Competition and Consumer Act 2010
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 51 of 1974
date: 27 May 2026
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

27 May 2026
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27
note: Compilation information and notes on amendments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-27-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-27-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-27-logic-deontic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-27-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the text as a compilation of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-27-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes the compilation's purpose and scope.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55 Object of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55
note: Ensure payment surcharges are not excessive and reflect cost of using payment methods.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.27
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55 Object of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Ensure payment surcharges are not excessive and reflect cost of using payment methods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55A Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55a
note: Defines payment surcharge and infringement notice compliance period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.27
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55a-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55a-logic-deontic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55a-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definedBy
logic summary: Defines terms used in the Act
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes
logic summary: Establishes a legal obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55B Payment surcharges must not be excessive
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55b
has part: 55B(1) Payment surcharges must not be excessive
has part: 55B(2) Payment surcharges must not be excessive
has part: 55B(3) Payment surcharges must not be excessive
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.29

55B(1) Payment surcharges must not be excessive
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55b-ss-1
part of: 55B Payment surcharges must not be excessive
note: Payment surcharges must not be excessive.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.29
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 55B(1) Payment surcharges must not be excessive
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (1) A corporation must not, in trade or commerce, charge a payment surcharge that is excessive.
conclusion text: Payment surcharges must not be excessive.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (1) A corporation must not, in trade or commerce, charge a payment surcharge that is excessive.
conclusion text: Payment surcharges must not be excessive.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal scope of prohibition
premise text: (1) A corporation must not, in trade or commerce, charge a payment surcharge that is excessive.
conclusion text: Payment surcharges must not be excessive during trade or commerce.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (1) A corporation must not, in trade or commerce, charge a payment surcharge that is excessive.
conclusion text: Payment surcharges must not be excessive.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (1) A corporation must not, in trade or commerce, charge a payment surcharge that is excessive.
conclusion text: Payment surcharges must not be excessive.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55B(2) Payment surcharges must not be excessive
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55b-ss-2
part of: 55B Payment surcharges must not be excessive
note: Payment surcharge must not be excessive
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.29
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 55B(2) Payment surcharges must not be excessive
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of excessive payment surcharge
premise text: (2) A payment surcharge is excessive if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of payment surcharges based on standards and regulations
premise text: (a) the surcharge is for a kind of payment covered by...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55B(3) Payment surcharges must not be excessive
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55b-ss-3
part of: 55B Payment surcharges must not be excessive
note: Payment surcharges must not be excessive
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.29
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 55B(3) Payment surcharges must not be excessive
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of excessive payment surcharges
premise text: (3) Subsection (1) does not apply to a corporation who is exempted from its operation by the regulations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55C Surcharge information notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55c
has part: 55C(1) Surcharge information notices
has part: 55C(2) Surcharge information notices
has part: 55C(3) Surcharge information notices
has part: 55C(4) Surcharge information notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.30

55C(1) Surcharge information notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55c-ss-1
part of: 55C Surcharge information notices
note: Require surcharge participant to provide information or documents
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.30
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55C(1) Surcharge information notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Expresses a requirement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55C(2) Surcharge information notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55c-ss-2
part of: 55C Surcharge information notices
note: Corporation must be a surcharge participant if it charges or processes payment surcharges.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.30
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55C(2) Surcharge information notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be a surcharge participant
premise text: (2) A corporation is a surcharge participant if...
conclusion text: ...the corporation must be a surcharge participant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Corporation's charging or processing of payment surcharges implies surcharge participation
premise text: (2) A corporation is a surcharge participant if...
conclusion text: ...the corporation must be a surcharge participant.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: Corporation's charging or processing of payment surcharges implies surcharge participation
premise text: (2) A corporation is a surcharge participant if...
conclusion text: ...the corporation must be a surcharge participant.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IF
logic summary: Corporation's charging or processing of payment surcharges implies surcharge participation
premise text: (2) A corporation is a surcharge participant if...
conclusion text: ...the corporation must be a surcharge participant.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Corporation's charging or processing of payment surcharges implies surcharge participation
premise text: (2) A corporation is a surcharge participant if...
conclusion text: ...the corporation must be a surcharge participant.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55C(3) Surcharge information notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55c-ss-3
part of: 55C Surcharge information notices
note: Notice must be a surcharge information notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.30
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55C(3) Surcharge information notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST BE
logic summary: Must be an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55C(4) Surcharge information notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55c-ss-4
part of: 55C Surcharge information notices
note: Must specify surcharge information notice details
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.30
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55C(4) Surcharge information notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Specify required details
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55D Extending periods for complying with notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55d
has part: 55D(1) Extending periods for complying with notices
has part: 55D(2) Extending periods for complying with notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.30

55D(1) Extending periods for complying with notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55d-ss-1
part of: 55D Extending periods for complying with notices
note: Participant can apply for extension of notice period within 21 days
description: written application to the Commission
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.30
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55d-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55D(1) Extending periods for complying with notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Participant has permission to apply for extension
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Extension period overlaps with notice period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55D(2) Extending periods for complying with notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55d-ss-2
part of: 55D Extending periods for complying with notices
note: Commission may extend period for complying with notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.30
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55d-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55d-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 55D(2) Extending periods for complying with notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to extend period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55E Participant must comply with notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55e
has part: 55E(1) Participant must comply with notice
has part: 55E(2) Participant must comply with notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.31

55E(1) Participant must comply with notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55e-ss-1
part of: 55E Participant must comply with notice
note: Fail to comply with notice within period or commit offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.31
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55e-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55e-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55e-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55e-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with notice.
premise text: (1) A surcharge participant commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...fail to comply with the notice within the period for so complying.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55e-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on failing to comply with notice.
premise text: (1) A surcharge participant commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...fail to comply with the notice within the period for so complying.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55e-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay penalty.
premise text: Penalty: 30 penalty units.
conclusion text: ...the surcharge participant fails to comply with the notice within the period for so complying.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55e-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on failing to pay penalty.
premise text: Penalty: 30 penalty units.
conclusion text: ...the surcharge participant fails to comply with the notice within the period for so complying.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55E(2) Participant must comply with notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55e-ss-2
part of: 55E Participant must comply with notice
note: Participant must comply with notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.31
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55e-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55E(2) Participant must comply with notice
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide compliance
premise text: Strict liability offence
conclusion text: Compliance required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55F Purpose and effect of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55f
has part: 55F(1) Purpose and effect of this Division
has part: 55F(2) Purpose and effect of this Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.32

55F(1) Purpose and effect of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55f-ss-1
part of: 55F Purpose and effect of this Division
note: Issue of infringement notice as an alternative to proceedings for a pecuniary penalty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.32
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55f-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55f-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55F(1) Purpose and effect of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State to issue an infringement notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55F(2) Purpose and effect of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55f-ss-2
part of: 55F Purpose and effect of this Division
note: Does not require an infringement notice to be issued for a contravention of section 55B.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.32
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55f-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55f-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55f-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55f-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55F(2) Purpose and effect of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: This Division does not require an infringement notice to be issued.
conclusion text: No infringement notice is required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55f-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: ⊆
logic summary: Temporal inclusion
premise text: (i) an infringement notice is not issued to the person for the contravention; or (ii) an infringement notice issued to the person for the contravention is withdrawn under section 55N;
conclusion text: The conditions are temporally included.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55f-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ⊆
logic summary: Temporal inclusion
premise text: (i) an infringement notice is not issued to the person for the contravention; or (ii) an infringement notice issued to the person for the contravention is withdrawn under section 55N;
conclusion text: The conditions are temporally included.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55f-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (ii) an infringement notice issued to the person for the contravention is withdrawn under section 55N;
conclusion text: No infringement notice is required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55G Issuing an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55g
has part: 55G(1) Issuing an infringement notice
has part: 55G(2) Issuing an infringement notice
has part: 55G(3) Issuing an infringement notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.32

55G(1) Issuing an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55g-ss-1
part of: 55G Issuing an infringement notice
note: Commission may issue infringement notice to a person with reasonable grounds to believe contravention of section 55B.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.32
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55G(1) Issuing an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Commission may issue infringement notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55G(2) Issuing an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55g-ss-2
part of: 55G Issuing an infringement notice
note: Commission must not issue more than one infringement notice for the same alleged contravention of section 55B.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.32
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 55G(2) Issuing an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55G(3) Issuing an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55g-ss-3
part of: 55G Issuing an infringement notice
note: Infringement notice has no effect if issued more than 12 months after alleged contravention of section 55B.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.32
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 55G(3) Issuing an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits issuing infringement notice more than 12 months after alleged contravention.
premise text: (3) The infringement notice does not have any effect if the notice:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Notice issued more than 12 months after alleged contravention.
premise text: (a) is issued more than 12 months after the day that the
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Notice relates to more than one alleged contravention of section 55B.
premise text: (b) relates to more than one alleged contravention of section 55B by the person.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55g-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits issuing infringement notice relating to more than one alleged contravention.
premise text: (b) relates to more than one alleged contravention of section 55B by the person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55H Matters to be included in an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55h
note: Infringement notice requirements
description: a unique number, day of issue, name and address, Commission contact details, alleged contravention details, penalty information, payment instructions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.33
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55h-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55h-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55h-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55H Matters to be included in an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55h-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide required information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55J Amount of penalty
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55j
note: Penalty amount for infringement notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.33
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55j-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55j-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55j-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits penalty units
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55K Effect of compliance with an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55k
note: Compliance with an infringement notice triggers this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.33
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55k-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55k-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55k-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55K Effect of compliance with an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55k-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Section applies if certain conditions are met.
premise text: Chapter 4 provisions relating to particular industries, payment surcharges etc.
conclusion text: This section applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

55L Effect of failure to comply with an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55l
note: Failure to comply with infringement notice results in liability for alleged contravention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.34
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55l-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55l-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55l-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55L Effect of failure to comply with an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55l-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with infringement notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55M Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55m
has part: 55M(1) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
has part: 55M(2) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
has part: 55M(3) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
has part: 55M(4) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
has part: 55M(5) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
has part: 55M(6) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.34

55M(1) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55m-ss-1
part of: 55M Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
note: Defines infringement notice compliance period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.34
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-1-norm

55M(2) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55m-ss-2
part of: 55M Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
note: Commission may extend infringement notice compliance period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.34
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 55M(2) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to extend compliance period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55M(3) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55m-ss-3
part of: 55M Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
note: Maximum extension period for infringement notice compliance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.34
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55M(3) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: max
logic summary: Limits the maximum duration of an extension
premise text: (3) Only one extension may be given and the extension must not be for longer than 28 days.
conclusion text: (extension-duration < 28)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps-with
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between two intervals
premise text: (3) Only one extension may be given and the extension must not be for longer than 28 days.
conclusion text: overlaps-with(extension-duration, [0, 28])
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: holds-for-all
logic summary: Describes a property that holds for all elements of a set
premise text: (3) Only one extension may be given and the extension must not be for longer than 28 days.
conclusion text: holds-for-all(extension, (extension-duration < 28))
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Describes a process of spreading or disseminating information
premise text: (3) Only one extension may be given and the extension must not be for longer than 28 days.
conclusion text: diffuses(extension-duration < 28)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: asserts
logic summary: Describes a statement or assertion made by an artificial agent
premise text: (3) Only one extension may be given and the extension must not be for longer than 28 days.
conclusion text: asserts(extension-duration < 28)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55M(4) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55m-ss-4
part of: 55M Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
note: Must provide notice of extension to the person issued the infringement notice.
description: Notice of extension
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.34
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55M(4) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice of extension
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55M(5) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55m-ss-5
part of: 55M Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
note: Failure to comply with subsection (4) does not affect the validity of the extension.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.34
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-5-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55M(5) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

55M(6) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55m-ss-6
part of: 55M Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
note: Reference to extended infringement notice compliance period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.34
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-6-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55m-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55M(6) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

55N Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55n
has part: 55N(1) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
has part: 55N(2) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
has part: 55N(3) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
has part: 55N(4) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.35

55N(1) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55n-ss-1
part of: 55N Withdrawal of an infringement notice
note: Right to withdraw infringement notice
description: Written representations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.35
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55n-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55n-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55N(1) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Right to withdraw
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55N(2) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55n-ss-2
part of: 55N Withdrawal of an infringement notice
note: Protection from self-incrimination in proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.35
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55n-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55n-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55N(2) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to protect self-incrimination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55N(3) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55n-ss-3
part of: 55N Withdrawal of an infringement notice
note: Commission may withdraw infringement notice upon request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.35
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55n-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55n-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55N(3) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to withdraw infringement notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

55N(4) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55n-ss-4
part of: 55N Withdrawal of an infringement notice
note: Subsection (3) applies regardless of representations made for withdrawal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.35
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55n-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55n-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55n-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55N(4) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-55n-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Always
logic summary: Subsection (3) applies regardless of representations made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56AA Object of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56aa
note: To enable consumers in certain sectors of the Australian economy to require information relating to themselves.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.37
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aa-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aa-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aa-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56AA Object of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56AB Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ab
note: Rules made under this Part may relate to particular industries and payment surcharges.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.37
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ab-norm

56AC Designated sectors subject to the consumer data right
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ac
has part: 56AC(1) Designated sectors subject to the consumer data right
has part: 56AC(2) Designated sectors subject to the consumer data right
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.39

56AC(1) Designated sectors subject to the consumer data right
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ac-ss-1
part of: 56AC Designated sectors subject to the consumer data right
note: Defines designated sector under subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.39
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ac-ss-1-norm

56AC(2) Designated sectors subject to the consumer data right
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ac-ss-2
part of: 56AC Designated sectors subject to the consumer data right
note: The Minister may designate a sector of the Australian economy by specifying classes of information, persons who hold information, and other details.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.39
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ac-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ac-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 56AC(2) Designated sectors subject to the consumer data right
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to designate a sector
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56AD Minister’s tasks before designating a sector or declaring
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ad
note: Consider all relevant factors before making an instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.41
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ad-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ad-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ad-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ad-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister must consider all relevant factors.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ad-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEFORE
logic summary: Consider all factors before making an instrument.
premise text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56AE Secretary must arrange for analysis, consultation and report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ae
note: The Secretary must arrange for analysis, consultation and report on an instrument proposing to designate a sector or declare actions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.43
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ae-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ae-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ae-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ae-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Secretary must comply with the section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ae-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
logic summary: Classification of industries and actions.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56AF Information Commissioner must analyse and report about an
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56af
has part: 56AF(1) Information Commissioner must analyse and report about an
has part: 56AF(2) Information Commissioner must analyse and report about an
has part: 56AF(3) Information Commissioner must analyse and report about an
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.44

56AF(1) Information Commissioner must analyse and report about an
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56af-ss-1
part of: 56AF Information Commissioner must analyse and report about an
note: Must analyse and report about the likely effect of an instrument on consumer privacy.
description: Analysis and report to the Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.44
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56AF(1) Information Commissioner must analyse and report about an
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56AF(2) Information Commissioner must analyse and report about an
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56af-ss-2
part of: 56AF Information Commissioner must analyse and report about an
note: Information Commissioner must publish report on website
description: report
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.44
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56AF(2) Information Commissioner must analyse and report about an
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56AF(3) Information Commissioner must analyse and report about an
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56af-ss-3
part of: 56AF Information Commissioner must analyse and report about an
note: Information Commissioner must consider certain factors when deciding whether to exclude part of report from publication.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.44
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56AF(3) Information Commissioner must analyse and report about an
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider certain factors
premise text: (3) In deciding whether or not to exclude a part of the report from publication, the Information Commissioner must:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to balance competing interests
premise text: (3) In deciding whether or not to exclude a part of the report from publication, the Information Commissioner must: (a) have regard to the need to prevent the matters in subsection 33(2) of the Privacy Act 1988; and (b) try to achieve an appropriate balance between the need to prevent those matters and the desirability of ensuring that interested persons are sufficiently informed of the Information Commissioner’s analysis in the report.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to prevent certain matters
premise text: (3) In deciding whether or not to exclude a part of the report from publication, the Information Commissioner must: (a) have regard to the need to prevent the matters in subsection 33(2) of the Privacy Act 1988; and
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to achieve balance
premise text: (3) In deciding whether or not to exclude a part of the report from publication, the Information Commissioner must: (b) try to achieve an appropriate balance between the need to prevent those matters and the desirability of ensuring that interested persons are sufficiently informed of the Information Commissioner’s analysis in the report.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56af-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval for consideration
premise text: (3) In deciding whether or not to exclude a part of the report from publication, the Information Commissioner must: (a) have regard to the need to prevent the matters in subsection 33(2) of the Privacy Act 1988; and
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

56AH Other matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ah
note: Exemptions from invalidation of instruments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.45
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ah-norm

56AI Meanings of CDR data, directly or indirectly derived and CDR
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ai
note: Defines CDR data and its meaning.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.45
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ai-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ai-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ai-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ai-logic-descriptionlogic-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ai-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Defines CDR data and its meaning.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ai-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Information covered by paragraph (a) or (aa)
conclusion text: Information derived from information covered by paragraph (a) or (aa)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ai-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Information covered by paragraph (b)
conclusion text: Information derived from information covered by paragraph (b)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56AJ Meaning of data holder
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56aj
note: A person is a data holder if they hold CDR data within a specified class and on or after the earliest holding day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.47
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aj-norm

56AK Meaning of accredited data recipient
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ak
has part: 56AK(1) Meaning of accredited data recipient
has part: 56AK(2) Meaning of accredited data recipient
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.50

56AK(1) Meaning of accredited data recipient
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ak-ss-1
part of: 56AK Meaning of accredited data recipient
note: A person is an accredited data recipient if they meet certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.50
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ak-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ak-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ak-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ak-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ak-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ak-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56AK(1) Meaning of accredited data recipient
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ak-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Permission to hold CDR data
premise text: The person is neither a data holder nor a designated gateway for the first-mentioned CDR data.
conclusion text: The person has permission to hold the CDR data.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ak-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: The CDR data is not being held by or on behalf of the person as an action service provider for a type of CDR action.
conclusion text: There is a temporal interval between when the CDR data was disclosed to the person and when it was held by or on behalf of them.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ak-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: <
logic summary: Prohibition on being a data holder
premise text: The person is neither a data holder nor a designated gateway for the first-mentioned CDR data.
conclusion text: The person cannot be a data holder.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ak-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Right to hold CDR data
premise text: The CDR data is held by or on behalf of the person.
conclusion text: The person has a right to hold the CDR data.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56AK(2) Meaning of accredited data recipient
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ak-ss-2
part of: 56AK Meaning of accredited data recipient
note: Authorisation required for using or disclosing CDR data
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.50
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ak-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ak-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ak-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56AK(2) Meaning of accredited data recipient
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ak-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Has authorisation
premise text: The person is authorised by the consumer data rules
conclusion text: The CDR data can be used or disclosed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56AL Meanings of CDR participant and designated gateway
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56al
has part: 56AL(1) Meanings of CDR participant and designated gateway
has part: 56AL(2) Meanings of CDR participant and designated gateway
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.51

56AL(1) Meanings of CDR participant and designated gateway
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56al-ss-1
part of: 56AL Meanings of CDR participant and designated gateway
note: Defines CDR participant and designated gateway.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.51
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56al-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56al-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56al-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56AL(1) Meanings of CDR participant and designated gateway
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56al-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56AL(2) Meanings of CDR participant and designated gateway
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56al-ss-2
part of: 56AL Meanings of CDR participant and designated gateway
note: A person is a designated gateway if specified in an instrument and meets certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.51
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56al-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56al-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56al-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56al-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56AL(2) Meanings of CDR participant and designated gateway
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56al-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: A person is a designated gateway if specified in an instrument and meets certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56al-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: CDR data is disclosed to the person under consumer data rules
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56AM Meanings of chargeable CDR data, chargeable circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56am
has part: 56AM(1) Meanings of chargeable CDR data, chargeable circumstances
has part: 56AM(2) Meanings of chargeable CDR data, chargeable circumstances
has part: 56AM(3) Meanings of chargeable CDR data, chargeable circumstances
has part: 56AM(4) Meanings of chargeable CDR data, chargeable circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.52

56AM(1) Meanings of chargeable CDR data, chargeable circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56am-ss-1
part of: 56AM Meanings of chargeable CDR data, chargeable circumstances
note: A person is an action service provider for a type of CDR action if the person meets certain conditions. CDR data is chargeable if specified in an instrument designation instrument Defines a CDR action as an action declared under section 56ACA.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-deontic-7
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-8
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-deontic-9
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-10
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-11
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-argumentation-12
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-diffusion-13

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56AM(1) Meanings of chargeable CDR data, chargeable circumstances
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: The data holder is within a class of data holders declared in the CDR declaration.
conclusion text: The person is an action service provider for that type of CDR action.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: The data holder is a voluntary action service provider for that type of CDR action.
conclusion text: The person is an action service provider for that type of CDR action.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: The data holder has been declared as a class of data holders for at least one type of CDR action.
conclusion text: The person is an action service provider for that type of CDR action.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: Recurring trace
premise text: The data holder has been declared as a class of data holders for at least one type of CDR action.
conclusion text: The person is an action service provider for that type of CDR action.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Duty
premise text: The person must meet the conditions to be an action service provider.
conclusion text: The person is an action service provider for that type of CDR action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Duty
premise text: The data holder must meet the conditions to be declared as a class of data holders.
conclusion text: The person is an action service provider for that type of CDR action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-deontic-7
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: CDR data is chargeable if specified in an instrument designation instrument
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-8
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: 56AC(2)
conclusion text: sector under subsection
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-deontic-9
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Identifies a CDR action as an obligation.
premise text: (1) A CDR action is an action of a type declared under section 56ACA.
conclusion text: A CDR action is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-10
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implies
logic summary: Establishes the relationship between a CDR action and its declaration under section 56ACA.
premise text: (1) A CDR action is an action of a type declared under section 56ACA.
conclusion text: If a CDR action exists, it implies a declaration under section 56ACA.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-11
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between a CDR action and its declaration under section 56ACA.
premise text: (1) A CDR action is an action of a type declared under section 56ACA.
conclusion text: A CDR action occurs during its declaration under section 56ACA.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-argumentation-12
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Establishes the logical connection between a CDR action and its declaration under section 56ACA.
premise text: (1) A CDR action is an action of a type declared under section 56ACA.
conclusion text: If a CDR action exists, it implies a declaration under section 56ACA.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-1-logic-diffusion-13
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: implies
logic summary: Describes the spread or dissemination of information about a CDR action and its declaration under section 56ACA.
premise text: (1) A CDR action is an action of a type declared under section 56ACA.
conclusion text: If a CDR action exists, it implies information about its declaration under section 56ACA.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

56AM(2) Meanings of chargeable CDR data, chargeable circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56am-ss-2
part of: 56AM Meanings of chargeable CDR data, chargeable circumstances
note: Definition of CDR declaration for a type of CDR action Disclose chargeable CDR data in specified circumstances. Definition of voluntary action service provider for CDR actions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-6
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-logic-deontic-7
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-8

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56AM(2) Meanings of chargeable CDR data, chargeable circumstances
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory disclosure
premise text: (2) The chargeable CDR data is disclosed in chargeable circumstances if it is disclosed in circumstances specified:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classifies
logic summary: Classification of chargeable CDR data
premise text: (2) The chargeable CDR data is disclosed in chargeable circumstances if it is disclosed in circumstances specified:
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Temporal interval for disclosure
premise text: (2) The chargeable CDR data is disclosed in chargeable circumstances if it is disclosed in circumstances specified:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Person is a voluntary action service provider if...
conclusion text: ...and the person holds an approval under the consumer data rules
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional permission based on accreditation
premise text: (2) A person is a voluntary action service provider if...
conclusion text: ...and the person holds an approval under the consumer data rules
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval for application to be approved
premise text: The person will need to have applied to be approved as an action service provider...
conclusion text: ...for that type of CDR action
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-logic-deontic-7
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of accredited action initiator
premise text: A person is an accredited action initiator for a type of CDR action if...
conclusion text: ...and the person’s accreditation authorises the person to initiate that type of CDR action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-8
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: The consumer data rules may include rules about accreditation...
conclusion text: ...including about different levels of accreditation
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

56AM(3) Meanings of chargeable CDR data, chargeable circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56am-ss-3
part of: 56AM Meanings of chargeable CDR data, chargeable circumstances
note: Chargeable CDR data is used in chargeable circumstances if it meets specified conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56AM(3) Meanings of chargeable CDR data, chargeable circumstances
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: chargeable CDR data is used in chargeable circumstances
conclusion text: it meets specified conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: chargeable CDR data is of class information
conclusion text: it is used in chargeable circumstances for that class of information
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

56AM(4) Meanings of chargeable CDR data, chargeable circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56am-ss-4
part of: 56AM Meanings of chargeable CDR data, chargeable circumstances
note: CDR data is fee-free under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-4-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56am-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56AM(4) Meanings of chargeable CDR data, chargeable circumstances
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

56AN Extension to external Territories
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56an
note: Extends provisions of this Part and other Acts to external Territories
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56an-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56an-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56an-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56AN Extension to external Territories
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56an-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: extends
logic summary: Extends provisions of this Part and other Acts to external Territories
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56AO Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ao
has part: 56AO(1) Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions
has part: 56AO(2) Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions
has part: 56AO(3) Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions
has part: 56AO(3A) Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions
has part: 56AO(3B) Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.54

56AO(1) Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ao-ss-1
part of: 56AO Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions
note: CDR provisions extend to acts, omissions, matters and things outside Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56AO(1) Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: extends
logic summary: Extends to acts, omissions, matters and things outside Australia.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56AO(2) Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ao-ss-2
part of: 56AO Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions
note: CDR provisions apply to all persons, including foreign persons, in relation to CDR data held within Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56AO(2) Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
logic summary: Applicability of CDR provisions to all persons
premise text: CDR data held within Australia
conclusion text: all persons, including foreign persons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56AO(3) Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ao-ss-3
part of: 56AO Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions
note: CDR provisions apply to acts or omissions by Australian persons, within Australia, or causing financial disadvantage outside Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-3-logic-deontic-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56AO(3) Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: (a) the act or omission is by (or on behalf of) an Australian person
conclusion text: CDR provisions apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: (b) the act or omission occurs wholly or partly in Australia, or wholly or partly on board an Australian aircraft or an Australian ship
conclusion text: CDR provisions apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: (c) the act or omission occurs wholly outside Australia, and an Australian person suffers, or is likely to suffer, financial or other disadvantage as a result of the act or omission
conclusion text: CDR provisions apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56AO(3A) Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ao-ss-3a
part of: 56AO Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions
note: CDR provisions apply to all persons, including foreign persons, within Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-3a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56AO(3A) Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
logic summary: Applicability of CDR provisions
premise text: CDR provisions have effect in relation to a CDR action to be performed within Australia.
conclusion text: The CDR provisions apply in relation to all persons (including foreign persons).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56AO(3B) Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ao-ss-3b
part of: 56AO Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions
note: Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-3b-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ao-ss-3b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56AO(3B) Extraterritorial operation of the CDR provisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

56AP Geographical application of offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ap
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.57
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ap-norm

56AQ CDR provisions bind the Crown
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56aq
has part: 56AQ(1) CDR provisions bind the Crown
has part: 56AQ(2) CDR provisions bind the Crown
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.57

56AQ(1) CDR provisions bind the Crown
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56aq-ss-1
part of: 56AQ CDR provisions bind the Crown
note: The CDR provisions bind the Crown in each of its capacities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.57
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-1-logic-dialectical-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: binds
logic summary: The CDR provisions impose an obligation on the Crown.
premise text: (1) The CDR provisions bind the Crown in each of its capacities.
conclusion text: The Crown is obligated to comply with the CDR provisions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The CDR provisions bind the Crown during its various capacities.
premise text: (1) The CDR provisions bind the Crown in each of its capacities.
conclusion text: The CDR provisions apply to the Crown's capacities from the time they come into effect until they are repealed or amended.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-1-logic-dialectical-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Dialectical
operator: implies
logic summary: The CDR provisions imply a duty on the Crown to comply with them.
premise text: (1) The CDR provisions bind the Crown in each of its capacities.
conclusion text: The Crown's compliance with the CDR provisions is implied by their binding nature.
execution surface: modalities::dialectical
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: entails
logic summary: The CDR provisions entail a duty on the Crown to comply with them.
premise text: (1) The CDR provisions bind the Crown in each of its capacities.
conclusion text: The Crown's compliance with the CDR provisions is entailed by their binding nature.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: requires
logic summary: The CDR provisions require the Crown to take specific actions.
premise text: (1) The CDR provisions bind the Crown in each of its capacities.
conclusion text: The Crown must take specific actions to comply with the CDR provisions.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56AQ(2) CDR provisions bind the Crown
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56aq-ss-2
part of: 56AQ CDR provisions bind the Crown
note: The Crown is not subject to certain remedies under specified laws.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.57
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: CDR provisions do not make the Crown liable to a pecuniary penalty.
conclusion text: The Crown is not subject to a pecuniary penalty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: CDR provisions do not make the Crown subject to a remedy under section 56EY.
conclusion text: The Crown is not subject to a remedy under section 56EY.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: CDR provisions do not make the Crown subject to a remedy under Part VI other than section 87B.
conclusion text: The Crown is not subject to a remedy under Part VI other than section 87B.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: CDR provisions do not make the Crown subject to a remedy under Part 4 or section 7 of the Regulatory Powers Act.
conclusion text: The Crown is not subject to a remedy under Part 4 or section 7 of the Regulatory Powers Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56aq-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: CDR provisions do not make the Crown subject to Part XID of this Act.
conclusion text: The Crown is not subject to Part XID of this Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56AR Government entities may participate under this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ar
note: Entities subject to CDR provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.57
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ar-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ar-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ar-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Entities subject to CDR provisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56AS Participating government entities of a State or Territory—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56as
note: The Minister may declare an entity as a participating entity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.59
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56as-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56as-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56as-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56AS Participating government entities of a State or Territory—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56as-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Declaration of participation is obligatory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56AT Participating government entities of a State or Territory—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56at
has part: 56AT(1) Participating government entities of a State or Territory—
has part: 56AT(2) Participating government entities of a State or Territory—
has part: 56AT(3) Participating government entities of a State or Territory—
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.60

56AT(1) Participating government entities of a State or Territory—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56at-ss-1
part of: 56AT Participating government entities of a State or Territory—
note: Revocation of declaration of participating entity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.60
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 56AT(1) Participating government entities of a State or Territory—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits revoking a declaration
premise text: (1) The Minister may, by notifiable instrument...
conclusion text: ...revokes a declaration made under subsection 56AS(1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval of revocation
premise text: (1) The Minister may, by notifiable instrument...
conclusion text: ...revokes a declaration made under subsection 56AS(1)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval of revocation
premise text: (1) The Minister may, by notifiable instrument...
conclusion text: ...revokes a declaration made under subsection 56AS(1)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses revocation to participating entities
premise text: (1) The Minister may, by notifiable instrument...
conclusion text: ...revokes a declaration made under subsection 56AS(1)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Reasoning
logic summary: Applies reasoning to revocation of declarations
premise text: (1) The Minister may, by notifiable instrument...
conclusion text: ...revokes a declaration made under subsection 56AS(1)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

56AT(2) Participating government entities of a State or Territory—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56at-ss-2
part of: 56AT Participating government entities of a State or Territory—
note: Minister must revoke declaration as soon as practicable upon request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.60
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister has a duty to revoke declaration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56AT(3) Participating government entities of a State or Territory—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56at-ss-3
part of: 56AT Participating government entities of a State or Territory—
note: Continues to apply to entity in relation to acquired, accrued or incurred rights, privileges, obligations or liabilities after revocation of declaration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.60
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56AT(3) Participating government entities of a State or Territory—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continues
logic summary: Entity continues to be subject to obligations after revocation.
premise text: Revocation of declaration
conclusion text: Subsection 56AR(2) applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
logic summary: Subsection 56AR(2) applies between declaration revocation and entity's rights, privileges, obligations or liabilities.
premise text: Declaration revocation
conclusion text: Entity continues to be subject to subsection 56AR(2)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Subsection 56AR(2) applies recurring to entity in relation to acquired, accrued or incurred rights, privileges, obligations or liabilities.
premise text: Declaration revocation
conclusion text: Entity continues to be subject to subsection 56AR(2)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56at-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Despite
logic summary: Subsection 56AR(2) applies despite declaration revocation.
premise text: Revocation of declaration
conclusion text: Entity continues to be subject to subsection 56AR(2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56AU Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of CDR entities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56au
has part: 56AU(1) Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of CDR entities
has part: 56AU(2) Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of CDR entities
has part: 56AU(3) Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of CDR entities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.61

56AU(1) Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of CDR entities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56au-ss-1
part of: 56AU Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of CDR entities
note: Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of CDR entities are obligations for the CDR entity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.61
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: :
logic summary: Obligation relation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56AU(2) Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of CDR entities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56au-ss-2
part of: 56AU Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of CDR entities
note: Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of CDR entities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.61
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56AU(2) Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of CDR entities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Part and the consumer data rules, if an act is done by a person in relation to another person...
conclusion text: the act is taken to have also been done in relation to the CDR entity.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Relates to temporal intervals
logic summary: Describes relation between temporal intervals
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Part and the consumer data rules, if an act is done by a person in relation to another person...
conclusion text: the agent who: (a) is acting on behalf of a CDR entity; and (b) is so acting within the agent’s actual or apparent authority;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Relates to trace
logic summary: Describes relation between traces
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Part and the consumer data rules, if an act is done by a person in relation to another person...
conclusion text: the agent who: (a) is acting on behalf of a CDR entity; and (b) is so acting within the agent’s actual or apparent authority;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Relates to diffusion
logic summary: Describes relation between diffusion
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Part and the consumer data rules, if an act is done by a person in relation to another person...
conclusion text: the agent who: (a) is acting on behalf of a CDR entity; and (b) is so acting within the agent’s actual or apparent authority;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Relates to CogAI
logic summary: Describes relation between CogAI
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Part and the consumer data rules, if an act is done by a person in relation to another person...
conclusion text: the agent who: (a) is acting on behalf of a CDR entity; and (b) is so acting within the agent’s actual or apparent authority;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

56AU(3) Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of CDR entities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56au-ss-3
part of: 56AU Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of CDR entities
note: Definition of CDR entity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.61
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56AU(3) Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of CDR entities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56au-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines a class hierarchy for CDR entities
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56BA Minister may make consumer data rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ba
has part: 56BA(1) Minister may make consumer data rules
has part: 56BA(2) Minister may make consumer data rules
has part: 56BA(3) Minister may make consumer data rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.62

56BA(1) Minister may make consumer data rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ba-ss-1
part of: 56BA Minister may make consumer data rules
note: Minister must make consumer data rules including deletion of CDR data Minister has obligation to make consumer data rules.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.62
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56BA(1) Minister may make consumer data rules
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make consumer data rules
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56BA(2) Minister may make consumer data rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ba-ss-2
part of: 56BA Minister may make consumer data rules
note: Consumer data rules must include requirements for deleting CDR data on request from consumer Cannot delete CDR data under certain conditions
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.62
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-2-logic-ltl-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56BA(2) Minister may make consumer data rules
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide requirements for deleting CDR data on request from consumer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: \u2262
logic summary: Cannot delete CDR data under certain conditions
premise text: The accredited data recipient is required to retain the CDR data
conclusion text: The rule cannot require deletion of all or part of the CDR data
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: \u2262
logic summary: CDR data must be retained by or under an Australian law or court/tribunal order
premise text: The accredited data recipient is required to retain the CDR data
conclusion text: The rule cannot require deletion of all or part of the CDR data
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: \u2262
logic summary: CDR data relates to current or anticipated legal proceedings
premise text: The CDR data relates to any current or anticipated legal proceedings
conclusion text: The rule cannot require deletion of all or part of the CDR data
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-2-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: \u2262
logic summary: CDR data must be retained by or under an Australian law or court/tribunal order
premise text: The accredited data recipient is required to retain the CDR data
conclusion text: The rule cannot require deletion of all or part of the CDR data
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56BA(3) Minister may make consumer data rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ba-ss-3
part of: 56BA Minister may make consumer data rules
note: Rules for consumer data deletion
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.62
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56BA(3) Minister may make consumer data rules
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with rules
premise text: The consumer data rules may include...
conclusion text: ...the requirement:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS OF
logic summary: Class of CDR data requested
premise text: depending on the class of CDR data requested to be deleted;
conclusion text: ...the rules about how the requirement is to be complied with
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ba-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal intervals for deletion
premise text: when a request ceases to be a valid request;
conclusion text: ...the CDR data covered in a valid request;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56BB Matters that the consumer data rules may deal with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bb
note: Matters that the consumer data rules may deal with
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.64
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bb-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bb-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56BB Matters that the consumer data rules may deal with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

56BC Rules about disclosure, collection, use, accuracy, storage,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bc
has part: 56BC(1) Rules about disclosure, collection, use, accuracy, storage,
has part: 56BC(2) Rules about disclosure, collection, use, accuracy, storage,
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.65

56BC(1) Rules about disclosure, collection, use, accuracy, storage,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bc-ss-1
part of: 56BC Rules about disclosure, collection, use, accuracy, storage,
note: Disclosure requirements for CDR data
description: CDR data upon request
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.65
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bc-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide CDR data
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56BC(2) Rules about disclosure, collection, use, accuracy, storage,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bc-ss-2
part of: 56BC Rules about disclosure, collection, use, accuracy, storage,
note: Rules about disclosure, collection, use, accuracy, storage
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.65
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bc-ss-2-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56BC(2) Rules about disclosure, collection, use, accuracy, storage,
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

56BD Limitations for rules about CDR data for which there are
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bd
has part: 56BD(1) Limitations for rules about CDR data for which there are
has part: 56BD(2) Limitations for rules about CDR data for which there are
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.67

56BD(1) Limitations for rules about CDR data for which there are
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bd-ss-1
part of: 56BD Limitations for rules about CDR data for which there are
note: Disclosure of CDR data is only required for certain types of consumers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.67
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bd-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bd-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56BD(1) Limitations for rules about CDR data for which there are
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires disclosure for specified types of consumers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bd-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Subclass of consumer data rules that require disclosure.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56BD(2) Limitations for rules about CDR data for which there are
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bd-ss-2
part of: 56BD Limitations for rules about CDR data for which there are
note: No fee can be charged for certain industries and payment surcharges.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.67
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bd-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bd-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bd-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bd-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not allow
logic summary: Prohibition on charging fees for certain industries and payment surcharges.
premise text: (2) The consumer data rules cannot allow a fee to be charged for: Chapter 4 Provisions relating to particular industries, payment surcharges etc.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Prohibition on charging fees during the specified time period.
premise text: (2) The consumer data rules cannot allow a fee to be charged for: Chapter 4 Provisions relating to particular industries, payment surcharges etc.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bd-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Prohibition on charging fees during the specified time period.
premise text: (2) The consumer data rules cannot allow a fee to be charged for: Chapter 4 Provisions relating to particular industries, payment surcharges etc.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bd-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Prohibition on charging fees during the specified time period.
premise text: (2) The consumer data rules cannot allow a fee to be charged for: Chapter 4 Provisions relating to particular industries, payment surcharges etc.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bd-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Prohibition on charging fees during the specified time period.
premise text: (2) The consumer data rules cannot allow a fee to be charged for: Chapter 4 Provisions relating to particular industries, payment surcharges etc.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56BE Rules about disclosure, collection, use, accuracy, storage,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56be
note: Requirements for CDR data disclosure
description: CDR data upon request
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.68
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56be-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56be-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56be-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to disclose CDR data
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56BF Limitations for rules about product data
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bf
note: Only certain kinds of product data can be required to be disclosed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.69
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bf-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bf-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56BF Limitations for rules about product data
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

56BG Rules about designated gateways
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bg
has part: 56BG(1) Rules about designated gateways
has part: 56BG(2) Rules about designated gateways
has part: 56BG(3) Rules about designated gateways
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.70

56BG(1) Rules about designated gateways
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bg-ss-1
part of: 56BG Rules about designated gateways
note: Rules about designated gateways for CDR data
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.70
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bg-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits acting between the CDR consumer and the CDR participant in the making of a valid request
premise text: (1) Without limiting paragraph 56BB(c), if there is a designated gateway for CDR data for which there are one or more CDR consumers, the consumer data rules may include the following rules:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

56BG(2) Rules about designated gateways
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bg-ss-2
part of: 56BG Rules about designated gateways
note: Rules for designated gateways
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.70
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bg-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56BG(2) Rules about designated gateways
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56BG(3) Rules about designated gateways
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bg-ss-3
part of: 56BG Rules about designated gateways
note: Rules about designated gateways can only include rules affecting the designated gateway if they relate to a disclosure described in paragraph (a) of this subsection.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.70
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bg-ss-3-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bg-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56BG(3) Rules about designated gateways
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

56BH Rules about accreditation for the purposes of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bh
note: Rules about accreditation for the purposes of this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.75
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bh-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bh-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56BH Rules about accreditation for the purposes of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

56BI Rules about reporting, record keeping and auditing
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bi
note: Power for CDR consumer to direct reports about valid requests and disclosures
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.79
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bi-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bi-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bi-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Power
logic summary: Granting permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56BJ Rules about incidental or related matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bj
note: Rules about incidental or related matters
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.81
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bj-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bj-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bj-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56BJ Rules about incidental or related matters
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bj-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Applies to the obligation
premise text: The text states that persons are relieved from complying with requirements
conclusion text: The obligation is lifted under certain circumstances
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56BK Further limitations on the consumer data rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bk
has part: 56BK(1) Further limitations on the consumer data rules
has part: 56BK(2) Further limitations on the consumer data rules
has part: 56BK(4) Further limitations on the consumer data rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.83

56BK(1) Further limitations on the consumer data rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bk-ss-1
part of: 56BK Further limitations on the consumer data rules
note: No retrospective commencement or application for consumer data rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.83
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-1-logic-cogai-6

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 56BK(1) Further limitations on the consumer data rules
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of retrospective commencement or application
premise text: (1) The consumer data rules cannot impose on a person a requirement that has a retrospective commencement or application.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classifies
logic summary: Classification of consumer data rules as having no retrospective commencement or application
premise text: (1) The consumer data rules cannot impose on a person a requirement that has a retrospective commencement or application.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Does not overlap
logic summary: No overlapping temporal intervals for retrospective commencement or application
premise text: (1) The consumer data rules cannot impose on a person a requirement that has a retrospective commencement or application.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Does not apply
logic summary: No LTL logic applicable due to lack of temporal intervals
premise text: (1) The consumer data rules cannot impose on a person a requirement that has a retrospective commencement or application.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Does not apply
logic summary: No diffusion logic applicable due to lack of temporal intervals
premise text: (1) The consumer data rules cannot impose on a person a requirement that has a retrospective commencement or application.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-1-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Does not apply
logic summary: No CogAI logic applicable due to lack of temporal intervals
premise text: (1) The consumer data rules cannot impose on a person a requirement that has a retrospective commencement or application.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

56BK(2) Further limitations on the consumer data rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bk-ss-2
part of: 56BK Further limitations on the consumer data rules
note: A person must disclose CDR data if they are a data holder, accredited person, or given a valid request.
description: Disclosure of CDR data
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.83
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56BK(2) Further limitations on the consumer data rules
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide disclosure
premise text: Data holder, accredited person, or valid request
conclusion text: Disclosure required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Classification of persons
premise text: Data holder, accredited person, or valid request
conclusion text: Classification of persons
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56BK(4) Further limitations on the consumer data rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bk-ss-4
part of: 56BK Further limitations on the consumer data rules
note: Despite other provisions, subsection (1) applies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.83
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56BK(4) Further limitations on the consumer data rules
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bk-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Despite
logic summary: Obligation despite other provisions
premise text: Other provisions
conclusion text: Subsection (1) applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

56BL Obligation to comply with consumer data rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bl
note: Consumer data rules may provide for civil penalty provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.84
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bl-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bl-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bl-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56BL Obligation to comply with consumer data rules
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bl-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56BM Infringement notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bm
has part: 56BM(1) Infringement notices
has part: 56BM(2) Infringement notices
has part: 56BM(3) Infringement notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.84

56BM(1) Infringement notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bm-ss-1
part of: 56BM Infringement notices
note: Division 5 of Part XI applies to a civil penalty provision in a corresponding way.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.84
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bm-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bm-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56BM(1) Infringement notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Division applies to a civil penalty provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56BM(2) Infringement notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bm-ss-2
part of: 56BM Infringement notices
note: Substitutions for references in Division 5 of Part XI
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.84
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bm-ss-2-norm

56BM(3) Infringement notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bm-ss-3
part of: 56BM Infringement notices
note: Section does not limit application of section 56GF to Division 5 of Part XI.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.84
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bm-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bm-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bm-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bm-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bm-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bm-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56BM(3) Infringement notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: does not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: Division 2 of Part XI does not limit the application of section 56GF.
conclusion text: Section 56GF can be applied to Division 5 of Part XI.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bm-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
logic summary: Temporal interval for section 56GF includes Division 5 of Part XI.
premise text: Division 2 of Part XI describes the extended application of Division 5 of Part XI.
conclusion text: Section 56GF applies to Division 5 of Part XI within its temporal scope.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bm-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: within
logic summary: Temporal interval for section 56GF includes Division 5 of Part XI.
premise text: Division 2 of Part XI describes the extended application of Division 5 of Part XI.
conclusion text: Section 56GF applies to Division 5 of Part XI within its temporal scope.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bm-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: within
logic summary: Temporal interval for section 56GF includes Division 5 of Part XI.
premise text: Division 2 of Part XI describes the extended application of Division 5 of Part XI.
conclusion text: Section 56GF applies to Division 5 of Part XI within its temporal scope.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bm-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: within
logic summary: Temporal interval for section 56GF includes Division 5 of Part XI.
premise text: Division 2 of Part XI describes the extended application of Division 5 of Part XI.
conclusion text: Section 56GF applies to Division 5 of Part XI within its temporal scope.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56BN Misleading or deceptive conduct—offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bn
has part: 56BN(1) Misleading or deceptive conduct—offence
has part: 56BN(2) Misleading or deceptive conduct—offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.85

56BN(1) Misleading or deceptive conduct—offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bn-ss-1
part of: 56BN Misleading or deceptive conduct—offence
note: Engaging in misleading or deceptive conduct is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.85
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bn-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bn-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 56BN(1) Misleading or deceptive conduct—offence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56BN(2) Misleading or deceptive conduct—offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bn-ss-2
part of: 56BN Misleading or deceptive conduct—offence
note: Exemption from subsection (1) if conduct is not misleading or deceptive in a material particular.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.85
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bn-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bn-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56BN(2) Misleading or deceptive conduct—offence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from obligations
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply if...
conclusion text: ...conduct is not misleading or deceptive in a material particular.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

56BO Misleading or deceptive conduct—civil penalty
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bo
has part: 56BO(1) Misleading or deceptive conduct—civil penalty
has part: 56BO(2) Misleading or deceptive conduct—civil penalty
has part: 56BO(3) Misleading or deceptive conduct—civil penalty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.86

56BO(1) Misleading or deceptive conduct—civil penalty
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bo-ss-1
part of: 56BO Misleading or deceptive conduct—civil penalty
note: Misleading or deceptive conduct is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.86
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 56BO(1) Misleading or deceptive conduct—civil penalty
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56BO(2) Misleading or deceptive conduct—civil penalty
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bo-ss-2
part of: 56BO Misleading or deceptive conduct—civil penalty
note: Exemption from civil penalty for non-misleading conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.86
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-2-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-2-logic-n3logic-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56BO(2) Misleading or deceptive conduct—civil penalty
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts conduct from civil penalty
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply if the conduct is not misleading or deceptive in a material particular.
conclusion text: The conduct is exempt from the civil penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implies
logic summary: Implies that the conduct is exempt from the civil penalty if it is not misleading or deceptive in a material particular
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if the conduct is not misleading or deceptive in a material particular.
conclusion text: The conduct implies exemption from the civil penalty
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-2-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses the concept of exemption to the conduct that is not misleading or deceptive in a material particular
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if the conduct is not misleading or deceptive in a material particular.
conclusion text: The diffusion of exemption applies to the conduct
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Recognizes the concept of exemption in the conduct that is not misleading or deceptive in a material particular
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if the conduct is not misleading or deceptive in a material particular.
conclusion text: The CogAI recognizes the exemption
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-2-logic-n3logic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: N3Logic
operator: subsumes
logic summary: Subsumes the concept of exemption under the conduct that is not misleading or deceptive in a material particular
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if the conduct is not misleading or deceptive in a material particular.
conclusion text: The N3Logic subsumes the exemption
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

56BO(3) Misleading or deceptive conduct—civil penalty
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bo-ss-3
part of: 56BO Misleading or deceptive conduct—civil penalty
note: Bears burden of adducing evidence to suggest a reasonable possibility that conduct is not misleading or deceptive.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.86
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56BO(3) Misleading or deceptive conduct—civil penalty
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Bearing the burden of adducing evidence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bo-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Possibility
logic summary: A reasonable possibility that conduct is not misleading or deceptive.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56BP Minister’s tasks before making the rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bp
note: Consider certain matters before making consumer data rules.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.87
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bp-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bp-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bp-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bp-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider matters
premise text: The Minister must:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bp-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Consider kinds of matters
premise text: Paragraphs 56AD(1)(a) and (b)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56BQ Secretary must arrange for consultation and report before the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bq
note: Secretary must arrange for consultation and report before making rules.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.88
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bq-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bq-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bq-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bq-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56BQ Secretary must arrange for consultation and report before the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bq-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bq-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
logic summary: Classification of rules
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56BR Commission and Information Commissioner must analyse the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56br
note: Commission and Information Commissioner must analyse proposed rules.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.88
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56br-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56br-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56br-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56BR Commission and Information Commissioner must analyse the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56br-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide analysis
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56BS Emergency rules: public consultation not required etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bs
has part: 56BS(1) Emergency rules: public consultation not required etc.
has part: 56BS(2) Emergency rules: public consultation not required etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.89

56BS(1) Emergency rules: public consultation not required etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bs-ss-1
part of: 56BS Emergency rules: public consultation not required etc.
note: The Minister may make consumer data rules without consulting the Commission and Information Commissioner under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.89
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-1-logic-ltl-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56BS(1) Emergency rules: public consultation not required etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to make consumer data rules without consulting the Commission and Information Commissioner.
premise text: The Minister may make consumer data rules under subsection 56BA(1):
conclusion text: without complying with paragraph 56BP(b) or (c); but after consulting the Commission and Information Commissioner;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Obligation to comply with certain conditions when making consumer data rules.
premise text: if the Minister believes (whether or not that belief is reasonable) that it is necessary to do so in order to avoid a risk of serious harm to:
conclusion text: the efficiency, integrity or stability of any aspect of the Australian economy; or the interests of consumers;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: None
logic summary: Temporal interval for consultation not required.
premise text: (1) The Minister may make consumer data rules under subsection 56BA(1):
conclusion text: without complying with paragraph 56BP(b) or (c); but after consulting the Commission and Information Commissioner;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: None
logic summary: Recurring trace for consultation not required.
premise text: (1) The Minister may make consumer data rules under subsection 56BA(1):
conclusion text: without complying with paragraph 56BP(b) or (c); but after consulting the Commission and Information Commissioner;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56BS(2) Emergency rules: public consultation not required etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bs-ss-2
part of: 56BS Emergency rules: public consultation not required etc.
note: Failure to comply with section does not invalidate consumer data rules.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.89
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56BS(2) Emergency rules: public consultation not required etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Failure to comply implies invalidation of consumer data rules.
premise text: Compliance with section is required.
conclusion text: Invalidation of consumer data rules is not justified.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The limited life of consumer data rules overlaps with the duration of section 56BS(2).
premise text: Consumer data rules have a limited life.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The emergency rules in section 56BS(2) overlap with the consumer data rules.
premise text: Emergency rules are temporary.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Implication
logic summary: Public consultation is implied to be required for non-consumer data rules.
premise text: Consumer data rules do not require public consultation.
conclusion text: Public consultation is required for other rules.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bs-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Implication
logic summary: The limited life of consumer data rules implies that they are subject to revision or update.
premise text: Consumer data rules have a limited life.
conclusion text: Revision or update is required for consumer data rules.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

56BT Emergency rules: consequences if made
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bt
note: Emergency rules cease after 6 months if made without consulting Commission or Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.89
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bt-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bt-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bt-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits emergency rules made without consulting Commission or Information Commissioner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56BU Charging a fee in inappropriate circumstances when required
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bu
has part: 56BU(1) Charging a fee in inappropriate circumstances when required
has part: 56BU(2) Charging a fee in inappropriate circumstances when required
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.90

56BU(1) Charging a fee in inappropriate circumstances when required
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bu-ss-1
part of: 56BU Charging a fee in inappropriate circumstances when required
note: Charging a fee for disclosure or use of CDR data in certain circumstances is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.90
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 56BU(1) Charging a fee in inappropriate circumstances when required
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of charging a fee for disclosure or use of CDR data in certain circumstances.
premise text: (1) A person contravenes this subsection...
conclusion text: ...the person charges (or causes to be charged)...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlapping of charging a fee for disclosure or use of CDR data in certain circumstances with other provisions.
premise text: (1) A person contravenes this subsection...
conclusion text: ...the person charges (or causes to be charged)...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring charging a fee for disclosure or use of CDR data in certain circumstances.
premise text: (1) A person contravenes this subsection...
conclusion text: ...the person charges (or causes to be charged)...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagating the prohibition of charging a fee for disclosure or use of CDR data in certain circumstances.
premise text: (1) A person contravenes this subsection...
conclusion text: ...the person charges (or causes to be charged)...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of charging a fee for disclosure or use of CDR data in certain circumstances.
premise text: (1) A person contravenes this subsection...
conclusion text: ...the person charges (or causes to be charged)...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

56BU(2) Charging a fee in inappropriate circumstances when required
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bu-ss-2
part of: 56BU Charging a fee in inappropriate circumstances when required
note: Charging a fee in inappropriate circumstances when required is prohibited. Prohibition on charging a fee in inappropriate circumstances when required
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.90
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-2-logic-deontic-6

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 56BU(2) Charging a fee in inappropriate circumstances when required
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of charging a fee in inappropriate circumstances.
premise text: (2) This subsection applies if: (a) any fee (the reasonable fee): (i) that has been determined under subsection 56BV(1) or
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for charging a fee in inappropriate circumstances.
premise text: (2) This subsection applies if: (a) any fee (the reasonable fee): (i) that has been determined under subsection 56BV(1) or
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
logic summary: Temporal trace for charging a fee in inappropriate circumstances.
premise text: (2) This subsection applies if: (a) any fee (the reasonable fee): (i) that has been determined under subsection 56BV(1) or
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffusion of charging a fee in inappropriate circumstances.
premise text: (2) This subsection applies if: (a) any fee (the reasonable fee): (i) that has been determined under subsection 56BV(1) or
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognition of charging a fee in inappropriate circumstances.
premise text: (2) This subsection applies if: (a) any fee (the reasonable fee): (i) that has been determined under subsection 56BV(1) or
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bu-ss-2-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids charging a fee in certain circumstances
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56BV Commission may intervene if fee for disclosing or using
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bv
has part: 56BV(1) Commission may intervene if fee for disclosing or using
has part: 56BV(2) Commission may intervene if fee for disclosing or using
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.91

56BV(1) Commission may intervene if fee for disclosing or using
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bv-ss-1
part of: 56BV Commission may intervene if fee for disclosing or using
note: Commission may determine fee for disclosing or using CDR data
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.91
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bv-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bv-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bv-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56BV(1) Commission may intervene if fee for disclosing or using
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Duty to pay fee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bv-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Fee determination
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56BV(2) Commission may intervene if fee for disclosing or using
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56bv-ss-2
part of: 56BV Commission may intervene if fee for disclosing or using
note: Commission may determine a fee for disclosing or using chargeable CDR data.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.91
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bv-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bv-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56BV(2) Commission may intervene if fee for disclosing or using
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56bv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Commission may determine a fee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56CA Granting accreditations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ca
has part: 56CA(1) Granting accreditations
has part: 56CA(2) Granting accreditations
has part: 56CA(3) Granting accreditations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.102

56CA(1) Granting accreditations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ca-ss-1
part of: 56CA Granting accreditations
note: Granting accreditation to a person if criteria are met
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.102
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ca-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56CA(2) Granting accreditations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ca-ss-2
part of: 56CA Granting accreditations
note: Granting accreditations to individuals not meeting certain citizenship requirements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.102
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ca-ss-2-norm

56CA(3) Granting accreditations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ca-ss-3
part of: 56CA Granting accreditations
note: No compensation is payable if accreditation is varied, transferred, suspended, or revoked.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.102
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ca-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ca-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ca-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56CA(3) Granting accreditations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ca-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Granting of accreditation imposes an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56CB Review of decisions refusing to accredit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56cb
note: Application for review of decision refusing accreditation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.102
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cb-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cb-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cb-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56CB Review of decisions refusing to accredit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cb-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to review decisions
premise text: Subsection 56CA(1)
conclusion text: Application for review
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

56CE Register of Accredited Persons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ce
has part: 56CE(1) Register of Accredited Persons
has part: 56CE(2) Register of Accredited Persons
has part: 56CE(3) Register of Accredited Persons
has part: 56CE(4) Register of Accredited Persons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.102

56CE(1) Register of Accredited Persons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ce-ss-1
part of: 56CE Register of Accredited Persons
note: Establish and maintain a register for the purposes of this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.102
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ce-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ce-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ce-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56CE(1) Register of Accredited Persons
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ce-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Establish and maintain a register.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56CE(2) Register of Accredited Persons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ce-ss-2
part of: 56CE Register of Accredited Persons
note: The Accreditation Registrar must maintain the register by electronic means.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.102
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ce-ss-2-norm

56CE(3) Register of Accredited Persons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ce-ss-3
part of: 56CE Register of Accredited Persons
note: The register is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.102
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ce-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ce-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ce-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative assertion of obligation
conclusion text: The register is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56CE(4) Register of Accredited Persons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ce-ss-4
part of: 56CE Register of Accredited Persons
note: The consumer data rules may make provision for or in relation to the inclusion of entries for accredited persons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.102
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ce-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ce-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ce-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56CE(4) Register of Accredited Persons
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ce-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The consumer data rules must make provision for or in relation to the inclusion of entries for accredited persons.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56CF Evidentiary value of the register
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56cf
has part: 56CF(1) Evidentiary value of the register
has part: 56CF(2) Evidentiary value of the register
has part: 56CF(3) Evidentiary value of the register
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.103

56CF(1) Evidentiary value of the register
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56cf-ss-1
part of: 56CF Evidentiary value of the register
note: The register is admissible as prima facie evidence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.103
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cf-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: admission
logic summary: Admission of the register as evidence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56CF(2) Evidentiary value of the register
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56cf-ss-2
part of: 56CF Evidentiary value of the register
note: The Accreditation Registrar must issue a document containing the details of a matter taken from the register.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.103
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cf-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56CF(2) Evidentiary value of the register
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to issue a document
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56CF(3) Evidentiary value of the register
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56cf-ss-3
part of: 56CF Evidentiary value of the register
note: Exhibit admissible as prima facie evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.103
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cf-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: admission
logic summary: Admission of document as evidence
premise text: (2) issued under subsection (2)
conclusion text: document admissible in any proceedings
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56CG Appointment of the CDR Accreditor
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56cg
note: The Minister must appoint a CDR Accreditor.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.103
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cg-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cg-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cg-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56CG Appointment of the CDR Accreditor
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cg-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to appoint
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56CH Functions, powers and annual report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ch
has part: 56CH(1) Functions, powers and annual report
has part: 56CH(2) Functions, powers and annual report
has part: 56CH(3) Functions, powers and annual report
has part: 56CH(4) Functions, powers and annual report
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.104

56CH(1) Functions, powers and annual report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ch-ss-1
part of: 56CH Functions, powers and annual report
note: The CDR Accreditor has specific functions to accredit persons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.104
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ch-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ch-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ch-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56CH(1) Functions, powers and annual report
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ch-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: The CDR Accreditor has specific functions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56CH(2) Functions, powers and annual report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ch-ss-2
part of: 56CH Functions, powers and annual report
note: The CDR Accreditor has the power to do all other things necessary or convenient.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.104
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ch-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ch-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ch-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56CH(2) Functions, powers and annual report
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ch-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower
logic summary: The CDR Accreditor has the power to do all other things necessary or convenient.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56CH(3) Functions, powers and annual report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ch-ss-3
part of: 56CH Functions, powers and annual report
note: Functions and powers of CDR Accreditor are taken to include certain functions and powers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.104
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ch-ss-3-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ch-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56CH(3) Functions, powers and annual report
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

56CH(4) Functions, powers and annual report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ch-ss-4
part of: 56CH Functions, powers and annual report
note: Annual report must include information about the performance of the CDR Accreditor’s functions and powers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.104
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ch-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ch-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ch-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56CH(4) Functions, powers and annual report
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ch-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide annual report
conclusion text: The CDR Accreditor must prepare an annual report.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56CI Directions by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ci
has part: 56CI(1) Directions by Minister
has part: 56CI(2) Directions by Minister
has part: 56CI(3) Directions by Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.105

56CI(1) Directions by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ci-ss-1
part of: 56CI Directions by Minister
note: The Minister may give written directions to the CDR Accreditor.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.105
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ci-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ci-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ci-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission granted by the Minister.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56CI(2) Directions by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ci-ss-2
part of: 56CI Directions by Minister
note: A direction under subsection (1) must be of a general nature only.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.105
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ci-ss-2-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ci-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56CI(2) Directions by Minister
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

56CI(3) Directions by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ci-ss-3
part of: 56CI Directions by Minister
note: Comply with direction from Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.105
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ci-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ci-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ci-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56CJ Delegation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56cj
has part: 56CJ(1) Delegation
has part: 56CJ(2) Delegation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.105

56CJ(1) Delegation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56cj-ss-1
part of: 56CJ Delegation
note: Delegation of functions or powers to SES employees and APS employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.105
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cj-ss-1-norm

56CJ(2) Delegation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56cj-ss-2
part of: 56CJ Delegation
note: Delegate must comply with directions of CDR Accreditor.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.105
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cj-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cj-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56CJ(2) Delegation
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56CK Appointment of the Accreditation Registrar
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ck
has part: 56CK(1) Appointment of the Accreditation Registrar
has part: 56CK(2) Appointment of the Accreditation Registrar
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.106

56CK(1) Appointment of the Accreditation Registrar
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ck-ss-1
part of: 56CK Appointment of the Accreditation Registrar
note: Minister must appoint Accreditation Registrar
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.106
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ck-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ck-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ck-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ck-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56CK(1) Appointment of the Accreditation Registrar
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ck-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide appointment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ck-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for appointment
premise text: (1) The Minister may, by written instrument, appoint as the Accreditation Registrar a person who:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56CK(2) Appointment of the Accreditation Registrar
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ck-ss-2
part of: 56CK Appointment of the Accreditation Registrar
note: Minister can terminate appointment by written instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.106
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ck-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ck-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ck-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Ability to terminate appointment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56CL Functions, powers and annual report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56cl
has part: 56CL(1) Functions, powers and annual report
has part: 56CL(2) Functions, powers and annual report
has part: 56CL(3) Functions, powers and annual report
has part: 56CL(4) Functions, powers and annual report
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.106

