertaking has breached any of its terms...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to apply for order
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
premise text: (4) If an SPF regulator considers that the person who gave the SPF regulator an undertaking has breached any of its terms...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to order
modality: Deontic
operator: order
premise text: (4) If an SPF regulator considers that the person who gave the SPF regulator an undertaking has breached any of its terms...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to Court
modality: Deontic
operator: Court
premise text: (4) If an SPF regulator considers that the person who gave the SPF regulator an undertaking has breached any of its terms...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58FV(4) Enforceable undertakings

58FV(5) Enforceable undertakings
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.264
note: Court may make orders to enforce breach of undertaking
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fv-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 58FV Enforceable undertakings

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with terms of undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58FV(5) Enforceable undertakings

58FV(6) Enforceable undertakings
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.264
note: Definition of Court for this section
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fv-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 58FV Enforceable undertakings

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines key term
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definition

58FW Granting injunctions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.265
note: Granting injunctions upon application
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fw-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fw
schema version: 2

58FX Particular kinds of injunctions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.266
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58FX(1) Particular kinds of injunctions
has part: 58FX(2) Particular kinds of injunctions
has part: 58FX(3) Particular kinds of injunctions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fx
schema version: 2

58FX(1) Particular kinds of injunctions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.266
note: Granting of injunctions without regard to intent or previous conduct.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fx-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fx-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fx-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fx-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58FX Particular kinds of injunctions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Court may grant an injunction under section 58FW restraining a person from engaging in conduct:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) whether or not it appears to the Court that the person intends to engage again, or to continue to engage, in conduct of that kind;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fx-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Court may grant an injunction under section 58FW restraining a person from engaging in conduct:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of conduct without regard to intent or previous engagement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) whether or not the person has previously engaged in conduct of that kind;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fx-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Court may grant an injunction under section 58FW restraining a person from engaging in conduct:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of conduct without regard to imminent danger.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (c) whether or not there is an imminent danger of substantial damage to any person if the first-mentioned person engages in conduct of that kind;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fx-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58FX(1) Particular kinds of injunctions

58FX(2) Particular kinds of injunctions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.266
note: Court may grant injunction requiring a person to do an act or thing under certain conditions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fx-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fx-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58FX Particular kinds of injunctions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May grant injunction under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fx-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58FX(2) Particular kinds of injunctions

58FX(3) Particular kinds of injunctions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.266
note: Court may grant injunction under section 58FW by consent of all parties.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fx-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fx-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58FX Particular kinds of injunctions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting injunction by consent
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

58FY Interim injunctions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.267
note: Granting of interim injunctions
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fy-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fy
schema version: 2

58FZ Rescinding or varying injunctions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.267
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58FZ(1) Rescinding or varying injunctions
has part: 58FZ(2) Rescinding or varying injunctions
has part: 58FZ(3) Rescinding or varying injunctions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fz
schema version: 2

58FZ(1) Rescinding or varying injunctions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.267
note: Allow application for injunction by any person
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fz-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fz-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58FZ Rescinding or varying injunctions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission to apply for injunction
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

58FZ(2) Rescinding or varying injunctions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.267
note: Court must not require undertakings as a condition of granting an interim injunction.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fz-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fz-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58FZ Rescinding or varying injunctions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court must not require undertakings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

58FZ(3) Rescinding or varying injunctions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.267
note: Rescinding or varying injunctions for a person other than an SPF regulator
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fz-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58fz-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58FZ Rescinding or varying injunctions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fz-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58FZ(3) Rescinding or varying injunctions

58GA Treatment of partnerships
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.283
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58GA(1) Treatment of partnerships
has part: 58GA(2) Treatment of partnerships
has part: 58GA(3) Treatment of partnerships
has part: 58GA(4) Treatment of partnerships
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ga
schema version: 2

58GA(1) Treatment of partnerships
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.283
note: Partnerships must comply with SPF provisions as if they were individuals.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ga-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58GA Treatment of partnerships

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Partnerships must comply with the SPF provisions between the time they are classified as individuals and the time the provision takes effect.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for conditional obligation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: The changes set out in this section apply to a partnership as if it were a person.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An artificial intelligence system must ensure that all partners comply with the SPF provisions if one partner is classified as an individual for compliance purposes.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application to partnership obligations
modality: CogAI
operator: ⇒
premise text: The changes set out in this section apply to a partnership as if it were a person.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Partnerships must comply with the SPF provisions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The SPF provisions apply to a partnership as if it were a person.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: All partners must comply with the SPF provisions if one partner is classified as an individual for compliance purposes.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation through partnership structure
modality: Diffusion
operator: ⇒
premise text: The changes set out in this section apply to a partnership as if it were a person.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Partnerships must comply with the SPF provisions if they are classified as individuals for compliance purposes.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Conditional obligation based on classification
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ⇒
premise text: The SPF provisions apply to a partnership as if it were a person.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58GA(1) Treatment of partnerships

58GA(2) Treatment of partnerships
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.283
note: Impose obligation on partners instead of partnership
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ga-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58GA Treatment of partnerships

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: instead, but may be discharged by any of the partners.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between obligations
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Relates to
premise text: (2) An obligation that would otherwise be imposed on the partnership

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: instead, but may be discharged by any of the partners.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of obligation shift
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implications
premise text: (2) An obligation that would otherwise be imposed on the partnership

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: instead, but may be discharged by any of the partners.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence analysis of obligation shift
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyzes
premise text: (2) An obligation that would otherwise be imposed on the partnership

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: instead, but may be discharged by any of the partners.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Impose obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Imposes
premise text: (2) An obligation that would otherwise be imposed on the partnership

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: instead, but may be discharged by any of the partners.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Impact of obligation shift on partnerships
modality: Diffusion
operator: Affects
premise text: (2) An obligation that would otherwise be imposed on the partnership

58GA(3) Treatment of partnerships
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.283
note: Permits partners to act on behalf of the partnership
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ga-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58GA Treatment of partnerships

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

58GA(4) Treatment of partnerships
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.283
note: Continuity of partnership unaffected by changes in composition.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ga-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 58GA Treatment of partnerships

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Continuity unaffected
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Maintaining continuity
modality: Deontic
operator: continuity
premise text: Partnership composition change

58GB Treatment of unincorporated associations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.283
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58GB(1) Treatment of unincorporated associations
has part: 58GB(2) Treatment of unincorporated associations
has part: 58GB(3) Treatment of unincorporated associations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58gb
schema version: 2

58GB(1) Treatment of unincorporated associations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.283
note: The SPF provisions apply to unincorporated associations as if they were persons.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gb-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58gb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58GB Treatment of unincorporated associations

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applying the SPF provisions to unincorporated associations.
modality: Deontic
operator: apply

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58GB(1) Treatment of unincorporated associations

58GB(2) Treatment of unincorporated associations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.283
note: Imposes obligation on association members
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gb-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58gb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58GB Treatment of unincorporated associations

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation imposition
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58GB(2) Treatment of unincorporated associations

58GB(3) Treatment of unincorporated associations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.283
note: Association members can act on behalf of the association.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gb-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58gb-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58GB Treatment of unincorporated associations

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows action by association members
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gb-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58GB(3) Treatment of unincorporated associations

58GC Treatment of trusts
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.283
note: Trusts must comply with SPF provisions as if they were a person.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gc-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gc-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58gc
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply with SPF provisions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

58GD Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.284
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58GD(1) Compensation for acquisition of property
has part: 58GD(2) Compensation for acquisition of property
has part: 58GD(3) Compensation for acquisition of property
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58gd
schema version: 2

58GD(1) Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.284
note: Compensation for acquisition of property on just terms
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gd-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58gd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58GD Compensation for acquisition of property

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide compensation
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58GD(1) Compensation for acquisition of property

58GD(2) Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
description: Compensation amount
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.284
note: Person acquiring property must pay reasonable compensation to first-mentioned person.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gd-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58gd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58GD Compensation for acquisition of property

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to pay compensation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58GD(2) Compensation for acquisition of property

58GD(3) Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.284
note: Compensation for acquisition of property
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gd-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58gd-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58GD Compensation for acquisition of property

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide compensation
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gd-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58GD(3) Compensation for acquisition of property

58GE Rules for the purposes of this Part
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.285
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58GE(1) Rules for the purposes of this Part
has part: 58GE(2) Rules for the purposes of this Part
has part: 58GE(3) Rules for the purposes of this Part
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ge
schema version: 2

58GE(1) Rules for the purposes of this Part
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.285
note: Rules for the purposes of this Part
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ge-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ge-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58GE Rules for the purposes of this Part

58GE(2) Rules for the purposes of this Part
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.285
note: Delegation of power to make SPF rules
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ge-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ge-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ge-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58GE Rules for the purposes of this Part

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ge-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Power delegation
modality: Deontic
operator: can

58GE(3) Rules for the purposes of this Part
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.285
note: Exemptions from SPF rules
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ge-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ge-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ge-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58ge-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58GE Rules for the purposes of this Part

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ge-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal intervals for exemptions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: disjoint
premise text: (SPF rules may not do the following: ...)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ge-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (may not do the following)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative assertion of a rule
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (SPF rules)

58GF Report of the operation of the SPF provisions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.285
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58GF(1) Report of the operation of the SPF provisions
has part: 58GF(2) Report of the operation of the SPF provisions
has part: 58GF(3) Report of the operation of the SPF provisions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58gf
schema version: 2

58GF(1) Report of the operation of the SPF provisions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.285
note: The Minister must conduct a review of the operation of the SPF provisions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gf-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58gf-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58GF Report of the operation of the SPF provisions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

58GF(2) Report of the operation of the SPF provisions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.285
note: Review of SPF provisions after a specified period
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gf-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58gf-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58GF Report of the operation of the SPF provisions

58GF(3) Report of the operation of the SPF provisions
type: Concept
description: yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.285
note: Must provide a written report to the Minister
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gf-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58gf-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58GF Report of the operation of the SPF provisions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a written report to the Minister
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

6 Section 6
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.387
note: Enforcement and remedies
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide enforcement and remedies
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

60 Simplified outline of this Part
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.287
note: Entity must not engage in price exploitation
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits entity from engaging in price exploitation
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60 Simplified outline of this Part

60A Definitions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.288
note: Defines terms related to carbon tax removal and repeal.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60a-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60a-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60a-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60a-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60a-logic-n3logic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60a
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: occurs after specified events
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for carbon tax removal and repeal
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: carbon tax repeal means...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60a-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: payment surcharges are relevant
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Relates payment surcharges to industry provisions
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: Provisions relating to particular industries, payment surcharges etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60a-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must be calculated as such
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes obligations related to carbon tax removal and repeal
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: carbon charge component of levy means...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60a-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is defined as such
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies entities by definition
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: bulk SGG importer means an entity that...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60a-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: includes specified amendments
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Incorporates amendments from other Acts
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
premise text: carbon tax repeal means...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60a-logic-n3logic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is related to carbon tax removal
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
logic summary: Defines relationships between entities and concepts
modality: N3Logic
operator: =
premise text: carbon charge component of levy means...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60A Definitions

60AA Objects etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.288
curation status: Proposed
has part: 60AA(1) Objects etc.
has part: 60AA(2) Objects etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60aa
schema version: 2

60AA(1) Objects etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.288
note: Deter price exploitation and ensure cost savings are passed through supply chain
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60aa-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60aa-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60aa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 60AA Objects etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) at (b)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relation between the objects in relation to the carbon tax repeal
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (1) The main objects of this Part are: (a) to deter price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal at each point in the supply chain for regulated goods; and (b) to ensure that all cost savings attributable to the carbon tax repeal are passed through the supply chain for regulated goods.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60aa-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) implies (b)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Establishes an implication between detering price exploitation and ensuring cost savings are passed through supply chain
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (1) The main objects of this Part are: (a) to deter price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal at each point in the supply chain for regulated goods; and (b) to ensure that all cost savings attributable to the carbon tax repeal are passed through the supply chain for regulated goods.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to deter price exploitation and ensure cost savings are passed through supply chain
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) The main objects of this Part are: (a) to deter price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal at each point in the supply chain for regulated goods; and (b) to ensure that all cost savings attributable to the carbon tax repeal are passed through the supply chain for regulated goods.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to ensure cost savings are passed through supply chain
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) The main objects of this Part are: (a) to deter price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal at each point in the supply chain for regulated goods; and (b) to ensure that all cost savings attributable to the carbon tax repeal are passed through the supply chain for regulated goods.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60aa-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) and (b)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Establishes a recurring trace of cost savings in relation to the carbon tax repeal
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (1) The main objects of this Part are: (a) to deter price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal at each point in the supply chain for regulated goods; and (b) to ensure that all cost savings attributable to the carbon tax repeal are passed through the supply chain for regulated goods.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60aa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60AA(1) Objects etc.

60AA(2) Objects etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.288
note: Ensure cost savings from carbon tax repeal are passed to consumers through lower prices.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60aa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 60AA Objects etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...through lower prices.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure cost savings are passed to consumers
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The intention of the Parliament is...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60AA(2) Objects etc.

60B Regulated goods
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.293
note: Defines regulated goods for the purposes of this Part.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60b-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60b-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60b-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60b
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60b-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: regulated goods means natural gas; or electricity; or synthetic greenhouse gas;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Identifies a class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Part, regulated goods means:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60b-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Identifies a class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass
premise text: (a) natural gas; or (b) electricity; or (c) synthetic greenhouse gas;

60C Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.295
curation status: Proposed
has part: 60C(1) Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal
has part: 60C(2) Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal
has part: 60C(3) Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60c
schema version: 2

60C(1) Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.295
note: Prohibition on price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60c-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 60C Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An entity must not engage in price exploitation...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (1) An entity must not engage in price exploitation...

60C(2) Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.295
note: Entity must not pass through all cost savings relating to the carbon tax repeal in relation to regulated supply prices.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60c-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 60C Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity must not pass through all cost savings.
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60C(2) Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal

60C(3) Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal
type: Concept
description: (a) the entity’s cost savings that are directly or indirectly attributable to the carbon tax repeal; (b) how the cost savings mentioned in paragraph (a) can reasonably be attributed to the different supplies that the entity makes; (c) the entity’s costs; (d) any other relevant matter that may reasonably influence the price.
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.295
note: Guidance on determining price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60c-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 60C Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60C(3) Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal

60CA Failure to pass on cost savings—250% penalty
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.295
note: Failure to pass on cost savings—250% penalty
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60ca-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60ca-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60ca-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60ca-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60ca-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60ca-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60ca
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60ca-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...250% penalty
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for contravention
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1) If:...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60ca-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...250% penalty
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits failure to pass on cost savings
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) If:...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60ca-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...250% penalty
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obliges entities that contravened subsection 60C(1) to pass on cost savings
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
premise text: (i) an entity contravened subsection 60C(1) in relation to a particular supply of electricity or natural gas;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60ca-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...250% penalty
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses penalty across entities that contravened subsection 60C(1)
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (i) an entity contravened subsection 60C(1) in relation to a particular supply of electricity or natural gas;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60ca-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Chapter 4 Provisions relating to particular industries, payment surcharges etc.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Requires recurring trace of entity's actions
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (i) an entity contravened subsection 60C(1) in relation to a particular supply of electricity or natural gas;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60ca-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60CA Failure to pass on cost savings—250% penalty

60D Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.297
curation status: Proposed
has part: 60D(1) Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price
has part: 60D(2) Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price
has part: 60D(3) Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price
has part: 60D(4) Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price
has part: 60D(5) Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60d
schema version: 2

60D(1) Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price
type: Concept
description: Written notice
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.297
note: Notice required for price exploitation
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 60D Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for notice
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (1) The Commission may give an entity a written notice under this section if the Commission considers that the entity has engaged in price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Consequence of price exploitation
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (1) The Commission may give an entity a written notice under this section if the Commission considers that the entity has engaged in price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application for notice
modality: CogAI
operator: REQUIRES
premise text: (1) The Commission may give an entity a written notice under this section if the Commission considers that the entity has engaged in price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission MUST give an entity a written notice...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of notice requirement
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS_TO
premise text: (1) The Commission may give an entity a written notice under this section if the Commission considers that the entity has engaged in price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60D(1) Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price

60D(2) Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price
type: Concept
description: true
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.297
note: Entity must provide notice with specific details about supply made.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 60D Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity must provide notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Notice identifies entity, supply kind, and circumstances.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IDENTITY

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60D(2) Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price

60D(3) Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.297
note: Notice is prima facie evidence that the price for the supply did not pass through all of the entity’s cost savings relating to the supply that were directly or indirectly attributable to the carbon tax repeal.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 60D Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60D(3) Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price

60D(4) Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price
type: Concept
description: written notice
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.297
note: Commission must give entity written notice of variation or revocation.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60d-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 60D Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission must give entity written notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60D(4) Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price

60D(5) Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.297
note: Notice under this section is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60d-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 60D Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Not a legislative instrument
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60D(5) Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price

60E Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.298
curation status: Proposed
has part: 60E(1) Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price
has part: 60E(2) Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price
has part: 60E(3) Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price
has part: 60E(4) Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price
has part: 60E(5) Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60e
schema version: 2

60E(1) Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.298
note: Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price exploitation
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 60E Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60E(1) Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price

60E(2) Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price
type: Concept
description: Notice with specified conditions and price limit.
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.298
note: Commission must issue notice with specified conditions and price limit.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 60E Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60E(2) Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price

60E(3) Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.298
note: Commission must give entity written notice of variation or revocation.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60e-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 60E Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission must give entity written notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60E(3) Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price

60E(4) Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.298
note: Commission must publish notice in an appropriate manner.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60e-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 60E Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60E(4) Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price

60E(5) Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.298
note: Notice under this section is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60e-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 60E Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Not a legislative instrument.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chapter 4
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60E(5) Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price

60F Acquisition of property
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.299
curation status: Proposed
has part: 60F(1) Acquisition of property
has part: 60F(2) Acquisition of property
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60f
schema version: 2

60F(1) Acquisition of property
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.299
note: Defines scope of section 60C
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60f-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60f-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 60F Acquisition of property

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines scope
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: Effect of provision

60F(2) Acquisition of property
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.299
note: Provision has no effect to the extent it would result in acquisition of property on just terms.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60f-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60f-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 60F Acquisition of property

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: to the extent it would result in acquisition of property on just terms.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclusion principle
modality: Deontic
operator: exclusion
premise text: The provision has no effect.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60F(2) Acquisition of property

60FA Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.300
curation status: Proposed
has part: 60FA(1) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
has part: 60FA(2) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
has part: 60FA(3) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
has part: 60FA(4) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
has part: 60FA(5) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
has part: 60FA(6) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
has part: 60FA(7) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60fa
schema version: 2

60FA(1) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
type: Concept
description: true
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.300
note: Entities must provide carbon tax removal substantiation notices.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60fa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 60FA Carbon tax removal substantiation notices

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide carbon tax removal substantiation notices
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) This section applies to an entity if the entity: (a) is an electricity retailer that sells electricity to electricity customers; or (b) is a natural gas retailer that sells natural gas to natural gas customers; or (c) is a bulk SGG importer that sells synthetic greenhouse gas to SGG customers.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60FA(1) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices

60FA(2) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.300
note: Entity must provide written statement and supporting information within a specified period.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60fa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 60FA Carbon tax removal substantiation notices

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity must provide written statement and supporting information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60FA(2) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices

60FA(3) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.300
note: Definition of carbon tax removal substantiation notice
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60fa-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 60FA Carbon tax removal substantiation notices

60FA(4) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.300
note: A period specified in a carbon tax removal substantiation notice must be 21 days after the notice is given.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60fa-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 60FA Carbon tax removal substantiation notices

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval of 21 days after notice is given.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (4) A period specified in a carbon tax removal substantiation notice must be 21 days after the notice is given.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal interval of 21 days after notice is given.
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (4) A period specified in a carbon tax removal substantiation notice must be 21 days after the notice is given.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to specify a period of 21 days after notice is given.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (4) A period specified in a carbon tax removal substantiation notice must be 21 days after the notice is given.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal interval of 21 days after notice is given.
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (4) A period specified in a carbon tax removal substantiation notice must be 21 days after the notice is given.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval of 21 days after notice is given.
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (4) A period specified in a carbon tax removal substantiation notice must be 21 days after the notice is given.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60FA(4) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices

60FA(5) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.300
note: Carbon tax removal substantiation notice must explain certain effects.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60fa-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 60FA Carbon tax removal substantiation notices

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60FA(5) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices

60FA(6) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.300
note: Section does not limit other sections
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60fa-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 60FA Carbon tax removal substantiation notices

60FA(7) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.300
note: Section does not limit Commission's general information-gathering powers.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60fa-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 60FA Carbon tax removal substantiation notices

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60FA(7) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices

60FB Extending periods for complying with carbon tax removal
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.301
curation status: Proposed
has part: 60FB(1) Extending periods for complying with carbon tax removal
has part: 60FB(2) Extending periods for complying with carbon tax removal
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60fb
schema version: 2

60FB(1) Extending periods for complying with carbon tax removal
type: Concept
description: Application in writing to the Commission
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.301
note: Entity may apply for extension of period to comply with notice.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fb-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60fb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 60FB Extending periods for complying with carbon tax removal

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity may apply for extension
modality: Deontic
operator: May

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60FB(1) Extending periods for complying with carbon tax removal

60FB(2) Extending periods for complying with carbon tax removal
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.301
note: Commission may extend period for complying with notice
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fb-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60fb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 60FB Extending periods for complying with carbon tax removal

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission has the power to extend the period
modality: Deontic
operator: May

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60FB(2) Extending periods for complying with carbon tax removal

60FC Compliance with carbon tax removal substantiation notices
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.301
note: Compliance with carbon tax removal substantiation notices within applicable compliance period.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fc-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fc-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60fc
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Comply within applicable compliance period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity must comply with notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Given a carbon tax removal substantiation notice.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fc-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60FC Compliance with carbon tax removal substantiation notices

60FD Carbon tax removal substantiation statements
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.303
curation status: Proposed
has part: 60FD(1) Carbon tax removal substantiation statements
has part: 60FD(2) Carbon tax removal substantiation statements
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60fd
schema version: 2

60FD(1) Carbon tax removal substantiation statements
type: Concept
description: true
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.303
note: Entities must provide carbon tax removal substantiation statements.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fd-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60fd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 60FD Carbon tax removal substantiation statements

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60FD(1) Carbon tax removal substantiation statements

60FD(2) Carbon tax removal substantiation statements
type: Concept
description: true
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.303
note: Entity must provide cost savings estimates to the Commission within 30 days after Royal Assent day.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fd-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60fd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 60FD Carbon tax removal substantiation statements

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Cost savings estimates must be provided within 30 days after Royal Assent day.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The financial year that began on 1 July 2014 started on a specific date.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity must provide cost savings estimates.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60FD(2) Carbon tax removal substantiation statements

60FE Statements for customers
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.306
curation status: Proposed
has part: 60FE(1) Statements for customers
has part: 60FE(2) Statements for customers
has part: 60FE(3) Statements for customers
has part: 60FE(4) Statements for customers
has part: 60FE(5) Statements for customers
has part: 60FE(6) Statements for customers
has part: 60FE(7) Statements for customers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60fe
schema version: 2

60FE(1) Statements for customers
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.306
note: Entity must prepare statement if it is an electricity retailer or natural gas retailer.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60fe-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 60FE Statements for customers

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Statement preparation must occur within the scope of entity's operations.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (1) This section applies to an entity if the entity: ...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity must prepare statement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60FE(1) Statements for customers

60FE(2) Statements for customers
type: Concept
description: true
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.306
note: Entity must prepare a statement with estimated cost savings for electricity and natural gas customers.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60fe-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 60FE Statements for customers

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity must prepare a statement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Statement contains estimated cost savings for electricity and natural gas customers.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IDENTITY

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60FE(2) Statements for customers

60FE(3) Statements for customers
type: Concept
description: true
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.306
note: Entity must communicate statement contents to customers within 30-60 days after Royal Assent day.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60fe-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 60FE Statements for customers

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity must perform action.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Statement contents relate to a class of customers.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60FE(3) Statements for customers

60FE(4) Statements for customers
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.306
note: Entity commits an offence if it omits to comply with a requirement.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-4-logic-ltl-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60fe-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 60FE Statements for customers

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (c) the entity omits to do an act; and (d) the omission breaches the requirement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity has an obligation to comply.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (a) the entity is subject to a requirement under subsection (2) or (3); and (b) the entity is capable of complying with the requirement;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (c) the entity omits to do an act; and (d) the omission breaches the requirement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity has an obligation to comply with a requirement under subsection (2) or (3).
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (a) the entity is subject to a requirement under subsection (2) or (3); and (b) the entity is capable of complying with the requirement;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-4-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (c) the entity omits to do an act; and (d) the omission breaches the requirement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Entity commits an offence if it omits to comply with a requirement that occurs under subsection (2) or (3).
modality: LTL
operator: occurs-if
premise text: (a) the entity is subject to a requirement under subsection (2) or (3); and (b) the entity is capable of complying with the requirement;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60FE(4) Statements for customers

60FE(5) Statements for customers
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.306
note: Strict liability offence for subsection (4)
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60fe-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 60FE Statements for customers

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Strict liability offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Offence classification
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: Subsection (4) is an offence.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Strict liability
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Offence type
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: Subsection (4) is an offence of strict liability.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60FE(5) Statements for customers

60FE(6) Statements for customers
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.306
note: Adjusts penalty units for individuals affected by subsection (4)
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60fe-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 60FE Statements for customers

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (4) has effect as if reference to 40 penalty units
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal adjustment of penalty units
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
premise text: Subsection (6) applies to an individual

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (4) has effect as if reference to 40 penalty units
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal adjustment of penalty units
modality: CogAI
operator: =
premise text: Subsection (6) applies to an individual

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (4) has effect as if reference to 40 penalty units
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Adjusts penalty units
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: Subsection (4) applies to an individual

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (4) has effect as if reference to 40 penalty units
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal adjustment of penalty units
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
premise text: Subsection (6) applies to an individual

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (4) has effect as if reference to 40 penalty units
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal adjustment of penalty units
modality: LTL
operator: =
premise text: Subsection (6) applies to an individual

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60FE(6) Statements for customers

60FE(7) Statements for customers
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.306
note: Excuse from preparing and communicating statements under certain conditions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-7-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60fe-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 60FE Statements for customers

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Individual is excused
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: excuse
premise text: Subsection (2) or (3) applies

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60FE(7) Statements for customers

60G Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.308
curation status: Proposed
has part: 60G(1) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
has part: 60G(2) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
has part: 60G(3) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
has part: 60G(4) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
has part: 60G(5) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
has part: 60G(6) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
has part: 60G(7) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
has part: 60G(8) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
has part: 60G(9) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60g
schema version: 2

60G(1) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.308
note: The Commission may monitor prices to assess the general effect of the carbon tax repeal on prices charged by entities for supplies, in the carbon tax repeal transition period, of relevant goods.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60g-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 60G Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commission may monitor prices
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60G(1) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax

60G(2) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.308
note: The Commission may monitor prices to assess the general effect of the carbon tax repeal on prices.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60g-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 60G Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60G(2) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax

60G(3) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.308
note: The Commission may monitor prices to assess the general effect of the carbon tax repeal on prices charged for supplies.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60g-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 60G Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60G(3) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax

60G(4) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.308
note: The Commission may monitor prices to assess the general effect of the carbon tax repeal on prices.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60g-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 60G Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commission may monitor prices.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60G(4) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax

60G(5) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.308
note: The Commission may monitor prices to assist its consideration of price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60g-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 60G Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a permitted action
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60G(5) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax

60G(6) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.308
note: The Commission may monitor prices to assess the general effect of the carbon tax scheme on prices charged by entities for supplies.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60g-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 60G Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60G(6) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax

60G(7) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.308
note: The Commission may monitor prices to assess the general effect of the carbon tax scheme on prices.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-7-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60g-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 60G Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commission may monitor prices.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60G(7) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax

60G(8) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.308
note: The Commission may monitor prices to assess the general effect of the carbon tax scheme on prices charged for supplies.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60g-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 60G Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60G(8) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax

60G(9) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.308
note: Commission may monitor prices to assess the general effect of the carbon tax scheme on prices.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-9-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60g-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 60G Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission may monitor prices
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-9-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60G(9) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax

60H Information-gathering powers
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.310
curation status: Proposed
has part: 60H(1) Information-gathering powers
has part: 60H(2) Information-gathering powers
has part: 60H(3) Information-gathering powers
has part: 60H(4) Information-gathering powers
has part: 60H(5) Information-gathering powers
has part: 60H(5A) Information-gathering powers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60h
schema version: 2

60H(1) Information-gathering powers
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.310
note: Commission may require a person to provide specified information or documents.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60h-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 60H Information-gathering powers

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commission requires the person to provide information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Require

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Providing false or misleading information is an offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60H(1) Information-gathering powers

60H(2) Information-gathering powers
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.310
note: Requires information or documents related to prices before or after the carbon tax repeal.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60h-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 60H Information-gathering powers

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires information or documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60H(2) Information-gathering powers

60H(3) Information-gathering powers
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.310
note: No limitation on subsection (1)
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60h-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 60H Information-gathering powers

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60H(3) Information-gathering powers

60H(4) Information-gathering powers
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.310
note: Failure to comply with a requirement is an offence.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60h-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 60H Information-gathering powers

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The omission occurs within the temporal interval between the requirement and its breach.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between a requirement and its breach.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: (c) the person omits to do an act; and (d) the omission breaches the requirement;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with a requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (a) the person is subject to a requirement under subsection (1); and (b) the person is capable of complying with the requirement;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on omitting to comply with a requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
premise text: (c) the person omits to do an act; and (d) the omission breaches the requirement;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The requirement diffuses to the person.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of a requirement to a person.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (a) the person is subject to a requirement under subsection (1); and (b) the person is capable of complying with the requirement;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval between the requirement and its breach is non-empty.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval between a requirement and its breach.
modality: LTL
operator: between
premise text: (c) the person omits to do an act; and (d) the omission breaches the requirement;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60H(4) Information-gathering powers

60H(5) Information-gathering powers
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.310
note: Excuse from providing information or producing a document due to potential incrimination or penalty.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60h-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 60H Information-gathering powers

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section does not limit section 60FA
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between requirement and exemption
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (5) An individual is excused...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Individual excused from providing information or producing a document
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Section does not limit section 60FA

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section does not limit section 60FA
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on requiring individual to provide information or produce document
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (5) An individual is excused...

60H(5A) Information-gathering powers
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.310
note: Limitation on section 60FA
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-5a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60h-ss-5a
schema version: 2
part of: 60H Information-gathering powers

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limits the scope of section 60FA
modality: Deontic
operator: Restricts

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-5a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60H(5A) Information-gathering powers

60J Reporting
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.312
curation status: Proposed
has part: 60J(1) Reporting
has part: 60J(2) Reporting
has part: 60J(3) Reporting
has part: 60J(4) Reporting
has part: 60J(5) Reporting
has part: 60J(6) Reporting
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60j
schema version: 2

60J(1) Reporting
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.312
note: Commission must report to Minister within 28 days after each quarter.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60j-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 60J Reporting

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60J(1) Reporting

60J(2) Reporting
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.312
note: Must report particulars of notices given under section 60E during the quarter.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60j-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 60J Reporting

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60J(2) Reporting

60J(3) Reporting
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.312
note: Reporting obligation remains unaffected by subsection (2)
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60j-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 60J Reporting

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (3)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation continues despite limiting clause
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
premise text: (2)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60J(3) Reporting

60J(4) Reporting
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.312
note: Defines a quarter as a 3-month period during the carbon tax repeal transition period or on specific dates.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60j-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 60J Reporting

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifies temporal intervals for quarters
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
premise text: (a) that occurs wholly or partly during the carbon tax repeal transition period;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a quarter as a 3-month period during the carbon tax repeal transition period or on specific dates.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60J(4) Reporting

60J(5) Reporting
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.312
note: Minister must make report public after receiving it.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60j-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 60J Reporting

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister must make report public
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make report public
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Minister receives report

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Report is a piece of information
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Report is a piece of information
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
premise text: Report has content

60J(6) Reporting
type: Concept
description: Report at the end of each quarter
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.312
note: Reporting obligation if section commences during a quarter
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60j-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 60J Reporting

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reporting obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60J(6) Reporting

60K False or misleading representations about the effect of the
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.313
note: False or misleading representations about the effect of the carbon tax repeal on prices
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60k-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60k-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60k-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60k
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60k-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of false or misleading representations
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60k-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of entities as NaturalPerson
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60k-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60K False or misleading representations about the effect of the

60L Issuing an infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.314
curation status: Proposed
has part: 60L(1) Issuing an infringement notice
has part: 60L(2) Issuing an infringement notice
has part: 60L(3) Issuing an infringement notice
has part: 60L(4) Issuing an infringement notice
has part: 60L(5) Issuing an infringement notice
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60l
schema version: 2

60L(1) Issuing an infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.314
note: Commission may issue infringement notice to a person with reasonable grounds.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60l-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 60L Issuing an infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission may issue an infringement notice.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Infringement notice can be issued at any time.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: If the Commission has reasonable grounds to believe a person has contravened an infringement notice provision, the Commission may issue an infringement notice.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission may issue an infringement notice.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Commission's decision to issue a notice is based on reasonable grounds.
modality: Argumentation
operator: If-Then
premise text: If the Commission has reasonable grounds to believe a person has contravened an infringement notice provision, then the Commission may issue an infringement notice.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission may issue an infringement notice.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Commission's decision to issue a notice is based on AI analysis.
modality: CogAI
operator: Then
premise text: If the Commission has reasonable grounds to believe a person has contravened an infringement notice provision, then the Commission may issue an infringement notice.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission may issue an infringement notice.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by the Commission.
modality: Deontic
operator: May
premise text: The Commission has reasonable grounds to believe a person has contravened an infringement notice provision.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission may issue an infringement notice.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Commission's decision to issue a notice affects the person.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Then
premise text: If the Commission has reasonable grounds to believe a person has contravened an infringement notice provision, then the Commission may issue an infringement notice.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60L(1) Issuing an infringement notice

60L(2) Issuing an infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.314
note: Commission must not issue more than one infringement notice to the same person for the same alleged contravention.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60l-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 60L Issuing an infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of issuing multiple infringement notices.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60L(2) Issuing an infringement notice

60L(3) Issuing an infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.314
note: Notice has no effect if issued more than 12 months after alleged contravention.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60l-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 60L Issuing an infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Time limit for issuing notice
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (a) is issued more than 12 months after the day on which the contravention of the infringement notice provision is alleged to have occurred;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notice has no effect if issued more than 12 months after alleged contravention.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Notice has no effect if issued more than 12 months after alleged contravention.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
premise text: (a) is issued more than 12 months after the day on which the contravention of the infringement notice provision is alleged to have occurred;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Notice has no effect if issued more than 12 months after alleged contravention.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
premise text: (a) is issued more than 12 months after the day on which the contravention of the infringement notice provision is alleged to have occurred;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60L(3) Issuing an infringement notice

60L(4) Issuing an infringement notice
type: Concept
description: Details of alleged contravention, penalty information, and contact details
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.314
note: Infringement notice requirements
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60l-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 60L Issuing an infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide required information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Combine multiple obligations
modality: LinearLogic
operator: AND

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60L(4) Issuing an infringement notice

60L(5) Issuing an infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.314
note: Penalty for issuing an infringement notice
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60l-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 60L Issuing an infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits issuing an infringement notice
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60L(5) Issuing an infringement notice

60M Effect of compliance with an infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.315
curation status: Proposed
has part: 60M(1) Effect of compliance with an infringement notice
has part: 60M(2) Effect of compliance with an infringement notice
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60m
schema version: 2

60M(1) Effect of compliance with an infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.315
note: Compliance with infringement notice results in obligation to pay penalty.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60m-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60m-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60m-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60m-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 60M Effect of compliance with an infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60m-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Penalty paid within specified period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
premise text: (b) the person pays the penalty specified in the infringement notice within the infringement notice compliance period and in accordance with the notice;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60m-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Payment implies obligation to pay penalty
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (c) the infringement notice is not withdrawn under section 60Q.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay penalty
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (1) This section applies if...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60M(1) Effect of compliance with an infringement notice

60M(2) Effect of compliance with an infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.315
note: The person is not regarded as having complied with the infringement notice.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60m-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60m-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 60M Effect of compliance with an infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Non-compliance
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negation of compliance
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
premise text: Compliance with the infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60m-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60M(2) Effect of compliance with an infringement notice

60N Effect of failure to comply with an infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.316
note: Liability for failure to comply with infringement notice
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60n-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60n-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60n
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60n-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Liability for contravention
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay penalty
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: Failure to comply with infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60n-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60N Effect of failure to comply with an infringement notice

60P Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.316
curation status: Proposed
has part: 60P(1) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
has part: 60P(2) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
has part: 60P(3) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
has part: 60P(4) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
has part: 60P(5) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
has part: 60P(6) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
has part: 60P(7) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60p
schema version: 2

60P(1) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.316
note: Defines infringement notice compliance period
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60p-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 60P Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice

60P(2) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.316
note: Compliance period for infringement notice
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60p-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 60P Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Holds true
modality: Deontic
operator: holds

60P(3) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.316
note: Commission may extend infringement notice compliance period upon request.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60p-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 60P Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission obligation to extend infringement notice compliance period.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60P(3) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice

60P(4) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.316
note: Maximum extension period for infringement notice compliance
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60p-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 60P Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Extension period overlaps with 28 days
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: (4) Only one extension may be given, and the extension must not be for longer than 28 days.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Extension period is limited to 28 days
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes a statement about the provision
modality: CogAI
operator: asserts
premise text: (4) Only one extension may be given, and the extension must not be for longer than 28 days.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (extension <= 28 days)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limits the maximum extension period
modality: Deontic
operator: max
premise text: (4) Only one extension may be given, and the extension must not be for longer than 28 days.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Extension period diffuses into 28 days
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes a relationship between events
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (4) Only one extension may be given, and the extension must not be for longer than 28 days.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Extension period overlaps with 28 days
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship
modality: LTL
operator: overlaps
premise text: (4) Only one extension may be given, and the extension must not be for longer than 28 days.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60P(4) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice

60P(5) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
description: Notice of extension
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.316
note: Must provide notice of extension to the person issued the infringement notice.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60p-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 60P Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice of extension
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60P(5) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice

60P(6) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.316
note: Failure to comply with subsection (5) does not affect the validity of the extension.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60p-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 60P Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60P(6) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice

60P(7) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.316
note: Reference to extended infringement notice compliance period
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60p-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 60P Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice

60Q Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.317
curation status: Proposed
has part: 60Q(1) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
has part: 60Q(2) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
has part: 60Q(3) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
has part: 60Q(4) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60q
schema version: 2

60Q(1) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
description: Written representations
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.317
note: Right to withdraw infringement notice
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60q-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60q-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 60Q Withdrawal of an infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right to withdraw
modality: Deontic
operator: can

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60q-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60Q(1) Withdrawal of an infringement notice

60Q(2) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.317
note: Protection from self-incrimination in proceedings
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60q-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60q-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 60Q Withdrawal of an infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to protect self-incrimination
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60q-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60Q(2) Withdrawal of an infringement notice

60Q(3) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.317
note: Commission may withdraw infringement notice upon request.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60q-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60q-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60q-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 60Q Withdrawal of an infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60q-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to withdraw infringement notice
modality: Deontic
operator: may

60Q(4) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.317
note: Subsection (3) applies regardless of representations made for withdrawal.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60q-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60q-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60q-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 60Q Withdrawal of an infringement notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60q-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Subsection (3) applies regardless of representations made.
modality: Deontic
operator: Always

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60q-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60Q(4) Withdrawal of an infringement notice

60R Effect of this Division
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.318
note: Does not require an infringement notice or affect liability for alleged contravention.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60r-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60r-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60r
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60r-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: !

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60r-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60R Effect of this Division

75B Interpretation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.320
curation status: Proposed
has part: 75B(1) Interpretation
has part: 75B(2) Interpretation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-75b
schema version: 2

75B(1) Interpretation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.320
note: Defines who is responsible for a contravention of certain provisions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-75b-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-75b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-75b-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-75b-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-75b-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-75b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 75B Interpretation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-75b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...who has aided, abetted, counselled or procured the contravention.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the scope of responsibility.
modality: Deontic
operator: is-a
premise text: The person involved in a contravention is defined as...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-75b-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...who has been in any way, directly or indirectly, knowingly concerned in, or party to, the contravention.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the scope of responsibility.
modality: Deontic
operator: is-a
premise text: The person involved in a contravention is defined as...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-75b-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...who has conspired with others to effect the contravention.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the scope of responsibility.
modality: Deontic
operator: is-a
premise text: The person involved in a contravention is defined as...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-75b-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...who has aided, abetted, counselled or procured the contravention; who has induced, whether by threats or promises or otherwise, the contravention; who has been in any way, directly or indirectly, knowingly concerned in, or party to, the contravention; or who has conspired with others to effect the contravention.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Combines multiple conditions for determining responsibility.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: &
premise text: The person involved in a contravention is defined as...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-75b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 75B(1) Interpretation

75B(2) Interpretation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.320
note: Reference to court is a reference to any court having jurisdiction in the matter.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-75b-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-75b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-75b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 75B Interpretation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-75b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reference to court is a reference to any court having jurisdiction in the matter.
modality: Deontic
operator: refers to

76 Pecuniary penalties
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.321
note: Contravention of specific provisions is prohibited.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76 Pecuniary penalties

76A Defence to proceedings under section 76 relating to a
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.327
curation status: Proposed
has part: 76A(1) Defence to proceedings under section 76 relating to a
has part: 76A(2) Defence to proceedings under section 76 relating to a
has part: 76A(3) Defence to proceedings under section 76 relating to a
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76a
schema version: 2

76A(1) Defence to proceedings under section 76 relating to a
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.327
note: Defines contravention in relation to section 76
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76a-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 76A Defence to proceedings under section 76 relating to a

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76A(1) Defence to proceedings under section 76 relating to a

76A(2) Defence to proceedings under section 76 relating to a
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.327
note: Defence against proceedings under section 76 relating to a contravention of section 92
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76a-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76a-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 76A Defence to proceedings under section 76 relating to a

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The contravention occurred before the respondent took reasonable precautions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Relates to the timing of the defence
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The respondent establishes a defence under section 76(2)(c)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The contravention is not established
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defence against prosecution
modality: Deontic
operator: EXCEPT
premise text: The respondent establishes a defence under section 76(2)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The prosecution must prove that the contravention was not due to a reasonable mistake or reliance on information
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Relates to the burden of proof
modality: Deontic
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: The respondent establishes a defence under section 76(2)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76a-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The prosecution must prove that the contravention was due to an act or default of another person, beyond the respondent's control
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Relates to the burden of proof
modality: Deontic
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: The respondent establishes a defence under section 76(2)(c)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The contravention occurred after the respondent took reasonable precautions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Relates to the timing of the defence
modality: LTL
operator: <=
premise text: The respondent establishes a defence under section 76(2)(c)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76A(2) Defence to proceedings under section 76 relating to a

76A(3) Defence to proceedings under section 76 relating to a
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.327
note: Another person does not include a person who was in Chapter 5 Enforcement and remedies
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76a-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 76A Defence to proceedings under section 76 relating to a

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76A(3) Defence to proceedings under section 76 relating to a

76B Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.328
curation status: Proposed
has part: 76B(1) Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
has part: 76B(2) Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
has part: 76B(3) Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
has part: 76B(4) Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
has part: 76B(5) Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
has part: 76B(6) Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76b
schema version: 2

76B(1) Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.328
note: Defines contravention and pecuniary penalty order.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 76B Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76B(1) Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct

76B(2) Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.328
note: Court cannot impose pecuniary penalty order in certain cases.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 76B Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of making a pecuniary penalty order
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76B(2) Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct

76B(3) Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.328
note: Proceedings for pecuniary penalty order stayed if criminal proceedings started or already started against person for offence.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 76B Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the proceedings may be resumed if the person is not convicted of the offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal overlap between criminal proceedings and pecuniary penalty order proceedings.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3) Proceedings for a pecuniary penalty order against a person in relation to a contravention of Part IV, subsection 56BO(1) or section 56BZJ or 92 are stayed...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the proceedings may be resumed if the person is not convicted of the offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Describes implication between criminal proceedings and pecuniary penalty order proceedings.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (3) Proceedings for a pecuniary penalty order against a person in relation to a contravention of Part IV, subsection 56BO(1) or section 56BZJ or 92 are stayed...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the proceedings may be resumed if the person is not convicted of the offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits pecuniary penalty order proceedings if criminal proceedings started or already started.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (3) Proceedings for a pecuniary penalty order against a person in relation to a contravention of Part IV, subsection 56BO(1) or section 56BZJ or 92 are stayed...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the proceedings may be resumed if the person is not convicted of the offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes diffusion of conditions for staying pecuniary penalty order proceedings.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (3) Proceedings for a pecuniary penalty order against a person in relation to a contravention of Part IV, subsection 56BO(1) or section 56BZJ or 92 are stayed...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the proceedings may be resumed if the person is not convicted of the offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes recurring trace between criminal proceedings and pecuniary penalty order proceedings.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
premise text: (3) Proceedings for a pecuniary penalty order against a person in relation to a contravention of Part IV, subsection 56BO(1) or section 56BZJ or 92 are stayed...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76B(3) Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct

76B(4) Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.328
note: Starting criminal proceedings against a person for substantially the same conduct as a contravention of certain laws.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76b-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 76B Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits starting criminal proceedings for substantially the same conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

76B(5) Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.328
note: Prevents admissibility of evidence in criminal proceedings if individual previously gave the same evidence or produced documents in a previous proceeding for a pecuniary penalty order.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76b-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 76B Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The individual's current evidence is not admissible if it overlaps with their previous evidence
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval during which the individual's evidence is not admissible
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The individual's previous evidence was given before the current proceeding

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The system applies the exemption to the individual's current evidence
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Defines how the system recognizes the exemption
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: The system recognizes the individual's previous evidence as exempt from admissibility

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Individual's previous evidence is not admissible
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prevents admissibility of evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: State prohibits admissibility

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The individual's current evidence is not admissible if it includes documents that were previously given or produced in a pecuniary penalty order
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Defines how the prohibition applies to related information
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: The individual's previous evidence includes documents that are also relevant to the current proceeding

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The individual's current evidence is not admissible until their previous evidence is no longer relevant
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval during which the individual's evidence is not admissible
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: The individual's previous evidence was given before the current proceeding

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76B(5) Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct

76B(6) Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.328
note: Definition of 'offence' for the purposes of this section.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76b-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 76B Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: =

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Applies to explicit class hierarchies.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =

77 Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.329
curation status: Proposed
has part: 77(1) Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties
has part: 77(2) Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77
schema version: 2

77(1) Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.329
note: Commission may institute a proceeding for recovery of pecuniary penalties.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 77 Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission may institute a proceeding.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77(1) Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties

77(2) Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.329
note: Commencement of civil action within 6 years after contravention
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 77 Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The commencement period overlaps with the contravention period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between commencement and contravention
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) A proceeding under subsection (1) may be commenced within 6 years after the contravention.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The CogAI recognizes the obligation to commence civil action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of obligation to commence civil action
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (2) A proceeding under subsection (1) may be commenced within 6 years after the contravention.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A proceeding under subsection (1) must be commenced within 6 years after contravention.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to commence civil action within 6 years
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) A proceeding under subsection (1) may be commenced within 6 years after the contravention.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The diffusion of obligation is triggered by the commencement period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation to commence civil action
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (2) A proceeding under subsection (1) may be commenced within 6 years after the contravention.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is a recurring trace between commencement and contravention.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of commencement and contravention
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
premise text: (2) A proceeding under subsection (1) may be commenced within 6 years after the contravention.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77(2) Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties

77A Indemnification of officers
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.329
note: Body corporate cannot indemnify certain liabilities incurred as an officer.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77a
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of indemnification
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77A Indemnification of officers

77B Certain indemnities not authorised and certain documents void
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.330
curation status: Proposed
has part: 77B(1) Certain indemnities not authorised and certain documents void
has part: 77B(2) Certain indemnities not authorised and certain documents void
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77b
schema version: 2

77B(1) Certain indemnities not authorised and certain documents void
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.330
note: Section 77A does not authorise anything that would otherwise be unlawful.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77b-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 77B Certain indemnities not authorised and certain documents void

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Nothing that would otherwise be unlawful
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of Section 77A
modality: Deontic
operator: does not authorise
premise text: Section 77A

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77B(1) Certain indemnities not authorised and certain documents void

77B(2) Certain indemnities not authorised and certain documents void
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.330
note: Anything that purports to indemnify a person against a liability is void.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77b-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 77B Certain indemnities not authorised and certain documents void

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits indemnification
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

77C Application of section 77A to a person other than a body
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.330
note: A person other than a body corporate is punishable by a fine not exceeding 5 penalty units if convicted of an offence against subsection 77A(1) or section 11.4 of the Criminal Code.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77c-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77c-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77c
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77c-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval during which the obligation applies.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77C Application of section 77A to a person other than a body

77D Orders relating to void acquisitions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.331
curation status: Proposed
has part: 77D(1) Orders relating to void acquisitions
has part: 77D(2) Orders relating to void acquisitions
has part: 77D(3) Orders relating to void acquisitions
has part: 77D(4) Orders relating to void acquisitions
has part: 77D(5) Orders relating to void acquisitions
has part: 77D(6) Orders relating to void acquisitions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77d
schema version: 2

77D(1) Orders relating to void acquisitions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.331
note: Applicable if an acquisition is void to any extent by force of subsection 45AZA(2) or would be void apart from an order under this section.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 77D Orders relating to void acquisitions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Condition for applicability of the provision
modality: Deontic
operator: ApplicableIf
premise text: (acquisition is void to any extent by force of subsection 45AZA(2)) or (would be void apart from an order under this section)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77D(1) Orders relating to void acquisitions

77D(2) Orders relating to void acquisitions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.331
note: Federal Court may make orders to deal with void acquisitions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 77D Orders relating to void acquisitions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77D(2) Orders relating to void acquisitions

77D(3) Orders relating to void acquisitions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.331
note: Application must be made within 6 years after acquisition.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 77D Orders relating to void acquisitions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to make application within time limit.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77D(3) Orders relating to void acquisitions

77D(4) Orders relating to void acquisitions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.331
note: Court must have regard to seriousness of related contravention before making an order.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77d-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 77D Orders relating to void acquisitions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must have regard to seriousness of related contravention before making an order.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77D(4) Orders relating to void acquisitions

77D(5) Orders relating to void acquisitions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.331
note: Commission must give copy of application to the Commission and may intervene in proceedings.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77d-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 77D Orders relating to void acquisitions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission must give copy of application to the Commission.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission may intervene in proceedings.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77D(5) Orders relating to void acquisitions

77D(6) Orders relating to void acquisitions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.331
note: Commission is a party to Chapter 5 Enforcement and remedies if it intervenes in a proceeding under paragraph (5)(b)
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-6-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77d-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 77D Orders relating to void acquisitions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Chapter 5 Enforcement and remedies
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission is a party
modality: Deontic
operator: is taken to be
premise text: (6) If the Commission intervenes in a proceeding under paragraph (5)(b)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-6-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Chapter 5 Enforcement and remedies
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Commission is a party
modality: LinearLogic
operator: is taken to be
premise text: (6) If the Commission intervenes in a proceeding under paragraph (5)(b)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77D(6) Orders relating to void acquisitions

78 Criminal proceedings not to be brought for contraventions of
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.333
note: Criminal proceedings not to be brought for contraventions of
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-78-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-78
schema version: 2

79 Offences against section 45AF or 45AG
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.333
note: Aiding, abetting, or inducing a person to contravene a provision is punishable.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-79
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is punishable
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits aiding, abetting, or inducing a person to contravene a provision.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (aa) attempts to contravene; or (a) aids, abets, counsels or procures a person to contravene;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is punishable
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits being knowingly concerned in or party to the contravention by a person of a provision.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (c) is in any way, directly or indirectly, knowingly concerned in, nor party to, the contravention by a person of;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is punishable
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conspiring with others to contravene a provision.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (d) conspires with others to contravene;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is punishable
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits a person not being a body corporate from contravening a provision.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (e) in a case where (i) the provision is a cartel offence provision; and (ii) the person is not a body corporate;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 79 Offences against section 45AF or 45AG

79A Enforcement and recovery of certain fines
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.335
curation status: Proposed
has part: 79A(1) Enforcement and recovery of certain fines
has part: 79A(2) Enforcement and recovery of certain fines
has part: 79A(3) Enforcement and recovery of certain fines
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-79a
schema version: 2

79A(1) Enforcement and recovery of certain fines
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.335
note: Defaulting in payment of a fine may result in the fine being declared ineffective.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79a-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-79a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 79A Enforcement and recovery of certain fines

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of defaulting in payment of a fine.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

79A(2) Enforcement and recovery of certain fines
type: Concept
description: Security for payment of fine
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.335
note: Court must cancel order in respect of fine if person provides security for payment.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79a-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-79a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 79A Enforcement and recovery of certain fines

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court has an obligation to cancel order if security is provided.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 79A(2) Enforcement and recovery of certain fines

79A(3) Enforcement and recovery of certain fines
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.335
note: Allow person to pay fine within specified time or by instalments.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79a-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-79a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 79A Enforcement and recovery of certain fines

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission to pay fine.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

79B Preference must be given to compensation for victims
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.337
note: Court must give preference to making an order for compensation if defendant cannot pay pecuniary penalty or fine and compensation.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79b-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-79b
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must give preference to making an order for compensation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 79B Preference must be given to compensation for victims

80 Injunctions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.337
note: Prohibition of conduct that constitutes or would constitute a contravention of certain provisions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-80
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) a contravention of any of the following provisions:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (1) Subject to subsections (1A), (1AAA) and (1B)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 80 Injunctions

80A Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal—orders
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.341
curation status: Proposed
has part: 80A(1) Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal—orders
has part: 80A(2) Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal—orders
has part: 80A(3) Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal—orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-80a
schema version: 2

80A(1) Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal—orders
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.341
note: Order not to make regulated supply at excessive price
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80a-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-80a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 80A Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal—orders

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 80A(1) Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal—orders

80A(2) Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal—orders
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.341
note: Section does not limit section 80.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80a-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-80a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 80A Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal—orders

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 80 does not limit section 80.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section implies no limitation on section 80.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Section 80A(2)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 80A(2) Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal—orders