56CL(1) Functions, powers and annual report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56cl-ss-1
part of: 56CL Functions, powers and annual report
note: List of functions of the Accreditation Registrar
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.106
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-1-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56CL(1) Functions, powers and annual report
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

56CL(2) Functions, powers and annual report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56cl-ss-2
part of: 56CL Functions, powers and annual report
note: The Accreditation Registrar has power to perform necessary tasks.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.106
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56CL(2) Functions, powers and annual report
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower
logic summary: Has the power to perform tasks.
premise text: (2) The Accreditation Registrar has the power...
conclusion text: The Accreditation Registrar has power.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: duringPerformance
logic summary: During performance of functions.
premise text: (2) The Accreditation Registrar has the power to do all other things necessary or convenient...
conclusion text: The Accreditation Registrar performs during.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: canDo
logic summary: Can perform tasks.
premise text: (2) The Accreditation Registrar has the power to do all other things necessary or convenient...
conclusion text: The Accreditation Registrar can do.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: canDo
logic summary: Can perform tasks.
premise text: (2) The Accreditation Registrar has the power to do all other things necessary or convenient...
conclusion text: The Accreditation Registrar can do.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: canDo
logic summary: Can perform tasks.
premise text: (2) The Accreditation Registrar has the power to do all other things necessary or convenient...
conclusion text: The Accreditation Registrar can do.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56CL(3) Functions, powers and annual report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56cl-ss-3
part of: 56CL Functions, powers and annual report
note: Clarifies functions and powers of the Accreditation Registrar
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.106
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-3-logic-ltl-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56CL(3) Functions, powers and annual report
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes functions and powers of other roles
premise text: (a) the person’s functions and powers in their capacity other than as the Accreditation Registrar
conclusion text: (b) the functions that may be performed, and the powers that may be exercised by anyone appointed under a Commonwealth law to act as the person in that primary capacity
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Functions and powers during Accreditation Registrar role
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, for a person who is the Accreditation Registrar
conclusion text: both: (a) the person’s functions and powers in their capacity other than as the Accreditation Registrar; and (b) if the person is not a body corporate—the functions that may be performed, and the powers that may be exercised by anyone appointed under a Commonwealth law to act as the person in that primary capacity
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Functions and powers during Accreditation Registrar role
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, for a person who is the Accreditation Registrar
conclusion text: both: (a) the person’s functions and powers in their capacity other than as the Accreditation Registrar; and (b) if the person is not a body corporate—the functions that may be performed, and the powers that may be exercised by anyone appointed under a Commonwealth law to act as the person in that primary capacity
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

56CL(4) Functions, powers and annual report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56cl-ss-4
part of: 56CL Functions, powers and annual report
note: Annual report must include information about Accreditation Registrar's functions and powers.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.106
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56CL(4) Functions, powers and annual report
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cl-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information about Accreditation Registrar's functions and powers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56CM Directions by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56cm
has part: 56CM(1) Directions by Minister
has part: 56CM(2) Directions by Minister
has part: 56CM(3) Directions by Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.107

56CM(1) Directions by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56cm-ss-1
part of: 56CM Directions by Minister
note: The Minister may give written directions to the Accreditation Registrar.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.107
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cm-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted by the Minister
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56CM(2) Directions by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56cm-ss-2
part of: 56CM Directions by Minister
note: Direction must be of a general nature only.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.107
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cm-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide direction of general nature
premise text: (2) A direction under subsection (1) must be of a general nature only.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56CM(3) Directions by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56cm-ss-3
part of: 56CM Directions by Minister
note: The Accreditation Registrar must comply with a direction under subsection (1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.107
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cm-ss-3-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cm-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56CM(3) Directions by Minister
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

56CN Delegation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56cn
note: Delegation of Accreditation Registrar's functions or powers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.107
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56cn-norm

56DA Minister may recognise external dispute resolution schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56da
has part: 56DA(1) Minister may recognise external dispute resolution schemes
has part: 56DA(2) Minister may recognise external dispute resolution schemes
has part: 56DA(3) Minister may recognise external dispute resolution schemes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.109

56DA(1) Minister may recognise external dispute resolution schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56da-ss-1
part of: 56DA Minister may recognise external dispute resolution schemes
note: Minister may recognise external dispute resolution schemes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.109
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56da-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56da-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56da-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 56DA(1) Minister may recognise external dispute resolution schemes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56da-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to recognise external dispute resolution schemes
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56DA(2) Minister may recognise external dispute resolution schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56da-ss-2
part of: 56DA Minister may recognise external dispute resolution schemes
note: The Minister must specify a period for recognition and conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.109
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56da-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56da-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56da-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Minister must specify a period and conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56DA(3) Minister may recognise external dispute resolution schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56da-ss-3
part of: 56DA Minister may recognise external dispute resolution schemes
note: Consideration before recognising external dispute resolution scheme
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.109
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56da-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56da-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56da-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56da-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider
premise text: Minister must consider Chapter 4 provisions
conclusion text: Before recognising scheme, Minister considers Chapter 4 provisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56da-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval for consideration
premise text: Minister must consider before recognising scheme
conclusion text: Consideration period is before recognising scheme
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

56EA Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ea
note: Failure to comply with privacy safeguards may lead to consequences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.111
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ea-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ea-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ea-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ea-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EA Simplified outline
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ea-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with privacy safeguards.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ea-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies
logic summary: Classifies data holders, gateways, and service providers as entities subject to privacy safeguards.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EB Kinds of CDR data to which the privacy safeguards apply
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56eb
has part: 56EB(1) Kinds of CDR data to which the privacy safeguards apply
has part: 56EB(2) Kinds of CDR data to which the privacy safeguards apply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.111

56EB(1) Kinds of CDR data to which the privacy safeguards apply
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56eb-ss-1
part of: 56EB Kinds of CDR data to which the privacy safeguards apply
note: Privacy safeguards apply only to CDR data with identifiable persons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.111
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eb-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EB(1) Kinds of CDR data to which the privacy safeguards apply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: onlyIf
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: There is a CDR consumer
conclusion text: Privacy safeguards apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EB(2) Kinds of CDR data to which the privacy safeguards apply
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56eb-ss-2
part of: 56EB Kinds of CDR data to which the privacy safeguards apply
note: Privacy safeguards apply to CDR data regardless of truth value.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.111
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eb-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EB(2) Kinds of CDR data to which the privacy safeguards apply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to protect CDR data
premise text: CDR data is subject to privacy safeguards
conclusion text: Privacy safeguards apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Applicable to temporal intervals
premise text: Privacy safeguards are in effect during certain periods
conclusion text: CDR data is subject to privacy safeguards during these periods
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EC Relationship with other laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ec
has part: 56EC(1) Relationship with other laws
has part: 56EC(2) Relationship with other laws
has part: 56EC(3) Relationship with other laws
has part: 56EC(4) Relationship with other laws
has part: 56EC(5) Relationship with other laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.112

56EC(1) Relationship with other laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ec-ss-1
part of: 56EC Relationship with other laws
note: Precedence of privacy safeguards over consumer data rules in case of inconsistency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.112
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EC(1) Relationship with other laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
logic summary: Precedence
premise text: Privacy safeguards prevail over consumer data rules.
conclusion text: Inconsistency resolved by prioritizing privacy safeguards.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EC(2) Relationship with other laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ec-ss-2
part of: 56EC Relationship with other laws
note: Consumer data rules must be consistent with privacy safeguards.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.112
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EC(2) Relationship with other laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Consistency obligation
premise text: Consumer data rules must be consistent with privacy safeguards.
conclusion text: Privacy safeguards are not covered by consumer data rules.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Subclass relationship
premise text: The consumer data rules are taken to be consistent with the privacy safeguards.
conclusion text: Consumer data rules are a subclass of privacy safeguards.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EC(3) Relationship with other laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ec-ss-3
part of: 56EC Relationship with other laws
note: Part IIIA of Privacy Act 1988 applies to CDR data under specified circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.112
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EC(3) Relationship with other laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the regulations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Specifies temporal overlap between regulations and declared conditions.
premise text: (3) This Division does not limit Part IIIA (about credit reporting) of the Privacy Act 1988.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Contains
logic summary: Specifies temporal relationship between regulations and declared conditions.
premise text: However, the regulations may declare that in specified circumstances that Part applies in relation to CDR data as if specified provisions of that Part were omitted, modified or varied as specified in the declaration.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Implicates
logic summary: Specifies implications for regulations under declared conditions.
premise text: (3) This Division does not limit Part IIIA (about credit reporting) of the Privacy Act 1988.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EC(4) Relationship with other laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ec-ss-4
part of: 56EC Relationship with other laws
note: Australian Privacy Principles do not apply to certain individuals in relation to CDR data.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.112
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EC(4) Relationship with other laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prevents application of Australian Privacy Principles.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies individuals as exempt from Australian Privacy Principles.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EC(5) Relationship with other laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ec-ss-5
part of: 56EC Relationship with other laws
note: No effect on Australian Privacy Principles for certain entities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.112
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-5-logic-deontic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EC(5) Relationship with other laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Entity classification
premise text: Entity type
conclusion text: Classification
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ec-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: No effect on Australian Privacy Principles
conclusion text: Obligation to maintain privacy principles
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56ED Privacy safeguard 1—open and transparent management of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ed
has part: 56ED(1) Privacy safeguard 1—open and transparent management of
has part: 56ED(2) Privacy safeguard 1—open and transparent management of
has part: 56ED(3) Privacy safeguard 1—open and transparent management of
has part: 56ED(4) Privacy safeguard 1—open and transparent management of
has part: 56ED(5) Privacy safeguard 1—open and transparent management of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.114

56ED(1) Privacy safeguard 1—open and transparent management of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ed-ss-1
part of: 56ED Privacy safeguard 1—open and transparent management of
note: Ensure open and transparent management of CDR data
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.114
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56ED(1) Privacy safeguard 1—open and transparent management of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Ensure action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
logic summary: Classification of data holders
premise text: (a) is a data holder of CDR data; or (b) is an accredited person...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56ED(2) Privacy safeguard 1—open and transparent management of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ed-ss-2
part of: 56ED Privacy safeguard 1—open and transparent management of
note: Implement practices, procedures and systems to comply with the Part and consumer data rules.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.114
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Ensure compliance
premise text: The CDR entity must take such steps as are reasonable in the circumstances
conclusion text: to implement practices, procedures and systems that will ensure that the CDR entity complies with this Part and the consumer data rules.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Implement practices, procedures and systems within a reasonable timeframe
premise text: (2) The CDR entity must take such steps as are reasonable in the circumstances
conclusion text: to implement practices, procedures and systems that will ensure that the CDR entity complies with this Part and the consumer data rules.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: Implement practices, procedures and systems within a reasonable timeframe
premise text: (2) The CDR entity must take such steps as are reasonable in the circumstances
conclusion text: to implement practices, procedures and systems that will ensure that the CDR entity complies with this Part and the consumer data rules.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Enable dealing with inquiries or complaints
premise text: (2) The CDR entity must take such steps as are reasonable in the circumstances
conclusion text: to enable the CDR entity to deal with inquiries or complaints from a CDR consumer for the CDR data about the CDR entity’s compliance with this Part or the consumer data rules.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56ED(3) Privacy safeguard 1—open and transparent management of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ed-ss-3
part of: 56ED Privacy safeguard 1—open and transparent management of
note: Must have and maintain a clearly expressed policy on CDR data management
description: (a) is about the CDR entity’s management of CDR data; (b) is in a form approved in accordance with the consumer data rules; (c) contains the information required by subsections (4), (5), (6) and (6A)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.114
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-3-logic-deontic-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST HAVE
logic summary: Must have a policy
premise text: (3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST MAINTAIN
logic summary: Must maintain a policy
premise text: (3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTAINS INFORMATION
logic summary: Policy contains required information
premise text: (c)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56ED(4) Privacy safeguard 1—open and transparent management of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ed-ss-4
part of: 56ED Privacy safeguard 1—open and transparent management of
note: Mandatory disclosure of CDR data access and complaint procedures
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.114
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Entity must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56ED(5) Privacy safeguard 1—open and transparent management of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ed-ss-5
part of: 56ED Privacy safeguard 1—open and transparent management of
note: CDR entity must provide certain information to accredited data recipients
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.114
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ed-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EE Privacy safeguard 2—anonymity and pseudonymity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ee
has part: 56EE(1) Privacy safeguard 2—anonymity and pseudonymity
has part: 56EE(2) Privacy safeguard 2—anonymity and pseudonymity
has part: 56EE(3) Privacy safeguard 2—anonymity and pseudonymity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.117

56EE(1) Privacy safeguard 2—anonymity and pseudonymity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ee-ss-1
part of: 56EE Privacy safeguard 2—anonymity and pseudonymity
note: Must provide option to use pseudonym or not identify when dealing with CDR data.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.117
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ee-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ee-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ee-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EE(1) Privacy safeguard 2—anonymity and pseudonymity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ee-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide option to use pseudonym or not identify when dealing with CDR data.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EE(2) Privacy safeguard 2—anonymity and pseudonymity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ee-ss-2
part of: 56EE Privacy safeguard 2—anonymity and pseudonymity
note: Option for CDR data access through designated gateway
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.117
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ee-ss-2-norm

56EE(3) Privacy safeguard 2—anonymity and pseudonymity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ee-ss-3
part of: 56EE Privacy safeguard 2—anonymity and pseudonymity
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for consumer data rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.117
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ee-ss-3-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ee-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EE(3) Privacy safeguard 2—anonymity and pseudonymity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

56EF Privacy safeguard 3—soliciting CDR data from participants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ef
has part: 56EF(1) Privacy safeguard 3—soliciting CDR data from participants
has part: 56EF(2) Privacy safeguard 3—soliciting CDR data from participants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.118

56EF(1) Privacy safeguard 3—soliciting CDR data from participants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ef-ss-1
part of: 56EF Privacy safeguard 3—soliciting CDR data from participants
note: Do not seek to collect CDR data from another person without valid request and compliance with consumer data rules.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.118
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ef-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ef-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ef-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ef-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EF(1) Privacy safeguard 3—soliciting CDR data from participants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ef-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ef-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of CDR data collection
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EF(2) Privacy safeguard 3—soliciting CDR data from participants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ef-ss-2
part of: 56EF Privacy safeguard 3—soliciting CDR data from participants
note: Collection of CDR data from participants must comply with consumer data rules.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.118
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ef-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ef-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ef-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ef-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EF(2) Privacy safeguard 3—soliciting CDR data from participants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ef-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ef-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Collection must occur between valid request and designated gateway
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EG Privacy safeguard 4—dealing with unsolicited CDR data from
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56eg
note: Destroy CDR data as soon as practicable after collecting it if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.119
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eg-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eg-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eg-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eg-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eg-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eg-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EG Privacy safeguard 4—dealing with unsolicited CDR data from
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eg-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to destroy CDR data
premise text: The collector collected the CDR data while covered by column 1 of an item of the table, and from a person covered by column 2 of that item.
conclusion text: Destroy CDR data as soon as practicable after collecting it.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eg-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for destruction
premise text: The collector collected the CDR data while covered by column 1 of an item of the table, and from a person covered by column 2 of that item.
conclusion text: Destroy CDR data as soon as practicable after collecting it if certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eg-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
logic summary: Recurring obligation to destroy CDR data
premise text: The collector collected the CDR data while covered by column 1 of an item of the table, and from a person covered by column 2 of that item.
conclusion text: Destroy CDR data as soon as practicable after collecting it if certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eg-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST_NOT
logic summary: Prohibition on destroying CDR data under certain conditions
premise text: The collector collected the CDR data not as the result of seeking to collect the CDR data under the consumer data rules.
conclusion text: Destroy CDR data as soon as practicable after collecting it if certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

56EH Privacy safeguard 5—notifying of the collection of CDR data
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56eh
note: Accredited data recipient must notify CDR consumers of collection
description: Notification to CDR consumers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.120
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eh-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eh-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eh-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EH Privacy safeguard 5—notifying of the collection of CDR data
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eh-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EI Privacy safeguard 6—use or disclosure of CDR data by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ei
has part: 56EI(1) Privacy safeguard 6—use or disclosure of CDR data by
has part: 56EI(2) Privacy safeguard 6—use or disclosure of CDR data by
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.121

56EI(1) Privacy safeguard 6—use or disclosure of CDR data by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ei-ss-1
part of: 56EI Privacy safeguard 6—use or disclosure of CDR data by
note: Use or disclosure of CDR data is prohibited unless certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.121
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ei-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ei-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ei-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EI(1) Privacy safeguard 6—use or disclosure of CDR data by
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ei-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of use or disclosure.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EI(2) Privacy safeguard 6—use or disclosure of CDR data by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ei-ss-2
part of: 56EI Privacy safeguard 6—use or disclosure of CDR data by
note: No use or disclosure of CDR data without authorisation under consumer data rules.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.121
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ei-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ei-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ei-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ei-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ei-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ei-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ei-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EI(2) Privacy safeguard 6—use or disclosure of CDR data by
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ei-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of use or disclosure without authorisation.
premise text: (2) A designated gateway for CDR data must not use or disclose it...
conclusion text: ...unless: (a) in the case of a disclosure—the disclosure is required under the consumer data rules; or (b) the use or disclosure is authorised under the consumer data rules; or (c) the use or disclosure is required or authorised by or under:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ei-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for written note of use or disclosure.
premise text: (2) A designated gateway for CDR data must not use or disclose it unless: (a) in the case of a disclosure—the disclosure is required under the consumer data rules; or (b) the use or disclosure is authorised under the consumer data rules; or (c) the use or disclosure is required or authorised by or under:
conclusion text: ...and the designated gateway makes a written note of the use or disclosure in accordance with the consumer data rules.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ei-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for CDR data handling.
premise text: (2) A designated gateway for CDR data must not use or disclose it unless: (a) in the case of a disclosure—the disclosure is required under the consumer data rules; or (b) the use or disclosure is authorised under the consumer data rules; or (c) the use or disclosure is required or authorised by or under:
conclusion text: ...and the designated gateway makes a written note of the use or disclosure in accordance with the consumer data rules.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ei-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of CDR data handling requirements.
premise text: (2) A designated gateway for CDR data must not use or disclose it unless: (a) in the case of a disclosure—the disclosure is required under the consumer data rules; or (b) the use or disclosure is authorised under the consumer data rules; or (c) the use or disclosure is required or authorised by or under:
conclusion text: ...and the designated gateway makes a written note of the use or disclosure in accordance with the consumer data rules.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ei-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation for CDR data handling.
premise text: (2) A designated gateway for CDR data must not use or disclose it unless: (a) in the case of a disclosure—the disclosure is required under the consumer data rules; or (b) the use or disclosure is authorised under the consumer data rules; or (c) the use or disclosure is required or authorised by or under:
conclusion text: ...and the designated gateway makes a written note of the use or disclosure in accordance with the consumer data rules.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EJ Privacy safeguard 7—use or disclosure of CDR data for direct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ej
has part: 56EJ(1) Privacy safeguard 7—use or disclosure of CDR data for direct
has part: 56EJ(2) Privacy safeguard 7—use or disclosure of CDR data for direct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.122

56EJ(1) Privacy safeguard 7—use or disclosure of CDR data for direct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ej-ss-1
part of: 56EJ Privacy safeguard 7—use or disclosure of CDR data for direct
note: Use or disclosure of CDR data for direct marketing without consent is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.122
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ej-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ej-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ej-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EJ(1) Privacy safeguard 7—use or disclosure of CDR data for direct
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ej-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of use or disclosure for direct marketing.
premise text: (1) An accredited data recipient of CDR data must not use or disclose it...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EJ(2) Privacy safeguard 7—use or disclosure of CDR data for direct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ej-ss-2
part of: 56EJ Privacy safeguard 7—use or disclosure of CDR data for direct
note: No direct marketing use or disclosure of CDR data without authorization under consumer data rules.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.122
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ej-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ej-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ej-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ej-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ej-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ej-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ej-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of direct marketing use or disclosure of CDR data.
premise text: (2) A designated gateway for CDR data must not...
conclusion text: ...unless: (a) in the case of a disclosure—the disclosure is required under the consumer data rules; or (b) the use or disclosure is authorised under the consumer data rules.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ej-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for prohibition on direct marketing use or disclosure of CDR data.
premise text: (2) A designated gateway for CDR data must not...
conclusion text: ...unless: (a) in the case of a disclosure—the disclosure is required under the consumer data rules; or (b) the use or disclosure is authorised under the consumer data rules.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ej-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for prohibition on direct marketing use or disclosure of CDR data.
premise text: (2) A designated gateway for CDR data must not...
conclusion text: ...unless: (a) in the case of a disclosure—the disclosure is required under the consumer data rules; or (b) the use or disclosure is authorised under the consumer data rules.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ej-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of prohibition on direct marketing use or disclosure of CDR data.
premise text: (2) A designated gateway for CDR data must not...
conclusion text: ...unless: (a) in the case of a disclosure—the disclosure is required under the consumer data rules; or (b) the use or disclosure is authorised under the consumer data rules.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ej-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
logic summary: Justification for prohibition on direct marketing use or disclosure of CDR data.
premise text: (2) A designated gateway for CDR data must not...
conclusion text: ...unless: (a) in the case of a disclosure—the disclosure is required under the consumer data rules; or (b) the use or disclosure is authorised under the consumer data rules.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EK Privacy safeguard 8—overseas disclosure of CDR data by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ek
has part: 56EK(1) Privacy safeguard 8—overseas disclosure of CDR data by
has part: 56EK(2) Privacy safeguard 8—overseas disclosure of CDR data by
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.122

56EK(1) Privacy safeguard 8—overseas disclosure of CDR data by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ek-ss-1
part of: 56EK Privacy safeguard 8—overseas disclosure of CDR data by
note: Must not disclose CDR data unless certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.122
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ek-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ek-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ek-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory disclosure restriction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EK(2) Privacy safeguard 8—overseas disclosure of CDR data by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ek-ss-2
part of: 56EK Privacy safeguard 8—overseas disclosure of CDR data by
note: Disclosure of CDR data to new recipient is allowed under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.122
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ek-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ek-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ek-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EK(2) Privacy safeguard 8—overseas disclosure of CDR data by
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ek-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows disclosure of CDR data to new recipient.
premise text: (2) If...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

56EL Privacy safeguard 9—adoption or disclosure of government
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56el
has part: 56EL(1) Privacy safeguard 9—adoption or disclosure of government
has part: 56EL(2) Privacy safeguard 9—adoption or disclosure of government
has part: 56EL(3) Privacy safeguard 9—adoption or disclosure of government
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.124

56EL(1) Privacy safeguard 9—adoption or disclosure of government
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56el-ss-1
part of: 56EL Privacy safeguard 9—adoption or disclosure of government
note: Do not adopt or use government related identifier without authorization.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.124
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56el-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56el-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56el-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56el-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EL(1) Privacy safeguard 9—adoption or disclosure of government
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56el-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (a) and (b)
conclusion text: (c) is not met
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56el-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Government related identifier classification
premise text: (b) is a government related identifier
conclusion text: (a) is an individual's own identifier
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EL(2) Privacy safeguard 9—adoption or disclosure of government
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56el-ss-2
part of: 56EL Privacy safeguard 9—adoption or disclosure of government
note: Disclosing government-related identifier without authorization is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.124
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56el-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56el-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56el-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56el-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EL(2) Privacy safeguard 9—adoption or disclosure of government
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56el-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
premise text: (2) If...
conclusion text: must not include the government related identifier in the disclosure unless...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56el-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of disclosure requirements
premise text: (2) If...
conclusion text: the person must not include the government related identifier in the disclosure unless...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EL(3) Privacy safeguard 9—adoption or disclosure of government
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56el-ss-3
part of: 56EL Privacy safeguard 9—adoption or disclosure of government
note: Disregard APPs not applying to certain purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.124
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56el-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56el-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56el-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EL(3) Privacy safeguard 9—adoption or disclosure of government
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56el-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Ignore
logic summary: Ignoring the restriction
premise text: APPs not applying
conclusion text: Disregard APPs not applying
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EM Privacy safeguard 10—notifying of the disclosure of CDR
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56em
has part: 56EM(1) Privacy safeguard 10—notifying of the disclosure of CDR
has part: 56EM(2) Privacy safeguard 10—notifying of the disclosure of CDR
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.125

56EM(1) Privacy safeguard 10—notifying of the disclosure of CDR
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56em-ss-1
part of: 56EM Privacy safeguard 10—notifying of the disclosure of CDR
note: Notify CDR consumers of disclosure of CDR data
description: notification specified in consumer data rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.125
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56em-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56em-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56em-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EM(2) Privacy safeguard 10—notifying of the disclosure of CDR
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56em-ss-2
part of: 56EM Privacy safeguard 10—notifying of the disclosure of CDR
note: Accredited data recipient must notify disclosure of CDR data.
description: Notification
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.125
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56em-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56em-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56em-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EM(2) Privacy safeguard 10—notifying of the disclosure of CDR
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56em-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EN Privacy safeguard 11—quality of CDR data
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56en
has part: 56EN(1) Privacy safeguard 11—quality of CDR data
has part: 56EN(2) Privacy safeguard 11—quality of CDR data
has part: 56EN(2A) Privacy safeguard 11—quality of CDR data
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.127

56EN(1) Privacy safeguard 11—quality of CDR data
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56en-ss-1
part of: 56EN Privacy safeguard 11—quality of CDR data
note: Ensure accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of CDR data upon disclosure.
description: reasonable steps
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.127
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to take reasonable steps
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EN(2) Privacy safeguard 11—quality of CDR data
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56en-ss-2
part of: 56EN Privacy safeguard 11—quality of CDR data
note: Accredited data recipient must ensure CDR data is accurate, up to date and complete when disclosing it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.127
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EN(2) Privacy safeguard 11—quality of CDR data
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must ensure CDR data is accurate, up to date and complete.
premise text: (2) If an accredited data recipient of CDR data...
conclusion text: the accredited data recipient must take reasonable steps...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: CDR data must be accurate, up to date and complete within a certain timeframe.
premise text: (2) If an accredited data recipient of CDR data...
conclusion text: the CDR data is accurate, up to date and complete.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
logic summary: CDR data must be accurate, up to date and complete in a recursive manner.
premise text: (2) If an accredited data recipient of CDR data...
conclusion text: the CDR data is accurate, up to date and complete.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
logic summary: CDR data must be accurate, up to date and complete in a spreading manner.
premise text: (2) If an accredited data recipient of CDR data...
conclusion text: the CDR data is accurate, up to date and complete.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Accredited data recipient must ensure CDR data is accurate, up to date and complete if required or authorized under the consumer data rules.
premise text: (2) If an accredited data recipient of CDR data...
conclusion text: the accredited data recipient must take reasonable steps...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EN(2A) Privacy safeguard 11—quality of CDR data
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56en-ss-2a
part of: 56EN Privacy safeguard 11—quality of CDR data
note: Ensure CDR data is accurate, up to date and complete
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.127
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-2a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-2a-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide accurate CDR data
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56en-ss-2a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasValue
logic summary: Ensure CDR data has a value
premise text: CDR data is held for a purpose
conclusion text: CDR data must have a value
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EO Privacy safeguard 12—security of CDR data, and destruction
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56eo
has part: 56EO(1) Privacy safeguard 12—security of CDR data, and destruction
has part: 56EO(2) Privacy safeguard 12—security of CDR data, and destruction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.129

56EO(1) Privacy safeguard 12—security of CDR data, and destruction
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56eo-ss-1
part of: 56EO Privacy safeguard 12—security of CDR data, and destruction
note: Protect CDR data from misuse, interference and loss.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.129
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eo-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must protect CDR data
premise text: (a) an accredited data recipient of CDR data; or (b) a designated gateway for CDR data;
conclusion text: take the steps specified in the consumer data rules to protect the CDR data from misuse, interference and loss.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for protection of CDR data
premise text: (1) Each person (a CDR entity) who is:...
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EO(2) Privacy safeguard 12—security of CDR data, and destruction
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56eo-ss-2
part of: 56EO Privacy safeguard 12—security of CDR data, and destruction
note: Destroy redundant CDR data if no longer needed for permitted purposes and not required by law or court order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.129
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eo-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eo-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eo-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eo-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory duty
premise text: the CDR entity must take the steps specified in the consumer data rules to destroy the redundant data or to ensure that the redundant data is de-identified.
conclusion text: The CDR entity has an obligation to destroy the redundant data.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eo-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between the CDR entity's retention of redundant data and its destruction
premise text: the CDR entity must take the steps specified in the consumer data rules to destroy the redundant data or to ensure that the redundant data is de-identified.
conclusion text: The CDR entity will destroy the redundant data during the period it retains it.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eo-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory duty for the CDR entity to ensure that the redundant data is de-identified
premise text: the CDR entity must take the steps specified in the consumer data rules to destroy the redundant data or to ensure that the redundant data is de-identified.
conclusion text: The CDR entity has an obligation to ensure that the redundant data is de-identified.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eo-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory duty for the CDR entity to destroy redundant data if not required by law or court order
premise text: the CDR entity is not required to retain the redundant data by or under an Australian law or a court/tribunal order.
conclusion text: The CDR entity has an obligation to destroy the redundant data.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EP Privacy safeguard 13—correction of CDR data
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ep
has part: 56EP(1) Privacy safeguard 13—correction of CDR data
has part: 56EP(2) Privacy safeguard 13—correction of CDR data
has part: 56EP(3) Privacy safeguard 13—correction of CDR data
has part: 56EP(4) Privacy safeguard 13—correction of CDR data
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.130

56EP(1) Privacy safeguard 13—correction of CDR data
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ep-ss-1
part of: 56EP Privacy safeguard 13—correction of CDR data
note: CDR entity must respond to request to correct CDR data
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ep-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ep-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ep-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ep-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide response
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ep-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS OF
logic summary: Subclass of consumer data rules
premise text: Consumer data rules
conclusion text: Correcting CDR data
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EP(2) Privacy safeguard 13—correction of CDR data
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ep-ss-2
part of: 56EP Privacy safeguard 13—correction of CDR data
note: Accredited data recipient must respond to correction request
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ep-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ep-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ep-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EP(2) Privacy safeguard 13—correction of CDR data
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ep-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must respond to correction request
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EP(3) Privacy safeguard 13—correction of CDR data
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ep-ss-3
part of: 56EP Privacy safeguard 13—correction of CDR data
note: Correct CDR data or provide a statement with it to ensure accuracy and completeness.
description: Notice of correction or statement, or notice of why a correction or statement is unnecessary or inappropriate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ep-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ep-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ep-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EP(3) Privacy safeguard 13—correction of CDR data
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ep-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to correct CDR data
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EP(4) Privacy safeguard 13—correction of CDR data
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ep-ss-4
part of: 56EP Privacy safeguard 13—correction of CDR data
note: Disregard purpose of holding CDR data for disclosure under consumer data rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ep-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ep-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ep-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EP(4) Privacy safeguard 13—correction of CDR data
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ep-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes duty on the state to disregard purpose for disclosure
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EQ Information Commissioner to promote compliance etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56eq
note: Information Commissioner's functions include promoting compliance and protection of CDR data.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.131
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eq-norm

56ER Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56er
has part: 56ER(1) Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment
has part: 56ER(1A) Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment
has part: 56ER(1B) Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment
has part: 56ER(2) Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment
has part: 56ER(3) Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.132

56ER(1) Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56er-ss-1
part of: 56ER Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment
note: The Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment to ensure compliance with privacy safeguards and consumer data rules.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.132
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56ER(1) Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Information Commissioner must conduct an assessment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56ER(1A) Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56er-ss-1a
part of: 56ER Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment
note: The Information Commissioner may assess an accredited person's compliance with privacy safeguard 1 and consumer data rules.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.132
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1a-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56ER(1A) Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

56ER(1B) Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56er-ss-1b
part of: 56ER Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment
note: The Information Commissioner may assess if an action service provider is maintaining and handling CDR data in accordance with privacy safeguards.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.132
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1b-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1b-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1b-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1b-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1b-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1b-logic-cogai-6

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56ER(1B) Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Information Commissioner must assess if an action service provider is maintaining and handling CDR data in accordance with privacy safeguards.
premise text: (1B) The Information Commissioner may assess...
conclusion text: ...is maintaining and handling the CDR data in accordance with:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1b-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: The action service provider is a type of entity that must maintain and handle CDR data.
premise text: (1B) The Information Commissioner may assess...
conclusion text: ...who has been or may be disclosed CDR data under the consumer data rules, is maintaining and handling the CDR data in accordance with:
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1b-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: The action service provider must have maintained and handled CDR data for at least one time period.
premise text: (1B) The Information Commissioner may assess...
conclusion text: ...who has been or may be disclosed CDR data under the consumer data rules, is maintaining and handling the CDR data in accordance with:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1b-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
logic summary: The action service provider must maintain and handle CDR data for all time periods.
premise text: (1B) The Information Commissioner may assess...
conclusion text: ...who has been or may be disclosed CDR data under the consumer data rules, is maintaining and handling the CDR data in accordance with:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1b-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: INHERENTLY
logic summary: The action service provider must maintain and handle CDR data inherently.
premise text: (1B) The Information Commissioner may assess...
conclusion text: ...who has been or may be disclosed CDR data under the consumer data rules, is maintaining and handling the CDR data in accordance with:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-1b-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: DEFAULTS_TO
logic summary: The action service provider defaults to maintaining and handling CDR data if no specific rule applies.
premise text: (1B) The Information Commissioner may assess...
conclusion text: ...who has been or may be disclosed CDR data under the consumer data rules, is maintaining and handling the CDR data in accordance with:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

56ER(2) Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56er-ss-2
part of: 56ER Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment
note: Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment under subsection (1), (1A) or (1B)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.132
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-2-norm

56ER(3) Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56er-ss-3
part of: 56ER Information Commissioner may conduct an assessment
note: Must report assessments to specified parties
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.132
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56er-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56ES Notification of CDR data security breaches
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56es
note: Notification of CDR data security breaches
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.133
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56es-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56es-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56es-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56ES Notification of CDR data security breaches
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56es-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must notify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56ET Investigating breaches of the privacy safeguards etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56et
note: Investigating breaches of privacy safeguards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.135
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56et-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56et-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56et-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56ET Investigating breaches of the privacy safeguards etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56et-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to investigate breaches of privacy safeguards
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EU Civil penalty provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56eu
has part: 56EU(1) Civil penalty provisions
has part: 56EU(2) Civil penalty provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.139

56EU(1) Civil penalty provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56eu-ss-1
part of: 56EU Civil penalty provisions
note: List of civil penalty provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.139
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eu-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits certain actions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EU(2) Civil penalty provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56eu-ss-2
part of: 56EU Civil penalty provisions
note: Each privacy safeguard penalty provision is enforceable under Part 4 of the Regulatory Powers Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.139
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eu-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eu-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eu-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eu-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eu-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EU(2) Civil penalty provisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: enforceable
logic summary: Enforceability obligation
premise text: Part 4 of the Regulatory Powers Act allows a civil penalty provision to be enforced by obtaining an order for a person to pay a pecuniary penalty for the contravention of the provision.
conclusion text: The privacy safeguard penalty provision is enforceable under Part 4 of the Regulatory Powers Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eu-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval during which enforcement is allowed
premise text: Part 4 of the Regulatory Powers Act allows a civil penalty provision to be enforced by obtaining an order for a person to pay a pecuniary penalty for the contravention of the provision.
conclusion text: The privacy safeguard penalty provision can be enforced under Part 4 of the Regulatory Powers Act during its effective period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eu-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval during which enforcement is allowed
premise text: Part 4 of the Regulatory Powers Act allows a civil penalty provision to be enforced by obtaining an order for a person to pay a pecuniary penalty for the contravention of the provision.
conclusion text: The privacy safeguard penalty provision can be enforced under Part 4 of the Regulatory Powers Act during its effective period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56eu-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: allowedBy
logic summary: Enforcement allowed by Part 4 of the Regulatory Powers Act
premise text: Part 4 of the Regulatory Powers Act allows a civil penalty provision to be enforced by obtaining an order for a person to pay a pecuniary penalty for the contravention of the provision.
conclusion text: The privacy safeguard penalty provision is allowed under Part 4 of the Regulatory Powers Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EV Civil penalty provisions—maximum amount of penalty
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ev
has part: 56EV(1) Civil penalty provisions—maximum amount of penalty
has part: 56EV(2) Civil penalty provisions—maximum amount of penalty
has part: 56EV(4) Civil penalty provisions—maximum amount of penalty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.141

56EV(1) Civil penalty provisions—maximum amount of penalty
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ev-ss-1
part of: 56EV Civil penalty provisions—maximum amount of penalty
note: Maximum amount of civil penalty for a body corporate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.141
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EV(1) Civil penalty provisions—maximum amount of penalty
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits exceeding maximum civil penalty amount
premise text: (1) Despite subsection 82(5) of the Regulatory Powers Act...
conclusion text: The pecuniary penalty payable must not be more than...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EV(2) Civil penalty provisions—maximum amount of penalty
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ev-ss-2
part of: 56EV Civil penalty provisions—maximum amount of penalty
note: Maximum penalty amount for contravention of privacy safeguard penalty provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.141
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EV(2) Civil penalty provisions—maximum amount of penalty
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits contravention of privacy safeguard penalty provision
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the maximum penalty amount for a contravention by a body corporate of a privacy safeguard penalty provision is...
conclusion text: ...the greater of the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Limits maximum penalty to within 12-month period
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the maximum penalty amount for a contravention by a body corporate of a privacy safeguard penalty provision is...
conclusion text: ...10% of the adjusted turnover of the body corporate during the 12-month period ending at the end of the month in which the contravention happened or began.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace for calculation of benefit value
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the maximum penalty amount for a contravention by a body corporate of a privacy safeguard penalty provision is...
conclusion text: ...3 times the value of that benefit;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Spreads calculation to related bodies corporate
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the maximum penalty amount for a contravention by a body corporate of a privacy safeguard penalty provision is...
conclusion text: ...and that is reasonably attributable to the contravention—3 times the value of that benefit;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
logic summary: Analyzes benefit value for calculation
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the maximum penalty amount for a contravention by a body corporate of a privacy safeguard penalty provision is...
conclusion text: ...if that court cannot determine the value of that benefit—10% of the adjusted turnover of the body corporate during the 12-month period ending at the end of the month in which the contravention happened or began.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

56EV(4) Civil penalty provisions—maximum amount of penalty
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ev-ss-4
part of: 56EV Civil penalty provisions—maximum amount of penalty
note: Maximum penalty amount for contravention of privacy safeguard penalty provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.141
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EV(4) Civil penalty provisions—maximum amount of penalty
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ev-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: max
logic summary: Defines maximum penalty amount
conclusion text: $500,000
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EW Enforceable undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ew
has part: 56EW(1) Enforceable undertakings
has part: 56EW(2) Enforceable undertakings
has part: 56EW(3) Enforceable undertakings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.142

56EW(1) Enforceable undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ew-ss-1
part of: 56EW Enforceable undertakings
note: Each provision of the privacy safeguards is enforceable under Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.142
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ew-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ew-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ew-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ew-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ew-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ew-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ew-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EW(1) Enforceable undertakings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ew-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: isEnforceable
logic summary: Provision is enforceable under Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act.
premise text: (1) Each provision of the privacy safeguards is enforceable under Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act.
conclusion text: Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act creates a framework for accepting and enforcing undertakings relating to compliance with provisions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ew-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: withinTemporalInterval
logic summary: Provision is enforceable under Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act within the temporal interval of Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act.
premise text: (1) Each provision of the privacy safeguards is enforceable under Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act.
conclusion text: Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act creates a framework for accepting and enforcing undertakings relating to compliance with provisions.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ew-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: withinTemporalInterval
logic summary: Provision is enforceable under Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act within the temporal interval of Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act.
premise text: (1) Each provision of the privacy safeguards is enforceable under Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act.
conclusion text: Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act creates a framework for accepting and enforcing undertakings relating to compliance with provisions.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ew-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: isFrameworkFor
logic summary: Provision is enforceable under Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act as part of its framework.
premise text: (1) Each provision of the privacy safeguards is enforceable under Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act.
conclusion text: Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act creates a framework for accepting and enforcing undertakings relating to compliance with provisions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ew-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: isEnforceableUnder
logic summary: Provision is enforceable under Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act.
premise text: (1) Each provision of the privacy safeguards is enforceable under Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act.
conclusion text: Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act creates a framework for accepting and enforcing undertakings relating to compliance with provisions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EW(2) Enforceable undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ew-ss-2
part of: 56EW Enforceable undertakings
note: Authorises Information Commissioner as authorised person for provisions under subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.142
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ew-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ew-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ew-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EW(2) Enforceable undertakings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ew-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Authorisation
premise text: Information Commissioner is an authorised person
conclusion text: Authority to act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

56EW(3) Enforceable undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ew-ss-3
part of: 56EW Enforceable undertakings
note: List of relevant courts for enforcement of provisions under Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.142
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ew-ss-3-norm

56EX Injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ex
has part: 56EX(1) Injunctions
has part: 56EX(2) Injunctions
has part: 56EX(3) Injunctions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.142

56EX(1) Injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ex-ss-1
part of: 56EX Injunctions
note: Enforceability of privacy safeguards under Part 7 of the Regulatory Powers Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.142
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EX(1) Injunctions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: enforces
logic summary: Enforceability obligation
premise text: Part 7 of the Regulatory Powers Act creates a framework for using injunctions to enforce provisions.
conclusion text: Privacy safeguards are enforceable under Part 7 of the Regulatory Powers Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval during which enforcement applies
premise text: Each provision of the privacy safeguards is enforceable under Part 7 of the Regulatory Powers Act.
conclusion text: The enforcement applies during this temporal interval.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval during which enforcement applies
premise text: Each provision of the privacy safeguards is enforceable under Part 7 of the Regulatory Powers Act.
conclusion text: The enforcement applies during this temporal interval.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
logic summary: Enforcement mechanism through which obligations are fulfilled
premise text: Each provision of the privacy safeguards is enforceable under Part 7 of the Regulatory Powers Act.
conclusion text: The enforcement mechanism fulfills this obligation.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: through
logic summary: Artificial intelligence mechanism through which obligations are fulfilled
premise text: Each provision of the privacy safeguards is enforceable under Part 7 of the Regulatory Powers Act.
conclusion text: The artificial intelligence mechanism fulfills this obligation.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EX(2) Injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ex-ss-2
part of: 56EX Injunctions
note: Authorises Information Commissioner as authorised person for provisions under subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.142
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EX(2) Injunctions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Authorisation
premise text: Information Commissioner is an authorised person
conclusion text: Authority to act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EX(3) Injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ex-ss-3
part of: 56EX Injunctions
note: List of relevant courts for a provision in the Regulatory Powers Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.142
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EX(3) Injunctions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: inclusion
logic summary: List of relevant courts is a condition for the provision
premise text: The Federal Court, Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2), and State or Territory courts are mentioned
conclusion text: These courts must be considered when applying the provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: The list of relevant courts overlaps with the concept 'relevant court'
premise text: The Federal Court, Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2), and State or Territory courts are mentioned as examples
conclusion text: These courts overlap with the concept of a relevant court
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: orderedBy
logic summary: The list of relevant courts is ordered by jurisdiction
premise text: State or Territory courts are mentioned after Federal Court and Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)
conclusion text: These courts have a specific order in relation to the provision
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: The list of relevant courts diffuses into the concept 'relevant court'
premise text: The Federal Court, Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2), and State or Territory courts are mentioned as examples
conclusion text: These courts diffuse into the concept of a relevant court
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ex-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: The list of relevant courts is recognized by the provision
premise text: The Federal Court, Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2), and State or Territory courts are mentioned as examples
conclusion text: These courts are recognized by the provision
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EY Actions for damages
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ey
has part: 56EY(1) Actions for damages
has part: 56EY(2) Actions for damages
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.143

56EY(1) Actions for damages
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ey-ss-1
part of: 56EY Actions for damages
note: Recovery of damages for contravention of privacy safeguards or consumer data rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.143
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EY(1) Actions for damages
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to recover damages for contravention of privacy safeguards or consumer data rules
premise text: (1) A person who suffers loss or damage (within the meaning of subsection 25(1) of the Privacy Act 1988)
conclusion text: may recover the amount of the loss or damage by action against that other person or against any person involved in the contravention.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval for recovery of damages
premise text: (1) A person who suffers loss or damage (within the meaning of subsection 25(1) of the Privacy Act 1988)
conclusion text: by action against that other person or against any person involved in the contravention.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
logic summary: Recovery of damages applies everywhere
premise text: (1) A person who suffers loss or damage (within the meaning of subsection 25(1) of the Privacy Act 1988)
conclusion text: may recover the amount of the loss or damage by action against that other person or against any person involved in the contravention.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Recovery of damages diffuses to all persons involved
premise text: (1) A person who suffers loss or damage (within the meaning of subsection 25(1) of the Privacy Act 1988)
conclusion text: may recover the amount of the loss or damage by action against that other person or against any person involved in the contravention.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: entails
logic summary: Recovery of damages entails a claim for damages
premise text: (1) A person who suffers loss or damage (within the meaning of subsection 25(1) of the Privacy Act 1988)
conclusion text: may recover the amount of the loss or damage by action against that other person or against any person involved in the contravention.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

56EY(2) Actions for damages
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ey-ss-2
part of: 56EY Actions for damages
note: Action for damages can be commenced within 6 years after the contravention happened or began.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.143
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56EY(2) Actions for damages
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Permission to commence action within a time limit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ey-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between events
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56EZ Delegation to the Commission etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ez
note: Delegation of functions and powers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.145
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ez-norm

56FA Making data standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fa
has part: 56FA(1) Making data standards
has part: 56FA(2) Making data standards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.147

56FA(1) Making data standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fa-ss-1
part of: 56FA Making data standards
note: The Data Standards Chair may make data standards about various matters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.147
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fa-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fa-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fa-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fa-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fa-ss-1-logic-cogai-6

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56FA(1) Making data standards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The Data Standards Chair has the power to make data standards.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fa-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classifies
logic summary: The Data Standards Chair classifies matters for which data standards are made.
premise text: (a) the format and description of CDR data;
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: The Data Standards Chair's power to make data standards is within their authority.
premise text: (1) The Data Standards Chair may, by writing, make one or more data standards about each of the following matters:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fa-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implicates
logic summary: The making of data standards implies a duty on the part of the Data Standards Chair.
premise text: (1) The Data Standards Chair may, by writing, make one or more data standards about each of the following matters:
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fa-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Implicates
logic summary: The making of data standards implies a duty on the part of the Data Standards Chair to diffuse their authority.
premise text: (1) The Data Standards Chair may, by writing, make one or more data standards about each of the following matters:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fa-ss-1-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Implicates
logic summary: The making of data standards implies a duty on the part of the Data Standards Chair to provide clear and consistent rules.
premise text: (1) The Data Standards Chair may, by writing, make one or more data standards about each of the following matters:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

56FA(2) Making data standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fa-ss-2
part of: 56FA Making data standards
note: Comply with consumer data rules when making, varying or revoking a data standard
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.147
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fa-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply with consumer data rules
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56FB What data standards can set out etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fb
has part: 56FB(1) What data standards can set out etc.
has part: 56FB(2) What data standards can set out etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.148

56FB(1) What data standards can set out etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fb-ss-1
part of: 56FB What data standards can set out etc.
note: A single data standard may set out different provisions for different designated sectors, classes of CDR data, types of CDR actions, classes of persons, classes of action service providers, and classes of accredited persons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.148
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fb-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56FB(1) What data standards can set out etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May set out different provisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56FB(2) What data standards can set out etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fb-ss-2
part of: 56FB What data standards can set out etc.
note: A separate data standard could deal with each of the different classes or types referred to in any of paragraphs (1)(b) to (d) of this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.148
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fb-ss-2-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56FB(2) What data standards can set out etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

56FC Data standards must be published
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fc
note: Publish data standards on the internet
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.149
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fc-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fc-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish data standards
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56FD Legal effect of data standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fd
has part: 56FD(1) Legal effect of data standards
has part: 56FD(2) Legal effect of data standards
has part: 56FD(2A) Legal effect of data standards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.149

56FD(1) Legal effect of data standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fd-ss-1
part of: 56FD Legal effect of data standards
note: Agrees to observe standard and engage in conduct required by the standard.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.149
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-1-logic-cogai-6

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56FD(1) Legal effect of data standards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Agreement to observe standard and engage in conduct required by the standard.
premise text: (a) a data holder of CDR data to which a binding data standard applies;
conclusion text: (d) agrees to engage in conduct that the person is required by the standard to engage in.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Data holder and accredited persons are part of a class included in the data standard.
premise text: (a) a data holder of CDR data to which a binding data standard applies;
conclusion text: and (b) each accredited person;
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The contract is in force between the data holder and accredited persons during the overlap of their engagement with the standard.
premise text: (c) agrees to observe the standard to the extent that the standard applies to the person;
conclusion text: (d) agrees to engage in conduct that the person is required by the standard to engage in.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: The contract is in force until the data holder and accredited persons cease to observe the standard and engage in conduct required by it.
premise text: (c) agrees to observe the standard to the extent that the standard applies to the person;
conclusion text: (d) agrees to engage in conduct that the person is required by the standard to engage in.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: The data holder and accredited persons diffuse their obligations to observe the standard and engage in conduct required by it.
premise text: (a) a data holder of CDR data to which a binding data standard applies;
conclusion text: (b) each accredited person;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-1-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Enforces
logic summary: The state enforces the obligations of the data holder and accredited persons to observe the standard and engage in conduct required by it.
premise text: A contract is taken to be in force between: (a) a data holder of CDR data to which a binding data standard applies;
conclusion text: (d) agrees to engage in conduct that the person is required by the standard to engage in.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56FD(2) Legal effect of data standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fd-ss-2
part of: 56FD Legal effect of data standards
note: Agrees to observe standard and engage in conduct required by the standard.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.149
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2-logic-cogai-6

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56FD(2) Legal effect of data standards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obliges
logic summary: Agrees to observe standard and engage in conduct required by the standard.
premise text: (a) a data holder of the CDR data; (b) the designated gateway for the CDR data; (c) each accredited person;
conclusion text: (d) agrees to observe the standard to the extent that the standard applies to the person; and (e) agrees to engage in conduct that the person is required by the standard to engage in.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: appliesTo
logic summary: Standard applies to the person.
premise text: (d) agrees to observe the standard to the extent that the standard applies to the person;
conclusion text: the standard applies to the person.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Agrees to engage in conduct during the applicable period.
premise text: (e) agrees to engage in conduct that the person is required by the standard to engage in;
conclusion text: the person engages in conduct during the applicable period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Agrees to observe standard implies engagement in conduct.
premise text: (d) agrees to observe the standard to the extent that the standard applies to the person; (e) agrees to engage in conduct that the person is required by the standard to engage in;
conclusion text: the person agrees to observe the standard and engage in conduct.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Data holder's agreement diffuses through gateway and accredited persons.
premise text: (a) a data holder of the CDR data; (b) the designated gateway for the CDR data; (c) each accredited person;
conclusion text: the data holder's agreement diffuses through the gateway and accredited persons.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: asserts
logic summary: Data holder asserts standard applies to themselves.
premise text: (d) agrees to observe the standard to the extent that the standard applies to the person;
conclusion text: the data holder asserts that the standard applies to them.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56FD(2A) Legal effect of data standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fd-ss-2a
part of: 56FD Legal effect of data standards
note: Contract in force between action service provider and data standard
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.149
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2a-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56FD(2A) Legal effect of data standards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Binding data standard applies
premise text: (2A) A contract is taken to be in force between:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fd-ss-2a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Type of CDR action
premise text: a type of CDR action to which a binding data standard applies
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

56FE Enforcement of binding data standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fe
has part: 56FE(1) Enforcement of binding data standards
has part: 56FE(2) Enforcement of binding data standards
has part: 56FE(3) Enforcement of binding data standards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.150

56FE(1) Enforcement of binding data standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fe-ss-1
part of: 56FE Enforcement of binding data standards
note: Failure to comply with binding data standard obligation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.150
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fe-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fe-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fe-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56FE(1) Enforcement of binding data standards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fe-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Fail
logic summary: Fails to meet obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56FE(2) Enforcement of binding data standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fe-ss-2
part of: 56FE Enforcement of binding data standards
note: Court may give directions to comply with binding data standard
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.150
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fe-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fe-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fe-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56FE(2) Enforcement of binding data standards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fe-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide compliance direction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56FE(3) Enforcement of binding data standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fe-ss-3
part of: 56FE Enforcement of binding data standards
note: An obligation to comply with a binding data standard includes an obligation arising under a contract.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.150
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fe-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fe-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fe-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fe-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56FE(3) Enforcement of binding data standards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fe-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion relation for obligations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fe-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subdivision
logic summary: Subdivision relation for data standards chair.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56FF Data Standards Chair
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ff
note: There is an obligation to have a Data Standards Chair.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.151
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ff-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ff-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ff-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Existence of an obligation
conclusion text: There is a Data Standards Chair.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56FG Appointment of the Data Standards Chair
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fg
has part: 56FG(1) Appointment of the Data Standards Chair
has part: 56FG(2) Appointment of the Data Standards Chair
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.151

56FG(1) Appointment of the Data Standards Chair
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fg-ss-1
part of: 56FG Appointment of the Data Standards Chair
note: Appointment of Data Standards Chair
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.151
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fg-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fg-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fg-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fg-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fg-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56FG(1) Appointment of the Data Standards Chair
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Appointment duty
premise text: (1) The Data Standards Chair is to be appointed...
conclusion text: ...by the Minister by written instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fg-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
logic summary: Temporal interval for appointment
premise text: (1) The Data Standards Chair is to be appointed, on a full-time basis or...
conclusion text: ...by the Minister by written instrument.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fg-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Minister's authority for appointment
premise text: (1) The Data Standards Chair is to be appointed, on a full-time basis or...
conclusion text: ...by the Minister by written instrument.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fg-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Appointment basis classification
premise text: (1) The Data Standards Chair is to be appointed, on a full-time basis or...
conclusion text: ...by the Minister by written instrument.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fg-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Appointment basis inference
premise text: (1) The Data Standards Chair is to be appointed, on a full-time basis or...
conclusion text: ...by the Minister by written instrument.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56FG(2) Appointment of the Data Standards Chair
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fg-ss-2
part of: 56FG Appointment of the Data Standards Chair
note: Data Standards Chair must hold office for a specified period not exceeding 3 years.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.151
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fg-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56FG(2) Appointment of the Data Standards Chair
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Data Standards Chair holds office
premise text: (2) The Data Standards Chair...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56FH Functions and powers of the Data Standards Chair
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fh
has part: 56FH(1) Functions and powers of the Data Standards Chair
has part: 56FH(2) Functions and powers of the Data Standards Chair
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.151

56FH(1) Functions and powers of the Data Standards Chair
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fh-ss-1
part of: 56FH Functions and powers of the Data Standards Chair
note: The Data Standards Chair has specific functions to make and review standards.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.151
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fh-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fh-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56FH(1) Functions and powers of the Data Standards Chair
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: The Data Standards Chair has specific functions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56FH(2) Functions and powers of the Data Standards Chair
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fh-ss-2
part of: 56FH Functions and powers of the Data Standards Chair
note: Establishment of committees, advisory panels and consultative groups.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.151
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fh-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fh-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56FH(2) Functions and powers of the Data Standards Chair
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower
logic summary: Has the power to establish committees, advisory panels and consultative groups.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56FI Directions by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fi
note: The Minister may give written directions to the Data Standards Chair.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.151
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fi-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fi-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fi-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to direct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56FJ Appointment of the Data Standards Body
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fj
has part: 56FJ(1) Appointment of the Data Standards Body
has part: 56FJ(2) Appointment of the Data Standards Body
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.152

56FJ(1) Appointment of the Data Standards Body
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fj-ss-1
part of: 56FJ Appointment of the Data Standards Body
note: The Minister has the obligation to appoint a Data Standards Body.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fj-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: The Minister has an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56FJ(2) Appointment of the Data Standards Body
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fj-ss-2
part of: 56FJ Appointment of the Data Standards Body
note: Minister may terminate appointment by written instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fj-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56FK Function and powers of the Data Standards Body
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fk
has part: 56FK(1) Function and powers of the Data Standards Body
has part: 56FK(2) Function and powers of the Data Standards Body
has part: 56FK(3) Function and powers of the Data Standards Body
has part: 56FK(4) Function and powers of the Data Standards Body
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.152

56FK(1) Function and powers of the Data Standards Body
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fk-ss-1
part of: 56FK Function and powers of the Data Standards Body
note: The Data Standards Body must assist the Data Standards Chair.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fk-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide assistance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56FK(2) Function and powers of the Data Standards Body
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fk-ss-2
part of: 56FK Function and powers of the Data Standards Body
note: Power to perform necessary or convenient actions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fk-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Ability to perform actions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56FK(3) Function and powers of the Data Standards Body
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fk-ss-3
part of: 56FK Function and powers of the Data Standards Body
note: Comply with consumer data rules when assisting the Data Standards Chair.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fk-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fk-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fk-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with consumer data rules.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56FK(4) Function and powers of the Data Standards Body
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fk-ss-4
part of: 56FK Function and powers of the Data Standards Body
note: Functions and powers of the Data Standards Body are taken to include other functions and powers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fk-ss-4-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fk-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56FK(4) Function and powers of the Data Standards Body
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

56FL Acting appointments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fl
note: The Minister may appoint a person to act as Data Standards Chair.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.153
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fl-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fl-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fl-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56FM Terms and conditions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fm
has part: 56FM(1) Terms and conditions
has part: 56FM(2) Terms and conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.153

56FM(1) Terms and conditions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fm-ss-1
part of: 56FM Terms and conditions
note: Terms and conditions for Data Standards Chair office
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.153
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fm-ss-1-norm

56FM(2) Terms and conditions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fm-ss-2
part of: 56FM Terms and conditions
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for the Data Standards Chair while Minister.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.153
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fm-ss-2-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fm-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56FM(2) Terms and conditions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

56FN Remuneration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fn
note: Data Standards Chair must be paid remuneration determined by the Remuneration Tribunal or prescribed by regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.153
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fn-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fn-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fn-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56FN Remuneration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fn-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be paid remuneration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56FO Leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fo
has part: 56FO(1) Leave
has part: 56FO(2) Leave
has part: 56FO(3) Leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.154

56FO(1) Leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fo-ss-1
part of: 56FO Leave
note: Recreation leave entitlements for Data Standards Chair appointed on a full-time basis.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.154
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fo-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fo-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fo-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fo-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fo-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56FO(1) Leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Recreation leave entitlements
premise text: Data Standards Chair appointed on a full-time basis
conclusion text: entitled to recreation leave
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Recreation leave entitlements apply during term of appointment
premise text: Data Standards Chair appointed on a full-time basis for a specified term
conclusion text: entitlements apply during the term of appointment
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fo-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Recreation leave entitlements imply data standards chair has certain rights
premise text: Data Standards Chair appointed on a full-time basis implies certain rights and entitlements
conclusion text: recreation leave entitlements imply certain rights
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fo-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: implies
logic summary: Recreation leave entitlements imply data standards chair has certain responsibilities
premise text: Data Standards Chair appointed on a full-time basis implies certain responsibilities and obligations
conclusion text: recreation leave entitlements imply certain responsibilities
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fo-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: implies
logic summary: Recreation leave entitlements imply data standards chair has certain capabilities
premise text: Data Standards Chair appointed on a full-time basis implies certain capabilities and abilities
conclusion text: recreation leave entitlements imply certain capabilities
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56FO(2) Leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fo-ss-2
part of: 56FO Leave
note: Minister may grant Data Standards Chair leave of absence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.154
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fo-ss-2-norm

56FO(3) Leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fo-ss-3
part of: 56FO Leave
note: Secretary may grant leave of absence to Data Standards Chair on terms and conditions determined by Secretary.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.154
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fo-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fo-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fo-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56FO(3) Leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fo-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Granting leave is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56FP Application of the finance law etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fp
has part: 56FP(1) Application of the finance law etc.
has part: 56FP(2) Application of the finance law etc.
has part: 56FP(3) Application of the finance law etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.154

56FP(1) Application of the finance law etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fp-ss-1
part of: 56FP Application of the finance law etc.
note: The Data Standards Chair is taken to be an official of the Department.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.154
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fp-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Classification as an official
premise text: Data Standards Chair is taken to be...
conclusion text: ...an official of the Department.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56FP(2) Application of the finance law etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fp-ss-2
part of: 56FP Application of the finance law etc.
note: Must include information about performance and exercise of Data Standards Chair's functions in annual report.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.154
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fp-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fp-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56FP(2) Application of the finance law etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a mandatory requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56FP(3) Application of the finance law etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fp-ss-3
part of: 56FP Application of the finance law etc.
note: Annual report must include information about the Data Standards Chair's functions and powers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.154
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fp-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fp-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fp-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56FP(3) Application of the finance law etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information about the Data Standards Chair's functions and powers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fp-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Annual report must contain information about the Data Standards Chair's functions and powers.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56FQ Resignation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fq
has part: 56FQ(1) Resignation
has part: 56FQ(2) Resignation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.155

56FQ(1) Resignation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fq-ss-1
part of: 56FQ Resignation
note: Resignation obligation of Data Standards Chair
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.155
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fq-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Data Standards Chair must resign
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56FQ(2) Resignation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fq-ss-2
part of: 56FQ Resignation
note: Resignation takes effect on specified day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.155
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fq-ss-2-norm

56FR Termination of appointment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fr
has part: 56FR(1) Termination of appointment
has part: 56FR(2) Termination of appointment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.155

56FR(1) Termination of appointment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fr-ss-1
part of: 56FR Termination of appointment
note: Minister may terminate appointment of Data Standards Chair for misbehaviour or incapacity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.155
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fr-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fr-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56FR(1) Termination of appointment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56FR(2) Termination of appointment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fr-ss-2
part of: 56FR Termination of appointment
note: Termination of appointment under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.155
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fr-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fr-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fr-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 56FR(2) Termination of appointment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits termination without specified grounds.
premise text: (2) The Minister may terminate the appointment...
conclusion text: The Data Standards Chair's appointment can be terminated only under these conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fr-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for termination.
premise text: (2) The Minister may terminate the appointment...
conclusion text: The termination can occur within this time frame.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

56FS Delegation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fs
has part: 56FS(1) Delegation
has part: 56FS(2) Delegation
has part: 56FS(3) Delegation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.156