80A(3) Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal—orders
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.341
note: Defines terms for price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal—orders
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80a-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-80a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 80A Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal—orders

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 80A(3) Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal—orders

80AB Stay of injunctions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.342
curation status: Proposed
has part: 80AB(1) Stay of injunctions
has part: 80AB(2) Stay of injunctions
has part: 80AB(3) Stay of injunctions
has part: 80AB(4) Stay of injunctions
has part: 80AB(5) Stay of injunctions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-80ab
schema version: 2

80AB(1) Stay of injunctions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.342
note: The Court may stay the operation of an injunction granted under section 80 if certain conditions are met.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-80ab-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 80AB Stay of injunctions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The conduct relates to the supply of goods or services to, or the acquisition of goods or services from a person who is or becomes a party to the proceeding referred to in paragraph (b)
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relates to the supply of goods or services to, or the acquisition of goods or services from

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: The Court considers that granting the stay: would be likely to facilitate the settlement of the dispute by conciliation
modality: Argumentation
operator: would be likely to facilitate the settlement of the dispute by conciliation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Court may stay the operation of an injunction
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Court considers that granting the stay: would, in all the circumstances, be just
modality: Deontic
operator: would, in all the circumstances, be just

80AB(2) Stay of injunctions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.342
note: Court may vary or rescind order staying injunction operation
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-80ab-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 80AB Stay of injunctions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court obligation to vary or rescind order
modality: Deontic
operator: May

80AB(3) Stay of injunctions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.342
note: Court must not make any order in relation to the costs of the proceedings.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-80ab-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 80AB Stay of injunctions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must not make any order.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

80AB(4) Stay of injunctions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.342
note: Nothing in this section affects other powers of the Court.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-80ab-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 80AB Stay of injunctions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 80AB(4) Stay of injunctions

80AB(5) Stay of injunctions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.342
note: Definition of associated contravention
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-80ab-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 80AB Stay of injunctions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Injunction includes an interim injunction
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Associated contravention is defined
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is defined as

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 80AB(5) Stay of injunctions

80AC Injunctions to prevent mergers if authorisation granted on the
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.343
note: Granting merger authorization on false or misleading information is prohibited.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ac-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ac-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-80ac
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ac-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Court may not grant the authorisation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of granting merger authorization on false or misleading information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The person was granted a merger authorisation for the proposed acquisition on the basis of information that was false or misleading in a material particular.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ac-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 80AC Injunctions to prevent mergers if authorisation granted on the

80AD Injunctions if acquisition determinations made on the basis of
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.344
note: Acquisition into effect if Commission made determination based on false or misleading information
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ad-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ad-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-80ad
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ad-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Acquisition into effect is prohibited
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits acquisition into effect if Commission made determination based on false or misleading information
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Commission made an acquisition determination under paragraph 51ABZE(1)(a) or 51ABZW(1)(a)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ad-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 80AD Injunctions if acquisition determinations made on the basis of

81 Divestiture where merger contravenes section 50 or 50A
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.344
curation status: Proposed
has part: 81(1) Divestiture where merger contravenes section 50 or 50A
has part: 81(1A) Divestiture where merger contravenes section 50 or 50A
has part: 81(1B) Divestiture where merger contravenes section 50 or 50A
has part: 81(1C) Divestiture where merger contravenes section 50 or 50A
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81
schema version: 2

81(1) Divestiture where merger contravenes section 50 or 50A
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.344
note: Court may give directions for disposal of shares or assets acquired in contravention of section 50.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 81 Divestiture where merger contravenes section 50 or 50A

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court has an obligation to give directions.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81(1) Divestiture where merger contravenes section 50 or 50A

81(1A) Divestiture where merger contravenes section 50 or 50A
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.344
note: Acquirer must refund amount paid to vendor if acquisition is voided by court declaration.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81-ss-1a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 81 Divestiture where merger contravenes section 50 or 50A

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Acquirer has an obligation to refund amount.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81(1A) Divestiture where merger contravenes section 50 or 50A

81(1B) Divestiture where merger contravenes section 50 or 50A
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.344
note: Directs a corporation to dispose of its assets within a specified period if it has contravened subsection 50A(6).
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81-ss-1b-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 81 Divestiture where merger contravenes section 50 or 50A

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The corporation must dispose of its assets.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Directs an action.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81(1B) Divestiture where merger contravenes section 50 or 50A

81(1C) Divestiture where merger contravenes section 50 or 50A
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.344
note: Court may make an order under subsection (1) or a declaration under subsection (1A)
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81-ss-1c-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81-ss-1c
schema version: 2
part of: 81 Divestiture where merger contravenes section 50 or 50A

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court may make an order or declaration
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81-ss-1c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81(1C) Divestiture where merger contravenes section 50 or 50A

81A Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.346
curation status: Proposed
has part: 81A(1) Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on
has part: 81A(2) Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on
has part: 81A(4) Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on
has part: 81A(5) Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on
has part: 81A(7) Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81a
schema version: 2

81A(1) Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.346
note: Acquirer must divest shares or assets if merger authorization was granted on false information.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 81A Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The acquirer must divest shares or assets.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Acquirer has an obligation to divest shares or assets.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The acquirer was granted a merger authorization on false information.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Court may grant permission for divestiture.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court may grant permission for divestiture if certain conditions are met.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: The Court or another court has found that the acquirer or related body corporate has contravened section 92 or Part 7.4 of the Criminal Code.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The acquirer must ensure that the acquisition would not have contravened section 50.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Acquirer must ensure that the acquisition would not have contravened section 50 without the authorization.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Apart from the authorisation, the acquisition would have contravened section 50.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Court must ensure that the authorisation would not have been granted.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must ensure that the authorisation would not have been granted without the false information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: If that information had not been given, the authorisation would not have been granted.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81A(1) Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on

81A(2) Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.346
note: Court may give directions for securing disposal of shares or assets.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 81A Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81A(2) Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on

81A(4) Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.346
note: Acquisition of shares or assets void if vendor involved in contravention
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 81A Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Acquisition void
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits acquisition of shares or assets
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Vendor involved in contravention

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81A(4) Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on

81A(5) Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.346
note: Vendor must refund amount paid to acquirer for acquired shares or assets.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 81A Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Vendor must refund amount.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81A(5) Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on

81A(7) Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.346
note: Court may accept undertaking to dispose of shares or assets
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-7-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81a-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 81A Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court discretion
modality: Deontic
operator: may

81B Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.348
curation status: Proposed
has part: 81B(1) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
has part: 81B(2) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
has part: 81B(3) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
has part: 81B(4) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
has part: 81B(5) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
has part: 81B(6) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
has part: 81B(7) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81b
schema version: 2

81B(1) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.348
note: Acquisition contravenes Subdivision B of Division 1A of Part IV if Commission made acquisition determination.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 81B Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81B(1) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.

81B(2) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.348
note: False information in acquisition determinations
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 81B Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Enforcement and remedies Chapter 5
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of false information
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Information was false or misleading in a material part

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81B(2) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.

81B(3) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.348
note: Divestiture if acquisition determinations made on false information
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 81B Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Divestiture
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for divestiture
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (3) This subsection applies if: (a) putting the acquisition into effect is subject to a condition; and (b) the condition is not complied with.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Divestiture
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifies divestiture as a consequence of non-compliance with acquisition determinations
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
premise text: (3) This subsection applies if: (a) putting the acquisition into effect is subject to a condition; and (b) the condition is not complied with.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Divestiture
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits divestiture if acquisition determinations made on false information
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) This subsection applies if: (a) putting the acquisition into effect is subject to a condition; and (b) the condition is not complied with.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Divestiture
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses divestiture as a consequence of non-compliance
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (3) This subsection applies if: (a) putting the acquisition into effect is subject to a condition; and (b) the condition is not complied with.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Divestiture
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines temporal trace for divestiture
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
premise text: (3) This subsection applies if: (a) putting the acquisition into effect is subject to a condition; and (b) the condition is not complied with.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81B(3) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.

81B(4) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.348
note: Federal Court may give directions for securing disposal of acquired assets.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81b-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 81B Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Federal Court may give directions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81B(4) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.

81B(5) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.348
note: Acquisition declared void if made on false acquisition determinations
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81b-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 81B Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the acquisition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81B(5) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.

81B(6) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.348
note: Court may not make order under subsection (5) if person from whom thing was acquired was involved in contravention or non-compliance.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-6-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81b-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 81B Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court may not make order under subsection (5) if person was involved in contravention or non-compliance during acquisition.
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Excerpt describes a temporal relationship between events.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Court being satisfied of matters in subsection (1)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court may not make order under subsection (5)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court cannot make order if person was involved in contravention or non-compliance.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: Court being satisfied of matters in subsection (1)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-6-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court may not make order under subsection (5) if person was involved in contravention or non-compliance.
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excerpt describes a prohibition on Court making order.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: Court being satisfied of matters in subsection (1)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court may not make order under subsection (5) if person was involved in contravention or non-compliance during acquisition.
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Excerpt describes a temporal relationship between events.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: Court being satisfied of matters in subsection (1)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-6-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81B(6) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.

81B(7) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.348
note: If Court makes order under subsection (5), thing is not disposed of by vendor.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-7-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81b-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 81B Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Thing is not disposed of by vendor.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If order made, thing is not disposed of.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Order made under subsection (5)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81B(7) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.

82 Actions for damages
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.350
curation status: Proposed
has part: 82(1) Actions for damages
has part: 82(2) Actions for damages
has part: 82(3) Actions for damages
has part: 82(4) Actions for damages
has part: 82(5) Actions for damages
has part: 82(6) Actions for damages
has part: 82(7) Actions for damages
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-82
schema version: 2

82(1) Actions for damages
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.350
note: Recover loss or damage from contravention of certain provisions
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-82-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 82 Actions for damages

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to recover loss or damage
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 82(1) Actions for damages

82(2) Actions for damages
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.350
note: Action can be commenced within 6 years after the day on which the cause of action accrued.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-82-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 82 Actions for damages

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ability to commence an action within a specified timeframe.
modality: Deontic
operator: can

82(3) Actions for damages
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.350
note: Seek an order from the court during proceedings on a matter.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-82-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 82 Actions for damages

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 82(3) Actions for damages

82(4) Actions for damages
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.350
note: Court may order applicant not liable for costs of respondents.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-82-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 82 Actions for damages

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits

82(5) Actions for damages
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.350
note: Court must satisfy conditions before making an order for damages.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-82-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 82 Actions for damages

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Order for damages
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must satisfy conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: None

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 82(5) Actions for damages

82(6) Actions for damages
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.350
note: Court may satisfy itself of matters in subsection (5) by having regard only to documents filed with the court.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-82-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 82 Actions for damages

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court may satisfy itself
modality: Deontic
operator: May

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 82(6) Actions for damages

82(7) Actions for damages
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.350
note: Person liable for costs in appeal
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-7-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-82-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 82 Actions for damages

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay costs
modality: Deontic
operator: Liability
premise text: (7) A person who appeals a decision...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 82(7) Actions for damages

83 Findings and admissions of fact in proceedings to be evidence
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.352
curation status: Proposed
has part: 83(1) Findings and admissions of fact in proceedings to be evidence
has part: 83(2) Findings and admissions of fact in proceedings to be evidence
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-83
schema version: 2

83(1) Findings and admissions of fact in proceedings to be evidence
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.352
note: Findings and admissions of fact in proceedings are prima facie evidence.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-83-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-83-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-83-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-83-ss-1-logic-epistemic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-83-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-83-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-83-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 83 Findings and admissions of fact in proceedings to be evidence

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-83-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, these findings and admissions are prima facie evidence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide prima facie evidence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Findings and admissions of fact in proceedings are made in certain types of proceedings.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-83-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, permission to provide prima facie evidence is not required.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to provide prima facie evidence is not required.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: There is no requirement for a person to provide prima facie evidence in proceedings.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-83-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, there is an obligation on the person to provide prima facie evidence in certain types of proceedings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: There is an obligation on the person to provide prima facie evidence in certain types of proceedings.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The court's findings are a basis for the admission of prima facie evidence.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-83-ss-1-logic-epistemic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, findings and admissions of fact in proceedings are justified by the court's findings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Findings and admissions of fact in proceedings are justified by the court's findings.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Justification
premise text: The court's findings are a justification for the admission of prima facie evidence.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-83-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, findings and admissions of fact in proceedings have a temporal relation to the proceedings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Findings and admissions of fact in proceedings have a temporal relation to the proceedings.
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalRelation
premise text: The findings and admissions of fact in proceedings occur at the same time as the proceedings.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-83-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 83(1) Findings and admissions of fact in proceedings to be evidence

83(2) Findings and admissions of fact in proceedings to be evidence
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.352
note: Produce a document under court seal to prove a finding or admission.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-83-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-83-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-83-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 83 Findings and admissions of fact in proceedings to be evidence

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-83-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must produce document under court seal.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-83-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 83(2) Findings and admissions of fact in proceedings to be evidence

84 Conduct by directors, employees or agents
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.352
curation status: Proposed
has part: 84(1) Conduct by directors, employees or agents
has part: 84(2) Conduct by directors, employees or agents
has part: 84(3) Conduct by directors, employees or agents
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-84
schema version: 2

84(1) Conduct by directors, employees or agents
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.352
note: Establishing state of mind for directors, employees or agents of a body corporate
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-84-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 84 Conduct by directors, employees or agents

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (e) The director, employee or agent had that state of mind.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires the director, employee or agent to be within their actual or apparent authority
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (d) The director, employee or agent had that state of mind.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (e) The director, employee or agent had that state of mind.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires the director, employee or agent to be acting within their actual or apparent authority
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (d) The director, employee or agent was, in engaging in that conduct, acting within the scope of his or her actual or apparent authority.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (e) The director, employee or agent had that state of mind.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires the director, employee or agent to be engaged in the conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (c) A director, employee or agent of the body corporate engaged in that conduct.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (e) The director, employee or agent had that state of mind.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires the conduct to be engaged in by a body corporate
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (b) A proceeding in respect of conduct engaged in by a body corporate, being conduct in relation to which section 153E, 153F, 153G or 153H applies;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (e) The director, employee or agent had that state of mind.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires the conduct to be in relation to which section 45AJ, 45AK, 46 or 46A, Part IVB, IVBA, IVBB or IVE, section 55B, Part V, subsection 56BN(1), 56BO(1) or 56BU(1), section 56BZA, 56BZB or 56BZC applies
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (b) A proceeding under this Part in respect of conduct engaged in by a body corporate, being conduct in relation to which section 45AJ, 45AK, 46 or 46A, Part IVB, IVBA, IVBB or IVE, section 55B, Part V, subsection 56BN(1), 56BO(1) or 56BU(1), section 56BZA, 56BZB or 56BZC,

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (e) The director, employee or agent had that state of mind.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires the conduct to be in relation to which section 45AF or 45AG applies
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (a) a prosecution for an offence against section 45AF or 45AG or subsection 56BN(1) or 56BZI(1) in respect of conduct engaged in by a body corporate;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 84(1) Conduct by directors, employees or agents

84(2) Conduct by directors, employees or agents
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.352
note: Any conduct engaged in on behalf of a body corporate shall be deemed to have been engaged by the body corporate.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-84-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 84 Conduct by directors, employees or agents

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conduct on behalf of a body corporate
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 84(2) Conduct by directors, employees or agents

84(3) Conduct by directors, employees or agents
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.352
note: Prohibition on conduct by directors, employees or agents
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-84-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 84 Conduct by directors, employees or agents

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 84(3) Conduct by directors, employees or agents

85 Defences
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.355
note: Defences against conduct in contravention of a provision
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-85-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-85-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-85-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: forbidden

86 Jurisdiction of courts
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.355
curation status: Proposed
has part: 86(1) Jurisdiction of courts
has part: 86(1A) Jurisdiction of courts
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86
schema version: 2

86(1) Jurisdiction of courts
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.355
note: Jurisdiction of courts is conferred on the Federal Court.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 86 Jurisdiction of courts

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Jurisdiction is conferred
modality: Deontic
operator: has

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86(1) Jurisdiction of courts

86(1A) Jurisdiction of courts
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.355
note: Jurisdiction is conferred on the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) in certain matters.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86-ss-1a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 86 Jurisdiction of courts

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes jurisdiction
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86(1A) Jurisdiction of courts

86A Transfer of matters
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.357
note: Civil proceeding pending in Federal Court
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86a
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State is obligated to handle civil proceedings
modality: Deontic
operator: is

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86A Transfer of matters

86AA Limit on jurisdiction of Federal Circuit and Family Court of
type: Concept
references: sec-153
references: sec-32AC
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.357
note: Limit on jurisdiction of Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86aa-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86aa-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86aa
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits exceeding $750,000 in loss or damage
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

86C Non-punitive orders
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.358
curation status: Proposed
has part: 86C(1) Non-punitive orders
has part: 86C(1A) Non-punitive orders
has part: 86C(2) Non-punitive orders
has part: 86C(3) Non-punitive orders
has part: 86C(4) Non-punitive orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86c
schema version: 2

86C(1) Non-punitive orders
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.358
note: The Court may make non-punitive orders in relation to a person who has engaged in contravening conduct.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 86C Non-punitive orders

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86C(1) Non-punitive orders

86C(1A) Non-punitive orders
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.358
note: Court may make non-punitive orders on application by Director of Public Prosecutions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-1a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86c-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 86C Non-punitive orders

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86C(1A) Non-punitive orders

86C(2) Non-punitive orders
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.358
note: List of orders that can be made by the Court in relation to a person.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 86C Non-punitive orders

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court may make orders
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

86C(3) Non-punitive orders
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.358
note: Court's powers under other provisions of the Act are not limited.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 86C Non-punitive orders

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court's powers under other provisions of the Act are not limited.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86C(3) Non-punitive orders

86C(4) Non-punitive orders
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.358
note: Community service order for a person who has engaged in contravening conduct.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86c-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 86C Non-punitive orders

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to direct the person to perform community service.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the key as a provision related to community service orders.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86C(4) Non-punitive orders

86D Punitive orders—adverse publicity
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.360
curation status: Proposed
has part: 86D(1) Punitive orders—adverse publicity
has part: 86D(1A) Punitive orders—adverse publicity
has part: 86D(2) Punitive orders—adverse publicity
has part: 86D(3) Punitive orders—adverse publicity
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86d
schema version: 2

86D(1) Punitive orders—adverse publicity
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.360
note: Prohibition on adverse publicity order for certain individuals
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 86D Punitive orders—adverse publicity

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The adverse publicity order applies during the period from when it is made to when the person is no longer guilty or has paid the penalty
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the temporal interval during which the adverse publicity order applies
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The adverse publicity order applies until the person is no longer guilty of the offence or has paid the pecuniary penalty

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: AI can be used to enforce the adverse publicity order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes how AI can be used to enforce the adverse publicity order
modality: CogAI
operator: by
premise text: The adverse publicity order can be enforced using AI-powered monitoring and reporting tools

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person who meets the conditions cannot be subject to an adverse publicity order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits making an adverse publicity order
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: The Court may not make an adverse publicity order

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The adverse publicity order spreads through media and public disclosure
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes how the adverse publicity order spreads to other individuals
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
premise text: The adverse publicity order applies through the media and public disclosure

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The adverse publicity order remains in effect until the person is no longer guilty or has paid the penalty
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes the temporal interval until which the adverse publicity order remains in effect
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: The adverse publicity order remains in effect until the person is no longer guilty of the offence or has paid the pecuniary penalty

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86D(1) Punitive orders—adverse publicity

86D(1A) Punitive orders—adverse publicity
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.360
note: Court may make adverse publicity order against a person guilty of certain offences.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-1a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86d-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 86D Punitive orders—adverse publicity

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86D(1A) Punitive orders—adverse publicity

86D(2) Punitive orders—adverse publicity
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.360
note: Requires person to disclose and publish information
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 86D Punitive orders—adverse publicity

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure and publication of information
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies order as a prohibition
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify

86D(3) Punitive orders—adverse publicity
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.360
note: Court's powers under other provisions of the Act are not limited.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 86D Punitive orders—adverse publicity

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court's powers under other provisions of the Act are not limited.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86D(3) Punitive orders—adverse publicity

86E Order disqualifying a person from managing corporations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.361
note: Disqualification from managing corporations for contravention of certain laws.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86e-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86e-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86e-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86e-logic-linearlogic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86e
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for a period that the Court considers appropriate if: ...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits managing corporations for contravention of laws.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) On application by the Commission, the Court may make an order disqualifying a person from managing corporations...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86e-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (b) the Court is satisfied that the disqualification is justified.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires justification for disqualification.
modality: Deontic
operator: Justify
premise text: (b) the Court is satisfied that the disqualification is justified.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86e-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for a period that the Court considers appropriate if: ...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implies a causal relationship between contravention and disqualification.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
premise text: (1) On application by the Commission, the Court may make an order disqualifying a person from managing corporations...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86e-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86E Order disqualifying a person from managing corporations

86F Privilege against exposure to penalty—disqualification from
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.363
curation status: Proposed
has part: 86F(1) Privilege against exposure to penalty—disqualification from
has part: 86F(2) Privilege against exposure to penalty—disqualification from
has part: 86F(3) Privilege against exposure to penalty—disqualification from
has part: 86F(4) Privilege against exposure to penalty—disqualification from
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86f
schema version: 2

86F(1) Privilege against exposure to penalty—disqualification from
type: Concept
description: true
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.363
note: Must answer questions or provide information in a civil or criminal proceeding under this Act.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86f-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 86F Privilege against exposure to penalty—disqualification from

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must answer questions or provide information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86F(1) Privilege against exposure to penalty—disqualification from

86F(2) Privilege against exposure to penalty—disqualification from
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.363
note: Statutory requirement applies regardless of proceeding
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86f-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 86F Privilege against exposure to penalty—disqualification from

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation always applies
modality: Deontic
operator: always

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86F(2) Privilege against exposure to penalty—disqualification from

86F(3) Privilege against exposure to penalty—disqualification from
type: Concept
description: true
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.363
note: Must answer questions or provide information, produce documents, etc.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86f-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 86F Privilege against exposure to penalty—disqualification from

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must answer questions or provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86F(3) Privilege against exposure to penalty—disqualification from

86F(4) Privilege against exposure to penalty—disqualification from
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.363
note: Disqualification from penalty for exposure
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86f-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 86F Privilege against exposure to penalty—disqualification from

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines class of disqualification
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86F(4) Privilege against exposure to penalty—disqualification from

87 Other orders
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.364
curation status: Proposed
has part: 87(1) Other orders
has part: 87(1A) Other orders
has part: 87(1B) Other orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87
schema version: 2

87(1) Other orders
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.364
note: Court may make order against person who engaged in conduct that caused loss or damage to another party.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 87 Other orders

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make order against person who engaged in conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87(1) Other orders

87(1A) Other orders
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.364
note: Court may impose civil penalty provisions on individuals or organizations that engage in contravention of certain sections.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1a-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1a-logic-deontic-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1a-logic-argumentation-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 87 Other orders

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Period of engagement is not specified.
confidence: 0.6000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Excerpt refers to a period during which individuals or organizations may engage in contravention.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Section 87(1A)(a)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1a-logic-argumentation-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Reason is that individuals or organizations have suffered loss or damage.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Excerpt provides a reason for the court to impose civil penalty provisions.
modality: Argumentation
operator: for
premise text: Section 87(1A)(a)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Civil penalty provisions may be imposed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court imposes obligation on individuals or organizations.
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes
premise text: Section 87(1A)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1a-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Civil penalty provisions are optional.
confidence: 0.7000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court may impose civil penalty provisions on individuals or organizations that engage in contravention.
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Section 87(1A)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Class of persons is defined by subsection (1BAA)
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Excerpt describes a class of persons who have suffered loss or damage.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass
premise text: Section 87(1A)(ba)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1a-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: All individuals or organizations are subject to civil penalty provisions.
confidence: 0.9000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Excerpt applies to all individuals or organizations that engage in contravention.
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
premise text: Section 87(1A)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87(1A) Other orders

87(1B) Other orders
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.364
note: Commission may make an application on behalf of one or more persons
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1b-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 87 Other orders

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission may make an application
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87(1B) Other orders

87AA Special provision relating to Court’s exercise of powers under
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.369
curation status: Proposed
has part: 87AA(1) Special provision relating to Court’s exercise of powers under
has part: 87AA(2) Special provision relating to Court’s exercise of powers under
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87aa
schema version: 2

87AA(1) Special provision relating to Court’s exercise of powers under
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.369
note: Court must have regard to applicant's action before an industrial authority in relation to boycott conduct.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87aa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 87AA Special provision relating to Court’s exercise of powers under

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court has an obligation to consider applicant's action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87AA(1) Special provision relating to Court’s exercise of powers under

87AA(2) Special provision relating to Court’s exercise of powers under
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.369
note: Boycott conduct is prohibited under certain provisions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-2-logic-argumentation-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87aa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 87AA Special provision relating to Court’s exercise of powers under

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Boycott conduct is related to the relevant provisions in a temporal manner.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relation between boycott conduct and the relevant provisions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (2) In this section: ... (a) a contravention of subsection 45D(1), 45DA(1), 45DB(1), 45E(2) or 45E(3) or section 45EA;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-2-logic-argumentation-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If boycott conduct occurs, it is a contravention of the relevant provisions.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Establishes an implication between boycott conduct and the relevant provisions.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (2) In this section: ... (a) a contravention of subsection 45D(1), 45DA(1), 45DB(1), 45E(2) or 45E(3) or section 45EA;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Boycott conduct is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits boycott conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) In this section: ... (a) a contravention of subsection 45D(1), 45DA(1), 45DB(1), 45E(2) or 45E(3) or section 45EA;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Boycott conduct is a contravention of certain provisions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies boycott conduct as a contravention of certain provisions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Classify
premise text: (2) In this section: ... (a) a contravention of subsection 45D(1), 45DA(1), 45DB(1), 45E(2) or 45E(3) or section 45EA;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Boycott conduct is a contravention of certain provisions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies boycott conduct as a contravention of certain provisions.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: (a) a contravention of subsection 45D(1), 45DA(1), 45DB(1), 45E(2) or 45E(3) or section 45EA;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Boycott conduct is part of a recurring trace with the relevant provisions.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Establishes a recurring trace between boycott conduct and the relevant provisions.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (2) In this section: ... (a) a contravention of subsection 45D(1), 45DA(1), 45DB(1), 45E(2) or 45E(3) or section 45EA;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87AA(2) Special provision relating to Court’s exercise of powers under

87B Enforcement of undertakings
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.370
curation status: Proposed
has part: 87B(1) Enforcement of undertakings
has part: 87B(1A) Enforcement of undertakings
has part: 87B(2) Enforcement of undertakings
has part: 87B(3) Enforcement of undertakings
has part: 87B(4) Enforcement of undertakings
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87b
schema version: 2

87B(1) Enforcement of undertakings
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.370
note: Commission may accept written undertaking from person.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 87B Enforcement of undertakings

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Accepts undertakings
modality: Deontic
operator: accepts

87B(1A) Enforcement of undertakings
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.370
note: Commission may accept a written undertaking given by a person for the purposes of this section in connection with a merger authorization.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-1a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87b-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 87B Enforcement of undertakings

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in connection with a merger authorization.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Undertaking during merger authorization
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The Commission may accept a written undertaking...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in connection with a merger authorization.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission accepts undertakings
modality: Deontic
operator: accepts
premise text: Commission may accept a written undertaking...