56FS(1) Delegation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fs-ss-1
part of: 56FS Delegation
note: Delegation of functions or powers to SES employees, APS employees, and others.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.156
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fs-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fs-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fs-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Specifies the temporal interval during which delegation can occur
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56FS(2) Delegation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fs-ss-2
part of: 56FS Delegation
note: Exempts Data Standards Chair from subsection (1) application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.156
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fs-ss-2-norm

56FS(3) Delegation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56fs-ss-3
part of: 56FS Delegation
note: Delegate must comply with Data Standards Chair directions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.156
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fs-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fs-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fs-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56FS(3) Delegation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56fs-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
premise text: Delegate under subsection (1)
conclusion text: Comply with Data Standards Chair directions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56GA CDR functions of the Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ga
has part: 56GA(1) CDR functions of the Information Commissioner
has part: 56GA(2) CDR functions of the Information Commissioner
has part: 56GA(1A) CDR functions of the Information Commissioner
has part: 56GA(1B) CDR functions of the Information Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.158

56GA(1) CDR functions of the Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ga-ss-1
part of: 56GA CDR functions of the Information Commissioner
note: The Information Commissioner has certain functions and may consult with others about matters relevant to the operation of this Part. Delegation of functions or powers under this Part
references: Acts Interpretation Act 1901
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.158
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56GA(1) CDR functions of the Information Commissioner
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: The Information Commissioner has certain functions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: The Information Commissioner may consult with others about matters relevant to the operation of this Part.
premise text: (b) to consult with or advise any of the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The Information Commissioner may consult with others about matters relevant to the operation of this Part during certain times.
premise text: (b) to consult with or advise any of the following:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: The Information Commissioner must consult with others about matters relevant to the operation of this Part.
premise text: (b) to consult with or advise any of the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: The Information Commissioner may delegate certain functions to others.
premise text: Note: The Commission may also delegate to the Information Commissioner any of the Commission’s functions relating to this Part (see subsection 26(3)).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56GA(2) CDR functions of the Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ga-ss-2
part of: 56GA CDR functions of the Information Commissioner
note: Request or initiative for performing functions Delegate must comply with written directions of the Secretary.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.158
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56GA(2) CDR functions of the Information Commissioner
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to perform functions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56GA(1A) CDR functions of the Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ga-ss-1a
part of: 56GA CDR functions of the Information Commissioner
note: Delegate Minister's functions to SES employees or acting SES employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.158
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1a-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1a-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: delegate
logic summary: Granting permission for delegation.
premise text: The Minister may delegate...
conclusion text: ...to an SES employee, or an acting SES employee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for delegation.
premise text: (1A) The Minister may, in writing...
conclusion text: ...functions or powers included: (a) as described in paragraph 56BHA(1)(j); and (b) in the consumer data rules;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1a-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: may
logic summary: Permissive language for delegation.
premise text: (1A) The Minister may, in writing...
conclusion text: ...delegate all or any of the Minister’s functions or powers included...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: to
logic summary: Delegation to SES employees.
premise text: (1A) The Minister may, in writing...
conclusion text: ...SES employee, or an acting SES employee, in the Department or in the Commission.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: in
logic summary: Delegation within the Commission.
premise text: (1A) The Minister may, in writing...
conclusion text: ...SES employee, or an acting SES employee, in the Department or in the Commission.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

56GA(1B) CDR functions of the Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ga-ss-1b
part of: 56GA CDR functions of the Information Commissioner
note: Delegation by the Secretary must comply with written directions of the Minister.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.158
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1b-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56GA(1B) CDR functions of the Information Commissioner
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ga-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56GB Referring to instruments as in force from time to time
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56gb
has part: 56GB(1) Referring to instruments as in force from time to time
has part: 56GB(2) Referring to instruments as in force from time to time
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.159

56GB(1) Referring to instruments as in force from time to time
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56gb-ss-1
part of: 56GB Referring to instruments as in force from time to time
note: List of instruments subject to this section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.159
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gb-ss-1-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56GB(1) Referring to instruments as in force from time to time
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

56GB(2) Referring to instruments as in force from time to time
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56gb-ss-2
part of: 56GB Referring to instruments as in force from time to time
note: Allows instruments to incorporate or adopt provisions from other instruments or writings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.159
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gb-ss-2-norm

56GC Complying with CDR requirements etc.: protection from
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56gc
has part: 56GC(1) Complying with CDR requirements etc.: protection from
has part: 56GC(2) Complying with CDR requirements etc.: protection from
has part: 56GC(3) Complying with CDR requirements etc.: protection from
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.160

56GC(1) Complying with CDR requirements etc.: protection from
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56gc-ss-1
part of: 56GC Complying with CDR requirements etc.: protection from
note: Protection from liability for complying with CDR requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.160
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with CDR requirements
premise text: Acting in good faith and compliance with CDR provisions
conclusion text: Not liable for actions or proceedings
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classifies
logic summary: Classification of CDR entities
premise text: CDR entity acting as described in an item of the table
conclusion text: Protection from liability
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56GC(2) Complying with CDR requirements etc.: protection from
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56gc-ss-2
part of: 56GC Complying with CDR requirements etc.: protection from
note: Evidential burden for relying on subsection (1) in civil actions or proceedings
description: Evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.160
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56GC(2) Complying with CDR requirements etc.: protection from
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide evidence
conclusion text: A person who wishes to rely on subsection (1) in relation to a civil action or civil proceeding bears an evidential burden...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: evidential burden
logic summary: Evidential burden for relying on subsection (1)
conclusion text: A person who wishes to rely on subsection (1) in relation to a civil action or civil proceeding bears an evidential burden...
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: trace
logic summary: Trace of evidential burden for relying on subsection (1)
conclusion text: A person who wishes to rely on subsection (1) in relation to a civil action or civil proceeding bears an evidential burden...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: burden of proof
logic summary: Burden of proof for relying on subsection (1)
conclusion text: A person who wishes to rely on subsection (1) in relation to a civil action or civil proceeding bears an evidential burden...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for evidentiial burden
conclusion text: A person who wishes to rely on subsection (1) in relation to a civil action or civil proceeding bears an evidential burden...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

56GC(3) Complying with CDR requirements etc.: protection from
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56gc-ss-3
part of: 56GC Complying with CDR requirements etc.: protection from
note: Definition of evidential burden
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.160
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56GC(3) Complying with CDR requirements etc.: protection from
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to provide evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gc-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Definition
logic summary: Defines evidential burden for clarity and precision
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56GD Exemptions by the Commission
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56gd
has part: 56GD(1) Exemptions by the Commission
has part: 56GD(2) Exemptions by the Commission
has part: 56GD(3) Exemptions by the Commission
has part: 56GD(4) Exemptions by the Commission
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.161

56GD(1) Exemptions by the Commission
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56gd-ss-1
part of: 56GD Exemptions by the Commission
note: Exemptions by the Commission
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.161
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gd-ss-1-norm

56GD(2) Exemptions by the Commission
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56gd-ss-2
part of: 56GD Exemptions by the Commission
note: Commission may exempt a person from provisions covered by this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.161
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gd-ss-2-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gd-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 56GD(2) Exemptions by the Commission
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

56GD(3) Exemptions by the Commission
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56gd-ss-3
part of: 56GD Exemptions by the Commission
note: Exemptions under subsection (2) may be limited to a specified period or apply unconditionally.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.161
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gd-ss-3-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gd-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56GD(3) Exemptions by the Commission
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

56GD(4) Exemptions by the Commission
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56gd-ss-4
part of: 56GD Exemptions by the Commission
note: Commission must publish exemption details on its website.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.161
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gd-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gd-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56GD(4) Exemptions by the Commission
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56GE Exemptions and modifications by regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ge
has part: 56GE(1) Exemptions and modifications by regulations
has part: 56GE(2) Exemptions and modifications by regulations
has part: 56GE(3) Exemptions and modifications by regulations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.162

56GE(1) Exemptions and modifications by regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ge-ss-1
part of: 56GE Exemptions and modifications by regulations
note: Exemptions and modifications by regulations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.162
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ge-ss-1-norm

56GE(2) Exemptions and modifications by regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ge-ss-2
part of: 56GE Exemptions and modifications by regulations
note: Exemptions and modifications by regulations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.162
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ge-ss-2-norm

56GE(3) Exemptions and modifications by regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56ge-ss-3
part of: 56GE Exemptions and modifications by regulations
note: Exemptions and modifications by regulations may be limited to a specified period or apply unconditionally.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.162
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56ge-ss-3-norm

56GF Application of the CDR provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56gf
has part: 56GF(1) Application of the CDR provisions
has part: 56GF(2) Application of the CDR provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.163

56GF(1) Application of the CDR provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56gf-ss-1
part of: 56GF Application of the CDR provisions
note: A person is subject to the CDR provisions if they act or omit to act in a way that affects a corporation's activities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.163
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gf-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gf-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56GF(1) Application of the CDR provisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to act or omit to act in a way that affects a corporation's activities.
premise text: (1) The CDR provisions apply to a person if: (a) the person is a corporation; or (b) the person is not a corporation, but the person: (i) acts; or (ii) omits to act; in a way that affects, is capable of affecting or is taken with intent to affect the activities, functions, relationships or business of a corporation.
conclusion text: (1) The CDR provisions apply to a person if: (a) the person is a corporation; or (b) the person is not a corporation, but the person: (i) acts; or (ii) omits to act; in a way that affects, is capable of affecting or is taken with intent to affect the activities, functions, relationships or business of a corporation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56GF(2) Application of the CDR provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56gf-ss-2
part of: 56GF Application of the CDR provisions
note: The CDR provisions apply to certain businesses and services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.163
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gf-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gf-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56GF(2) Application of the CDR provisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
logic summary: Applicability of the CDR provisions
premise text: (2) The CDR provisions also apply to:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gf-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between CDR provisions and industries/services
premise text: (2) The CDR provisions also apply to:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56GG Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56gg
has part: 56GG(1) Compensation for acquisition of property
has part: 56GG(2) Compensation for acquisition of property
has part: 56GG(3) Compensation for acquisition of property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.165

56GG(1) Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56gg-ss-1
part of: 56GG Compensation for acquisition of property
note: Compensation for acquisition of property on just terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.165
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gg-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56GG(1) Compensation for acquisition of property
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide compensation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56GG(2) Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56gg-ss-2
part of: 56GG Compensation for acquisition of property
note: Person acquiring property must pay reasonable compensation to first-mentioned person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.165
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gg-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56GG(2) Compensation for acquisition of property
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to pay compensation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56GG(3) Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56gg-ss-3
part of: 56GG Compensation for acquisition of property
note: Compensation for acquisition of property: proceedings in Federal Court or Supreme Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.165
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gg-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gg-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56GG(3) Compensation for acquisition of property
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide compensation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56GH Review of the operation of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56gh
has part: 56GH(1) Review of the operation of this Part
has part: 56GH(2) Review of the operation of this Part
has part: 56GH(3) Review of the operation of this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.165

56GH(1) Review of the operation of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56gh-ss-1
part of: 56GH Review of the operation of this Part
note: The Minister must conduct an independent review of the operation of this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.165
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gh-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gh-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56GH(1) Review of the operation of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Minister must conduct an independent review.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56GH(2) Review of the operation of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56gh-ss-2
part of: 56GH Review of the operation of this Part
note: Must complete review report before July 1, 2022.
description: Written report
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.165
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gh-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gh-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56GH(2) Review of the operation of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to complete review
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56GH(3) Review of the operation of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56gh-ss-3
part of: 56GH Review of the operation of this Part
note: Minister must table report in each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.165
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gh-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-56gh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister must perform action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57AA Objects of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57aa
note: Promote competition, establish fair playing field, and protect safety information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.166
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57aa-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57aa-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57aa-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57AA Objects of Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Promote competition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57AB Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57ab
note: Supply of scheme information to Australian repairers and scheme RTOs is required.
description: Fair market value
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.166
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ab-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ab-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ab-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ab-logic-linearlogic-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ab-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57AB Simplified outline
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ab-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide scheme information at fair market value.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ab-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: SHALL
logic summary: Data providers must protect individuals accessing scheme information from civil claims.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ab-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: AND
logic summary: Multiple obligations apply to data providers and Australian repairers/scheme RTOs.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57BA Meaning of scheme vehicle
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57ba
note: Definition of scheme vehicle
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.168
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ba-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ba-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ba-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ba-logic-deontic-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ba-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: scheme rules prescribe definitions and categories for vehicles
conclusion text: vehicle is a scheme vehicle if it meets these criteria
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ba-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: vehicles manufactured on or after January 1, 2002, meet the criteria
conclusion text: vehicle was manufactured before this date if it does not meet the criteria
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ba-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of scheme vehicle
premise text: scheme rules prescribe definitions and categories for vehicles
conclusion text: vehicle is a scheme vehicle if it meets these criteria
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57BB Meaning of Australian repairer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57bb
note: A person is an Australian repairer if they carry on or actively seek to carry on a business involving diagnosing faults with, servicing, repairing, modifying or dismantling scheme vehicles.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.168
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bb-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bb-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bb-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bb-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bb-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bb-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bb-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57BB Meaning of Australian repairer
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bb-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of Australian repairer
premise text: A person is an Australian repairer to the extent that...
conclusion text: The person carries on or actively seeks to carry on a business...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bb-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between business activities and diagnosis
premise text: A person carries on or actively seeks to carry on a business...
conclusion text: The business activities occur during the period of diagnosis
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bb-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: if-then
logic summary: Business activities imply Australian repairer status
premise text: A person carries on or actively seeks to carry on a business...
conclusion text: The person is an Australian repairer if they carry on or actively seek to carry on such a business
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bb-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: and
logic summary: Multiple conditions for Australian repairer status
premise text: A person carries on or actively seeks to carry on a business...
conclusion text: The person has multiple characteristics of an Australian repairer
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bb-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: has
logic summary: Business activities imply cognitive abilities
premise text: A person carries on or actively seeks to carry on a business...
conclusion text: The person has the cognitive abilities required for an Australian repairer
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

57BC Meaning of scheme RTO and RTO course
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57bc
note: Defines what an RTO course is.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.168
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bc-norm

57BD Meaning of scheme information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57bd
has part: 57BD(1) Meaning of scheme information
has part: 57BD(2) Meaning of scheme information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.169

57BD(1) Meaning of scheme information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57bd-ss-1
part of: 57BD Meaning of scheme information
note: Defines scheme information for manufacturers and their related bodies corporate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.169
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bd-ss-1-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57BD(1) Meaning of scheme information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

57BD(2) Meaning of scheme information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57bd-ss-2
part of: 57BD Meaning of scheme information
note: Excluded from scheme information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.169
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bd-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57BD(2) Meaning of scheme information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57BE Meaning of data provider
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57be
note: Definition of data provider
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.170
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57be-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57be-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57BE Meaning of data provider
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

57BF Meaning of safety and security information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57bf
has part: 57BF(1) Meaning of safety and security information
has part: 57BF(2) Meaning of safety and security information
has part: 57BF(3) Meaning of safety and security information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.170

57BF(1) Meaning of safety and security information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57bf-ss-1
part of: 57BF Meaning of safety and security information
note: Safety and security information must be provided for a scheme vehicle.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.170
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bf-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bf-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57BF(1) Meaning of safety and security information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide safety and security information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57BF(2) Meaning of safety and security information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57bf-ss-2
part of: 57BF Meaning of safety and security information
note: Defines safety information for a scheme vehicle
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.170
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bf-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57BF(2) Meaning of safety and security information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires provision of safety information
premise text: (2) Safety information, for a scheme vehicle...
conclusion text: ...of a kind prescribed by the scheme rules:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

57BF(3) Meaning of safety and security information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57bf-ss-3
part of: 57BF Meaning of safety and security information
note: Prescribes security information for a scheme vehicle
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.170
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bf-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bf-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57BF(3) Meaning of safety and security information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prescribes
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state to provide security information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57BG Supply of scheme information between related bodies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57bg
note: Supply of scheme information between related bodies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.171
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bg-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bg-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bg-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57BG Supply of scheme information between related bodies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57bg-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide scheme information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57CA Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57ca
has part: 57CA(1) Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers
has part: 57CA(2) Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers
has part: 57CA(3) Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers
has part: 57CA(4) Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers
has part: 57CA(5) Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.172

57CA(1) Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57ca-ss-1
part of: 57CA Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers
note: Main obligation for supplying scheme information to Australian repairers or RTOs.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.172
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57CA(1) Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must supply scheme information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57CA(2) Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57ca-ss-2
part of: 57CA Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers
note: Must provide scheme information to Australian repairers and RTOs in a specified form.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.172
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57CA(2) Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide scheme information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57CA(3) Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57ca-ss-3
part of: 57CA Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers
note: Scheme information must be supplied on terms and conditions that include provision for the supply of scheme information.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.172
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57CA(3) Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide scheme information on specified terms and conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57CA(4) Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57ca-ss-4
part of: 57CA Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers
note: Must provide scheme information at a fair market value price
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.172
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57CA(4) Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide scheme information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57CA(5) Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57ca-ss-5
part of: 57CA Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers
note: Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.172
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57CA(5) Scheme information—offer to supply to Australian repairers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide scheme information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ca-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Classification of scheme information
premise text: scheme vehicle make, model and year
conclusion text: scheme information for supply to Australian repairers
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57CB Scheme information—supply on request by Australian
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57cb
has part: 57CB(1) Scheme information—supply on request by Australian
has part: 57CB(2) Scheme information—supply on request by Australian
has part: 57CB(3) Scheme information—supply on request by Australian
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.174

57CB(1) Scheme information—supply on request by Australian
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57cb-ss-1
part of: 57CB Scheme information—supply on request by Australian
note: Request for supply of scheme information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.174
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide scheme information
premise text: (a) a data provider makes, or is required to make, a scheme offer...
conclusion text: ...the Australian repairer or scheme RTO pays, or offers to pay,...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to access scheme information for business purposes
premise text: (b) either:...
conclusion text: ...an Australian repairer has a need to access the scheme information...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between data provider's offer and request
premise text: (a) a data provider makes, or is required to make, a scheme offer...
conclusion text: ...and (c) the Australian repairer or scheme RTO requests,...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Request implies payment for scheme information
premise text: (d) the Australian repairer or scheme RTO pays, or offers to pay,...
conclusion text: ...the data provider must supply the scheme information.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Transmission
logic summary: Scheme information transmission from data provider to requestor
premise text: (c) the Australian repairer or scheme RTO requests,...
conclusion text: ...the data provider must supply the scheme information.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57CB(2) Scheme information—supply on request by Australian
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57cb-ss-2
part of: 57CB Scheme information—supply on request by Australian
note: Supply scheme information to Australian repairer or RTO within specified terms and conditions.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.174
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with section 57CC
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57CB(3) Scheme information—supply on request by Australian
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57cb-ss-3
part of: 57CB Scheme information—supply on request by Australian
note: Scheme information must be provided upon payment or offer of the scheme price.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.174
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide scheme information upon payment or offer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The period covered by this subsection starts when the Australian repairer or scheme RTO pays or offers to pay the scheme price.
premise text: (payment or offer time)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: If the Australian repairer or scheme RTO pays or offers to pay the scheme price, then scheme information must be provided.
premise text: (payment or offer time)
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cb-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: The provision of scheme information upon payment or offer diffuses to the relevant parties.
premise text: (payment or offer time)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57CC Scheme information—terms and conditions of supply and use
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57cc
note: Terms and conditions of supply generally allow data providers to supply scheme information for diagnostic purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.177
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cc-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cc-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cc-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 57CC Scheme information—terms and conditions of supply and use
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow
logic summary: Permits access to scheme information for diagnostic purposes.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

57CD Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57cd
has part: 57CD(1) Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and
has part: 57CD(2) Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and
has part: 57CD(3) Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and
has part: 57CD(4) Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and
has part: 57CD(5) Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.178

57CD(1) Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57cd-ss-1
part of: 57CD Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and
note: Data provider must comply with obligation under this Part in relation to scheme information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.178
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57CD(1) Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Data provider must comply with obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57CD(2) Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57cd-ss-2
part of: 57CD Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and
note: Supply of scheme information infringes copyright without just terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.178
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 57CD(2) Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supply of scheme information infringing copyright
premise text: (2) Subsection (3) applies if...
conclusion text: ...the infringement would constitute an acquisition of property otherwise than on just terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with copyright infringement
premise text: (c) the supply constitutes or results in an infringement of the copyright of the third party claimant;
conclusion text: ...apart from this section, the infringement would constitute an acquisition of property otherwise than on just terms
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring supply of scheme information infringes copyright
premise text: (a) a data provider supplies scheme information to an Australian repairer or scheme RTO under this Part;
conclusion text: ...some or all of the scheme information that is the subject of the supply;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses copyright infringement through supply of scheme information
premise text: (b) a person (the third party claimant) holds copyright in relation to some or all of the scheme information that is the subject of the supply;
conclusion text: ...apart from this section, the infringement would constitute an acquisition of property otherwise than on just terms
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognizes copyright infringement through scheme information supply
premise text: (c) the supply constitutes or results in an infringement of the copyright of the third party claimant;
conclusion text: ...apart from this section, the infringement would constitute an acquisition of property otherwise than on just terms
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57CD(3) Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57cd-ss-3
part of: 57CD Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and
note: Data provider must pay compensation to third party claimant.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.178
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Data provider has an obligation to pay compensation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57CD(4) Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57cd-ss-4
part of: 57CD Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and
note: Debt due by data provider to third party claimant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.178
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-4-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-4-logic-ltl-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: due
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-4-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: recoverable
logic summary: Recoverable claim
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ordered recovery
logic summary: Ordered recovery in court
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57CD(5) Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57cd-ss-5
part of: 57CD Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and
note: Data provider must prove defence in civil action for copyright infringement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.178
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57CD(5) Scheme information—interaction of supply obligations and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57cd-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57DA Safety and security information—packaging
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57da
note: Separate safety and security information from other scheme information.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.181
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57da-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57da-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57da-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide separate safety and security information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57DB Safety and security information—supply to Australian
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57db
has part: 57DB(1) Safety and security information—supply to Australian
has part: 57DB(2) Safety and security information—supply to Australian
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.181

57DB(1) Safety and security information—supply to Australian
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57db-ss-1
part of: 57DB Safety and security information—supply to Australian
note: Must not supply safety and security information for a scheme vehicle unless certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.181
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57db-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57db-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57db-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57db-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57db-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57db-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57db-ss-1-logic-argumentation-6

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57db-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of supplying safety and security information
premise text: data provider must not supply scheme information under this Part that is, or includes, safety and security information for a scheme vehicle...
conclusion text: ...unless certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57db-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of safety and security information
premise text: (1) A data provider must not supply scheme information under this Part that is, or includes, safety and security information for a scheme vehicle...
conclusion text: ...unless certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57db-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for supplying safety and security information
premise text: (1) A data provider must not supply scheme information under this Part that is, or includes, safety and security information for a scheme vehicle...
conclusion text: ...unless certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57db-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of supplying safety and security information
premise text: (1) A data provider must not supply scheme information under this Part that is, or includes, safety and security information for a scheme vehicle...
conclusion text: ...unless certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57db-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to not supply safety and security information
premise text: (1) A data provider must not supply scheme information under this Part that is, or includes, safety and security information for a scheme vehicle...
conclusion text: ...unless certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57db-ss-1-logic-argumentation-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of supplying safety and security information
premise text: (1) A data provider must not supply scheme information under this Part that is, or includes, safety and security information for a scheme vehicle...
conclusion text: ...unless certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

57DB(2) Safety and security information—supply to Australian
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57db-ss-2
part of: 57DB Safety and security information—supply to Australian
note: Safety and security information must be used for the purposes of the Australian repairer's business.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.181
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57db-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57db-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57db-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide safety and security information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57DC Safety and security information—use or disclosure of sensitive
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57dc
note: Use or disclosure of sensitive information is restricted for certain individuals and small business operators.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.183
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dc-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dc-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dc-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dc-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dc-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dc-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57DC Safety and security information—use or disclosure of sensitive
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Restrict
logic summary: Restricts use or disclosure of sensitive information.
premise text: The data provider is a small business operator within the meaning of the Privacy Act 1988.
conclusion text: Use or disclosure of sensitive information is restricted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dc-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Restriction
logic summary: Restricts use or disclosure to specific time periods.
premise text: The data provider is a small business operator within the meaning of the Privacy Act 1988; and that Act would not, apart from this section, apply to the data provider in relation to the information about the individual.
conclusion text: Use or disclosure of sensitive information is restricted to specific time periods.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dc-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Restriction
logic summary: Restricts use or disclosure to recurring patterns.
premise text: The data provider is a small business operator within the meaning of the Privacy Act 1988; and that Act would not, apart from this section, apply to the data provider in relation to the information about the individual.
conclusion text: Use or disclosure of sensitive information is restricted to recurring patterns.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dc-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Restrict
logic summary: Restricts use or disclosure of sensitive information for specific individuals.
premise text: The information is about an individual mentioned in paragraph 57DB(2)(a); and the data provider is a small business operator within the meaning of the Privacy Act 1988.
conclusion text: Use or disclosure of sensitive information is restricted for specific individuals.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57DD Safety and security information—storage of, and access to,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57dd
has part: 57DD(1) Safety and security information—storage of, and access to,
has part: 57DD(2) Safety and security information—storage of, and access to,
has part: 57DD(3) Safety and security information—storage of, and access to,
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.184

57DD(1) Safety and security information—storage of, and access to,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57dd-ss-1
part of: 57DD Safety and security information—storage of, and access to,
note: Sensitive information must be stored in Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.184
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dd-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57DD(1) Safety and security information—storage of, and access to,
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must store sensitive information in Australia.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57DD(2) Safety and security information—storage of, and access to,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57dd-ss-2
part of: 57DD Safety and security information—storage of, and access to,
note: Must store sensitive information in Australia or an external Territory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.184
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dd-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must store sensitive information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57DD(3) Safety and security information—storage of, and access to,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57dd-ss-3
part of: 57DD Safety and security information—storage of, and access to,
note: Do not access sensitive information outside Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.184
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dd-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57dd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: Sensitive information
conclusion text: Do not access outside Australia
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57DE Security information—records of access
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57de
has part: 57DE(1) Security information—records of access
has part: 57DE(2) Security information—records of access
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.185

57DE(1) Security information—records of access
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57de-ss-1
part of: 57DE Security information—records of access
note: Record-keeping requirement for security information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.185
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57de-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57de-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57de-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57DE(1) Security information—records of access
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57de-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide record-keeping requirement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57DE(2) Security information—records of access
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57de-ss-2
part of: 57DE Security information—records of access
note: Maintain records of security information supply for 5 years
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.185
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57de-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57de-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57de-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must maintain records
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57EA Scope of Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57ea
note: Scope of Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.186
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ea-norm

57EB Resolving disputes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57eb
note: A party may initiate action to resolve a dispute.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.186
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eb-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eb-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eb-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57EB Resolving disputes
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eb-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57EC Right to bring proceedings unaffected
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57ec
note: Right to bring proceedings unaffected
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.186
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ec-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ec-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 57EC Right to bring proceedings unaffected
held by: State
scope note: held by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

57ED Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57ed
has part: 57ED(1) Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation
has part: 57ED(2) Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation
has part: 57ED(3) Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation
has part: 57ED(4) Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation
has part: 57ED(5) Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.186

57ED(1) Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57ed-ss-1
part of: 57ED Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation
note: Initiating party must provide written notice to responding party before initiating action.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.186
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57ED(1) Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide written notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57ED(2) Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57ed-ss-2
part of: 57ED Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation
note: Parties must try to resolve the dispute.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.186
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57ED(2) Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must try to resolve the dispute.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57ED(3) Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57ed-ss-3
part of: 57ED Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation
note: Parties must refer dispute to mediator if unable to agree within 2 business days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.186
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57ED(3) Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide mediation
premise text: (3) If the parties cannot agree how to resolve the dispute within 2 business days...
conclusion text: Either party may refer the matter to a mediator for mediation under this Division.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for dispute resolution
premise text: (3) If the parties cannot agree how to resolve the dispute within 2 business days...
conclusion text: Either party may refer the matter to a mediator for mediation under this Division.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for dispute resolution
premise text: (3) If the parties cannot agree how to resolve the dispute within 2 business days...
conclusion text: Either party may refer the matter to a mediator for mediation under this Division.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May refer dispute to mediator
premise text: (3) If the parties cannot agree how to resolve the dispute within 2 business days...
conclusion text: Either party may refer the matter to a mediator for mediation under this Division.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57ED(4) Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57ed-ss-4
part of: 57ED Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation
note: Either party may request the scheme adviser to nominate a mediator.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.186
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 57ED(4) Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to request mediation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57ED(5) Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57ed-ss-5
part of: 57ED Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation
note: Scheme adviser must nominate a mediator for the dispute within 2 business days after a request is made under subsection (4).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.186
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57ED(5) Attempt to resolve dispute before mediation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ed-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to nominate a mediator
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57EE When is a party taken to have tried to resolve a dispute?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57ee
note: A party is taken to have tried to resolve a dispute if they approach it in a reconciliatory manner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.187
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ee-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ee-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ee-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57EE When is a party taken to have tried to resolve a dispute?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ee-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Party's actions are obligations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57EF Mediation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57ef
has part: 57EF(1) Mediation
has part: 57EF(2) Mediation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.187

57EF(1) Mediation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57ef-ss-1
part of: 57EF Mediation
note: Mediator appointed by parties decides time and place for mediation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.187
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ef-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ef-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ef-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ef-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57EF(1) Mediation
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ef-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Decide
logic summary: Mediator has the obligation to decide.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ef-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Mediator's decision implies mediation will occur.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57EF(2) Mediation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57ef-ss-2
part of: 57EF Mediation
note: Allow parties to appoint a technical expert with agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.187
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ef-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ef-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ef-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grant permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57EG Termination of mediation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57eg
has part: 57EG(1) Termination of mediation
has part: 57EG(2) Termination of mediation
has part: 57EG(3) Termination of mediation
has part: 57EG(4) Termination of mediation
has part: 57EG(5) Termination of mediation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.188

57EG(1) Termination of mediation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57eg-ss-1
part of: 57EG Termination of mediation
note: Dispute must be resolved within 30 days after mediation starts.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.188
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57EG(1) Termination of mediation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to resolve dispute within 30 days.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57EG(2) Termination of mediation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57eg-ss-2
part of: 57EG Termination of mediation
note: Mediator may terminate mediation at any time unless a resolution is imminent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.188
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57EG(2) Termination of mediation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Mediator's power to terminate mediation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57EG(3) Termination of mediation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57eg-ss-3
part of: 57EG Termination of mediation
note: Mediator must terminate mediation upon request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.188
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57EG(3) Termination of mediation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to terminate mediation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57EG(4) Termination of mediation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57eg-ss-4
part of: 57EG Termination of mediation
note: Mediator must issue a certificate after terminating mediation.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.188
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57EG(4) Termination of mediation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a certificate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57EG(5) Termination of mediation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57eg-ss-5
part of: 57EG Termination of mediation
note: Mediator must provide a copy of the certificate to parties and scheme adviser.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.188
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57EG(5) Termination of mediation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eg-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57EH Costs of mediation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57eh
has part: 57EH(1) Costs of mediation
has part: 57EH(2) Costs of mediation
has part: 57EH(3) Costs of mediation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.189

57EH(1) Costs of mediation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57eh-ss-1
part of: 57EH Costs of mediation
note: Parties are equally liable for mediation costs unless they agree otherwise.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.189
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57EH(1) Costs of mediation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Parties have an obligation to pay mediation costs.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: The cost of mediation is between the parties.
premise text: (1) The parties are equally liable for the costs of mediation under this Division unless they agree otherwise.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implication
logic summary: If the parties do not agree on the cost, one party may be liable.
premise text: (1) The parties are equally liable for the costs of mediation under this Division unless they agree otherwise.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
logic summary: The cost of mediation is diffused between the parties.
premise text: (1) The parties are equally liable for the costs of mediation under this Division unless they agree otherwise.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: cognitive
logic summary: The parties have a cognitive obligation to pay mediation costs.
premise text: (1) The parties are equally liable for the costs of mediation under this Division unless they agree otherwise.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57EH(2) Costs of mediation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57eh-ss-2
part of: 57EH Costs of mediation
note: Parties must pay their own costs of attending mediation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.189
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57EH(2) Costs of mediation
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must pay own costs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57EH(3) Costs of mediation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57eh-ss-3
part of: 57EH Costs of mediation
note: Excludes costs of mediation from the definition of 'costs'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.189
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57EH(3) Costs of mediation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57eh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exclusion
logic summary: Excludes costs of mediation from the definition of 'costs'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57FA Scheme adviser—establishment and appointment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57fa
has part: 57FA(1) Scheme adviser—establishment and appointment
has part: 57FA(2) Scheme adviser—establishment and appointment
has part: 57FA(3) Scheme adviser—establishment and appointment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.190

57FA(1) Scheme adviser—establishment and appointment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57fa-ss-1
part of: 57FA Scheme adviser—establishment and appointment
note: Establishment and appointment of a motor vehicle service and repair information scheme adviser.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.190
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fa-ss-1-norm

57FA(2) Scheme adviser—establishment and appointment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57fa-ss-2
part of: 57FA Scheme adviser—establishment and appointment
note: Minister may appoint a person to be the scheme adviser.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.190
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fa-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission granted by Minister
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57FA(3) Scheme adviser—establishment and appointment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57fa-ss-3
part of: 57FA Scheme adviser—establishment and appointment
note: No payment is allowed to the scheme adviser.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.190
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fa-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fa-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 57FA(3) Scheme adviser—establishment and appointment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits payment to the scheme adviser.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57FB Scheme adviser—functions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57fb
has part: 57FB(1) Scheme adviser—functions
has part: 57FB(2) Scheme adviser—functions
has part: 57FB(3) Scheme adviser—functions
has part: 57FB(4) Scheme adviser—functions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.190

57FB(1) Scheme adviser—functions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57fb-ss-1
part of: 57FB Scheme adviser—functions
note: The scheme adviser must report to the Minister and the Commission on various matters.
description: Annual reports, information about inquiries and disputes, resolution rates for disputes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.190
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57FB(1) Scheme adviser—functions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The scheme adviser has a duty to report to the Minister and the Commission.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: The scheme adviser's functions are defined in this section.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57FB(2) Scheme adviser—functions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57fb-ss-2
part of: 57FB Scheme adviser—functions
note: Information about contract terms is not confidential to the extent it identifies parties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.190
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57FB(2) Scheme adviser—functions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to disclose contract terms
premise text: Contract terms are notified to the scheme adviser
conclusion text: Information is not confidential
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57FB(3) Scheme adviser—functions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57fb-ss-3
part of: 57FB Scheme adviser—functions
note: Scheme adviser has necessary powers for office functions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.190
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57FB(3) Scheme adviser—functions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Possession of power
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57FB(4) Scheme adviser—functions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57fb-ss-4
part of: 57FB Scheme adviser—functions
note: Exempts reports from Section 34C of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.190
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57FB(4) Scheme adviser—functions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57fb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Section 34C exemption
premise text: Section 34C of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 requires periodic reports.
conclusion text: Reports are exempt from Section 34C.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

57GA Civil penalty provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57ga
note: Defines civil penalty provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.192
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ga-norm

57GB Infringement notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57gb
has part: 57GB(1) Infringement notices
has part: 57GB(2) Infringement notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.192

57GB(1) Infringement notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57gb-ss-1
part of: 57GB Infringement notices
note: Division 2A of Part IVB applies to alleged contraventions of civil penalty provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.192
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gb-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gb-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gb-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gb-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57GB(1) Infringement notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Division applies to alleged contraventions
premise text: (1) Division 2A of Part IVB
conclusion text: in relation to an alleged contravention of a civil penalty provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: applies
logic summary: Division applies within specified intervals
premise text: (1) Division 2A of Part IVB
conclusion text: in relation to an alleged contravention of a civil penalty provision mentioned in an item in the table in subsection (2)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gb-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: applies
logic summary: Division applies within specified intervals
premise text: (1) Division 2A of Part IVB
conclusion text: in relation to an alleged contravention of a civil penalty provision mentioned in an item in the table in subsection (2)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gb-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: applies
logic summary: Division applies through specified channels
premise text: (1) Division 2A of Part IVB
conclusion text: in relation to an alleged contravention of a civil penalty provision mentioned in an item in the table in subsection (2)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gb-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: applies
logic summary: Division applies through specified channels
premise text: (1) Division 2A of Part IVB
conclusion text: in relation to an alleged contravention of a civil penalty provision mentioned in an item in the table in subsection (2)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57GB(2) Infringement notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57gb-ss-2
part of: 57GB Infringement notices
note: Specify penalty for infringement notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.192
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gb-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57GC Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57gc
note: States and Territories can operate concurrently with this Part unless directly inconsistent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.194
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gc-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gc-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: States and Territories can operate concurrently.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57GD Acquisition of property
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57gd
has part: 57GD(1) Acquisition of property
has part: 57GD(2) Acquisition of property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.194

57GD(1) Acquisition of property
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57gd-ss-1
part of: 57GD Acquisition of property
note: Defines scope of section 57GD(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.194
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gd-ss-1-norm

57GD(2) Acquisition of property
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57gd-ss-2
part of: 57GD Acquisition of property
note: No effect if acquisition of property occurs on just terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.194
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gd-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gd-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gd-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gd-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits effect if acquisition of property occurs on just terms
premise text: (2) The provision has no effect to the extent (if any) to which its operation would result in the acquisition of property...
conclusion text: ...from a person otherwise than on just terms (within the meaning of that paragraph).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between provision and acquisition of property
premise text: (2) The provision has no effect to the extent (if any) to which its operation would result in the acquisition of property...
conclusion text: ...from a person otherwise than on just terms (within the meaning of that paragraph).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gd-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Repeating pattern between provision and acquisition of property
premise text: (2) The provision has no effect to the extent (if any) to which its operation would result in the acquisition of property...
conclusion text: ...from a person otherwise than on just terms (within the meaning of that paragraph).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gd-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusing effect of provision to acquisition of property
premise text: (2) The provision has no effect to the extent (if any) to which its operation would result in the acquisition of property...
conclusion text: ...from a person otherwise than on just terms (within the meaning of that paragraph).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57gd-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Recognition of provision's effect on acquisition of property
premise text: (2) The provision has no effect to the extent (if any) to which its operation would result in the acquisition of property...
conclusion text: ...from a person otherwise than on just terms (within the meaning of that paragraph).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57GE Scheme rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57ge
has part: 57GE(1) Scheme rules
has part: 57GE(2) Scheme rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.195

57GE(1) Scheme rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57ge-ss-1
part of: 57GE Scheme rules
note: Minister may make rules by legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.195
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ge-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ge-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ge-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to make rules
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57GE(2) Scheme rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57ge-ss-2
part of: 57GE Scheme rules
note: Rules cannot create an offence, civil penalty, or impose certain powers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.195
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ge-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ge-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ge-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ge-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative prohibition
premise text: (2) To avoid doubt, the rules may not...
conclusion text: The rules cannot create an offence or civil penalty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-57ge-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Temporal restrictions on rule application
premise text: (2) To avoid doubt, the rules may not...
conclusion text: The rules are restricted to specific temporal intervals.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58AA Object of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58aa
note: Prevent and respond to scams impacting natural persons in Australia or those who carry on small businesses in Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.196
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58aa-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58aa-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58aa-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58AA Object of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to prevent and respond to scams
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58AB Simplified outline of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ab
note: Framework requirements for service providers in selected sectors of the economy to combat scams.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.196
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ab-norm

58AC Regulated sectors subject to the Scams Prevention Framework
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ac
note: Designation of regulated sectors by the Minister.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.197
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ac-norm

58AD Regulated entities for regulated sectors and their regulated
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ad
has part: 58AD(1) Regulated entities for regulated sectors and their regulated
has part: 58AD(2) Regulated entities for regulated sectors and their regulated
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.198

58AD(1) Regulated entities for regulated sectors and their regulated
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ad-ss-1
part of: 58AD Regulated entities for regulated sectors and their regulated
note: A regulated entity for a sector includes a business or service covered by paragraph 58AC(2)(a), (b) or (c).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.198
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58AD(1) Regulated entities for regulated sectors and their regulated
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Regulated sector includes a business or service
conclusion text: Regulated entity for the sector
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: Business or service covered by paragraph 58AC(2)(a), (b) or (c)
conclusion text: Regulated entity for the sector
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Duty
premise text: Person who carries on or provides that business or service is a regulated entity for the sector
conclusion text: Obligation to be a regulated entity
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Duty
premise text: That business or service is a regulated service of the regulated entity for the sector
conclusion text: Obligation to provide a regulated service
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58AD(2) Regulated entities for regulated sectors and their regulated
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ad-ss-2
part of: 58AD Regulated entities for regulated sectors and their regulated
note: List of regulated entities and their services for a regulated sector
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.198
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58AD(2) Regulated entities for regulated sectors and their regulated
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Other regulated entities, and their regulated services, for the regulated sector
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: (a) carrying on or providing a business or service that is part of the regulated sector; and (b) acting using a postal, telegraphic, telephonic or other like service so much of that business or service as relates to the person acting in that way.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of regulated entity
premise text: a corporation that carries on or provides a business or service that is part of the regulated sector that business or service.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of person acting in a way
premise text: a person to the extent that the person is both (a) carrying on or providing a business or service that is part of the regulated sector; and (b) acting using a postal, telegraphic, telephonic or other like service so much of that business or service as relates to the person acting in that way.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of trade or commerce
premise text: a kind of trade or commerce mentioned in subsection (3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58AE Minister must consider matters, and consult, before
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ae
has part: 58AE(1) Minister must consider matters, and consult, before
has part: 58AE(2) Minister must consider matters, and consult, before
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.201

58AE(1) Minister must consider matters, and consult, before
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ae-ss-1
part of: 58AE Minister must consider matters, and consult, before
note: Minister must consider matters and consult before making an instrument about a sector of the economy.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.201
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister must consider matters and consult.
premise text: (1) Before making an instrument under subsection 58AC(1) about a sector of the economy, the Minister must:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister must consult businesses or services making up the sector.
premise text: (b) Consult the businesses or services making up the sector, or such associations or other bodies representing them as the Minister thinks appropriate;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister must consult persons who would be SPF consumers of regulated services for the sector.
premise text: (c) Consult such associations or other bodies representing the persons referred to in subparagraph (a)(iii) as the Minister thinks appropriate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58AE(2) Minister must consider matters, and consult, before
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ae-ss-2
part of: 58AE Minister must consider matters, and consult, before
note: Minister must consider matters and consult before taking action.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.201
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58AE(2) Minister must consider matters, and consult, before
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider matters and consult.
premise text: (2) A failure to comply with subsection (1) does not invalidate an instrument made under subsection 58AC(1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for consideration and consultation.
premise text: (2) A failure to comply with subsection (1) does not invalidate an instrument made under subsection 58AC(1).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Consultation implies consideration.
premise text: (2) A failure to comply with subsection (1) does not invalidate an instrument made under subsection 58AC(1).
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Diffusion of information relevant.
premise text: (2) A failure to comply with subsection (1) does not invalidate an instrument made under subsection 58AC(1).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ae-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Artificial intelligence relevant.
premise text: (2) A failure to comply with subsection (1) does not invalidate an instrument made under subsection 58AC(1).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

58AF Delegation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58af
note: Delegation of power to another Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.201
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58af-norm

58AG Meaning of scam
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ag
has part: 58AG(1) Meaning of scam
has part: 58AG(2) Meaning of scam
has part: 58AG(3) Meaning of scam
has part: 58AG(4) Meaning of scam
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.202

58AG(1) Meaning of scam
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ag-ss-1
part of: 58AG Meaning of scam
note: Definition of scam
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.202
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ag-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ag-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ag-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58AG(1) Meaning of scam
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ag-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of a scam is provided
premise text: (1) A scam is a direct or indirect attempt (whether or not successful)...
conclusion text: ...a scam is defined
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

58AG(2) Meaning of scam
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ag-ss-2
part of: 58AG Meaning of scam
note: Deception in attempt to scam
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.202
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ag-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ag-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ag-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58AG(2) Meaning of scam
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ag-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Regulated service
premise text: (2) The attempt involves deception if the attempt:
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58AG(3) Meaning of scam
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ag-ss-3
part of: 58AG Meaning of scam
note: The attempt may be a single act or a course of conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.202
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ag-ss-3-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ag-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58AG(3) Meaning of scam
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

58AG(4) Meaning of scam
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ag-ss-4
part of: 58AG Meaning of scam
note: The attempt is not a scam if it meets the SPF rules.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.202
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ag-ss-4-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ag-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58AG(4) Meaning of scam
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

58AH Meaning of SPF consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ah
has part: 58AH(1) Meaning of SPF consumer
has part: 58AH(2) Meaning of SPF consumer
has part: 58AH(3) Meaning of SPF consumer
has part: 58AH(4) Meaning of SPF consumer
has part: 58AH(5) Meaning of SPF consumer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.202

58AH(1) Meaning of SPF consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ah-ss-1
part of: 58AH Meaning of SPF consumer
note: Defines who is considered an SPF consumer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.202
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58AH(1) Meaning of SPF consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Establishes the scope of the obligation.
premise text: (1) An SPF consumer, of a regulated service, is any of the following:
conclusion text: The provision defines who must be considered an SPF consumer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of the obligation.
premise text: (1) An SPF consumer, of a regulated service, is any of the following:
conclusion text: The provision applies to consumers within Australia and those provided services outside Australia by a regulated entity.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: =
logic summary: Establishes the basis for the obligation.
premise text: (1) An SPF consumer, of a regulated service, is any of the following:
conclusion text: The provision relies on the definition of an SPF consumer to establish the scope of the obligation.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
logic summary: Describes how the obligation is communicated.
premise text: (1) An SPF consumer, of a regulated service, is any of the following:
conclusion text: The provision explicitly states who must be considered an SPF consumer.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: =
logic summary: Describes how the obligation is processed.
premise text: (1) An SPF consumer, of a regulated service, is any of the following:
conclusion text: The provision uses clear and concise language to define who must be considered an SPF consumer.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

58AH(2) Meaning of SPF consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ah-ss-2
part of: 58AH Meaning of SPF consumer
note: Residency requirements for SPF consumer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.202
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-2-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58AH(2) Meaning of SPF consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

58AH(3) Meaning of SPF consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ah-ss-3
part of: 58AH Meaning of SPF consumer
note: Regulated service provision to a person is included in the meaning of SPF consumer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.202
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58AH(3) Meaning of SPF consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion relation
premise text: (3) Subsection (1) includes the provision or purported provision of a regulated service:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: substantially
logic summary: Substantial inclusion
premise text: (3) Subsection (1) includes the provision or purported provision of a regulated service:
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58AH(4) Meaning of SPF consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ah-ss-4
part of: 58AH Meaning of SPF consumer
note: Person is not an SPF consumer if a condition applies to them.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.202
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58AH(4) Meaning of SPF consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (4)
conclusion text: Not an SPF consumer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58AH(5) Meaning of SPF consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ah-ss-5
part of: 58AH Meaning of SPF consumer
note: Defines annual turnover for SPF consumer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.202
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ah-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term
conclusion text: annual turnover for SPF consumer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58AI Meaning of actionable scam intelligence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ai
note: Identify or have actionable scam intelligence if there are reasonable grounds to suspect a communication, transaction, or activity is a scam.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.204
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ai-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ai-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ai-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Entity must identify or have actionable scam intelligence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58AJ Extension to external Territories and outside of Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58aj
has part: 58AJ(1) Extension to external Territories and outside of Australia
has part: 58AJ(2) Extension to external Territories and outside of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.205

58AJ(1) Extension to external Territories and outside of Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58aj-ss-1
part of: 58AJ Extension to external Territories and outside of Australia
note: Extends provisions of this Part to external Territories and outside Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.205
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58aj-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58aj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58aj-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58AJ(1) Extension to external Territories and outside of Australia
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58aj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: extends
logic summary: Extends provisions of this Part to external Territories and outside Australia.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58AJ(2) Extension to external Territories and outside of Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58aj-ss-2
part of: 58AJ Extension to external Territories and outside of Australia
note: Extension of SPF provisions to acts outside Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.205
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58aj-ss-2-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58aj-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58AJ(2) Extension to external Territories and outside of Australia
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

58AK Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of regulated entities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ak
has part: 58AK(1) Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of regulated entities
has part: 58AK(2) Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of regulated entities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.205

58AK(1) Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of regulated entities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ak-ss-1
part of: 58AK Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of regulated entities
note: Section applies SPF provisions to regulated entities in a corresponding way.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.205
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ak-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ak-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ak-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Section applies to regulated entities.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58AK(2) Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of regulated entities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ak-ss-2
part of: 58AK Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of regulated entities
note: Regulated entities' agents must comply with SPF provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.205
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ak-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ak-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ak-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58AK(2) Acts done by or in relation to agents etc. of regulated entities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ak-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
premise text: Regulated entities' agents must comply with SPF provisions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BA Simplified outline of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ba
note: Each regulated entity must comply with the Scams Prevention Framework principles.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.207
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ba-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ba-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ba-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58BA Simplified outline of this Division
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ba-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulated entities must comply with the framework.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BB Meaning of reasonable steps
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bb
note: Matters relevant to determining reasonable steps for regulated entities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.207
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bb-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bb-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58BB Meaning of reasonable steps
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

58BC Simplified outline of this Subdivision
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bc
note: Governance policies and procedures must be implemented and reviewed annually.
description: Records of compliance, annual certification by senior officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.208
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bc-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bc-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulated entity must implement governance policies and procedures.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BD Documenting and implementing governance policies and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bd
has part: 58BD(1) Documenting and implementing governance policies and
has part: 58BD(2) Documenting and implementing governance policies and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.208

58BD(1) Documenting and implementing governance policies and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bd-ss-1
part of: 58BD Documenting and implementing governance policies and
note: Document governance policies and procedures about scams prevention, implement them, and develop performance metrics.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.208
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bd-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Entity must document and implement governance policies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BD(2) Documenting and implementing governance policies and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bd-ss-2
part of: 58BD Documenting and implementing governance policies and
note: Civil penalty provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.208
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bd-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bd-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58BD(2) Documenting and implementing governance policies and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Identifies a civil penalty provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bd-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has subclass
logic summary: Classifies as a principle for section 58FJ
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BE Annual certification about SPF governance policies,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58be
has part: 58BE(1) Annual certification about SPF governance policies,
has part: 58BE(2) Annual certification about SPF governance policies,
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.209

58BE(1) Annual certification about SPF governance policies,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58be-ss-1
part of: 58BE Annual certification about SPF governance policies,
note: Annual certification about SPF governance policies is required.
description: Certification from senior officer within 12 months or 7 days after each 12-month anniversary
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.209
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58be-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58be-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58be-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulated entity must provide certification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BE(2) Annual certification about SPF governance policies,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58be-ss-2
part of: 58BE Annual certification about SPF governance policies,
note: Annual certification about SPF governance policies is a civil penalty provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.209
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58be-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58be-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58be-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58be-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58BE(2) Annual certification about SPF governance policies,
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58be-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Subsection (1) is an obligation.
premise text: (2)
conclusion text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58be-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass
logic summary: Subsection (1) has the class of a civil penalty provision.
premise text: (2)
conclusion text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BF Record keeping of compliance with SPF provisions—civil
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bf
note: Failure to keep records of material information for at least 6 years after activity
description: Records of SPF governance policies, procedures, metrics and targets
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.209
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bf-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bf-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bf-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Regulated entity has an obligation to keep records
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BG Reporting about compliance with this Subdivision—civil
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bg
has part: 58BG(1) Reporting about compliance with this Subdivision—civil
has part: 58BG(2) Reporting about compliance with this Subdivision—civil
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.210

58BG(1) Reporting about compliance with this Subdivision—civil
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bg-ss-1
part of: 58BG Reporting about compliance with this Subdivision—civil
note: Failure to comply with written request for records within 10 business days or longer period allowed by regulator.
description: Records requested by the SPF general regulator or sector regulator
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.210
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bg-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bg-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 58BG(1) Reporting about compliance with this Subdivision—civil
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of non-compliance with written request for records
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BG(2) Reporting about compliance with this Subdivision—civil
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bg-ss-2
part of: 58BG Reporting about compliance with this Subdivision—civil
note: Reporting about compliance with this Subdivision—civil
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.210
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bg-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bg-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58BG(2) Reporting about compliance with this Subdivision—civil
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Reporting obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bg-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
logic summary: Classification of subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BH Sector-specific details can be set out in SPF codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bh
note: Regulated entity must include sector-specific provisions in governance policies and procedures.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.211
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bh-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bh-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bh-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58BH Sector-specific details can be set out in SPF codes
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bh-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulated entity must include sector-specific provisions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BI Simplified outline of this Subdivision
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bi
note: Take reasonable steps to prevent scams
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.211
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bi-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bi-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bi-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to take action
premise text: sector-specific provisions for this principle
conclusion text: Take reasonable steps to prevent scams
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BJ Taking reasonable steps to prevent scams from being
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bj
has part: 58BJ(1) Taking reasonable steps to prevent scams from being
has part: 58BJ(2) Taking reasonable steps to prevent scams from being
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.211

58BJ(1) Taking reasonable steps to prevent scams from being
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bj-ss-1
part of: 58BJ Taking reasonable steps to prevent scams from being
note: Failing to prevent scams from being committed
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.211
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bj-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to prevent scams
premise text: Regulated entity must take reasonable steps
conclusion text: Failure to do so is a contravention
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BJ(2) Taking reasonable steps to prevent scams from being
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bj-ss-2
part of: 58BJ Taking reasonable steps to prevent scams from being
note: Taking reasonable steps to prevent scams from being
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.211
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bj-ss-2-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bj-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58BJ(2) Taking reasonable steps to prevent scams from being
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

58BK Further detail about certain concepts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bk
has part: 58BK(1) Further detail about certain concepts
has part: 58BK(2) Further detail about certain concepts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.212

58BK(1) Further detail about certain concepts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bk-ss-1
part of: 58BK Further detail about certain concepts
note: Requires regulated entities to take reasonable steps beyond actionable scam intelligence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.212
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bk-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bk-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58BK(1) Further detail about certain concepts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Expresses a requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BK(2) Further detail about certain concepts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bk-ss-2
part of: 58BK Further detail about certain concepts
note: Identify SPF consumers at risk of being targeted by a scam
description: Information about scams to identified consumers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.212
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bk-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to identify SPF consumers
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BL Simplified outline of this Subdivision
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bl
note: Must take reasonable steps to detect scams
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.212
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bl-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bl-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bl-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bl-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bl-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bl-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bl-logic-cogai-6

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bl-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to take action
premise text: Regulated entity for a regulated sector must detect scams
conclusion text: Must take reasonable steps to detect scams
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bl-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS-A
logic summary: Class hierarchy: Obligation -> Action -> Scam Detection
premise text: Scam detection is a type of action
conclusion text: Scam detection is an obligation for regulated entities
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bl-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval: Must take reasonable steps to detect scams within a timely way
premise text: Timely way is a temporal interval
conclusion text: Must take reasonable steps to detect scams within a timely way
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bl-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Investigating activities may imply identifying consumers impacted by scams
premise text: Investigating activities implies taking action
conclusion text: Identifying consumers impacted by scams may be implied by investigating activities
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bl-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: AND
logic summary: Multiple obligations: Regulated entity must detect scams and identify impacted consumers
premise text: Regulated entity has multiple obligations
conclusion text: Regulated entity must detect scams and identify impacted consumers
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bl-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS-A
logic summary: Scam detection is a type of artificial intelligence application
premise text: Artificial intelligence applications are used for scam detection
conclusion text: Scam detection is an AI application
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BM Taking reasonable steps to detect scams—civil penalty
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bm
has part: 58BM(1) Taking reasonable steps to detect scams—civil penalty
has part: 58BM(2) Taking reasonable steps to detect scams—civil penalty
has part: 58BM(3) Taking reasonable steps to detect scams—civil penalty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.213

58BM(1) Taking reasonable steps to detect scams—civil penalty
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bm-ss-1
part of: 58BM Taking reasonable steps to detect scams—civil penalty
note: Failing to take reasonable steps to detect scams is a contravention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.213
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bm-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to take reasonable steps
premise text: Regulated entity must take reasonable steps
conclusion text: Failure to do so is a contravention
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BM(2) Taking reasonable steps to detect scams—civil penalty
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bm-ss-2
part of: 58BM Taking reasonable steps to detect scams—civil penalty
note: Civil penalty for taking reasonable steps to detect scams
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.213
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bm-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bm-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bm-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58BM(2) Taking reasonable steps to detect scams—civil penalty
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Obligation on the state
premise text: Section 58FJ (about civil penalties)
conclusion text: Subsection (1) is a civil penalty provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bm-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
logic summary: Classification of subsection (1)
premise text: SPF principle for the purposes of section 58FJ
conclusion text: Subsection (1) is a civil penalty provision of an SPF principle
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BM(3) Taking reasonable steps to detect scams—civil penalty
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bm-ss-3
part of: 58BM Taking reasonable steps to detect scams—civil penalty
note: Fails to take reasonable steps to detect scams
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.213
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bm-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bm-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bm-ss-3-logic-ltl-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Fail
logic summary: Failure to perform an obligation
premise text: Taking reasonable steps to detect scams is an obligation.
conclusion text: The regulated entity fails to take reasonable steps to detect scams.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bm-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: The obligation applies within a specific time frame
premise text: The obligation to take reasonable steps to detect scams applies within a specific time frame.
conclusion text: The obligation applies within a specific time frame.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bm-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: The obligation is recurring
premise text: The regulated entity must take reasonable steps to detect scams repeatedly.
conclusion text: The obligation is recurring.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BN Investigating actionable scam intelligence—civil penalty
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bn
has part: 58BN(1) Investigating actionable scam intelligence—civil penalty
has part: 58BN(2) Investigating actionable scam intelligence—civil penalty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.213

58BN(1) Investigating actionable scam intelligence—civil penalty
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bn-ss-1
part of: 58BN Investigating actionable scam intelligence—civil penalty
note: Failing to investigate actionable scam intelligence within a 28-day period is an obligation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.213
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bn-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to investigate
premise text: Regulated entity has actionable scam intelligence
conclusion text: Fails to investigate within 28-day period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BN(2) Investigating actionable scam intelligence—civil penalty
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bn-ss-2
part of: 58BN Investigating actionable scam intelligence—civil penalty
note: Civil penalty provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.213
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bn-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bn-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bn-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58BN(2) Investigating actionable scam intelligence—civil penalty
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Identifies a civil penalty provision
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is a civil penalty provision.
conclusion text: Subsection (1) is a civil penalty provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bn-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is
logic summary: Identifies a principle for the purposes of section 58FJ
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is a civil penalty provision of an SPF principle for the purposes of section 58FJ.
conclusion text: Subsection (1) is a civil penalty provision of an SPF principle for the purposes of section 58FJ.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BO Identifying impacted SPF consumers—civil penalty provision
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bo
note: Civil penalty for contravening subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.213
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bo-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bo-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bo-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits regulated entity from contravening subsection
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BP Sector-specific details can be set out in SPF codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bp
note: Regulated sector may include sector-specific provisions describing reasonable steps and time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.214
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bp-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bp-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bp-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58BP Sector-specific details can be set out in SPF codes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bp-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes sector-specific provisions
premise text: SPF code for a regulated sector may include...
conclusion text: ...sector-specific provisions describing...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

58BQ Simplified outline of this Subdivision
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bq
note: Must provide reports on actionable intelligence and scams to SPF regulators.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.214
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bq-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bq-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bq-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide reports
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BR Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58br
has part: 58BR(1) Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—
has part: 58BR(2) Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—
has part: 58BR(3) Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—
has part: 58BR(4) Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—
has part: 58BR(5) Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.215

58BR(1) Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58br-ss-1
part of: 58BR Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—
note: Reporting of actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators is required.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.215
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Mandatory reporting
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BR(2) Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58br-ss-2
part of: 58BR Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—
note: Entity must report actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulator within prescribed period and manner.
description: True
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.215
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58BR(2) Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Entity must report actionable scam intelligence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BR(3) Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58br-ss-3
part of: 58BR Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—
note: Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.215
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58BR(3) Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS OF
logic summary: Subsection (2) is a civil penalty provision
premise text: SPF principle
conclusion text: Section 58FJ
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BR(4) Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58br-ss-4
part of: 58BR Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—
note: Entity exempt from reporting if circumstances apply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.215
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-4-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58BR(4) Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

58BR(5) Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58br-ss-5
part of: 58BR Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—
note: Reporting requirements for actionable scam intelligence
description: report, sources/evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.215
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58BR(5) Reporting actionable scam intelligence to SPF regulators—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58br-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Reporting requirement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BS Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bs
has part: 58BS(1) Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
has part: 58BS(2) Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
has part: 58BS(3) Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
has part: 58BS(4) Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
has part: 58BS(5) Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
has part: 58BS(6) Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.216

58BS(1) Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bs-ss-1
part of: 58BS Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
note: Regulated entity must provide report to SPF regulator upon request.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.216
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58BS(1) Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulated entity must provide report.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BS(2) Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bs-ss-2
part of: 58BS Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
note: Entity must report scam information to SPF regulator within specified period and manner.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.216
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58BS(2) Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Entity must report scam information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BS(3) Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bs-ss-3
part of: 58BS Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
note: Civil penalty provision for reporting scams to SPF regulators
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.216
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-3-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-3-logic-cogai-6

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58BS(3) Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Identifies a civil penalty provision
premise text: Subsection (2) is a civil penalty provision.
conclusion text: It is an obligation to report scams to SPF regulators.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
logic summary: Classifies subsection (2) as a principle for section 58FJ
premise text: This means subsection (2) is a civil penalty provision of an SPF principle.
conclusion text: Subsection (2) is a principle for section 58FJ.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between subsection (2) and section 58FJ
premise text: It applies to section 58FJ about civil penalties.
conclusion text: Subsection (2) occurs during the application of section 58FJ.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-3-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Establishes a logical connection between subsection (2) and reporting scams to SPF regulators
premise text: Reporting scams to SPF regulators is required by law.
conclusion text: Subsection (2) implies that reporting scams to SPF regulators is necessary.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: is
logic summary: Identifies the scope of subsection (2)
premise text: This applies to all cases where a scam is reported to SPF regulators.
conclusion text: Subsection (2) applies to all cases where a scam is reported to SPF regulators.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: is
logic summary: Recognizes the artificial intelligence aspect of subsection (2)
premise text: This provision is part of an SPF principle.
conclusion text: Subsection (2) is a rule for artificial intelligence systems.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BS(4) Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bs-ss-4
part of: 58BS Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
note: Request for report format and content
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.216
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Request for report format and content
conclusion text: true
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BS(5) Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bs-ss-5
part of: 58BS Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
note: Entity must de-identify personal information unless SPF regulator believes it's necessary.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.216
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58BS(5) Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Entity must de-identify personal information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BS(6) Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bs-ss-6
part of: 58BS Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
note: A regulated entity must provide a later scam report that references an earlier report to another SPF regulator.
description: True
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.216
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-6-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-6-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58BS(6) Reporting scams to SPF regulators—civil penalty provisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: The regulated entity must provide the later scam report.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The later scam report is related in time to the earlier scam report.
premise text: (b) another SPF regulator later requests a scam report under this section from the regulated entity about the same matters;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-6-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: The regulated entity's obligation to provide the later scam report implies that it must state the earlier scam report.
premise text: (a) a regulated entity gives a scam report to an SPF regulator under this section;
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: The obligation to provide the later scam report is propagated from the first-mentioned SPF regulator.
premise text: (b) another SPF regulator later requests a scam report under this section from the regulated entity about the same matters;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bs-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: The regulated entity's obligation to provide the later scam report is inferred from its earlier action.
premise text: (a) a regulated entity gives a scam report to an SPF regulator under this section;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BT Authorised third party data gateways, portals or websites for
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bt
has part: 58BT(1) Authorised third party data gateways, portals or websites for
has part: 58BT(2) Authorised third party data gateways, portals or websites for
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.217