87B(2) Enforcement of undertakings
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.370
note: The person may withdraw or vary the undertaking with Commission's consent.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 87B Enforcement of undertakings

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to withdraw or vary the undertaking.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87B(2) Enforcement of undertakings

87B(3) Enforcement of undertakings
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.370
note: Commission may apply to Court for an order if undertaking is breached.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 87B Enforcement of undertakings

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission may apply to Court
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Breach of undertaking triggers application
modality: LinearLogic
operator: if

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87B(3) Enforcement of undertakings

87B(4) Enforcement of undertakings
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.370
note: Court may make orders to enforce undertaking breach
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87b-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 87B Enforcement of undertakings

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87B(4) Enforcement of undertakings

87C Enforcement of undertakings—Secretary of the Department
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.371
curation status: Proposed
has part: 87C(1) Enforcement of undertakings—Secretary of the Department
has part: 87C(2) Enforcement of undertakings—Secretary of the Department
has part: 87C(3) Enforcement of undertakings—Secretary of the Department
has part: 87C(4) Enforcement of undertakings—Secretary of the Department
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87c
schema version: 2

87C(1) Enforcement of undertakings—Secretary of the Department
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.371
note: Secretary may accept written undertaking from a person.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87c-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 87C Enforcement of undertakings—Secretary of the Department

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Acceptance of an undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: acceptance

87C(2) Enforcement of undertakings—Secretary of the Department
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.371
note: Secretary of the Department must consent to withdrawal or variation of undertaking.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87c-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 87C Enforcement of undertakings—Secretary of the Department

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Secretary of the Department must consent to withdrawal or variation of undertaking.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide consent
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87C(2) Enforcement of undertakings—Secretary of the Department

87C(3) Enforcement of undertakings—Secretary of the Department
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.371
note: Secretary may apply to Court for order if person breaches undertaking terms
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87c-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87c-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 87C Enforcement of undertakings—Secretary of the Department

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Application to Court
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by Secretary
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Secretary considers breach

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87c-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Order application
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Secretary has duty to apply for order
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: Breach consideration

87C(4) Enforcement of undertakings—Secretary of the Department
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.371
note: Court may order person to comply with breached undertaking term.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87c-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87c-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 87C Enforcement of undertakings—Secretary of the Department

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court has obligation to order person to comply with breached undertaking term.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87c-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87C(4) Enforcement of undertakings—Secretary of the Department

87CA Intervention by Commission
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.371
curation status: Proposed
has part: 87CA(1) Intervention by Commission
has part: 87CA(2) Intervention by Commission
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87ca
schema version: 2

87CA(1) Intervention by Commission
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.371
note: Commission may intervene in proceedings with Court leave and conditions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ca-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87ca-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 87CA Intervention by Commission

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to intervene
modality: Deontic
operator: May

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ca-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87CA(1) Intervention by Commission

87CA(2) Intervention by Commission
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.371
note: Commission has rights and liabilities of a party in a proceeding.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ca-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ca-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87ca-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 87CA Intervention by Commission

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ca-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission is taken to be a party
modality: Deontic
operator: has

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ca-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87CA(2) Intervention by Commission

87CB Application of Part
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.372
curation status: Proposed
has part: 87CB(1) Application of Part
has part: 87CB(2) Application of Part
has part: 87CB(3) Application of Part
has part: 87CB(4) Application of Part
has part: 87CB(5) Application of Part
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87cb
schema version: 2

87CB(1) Application of Part
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.372
note: Application of Part for economic loss or damage to property caused by contravention of section 18.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87cb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 87CB Application of Part

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if the claim is an apportionable claim...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Part applies to a claim if conditions are met.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: (1) This Part applies...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87CB(1) Application of Part

87CB(2) Application of Part
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.372
note: Single apportionable claim for the same loss or damage
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87cb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 87CB Application of Part

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Single apportionable claim for the same loss or damage
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87CB(2) Application of Part

87CB(3) Application of Part
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.372
note: Definition of concurrent wrongdoer
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87cb-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 87CB Application of Part

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a key term
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87CB(3) Application of Part

87CB(4) Application of Part
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.372
note: Limits apportionable claims to those specified in subsection (1)
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87cb-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 87CB Application of Part

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limits scope of apportionable claims
modality: Deontic
operator: Limitation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87CB(4) Application of Part

87CB(5) Application of Part
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.372
note: No matter that a concurrent wrongdoer is insolvent, etc.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87cb-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 87CB Application of Part

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No obligation regardless of wrongdoer's status
modality: Deontic
operator: no matter
premise text: (5) For the purposes of this Part, it does not matter...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87CB(5) Application of Part

87CC Certain concurrent wrongdoers not to have benefit of
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.372
curation status: Proposed
has part: 87CC(1) Certain concurrent wrongdoers not to have benefit of
has part: 87CC(2) Certain concurrent wrongdoers not to have benefit of
has part: 87CC(3) Certain concurrent wrongdoers not to have benefit of
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87cc
schema version: 2

87CC(1) Certain concurrent wrongdoers not to have benefit of
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.372
note: Concurrent wrongdoers not to have benefit of certain liability
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87cc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 87CC Certain concurrent wrongdoers not to have benefit of

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This provision applies during proceedings involving concurrent wrongdoers with apportionable claims
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Applies during proceedings involving concurrent wrongdoers
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) Nothing in this Part operates...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Concurrent wrongdoer's actions imply intent to cause economic loss or damage
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implies intent to cause economic loss or damage
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (a) the concurrent wrongdoer intended...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This provision regulates the liability of concurrent wrongdoers
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Regulates concurrent wrongdoers' liability
modality: CogAI
operator: regulates
premise text: (1) Nothing in this Part operates...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Concurrent wrongdoer not entitled to benefit from exclusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excludes exclusion of liability for concurrent wrongdoers
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
premise text: Nothing in this Part operates to exclude the liability...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This provision applies through fraudulent conduct by concurrent wrongdoers
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Applies through fraudulent conduct
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
premise text: (b) the concurrent wrongdoer fraudulently...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87CC(1) Certain concurrent wrongdoers not to have benefit of

87CC(2) Certain concurrent wrongdoers not to have benefit of
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.372
note: Liability of excluded concurrent wrongdoer determined by relevant legal rules.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87cc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 87CC Certain concurrent wrongdoers not to have benefit of

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The liability of an excluded concurrent wrongdoer is to be determined in accordance with the legal rules (if any) that...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Determines liability of excluded concurrent wrongdoer.
modality: Deontic
operator: determines
premise text: (apart from this Part) are relevant legal rules

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87CC(2) Certain concurrent wrongdoers not to have benefit of

87CC(3) Certain concurrent wrongdoers not to have benefit of
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.372
note: Determine liability of concurrent wrongdoer according to this Part's provisions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87cc-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 87CC Certain concurrent wrongdoers not to have benefit of

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Determines liability obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: determines

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87CC(3) Certain concurrent wrongdoers not to have benefit of

87CD Proportionate liability for apportionable claims
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.373
curation status: Proposed
has part: 87CD(1) Proportionate liability for apportionable claims
has part: 87CD(2) Proportionate liability for apportionable claims
has part: 87CD(3) Proportionate liability for apportionable claims
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87cd
schema version: 2

87CD(1) Proportionate liability for apportionable claims
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.373
note: Proportionate liability for apportionable claims
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cd-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87cd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 87CD Proportionate liability for apportionable claims

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limits defendant's liability to proportionate amount
modality: Deontic
operator: Limitation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87CD(1) Proportionate liability for apportionable claims

87CD(2) Proportionate liability for apportionable claims
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.373
note: Liability for apportionable claims and non-apportionable claims
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cd-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87cd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 87CD Proportionate liability for apportionable claims

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to determine liability for apportionable claims
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87CD(2) Proportionate liability for apportionable claims

87CD(3) Proportionate liability for apportionable claims
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.373
note: Exclude proportion of damage due to plaintiff's contributory negligence
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cd-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87cd-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 87CD Proportionate liability for apportionable claims

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes duty on the state
modality: Deontic
operator: >

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cd-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87CD(3) Proportionate liability for apportionable claims

87CE Defendant to notify plaintiff of concurrent wrongdoer of
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.374
curation status: Proposed
has part: 87CE(1) Defendant to notify plaintiff of concurrent wrongdoer of
has part: 87CE(2) Defendant to notify plaintiff of concurrent wrongdoer of
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87ce
schema version: 2

87CE(1) Defendant to notify plaintiff of concurrent wrongdoer of
type: Concept
description: Written notice
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.374
note: Notify plaintiff of concurrent wrongdoer if reasonable grounds exist.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ce-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ce-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87ce-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 87CE Defendant to notify plaintiff of concurrent wrongdoer of

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ce-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defendant has an obligation to notify plaintiff.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ce-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87CE(1) Defendant to notify plaintiff of concurrent wrongdoer of

87CE(2) Defendant to notify plaintiff of concurrent wrongdoer of
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.374
note: Defendant must pay costs on an indemnity basis or otherwise.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ce-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ce-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87ce-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 87CE Defendant to notify plaintiff of concurrent wrongdoer of

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ce-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The defendant must pay costs on an indemnity basis or otherwise.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The court may order that the costs to be paid by the defendant...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ce-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87CE(2) Defendant to notify plaintiff of concurrent wrongdoer of

87CF Contribution not recoverable from defendant
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.375
note: Defendant cannot be required to contribute or indemnify another wrongdoer.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cf-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cf-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87cf
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cf-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of contribution and indemnification
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cf-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87CF Contribution not recoverable from defendant

87CG Subsequent actions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.375
curation status: Proposed
has part: 87CG(1) Subsequent actions
has part: 87CG(2) Subsequent actions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87cg
schema version: 2

87CG(1) Subsequent actions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.375
note: Allows a plaintiff to bring another action against a concurrent wrongdoer for the same damage or loss.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cg-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87cg-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 87CG Subsequent actions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows action
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cg-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87CG(1) Subsequent actions

87CG(2) Subsequent actions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.375
note: Limitation on damages in proceedings
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cg-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87cg-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 87CG Subsequent actions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limits the amount of damages that can be recovered
modality: Deontic
operator: Restriction

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87CG(2) Subsequent actions

87CH Joining non-party concurrent wrongdoer in the action
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.375
curation status: Proposed
has part: 87CH(1) Joining non-party concurrent wrongdoer in the action
has part: 87CH(2) Joining non-party concurrent wrongdoer in the action
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87ch
schema version: 2

87CH(1) Joining non-party concurrent wrongdoer in the action
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.375
note: Court may give leave to join a non-party concurrent wrongdoer in the action.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ch-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87ch-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 87CH Joining non-party concurrent wrongdoer in the action

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ch-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87CH(1) Joining non-party concurrent wrongdoer in the action

87CH(2) Joining non-party concurrent wrongdoer in the action
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.375
note: Court cannot give leave for joinder of previously concluded proceedings person
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ch-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ch-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87ch-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 87CH Joining non-party concurrent wrongdoer in the action

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ch-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court cannot give leave
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

87CI Application of Part
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.375
note: Application of Part
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ci-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87ci
schema version: 2

87D Definitions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.377
note: Definitions for Part 5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87d-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87d-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87d
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87d-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines key terms
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has definition

87E Proceedings to which this Part applies
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.379
note: Proceedings under Australian Consumer Law
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87e-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87e-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87e
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to proceedings taken under the Australian Consumer Law:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation applies to proceedings
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: (1) This Part applies...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87e-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87E Proceedings to which this Part applies

87F Basic rule
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.380
curation status: Proposed
has part: 87F(1) Basic rule
has part: 87F(1A) Basic rule
has part: 87F(2) Basic rule
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87f
schema version: 2

87F(1) Basic rule
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.380
note: Court cannot award personal injury damages after a certain period.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87f-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87f-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 87F Basic rule

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if the proceeding was commenced...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of awarding personal injury damages
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: (1) A court must not award...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87f-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87F(1) Basic rule

87F(1A) Basic rule
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.380
note: Exempts proceedings from death or injury due to tobacco use.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87f-ss-1a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87f-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87f-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 87F Basic rule

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87f-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87f-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87F(1A) Basic rule

87F(2) Basic rule
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.380
note: Prevents an award of personal injury damages under certain conditions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87f-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87f-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 87F Basic rule

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prevents an award of personal injury damages
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

87G Date of discoverability
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.381
note: Defines date of discoverability for death or injury claims.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87g-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87g-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87g
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The date of discoverability...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: States a condition
modality: Deontic
operator: has

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87g-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87G Date of discoverability

87H Long-stop period
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.383
curation status: Proposed
has part: 87H(1) Long-stop period
has part: 87H(2) Long-stop period
has part: 87H(3) Long-stop period
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87h
schema version: 2

87H(1) Long-stop period
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.383
note: Defines long-stop period for death or injury claims
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87h-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 87H Long-stop period

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: 12 years following the act or omission

87H(2) Long-stop period
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.383
note: Court cannot extend discovery period beyond 3 years.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87h-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 87H Long-stop period

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval restriction
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: (2) The court must not extend the period by more than 3 years beyond the date of discoverability for the death or injury.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Inference from prohibition
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (2) The court must not extend the period by more than 3 years beyond the date of discoverability for the death or injury.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
modality: CogAI
operator: Restriction
premise text: (2) The court must not extend the period by more than 3 years beyond the date of discoverability for the death or injury.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of extending discovery period
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Limitation on extension
modality: Diffusion
operator: Restriction
premise text: (2) The court must not extend the period by more than 3 years beyond the date of discoverability for the death or injury.

87H(3) Long-stop period
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.383
note: Court must consider justice of case when extending period.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87h-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 87H Long-stop period

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court's consideration is within a temporal interval
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval within which court must consider justice of case
modality: AllenInterval
operator: WITHIN
premise text: (3) In considering whether to extend the period, the court must have regard to:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court's consideration is within a temporal interval (CogAI)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal interval within which court must consider justice of case (CogAI)
modality: CogAI
operator: WITHIN
premise text: (3) In considering whether to extend the period, the court must have regard to:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court must consider justice of case when extending period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider justice of case
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) In considering whether to extend the period, the court must have regard to...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court's consideration is within a temporal interval (diffusion)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal interval within which court must consider justice of case (diffusion)
modality: Diffusion
operator: WITHIN
premise text: (3) In considering whether to extend the period, the court must have regard to:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court's consideration is within a temporal interval (LTL)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval within which court must consider justice of case (LTL)
modality: LTL
operator: WITHIN
premise text: (3) In considering whether to extend the period, the court must have regard to:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87H(3) Long-stop period

87J The effect of minority or incapacity
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.383
note: Disregard periods of minority or incapacity when determining the expiration of a period.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87j-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87j-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87j-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87j-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87j-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87j-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87j
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87j-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disregard any period during which the plaintiff has been unable to work.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between minority or incapacity periods and the expiration of a period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The long-stop period may have begun before the plaintiff's minority or incapacity began.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87j-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disregard any period during which the plaintiff has been unable to work.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal overlap between minority or incapacity periods and the expiration of a period (cognitive AI)
modality: CogAI
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The plaintiff's inability to work is a characteristic of the class of persons affected by the provision.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87j-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disregard any period during which the plaintiff has been unable to work.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ignoring minority or incapacity periods
modality: Deontic
operator: Ignore
premise text: The period of 3 years after the date of discoverability has expired.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87j-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disregard any period during which the plaintiff has been unable to work.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal overlap between minority or incapacity periods and the expiration of a period (diffusion)
modality: Diffusion
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The long-stop period may have begun before the plaintiff's minority or incapacity began.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87j-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disregard any period during which the plaintiff has been unable to work.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal overlap between minority or incapacity periods and the expiration of a period (recurring trace)
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The plaintiff's inability to work is a recurring characteristic of the class of persons affected by the provision.

87K The effect of close relationships
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.384
curation status: Proposed
has part: 87K(1) The effect of close relationships
has part: 87K(2) The effect of close relationships
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87k
schema version: 2

87K(1) The effect of close relationships
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.384
note: If a cause of action is founded on the death or injury to a minor, disregard any period before the victim turns 25.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87k-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 87K The effect of close relationships

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...who was a parent or guardian of the victim; or a person in a close relationship with a parent or guardian of the victim...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between the victim's birth and the date of discoverability.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: (b) the proceeding is taken against a person who was at that time:...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...who was at that time:...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Entity relationship between the victim and the person in a close relationship with a parent or guardian.
modality: CogAI
operator: entity
premise text: (i) a person in a close relationship with a parent or guardian of the victim;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...disregard any period:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to disregard periods before the victim turns 25.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (1) If:...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...disregard any period:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: If a cause of action is founded on the death or injury to a minor, then disregard any period before the victim turns 25.
modality: Diffusion
operator: if-then
premise text: (1) If:...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or before the victim's death.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval until the long-stop period expires.
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (c) before the victim turns 25; or (d) if the victim dies before turning 25—before the victim’s death.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87K(1) The effect of close relationships

87K(2) The effect of close relationships
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.384
note: A person is taken to be in a close relationship with a parent or guardian if they might influence the parent or guardian not to bring a claim on behalf of the victim.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87k-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 87K The effect of close relationships

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The time period between these events is relevant to the classification of close relationships.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between influence and disclosure
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
premise text: There is a temporal interval between when the person might influence the parent or guardian and when the victim might be unwilling to disclose.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The system recognizes this pattern as a key factor in determining close relationships.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Pattern recognition in influence and disclosure
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: This pattern of influence and disclosure is recognized as relevant to the classification of close relationships.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is taken to be in a close relationship if they might influence the parent or guardian.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Influence or not to influence
modality: Deontic
operator: Might
premise text: Person's relationship with parent or guardian might affect the parent or guardian's decision.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is taken to be in a close relationship if the victim might be unwilling to disclose.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Victim's willingness to disclose
modality: Deontic
operator: Might
premise text: The victim might be unwilling to disclose acts, omissions, or events to the parent or guardian.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person's actions might create a recurring trace that affects the classification of close relationships.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of influence and disclosure
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: This pattern of influence and disclosure might be recurring in similar situations.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87K(2) The effect of close relationships

87L Limits on damages for non-economic loss
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.385
note: Court cannot award damages for non-economic loss exceeding permitted amount.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87l-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87l-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87l
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87l-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on awarding damages
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

87M Maximum amount of damages for non-economic loss
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.385
curation status: Proposed
has part: 87M(1) Maximum amount of damages for non-economic loss
has part: 87M(2) Maximum amount of damages for non-economic loss
has part: 87M(3) Maximum amount of damages for non-economic loss
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87m
schema version: 2

87M(1) Maximum amount of damages for non-economic loss
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.385
note: Maximum amount of damages for non-economic loss
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87m-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87m-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 87M Maximum amount of damages for non-economic loss

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The maximum amount of damages for non-economic loss is $250,000.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: =

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87M(1) Maximum amount of damages for non-economic loss

87M(2) Maximum amount of damages for non-economic loss
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.385
note: Rounding of damages for non-economic loss
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87m-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87m-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 87M Maximum amount of damages for non-economic loss

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87m-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87M(2) Maximum amount of damages for non-economic loss

87M(3) Maximum amount of damages for non-economic loss
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.385
note: Does not affect operation of section 86AA
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87m-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87m-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 87M Maximum amount of damages for non-economic loss

87N Index numbers
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.386
curation status: Proposed
has part: 87N(1) Index numbers
has part: 87N(2) Index numbers
has part: 87N(3) Index numbers
has part: 87N(4) Index numbers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87n
schema version: 2

87N(1) Index numbers
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.386
note: The index number for a quarter is the All Groups Consumer Price Index number.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87n-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87n-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 87N Index numbers

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The index number must be provided.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87n-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87N(1) Index numbers

87N(2) Index numbers
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.386
note: Disregard publication of later index number if previous one is still in effect.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87n-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87n-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 87N Index numbers

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disregard publication of later index number for the purposes of this section.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Disregard later publication if previous one is still in effect.
modality: Deontic
operator: Ignore
premise text: (a) and (b)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87n-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87N(2) Index numbers

87N(3) Index numbers
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.386
note: Regard index numbers published in terms of the new index reference period when applying this section after a change.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87n-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87n-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 87N Index numbers

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87n-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87N(3) Index numbers

87N(4) Index numbers
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.386
note: Definition of Australian Statistician
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87n-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87n-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 87N Index numbers

87P Most extreme cases
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.386
curation status: Proposed
has part: 87P(1) Most extreme cases
has part: 87P(2) Most extreme cases
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87p
schema version: 2

87P(1) Most extreme cases
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.386
note: Court must not award personal injury damages for non-economic loss in most extreme cases.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87p-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87p-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87p-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87p-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87p-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 87P Most extreme cases

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87p-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Most extreme cases are defined by a specific temporal interval
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between court decision and most extreme case definition
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: Court decision is subject to temporal constraints

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87p-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Non-economic loss must be considered in damages assessment
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Damages assessment implies non-economic loss consideration
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: Damages assessment is relevant to non-economic loss

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Damages cannot be awarded
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must not award damages
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: State bears the duty to prevent non-economic loss

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87p-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Damages cannot be awarded in any case
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Prohibition of damages affects all cases
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: State bears the duty to prevent non-economic loss

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87p-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87P(1) Most extreme cases

87P(2) Most extreme cases
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.386
note: Defines most extreme case for non-economic loss
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87p-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87p-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 87P Most extreme cases

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: most extreme case
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies a specific concept
modality: Deontic
operator: is

87Q Cases of 33% or more (but not 100%) of a most extreme case
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.387
curation status: Proposed
has part: 87Q(1) Cases of 33% or more (but not 100%) of a most extreme case
has part: 87Q(2) Cases of 33% or more (but not 100%) of a most extreme case
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87q
schema version: 2

87Q(1) Cases of 33% or more (but not 100%) of a most extreme case
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.387
note: Court must not award personal injury damages for non-economic loss exceeding a certain percentage.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87q-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 87Q Cases of 33% or more (but not 100%) of a most extreme case

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court must not award as personal injury damages for non-economic loss an amount that exceeds the applicable percentage...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Restriction applies to a specific time period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Apply
premise text: (1) If the non-economic loss the plaintiff suffers is at least 33%, but less than 100%...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court must not award as personal injury damages for non-economic loss an amount that exceeds the applicable percentage...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Court's decision may be subject to argument.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Imply
premise text: (1) If the non-economic loss the plaintiff suffers is at least 33%, but less than 100%...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court must not award as personal injury damages for non-economic loss an amount that exceeds the applicable percentage...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must not award personal injury damages.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) If the non-economic loss the plaintiff suffers is at least 33%, but less than 100% of a most extreme case...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court must not award as personal injury damages for non-economic loss an amount that exceeds the applicable percentage...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Restriction may be applied in similar cases.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Imply
premise text: (1) If the non-economic loss the plaintiff suffers is at least 33%, but less than 100%...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court must not award as personal injury damages for non-economic loss an amount that exceeds the applicable percentage...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Court's decision implies a restriction on damages.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
premise text: (1) If the non-economic loss the plaintiff suffers is at least 33%, but less than 100%...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87Q(1) Cases of 33% or more (but not 100%) of a most extreme case

87Q(2) Cases of 33% or more (but not 100%) of a most extreme case
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.387
note: Defines applicable percentage for non-economic loss
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87q-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 87Q Cases of 33% or more (but not 100%) of a most extreme case

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2) The applicable percentage is the extent of the non-economic loss the plaintiff suffers, expressed as a percentage of a most extreme case.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
premise text: (2) The applicable percentage is the extent of the non-economic loss the plaintiff suffers, expressed as a percentage of a most extreme case.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2) The applicable percentage is the extent of the non-economic loss the plaintiff suffers, expressed as a percentage of a most extreme case.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a specific value
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (2) The applicable percentage is the extent of the non-economic loss the plaintiff suffers, expressed as a percentage of a most extreme case.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2) The applicable percentage is the extent of the non-economic loss the plaintiff suffers, expressed as a percentage of a most extreme case.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Requires an ordered or recurring trace
modality: LTL
operator: =
premise text: (2) The applicable percentage is the extent of the non-economic loss the plaintiff suffers, expressed as a percentage of a most extreme case.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87Q(2) Cases of 33% or more (but not 100%) of a most extreme case

87R Cases of 15% or more (but less than 33%) of a most extreme
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.387
note: Court must not award personal injury damages for non-economic loss exceeding a certain amount.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87r-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87r-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87r-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87r
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87r-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court must not award personal injury damages.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must not award personal injury damages.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Court awards personal injury damages.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87r-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court's decision implies a restriction on damages.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Court's decision implies a restriction on damages.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
premise text: Court awards personal injury damages.

87S Cases of less than 15% of a most extreme case
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.388
note: Court must not award personal injury damages for non-economic loss if the plaintiff suffers less than 15% of a most extreme case.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87s-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87s-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87s-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87s-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87s-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87s-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87s
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87s-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No personal injury damages for non-economic loss during this time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal intervals overlap.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: Plaintiff suffers non-economic loss before or after the most extreme case.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87s-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No personal injury damages for non-economic loss in this case.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence recognizes.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: Plaintiff suffers less than 15% of a most extreme case.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87s-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No personal injury damages for non-economic loss.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must not award personal injury damages.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Plaintiff suffers less than 15% of a most extreme case.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87s-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No personal injury damages for non-economic loss in these cases.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Information spreads.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
premise text: Plaintiff suffers less than 15% of a most extreme case widely.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87s-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No personal injury damages for non-economic loss in these cases.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Tracing of events.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: Plaintiff suffers less than 15% of a most extreme case repeatedly.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87s-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87S Cases of less than 15% of a most extreme case

87T Referring to earlier decisions on non-economic loss
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.388
curation status: Proposed
has part: 87T(1) Referring to earlier decisions on non-economic loss
has part: 87T(2) Referring to earlier decisions on non-economic loss
has part: 87T(3) Referring to earlier decisions on non-economic loss
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87t
schema version: 2

87T(1) Referring to earlier decisions on non-economic loss
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.388
note: Court may refer to earlier decisions for non-economic loss damages
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87t-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87t-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 87T Referring to earlier decisions on non-economic loss

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Establishing appropriate award
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishing appropriate award
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Court may refer to earlier decisions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87t-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87T(1) Referring to earlier decisions on non-economic loss

87T(2) Referring to earlier decisions on non-economic loss
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.388
note: Referencing earlier decisions on non-economic loss
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87t-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87t-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 87T Referring to earlier decisions on non-economic loss

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87t-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87T(2) Referring to earlier decisions on non-economic loss

87T(3) Referring to earlier decisions on non-economic loss
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.388
note: Does not affect rules for determination of other damages or compensation.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87t-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87t-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 87T Referring to earlier decisions on non-economic loss

87U Personal injury damages for loss of earning capacity
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.389
note: Court must disregard amount of plaintiff's gross weekly earnings exceeding twice the average weekly earnings for the quarter.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87u-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87u-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87u
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87u-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must disregard amount of plaintiff's gross weekly earnings exceeding twice the average weekly earnings for the quarter.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87u-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87U Personal injury damages for loss of earning capacity

87V Average weekly earnings
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.389
note: Defines average weekly earnings for a quarter.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87v-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87v-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87v-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87v
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87v-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines average weekly earnings for a quarter.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87v-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: as the average weekly earnings for all employees (total earnings, seasonally adjusted) for the reference period in that quarter
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Identifies the source of average weekly earnings data
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Published by the Australian Statistician

87W Personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.391
curation status: Proposed
has part: 87W(1) Personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services
has part: 87W(2) Personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services
has part: 87W(3) Personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services
has part: 87W(4) Personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87w
schema version: 2

87W(1) Personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.391
note: Court cannot award personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87w-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87w-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 87W Personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court cannot award personal injury damages.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87w-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87W(1) Personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services

87W(2) Personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.391
note: Court must be satisfied that certain conditions are met for gratuitous attendant care services.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87w-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87w-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87w-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 87W Personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87w-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must be satisfied that certain conditions are met
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87w-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87W(2) Personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services

87W(3) Personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.391
note: No personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services exceeding average weekly earnings
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87w-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87w-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87w-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87w-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 87W Personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87w-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Services overlap with quarter in which average weekly earnings are ascertained
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (3) If the services were provided during a quarter...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87w-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits awarding personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services exceeding average weekly earnings
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) If the services were provided during a quarter...

87W(4) Personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.391
note: Personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87w-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87w-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 87W Personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87w-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87W(4) Personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services

87X Personal injury damages for loss of plaintiff’s capacity to
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.392
curation status: Proposed
has part: 87X(1) Personal injury damages for loss of plaintiff’s capacity to
has part: 87X(2) Personal injury damages for loss of plaintiff’s capacity to
has part: 87X(3) Personal injury damages for loss of plaintiff’s capacity to
has part: 87X(4) Personal injury damages for loss of plaintiff’s capacity to
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87x
schema version: 2

87X(1) Personal injury damages for loss of plaintiff’s capacity to
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.392
note: Court cannot award damages for loss of capacity to provide gratuitous care services.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87x-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 87X Personal injury damages for loss of plaintiff’s capacity to

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on awarding damages
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87X(1) Personal injury damages for loss of plaintiff’s capacity to

87X(2) Personal injury damages for loss of plaintiff’s capacity to
type: Concept
description: Services provided by plaintiff
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.392
note: Court must be satisfied that plaintiff provided services for at least 6 hours/week and over 6 months prior to loss of capacity.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87x-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 87X Personal injury damages for loss of plaintiff’s capacity to

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval (6 months)
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Services provided by plaintiff
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must be satisfied that plaintiff provided services for at least 6 hours/week and over 6 months prior to loss of capacity.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87X(2) Personal injury damages for loss of plaintiff’s capacity to

87X(3) Personal injury damages for loss of plaintiff’s capacity to
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.392
note: Court must not award personal injury damages for services exceeding average weekly earnings
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87x-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 87X Personal injury damages for loss of plaintiff’s capacity to

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must not award damages
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

87X(4) Personal injury damages for loss of plaintiff’s capacity to
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.392
note: Court must not award damages for services exceeding a certain threshold.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87x-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 87X Personal injury damages for loss of plaintiff’s capacity to

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court must not award damages exceeding this threshold
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Service duration restriction
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: Services provided for at least 40 hours/week

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court must not award damages exceeding 1/40 of average weekly earnings
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Service duration comparison
modality: LinearLogic
operator: <
premise text: Services provided for less than 40 hours/week

87Y Damages for future economic loss—discount rate
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.394
curation status: Proposed
has part: 87Y(1) Damages for future economic loss—discount rate
has part: 87Y(2) Damages for future economic loss—discount rate
has part: 87Y(3) Damages for future economic loss—discount rate
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87y
schema version: 2

87Y(1) Damages for future economic loss—discount rate
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.394
note: Prescribes a discount rate for future economic loss
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87y-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 87Y Damages for future economic loss—discount rate

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: prescribes

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87Y(1) Damages for future economic loss—discount rate

87Y(2) Damages for future economic loss—discount rate
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.394
note: Regulation cannot commence before a certain period after being laid before Parliament.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87y-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 87Y Damages for future economic loss—discount rate

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...on that day or on the later of those days.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval starts after regulation is laid before Parliament.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: starts before
premise text: the end of the period of 6 months starting...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...on that day or on the later of those days.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Regulation applies to all relevant parties after being laid before Parliament.
modality: CogAI
operator: applies to
premise text: the end of the period of 6 months starting...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: before the end of the period of 6 months starting...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulation cannot commence.
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: Regulation made for the purposes of paragraph (1)(a)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...on that day or on the later of those days.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Regulation diffuses to all relevant parties after being laid before Parliament.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses to
premise text: the end of the period of 6 months starting...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...on that day or on the later of those days.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval starts after regulation is laid before Parliament.
modality: LTL
operator: starts before
premise text: the end of the period of 6 months starting...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87Y(2) Damages for future economic loss—discount rate

87Y(3) Damages for future economic loss—discount rate
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.394
note: Does not affect other laws regarding damages discounting
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87y-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 87Y Damages for future economic loss—discount rate

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excludes effect on other laws
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion

87Z Damages for loss of superannuation entitlements
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.394
note: Court cannot award personal injury damages exceeding a certain amount for economic loss due to loss of employer superannuation contributions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87z-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87z-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87z-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87z-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87z-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87z
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87z-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The prohibition applies to past economic loss due to loss of earnings or deprivation of earning capacity.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: Section 87ZA (a) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87z-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court cannot award personal injury damages exceeding a certain amount.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Section 87Z of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87z-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court cannot award personal injury damages exceeding a certain amount for economic loss due to loss of employer superannuation contributions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Section 87ZA (a) and (b) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87z-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The prohibition applies to future economic loss due to deprivation of earning capacity.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: Section 87ZA (b) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010

87ZA Interest on damages
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.395
curation status: Proposed
has part: 87ZA(1) Interest on damages
has part: 87ZA(2) Interest on damages
has part: 87ZA(3) Interest on damages
has part: 87ZA(4) Interest on damages
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87za
schema version: 2

87ZA(1) Interest on damages
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.395
note: Court cannot order interest on certain damages
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87za-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87za-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87za-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 87ZA Interest on damages

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87za-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...order the payment of interest...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of interest on personal injury damages
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (1) A court must not...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87za-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87ZA(1) Interest on damages

87ZA(2) Interest on damages
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.395
note: Court must determine interest rate for personal injury damages
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87za-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87za-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87za-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 87ZA Interest on damages

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87za-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court obligation to determine interest rate
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87za-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87ZA(2) Interest on damages

87ZA(3) Interest on damages
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.395
note: Payment of interest on a debt under a judgment or order of a court is unaffected.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87za-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87za-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87za-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 87ZA Interest on damages

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87za-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Payment of interest on a debt under a judgment or order of a court is unaffected.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excluded from interest payment
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion

87ZA(4) Interest on damages
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.395
note: Interest on damages
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87za-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87za-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 87ZA Interest on damages

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87za-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87ZA(4) Interest on damages

87ZB Exemplary and aggravated damages
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.396
curation status: Proposed
has part: 87ZB(1) Exemplary and aggravated damages
has part: 87ZB(2) Exemplary and aggravated damages
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87zb
schema version: 2

87ZB(1) Exemplary and aggravated damages
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.396
note: Court cannot award exemplary or aggravated damages in death or personal injury cases.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zb-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87zb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 87ZB Exemplary and aggravated damages

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of awarding exemplary damages
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zb-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87ZB(1) Exemplary and aggravated damages

87ZB(2) Exemplary and aggravated damages
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.396
note: Court power to award damages not affected by this section
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zb-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87zb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 87ZB Exemplary and aggravated damages

87ZC Court may make orders under section 87 for structured
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.397
curation status: Proposed
has part: 87ZC(1) Court may make orders under section 87 for structured
has part: 87ZC(2) Court may make orders under section 87 for structured
has part: 87ZC(3) Court may make orders under section 87 for structured
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87zc
schema version: 2

87ZC(1) Court may make orders under section 87 for structured
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.397
note: Court may make orders under section 87 for structured settlement.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zc-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87zc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 87ZC Court may make orders under section 87 for structured

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court may make an order
modality: Deontic
operator: May

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87ZC(1) Court may make orders under section 87 for structured

87ZC(2) Court may make orders under section 87 for structured
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.397
note: Court may make orders under section 87 in a proceeding that is not a proceeding to which this Part applies.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zc-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87zc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 87ZC Court may make orders under section 87 for structured

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court may make orders under section 87
modality: Deontic
operator: May

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87ZC(2) Court may make orders under section 87 for structured

87ZC(3) Court may make orders under section 87 for structured
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.397
note: Court may make orders under section 87 for structured settlement.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zc-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zc-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87zc-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 87ZC Court may make orders under section 87 for structured

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must make orders under section 87.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zc-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Structured settlement is an agreement that provides for the payment of all or part of an award of damages.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zc-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87ZC(3) Court may make orders under section 87 for structured

87ZP Definitions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.398
curation status: Proposed
has part: 87ZP(1) Definitions
has part: 87ZP(2) Definitions
has part: 87ZP(3) Definitions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87zp
schema version: 2

87ZP(1) Definitions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.398
note: Defines industry code of practice and minor variation.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zp-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87zp-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 87ZP Definitions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zp-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87ZP(1) Definitions

87ZP(2) Definitions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.398
note: Reference definition for Commission notices
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zp-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zp-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zp-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zp-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87zp-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 87ZP Definitions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zp-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...under subsection 91C(3).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between revocation and substitution
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: (2) A reference in this Division to a proposal of the Commission is a...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zp-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...under subsection 91C(3).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation between revocation and substitution
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (2) A reference in this Division to a proposal of the Commission is a...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zp-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...under subsection 91B(3).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation between revocation and substitution
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (2) A reference in this Division to a proposal of the Commission is a...

87ZP(3) Definitions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.398
note: Reference to an authorisation under this Division
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zp-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87zp-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 87ZP Definitions

88 Commission may grant authorisations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.398
curation status: Proposed
has part: 88(1) Commission may grant authorisations
has part: 88(1A) Commission may grant authorisations
has part: 88(2) Commission may grant authorisations
has part: 88(3) Commission may grant authorisations
has part: 88(4) Commission may grant authorisations
has part: 88(5) Commission may grant authorisations
has part: 88(6) Commission may grant authorisations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-88
schema version: 2

88(1) Commission may grant authorisations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.398
note: Commission may grant authorisation to engage in conduct specified in the authorisation.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-88-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 88 Commission may grant authorisations

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An authorisation is granted.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by the Commission.
modality: Deontic
operator: grant
premise text: The Commission may grant an authorisation.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 88(1) Commission may grant authorisations

88(1A) Commission may grant authorisations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.398
note: Commission may grant authorisations
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-1a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-88-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 88 Commission may grant authorisations

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-1a-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 88(1A) Commission may grant authorisations

88(2) Commission may grant authorisations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.398
note: Exemptions from Division 1 or 2 of Part IV
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-88-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 88 Commission may grant authorisations

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission to conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 88(2) Commission may grant authorisations

88(3) Commission may grant authorisations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.398
note: Commission may specify conditions in authorisation
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-88-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 88 Commission may grant authorisations

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission may specify conditions in authorisation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 88(3) Commission may grant authorisations

88(4) Commission may grant authorisations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.398
note: Commission must give undertaking under section 87B
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-88-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 88 Commission may grant authorisations

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 88(4) Commission may grant authorisations

88(5) Commission may grant authorisations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.398
note: Commission may grant separate authorisations for any of the conduct.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-88-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 88 Commission may grant authorisations

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission grants permission.
modality: Deontic
operator: Grant

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 88(5) Commission may grant authorisations

88(6) Commission may grant authorisations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.398
note: Commission cannot grant authorisation before decision on application.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-6-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-88-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 88 Commission may grant authorisations

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission does not have power to grant an authorisation for conduct engaged in before the decision on application.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Negation of conjunction
modality: AllenInterval
operator: ¬(A ∧ B)
premise text: The Commission has power to grant authorisations and decides the application for the authorisation at time A, but not before time B.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission does not have power to grant an authorisation for conduct engaged in before the decision on application.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Negation of conjunction
modality: CogAI
operator: ¬(A ∧ B)
premise text: The Commission has power to grant authorisations and decides the application for the authorisation, but not before time A.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commission does not have power to grant authorisation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: !A
premise text: Commission has power to grant authorisation.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission does not have power to grant an authorisation for conduct engaged in before the decision on application.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Negation of conjunction
modality: Diffusion
operator: ¬(A ∧ B)
premise text: The Commission has power to grant authorisations and decides the application for the authorisation, but not before time A.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-6-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission does not have power to grant an authorisation for conduct engaged in before the decision on application.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Negation of conjunction
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ¬(A ∧ B)
premise text: The Commission has power to grant authorisations and decides the application for the authorisation.

89 Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.400
curation status: Proposed
has part: 89(1) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
has part: 89(1A) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
has part: 89(1B) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
has part: 89(2) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
has part: 89(3) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
has part: 89(4) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
has part: 89(5) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-89
schema version: 2

89(1) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
type: Concept
description: Form, information, and fee
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.400
note: Application requirements for authorisation
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-89-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 89 Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Application is valid if it meets the requirements
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be in a specific form
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Form is required

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89(1) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register

89(1A) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
type: Concept
description: written notice
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.400
note: Commission must give written notice to applicant within 5 business days if application is deemed invalid.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-1a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-89-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 89 Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission must prohibit applicant from proceeding.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-1a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89(1A) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register

89(1B) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.400
note: Defines business day for purposes of subsection (1A)
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-1b-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-89-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 89 Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: business day means a day that is not a Saturday, a Sunday or a public holiday in the Australian Capital Territory.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (1B) For the purposes of subsection (1A)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89(1B) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register

89(2) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.400
note: Public notice of application receipt
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-89-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 89 Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission must cause notice of the receipt of that application to be made public.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must cause public notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) If the Commission receives an application...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89(2) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register

89(3) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.400
note: Register of applications for authorisations and revocations.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-89-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 89 Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register

89(4) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.400
note: The register must include certain documents and information.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-89-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 89 Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide the required information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89(4) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register

89(5) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.400
note: Request for exclusion of document or submission from register
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-89-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 89 Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register

90 Determination of applications for authorisations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.403
curation status: Proposed
has part: 90(1) Determination of applications for authorisations
has part: 90(4) Determination of applications for authorisations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-90
schema version: 2

90(1) Determination of applications for authorisations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.403
note: Commission must make a determination in writing granting or dismissing an application for authorisation.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-90-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 90 Determination of applications for authorisations

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission must make a determination in writing.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 90(1) Determination of applications for authorisations

90(4) Determination of applications for authorisations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.403
note: Commission must state reasons for determination
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-90-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 90 Determination of applications for authorisations

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide reasons
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 90(4) Determination of applications for authorisations

90A Commission to afford opportunity for conference before
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.408
curation status: Proposed
has part: 90A(1) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before
has part: 90A(2) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before
has part: 90A(3) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before
has part: 90A(4) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before
has part: 90A(5) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-90a
schema version: 2

90A(1) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.408
note: Commission must prepare draft determination before determining an application for authorisation.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-90a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 90A Commission to afford opportunity for conference before

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide draft determination
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 90A(1) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before

90A(2) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.408
note: Commission must invite applicant and interested persons to notify about conference
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-90a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 90A Commission to afford opportunity for conference before

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 90A(2) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before

90A(3) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.408
note: Commission must inform applicant of draft determination
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-90a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 90A Commission to afford opportunity for conference before

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must inform applicant
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 90A(3) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before

90A(4) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.408
note: The Commission must send a copy of the draft determination and a summary of reasons with each notice under subsection (2).
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-90a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 90A Commission to afford opportunity for conference before

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commission must send a copy of the draft determination and a summary of reasons.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

90A(5) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.408
note: Failure to notify within 14 days allows Commission to make determination without conference.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-90a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 90A Commission to afford opportunity for conference before

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notification period overlaps with Commission's action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for notification period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: 14 days mentioned in subsection (2).

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commission may make determination without conference.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits failure to notify within 14 days.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: No notification within 14 days.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 90A(5) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before

90B Commission may rely on consultations undertaken by the
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.412
curation status: Proposed
has part: 90B(1) Commission may rely on consultations undertaken by the
has part: 90B(2) Commission may rely on consultations undertaken by the
has part: 90B(3) Commission may rely on consultations undertaken by the
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-90b
schema version: 2

90B(1) Commission may rely on consultations undertaken by the
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.412
note: Commission may rely on consultations undertaken by the AEMC.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90b-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-90b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 90B Commission may rely on consultations undertaken by the

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) This section applies if: (a) an application under section 88, 91A, 91B or 91C is made in relation to the National Electricity Rules or a provision of the Rules; and (b) the AEMC has done the following: (i) published the Rules or the provision and invited people to make submissions to it on the Rules or the provision; (ii) specified the effect of subsection (2) when it published the Rules or the provision; (iii) considered any submissions that were received within the time limit specified by it when it published the Rules or the provision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission may rely on consultations undertaken by the AEMC.
modality: Deontic
operator: RelyOn
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) an application under section 88, 91A, 91B or 91C is made in relation to the National Electricity Rules or a provision of the Rules; and (b) the AEMC has done the following: (i) published the Rules or the provision and invited people to make submissions to it on the Rules or the provision; (ii) specified the effect of subsection (2) when it published the Rules or the provision; (iii) considered any submissions that were received within the time limit specified by it when it published the Rules or the provision.

90B(2) Commission may rely on consultations undertaken by the
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.412
note: Commission may rely on consultations undertaken by the AEMC.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90b-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-90b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 90B Commission may rely on consultations undertaken by the

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to rely on consultations
modality: Deontic
operator: may

90B(3) Commission may rely on consultations undertaken by the
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.412
note: Defines National Electricity Rules
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90b-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90b-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90b-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90b-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-90b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 90B Commission may rely on consultations undertaken by the

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90b-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: National Electricity Rules means...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Identifies the scope of National Electricity Rules
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: (a) the National Electricity Rules, as in force from time to time,

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90b-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or (c) those Rules as they apply as a law of a Territory;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Includes rules from other jurisdictions
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: (b) those Rules as they apply as a law of another State;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90b-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or (c) those Rules as they apply as a law of the Commonwealth.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Includes rules from the Commonwealth
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: (d) those Rules as they apply as a law of the Commonwealth.

91 Grant and variation of authorisations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.413
curation status: Proposed
has part: 91(1) Grant and variation of authorisations
has part: 91(1A) Grant and variation of authorisations
has part: 91(1B) Grant and variation of authorisations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-91
schema version: 2

91(1) Grant and variation of authorisations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.413
note: Authorisation period specified in authorisation
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-91-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 91 Grant and variation of authorisations

91(1A) Grant and variation of authorisations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.413
note: Authorisation commencement
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91-ss-1a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-91-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 91 Grant and variation of authorisations

91(1B) Grant and variation of authorisations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.413
note: Grant and variation of authorisations
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91-ss-1b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-91-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 91 Grant and variation of authorisations

91A Minor variations of authorisations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.415
curation status: Proposed
has part: 91A(1) Minor variations of authorisations
has part: 91A(2) Minor variations of authorisations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-91a
schema version: 2

91A(1) Minor variations of authorisations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.415
note: Granting minor variations of authorisation
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91a-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-91a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 91A Minor variations of authorisations

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorises minor variation
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91a-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 91A(1) Minor variations of authorisations

91A(2) Minor variations of authorisations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.415
note: Commission must satisfy minor variation application
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91a-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-91a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 91A Minor variations of authorisations

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commission must satisfy
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide satisfaction
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Application is a minor variation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 91A(2) Minor variations of authorisations

91B Revocation of an authorisation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.418
curation status: Proposed
has part: 91B(1) Revocation of an authorisation
has part: 91B(2) Revocation of an authorisation
has part: 91B(3) Revocation of an authorisation
has part: 91B(3A) Revocation of an authorisation
has part: 91B(3B) Revocation of an authorisation
has part: 91B(4) Revocation of an authorisation
has part: 91B(5) Revocation of an authorisation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-91b
schema version: 2

91B(1) Revocation of an authorisation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.418
note: Application for revocation of authorisation
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-91b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 91B Revocation of an authorisation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 91B(1) Revocation of an authorisation

91B(2) Revocation of an authorisation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.418
note: Commission must notify interested persons of revocation application and basis.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-91b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 91B Revocation of an authorisation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notification obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 91B(2) Revocation of an authorisation

91B(3) Revocation of an authorisation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.418
note: Revocation of an authorisation if certain conditions are met
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-91b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 91B Revocation of an authorisation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission considers revocation during overlapping time periods.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlaps with temporal intervals related to authorisation grant
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: there has been a material change of circumstances since the authorisation was granted;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission informs persons of proposed revocation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implies that persons interested must be informed of proposed revocation
modality: Argumentation
operator: Imply
premise text: (d) inform those persons that it is considering the revocation of the authorisation;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission analyzes submissions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Analyzes submissions received in response to proposed revocation
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
premise text: (f) invite submissions in respect of the revocation within a period specified by the Commission.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission may revoke the authorisation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits revocation of an authorisation under certain conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) If, at any time after granting an authorisation...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission spreads information about proposed revocation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spreads information about proposed revocation to interested parties
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
premise text: (d) inform those persons that it is considering the revocation of the authorisation;

91B(3A) Revocation of an authorisation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.418
note: Subsection 90(6) applies in relation to an application for a revocation of an authorisation.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-91b-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 91B Revocation of an authorisation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Application for revocation of authorisation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicability condition
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: Subsection 90(6)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 91B(3A) Revocation of an authorisation

91B(3B) Revocation of an authorisation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.418
note: Subsection 90(6) applies in relation to a proposal for revocation of an authorisation.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3b-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3b-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3b-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-91b-ss-3b
schema version: 2
part of: 91B Revocation of an authorisation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Proposal for revocation of an authorisation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Subsection applies in relation to a proposal for revocation of an authorisation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: Other than paragraphs 90(6)(a) and (b)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Proposal for revocation of an authorisation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Subsection applies to proposals for revocation of an authorisation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
premise text: Subsection 90(6)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3b-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Proposal for revocation of an authorisation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Subsection applies to proposals for revocation of an authorisation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
premise text: Paragraphs 90(6)(a) and (b)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3b-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Proposal for revocation of an authorisation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Subsection applies in relation to a proposal for revocation of an authorisation.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: Corresponding way

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 91B(3B) Revocation of an authorisation

91B(4) Revocation of an authorisation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.418
note: Commission's decision on revoking an authorisation
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-91b-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 91B Revocation of an authorisation

91B(5) Revocation of an authorisation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.418
note: Commission must not make a determination revoking the authorisation unless satisfied.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-91b-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 91B Revocation of an authorisation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission must not make a determination revoking the authorisation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not

91C Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.420
curation status: Proposed
has part: 91C(1) Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
has part: 91C(2) Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
has part: 91C(3) Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
has part: 91C(3A) Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
has part: 91C(3B) Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
has part: 91C(4) Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-91c
schema version: 2

91C(1) Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.420
note: A person may apply to revoke an authorisation and substitute a new one.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-91c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 91C Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 91C(1) Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a

91C(2) Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
type: Concept
description: Notice in writing
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.420
note: Notify persons interested of revocation and substitution of authorisation.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-91c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 91C Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

91C(3) Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.420
note: Commission may inform persons of proposed revocation and substitution of authorisation.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-91c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 91C Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission may inform persons.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 91C(3) Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a

91C(3A) Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.420
note: Subsection 90(6) applies in relation to an application for a revocation and substitution of an authorisation.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-3a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-91c-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 91C Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Subsection applies in relation to an application.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 91C(3A) Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a

91C(3B) Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.420
note: Subsection 90(6) applies in relation to a proposal for revocation and substitution of an authorisation.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-3b-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-91c-ss-3b
schema version: 2
part of: 91C Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Subsection applies in relation to a proposal.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-3b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 91C(3B) Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a

91C(4) Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.420
note: Commission may revoke or substitute an authorisation after considering submissions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-91c-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 91C Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Revocation or substitution is permitted.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to revoke or substitute an authorisation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Commission has the authority to make a determination.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 91C(4) Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a

92 Providing false or misleading information
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.423
note: Providing false or misleading information in merger authorisation applications
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prohibition
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of providing false or misleading information
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: Negligence in providing information

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 92 Providing false or misleading information

92A Definitions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.425
curation status: Proposed
has part: 92A(1) Definitions
has part: 92A(2) Definitions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92a
schema version: 2

92A(1) Definitions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.425
note: Defines business day for the purpose of this Division.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92a-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 92A Definitions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes a term with a specific meaning.
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines a term for classification purposes.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: defines

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 92A(1) Definitions

92A(2) Definitions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.425
note: Reference to an authorisation under this Division
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92a-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 92A Definitions

92B Commission may grant authorisations in exceptional
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.425
curation status: Proposed
has part: 92B(1) Commission may grant authorisations in exceptional
has part: 92B(2) Commission may grant authorisations in exceptional
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92b
schema version: 2

92B(1) Commission may grant authorisations in exceptional
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.425
note: Commission may grant authorisation to engage in conduct specified in the authorisation.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92b-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 92B Commission may grant authorisations in exceptional

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission grants permission.
modality: Deontic
operator: Grant

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92b-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 92B(1) Commission may grant authorisations in exceptional

92B(2) Commission may grant authorisations in exceptional
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.425
note: Commission may grant authorisations in exceptional circumstances.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92b-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 92B Commission may grant authorisations in exceptional

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92b-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 92B(2) Commission may grant authorisations in exceptional

92C Procedure for applications
type: Concept
description: Form, prescribed documents, and application statement
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.426
note: Application must be in approved form and contain required information.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92c-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92c
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be in approved form
modality: Deontic
operator: must

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 92C Procedure for applications

92D Determination of applications
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.427
curation status: Proposed
has part: 92D(1) Determination of applications
has part: 92D(2) Determination of applications
has part: 92D(3) Determination of applications
has part: 92D(4) Determination of applications
has part: 92D(5) Determination of applications
has part: 92D(6) Determination of applications
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92d
schema version: 2

92D(1) Determination of applications
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.427
note: Granting or dismissing an application for authorisation
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 92D Determination of applications

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting or dismissing an application
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

92D(2) Determination of applications
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.427
note: List of declarations that must be made
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 92D Determination of applications

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a list of declarations
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 92D(2) Determination of applications

92D(3) Determination of applications
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.427
note: Commission must be satisfied that conduct would assist in response to exceptional circumstances.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 92D Determination of applications

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 92D(3) Determination of applications

92D(4) Determination of applications
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.427
note: Must consider public benefit and detriment in determination
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92d-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 92D Determination of applications

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for consideration of public benefit and detriment
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (4) In making a determination under subsection (1), the Commission:...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider public benefit and detriment
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

92D(5) Determination of applications
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.427
note: Must specify exceptional circumstances or emergency
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92d-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 92D Determination of applications

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify exceptional circumstances or emergency
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 92D(5) Determination of applications

92D(6) Determination of applications
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.427
note: The Commission must state its reasons for a determination.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92d-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 92D Determination of applications

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission must state its reasons.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide reasons
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

92E Period for which authorisations remain in force
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.428
note: Authorisation duration
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92e-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92e
schema version: 2

92F Variation of authorisations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.428
curation status: Proposed
has part: 92F(1) Variation of authorisations
has part: 92F(2) Variation of authorisations
has part: 92F(3) Variation of authorisations
has part: 92F(4) Variation of authorisations
has part: 92F(5) Variation of authorisations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92f
schema version: 2