58BT(1) Authorised third party data gateways, portals or websites for
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bt-ss-1
part of: 58BT Authorised third party data gateways, portals or websites for
note: Authorises third parties to operate data gateways, portals or websites.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.217
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bt-ss-1-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bt-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58BT(1) Authorised third party data gateways, portals or websites for
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

58BT(2) Authorised third party data gateways, portals or websites for
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bt-ss-2
part of: 58BT Authorised third party data gateways, portals or websites for
note: Authorisation criteria and conditions for SPF general regulator
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.217
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bt-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bt-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bt-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58BT(2) Authorised third party data gateways, portals or websites for
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bt-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <>
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: Provisions providing that authorisations may be granted at different levels corresponding to different risks
conclusion text: Risk-based authorisation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BU Relationship with other duties and obligations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bu
note: Duty of confidence is overridden by conflicting obligations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.218
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bu-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bu-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bu-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58BU Relationship with other duties and obligations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bu-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: overriddenBy
logic summary: Obligation override
premise text: Duty of confidence
conclusion text: Conflicting obligation takes precedence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BV SPF general regulator may share information relating to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bv
has part: 58BV(1) SPF general regulator may share information relating to
has part: 58BV(2) SPF general regulator may share information relating to
has part: 58BV(3) SPF general regulator may share information relating to
has part: 58BV(4) SPF general regulator may share information relating to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.218

58BV(1) SPF general regulator may share information relating to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bv-ss-1
part of: 58BV SPF general regulator may share information relating to
note: Disclosure of information relating to scamming actions is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.218
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-1-logic-cogai-6

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
premise text: SPF general regulator may disclose information
conclusion text: to an entity mentioned in subsection (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of information as personal or non-personal
premise text: This includes disclosing SPF personal information, but such information may first need to be de-identified
conclusion text: see subsection (4)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between disclosure and de-identification
premise text: Note 1: This includes disclosing SPF personal information, but such information may first need to be de-identified (see subsection (4))
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of disclosure and de-identification
premise text: Note 1: This includes disclosing SPF personal information, but such information may first need to be de-identified (see subsection (4))
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread of information
logic summary: Spread of information about disclosure and de-identification
premise text: Note 1: This includes disclosing SPF personal information, but such information may first need to be de-identified (see subsection (4))
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-1-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge graph construction
logic summary: Construction of knowledge graph about disclosure and de-identification
premise text: Note 1: This includes disclosing SPF personal information, but such information may first need to be de-identified (see subsection (4))
conclusion text: None
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

58BV(2) SPF general regulator may share information relating to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bv-ss-2
part of: 58BV SPF general regulator may share information relating to
note: Entities that may share information relating to SPF general regulator
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.218
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58BV(2) SPF general regulator may share information relating to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shares
logic summary: Sharing obligation
premise text: Entities may share information
conclusion text: Obligation to share
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BV(3) SPF general regulator may share information relating to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bv-ss-3
part of: 58BV SPF general regulator may share information relating to
note: SPF general regulator may share information relating to a foreign agency if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.218
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligates
logic summary: The agency is obligated to control the storage and handling of the information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BV(4) SPF general regulator may share information relating to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bv-ss-4
part of: 58BV SPF general regulator may share information relating to
note: Disclosure of personal information under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.218
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bv-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to disclose personal information under certain conditions.
premise text: SPF general regulator may share information relating to SPF personal information.
conclusion text: Disclosure of personal information must be made under subsection (1) unless de-identification is deemed necessary.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

58BW Simplified outline of this Subdivision
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bw
note: Must take reasonable steps to disrupt scam activities and prevent losses.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.220
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bw-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bw-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bw-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to take action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BX Taking reasonable steps to disrupt activities that are the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bx
has part: 58BX(1) Taking reasonable steps to disrupt activities that are the
has part: 58BX(2) Taking reasonable steps to disrupt activities that are the
has part: 58BX(3) Taking reasonable steps to disrupt activities that are the
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.220

58BX(1) Taking reasonable steps to disrupt activities that are the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bx-ss-1
part of: 58BX Taking reasonable steps to disrupt activities that are the
note: Failing to disrupt or prevent loss from scam activity is an obligation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.220
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to disrupt or prevent loss from scam activity.
premise text: Regulated entity has actionable scam intelligence.
conclusion text: Failing to act is a contravention.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BX(2) Taking reasonable steps to disrupt activities that are the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bx-ss-2
part of: 58BX Taking reasonable steps to disrupt activities that are the
note: Disrupt activities that are the subject of a civil penalty provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.220
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-2-logic-shacl-6

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits activities that are the subject of a civil penalty provision.
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is a civil penalty provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies subsection (1) as a civil penalty provision.
premise text: This means subsection (1) is a civil penalty provision of an SPF principle for the purposes of section 58FJ.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Disruption
logic summary: Disrupts activities that are the subject of a civil penalty provision at a reasonable time.
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is a civil penalty provision.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Disruption
logic summary: Disrupts activities that are the subject of a civil penalty provision repeatedly.
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is a civil penalty provision.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Reasonable Disruption
logic summary: Disrupts activities that are the subject of a civil penalty provision in a reasonable manner.
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is a civil penalty provision.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-2-logic-shacl-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validate Disruption
logic summary: Validates that the disruption of activities is reasonable.
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is a civil penalty provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BX(3) Taking reasonable steps to disrupt activities that are the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bx-ss-3
part of: 58BX Taking reasonable steps to disrupt activities that are the
note: Taking reasonable steps to disrupt activities that are the actionable scam intelligence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.220
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58BX(3) Taking reasonable steps to disrupt activities that are the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: should
logic summary: Should take reasonable steps
premise text: The entity has actionable scam intelligence
conclusion text: Take proportionate steps
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BY Reporting about the outcomes of investigations of activities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58by
has part: 58BY(1) Reporting about the outcomes of investigations of activities
has part: 58BY(2) Reporting about the outcomes of investigations of activities
has part: 58BY(3) Reporting about the outcomes of investigations of activities
has part: 58BY(4) Reporting about the outcomes of investigations of activities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.221

58BY(1) Reporting about the outcomes of investigations of activities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58by-ss-1
part of: 58BY Reporting about the outcomes of investigations of activities
note: Reporting about outcomes of investigations of activities related to regulated services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.221
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58by-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58by-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58by-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Reporting obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BY(2) Reporting about the outcomes of investigations of activities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58by-ss-2
part of: 58BY Reporting about the outcomes of investigations of activities
note: Entity must report actionable scam intelligence to SPF general regulator within prescribed timeframe and format.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.221
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58by-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58by-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58by-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58BY(2) Reporting about the outcomes of investigations of activities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58by-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Entity must report actionable scam intelligence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BY(3) Reporting about the outcomes of investigations of activities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58by-ss-3
part of: 58BY Reporting about the outcomes of investigations of activities
note: Reporting about investigation outcomes is a civil penalty provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.221
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58by-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58by-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58by-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58by-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58BY(3) Reporting about the outcomes of investigations of activities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58by-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must report investigation outcomes.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58by-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS OF
logic summary: Subsection (2) is a civil penalty provision.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BY(4) Reporting about the outcomes of investigations of activities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58by-ss-4
part of: 58BY Reporting about the outcomes of investigations of activities
note: Rules for reporting outcomes of investigations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.221
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58by-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58by-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58by-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58BY(4) Reporting about the outcomes of investigations of activities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58by-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Reporting obligation
premise text: (4) For the purposes of (but without limiting) subsection (2)
conclusion text: the SPF rules may prescribe
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

58BZ Sector-specific details can be set out in SPF codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bz
has part: 58BZ(1) Sector-specific details can be set out in SPF codes
has part: 58BZ(2) Sector-specific details can be set out in SPF codes
has part: 58BZ(3) Sector-specific details can be set out in SPF codes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.222

58BZ(1) Sector-specific details can be set out in SPF codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bz-ss-1
part of: 58BZ Sector-specific details can be set out in SPF codes
note: Regulated entities must have actionable scam intelligence about certain activities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.222
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bz-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulated entities must have actionable scam intelligence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BZ(2) Sector-specific details can be set out in SPF codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bz-ss-2
part of: 58BZ Sector-specific details can be set out in SPF codes
note: The regulated entity is not liable for taking action to disrupt an activity if it is taken in good faith, compliance with SPF provisions, and proportionate to the activity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.222
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bz-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bz-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bz-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bz-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The regulated entity has an obligation not to be liable for taking action to disrupt an activity.
premise text: The action must be taken in good faith, compliance with SPF provisions, and proportionate to the activity.
conclusion text: The regulated entity is not liable.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bz-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The action must be taken during the period when the intelligence becomes actionable scam intelligence for the entity.
premise text: The action must start on the day that the intelligence becomes actionable scam intelligence for the entity.
conclusion text: The action must end before 28 days after the entity reasonably believes that the activity is or is not a scam.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bz-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: The action must be promptly reversed if the entity identifies that the activity is not a scam.
premise text: The entity identifies that the activity is not a scam.
conclusion text: The action must be reversed.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bz-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: The regulated entity has permission to take action to disrupt an activity if it is taken in good faith, compliance with SPF provisions, and proportionate to the activity.
premise text: The action must be taken in good faith, compliance with SPF provisions, and proportionate to the activity.
conclusion text: The regulated entity has permission to take action to disrupt an activity.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58BZ(3) Sector-specific details can be set out in SPF codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58bz-ss-3
part of: 58BZ Sector-specific details can be set out in SPF codes
note: Must have an accessible mechanism for consumers to report scams and a transparent internal dispute resolution mechanism.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.222
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bz-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bz-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58bz-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must have an accessible mechanism for consumers to report scams and a transparent internal dispute resolution mechanism.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58CA Simplified outline of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ca
note: Minister may make code for regulated sector with sector-specific provisions based on Scams Prevention Framework principles.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.230
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ca-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ca-logic-alleninterval-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ca-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for code implementation
premise text: Minister may make code
conclusion text: Code implementation starts now
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58CB Sector-specific codes (SPF codes)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58cb
note: The Minister may make a code for a regulated sector.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.230
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cb-norm

58CC Content of SPF codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58cc
has part: 58CC(1) Content of SPF codes
has part: 58CC(2) Content of SPF codes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.230

58CC(1) Content of SPF codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58cc-ss-1
part of: 58CC Content of SPF codes
note: SPF code must be consistent with SPF principles and deal with specific themes or matters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.230
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cc-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58CC(1) Content of SPF codes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: SPF code must be consistent with SPF principles.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58CC(2) Content of SPF codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58cc-ss-2
part of: 58CC Content of SPF codes
note: Regulated sector may include specific provisions regarding services, consumers, and requirements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.230
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cc-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cc-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cc-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cc-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cc-ss-2-logic-shacl-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58CC(2) Content of SPF codes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes specific provisions
premise text: (2) Without limiting subparagraph (1)(b)(ii), an SPF code for a regulated sector may include the following:
conclusion text: Provisions regarding services and consumers
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cc-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Includes provisions for specific dates or periods
premise text: (2) Without limiting subparagraph (1)(b)(ii), an SPF code for a regulated sector may include the following:
conclusion text: Provisions regarding services and consumers from a certain point in time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cc-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: for all
logic summary: Applies to all regulated entities
premise text: (2) Without limiting subparagraph (1)(b)(ii), an SPF code for a regulated sector may include the following:
conclusion text: All regulated entities must comply with provisions regarding services and consumers
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cc-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: has power
logic summary: Grants powers to the regulator or another person
premise text: (d) a provision that: (i) confers powers on the SPF sector regulator for the sector or on another person; or
conclusion text: The regulator has power to enforce provisions regarding services and consumers
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cc-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: validates
logic summary: Validates specific requirements
premise text: (f) provisions about the manner or form in which persons or bodies: (i) may exercise powers under the SPF code; or
conclusion text: Specific requirements must be met for exercising powers under the SPF code
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

58CD Delegation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58cd
note: Delegation of power under section 58CB
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.232
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58cd-norm

58DA Simplified outline of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58da
note: Authorise external dispute resolution schemes for consumer complaints about scams.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.234
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58da-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58da-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58da-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Authorise external dispute resolution schemes for consumer complaints about scams.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58DB Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58db
has part: 58DB(1) Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes
has part: 58DB(2) Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes
has part: 58DB(3) Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes
has part: 58DB(4) Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes
has part: 58DB(5) Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.234

58DB(1) Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58db-ss-1
part of: 58DB Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes
note: Authorise external dispute resolution schemes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.234
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58db-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58db-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58db-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 58DB(1) Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58db-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grant permission to authorise external dispute resolution schemes
premise text: The Minister may, by legislative instrument...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58DB(2) Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58db-ss-2
part of: 58DB Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes
note: Minister must consider certain factors before authorizing an external dispute resolution scheme.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.234
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58db-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58db-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58db-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58db-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister must consider certain factors.
premise text: (2) Before authorising a scheme, the Minister...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58db-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: The Minister must consider factors within a certain timeframe.
premise text: (2) Before authorising a scheme, the Minister...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58DB(3) Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58db-ss-3
part of: 58DB Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes
note: Authorisation of external dispute resolution schemes may be subject to conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.234
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58db-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58db-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58db-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to authorise external dispute resolution schemes.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58DB(4) Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58db-ss-4
part of: 58DB Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes
note: Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.234
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58db-ss-4-norm

58DB(5) Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58db-ss-5
part of: 58DB Minister may authorise external dispute resolution schemes
note: Authorise multiple external dispute resolution schemes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.234
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58db-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58db-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58db-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow
logic summary: Grant permission to authorise schemes
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58DC Content, including requirements, of a scheme that is not
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58dc
has part: 58DC(1) Content, including requirements, of a scheme that is not
has part: 58DC(2) Content, including requirements, of a scheme that is not
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.235

58DC(1) Content, including requirements, of a scheme that is not
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58dc-ss-1
part of: 58DC Content, including requirements, of a scheme that is not
note: Requirements for a scheme that is not exempt from the SPF rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.235
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dc-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dc-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dc-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58DC(1) Content, including requirements, of a scheme that is not
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prescribes
logic summary: Requires a scheme to meet certain standards
premise text: (1) The SPF rules may prescribe...
conclusion text: ...requirements for a scheme that is not exempt from the SPF rules
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dc-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires organisational requirements for membership of the scheme
premise text: (a) organisational requirements for membership of the scheme;
conclusion text: ...requirements for how the scheme is to operate:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dc-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires requirements for making changes to the scheme
premise text: (e) requirements for making changes to the scheme.
conclusion text: ...requirements for making changes to the scheme
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58DC(2) Content, including requirements, of a scheme that is not
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58dc-ss-2
part of: 58DC Content, including requirements, of a scheme that is not
note: Provisions for powers under the scheme
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.235
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dc-ss-2-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58DC(2) Content, including requirements, of a scheme that is not
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

58DD Scheme operator to report to SPF regulators
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58dd
has part: 58DD(1) Scheme operator to report to SPF regulators
has part: 58DD(2) Scheme operator to report to SPF regulators
has part: 58DD(3) Scheme operator to report to SPF regulators
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.236

58DD(1) Scheme operator to report to SPF regulators
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58dd-ss-1
part of: 58DD Scheme operator to report to SPF regulators
note: Operator must report to regulators on serious contraventions, failures, or systemic issues
description: particulars of the contravention, failure or issue
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.236
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dd-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Operator has a duty to report
conclusion text: report particulars of contravention, failure or issue
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58DD(2) Scheme operator to report to SPF regulators
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58dd-ss-2
part of: 58DD Scheme operator to report to SPF regulators
note: Operator must report settlement particulars to SPF regulators
description: De-identifying any SPF personal information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.236
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dd-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Operator must report settlement particulars to SPF regulators
conclusion text: De-identifying any SPF personal information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58DD(3) Scheme operator to report to SPF regulators
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58dd-ss-3
part of: 58DD Scheme operator to report to SPF regulators
note: Operator must de-identify SPF personal information unless reasonable belief that doing so would not achieve object of Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.236
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dd-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58dd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58DE Disclosing information to the operator of an SPF EDR scheme
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58de
has part: 58DE(1) Disclosing information to the operator of an SPF EDR scheme
has part: 58DE(2) Disclosing information to the operator of an SPF EDR scheme
has part: 58DE(3) Disclosing information to the operator of an SPF EDR scheme
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.237

58DE(1) Disclosing information to the operator of an SPF EDR scheme
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58de-ss-1
part of: 58DE Disclosing information to the operator of an SPF EDR scheme
note: Disclosure of information to the operator of an SPF EDR scheme for enabling or assisting its functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.237
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58de-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58de-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58de-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to disclose information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58DE(2) Disclosing information to the operator of an SPF EDR scheme
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58de-ss-2
part of: 58DE Disclosing information to the operator of an SPF EDR scheme
note: Operator must comply with conditions imposed by the regulator.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.237
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58de-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58de-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58de-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory compliance
premise text: The regulator may impose conditions.
conclusion text: Operator must comply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58DE(3) Disclosing information to the operator of an SPF EDR scheme
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58de-ss-3
part of: 58DE Disclosing information to the operator of an SPF EDR scheme
note: Must de-identify personal information unless reasonable belief that doing so would not achieve the object of this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.237
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58de-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58de-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58de-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58EA Simplified outline of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ea
note: The Commission is the regulator of most aspects of the Scams Prevention Framework.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.238
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ea-norm

58EB General regulator of the Scams Prevention Framework
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58eb
has part: 58EB(1) General regulator of the Scams Prevention Framework
has part: 58EB(2) General regulator of the Scams Prevention Framework
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.238

58EB(1) General regulator of the Scams Prevention Framework
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58eb-ss-1
part of: 58EB General regulator of the Scams Prevention Framework
note: Commission is the general regulator for SPF provisions apart from SPF codes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.238
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eb-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58EB(1) General regulator of the Scams Prevention Framework
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Commission is the general regulator.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58EB(2) General regulator of the Scams Prevention Framework
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58eb-ss-2
part of: 58EB General regulator of the Scams Prevention Framework
note: The SPF general regulator has obligations to review, advise, monitor, investigate and enforce compliance with the SPF provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.238
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eb-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eb-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58EB(2) General regulator of the Scams Prevention Framework
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: The regulator has obligations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eb-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
logic summary: The regulator's powers are part of the SPF provisions.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58EC Delegation of the SPF general regulator’s functions and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ec
has part: 58EC(1) Delegation of the SPF general regulator’s functions and
has part: 58EC(2) Delegation of the SPF general regulator’s functions and
has part: 58EC(3) Delegation of the SPF general regulator’s functions and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.239

58EC(1) Delegation of the SPF general regulator’s functions and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ec-ss-1
part of: 58EC Delegation of the SPF general regulator’s functions and
note: Delegation of SPF general regulator’s functions and powers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.239
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ec-ss-1-norm

58EC(2) Delegation of the SPF general regulator’s functions and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ec-ss-2
part of: 58EC Delegation of the SPF general regulator’s functions and
note: Delegation of powers under section 155 to a designated person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.239
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ec-ss-2-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ec-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 58EC(2) Delegation of the SPF general regulator’s functions and
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

58EC(3) Delegation of the SPF general regulator’s functions and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ec-ss-3
part of: 58EC Delegation of the SPF general regulator’s functions and
note: Delegation of certain functions to Commission members and employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.239
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ec-ss-3-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ec-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58EC(3) Delegation of the SPF general regulator’s functions and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

58ED Regulator of a regulated sector
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ed
has part: 58ED(1) Regulator of a regulated sector
has part: 58ED(2) Regulator of a regulated sector
has part: 58ED(3) Regulator of a regulated sector
has part: 58ED(4) Regulator of a regulated sector
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.240

58ED(1) Regulator of a regulated sector
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ed-ss-1
part of: 58ED Regulator of a regulated sector
note: The Minister may designate an entity as the sector regulator.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.240
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58ED(1) Regulator of a regulated sector
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Designation is a power of the Minister.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: The designation must be made within the meaning of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58ED(2) Regulator of a regulated sector
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ed-ss-2
part of: 58ED Regulator of a regulated sector
note: The Commission is the SPF sector regulator for a regulated sector if no instrument under subsection (1) is in force for the sector.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.240
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58ED(2) Regulator of a regulated sector
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Establishes a conditional obligation on the Commission to regulate the sector
premise text: No instrument under subsection (1) is in force for the sector
conclusion text: The Commission must regulate the sector if no instrument under subsection (1) is in force
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies the Commission as the SPF sector regulator
premise text: The Commission is designated under subsection (1)
conclusion text: The Commission is the SPF sector regulator for a regulated sector
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: while
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relationship between the Commission's designation and its regulation of the sector
premise text: No instrument under subsection (1) is in force for the sector
conclusion text: The Commission regulates the sector while no instrument under subsection (1) is in force
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: if
logic summary: Establishes a conditional relationship between the Commission's designation and its regulation of the sector
premise text: No instrument under subsection (1) is in force for the sector
conclusion text: The Commission must regulate the sector if no instrument under subsection (1) is in force
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

58ED(3) Regulator of a regulated sector
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ed-ss-3
part of: 58ED Regulator of a regulated sector
note: Regulator of a regulated sector must monitor, investigate and enforce compliance with the provisions of the SPF code for the sector.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.240
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58ED(3) Regulator of a regulated sector
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must perform actions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58ED(4) Regulator of a regulated sector
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ed-ss-4
part of: 58ED Regulator of a regulated sector
note: The Minister may delegate power to another Minister in writing.
references: Acts Interpretation Act 1901
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.240
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ed-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

58EE Delegation of an SPF sector regulator’s functions and powers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ee
note: Delegation of SPF sector regulator's functions and powers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.241
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ee-norm

58EF Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ef
has part: 58EF(1) Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention
has part: 58EF(2) Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention
has part: 58EF(3) Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention
has part: 58EF(4) Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention
has part: 58EF(5) Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.242

58EF(1) Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ef-ss-1
part of: 58EF Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention
note: SPF general regulator and sector regulators must enter into an arrangement for regulation and enforcement. Publish a statement on its website summarising roles and responsibilities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.242
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58EF(1) Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to enter into an arrangement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Must publish a statement on its website.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58EF(2) Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ef-ss-2
part of: 58EF Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention
note: The SPF general regulator may choose to comply with subsection (1) by entering into a single arrangement or separate arrangements with one or more sector regulators. Must consult entities before publishing statement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.242
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consult entities
premise text: The SPF general regulator must consult the entities mentioned in subsection (1)
conclusion text: There is an obligation to consult entities
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEFORE
logic summary: Consultation must occur before publishing statement
premise text: The SPF general regulator must consult the entities mentioned in subsection (1) before publishing the statement
conclusion text: Consultation must occur before publishing statement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Consultation implies publication of statement
premise text: The SPF general regulator must consult the entities mentioned in subsection (1) before publishing the statement
conclusion text: Publication of statement implies consultation
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Consultation is a necessary condition for publication
premise text: The SPF general regulator must consult the entities mentioned in subsection (1) before publishing the statement
conclusion text: Consultation is a necessary condition for publication
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Consultation is an essential requirement for publication
premise text: The SPF general regulator must consult the entities mentioned in subsection (1) before publishing the statement
conclusion text: Consultation is an essential requirement for publication
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58EF(3) Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ef-ss-3
part of: 58EF Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention
note: The statement is not a legislative instrument. Provisions relating to matters prescribed by the SPF rules must be included in arrangements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.242
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58EF(3) Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
conclusion text: The statement is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes provisions
premise text: Arrangements must include provisions
conclusion text: relating to matters prescribed by the SPF rules
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58EF(4) Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ef-ss-4
part of: 58EF Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention
note: Publish arrangement on website
description: Arrangement details
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.242
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58EF(5) Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ef-ss-5
part of: 58EF Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention
note: Failure to comply does not invalidate regulatory actions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.242
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58EF(5) Arrangements for regulating the Scams Prevention
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ef-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from compliance
premise text: Regulatory actions are not invalidated by non-compliance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58EG SPF regulators may disclose information to each other
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58eg
has part: 58EG(1) SPF regulators may disclose information to each other
has part: 58EG(2) SPF regulators may disclose information to each other
has part: 58EG(3) SPF regulators may disclose information to each other
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.244

58EG(1) SPF regulators may disclose information to each other
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58eg-ss-1
part of: 58EG SPF regulators may disclose information to each other
note: Disclosure of information between SPF regulators
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.244
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eg-ss-1-norm

58EG(2) SPF regulators may disclose information to each other
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58eg-ss-2
part of: 58EG SPF regulators may disclose information to each other
note: Disclosure of information by SPF regulators to each other is permitted.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.244
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eg-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eg-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission granted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eg-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Related provisions apply
premise text: 155AAA(1)(b)
conclusion text: 59DB
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58EG(3) SPF regulators may disclose information to each other
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58eg-ss-3
part of: 58EG SPF regulators may disclose information to each other
note: Disclosure of SPF personal information to each other
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.244
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eg-ss-3-norm

58EH Regard must be had to the object of this Part when
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58eh
note: Must consider object of Part when deciding to make disclosure
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.244
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eh-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eh-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58eh-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider object of Part
premise text: SPF regulator must have regard to the object of this Part
conclusion text: when deciding whether to make a disclosure under this Subdivision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

58EI Notice need not be given of a collection, use or disclosure of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ei
note: No notification required for certain actions under this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.244
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ei-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ei-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ei-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: -
logic summary: Regulator's obligation to notify
premise text: The SPF regulator plans to make a disclosure of information or documents under this Part
conclusion text: No obligation to notify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58EJ Information that need not be disclosed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ej
note: No disclosure of certain information required
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.245
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ej-norm

58FA Simplified outline of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fa
note: The Commission may monitor and investigate compliance with the Scams Prevention Framework.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.246
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fa-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fa-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: The Commission may perform an action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FB Appointment of inspectors
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fb
has part: 58FB(1) Appointment of inspectors
has part: 58FB(2) Appointment of inspectors
has part: 58FB(3) Appointment of inspectors
has part: 58FB(4) Appointment of inspectors
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.247

58FB(1) Appointment of inspectors
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fb-ss-1
part of: 58FB Appointment of inspectors
note: Appointment of inspectors
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.247
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fb-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Authorization to appoint inspectors
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FB(2) Appointment of inspectors
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fb-ss-2
part of: 58FB Appointment of inspectors
note: Must appoint inspector with appropriate qualifications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.247
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fb-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to appoint inspector
premise text: SPF regulator must not appoint...
conclusion text: ...unless the SPF regulator is satisfied...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FB(3) Appointment of inspectors
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fb-ss-3
part of: 58FB Appointment of inspectors
note: Comply with administrative directions as an inspector.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.247
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fb-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fb-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58FB(3) Appointment of inspectors
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory compliance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FB(4) Appointment of inspectors
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fb-ss-4
part of: 58FB Appointment of inspectors
note: SPF regulator acts as inspector if no appointments are in force
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.247
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fb-ss-4-norm

58FC Multiple remedies can be sought for a single contravention
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fc
note: Court's powers under other provisions not limited
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.248
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fc-norm

58FD Preference must be given to compensation for victims
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fd
note: Court must give preference to compensation over pecuniary penalty if defendant cannot pay both.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.248
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fd-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fd-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fd-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58FD Preference must be given to compensation for victims
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fd-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Preference
logic summary: Court must prioritize compensation over pecuniary penalty.
premise text: Defendant cannot pay both penalties.
conclusion text: Compensation takes precedence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FE Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fe
has part: 58FE(1) Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default
has part: 58FE(2) Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default
has part: 58FE(3) Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default
has part: 58FE(4) Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.248

58FE(1) Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fe-ss-1
part of: 58FE Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default
note: Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.248
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58FE(1) Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to monitor compliance with an SPF code—default
premise text: (1) This section applies for the SPF code for a regulated sector unless...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between sections
premise text: Section 58FE (1) and Chapter 4 Scams Prevention Framework Part IVF
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

58FE(2) Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fe-ss-2
part of: 58FE Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default
note: Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.248
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58FE(2) Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASSOF
logic summary: Part of a framework for monitoring compliance
premise text: Part 2 of the Regulatory Powers Act
conclusion text: includes powers of entry and inspection
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

58FE(3) Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fe-ss-3
part of: 58FE Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default
note: Monitoring of compliance with SPF code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.248
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58FE(3) Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to monitor compliance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Part of Regulatory Powers Act framework
premise text: Regulatory Powers Act
conclusion text: Part 2
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FE(4) Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fe-ss-4
part of: 58FE Monitoring compliance with an SPF code—default
note: Defines roles and courts for SPF sector regulator
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.248
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-4-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for courts
premise text: Each of the following courts is a relevant court: (i) the Federal Court; (ii) the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2); (iii) a court of a State or Territory that has jurisdiction in relation to the matter.
conclusion text: (i) the Federal Court
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines inspector's role
premise text: An inspector of the SPF sector regulator is an authorised person.
conclusion text: The inspector of the SPF sector regulator is an authorised applicant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
logic summary: Defines magistrate's role
premise text: A magistrate is an issuing officer.
conclusion text: The magistrate is an issuing officer.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fe-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines magistrate's role
premise text: A magistrate is an issuing officer.
conclusion text: The magistrate is an issuing officer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FF Investigating compliance with an SPF code—default
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ff
has part: 58FF(1) Investigating compliance with an SPF code—default
has part: 58FF(2) Investigating compliance with an SPF code—default
has part: 58FF(3) Investigating compliance with an SPF code—default
has part: 58FF(4) Investigating compliance with an SPF code—default
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.250

58FF(1) Investigating compliance with an SPF code—default
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ff-ss-1
part of: 58FF Investigating compliance with an SPF code—default
note: Default provision for investigating compliance with an SPF code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.250
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58FF(1) Investigating compliance with an SPF code—default
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Exempts from default provision
premise text: (ACMA, ASIC or Commission is sector regulator)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FF(2) Investigating compliance with an SPF code—default
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ff-ss-2
part of: 58FF Investigating compliance with an SPF code—default
note: Each civil penalty provision of the SPF code is subject to investigation under Part 3 of the Regulatory Powers Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.250
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58FF(2) Investigating compliance with an SPF code—default
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBJECT
logic summary: Subject to investigation
premise text: (2) Each civil penalty provision of the SPF code is subject to investigation under Part 3 of the Regulatory Powers Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS_OF
logic summary: Part 3 of the Regulatory Powers Act creates a framework for investigating whether a provision has been contravened
premise text: Part 3 of the Regulatory Powers Act creates a framework for investigating whether a provision has been contravened.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: MEETS
logic summary: Includes powers of entry, search and seizure
premise text: Part 3 of the Regulatory Powers Act includes powers of entry, search and seizure.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FF(3) Investigating compliance with an SPF code—default
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ff-ss-3
part of: 58FF Investigating compliance with an SPF code—default
note: Authorises inspector of SPF sector regulator to investigate compliance with SPF code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.250
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Authorisation
premise text: Inspector is authorised applicant
conclusion text: SPF sector regulator authorises inspector to investigate compliance with SPF code
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FF(4) Investigating compliance with an SPF code—default
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ff-ss-4
part of: 58FF Investigating compliance with an SPF code—default
note: Delegate powers and functions to an SES employee or acting SES employee of the SPF sector regulator
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.250
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 58FF(4) Investigating compliance with an SPF code—default
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ff-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: delegate
logic summary: Granting permission to delegate powers and functions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FG Monitoring or investigating—the ACMA
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fg
has part: 58FG(1) Monitoring or investigating—the ACMA
has part: 58FG(2) Monitoring or investigating—the ACMA
has part: 58FG(3) Monitoring or investigating—the ACMA
has part: 58FG(4) Monitoring or investigating—the ACMA
has part: 58FG(5) Monitoring or investigating—the ACMA
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.252

58FG(1) Monitoring or investigating—the ACMA
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fg-ss-1
part of: 58FG Monitoring or investigating—the ACMA
note: The ACMA must monitor or investigate if it is the sector regulator.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.252
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fg-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to monitor or investigate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FG(2) Monitoring or investigating—the ACMA
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fg-ss-2
part of: 58FG Monitoring or investigating—the ACMA
note: Monitoring or investigating—the ACMA
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.252
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fg-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fg-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the contravention of the SPF code for the sector
premise text: (2) Part 26 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 also applies:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fg-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with the Telecommunications Act 1997
premise text: (2) Part 26 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 also applies:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

58FG(3) Monitoring or investigating—the ACMA
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fg-ss-3
part of: 58FG Monitoring or investigating—the ACMA
note: The Minister may specify modifications to remove doubt about how provisions apply in relation to the SPF code. Part 27 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 applies to ACMA in its capacity as SPF sector regulator and in relation to performance of functions under SPF code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.252
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fg-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Part applies to ACMA
premise text: ACMA is the SPF sector regulator
conclusion text: Part applies to ACMA
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FG(4) Monitoring or investigating—the ACMA
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fg-ss-4
part of: 58FG Monitoring or investigating—the ACMA
note: Instrument has effect accordingly.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.252
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fg-ss-4-norm

58FG(5) Monitoring or investigating—the ACMA
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fg-ss-5
part of: 58FG Monitoring or investigating—the ACMA
note: Defines terms for ACMA's telecommunications functions and powers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.252
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fg-ss-5-norm

58FH Monitoring or investigating—ASIC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fh
has part: 58FH(1) Monitoring or investigating—ASIC
has part: 58FH(2) Monitoring or investigating—ASIC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.253

58FH(1) Monitoring or investigating—ASIC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fh-ss-1
part of: 58FH Monitoring or investigating—ASIC
note: Applicability condition for ASIC as sector regulator
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.253
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fh-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional applicability
premise text: ASIC is the SPF sector regulator for a regulated sector.
conclusion text: This section applies if ASIC is the SPF sector regulator for a regulated sector.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FH(2) Monitoring or investigating—ASIC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fh-ss-2
part of: 58FH Monitoring or investigating—ASIC
note: ASIC must monitor or investigate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.253
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fh-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to monitor or investigate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FI Monitoring or investigating—Minister may declare that
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fi
has part: 58FI(1) Monitoring or investigating—Minister may declare that
has part: 58FI(2) Monitoring or investigating—Minister may declare that
has part: 58FI(3) Monitoring or investigating—Minister may declare that
has part: 58FI(4) Monitoring or investigating—Minister may declare that
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.255

58FI(1) Monitoring or investigating—Minister may declare that
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fi-ss-1
part of: 58FI Monitoring or investigating—Minister may declare that
note: The Minister may declare that the provisions of another law provide an entity with powers to monitor compliance or investigate provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.255
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fi-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: The Minister may declare that the provisions of another law provide an entity with powers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FI(2) Monitoring or investigating—Minister may declare that
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fi-ss-2
part of: 58FI Monitoring or investigating—Minister may declare that
note: Minister may declare alternative power provisions apply to entity in its capacity as sector regulator and in relation to specified provisions of the SPF code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.255
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fi-ss-2-norm

58FI(3) Monitoring or investigating—Minister may declare that
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fi-ss-3
part of: 58FI Monitoring or investigating—Minister may declare that
note: Modifications for alternative power provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.255
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fi-ss-3-norm

58FI(4) Monitoring or investigating—Minister may declare that
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fi-ss-4
part of: 58FI Monitoring or investigating—Minister may declare that
note: The Minister may declare that the instrument has effect accordingly.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.255
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fi-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fi-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fi-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Declaration of obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FJ Civil penalty provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fj
has part: 58FJ(1) Civil penalty provisions
has part: 58FJ(2) Civil penalty provisions
has part: 58FJ(3) Civil penalty provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.256

58FJ(1) Civil penalty provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fj-ss-1
part of: 58FJ Civil penalty provisions
note: Civil penalty provisions enforceable under Part 4 of the Regulatory Powers Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.256
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fj-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fj-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fj-ss-1-logic-deontic-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fj-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58FJ(1) Civil penalty provisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: enforceable
logic summary: Obligation enforcement
premise text: Part 4 of the Regulatory Powers Act allows a civil penalty provision to be enforced
conclusion text: The provision is enforceable under Part 4
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fj-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: allowed
logic summary: Obligation allowance
premise text: Part 4 of the Regulatory Powers Act allows a civil penalty provision to be enforced
conclusion text: The provision is allowed under Part 4
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fj-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: authorized
logic summary: Obligation authorization
premise text: Part 4 of the Regulatory Powers Act allows an authorized applicant to enforce a civil penalty provision
conclusion text: The applicant is authorized to enforce the provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FJ(2) Civil penalty provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fj-ss-2
part of: 58FJ Civil penalty provisions
note: SPF general regulator and sector regulator are authorised applicants for civil penalty provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.256
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fj-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fj-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58FJ(2) Civil penalty provisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Authorized applicant
premise text: SPF general regulator and sector regulator are SPF applicants
conclusion text: are authorized applicants
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FJ(3) Civil penalty provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fj-ss-3
part of: 58FJ Civil penalty provisions
note: List of relevant courts for purposes of Part 4 of the Regulatory Powers Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.256
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fj-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fj-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fj-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58FJ(3) Civil penalty provisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fj-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: List of relevant courts for purposes of Part 4 of the Regulatory Powers Act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FK Maximum penalty for tier 1 contraventions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fk
has part: 58FK(1) Maximum penalty for tier 1 contraventions
has part: 58FK(2) Maximum penalty for tier 1 contraventions
has part: 58FK(3) Maximum penalty for tier 1 contraventions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.257

58FK(1) Maximum penalty for tier 1 contraventions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fk-ss-1
part of: 58FK Maximum penalty for tier 1 contraventions
note: Maximum penalty for tier 1 contraventions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.257
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fk-ss-1-norm

58FK(2) Maximum penalty for tier 1 contraventions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fk-ss-2
part of: 58FK Maximum penalty for tier 1 contraventions
note: Maximum penalty for tier 1 contraventions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.257
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fk-ss-2-norm

58FK(3) Maximum penalty for tier 1 contraventions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fk-ss-3
part of: 58FK Maximum penalty for tier 1 contraventions
note: Maximum penalty for tier 1 contraventions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.257
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fk-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fk-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fk-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fk-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits penalty units for tier 1 contraventions
premise text: (3) For the purposes of subsection (1)
conclusion text: 7,990 penalty units
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fk-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for penalty units
premise text: (3) For the purposes of subsection (1)
conclusion text: 7,990 penalty units
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

58FL Maximum penalty for tier 2 contraventions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fl
note: Maximum penalty for tier 2 contraventions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.257
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fl-norm

58FM Civil penalty double jeopardy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fm
note: No liability for pecuniary penalty in respect of particular conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.258
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fm-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fm-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fm-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FN Purpose and effect of this Subdivision
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fn
has part: 58FN(1) Purpose and effect of this Subdivision
has part: 58FN(2) Purpose and effect of this Subdivision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.259

58FN(1) Purpose and effect of this Subdivision
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fn-ss-1
part of: 58FN Purpose and effect of this Subdivision
note: Issue of infringement notice for alleged contravention of civil penalty provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.259
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fn-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fn-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fn-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58FN(1) Purpose and effect of this Subdivision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Issue of infringement notice
premise text: (1) The purpose of this Subdivision is to provide for the issue of an infringement notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fn-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Issue of infringement notice for alleged contravention of civil penalty provision
premise text: (b) a civil penalty provision of an SPF code;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FN(2) Purpose and effect of this Subdivision
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fn-ss-2
part of: 58FN Purpose and effect of this Subdivision
note: Exemptions from liability for SPF infringement notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.259
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fn-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fn-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fn-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fn-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fn-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58FN(2) Purpose and effect of this Subdivision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts from liability
premise text: (2) This Subdivision does not: (a) require an SPF infringement notice to be issued for an alleged contravention of such a civil penalty provision;
conclusion text: A person is exempt from liability.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fn-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
logic summary: Permits withdrawal of infringement notice
premise text: (2) This Subdivision does not: (ii) an SPF infringement notice issued to the person for the crime is withdrawn under section 58FU;
conclusion text: The subdivision permits the withdrawal of the infringement notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fn-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
logic summary: Permits non-compliance with notice
premise text: (2) This Subdivision does not: (c) prevent a court from imposing a higher penalty than the penalty specified in the SPF infringement notice if the person does not comply with the notice.
conclusion text: The subdivision permits non-compliance with the notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fn-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: and
logic summary: Combines exemptions and permissions
premise text: (2) This Subdivision does not: (a) require an SPF infringement notice to be issued for an alleged contravention of such a civil penalty provision; or (b) affect a person’s liability to proceedings for an SPF civil penalty order in relation to an alleged contravention of a civil penalty provision if:
conclusion text: The subdivision combines exemptions and permissions.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

58FO Issuing an SPF infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fo
has part: 58FO(1) Issuing an SPF infringement notice
has part: 58FO(2) Issuing an SPF infringement notice
has part: 58FO(3) Issuing an SPF infringement notice
has part: 58FO(4) Issuing an SPF infringement notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.260

58FO(1) Issuing an SPF infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fo-ss-1
part of: 58FO Issuing an SPF infringement notice
note: Inspector may issue notice to person for contravention of SPF principle.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.260
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fo-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fo-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58FO(1) Issuing an SPF infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May issue notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FO(2) Issuing an SPF infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fo-ss-2
part of: 58FO Issuing an SPF infringement notice
note: Inspector may issue notice for contravention of civil penalty provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.260
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fo-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fo-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 58FO(2) Issuing an SPF infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits issuing notice for contravention.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FO(3) Issuing an SPF infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fo-ss-3
part of: 58FO Issuing an SPF infringement notice
note: Inspectors must not issue more than one infringement notice for the same contravention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.260
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fo-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fo-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fo-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of issuing multiple infringement notices.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FO(4) Issuing an SPF infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fo-ss-4
part of: 58FO Issuing an SPF infringement notice
note: Notice has no effect if issued more than 12 months after alleged contravention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.260
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fo-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fo-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fo-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Notice has no effect if issued more than 12 months after alleged contravention.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FP Matters to be included in an SPF infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fp
note: Mandatory requirements for an SPF infringement notice
description: a unique number, day of issue, name of person to whom issued, inspector's details, alleged contravention details, penalty information, and payment instructions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.260
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fp-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fp-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fp-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Mandatory requirements for an SPF infringement notice
conclusion text: a unique number, day of issue, name of person to whom issued, inspector's details, alleged contravention details, penalty information, and payment instructions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FQ Amount of penalty
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fq
note: Penalty amount for SPF infringement notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.261
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fq-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fq-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fq-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58FQ Amount of penalty
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fq-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Equality condition
premise text: The penalty to be specified in an SPF infringement notice...
conclusion text: must equal the following amount:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FR Effect of compliance with an SPF infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fr
note: Compliance with an SPF infringement notice results in no further action.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.261
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fr-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fr-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fr-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58FR Effect of compliance with an SPF infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fr-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Compliance with an SPF infringement notice results in no further action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FS Effect of failure to comply with an SPF infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fs
note: Failure to pay penalty results in liability for SPF civil penalty order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.262
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fs-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fs-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fs-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fs-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58FS Effect of failure to comply with an SPF infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fs-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay penalty
premise text: Notice specifies penalty amount and compliance period.
conclusion text: Failure to comply results in liability.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fs-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
logic summary: Compliance period must be within infringement notice period
premise text: Notice specifies compliance period.
conclusion text: Compliance period overlaps with infringement notice period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FT Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ft
has part: 58FT(1) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
has part: 58FT(2) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
has part: 58FT(3) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
has part: 58FT(4) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
has part: 58FT(5) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.262

58FT(1) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ft-ss-1
part of: 58FT Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
note: Infringement notice compliance period obligation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.262
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58FT(1) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with infringement notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FT(2) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ft-ss-2
part of: 58FT Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
note: SPF regulator may extend infringement notice compliance period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.262
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to extend compliance period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FT(3) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ft-ss-3
part of: 58FT Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
note: Maximum extension period for infringement notice compliance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.262
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58FT(3) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: max
logic summary: Limits the maximum extension period
premise text: (3) Only one extension may be given and the extension must not be for longer than 28 days.
conclusion text: (extension < 28 days)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship
premise text: (3) Only one extension may be given and the extension must not be for longer than 28 days.
conclusion text: Extension period overlaps with 28 days
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: holdsForAll
logic summary: Describes a universal property
premise text: (3) Only one extension may be given and the extension must not be for longer than 28 days.
conclusion text: Extension period holds within 28 days for all cases
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Describes a spreading relationship
premise text: (3) Only one extension may be given and the extension must not be for longer than 28 days.
conclusion text: Extension period diffuses within 28 days
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: hasKnowledgeOf
logic summary: Describes a knowledge relationship
premise text: (3) Only one extension may be given and the extension must not be for longer than 28 days.
conclusion text: State has knowledge of maximum extension period
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FT(4) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ft-ss-4
part of: 58FT Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
note: Failure to provide written notice of extension does not affect its validity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.262
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice remains unaffected.
premise text: (4) A failure to give the person written notice of the extension does not affect the validity of the extension.
conclusion text: The obligation to provide notice remains unaffected.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

58FT(5) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ft-ss-5
part of: 58FT Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
note: Reference to extended infringement notice compliance period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.262
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-5-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ft-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58FT(5) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

58FU Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fu
has part: 58FU(1) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
has part: 58FU(2) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
has part: 58FU(3) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
has part: 58FU(4) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
has part: 58FU(5) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.263

58FU(1) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fu-ss-1
part of: 58FU Withdrawal of an infringement notice
note: Right to make written representations seeking withdrawal of infringement notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.263
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 58FU(1) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Right to make written representations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FU(2) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fu-ss-2
part of: 58FU Withdrawal of an infringement notice
note: Withdrawal of an infringement notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.263
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to withdraw infringement notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FU(3) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fu-ss-3
part of: 58FU Withdrawal of an infringement notice
note: SPF regulator may withdraw infringement notice upon request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.263
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permits action by the SPF regulator.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

58FU(4) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fu-ss-4
part of: 58FU Withdrawal of an infringement notice
note: Content of withdrawal notices must be provided
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.263
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58FU(4) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide content of withdrawal notices
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FU(5) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fu-ss-5
part of: 58FU Withdrawal of an infringement notice
note: Must state name and address of the person
description: Withdrawal notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.263
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58FU(5) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fu-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must state name and address of the person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FV Enforceable undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fv
has part: 58FV(1) Enforceable undertakings
has part: 58FV(2) Enforceable undertakings
has part: 58FV(3) Enforceable undertakings
has part: 58FV(4) Enforceable undertakings
has part: 58FV(5) Enforceable undertakings
has part: 58FV(6) Enforceable undertakings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.264

58FV(1) Enforceable undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fv-ss-1
part of: 58FV Enforceable undertakings
note: Acceptance of written undertakings for compliance with SPF principles
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.264
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: accepts
logic summary: Acceptance of undertakings
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FV(2) Enforceable undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fv-ss-2
part of: 58FV Enforceable undertakings
note: Written undertaking for compliance with SPF code provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.264
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: accepts
logic summary: Accepts written undertakings
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FV(3) Enforceable undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fv-ss-3
part of: 58FV Enforceable undertakings
note: Consent required for withdrawal or variation of enforceable undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.264
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Withdrawal
logic summary: Consent required for withdrawal
premise text: (3) The person who gave the undertaking may withdraw or vary it at any time
conclusion text: with the consent of the SPF regulator who accepted it.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Variation
logic summary: Consent required for variation
premise text: (3) The person who gave the undertaking may withdraw or vary it at any time
conclusion text: with the consent of the SPF regulator who accepted it.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: SPF regulator has obligation to accept enforceable undertakings
premise text: (3) The person who gave the undertaking may withdraw or vary it at any time
conclusion text: with the consent of the SPF regulator who accepted it.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: SPF regulator has permission to accept enforceable undertakings
premise text: (3) The person who gave the undertaking may withdraw or vary it at any time
conclusion text: with the consent of the SPF regulator who accepted it.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Right
logic summary: SPF regulator has right to enforce undertakings
premise text: (3) The person who gave the undertaking may withdraw or vary it at any time
conclusion text: Orders for enforcing the undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FV(4) Enforceable undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fv-ss-4
part of: 58FV Enforceable undertakings
note: SPF regulator may apply to Court for order if undertaking is breached.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.264
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-4-logic-deontic-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58FV(4) Enforceable undertakings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: (4) If an SPF regulator considers that the person who gave the SPF regulator an undertaking has breached any of its terms...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
logic summary: Obligation to apply for order
premise text: (4) If an SPF regulator considers that the person who gave the SPF regulator an undertaking has breached any of its terms...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: order
logic summary: Obligation to order
premise text: (4) If an SPF regulator considers that the person who gave the SPF regulator an undertaking has breached any of its terms...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Court
logic summary: Obligation to Court
premise text: (4) If an SPF regulator considers that the person who gave the SPF regulator an undertaking has breached any of its terms...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FV(5) Enforceable undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fv-ss-5
part of: 58FV Enforceable undertakings
note: Court may make orders to enforce breach of undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.264
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58FV(5) Enforceable undertakings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with terms of undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FV(6) Enforceable undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fv-ss-6
part of: 58FV Enforceable undertakings
note: Definition of Court for this section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.264
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fv-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines key term
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FW Granting injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fw
note: Granting injunctions upon application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.265
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fw-norm

58FX Particular kinds of injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fx
has part: 58FX(1) Particular kinds of injunctions
has part: 58FX(2) Particular kinds of injunctions
has part: 58FX(3) Particular kinds of injunctions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.266

58FX(1) Particular kinds of injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fx-ss-1
part of: 58FX Particular kinds of injunctions
note: Granting of injunctions without regard to intent or previous conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.266
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fx-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fx-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fx-ss-1-logic-deontic-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fx-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 58FX(1) Particular kinds of injunctions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of conduct
premise text: (a) whether or not it appears to the Court that the person intends to engage again, or to continue to engage, in conduct of that kind;
conclusion text: The Court may grant an injunction under section 58FW restraining a person from engaging in conduct:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fx-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of conduct without regard to intent or previous engagement.
premise text: (b) whether or not the person has previously engaged in conduct of that kind;
conclusion text: The Court may grant an injunction under section 58FW restraining a person from engaging in conduct:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fx-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of conduct without regard to imminent danger.
premise text: (c) whether or not there is an imminent danger of substantial damage to any person if the first-mentioned person engages in conduct of that kind;
conclusion text: The Court may grant an injunction under section 58FW restraining a person from engaging in conduct:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FX(2) Particular kinds of injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fx-ss-2
part of: 58FX Particular kinds of injunctions
note: Court may grant injunction requiring a person to do an act or thing under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.266
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fx-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fx-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58FX(2) Particular kinds of injunctions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May grant injunction under certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FX(3) Particular kinds of injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fx-ss-3
part of: 58FX Particular kinds of injunctions
note: Court may grant injunction under section 58FW by consent of all parties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.266
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fx-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting injunction by consent
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FY Interim injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fy
note: Granting of interim injunctions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.267
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fy-norm

58FZ Rescinding or varying injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fz
has part: 58FZ(1) Rescinding or varying injunctions
has part: 58FZ(2) Rescinding or varying injunctions
has part: 58FZ(3) Rescinding or varying injunctions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.267

58FZ(1) Rescinding or varying injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fz-ss-1
part of: 58FZ Rescinding or varying injunctions
note: Allow application for injunction by any person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.267
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fz-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grant permission to apply for injunction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FZ(2) Rescinding or varying injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fz-ss-2
part of: 58FZ Rescinding or varying injunctions
note: Court must not require undertakings as a condition of granting an interim injunction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.267
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fz-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
conclusion text: Court must not require undertakings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58FZ(3) Rescinding or varying injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58fz-ss-3
part of: 58FZ Rescinding or varying injunctions
note: Rescinding or varying injunctions for a person other than an SPF regulator
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.267
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fz-ss-3-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58fz-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58FZ(3) Rescinding or varying injunctions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

58GA Treatment of partnerships
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ga
has part: 58GA(1) Treatment of partnerships
has part: 58GA(2) Treatment of partnerships
has part: 58GA(3) Treatment of partnerships
has part: 58GA(4) Treatment of partnerships
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.283

58GA(1) Treatment of partnerships
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ga-ss-1
part of: 58GA Treatment of partnerships
note: Partnerships must comply with SPF provisions as if they were individuals.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.283
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58GA(1) Treatment of partnerships
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
premise text: The SPF provisions apply to a partnership as if it were a person.
conclusion text: Partnerships must comply with the SPF provisions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ⇒
logic summary: Conditional obligation based on classification
premise text: The SPF provisions apply to a partnership as if it were a person.
conclusion text: Partnerships must comply with the SPF provisions if they are classified as individuals for compliance purposes.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for conditional obligation
premise text: The changes set out in this section apply to a partnership as if it were a person.
conclusion text: Partnerships must comply with the SPF provisions between the time they are classified as individuals and the time the provision takes effect.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: ⇒
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation through partnership structure
premise text: The changes set out in this section apply to a partnership as if it were a person.
conclusion text: All partners must comply with the SPF provisions if one partner is classified as an individual for compliance purposes.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: ⇒
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application to partnership obligations
premise text: The changes set out in this section apply to a partnership as if it were a person.
conclusion text: An artificial intelligence system must ensure that all partners comply with the SPF provisions if one partner is classified as an individual for compliance purposes.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58GA(2) Treatment of partnerships
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ga-ss-2
part of: 58GA Treatment of partnerships
note: Impose obligation on partners instead of partnership
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.283
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Imposes
logic summary: Impose obligation
premise text: (2) An obligation that would otherwise be imposed on the partnership
conclusion text: instead, but may be discharged by any of the partners.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Relates to
logic summary: Temporal relation between obligations
premise text: (2) An obligation that would otherwise be imposed on the partnership
conclusion text: instead, but may be discharged by any of the partners.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implications
logic summary: Implication of obligation shift
premise text: (2) An obligation that would otherwise be imposed on the partnership
conclusion text: instead, but may be discharged by any of the partners.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Affects
logic summary: Impact of obligation shift on partnerships
premise text: (2) An obligation that would otherwise be imposed on the partnership
conclusion text: instead, but may be discharged by any of the partners.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyzes
logic summary: Artificial intelligence analysis of obligation shift
premise text: (2) An obligation that would otherwise be imposed on the partnership
conclusion text: instead, but may be discharged by any of the partners.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58GA(3) Treatment of partnerships
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ga-ss-3
part of: 58GA Treatment of partnerships
note: Permits partners to act on behalf of the partnership
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.283
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grants permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58GA(4) Treatment of partnerships
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ga-ss-4
part of: 58GA Treatment of partnerships
note: Continuity of partnership unaffected by changes in composition.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.283
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ga-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: continuity
logic summary: Maintaining continuity
premise text: Partnership composition change
conclusion text: Continuity unaffected
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58GB Treatment of unincorporated associations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58gb
has part: 58GB(1) Treatment of unincorporated associations
has part: 58GB(2) Treatment of unincorporated associations
has part: 58GB(3) Treatment of unincorporated associations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.283

58GB(1) Treatment of unincorporated associations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58gb-ss-1
part of: 58GB Treatment of unincorporated associations
note: The SPF provisions apply to unincorporated associations as if they were persons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.283
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gb-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58GB(1) Treatment of unincorporated associations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
logic summary: Applying the SPF provisions to unincorporated associations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58GB(2) Treatment of unincorporated associations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58gb-ss-2
part of: 58GB Treatment of unincorporated associations
note: Imposes obligation on association members
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.283
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gb-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58GB(2) Treatment of unincorporated associations
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes
logic summary: Obligation imposition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58GB(3) Treatment of unincorporated associations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58gb-ss-3
part of: 58GB Treatment of unincorporated associations
note: Association members can act on behalf of the association.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.283
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gb-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gb-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 58GB(3) Treatment of unincorporated associations
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows action by association members
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58GC Treatment of trusts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58gc
note: Trusts must comply with SPF provisions as if they were a person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.283
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gc-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gc-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with SPF provisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58GD Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58gd
has part: 58GD(1) Compensation for acquisition of property
has part: 58GD(2) Compensation for acquisition of property
has part: 58GD(3) Compensation for acquisition of property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.284

58GD(1) Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58gd-ss-1
part of: 58GD Compensation for acquisition of property
note: Compensation for acquisition of property on just terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.284
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gd-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58GD(1) Compensation for acquisition of property
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide compensation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58GD(2) Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58gd-ss-2
part of: 58GD Compensation for acquisition of property
note: Person acquiring property must pay reasonable compensation to first-mentioned person.
description: Compensation amount
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.284
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gd-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58GD(2) Compensation for acquisition of property
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to pay compensation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58GD(3) Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58gd-ss-3
part of: 58GD Compensation for acquisition of property
note: Compensation for acquisition of property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.284
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gd-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gd-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58GD(3) Compensation for acquisition of property
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide compensation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58GE Rules for the purposes of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ge
has part: 58GE(1) Rules for the purposes of this Part
has part: 58GE(2) Rules for the purposes of this Part
has part: 58GE(3) Rules for the purposes of this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.285

58GE(1) Rules for the purposes of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ge-ss-1
part of: 58GE Rules for the purposes of this Part
note: Rules for the purposes of this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.285
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ge-ss-1-norm

58GE(2) Rules for the purposes of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ge-ss-2
part of: 58GE Rules for the purposes of this Part
note: Delegation of power to make SPF rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.285
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ge-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ge-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ge-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Power delegation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58GE(3) Rules for the purposes of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58ge-ss-3
part of: 58GE Rules for the purposes of this Part
note: Exemptions from SPF rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.285
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ge-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ge-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ge-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ge-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative assertion of a rule
premise text: (SPF rules)
conclusion text: (may not do the following)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58ge-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: disjoint
logic summary: Temporal intervals for exemptions
premise text: (SPF rules may not do the following: ...)
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58GF Report of the operation of the SPF provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58gf
has part: 58GF(1) Report of the operation of the SPF provisions
has part: 58GF(2) Report of the operation of the SPF provisions
has part: 58GF(3) Report of the operation of the SPF provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.285

58GF(1) Report of the operation of the SPF provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58gf-ss-1
part of: 58GF Report of the operation of the SPF provisions
note: The Minister must conduct a review of the operation of the SPF provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.285
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gf-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58GF(2) Report of the operation of the SPF provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58gf-ss-2
part of: 58GF Report of the operation of the SPF provisions
note: Review of SPF provisions after a specified period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.285
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gf-ss-2-norm

58GF(3) Report of the operation of the SPF provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58gf-ss-3
part of: 58GF Report of the operation of the SPF provisions
note: Must provide a written report to the Minister
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.285
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gf-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-58gf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide a written report to the Minister
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60 Simplified outline of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60
note: Entity must not engage in price exploitation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.287
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 60 Simplified outline of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits entity from engaging in price exploitation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 July 2014; and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1
note: Provide information with substantiating estimate.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.288
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 July 2014; and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60AA Objects etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60aa
has part: 60AA(1) Objects etc.
has part: 60AA(2) Objects etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.288

60AA(1) Objects etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60aa-ss-1
part of: 60AA Objects etc.
note: Deter price exploitation and ensure cost savings are passed through supply chain
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.288
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60aa-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60aa-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60aa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60AA(1) Objects etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to deter price exploitation and ensure cost savings are passed through supply chain
premise text: (1) The main objects of this Part are: (a) to deter price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal at each point in the supply chain for regulated goods; and (b) to ensure that all cost savings attributable to the carbon tax repeal are passed through the supply chain for regulated goods.
conclusion text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relation between the objects in relation to the carbon tax repeal
premise text: (1) The main objects of this Part are: (a) to deter price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal at each point in the supply chain for regulated goods; and (b) to ensure that all cost savings attributable to the carbon tax repeal are passed through the supply chain for regulated goods.
conclusion text: (a) at (b)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60aa-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Establishes a recurring trace of cost savings in relation to the carbon tax repeal
premise text: (1) The main objects of this Part are: (a) to deter price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal at each point in the supply chain for regulated goods; and (b) to ensure that all cost savings attributable to the carbon tax repeal are passed through the supply chain for regulated goods.
conclusion text: (a) and (b)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to ensure cost savings are passed through supply chain
premise text: (1) The main objects of this Part are: (a) to deter price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal at each point in the supply chain for regulated goods; and (b) to ensure that all cost savings attributable to the carbon tax repeal are passed through the supply chain for regulated goods.
conclusion text: (b)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60aa-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Establishes an implication between detering price exploitation and ensuring cost savings are passed through supply chain
premise text: (1) The main objects of this Part are: (a) to deter price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal at each point in the supply chain for regulated goods; and (b) to ensure that all cost savings attributable to the carbon tax repeal are passed through the supply chain for regulated goods.
conclusion text: (a) implies (b)
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60AA(2) Objects etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60aa-ss-2
part of: 60AA Objects etc.
note: Ensure cost savings from carbon tax repeal are passed to consumers through lower prices.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.288
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60AA(2) Objects etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Ensure cost savings are passed to consumers
premise text: The intention of the Parliament is...
conclusion text: ...through lower prices.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60A Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60a
note: Defines terms related to carbon tax removal and repeal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.288
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60a-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60a-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60a-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60a-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60a-logic-n3logic-6

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60A Definitions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60a-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies entities by definition
premise text: bulk SGG importer means an entity that...
conclusion text: is defined as such
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for carbon tax removal and repeal
premise text: carbon tax repeal means...
conclusion text: occurs after specified events
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60a-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Establishes obligations related to carbon tax removal and repeal
premise text: carbon charge component of levy means...
conclusion text: must be calculated as such
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60a-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Relates payment surcharges to industry provisions
premise text: Provisions relating to particular industries, payment surcharges etc.
conclusion text: payment surcharges are relevant
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60a-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
logic summary: Incorporates amendments from other Acts
premise text: carbon tax repeal means...
conclusion text: includes specified amendments
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60a-logic-n3logic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: N3Logic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines relationships between entities and concepts
premise text: carbon charge component of levy means...
conclusion text: is related to carbon tax removal
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