92F(1) Variation of authorisations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.428
note: Commission may vary an authorisation under this Division.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92f-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92f-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 92F Variation of authorisations

92F(2) Variation of authorisations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.428
note: Commission must ensure conduct assists in response to exceptional circumstances.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92f-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92f-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 92F Variation of authorisations

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commission must ensure conduct assists
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide assistance
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Assistance is required

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 92F(2) Variation of authorisations

92F(3) Variation of authorisations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.428
note: Must consider likely benefit and detriment to public in making determination.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92f-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92f-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 92F Variation of authorisations

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to consider
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must consider
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Regard must be had to

92F(4) Variation of authorisations
type: Concept
description: written notice stating the variation and its details
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.428
note: Commission must notify applicant of variation to authorisation.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92f-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92f-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 92F Variation of authorisations

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission must notify applicant
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92f-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 92F(4) Variation of authorisations

92F(5) Variation of authorisations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.428
note: Variation takes effect on business day after notice is given.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92f-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92f-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 92F Variation of authorisations

92G Revocation of authorisations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.429
curation status: Proposed
has part: 92G(1) Revocation of authorisations
has part: 92G(2) Revocation of authorisations
has part: 92G(3) Revocation of authorisations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92g
schema version: 2

92G(1) Revocation of authorisations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.429
note: Revocation of authorisation under certain circumstances
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92g-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92g-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92g-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 92G Revocation of authorisations

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92g-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for revocation consideration
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1) The Commission may, at any time, revoke an authorisation under this Division...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits revocation of authorisation
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) The Commission may, at any time, revoke an authorisation under this Division...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92g-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 92G(1) Revocation of authorisations

92G(2) Revocation of authorisations
type: Concept
description: (a) and (b)
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.429
note: Revocation notice must be given to the applicant.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92g-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92g-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 92G Revocation of authorisations

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of authorisation revocation notice
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) The Commission must give the person who applied for the authorisation written notice...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92g-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 92G(2) Revocation of authorisations

92G(3) Revocation of authorisations
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.429
note: Revocation takes effect on business day after notice is given.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92g-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92g-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92g-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 92G Revocation of authorisations

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92g-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: sec-92g-ss-3 requires AllenInterval
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Temporal intervals require AllenInterval

92H Register of applications and proposals
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.430
curation status: Proposed
has part: 92H(1) Register of applications and proposals
has part: 92H(2) Register of applications and proposals
has part: 92H(3) Register of applications and proposals
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92h
schema version: 2

92H(1) Register of applications and proposals
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.430
note: Maintain a register of applications and authorisations.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92h-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92h-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 92H Register of applications and proposals

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must maintain a register.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

92H(2) Register of applications and proposals
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.430
note: The register must include a statement of reasons.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92h-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92h-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 92H Register of applications and proposals

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a statement of reasons.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92h-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 92H(2) Register of applications and proposals

92H(3) Register of applications and proposals
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.430
note: Conditional delay in registering applications and proposals
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92h-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92h-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92h-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 92H Register of applications and proposals

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92h-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

93 Notification of exclusive dealing or resale price maintenance
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.431
curation status: Proposed
has part: 93(1) Notification of exclusive dealing or resale price maintenance
has part: 93(8) Notification of exclusive dealing or resale price maintenance
has part: 93(1A) Notification of exclusive dealing or resale price maintenance
has part: 93(2) Notification of exclusive dealing or resale price maintenance
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93
schema version: 2

93(1) Notification of exclusive dealing or resale price maintenance
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.431
note: Corporation must notify of exclusive dealing or resale price maintenance conduct.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 93 Notification of exclusive dealing or resale price maintenance

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notification.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 93(1) Notification of exclusive dealing or resale price maintenance

93(1A) Notification of exclusive dealing or resale price maintenance
type: Concept
description: The information required by the form and any other prescribed documents
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.431
note: Requirements for a valid notice under subsection (1)
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93-ss-1a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 93 Notification of exclusive dealing or resale price maintenance

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires specific information to be provided
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 93(1A) Notification of exclusive dealing or resale price maintenance

93(2) Notification of exclusive dealing or resale price maintenance
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.431
note: No notice can be given for conduct or proposed conduct if certain conditions are met.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 93 Notification of exclusive dealing or resale price maintenance

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of notice giving
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (2) A corporation or other person may not give a notice under subsection (1)

93(8) Notification of exclusive dealing or resale price maintenance
type: Concept
description: notice setting out particulars of conduct or proposed conduct
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.431
note: May give notice to Commission about conduct or proposed conduct
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93-ss-8-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 93 Notification of exclusive dealing or resale price maintenance

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to give notice
modality: Deontic
operator: May

93A Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.452
curation status: Proposed
has part: 93A(1) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
has part: 93A(2) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
has part: 93A(3) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
has part: 93A(4) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
has part: 93A(5) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
has part: 93A(6) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93a
schema version: 2

93A(1) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
type: Concept
description: Draft notice
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.452
note: Draft notice must be prepared before giving a notice under certain subsections.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 93A Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide draft notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

93A(2) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.452
note: Commission must invite corporation or person to notify on conference
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 93A Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice and invite conference
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 93A(2) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving

93A(3) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.452
note: The Commission shall send with each notice under subsection (2) a copy of the draft notice and a summary of the reasons why it proposes to give the notice.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 93A Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The Commission shall send with each notice under subsection (2) a copy of the draft notice and a summary of the reasons why it proposes to give the notice.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEFORE

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: The Commission must send with each notice under subsection (2) a copy of the draft notice and a summary of the reasons why it proposes to give the notice.
modality: Argumentation
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The Commission must send with each notice under subsection (2) a copy of the draft notice and a summary of the reasons why it proposes to give the notice.
modality: CogAI
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commission must send with each notice under subsection (2) a copy of the draft notice and a summary of the reasons why it proposes to give the notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The Commission must send with each notice under subsection (2) a copy of the draft notice and a summary of the reasons why it proposes to give the notice.
modality: Diffusion
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 93A(3) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving

93A(4) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.452
note: Commission must decide whether to give notice after 14-day period of silence from persons notified.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 93A Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must decide whether to give notice
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to decide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Commission has authority to give notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 93A(4) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving

93A(5) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.452
note: Commission must hold conference if requested within 14 days
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 93A Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide conference opportunity
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 93A(5) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving

93A(6) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.452
note: Commission must afford opportunity for conference before giving notice.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93a-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 93A Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide opportunity for conference
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 93A(6) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving

93AA Definitions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.438
note: Definitions for Subdivision
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93aa-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93aa
schema version: 2

93AB Notification of collective bargaining
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.438
curation status: Proposed
has part: 93AB(1A) Notification of collective bargaining
has part: 93AB(1) Notification of collective bargaining
has part: 93AB(2) Notification of collective bargaining
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93ab
schema version: 2

93AB(1) Notification of collective bargaining
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.438
note: A corporation may give a notice to the Commission if certain requirements are met.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93ab-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 93AB Notification of collective bargaining

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to give a notice
modality: Deontic
operator: May

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ab-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 93AB(1) Notification of collective bargaining

93AB(1A) Notification of collective bargaining
type: Concept
description: true
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.438
note: A corporation must provide a notice to the Commission if certain conditions are met.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ab-ss-1a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ab-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ab-ss-1a-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93ab-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 93AB Notification of collective bargaining

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ab-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ab-ss-1a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obliges the corporation to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: OBLIGES

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ab-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 93AB(1A) Notification of collective bargaining

93AB(2) Notification of collective bargaining
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.438
note: Corporation must have made or propose to make initial contract with one or more persons about supply of particular goods or services.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93ab-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 93AB Notification of collective bargaining

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Corporation must have made initial contract.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST HAVE

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ab-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 93AB(2) Notification of collective bargaining

93AC Commission’s objection notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.443
curation status: Proposed
has part: 93AC(1) Commission’s objection notice
has part: 93AC(2) Commission’s objection notice
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93ac
schema version: 2

93AC(1) Commission’s objection notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.443
note: Commission may give corporation a written notice stating that it is satisfied the benefit to public does not outweigh detriment.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ac-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ac-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ac-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ac-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ac-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93ac-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 93AC Commission’s objection notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ac-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commission may give the corporation a written notice...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Commission's objection notice has temporal interval of when it was given.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1) If:...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ac-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commission may give the corporation a written notice...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Commission justifies prohibition by considering benefit to public.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
premise text: (b) the Commission is satisfied that any benefit to the public...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ac-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commission may give the corporation a written notice...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Commission infers prohibition from cartel provision.
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: (a) a corporation gives the Commission a collective bargaining notice...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commission may give the corporation a written notice...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission prohibits corporation from including cartel provision in contract.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) a corporation gives the Commission a collective bargaining notice...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ac-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commission may give the corporation a written notice...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Commission's objection notice spreads to corporation.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
premise text: (a) a corporation gives the Commission a collective bargaining notice...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ac-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 93AC(1) Commission’s objection notice

93AC(2) Commission’s objection notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.443
note: Commission’s obligation to respond to collective bargaining notices
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ac-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93ac-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 93AC Commission’s objection notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide response
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ac-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 93AC(2) Commission’s objection notice

93AD When collective bargaining notice comes into force and ceases
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.446
curation status: Proposed
has part: 93AD(1) When collective bargaining notice comes into force and ceases
has part: 93AD(2) When collective bargaining notice comes into force and ceases
has part: 93AD(3) When collective bargaining notice comes into force and ceases
has part: 93AD(4) When collective bargaining notice comes into force and ceases
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93ad
schema version: 2

93AD(1) When collective bargaining notice comes into force and ceases
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.446
note: Collective bargaining notice comes into force after a specified period.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ad-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93ad-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 93AD When collective bargaining notice comes into force and ceases

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The state holds an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: holds

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ad-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 93AD(1) When collective bargaining notice comes into force and ceases

93AD(2) When collective bargaining notice comes into force and ceases
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.446
note: Collective bargaining notice ceases to be in force if withdrawn or an objection notice is given.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ad-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ad-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ad-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ad-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ad-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93ad-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 93AD When collective bargaining notice comes into force and ceases

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ad-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Collective bargaining notice ceases to be in force if Commission gives conference notice during the specified period.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the timing of collective bargaining notice withdrawal and objection notice giving.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Commission gives conference notice during the period referred to in paragraph (1)(a).

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ad-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commission giving conference notice gives rise to collective bargaining notice ceasing to be in force.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes the relationship between Commission giving conference notice and collective bargaining notice withdrawal.
modality: CogAI
operator: if
premise text: Commission gives conference notice during the period referred to in paragraph (1)(a).

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Collective bargaining notice ceases to be in force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits collective bargaining notice coming into force under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: Withdrawal or objection notice given.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ad-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Withdrawal or objection notice gives rise to collective bargaining notice ceasing to be in force.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes the relationship between collective bargaining notice withdrawal and cessation of its effect.
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
premise text: Collective bargaining notice ceases to be in force if withdrawn or an objection notice is given.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ad-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Collective bargaining notice ceases to be in force if Commission gives conference notice during the specified period.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes the timing of collective bargaining notice giving and objection notice giving.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: Commission gives conference notice during the period referred to in paragraph (1)(a).

93AD(3) When collective bargaining notice comes into force and ceases
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.446
note: Conditions under which a collective bargaining notice ceases to be in force.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ad-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93ad-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 93AD When collective bargaining notice comes into force and ceases

93AD(4) When collective bargaining notice comes into force and ceases
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.446
note: Defines relevant day for collective bargaining notice
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ad-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93ad-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 93AD When collective bargaining notice comes into force and ceases

93AE Withdrawal of collective bargaining notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.449
curation status: Proposed
has part: 93AE(1) Withdrawal of collective bargaining notice
has part: 93AE(2) Withdrawal of collective bargaining notice
has part: 93AE(3) Withdrawal of collective bargaining notice
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93ae
schema version: 2

93AE(1) Withdrawal of collective bargaining notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.449
note: Corporation may withdraw collective bargaining notice
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ae-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93ae-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 93AE Withdrawal of collective bargaining notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to withdraw collective bargaining notice
modality: Deontic
operator: may

93AE(2) Withdrawal of collective bargaining notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.449
note: The corporation may withdraw collective bargaining notice at any time before the Commission gives it an objection notice.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ae-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ae-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93ae-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 93AE Withdrawal of collective bargaining notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ae-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to withdraw collective bargaining notice
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ae-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 93AE(2) Withdrawal of collective bargaining notice

93AE(3) Withdrawal of collective bargaining notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.449
note: Withdrawal of collective bargaining notice
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ae-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ae-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93ae-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 93AE Withdrawal of collective bargaining notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ae-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: then the collective bargaining notice is taken to be withdrawn.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits withdrawal of collective bargaining notice
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) If...

93AF Only 1 collective bargaining notice under subsection 93AB(1)
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.450
note: No further collective bargaining notice under subsection 93AB(1) may be given.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93af-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93af-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93af-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93af-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93af-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93af
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93af-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No further collective bargaining notice may be given
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of further collective bargaining notice
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Given a collective bargaining notice under subsection 93AB(1)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93af-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision restricts the giving of collective bargaining notices
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restriction on the giving of collective bargaining notices
modality: Deontic
operator: Restrict
premise text: The provision limits the number of collective bargaining notices that can be given

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93af-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision enforces the prohibition on further collective bargaining notices
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Enforcement of the prohibition on further collective bargaining notices
modality: Deontic
operator: Enforce
premise text: The provision establishes a duty to comply with the prohibition

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93af-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The prohibition implies that no further collective bargaining notice may be given
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implication of the prohibition on further collective bargaining notices
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
premise text: If a collective bargaining notice is given, no further notice may be given

93AG Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.450
curation status: Proposed
has part: 93AG(1) Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
has part: 93AG(2) Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
has part: 93AG(3) Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
has part: 93AG(4) Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
has part: 93AG(5) Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93ag
schema version: 2

93AG(1) Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.450
note: Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93ag-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 93AG Stop notice for collective boycott conduct

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commission reasonably believes that...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for material change of circumstances
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (c) there has been a material change of circumstances since...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission may not give a corporation a written notice (a stop notice) if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits collective boycott conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) the corporation has given the Commission a collective bargaining notice that relates (wholly or partly) to collective boycott conduct;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 93AG(1) Stop notice for collective boycott conduct

93AG(2) Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
type: Concept
description: yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.450
note: Commission must provide written statement of reasons for stop notice. Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93ag-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 93AG Stop notice for collective boycott conduct

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide written statement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits collective boycott conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 93AG(2) Stop notice for collective boycott conduct

93AG(3) Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.450
note: Collective bargaining notice not in force under section 93AD for collective boycott conduct
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93ag-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 93AG Stop notice for collective boycott conduct

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Not in force under section 93AD
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Stop notice and collective bargaining notice overlap in time
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Collective bargaining notice is taken while stop notice is in force

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Not in force under section 93AD
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: State infers obligation from collective bargaining notice and stop notice
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
premise text: Collective bargaining notice is taken for the purposes of this Act

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Not in force under section 93AD
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation implies prohibition of collective bargaining notice for collective boycott conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Collective bargaining notice is in force

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Not in force under section 93AD
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Stop notice diffuses to collective bargaining notice
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Collective bargaining notice is taken for the purposes of this Act

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Not in force under section 93AD
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Collective bargaining notice repeats every time collective boycott conduct occurs
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: Collective bargaining notice is taken for the purposes of this Act

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 93AG(3) Stop notice for collective boycott conduct

93AG(4) Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.450
note: The stop notice comes into force at the specified time.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-4-logic-cogai-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-4-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93ag-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 93AG Stop notice for collective boycott conduct

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The stop notice is in effect during this point forward.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The timing of the stop notice's effect.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (4) The stop notice comes into force at the time the Commission gives the corporation the stop notice.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-4-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The stop notice has an effect on the corporation from this point forward.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The stop notice's impact on the corporation.
modality: CogAI
operator: has-effect
premise text: (4) The stop notice comes into force at the time the Commission gives the corporation the stop notice.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The stop notice is enforceable from this point forward.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The stop notice's effective start.
modality: Deontic
operator: comes-into-force
premise text: (4) The stop notice comes into force at the time the Commission gives the corporation the stop notice.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the Commission gives the corporation a stop notice, then it comes into force at that time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: The stop notice's timing.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implies
premise text: (4) The stop notice comes into force at the time the Commission gives the corporation the stop notice.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-4-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The stop notice has an effect on the corporation from this point forward.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: The stop notice's impact on the corporation.
modality: SHACL
operator: has-effect
premise text: (4) The stop notice comes into force at the time the Commission gives the corporation the stop notice.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 93AG(4) Stop notice for collective boycott conduct

93AG(5) Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.450
note: Stop notice ceases at end of period or Commission objection notice
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93ag-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 93AG Stop notice for collective boycott conduct

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits collective boycott conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 93AG(5) Stop notice for collective boycott conduct

95 Register of notifications
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.455
note: The Commission shall keep a register containing certain notices and documents.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commission must keep a register.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95 Register of notifications

95A Interpretation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.466
note: Definitions and interpretations for Part VIIA of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95a-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95a
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95a-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy for definitions
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =

95AA Commission may determine class exemptions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.459
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95AA(1) Commission may determine class exemptions
has part: 95AA(2) Commission may determine class exemptions
has part: 95AA(3) Commission may determine class exemptions
has part: 95AA(4) Commission may determine class exemptions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95aa
schema version: 2

95AA(1) Commission may determine class exemptions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.459
note: Commission may determine class exemptions
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-1-logic-diffusion-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95aa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95AA Commission may determine class exemptions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The Commission's determination does not affect competition for a specified period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: would not have the effect of
premise text: (a) that conduct of that kind would not have the effect, or would not be likely to have the effect, of substantially lessening competition;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission has the power to make a determination
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: The Commission's determination affects competition and public benefit
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has the effect of
premise text: (a) that conduct of that kind would not have the effect, or would not be likely to have the effect, of substantially lessening competition;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: The Commission's determination results in a benefit to the public
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: would result in
premise text: (b) that conduct of that kind would result, or would be likely to result, in a benefit to the public;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-1-logic-diffusion-6
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The Commission's determination does not affect competition for a specified period
modality: Diffusion
operator: would not have the effect of
premise text: (a) that conduct of that kind would not have the effect, or would not be likely to have the effect, of substantially lessening competition;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The Commission's determination results in a benefit to the public over time
modality: LTL
operator: would result in
premise text: (b) that conduct of that kind would result, or would be likely to result, in a benefit to the public;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95AA(1) Commission may determine class exemptions

95AA(2) Commission may determine class exemptions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.459
note: Commission may specify limitations on exemptions
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95aa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95AA Commission may determine class exemptions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May specify limitations
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95AA(2) Commission may determine class exemptions

95AA(3) Commission may determine class exemptions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.459
note: Commission may determine class exemptions
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95aa-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 95AA Commission may determine class exemptions

95AA(4) Commission may determine class exemptions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.459
note: Commission may determine class exemptions
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95aa-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 95AA Commission may determine class exemptions

95AB Commission may withdraw the benefit of class exemption in
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.460
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95AB(1) Commission may withdraw the benefit of class exemption in
has part: 95AB(2) Commission may withdraw the benefit of class exemption in
has part: 95AB(3) Commission may withdraw the benefit of class exemption in
has part: 95AB(4) Commission may withdraw the benefit of class exemption in
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95ab
schema version: 2

95AB(1) Commission may withdraw the benefit of class exemption in
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.460
note: Commission may withdraw class exemption if conduct substantially lessens competition.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95ab-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95AB Commission may withdraw the benefit of class exemption in

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conduct that would have effect of substantially lessening competition.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95AB(1) Commission may withdraw the benefit of class exemption in

95AB(2) Commission may withdraw the benefit of class exemption in
type: Concept
description: yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.460
note: Commission must provide written statement of reasons for notice.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95ab-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95AB Commission may withdraw the benefit of class exemption in

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide written statement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95AB(2) Commission may withdraw the benefit of class exemption in

95AB(3) Commission may withdraw the benefit of class exemption in
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.460
note: Determination does not apply to conduct engaged in by person while notice is in force.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95ab-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 95AB Commission may withdraw the benefit of class exemption in

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal exclusion: Determination does not apply during notice period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Exclusion
premise text: (3) While a notice under subsection (1) is in force, the determination does not apply to the conduct specified in the notice engaged in by the person.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal exclusion: Determination does not apply during notice period.
modality: CogAI
operator: Temporal Exclusion
premise text: (3) While a notice under subsection (1) is in force, the determination does not apply to the conduct specified in the notice engaged in by the person.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclusion of determination from conduct engaged in while notice is in force.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
premise text: (3) While a notice under subsection (1) is in force, the determination does not apply to the conduct specified in the notice engaged in by the person.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal exclusion: Determination does not apply during notice period.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Temporal Exclusion
premise text: (3) While a notice under subsection (1) is in force, the determination does not apply to the conduct specified in the notice engaged in by the person.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal exclusion: Determination does not apply during notice period.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Exclusion
premise text: (3) While a notice under subsection (1) is in force, the determination does not apply to the conduct specified in the notice engaged in by the person.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95AB(3) Commission may withdraw the benefit of class exemption in

95AB(4) Commission may withdraw the benefit of class exemption in
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.460
note: Commission may withdraw the benefit of class exemption in certain circumstances.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95ab-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 95AB Commission may withdraw the benefit of class exemption in

95AC Exceptional circumstances class exemptions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.461
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95AC(1) Exceptional circumstances class exemptions
has part: 95AC(2) Exceptional circumstances class exemptions
has part: 95AC(3) Exceptional circumstances class exemptions
has part: 95AC(4) Exceptional circumstances class exemptions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95ac
schema version: 2

95AC(1) Exceptional circumstances class exemptions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.461
note: Commission may determine exemptions from certain provisions under exceptional circumstances.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95ac-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95AC Exceptional circumstances class exemptions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commission may determine exemptions
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to exempt
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Declaration in force

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: specified provisions do not apply
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class exemption definition
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: None
premise text: Division 1 or 2 of Part IV

95AC(2) Exceptional circumstances class exemptions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.461
note: Exceptions for declarations under section 95AE and national emergency declarations.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95ac-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95AC Exceptional circumstances class exemptions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Exceptions for overlapping temporal intervals.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlapsWith
premise text: (b) a national emergency declaration (within the meaning of the National Emergency Declaration Act 2020).

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Includes exceptions for specific types of declarations.
modality: CogAI
operator: includes
premise text: (2) The declarations are the following:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes exceptions for specific types of declarations.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (2) The declarations are the following:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Includes exceptions for specific types of declarations.
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
premise text: (2) The declarations are the following:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Includes exceptions for specific types of declarations.
modality: LTL
operator: includes
premise text: (2) The declarations are the following:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95AC(2) Exceptional circumstances class exemptions

95AC(3) Exceptional circumstances class exemptions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.461
note: Commission must be satisfied that conduct would assist in response to exceptional circumstances.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95ac-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 95AC Exceptional circumstances class exemptions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95AC(3) Exceptional circumstances class exemptions

95AC(4) Exceptional circumstances class exemptions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.461
note: Consideration of public benefit and detriment in exceptional circumstances
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95ac-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 95AC Exceptional circumstances class exemptions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Consideration of public benefit and detriment
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
premise text: (4) In making a determination under subsection (1), the Commission:

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95AC(4) Exceptional circumstances class exemptions

95AD Commission may withdraw the benefit of exceptional
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.463
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95AD(1) Commission may withdraw the benefit of exceptional
has part: 95AD(2) Commission may withdraw the benefit of exceptional
has part: 95AD(3) Commission may withdraw the benefit of exceptional
has part: 95AD(4) Commission may withdraw the benefit of exceptional
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95ad
schema version: 2

95AD(1) Commission may withdraw the benefit of exceptional
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.463
note: Commission may withdraw benefit of exceptional if conduct is not appropriate.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95ad-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95AD Commission may withdraw the benefit of exceptional

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: conduct of that kind would not assist, or would not be likely to assist, in the response to or recovery from the exceptional circumstances or emergency specified in the determination;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Conduct is not within a relevant time interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Not Within
premise text: (a) a determination in force under section 95AC specifies a kind of conduct;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: conduct of that kind would not assist, or would not be likely to assist, in the response to or recovery from the exceptional circumstances or emergency specified in the determination;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) a determination in force under section 95AC specifies a kind of conduct;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: conduct of that kind would not assist, or would not be likely to assist, in the response to or recovery from the exceptional circumstances or emergency specified in the determination;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (ii) conduct of that kind is not appropriate.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: conduct of that kind would not assist, or would not be likely to assist, in the response to or recovery from the exceptional circumstances or emergency specified in the determination;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Conduct is not within a relevant time interval
modality: Diffusion
operator: Not Within
premise text: (a) a determination in force under section 95AC specifies a kind of conduct;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: conduct of that kind would not assist, or would not be likely to assist, in the response to or recovery from the exceptional circumstances or emergency specified in the determination;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Conduct is not within a relevant time interval
modality: LTL
operator: Not Within
premise text: (a) a determination in force under section 95AC specifies a kind of conduct;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95AD(1) Commission may withdraw the benefit of exceptional

95AD(2) Commission may withdraw the benefit of exceptional
type: Concept
description: yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.463
note: Commission must provide written statement of reasons for notice.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95ad-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95AD Commission may withdraw the benefit of exceptional

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide written statement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

95AD(3) Commission may withdraw the benefit of exceptional
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.463
note: Determination does not apply to conduct engaged in by person while notice is in force.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95ad-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 95AD Commission may withdraw the benefit of exceptional

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap: Determination does not apply while notice is in force.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3) While a notice under subsection (1) is in force, the determination does not apply to the conduct specified in the notice engaged in by the person.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Exclusion of determination from conduct engaged in by person while notice is in force (CogAI).
modality: CogAI
operator: Exclusion
premise text: (3) While a notice under subsection (1) is in force, the determination does not apply to the conduct specified in the notice engaged in by the person.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclusion of determination from conduct engaged in by person while notice is in force.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
premise text: (3) While a notice under subsection (1) is in force, the determination does not apply to the conduct specified in the notice engaged in by the person.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of exclusion: Determination does not apply while notice is in force.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (3) While a notice under subsection (1) is in force, the determination does not apply to the conduct specified in the notice engaged in by the person.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring exclusion of determination from conduct engaged in by person while notice is in force.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
premise text: (3) While a notice under subsection (1) is in force, the determination does not apply to the conduct specified in the notice engaged in by the person.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95AD(3) Commission may withdraw the benefit of exceptional

95AD(4) Commission may withdraw the benefit of exceptional
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.463
note: Notice under subsection (1) ceases to be in force at the earlier of two times.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95ad-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 95AD Commission may withdraw the benefit of exceptional

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the day after the day the Commission gives the person the written notice;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ceases to be in force
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
premise text: (4) The notice under subsection (1):...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the time the determination under section 95AC ceases to become in force.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ceases to be in force at the earlier of two times.
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
premise text: (4) The notice under subsection (1):...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the day after the day the Commission gives the person the written notice;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ceases to be in force at the earlier of two times.
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
premise text: (ii) the time the determination under section 95AC ceases to become in force.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the time the determination under section 95AC ceases to become in force.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval required for LTL application
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (i) if the Commission revokes the notice—the day after the day the Commission gives the person the written notice;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95AD(4) Commission may withdraw the benefit of exceptional

95AE Minister may declare exceptional circumstances
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.464
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95AE(1) Minister may declare exceptional circumstances
has part: 95AE(2) Minister may declare exceptional circumstances
has part: 95AE(3) Minister may declare exceptional circumstances
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95ae
schema version: 2

95AE(1) Minister may declare exceptional circumstances
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.464
note: The Minister may declare exceptional circumstances under this section.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ae-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95ae-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95AE Minister may declare exceptional circumstances

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration of exceptional circumstances is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ae-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95AE(1) Minister may declare exceptional circumstances

95AE(2) Minister may declare exceptional circumstances
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.464
note: Declaration under subsection (1) has a specified start and end date.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ae-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95ae-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95AE Minister may declare exceptional circumstances

95AE(3) Minister may declare exceptional circumstances
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.464
note: The Minister must declare exceptional circumstances within a specified period.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ae-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ae-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95ae-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 95AE Minister may declare exceptional circumstances

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ae-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The declaration must be made within the specified period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Minister must declare exceptional circumstances.

95AF Extension of declaration of exceptional circumstances
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.465
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95AF(1) Extension of declaration of exceptional circumstances
has part: 95AF(2) Extension of declaration of exceptional circumstances
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95af
schema version: 2

95AF(1) Extension of declaration of exceptional circumstances
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.465
note: Minister may extend declaration of exceptional circumstances
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95af-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95af-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95af-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95AF Extension of declaration of exceptional circumstances

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95af-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to extend declaration
modality: Deontic
operator: May

95AF(2) Extension of declaration of exceptional circumstances
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.465
note: The Minister may extend the operation of an order more than once, but each extension must not exceed 3 months.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95af-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95af-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95af-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95AF Extension of declaration of exceptional circumstances

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95af-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to extend the operation of an order
modality: Deontic
operator: May

95B Exempt supplies
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.470
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95B(1) Exempt supplies
has part: 95B(2) Exempt supplies
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95b
schema version: 2

95B(1) Exempt supplies
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.470
note: Declare supply of goods or services as exempt
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95b-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95B Exempt supplies

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to declare supplies
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95b-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95B(1) Exempt supplies

95B(2) Exempt supplies
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.470
note: Variation or revocation of declarations by notice published in the Gazette.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95b-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95B Exempt supplies

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to vary or revoke declarations.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95b-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95B(2) Exempt supplies

95C Application of Part
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.470
note: This Part applies in relation to the supply of goods or services by certain entities.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95c-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95c
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95C Application of Part

95D Crown to be bound
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.471
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95D(1) Crown to be bound
has part: 95D(2) Crown to be bound
has part: 95D(3) Crown to be bound
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95d
schema version: 2

95D(1) Crown to be bound
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.471
note: The Crown is bound by this Part.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95D Crown to be bound

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Crown is bound by this Part.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Crown is obligated to comply.
modality: Deontic
operator: Binding
premise text: (1) This Part binds the Crown...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95D(1) Crown to be bound

95D(2) Crown to be bound
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.471
note: Crown not liable for prosecution
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95D Crown to be bound

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Crown is not liable for prosecution.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If nothing in the Part makes the Crown liable, then the Crown is not liable.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (2) Nothing in this Part makes the Crown liable to be prosecuted for an offence.

95D(3) Crown to be bound
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.471
note: Exempts incorporated Commonwealth authorities and State/Territory authorities from the protection in subsection (2).
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 95D Crown to be bound

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The exemption applies to entities that overlap with the scope of subsection (2).
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3) The protection in subsection (2) does not apply to an incorporated Commonwealth authority or an incorporated State or Territory authority.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The exemption is recognized by the system as a valid exception.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (3) The protection in subsection (2) does not apply to an incorporated Commonwealth authority or an incorporated State or Territory authority.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts entities from a duty or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The exemption diffuses to other entities that overlap with the scope of subsection (2).
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (3) The protection in subsection (2) does not apply to an incorporated Commonwealth authority or an incorporated State or Territory authority.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The exemption is repeated for each entity that overlaps with the scope of subsection (2).
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (3) The protection in subsection (2) does not apply to an incorporated Commonwealth authority or an incorporated State or Territory authority.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95D(3) Crown to be bound

95E Object of this Part
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.471
note: Prices surveillance should be applied only in markets where competitive pressures are insufficient to achieve efficient prices and protect consumers.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95e-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95e-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95e
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: should

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95e-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95E Object of this Part

95F Simplified overview of this Part
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.471
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95F(1) Simplified overview of this Part
has part: 95F(2) Simplified overview of this Part
has part: 95F(3) Simplified overview of this Part
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95f
schema version: 2

95F(1) Simplified overview of this Part
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.471
note: Overview of this Part
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95f-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95f-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95F Simplified overview of this Part

95F(2) Simplified overview of this Part
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.471
note: Commission or another body must hold price inquiries.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95f-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95f-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95F Simplified overview of this Part

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95F(2) Simplified overview of this Part

95F(3) Simplified overview of this Part
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.471
note: Restricts ability to increase prices, but allows for alternative
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95f-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95f-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95f-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95f-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95f-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95f-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 95F Simplified overview of this Part

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95f-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: However, there is a way for the person to increase prices during that period.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal overlap
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (3) These inquiries may relate to the supply of goods or services by a particular person.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95f-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: However, there is a way for the person to increase prices during that period.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes recognition
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: (3) These inquiries may relate to the supply of goods or services by a particular person.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: However, there is a way for the person to increase prices during that period.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows for alternative
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (3) These inquiries may relate to the supply of goods or services by a particular person.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95f-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: However, there is a way for the person to increase prices during that period.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes diffusion
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (3) These inquiries may relate to the supply of goods or services by a particular person.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95f-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: However, there is a way for the person to increase prices during that period.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes recurring trace
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (3) These inquiries may relate to the supply of goods or services by a particular person.

95G Commission’s functions under this Part
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.473
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95G(1) Commission’s functions under this Part
has part: 95G(2) Commission’s functions under this Part
has part: 95G(3) Commission’s functions under this Part
has part: 95G(4) Commission’s functions under this Part
has part: 95G(5) Commission’s functions under this Part
has part: 95G(6) Commission’s functions under this Part
has part: 95G(7) Commission’s functions under this Part
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95g
schema version: 2

95G(1) Commission’s functions under this Part
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.473
note: Commission's functions under this Part
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95g-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95G Commission’s functions under this Part

95G(2) Commission’s functions under this Part
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.473
note: The Commission must hold inquiries as required under section 95H.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95g-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95G Commission’s functions under this Part

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95G(2) Commission’s functions under this Part

95G(3) Commission’s functions under this Part
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.473
note: Commission may hold inquiries with Minister's approval
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95g-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 95G Commission’s functions under this Part

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to hold inquiries
modality: Deontic
operator: may

95G(4) Commission’s functions under this Part
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.473
note: The Commission must provide a report to the Minister on the results of each inquiry.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95g-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 95G Commission’s functions under this Part

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commission must provide a report.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

95G(5) Commission’s functions under this Part
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.473
note: The Commission must consider locality notices and take action in accordance with this Part.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95g-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 95G Commission’s functions under this Part

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commission must consider locality notices.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95G(5) Commission’s functions under this Part

95G(6) Commission’s functions under this Part
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.473
note: The Commission must monitor prices, costs and profits in a directed industry or business.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95g-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 95G Commission’s functions under this Part

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commission must monitor prices, costs and profits.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95G(6) Commission’s functions under this Part

95G(7) Commission’s functions under this Part
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.473
note: Must have particular regard to certain factors when exercising powers and performing functions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-7-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95g-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 95G Commission’s functions under this Part

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a duty or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

95H Price inquiries
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.475
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95H(1) Price inquiries
has part: 95H(2) Price inquiries
has part: 95H(3) Price inquiries
has part: 95H(4) Price inquiries
has part: 95H(5) Price inquiries
has part: 95H(5A) Price inquiries
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95h
schema version: 2

95H(1) Price inquiries
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.475
note: The Minister requires the Commission to hold an inquiry into a specified matter or matters.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95h-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95H Price inquiries

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: require

95H(2) Price inquiries
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.475
note: Approval of Commission inquiries
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95h-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95H Price inquiries

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to hold inquiry
modality: Deontic
operator: may

95H(3) Price inquiries
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.475
note: Request for inquiry by Minister
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95h-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 95H Price inquiries

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to hold inquiry
modality: Deontic
operator: may

95H(4) Price inquiries
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.475
note: The other body must appoint a person to preside at the inquiry in writing.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95h-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 95H Price inquiries

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must appoint a person to preside at the inquiry in writing.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95H(4) Price inquiries

95H(5) Price inquiries
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.475
note: Minister must appoint one of the individuals to preside at the inquiry if the other body is a group of 2 or more individuals.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95h-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 95H Price inquiries

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to appoint
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95H(5) Price inquiries

95H(5A) Price inquiries
type: Concept
description: (a) specifying that the body will hold the inquiry; and (b) giving the Minister’s reasons for requesting the body, rather than the Commission, to hold the inquiry.
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.475
note: Must table a statement in each House of the Parliament
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-5a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95h-ss-5a
schema version: 2
part of: 95H Price inquiries

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (5A) The Minister must, as soon as practicable after confirmation that the other body will hold the inquiry...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

95J Content of inquiry notices
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.476
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95J(1) Content of inquiry notices
has part: 95J(2) Content of inquiry notices
has part: 95J(3) Content of inquiry notices
has part: 95J(4) Content of inquiry notices
has part: 95J(5) Content of inquiry notices
has part: 95J(6) Content of inquiry notices
has part: 95J(7) Content of inquiry notices
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95j
schema version: 2

95J(1) Content of inquiry notices
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.476
note: Must specify goods or services description in inquiry notice
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95j-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95J Content of inquiry notices

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify goods or services description
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95J(1) Content of inquiry notices

95J(2) Content of inquiry notices
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.476
note: Inquiry notice must specify relation to supply of goods or services
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95j-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95J Content of inquiry notices

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must specify relation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95J(2) Content of inquiry notices

95J(3) Content of inquiry notices
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.476
note: Specify person or persons for inquiry notice
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95j-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 95J Content of inquiry notices

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must specify person or persons
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95J(3) Content of inquiry notices

95J(4) Content of inquiry notices
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.476
note: Minister must be notified of determination by inquiry Chair.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95j-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 95J Content of inquiry notices

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister must be notified
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notification obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Inquiry Chair must give notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95J(4) Content of inquiry notices

95J(5) Content of inquiry notices
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.476
note: Cannot determine State or Territory authority as a person in relation to whom an inquiry will be held.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95j-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 95J Content of inquiry notices

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

95J(6) Content of inquiry notices
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.476
note: Directions may be given in an inquiry notice.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95j-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 95J Content of inquiry notices

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to give directions
modality: Deontic
operator: may

95J(7) Content of inquiry notices
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.476
note: Inquiry body must comply with directions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-7-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95j-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 95J Content of inquiry notices

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (7) The inquiry body must comply with any such directions.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95J(7) Content of inquiry notices

95K Period for completing inquiry
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.477
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95K(1) Period for completing inquiry
has part: 95K(2) Period for completing inquiry
has part: 95K(3) Period for completing inquiry
has part: 95K(4) Period for completing inquiry
has part: 95K(5) Period for completing inquiry
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95k
schema version: 2

95K(1) Period for completing inquiry
type: Concept
description: Report on inquiry completion
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.477
note: Specify period for completing inquiry and report to Minister.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95k-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95k-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95K Period for completing inquiry

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify period for completing inquiry and report to Minister.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95k-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95K(1) Period for completing inquiry

95K(2) Period for completing inquiry
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.477
note: Inquiry body must complete inquiry and report to Minister within period.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95k-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95k-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95K Period for completing inquiry

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inquiry body must complete inquiry.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

95K(3) Period for completing inquiry
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.477
note: Minister may extend or further extend the completion period of an inquiry by notice in writing.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95k-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95k-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 95K Period for completing inquiry

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister may extend or further extend the completion period.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

95K(4) Period for completing inquiry
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.477
note: Inquiry body must complete inquiry and give report within extended completion period.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95k-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95k-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95k-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 95K Period for completing inquiry

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95k-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Inquiry completion period is greater than or equal to the original completion period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inquiry body must complete inquiry.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95k-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95K(4) Period for completing inquiry

95K(5) Period for completing inquiry
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.477
note: Defines completion period for inquiry
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95k-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95k-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 95K Period for completing inquiry

95L Notice of holding of inquiry
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.478
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95L(1) Notice of holding of inquiry
has part: 95L(3) Notice of holding of inquiry
has part: 95L(4) Notice of holding of inquiry
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95l
schema version: 2

95L(1) Notice of holding of inquiry
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.478
note: Notice of inquiry must be given by the inquiry body.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95l-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95l-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95L Notice of holding of inquiry

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inquiry body must give notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95l-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95L(1) Notice of holding of inquiry

95L(3) Notice of holding of inquiry
type: Concept
description: notice content
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.478
note: Give notice to person(s) in writing
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95l-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95l-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 95L Notice of holding of inquiry

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to give notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

95L(4) Notice of holding of inquiry
type: Concept
description: a notice under this section must state that the inquiry body is to hold the inquiry; specify the matter or matters in relation to which the inquiry is to be held; specify the time and place at which the inquiry is to start; in the case of a notice under subsection (3)—set out the effect of section 95N; and specify any other matter prescribed by the regulations
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.478
note: Notice requirements for inquiry body
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95l-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95l-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95l-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 95L Notice of holding of inquiry

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95l-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95l-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95L(4) Notice of holding of inquiry

95M Notice of extension of period for completing inquiry
type: Concept
description: Notice in writing
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.478
note: Must provide notice of extension to person(s) involved in inquiry.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95m-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95m-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95m
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95m-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

95N Price restrictions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.479
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95N(1) Price restrictions
has part: 95N(2) Price restrictions
has part: 95N(3) Price restrictions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95n
schema version: 2

95N(1) Price restrictions
type: Concept
description: true
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.479
note: Must provide a business notice stating the inquiry body's intention to hold an inquiry.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95n-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95N Price restrictions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a business notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95N(1) Price restrictions

95N(2) Price restrictions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.479
note: Supplying goods or services in a locality on particular terms and conditions without complying with notice.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95n-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95N Price restrictions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in that locality on the same or substantially similar terms and conditions in that period;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The supply is within the same period as previous supplies.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (b) the person has supplied goods or services...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the current supply is not in accordance with the notice.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits supplying goods or services in a locality on particular terms and conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) The person commits an offence if...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the current supply is not in accordance with the notice.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation to comply with notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (d) in a case where a notice has been given...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in that locality on the same or substantially similar terms and conditions in that period;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The supply is repeated within a 12-month period.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (b) the person has supplied goods or services...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95N(2) Price restrictions

95N(3) Price restrictions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.479
note: Supplies goods or services of a particular description in a locality on particular terms and conditions before the applicable day.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95n-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 95N Price restrictions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The supplying of goods or services before the applicable day is during the committing of an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the temporal relation between supplying goods or services before the applicable day and committing an offence.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) The person commits an offence if: (a) before the applicable day in relation to the business notice, the person supplies (the current supply) goods or services of that description in a locality on particular terms and conditions; and

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The supplying of goods or services of that description in that locality on particular terms and conditions is part of having a business notice.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes the relation between supplying goods or services of a particular description in a locality on particular terms and conditions and having a business notice.
modality: CogAI
operator: hasPart
premise text: (3) The person commits an offence if: (a) before the applicable day in relation to the business notice, the person supplies (the current supply) goods or services of that description in a locality on particular terms and conditions; and

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must not supply goods or services on particular terms and conditions before the applicable day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits supplying goods or services on particular terms and conditions before the applicable day.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (3) The person commits an offence if: (a) before the applicable day in relation to the business notice, the person supplies (the current supply) goods or services of that description in a locality on particular terms and conditions; and

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The supplying of goods or services before the applicable day is if the person commits an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes the condition under which supplying goods or services before the applicable day leads to committing an offence.
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
premise text: (3) The person commits an offence if: (a) before the applicable day in relation to the business notice, the person supplies (the current supply) goods or services of that description in a locality on particular terms and conditions; and

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The supplying of goods or services on particular terms and conditions after the applicable day is until the committing of an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes the temporal relation between supplying goods or services on particular terms and conditions after the applicable day and committing an offence.
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (3) The person commits an offence if: (a) before the applicable day in relation to the business notice, the person supplies (the current supply) goods or services of that description in a locality on particular terms and conditions; and

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95N(3) Price restrictions

95P Copies of report to be made available
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.481
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95P(1) Copies of report to be made available
has part: 95P(2) Copies of report to be made available
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95p
schema version: 2

95P(1) Copies of report to be made available
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.481
note: Inquiry body must send a copy of the report to the person(s) on the day it gives the Minister the report.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95p-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95p-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95P Copies of report to be made available

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inquiry body must send a copy of the report.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

95P(2) Copies of report to be made available
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.481
note: A copy of a report must be accompanied by a notice setting out the effect of section 95Q.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95p-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95p-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95P Copies of report to be made available

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95p-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95P(2) Copies of report to be made available

95Q Notification of proposed prices after receipt of report
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.482
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95Q(1) Notification of proposed prices after receipt of report
has part: 95Q(2) Notification of proposed prices after receipt of report
has part: 95Q(3) Notification of proposed prices after receipt of report
has part: 95Q(4) Notification of proposed prices after receipt of report
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95q
schema version: 2

95Q(1) Notification of proposed prices after receipt of report
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.482
note: Notification of proposed prices after receipt of report
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95q-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95Q Notification of proposed prices after receipt of report

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Price notification
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for price notification
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (1) This section applies if a person receives a copy of a report on an inquiry held in relation to the supply by the person of goods or services of a particular description.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Price notification
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Requires price notification
modality: CogAI
operator: REQUIRES
premise text: (1) This section applies if a person receives a copy of a report on an inquiry held in relation to the supply by the person of goods or services of a particular description.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Price notification
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) This section applies if a person receives a copy of a report on an inquiry held in relation to the supply by the person of goods or services of a particular description.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Price notification
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses price notification
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS_TO
premise text: (1) This section applies if a person receives a copy of a report on an inquiry held in relation to the supply by the person of goods or services of a particular description.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Price notification
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for price notification
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (1) This section applies if a person receives a copy of a report on an inquiry held in relation to the supply by the person of goods or services of a particular description.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95Q(1) Notification of proposed prices after receipt of report

95Q(2) Notification of proposed prices after receipt of report
type: Concept
description: true
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.482
note: Must provide written notice of proposed prices within 14 days.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95q-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95Q Notification of proposed prices after receipt of report

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95Q(2) Notification of proposed prices after receipt of report

95Q(3) Notification of proposed prices after receipt of report
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.482
note: Contravening subsection (2) is an offence.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95q-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 95Q Notification of proposed prices after receipt of report

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty: 10 penalty units.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits contravening subsection (2)
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if the person contravenes subsection (2).

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95Q(3) Notification of proposed prices after receipt of report

95Q(4) Notification of proposed prices after receipt of report
type: Concept
description: Details of price or prices
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.482
note: Publicly available details of price or prices specified in the notice must be made available within 14 days.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95q-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 95Q Notification of proposed prices after receipt of report

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Details of price or prices must be made available
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide details within 14 days
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

95R Public inquiries etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.483
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95R(1) Public inquiries etc.
has part: 95R(2) Public inquiries etc.
has part: 95R(3) Public inquiries etc.
has part: 95R(4) Public inquiries etc.
has part: 95R(5) Public inquiries etc.
has part: 95R(6) Public inquiries etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95r
schema version: 2

95R(1) Public inquiries etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.483
note: Inquiry body must hold inquiry in public unless directed otherwise.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95r-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95R Public inquiries etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval for the inquiry is contained within the public inquiry period.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for inquiry
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (1) An inquiry body must hold an inquiry in public, unless the Minister directs otherwise.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The artificial intelligence involved in the inquiry is contained within the public inquiry period.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence involvement
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (1) An inquiry body must hold an inquiry in public, unless the Minister directs otherwise.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The inquiry body MUST hold the inquiry in public.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must hold inquiry in public
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) An inquiry body must hold an inquiry in public, unless the Minister directs otherwise.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The diffusion of information related to the inquiry is contained within the public inquiry period.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (1) An inquiry body must hold an inquiry in public, unless the Minister directs otherwise.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal trace for the inquiry contains the public inquiry period.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal trace for inquiry
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (1) An inquiry body must hold an inquiry in public, unless the Minister directs otherwise.

95R(2) Public inquiries etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.483
note: Private inquiry evidence may be taken if witness objects or inquiry body considers desirable.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95r-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95R Public inquiries etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between private and public inquiries
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (b) The inquiry body considers that it is desirable to do so.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to take private inquiry evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Witness objects or inquiry body considers desirable.

95R(3) Public inquiries etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.483
note: Permits witness to give written statement instead of oral testimony.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95r-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 95R Public inquiries etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows witness to provide written statement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow

95R(4) Public inquiries etc.
type: Concept
description: yes
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.483
note: Make available to public certain statement contents under specific conditions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95r-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 95R Public inquiries etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inquiry body must make available certain statement contents.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

95R(5) Public inquiries etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.483
note: Permits submission in writing
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95r-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 95R Public inquiries etc.

95R(6) Public inquiries etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.483
note: Inquiry body must make available to the public submission contents.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95r-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 95R Public inquiries etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inquiry body must make available to the public submission contents.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

95S Taking of evidence on oath or affirmation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.484
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95S(1) Taking of evidence on oath or affirmation
has part: 95S(2) Taking of evidence on oath or affirmation
has part: 95S(3) Taking of evidence on oath or affirmation
has part: 95S(4) Taking of evidence on oath or affirmation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95s
schema version: 2

95S(1) Taking of evidence on oath or affirmation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.484
note: Inquiry body may take evidence on oath or affirmation.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95s-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95S Taking of evidence on oath or affirmation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to provide evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95S(1) Taking of evidence on oath or affirmation

95S(2) Taking of evidence on oath or affirmation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.484
note: An oath or affirmation may be administered by a member of the Commission in an inquiry by the Commission, or by the person presiding at the inquiry in an external inquiry.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95s-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95S Taking of evidence on oath or affirmation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in an inquiry by the Commission, or in an external inquiry.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Has temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: hasTemporalRelation
premise text: (2) An oath or affirmation may be administered by...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a member of the Commission in an inquiry by the Commission, or by the person presiding at the inquiry in an external inquiry.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
premise text: (2) An oath or affirmation may be administered by...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...by a member of the Commission in an inquiry by the Commission, or by the person presiding at the inquiry in an external inquiry.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
premise text: (2) An oath or affirmation may be administered by...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in an inquiry by the Commission, or in an external inquiry.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Has temporal relation
modality: LTL
operator: hasTemporalRelation
premise text: (2) An oath or affirmation may be administered by...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95S(2) Taking of evidence on oath or affirmation

95S(3) Taking of evidence on oath or affirmation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.484
note: Summoning a person to appear at an inquiry and produce documents.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95s-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 95S Taking of evidence on oath or affirmation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to appear at an inquiry.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to produce documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission

95S(4) Taking of evidence on oath or affirmation
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.484
note: Commission may exercise power on application of another person.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95s-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 95S Taking of evidence on oath or affirmation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to exercise power
modality: Deontic
operator: May

95T Failure of witness to attend
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.485
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95T(1) Failure of witness to attend
has part: 95T(2) Failure of witness to attend
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95t
schema version: 2

95T(1) Failure of witness to attend
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.485
note: Failure to attend as a witness without excuse or release.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95t-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95T Failure of witness to attend

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (b) the person fails to attend as required by the summons or fails to appear and report himself or herself from day to day;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between summons and failure to attend.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (c) the person has not been excused, or released from further attendance...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Conditional relationship between excuse/release and failure to attend.
modality: CogAI
operator: If
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (c) the person has not been excused, or released from further attendance...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Failure to attend as a witness without excuse or release.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (c) the person has not been excused, or released from further attendance...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Conditional relationship between excuse/release and failure to attend.
modality: Diffusion
operator: If
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (b) the person fails to attend as required by the summons or fails to appear and report himself or herself from day to day;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between summons and failure to attend.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95T(1) Failure of witness to attend

95T(2) Failure of witness to attend
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.485
note: Defendant bears evidential burden for reasonable excuse
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95t-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95T Failure of witness to attend

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defendant has an obligation to provide a reasonable excuse
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Defendant must know of the excuse
modality: Epistemic
operator: Knowledge

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Excuse is valid until proven otherwise
modality: LTL
operator: Until

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95T(2) Failure of witness to attend

95U Refusal to be sworn or to answer question
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.485
note: Refusal to be sworn or answer question
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95u-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95u-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95u
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95u-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Refusal to be sworn or answer question
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95u-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95U Refusal to be sworn or to answer question

95V Protection of witnesses
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.486
note: Protection of witnesses in civil or criminal proceedings
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95v-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95v
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95v-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95V Protection of witnesses

95W Allowances to witnesses
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.486
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95W(1) Allowances to witnesses
has part: 95W(2) Allowances to witnesses
has part: 95W(3) Allowances to witnesses
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95w
schema version: 2

95W(1) Allowances to witnesses
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.486
note: Witnesses are entitled to allowances for travelling and other expenses.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95w-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95w-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95W Allowances to witnesses

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entitlement is a property of the state.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95w-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95W(1) Allowances to witnesses

95W(2) Allowances to witnesses
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.486
note: Witness entitled to payment by Commonwealth or summoning person.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95w-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95w-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95w-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95W Allowances to witnesses

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95w-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Witness entitled to payment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Witness has obligation to be paid.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
premise text: Witness summoned by inquiry Chair or application of person.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95w-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95W(2) Allowances to witnesses

95W(3) Allowances to witnesses
type: Concept
description: True
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.486
note: Allowances for witnesses must be provided by reference to a scale of expenses.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95w-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95w-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95w-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 95W Allowances to witnesses

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95w-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory provision
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95w-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95W(3) Allowances to witnesses

95X Declarations by Minister or Commission
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.488
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95X(1) Declarations by Minister or Commission
has part: 95X(2) Declarations by Minister or Commission
has part: 95X(3) Declarations by Minister or Commission
has part: 95X(4) Declarations by Minister or Commission
has part: 95X(5) Declarations by Minister or Commission
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95x
schema version: 2

95X(1) Declarations by Minister or Commission
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.488
note: Declare goods or services for purposes of this Part.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95x-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95x-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95x-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95X Declarations by Minister or Commission

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95x-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to declare goods or services.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95x-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95X(1) Declarations by Minister or Commission

95X(2) Declarations by Minister or Commission
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.488
note: Declare person as declared person for specified goods or services.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95x-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95x-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95X Declarations by Minister or Commission

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to declare person
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95x-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95X(2) Declarations by Minister or Commission

95X(3) Declarations by Minister or Commission
type: Concept
description: Notice in writing
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.488
note: Commission must give notice to person of declaration effect.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95x-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95x-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95x-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 95X Declarations by Minister or Commission

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95x-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must give notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95x-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95X(3) Declarations by Minister or Commission

95X(4) Declarations by Minister or Commission
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.488
note: Declaration must specify when it ceases to have effect
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95x-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95x-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 95X Declarations by Minister or Commission

95X(5) Declarations by Minister or Commission
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.488
note: Minister or Commission may vary or revoke a declaration.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95x-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95x-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95x-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 95X Declarations by Minister or Commission

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95x-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to vary or revoke a declaration.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95x-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95X(5) Declarations by Minister or Commission

95Y Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.488
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95Y(1) Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities
has part: 95Y(2) Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities
has part: 95Y(3) Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities
has part: 95Y(4) Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities
has part: 95Y(5) Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95y
schema version: 2

95Y(1) Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.488
note: Minister must obtain agreement from State or Territory authority before making a declaration.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95y-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95Y Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The declaration was made between the current request and the previous request.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Declaration must be made within a specific time frame
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: The Minister makes a declaration.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister has obtained agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Minister's action implies agreement from State or Territory authority
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: The Minister makes a declaration.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister must have obtained agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must obtain agreement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Minister makes a declaration.