1 January 2014;
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-2
note: List of provisions related to carbon tax and greenhouse gas charges.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.290
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-1-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-1-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies provisions by Act and section
premise text: Provisions listed are from the following Acts:
conclusion text: The listed provisions are from the specified Acts.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <
logic summary: Temporal interval for commencement of provisions
premise text: Commencement date is January 1, 2014
conclusion text: Provisions commence on January 1, 2014.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies obligations and prohibitions
premise text: Some provisions impose duties or bans conduct
conclusion text: The listed provisions include obligations and prohibitions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60B Regulated goods
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60b
note: Defines regulated goods for the purposes of this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.293
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60b-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60b-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60b-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60b-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass
logic summary: Identifies a class hierarchy
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Part, regulated goods means:
conclusion text: regulated goods means natural gas; or electricity; or synthetic greenhouse gas;
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60b-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass
logic summary: Identifies a class hierarchy
premise text: (a) natural gas; or (b) electricity; or (c) synthetic greenhouse gas;
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

60C Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60c
has part: 60C(1) Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal
has part: 60C(2) Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal
has part: 60C(3) Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.295

60C(1) Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60c-ss-1
part of: 60C Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal
note: Prohibition on price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.295
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60c-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (1) An entity must not engage in price exploitation...
conclusion text: An entity must not engage in price exploitation...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60C(2) Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60c-ss-2
part of: 60C Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal
note: Entity must not pass through all cost savings relating to the carbon tax repeal in relation to regulated supply prices.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.295
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60c-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60C(2) Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Entity must not pass through all cost savings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60C(3) Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60c-ss-3
part of: 60C Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal
note: Guidance on determining price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal
description: (a) the entity’s cost savings that are directly or indirectly attributable to the carbon tax repeal; (b) how the cost savings mentioned in paragraph (a) can reasonably be attributed to the different supplies that the entity makes; (c) the entity’s costs; (d) any other relevant matter that may reasonably influence the price.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.295
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60c-ss-3-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60C(3) Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

60CA Failure to pass on cost savings—250% penalty
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60ca
note: Failure to pass on cost savings—250% penalty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.295
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60ca-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60ca-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60ca-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60ca-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60ca-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60ca-logic-deontic-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60ca-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 60CA Failure to pass on cost savings—250% penalty
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60ca-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits failure to pass on cost savings
premise text: (1) If:...
conclusion text: ...250% penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60ca-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for contravention
premise text: (1) If:...
conclusion text: ...250% penalty
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60ca-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Requires recurring trace of entity's actions
premise text: (i) an entity contravened subsection 60C(1) in relation to a particular supply of electricity or natural gas;
conclusion text: ...Chapter 4 Provisions relating to particular industries, payment surcharges etc.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60ca-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses penalty across entities that contravened subsection 60C(1)
premise text: (i) an entity contravened subsection 60C(1) in relation to a particular supply of electricity or natural gas;
conclusion text: ...250% penalty
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60ca-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Obliges entities that contravened subsection 60C(1) to pass on cost savings
premise text: (i) an entity contravened subsection 60C(1) in relation to a particular supply of electricity or natural gas;
conclusion text: ...250% penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

60D Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60d
has part: 60D(1) Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price
has part: 60D(2) Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price
has part: 60D(3) Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price
has part: 60D(4) Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price
has part: 60D(5) Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.297

60D(1) Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60d-ss-1
part of: 60D Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price
note: Notice required for price exploitation
description: Written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.297
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60D(1) Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
conclusion text: The Commission MUST give an entity a written notice...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for notice
premise text: (1) The Commission may give an entity a written notice under this section if the Commission considers that the entity has engaged in price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Consequence of price exploitation
premise text: (1) The Commission may give an entity a written notice under this section if the Commission considers that the entity has engaged in price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS_TO
logic summary: Spread of notice requirement
premise text: (1) The Commission may give an entity a written notice under this section if the Commission considers that the entity has engaged in price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: REQUIRES
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application for notice
premise text: (1) The Commission may give an entity a written notice under this section if the Commission considers that the entity has engaged in price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

60D(2) Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60d-ss-2
part of: 60D Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price
note: Entity must provide notice with specific details about supply made.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.297
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60D(2) Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Entity must provide notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IDENTITY
logic summary: Notice identifies entity, supply kind, and circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60D(3) Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60d-ss-3
part of: 60D Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price
note: Notice is prima facie evidence that the price for the supply did not pass through all of the entity’s cost savings relating to the supply that were directly or indirectly attributable to the carbon tax repeal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.297
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60D(3) Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Entity must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60D(4) Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60d-ss-4
part of: 60D Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price
note: Commission must give entity written notice of variation or revocation.
description: written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.297
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60D(4) Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Commission must give entity written notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60D(5) Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60d-ss-5
part of: 60D Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price
note: Notice under this section is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.297
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 60D(5) Notice to entity that is considered to have engaged in price
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Not a legislative instrument
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60E Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60e
has part: 60E(1) Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price
has part: 60E(2) Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price
has part: 60E(3) Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price
has part: 60E(4) Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price
has part: 60E(5) Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.298

60E(1) Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60e-ss-1
part of: 60E Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price
note: Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price exploitation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.298
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60E(1) Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Commission obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60E(2) Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60e-ss-2
part of: 60E Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price
note: Commission must issue notice with specified conditions and price limit.
description: Notice with specified conditions and price limit.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.298
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60E(2) Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60E(3) Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60e-ss-3
part of: 60E Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price
note: Commission must give entity written notice of variation or revocation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.298
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60E(3) Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Commission must give entity written notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60E(4) Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60e-ss-4
part of: 60E Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price
note: Commission must publish notice in an appropriate manner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.298
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60E(4) Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60E(5) Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60e-ss-5
part of: 60E Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price
note: Notice under this section is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.298
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-5-logic-deontic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 60E(5) Commission may issue notice to aid prevention of price
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60e-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Chapter 4
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60F Acquisition of property
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60f
has part: 60F(1) Acquisition of property
has part: 60F(2) Acquisition of property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.299

60F(1) Acquisition of property
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60f-ss-1
part of: 60F Acquisition of property
note: Defines scope of section 60C
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.299
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60f-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines scope
premise text: Effect of provision
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

60F(2) Acquisition of property
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60f-ss-2
part of: 60F Acquisition of property
note: Provision has no effect to the extent it would result in acquisition of property on just terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.299
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60f-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60F(2) Acquisition of property
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exclusion
logic summary: Exclusion principle
premise text: The provision has no effect.
conclusion text: to the extent it would result in acquisition of property on just terms.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60FA Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60fa
has part: 60FA(1) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
has part: 60FA(2) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
has part: 60FA(3) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
has part: 60FA(4) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
has part: 60FA(5) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
has part: 60FA(6) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
has part: 60FA(7) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.300

60FA(1) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60fa-ss-1
part of: 60FA Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
note: Entities must provide carbon tax removal substantiation notices.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.300
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60FA(1) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide carbon tax removal substantiation notices
premise text: (1) This section applies to an entity if the entity: (a) is an electricity retailer that sells electricity to electricity customers; or (b) is a natural gas retailer that sells natural gas to natural gas customers; or (c) is a bulk SGG importer that sells synthetic greenhouse gas to SGG customers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60FA(2) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60fa-ss-2
part of: 60FA Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
note: Entity must provide written statement and supporting information within a specified period.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.300
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60FA(2) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Entity must provide written statement and supporting information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60FA(3) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60fa-ss-3
part of: 60FA Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
note: Definition of carbon tax removal substantiation notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.300
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-3-norm

60FA(4) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60fa-ss-4
part of: 60FA Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
note: A period specified in a carbon tax removal substantiation notice must be 21 days after the notice is given.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.300
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60FA(4) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to specify a period of 21 days after notice is given.
premise text: (4) A period specified in a carbon tax removal substantiation notice must be 21 days after the notice is given.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval of 21 days after notice is given.
premise text: (4) A period specified in a carbon tax removal substantiation notice must be 21 days after the notice is given.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval of 21 days after notice is given.
premise text: (4) A period specified in a carbon tax removal substantiation notice must be 21 days after the notice is given.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval of 21 days after notice is given.
premise text: (4) A period specified in a carbon tax removal substantiation notice must be 21 days after the notice is given.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval of 21 days after notice is given.
premise text: (4) A period specified in a carbon tax removal substantiation notice must be 21 days after the notice is given.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60FA(5) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60fa-ss-5
part of: 60FA Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
note: Carbon tax removal substantiation notice must explain certain effects.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.300
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60FA(5) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60FA(6) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60fa-ss-6
part of: 60FA Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
note: Section does not limit other sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.300
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-6-norm

60FA(7) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60fa-ss-7
part of: 60FA Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
note: Section does not limit Commission's general information-gathering powers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.300
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-7-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fa-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60FA(7) Carbon tax removal substantiation notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

60FB Extending periods for complying with carbon tax removal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60fb
has part: 60FB(1) Extending periods for complying with carbon tax removal
has part: 60FB(2) Extending periods for complying with carbon tax removal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.301

60FB(1) Extending periods for complying with carbon tax removal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60fb-ss-1
part of: 60FB Extending periods for complying with carbon tax removal
note: Entity may apply for extension of period to comply with notice.
description: Application in writing to the Commission
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.301
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fb-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60FB(1) Extending periods for complying with carbon tax removal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Entity may apply for extension
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60FB(2) Extending periods for complying with carbon tax removal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60fb-ss-2
part of: 60FB Extending periods for complying with carbon tax removal
note: Commission may extend period for complying with notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.301
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fb-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60FB(2) Extending periods for complying with carbon tax removal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Commission has the power to extend the period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60FC Compliance with carbon tax removal substantiation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60fc
note: Compliance with carbon tax removal substantiation notices within applicable compliance period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.301
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fc-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fc-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fc-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60FC Compliance with carbon tax removal substantiation notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Entity must comply with notice.
premise text: Given a carbon tax removal substantiation notice.
conclusion text: Comply within applicable compliance period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60FD Carbon tax removal substantiation statements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60fd
has part: 60FD(1) Carbon tax removal substantiation statements
has part: 60FD(2) Carbon tax removal substantiation statements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.303

60FD(1) Carbon tax removal substantiation statements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60fd-ss-1
part of: 60FD Carbon tax removal substantiation statements
note: Entities must provide carbon tax removal substantiation statements.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.303
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fd-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60FD(1) Carbon tax removal substantiation statements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60FD(2) Carbon tax removal substantiation statements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60fd-ss-2
part of: 60FD Carbon tax removal substantiation statements
note: Entity must provide cost savings estimates to the Commission within 30 days after Royal Assent day.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.303
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fd-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60FD(2) Carbon tax removal substantiation statements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Entity must provide cost savings estimates.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Cost savings estimates must be provided within 30 days after Royal Assent day.
premise text: The financial year that began on 1 July 2014 started on a specific date.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60FE Statements for customers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60fe
has part: 60FE(1) Statements for customers
has part: 60FE(2) Statements for customers
has part: 60FE(3) Statements for customers
has part: 60FE(4) Statements for customers
has part: 60FE(5) Statements for customers
has part: 60FE(6) Statements for customers
has part: 60FE(7) Statements for customers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.306

60FE(1) Statements for customers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60fe-ss-1
part of: 60FE Statements for customers
note: Entity must prepare statement if it is an electricity retailer or natural gas retailer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.306
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60FE(1) Statements for customers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Entity must prepare statement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Statement preparation must occur within the scope of entity's operations.
premise text: (1) This section applies to an entity if the entity: ...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60FE(2) Statements for customers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60fe-ss-2
part of: 60FE Statements for customers
note: Entity must prepare a statement with estimated cost savings for electricity and natural gas customers.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.306
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60FE(2) Statements for customers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Entity must prepare a statement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IDENTITY
logic summary: Statement contains estimated cost savings for electricity and natural gas customers.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60FE(3) Statements for customers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60fe-ss-3
part of: 60FE Statements for customers
note: Entity must communicate statement contents to customers within 30-60 days after Royal Assent day.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.306
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60FE(3) Statements for customers
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Entity must perform action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Statement contents relate to a class of customers.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60FE(4) Statements for customers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60fe-ss-4
part of: 60FE Statements for customers
note: Entity commits an offence if it omits to comply with a requirement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.306
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-4-logic-ltl-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-4-logic-deontic-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60FE(4) Statements for customers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Entity has an obligation to comply.
premise text: (a) the entity is subject to a requirement under subsection (2) or (3); and (b) the entity is capable of complying with the requirement;
conclusion text: (c) the entity omits to do an act; and (d) the omission breaches the requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-4-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: occurs-if
logic summary: Entity commits an offence if it omits to comply with a requirement that occurs under subsection (2) or (3).
premise text: (a) the entity is subject to a requirement under subsection (2) or (3); and (b) the entity is capable of complying with the requirement;
conclusion text: (c) the entity omits to do an act; and (d) the omission breaches the requirement.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Entity has an obligation to comply with a requirement under subsection (2) or (3).
premise text: (a) the entity is subject to a requirement under subsection (2) or (3); and (b) the entity is capable of complying with the requirement;
conclusion text: (c) the entity omits to do an act; and (d) the omission breaches the requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60FE(5) Statements for customers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60fe-ss-5
part of: 60FE Statements for customers
note: Strict liability offence for subsection (4)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.306
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-5-logic-deontic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60FE(5) Statements for customers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Offence classification
premise text: Subsection (4) is an offence.
conclusion text: Strict liability offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Offence type
premise text: Subsection (4) is an offence of strict liability.
conclusion text: Strict liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60FE(6) Statements for customers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60fe-ss-6
part of: 60FE Statements for customers
note: Adjusts penalty units for individuals affected by subsection (4)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.306
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-6-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60FE(6) Statements for customers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Adjusts penalty units
premise text: Subsection (4) applies to an individual
conclusion text: Subsection (4) has effect as if reference to 40 penalty units
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal adjustment of penalty units
premise text: Subsection (6) applies to an individual
conclusion text: Subsection (4) has effect as if reference to 40 penalty units
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal adjustment of penalty units
premise text: Subsection (6) applies to an individual
conclusion text: Subsection (4) has effect as if reference to 40 penalty units
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal adjustment of penalty units
premise text: Subsection (6) applies to an individual
conclusion text: Subsection (4) has effect as if reference to 40 penalty units
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal adjustment of penalty units
premise text: Subsection (6) applies to an individual
conclusion text: Subsection (4) has effect as if reference to 40 penalty units
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60FE(7) Statements for customers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60fe-ss-7
part of: 60FE Statements for customers
note: Excuse from preparing and communicating statements under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.306
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-7-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60FE(7) Statements for customers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60fe-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excuse
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
premise text: Subsection (2) or (3) applies
conclusion text: Individual is excused
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60G Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60g
has part: 60G(1) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
has part: 60G(2) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
has part: 60G(3) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
has part: 60G(4) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
has part: 60G(5) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
has part: 60G(6) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
has part: 60G(7) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
has part: 60G(8) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
has part: 60G(9) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.308

60G(1) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60g-ss-1
part of: 60G Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
note: The Commission may monitor prices to assess the general effect of the carbon tax repeal on prices charged by entities for supplies, in the carbon tax repeal transition period, of relevant goods.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.308
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60G(1) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: The Commission may monitor prices
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60G(2) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60g-ss-2
part of: 60G Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
note: The Commission may monitor prices to assess the general effect of the carbon tax repeal on prices.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.308
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-2-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60G(2) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

60G(3) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60g-ss-3
part of: 60G Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
note: The Commission may monitor prices to assess the general effect of the carbon tax repeal on prices charged for supplies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.308
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-3-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60G(3) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

60G(4) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60g-ss-4
part of: 60G Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
note: The Commission may monitor prices to assess the general effect of the carbon tax repeal on prices.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.308
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60G(4) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: The Commission may monitor prices.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60G(5) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60g-ss-5
part of: 60G Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
note: The Commission may monitor prices to assist its consideration of price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.308
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60G(5) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses a permitted action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60G(6) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60g-ss-6
part of: 60G Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
note: The Commission may monitor prices to assess the general effect of the carbon tax scheme on prices charged by entities for supplies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.308
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-6-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60G(6) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

60G(7) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60g-ss-7
part of: 60G Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
note: The Commission may monitor prices to assess the general effect of the carbon tax scheme on prices.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.308
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-7-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60G(7) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: The Commission may monitor prices.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60G(8) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60g-ss-8
part of: 60G Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
note: The Commission may monitor prices to assess the general effect of the carbon tax scheme on prices charged for supplies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.308
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-8-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60G(8) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

60G(9) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60g-ss-9
part of: 60G Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
note: Commission may monitor prices to assess the general effect of the carbon tax scheme on prices.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.308
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-9-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-9-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60G(9) Commission may monitor prices in relation to the carbon tax
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60g-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Commission may monitor prices
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60H Information-gathering powers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60h
has part: 60H(1) Information-gathering powers
has part: 60H(2) Information-gathering powers
has part: 60H(3) Information-gathering powers
has part: 60H(4) Information-gathering powers
has part: 60H(5) Information-gathering powers
has part: 60H(5A) Information-gathering powers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.310

60H(1) Information-gathering powers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60h-ss-1
part of: 60H Information-gathering powers
note: Commission may require a person to provide specified information or documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.310
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60H(1) Information-gathering powers
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Require
logic summary: The Commission requires the person to provide information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Providing false or misleading information is an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60H(2) Information-gathering powers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60h-ss-2
part of: 60H Information-gathering powers
note: Requires information or documents related to prices before or after the carbon tax repeal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.310
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60H(2) Information-gathering powers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires information or documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60H(3) Information-gathering powers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60h-ss-3
part of: 60H Information-gathering powers
note: No limitation on subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.310
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-3-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60H(3) Information-gathering powers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

60H(4) Information-gathering powers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60h-ss-4
part of: 60H Information-gathering powers
note: Failure to comply with a requirement is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.310
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60H(4) Information-gathering powers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with a requirement.
premise text: (a) the person is subject to a requirement under subsection (1); and (b) the person is capable of complying with the requirement;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on omitting to comply with a requirement.
premise text: (c) the person omits to do an act; and (d) the omission breaches the requirement;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval between a requirement and its breach.
premise text: (c) the person omits to do an act; and (d) the omission breaches the requirement;
conclusion text: The omission occurs within the temporal interval between the requirement and its breach.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval between a requirement and its breach.
premise text: (c) the person omits to do an act; and (d) the omission breaches the requirement;
conclusion text: The temporal interval between the requirement and its breach is non-empty.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of a requirement to a person.
premise text: (a) the person is subject to a requirement under subsection (1); and (b) the person is capable of complying with the requirement;
conclusion text: The requirement diffuses to the person.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

60H(5) Information-gathering powers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60h-ss-5
part of: 60H Information-gathering powers
note: Excuse from providing information or producing a document due to potential incrimination or penalty.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.310
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
premise text: Section does not limit section 60FA
conclusion text: Individual excused from providing information or producing a document
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on requiring individual to provide information or produce document
premise text: (5) An individual is excused...
conclusion text: Section does not limit section 60FA
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between requirement and exemption
premise text: (5) An individual is excused...
conclusion text: Section does not limit section 60FA
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60H(5A) Information-gathering powers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60h-ss-5a
part of: 60H Information-gathering powers
note: Limitation on section 60FA
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.310
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-5a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-5a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60H(5A) Information-gathering powers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60h-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Restricts
logic summary: Limits the scope of section 60FA
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60J Reporting
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60j
has part: 60J(1) Reporting
has part: 60J(2) Reporting
has part: 60J(3) Reporting
has part: 60J(4) Reporting
has part: 60J(5) Reporting
has part: 60J(6) Reporting
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.312

60J(1) Reporting
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60j-ss-1
part of: 60J Reporting
note: Commission must report to Minister within 28 days after each quarter.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.312
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60J(1) Reporting
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60J(2) Reporting
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60j-ss-2
part of: 60J Reporting
note: Must report particulars of notices given under section 60E during the quarter.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.312
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60J(2) Reporting
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60J(3) Reporting
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60j-ss-3
part of: 60J Reporting
note: Reporting obligation remains unaffected by subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.312
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60J(3) Reporting
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
logic summary: Obligation continues despite limiting clause
premise text: (2)
conclusion text: (3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60J(4) Reporting
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60j-ss-4
part of: 60J Reporting
note: Defines a quarter as a 3-month period during the carbon tax repeal transition period or on specific dates.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.312
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60J(4) Reporting
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Defines a quarter as a 3-month period during the carbon tax repeal transition period or on specific dates.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: Specifies temporal intervals for quarters
premise text: (a) that occurs wholly or partly during the carbon tax repeal transition period;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60J(5) Reporting
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60j-ss-5
part of: 60J Reporting
note: Minister must make report public after receiving it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.312
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make report public
premise text: Minister receives report
conclusion text: Minister must make report public
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Report is a piece of information
premise text: Report has content
conclusion text: Report is a piece of information
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60J(6) Reporting
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60j-ss-6
part of: 60J Reporting
note: Reporting obligation if section commences during a quarter
description: Report at the end of each quarter
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.312
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60J(6) Reporting
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60j-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Reporting obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60K False or misleading representations about the effect of the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60k
note: False or misleading representations about the effect of the carbon tax repeal on prices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.313
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60k-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60k-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60k-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60k-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 60K False or misleading representations about the effect of the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60k-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of false or misleading representations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60k-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of entities as NaturalPerson
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60L Issuing an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60l
has part: 60L(1) Issuing an infringement notice
has part: 60L(2) Issuing an infringement notice
has part: 60L(3) Issuing an infringement notice
has part: 60L(4) Issuing an infringement notice
has part: 60L(5) Issuing an infringement notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.314

60L(1) Issuing an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60l-ss-1
part of: 60L Issuing an infringement notice
note: Commission may issue infringement notice to a person with reasonable grounds.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.314
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60L(1) Issuing an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission granted by the Commission.
premise text: The Commission has reasonable grounds to believe a person has contravened an infringement notice provision.
conclusion text: The Commission may issue an infringement notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Infringement notice can be issued at any time.
premise text: If the Commission has reasonable grounds to believe a person has contravened an infringement notice provision, the Commission may issue an infringement notice.
conclusion text: The Commission may issue an infringement notice.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: If-Then
logic summary: Commission's decision to issue a notice is based on reasonable grounds.
premise text: If the Commission has reasonable grounds to believe a person has contravened an infringement notice provision, then the Commission may issue an infringement notice.
conclusion text: The Commission may issue an infringement notice.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Then
logic summary: Commission's decision to issue a notice affects the person.
premise text: If the Commission has reasonable grounds to believe a person has contravened an infringement notice provision, then the Commission may issue an infringement notice.
conclusion text: The Commission may issue an infringement notice.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Then
logic summary: Commission's decision to issue a notice is based on AI analysis.
premise text: If the Commission has reasonable grounds to believe a person has contravened an infringement notice provision, then the Commission may issue an infringement notice.
conclusion text: The Commission may issue an infringement notice.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60L(2) Issuing an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60l-ss-2
part of: 60L Issuing an infringement notice
note: Commission must not issue more than one infringement notice to the same person for the same alleged contravention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.314
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 60L(2) Issuing an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of issuing multiple infringement notices.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60L(3) Issuing an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60l-ss-3
part of: 60L Issuing an infringement notice
note: Notice has no effect if issued more than 12 months after alleged contravention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.314
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-3-logic-ltl-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 60L(3) Issuing an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Notice has no effect if issued more than 12 months after alleged contravention.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: Notice has no effect if issued more than 12 months after alleged contravention.
premise text: (a) is issued more than 12 months after the day on which the contravention of the infringement notice provision is alleged to have occurred;
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Time limit for issuing notice
premise text: (a) is issued more than 12 months after the day on which the contravention of the infringement notice provision is alleged to have occurred;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Notice has no effect if issued more than 12 months after alleged contravention.
premise text: (a) is issued more than 12 months after the day on which the contravention of the infringement notice provision is alleged to have occurred;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60L(4) Issuing an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60l-ss-4
part of: 60L Issuing an infringement notice
note: Infringement notice requirements
description: Details of alleged contravention, penalty information, and contact details
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.314
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60L(4) Issuing an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide required information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: AND
logic summary: Combine multiple obligations
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60L(5) Issuing an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60l-ss-5
part of: 60L Issuing an infringement notice
note: Penalty for issuing an infringement notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.314
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 60L(5) Issuing an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60l-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits issuing an infringement notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60M Effect of compliance with an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60m
has part: 60M(1) Effect of compliance with an infringement notice
has part: 60M(2) Effect of compliance with an infringement notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.315

60M(1) Effect of compliance with an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60m-ss-1
part of: 60M Effect of compliance with an infringement notice
note: Compliance with infringement notice results in obligation to pay penalty.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.315
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60m-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60m-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60m-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60M(1) Effect of compliance with an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay penalty
premise text: (1) This section applies if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60m-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
logic summary: Penalty paid within specified period
premise text: (b) the person pays the penalty specified in the infringement notice within the infringement notice compliance period and in accordance with the notice;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60m-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Payment implies obligation to pay penalty
premise text: (c) the infringement notice is not withdrawn under section 60Q.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60M(2) Effect of compliance with an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60m-ss-2
part of: 60M Effect of compliance with an infringement notice
note: The person is not regarded as having complied with the infringement notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.315
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60m-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60m-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60M(2) Effect of compliance with an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
logic summary: Negation of compliance
premise text: Compliance with the infringement notice
conclusion text: Non-compliance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60N Effect of failure to comply with an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60n
note: Liability for failure to comply with infringement notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.316
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60n-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60n-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60n-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60N Effect of failure to comply with an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60n-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay penalty
premise text: Failure to comply with infringement notice
conclusion text: Liability for contravention
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60P Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60p
has part: 60P(1) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
has part: 60P(2) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
has part: 60P(3) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
has part: 60P(4) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
has part: 60P(5) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
has part: 60P(6) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
has part: 60P(7) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.316

60P(1) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60p-ss-1
part of: 60P Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
note: Defines infringement notice compliance period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.316
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-1-norm

60P(2) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60p-ss-2
part of: 60P Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
note: Compliance period for infringement notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.316
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Holds true
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60P(3) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60p-ss-3
part of: 60P Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
note: Commission may extend infringement notice compliance period upon request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.316
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60P(3) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Commission obligation to extend infringement notice compliance period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

60P(4) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60p-ss-4
part of: 60P Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
note: Maximum extension period for infringement notice compliance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.316
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60P(4) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: max
logic summary: Limits the maximum extension period
premise text: (4) Only one extension may be given, and the extension must not be for longer than 28 days.
conclusion text: (extension <= 28 days)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship
premise text: (4) Only one extension may be given, and the extension must not be for longer than 28 days.
conclusion text: Extension period overlaps with 28 days
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship
premise text: (4) Only one extension may be given, and the extension must not be for longer than 28 days.
conclusion text: Extension period overlaps with 28 days
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Describes a relationship between events
premise text: (4) Only one extension may be given, and the extension must not be for longer than 28 days.
conclusion text: Extension period diffuses into 28 days
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: asserts
logic summary: Describes a statement about the provision
premise text: (4) Only one extension may be given, and the extension must not be for longer than 28 days.
conclusion text: Extension period is limited to 28 days
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60P(5) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60p-ss-5
part of: 60P Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
note: Must provide notice of extension to the person issued the infringement notice.
description: Notice of extension
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.316
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60P(5) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide notice of extension
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60P(6) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60p-ss-6
part of: 60P Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
note: Failure to comply with subsection (5) does not affect the validity of the extension.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.316
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-6-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60P(6) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

60P(7) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60p-ss-7
part of: 60P Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
note: Reference to extended infringement notice compliance period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.316
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60p-ss-7-norm

60Q Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60q
has part: 60Q(1) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
has part: 60Q(2) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
has part: 60Q(3) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
has part: 60Q(4) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.317

60Q(1) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60q-ss-1
part of: 60Q Withdrawal of an infringement notice
note: Right to withdraw infringement notice
description: Written representations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.317
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60q-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60q-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60Q(1) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Right to withdraw
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60Q(2) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60q-ss-2
part of: 60Q Withdrawal of an infringement notice
note: Protection from self-incrimination in proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.317
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60q-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60q-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60Q(2) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to protect self-incrimination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60Q(3) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60q-ss-3
part of: 60Q Withdrawal of an infringement notice
note: Commission may withdraw infringement notice upon request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.317
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60q-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60q-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60q-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to withdraw infringement notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

60Q(4) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60q-ss-4
part of: 60Q Withdrawal of an infringement notice
note: Subsection (3) applies regardless of representations made for withdrawal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.317
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60q-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60q-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60q-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60Q(4) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60q-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Always
logic summary: Subsection (3) applies regardless of representations made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60R Effect of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60r
note: Does not require an infringement notice or affect liability for alleged contravention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.318
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60r-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60r-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60r-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60R Effect of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-60r-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Classifies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

75B Interpretation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-75b
has part: 75B(1) Interpretation
has part: 75B(2) Interpretation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.320

75B(1) Interpretation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-75b-ss-1
part of: 75B Interpretation
note: Defines who is responsible for a contravention of certain provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.320
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-75b-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-75b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-75b-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-75b-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-75b-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-75b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 75B(1) Interpretation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-75b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is-a
logic summary: Defines the scope of responsibility.
premise text: The person involved in a contravention is defined as...
conclusion text: ...who has aided, abetted, counselled or procured the contravention.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-75b-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is-a
logic summary: Defines the scope of responsibility.
premise text: The person involved in a contravention is defined as...
conclusion text: ...who has been in any way, directly or indirectly, knowingly concerned in, or party to, the contravention.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-75b-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is-a
logic summary: Defines the scope of responsibility.
premise text: The person involved in a contravention is defined as...
conclusion text: ...who has conspired with others to effect the contravention.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-75b-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: &
logic summary: Combines multiple conditions for determining responsibility.
premise text: The person involved in a contravention is defined as...
conclusion text: ...who has aided, abetted, counselled or procured the contravention; who has induced, whether by threats or promises or otherwise, the contravention; who has been in any way, directly or indirectly, knowingly concerned in, or party to, the contravention; or who has conspired with others to effect the contravention.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

75B(2) Interpretation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-75b-ss-2
part of: 75B Interpretation
note: Reference to court is a reference to any court having jurisdiction in the matter.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.320
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-75b-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-75b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-75b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: refers to
logic summary: Reference to court is a reference to any court having jurisdiction in the matter.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76 Pecuniary penalties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76
note: Contravention of specific provisions is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.321
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 76 Pecuniary penalties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Section 10
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10
has part: 10(1B) Section 10
has part: 10(1C) Section 10
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.325

10(1B) Section 10
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-ss-1b
part of: 10 Section 10
note: Calculates compensation for breach of contract
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.325
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-10-ss-1b-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-10-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-10-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10(1B) Section 10
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-10-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to pay compensation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10(1C) Section 10
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-ss-1c
part of: 10 Section 10
note: Defines amounts for a specific purpose
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.325
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-10-ss-1c-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-10-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-10-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines a value
conclusion text: $10,000,000
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76A Defence to proceedings under section 76 relating to a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76a
has part: 76A(1) Defence to proceedings under section 76 relating to a
has part: 76A(2) Defence to proceedings under section 76 relating to a
has part: 76A(3) Defence to proceedings under section 76 relating to a
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.327

76A(1) Defence to proceedings under section 76 relating to a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76a-ss-1
part of: 76A Defence to proceedings under section 76 relating to a
note: Defines contravention in relation to section 76
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.327
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76a-ss-1-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76A(1) Defence to proceedings under section 76 relating to a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

76A(2) Defence to proceedings under section 76 relating to a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76a-ss-2
part of: 76A Defence to proceedings under section 76 relating to a
note: Defence against proceedings under section 76 relating to a contravention of section 92
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.327
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76a-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76a-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76A(2) Defence to proceedings under section 76 relating to a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: EXCEPT
logic summary: Defence against prosecution
premise text: The respondent establishes a defence under section 76(2)
conclusion text: The contravention is not established
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Relates to the timing of the defence
premise text: The respondent establishes a defence under section 76(2)(c)
conclusion text: The contravention occurred before the respondent took reasonable precautions
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: Relates to the timing of the defence
premise text: The respondent establishes a defence under section 76(2)(c)
conclusion text: The contravention occurred after the respondent took reasonable precautions
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Relates to the burden of proof
premise text: The respondent establishes a defence under section 76(2)
conclusion text: The prosecution must prove that the contravention was not due to a reasonable mistake or reliance on information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76a-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Relates to the burden of proof
premise text: The respondent establishes a defence under section 76(2)(c)
conclusion text: The prosecution must prove that the contravention was due to an act or default of another person, beyond the respondent's control
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76A(3) Defence to proceedings under section 76 relating to a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76a-ss-3
part of: 76A Defence to proceedings under section 76 relating to a
note: Another person does not include a person who was in Chapter 5 Enforcement and remedies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.327
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76a-ss-3-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76A(3) Defence to proceedings under section 76 relating to a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

76B Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76b
has part: 76B(1) Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
has part: 76B(2) Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
has part: 76B(3) Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
has part: 76B(4) Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
has part: 76B(5) Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
has part: 76B(6) Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.328

76B(1) Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76b-ss-1
part of: 76B Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
note: Defines contravention and pecuniary penalty order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.328
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-1-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76B(1) Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

76B(2) Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76b-ss-2
part of: 76B Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
note: Court cannot impose pecuniary penalty order in certain cases.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.328
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 76B(2) Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of making a pecuniary penalty order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76B(3) Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76b-ss-3
part of: 76B Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
note: Proceedings for pecuniary penalty order stayed if criminal proceedings started or already started against person for offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.328
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 76B(3) Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits pecuniary penalty order proceedings if criminal proceedings started or already started.
premise text: (3) Proceedings for a pecuniary penalty order against a person in relation to a contravention of Part IV, subsection 56BO(1) or section 56BZJ or 92 are stayed...
conclusion text: ...the proceedings may be resumed if the person is not convicted of the offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Describes temporal overlap between criminal proceedings and pecuniary penalty order proceedings.
premise text: (3) Proceedings for a pecuniary penalty order against a person in relation to a contravention of Part IV, subsection 56BO(1) or section 56BZJ or 92 are stayed...
conclusion text: ...the proceedings may be resumed if the person is not convicted of the offence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: Describes recurring trace between criminal proceedings and pecuniary penalty order proceedings.
premise text: (3) Proceedings for a pecuniary penalty order against a person in relation to a contravention of Part IV, subsection 56BO(1) or section 56BZJ or 92 are stayed...
conclusion text: ...the proceedings may be resumed if the person is not convicted of the offence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Describes diffusion of conditions for staying pecuniary penalty order proceedings.
premise text: (3) Proceedings for a pecuniary penalty order against a person in relation to a contravention of Part IV, subsection 56BO(1) or section 56BZJ or 92 are stayed...
conclusion text: ...the proceedings may be resumed if the person is not convicted of the offence.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Describes implication between criminal proceedings and pecuniary penalty order proceedings.
premise text: (3) Proceedings for a pecuniary penalty order against a person in relation to a contravention of Part IV, subsection 56BO(1) or section 56BZJ or 92 are stayed...
conclusion text: ...the proceedings may be resumed if the person is not convicted of the offence.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76B(4) Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76b-ss-4
part of: 76B Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
note: Starting criminal proceedings against a person for substantially the same conduct as a contravention of certain laws.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.328
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits starting criminal proceedings for substantially the same conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76B(5) Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76b-ss-5
part of: 76B Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
note: Prevents admissibility of evidence in criminal proceedings if individual previously gave the same evidence or produced documents in a previous proceeding for a pecuniary penalty order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.328
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 76B(5) Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prevents admissibility of evidence
premise text: State prohibits admissibility
conclusion text: Individual's previous evidence is not admissible
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval during which the individual's evidence is not admissible
premise text: The individual's previous evidence was given before the current proceeding
conclusion text: The individual's current evidence is not admissible if it overlaps with their previous evidence
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval during which the individual's evidence is not admissible
premise text: The individual's previous evidence was given before the current proceeding
conclusion text: The individual's current evidence is not admissible until their previous evidence is no longer relevant
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Defines how the prohibition applies to related information
premise text: The individual's previous evidence includes documents that are also relevant to the current proceeding
conclusion text: The individual's current evidence is not admissible if it includes documents that were previously given or produced in a pecuniary penalty order
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Defines how the system recognizes the exemption
premise text: The system recognizes the individual's previous evidence as exempt from admissibility
conclusion text: The system applies the exemption to the individual's current evidence
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

76B(6) Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76b-ss-6
part of: 76B Consequences in some cases if substantially the same conduct
note: Definition of 'offence' for the purposes of this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.328
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-76b-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Applies to explicit class hierarchies.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77 Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77
has part: 77(1) Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties
has part: 77(2) Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.329

77(1) Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77-ss-1
part of: 77 Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties
note: Commission may institute a proceeding for recovery of pecuniary penalties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.329
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77(1) Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Commission may institute a proceeding.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77(2) Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77-ss-2
part of: 77 Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties
note: Commencement of civil action within 6 years after contravention
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.329
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77(2) Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to commence civil action within 6 years
premise text: (2) A proceeding under subsection (1) may be commenced within 6 years after the contravention.
conclusion text: A proceeding under subsection (1) must be commenced within 6 years after contravention.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between commencement and contravention
premise text: (2) A proceeding under subsection (1) may be commenced within 6 years after the contravention.
conclusion text: The commencement period overlaps with the contravention period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Recurring trace of commencement and contravention
premise text: (2) A proceeding under subsection (1) may be commenced within 6 years after the contravention.
conclusion text: There is a recurring trace between commencement and contravention.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation to commence civil action
premise text: (2) A proceeding under subsection (1) may be commenced within 6 years after the contravention.
conclusion text: The diffusion of obligation is triggered by the commencement period.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Recognition of obligation to commence civil action
premise text: (2) A proceeding under subsection (1) may be commenced within 6 years after the contravention.
conclusion text: The CogAI recognizes the obligation to commence civil action.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77A Indemnification of officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77a
note: Body corporate cannot indemnify certain liabilities incurred as an officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.329
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77a-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 77A Indemnification of officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of indemnification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77B Certain indemnities not authorised and certain documents void
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77b
has part: 77B(1) Certain indemnities not authorised and certain documents void
has part: 77B(2) Certain indemnities not authorised and certain documents void
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.330

77B(1) Certain indemnities not authorised and certain documents void
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77b-ss-1
part of: 77B Certain indemnities not authorised and certain documents void
note: Section 77A does not authorise anything that would otherwise be unlawful.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.330
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77b-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77B(1) Certain indemnities not authorised and certain documents void
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: does not authorise
logic summary: Prohibition of Section 77A
premise text: Section 77A
conclusion text: Nothing that would otherwise be unlawful
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77B(2) Certain indemnities not authorised and certain documents void
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77b-ss-2
part of: 77B Certain indemnities not authorised and certain documents void
note: Anything that purports to indemnify a person against a liability is void.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.330
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77b-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits indemnification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77C Application of section 77A to a person other than a body
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77c
note: A person other than a body corporate is punishable by a fine not exceeding 5 penalty units if convicted of an offence against subsection 77A(1) or section 11.4 of the Criminal Code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.330
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77c-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77c-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77C Application of section 77A to a person other than a body
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77c-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval during which the obligation applies.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

77D Orders relating to void acquisitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77d
has part: 77D(1) Orders relating to void acquisitions
has part: 77D(2) Orders relating to void acquisitions
has part: 77D(3) Orders relating to void acquisitions
has part: 77D(4) Orders relating to void acquisitions
has part: 77D(5) Orders relating to void acquisitions
has part: 77D(6) Orders relating to void acquisitions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.331

77D(1) Orders relating to void acquisitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77d-ss-1
part of: 77D Orders relating to void acquisitions
note: Applicable if an acquisition is void to any extent by force of subsection 45AZA(2) or would be void apart from an order under this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.331
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77D(1) Orders relating to void acquisitions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ApplicableIf
logic summary: Condition for applicability of the provision
premise text: (acquisition is void to any extent by force of subsection 45AZA(2)) or (would be void apart from an order under this section)
conclusion text: This section applies if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77D(2) Orders relating to void acquisitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77d-ss-2
part of: 77D Orders relating to void acquisitions
note: Federal Court may make orders to deal with void acquisitions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.331
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77D(2) Orders relating to void acquisitions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77D(3) Orders relating to void acquisitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77d-ss-3
part of: 77D Orders relating to void acquisitions
note: Application must be made within 6 years after acquisition.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.331
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77D(3) Orders relating to void acquisitions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to make application within time limit.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77D(4) Orders relating to void acquisitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77d-ss-4
part of: 77D Orders relating to void acquisitions
note: Court must have regard to seriousness of related contravention before making an order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.331
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77D(4) Orders relating to void acquisitions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must have regard to seriousness of related contravention before making an order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77D(5) Orders relating to void acquisitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77d-ss-5
part of: 77D Orders relating to void acquisitions
note: Commission must give copy of application to the Commission and may intervene in proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.331
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-5-logic-deontic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77D(5) Orders relating to void acquisitions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Commission must give copy of application to the Commission.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Commission may intervene in proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77D(6) Orders relating to void acquisitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77d-ss-6
part of: 77D Orders relating to void acquisitions
note: Commission is a party to Chapter 5 Enforcement and remedies if it intervenes in a proceeding under paragraph (5)(b)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.331
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-6-logic-linearlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77D(6) Orders relating to void acquisitions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is taken to be
logic summary: Commission is a party
premise text: (6) If the Commission intervenes in a proceeding under paragraph (5)(b)
conclusion text: Chapter 5 Enforcement and remedies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-77d-ss-6-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: is taken to be
logic summary: Commission is a party
premise text: (6) If the Commission intervenes in a proceeding under paragraph (5)(b)
conclusion text: Chapter 5 Enforcement and remedies
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78 Criminal proceedings not to be brought for contraventions of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-78
note: Criminal proceedings not to be brought for contraventions of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.333
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-78-norm

79 Offences against section 45AF or 45AG
type: Concept
realized by: sec-79
note: Aiding, abetting, or inducing a person to contravene a provision is punishable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.333
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 79 Offences against section 45AF or 45AG
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits aiding, abetting, or inducing a person to contravene a provision.
premise text: (aa) attempts to contravene; or (a) aids, abets, counsels or procures a person to contravene;
conclusion text: is punishable
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits being knowingly concerned in or party to the contravention by a person of a provision.
premise text: (c) is in any way, directly or indirectly, knowingly concerned in, nor party to, the contravention by a person of;
conclusion text: is punishable
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits conspiring with others to contravene a provision.
premise text: (d) conspires with others to contravene;
conclusion text: is punishable
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits a person not being a body corporate from contravening a provision.
premise text: (e) in a case where (i) the provision is a cartel offence provision; and (ii) the person is not a body corporate;
conclusion text: is punishable
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79A Enforcement and recovery of certain fines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-79a
has part: 79A(1) Enforcement and recovery of certain fines
has part: 79A(2) Enforcement and recovery of certain fines
has part: 79A(3) Enforcement and recovery of certain fines
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.335

79A(1) Enforcement and recovery of certain fines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-79a-ss-1
part of: 79A Enforcement and recovery of certain fines
note: Defaulting in payment of a fine may result in the fine being declared ineffective.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.335
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79a-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of defaulting in payment of a fine.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79A(2) Enforcement and recovery of certain fines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-79a-ss-2
part of: 79A Enforcement and recovery of certain fines
note: Court must cancel order in respect of fine if person provides security for payment.
description: Security for payment of fine
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.335
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79a-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 79A(2) Enforcement and recovery of certain fines
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Court has an obligation to cancel order if security is provided.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79A(3) Enforcement and recovery of certain fines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-79a-ss-3
part of: 79A Enforcement and recovery of certain fines
note: Allow person to pay fine within specified time or by instalments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.335
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79a-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grant permission to pay fine.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79B Preference must be given to compensation for victims
type: Concept
realized by: sec-79b
note: Court must give preference to making an order for compensation if defendant cannot pay pecuniary penalty or fine and compensation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.337
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79b-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79b-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 79B Preference must be given to compensation for victims
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-79b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must give preference to making an order for compensation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80 Injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-80
note: Prohibition of conduct that constitutes or would constitute a contravention of certain provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.337
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 80 Injunctions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition of conduct.
premise text: (1) Subject to subsections (1A), (1AAA) and (1B)
conclusion text: (a) a contravention of any of the following provisions:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80A Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal—orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-80a
has part: 80A(1) Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal—orders
has part: 80A(2) Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal—orders
has part: 80A(3) Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal—orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.341

80A(1) Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal—orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-80a-ss-1
part of: 80A Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal—orders
note: Order not to make regulated supply at excessive price
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.341
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80a-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 80A(1) Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal—orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80A(2) Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal—orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-80a-ss-2
part of: 80A Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal—orders
note: Section does not limit section 80.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.341
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80a-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80A(2) Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal—orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Section implies no limitation on section 80.
premise text: Section 80A(2)
conclusion text: Section 80 does not limit section 80.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

80A(3) Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal—orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-80a-ss-3
part of: 80A Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal—orders
note: Defines terms for price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal—orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.341
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80a-ss-3-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80A(3) Price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal—orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

80AB Stay of injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-80ab
has part: 80AB(1) Stay of injunctions
has part: 80AB(2) Stay of injunctions
has part: 80AB(3) Stay of injunctions
has part: 80AB(4) Stay of injunctions
has part: 80AB(5) Stay of injunctions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.342

80AB(1) Stay of injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-80ab-ss-1
part of: 80AB Stay of injunctions
note: The Court may stay the operation of an injunction granted under section 80 if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.342
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: The Court may stay the operation of an injunction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relates to the supply of goods or services to, or the acquisition of goods or services from
logic summary: The conduct relates to the supply of goods or services to, or the acquisition of goods or services from a person who is or becomes a party to the proceeding referred to in paragraph (b)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: would be likely to facilitate the settlement of the dispute by conciliation
logic summary: The Court considers that granting the stay: would be likely to facilitate the settlement of the dispute by conciliation
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: would, in all the circumstances, be just
logic summary: The Court considers that granting the stay: would, in all the circumstances, be just
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80AB(2) Stay of injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-80ab-ss-2
part of: 80AB Stay of injunctions
note: Court may vary or rescind order staying injunction operation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.342
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Court obligation to vary or rescind order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80AB(3) Stay of injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-80ab-ss-3
part of: 80AB Stay of injunctions
note: Court must not make any order in relation to the costs of the proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.342
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Court must not make any order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80AB(4) Stay of injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-80ab-ss-4
part of: 80AB Stay of injunctions
note: Nothing in this section affects other powers of the Court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.342
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-4-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80AB(4) Stay of injunctions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

80AB(5) Stay of injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-80ab-ss-5
part of: 80AB Stay of injunctions
note: Definition of associated contravention
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.342
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80AB(5) Stay of injunctions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Injunction includes an interim injunction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ab-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is defined as
logic summary: Associated contravention is defined
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80AC Injunctions to prevent mergers if authorisation granted on the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-80ac
note: Granting merger authorization on false or misleading information is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.343
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ac-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ac-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ac-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 80AC Injunctions to prevent mergers if authorisation granted on the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ac-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of granting merger authorization on false or misleading information.
premise text: The person was granted a merger authorisation for the proposed acquisition on the basis of information that was false or misleading in a material particular.
conclusion text: The Court may not grant the authorisation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80AD Injunctions if acquisition determinations made on the basis of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-80ad
note: Acquisition into effect if Commission made determination based on false or misleading information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.344
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ad-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ad-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ad-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 80AD Injunctions if acquisition determinations made on the basis of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-80ad-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits acquisition into effect if Commission made determination based on false or misleading information
premise text: Commission made an acquisition determination under paragraph 51ABZE(1)(a) or 51ABZW(1)(a)
conclusion text: Acquisition into effect is prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81 Divestiture where merger contravenes section 50 or 50A
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81
has part: 81(1) Divestiture where merger contravenes section 50 or 50A
has part: 81(1A) Divestiture where merger contravenes section 50 or 50A
has part: 81(1B) Divestiture where merger contravenes section 50 or 50A
has part: 81(1C) Divestiture where merger contravenes section 50 or 50A
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.344

81(1) Divestiture where merger contravenes section 50 or 50A
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81-ss-1
part of: 81 Divestiture where merger contravenes section 50 or 50A
note: Court may give directions for disposal of shares or assets acquired in contravention of section 50.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.344
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 81(1) Divestiture where merger contravenes section 50 or 50A
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Court has an obligation to give directions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81(1A) Divestiture where merger contravenes section 50 or 50A
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81-ss-1a
part of: 81 Divestiture where merger contravenes section 50 or 50A
note: Acquirer must refund amount paid to vendor if acquisition is voided by court declaration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.344
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81-ss-1a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 81(1A) Divestiture where merger contravenes section 50 or 50A
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Acquirer has an obligation to refund amount.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81(1B) Divestiture where merger contravenes section 50 or 50A
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81-ss-1b
part of: 81 Divestiture where merger contravenes section 50 or 50A
note: Directs a corporation to dispose of its assets within a specified period if it has contravened subsection 50A(6).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.344
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81-ss-1b-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 81(1B) Divestiture where merger contravenes section 50 or 50A
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Directs an action.
conclusion text: The corporation must dispose of its assets.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81(1C) Divestiture where merger contravenes section 50 or 50A
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81-ss-1c
part of: 81 Divestiture where merger contravenes section 50 or 50A
note: Court may make an order under subsection (1) or a declaration under subsection (1A)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.344
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81-ss-1c-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81-ss-1c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 81(1C) Divestiture where merger contravenes section 50 or 50A
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Court may make an order or declaration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81A Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81a
has part: 81A(1) Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on
has part: 81A(2) Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on
has part: 81A(4) Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on
has part: 81A(5) Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on
has part: 81A(7) Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.346

81A(1) Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81a-ss-1
part of: 81A Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on
note: Acquirer must divest shares or assets if merger authorization was granted on false information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.346
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 81A(1) Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Acquirer has an obligation to divest shares or assets.
premise text: The acquirer was granted a merger authorization on false information.
conclusion text: The acquirer must divest shares or assets.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Court may grant permission for divestiture if certain conditions are met.
premise text: The Court or another court has found that the acquirer or related body corporate has contravened section 92 or Part 7.4 of the Criminal Code.
conclusion text: The Court may grant permission for divestiture.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Acquirer must ensure that the acquisition would not have contravened section 50 without the authorization.
premise text: Apart from the authorisation, the acquisition would have contravened section 50.
conclusion text: The acquirer must ensure that the acquisition would not have contravened section 50.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Court must ensure that the authorisation would not have been granted without the false information.
premise text: If that information had not been given, the authorisation would not have been granted.
conclusion text: The Court must ensure that the authorisation would not have been granted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81A(2) Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81a-ss-2
part of: 81A Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on
note: Court may give directions for securing disposal of shares or assets.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.346
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 81A(2) Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

81A(4) Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81a-ss-4
part of: 81A Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on
note: Acquisition of shares or assets void if vendor involved in contravention
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.346
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 81A(4) Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits acquisition of shares or assets
premise text: Vendor involved in contravention
conclusion text: Acquisition void
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81A(5) Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81a-ss-5
part of: 81A Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on
note: Vendor must refund amount paid to acquirer for acquired shares or assets.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.346
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 81A(5) Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Vendor must refund amount.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81A(7) Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81a-ss-7
part of: 81A Divestiture where merger done under authorisation granted on
note: Court may accept undertaking to dispose of shares or assets
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.346
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-7-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Court discretion
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81B Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81b
has part: 81B(1) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
has part: 81B(2) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
has part: 81B(3) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
has part: 81B(4) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
has part: 81B(5) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
has part: 81B(6) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
has part: 81B(7) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.348

81B(1) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81b-ss-1
part of: 81B Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
note: Acquisition contravenes Subdivision B of Division 1A of Part IV if Commission made acquisition determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.348
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-1-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 81B(1) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

81B(2) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81b-ss-2
part of: 81B Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
note: False information in acquisition determinations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.348
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 81B(2) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of false information
premise text: Information was false or misleading in a material part
conclusion text: Enforcement and remedies Chapter 5
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81B(3) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81b-ss-3
part of: 81B Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
note: Divestiture if acquisition determinations made on false information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.348
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 81B(3) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits divestiture if acquisition determinations made on false information
premise text: (3) This subsection applies if: (a) putting the acquisition into effect is subject to a condition; and (b) the condition is not complied with.
conclusion text: Divestiture
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for divestiture
premise text: (3) This subsection applies if: (a) putting the acquisition into effect is subject to a condition; and (b) the condition is not complied with.
conclusion text: Divestiture
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
logic summary: Defines temporal trace for divestiture
premise text: (3) This subsection applies if: (a) putting the acquisition into effect is subject to a condition; and (b) the condition is not complied with.
conclusion text: Divestiture
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses divestiture as a consequence of non-compliance
premise text: (3) This subsection applies if: (a) putting the acquisition into effect is subject to a condition; and (b) the condition is not complied with.
conclusion text: Divestiture
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies divestiture as a consequence of non-compliance with acquisition determinations
premise text: (3) This subsection applies if: (a) putting the acquisition into effect is subject to a condition; and (b) the condition is not complied with.
conclusion text: Divestiture
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81B(4) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81b-ss-4
part of: 81B Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
note: Federal Court may give directions for securing disposal of acquired assets.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.348
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 81B(4) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Federal Court may give directions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81B(5) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81b-ss-5
part of: 81B Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
note: Acquisition declared void if made on false acquisition determinations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.348
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 81B(5) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the acquisition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81B(6) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81b-ss-6
part of: 81B Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
note: Court may not make order under subsection (5) if person from whom thing was acquired was involved in contravention or non-compliance.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.348
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-6-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-6-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 81B(6) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Court cannot make order if person was involved in contravention or non-compliance.
premise text: Court being satisfied of matters in subsection (1)
conclusion text: Court may not make order under subsection (5)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Excerpt describes a temporal relationship between events.
premise text: Court being satisfied of matters in subsection (1)
conclusion text: Court may not make order under subsection (5) if person was involved in contravention or non-compliance during acquisition.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Excerpt describes a temporal relationship between events.
premise text: Court being satisfied of matters in subsection (1)
conclusion text: Court may not make order under subsection (5) if person was involved in contravention or non-compliance during acquisition.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-6-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Excerpt describes a prohibition on Court making order.
premise text: Court being satisfied of matters in subsection (1)
conclusion text: Court may not make order under subsection (5) if person was involved in contravention or non-compliance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed

81B(7) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81b-ss-7
part of: 81B Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
note: If Court makes order under subsection (5), thing is not disposed of by vendor.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.348
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-7-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 81B(7) Divestiture etc. if acquisition determinations made on false etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-81b-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If order made, thing is not disposed of.
premise text: Order made under subsection (5)
conclusion text: Thing is not disposed of by vendor.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82 Actions for damages
type: Concept
realized by: sec-82
has part: 82(1) Actions for damages
has part: 82(2) Actions for damages
has part: 82(3) Actions for damages
has part: 82(4) Actions for damages
has part: 82(5) Actions for damages
has part: 82(6) Actions for damages
has part: 82(7) Actions for damages
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.350

82(1) Actions for damages
type: Concept
realized by: sec-82-ss-1
part of: 82 Actions for damages
note: Recover loss or damage from contravention of certain provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.350
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 82(1) Actions for damages
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to recover loss or damage
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82(2) Actions for damages
type: Concept
realized by: sec-82-ss-2
part of: 82 Actions for damages
note: Action can be commenced within 6 years after the day on which the cause of action accrued.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.350
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Ability to commence an action within a specified timeframe.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82(3) Actions for damages
type: Concept
realized by: sec-82-ss-3
part of: 82 Actions for damages
note: Seek an order from the court during proceedings on a matter.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.350
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 82(3) Actions for damages
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82(4) Actions for damages
type: Concept
realized by: sec-82-ss-4
part of: 82 Actions for damages
note: Court may order applicant not liable for costs of respondents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.350
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
logic summary: Grants permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82(5) Actions for damages
type: Concept
realized by: sec-82-ss-5
part of: 82 Actions for damages
note: Court must satisfy conditions before making an order for damages.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.350
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 82(5) Actions for damages
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Court must satisfy conditions
premise text: None
conclusion text: Order for damages
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82(6) Actions for damages
type: Concept
realized by: sec-82-ss-6
part of: 82 Actions for damages
note: Court may satisfy itself of matters in subsection (5) by having regard only to documents filed with the court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.350
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 82(6) Actions for damages
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Court may satisfy itself
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82(7) Actions for damages
type: Concept
realized by: sec-82-ss-7
part of: 82 Actions for damages
note: Person liable for costs in appeal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.350
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-7-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 82(7) Actions for damages
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-82-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Liability
logic summary: Obligation to pay costs
premise text: (7) A person who appeals a decision...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

83 Findings and admissions of fact in proceedings to be evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-83
has part: 83(1) Findings and admissions of fact in proceedings to be evidence
has part: 83(2) Findings and admissions of fact in proceedings to be evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.352

83(1) Findings and admissions of fact in proceedings to be evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-83-ss-1
part of: 83 Findings and admissions of fact in proceedings to be evidence
note: Findings and admissions of fact in proceedings are prima facie evidence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.352
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-83-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-83-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-83-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-83-ss-1-logic-epistemic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-83-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-83-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-83-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 83(1) Findings and admissions of fact in proceedings to be evidence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-83-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide prima facie evidence.
premise text: Findings and admissions of fact in proceedings are made in certain types of proceedings.
conclusion text: Therefore, these findings and admissions are prima facie evidence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-83-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permission to provide prima facie evidence is not required.
premise text: There is no requirement for a person to provide prima facie evidence in proceedings.
conclusion text: Therefore, permission to provide prima facie evidence is not required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-83-ss-1-logic-epistemic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Justification
logic summary: Findings and admissions of fact in proceedings are justified by the court's findings.
premise text: The court's findings are a justification for the admission of prima facie evidence.
conclusion text: Therefore, findings and admissions of fact in proceedings are justified by the court's findings.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-83-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalRelation
logic summary: Findings and admissions of fact in proceedings have a temporal relation to the proceedings.
premise text: The findings and admissions of fact in proceedings occur at the same time as the proceedings.
conclusion text: Therefore, findings and admissions of fact in proceedings have a temporal relation to the proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-83-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: There is an obligation on the person to provide prima facie evidence in certain types of proceedings.
premise text: The court's findings are a basis for the admission of prima facie evidence.
conclusion text: Therefore, there is an obligation on the person to provide prima facie evidence in certain types of proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

83(2) Findings and admissions of fact in proceedings to be evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-83-ss-2
part of: 83 Findings and admissions of fact in proceedings to be evidence
note: Produce a document under court seal to prove a finding or admission.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.352
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-83-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-83-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-83-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 83(2) Findings and admissions of fact in proceedings to be evidence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-83-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must produce document under court seal.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84 Conduct by directors, employees or agents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-84
has part: 84(1) Conduct by directors, employees or agents
has part: 84(2) Conduct by directors, employees or agents
has part: 84(3) Conduct by directors, employees or agents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.352

84(1) Conduct by directors, employees or agents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-84-ss-1
part of: 84 Conduct by directors, employees or agents
note: Establishing state of mind for directors, employees or agents of a body corporate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.352
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-6

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 84(1) Conduct by directors, employees or agents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires the director, employee or agent to be within their actual or apparent authority
premise text: (d) The director, employee or agent had that state of mind.
conclusion text: (e) The director, employee or agent had that state of mind.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires the director, employee or agent to be acting within their actual or apparent authority
premise text: (d) The director, employee or agent was, in engaging in that conduct, acting within the scope of his or her actual or apparent authority.
conclusion text: (e) The director, employee or agent had that state of mind.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires the director, employee or agent to be engaged in the conduct
premise text: (c) A director, employee or agent of the body corporate engaged in that conduct.
conclusion text: (e) The director, employee or agent had that state of mind.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires the conduct to be engaged in by a body corporate
premise text: (b) A proceeding in respect of conduct engaged in by a body corporate, being conduct in relation to which section 153E, 153F, 153G or 153H applies;
conclusion text: (e) The director, employee or agent had that state of mind.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires the conduct to be in relation to which section 45AJ, 45AK, 46 or 46A, Part IVB, IVBA, IVBB or IVE, section 55B, Part V, subsection 56BN(1), 56BO(1) or 56BU(1), section 56BZA, 56BZB or 56BZC applies
premise text: (b) A proceeding under this Part in respect of conduct engaged in by a body corporate, being conduct in relation to which section 45AJ, 45AK, 46 or 46A, Part IVB, IVBA, IVBB or IVE, section 55B, Part V, subsection 56BN(1), 56BO(1) or 56BU(1), section 56BZA, 56BZB or 56BZC,
conclusion text: (e) The director, employee or agent had that state of mind.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires the conduct to be in relation to which section 45AF or 45AG applies
premise text: (a) a prosecution for an offence against section 45AF or 45AG or subsection 56BN(1) or 56BZI(1) in respect of conduct engaged in by a body corporate;
conclusion text: (e) The director, employee or agent had that state of mind.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84(2) Conduct by directors, employees or agents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-84-ss-2
part of: 84 Conduct by directors, employees or agents
note: Any conduct engaged in on behalf of a body corporate shall be deemed to have been engaged by the body corporate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.352
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 84(2) Conduct by directors, employees or agents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits conduct on behalf of a body corporate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84(3) Conduct by directors, employees or agents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-84-ss-3
part of: 84 Conduct by directors, employees or agents
note: Prohibition on conduct by directors, employees or agents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.352
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 84(3) Conduct by directors, employees or agents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-84-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85 Defences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85
note: Defences against conduct in contravention of a provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.355
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-85-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-85-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-85-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbidden
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86 Jurisdiction of courts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86
has part: 86(1) Jurisdiction of courts
has part: 86(1A) Jurisdiction of courts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.355

86(1) Jurisdiction of courts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86-ss-1
part of: 86 Jurisdiction of courts
note: Jurisdiction of courts is conferred on the Federal Court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.355
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 86(1) Jurisdiction of courts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Jurisdiction is conferred
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86(1A) Jurisdiction of courts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86-ss-1a
part of: 86 Jurisdiction of courts
note: Jurisdiction is conferred on the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) in certain matters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.355
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86-ss-1a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 86(1A) Jurisdiction of courts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction
logic summary: Establishes jurisdiction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86AA Limit on jurisdiction of Federal Circuit and Family Court of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86aa
note: Limit on jurisdiction of Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)
references: sec-153
references: sec-32AC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.357
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86aa-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86aa-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits exceeding $750,000 in loss or damage
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86A Transfer of matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86a
note: Civil proceeding pending in Federal Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.357
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86a-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 86A Transfer of matters
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: State is obligated to handle civil proceedings
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86C Non-punitive orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86c
has part: 86C(1) Non-punitive orders
has part: 86C(1A) Non-punitive orders
has part: 86C(2) Non-punitive orders
has part: 86C(3) Non-punitive orders
has part: 86C(4) Non-punitive orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.358