95Y(2) Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.488
note: Cannot recommend declaration of State or Territory authority without supervision
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95y-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95Y Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...that there is effective supervision of the prices charged by the authority for the supply of those goods or services
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Supervision must overlap with government notification
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (a) at least one Australian government has notified the State or Territory concerned...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...recommend a declaration of a State or Territory authority
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot recommend declaration without supervision
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) The Council must not...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...that there is effective supervision of the prices charged by the authority for the supply of those goods or services
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Supervision implies government notification
modality: Deontic
operator: Imply
premise text: (a) at least one Australian government has notified the State or Territory concerned...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...that there is effective supervision of the prices charged by the authority for the supply of those goods or services
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Supervision implies impact on trade or commerce
modality: Deontic
operator: Imply
premise text: (c) the supply of those goods or services by the authority has a significant direct or indirect impact on qualifying trade or commerce

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...that there is effective supervision of the prices charged by the authority for the supply of those goods or services
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Supervision must be recurrent
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
premise text: (b) there is not such effective supervision

95Y(3) Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.488
note: Council must not recommend declaration of State or Territory authority if effective supervision exists.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95y-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 95Y Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Supervision mechanism overlaps with current supervision.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (b) it is satisfied that there has not been a substantial change in the mechanism for that supervision...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Council is prohibited from recommending declaration.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (3) The Council must also not recommend a declaration of a State or Territory authority...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Council must provide evidence of effective supervision.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (3) The Council must also not recommend a declaration of a State or Territory authority...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Council may recommend declaration if no effective supervision exists.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (3) The Council must also not recommend a declaration of a State or Territory authority...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Supervision mechanism continues until substantial change occurs.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (b) it is satisfied that there has not been a substantial change in the mechanism for that supervision...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95Y(3) Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities

95Y(4) Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.488
note: Council must apply relevant principles from the Competition Principles Agreement when deciding on effective supervision of prices charged by a State or Territory authority.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95y-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 95Y Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Council must apply relevant principles from the Competition Principles Agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95Y(4) Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities

95Y(5) Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.488
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95y-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 95Y Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities

95Z Price restrictions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.490
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95Z(1) Price restrictions
has part: 95Z(2) Price restrictions
has part: 95Z(3) Price restrictions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95z
schema version: 2

95Z(1) Price restrictions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.490
note: Supplies goods or services at a particular price exceeds the highest price supplied in the same locality and terms within 12 months.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95z-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95Z Price restrictions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The actual price exceeds the highest price at which the person has supplied goods or services of that description in that locality on the same or substantially similar terms and conditions in that period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the time period within which the supply must be made.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (c) the person has supplied goods or services of that description in that locality on the same or substantially similar terms and conditions in the period of 12 months before the current supply;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits supplying goods or services at a particular price.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (a) the person is a declared person in relation to notified goods or services;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty to supply goods or services at a particular price.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (d) the actual price exceeds the highest price at which the person has supplied goods or services of that description in that locality on the same or substantially similar terms and conditions in that period;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95Z(1) Price restrictions

95Z(2) Price restrictions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.490
note: Supplies goods or services of a particular description on substantially similar terms and conditions within the last 12 months in Australia, exceeding the highest price paid for those goods or services elsewhere in Australia.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95z-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95Z Price restrictions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The current supply overlaps with supplies of goods or services on substantially similar terms and conditions within the last 12 months in Australia, exceeding the highest price paid for those goods or services elsewhere in Australia.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: If a person supplies goods or services of a particular description on substantially similar terms and conditions within the last 12 months in Australia, exceeding the highest price paid for those goods or services elsewhere in Australia, then they commit an offence.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits supplying goods or services on substantially similar terms and conditions within the last 12 months in Australia, exceeding the highest price paid for those goods or services elsewhere in Australia.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The current supply diffuses supplies of goods or services on substantially similar terms and conditions within the last 12 months in Australia, exceeding the highest price paid for those goods or services elsewhere in Australia.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The current supply repeats supplies of goods or services on substantially similar terms and conditions within the last 12 months in Australia, exceeding the highest price paid for those goods or services elsewhere in Australia.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95Z(2) Price restrictions

95Z(3) Price restrictions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.490
note: Supplying goods or services without complying with certain terms and conditions is an offence.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95z-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 95Z Price restrictions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in the period of 12 months before the current supply;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires the supply of goods or services to occur within a specific time frame.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the current supply is not an exempt supply.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits supplying goods or services without complying with terms and conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the current supply is not an exempt supply.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obliges the supplier to comply with terms and conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95Z(3) Price restrictions

95ZA Later notices modifying a locality notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.493
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95ZA(1) Later notices modifying a locality notice
has part: 95ZA(2) Later notices modifying a locality notice
has part: 95ZA(3) Later notices modifying a locality notice
has part: 95ZA(4) Later notices modifying a locality notice
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95za
schema version: 2

95ZA(1) Later notices modifying a locality notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.493
note: Allow person to modify locality notice with further written notices.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95za-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZA Later notices modifying a locality notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows modification of locality notice
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95ZA(1) Later notices modifying a locality notice

95ZA(2) Later notices modifying a locality notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.493
note: Price in notice must be less than proposed price and previous notices
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95za-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZA Later notices modifying a locality notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The price is before the proposed price
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation: Notice < Proposed Price
modality: AllenInterval
operator: before
premise text: (2) A price specified in a notice under subsection (1)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The cognitive agent recognizes the price
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Cognitive agent recognition: Notice -> Price
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (2) A price specified in a notice under subsection (1)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A price must be less than the proposed price
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: (2) A price specified in a notice under subsection (1)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The price diffuses the notice
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion: Notice -> Price
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (2) A price specified in a notice under subsection (1)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The price is until the proposed price
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation: Notice <= Proposed Price
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (2) A price specified in a notice under subsection (1)

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95ZA(2) Later notices modifying a locality notice

95ZA(3) Later notices modifying a locality notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.493
note: Notice has no effect if a locality notice is given under subsection (1)
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95za-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZA Later notices modifying a locality notice

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Locality notice has no effect
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If a notice is given, then the locality notice has no effect
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Notice given

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Locality notice has no effect
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: If a notice is given, then the locality notice has no effect
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implies
premise text: Notice given

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95ZA(3) Later notices modifying a locality notice

95ZA(4) Later notices modifying a locality notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.493
note: Defines 'proposed price' for the purpose of this section.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95za-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZA Later notices modifying a locality notice

95ZB Applicable period in relation to a locality notice
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.493
note: Defines applicable period for locality notice
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zb-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zb
schema version: 2

95ZC Register of price notifications
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.494
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95ZC(1) Register of price notifications
has part: 95ZC(2) Register of price notifications
has part: 95ZC(3) Register of price notifications
has part: 95ZC(4) Register of price notifications
has part: 95ZC(5) Register of price notifications
has part: 95ZC(6) Register of price notifications
has part: 95ZC(7) Register of price notifications
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zc
schema version: 2

95ZC(1) Register of price notifications
type: Concept
description: Information on the register
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.494
note: The Commission must keep a register.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZC Register of price notifications

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information on the register
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95ZC(1) Register of price notifications

95ZC(2) Register of price notifications
type: Concept
description: true
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.494
note: Commission must include certain information in the register after receiving a locality notice.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZC Register of price notifications

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information in the register.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95ZC(2) Register of price notifications

95ZC(3) Register of price notifications
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.494
note: Commission must publish notice in Gazette after receiving locality notice.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zc-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZC Register of price notifications

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Notice published within 3 months
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) The Commission must, within 3 months after the end of the applicable period in relation to the locality notice,

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish notice in Gazette
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) The Commission must, within 3 months after the end of the applicable period in relation to the locality notice,

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95ZC(3) Register of price notifications

95ZC(4) Register of price notifications
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.494
note: Request to exclude confidential information from a document in the register.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zc-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZC Register of price notifications

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to exclude confidential information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95ZC(4) Register of price notifications

95ZC(5) Register of price notifications
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.494
note: Commission may exclude information from register if it is satisfied that the claim is justified.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zc-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZC Register of price notifications

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95ZC(5) Register of price notifications

95ZC(6) Register of price notifications
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.494
note: Application for review of decision to exclude information from register
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zc-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZC Register of price notifications

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95ZC(6) Register of price notifications

95ZC(7) Register of price notifications
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.494
note: Right to inspect register during office hours
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-7-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zc-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZC Register of price notifications

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right to access register
modality: Deontic
operator: can

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-7-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95ZC(7) Register of price notifications

95ZD Delegation by Commission
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.496
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95ZD(1) Delegation by Commission
has part: 95ZD(2) Delegation by Commission
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zd
schema version: 2

95ZD(1) Delegation by Commission
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.496
note: Commission may delegate certain powers to a member.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zd-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZD Delegation by Commission

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Power is delegated.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Describes the action of delegation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: Commission delegates power.

95ZD(2) Delegation by Commission
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.496
note: Commission's powers under paragraph 95Z(6)(b) or (c)
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zd-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zd-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZD Delegation by Commission

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission has power
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zd-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Definition of price notification powers
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: isDefinedBy

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95ZD(2) Delegation by Commission

95ZE Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of an industry
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.497
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95ZE(1) Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of an industry
has part: 95ZE(2) Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of an industry
has part: 95ZE(3) Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of an industry
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95ze
schema version: 2

95ZE(1) Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of an industry
type: Concept
description: Report on monitoring at specified time or intervals
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.497
note: The Minister must give the Commission a written direction to monitor prices, costs and profits.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ze-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ze-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95ze-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZE Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of an industry

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ze-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Minister must give the Commission a written direction.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ze-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95ZE(1) Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of an industry

95ZE(2) Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of an industry
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.497
note: The Commission must have regard to the need for commercial confidentiality.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ze-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ze-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95ze-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZE Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of an industry

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ze-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...regard to the need for commercial confidentiality.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Commission must...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ze-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95ZE(2) Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of an industry

95ZE(3) Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of an industry
type: Concept
description: true
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.497
note: Must provide public inspection of report
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ze-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ze-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95ze-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZE Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of an industry

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ze-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide public inspection
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ze-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95ZE(3) Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of an industry

95ZF Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of a business
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.497
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95ZF(1) Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of a business
has part: 95ZF(2) Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of a business
has part: 95ZF(3) Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of a business
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zf
schema version: 2

95ZF(1) Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of a business
type: Concept
description: (a) to monitor prices, costs and profits relating to the supply of goods or services by a specified person; (b) to give the Minister a report on the monitoring at a specified time or at specified intervals within a specified period.
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.497
note: Minister may give Commission written direction to monitor prices, costs and profits.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zf-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZF Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of a business

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Commission must report at specified time.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: at
premise text: (b) to give the Minister a report on the monitoring at a specified time or at specified intervals within a specified period.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Commission must use specified person's data.
modality: CogAI
operator: specified
premise text: (a) to monitor prices, costs and profits relating to the supply of goods or services by a specified person;

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister may give Commission written direction.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Commission must report within specified period.
modality: Diffusion
operator: within
premise text: (b) to give the Minister a report on the monitoring at a specified time or at specified intervals within a specified period.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Commission must report at specified intervals.
modality: LTL
operator: at
premise text: (b) to give the Minister a report on the monitoring at a specified time or at specified intervals within a specified period.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95ZF(1) Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of a business

95ZF(2) Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of a business
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.497
note: Must send a copy of the report to a person
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zf-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZF Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of a business

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...send a copy of the report
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to send a copy of the report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Commission must...

95ZF(3) Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of a business
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.497
note: Commission must send a copy of the report to the person on the specified day.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zf-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZF Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of a business

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a copy of the report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95ZF(3) Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of a business

95ZG Exceptions to price monitoring
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.498
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95ZG(1) Exceptions to price monitoring
has part: 95ZG(2) Exceptions to price monitoring
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zg
schema version: 2

95ZG(1) Exceptions to price monitoring
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.498
note: Minister cannot direct Commission to monitor prices of exempt supplies.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zg-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zg-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZG Exceptions to price monitoring

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

95ZG(2) Exceptions to price monitoring
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.498
note: Minister cannot direct Commission to monitor prices without State/Territory agreement
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zg-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zg-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZG Exceptions to price monitoring

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State/Territory agreement required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of action
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: Minister direction

95ZH Ministerial directions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.499
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95ZH(1) Ministerial directions
has part: 95ZH(2) Ministerial directions
has part: 95ZH(3) Ministerial directions
has part: 95ZH(4) Ministerial directions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zh
schema version: 2

95ZH(1) Ministerial directions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.499
note: The Minister may direct the Commission to give special consideration.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zh-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zh-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZH Ministerial directions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to direct
modality: Deontic
operator: May

95ZH(2) Ministerial directions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.499
note: Commission must comply with ministerial directions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zh-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zh-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZH Ministerial directions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) The Commission must comply with any such directions.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zh-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95ZH(2) Ministerial directions

95ZH(3) Ministerial directions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.499
note: The Minister may direct the body holding an external inquiry to give special consideration to a specified matter or matters.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zh-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zh-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZH Ministerial directions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Minister has the power to direct.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

95ZH(4) Ministerial directions
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.499
note: The body must comply with ministerial directions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zh-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zh-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zh-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZH Ministerial directions

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zh-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (4) The body must comply with any such directions.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zh-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95ZH(4) Ministerial directions

95ZI Inquiries by an unincorporated body or a group of 2 or more
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.499
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95ZI(1) Inquiries by an unincorporated body or a group of 2 or more
has part: 95ZI(2) Inquiries by an unincorporated body or a group of 2 or more
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zi
schema version: 2

95ZI(1) Inquiries by an unincorporated body or a group of 2 or more
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.499
note: This section applies to inquiries by an unincorporated body or a group of 2 or more individuals.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zi-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zi-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZI Inquiries by an unincorporated body or a group of 2 or more

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section applies to inquiries
modality: Deontic
operator: appliesTo

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zi-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95ZI(1) Inquiries by an unincorporated body or a group of 2 or more

95ZI(2) Inquiries by an unincorporated body or a group of 2 or more
type: Concept
description: true
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.499
note: Unincorporated body or group of individuals must give notice, report, or document to a person under this Part.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zi-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zi-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZI Inquiries by an unincorporated body or a group of 2 or more

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice, report, or document.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zi-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95ZI(2) Inquiries by an unincorporated body or a group of 2 or more

95ZJ Withdrawal of notices
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.500
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95ZJ(1) Withdrawal of notices
has part: 95ZJ(2) Withdrawal of notices
has part: 95ZJ(3) Withdrawal of notices
has part: 95ZJ(4) Withdrawal of notices
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zj
schema version: 2

95ZJ(1) Withdrawal of notices
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.500
note: Commission may give a person a notice withdrawing a previously given notice.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zj-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zj-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZJ Withdrawal of notices

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission may give a person a notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zj-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95ZJ(1) Withdrawal of notices

95ZJ(2) Withdrawal of notices
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.500
note: Commission's withdrawal notice affects the Part's validity.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zj-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zj-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZJ Withdrawal of notices

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Withdrawal notice imposes an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

95ZJ(3) Withdrawal of notices
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.500
note: Body must give a person a notice withdrawing a previous notice.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zj-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zj-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zj-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZJ Withdrawal of notices

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zj-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Body has an obligation to give a person a notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

95ZJ(4) Withdrawal of notices
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.500
note: Effect of withdrawal notice on Part
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zj-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zj-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zj-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZJ Withdrawal of notices

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zj-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Part has effect
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional effect
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: Withdrawal notice given

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zj-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95ZJ(4) Withdrawal of notices

95ZK Power to obtain information or documents
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.500
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95ZK(1) Power to obtain information or documents
has part: 95ZK(2) Power to obtain information or documents
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zk
schema version: 2

95ZK(1) Power to obtain information or documents
type: Concept
description: true
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.500
note: The Chairperson may require a person to provide information or documents.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zk-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zk-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZK Power to obtain information or documents

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Chairperson must require the person to provide information or documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zk-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95ZK(1) Power to obtain information or documents

95ZK(2) Power to obtain information or documents
type: Concept
description: true
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.500
note: Require person to provide information or documents within a specified period and manner.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zk-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zk-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZK Power to obtain information or documents

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the person to provide information or documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: require

95ZL Inspection of documents etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.504
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95ZL(1) Inspection of documents etc.
has part: 95ZL(2) Inspection of documents etc.
has part: 95ZL(3) Inspection of documents etc.
has part: 95ZL(4) Inspection of documents etc.
has part: 95ZL(5) Inspection of documents etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zl
schema version: 2

95ZL(1) Inspection of documents etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.504
note: Commission members may inspect documents given for Commission purposes or produced at an inquiry.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zl-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zl-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZL Inspection of documents etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission members can inspect documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: can

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zl-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95ZL(1) Inspection of documents etc.

95ZL(2) Inspection of documents etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.504
note: Members can make copies or take extracts from documents
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zl-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zl-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zl-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZL Inspection of documents etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zl-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to make copies or extract documents
modality: Deontic
operator: can

95ZL(3) Inspection of documents etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.504
note: Associate members of the Commission may inspect documents under certain conditions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zl-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zl-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zl-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZL Inspection of documents etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zl-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Associate members can inspect documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: can

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zl-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95ZL(3) Inspection of documents etc.

95ZL(4) Inspection of documents etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.504
note: Associate members can make copies or take extracts from documents.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zl-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zl-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZL Inspection of documents etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zl-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95ZL(4) Inspection of documents etc.

95ZL(5) Inspection of documents etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.504
note: Inspect documents and make copies or extracts.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zl-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zl-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zl-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZL Inspection of documents etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zl-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to inspect documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: can

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zl-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95ZL(5) Inspection of documents etc.

95ZM Retention of documents
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.505
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95ZM(1) Retention of documents
has part: 95ZM(2) Retention of documents
has part: 95ZM(3) Retention of documents
has part: 95ZM(4) Retention of documents
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zm
schema version: 2

95ZM(1) Retention of documents
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.505
note: Commission may retain documents for a reasonable period.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zm-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZM Retention of documents

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The document is retained for a reasonable period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for document retention.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: The Commission may retain a document for such reasonable period as it thinks fit.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission has the ability to retain documents.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes the Commission's ability to retain documents.
modality: CogAI
operator: Applicable
premise text: The Commission, or a body other than the Commission, may retain a document.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission may retain documents.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Describes the action of retaining documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: The Commission, or a body other than the Commission, may retain a document.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission may retain documents given or produced to it.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes the scope of document retention.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Applicable
premise text: The Commission, or a body other than the Commission, may retain a document given or produced to it as mentioned in section 95ZL.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The document is retained for a reasonable period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes the temporal interval for document retention.
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: The Commission may retain a document for such reasonable period as it thinks fit.

95ZM(2) Retention of documents
type: Concept
description: true
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.505
note: The person entitled to possession of the document is entitled to be supplied with a copy.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zm-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZM Retention of documents

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to supply a document
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95ZM(2) Retention of documents

95ZM(3) Retention of documents
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.505
note: Must be received as evidence in all courts and tribunals.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zm-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZM Retention of documents

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be received
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95ZM(3) Retention of documents

95ZM(4) Retention of documents
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.505
note: Must permit inspection and copying of documents under certain conditions.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zm-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZM Retention of documents

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to permit inspection
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

95ZN Confidential information
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.505
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95ZN(1) Confidential information
has part: 95ZN(2) Confidential information
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zn
schema version: 2

95ZN(1) Confidential information
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.505
note: Confidentiality obligation for disclosure of sensitive information
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zn-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zn-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZN Confidential information

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to maintain confidentiality
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zn-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95ZN(1) Confidential information

95ZN(2) Confidential information
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.505
note: Conditional commencement
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zn-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zn-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZN Confidential information

95ZO Immunity
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.506
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95ZO(1) Immunity
has part: 95ZO(2) Immunity
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zo
schema version: 2

95ZO(1) Immunity
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.506
note: Protection and immunity for Commission members
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zo-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZO Immunity

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Protection and immunity granted during this time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Protection and immunity during performance of functions or exercise of powers
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Commission member performs functions or exercises powers during this time

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Protection and immunity granted during this time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Protection and immunity during performance of functions or exercise of powers
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: Commission member performs functions or exercises powers during this time

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Protection and immunity granted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: Commission member has protection and immunity

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Protection and immunity granted during this time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Protection and immunity during performance of functions or exercise of powers
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: Commission member performs functions or exercises powers during this time

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Protection and immunity granted during this time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Protection and immunity during performance of functions or exercise of powers
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: Commission member performs functions or exercises powers during this time

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95ZO(1) Immunity

95ZO(2) Immunity
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.506
note: Protection and immunity for inquiry persons
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zo-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZO Immunity

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person presiding at the inquiry has... protection and immunity while performing their functions or exercising powers under this Part.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Protection and immunity apply during inquiry performance
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) In an external inquiry...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the person presiding at the inquiry has protection and immunity, then they have... certain conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Protection and immunity imply certain conditions
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (2) In an external inquiry...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The system recognizes that the person presiding at the inquiry has... protection and immunity.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: System recognizes protection and immunity for inquiry persons
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (2) In an external inquiry...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person presiding at the inquiry has... protection and immunity.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inquiry person has protection and immunity
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: (2) In an external inquiry...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person presiding at the inquiry has... protection and immunity that diffuses to other inquiry persons.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Protection and immunity diffuse to inquiry persons
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (2) In an external inquiry...

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95ZO(2) Immunity

95ZP Secrecy: members or staff members of the Commission etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.507
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95ZP(1) Secrecy: members or staff members of the Commission etc.
has part: 95ZP(2) Secrecy: members or staff members of the Commission etc.
has part: 95ZP(3) Secrecy: members or staff members of the Commission etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zp
schema version: 2

95ZP(1) Secrecy: members or staff members of the Commission etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.507
note: Disclosing protected information is prohibited.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zp-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zp-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZP Secrecy: members or staff members of the Commission etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of protected information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zp-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95ZP(1) Secrecy: members or staff members of the Commission etc.

95ZP(2) Secrecy: members or staff members of the Commission etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.507
note: Cannot disclose protected information to a court or produce protected documents unless necessary for carrying out the provisions of this Act.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zp-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zp-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZP Secrecy: members or staff members of the Commission etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on disclosure or production
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: None

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zp-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95ZP(2) Secrecy: members or staff members of the Commission etc.

95ZP(3) Secrecy: members or staff members of the Commission etc.
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.507
note: Definition of 'entrusted person'
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zp-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zp-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zp-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 95ZP Secrecy: members or staff members of the Commission etc.

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zp-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Entrusted person
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Identifies a specific role within the Commission
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Commission member or staff member

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zp-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95ZP(3) Secrecy: members or staff members of the Commission etc.

95ZQ Secrecy: persons involved in inquiries by bodies other than
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.509
note: Committing an offence by certain actions
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zq-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zq-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95zq
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zq-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits committing an offence
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

96 Acts constituting engaging in resale price maintenance
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.512
curation status: Proposed
has part: 96(1) Acts constituting engaging in resale price maintenance
has part: 96(2) Acts constituting engaging in resale price maintenance
has part: 96(3) Acts constituting engaging in resale price maintenance
has part: 96(4) Acts constituting engaging in resale price maintenance
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-96
schema version: 2

96(1) Acts constituting engaging in resale price maintenance
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.512
note: Engaging in resale price maintenance is an obligation for a corporation.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-96-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 96 Acts constituting engaging in resale price maintenance

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Engaging in resale price maintenance is an obligation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: is

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 96(1) Acts constituting engaging in resale price maintenance

96(2) Acts constituting engaging in resale price maintenance
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.512
note: Engaging in resale price maintenance is prohibited for individuals.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-96-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 96 Acts constituting engaging in resale price maintenance

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits engaging in resale price maintenance.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 96(2) Acts constituting engaging in resale price maintenance

96(3) Acts constituting engaging in resale price maintenance
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.512
note: Supplier cannot supply goods at a price less than specified by supplier.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-96-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 96 Acts constituting engaging in resale price maintenance

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Supplier is prohibited from supplying goods at a lower price.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 96(3) Acts constituting engaging in resale price maintenance

96(4) Acts constituting engaging in resale price maintenance
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.512
note: Supplier's specified price deemed to be their own if made known
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-96-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 96 Acts constituting engaging in resale price maintenance

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Supplier's knowledge of price specification
modality: Deontic
operator: >

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 96(4) Acts constituting engaging in resale price maintenance

96A Resale price maintenance in relation to services
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.515
curation status: Proposed
has part: 96A(1) Resale price maintenance in relation to services
has part: 96A(2) Resale price maintenance in relation to services
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-96a
schema version: 2

96A(1) Resale price maintenance in relation to services
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.515
note: This Part applies to conduct in relation to services in a way that corresponds to the way it applies to conduct in relation to goods.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96a-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-96a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 96A Resale price maintenance in relation to services

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision applies to conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 96A(1) Resale price maintenance in relation to services

96A(2) Resale price maintenance in relation to services
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.515
note: Modifications for resale price maintenance in relation to services
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96a-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-96a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 96A Resale price maintenance in relation to services

97 Recommended prices
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.515
note: Supplier cannot induce or attempt to induce a second person in relation to goods
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-97-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-97-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-97
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-97-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits supplier from inducing or attempting to induce a second person
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-97-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 97 Recommended prices

98 Withholding the supply of goods
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.515
note: Supplier must withhold supply of goods
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-98-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-98-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-98
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-98-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: DEEMED

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-98-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 98 Withholding the supply of goods

99 Statements as to the minimum price of goods
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.516
curation status: Proposed
has part: 99(1) Statements as to the minimum price of goods
has part: 99(2) Statements as to the minimum price of goods
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-99
schema version: 2

99(1) Statements as to the minimum price of goods
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.516
note: Statement applied to goods or documents must refer to those goods
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-99-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-99-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-99-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 99 Statements as to the minimum price of goods

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-99-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Goods are believed to be referred to
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Belief about goods
modality: Deontic
operator: >
premise text: Statement is applied to goods or documents

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-99-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 99(1) Statements as to the minimum price of goods

99(2) Statements as to the minimum price of goods
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.516
note: Defines what 'covering' includes for the purpose of subsection (1)
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-99-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-99-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 99 Statements as to the minimum price of goods

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-99-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 99(2) Statements as to the minimum price of goods

Competition and Consumer Act 2010
type: Document
date: 27 May 2026
identifier: No. 51 of 1974
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
category: AU