86C(1) Non-punitive orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86c-ss-1
part of: 86C Non-punitive orders
note: The Court may make non-punitive orders in relation to a person who has engaged in contravening conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.358
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 86C(1) Non-punitive orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86C(1A) Non-punitive orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86c-ss-1a
part of: 86C Non-punitive orders
note: Court may make non-punitive orders on application by Director of Public Prosecutions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.358
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-1a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 86C(1A) Non-punitive orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86C(2) Non-punitive orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86c-ss-2
part of: 86C Non-punitive orders
note: List of orders that can be made by the Court in relation to a person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.358
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Court may make orders
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86C(3) Non-punitive orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86c-ss-3
part of: 86C Non-punitive orders
note: Court's powers under other provisions of the Act are not limited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.358
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 86C(3) Non-punitive orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Court's powers under other provisions of the Act are not limited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86C(4) Non-punitive orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86c-ss-4
part of: 86C Non-punitive orders
note: Community service order for a person who has engaged in contravening conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.358
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 86C(4) Non-punitive orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to direct the person to perform community service.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86c-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies the key as a provision related to community service orders.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86D Punitive orders—adverse publicity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86d
has part: 86D(1) Punitive orders—adverse publicity
has part: 86D(1A) Punitive orders—adverse publicity
has part: 86D(2) Punitive orders—adverse publicity
has part: 86D(3) Punitive orders—adverse publicity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.360

86D(1) Punitive orders—adverse publicity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86d-ss-1
part of: 86D Punitive orders—adverse publicity
note: Prohibition on adverse publicity order for certain individuals
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.360
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 86D(1) Punitive orders—adverse publicity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits making an adverse publicity order
premise text: The Court may not make an adverse publicity order
conclusion text: A person who meets the conditions cannot be subject to an adverse publicity order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes the temporal interval during which the adverse publicity order applies
premise text: The adverse publicity order applies until the person is no longer guilty of the offence or has paid the pecuniary penalty
conclusion text: The adverse publicity order applies during the period from when it is made to when the person is no longer guilty or has paid the penalty
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Describes the temporal interval until which the adverse publicity order remains in effect
premise text: The adverse publicity order remains in effect until the person is no longer guilty of the offence or has paid the pecuniary penalty
conclusion text: The adverse publicity order remains in effect until the person is no longer guilty or has paid the penalty
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
logic summary: Describes how the adverse publicity order spreads to other individuals
premise text: The adverse publicity order applies through the media and public disclosure
conclusion text: The adverse publicity order spreads through media and public disclosure
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: by
logic summary: Describes how AI can be used to enforce the adverse publicity order
premise text: The adverse publicity order can be enforced using AI-powered monitoring and reporting tools
conclusion text: AI can be used to enforce the adverse publicity order
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86D(1A) Punitive orders—adverse publicity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86d-ss-1a
part of: 86D Punitive orders—adverse publicity
note: Court may make adverse publicity order against a person guilty of certain offences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.360
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-1a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 86D(1A) Punitive orders—adverse publicity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86D(2) Punitive orders—adverse publicity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86d-ss-2
part of: 86D Punitive orders—adverse publicity
note: Requires person to disclose and publish information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.360
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure and publication of information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies order as a prohibition
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86D(3) Punitive orders—adverse publicity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86d-ss-3
part of: 86D Punitive orders—adverse publicity
note: Court's powers under other provisions of the Act are not limited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.360
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 86D(3) Punitive orders—adverse publicity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Court's powers under other provisions of the Act are not limited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86E Order disqualifying a person from managing corporations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86e
note: Disqualification from managing corporations for contravention of certain laws.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.361
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86e-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86e-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86e-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86e-logic-linearlogic-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86e-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 86E Order disqualifying a person from managing corporations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits managing corporations for contravention of laws.
premise text: (1) On application by the Commission, the Court may make an order disqualifying a person from managing corporations...
conclusion text: ...for a period that the Court considers appropriate if: ...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86e-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Justify
logic summary: Requires justification for disqualification.
premise text: (b) the Court is satisfied that the disqualification is justified.
conclusion text: ...and (b) the Court is satisfied that the disqualification is justified.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86e-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implies a causal relationship between contravention and disqualification.
premise text: (1) On application by the Commission, the Court may make an order disqualifying a person from managing corporations...
conclusion text: ...for a period that the Court considers appropriate if: ...
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

86F Privilege against exposure to penalty—disqualification from
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86f
has part: 86F(1) Privilege against exposure to penalty—disqualification from
has part: 86F(2) Privilege against exposure to penalty—disqualification from
has part: 86F(3) Privilege against exposure to penalty—disqualification from
has part: 86F(4) Privilege against exposure to penalty—disqualification from
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.363

86F(1) Privilege against exposure to penalty—disqualification from
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86f-ss-1
part of: 86F Privilege against exposure to penalty—disqualification from
note: Must answer questions or provide information in a civil or criminal proceeding under this Act.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.363
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 86F(1) Privilege against exposure to penalty—disqualification from
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must answer questions or provide information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86F(2) Privilege against exposure to penalty—disqualification from
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86f-ss-2
part of: 86F Privilege against exposure to penalty—disqualification from
note: Statutory requirement applies regardless of proceeding
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.363
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 86F(2) Privilege against exposure to penalty—disqualification from
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: always
logic summary: Obligation always applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86F(3) Privilege against exposure to penalty—disqualification from
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86f-ss-3
part of: 86F Privilege against exposure to penalty—disqualification from
note: Must answer questions or provide information, produce documents, etc.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.363
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 86F(3) Privilege against exposure to penalty—disqualification from
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must answer questions or provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86F(4) Privilege against exposure to penalty—disqualification from
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86f-ss-4
part of: 86F Privilege against exposure to penalty—disqualification from
note: Disqualification from penalty for exposure
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.363
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 86F(4) Privilege against exposure to penalty—disqualification from
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-86f-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Defines class of disqualification
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87 Other orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87
has part: 87(1) Other orders
has part: 87(1A) Other orders
has part: 87(1B) Other orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.364

87(1) Other orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87-ss-1
part of: 87 Other orders
note: Court may make order against person who engaged in conduct that caused loss or damage to another party.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.364
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87(1) Other orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to make order against person who engaged in conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87(1A) Other orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87-ss-1a
part of: 87 Other orders
note: Court may impose civil penalty provisions on individuals or organizations that engage in contravention of certain sections.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.364
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1a-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1a-logic-deontic-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1a-logic-argumentation-6

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87(1A) Other orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes
logic summary: Court imposes obligation on individuals or organizations.
premise text: Section 87(1A)
conclusion text: Civil penalty provisions may be imposed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass
logic summary: Excerpt describes a class of persons who have suffered loss or damage.
premise text: Section 87(1A)(ba)
conclusion text: Class of persons is defined by subsection (1BAA)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Excerpt refers to a period during which individuals or organizations may engage in contravention.
premise text: Section 87(1A)(a)
conclusion text: Period of engagement is not specified.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.6000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1a-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
logic summary: Excerpt applies to all individuals or organizations that engage in contravention.
premise text: Section 87(1A)
conclusion text: All individuals or organizations are subject to civil penalty provisions.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.9000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1a-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Court may impose civil penalty provisions on individuals or organizations that engage in contravention.
premise text: Section 87(1A)
conclusion text: Civil penalty provisions are optional.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.7000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1a-logic-argumentation-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: for
logic summary: Excerpt provides a reason for the court to impose civil penalty provisions.
premise text: Section 87(1A)(a)
conclusion text: Reason is that individuals or organizations have suffered loss or damage.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

87(1B) Other orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87-ss-1b
part of: 87 Other orders
note: Commission may make an application on behalf of one or more persons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.364
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1b-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87(1B) Other orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Commission may make an application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87AA Special provision relating to Court’s exercise of powers under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87aa
has part: 87AA(1) Special provision relating to Court’s exercise of powers under
has part: 87AA(2) Special provision relating to Court’s exercise of powers under
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.369

87AA(1) Special provision relating to Court’s exercise of powers under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87aa-ss-1
part of: 87AA Special provision relating to Court’s exercise of powers under
note: Court must have regard to applicant's action before an industrial authority in relation to boycott conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.369
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87AA(1) Special provision relating to Court’s exercise of powers under
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Court has an obligation to consider applicant's action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87AA(2) Special provision relating to Court’s exercise of powers under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87aa-ss-2
part of: 87AA Special provision relating to Court’s exercise of powers under
note: Boycott conduct is prohibited under certain provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.369
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-2-logic-argumentation-6

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 87AA(2) Special provision relating to Court’s exercise of powers under
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits boycott conduct.
premise text: (2) In this section: ... (a) a contravention of subsection 45D(1), 45DA(1), 45DB(1), 45E(2) or 45E(3) or section 45EA;
conclusion text: Boycott conduct is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies boycott conduct as a contravention of certain provisions.
premise text: (a) a contravention of subsection 45D(1), 45DA(1), 45DB(1), 45E(2) or 45E(3) or section 45EA;
conclusion text: Boycott conduct is a contravention of certain provisions.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relation between boycott conduct and the relevant provisions.
premise text: (2) In this section: ... (a) a contravention of subsection 45D(1), 45DA(1), 45DB(1), 45E(2) or 45E(3) or section 45EA;
conclusion text: Boycott conduct is related to the relevant provisions in a temporal manner.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Establishes a recurring trace between boycott conduct and the relevant provisions.
premise text: (2) In this section: ... (a) a contravention of subsection 45D(1), 45DA(1), 45DB(1), 45E(2) or 45E(3) or section 45EA;
conclusion text: Boycott conduct is part of a recurring trace with the relevant provisions.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies boycott conduct as a contravention of certain provisions.
premise text: (2) In this section: ... (a) a contravention of subsection 45D(1), 45DA(1), 45DB(1), 45E(2) or 45E(3) or section 45EA;
conclusion text: Boycott conduct is a contravention of certain provisions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87aa-ss-2-logic-argumentation-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Establishes an implication between boycott conduct and the relevant provisions.
premise text: (2) In this section: ... (a) a contravention of subsection 45D(1), 45DA(1), 45DB(1), 45E(2) or 45E(3) or section 45EA;
conclusion text: If boycott conduct occurs, it is a contravention of the relevant provisions.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

87B Enforcement of undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87b
has part: 87B(1) Enforcement of undertakings
has part: 87B(1A) Enforcement of undertakings
has part: 87B(2) Enforcement of undertakings
has part: 87B(3) Enforcement of undertakings
has part: 87B(4) Enforcement of undertakings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.370

87B(1) Enforcement of undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87b-ss-1
part of: 87B Enforcement of undertakings
note: Commission may accept written undertaking from person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.370
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: accepts
logic summary: Accepts undertakings
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87B(1A) Enforcement of undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87b-ss-1a
part of: 87B Enforcement of undertakings
note: Commission may accept a written undertaking given by a person for the purposes of this section in connection with a merger authorization.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.370
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-1a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: accepts
logic summary: Commission accepts undertakings
premise text: Commission may accept a written undertaking...
conclusion text: ...in connection with a merger authorization.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Undertaking during merger authorization
premise text: The Commission may accept a written undertaking...
conclusion text: ...in connection with a merger authorization.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87B(2) Enforcement of undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87b-ss-2
part of: 87B Enforcement of undertakings
note: The person may withdraw or vary the undertaking with Commission's consent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.370
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87B(2) Enforcement of undertakings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to withdraw or vary the undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87B(3) Enforcement of undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87b-ss-3
part of: 87B Enforcement of undertakings
note: Commission may apply to Court for an order if undertaking is breached.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.370
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87B(3) Enforcement of undertakings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Commission may apply to Court
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: if
logic summary: Breach of undertaking triggers application
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87B(4) Enforcement of undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87b-ss-4
part of: 87B Enforcement of undertakings
note: Court may make orders to enforce undertaking breach
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.370
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87B(4) Enforcement of undertakings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87C Enforcement of undertakings—Secretary of the Department
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87c
has part: 87C(1) Enforcement of undertakings—Secretary of the Department
has part: 87C(2) Enforcement of undertakings—Secretary of the Department
has part: 87C(3) Enforcement of undertakings—Secretary of the Department
has part: 87C(4) Enforcement of undertakings—Secretary of the Department
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.371

87C(1) Enforcement of undertakings—Secretary of the Department
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87c-ss-1
part of: 87C Enforcement of undertakings—Secretary of the Department
note: Secretary may accept written undertaking from a person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.371
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87c-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: acceptance
logic summary: Acceptance of an undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87C(2) Enforcement of undertakings—Secretary of the Department
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87c-ss-2
part of: 87C Enforcement of undertakings—Secretary of the Department
note: Secretary of the Department must consent to withdrawal or variation of undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.371
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87c-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87C(2) Enforcement of undertakings—Secretary of the Department
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide consent
conclusion text: Secretary of the Department must consent to withdrawal or variation of undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87C(3) Enforcement of undertakings—Secretary of the Department
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87c-ss-3
part of: 87C Enforcement of undertakings—Secretary of the Department
note: Secretary may apply to Court for order if person breaches undertaking terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.371
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87c-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87c-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted by Secretary
premise text: Secretary considers breach
conclusion text: Application to Court
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87c-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Secretary has duty to apply for order
premise text: Breach consideration
conclusion text: Order application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87C(4) Enforcement of undertakings—Secretary of the Department
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87c-ss-4
part of: 87C Enforcement of undertakings—Secretary of the Department
note: Court may order person to comply with breached undertaking term.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.371
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87c-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87c-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87C(4) Enforcement of undertakings—Secretary of the Department
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Court has obligation to order person to comply with breached undertaking term.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87CA Intervention by Commission
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87ca
has part: 87CA(1) Intervention by Commission
has part: 87CA(2) Intervention by Commission
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.371

87CA(1) Intervention by Commission
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87ca-ss-1
part of: 87CA Intervention by Commission
note: Commission may intervene in proceedings with Court leave and conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.371
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ca-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ca-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87CA(1) Intervention by Commission
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to intervene
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87CA(2) Intervention by Commission
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87ca-ss-2
part of: 87CA Intervention by Commission
note: Commission has rights and liabilities of a party in a proceeding.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.371
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ca-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ca-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ca-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87CA(2) Intervention by Commission
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ca-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Commission is taken to be a party
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87CB Application of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87cb
has part: 87CB(1) Application of Part
has part: 87CB(2) Application of Part
has part: 87CB(3) Application of Part
has part: 87CB(4) Application of Part
has part: 87CB(5) Application of Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.372

87CB(1) Application of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87cb-ss-1
part of: 87CB Application of Part
note: Application of Part for economic loss or damage to property caused by contravention of section 18.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.372
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87CB(1) Application of Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Part applies to a claim if conditions are met.
premise text: (1) This Part applies...
conclusion text: ...if the claim is an apportionable claim...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87CB(2) Application of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87cb-ss-2
part of: 87CB Application of Part
note: Single apportionable claim for the same loss or damage
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.372
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87CB(2) Application of Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Single apportionable claim for the same loss or damage
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87CB(3) Application of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87cb-ss-3
part of: 87CB Application of Part
note: Definition of concurrent wrongdoer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.372
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87CB(3) Application of Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines a key term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87CB(4) Application of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87cb-ss-4
part of: 87CB Application of Part
note: Limits apportionable claims to those specified in subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.372
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87CB(4) Application of Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Limitation
logic summary: Limits scope of apportionable claims
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87CB(5) Application of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87cb-ss-5
part of: 87CB Application of Part
note: No matter that a concurrent wrongdoer is insolvent, etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.372
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87CB(5) Application of Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cb-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: no matter
logic summary: No obligation regardless of wrongdoer's status
premise text: (5) For the purposes of this Part, it does not matter...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87CC Certain concurrent wrongdoers not to have benefit of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87cc
has part: 87CC(1) Certain concurrent wrongdoers not to have benefit of
has part: 87CC(2) Certain concurrent wrongdoers not to have benefit of
has part: 87CC(3) Certain concurrent wrongdoers not to have benefit of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.372

87CC(1) Certain concurrent wrongdoers not to have benefit of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87cc-ss-1
part of: 87CC Certain concurrent wrongdoers not to have benefit of
note: Concurrent wrongdoers not to have benefit of certain liability
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.372
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87CC(1) Certain concurrent wrongdoers not to have benefit of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
logic summary: Excludes exclusion of liability for concurrent wrongdoers
premise text: Nothing in this Part operates to exclude the liability...
conclusion text: Concurrent wrongdoer not entitled to benefit from exclusion
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Applies during proceedings involving concurrent wrongdoers
premise text: (1) Nothing in this Part operates...
conclusion text: This provision applies during proceedings involving concurrent wrongdoers with apportionable claims
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Implies intent to cause economic loss or damage
premise text: (a) the concurrent wrongdoer intended...
conclusion text: Concurrent wrongdoer's actions imply intent to cause economic loss or damage
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
logic summary: Applies through fraudulent conduct
premise text: (b) the concurrent wrongdoer fraudulently...
conclusion text: This provision applies through fraudulent conduct by concurrent wrongdoers
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: regulates
logic summary: Regulates concurrent wrongdoers' liability
premise text: (1) Nothing in this Part operates...
conclusion text: This provision regulates the liability of concurrent wrongdoers
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

87CC(2) Certain concurrent wrongdoers not to have benefit of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87cc-ss-2
part of: 87CC Certain concurrent wrongdoers not to have benefit of
note: Liability of excluded concurrent wrongdoer determined by relevant legal rules.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.372
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87CC(2) Certain concurrent wrongdoers not to have benefit of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: determines
logic summary: Determines liability of excluded concurrent wrongdoer.
premise text: (apart from this Part) are relevant legal rules
conclusion text: The liability of an excluded concurrent wrongdoer is to be determined in accordance with the legal rules (if any) that...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87CC(3) Certain concurrent wrongdoers not to have benefit of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87cc-ss-3
part of: 87CC Certain concurrent wrongdoers not to have benefit of
note: Determine liability of concurrent wrongdoer according to this Part's provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.372
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87CC(3) Certain concurrent wrongdoers not to have benefit of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: determines
logic summary: Determines liability obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87CD Proportionate liability for apportionable claims
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87cd
has part: 87CD(1) Proportionate liability for apportionable claims
has part: 87CD(2) Proportionate liability for apportionable claims
has part: 87CD(3) Proportionate liability for apportionable claims
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.373

87CD(1) Proportionate liability for apportionable claims
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87cd-ss-1
part of: 87CD Proportionate liability for apportionable claims
note: Proportionate liability for apportionable claims
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.373
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cd-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87CD(1) Proportionate liability for apportionable claims
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Limitation
logic summary: Limits defendant's liability to proportionate amount
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87CD(2) Proportionate liability for apportionable claims
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87cd-ss-2
part of: 87CD Proportionate liability for apportionable claims
note: Liability for apportionable claims and non-apportionable claims
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.373
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cd-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87CD(2) Proportionate liability for apportionable claims
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to determine liability for apportionable claims
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87CD(3) Proportionate liability for apportionable claims
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87cd-ss-3
part of: 87CD Proportionate liability for apportionable claims
note: Exclude proportion of damage due to plaintiff's contributory negligence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.373
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cd-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cd-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87CD(3) Proportionate liability for apportionable claims
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Imposes duty on the state
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87CE Defendant to notify plaintiff of concurrent wrongdoer of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87ce
has part: 87CE(1) Defendant to notify plaintiff of concurrent wrongdoer of
has part: 87CE(2) Defendant to notify plaintiff of concurrent wrongdoer of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.374

87CE(1) Defendant to notify plaintiff of concurrent wrongdoer of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87ce-ss-1
part of: 87CE Defendant to notify plaintiff of concurrent wrongdoer of
note: Notify plaintiff of concurrent wrongdoer if reasonable grounds exist.
description: Written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.374
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ce-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ce-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ce-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87CE(1) Defendant to notify plaintiff of concurrent wrongdoer of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ce-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defendant has an obligation to notify plaintiff.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87CE(2) Defendant to notify plaintiff of concurrent wrongdoer of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87ce-ss-2
part of: 87CE Defendant to notify plaintiff of concurrent wrongdoer of
note: Defendant must pay costs on an indemnity basis or otherwise.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.374
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ce-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ce-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ce-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87CE(2) Defendant to notify plaintiff of concurrent wrongdoer of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ce-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
premise text: The court may order that the costs to be paid by the defendant...
conclusion text: The defendant must pay costs on an indemnity basis or otherwise.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87CF Contribution not recoverable from defendant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87cf
note: Defendant cannot be required to contribute or indemnify another wrongdoer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.375
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cf-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cf-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cf-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 87CF Contribution not recoverable from defendant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cf-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of contribution and indemnification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87CG Subsequent actions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87cg
has part: 87CG(1) Subsequent actions
has part: 87CG(2) Subsequent actions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.375

87CG(1) Subsequent actions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87cg-ss-1
part of: 87CG Subsequent actions
note: Allows a plaintiff to bring another action against a concurrent wrongdoer for the same damage or loss.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.375
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cg-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cg-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 87CG(1) Subsequent actions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
logic summary: Allows action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87CG(2) Subsequent actions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87cg-ss-2
part of: 87CG Subsequent actions
note: Limitation on damages in proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.375
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cg-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87CG(2) Subsequent actions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87cg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Restriction
logic summary: Limits the amount of damages that can be recovered
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87CH Joining non-party concurrent wrongdoer in the action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87ch
has part: 87CH(1) Joining non-party concurrent wrongdoer in the action
has part: 87CH(2) Joining non-party concurrent wrongdoer in the action
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.375

87CH(1) Joining non-party concurrent wrongdoer in the action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87ch-ss-1
part of: 87CH Joining non-party concurrent wrongdoer in the action
note: Court may give leave to join a non-party concurrent wrongdoer in the action.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.375
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ch-ss-1-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ch-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87CH(1) Joining non-party concurrent wrongdoer in the action
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

87CH(2) Joining non-party concurrent wrongdoer in the action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87ch-ss-2
part of: 87CH Joining non-party concurrent wrongdoer in the action
note: Court cannot give leave for joinder of previously concluded proceedings person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.375
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ch-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ch-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ch-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Court cannot give leave
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87CI Application of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87ci
note: Application of Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.375
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87ci-norm

87D Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87d
note: Definitions for Part 5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.377
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87d-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87d-logic-descriptionlogic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87d-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has definition
logic summary: Defines key terms
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 September or 31 December.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30
note: Prohibition on smoking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.378
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-30-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-30-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87E Proceedings to which this Part applies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87e
note: Proceedings under Australian Consumer Law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.379
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87e-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87e-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87e-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87E Proceedings to which this Part applies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Obligation applies to proceedings
premise text: (1) This Part applies...
conclusion text: ...to proceedings taken under the Australian Consumer Law:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

87F Basic rule
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87f
has part: 87F(1) Basic rule
has part: 87F(1A) Basic rule
has part: 87F(2) Basic rule
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.380

87F(1) Basic rule
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87f-ss-1
part of: 87F Basic rule
note: Court cannot award personal injury damages after a certain period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.380
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87f-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87f-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 87F(1) Basic rule
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of awarding personal injury damages
premise text: (1) A court must not award...
conclusion text: ...if the proceeding was commenced...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87F(1A) Basic rule
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87f-ss-1a
part of: 87F Basic rule
note: Exempts proceedings from death or injury due to tobacco use.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.380
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87f-ss-1a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87f-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87f-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87F(1A) Basic rule
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87f-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87F(2) Basic rule
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87f-ss-2
part of: 87F Basic rule
note: Prevents an award of personal injury damages under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.380
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87f-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prevents an award of personal injury damages
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

87G Date of discoverability
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87g
note: Defines date of discoverability for death or injury claims.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.381
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87g-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87g-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87g-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87G Date of discoverability
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: States a condition
conclusion text: The date of discoverability...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87H Long-stop period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87h
has part: 87H(1) Long-stop period
has part: 87H(2) Long-stop period
has part: 87H(3) Long-stop period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.383

87H(1) Long-stop period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87h-ss-1
part of: 87H Long-stop period
note: Defines long-stop period for death or injury claims
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.383
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires temporal relation
premise text: 12 years following the act or omission
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87H(2) Long-stop period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87h-ss-2
part of: 87H Long-stop period
note: Court cannot extend discovery period beyond 3 years.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.383
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of extending discovery period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Temporal interval restriction
premise text: (2) The court must not extend the period by more than 3 years beyond the date of discoverability for the death or injury.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Inference from prohibition
premise text: (2) The court must not extend the period by more than 3 years beyond the date of discoverability for the death or injury.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Restriction
logic summary: Limitation on extension
premise text: (2) The court must not extend the period by more than 3 years beyond the date of discoverability for the death or injury.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Restriction
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
premise text: (2) The court must not extend the period by more than 3 years beyond the date of discoverability for the death or injury.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87H(3) Long-stop period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87h-ss-3
part of: 87H Long-stop period
note: Court must consider justice of case when extending period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.383
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87H(3) Long-stop period
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider justice of case
premise text: (3) In considering whether to extend the period, the court must have regard to...
conclusion text: Court must consider justice of case when extending period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: WITHIN
logic summary: Temporal interval within which court must consider justice of case
premise text: (3) In considering whether to extend the period, the court must have regard to:
conclusion text: Court's consideration is within a temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: WITHIN
logic summary: Temporal interval within which court must consider justice of case (LTL)
premise text: (3) In considering whether to extend the period, the court must have regard to:
conclusion text: Court's consideration is within a temporal interval (LTL)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: WITHIN
logic summary: Temporal interval within which court must consider justice of case (diffusion)
premise text: (3) In considering whether to extend the period, the court must have regard to:
conclusion text: Court's consideration is within a temporal interval (diffusion)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87h-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: WITHIN
logic summary: Temporal interval within which court must consider justice of case (CogAI)
premise text: (3) In considering whether to extend the period, the court must have regard to:
conclusion text: Court's consideration is within a temporal interval (CogAI)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87J The effect of minority or incapacity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87j
note: Disregard periods of minority or incapacity when determining the expiration of a period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.383
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87j-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87j-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87j-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87j-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87j-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87j-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87j-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Ignore
logic summary: Ignoring minority or incapacity periods
premise text: The period of 3 years after the date of discoverability has expired.
conclusion text: Disregard any period during which the plaintiff has been unable to work.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87j-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between minority or incapacity periods and the expiration of a period
premise text: The long-stop period may have begun before the plaintiff's minority or incapacity began.
conclusion text: Disregard any period during which the plaintiff has been unable to work.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87j-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between minority or incapacity periods and the expiration of a period (recurring trace)
premise text: The plaintiff's inability to work is a recurring characteristic of the class of persons affected by the provision.
conclusion text: Disregard any period during which the plaintiff has been unable to work.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87j-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between minority or incapacity periods and the expiration of a period (diffusion)
premise text: The long-stop period may have begun before the plaintiff's minority or incapacity began.
conclusion text: Disregard any period during which the plaintiff has been unable to work.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87j-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between minority or incapacity periods and the expiration of a period (cognitive AI)
premise text: The plaintiff's inability to work is a characteristic of the class of persons affected by the provision.
conclusion text: Disregard any period during which the plaintiff has been unable to work.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87K The effect of close relationships
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87k
has part: 87K(1) The effect of close relationships
has part: 87K(2) The effect of close relationships
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.384

87K(1) The effect of close relationships
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87k-ss-1
part of: 87K The effect of close relationships
note: If a cause of action is founded on the death or injury to a minor, disregard any period before the victim turns 25.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.384
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87K(1) The effect of close relationships
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to disregard periods before the victim turns 25.
premise text: (1) If:...
conclusion text: ...disregard any period:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval between the victim's birth and the date of discoverability.
premise text: (b) the proceeding is taken against a person who was at that time:...
conclusion text: ...who was a parent or guardian of the victim; or a person in a close relationship with a parent or guardian of the victim...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal interval until the long-stop period expires.
premise text: (c) before the victim turns 25; or (d) if the victim dies before turning 25—before the victim’s death.
conclusion text: ...or before the victim's death.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if-then
logic summary: If a cause of action is founded on the death or injury to a minor, then disregard any period before the victim turns 25.
premise text: (1) If:...
conclusion text: ...disregard any period:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: entity
logic summary: Entity relationship between the victim and the person in a close relationship with a parent or guardian.
premise text: (i) a person in a close relationship with a parent or guardian of the victim;
conclusion text: ...who was at that time:...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87K(2) The effect of close relationships
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87k-ss-2
part of: 87K The effect of close relationships
note: A person is taken to be in a close relationship with a parent or guardian if they might influence the parent or guardian not to bring a claim on behalf of the victim.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.384
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87K(2) The effect of close relationships
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Might
logic summary: Influence or not to influence
premise text: Person's relationship with parent or guardian might affect the parent or guardian's decision.
conclusion text: The person is taken to be in a close relationship if they might influence the parent or guardian.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Might
logic summary: Victim's willingness to disclose
premise text: The victim might be unwilling to disclose acts, omissions, or events to the parent or guardian.
conclusion text: The person is taken to be in a close relationship if the victim might be unwilling to disclose.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
logic summary: Temporal interval between influence and disclosure
premise text: There is a temporal interval between when the person might influence the parent or guardian and when the victim might be unwilling to disclose.
conclusion text: The time period between these events is relevant to the classification of close relationships.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of influence and disclosure
premise text: This pattern of influence and disclosure might be recurring in similar situations.
conclusion text: The person's actions might create a recurring trace that affects the classification of close relationships.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87k-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Pattern recognition in influence and disclosure
premise text: This pattern of influence and disclosure is recognized as relevant to the classification of close relationships.
conclusion text: The system recognizes this pattern as a key factor in determining close relationships.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

87L Limits on damages for non-economic loss
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87l
note: Court cannot award damages for non-economic loss exceeding permitted amount.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.385
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87l-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87l-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87l-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on awarding damages
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87M Maximum amount of damages for non-economic loss
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87m
has part: 87M(1) Maximum amount of damages for non-economic loss
has part: 87M(2) Maximum amount of damages for non-economic loss
has part: 87M(3) Maximum amount of damages for non-economic loss
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.385

87M(1) Maximum amount of damages for non-economic loss
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87m-ss-1
part of: 87M Maximum amount of damages for non-economic loss
note: Maximum amount of damages for non-economic loss
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.385
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87m-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87M(1) Maximum amount of damages for non-economic loss
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines obligation
conclusion text: The maximum amount of damages for non-economic loss is $250,000.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87M(2) Maximum amount of damages for non-economic loss
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87m-ss-2
part of: 87M Maximum amount of damages for non-economic loss
note: Rounding of damages for non-economic loss
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.385
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87m-ss-2-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87m-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87M(2) Maximum amount of damages for non-economic loss
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

87M(3) Maximum amount of damages for non-economic loss
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87m-ss-3
part of: 87M Maximum amount of damages for non-economic loss
note: Does not affect operation of section 86AA
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.385
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87m-ss-3-norm

87N Index numbers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87n
has part: 87N(1) Index numbers
has part: 87N(2) Index numbers
has part: 87N(3) Index numbers
has part: 87N(4) Index numbers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.386

87N(1) Index numbers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87n-ss-1
part of: 87N Index numbers
note: The index number for a quarter is the All Groups Consumer Price Index number.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.386
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87n-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87n-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87N(1) Index numbers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: The index number must be provided.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87N(2) Index numbers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87n-ss-2
part of: 87N Index numbers
note: Disregard publication of later index number if previous one is still in effect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.386
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87n-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87n-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87N(2) Index numbers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Ignore
logic summary: Disregard later publication if previous one is still in effect.
premise text: (a) and (b)
conclusion text: Disregard publication of later index number for the purposes of this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87N(3) Index numbers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87n-ss-3
part of: 87N Index numbers
note: Regard index numbers published in terms of the new index reference period when applying this section after a change.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.386
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87n-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87n-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87N(3) Index numbers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87N(4) Index numbers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87n-ss-4
part of: 87N Index numbers
note: Definition of Australian Statistician
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.386
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87n-ss-4-norm

87P Most extreme cases
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87p
has part: 87P(1) Most extreme cases
has part: 87P(2) Most extreme cases
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.386

87P(1) Most extreme cases
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87p-ss-1
part of: 87P Most extreme cases
note: Court must not award personal injury damages for non-economic loss in most extreme cases.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.386
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87p-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87p-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87p-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87p-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87p-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 87P(1) Most extreme cases
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Court must not award damages
premise text: State bears the duty to prevent non-economic loss
conclusion text: Damages cannot be awarded
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87p-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between court decision and most extreme case definition
premise text: Court decision is subject to temporal constraints
conclusion text: Most extreme cases are defined by a specific temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87p-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Damages assessment implies non-economic loss consideration
premise text: Damages assessment is relevant to non-economic loss
conclusion text: Non-economic loss must be considered in damages assessment
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87p-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Prohibition of damages affects all cases
premise text: State bears the duty to prevent non-economic loss
conclusion text: Damages cannot be awarded in any case
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87P(2) Most extreme cases
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87p-ss-2
part of: 87P Most extreme cases
note: Defines most extreme case for non-economic loss
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.386
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87p-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Identifies a specific concept
conclusion text: most extreme case
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87Q Cases of 33% or more (but not 100%) of a most extreme case
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87q
has part: 87Q(1) Cases of 33% or more (but not 100%) of a most extreme case
has part: 87Q(2) Cases of 33% or more (but not 100%) of a most extreme case
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.387

87Q(1) Cases of 33% or more (but not 100%) of a most extreme case
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87q-ss-1
part of: 87Q Cases of 33% or more (but not 100%) of a most extreme case
note: Court must not award personal injury damages for non-economic loss exceeding a certain percentage.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.387
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 87Q(1) Cases of 33% or more (but not 100%) of a most extreme case
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Court must not award personal injury damages.
premise text: (1) If the non-economic loss the plaintiff suffers is at least 33%, but less than 100% of a most extreme case...
conclusion text: ...the court must not award as personal injury damages for non-economic loss an amount that exceeds the applicable percentage...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Court's decision implies a restriction on damages.
premise text: (1) If the non-economic loss the plaintiff suffers is at least 33%, but less than 100%...
conclusion text: ...the court must not award as personal injury damages for non-economic loss an amount that exceeds the applicable percentage...
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Apply
logic summary: Restriction applies to a specific time period.
premise text: (1) If the non-economic loss the plaintiff suffers is at least 33%, but less than 100%...
conclusion text: ...the court must not award as personal injury damages for non-economic loss an amount that exceeds the applicable percentage...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Imply
logic summary: Restriction may be applied in similar cases.
premise text: (1) If the non-economic loss the plaintiff suffers is at least 33%, but less than 100%...
conclusion text: ...the court must not award as personal injury damages for non-economic loss an amount that exceeds the applicable percentage...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Imply
logic summary: Court's decision may be subject to argument.
premise text: (1) If the non-economic loss the plaintiff suffers is at least 33%, but less than 100%...
conclusion text: ...the court must not award as personal injury damages for non-economic loss an amount that exceeds the applicable percentage...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

87Q(2) Cases of 33% or more (but not 100%) of a most extreme case
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87q-ss-2
part of: 87Q Cases of 33% or more (but not 100%) of a most extreme case
note: Defines applicable percentage for non-economic loss
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.387
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87Q(2) Cases of 33% or more (but not 100%) of a most extreme case
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines a specific value
premise text: (2) The applicable percentage is the extent of the non-economic loss the plaintiff suffers, expressed as a percentage of a most extreme case.
conclusion text: (2) The applicable percentage is the extent of the non-economic loss the plaintiff suffers, expressed as a percentage of a most extreme case.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
premise text: (2) The applicable percentage is the extent of the non-economic loss the plaintiff suffers, expressed as a percentage of a most extreme case.
conclusion text: (2) The applicable percentage is the extent of the non-economic loss the plaintiff suffers, expressed as a percentage of a most extreme case.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87q-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: =
logic summary: Requires an ordered or recurring trace
premise text: (2) The applicable percentage is the extent of the non-economic loss the plaintiff suffers, expressed as a percentage of a most extreme case.
conclusion text: (2) The applicable percentage is the extent of the non-economic loss the plaintiff suffers, expressed as a percentage of a most extreme case.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87R Cases of 15% or more (but less than 33%) of a most extreme
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87r
note: Court must not award personal injury damages for non-economic loss exceeding a certain amount.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.387
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87r-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87r-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87r-logic-linearlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87r-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Court must not award personal injury damages.
premise text: Court awards personal injury damages.
conclusion text: Court must not award personal injury damages.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87r-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Court's decision implies a restriction on damages.
premise text: Court awards personal injury damages.
conclusion text: Court's decision implies a restriction on damages.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-3
note: Percentage values
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.387
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-1-3-norm

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2
note: Percentage values
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.387
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-2-norm

3 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3
note: Percentage distribution
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.387
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-3-norm

4 Section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4
note: Percentage values
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.387
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-4-norm

5 Section 5
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5
note: Percentage threshold
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.387
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-5-norm

6 Section 6
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6
note: Enforcement and remedies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.387
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-6-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide enforcement and remedies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87S Cases of less than 15% of a most extreme case
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87s
note: Court must not award personal injury damages for non-economic loss if the plaintiff suffers less than 15% of a most extreme case.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.388
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87s-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87s-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87s-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87s-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87s-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87s-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87s-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 87S Cases of less than 15% of a most extreme case
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87s-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Court must not award personal injury damages.
premise text: Plaintiff suffers less than 15% of a most extreme case.
conclusion text: No personal injury damages for non-economic loss.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87s-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal intervals overlap.
premise text: Plaintiff suffers non-economic loss before or after the most extreme case.
conclusion text: No personal injury damages for non-economic loss during this time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87s-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Tracing of events.
premise text: Plaintiff suffers less than 15% of a most extreme case repeatedly.
conclusion text: No personal injury damages for non-economic loss in these cases.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87s-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Information spreads.
premise text: Plaintiff suffers less than 15% of a most extreme case widely.
conclusion text: No personal injury damages for non-economic loss in these cases.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87s-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Artificial intelligence recognizes.
premise text: Plaintiff suffers less than 15% of a most extreme case.
conclusion text: No personal injury damages for non-economic loss in this case.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87T Referring to earlier decisions on non-economic loss
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87t
has part: 87T(1) Referring to earlier decisions on non-economic loss
has part: 87T(2) Referring to earlier decisions on non-economic loss
has part: 87T(3) Referring to earlier decisions on non-economic loss
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.388

87T(1) Referring to earlier decisions on non-economic loss
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87t-ss-1
part of: 87T Referring to earlier decisions on non-economic loss
note: Court may refer to earlier decisions for non-economic loss damages
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.388
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87t-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87t-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87T(1) Referring to earlier decisions on non-economic loss
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Establishing appropriate award
premise text: Court may refer to earlier decisions
conclusion text: Establishing appropriate award
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87T(2) Referring to earlier decisions on non-economic loss
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87t-ss-2
part of: 87T Referring to earlier decisions on non-economic loss
note: Referencing earlier decisions on non-economic loss
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.388
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87t-ss-2-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87t-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87T(2) Referring to earlier decisions on non-economic loss
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

87T(3) Referring to earlier decisions on non-economic loss
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87t-ss-3
part of: 87T Referring to earlier decisions on non-economic loss
note: Does not affect rules for determination of other damages or compensation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.388
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87t-ss-3-norm

87U Personal injury damages for loss of earning capacity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87u
note: Court must disregard amount of plaintiff's gross weekly earnings exceeding twice the average weekly earnings for the quarter.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.389
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87u-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87u-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87u-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87U Personal injury damages for loss of earning capacity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87u-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Court must disregard amount of plaintiff's gross weekly earnings exceeding twice the average weekly earnings for the quarter.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87V Average weekly earnings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87v
note: Defines average weekly earnings for a quarter.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.389
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87v-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87v-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87v-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87v-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Defines average weekly earnings for a quarter.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87v-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Identifies the source of average weekly earnings data
premise text: Published by the Australian Statistician
conclusion text: as the average weekly earnings for all employees (total earnings, seasonally adjusted) for the reference period in that quarter
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87W Personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87w
has part: 87W(1) Personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services
has part: 87W(2) Personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services
has part: 87W(3) Personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services
has part: 87W(4) Personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.391

87W(1) Personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87w-ss-1
part of: 87W Personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services
note: Court cannot award personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.391
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87w-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87w-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 87W(1) Personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Court cannot award personal injury damages.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87W(2) Personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87w-ss-2
part of: 87W Personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services
note: Court must be satisfied that certain conditions are met for gratuitous attendant care services.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.391
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87w-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87w-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87w-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87W(2) Personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87w-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must be satisfied that certain conditions are met
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87W(3) Personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87w-ss-3
part of: 87W Personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services
note: No personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services exceeding average weekly earnings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.391
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87w-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87w-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87w-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87w-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits awarding personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services exceeding average weekly earnings
premise text: (3) If the services were provided during a quarter...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87w-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Services overlap with quarter in which average weekly earnings are ascertained
premise text: (3) If the services were provided during a quarter...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87W(4) Personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87w-ss-4
part of: 87W Personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services
note: Personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.391
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87w-ss-4-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87w-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87W(4) Personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

87X Personal injury damages for loss of plaintiff’s capacity to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87x
has part: 87X(1) Personal injury damages for loss of plaintiff’s capacity to
has part: 87X(2) Personal injury damages for loss of plaintiff’s capacity to
has part: 87X(3) Personal injury damages for loss of plaintiff’s capacity to
has part: 87X(4) Personal injury damages for loss of plaintiff’s capacity to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.392

87X(1) Personal injury damages for loss of plaintiff’s capacity to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87x-ss-1
part of: 87X Personal injury damages for loss of plaintiff’s capacity to
note: Court cannot award damages for loss of capacity to provide gratuitous care services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.392
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 87X(1) Personal injury damages for loss of plaintiff’s capacity to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on awarding damages
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87X(2) Personal injury damages for loss of plaintiff’s capacity to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87x-ss-2
part of: 87X Personal injury damages for loss of plaintiff’s capacity to
note: Court must be satisfied that plaintiff provided services for at least 6 hours/week and over 6 months prior to loss of capacity.
description: Services provided by plaintiff
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.392
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87X(2) Personal injury damages for loss of plaintiff’s capacity to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Court must be satisfied that plaintiff provided services for at least 6 hours/week and over 6 months prior to loss of capacity.
conclusion text: Services provided by plaintiff
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval (6 months)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87X(3) Personal injury damages for loss of plaintiff’s capacity to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87x-ss-3
part of: 87X Personal injury damages for loss of plaintiff’s capacity to
note: Court must not award personal injury damages for services exceeding average weekly earnings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.392
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Court must not award damages
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87X(4) Personal injury damages for loss of plaintiff’s capacity to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87x-ss-4
part of: 87X Personal injury damages for loss of plaintiff’s capacity to
note: Court must not award damages for services exceeding a certain threshold.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.392
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-4-logic-deontic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: <
logic summary: Service duration comparison
premise text: Services provided for less than 40 hours/week
conclusion text: Court must not award damages exceeding 1/40 of average weekly earnings
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87x-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Service duration restriction
premise text: Services provided for at least 40 hours/week
conclusion text: Court must not award damages exceeding this threshold
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87Y Damages for future economic loss—discount rate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87y
has part: 87Y(1) Damages for future economic loss—discount rate
has part: 87Y(2) Damages for future economic loss—discount rate
has part: 87Y(3) Damages for future economic loss—discount rate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.394

87Y(1) Damages for future economic loss—discount rate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87y-ss-1
part of: 87Y Damages for future economic loss—discount rate
note: Prescribes a discount rate for future economic loss
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.394
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87Y(1) Damages for future economic loss—discount rate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prescribes
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87Y(2) Damages for future economic loss—discount rate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87y-ss-2
part of: 87Y Damages for future economic loss—discount rate
note: Regulation cannot commence before a certain period after being laid before Parliament.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.394
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 87Y(2) Damages for future economic loss—discount rate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Regulation cannot commence.
premise text: Regulation made for the purposes of paragraph (1)(a)
conclusion text: before the end of the period of 6 months starting...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: starts before
logic summary: Temporal interval starts after regulation is laid before Parliament.
premise text: the end of the period of 6 months starting...
conclusion text: ...on that day or on the later of those days.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: starts before
logic summary: Temporal interval starts after regulation is laid before Parliament.
premise text: the end of the period of 6 months starting...
conclusion text: ...on that day or on the later of those days.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses to
logic summary: Regulation diffuses to all relevant parties after being laid before Parliament.
premise text: the end of the period of 6 months starting...
conclusion text: ...on that day or on the later of those days.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: applies to
logic summary: Regulation applies to all relevant parties after being laid before Parliament.
premise text: the end of the period of 6 months starting...
conclusion text: ...on that day or on the later of those days.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87Y(3) Damages for future economic loss—discount rate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87y-ss-3
part of: 87Y Damages for future economic loss—discount rate
note: Does not affect other laws regarding damages discounting
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.394
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87y-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Excludes effect on other laws
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87Z Damages for loss of superannuation entitlements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87z
note: Court cannot award personal injury damages exceeding a certain amount for economic loss due to loss of employer superannuation contributions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.394
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87z-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87z-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87z-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87z-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87z-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87z-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Court cannot award personal injury damages exceeding a certain amount.
premise text: Section 87Z of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87z-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: The prohibition applies to past economic loss due to loss of earnings or deprivation of earning capacity.
premise text: Section 87ZA (a) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87z-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: The prohibition applies to future economic loss due to deprivation of earning capacity.
premise text: Section 87ZA (b) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87z-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Court cannot award personal injury damages exceeding a certain amount for economic loss due to loss of employer superannuation contributions.
premise text: Section 87ZA (a) and (b) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87ZA Interest on damages
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87za
has part: 87ZA(1) Interest on damages
has part: 87ZA(2) Interest on damages
has part: 87ZA(3) Interest on damages
has part: 87ZA(4) Interest on damages
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.395

87ZA(1) Interest on damages
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87za-ss-1
part of: 87ZA Interest on damages
note: Court cannot order interest on certain damages
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.395
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87za-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87za-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87za-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 87ZA(1) Interest on damages
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87za-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition of interest on personal injury damages
premise text: (1) A court must not...
conclusion text: ...order the payment of interest...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87ZA(2) Interest on damages
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87za-ss-2
part of: 87ZA Interest on damages
note: Court must determine interest rate for personal injury damages
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.395
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87za-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87za-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87za-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87ZA(2) Interest on damages
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87za-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court obligation to determine interest rate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87ZA(3) Interest on damages
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87za-ss-3
part of: 87ZA Interest on damages
note: Payment of interest on a debt under a judgment or order of a court is unaffected.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.395
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87za-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87za-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87za-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Excluded from interest payment
conclusion text: Payment of interest on a debt under a judgment or order of a court is unaffected.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87ZA(4) Interest on damages
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87za-ss-4
part of: 87ZA Interest on damages
note: Interest on damages
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.395
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87za-ss-4-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87za-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87ZA(4) Interest on damages
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

87ZB Exemplary and aggravated damages
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87zb
has part: 87ZB(1) Exemplary and aggravated damages
has part: 87ZB(2) Exemplary and aggravated damages
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.396

87ZB(1) Exemplary and aggravated damages
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87zb-ss-1
part of: 87ZB Exemplary and aggravated damages
note: Court cannot award exemplary or aggravated damages in death or personal injury cases.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.396
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zb-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zb-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 87ZB(1) Exemplary and aggravated damages
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of awarding exemplary damages
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87ZB(2) Exemplary and aggravated damages
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87zb-ss-2
part of: 87ZB Exemplary and aggravated damages
note: Court power to award damages not affected by this section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.396
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zb-ss-2-norm

87ZC Court may make orders under section 87 for structured
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87zc
has part: 87ZC(1) Court may make orders under section 87 for structured
has part: 87ZC(2) Court may make orders under section 87 for structured
has part: 87ZC(3) Court may make orders under section 87 for structured
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.397

87ZC(1) Court may make orders under section 87 for structured
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87zc-ss-1
part of: 87ZC Court may make orders under section 87 for structured
note: Court may make orders under section 87 for structured settlement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.397
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zc-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87ZC(1) Court may make orders under section 87 for structured
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Court may make an order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87ZC(2) Court may make orders under section 87 for structured
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87zc-ss-2
part of: 87ZC Court may make orders under section 87 for structured
note: Court may make orders under section 87 in a proceeding that is not a proceeding to which this Part applies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.397
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zc-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87ZC(2) Court may make orders under section 87 for structured
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Court may make orders under section 87
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87ZC(3) Court may make orders under section 87 for structured
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87zc-ss-3
part of: 87ZC Court may make orders under section 87 for structured
note: Court may make orders under section 87 for structured settlement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.397
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zc-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zc-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zc-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87ZC(3) Court may make orders under section 87 for structured
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must make orders under section 87.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zc-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Structured settlement is an agreement that provides for the payment of all or part of an award of damages.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87ZP Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87zp
has part: 87ZP(1) Definitions
has part: 87ZP(2) Definitions
has part: 87ZP(3) Definitions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.398

87ZP(1) Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87zp-ss-1
part of: 87ZP Definitions
note: Defines industry code of practice and minor variation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.398
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zp-ss-1-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zp-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87ZP(1) Definitions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

87ZP(2) Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87zp-ss-2
part of: 87ZP Definitions
note: Reference definition for Commission notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.398
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zp-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zp-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zp-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zp-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zp-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal relation between revocation and substitution
premise text: (2) A reference in this Division to a proposal of the Commission is a...
conclusion text: ...under subsection 91C(3).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zp-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal relation between revocation and substitution
premise text: (2) A reference in this Division to a proposal of the Commission is a...
conclusion text: ...under subsection 91C(3).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zp-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal relation between revocation and substitution
premise text: (2) A reference in this Division to a proposal of the Commission is a...
conclusion text: ...under subsection 91B(3).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

87ZP(3) Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87zp-ss-3
part of: 87ZP Definitions
note: Reference to an authorisation under this Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.398
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-87zp-ss-3-norm

88 Commission may grant authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-88
has part: 88(1) Commission may grant authorisations
has part: 88(1A) Commission may grant authorisations
has part: 88(2) Commission may grant authorisations
has part: 88(3) Commission may grant authorisations
has part: 88(4) Commission may grant authorisations
has part: 88(5) Commission may grant authorisations
has part: 88(6) Commission may grant authorisations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.398

88(1) Commission may grant authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-88-ss-1
part of: 88 Commission may grant authorisations
note: Commission may grant authorisation to engage in conduct specified in the authorisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.398
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 88(1) Commission may grant authorisations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: grant
logic summary: Permission granted by the Commission.
premise text: The Commission may grant an authorisation.
conclusion text: An authorisation is granted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88(1A) Commission may grant authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-88-ss-1a
part of: 88 Commission may grant authorisations
note: Commission may grant authorisations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.398
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-1a-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-1a-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 88(1A) Commission may grant authorisations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

88(2) Commission may grant authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-88-ss-2
part of: 88 Commission may grant authorisations
note: Exemptions from Division 1 or 2 of Part IV
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.398
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 88(2) Commission may grant authorisations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
logic summary: Grants permission to conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88(3) Commission may grant authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-88-ss-3
part of: 88 Commission may grant authorisations
note: Commission may specify conditions in authorisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.398
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 88(3) Commission may grant authorisations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Commission may specify conditions in authorisation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

88(4) Commission may grant authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-88-ss-4
part of: 88 Commission may grant authorisations
note: Commission must give undertaking under section 87B
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.398
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 88(4) Commission may grant authorisations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88(5) Commission may grant authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-88-ss-5
part of: 88 Commission may grant authorisations
note: Commission may grant separate authorisations for any of the conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.398
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 88(5) Commission may grant authorisations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Grant
logic summary: Commission grants permission.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88(6) Commission may grant authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-88-ss-6
part of: 88 Commission may grant authorisations
note: Commission cannot grant authorisation before decision on application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.398
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-6-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-6-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !A
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: Commission has power to grant authorisation.
conclusion text: Commission does not have power to grant authorisation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-6-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ¬(A ∧ B)
logic summary: Negation of conjunction
premise text: The Commission has power to grant authorisations and decides the application for the authorisation.
conclusion text: The Commission does not have power to grant an authorisation for conduct engaged in before the decision on application.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: ¬(A ∧ B)
logic summary: Negation of conjunction
premise text: The Commission has power to grant authorisations and decides the application for the authorisation at time A, but not before time B.
conclusion text: The Commission does not have power to grant an authorisation for conduct engaged in before the decision on application.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: ¬(A ∧ B)
logic summary: Negation of conjunction
premise text: The Commission has power to grant authorisations and decides the application for the authorisation, but not before time A.
conclusion text: The Commission does not have power to grant an authorisation for conduct engaged in before the decision on application.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-88-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: ¬(A ∧ B)
logic summary: Negation of conjunction
premise text: The Commission has power to grant authorisations and decides the application for the authorisation, but not before time A.
conclusion text: The Commission does not have power to grant an authorisation for conduct engaged in before the decision on application.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89 Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89
has part: 89(1) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
has part: 89(1A) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
has part: 89(1B) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
has part: 89(2) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
has part: 89(3) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
has part: 89(4) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
has part: 89(5) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.400

89(1) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89-ss-1
part of: 89 Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
note: Application requirements for authorisation
description: Form, information, and fee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.400
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89(1) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be in a specific form
premise text: Form is required
conclusion text: Application is valid if it meets the requirements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89(1A) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89-ss-1a
part of: 89 Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
note: Commission must give written notice to applicant within 5 business days if application is deemed invalid.
description: written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.400
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-1a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-1a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 89(1A) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Commission must prohibit applicant from proceeding.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89(1B) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89-ss-1b
part of: 89 Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
note: Defines business day for purposes of subsection (1A)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.400
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-1b-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89(1B) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning
premise text: (1B) For the purposes of subsection (1A)
conclusion text: business day means a day that is not a Saturday, a Sunday or a public holiday in the Australian Capital Territory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

89(2) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89-ss-2
part of: 89 Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
note: Public notice of application receipt
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.400
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89(2) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must cause public notice
premise text: (2) If the Commission receives an application...
conclusion text: The Commission must cause notice of the receipt of that application to be made public.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89(3) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89-ss-3
part of: 89 Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
note: Register of applications for authorisations and revocations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.400
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-3-norm

89(4) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89-ss-4
part of: 89 Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
note: The register must include certain documents and information.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.400
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89(4) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide the required information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89(5) Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89-ss-5
part of: 89 Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
note: Request for exclusion of document or submission from register
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.400
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-89-ss-5-norm

90 Determination of applications for authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-90
has part: 90(1) Determination of applications for authorisations
has part: 90(4) Determination of applications for authorisations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.403

90(1) Determination of applications for authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-90-ss-1
part of: 90 Determination of applications for authorisations
note: Commission must make a determination in writing granting or dismissing an application for authorisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.403
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 90(1) Determination of applications for authorisations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Commission must make a determination in writing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90(4) Determination of applications for authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-90-ss-4
part of: 90 Determination of applications for authorisations
note: Commission must state reasons for determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.403
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 90(4) Determination of applications for authorisations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide reasons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 January 2026.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.408
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-1-4-norm

90A Commission to afford opportunity for conference before
type: Concept
realized by: sec-90a
has part: 90A(1) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before
has part: 90A(2) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before
has part: 90A(3) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before
has part: 90A(4) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before
has part: 90A(5) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.408

90A(1) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before
type: Concept
realized by: sec-90a-ss-1
part of: 90A Commission to afford opportunity for conference before
note: Commission must prepare draft determination before determining an application for authorisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.408
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 90A(1) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide draft determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90A(2) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before
type: Concept
realized by: sec-90a-ss-2
part of: 90A Commission to afford opportunity for conference before
note: Commission must invite applicant and interested persons to notify about conference
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.408
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 90A(2) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90A(3) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before
type: Concept
realized by: sec-90a-ss-3
part of: 90A Commission to afford opportunity for conference before
note: Commission must inform applicant of draft determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.408
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 90A(3) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must inform applicant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90A(4) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before
type: Concept
realized by: sec-90a-ss-4
part of: 90A Commission to afford opportunity for conference before
note: The Commission must send a copy of the draft determination and a summary of reasons with each notice under subsection (2).
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.408
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Commission must send a copy of the draft determination and a summary of reasons.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90A(5) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before
type: Concept
realized by: sec-90a-ss-5
part of: 90A Commission to afford opportunity for conference before
note: Failure to notify within 14 days allows Commission to make determination without conference.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.408
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 90A(5) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits failure to notify within 14 days.
premise text: No notification within 14 days.
conclusion text: Commission may make determination without conference.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal interval for notification period.
premise text: 14 days mentioned in subsection (2).
conclusion text: Notification period overlaps with Commission's action.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90B Commission may rely on consultations undertaken by the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-90b
has part: 90B(1) Commission may rely on consultations undertaken by the
has part: 90B(2) Commission may rely on consultations undertaken by the
has part: 90B(3) Commission may rely on consultations undertaken by the
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.412

90B(1) Commission may rely on consultations undertaken by the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-90b-ss-1
part of: 90B Commission may rely on consultations undertaken by the
note: Commission may rely on consultations undertaken by the AEMC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.412
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90b-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: RelyOn
logic summary: Commission may rely on consultations undertaken by the AEMC.
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) an application under section 88, 91A, 91B or 91C is made in relation to the National Electricity Rules or a provision of the Rules; and (b) the AEMC has done the following: (i) published the Rules or the provision and invited people to make submissions to it on the Rules or the provision; (ii) specified the effect of subsection (2) when it published the Rules or the provision; (iii) considered any submissions that were received within the time limit specified by it when it published the Rules or the provision.
conclusion text: (1) This section applies if: (a) an application under section 88, 91A, 91B or 91C is made in relation to the National Electricity Rules or a provision of the Rules; and (b) the AEMC has done the following: (i) published the Rules or the provision and invited people to make submissions to it on the Rules or the provision; (ii) specified the effect of subsection (2) when it published the Rules or the provision; (iii) considered any submissions that were received within the time limit specified by it when it published the Rules or the provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90B(2) Commission may rely on consultations undertaken by the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-90b-ss-2
part of: 90B Commission may rely on consultations undertaken by the
note: Commission may rely on consultations undertaken by the AEMC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.412
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90b-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to rely on consultations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90B(3) Commission may rely on consultations undertaken by the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-90b-ss-3
part of: 90B Commission may rely on consultations undertaken by the
note: Defines National Electricity Rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.412
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90b-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90b-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90b-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90b-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90b-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Identifies the scope of National Electricity Rules
premise text: (a) the National Electricity Rules, as in force from time to time,
conclusion text: National Electricity Rules means...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90b-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Includes rules from other jurisdictions
premise text: (b) those Rules as they apply as a law of another State;
conclusion text: ...or (c) those Rules as they apply as a law of a Territory;
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-90b-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Includes rules from the Commonwealth
premise text: (d) those Rules as they apply as a law of the Commonwealth.
conclusion text: ...or (c) those Rules as they apply as a law of the Commonwealth.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

91 Grant and variation of authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-91
has part: 91(1) Grant and variation of authorisations
has part: 91(1A) Grant and variation of authorisations
has part: 91(1B) Grant and variation of authorisations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.413

91(1) Grant and variation of authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-91-ss-1
part of: 91 Grant and variation of authorisations
note: Authorisation period specified in authorisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.413
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91-ss-1-norm

91(1A) Grant and variation of authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-91-ss-1a
part of: 91 Grant and variation of authorisations
note: Authorisation commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.413
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91-ss-1a-norm

91(1B) Grant and variation of authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-91-ss-1b
part of: 91 Grant and variation of authorisations
note: Grant and variation of authorisations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.413
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91-ss-1b-norm

91A Minor variations of authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-91a
has part: 91A(1) Minor variations of authorisations
has part: 91A(2) Minor variations of authorisations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.415

91A(1) Minor variations of authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-91a-ss-1
part of: 91A Minor variations of authorisations
note: Granting minor variations of authorisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.415
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91a-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91a-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 91A(1) Minor variations of authorisations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Authorises minor variation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

91A(2) Minor variations of authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-91a-ss-2
part of: 91A Minor variations of authorisations
note: Commission must satisfy minor variation application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.415
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91a-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 91A(2) Minor variations of authorisations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide satisfaction
premise text: Application is a minor variation
conclusion text: Commission must satisfy
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

91B Revocation of an authorisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-91b
has part: 91B(1) Revocation of an authorisation
has part: 91B(2) Revocation of an authorisation
has part: 91B(3) Revocation of an authorisation
has part: 91B(3A) Revocation of an authorisation
has part: 91B(3B) Revocation of an authorisation
has part: 91B(4) Revocation of an authorisation
has part: 91B(5) Revocation of an authorisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.418

91B(1) Revocation of an authorisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-91b-ss-1
part of: 91B Revocation of an authorisation
note: Application for revocation of authorisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.418
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-1-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 91B(1) Revocation of an authorisation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

91B(2) Revocation of an authorisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-91b-ss-2
part of: 91B Revocation of an authorisation
note: Commission must notify interested persons of revocation application and basis.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.418
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 91B(2) Revocation of an authorisation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Notification obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

91B(3) Revocation of an authorisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-91b-ss-3
part of: 91B Revocation of an authorisation
note: Revocation of an authorisation if certain conditions are met
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.418
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits revocation of an authorisation under certain conditions
premise text: (3) If, at any time after granting an authorisation...
conclusion text: The Commission may revoke the authorisation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with temporal intervals related to authorisation grant
premise text: there has been a material change of circumstances since the authorisation was granted;
conclusion text: The Commission considers revocation during overlapping time periods.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implies that persons interested must be informed of proposed revocation
premise text: (d) inform those persons that it is considering the revocation of the authorisation;
conclusion text: The Commission informs persons of proposed revocation.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Spreads information about proposed revocation to interested parties
premise text: (d) inform those persons that it is considering the revocation of the authorisation;
conclusion text: The Commission spreads information about proposed revocation.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
logic summary: Analyzes submissions received in response to proposed revocation
premise text: (f) invite submissions in respect of the revocation within a period specified by the Commission.
conclusion text: The Commission analyzes submissions.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

91B(3A) Revocation of an authorisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-91b-ss-3a
part of: 91B Revocation of an authorisation
note: Subsection 90(6) applies in relation to an application for a revocation of an authorisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.418
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 91B(3A) Revocation of an authorisation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Applicability condition
premise text: Subsection 90(6)
conclusion text: Application for revocation of authorisation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

91B(3B) Revocation of an authorisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-91b-ss-3b
part of: 91B Revocation of an authorisation
note: Subsection 90(6) applies in relation to a proposal for revocation of an authorisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.418
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3b-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3b-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3b-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 91B(3B) Revocation of an authorisation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Subsection applies to proposals for revocation of an authorisation.
premise text: Subsection 90(6)
conclusion text: Proposal for revocation of an authorisation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Subsection applies in relation to a proposal for revocation of an authorisation.
premise text: Other than paragraphs 90(6)(a) and (b)
conclusion text: Proposal for revocation of an authorisation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3b-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Subsection applies in relation to a proposal for revocation of an authorisation.
premise text: Corresponding way
conclusion text: Proposal for revocation of an authorisation
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-3b-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Subsection applies to proposals for revocation of an authorisation.
premise text: Paragraphs 90(6)(a) and (b)
conclusion text: Proposal for revocation of an authorisation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

91B(4) Revocation of an authorisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-91b-ss-4
part of: 91B Revocation of an authorisation
note: Commission's decision on revoking an authorisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.418
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-4-norm

91B(5) Revocation of an authorisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-91b-ss-5
part of: 91B Revocation of an authorisation
note: Commission must not make a determination revoking the authorisation unless satisfied.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.418
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Commission must not make a determination revoking the authorisation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

91C Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-91c
has part: 91C(1) Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
has part: 91C(2) Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
has part: 91C(3) Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
has part: 91C(3A) Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
has part: 91C(3B) Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
has part: 91C(4) Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.420

91C(1) Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-91c-ss-1
part of: 91C Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
note: A person may apply to revoke an authorisation and substitute a new one.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.420
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-1-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 91C(1) Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

91C(2) Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-91c-ss-2
part of: 91C Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
note: Notify persons interested of revocation and substitution of authorisation.
description: Notice in writing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.420
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Commission must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

91C(3) Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-91c-ss-3
part of: 91C Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
note: Commission may inform persons of proposed revocation and substitution of authorisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.420
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 91C(3) Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Commission may inform persons.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

91C(3A) Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-91c-ss-3a
part of: 91C Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
note: Subsection 90(6) applies in relation to an application for a revocation and substitution of an authorisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.420
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-3a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 91C(3A) Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Subsection applies in relation to an application.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

91C(3B) Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-91c-ss-3b
part of: 91C Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
note: Subsection 90(6) applies in relation to a proposal for revocation and substitution of an authorisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.420
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-3b-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-3b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 91C(3B) Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Subsection applies in relation to a proposal.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

91C(4) Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-91c-ss-4
part of: 91C Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
note: Commission may revoke or substitute an authorisation after considering submissions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.420
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 91C(4) Revocation of an authorisation and substitution of a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-91c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to revoke or substitute an authorisation.
premise text: Commission has the authority to make a determination.
conclusion text: Revocation or substitution is permitted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

92 Providing false or misleading information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92
note: Providing false or misleading information in merger authorisation applications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.423
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 92 Providing false or misleading information
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of providing false or misleading information
premise text: Negligence in providing information
conclusion text: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92A Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92a
has part: 92A(1) Definitions
has part: 92A(2) Definitions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.425

92A(1) Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92a-ss-1
part of: 92A Definitions
note: Defines business day for the purpose of this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.425
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92a-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 92A(1) Definitions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Establishes a term with a specific meaning.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term for classification purposes.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92A(2) Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92a-ss-2
part of: 92A Definitions
note: Reference to an authorisation under this Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.425
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92a-ss-2-norm

92B Commission may grant authorisations in exceptional
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92b
has part: 92B(1) Commission may grant authorisations in exceptional
has part: 92B(2) Commission may grant authorisations in exceptional
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.425

92B(1) Commission may grant authorisations in exceptional
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92b-ss-1
part of: 92B Commission may grant authorisations in exceptional
note: Commission may grant authorisation to engage in conduct specified in the authorisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.425
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92b-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92b-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 92B(1) Commission may grant authorisations in exceptional
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Grant
logic summary: Commission grants permission.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92B(2) Commission may grant authorisations in exceptional
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92b-ss-2
part of: 92B Commission may grant authorisations in exceptional
note: Commission may grant authorisations in exceptional circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.425
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92b-ss-2-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92b-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 92B(2) Commission may grant authorisations in exceptional
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

92C Procedure for applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92c
note: Application must be in approved form and contain required information.
description: Form, prescribed documents, and application statement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.426
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92c-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92c-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 92C Procedure for applications
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Must be in approved form
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92D Determination of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92d
has part: 92D(1) Determination of applications
has part: 92D(2) Determination of applications
has part: 92D(3) Determination of applications
has part: 92D(4) Determination of applications
has part: 92D(5) Determination of applications
has part: 92D(6) Determination of applications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.427

92D(1) Determination of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92d-ss-1
part of: 92D Determination of applications
note: Granting or dismissing an application for authorisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.427
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Granting or dismissing an application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92D(2) Determination of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92d-ss-2
part of: 92D Determination of applications
note: List of declarations that must be made
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.427
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 92D(2) Determination of applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a list of declarations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92D(3) Determination of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92d-ss-3
part of: 92D Determination of applications
note: Commission must be satisfied that conduct would assist in response to exceptional circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.427
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 92D(3) Determination of applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92D(4) Determination of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92d-ss-4
part of: 92D Determination of applications
note: Must consider public benefit and detriment in determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.427
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider public benefit and detriment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for consideration of public benefit and detriment
premise text: (4) In making a determination under subsection (1), the Commission:...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92D(5) Determination of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92d-ss-5
part of: 92D Determination of applications
note: Must specify exceptional circumstances or emergency
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.427
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 92D(5) Determination of applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Specify exceptional circumstances or emergency
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92D(6) Determination of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92d-ss-6
part of: 92D Determination of applications
note: The Commission must state its reasons for a determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.427
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92d-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide reasons
conclusion text: The Commission must state its reasons.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92E Period for which authorisations remain in force
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92e
note: Authorisation duration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.428
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92e-norm

92F Variation of authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92f
has part: 92F(1) Variation of authorisations
has part: 92F(2) Variation of authorisations
has part: 92F(3) Variation of authorisations
has part: 92F(4) Variation of authorisations
has part: 92F(5) Variation of authorisations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.428

92F(1) Variation of authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92f-ss-1
part of: 92F Variation of authorisations
note: Commission may vary an authorisation under this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.428
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92f-ss-1-norm

92F(2) Variation of authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92f-ss-2
part of: 92F Variation of authorisations
note: Commission must ensure conduct assists in response to exceptional circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.428
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92f-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 92F(2) Variation of authorisations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide assistance
premise text: Assistance is required
conclusion text: Commission must ensure conduct assists
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92F(3) Variation of authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92f-ss-3
part of: 92F Variation of authorisations
note: Must consider likely benefit and detriment to public in making determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.428
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92f-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must consider
premise text: Regard must be had to
conclusion text: Obligation to consider
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92F(4) Variation of authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92f-ss-4
part of: 92F Variation of authorisations
note: Commission must notify applicant of variation to authorisation.
description: written notice stating the variation and its details
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.428
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92f-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92f-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 92F(4) Variation of authorisations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Commission must notify applicant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92F(5) Variation of authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92f-ss-5
part of: 92F Variation of authorisations
note: Variation takes effect on business day after notice is given.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.428
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92f-ss-5-norm

92G Revocation of authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92g
has part: 92G(1) Revocation of authorisations
has part: 92G(2) Revocation of authorisations
has part: 92G(3) Revocation of authorisations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.429

92G(1) Revocation of authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92g-ss-1
part of: 92G Revocation of authorisations
note: Revocation of authorisation under certain circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.429
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92g-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92g-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92g-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 92G(1) Revocation of authorisations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits revocation of authorisation
premise text: (1) The Commission may, at any time, revoke an authorisation under this Division...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92g-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for revocation consideration
premise text: (1) The Commission may, at any time, revoke an authorisation under this Division...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92G(2) Revocation of authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92g-ss-2
part of: 92G Revocation of authorisations
note: Revocation notice must be given to the applicant.
description: (a) and (b)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.429
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92g-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92g-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 92G(2) Revocation of authorisations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of authorisation revocation notice
premise text: (2) The Commission must give the person who applied for the authorisation written notice...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92G(3) Revocation of authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92g-ss-3
part of: 92G Revocation of authorisations
note: Revocation takes effect on business day after notice is given.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.429
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92g-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92g-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92g-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires temporal relation
premise text: Temporal intervals require AllenInterval
conclusion text: sec-92g-ss-3 requires AllenInterval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92H Register of applications and proposals
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92h
has part: 92H(1) Register of applications and proposals
has part: 92H(2) Register of applications and proposals
has part: 92H(3) Register of applications and proposals
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.430

92H(1) Register of applications and proposals
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92h-ss-1
part of: 92H Register of applications and proposals
note: Maintain a register of applications and authorisations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.430
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92h-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must maintain a register.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92H(2) Register of applications and proposals
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92h-ss-2
part of: 92H Register of applications and proposals
note: The register must include a statement of reasons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.430
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92h-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92h-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 92H(2) Register of applications and proposals
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a statement of reasons.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92H(3) Register of applications and proposals
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92h-ss-3
part of: 92H Register of applications and proposals
note: Conditional delay in registering applications and proposals
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.430
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92h-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92h-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-92h-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93 Notification of exclusive dealing or resale price maintenance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93
has part: 93(1) Notification of exclusive dealing or resale price maintenance
has part: 93(8) Notification of exclusive dealing or resale price maintenance
has part: 93(1A) Notification of exclusive dealing or resale price maintenance
has part: 93(2) Notification of exclusive dealing or resale price maintenance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.431

93(1) Notification of exclusive dealing or resale price maintenance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93-ss-1
part of: 93 Notification of exclusive dealing or resale price maintenance
note: Corporation must notify of exclusive dealing or resale price maintenance conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.431
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 93(1) Notification of exclusive dealing or resale price maintenance
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notification.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93(8) Notification of exclusive dealing or resale price maintenance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93-ss-8
part of: 93 Notification of exclusive dealing or resale price maintenance
note: May give notice to Commission about conduct or proposed conduct
description: notice setting out particulars of conduct or proposed conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.431
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93-ss-8-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to give notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93(1A) Notification of exclusive dealing or resale price maintenance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93-ss-1a
part of: 93 Notification of exclusive dealing or resale price maintenance
note: Requirements for a valid notice under subsection (1)
description: The information required by the form and any other prescribed documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.431
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93-ss-1a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 93(1A) Notification of exclusive dealing or resale price maintenance
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires specific information to be provided
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93(2) Notification of exclusive dealing or resale price maintenance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93-ss-2
part of: 93 Notification of exclusive dealing or resale price maintenance
note: No notice can be given for conduct or proposed conduct if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.431
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition of notice giving
premise text: (2) A corporation or other person may not give a notice under subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93AA Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93aa
note: Definitions for Subdivision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.438
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93aa-norm

93AB Notification of collective bargaining
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93ab
has part: 93AB(1A) Notification of collective bargaining
has part: 93AB(1) Notification of collective bargaining
has part: 93AB(2) Notification of collective bargaining
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.438

93AB(1A) Notification of collective bargaining
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93ab-ss-1a
part of: 93AB Notification of collective bargaining
note: A corporation must provide a notice to the Commission if certain conditions are met.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.438
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ab-ss-1a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ab-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ab-ss-1a-logic-deontic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ab-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 93AB(1A) Notification of collective bargaining
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ab-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ab-ss-1a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: OBLIGES
logic summary: Obliges the corporation to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93AB(1) Notification of collective bargaining
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93ab-ss-1
part of: 93AB Notification of collective bargaining
note: A corporation may give a notice to the Commission if certain requirements are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.438
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ab-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 93AB(1) Notification of collective bargaining
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to give a notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93AB(2) Notification of collective bargaining
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93ab-ss-2
part of: 93AB Notification of collective bargaining
note: Corporation must have made or propose to make initial contract with one or more persons about supply of particular goods or services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.438
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ab-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 93AB(2) Notification of collective bargaining
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST HAVE
logic summary: Corporation must have made initial contract.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93AC Commission’s objection notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93ac
has part: 93AC(1) Commission’s objection notice
has part: 93AC(2) Commission’s objection notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.443

93AC(1) Commission’s objection notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93ac-ss-1
part of: 93AC Commission’s objection notice
note: Commission may give corporation a written notice stating that it is satisfied the benefit to public does not outweigh detriment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.443
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ac-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ac-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ac-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ac-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ac-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ac-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 93AC(1) Commission’s objection notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Commission prohibits corporation from including cartel provision in contract.
premise text: (a) a corporation gives the Commission a collective bargaining notice...
conclusion text: ...the Commission may give the corporation a written notice...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ac-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Commission's objection notice has temporal interval of when it was given.
premise text: (1) If:...
conclusion text: ...the Commission may give the corporation a written notice...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ac-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
logic summary: Commission justifies prohibition by considering benefit to public.
premise text: (b) the Commission is satisfied that any benefit to the public...
conclusion text: ...the Commission may give the corporation a written notice...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ac-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Commission's objection notice spreads to corporation.
premise text: (a) a corporation gives the Commission a collective bargaining notice...
conclusion text: ...the Commission may give the corporation a written notice...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ac-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Commission infers prohibition from cartel provision.
premise text: (a) a corporation gives the Commission a collective bargaining notice...
conclusion text: ...the Commission may give the corporation a written notice...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93AC(2) Commission’s objection notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93ac-ss-2
part of: 93AC Commission’s objection notice
note: Commission’s obligation to respond to collective bargaining notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.443
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ac-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ac-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 93AC(2) Commission’s objection notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide response
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93AD When collective bargaining notice comes into force and ceases
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93ad
has part: 93AD(1) When collective bargaining notice comes into force and ceases
has part: 93AD(2) When collective bargaining notice comes into force and ceases
has part: 93AD(3) When collective bargaining notice comes into force and ceases
has part: 93AD(4) When collective bargaining notice comes into force and ceases
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.446

93AD(1) When collective bargaining notice comes into force and ceases
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93ad-ss-1
part of: 93AD When collective bargaining notice comes into force and ceases
note: Collective bargaining notice comes into force after a specified period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.446
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ad-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ad-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 93AD(1) When collective bargaining notice comes into force and ceases
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: The state holds an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93AD(2) When collective bargaining notice comes into force and ceases
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93ad-ss-2
part of: 93AD When collective bargaining notice comes into force and ceases
note: Collective bargaining notice ceases to be in force if withdrawn or an objection notice is given.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.446
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ad-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ad-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ad-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ad-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ad-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits collective bargaining notice coming into force under certain conditions.
premise text: Withdrawal or objection notice given.
conclusion text: Collective bargaining notice ceases to be in force.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ad-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes the timing of collective bargaining notice withdrawal and objection notice giving.
premise text: Commission gives conference notice during the period referred to in paragraph (1)(a).
conclusion text: Collective bargaining notice ceases to be in force if Commission gives conference notice during the specified period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ad-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Describes the timing of collective bargaining notice giving and objection notice giving.
premise text: Commission gives conference notice during the period referred to in paragraph (1)(a).
conclusion text: Collective bargaining notice ceases to be in force if Commission gives conference notice during the specified period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ad-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: Describes the relationship between collective bargaining notice withdrawal and cessation of its effect.
premise text: Collective bargaining notice ceases to be in force if withdrawn or an objection notice is given.
conclusion text: Withdrawal or objection notice gives rise to collective bargaining notice ceasing to be in force.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ad-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: if
logic summary: Describes the relationship between Commission giving conference notice and collective bargaining notice withdrawal.
premise text: Commission gives conference notice during the period referred to in paragraph (1)(a).
conclusion text: Commission giving conference notice gives rise to collective bargaining notice ceasing to be in force.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

93AD(3) When collective bargaining notice comes into force and ceases
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93ad-ss-3
part of: 93AD When collective bargaining notice comes into force and ceases
note: Conditions under which a collective bargaining notice ceases to be in force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.446
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ad-ss-3-norm

93AD(4) When collective bargaining notice comes into force and ceases
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93ad-ss-4
part of: 93AD When collective bargaining notice comes into force and ceases
note: Defines relevant day for collective bargaining notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.446
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ad-ss-4-norm

1 If an application is not made to the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-5
note: Application must be made on the day of notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.447
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-1-5-norm

2 If an application is made to the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-2
has part: 2(5) If an application is made to the
has part: 2(6) If an application is made to the
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.448

2(5) If an application is made to the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-2-ss-5
part of: 2 If an application is made to the
note: Commission may determine an alternative period for the corporation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.448
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-2-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-2-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-2-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-2-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Commission may determine an alternative period for the corporation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-2-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2(6) If an application is made to the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-2-ss-6
part of: 2 If an application is made to the
note: The Commission must provide a written statement of its reasons for giving notice.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.448
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-2-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-2-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-2-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Commission must provide a written statement of its reasons for giving notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93AE Withdrawal of collective bargaining notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93ae
has part: 93AE(1) Withdrawal of collective bargaining notice
has part: 93AE(2) Withdrawal of collective bargaining notice
has part: 93AE(3) Withdrawal of collective bargaining notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.449

93AE(1) Withdrawal of collective bargaining notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93ae-ss-1
part of: 93AE Withdrawal of collective bargaining notice
note: Corporation may withdraw collective bargaining notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.449
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ae-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to withdraw collective bargaining notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93AE(2) Withdrawal of collective bargaining notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93ae-ss-2
part of: 93AE Withdrawal of collective bargaining notice
note: The corporation may withdraw collective bargaining notice at any time before the Commission gives it an objection notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.449
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ae-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ae-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ae-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 93AE(2) Withdrawal of collective bargaining notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ae-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to withdraw collective bargaining notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93AE(3) Withdrawal of collective bargaining notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93ae-ss-3
part of: 93AE Withdrawal of collective bargaining notice
note: Withdrawal of collective bargaining notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.449
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ae-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ae-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ae-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits withdrawal of collective bargaining notice
premise text: (3) If...
conclusion text: then the collective bargaining notice is taken to be withdrawn.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93AF Only 1 collective bargaining notice under subsection 93AB(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93af
note: No further collective bargaining notice under subsection 93AB(1) may be given.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.450
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93af-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93af-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93af-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93af-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93af-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93af-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of further collective bargaining notice
premise text: Given a collective bargaining notice under subsection 93AB(1)
conclusion text: No further collective bargaining notice may be given
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93af-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Restrict
logic summary: Restriction on the giving of collective bargaining notices
premise text: The provision limits the number of collective bargaining notices that can be given
conclusion text: The provision restricts the giving of collective bargaining notices
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93af-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implication of the prohibition on further collective bargaining notices
premise text: If a collective bargaining notice is given, no further notice may be given
conclusion text: The prohibition implies that no further collective bargaining notice may be given
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93af-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Enforce
logic summary: Enforcement of the prohibition on further collective bargaining notices
premise text: The provision establishes a duty to comply with the prohibition
conclusion text: The provision enforces the prohibition on further collective bargaining notices
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

93AG Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93ag
has part: 93AG(1) Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
has part: 93AG(2) Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
has part: 93AG(3) Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
has part: 93AG(4) Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
has part: 93AG(5) Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.450

93AG(1) Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93ag-ss-1
part of: 93AG Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
note: Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.450
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 93AG(1) Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits collective boycott conduct
premise text: (a) the corporation has given the Commission a collective bargaining notice that relates (wholly or partly) to collective boycott conduct;
conclusion text: The Commission may not give a corporation a written notice (a stop notice) if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for material change of circumstances
premise text: (c) there has been a material change of circumstances since...
conclusion text: ...the Commission reasonably believes that...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93AG(2) Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93ag-ss-2
part of: 93AG Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
note: Commission must provide written statement of reasons for stop notice. Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.450
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 93AG(2) Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide written statement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits collective boycott conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93AG(3) Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93ag-ss-3
part of: 93AG Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
note: Collective bargaining notice not in force under section 93AD for collective boycott conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.450
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 93AG(3) Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Obligation implies prohibition of collective bargaining notice for collective boycott conduct
premise text: Collective bargaining notice is in force
conclusion text: Not in force under section 93AD
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Stop notice and collective bargaining notice overlap in time
premise text: Collective bargaining notice is taken while stop notice is in force
conclusion text: Not in force under section 93AD
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Collective bargaining notice repeats every time collective boycott conduct occurs
premise text: Collective bargaining notice is taken for the purposes of this Act
conclusion text: Not in force under section 93AD
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Stop notice diffuses to collective bargaining notice
premise text: Collective bargaining notice is taken for the purposes of this Act
conclusion text: Not in force under section 93AD
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
logic summary: State infers obligation from collective bargaining notice and stop notice
premise text: Collective bargaining notice is taken for the purposes of this Act
conclusion text: Not in force under section 93AD
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93AG(4) Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93ag-ss-4
part of: 93AG Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
note: The stop notice comes into force at the specified time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.450
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-4-logic-cogai-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-4-logic-shacl-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 93AG(4) Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: comes-into-force
logic summary: The stop notice's effective start.
premise text: (4) The stop notice comes into force at the time the Commission gives the corporation the stop notice.
conclusion text: The stop notice is enforceable from this point forward.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implies
logic summary: The stop notice's timing.
premise text: (4) The stop notice comes into force at the time the Commission gives the corporation the stop notice.
conclusion text: If the Commission gives the corporation a stop notice, then it comes into force at that time.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The timing of the stop notice's effect.
premise text: (4) The stop notice comes into force at the time the Commission gives the corporation the stop notice.
conclusion text: The stop notice is in effect during this point forward.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-4-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: has-effect
logic summary: The stop notice's impact on the corporation.
premise text: (4) The stop notice comes into force at the time the Commission gives the corporation the stop notice.
conclusion text: The stop notice has an effect on the corporation from this point forward.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-4-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: has-effect
logic summary: The stop notice's impact on the corporation.
premise text: (4) The stop notice comes into force at the time the Commission gives the corporation the stop notice.
conclusion text: The stop notice has an effect on the corporation from this point forward.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93AG(5) Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93ag-ss-5
part of: 93AG Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
note: Stop notice ceases at end of period or Commission objection notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.450
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 93AG(5) Stop notice for collective boycott conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93ag-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits collective boycott conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93A Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93a
has part: 93A(1) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
has part: 93A(2) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
has part: 93A(3) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
has part: 93A(4) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
has part: 93A(5) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
has part: 93A(6) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.452

93A(1) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93a-ss-1
part of: 93A Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
note: Draft notice must be prepared before giving a notice under certain subsections.
description: Draft notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.452
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide draft notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93A(2) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93a-ss-2
part of: 93A Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
note: Commission must invite corporation or person to notify on conference
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.452
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 93A(2) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice and invite conference
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93A(3) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93a-ss-3
part of: 93A Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
note: The Commission shall send with each notice under subsection (2) a copy of the draft notice and a summary of the reasons why it proposes to give the notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.452
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 93A(3) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Commission must send with each notice under subsection (2) a copy of the draft notice and a summary of the reasons why it proposes to give the notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEFORE
logic summary: The Commission shall send with each notice under subsection (2) a copy of the draft notice and a summary of the reasons why it proposes to give the notice.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Commission must send with each notice under subsection (2) a copy of the draft notice and a summary of the reasons why it proposes to give the notice.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Commission must send with each notice under subsection (2) a copy of the draft notice and a summary of the reasons why it proposes to give the notice.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Commission must send with each notice under subsection (2) a copy of the draft notice and a summary of the reasons why it proposes to give the notice.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93A(4) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93a-ss-4
part of: 93A Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
note: Commission must decide whether to give notice after 14-day period of silence from persons notified.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.452
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 93A(4) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to decide
premise text: Commission has authority to give notice
conclusion text: Must decide whether to give notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93A(5) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93a-ss-5
part of: 93A Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
note: Commission must hold conference if requested within 14 days
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.452
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 93A(5) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide conference opportunity
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93A(6) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93a-ss-6
part of: 93A Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
note: Commission must afford opportunity for conference before giving notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.452
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 93A(6) Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-93a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide opportunity for conference
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95 Register of notifications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95
note: The Commission shall keep a register containing certain notices and documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.455
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95 Register of notifications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Commission must keep a register.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95AA Commission may determine class exemptions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95aa
has part: 95AA(1) Commission may determine class exemptions
has part: 95AA(2) Commission may determine class exemptions
has part: 95AA(3) Commission may determine class exemptions
has part: 95AA(4) Commission may determine class exemptions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.459

95AA(1) Commission may determine class exemptions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95aa-ss-1
part of: 95AA Commission may determine class exemptions
note: Commission may determine class exemptions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.459
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-1-logic-diffusion-6

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95AA(1) Commission may determine class exemptions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Commission has the power to make a determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has the effect of
logic summary: The Commission's determination affects competition and public benefit
premise text: (a) that conduct of that kind would not have the effect, or would not be likely to have the effect, of substantially lessening competition;
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: would result in
logic summary: The Commission's determination results in a benefit to the public
premise text: (b) that conduct of that kind would result, or would be likely to result, in a benefit to the public;
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: would not have the effect of
logic summary: The Commission's determination does not affect competition for a specified period
premise text: (a) that conduct of that kind would not have the effect, or would not be likely to have the effect, of substantially lessening competition;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: would result in
logic summary: The Commission's determination results in a benefit to the public over time
premise text: (b) that conduct of that kind would result, or would be likely to result, in a benefit to the public;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-1-logic-diffusion-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: would not have the effect of
logic summary: The Commission's determination does not affect competition for a specified period
premise text: (a) that conduct of that kind would not have the effect, or would not be likely to have the effect, of substantially lessening competition;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95AA(2) Commission may determine class exemptions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95aa-ss-2
part of: 95AA Commission may determine class exemptions
note: Commission may specify limitations on exemptions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.459
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95AA(2) Commission may determine class exemptions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May specify limitations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95AA(3) Commission may determine class exemptions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95aa-ss-3
part of: 95AA Commission may determine class exemptions
note: Commission may determine class exemptions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.459
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-3-norm

95AA(4) Commission may determine class exemptions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95aa-ss-4
part of: 95AA Commission may determine class exemptions
note: Commission may determine class exemptions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.459
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95aa-ss-4-norm

95AB Commission may withdraw the benefit of class exemption in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95ab
has part: 95AB(1) Commission may withdraw the benefit of class exemption in
has part: 95AB(2) Commission may withdraw the benefit of class exemption in
has part: 95AB(3) Commission may withdraw the benefit of class exemption in
has part: 95AB(4) Commission may withdraw the benefit of class exemption in
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.460

95AB(1) Commission may withdraw the benefit of class exemption in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95ab-ss-1
part of: 95AB Commission may withdraw the benefit of class exemption in
note: Commission may withdraw class exemption if conduct substantially lessens competition.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.460
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 95AB(1) Commission may withdraw the benefit of class exemption in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits conduct that would have effect of substantially lessening competition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95AB(2) Commission may withdraw the benefit of class exemption in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95ab-ss-2
part of: 95AB Commission may withdraw the benefit of class exemption in
note: Commission must provide written statement of reasons for notice.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.460
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95AB(2) Commission may withdraw the benefit of class exemption in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide written statement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95AB(3) Commission may withdraw the benefit of class exemption in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95ab-ss-3
part of: 95AB Commission may withdraw the benefit of class exemption in
note: Determination does not apply to conduct engaged in by person while notice is in force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.460
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95AB(3) Commission may withdraw the benefit of class exemption in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Exclusion of determination from conduct engaged in while notice is in force.
premise text: (3) While a notice under subsection (1) is in force, the determination does not apply to the conduct specified in the notice engaged in by the person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Exclusion
logic summary: Temporal exclusion: Determination does not apply during notice period.
premise text: (3) While a notice under subsection (1) is in force, the determination does not apply to the conduct specified in the notice engaged in by the person.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Exclusion
logic summary: Temporal exclusion: Determination does not apply during notice period.
premise text: (3) While a notice under subsection (1) is in force, the determination does not apply to the conduct specified in the notice engaged in by the person.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Temporal Exclusion
logic summary: Temporal exclusion: Determination does not apply during notice period.
premise text: (3) While a notice under subsection (1) is in force, the determination does not apply to the conduct specified in the notice engaged in by the person.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Temporal Exclusion
logic summary: Temporal exclusion: Determination does not apply during notice period.
premise text: (3) While a notice under subsection (1) is in force, the determination does not apply to the conduct specified in the notice engaged in by the person.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95AB(4) Commission may withdraw the benefit of class exemption in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95ab-ss-4
part of: 95AB Commission may withdraw the benefit of class exemption in
note: Commission may withdraw the benefit of class exemption in certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.460
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ab-ss-4-norm

95AC Exceptional circumstances class exemptions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95ac
has part: 95AC(1) Exceptional circumstances class exemptions
has part: 95AC(2) Exceptional circumstances class exemptions
has part: 95AC(3) Exceptional circumstances class exemptions
has part: 95AC(4) Exceptional circumstances class exemptions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.461

95AC(1) Exceptional circumstances class exemptions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95ac-ss-1
part of: 95AC Exceptional circumstances class exemptions
note: Commission may determine exemptions from certain provisions under exceptional circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.461
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to exempt
premise text: Declaration in force
conclusion text: Commission may determine exemptions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: None
logic summary: Class exemption definition
premise text: Division 1 or 2 of Part IV
conclusion text: specified provisions do not apply
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

95AC(2) Exceptional circumstances class exemptions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95ac-ss-2
part of: 95AC Exceptional circumstances class exemptions
note: Exceptions for declarations under section 95AE and national emergency declarations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.461
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95AC(2) Exceptional circumstances class exemptions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes exceptions for specific types of declarations.
premise text: (2) The declarations are the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlapsWith
logic summary: Exceptions for overlapping temporal intervals.
premise text: (b) a national emergency declaration (within the meaning of the National Emergency Declaration Act 2020).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes exceptions for specific types of declarations.
premise text: (2) The declarations are the following:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes exceptions for specific types of declarations.
premise text: (2) The declarations are the following:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes exceptions for specific types of declarations.
premise text: (2) The declarations are the following:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95AC(3) Exceptional circumstances class exemptions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95ac-ss-3
part of: 95AC Exceptional circumstances class exemptions
note: Commission must be satisfied that conduct would assist in response to exceptional circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.461
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95AC(3) Exceptional circumstances class exemptions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95AC(4) Exceptional circumstances class exemptions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95ac-ss-4
part of: 95AC Exceptional circumstances class exemptions
note: Consideration of public benefit and detriment in exceptional circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.461
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95AC(4) Exceptional circumstances class exemptions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ac-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
logic summary: Consideration of public benefit and detriment
premise text: (4) In making a determination under subsection (1), the Commission:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

95AD Commission may withdraw the benefit of exceptional
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95ad
has part: 95AD(1) Commission may withdraw the benefit of exceptional
has part: 95AD(2) Commission may withdraw the benefit of exceptional
has part: 95AD(3) Commission may withdraw the benefit of exceptional
has part: 95AD(4) Commission may withdraw the benefit of exceptional
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.463

95AD(1) Commission may withdraw the benefit of exceptional
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95ad-ss-1
part of: 95AD Commission may withdraw the benefit of exceptional
note: Commission may withdraw benefit of exceptional if conduct is not appropriate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.463
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 95AD(1) Commission may withdraw the benefit of exceptional
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
premise text: (a) a determination in force under section 95AC specifies a kind of conduct;
conclusion text: conduct of that kind would not assist, or would not be likely to assist, in the response to or recovery from the exceptional circumstances or emergency specified in the determination;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
premise text: (ii) conduct of that kind is not appropriate.
conclusion text: conduct of that kind would not assist, or would not be likely to assist, in the response to or recovery from the exceptional circumstances or emergency specified in the determination;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Not Within
logic summary: Conduct is not within a relevant time interval
premise text: (a) a determination in force under section 95AC specifies a kind of conduct;
conclusion text: conduct of that kind would not assist, or would not be likely to assist, in the response to or recovery from the exceptional circumstances or emergency specified in the determination;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Not Within
logic summary: Conduct is not within a relevant time interval
premise text: (a) a determination in force under section 95AC specifies a kind of conduct;
conclusion text: conduct of that kind would not assist, or would not be likely to assist, in the response to or recovery from the exceptional circumstances or emergency specified in the determination;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Not Within
logic summary: Conduct is not within a relevant time interval
premise text: (a) a determination in force under section 95AC specifies a kind of conduct;
conclusion text: conduct of that kind would not assist, or would not be likely to assist, in the response to or recovery from the exceptional circumstances or emergency specified in the determination;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95AD(2) Commission may withdraw the benefit of exceptional
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95ad-ss-2
part of: 95AD Commission may withdraw the benefit of exceptional
note: Commission must provide written statement of reasons for notice.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.463
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide written statement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95AD(3) Commission may withdraw the benefit of exceptional
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95ad-ss-3
part of: 95AD Commission may withdraw the benefit of exceptional
note: Determination does not apply to conduct engaged in by person while notice is in force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.463
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95AD(3) Commission may withdraw the benefit of exceptional
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Exclusion of determination from conduct engaged in by person while notice is in force.
premise text: (3) While a notice under subsection (1) is in force, the determination does not apply to the conduct specified in the notice engaged in by the person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap: Determination does not apply while notice is in force.
premise text: (3) While a notice under subsection (1) is in force, the determination does not apply to the conduct specified in the notice engaged in by the person.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Recurring exclusion of determination from conduct engaged in by person while notice is in force.
premise text: (3) While a notice under subsection (1) is in force, the determination does not apply to the conduct specified in the notice engaged in by the person.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of exclusion: Determination does not apply while notice is in force.
premise text: (3) While a notice under subsection (1) is in force, the determination does not apply to the conduct specified in the notice engaged in by the person.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Exclusion of determination from conduct engaged in by person while notice is in force (CogAI).
premise text: (3) While a notice under subsection (1) is in force, the determination does not apply to the conduct specified in the notice engaged in by the person.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

95AD(4) Commission may withdraw the benefit of exceptional
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95ad-ss-4
part of: 95AD Commission may withdraw the benefit of exceptional
note: Notice under subsection (1) ceases to be in force at the earlier of two times.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.463
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-4-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95AD(4) Commission may withdraw the benefit of exceptional
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
logic summary: Ceases to be in force
premise text: (4) The notice under subsection (1):...
conclusion text: ...the day after the day the Commission gives the person the written notice;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
logic summary: Ceases to be in force at the earlier of two times.
premise text: (4) The notice under subsection (1):...
conclusion text: ...the time the determination under section 95AC ceases to become in force.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal interval required for LTL application
premise text: (i) if the Commission revokes the notice—the day after the day the Commission gives the person the written notice;
conclusion text: ...the time the determination under section 95AC ceases to become in force.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ad-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
logic summary: Ceases to be in force at the earlier of two times.
premise text: (ii) the time the determination under section 95AC ceases to become in force.
conclusion text: ...the day after the day the Commission gives the person the written notice;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

95AE Minister may declare exceptional circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95ae
has part: 95AE(1) Minister may declare exceptional circumstances
has part: 95AE(2) Minister may declare exceptional circumstances
has part: 95AE(3) Minister may declare exceptional circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.464

95AE(1) Minister may declare exceptional circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95ae-ss-1
part of: 95AE Minister may declare exceptional circumstances
note: The Minister may declare exceptional circumstances under this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.464
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ae-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ae-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95AE(1) Minister may declare exceptional circumstances
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Declaration of exceptional circumstances is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95AE(2) Minister may declare exceptional circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95ae-ss-2
part of: 95AE Minister may declare exceptional circumstances
note: Declaration under subsection (1) has a specified start and end date.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.464
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ae-ss-2-norm

95AE(3) Minister may declare exceptional circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95ae-ss-3
part of: 95AE Minister may declare exceptional circumstances
note: The Minister must declare exceptional circumstances within a specified period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.464
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ae-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ae-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ae-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
premise text: The Minister must declare exceptional circumstances.
conclusion text: The declaration must be made within the specified period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95AF Extension of declaration of exceptional circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95af
has part: 95AF(1) Extension of declaration of exceptional circumstances
has part: 95AF(2) Extension of declaration of exceptional circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.465

95AF(1) Extension of declaration of exceptional circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95af-ss-1
part of: 95AF Extension of declaration of exceptional circumstances
note: Minister may extend declaration of exceptional circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.465
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95af-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95af-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95af-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Obligation to extend declaration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95AF(2) Extension of declaration of exceptional circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95af-ss-2
part of: 95AF Extension of declaration of exceptional circumstances
note: The Minister may extend the operation of an order more than once, but each extension must not exceed 3 months.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.465
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95af-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95af-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95af-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to extend the operation of an order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95A Interpretation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95a
note: Definitions and interpretations for Part VIIA of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.466
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95a-logic-descriptionlogic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95a-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy for definitions
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95B Exempt supplies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95b
has part: 95B(1) Exempt supplies
has part: 95B(2) Exempt supplies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.470

95B(1) Exempt supplies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95b-ss-1
part of: 95B Exempt supplies
note: Declare supply of goods or services as exempt
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.470
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95b-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95b-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 95B(1) Exempt supplies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to declare supplies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95B(2) Exempt supplies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95b-ss-2
part of: 95B Exempt supplies
note: Variation or revocation of declarations by notice published in the Gazette.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.470
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95b-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95b-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 95B(2) Exempt supplies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to vary or revoke declarations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

95C Application of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95c
note: This Part applies in relation to the supply of goods or services by certain entities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.470
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95c-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95C Application of Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

95D Crown to be bound
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95d
has part: 95D(1) Crown to be bound
has part: 95D(2) Crown to be bound
has part: 95D(3) Crown to be bound
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.471

95D(1) Crown to be bound
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95d-ss-1
part of: 95D Crown to be bound
note: The Crown is bound by this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.471
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95D(1) Crown to be bound
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Binding
logic summary: The Crown is obligated to comply.
premise text: (1) This Part binds the Crown...
conclusion text: The Crown is bound by this Part.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95D(2) Crown to be bound
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95d-ss-2
part of: 95D Crown to be bound
note: Crown not liable for prosecution
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.471
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If nothing in the Part makes the Crown liable, then the Crown is not liable.
premise text: (2) Nothing in this Part makes the Crown liable to be prosecuted for an offence.
conclusion text: The Crown is not liable for prosecution.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95D(3) Crown to be bound
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95d-ss-3
part of: 95D Crown to be bound
note: Exempts incorporated Commonwealth authorities and State/Territory authorities from the protection in subsection (2).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.471
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 95D(3) Crown to be bound
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Exempts entities from a duty or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The exemption applies to entities that overlap with the scope of subsection (2).
premise text: (3) The protection in subsection (2) does not apply to an incorporated Commonwealth authority or an incorporated State or Territory authority.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: The exemption is repeated for each entity that overlaps with the scope of subsection (2).
premise text: (3) The protection in subsection (2) does not apply to an incorporated Commonwealth authority or an incorporated State or Territory authority.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: The exemption diffuses to other entities that overlap with the scope of subsection (2).
premise text: (3) The protection in subsection (2) does not apply to an incorporated Commonwealth authority or an incorporated State or Territory authority.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95d-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: The exemption is recognized by the system as a valid exception.
premise text: (3) The protection in subsection (2) does not apply to an incorporated Commonwealth authority or an incorporated State or Territory authority.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95E Object of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95e
note: Prices surveillance should be applied only in markets where competitive pressures are insufficient to achieve efficient prices and protect consumers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.471
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95e-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95e-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95e-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95E Object of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: should
logic summary: Implies an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95F Simplified overview of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95f
has part: 95F(1) Simplified overview of this Part
has part: 95F(2) Simplified overview of this Part
has part: 95F(3) Simplified overview of this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.471

95F(1) Simplified overview of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95f-ss-1
part of: 95F Simplified overview of this Part
note: Overview of this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.471
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95f-ss-1-norm

95F(2) Simplified overview of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95f-ss-2
part of: 95F Simplified overview of this Part
note: Commission or another body must hold price inquiries.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.471
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95f-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95F(2) Simplified overview of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95F(3) Simplified overview of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95f-ss-3
part of: 95F Simplified overview of this Part
note: Restricts ability to increase prices, but allows for alternative
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.471
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95f-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95f-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95f-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95f-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95f-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows for alternative
premise text: (3) These inquiries may relate to the supply of goods or services by a particular person.
conclusion text: However, there is a way for the person to increase prices during that period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95f-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Describes temporal overlap
premise text: (3) These inquiries may relate to the supply of goods or services by a particular person.
conclusion text: However, there is a way for the person to increase prices during that period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95f-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Describes recurring trace
premise text: (3) These inquiries may relate to the supply of goods or services by a particular person.
conclusion text: However, there is a way for the person to increase prices during that period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95f-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Describes diffusion
premise text: (3) These inquiries may relate to the supply of goods or services by a particular person.
conclusion text: However, there is a way for the person to increase prices during that period.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95f-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Describes recognition
premise text: (3) These inquiries may relate to the supply of goods or services by a particular person.
conclusion text: However, there is a way for the person to increase prices during that period.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

95G Commission’s functions under this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95g
has part: 95G(1) Commission’s functions under this Part
has part: 95G(2) Commission’s functions under this Part
has part: 95G(3) Commission’s functions under this Part
has part: 95G(4) Commission’s functions under this Part
has part: 95G(5) Commission’s functions under this Part
has part: 95G(6) Commission’s functions under this Part
has part: 95G(7) Commission’s functions under this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.473

95G(1) Commission’s functions under this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95g-ss-1
part of: 95G Commission’s functions under this Part
note: Commission's functions under this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.473
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-1-norm

95G(2) Commission’s functions under this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95g-ss-2
part of: 95G Commission’s functions under this Part
note: The Commission must hold inquiries as required under section 95H.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.473
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95G(2) Commission’s functions under this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95G(3) Commission’s functions under this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95g-ss-3
part of: 95G Commission’s functions under this Part
note: Commission may hold inquiries with Minister's approval
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.473
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to hold inquiries
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95G(4) Commission’s functions under this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95g-ss-4
part of: 95G Commission’s functions under this Part
note: The Commission must provide a report to the Minister on the results of each inquiry.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.473
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Commission must provide a report.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95G(5) Commission’s functions under this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95g-ss-5
part of: 95G Commission’s functions under this Part
note: The Commission must consider locality notices and take action in accordance with this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.473
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95G(5) Commission’s functions under this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Commission must consider locality notices.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95G(6) Commission’s functions under this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95g-ss-6
part of: 95G Commission’s functions under this Part
note: The Commission must monitor prices, costs and profits in a directed industry or business.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.473
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95G(6) Commission’s functions under this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Commission must monitor prices, costs and profits.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95G(7) Commission’s functions under this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95g-ss-7
part of: 95G Commission’s functions under this Part
note: Must have particular regard to certain factors when exercising powers and performing functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.473
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-7-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95g-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a duty or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95H Price inquiries
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95h
has part: 95H(1) Price inquiries
has part: 95H(2) Price inquiries
has part: 95H(3) Price inquiries
has part: 95H(4) Price inquiries
has part: 95H(5) Price inquiries
has part: 95H(5A) Price inquiries
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.475

95H(1) Price inquiries
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95h-ss-1
part of: 95H Price inquiries
note: The Minister requires the Commission to hold an inquiry into a specified matter or matters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.475
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: Expresses a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95H(2) Price inquiries
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95h-ss-2
part of: 95H Price inquiries
note: Approval of Commission inquiries
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.475
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to hold inquiry
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95H(3) Price inquiries
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95h-ss-3
part of: 95H Price inquiries
note: Request for inquiry by Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.475
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to hold inquiry
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95H(4) Price inquiries
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95h-ss-4
part of: 95H Price inquiries
note: The other body must appoint a person to preside at the inquiry in writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.475
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95H(4) Price inquiries
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must appoint a person to preside at the inquiry in writing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95H(5) Price inquiries
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95h-ss-5
part of: 95H Price inquiries
note: Minister must appoint one of the individuals to preside at the inquiry if the other body is a group of 2 or more individuals.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.475
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95H(5) Price inquiries
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to appoint
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95H(5A) Price inquiries
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95h-ss-5a
part of: 95H Price inquiries
note: Must table a statement in each House of the Parliament
description: (a) specifying that the body will hold the inquiry; and (b) giving the Minister’s reasons for requesting the body, rather than the Commission, to hold the inquiry.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.475
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-5a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95h-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
conclusion text: (5A) The Minister must, as soon as practicable after confirmation that the other body will hold the inquiry...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95J Content of inquiry notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95j
has part: 95J(1) Content of inquiry notices
has part: 95J(2) Content of inquiry notices
has part: 95J(3) Content of inquiry notices
has part: 95J(4) Content of inquiry notices
has part: 95J(5) Content of inquiry notices
has part: 95J(6) Content of inquiry notices
has part: 95J(7) Content of inquiry notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.476

95J(1) Content of inquiry notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95j-ss-1
part of: 95J Content of inquiry notices
note: Must specify goods or services description in inquiry notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.476
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95J(1) Content of inquiry notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Specify goods or services description
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95J(2) Content of inquiry notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95j-ss-2
part of: 95J Content of inquiry notices
note: Inquiry notice must specify relation to supply of goods or services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.476
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95J(2) Content of inquiry notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must specify relation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95J(3) Content of inquiry notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95j-ss-3
part of: 95J Content of inquiry notices
note: Specify person or persons for inquiry notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.476
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95J(3) Content of inquiry notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must specify person or persons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95J(4) Content of inquiry notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95j-ss-4
part of: 95J Content of inquiry notices
note: Minister must be notified of determination by inquiry Chair.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.476
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95J(4) Content of inquiry notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Notification obligation
premise text: Inquiry Chair must give notice
conclusion text: Minister must be notified
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95J(5) Content of inquiry notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95j-ss-5
part of: 95J Content of inquiry notices
note: Cannot determine State or Territory authority as a person in relation to whom an inquiry will be held.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.476
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95J(6) Content of inquiry notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95j-ss-6
part of: 95J Content of inquiry notices
note: Directions may be given in an inquiry notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.476
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to give directions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95J(7) Content of inquiry notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95j-ss-7
part of: 95J Content of inquiry notices
note: Inquiry body must comply with directions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.476
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-7-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95J(7) Content of inquiry notices
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95j-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
premise text: (7) The inquiry body must comply with any such directions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95K Period for completing inquiry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95k
has part: 95K(1) Period for completing inquiry
has part: 95K(2) Period for completing inquiry
has part: 95K(3) Period for completing inquiry
has part: 95K(4) Period for completing inquiry
has part: 95K(5) Period for completing inquiry
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.477

95K(1) Period for completing inquiry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95k-ss-1
part of: 95K Period for completing inquiry
note: Specify period for completing inquiry and report to Minister.
description: Report on inquiry completion
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.477
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95k-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95k-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95K(1) Period for completing inquiry
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Specify period for completing inquiry and report to Minister.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95K(2) Period for completing inquiry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95k-ss-2
part of: 95K Period for completing inquiry
note: Inquiry body must complete inquiry and report to Minister within period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.477
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95k-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Inquiry body must complete inquiry.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95K(3) Period for completing inquiry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95k-ss-3
part of: 95K Period for completing inquiry
note: Minister may extend or further extend the completion period of an inquiry by notice in writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.477
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95k-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Minister may extend or further extend the completion period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95K(4) Period for completing inquiry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95k-ss-4
part of: 95K Period for completing inquiry
note: Inquiry body must complete inquiry and give report within extended completion period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.477
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95k-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95k-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95k-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95K(4) Period for completing inquiry
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Inquiry body must complete inquiry.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95k-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Inquiry completion period is greater than or equal to the original completion period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95K(5) Period for completing inquiry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95k-ss-5
part of: 95K Period for completing inquiry
note: Defines completion period for inquiry
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.477
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95k-ss-5-norm

95L Notice of holding of inquiry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95l
has part: 95L(1) Notice of holding of inquiry
has part: 95L(3) Notice of holding of inquiry
has part: 95L(4) Notice of holding of inquiry
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.478

95L(1) Notice of holding of inquiry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95l-ss-1
part of: 95L Notice of holding of inquiry
note: Notice of inquiry must be given by the inquiry body.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.478
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95l-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95l-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95L(1) Notice of holding of inquiry
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Inquiry body must give notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95L(3) Notice of holding of inquiry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95l-ss-3
part of: 95L Notice of holding of inquiry
note: Give notice to person(s) in writing
description: notice content
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.478
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95l-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to give notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95L(4) Notice of holding of inquiry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95l-ss-4
part of: 95L Notice of holding of inquiry
note: Notice requirements for inquiry body
description: a notice under this section must state that the inquiry body is to hold the inquiry; specify the matter or matters in relation to which the inquiry is to be held; specify the time and place at which the inquiry is to start; in the case of a notice under subsection (3)—set out the effect of section 95N; and specify any other matter prescribed by the regulations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.478
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95l-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95l-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95l-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95L(4) Notice of holding of inquiry
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95l-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95M Notice of extension of period for completing inquiry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95m
note: Must provide notice of extension to person(s) involved in inquiry.
description: Notice in writing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.478
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95m-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95m-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95m-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95N Price restrictions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95n
has part: 95N(1) Price restrictions
has part: 95N(2) Price restrictions
has part: 95N(3) Price restrictions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.479

95N(1) Price restrictions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95n-ss-1
part of: 95N Price restrictions
note: Must provide a business notice stating the inquiry body's intention to hold an inquiry.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.479
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95N(1) Price restrictions
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a business notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95N(2) Price restrictions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95n-ss-2
part of: 95N Price restrictions
note: Supplying goods or services in a locality on particular terms and conditions without complying with notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.479
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 95N(2) Price restrictions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits supplying goods or services in a locality on particular terms and conditions.
premise text: (2) The person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the current supply is not in accordance with the notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The supply is within the same period as previous supplies.
premise text: (b) the person has supplied goods or services...
conclusion text: ...in that locality on the same or substantially similar terms and conditions in that period;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: The supply is repeated within a 12-month period.
premise text: (b) the person has supplied goods or services...
conclusion text: ...in that locality on the same or substantially similar terms and conditions in that period;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation to comply with notice.
premise text: (d) in a case where a notice has been given...
conclusion text: ...the current supply is not in accordance with the notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95N(3) Price restrictions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95n-ss-3
part of: 95N Price restrictions
note: Supplies goods or services of a particular description in a locality on particular terms and conditions before the applicable day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.479
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 95N(3) Price restrictions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits supplying goods or services on particular terms and conditions before the applicable day.
premise text: (3) The person commits an offence if: (a) before the applicable day in relation to the business notice, the person supplies (the current supply) goods or services of that description in a locality on particular terms and conditions; and
conclusion text: The person must not supply goods or services on particular terms and conditions before the applicable day.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes the temporal relation between supplying goods or services before the applicable day and committing an offence.
premise text: (3) The person commits an offence if: (a) before the applicable day in relation to the business notice, the person supplies (the current supply) goods or services of that description in a locality on particular terms and conditions; and
conclusion text: The supplying of goods or services before the applicable day is during the committing of an offence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Describes the temporal relation between supplying goods or services on particular terms and conditions after the applicable day and committing an offence.
premise text: (3) The person commits an offence if: (a) before the applicable day in relation to the business notice, the person supplies (the current supply) goods or services of that description in a locality on particular terms and conditions; and
conclusion text: The supplying of goods or services on particular terms and conditions after the applicable day is until the committing of an offence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: Describes the condition under which supplying goods or services before the applicable day leads to committing an offence.
premise text: (3) The person commits an offence if: (a) before the applicable day in relation to the business notice, the person supplies (the current supply) goods or services of that description in a locality on particular terms and conditions; and
conclusion text: The supplying of goods or services before the applicable day is if the person commits an offence.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95n-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Describes the relation between supplying goods or services of a particular description in a locality on particular terms and conditions and having a business notice.
premise text: (3) The person commits an offence if: (a) before the applicable day in relation to the business notice, the person supplies (the current supply) goods or services of that description in a locality on particular terms and conditions; and
conclusion text: The supplying of goods or services of that description in that locality on particular terms and conditions is part of having a business notice.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95P Copies of report to be made available
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95p
has part: 95P(1) Copies of report to be made available
has part: 95P(2) Copies of report to be made available
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.481

95P(1) Copies of report to be made available
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95p-ss-1
part of: 95P Copies of report to be made available
note: Inquiry body must send a copy of the report to the person(s) on the day it gives the Minister the report.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.481
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95p-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Inquiry body must send a copy of the report.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95P(2) Copies of report to be made available
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95p-ss-2
part of: 95P Copies of report to be made available
note: A copy of a report must be accompanied by a notice setting out the effect of section 95Q.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.481
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95p-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95p-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95P(2) Copies of report to be made available
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95Q Notification of proposed prices after receipt of report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95q
has part: 95Q(1) Notification of proposed prices after receipt of report
has part: 95Q(2) Notification of proposed prices after receipt of report
has part: 95Q(3) Notification of proposed prices after receipt of report
has part: 95Q(4) Notification of proposed prices after receipt of report
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.482

95Q(1) Notification of proposed prices after receipt of report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95q-ss-1
part of: 95Q Notification of proposed prices after receipt of report
note: Notification of proposed prices after receipt of report
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.482
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95Q(1) Notification of proposed prices after receipt of report
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must notify
premise text: (1) This section applies if a person receives a copy of a report on an inquiry held in relation to the supply by the person of goods or services of a particular description.
conclusion text: Price notification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for price notification
premise text: (1) This section applies if a person receives a copy of a report on an inquiry held in relation to the supply by the person of goods or services of a particular description.
conclusion text: Price notification
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for price notification
premise text: (1) This section applies if a person receives a copy of a report on an inquiry held in relation to the supply by the person of goods or services of a particular description.
conclusion text: Price notification
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS_TO
logic summary: Diffuses price notification
premise text: (1) This section applies if a person receives a copy of a report on an inquiry held in relation to the supply by the person of goods or services of a particular description.
conclusion text: Price notification
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: REQUIRES
logic summary: Requires price notification
premise text: (1) This section applies if a person receives a copy of a report on an inquiry held in relation to the supply by the person of goods or services of a particular description.
conclusion text: Price notification
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

95Q(2) Notification of proposed prices after receipt of report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95q-ss-2
part of: 95Q Notification of proposed prices after receipt of report
note: Must provide written notice of proposed prices within 14 days.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.482
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95Q(2) Notification of proposed prices after receipt of report
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95Q(3) Notification of proposed prices after receipt of report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95q-ss-3
part of: 95Q Notification of proposed prices after receipt of report
note: Contravening subsection (2) is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.482
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 95Q(3) Notification of proposed prices after receipt of report
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits contravening subsection (2)
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if the person contravenes subsection (2).
conclusion text: Penalty: 10 penalty units.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95Q(4) Notification of proposed prices after receipt of report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95q-ss-4
part of: 95Q Notification of proposed prices after receipt of report
note: Publicly available details of price or prices specified in the notice must be made available within 14 days.
description: Details of price or prices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.482
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95q-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide details within 14 days
conclusion text: Details of price or prices must be made available
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95R Public inquiries etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95r
has part: 95R(1) Public inquiries etc.
has part: 95R(2) Public inquiries etc.
has part: 95R(3) Public inquiries etc.
has part: 95R(4) Public inquiries etc.
has part: 95R(5) Public inquiries etc.
has part: 95R(6) Public inquiries etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.483

95R(1) Public inquiries etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95r-ss-1
part of: 95R Public inquiries etc.
note: Inquiry body must hold inquiry in public unless directed otherwise.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.483
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must hold inquiry in public
premise text: (1) An inquiry body must hold an inquiry in public, unless the Minister directs otherwise.
conclusion text: The inquiry body MUST hold the inquiry in public.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for inquiry
premise text: (1) An inquiry body must hold an inquiry in public, unless the Minister directs otherwise.
conclusion text: The temporal interval for the inquiry is contained within the public inquiry period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal trace for inquiry
premise text: (1) An inquiry body must hold an inquiry in public, unless the Minister directs otherwise.
conclusion text: The temporal trace for the inquiry contains the public inquiry period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Diffusion of information
premise text: (1) An inquiry body must hold an inquiry in public, unless the Minister directs otherwise.
conclusion text: The diffusion of information related to the inquiry is contained within the public inquiry period.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Artificial intelligence involvement
premise text: (1) An inquiry body must hold an inquiry in public, unless the Minister directs otherwise.
conclusion text: The artificial intelligence involved in the inquiry is contained within the public inquiry period.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

95R(2) Public inquiries etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95r-ss-2
part of: 95R Public inquiries etc.
note: Private inquiry evidence may be taken if witness objects or inquiry body considers desirable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.483
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to take private inquiry evidence
premise text: Witness objects or inquiry body considers desirable.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between private and public inquiries
premise text: (b) The inquiry body considers that it is desirable to do so.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95R(3) Public inquiries etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95r-ss-3
part of: 95R Public inquiries etc.
note: Permits witness to give written statement instead of oral testimony.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.483
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow
logic summary: Allows witness to provide written statement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95R(4) Public inquiries etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95r-ss-4
part of: 95R Public inquiries etc.
note: Make available to public certain statement contents under specific conditions.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.483
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Inquiry body must make available certain statement contents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95R(5) Public inquiries etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95r-ss-5
part of: 95R Public inquiries etc.
note: Permits submission in writing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.483
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-5-norm

95R(6) Public inquiries etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95r-ss-6
part of: 95R Public inquiries etc.
note: Inquiry body must make available to the public submission contents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.483
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95r-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Inquiry body must make available to the public submission contents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95S Taking of evidence on oath or affirmation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95s
has part: 95S(1) Taking of evidence on oath or affirmation
has part: 95S(2) Taking of evidence on oath or affirmation
has part: 95S(3) Taking of evidence on oath or affirmation
has part: 95S(4) Taking of evidence on oath or affirmation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.484

95S(1) Taking of evidence on oath or affirmation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95s-ss-1
part of: 95S Taking of evidence on oath or affirmation
note: Inquiry body may take evidence on oath or affirmation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.484
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95S(1) Taking of evidence on oath or affirmation
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to provide evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95S(2) Taking of evidence on oath or affirmation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95s-ss-2
part of: 95S Taking of evidence on oath or affirmation
note: An oath or affirmation may be administered by a member of the Commission in an inquiry by the Commission, or by the person presiding at the inquiry in an external inquiry.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.484
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-2-logic-ltl-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95S(2) Taking of evidence on oath or affirmation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Has obligation
premise text: (2) An oath or affirmation may be administered by...
conclusion text: ...a member of the Commission in an inquiry by the Commission, or by the person presiding at the inquiry in an external inquiry.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Has obligation
premise text: (2) An oath or affirmation may be administered by...
conclusion text: ...by a member of the Commission in an inquiry by the Commission, or by the person presiding at the inquiry in an external inquiry.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: hasTemporalRelation
logic summary: Has temporal relation
premise text: (2) An oath or affirmation may be administered by...
conclusion text: ...in an inquiry by the Commission, or in an external inquiry.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: hasTemporalRelation
logic summary: Has temporal relation
premise text: (2) An oath or affirmation may be administered by...
conclusion text: ...in an inquiry by the Commission, or in an external inquiry.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95S(3) Taking of evidence on oath or affirmation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95s-ss-3
part of: 95S Taking of evidence on oath or affirmation
note: Summoning a person to appear at an inquiry and produce documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.484
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to appear at an inquiry.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permission to produce documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95S(4) Taking of evidence on oath or affirmation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95s-ss-4
part of: 95S Taking of evidence on oath or affirmation
note: Commission may exercise power on application of another person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.484
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95s-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to exercise power
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95T Failure of witness to attend
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95t
has part: 95T(1) Failure of witness to attend
has part: 95T(2) Failure of witness to attend
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.485

95T(1) Failure of witness to attend
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95t-ss-1
part of: 95T Failure of witness to attend
note: Failure to attend as a witness without excuse or release.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.485
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95T(1) Failure of witness to attend
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Failure to attend as a witness without excuse or release.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...and (c) the person has not been excused, or released from further attendance...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
logic summary: Temporal interval between summons and failure to attend.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...and (b) the person fails to attend as required by the summons or fails to appear and report himself or herself from day to day;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Temporal relationship between summons and failure to attend.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...and (b) the person fails to attend as required by the summons or fails to appear and report himself or herself from day to day;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: If
logic summary: Conditional relationship between excuse/release and failure to attend.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...and (c) the person has not been excused, or released from further attendance...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: If
logic summary: Conditional relationship between excuse/release and failure to attend.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...and (c) the person has not been excused, or released from further attendance...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95T(2) Failure of witness to attend
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95t-ss-2
part of: 95T Failure of witness to attend
note: Defendant bears evidential burden for reasonable excuse
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.485
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95T(2) Failure of witness to attend
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defendant has an obligation to provide a reasonable excuse
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Knowledge
logic summary: Defendant must know of the excuse
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95t-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Excuse is valid until proven otherwise
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95U Refusal to be sworn or to answer question
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95u
note: Refusal to be sworn or answer question
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.485
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95u-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95u-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95u-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 95U Refusal to be sworn or to answer question
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95u-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
conclusion text: Refusal to be sworn or answer question
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95V Protection of witnesses
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95v
note: Protection of witnesses in civil or criminal proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.486
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95v-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95v-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95V Protection of witnesses
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

95W Allowances to witnesses
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95w
has part: 95W(1) Allowances to witnesses
has part: 95W(2) Allowances to witnesses
has part: 95W(3) Allowances to witnesses
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.486

95W(1) Allowances to witnesses
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95w-ss-1
part of: 95W Allowances to witnesses
note: Witnesses are entitled to allowances for travelling and other expenses.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.486
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95w-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95w-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95W(1) Allowances to witnesses
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Entitlement is a property of the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95W(2) Allowances to witnesses
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95w-ss-2
part of: 95W Allowances to witnesses
note: Witness entitled to payment by Commonwealth or summoning person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.486
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95w-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95w-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95w-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95W(2) Allowances to witnesses
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95w-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Witness has obligation to be paid.
premise text: Witness summoned by inquiry Chair or application of person.
conclusion text: Witness entitled to payment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95W(3) Allowances to witnesses
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95w-ss-3
part of: 95W Allowances to witnesses
note: Allowances for witnesses must be provided by reference to a scale of expenses.
description: True
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.486
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95w-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95w-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95w-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95W(3) Allowances to witnesses
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95w-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95X Declarations by Minister or Commission
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95x
has part: 95X(1) Declarations by Minister or Commission
has part: 95X(2) Declarations by Minister or Commission
has part: 95X(3) Declarations by Minister or Commission
has part: 95X(4) Declarations by Minister or Commission
has part: 95X(5) Declarations by Minister or Commission
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.488

95X(1) Declarations by Minister or Commission
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95x-ss-1
part of: 95X Declarations by Minister or Commission
note: Declare goods or services for purposes of this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.488
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95x-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95x-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95x-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 95X(1) Declarations by Minister or Commission
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95x-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to declare goods or services.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95X(2) Declarations by Minister or Commission
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95x-ss-2
part of: 95X Declarations by Minister or Commission
note: Declare person as declared person for specified goods or services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.488
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95x-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95x-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 95X(2) Declarations by Minister or Commission
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to declare person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

95X(3) Declarations by Minister or Commission
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95x-ss-3
part of: 95X Declarations by Minister or Commission
note: Commission must give notice to person of declaration effect.
description: Notice in writing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.488
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95x-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95x-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95x-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95X(3) Declarations by Minister or Commission
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95x-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must give notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95X(4) Declarations by Minister or Commission
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95x-ss-4
part of: 95X Declarations by Minister or Commission
note: Declaration must specify when it ceases to have effect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.488
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95x-ss-4-norm

95X(5) Declarations by Minister or Commission
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95x-ss-5
part of: 95X Declarations by Minister or Commission
note: Minister or Commission may vary or revoke a declaration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.488
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95x-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95x-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95x-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 95X(5) Declarations by Minister or Commission
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95x-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to vary or revoke a declaration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

95Y Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95y
has part: 95Y(1) Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities
has part: 95Y(2) Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities
has part: 95Y(3) Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities
has part: 95Y(4) Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities
has part: 95Y(5) Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.488

95Y(1) Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95y-ss-1
part of: 95Y Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities
note: Minister must obtain agreement from State or Territory authority before making a declaration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.488
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister must obtain agreement
premise text: The Minister makes a declaration.
conclusion text: The Minister must have obtained agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Declaration must be made within a specific time frame
premise text: The Minister makes a declaration.
conclusion text: The declaration was made between the current request and the previous request.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Minister's action implies agreement from State or Territory authority
premise text: The Minister makes a declaration.
conclusion text: The Minister has obtained agreement.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95Y(2) Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95y-ss-2
part of: 95Y Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities
note: Cannot recommend declaration of State or Territory authority without supervision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.488
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Cannot recommend declaration without supervision
premise text: (2) The Council must not...
conclusion text: ...recommend a declaration of a State or Territory authority
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Supervision must overlap with government notification
premise text: (a) at least one Australian government has notified the State or Territory concerned...
conclusion text: ...that there is effective supervision of the prices charged by the authority for the supply of those goods or services
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Supervision must be recurrent
premise text: (b) there is not such effective supervision
conclusion text: ...that there is effective supervision of the prices charged by the authority for the supply of those goods or services
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Supervision implies government notification
premise text: (a) at least one Australian government has notified the State or Territory concerned...
conclusion text: ...that there is effective supervision of the prices charged by the authority for the supply of those goods or services
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Supervision implies impact on trade or commerce
premise text: (c) the supply of those goods or services by the authority has a significant direct or indirect impact on qualifying trade or commerce
conclusion text: ...that there is effective supervision of the prices charged by the authority for the supply of those goods or services
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95Y(3) Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95y-ss-3
part of: 95Y Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities
note: Council must not recommend declaration of State or Territory authority if effective supervision exists.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.488
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 95Y(3) Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Council is prohibited from recommending declaration.
premise text: (3) The Council must also not recommend a declaration of a State or Territory authority...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Supervision mechanism overlaps with current supervision.
premise text: (b) it is satisfied that there has not been a substantial change in the mechanism for that supervision...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Council must provide evidence of effective supervision.
premise text: (3) The Council must also not recommend a declaration of a State or Territory authority...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Supervision mechanism continues until substantial change occurs.
premise text: (b) it is satisfied that there has not been a substantial change in the mechanism for that supervision...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Council may recommend declaration if no effective supervision exists.
premise text: (3) The Council must also not recommend a declaration of a State or Territory authority...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95Y(4) Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95y-ss-4
part of: 95Y Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities
note: Council must apply relevant principles from the Competition Principles Agreement when deciding on effective supervision of prices charged by a State or Territory authority.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.488
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95Y(4) Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Council must apply relevant principles from the Competition Principles Agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95Y(5) Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95y-ss-5
part of: 95Y Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.488
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95y-ss-5-norm

95Z Price restrictions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95z
has part: 95Z(1) Price restrictions
has part: 95Z(2) Price restrictions
has part: 95Z(3) Price restrictions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.490

95Z(1) Price restrictions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95z-ss-1
part of: 95Z Price restrictions
note: Supplies goods or services at a particular price exceeds the highest price supplied in the same locality and terms within 12 months.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.490
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-1-logic-deontic-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 95Z(1) Price restrictions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits supplying goods or services at a particular price.
premise text: (a) the person is a declared person in relation to notified goods or services;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Describes the time period within which the supply must be made.
premise text: (c) the person has supplied goods or services of that description in that locality on the same or substantially similar terms and conditions in the period of 12 months before the current supply;
conclusion text: The actual price exceeds the highest price at which the person has supplied goods or services of that description in that locality on the same or substantially similar terms and conditions in that period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty to supply goods or services at a particular price.
premise text: (d) the actual price exceeds the highest price at which the person has supplied goods or services of that description in that locality on the same or substantially similar terms and conditions in that period;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95Z(2) Price restrictions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95z-ss-2
part of: 95Z Price restrictions
note: Supplies goods or services of a particular description on substantially similar terms and conditions within the last 12 months in Australia, exceeding the highest price paid for those goods or services elsewhere in Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.490
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 95Z(2) Price restrictions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits supplying goods or services on substantially similar terms and conditions within the last 12 months in Australia, exceeding the highest price paid for those goods or services elsewhere in Australia.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The current supply overlaps with supplies of goods or services on substantially similar terms and conditions within the last 12 months in Australia, exceeding the highest price paid for those goods or services elsewhere in Australia.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: The current supply repeats supplies of goods or services on substantially similar terms and conditions within the last 12 months in Australia, exceeding the highest price paid for those goods or services elsewhere in Australia.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: The current supply diffuses supplies of goods or services on substantially similar terms and conditions within the last 12 months in Australia, exceeding the highest price paid for those goods or services elsewhere in Australia.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: If a person supplies goods or services of a particular description on substantially similar terms and conditions within the last 12 months in Australia, exceeding the highest price paid for those goods or services elsewhere in Australia, then they commit an offence.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95Z(3) Price restrictions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95z-ss-3
part of: 95Z Price restrictions
note: Supplying goods or services without complying with certain terms and conditions is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.490
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 95Z(3) Price restrictions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplying goods or services without complying with terms and conditions.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...the current supply is not an exempt supply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Obliges the supplier to comply with terms and conditions.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...the current supply is not an exempt supply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95z-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Requires the supply of goods or services to occur within a specific time frame.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...in the period of 12 months before the current supply;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZA Later notices modifying a locality notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95za
has part: 95ZA(1) Later notices modifying a locality notice
has part: 95ZA(2) Later notices modifying a locality notice
has part: 95ZA(3) Later notices modifying a locality notice
has part: 95ZA(4) Later notices modifying a locality notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.493

95ZA(1) Later notices modifying a locality notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95za-ss-1
part of: 95ZA Later notices modifying a locality notice
note: Allow person to modify locality notice with further written notices.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.493
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 95ZA(1) Later notices modifying a locality notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows modification of locality notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZA(2) Later notices modifying a locality notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95za-ss-2
part of: 95ZA Later notices modifying a locality notice
note: Price in notice must be less than proposed price and previous notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.493
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95ZA(2) Later notices modifying a locality notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
premise text: (2) A price specified in a notice under subsection (1)
conclusion text: A price must be less than the proposed price
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: before
logic summary: Temporal relation: Notice < Proposed Price
premise text: (2) A price specified in a notice under subsection (1)
conclusion text: The price is before the proposed price
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal relation: Notice <= Proposed Price
premise text: (2) A price specified in a notice under subsection (1)
conclusion text: The price is until the proposed price
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion: Notice -> Price
premise text: (2) A price specified in a notice under subsection (1)
conclusion text: The price diffuses the notice
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Cognitive agent recognition: Notice -> Price
premise text: (2) A price specified in a notice under subsection (1)
conclusion text: The cognitive agent recognizes the price
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZA(3) Later notices modifying a locality notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95za-ss-3
part of: 95ZA Later notices modifying a locality notice
note: Notice has no effect if a locality notice is given under subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.493
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95ZA(3) Later notices modifying a locality notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If a notice is given, then the locality notice has no effect
premise text: Notice given
conclusion text: Locality notice has no effect
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If a notice is given, then the locality notice has no effect
premise text: Notice given
conclusion text: Locality notice has no effect
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

95ZA(4) Later notices modifying a locality notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95za-ss-4
part of: 95ZA Later notices modifying a locality notice
note: Defines 'proposed price' for the purpose of this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.493
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95za-ss-4-norm

95ZB Applicable period in relation to a locality notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zb
note: Defines applicable period for locality notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.493
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zb-norm

31 May.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31
note: Adjusts applicable period for response notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.494
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-31-norm

95ZC Register of price notifications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zc
has part: 95ZC(1) Register of price notifications
has part: 95ZC(2) Register of price notifications
has part: 95ZC(3) Register of price notifications
has part: 95ZC(4) Register of price notifications
has part: 95ZC(5) Register of price notifications
has part: 95ZC(6) Register of price notifications
has part: 95ZC(7) Register of price notifications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.494

95ZC(1) Register of price notifications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zc-ss-1
part of: 95ZC Register of price notifications
note: The Commission must keep a register.
description: Information on the register
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.494
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95ZC(1) Register of price notifications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
conclusion text: Information on the register
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZC(2) Register of price notifications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zc-ss-2
part of: 95ZC Register of price notifications
note: Commission must include certain information in the register after receiving a locality notice.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.494
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95ZC(2) Register of price notifications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information in the register.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZC(3) Register of price notifications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zc-ss-3
part of: 95ZC Register of price notifications
note: Commission must publish notice in Gazette after receiving locality notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.494
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-3-logic-deontic-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95ZC(3) Register of price notifications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Notice published within 3 months
premise text: (3) The Commission must, within 3 months after the end of the applicable period in relation to the locality notice,
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish notice in Gazette
premise text: (3) The Commission must, within 3 months after the end of the applicable period in relation to the locality notice,
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZC(4) Register of price notifications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zc-ss-4
part of: 95ZC Register of price notifications
note: Request to exclude confidential information from a document in the register.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.494
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 95ZC(4) Register of price notifications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission to exclude confidential information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZC(5) Register of price notifications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zc-ss-5
part of: 95ZC Register of price notifications
note: Commission may exclude information from register if it is satisfied that the claim is justified.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.494
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-5-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95ZC(5) Register of price notifications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

95ZC(6) Register of price notifications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zc-ss-6
part of: 95ZC Register of price notifications
note: Application for review of decision to exclude information from register
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.494
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-6-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95ZC(6) Register of price notifications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

95ZC(7) Register of price notifications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zc-ss-7
part of: 95ZC Register of price notifications
note: Right to inspect register during office hours
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.494
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-7-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-7-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 95ZC(7) Register of price notifications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zc-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Right to access register
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZD Delegation by Commission
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zd
has part: 95ZD(1) Delegation by Commission
has part: 95ZD(2) Delegation by Commission
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.496

95ZD(1) Delegation by Commission
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zd-ss-1
part of: 95ZD Delegation by Commission
note: Commission may delegate certain powers to a member.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.496
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zd-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes the action of delegation.
premise text: Commission delegates power.
conclusion text: Power is delegated.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZD(2) Delegation by Commission
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zd-ss-2
part of: 95ZD Delegation by Commission
note: Commission's powers under paragraph 95Z(6)(b) or (c)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.496
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zd-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zd-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95ZD(2) Delegation by Commission
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower
logic summary: Commission has power
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zd-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: isDefinedBy
logic summary: Definition of price notification powers
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZE Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of an industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95ze
has part: 95ZE(1) Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of an industry
has part: 95ZE(2) Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of an industry
has part: 95ZE(3) Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of an industry
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.497

95ZE(1) Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of an industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95ze-ss-1
part of: 95ZE Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of an industry
note: The Minister must give the Commission a written direction to monitor prices, costs and profits.
description: Report on monitoring at specified time or intervals
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.497
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ze-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ze-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ze-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95ZE(1) Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of an industry
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ze-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Minister must give the Commission a written direction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZE(2) Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of an industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95ze-ss-2
part of: 95ZE Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of an industry
note: The Commission must have regard to the need for commercial confidentiality.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.497
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ze-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ze-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ze-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95ZE(2) Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of an industry
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ze-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
premise text: The Commission must...
conclusion text: ...regard to the need for commercial confidentiality.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZE(3) Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of an industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95ze-ss-3
part of: 95ZE Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of an industry
note: Must provide public inspection of report
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.497
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ze-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ze-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ze-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95ZE(3) Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of an industry
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95ze-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Obligation to provide public inspection
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZF Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of a business
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zf
has part: 95ZF(1) Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of a business
has part: 95ZF(2) Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of a business
has part: 95ZF(3) Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of a business
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.497

95ZF(1) Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of a business
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zf-ss-1
part of: 95ZF Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of a business
note: Minister may give Commission written direction to monitor prices, costs and profits.
description: (a) to monitor prices, costs and profits relating to the supply of goods or services by a specified person; (b) to give the Minister a report on the monitoring at a specified time or at specified intervals within a specified period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.497
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95ZF(1) Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of a business
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Minister may give Commission written direction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: at
logic summary: Commission must report at specified time.
premise text: (b) to give the Minister a report on the monitoring at a specified time or at specified intervals within a specified period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: at
logic summary: Commission must report at specified intervals.
premise text: (b) to give the Minister a report on the monitoring at a specified time or at specified intervals within a specified period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: within
logic summary: Commission must report within specified period.
premise text: (b) to give the Minister a report on the monitoring at a specified time or at specified intervals within a specified period.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: specified
logic summary: Commission must use specified person's data.
premise text: (a) to monitor prices, costs and profits relating to the supply of goods or services by a specified person;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZF(2) Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of a business
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zf-ss-2
part of: 95ZF Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of a business
note: Must send a copy of the report to a person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.497
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to send a copy of the report
premise text: The Commission must...
conclusion text: ...send a copy of the report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZF(3) Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of a business
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zf-ss-3
part of: 95ZF Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of a business
note: Commission must send a copy of the report to the person on the specified day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.497
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95ZF(3) Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of a business
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a copy of the report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZG Exceptions to price monitoring
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zg
has part: 95ZG(1) Exceptions to price monitoring
has part: 95ZG(2) Exceptions to price monitoring
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.498

95ZG(1) Exceptions to price monitoring
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zg-ss-1
part of: 95ZG Exceptions to price monitoring
note: Minister cannot direct Commission to monitor prices of exempt supplies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.498
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zg-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZG(2) Exceptions to price monitoring
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zg-ss-2
part of: 95ZG Exceptions to price monitoring
note: Minister cannot direct Commission to monitor prices without State/Territory agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.498
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zg-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of action
premise text: Minister direction
conclusion text: State/Territory agreement required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZH Ministerial directions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zh
has part: 95ZH(1) Ministerial directions
has part: 95ZH(2) Ministerial directions
has part: 95ZH(3) Ministerial directions
has part: 95ZH(4) Ministerial directions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.499

95ZH(1) Ministerial directions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zh-ss-1
part of: 95ZH Ministerial directions
note: The Minister may direct the Commission to give special consideration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.499
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zh-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to direct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZH(2) Ministerial directions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zh-ss-2
part of: 95ZH Ministerial directions
note: Commission must comply with ministerial directions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.499
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zh-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zh-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95ZH(2) Ministerial directions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
premise text: (2) The Commission must comply with any such directions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZH(3) Ministerial directions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zh-ss-3
part of: 95ZH Ministerial directions
note: The Minister may direct the body holding an external inquiry to give special consideration to a specified matter or matters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.499
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zh-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The Minister has the power to direct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZH(4) Ministerial directions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zh-ss-4
part of: 95ZH Ministerial directions
note: The body must comply with ministerial directions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.499
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zh-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zh-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zh-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95ZH(4) Ministerial directions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zh-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
premise text: (4) The body must comply with any such directions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZI Inquiries by an unincorporated body or a group of 2 or more
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zi
has part: 95ZI(1) Inquiries by an unincorporated body or a group of 2 or more
has part: 95ZI(2) Inquiries by an unincorporated body or a group of 2 or more
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.499

95ZI(1) Inquiries by an unincorporated body or a group of 2 or more
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zi-ss-1
part of: 95ZI Inquiries by an unincorporated body or a group of 2 or more
note: This section applies to inquiries by an unincorporated body or a group of 2 or more individuals.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.499
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zi-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zi-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95ZI(1) Inquiries by an unincorporated body or a group of 2 or more
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: appliesTo
logic summary: Section applies to inquiries
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZI(2) Inquiries by an unincorporated body or a group of 2 or more
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zi-ss-2
part of: 95ZI Inquiries by an unincorporated body or a group of 2 or more
note: Unincorporated body or group of individuals must give notice, report, or document to a person under this Part.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.499
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zi-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zi-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95ZI(2) Inquiries by an unincorporated body or a group of 2 or more
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice, report, or document.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZJ Withdrawal of notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zj
has part: 95ZJ(1) Withdrawal of notices
has part: 95ZJ(2) Withdrawal of notices
has part: 95ZJ(3) Withdrawal of notices
has part: 95ZJ(4) Withdrawal of notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.500

95ZJ(1) Withdrawal of notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zj-ss-1
part of: 95ZJ Withdrawal of notices
note: Commission may give a person a notice withdrawing a previously given notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.500
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zj-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zj-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95ZJ(1) Withdrawal of notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Commission may give a person a notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZJ(2) Withdrawal of notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zj-ss-2
part of: 95ZJ Withdrawal of notices
note: Commission's withdrawal notice affects the Part's validity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.500
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zj-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Withdrawal notice imposes an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZJ(3) Withdrawal of notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zj-ss-3
part of: 95ZJ Withdrawal of notices
note: Body must give a person a notice withdrawing a previous notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.500
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zj-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zj-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zj-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Body has an obligation to give a person a notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZJ(4) Withdrawal of notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zj-ss-4
part of: 95ZJ Withdrawal of notices
note: Effect of withdrawal notice on Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.500
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zj-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zj-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zj-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95ZJ(4) Withdrawal of notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zj-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional effect
premise text: Withdrawal notice given
conclusion text: Part has effect
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZK Power to obtain information or documents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zk
has part: 95ZK(1) Power to obtain information or documents
has part: 95ZK(2) Power to obtain information or documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.500

95ZK(1) Power to obtain information or documents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zk-ss-1
part of: 95ZK Power to obtain information or documents
note: The Chairperson may require a person to provide information or documents.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.500
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zk-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zk-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95ZK(1) Power to obtain information or documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Chairperson must require the person to provide information or documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZK(2) Power to obtain information or documents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zk-ss-2
part of: 95ZK Power to obtain information or documents
note: Require person to provide information or documents within a specified period and manner.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.500
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zk-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the person to provide information or documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZL Inspection of documents etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zl
has part: 95ZL(1) Inspection of documents etc.
has part: 95ZL(2) Inspection of documents etc.
has part: 95ZL(3) Inspection of documents etc.
has part: 95ZL(4) Inspection of documents etc.
has part: 95ZL(5) Inspection of documents etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.504

95ZL(1) Inspection of documents etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zl-ss-1
part of: 95ZL Inspection of documents etc.
note: Commission members may inspect documents given for Commission purposes or produced at an inquiry.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.504
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zl-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zl-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95ZL(1) Inspection of documents etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Commission members can inspect documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZL(2) Inspection of documents etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zl-ss-2
part of: 95ZL Inspection of documents etc.
note: Members can make copies or take extracts from documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.504
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zl-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zl-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zl-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Permission to make copies or extract documents
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZL(3) Inspection of documents etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zl-ss-3
part of: 95ZL Inspection of documents etc.
note: Associate members of the Commission may inspect documents under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.504
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zl-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zl-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zl-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95ZL(3) Inspection of documents etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zl-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Associate members can inspect documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZL(4) Inspection of documents etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zl-ss-4
part of: 95ZL Inspection of documents etc.
note: Associate members can make copies or take extracts from documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.504
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zl-ss-4-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zl-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 95ZL(4) Inspection of documents etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

95ZL(5) Inspection of documents etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zl-ss-5
part of: 95ZL Inspection of documents etc.
note: Inspect documents and make copies or extracts.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.504
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zl-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zl-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zl-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 95ZL(5) Inspection of documents etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zl-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Permission to inspect documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZM Retention of documents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zm
has part: 95ZM(1) Retention of documents
has part: 95ZM(2) Retention of documents
has part: 95ZM(3) Retention of documents
has part: 95ZM(4) Retention of documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.505

95ZM(1) Retention of documents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zm-ss-1
part of: 95ZM Retention of documents
note: Commission may retain documents for a reasonable period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.505
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes the action of retaining documents.
premise text: The Commission, or a body other than the Commission, may retain a document.
conclusion text: The Commission may retain documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for document retention.
premise text: The Commission may retain a document for such reasonable period as it thinks fit.
conclusion text: The document is retained for a reasonable period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes the temporal interval for document retention.
premise text: The Commission may retain a document for such reasonable period as it thinks fit.
conclusion text: The document is retained for a reasonable period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes the scope of document retention.
premise text: The Commission, or a body other than the Commission, may retain a document given or produced to it as mentioned in section 95ZL.
conclusion text: The Commission may retain documents given or produced to it.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes the Commission's ability to retain documents.
premise text: The Commission, or a body other than the Commission, may retain a document.
conclusion text: The Commission has the ability to retain documents.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZM(2) Retention of documents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zm-ss-2
part of: 95ZM Retention of documents
note: The person entitled to possession of the document is entitled to be supplied with a copy.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.505
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95ZM(2) Retention of documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to supply a document
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZM(3) Retention of documents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zm-ss-3
part of: 95ZM Retention of documents
note: Must be received as evidence in all courts and tribunals.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.505
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95ZM(3) Retention of documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be received
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZM(4) Retention of documents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zm-ss-4
part of: 95ZM Retention of documents
note: Must permit inspection and copying of documents under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.505
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zm-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to permit inspection
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZN Confidential information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zn
has part: 95ZN(1) Confidential information
has part: 95ZN(2) Confidential information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.505

95ZN(1) Confidential information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zn-ss-1
part of: 95ZN Confidential information
note: Confidentiality obligation for disclosure of sensitive information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.505
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zn-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zn-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95ZN(1) Confidential information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to maintain confidentiality
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZN(2) Confidential information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zn-ss-2
part of: 95ZN Confidential information
note: Conditional commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.505
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zn-ss-2-norm

95ZO Immunity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zo
has part: 95ZO(1) Immunity
has part: 95ZO(2) Immunity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.506

95ZO(1) Immunity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zo-ss-1
part of: 95ZO Immunity
note: Protection and immunity for Commission members
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.506
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95ZO(1) Immunity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: Commission member has protection and immunity
conclusion text: Protection and immunity granted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Protection and immunity during performance of functions or exercise of powers
premise text: Commission member performs functions or exercises powers during this time
conclusion text: Protection and immunity granted during this time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Protection and immunity during performance of functions or exercise of powers
premise text: Commission member performs functions or exercises powers during this time
conclusion text: Protection and immunity granted during this time
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Protection and immunity during performance of functions or exercise of powers
premise text: Commission member performs functions or exercises powers during this time
conclusion text: Protection and immunity granted during this time
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Protection and immunity during performance of functions or exercise of powers
premise text: Commission member performs functions or exercises powers during this time
conclusion text: Protection and immunity granted during this time
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZO(2) Immunity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zo-ss-2
part of: 95ZO Immunity
note: Protection and immunity for inquiry persons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.506
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95ZO(2) Immunity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Inquiry person has protection and immunity
premise text: (2) In an external inquiry...
conclusion text: The person presiding at the inquiry has... protection and immunity.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Protection and immunity apply during inquiry performance
premise text: (2) In an external inquiry...
conclusion text: The person presiding at the inquiry has... protection and immunity while performing their functions or exercising powers under this Part.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Protection and immunity imply certain conditions
premise text: (2) In an external inquiry...
conclusion text: If the person presiding at the inquiry has protection and immunity, then they have... certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Protection and immunity diffuse to inquiry persons
premise text: (2) In an external inquiry...
conclusion text: The person presiding at the inquiry has... protection and immunity that diffuses to other inquiry persons.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zo-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: System recognizes protection and immunity for inquiry persons
premise text: (2) In an external inquiry...
conclusion text: The system recognizes that the person presiding at the inquiry has... protection and immunity.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZP Secrecy: members or staff members of the Commission etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zp
has part: 95ZP(1) Secrecy: members or staff members of the Commission etc.
has part: 95ZP(2) Secrecy: members or staff members of the Commission etc.
has part: 95ZP(3) Secrecy: members or staff members of the Commission etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.507

95ZP(1) Secrecy: members or staff members of the Commission etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zp-ss-1
part of: 95ZP Secrecy: members or staff members of the Commission etc.
note: Disclosing protected information is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.507
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zp-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zp-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 95ZP(1) Secrecy: members or staff members of the Commission etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of protected information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZP(2) Secrecy: members or staff members of the Commission etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zp-ss-2
part of: 95ZP Secrecy: members or staff members of the Commission etc.
note: Cannot disclose protected information to a court or produce protected documents unless necessary for carrying out the provisions of this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.507
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zp-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zp-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 95ZP(2) Secrecy: members or staff members of the Commission etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on disclosure or production
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZP(3) Secrecy: members or staff members of the Commission etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zp-ss-3
part of: 95ZP Secrecy: members or staff members of the Commission etc.
note: Definition of 'entrusted person'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.507
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zp-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zp-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zp-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95ZP(3) Secrecy: members or staff members of the Commission etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zp-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Identifies a specific role within the Commission
premise text: Commission member or staff member
conclusion text: Entrusted person
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95ZQ Secrecy: persons involved in inquiries by bodies other than
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95zq
note: Committing an offence by certain actions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.509
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zq-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zq-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-95zq-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits committing an offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96 Acts constituting engaging in resale price maintenance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-96
has part: 96(1) Acts constituting engaging in resale price maintenance
has part: 96(2) Acts constituting engaging in resale price maintenance
has part: 96(3) Acts constituting engaging in resale price maintenance
has part: 96(4) Acts constituting engaging in resale price maintenance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.512

96(1) Acts constituting engaging in resale price maintenance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-96-ss-1
part of: 96 Acts constituting engaging in resale price maintenance
note: Engaging in resale price maintenance is an obligation for a corporation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.512
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 96(1) Acts constituting engaging in resale price maintenance
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of obligation
conclusion text: Engaging in resale price maintenance is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96(2) Acts constituting engaging in resale price maintenance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-96-ss-2
part of: 96 Acts constituting engaging in resale price maintenance
note: Engaging in resale price maintenance is prohibited for individuals.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.512
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 96(2) Acts constituting engaging in resale price maintenance
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits engaging in resale price maintenance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96(3) Acts constituting engaging in resale price maintenance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-96-ss-3
part of: 96 Acts constituting engaging in resale price maintenance
note: Supplier cannot supply goods at a price less than specified by supplier.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.512
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 96(3) Acts constituting engaging in resale price maintenance
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Supplier is prohibited from supplying goods at a lower price.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96(4) Acts constituting engaging in resale price maintenance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-96-ss-4
part of: 96 Acts constituting engaging in resale price maintenance
note: Supplier's specified price deemed to be their own if made known
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.512
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 96(4) Acts constituting engaging in resale price maintenance
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Supplier's knowledge of price specification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96A Resale price maintenance in relation to services
type: Concept
realized by: sec-96a
has part: 96A(1) Resale price maintenance in relation to services
has part: 96A(2) Resale price maintenance in relation to services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.515

96A(1) Resale price maintenance in relation to services
type: Concept
realized by: sec-96a-ss-1
part of: 96A Resale price maintenance in relation to services
note: This Part applies to conduct in relation to services in a way that corresponds to the way it applies to conduct in relation to goods.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.515
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96a-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 96A(1) Resale price maintenance in relation to services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: The provision applies to conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96A(2) Resale price maintenance in relation to services
type: Concept
realized by: sec-96a-ss-2
part of: 96A Resale price maintenance in relation to services
note: Modifications for resale price maintenance in relation to services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.515
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-96a-ss-2-norm

97 Recommended prices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-97
note: Supplier cannot induce or attempt to induce a second person in relation to goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.515
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-97-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-97-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-97-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 97 Recommended prices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-97-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits supplier from inducing or attempting to induce a second person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

98 Withholding the supply of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sec-98
note: Supplier must withhold supply of goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.515
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-98-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-98-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-98-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 98 Withholding the supply of goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-98-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: DEEMED
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

99 Statements as to the minimum price of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sec-99
has part: 99(1) Statements as to the minimum price of goods
has part: 99(2) Statements as to the minimum price of goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.516

99(1) Statements as to the minimum price of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sec-99-ss-1
part of: 99 Statements as to the minimum price of goods
note: Statement applied to goods or documents must refer to those goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.516
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-99-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-99-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-99-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 99(1) Statements as to the minimum price of goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-99-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Belief about goods
premise text: Statement is applied to goods or documents
conclusion text: Goods are believed to be referred to
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

99(2) Statements as to the minimum price of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sec-99-ss-2
part of: 99 Statements as to the minimum price of goods
note: Defines what 'covering' includes for the purpose of subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.516
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-99-ss-2-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-99-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 99(2) Statements as to the minimum price of goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

100 Evidentiary provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100
has part: 100(1) Evidentiary provisions
has part: 100(2) Evidentiary provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.517

100(1) Evidentiary provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100-ss-1
part of: 100 Evidentiary provisions
note: Presumption of reason for defendant's action
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.517
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 100(1) Evidentiary provisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defendant has a duty to provide reason for their action
premise text: (a) the defendant has acted, in relation to the plaintiff, as mentioned in paragraph 98(1)(a), (b), (c) or (d);
conclusion text: then, subject to subsection (2), it shall be presumed, unless the contrary is established, that that matter or circumstance was the reason for the defendant’s so acting.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defendant became aware of matter or circumstance capable of constituting reason for their action within 6 months before the time of the action
premise text: (c) during the period of 6 months immediately before the time when the defendant so acted, the defendant became aware of a matter or circumstance capable of constituting a reason referred to in paragraph 96(3)(d) or (e) for the defendant’s so acting;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Defendant is permitted to act as mentioned in paragraph 98(1)(a), (b), (c) or (d)
premise text: (a) the defendant has acted, in relation to the plaintiff, as mentioned in paragraph 98(1)(a), (b), (c) or (d);
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defendant has an obligation to provide reason for their action
premise text: (a) the defendant has acted, in relation to the plaintiff, as mentioned in paragraph 98(1)(a), (b), (c) or (d);
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

100(2) Evidentiary provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100-ss-2
part of: 100 Evidentiary provisions
note: Exemption from evidentiary provisions under certain conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.517
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 100(2) Evidentiary provisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exempts
logic summary: Exemption from evidentiary provisions
premise text: The defendant is exempt from the requirement...
conclusion text: ...if certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Exemption applies during certain conditions
premise text: The defendant requires only a requirement by the defendant as to Chapter 6
conclusion text: ...but the terms disadvantageous to the plaintiff, or the less favourable treatment of the plaintiff...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Exemption applies during certain conditions
premise text: The defendant requires only a requirement by the defendant as to Chapter 6
conclusion text: ...but the terms disadvantageous to the plaintiff, or the less favourable treatment of the plaintiff...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if and only if
logic summary: Exemption applies if certain conditions are met
premise text: The plaintiff establishes the matter mentioned in paragraph 98(1)(b) or (c)
conclusion text: ...but the terms disadvantageous to the plaintiff, or the less favourable treatment of the plaintiff...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: if and only if
logic summary: Exemption applies if certain conditions are met
premise text: The defendant requires only a requirement by the defendant as to Chapter 6
conclusion text: ...but the terms disadvantageous to the plaintiff, or the less favourable treatment of the plaintiff...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

100A Applications for review
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100a
has part: 100A(1) Applications for review
has part: 100A(2) Applications for review
has part: 100A(3) Applications for review
has part: 100A(4) Applications for review
has part: 100A(5) Applications for review
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.519

100A(1) Applications for review
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100a-ss-1
part of: 100A Applications for review
note: Section applies if a provision of this Act provides that a person may apply under this Division for review of a decision of the Commission.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.519
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 100A(1) Applications for review
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: A provision of this Act provides that a person may apply under this Division for review of a decision of the Commission.
conclusion text: This section applies if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

100A(2) Applications for review
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100a-ss-2
part of: 100A Applications for review
note: Must apply for review within a time limit.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.519
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 100A(2) Applications for review
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to apply for review
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100A(3) Applications for review
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100a-ss-3
part of: 100A Applications for review
note: Requirements for making applications for review may be determined by the Minister.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.519
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to determine requirements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100A(4) Applications for review
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100a-ss-4
part of: 100A Applications for review
note: The Tribunal must review the decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.519
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must review the decision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100A(5) Applications for review
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100a-ss-5
part of: 100A Applications for review
note: Applicability of the Act to the Tribunal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.519
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 100A(5) Applications for review
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: like manner
logic summary: Similar applicability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100B Functions and powers of Tribunal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100b
note: Tribunal may make decisions and exercise Commission's powers during review
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.519
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100b-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100b-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Tribunal has the power to make decisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100C Applications for review
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100c
has part: 100C(1) Applications for review
has part: 100C(2) Applications for review
has part: 100C(3) Applications for review
has part: 100C(4) Applications for review
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.521

100C(1) Applications for review
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100c-ss-1
part of: 100C Applications for review
note: A person can apply for a review of an acquisition determination within 14 days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.521
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 100C(1) Applications for review
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Possibility
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100C(2) Applications for review
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100c-ss-2
part of: 100C Applications for review
note: Requirements for making an application may be determined by legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.521
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Requirements for making an application may be determined by legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Requirements determined during applications
premise text: (2)
conclusion text: determination
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100C(3) Applications for review
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100c-ss-3
part of: 100C Applications for review
note: Allow person to apply for review of determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.521
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: allow
logic summary: Allow application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100C(4) Applications for review
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100c-ss-4
part of: 100C Applications for review
note: Consideration of factors before allowing an application to the Tribunal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.521
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Mandatory consideration of factors
premise text: Tribunal must have regard to...
conclusion text: ...the person’s interest in the matter; and...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal consideration of factors
premise text: (4) In considering whether to allow a person to apply to the Tribunal under subsection (3),
conclusion text: ...the application has any reasonable prospects of success; and...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal consideration of factors
premise text: (4) In considering whether to allow a person to apply to the Tribunal under subsection (3),
conclusion text: ...the application has any reasonable prospects of success; and...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal consideration of factors
premise text: (4) In considering whether to allow a person to apply to the Tribunal under subsection (3),
conclusion text: ...the application has any reasonable prospects of success; and...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100c-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal consideration of factors
premise text: (4) In considering whether to allow a person to apply to the Tribunal under subsection (3),
conclusion text: ...the application has any reasonable prospects of success; and...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100D Further information and documents in relation to applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100d
has part: 100D(1) Further information and documents in relation to applications
has part: 100D(2) Further information and documents in relation to applications
has part: 100D(3) Further information and documents in relation to applications
has part: 100D(4) Further information and documents in relation to applications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.522

100D(1) Further information and documents in relation to applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100d-ss-1
part of: 100D Further information and documents in relation to applications
note: Must provide information or documents to the Tribunal.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.522
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100d-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 100D(1) Further information and documents in relation to applications
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide information or documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100D(2) Further information and documents in relation to applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100d-ss-2
part of: 100D Further information and documents in relation to applications
note: The Minister may determine information or documents in relation to an application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.522
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100d-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to determine information or documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100D(3) Further information and documents in relation to applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100d-ss-3
part of: 100D Further information and documents in relation to applications
note: Provide information or documents within 30 days of applying for review.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.522
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100d-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information or documents within 30 days.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100D(4) Further information and documents in relation to applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100d-ss-4
part of: 100D Further information and documents in relation to applications
note: Failure to provide information or documents within 30 days results in withdrawal of application.
description: information or documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.522
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100d-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits failure to provide information or documents within 30 days.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100E Applicants may withdraw applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100e
has part: 100E(1) Applicants may withdraw applications
has part: 100E(2) Applicants may withdraw applications
has part: 100E(3) Applicants may withdraw applications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.522

100E(1) Applicants may withdraw applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100e-ss-1
part of: 100E Applicants may withdraw applications
note: Applicant may withdraw application at any time
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.522
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Obligation to withdraw
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100E(2) Applicants may withdraw applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100e-ss-2
part of: 100E Applicants may withdraw applications
note: Participant may apply for reinstatement of withdrawn application within 7 days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.522
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 100E(2) Applicants may withdraw applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Participant may apply for reinstatement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Must know
logic summary: Participant must know about withdrawal notice.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Reinstatement application must be made within 7 days.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100E(3) Applicants may withdraw applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100e-ss-3
part of: 100E Applicants may withdraw applications
note: Tribunal may reinstate application for review under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.522
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-3-logic-shacl-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Expresses permission or allowance
conclusion text: the Tribunal may reinstate the application and make such orders as appear to the Tribunal to be appropriate in the circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <>
logic summary: Describes a condition or restriction on an action
conclusion text: (3) If: (a) a participant applies under subsection (2); and (b) the Tribunal believes it to be appropriate to reinstate the application for review;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <>
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between events or periods
conclusion text: (3) If: (a) a participant applies under subsection (2); and (b) the Tribunal believes it to be appropriate to reinstate the application for review;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: <>
logic summary: Describes a process or system that can reason about the law
conclusion text: (3) If: (a) a participant applies under subsection (2); and (b) the Tribunal believes it to be appropriate to reinstate the application for review;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100e-ss-3-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: <>
logic summary: Describes a set of constraints on data or behavior
conclusion text: (3) If: (a) a participant applies under subsection (2); and (b) the Tribunal believes it to be appropriate to reinstate the application for review;
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100F Tribunal may dismiss applications if parties consent
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100f
note: Tribunal may dismiss applications with party consent
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.523
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100f-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100f-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May dismiss application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100G Tribunal may dismiss applications if fees not paid
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100g
note: Failure to pay fees may result in dismissal of application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.523
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100g-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100g-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on non-payment of fees.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100H Tribunal may dismiss applications if applicants fail to comply
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100h
note: Failure to comply with order or Act results in dismissal of application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.523
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100h-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100h-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100h-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100h-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100h-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100h-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100h-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of non-compliance with order or Act.
premise text: Failure to comply with order or Act.
conclusion text: Dismissal of application.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100h-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Non-compliance with order or Act overlaps with dismissal of application.
premise text: The non-compliance with order or Act occurs before the dismissal of application.
conclusion text: The two events are temporally related.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100h-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Non-compliance with order or Act overlaps with dismissal of application.
premise text: The non-compliance with order or Act occurs before the dismissal of application.
conclusion text: The two events are temporally related.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100h-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Implication
logic summary: Non-compliance with order or Act implies dismissal of application.
premise text: If the applicant fails to comply with order or Act, then the Tribunal may dismiss the application.
conclusion text: The non-compliance with order or Act leads to the dismissal of application.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100h-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Implication
logic summary: Non-compliance with order or Act implies dismissal of application.
premise text: If the applicant fails to comply with order or Act, then the Tribunal may dismiss the application.
conclusion text: The non-compliance with order or Act leads to the dismissal of application.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100J Tribunal may dismiss application if frivolous, vexatious etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100j
note: Dismiss application if frivolous, vexatious etc.
references: sec-111
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.523
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100j-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100j-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100j-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: Application is frivolous, vexatious etc.
conclusion text: Dismiss application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100K Certain participants may seek to withdraw from being
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100k
has part: 100K(1) Certain participants may seek to withdraw from being
has part: 100K(2) Certain participants may seek to withdraw from being
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.524

100K(1) Certain participants may seek to withdraw from being
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100k-ss-1
part of: 100K Certain participants may seek to withdraw from being
note: Participant must provide written notice to cease participation.
description: Written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.524
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100k-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide written notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100K(2) Certain participants may seek to withdraw from being
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100k-ss-2
part of: 100K Certain participants may seek to withdraw from being
note: The applicant may withdraw their application under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.524
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100k-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100k-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 100K(2) Certain participants may seek to withdraw from being
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to withdraw an application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

100L Notice of withdrawals and dismissals
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100l
note: Notice of withdrawal or dismissal to Commission and participants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.524
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100l-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100l-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100l-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Tribunal must give notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100M Tribunal not to review determinations while Commission
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100m
has part: 100M(1) Tribunal not to review determinations while Commission
has part: 100M(2) Tribunal not to review determinations while Commission
has part: 100M(3) Tribunal not to review determinations while Commission
has part: 100M(4) Tribunal not to review determinations while Commission
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.524

100M(1) Tribunal not to review determinations while Commission
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100m-ss-1
part of: 100M Tribunal not to review determinations while Commission
note: No review of acquisition determination under subsection 51ABZE(1) if public benefit application has been made and Commission has not decided to cease considering it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.524
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-1-logic-shacl-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 100M(1) Tribunal not to review determinations while Commission
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of review under subsection 51ABZE(1)
premise text: A public benefit application has been made.
conclusion text: No review is allowed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlap between review and public benefit application
premise text: A public benefit application has been made in relation to the notification.
conclusion text: The review is overlapped with the public benefit application.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace between Commission and public benefit application
premise text: The Commission has not decided under section 51ABZV to cease considering the public benefit application.
conclusion text: There is a recurring trace between the Commission and the public benefit application.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Entity
logic summary: Entity classification of Commission and public benefit application
premise text: The Commission has not decided under section 51ABZV to cease considering the public benefit application.
conclusion text: The Commission and public benefit application are entities classified as such.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Constraint
logic summary: Constraint on review of acquisition determination
premise text: A public benefit application has been made in relation to the notification.
conclusion text: There is a constraint on the review of the acquisition determination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

100M(2) Tribunal not to review determinations while Commission
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100m-ss-2
part of: 100M Tribunal not to review determinations while Commission
note: No review of acquisition determination while public benefit application is made or Commission decides to cease considering it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.524
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of review
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100M(3) Tribunal not to review determinations while Commission
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100m-ss-3
part of: 100M Tribunal not to review determinations while Commission
note: Tribunal must cease review proceedings until Commission decides on public benefit application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.524
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 100M(3) Tribunal not to review determinations while Commission
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Tribunal must cease review proceedings.
premise text: (3) If...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100M(4) Tribunal not to review determinations while Commission
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100m-ss-4
part of: 100M Tribunal not to review determinations while Commission
note: No review of acquisition determination while public benefit application is made
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.524
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100m-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prevents review of acquisition determination
premise text: Public benefit application made
conclusion text: No review allowed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100N Functions and powers of Tribunal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100n
has part: 100N(1) Functions and powers of Tribunal
has part: 100N(2) Functions and powers of Tribunal
has part: 100N(3) Functions and powers of Tribunal
has part: 100N(4) Functions and powers of Tribunal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.526

100N(1) Functions and powers of Tribunal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100n-ss-1
part of: 100N Functions and powers of Tribunal
note: May make a determination affirming, setting aside or varying the determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.526
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100n-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May perform all functions and exercise all powers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100N(2) Functions and powers of Tribunal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100n-ss-2
part of: 100N Functions and powers of Tribunal
note: Applicability of Commission's provisions to Tribunal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.526
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100n-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Applicability of Commission's provisions to Tribunal
premise text: (whichever is relevant) applies in relation to the Tribunal in the same way as it applies in relation to the Commission.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100N(3) Functions and powers of Tribunal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100n-ss-3
part of: 100N Functions and powers of Tribunal
note: Tribunal may make acquisition determination by consent of applicant, notifying party, and intervenors.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.526
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100n-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to make acquisition determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100N(4) Functions and powers of Tribunal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100n-ss-4
part of: 100N Functions and powers of Tribunal
note: Commission's determination is binding on other authorities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.526
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100n-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100n-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100n-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 100N(4) Functions and powers of Tribunal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100n-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: binding
logic summary: Obligation to follow Commission's decision.
premise text: Commission's determination is binding on other authorities.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100P Time within which Tribunal must make determination on
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100p
has part: 100P(1) Time within which Tribunal must make determination on
has part: 100P(2) Time within which Tribunal must make determination on
has part: 100P(3) Time within which Tribunal must make determination on
has part: 100P(4) Time within which Tribunal must make determination on
has part: 100P(5) Time within which Tribunal must make determination on
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.527

100P(1) Time within which Tribunal must make determination on
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100p-ss-1
part of: 100P Time within which Tribunal must make determination on
note: Tribunal must make determination within a specified timeframe.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.527
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 100P(1) Time within which Tribunal must make determination on
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a determination within the specified timeframe.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ⇒
logic summary: If the Commission makes an acquisition determination, then the Tribunal must make its determination within the specified timeframe.
premise text: Commission makes acquisition determination
conclusion text: Tribunal must make determination within the specified timeframe.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: ⊆
logic summary: The Tribunal's determination must be made within a temporal interval of at least 45 days after the Commission makes its acquisition determination.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100P(2) Time within which Tribunal must make determination on
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100p-ss-2
part of: 100P Time within which Tribunal must make determination on
note: Tribunal must make determination within 90 days after application and additional information are provided.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.527
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Tribunal must make determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
logic summary: Time period for Tribunal's decision
premise text: (2) Subject to subsections (3) and (5), the Tribunal must make its determination on a review of an acquisition determination under this Division no later than 90 days after the later of: (a) the last day on which an application for review of the determination could have been made under subsection 100C(1); and (b) the day the applicant gives to the Tribunal the additional information or documents required under subsection 100D(1). Note: See also subsections 100M(3) and (4) if a public benefit application is made. Extensions
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: within
logic summary: Time period for Tribunal's decision
premise text: (2) Subject to subsections (3) and (5), the Tribunal must make its determination on a review of an acquisition determination under this Division no later than 90 days after the later of: (a) the last day on which an application for review of the determination could have been made under subsection 100C(1); and (b) the day the applicant gives to the Tribunal the additional information or documents required under subsection 100D(1). Note: See also subsections 100M(3) and (4) if a public benefit application is made. Extensions
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Tribunal must make determination within specified time period
premise text: (2) Subject to subsections (3) and (5), the Tribunal must make its determination on a review of an acquisition determination under this Division no later than 90 days after the later of: (a) the last day on which an application for review of the determination could have been made under subsection 100C(1); and (b) the day the applicant gives to the Tribunal the additional information or documents required under subsection 100D(1). Note: See also subsections 100M(3) and (4) if a public benefit application is made. Extensions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100P(3) Time within which Tribunal must make determination on
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100p-ss-3
part of: 100P Time within which Tribunal must make determination on
note: Tribunal may extend review period by 60 days
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.527
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-3-norm

100P(4) Time within which Tribunal must make determination on
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100p-ss-4
part of: 100P Time within which Tribunal must make determination on
note: Tribunal must make determination within a specified time period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.527
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to act within a timeframe
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100P(5) Time within which Tribunal must make determination on
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100p-ss-5
part of: 100P Time within which Tribunal must make determination on
note: Tribunal's period for making determination extended under subsection (3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.527
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100p-ss-5-norm

100Q Technical experts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100q
note: The Tribunal may ask questions of a technical expert or seek information, documents or evidence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.528
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100q-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100q-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100q-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The Tribunal may do something.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100R Commission information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100r
has part: 100R(1) Commission information
has part: 100R(2) Commission information
has part: 100R(3) Commission information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.528

100R(1) Commission information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100r-ss-1
part of: 100R Commission information
note: Commission must provide information to Tribunal upon request.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.528
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 100R(1) Commission information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires Commission to provide information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100R(2) Commission information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100r-ss-2
part of: 100R Commission information
note: Commission may consider information furnished to the Commission in connection with a determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.528
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 100R(2) Commission information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: regard
logic summary: The Tribunal may regard the information.
premise text: (2) For the purposes of a review under this Division, the Tribunal may have regard to any information furnished...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The Commission considers the information during its making.
premise text: (2) For the purposes of a review under this Division, the Tribunal may have regard to any information furnished...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: consider
logic summary: The Commission considers the information in its making.
premise text: (2) For the purposes of a review under this Division, the Tribunal may have regard to any information furnished...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: in connection with
logic summary: The Commission considers the information in its making.
premise text: (2) For the purposes of a review under this Division, the Tribunal may have regard to any information furnished...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: in connection with
logic summary: The Commission considers the information in its making.
premise text: (2) For the purposes of a review under this Division, the Tribunal may have regard to any information furnished...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

100R(3) Commission information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100r-ss-3
part of: 100R Commission information
note: Commission is not permitted to have regard in making determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.528
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 100R(3) Commission information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits Commission from having regard.
premise text: (3) Subsection (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100S Information gathering etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100s
has part: 100S(1) Information gathering etc.
has part: 100S(2) Information gathering etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.529

100S(1) Information gathering etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100s-ss-1
part of: 100S Information gathering etc.
note: Tribunal may consult consumer associations and have regard to information furnished.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.529
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100s-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Tribunal may consult consumer associations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100S(2) Information gathering etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100s-ss-2
part of: 100S Information gathering etc.
note: Allow new information, documents or evidence to be provided under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.529
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100s-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow
logic summary: Permission to provide new information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100T Information etc. to which Tribunal may have regard
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100t
note: Limitation on information considered by Tribunal in review under Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.530
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100t-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100t-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100t-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100t-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100t-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100t-logic-deontic-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100t-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Tribunal must not consider certain information
premise text: Section 100N
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100t-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Tribunal may consider additional information under certain circumstances
premise text: Subsections 100Q(b)(ii), 100R(2)
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100t-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Tribunal must provide information to certain persons under subsection 100S(2)
premise text: Subsection 100S(2)
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100t-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Tribunal must provide information to certain persons under subsection 100D(1)
premise text: Subsection 100D(1)
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-100t-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Tribunal must provide information to Commission under subsection 100B(5)
premise text: Subsection 100B(5)
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

101 Applications for review
type: Concept
realized by: sec-101
has part: 101(1) Applications for review
has part: 101(1A) Applications for review
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.531

101(1) Applications for review
type: Concept
realized by: sec-101-ss-1
part of: 101 Applications for review
note: A person may apply to the Tribunal for a review of a determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.531
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 101(1) Applications for review
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: A person may apply to the Tribunal for a review of a determination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

101(1A) Applications for review
type: Concept
realized by: sec-101-ss-1a
part of: 101 Applications for review
note: Tribunal may make a determination by consent of applicant, Commission, and interveners.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.531
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101-ss-1a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Tribunal may make a determination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

101A Application for review of notices under Division 2 of Part VII
type: Concept
realized by: sec-101a
note: A person may apply for a review of a notice within the time allowed by or under regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.533
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101a-logic-epistemic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 101A Application for review of notices under Division 2 of Part VII
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Expresses a permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101a-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Within the time allowed by or under regulations
logic summary: Indicates a condition for application.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

101B Application for review of notice under section 95AB
type: Concept
realized by: sec-101b
has part: 101B(1) Application for review of notice under section 95AB
has part: 101B(2) Application for review of notice under section 95AB
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.533

101B(1) Application for review of notice under section 95AB
type: Concept
realized by: sec-101b-ss-1
part of: 101B Application for review of notice under section 95AB
note: A person may apply to the Tribunal for a review of notice under section 95AB.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.533
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101b-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101b-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 101B(1) Application for review of notice under section 95AB
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101b-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Within the time allowed by or under regulations
logic summary: Specifies a condition for application.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: As prescribed and within the time allowed by or under regulations
logic summary: Expresses a temporal condition.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

101B(2) Application for review of notice under section 95AB
type: Concept
realized by: sec-101b-ss-2
part of: 101B Application for review of notice under section 95AB
note: Tribunal must review notice if person has sufficient interest
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.533
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101b-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101b-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Tribunal must review notice
premise text: Person has sufficient interest
conclusion text: Tribunal reviews notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-101b-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Review must occur after notice was given
premise text: Person has sufficient interest
conclusion text: Review occurs after notice was given
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102 Functions and powers of Tribunal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-102
note: Tribunal may perform all functions and exercise all powers of Commission during review.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.533
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-102-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-102-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-102-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Tribunal may perform functions and exercise powers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102A Reviews are re-hearings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-102a
note: A review by the Tribunal under this Part is a re-hearing of the matter, unless it is a review of certain determinations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.543
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-102a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-102a-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-102a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 102A Reviews are re-hearings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-102a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the Tribunal.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

103 Procedure generally
type: Concept
realized by: sec-103
has part: 103(1) Procedure generally
has part: 103(2) Procedure generally
has part: 103(3) Procedure generally
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.543

103(1) Procedure generally
type: Concept
realized by: sec-103-ss-1
part of: 103 Procedure generally
note: Tribunal has discretion in proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.543
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-103-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-103-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-103-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 103(1) Procedure generally
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-103-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Procedure flexibility
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

103(2) Procedure generally
type: Concept
realized by: sec-103-ss-2
part of: 103 Procedure generally
note: Exercise of powers by a presidential member
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.543
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-103-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-103-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-103-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exercise
logic summary: Power exercise
premise text: (2) The powers of the Tribunal...
conclusion text: The powers may be exercised by a presidential member.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

103(3) Procedure generally
type: Concept
realized by: sec-103-ss-3
part of: 103 Procedure generally
note: Exercise powers regardless of Tribunal constitution
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.543
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-103-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-103-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-103-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 103(3) Procedure generally
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-103-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to exercise powers
premise text: (3) The powers mentioned in subsection (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

104 Regulations as to certain matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-104
note: Regulations for securing material facts and considerations in proceedings before the Tribunal or Commission.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.544
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-104-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-104-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-104-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-104-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 104 Regulations as to certain matters
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-104-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulations must secure material facts and considerations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-104-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
logic summary: Classification of regulations for securing material facts and considerations.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

105 Power to take evidence on oath
type: Concept
realized by: sec-105
has part: 105(1) Power to take evidence on oath
has part: 105(2) Power to take evidence on oath
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.544

105(1) Power to take evidence on oath
type: Concept
realized by: sec-105-ss-1
part of: 105 Power to take evidence on oath
note: The Tribunal may take evidence on oath or affirmation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.544
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-105-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-105-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-105-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to take evidence on oath or affirmation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

105(2) Power to take evidence on oath
type: Concept
realized by: sec-105-ss-2
part of: 105 Power to take evidence on oath
note: Summoning a person to appear before the Tribunal and produce documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.544
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-105-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-105-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-105-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 105(2) Power to take evidence on oath
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-105-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Summoning a person to appear before the Tribunal.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106 Hearings to be in public except in special circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-106
has part: 106(1) Hearings to be in public except in special circumstances
has part: 106(2) Hearings to be in public except in special circumstances
has part: 106(3) Hearings to be in public except in special circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.544

106(1) Hearings to be in public except in special circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-106-ss-1
part of: 106 Hearings to be in public except in special circumstances
note: Hearings must be in public except in special circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.544
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-106-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-106-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-106-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 106(1) Hearings to be in public except in special circumstances
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-106-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide public hearings
premise text: (1) Subject to this section, the hearing of proceedings before the Tribunal shall be in public.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106(2) Hearings to be in public except in special circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-106-ss-2
part of: 106 Hearings to be in public except in special circumstances
note: Publication of evidence given before the Tribunal is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.544
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-106-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-106-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-106-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-106-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-106-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-106-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-106-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-106-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Restriction
logic summary: Restrict publication to private hearings
premise text: (2) Where the Tribunal is satisfied that it is desirable to do so by reason of the confidential nature of any evidence or matter...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-106-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Restriction
logic summary: Restrict publication to private hearings
premise text: (2) Where the Tribunal is satisfied that it is desirable to do so by reason of the confidential nature of any evidence or matter...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-106-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Restriction
logic summary: Restrict publication of evidence given before the Tribunal
premise text: (2) Where the Tribunal is satisfied that it is desirable to do so by reason of the confidential nature of any evidence or matter...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-106-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
logic summary: Classification of evidence as confidential
premise text: (2) Where the Tribunal is satisfied that it is desirable to do so by reason of the confidential nature of any evidence or matter...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106(3) Hearings to be in public except in special circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-106-ss-3
part of: 106 Hearings to be in public except in special circumstances
note: Powers of Tribunal may be exercised by the Tribunal as constituted for the purposes of the hearing or by the Tribunal constituted by a presidential member.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.544
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-106-ss-3-norm

107 Evidence in form of written statement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107
note: Permit witness to give evidence by written statement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.545
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-107-norm

108 Taking of evidence by single member
type: Concept
realized by: sec-108
note: Authority to take evidence on behalf of the Tribunal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.545
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-108-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-108-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-108-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-108-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has authority
logic summary: Presidential member has authority to take evidence
premise text: Tribunal authorizes presidential member
conclusion text: Presidential member takes evidence on behalf of the Tribunal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-108-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
logic summary: Evidence taken within the authority period
premise text: Authority is given for a limited time
conclusion text: Evidence taken during the authority period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

109 Participants in proceedings before Tribunal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-109
note: Entitlement to participate in proceedings before Tribunal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.545
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-109-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-109-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-109-logic-ltl-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-109-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-109-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-109-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 109 Participants in proceedings before Tribunal
held by: NaturalPerson
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-109-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Has right to participate
premise text: (1) A person to whom an authorisation under Division 1 of Part VII was granted is entitled to participate in any proceedings before the Tribunal instituted by another person in relation to that authorisation.
conclusion text: (1AA) A notifying party of a notification of an acquisition is entitled to participate in any proceedings before the Tribunal under Division 1B instituted by another person for review of an acquisition determination in respect of the notification.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-109-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: hasTemporalRelation
logic summary: Has temporal relation with acquisition determination
premise text: (1) A person to whom an authorisation under Division 1 of Part VII was granted is entitled to participate in any proceedings before the Tribunal instituted by another person in relation to that authorisation.
conclusion text: A notifying party of a notification of an acquisition is entitled to participate in any proceedings before the Tribunal under Division 1B instituted by another person for review of an acquisition determination in respect of the notification.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-109-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermission
logic summary: Has permission to participate
premise text: (1) A person to whom an authorisation under Division 1 of Part VII was granted is entitled to participate in any proceedings before the Tribunal instituted by another person in relation to that authorisation.
conclusion text: (1AA) A notifying party of a notification of an acquisition is entitled to participate in any proceedings before the Tribunal under Division 1B instituted by another person for review of an acquisition determination in respect of the notification.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-109-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Has obligation to permit participation
premise text: (1) A person to whom an authorisation under Division 1 of Part VII was granted is entitled to participate in any proceedings before the Tribunal instituted by another person in relation to that authorisation.
conclusion text: (1AA) A notifying party of a notification of an acquisition is entitled to participate in any proceedings before the Tribunal under Division 1B instituted by another person for review of an acquisition determination in respect of the notification.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110 Representation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110
note: Representation in proceedings before the Tribunal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.546
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-110-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-110-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-110-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-110-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-110-logic-alleninterval-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-110-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 110 Representation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-110-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must appear in person
premise text: Natural person may appear in person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-110-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY BE REPRESENTED BY
logic summary: May be represented by an employee or a director
premise text: Body corporate may be represented by an employee or a director
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-110-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be approved by the Tribunal
premise text: Employee, director, or officer must be approved by the Tribunal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-110-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for representation approval
premise text: Tribunal approves representation at some point in time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

111 Tribunal may order costs be awarded
type: Concept
realized by: sec-111
has part: 111(1) Tribunal may order costs be awarded
has part: 111(2) Tribunal may order costs be awarded
has part: 111(3) Tribunal may order costs be awarded
has part: 111(4) Tribunal may order costs be awarded
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.546

111(1) Tribunal may order costs be awarded
type: Concept
realized by: sec-111-ss-1
part of: 111 Tribunal may order costs be awarded
note: Tribunal may order costs be awarded to another participant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.546
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-111-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-111-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-111-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 111(1) Tribunal may order costs be awarded
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-111-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

111(2) Tribunal may order costs be awarded
type: Concept
realized by: sec-111-ss-2
part of: 111 Tribunal may order costs be awarded
note: Tribunal may make further orders regarding costs assessment or taxation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.546
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-111-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-111-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-111-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies a possible obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

111(3) Tribunal may order costs be awarded
type: Concept
realized by: sec-111-ss-3
part of: 111 Tribunal may order costs be awarded
note: Minister may make provision for fees payable for assessment or taxation of costs ordered by the Tribunal to be paid.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.546
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-111-ss-3-norm

111(4) Tribunal may order costs be awarded
type: Concept
realized by: sec-111-ss-4
part of: 111 Tribunal may order costs be awarded
note: Participant must pay costs ordered by tribunal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.546
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-111-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-111-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-111-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 111(4) Tribunal may order costs be awarded
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-111-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Participant has a duty to pay costs.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

112 Tribunal may charge fees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-112
has part: 112(1) Tribunal may charge fees
has part: 112(2) Tribunal may charge fees
has part: 112(3) Tribunal may charge fees
has part: 112(4) Tribunal may charge fees
has part: 112(5) Tribunal may charge fees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.547

112(1) Tribunal may charge fees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-112-ss-1
part of: 112 Tribunal may charge fees
note: Tribunal may charge fees on behalf of the Commonwealth.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.547
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-112-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-112-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-112-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 112(1) Tribunal may charge fees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-112-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

112(2) Tribunal may charge fees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-112-ss-2
part of: 112 Tribunal may charge fees
note: Determine fees for purposes of subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.547
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-112-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-112-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-112-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Grant permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

112(3) Tribunal may charge fees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-112-ss-3
part of: 112 Tribunal may charge fees
note: Fees for Tribunal applications and proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.547
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-112-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-112-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-112-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits fees for certain Tribunal actions
premise text: (3) A determination under subsection (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

112(4) Tribunal may charge fees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-112-ss-4
part of: 112 Tribunal may charge fees
note: Determination of fee payment circumstances, who must pay, time for payment, and remittal/refund waiver
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.547
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-112-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-112-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-112-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: determines
logic summary: Determines fee payment circumstances
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

112(5) Tribunal may charge fees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-112-ss-5
part of: 112 Tribunal may charge fees
note: Determination may determine fees for particular classes of applications, costs or proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.547
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-112-ss-5-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-112-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 112(5) Tribunal may charge fees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

113 Standing of Commission to seek judicial review
type: Concept
realized by: sec-113
has part: 113(1) Standing of Commission to seek judicial review
has part: 113(2) Standing of Commission to seek judicial review
has part: 113(3) Standing of Commission to seek judicial review
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.548

113(1) Standing of Commission to seek judicial review
type: Concept
realized by: sec-113-ss-1
part of: 113 Standing of Commission to seek judicial review
note: Commission can seek judicial review of decisions under this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.548
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-113-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-113-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-113-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 113(1) Standing of Commission to seek judicial review
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-113-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Permission to seek judicial review
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

113(2) Standing of Commission to seek judicial review
type: Concept
realized by: sec-113-ss-2
part of: 113 Standing of Commission to seek judicial review
note: Commission is taken to be a person aggrieved by the decision, failure or conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.548
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-113-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-113-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-113-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 113(2) Standing of Commission to seek judicial review
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-113-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Commission is taken to be a person aggrieved
premise text: (2) The Commission
conclusion text: a person aggrieved by the decision, failure or conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

113(3) Standing of Commission to seek judicial review
type: Concept
realized by: sec-113-ss-3
part of: 113 Standing of Commission to seek judicial review
note: Commission's standing to seek judicial review
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.548
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-113-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-113-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-113-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 113(3) Standing of Commission to seek judicial review
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-113-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: same meaning
logic summary: Same meaning as the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977
premise text: (3)
conclusion text: same meaning
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed