Competition and Consumer Act 2010
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 51 of 1974
date: 27 May 2026
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

27 May 2026
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27
note: Compilation information and notes on amendments, application, saving, transitional provisions, editorial changes, presentational changes, modifications, and self-repealing provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-27-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-27-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-27-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-27-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the text as a descriptive compilation.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sec-27-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: No temporal relation specified.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AA Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45aa
note: Making or giving effect to a contract with a cartel provision is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.21
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45aa-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45aa-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45aa-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45aa-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45aa-logic-cogai-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45aa-logic-shacl-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45aa-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AA Simplified outline
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making or giving effect to a contract with a cartel provision.
premise text: A person must not make, or give effect to, a contract, arrangement or understanding that contains a cartel provision.
conclusion text: Making or giving effect to a contract with a cartel provision is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45aa-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for cartel provisions.
premise text: A person must not make, or give effect to, a contract, arrangement or understanding that contains a cartel provision.
conclusion text: The prohibition on making or giving effect to a contract with a cartel provision applies at all times.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45aa-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines a recurring trace for cartel provisions.
premise text: A person must not make, or give effect to, a contract, arrangement or understanding that contains a cartel provision.
conclusion text: The prohibition on making or giving effect to a contract with a cartel provision applies in all cases where a person makes or gives effect to such a contract.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45aa-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Entity Recognition
logic summary: Recognizes entities involved in cartel provisions.
premise text: A person must not make, or give effect to, a contract, arrangement or understanding that contains a cartel provision.
conclusion text: The prohibition on making or giving effect to a contract with a cartel provision applies to all persons who make or give effect to such contracts.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45aa-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema Validation
logic summary: Validates schema for cartel provisions.
premise text: A person must not make, or give effect to, a contract, arrangement or understanding that contains a cartel provision.
conclusion text: The prohibition on making or giving effect to a contract with a cartel provision is validated by the schema for cartel provisions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AB Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45ab
note: Definition of benefit and bid
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.21
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ab-norm

45AC Extended meaning of party
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45ac
note: Each related body corporate is taken to be a party to the contract, arrangement or understanding.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.22
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ac-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ac-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ac-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AC Extended meaning of party
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ac-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to include related parties in contracts
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AD Cartel provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45ad
has part: 45AD(1) Cartel provisions
has part: 45AD(2) Cartel provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.22

45AD(1) Cartel provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45ad-ss-1
part of: 45AD Cartel provisions
note: A provision of a contract, arrangement or understanding is a cartel provision if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.22
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ad-ss-1-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ad-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AD(1) Cartel provisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

45AD(2) Cartel provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45ad-ss-2
part of: 45AD Cartel provisions
note: Provision has the purpose or effect of fixing, controlling, or maintaining prices or discounts.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.22
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ad-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ad-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AD(2) Cartel provisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPurpose
logic summary: Provision has a purpose.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AE Meaning of expressions in other provisions of this Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45ae
note: Disregard this Division in determining expression meanings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.29
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ae-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ae-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ae-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AE Meaning of expressions in other provisions of this Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ae-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to disregard this Division.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AF Making a contract etc. containing a cartel provision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45af
has part: 45AF(1) Making a contract etc. containing a cartel provision
has part: 45AF(2) Making a contract etc. containing a cartel provision
has part: 45AF(3) Making a contract etc. containing a cartel provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.29

45AF(1) Making a contract etc. containing a cartel provision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45af-ss-1
part of: 45AF Making a contract etc. containing a cartel provision
note: Making a contract or arrangement with a cartel provision is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.29
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45af-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45af-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45af-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45af-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45af-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45af-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45af-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AF(1) Making a contract etc. containing a cartel provision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45af-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits making contracts or arrangements with cartel provisions.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...contains a cartel provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45af-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The prohibition applies to contracts, arrangements, and understandings that overlap with each other.
premise text: (b) the contract, arrangement or understanding contains a cartel provision.
conclusion text: ...contains a cartel provision.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45af-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: The prohibition is recurrent and applies to all contracts, arrangements, and understandings that contain cartel provisions.
premise text: (b) the contract, arrangement or understanding contains a cartel provision.
conclusion text: ...contains a cartel provision.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45af-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: The prohibition diffuses to all contracts, arrangements, and understandings that contain cartel provisions.
premise text: (b) the contract, arrangement or understanding contains a cartel provision.
conclusion text: ...contains a cartel provision.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45af-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: The prohibition recognizes contracts, arrangements, and understandings that contain cartel provisions as offences.
premise text: (a) the person makes a contract or arrangement...
conclusion text: ...contains a cartel provision.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AF(2) Making a contract etc. containing a cartel provision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45af-ss-2
part of: 45AF Making a contract etc. containing a cartel provision
note: Knowledge or belief is required for the fault element.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.29
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45af-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45af-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45af-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45af-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AF(2) Making a contract etc. containing a cartel provision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45af-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: K
logic summary: Knowledge operator
premise text: The agent must know or believe.
conclusion text: The fault element is satisfied.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45af-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: B
logic summary: Belief operator
premise text: The agent believes.
conclusion text: The fault element is satisfied.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AF(3) Making a contract etc. containing a cartel provision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45af-ss-3
part of: 45AF Making a contract etc. containing a cartel provision
note: Offence punishable by fine not exceeding $100,000,000
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.29
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45af-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45af-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45af-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits offence
premise text: (3) An offence...
conclusion text: ...punishable on conviction...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AG Giving effect to a cartel provision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45ag
has part: 45AG(1) Giving effect to a cartel provision
has part: 45AG(2) Giving effect to a cartel provision
has part: 45AG(3) Giving effect to a cartel provision
has part: 45AG(4) Giving effect to a cartel provision
has part: 45AG(5) Giving effect to a cartel provision
has part: 45AG(6) Giving effect to a cartel provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.30

45AG(1) Giving effect to a cartel provision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-1
part of: 45AG Giving effect to a cartel provision
note: Giving effect to a cartel provision is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.30
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-1-logic-deontic-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AG(1) Giving effect to a cartel provision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation
conclusion text: Giving effect to a cartel provision is an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) a contract, arrangement or understanding contains a cartel provision; and (b) the person gives effect to the cartel provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) a contract, arrangement or understanding contains a cartel provision; and (b) the person gives effect to the cartel provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

45AG(2) Giving effect to a cartel provision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-2
part of: 45AG Giving effect to a cartel provision
note: Knowledge or belief is required for a penalty to be imposed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.30
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AG(2) Giving effect to a cartel provision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires knowledge or belief.
premise text: (2) The fault element for paragraph (1)(a) is knowledge or belief.
conclusion text: Penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: knowledge or belief
logic summary: Knowledge or belief is a necessary condition.
premise text: (2) The fault element for paragraph (1)(a) is knowledge or belief.
conclusion text: Penalty
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: occurs if
logic summary: Knowledge or belief occurs if a penalty is imposed.
premise text: (2) The fault element for paragraph (1)(a) is knowledge or belief.
conclusion text: Penalty
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: requires
logic summary: Knowledge or belief is required to justify a penalty.
premise text: (2) The fault element for paragraph (1)(a) is knowledge or belief.
conclusion text: Penalty
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Knowledge or belief occurs during the imposition of a penalty.
premise text: (2) The fault element for paragraph (1)(a) is knowledge or belief.
conclusion text: Penalty
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AG(3) Giving effect to a cartel provision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-3
part of: 45AG Giving effect to a cartel provision
note: Offence punishable by fine not exceeding $100,000,000 or 3 times total value of benefits obtained.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.30
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AG(3) Giving effect to a cartel provision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Imposes a prohibition on committing an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AG(4) Giving effect to a cartel provision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-4
part of: 45AG Giving effect to a cartel provision
note: Offence punishable by imprisonment or fine
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.30
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AG(4) Giving effect to a cartel provision
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imprisonment or fine for offence
premise text: (4) An offence...
conclusion text: ...or a fine not exceeding 2,000 penalty units, or both.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AG(5) Giving effect to a cartel provision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-5
part of: 45AG Giving effect to a cartel provision
note: Indictable offence for cartel provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.30
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AG(5) Giving effect to a cartel provision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits cartel provisions
premise text: (5) Paragraph (1)(a)
conclusion text: Indictable offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AG(6) Giving effect to a cartel provision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-6
part of: 45AG Giving effect to a cartel provision
note: An offence against subsection (1) is an indictable offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.30
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AG(6) Giving effect to a cartel provision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ag-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Indictable offence
premise text: (1)
conclusion text: (6)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

45AH Determining guilt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45ah
has part: 45AH(1) Determining guilt
has part: 45AH(2) Determining guilt
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.31

45AH(1) Determining guilt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45ah-ss-1
part of: 45AH Determining guilt
note: A person may be found guilty of an offence against section 45AF or 45AG even if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.31
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ah-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ah-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ah-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AH(1) Determining guilt
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ah-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to commit an offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AH(2) Determining guilt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45ah-ss-2
part of: 45AH Determining guilt
note: No person can be found guilty of an offence against section 45AF or 45AG if all other parties have been acquitted.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.31
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ah-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ah-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ah-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ah-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ah-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ah-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ah-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AH(2) Determining guilt
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ah-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If all parties are acquitted, then no person can be found guilty.
premise text: All other parties to the contract have been acquitted.
conclusion text: No person can be found guilty of an offence against section 45AF or 45AG.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ah-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The condition overlaps with the definition of 'guilt'.
premise text: All other parties to the contract, arrangement or understanding have been acquitted.
conclusion text: Determining guilt
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ah-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Eventually
logic summary: The condition eventually leads to the conclusion.
premise text: All other parties to the contract, arrangement or understanding have been acquitted.
conclusion text: No person can be found guilty of an offence against section 45AF or 45AG.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ah-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: The condition diffuses to the conclusion.
premise text: All other parties to the contract, arrangement or understanding have been acquitted.
conclusion text: Determining guilt
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ah-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: The AI recognizes the condition as a pattern.
premise text: All other parties to the contract, arrangement or understanding have been acquitted.
conclusion text: Determining guilt
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AI Court may make related civil orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45ai
note: Court may make related civil orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.32
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ai-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ai-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ai-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AI Court may make related civil orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ai-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AJ Making a contract etc. containing a cartel provision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45aj
note: Making a contract or arrangement with a cartel provision is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.32
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45aj-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45aj-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45aj-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AJ Making a contract etc. containing a cartel provision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45aj-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making contracts or arrangements with cartel provisions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AK Giving effect to a cartel provision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45ak
has part: 45AK(1) Giving effect to a cartel provision
has part: 45AK(2) Giving effect to a cartel provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.32

45AK(1) Giving effect to a cartel provision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45ak-ss-1
part of: 45AK Giving effect to a cartel provision
note: Giving effect to a cartel provision is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.32
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ak-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ak-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ak-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AK(1) Giving effect to a cartel provision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ak-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits giving effect to a cartel provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AK(2) Giving effect to a cartel provision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45ak-ss-2
part of: 45AK Giving effect to a cartel provision
note: Applicability of paragraph (1)(a) to contracts or arrangements made before, at, or after the commencement of this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.32
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ak-ss-2-norm

45AL Conduct notified
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45al
has part: 45AL(1) Conduct notified
has part: 45AL(2) Conduct notified
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.33

45AL(1) Conduct notified
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45al-ss-1
part of: 45AL Conduct notified
note: Exempts certain provisions from applying to cartel arrangements under specific conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.33
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45al-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45al-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45al-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Granting permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AL(2) Conduct notified
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45al-ss-2
part of: 45AL Conduct notified
note: Evidential burden for relying on subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.33
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45al-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45al-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45al-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45al-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AL(2) Conduct notified
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45al-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45al-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Burden of proof
logic summary: Agent bears burden of proof
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AM Cartel provision subject to grant of authorisation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45am
has part: 45AM(1) Cartel provision subject to grant of authorisation
has part: 45AM(2) Cartel provision subject to grant of authorisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.33

45AM(1) Cartel provision subject to grant of authorisation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45am-ss-1
part of: 45AM Cartel provision subject to grant of authorisation
note: Grant of authorisation required for cartel provision to come into force
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.33
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45am-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45am-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45am-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: allows
logic summary: Grant of authorisation required for cartel provision to come into force
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AM(2) Cartel provision subject to grant of authorisation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45am-ss-2
part of: 45AM Cartel provision subject to grant of authorisation
note: Evidential burden on a person relying on subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.33
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45am-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45am-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45am-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45am-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AM(2) Cartel provision subject to grant of authorisation
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45am-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45am-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: evidential burden
logic summary: Evidential burden on a person relying on subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AN Contracts, arrangements or understandings between related
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45an
has part: 45AN(1) Contracts, arrangements or understandings between related
has part: 45AN(2) Contracts, arrangements or understandings between related
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.34

45AN(1) Contracts, arrangements or understandings between related
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45an-ss-1
part of: 45AN Contracts, arrangements or understandings between related
note: No sections apply to contracts between related bodies corporate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.34
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45an-ss-1-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45an-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AN(1) Contracts, arrangements or understandings between related
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

45AN(2) Contracts, arrangements or understandings between related
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45an-ss-2
part of: 45AN Contracts, arrangements or understandings between related
note: Evidential burden for relying on subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.34
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45an-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45an-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45an-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45an-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AN(2) Contracts, arrangements or understandings between related
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45an-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Bearing evidential burden
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45an-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Evidential Burden
logic summary: Reliance on subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AO Joint ventures—prosecution
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45ao
has part: 45AO(1) Joint ventures—prosecution
has part: 45AO(2) Joint ventures—prosecution
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.34

45AO(1) Joint ventures—prosecution
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45ao-ss-1
part of: 45AO Joint ventures—prosecution
note: Exempts cartel provisions in joint ventures from certain sections of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.34
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ao-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ao-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ao-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ao-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ao-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ao-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ao-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-6

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ao-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permits cartel provisions in joint ventures under certain conditions.
premise text: (1) Sections 45AF and 45AG do not apply...
conclusion text: ...the joint venture is for any one or more of the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ao-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies joint ventures into different types based on their purpose.
premise text: (i) production of goods;
conclusion text: ...the supply of goods or services;
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ao-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relationship between the joint venture and its purpose.
premise text: (b) the joint venture is for any one or more of...
conclusion text: ...the activity mentioned in paragraph (b) jointly by means of:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ao-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Establishes a recurring trace between the joint venture and its purpose.
premise text: (ii) their joint control;
conclusion text: ...their ownership of shares in the capital;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ao-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on parties to a contract or arrangement to comply with certain conditions.
premise text: (c) the joint venture is not carried on for...
conclusion text: ...the purpose of substantially lessening competition;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ao-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies the type of joint venture based on its ownership structure.
premise text: (e) in a case where subparagraph 4J(a)(ii) applies to...
conclusion text: ...the body corporate for the purpose of enabling those parties to carry on...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AO(2) Joint ventures—prosecution
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45ao-ss-2
part of: 45AO Joint ventures—prosecution
note: Defendant must prove matter on the balance of probabilities to rely on subsection (1)
description: Evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.34
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ao-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ao-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ao-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ao-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AO(2) Joint ventures—prosecution
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ao-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Defendant must prove
conclusion text: matter on the balance of probabilities
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ao-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Probability
logic summary: on the balance of probabilities
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

45AP Joint ventures—civil penalty proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45ap
note: Exempts cartel provisions in joint ventures from certain regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.35
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ap-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ap-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ap-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AP Joint ventures—civil penalty proceedings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ap-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negates the obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AQ Resale price maintenance
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45aq
has part: 45AQ(1) Resale price maintenance
has part: 45AQ(2) Resale price maintenance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.36

45AQ(1) Resale price maintenance
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45aq-ss-1
part of: 45AQ Resale price maintenance
note: Exempts cartel provisions from sections 45AF, 45AG, 45AJ, and 45AK.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.36
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45aq-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45aq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45aq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Exempts cartel provisions from sections 45AF, 45AG, 45AJ, and 45AK.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AQ(2) Resale price maintenance
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45aq-ss-2
part of: 45AQ Resale price maintenance
note: Evidential burden for relying on subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.36
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45aq-ss-2-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45aq-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AQ(2) Resale price maintenance
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

45AR Exclusive dealing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45ar
has part: 45AR(1) Exclusive dealing
has part: 45AR(2) Exclusive dealing
has part: 45AR(3) Exclusive dealing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.37

45AR(1) Exclusive dealing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45ar-ss-1
part of: 45AR Exclusive dealing
note: Exempts cartel provisions from certain prohibitions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.37
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ar-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ar-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ar-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts cartel provisions from certain prohibitions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AR(2) Exclusive dealing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45ar-ss-2
part of: 45AR Exclusive dealing
note: Exemptions from cartel provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.37
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ar-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ar-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ar-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AR(3) Exclusive dealing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45ar-ss-3
part of: 45AR Exclusive dealing
note: Person bears evidential burden in relation to matter
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.37
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ar-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ar-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ar-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ar-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AR(3) Exclusive dealing
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ar-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ar-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Burden of Proof
logic summary: Burden of proof
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AS Dual listed company arrangement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45as
note: Exempts dual listed company arrangements from cartel provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.37
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45as-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45as-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45as-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exempt
logic summary: Exempts
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AT Acquisition of shares or assets
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45at
has part: 45AT(1) Acquisition of shares or assets
has part: 45AT(2) Acquisition of shares or assets
has part: 45AT(3) Acquisition of shares or assets
has part: 45AT(4) Acquisition of shares or assets
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.38

45AT(1) Acquisition of shares or assets
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45at-ss-1
part of: 45AT Acquisition of shares or assets
note: Prohibits application of certain sections to contracts containing cartel provisions for acquiring shares or assets.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.38
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45at-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45at-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45at-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits application of certain sections.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AT(2) Acquisition of shares or assets
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45at-ss-2
part of: 45AT Acquisition of shares or assets
note: Evidential burden for relying on subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.38
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45at-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45at-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45at-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45at-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AT(2) Acquisition of shares or assets
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45at-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45at-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Burden of proof
logic summary: Agent bears the burden of proof
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AT(3) Acquisition of shares or assets
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45at-ss-3
part of: 45AT Acquisition of shares or assets
note: Cartel provision overrides acquisition provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.38
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45at-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45at-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45at-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits application of certain sections in relation to cartel provisions
premise text: Cartel provision takes precedence over acquisition provisions
conclusion text: Sections 45AF, 45AG, 45AJ and 45AK do not apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AT(4) Acquisition of shares or assets
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45at-ss-4
part of: 45AT Acquisition of shares or assets
note: Evidential burden for relying on subsection (3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.38
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45at-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45at-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45at-ss-4-logic-epistemic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45at-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AT(4) Acquisition of shares or assets
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45at-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45at-ss-4-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: epistemic-obligation
logic summary: Evidential burden for relying on subsection (3)
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AU Collective acquisition of goods or services by the parties to a
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45au
has part: 45AU(1) Collective acquisition of goods or services by the parties to a
has part: 45AU(2) Collective acquisition of goods or services by the parties to a
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.39

45AU(1) Collective acquisition of goods or services by the parties to a
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45au-ss-1
part of: 45AU Collective acquisition of goods or services by the parties to a
note: Exempts sections 45AF, 45AG, 45AJ and 45AK from applying to contracts with cartel provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.39
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45au-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45au-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45au-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits application of sections 45AF, 45AG, 45AJ and 45AK to contracts with cartel provisions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AU(2) Collective acquisition of goods or services by the parties to a
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45au-ss-2
part of: 45AU Collective acquisition of goods or services by the parties to a
note: Person bears evidential burden to rely on subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.39
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45au-ss-2-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45au-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AU(2) Collective acquisition of goods or services by the parties to a
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

45AV Purportedly putting acquisitions into effect
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45av
has part: 45AV(1) Purportedly putting acquisitions into effect
has part: 45AV(2) Purportedly putting acquisitions into effect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.40

45AV(1) Purportedly putting acquisitions into effect
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45av-ss-1
part of: 45AV Purportedly putting acquisitions into effect
note: Reference to putting an acquisition into effect includes a reference to purportedly putting the acquisition into effect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.40
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45av-ss-1-norm

45AV(2) Purportedly putting acquisitions into effect
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45av-ss-2
part of: 45AV Purportedly putting acquisitions into effect
note: Engaging in conduct that would constitute putting an acquisition into effect is considered a purported act of putting an acquisition into effect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.40
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45av-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45av-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45av-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45av-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45av-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45av-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45av-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AV(2) Purportedly putting acquisitions into effect
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45av-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: The text describes a condition for something to be considered an obligation.
premise text: (2) A person purportedly puts into effect an acquisition...
conclusion text: if the person engages in conduct that, apart from this Division, would constitute putting the acquisition into effect.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45av-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The text describes a temporal relationship between two events.
premise text: (2) A person purportedly puts into effect an acquisition...
conclusion text: if the person engages in conduct that, apart from this Division, would constitute putting the acquisition into effect.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45av-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: The text describes a temporal relationship between two events.
premise text: (2) A person purportedly puts into effect an acquisition...
conclusion text: if the person engages in conduct that, apart from this Division, would constitute putting the acquisition into effect.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45av-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: The text describes a temporal relationship between two events.
premise text: (2) A person purportedly puts into effect an acquisition...
conclusion text: if the person engages in conduct that, apart from this Division, would constitute putting the acquisition into effect.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45av-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: The text describes a temporal relationship between two events.
premise text: (2) A person purportedly puts into effect an acquisition...
conclusion text: if the person engages in conduct that, apart from this Division, would constitute putting the acquisition into effect.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AW Commission must be notified of acquisitions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45aw
note: Failure to notify required acquisitions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.40
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45aw-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45aw-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45aw-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AW Commission must be notified of acquisitions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45aw-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits failure to notify required acquisitions
premise text: Acquisition must be notified
conclusion text: Failure to notify is prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AX Commission must be notified of material changes of fact in
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45ax
has part: 45AX(1) Commission must be notified of material changes of fact in
has part: 45AX(2) Commission must be notified of material changes of fact in
has part: 45AX(3) Commission must be notified of material changes of fact in
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.41

45AX(1) Commission must be notified of material changes of fact in
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45ax-ss-1
part of: 45AX Commission must be notified of material changes of fact in
note: Commission must be notified of material changes of fact in respect of a notification.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.41
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ax-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ax-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ax-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AX(1) Commission must be notified of material changes of fact in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ax-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Notification obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AX(2) Commission must be notified of material changes of fact in
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45ax-ss-2
part of: 45AX Commission must be notified of material changes of fact in
note: Notify Commission of material changes of fact
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.41
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ax-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ax-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ax-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AX(2) Commission must be notified of material changes of fact in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ax-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Notification obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AX(3) Commission must be notified of material changes of fact in
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45ax-ss-3
part of: 45AX Commission must be notified of material changes of fact in
note: Commission must be notified of material changes of fact in relation to a public benefit application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.41
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ax-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ax-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ax-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AX(3) Commission must be notified of material changes of fact in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ax-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Notification obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AY Stayed acquisitions must not be put into effect
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45ay
note: Acquisitions stayed must not be put into effect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.42
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ay-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ay-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ay-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AY Stayed acquisitions must not be put into effect
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ay-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits putting acquisitions into effect when stayed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AZ Conditions must be complied with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45az
has part: 45AZ(1) Conditions must be complied with
has part: 45AZ(2) Conditions must be complied with
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.43

45AZ(1) Conditions must be complied with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45az-ss-1
part of: 45AZ Conditions must be complied with
note: Compliance with conditions is required for acquisition to be effective. Must comply with conditions when putting an acquisition into effect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.43
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45az-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45az-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45az-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45az-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AZ(1) Conditions must be complied with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45az-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45az-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory compliance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45AZ(2) Conditions must be complied with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45az-ss-2
part of: 45AZ Conditions must be complied with
note: Failure to comply with conditions is a contravention. Providing false or misleading information is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.43
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45az-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45az-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45az-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45az-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45az-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45az-ss-2-logic-epistemic-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45az-ss-2-logic-ltl-6

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45az-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45AZ(2) Conditions must be complied with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45az-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45az-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of providing false or misleading information.
premise text: The person knows that, or is reckless as to whether, the information is false or misleading in a material particular.
conclusion text: The acquisition is void by force of this subsection.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45az-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of providing false or misleading information.
premise text: (a) the person gives information to the Commission or the Tribunal under an acquisitions provision; and (b) the information is false or misleading in a material particular;
conclusion text: The person contravenes this section if:...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45az-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of providing false or misleading information.
premise text: (c) the person knows that, or is reckless as to whether, the information is false or misleading in a material particular.
conclusion text: The acquisition is void by force of this subsection.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45az-ss-2-logic-epistemic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Knows
logic summary: Knowledge of false or misleading information is required for prohibition to apply.
premise text: (c) the person knows that, or is reckless as to whether, the information is false or misleading in a material particular.
conclusion text: The person contravenes this section if:...
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45az-ss-2-logic-ltl-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Reckless
logic summary: Recklessness is required for prohibition to apply.
premise text: (c) the person knows that, or is reckless as to whether, the information is false or misleading in a material particular.
conclusion text: The person contravenes this section if:...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45 Contracts, arrangements or understandings that restrict dealings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45
has part: 45(1) Contracts, arrangements or understandings that restrict dealings
has part: 45(2) Contracts, arrangements or understandings that restrict dealings
has part: 45(3) Contracts, arrangements or understandings that restrict dealings
has part: 45(4) Contracts, arrangements or understandings that restrict dealings
has part: 45(5) Contracts, arrangements or understandings that restrict dealings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.44

45(1) Contracts, arrangements or understandings that restrict dealings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45-ss-1
part of: 45 Contracts, arrangements or understandings that restrict dealings
note: Restrict dealings that would substantially lessen competition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.44
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 45(1) Contracts, arrangements or understandings that restrict dealings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits actions that would substantially lessen competition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45(2) Contracts, arrangements or understandings that restrict dealings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45-ss-2
part of: 45 Contracts, arrangements or understandings that restrict dealings
note: Paragraph (1)(b) applies to contracts or arrangements made before or after the commencement of this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.44
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45-ss-2-norm

45(3) Contracts, arrangements or understandings that restrict dealings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45-ss-3
part of: 45 Contracts, arrangements or understandings that restrict dealings
note: Defines competition in relation to a provision of a contract, arrangement or understanding.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.44
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45(3) Contracts, arrangements or understandings that restrict dealings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: States the concept of competition is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has definition
logic summary: Defines the scope of competition.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45(4) Contracts, arrangements or understandings that restrict dealings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45-ss-4
part of: 45 Contracts, arrangements or understandings that restrict dealings
note: Substantially lessening competition in contracts and arrangements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.44
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45-ss-4-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45(4) Contracts, arrangements or understandings that restrict dealings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

45(5) Contracts, arrangements or understandings that restrict dealings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45-ss-5
part of: 45 Contracts, arrangements or understandings that restrict dealings
note: Exemptions from section 48 for certain conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.44
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permits exemptions from section 48
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45D Secondary boycotts for the purpose of causing substantial loss
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45d
has part: 45D(1) Secondary boycotts for the purpose of causing substantial loss
has part: 45D(2) Secondary boycotts for the purpose of causing substantial loss
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.48

45D(1) Secondary boycotts for the purpose of causing substantial loss
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45d-ss-1
part of: 45D Secondary boycotts for the purpose of causing substantial loss
note: Secondary boycotts for the purpose of causing substantial loss
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45d-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45d-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45d-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45d-ss-1-logic-shacl-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45d-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 45D(1) Secondary boycotts for the purpose of causing substantial loss
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits conduct that hinders or prevents third persons from supplying goods or services
premise text: (1) A person must not, in concert with a second person...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for conduct that hinders or prevents third persons from supplying goods or services
premise text: (1) A person must not, in concert with a second person...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45d-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for conduct that hinders or prevents third persons from supplying goods or services
premise text: (1) A person must not, in concert with a second person...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45d-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Represents conduct as a knowledge representation
premise text: (1) A person must not, in concert with a second person...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45d-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema Validation
logic summary: Validates schema for conduct that hinders or prevents third persons from supplying goods or services
premise text: (1) A person must not, in concert with a second person...
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

45D(2) Secondary boycotts for the purpose of causing substantial loss
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45d-ss-2
part of: 45D Secondary boycotts for the purpose of causing substantial loss
note: A person is taken to engage in conduct for a purpose mentioned in subsection (1) if the person engages in the conduct for purposes that include that purpose.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45d-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45D(2) Secondary boycotts for the purpose of causing substantial loss
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: The person engages in the conduct.
conclusion text: The person is taken to engage in conduct for a purpose mentioned in subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

45DA Secondary boycotts for the purpose of causing substantial
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45da
has part: 45DA(1) Secondary boycotts for the purpose of causing substantial
has part: 45DA(2) Secondary boycotts for the purpose of causing substantial
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.49

45DA(1) Secondary boycotts for the purpose of causing substantial
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45da-ss-1
part of: 45DA Secondary boycotts for the purpose of causing substantial
note: Secondary boycotts for the purpose of causing substantial lessening of competition in any market.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.49
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45da-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45da-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45da-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 45DA(1) Secondary boycotts for the purpose of causing substantial
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45da-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits conduct that hinders or prevents third persons from supplying goods or services.
premise text: (1) A person must not, in concert with a second person...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45DA(2) Secondary boycotts for the purpose of causing substantial
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45da-ss-2
part of: 45DA Secondary boycotts for the purpose of causing substantial
note: A person is taken to engage in conduct for a purpose mentioned in subsection (1) if the person engages in the conduct for purposes that include that purpose.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.49
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45da-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45da-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45da-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45da-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45da-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45da-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45da-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45DA(2) Secondary boycotts for the purpose of causing substantial
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45da-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: The person engages in conduct.
conclusion text: The person is taken to engage in conduct for a purpose mentioned in subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45da-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal inclusion of engagement
premise text: Engagement occurs before the specified purpose.
conclusion text: The person is taken to engage in conduct for a purpose mentioned in subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45da-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: Temporal lower bound of engagement
premise text: Engagement occurs after the specified purpose.
conclusion text: The person is taken to engage in conduct for a purpose mentioned in subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45da-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: ⊆
logic summary: Inclusion of engagement in conduct
premise text: Conduct includes purposes that include the specified purpose.
conclusion text: The person is taken to engage in conduct for a purpose mentioned in subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45da-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: ⊆
logic summary: Inference of engagement from conduct
premise text: Conduct includes purposes that include the specified purpose.
conclusion text: The person is taken to engage in conduct for a purpose mentioned in subsection (1).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

45DC Involvement and liability of employee organisations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45dc
note: Organisation is liable for conduct in concert with members or officers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.49
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45dc-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45dc-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45dc-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45dc-logic-ltl-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45dc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Organisation has an obligation to provide liability for conduct in concert with members or officers
premise text: Members or officers are part of the organisation
conclusion text: Organisation is liable
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45dc-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Conduct in concert overlaps with conduct by members or officers
premise text: Members or officers engage in conduct in concert
conclusion text: Conduct in concert overlaps with conduct by members or officers
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45dc-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Conduct in concert repeats over time
premise text: Members or officers engage in conduct in concert
conclusion text: Conduct in concert repeats
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45DD Situations in which boycotts permitted
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45dd
note: Boycotts permitted for dominant employment purpose
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.51
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45dd-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45dd-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45dd-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
logic summary: Allows boycotts under specific conditions
premise text: Dominant purpose of conduct relates to employment matters
conclusion text: No contravention of subsection 45D(1) or 45DA(1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45E Prohibition of contracts, arrangements or understandings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45e
has part: 45E(1) Prohibition of contracts, arrangements or understandings
has part: 45E(2) Prohibition of contracts, arrangements or understandings
has part: 45E(3) Prohibition of contracts, arrangements or understandings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.54

45E(1) Prohibition of contracts, arrangements or understandings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45e-ss-1
part of: 45E Prohibition of contracts, arrangements or understandings
note: Prohibition of contracts, arrangements or understandings in supply situations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45e-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45e-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45e-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45e-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45e-ss-1-logic-shacl-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45e-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 45E(1) Prohibition of contracts, arrangements or understandings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a prohibition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45e-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Requires overlap between supply and acquisition situations.
premise text: (a) a supply situation—in this situation, a person (the first person) has been accustomed, or is under an obligation, to supply goods or services to another person (the second person); or (b) an acquisition situation—in this situation, a person (the first person) has been accustomed, or is under an obligation, to acquire goods or services from another person (the second person).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45e-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Requires recurring supply and acquisition situations.
premise text: (a) a supply situation—in this situation, a person (the first person) has been accustomed, or is under an obligation, to supply goods or services to another person (the second person); or (b) an acquisition situation—in this situation, a person (the first person) has been accustomed, or is under an obligation, to acquire goods or services from another person (the second person).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45e-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Requires recognition of supply and acquisition situations.
premise text: (a) a supply situation—in this situation, a person (the first person) has been accustomed, or is under an obligation, to supply goods or services to another person (the second person); or (b) an acquisition situation—in this situation, a person (the first person) has been accustomed, or is under an obligation, to acquire goods or services from another person (the second person).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45e-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validate
logic summary: Requires validation of supply and acquisition situations.
premise text: (a) a supply situation—in this situation, a person (the first person) has been accustomed, or is under an obligation, to supply goods or services to another person (the second person); or (b) an acquisition situation—in this situation, a person (the first person) has been accustomed, or is under an obligation, to acquire goods or services from another person (the second person).
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45E(2) Prohibition of contracts, arrangements or understandings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45e-ss-2
part of: 45E Prohibition of contracts, arrangements or understandings
note: Prevents the first person from making a contract or arrangement with an organisation of employees, an officer, or a person acting on behalf of them.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45e-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45e-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45e-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45e-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45e-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 45E(2) Prohibition of contracts, arrangements or understandings
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the first person from making a contract or arrangement.
premise text: (2) In a supply situation, the first person must not make a contract or arrangement...
conclusion text: ...the proposed contract, arrangement or understanding contains a provision included for the purpose, or for purposes including the purpose, of:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with the provision that prevents or hinders the first person from supplying goods or services.
premise text: ...(a) preventing or hindering the first person from supplying or continuing to supply such goods or services to the second person;
conclusion text: ...the proposed contract, arrangement or understanding contains a provision included for the purpose, or for purposes including the purpose, of:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45e-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace with the provision that prevents or hinders the first person from supplying goods or services.
premise text: ...(a) preventing or hindering the first person from supplying or continuing to supply such goods or services to the second person;
conclusion text: ...the proposed contract, arrangement or understanding contains a provision included for the purpose, or for purposes including the purpose, of:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45e-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses the prohibition to prevent the first person from making a contract or arrangement.
premise text: (2) In a supply situation, the first person must not make a contract or arrangement...
conclusion text: ...the proposed contract, arrangement or understanding contains a provision included for the purpose, or for purposes including the purpose, of:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45e-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implies that the first person must not make a contract or arrangement.
premise text: (2) In a supply situation, the first person must not make a contract or arrangement...
conclusion text: ...the proposed contract, arrangement or understanding contains a provision included for the purpose, or for purposes including the purpose, of:
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45E(3) Prohibition of contracts, arrangements or understandings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45e-ss-3
part of: 45E Prohibition of contracts, arrangements or understandings
note: Prevent making contracts, arrangements, or understandings with the organisation that may hinder acquiring goods or services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45e-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45e-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45e-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45e-ss-3-logic-cogai-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of contracts, arrangements, or understandings
premise text: Acquisition situation
conclusion text: Prevent making contracts, arrangements, or understandings with the organisation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45e-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of contracts, arrangements, or understandings during acquisition period
premise text: Acquisition situation
conclusion text: Prevent making contracts, arrangements, or understandings with the organisation during acquisition period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45e-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of contracts, arrangements, or understandings during acquisition period
premise text: Acquisition situation
conclusion text: Prevent making contracts, arrangements, or understandings with the organisation during acquisition period
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45e-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Representation of prohibition in knowledge base
premise text: Acquisition situation
conclusion text: Prevent making contracts, arrangements, or understandings with the organisation
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45EA Provisions contravening section 45E not to be given effect
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45ea
note: Prohibition on giving effect to certain provisions of contracts or arrangements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.58
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ea-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ea-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ea-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 45EA Provisions contravening section 45E not to be given effect
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45ea-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45EB Sections 45D to 45EA do not affect operation of other
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45eb
note: Nothing in section 45D, 45DA, 45DC, 45DD, 45E or 45EA affects the operation of any other provision of this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.58
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45eb-norm

46 Misuse of market power
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-46
has part: 46(1) Misuse of market power
has part: 46(3) Misuse of market power
has part: 46(4) Misuse of market power
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.58

46(1) Misuse of market power
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-46-ss-1
part of: 46 Misuse of market power
note: Must not engage in conduct that has the purpose or effect of substantially lessening competition.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.58
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 46(1) Misuse of market power
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (1) A person who has a substantial degree of power in a market must not...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46(3) Misuse of market power
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-46-ss-3
part of: 46 Misuse of market power
note: A person has a substantial degree of power in a market if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.58
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 46(3) Misuse of market power
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: A person has a substantial degree of power in a market if certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46(4) Misuse of market power
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-46-ss-4
part of: 46 Misuse of market power
note: Consideration of market power constraints when determining degree of power.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.58
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-4-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 46(4) Misuse of market power
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
logic summary: Considering the constraints of market power.
premise text: (4) In determining for the purposes of this section...
conclusion text: ...the degree of power that a person (the first person)...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Consideration of power resulting from supply and acquisition.
premise text: (b) regard may be had to the power the first person or bodies corporate have in that market that results from...
conclusion text: ...Schedule 1 The Schedule version of Part IV
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mustConsider
logic summary: Must consider the constraints of market power.
premise text: (4) In determining for the purposes of this section...
conclusion text: ...the degree of power that a person (the first person)...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mustRegard
logic summary: Must regard the constraints of market power.
premise text: (4) In determining for the purposes of this section...
conclusion text: ...the degree of power that a person (the first person)...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

47 Exclusive dealing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47
has part: 47(1) Exclusive dealing
has part: 47(2) Exclusive dealing
has part: 47(3) Exclusive dealing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.60

47(1) Exclusive dealing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47-ss-1
part of: 47 Exclusive dealing
note: Prohibition on exclusive dealing in trade or commerce
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.60
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 47(1) Exclusive dealing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits exclusive dealing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(2) Exclusive dealing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47-ss-2
part of: 47 Exclusive dealing
note: Exclusive dealing prohibition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.60
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 47(2) Exclusive dealing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits exclusive dealing
premise text: (2) A person (the first person) engages in the practice of exclusive dealing if...
conclusion text: ...will not, or will not except to a limited extent, acquire goods or services...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits exclusive dealing for all time
premise text: (2) A person (the first person) engages in the practice of exclusive dealing if...
conclusion text: ...will not, or will not except to a limited extent, acquire goods or services...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits exclusive dealing for all time
premise text: (2) A person (the first person) engages in the practice of exclusive dealing if...
conclusion text: ...will not, or will not except to a limited extent, acquire goods or services...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Prohibition diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses prohibition to all persons and places
premise text: (2) A person (the first person) engages in the practice of exclusive dealing if...
conclusion text: ...will not, or will not except to a limited extent, acquire goods or services...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Prohibition inference
logic summary: Infers prohibition from exclusive dealing definition
premise text: (2) A person (the first person) engages in the practice of exclusive dealing if...
conclusion text: ...will not, or will not except to a limited extent, acquire goods or services...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(3) Exclusive dealing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47-ss-3
part of: 47 Exclusive dealing
note: Refusal to supply goods or services at a particular price
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.60
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 47(3) Exclusive dealing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of exclusive dealing
premise text: (3) A person (the first person) also engages in the practice of exclusive dealing if the first person refuses: (a) to supply goods or services to a second person; (b) to supply goods or services to a second person at a particular price;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between refusal and exclusive dealing
premise text: (3) A person (the first person) also engages in the practice of exclusive dealing if the first person refuses: (a) to supply goods or services to a second person; (b) to supply goods or services to a second person at a particular price;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring refusal as exclusive dealing practice
premise text: (3) A person (the first person) also engages in the practice of exclusive dealing if the first person refuses: (a) to supply goods or services to a second person; (b) to supply goods or services to a second person at a particular price;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffusion of exclusive dealing practice through refusal
premise text: (3) A person (the first person) also engages in the practice of exclusive dealing if the first person refuses: (a) to supply goods or services to a second person; (b) to supply goods or services to a second person at a particular price;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognition of exclusive dealing through refusal
premise text: (3) A person (the first person) also engages in the practice of exclusive dealing if the first person refuses: (a) to supply goods or services to a second person; (b) to supply goods or services to a second person at a particular price;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48 Resale price maintenance
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-48
has part: 48(1) Resale price maintenance
has part: 48(2) Resale price maintenance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.67

48(1) Resale price maintenance
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-48-ss-1
part of: 48 Resale price maintenance
note: Prohibits resale price maintenance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.67
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-48-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-48-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 48(1) Resale price maintenance
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
premise text: (1) A person shall not engage in the practice of resale price maintenance.
conclusion text: A person shall not engage in the practice of resale price maintenance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

48(2) Resale price maintenance
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-48-ss-2
part of: 48 Resale price maintenance
note: Notice requirement for resale price maintenance exemption
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.67
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-48-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-48-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-48-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 48(2) Resale price maintenance
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-48-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
logic summary: Allows conduct under notice
premise text: Notice is in force
conclusion text: Exemption applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49 Dual listed company arrangements that affect competition
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-49
note: Make or give effect to dual listed company arrangement with purpose of substantially lessening competition.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.67
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-49-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-49-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-49-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 49 Dual listed company arrangements that affect competition
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (1) A person must not...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50 Prohibition of acquisitions that would result in a substantial
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-50
has part: 50(1) Prohibition of acquisitions that would result in a substantial
has part: 50(3) Prohibition of acquisitions that would result in a substantial
has part: 50(3A) Prohibition of acquisitions that would result in a substantial
has part: 50(3B) Prohibition of acquisitions that would result in a substantial
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.69

50(1) Prohibition of acquisitions that would result in a substantial
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-50-ss-1
part of: 50 Prohibition of acquisitions that would result in a substantial
note: Acquiring shares or assets that would lessen competition is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.69
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 50(1) Prohibition of acquisitions that would result in a substantial
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Directly prohibits the action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50(3) Prohibition of acquisitions that would result in a substantial
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-50-ss-3
part of: 50 Prohibition of acquisitions that would result in a substantial
note: Acquisitions that would result in a substantial lessening of competition are prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.69
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits acquisitions that would result in a substantial lessening of competition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50(3A) Prohibition of acquisitions that would result in a substantial
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-50-ss-3a
part of: 50 Prohibition of acquisitions that would result in a substantial
note: Prohibition of acquisitions that would result in a substantial degree of power in a market.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.69
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-ss-3a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-ss-3a-logic-ltl-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits acquisitions that would result in a substantial degree of power in a market.
premise text: (3A) Subsections 46(3) to (8) have effect for the purposes of this section as if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with market references in subsections 46(3) to (8)
premise text: (b) a reference in those subsections to a market were a reference to a market (within the meaning of this section).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-ss-3a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurse
logic summary: Recurses with market references in subsections 46(3) to (8)
premise text: (3A) Subsections 46(3) to (8) have effect for the purposes of this section as if...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50(3B) Prohibition of acquisitions that would result in a substantial
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-50-ss-3b
part of: 50 Prohibition of acquisitions that would result in a substantial
note: Acquisitions that would result in a substantial lessening of competition are prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.69
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-ss-3b-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits acquisitions that would result in a substantial lessening of competition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51 Exceptions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-51
has part: 51(1) Exceptions
has part: 51(1A) Exceptions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.71

51(1) Exceptions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-51-ss-1
part of: 51 Exceptions
note: Exemptions from contravention of Part IV of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.71
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-51-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-51-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-51-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from contravention
premise text: (1) In deciding whether a person has contravened this Part, the following must be disregarded:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-51-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal scope of exemptions
premise text: (b) anything done in a State, if the thing is specified in, and specifically authorised by:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-51-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring traces of exemptions
premise text: (c) anything done in the Australian Capital Territory, if the thing is specified in, and specifically authorised by:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorization
logic summary: Authorization for exemptions
premise text: (i) an Act passed by the Parliament of that State; or (ii) regulations made under such an Act;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51(1A) Exceptions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-51-ss-1a
part of: 51 Exceptions
note: Conduct is authorised by a law if specified in a licence or instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.71
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-51-ss-1a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-51-ss-1a-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-51-ss-1a-logic-deontic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-51-ss-1a-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-1-sec-51-ss-1a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: authorises
logic summary: Authorisation by law
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Application of this Schedule
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
note: This Schedule applies to the extent provided by certain laws.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.91
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Application of this Schedule
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: extends
logic summary: Extends application of this Schedule.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
has part: 2(1) Definitions
has part: 2(2) Definitions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.91

2(1) Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2-ss-1
part of: 2 Definitions
note: Defines terms used in the Australian Consumer Law Defines terms related to consumer contracts and small business contracts. Defines terms and concepts used in the Australian Consumer Law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.91
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-7
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-8

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2(1) Definitions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Defines terms used in the Australian Consumer Law
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies expressions as synonyms or antonyms
premise text: Expressions used in this definition that are also used in the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 have the same meaning as in that Act.
conclusion text: The expression is a synonym for the expression in the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies terms into categories
premise text: The term is defined as...
conclusion text: ...and the definition applies to all cases
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies terms into categories
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Defines obligations for credit providers and consumers
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: asserts
logic summary: Asserts the definitions of terms and concepts.
premise text: The Australian Consumer Law defines terms and concepts used in this Schedule.
conclusion text: These definitions apply to this Schedule.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-7
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: appliesTo
logic summary: Applies these definitions to the Australian Consumer Law.
premise text: The definitions in subsection (1) apply to this Part.
conclusion text: These definitions are applicable to this Part.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-8
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires compliance with these definitions.
premise text: A person must comply with the definitions in subsection (1).
conclusion text: Compliance with these definitions is required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

2(2) Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2-ss-2
part of: 2 Definitions
note: Definition of 'conduct' for the purpose of this Schedule.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.91
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: refers to
logic summary: Definition of 'conduct'
premise text: The expression 'conduct' is defined in this section.
conclusion text: This definition applies to the purpose of this Schedule.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Meaning of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
has part: 3(1) Meaning of consumer
has part: 3(2) Meaning of consumer
has part: 3(3) Meaning of consumer
has part: 3(4) Meaning of consumer
has part: 3(5) Meaning of consumer
has part: 3(6) Meaning of consumer
has part: 3(7) Meaning of consumer
has part: 3(8) Meaning of consumer
has part: 3(9) Meaning of consumer
has part: 3(10) Meaning of consumer
has part: 3(11) Meaning of consumer
has part: 3(12) Meaning of consumer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.107

3(1) Meaning of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3-ss-1
part of: 3 Meaning of consumer
note: A person is taken to have acquired particular goods as a consumer if the amount paid did not exceed $40,000 or was for personal use.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.107
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3(1) Meaning of consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Definition of consumer
premise text: The amount paid did not exceed $40,000 or was for personal use.
conclusion text: A person is taken to have acquired particular goods as a consumer if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between payment and acquisition
premise text: The amount paid was worked out under subsections (4) to (9).
conclusion text: A person is taken to have acquired particular goods as a consumer if...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Definition of vehicle or trailer
premise text: The goods consisted of a vehicle or trailer acquired for use principally in the transport of goods on public roads.
conclusion text: A person is taken to have acquired particular goods as a consumer if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Definition of personal use
premise text: The goods were of a kind ordinarily acquired for personal, domestic or household use.
conclusion text: A person is taken to have acquired particular goods as a consumer if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3(2) Meaning of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3-ss-2
part of: 3 Meaning of consumer
note: Acquiring goods for re-supply or using them up/transforming in trade/commerce is exempt from subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.107
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-2-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3(2) Meaning of consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

3(3) Meaning of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3-ss-3
part of: 3 Meaning of consumer
note: Definition of consumer for purposes of the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.107
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Definition of consumer for purposes of the Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3(4) Meaning of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3-ss-4
part of: 3 Meaning of consumer
note: The amount paid for goods or services is taken to be the price paid by the person, unless subsection (5) applies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.107
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the person to pay the correct price.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3(5) Meaning of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3-ss-5
part of: 3 Meaning of consumer
note: The amount paid or payable for goods or services is determined by the lowest price that could have been reasonably purchased from another supplier.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.107
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3(5) Meaning of consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to pay the correct amount
premise text: The supplier must provide the correct price
conclusion text: The buyer must pay the correct amount
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal interval of reasonable purchasing time
premise text: There is a temporal interval during which the buyer could have reasonably purchased
conclusion text: The price at which goods or services can be purchased is within this interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Price determination based on alternative suppliers
premise text: If there are alternative suppliers, the price is determined by their lowest prices
conclusion text: The buyer must pay the lowest price offered by an alternative supplier
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Price information spreads to buyers
premise text: The price information is available to the buyer
conclusion text: The buyer can use this information to make a decision
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3(6) Meaning of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3-ss-6
part of: 3 Meaning of consumer
note: The price of goods or services acquired by a person other than purchase is determined by the market price at the time of acquisition.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.107
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-6-norm

3(7) Meaning of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3-ss-7
part of: 3 Meaning of consumer
note: The amount paid or payable for goods or services is taken to be the lowest price at which the person could, at that time, reasonably have purchased goods or services of that kind from another supplier.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.107
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-7-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-7-logic-ltl-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3(7) Meaning of consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to ensure that goods or services can be purchased from another supplier at a reasonable price.
premise text: (7) For the purposes of subsection (1) or (3), if...
conclusion text: The amount paid or payable for goods or services is taken to be the lowest price at which the person could, at that time, reasonably have purchased goods or services of that kind from another supplier.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relation between the acquisition of goods or services and their purchase from another supplier.
premise text: (7) For the purposes of subsection (1) or (3), if...
conclusion text: At that time, goods or services of the kind acquired could have been purchased from another supplier other than by a mixed supply;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Establishes a recurring trace between the acquisition of goods or services and their purchase from another supplier.
premise text: (7) For the purposes of subsection (1) or (3), if...
conclusion text: Goods or services acquired by a person other than by way of purchase could not, at the time of the acquisition, have been purchased from the supplier, or could have been purchased only by a mixed supply;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

3(8) Meaning of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3-ss-8
part of: 3 Meaning of consumer
note: Determines value of goods or services acquired without purchase
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.107
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-8-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3(8) Meaning of consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Determines value of goods or services acquired without purchase
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: Acquisition time
conclusion text: Purchased from supplier
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3(9) Meaning of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3-ss-9
part of: 3 Meaning of consumer
note: Presumption that persons are consumers if they obtain credit and the amount paid or payable is increased.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.107
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-9-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-9-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-9-logic-diffusion-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3(9) Meaning of consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Prescribes a duty
premise text: (9) If...
conclusion text: obtaining the credit is taken for the purposes of subsection (3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship
premise text: (a) a person obtains credit in connection with the acquisition of goods or services by him or her;
conclusion text: acquisition
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-9-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: Describes a recurring trace
premise text: (b) the amount paid or payable by him or her for the goods or services is increased because he or she so obtains credit;
conclusion text: increase
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-9-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Describes a diffusion relationship
premise text: (9) If...
conclusion text: acquisition of a service
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3(10) Meaning of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3-ss-10
part of: 3 Meaning of consumer
note: Presumption of consumer status
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.107
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-10-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-10-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-10-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3(10) Meaning of consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Presumption of consumer status
premise text: Alleged in any proceeding under this Schedule
conclusion text: Person was a consumer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3(11) Meaning of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3-ss-11
part of: 3 Meaning of consumer
note: Definition of mixed supply for consumer acquisition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.107
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-11-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-11-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-11-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-11-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3(11) Meaning of consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Definition of mixed supply for consumer acquisition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-11-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: and
logic summary: Temporal relation between acquisitions
premise text: Acquisitions occur simultaneously
conclusion text: Simultaneous acquisition
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3(12) Meaning of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3-ss-12
part of: 3 Meaning of consumer
note: Definition of consumer for the purpose of this Schedule.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.107
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-12-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-12-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-ss-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear meaning.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Misleading representations with respect to future matters
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
has part: 4(1) Misleading representations with respect to future matters
has part: 4(2) Misleading representations with respect to future matters
has part: 4(3) Misleading representations with respect to future matters
has part: 4(4) Misleading representations with respect to future matters
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.111

4(1) Misleading representations with respect to future matters
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4-ss-1
part of: 4 Misleading representations with respect to future matters
note: Misleading representations with respect to future matters are prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.111
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 4(1) Misleading representations with respect to future matters
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits misleading representations with respect to future matters.
premise text: (1) If: a person makes a representation with respect to any future matter (including the doing of, or the refusing to do, any act); and the person does not have reasonable grounds for making the representation; the representation is taken, for the purposes of this Schedule, to be misleading.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Identifies representations with respect to future matters as overlapping with the provision's scope.
premise text: (1) If: a person makes a representation with respect to any future matter (including the doing of, or the refusing to do, any act); and the person does not have reasonable grounds for making the representation; the representation is taken, for the purposes of this Schedule, to be misleading.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Contains
logic summary: Identifies representations with respect to future matters as contained within the provision's scope.
premise text: (1) If: a person makes a representation with respect to any future matter (including the doing of, or the refusing to do, any act); and the person does not have reasonable grounds for making the representation; the representation is taken, for the purposes of this Schedule, to be misleading.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses the provision's scope to include representations with respect to future matters.
premise text: (1) If: a person makes a representation with respect to any future matter (including the doing of, or the refusing to do, any act); and the person does not have reasonable grounds for making the representation; the representation is taken, for the purposes of this Schedule, to be misleading.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Recognizes representations with respect to future matters as being recognized by the provision.
premise text: (1) If: a person makes a representation with respect to any future matter (including the doing of, or the refusing to do, any act); and the person does not have reasonable grounds for making the representation; the representation is taken, for the purposes of this Schedule, to be misleading.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4(2) Misleading representations with respect to future matters
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4-ss-2
part of: 4 Misleading representations with respect to future matters
note: Party or other person is not deemed to have had reasonable grounds for making a representation unless evidence is adduced to the contrary.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.111
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4(2) Misleading representations with respect to future matters
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4(3) Misleading representations with respect to future matters
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4-ss-3
part of: 4 Misleading representations with respect to future matters
note: Prohibits placing an onus of proof on a person regarding the grounds for making a representation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.111
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits an action.
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, subsection (2) does not: (a) have the effect that, merely because such evidence to the contrary is adduced, the person who made the representation is taken to have had reasonable grounds for making the representation; or (b) have the effect of placing on any person an onus of proving that the person who made the representation had reasonable grounds for making the representation.
conclusion text: (3) To avoid doubt, subsection (2) does not: (a) have the effect that, merely because such evidence to the contrary is adduced, the person who made the representation is taken to have had reasonable grounds for making the representation; or (b) have the effect of placing on any person an onus of proving that the person who made the representation had reasonable grounds for making the representation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4(4) Misleading representations with respect to future matters
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4-ss-4
part of: 4 Misleading representations with respect to future matters
note: No implication that a representation is not misleading because of reasonable grounds.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.111
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: No implication
premise text: Subsection (1) does not limit by implication the meaning of a reference in this Schedule to...
conclusion text: ...a representation that a person makes with respect to any future matter is not misleading merely because the person has reasonable grounds for making the representation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

5 When donations are treated as supplies or acquisitions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-5
has part: 5(1) When donations are treated as supplies or acquisitions
has part: 5(2) When donations are treated as supplies or acquisitions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.112

5(1) When donations are treated as supplies or acquisitions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-5-ss-1
part of: 5 When donations are treated as supplies or acquisitions
note: Donations must be for promotional purposes to be treated as supplies or acquisitions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.112
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-5-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-5-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5(1) When donations are treated as supplies or acquisitions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide promotional purpose
premise text: Donation of goods or services
conclusion text: Treated as supply or acquisition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5(2) When donations are treated as supplies or acquisitions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-5-ss-2
part of: 5 When donations are treated as supplies or acquisitions
note: Treats donations as supplies or acquisitions for specified purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.112
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-5-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-5-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-5-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5(2) When donations are treated as supplies or acquisitions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-5-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: States a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Related bodies corporate
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
has part: 6(1) Related bodies corporate
has part: 6(2) Related bodies corporate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.112

6(1) Related bodies corporate
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6-ss-1
part of: 6 Related bodies corporate
note: A body corporate is taken to be related to another body corporate if the bodies corporate would, under section 4A(5) of the Competition and Consumer Act, be deemed to be related to each other.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.112
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-6-ss-1-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-6-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(1) Related bodies corporate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

6(2) Related bodies corporate
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6-ss-2
part of: 6 Related bodies corporate
note: Bodies corporate are not presumed related to each other in proceedings under this Schedule.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.112
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(2) Related bodies corporate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: presumption
logic summary: Presumption of non-relatedness
premise text: None established
conclusion text: Bodies corporate not related
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Meaning of manufacturer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-7
has part: 7(1) Meaning of manufacturer
has part: 7(2) Meaning of manufacturer
has part: 7(3) Meaning of manufacturer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.112

7(1) Meaning of manufacturer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-7-ss-1
part of: 7 Meaning of manufacturer
note: Defines who is considered a manufacturer under the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.112
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-6
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-7

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7(1) Meaning of manufacturer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Defines who is considered a manufacturer under the Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Identifies the subject of the definition.
premise text: (a) a person who grows, extracts, produces, processes or assembles goods;
conclusion text: The Australian Consumer Law Schedule 2 Introduction Chapter 1 Section 7
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Identifies the subject of the definition.
premise text: (b) a person who holds himself or herself out to the public as the manufacturer of goods;
conclusion text: The Australian Consumer Law Schedule 2 Introduction Chapter 1 Section 7
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Identifies the subject of the definition.
premise text: (c) a person who causes or permits the name of the person, a name by which the person carries on business or a brand or mark of the person to be applied to goods supplied by the person;
conclusion text: The Australian Consumer Law Schedule 2 Introduction Chapter 1 Section 7
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Identifies the subject of the definition.
premise text: (d) a person (the first person) who causes or permits another person, in connection with: ... to hold out the first person to the public as the manufacturer of the goods;
conclusion text: The Australian Consumer Law Schedule 2 Introduction Chapter 1 Section 7
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Identifies the subject of the definition.
premise text: (e) a person who imports goods into Australia if: ... at the time of the importation, the manufacturer of the goods does not have a place of business in Australia;
conclusion text: The Australian Consumer Law Schedule 2 Introduction Chapter 1 Section 7
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-7
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Defines the temporal relationship between the manufacturer and the goods.
premise text: (i) the supply or possible supply of goods by that other person; or (ii) the promotion by that other person by any means of the supply or use of goods;
conclusion text: The Australian Consumer Law Schedule 2 Introduction Chapter 1 Section 7
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

7(2) Meaning of manufacturer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-7-ss-2
part of: 7 Meaning of manufacturer
note: Definition of 'manufacturer' for goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.112
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7(2) Meaning of manufacturer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Definition of 'manufacturer' for goods
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7(3) Meaning of manufacturer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-7-ss-3
part of: 7 Meaning of manufacturer
note: Person is taken to have imported goods into Australia if goods are imported on their behalf.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.112
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7(3) Meaning of manufacturer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty
premise text: Goods are imported into Australia on behalf of a person.
conclusion text: Person is taken to have imported goods into Australia.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between importing and being taken to have imported
premise text: Goods are imported into Australia on behalf of a person.
conclusion text: Person is taken to have imported goods into Australia at some point in time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Establishes the implication between importing and being taken to have imported
premise text: Goods are imported into Australia on behalf of a person.
conclusion text: Person is taken to have imported goods into Australia if goods are imported on their behalf.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Describes the propagation of the obligation from the importer to the person
premise text: Goods are imported into Australia on behalf of a person.
conclusion text: Person is taken to have imported goods into Australia if goods are imported on their behalf.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: KnowledgeRepresentation
logic summary: Represents the knowledge that person is taken to have imported goods into Australia if goods are imported on their behalf
premise text: Goods are imported into Australia on behalf of a person.
conclusion text: Person is taken to have imported goods into Australia if goods are imported on their behalf.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Goods affixed to land or premises
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8
note: Goods are taken to be supplied to a consumer even if they are affixed to land or premises at the time of supply.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.114
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-norm

9 Meaning of safety defect in relation to goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9
has part: 9(1) Meaning of safety defect in relation to goods
has part: 9(2) Meaning of safety defect in relation to goods
has part: 9(3) Meaning of safety defect in relation to goods
has part: 9(4) Meaning of safety defect in relation to goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.114

9(1) Meaning of safety defect in relation to goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9-ss-1
part of: 9 Meaning of safety defect in relation to goods
note: Goods have a safety defect if their safety is not such as persons generally are entitled to expect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.114
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9(1) Meaning of safety defect in relation to goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasSafetyDefect
logic summary: Definition of safety defect
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Schedule, goods have a safety defect if...
conclusion text: goods have a safety defect
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation to safety defects
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Schedule, goods have a safety defect if...
conclusion text: safety defects occur during the period of use
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation to safety defects
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Schedule, goods have a safety defect if...
conclusion text: safety defects occur during the period of use
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation to safety defects
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Schedule, goods have a safety defect if...
conclusion text: safety defects occur during the period of use
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation to safety defects
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Schedule, goods have a safety defect if...
conclusion text: safety defects occur during the period of use
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

9(2) Meaning of safety defect in relation to goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9-ss-2
part of: 9 Meaning of safety defect in relation to goods
note: Consider relevant circumstances when determining the safety of goods.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.114
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-ss-2-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9(2) Meaning of safety defect in relation to goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

9(3) Meaning of safety defect in relation to goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9-ss-3
part of: 9 Meaning of safety defect in relation to goods
note: Inference of safety defect not solely based on supply of safer goods.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.114
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: No sole reliance on supply of safer goods.
conclusion text: Inference not solely based on supply of safer goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9(4) Meaning of safety defect in relation to goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9-ss-4
part of: 9 Meaning of safety defect in relation to goods
note: Goods have a safety defect if there is an inference based on non-compliance with the safest possible standard.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.114
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-ss-4-logic-ltl-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-ss-4-logic-deontic-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9(4) Meaning of safety defect in relation to goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Safety defect inference
premise text: (4) An inference that goods have a safety defect is not to be made only because: (a) there was compliance with a Commonwealth mandatory standard for them; and (b) that standard was not the safest possible standard having regard to the latest state of scientific or technical knowledge when they were supplied by their manufacturer.
conclusion text: The inference is not valid.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-ss-4-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: (4) An inference that goods have a safety defect is not to be made only because: (a) there was compliance with a Commonwealth mandatory standard for them; and (b) that standard was not the safest possible standard having regard to the latest state of scientific or technical knowledge when they were supplied by their manufacturer.
conclusion text: The inference is valid before the standard was not met.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: <
logic summary: Safety defect inference
premise text: (4) An inference that goods have a safety defect is not to be made only because: (a) there was compliance with a Commonwealth mandatory standard for them; and (b) that standard was not the safest possible standard having regard to the latest state of scientific or technical knowledge when they were supplied by their manufacturer.
conclusion text: The inference is valid before the standard was met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Asserting a right to payment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10
has part: 10(1) Asserting a right to payment
has part: 10(2) Asserting a right to payment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.115

10(1) Asserting a right to payment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-ss-1
part of: 10 Asserting a right to payment
note: Asserting a right to payment from another person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.115
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10(1) Asserting a right to payment
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Asserting an obligation
premise text: (a) makes a demand for the payment or asserts a present or prospective right to the payment;
conclusion text: A person is taken to assert a right to payment from another person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Asserting an obligation through threats
premise text: (b) threatens to bring any legal proceedings with a view to obtaining the payment;
conclusion text: A person is taken to assert a right to payment from another person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Asserting an obligation through listing
premise text: (c) places or causes to be placed the name of the other person on a list of defaulters or debtors, or threatens to do so, with a view to obtaining the payment;
conclusion text: A person is taken to assert a right to payment from another person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Asserting an obligation through collection procedures
premise text: (d) invokes or causes to be invoked any other collection procedure, or threatens to do so, with a view to obtaining the payment;
conclusion text: A person is taken to assert a right to payment from another person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Asserting an obligation through documents
premise text: (e) sends any invoice or other document that: (i) states the amount of the payment; or (ii) sets out the price of unsolicited goods or unsolicited services; or (iii) sets out the charge for placing, in a publication, an entry or advertisement;
conclusion text: A person is taken to assert a right to payment from another person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10(2) Asserting a right to payment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-ss-2
part of: 10 Asserting a right to payment
note: Establishes a presumption of authenticity for invoices and documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.115
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10(2) Asserting a right to payment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Presumption
logic summary: Establishes a default assumption about the authenticity of documents
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 References to acquisition, supply and re-supply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-11
note: Definitions for references to acquisition, supply and re-supply of goods and services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.115
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-11-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-11-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-11-logic-deontic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-11-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy for references to acquisition, supply and re-supply of goods and services.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-11-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: References to acquisition, supply and re-supply of goods and services are defined.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Application of Schedule in relation to leases and licences of land
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-12
note: Definition of contract for leases and licences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.116
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-logic-descriptionlogic-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12 Application of Schedule in relation to leases and licences of land
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Definition of contract for leases and licences
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: a reference to a contract includes a reference to a lease of, or a licence in respect of, land or a building or part of a building
conclusion text: a reference to making or entering into a contract, in relation to such a lease or licence, is a reference to granting or taking the lease or licence
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: a reference to a party to a contract, in relation to such a lease or licence, includes a reference to any person bound by, or entitled to the benefit of, any provision contained in the lease or licence
conclusion text: a reference to a party to a contract, in relation to such a lease or licence, is a reference to any person bound by, or entitled to the benefit of, any provision contained in the lease or licence
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Loss or damage to include injury
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13
note: Definition of loss or damage includes injury
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.117
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 13 Loss or damage to include injury
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition
premise text: a reference to loss or damage, other than a reference to the amount of any loss or damage, includes a reference to injury;
conclusion text: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: In this Schedule:
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Meaning of continuing credit contract
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-14
has part: 14(1) Meaning of continuing credit contract
has part: 14(2) Meaning of continuing credit contract
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.117

14(1) Meaning of continuing credit contract
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-14-ss-1
part of: 14 Meaning of continuing credit contract
note: Agreement to provide credit constitutes a continuing credit contract.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.117
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-14-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-14-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14(1) Meaning of continuing credit contract
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Credit agreement implies a continuing credit contract
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14(2) Meaning of continuing credit contract
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-14-ss-2
part of: 14 Meaning of continuing credit contract
note: Credit provided to consumer in relation to goods or services supplied by another person.
description: Payments made, or to be made, by the creditor to that other person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.117
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-14-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-14-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14(2) Meaning of continuing credit contract
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide credit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Contraventions of this Schedule
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15
note: Exemptions from contravention of Schedule provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.118
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15 Contraventions of this Schedule
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from obligations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Severability
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16
has part: 16(1) Severability
has part: 16(2) Severability
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.118

16(1) Severability
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16-ss-1
part of: 16 Severability
note: Nothing in this Schedule affects the validity or enforceability of a contract otherwise than in relation to a severable provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.118
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Contract validity obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Severable provision classification
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16(2) Severability
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16-ss-2
part of: 16 Severability
note: Severability clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.118
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-ss-2-norm

17 References to provisions in this Schedule
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-17
note: Reference to provisions in this Schedule
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.119
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-17-norm

18 Misleading or deceptive conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-18
has part: 18(1) Misleading or deceptive conduct
has part: 18(2) Misleading or deceptive conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.120

18(1) Misleading or deceptive conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-18-ss-1
part of: 18 Misleading or deceptive conduct
note: Prohibition on misleading or deceptive conduct in trade or commerce
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.120
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-18-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-18-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 18(1) Misleading or deceptive conduct
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18(2) Misleading or deceptive conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-18-ss-2
part of: 18 Misleading or deceptive conduct
note: Nothing in Part 3-1 limits by implication subsection (1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.120
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-18-ss-2-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-18-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18(2) Misleading or deceptive conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

19 Application of this Part to information providers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19
has part: 19(1) Application of this Part to information providers
has part: 19(2) Application of this Part to information providers
has part: 19(3) Application of this Part to information providers
has part: 19(4) Application of this Part to information providers
has part: 19(5) Application of this Part to information providers
has part: 19(6) Application of this Part to information providers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.120

19(1) Application of this Part to information providers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19-ss-1
part of: 19 Application of this Part to information providers
note: This Part does not apply to a publication of matter by an information provider if the conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.120
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19(1) Application of this Part to information providers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: does not apply
logic summary: The provision does not apply to the specified information providers.
premise text: (1) This Part does not apply to a publication of matter by an information provider if:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relation between temporal intervals
logic summary: The provision applies to publications made by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, the Special Broadcasting Service Corporation, or the holder of a licence granted under the Broadcasting Services Act 1992.
premise text: (b) if the information provider is the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, the Special Broadcasting Service Corporation or the holder of a licence granted under the Broadcasting Services Act 1992—the publication was by way of a radio or television broadcast by the information provider.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ordered trace
logic summary: The provision applies to publications made in the course of carrying on a business of providing information.
premise text: (a) in any case—the information provider made the publication in the course of carrying on a business of providing information;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: information dissemination
logic summary: The provision applies to publications by way of radio or television broadcast.
premise text: (b) if the information provider is the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, the Special Broadcasting Service Corporation or the holder of a licence granted under the Broadcasting Services Act 1992—the publication was by way of a radio or television broadcast by the information provider.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: artificial intelligence application
logic summary: The provision applies to publications made in the course of carrying on a business of providing information.
premise text: (a) in any case—the information provider made the publication in the course of carrying on a business of providing information;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19(2) Application of this Part to information providers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19-ss-2
part of: 19 Application of this Part to information providers
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for publications of advertisements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.120
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-ss-2-norm

19(3) Application of this Part to information providers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19-ss-3
part of: 19 Application of this Part to information providers
note: Exemptions from subsection (1) for certain publications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.120
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-ss-3-norm

19(4) Application of this Part to information providers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19-ss-4
part of: 19 Application of this Part to information providers
note: Exemptions for certain publications related to land interests
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.120
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Exemptions for certain publications related to land interests
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy application
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >
logic summary: Temporal interval application
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19(5) Application of this Part to information providers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19-ss-5
part of: 19 Application of this Part to information providers
note: An information provider is defined as a person carrying on a business of providing information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.120
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19(5) Application of this Part to information providers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of an information provider
premise text: An information provider is a person who carries on a business of providing information.
conclusion text: Therefore, an information provider is defined as a person carrying on a business of providing information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

19(6) Application of this Part to information providers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19-ss-6
part of: 19 Application of this Part to information providers
note: List of information providers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.120
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-ss-6-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19(6) Application of this Part to information providers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

20 Unconscionable conduct within the meaning of the unwritten law
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20
has part: 20(1) Unconscionable conduct within the meaning of the unwritten law
has part: 20(2) Unconscionable conduct within the meaning of the unwritten law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.123

20(1) Unconscionable conduct within the meaning of the unwritten law
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20-ss-1
part of: 20 Unconscionable conduct within the meaning of the unwritten law
note: Prohibition on unconscionable conduct in trade or commerce
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.123
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-20-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-20-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 20(1) Unconscionable conduct within the meaning of the unwritten law
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits unconscionable conduct
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20(2) Unconscionable conduct within the meaning of the unwritten law
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20-ss-2
part of: 20 Unconscionable conduct within the meaning of the unwritten law
note: Exempt from unconscionable conduct meaning under unwritten law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.123
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ProhibitedBy
logic summary: Exempt from unconscionable conduct meaning
premise text: (2) This section does not apply to conduct that is prohibited by section 21.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap with section 21
premise text: (2) This section does not apply to conduct that is prohibited by section 21.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Unconscionable conduct in connection with goods or services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-21
has part: 21(1) Unconscionable conduct in connection with goods or services
has part: 21(2) Unconscionable conduct in connection with goods or services
has part: 21(3) Unconscionable conduct in connection with goods or services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.123

21(1) Unconscionable conduct in connection with goods or services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-21-ss-1
part of: 21 Unconscionable conduct in connection with goods or services
note: Prohibition on unconscionable conduct in trade or commerce
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.123
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-21-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-21-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-21-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-21-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-21-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-21-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-21-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 21(1) Unconscionable conduct in connection with goods or services
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-21-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits unconscionable conduct
premise text: (1) A person must not...
conclusion text: ...engage in conduct that is, in all the circumstances, unconscionable.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-21-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Limits scope to trade or commerce
premise text: (1) A person must not...
conclusion text: ...engage in conduct that is, in all the circumstances, unconscionable.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-21-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Establishes a causal link between conduct and its prohibition
premise text: (1) A person must not...
conclusion text: ...engage in conduct that is, in all the circumstances, unconscionable.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-21-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Spreads the prohibition to related concepts
premise text: (1) A person must not...
conclusion text: ...engage in conduct that is, in all the circumstances, unconscionable.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-21-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Identifies the prohibited conduct as a pattern
premise text: (1) A person must not...
conclusion text: ...engage in conduct that is, in all the circumstances, unconscionable.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21(2) Unconscionable conduct in connection with goods or services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-21-ss-2
part of: 21 Unconscionable conduct in connection with goods or services
note: Exemptions from unconscionable conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.123
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-21-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-21-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-21-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21(2) Unconscionable conduct in connection with goods or services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-21-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from the obligation to refrain from unconscionable conduct
premise text: The person engaging in the conduct is exempt if...
conclusion text: ...the section does not apply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

21(3) Unconscionable conduct in connection with goods or services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-21-ss-3
part of: 21 Unconscionable conduct in connection with goods or services
note: Must not have regard to unforeseeable circumstances when determining contravention
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.123
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-21-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-21-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-21-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21(3) Unconscionable conduct in connection with goods or services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-21-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
premise text: Court must not have regard to unforeseeable circumstances
conclusion text: No consideration of unforeseeable circumstances
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Matters the court may have regard to for the purposes of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-22
note: Court may have regard to various factors when determining whether a person has contravened section 21 in connection with the supply or possible supply of goods or services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.124
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22 Matters the court may have regard to for the purposes of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: The court has an obligation to consider the factors listed in section 22 when determining whether a person has contravened section 21.
premise text: Section 22 lists various factors that the court may have regard to.
conclusion text: The court must consider these factors when making a determination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The court must consider the relative strengths of the bargaining positions of the supplier and the customer during the supply or possible supply of goods or services.
premise text: Section 22 lists factors that the court may have regard to, including the relative strengths of the bargaining positions of the supplier and the customer.
conclusion text: The court must consider these factors when making a determination.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
logic summary: The court must consider all relevant factors listed in section 22 when determining whether a person has contravened section 21.
premise text: Section 22 lists various factors that the court may have regard to.
conclusion text: These factors are relevant to determining whether a person has contravened section 21.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: The supplier must comply with certain conditions when supplying goods or services.
premise text: Section 22 lists factors that the court may have regard to, including whether the customer was required to comply with conditions that were not reasonably necessary for the protection of the legitimate interests of the supplier.
conclusion text: The supplier must comply with these conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22A Presumptions relating to whether representations are
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-22a
note: Presumptions relating to whether representations are misleading
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.127
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22a-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22A Presumptions relating to whether representations are
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

23 Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23
has part: 23(1) Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
has part: 23(2) Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
has part: 23(2A) Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
has part: 23(2B) Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
has part: 23(2C) Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
has part: 23(3) Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
has part: 23(4) Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
has part: 23(5) Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
has part: 23(6) Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.128

23(1) Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23-ss-1
part of: 23 Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
note: Unfair terms in consumer contracts and small business contracts are void.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.128
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23(1) Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits unfair terms in consumer contracts and small business contracts.
premise text: (1) A term of a consumer contract or small business contract is void if: (a) the term is unfair; and (b) the contract is a standard form contract.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Establishes temporal relations between terms.
premise text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23(2) Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23-ss-2
part of: 23 Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
note: Contract continues to bind parties if it can operate without the unfair term.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.128
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23(2) Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
logic summary: Contract continuation obligation
premise text: Contract continues to bind parties if it is capable of operating without the unfair term.
conclusion text: The contract continues to bind the parties.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalContinuation
logic summary: Temporal continuation of contract
premise text: Contract continues to bind parties if it is capable of operating without the unfair term.
conclusion text: The contract continues to bind the parties until a later time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RecurringTrace
logic summary: Recurring trace for contract continuation
premise text: Contract continues to bind parties if it is capable of operating without the unfair term.
conclusion text: The contract continues to bind the parties in a recurring pattern.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: DiffusionOperator
logic summary: Diffusion for contract continuation
premise text: Contract continues to bind parties if it is capable of operating without the unfair term.
conclusion text: The contract continues to bind the parties in a diffusive pattern.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CogAIOperator
logic summary: Cognitive AI for contract continuation
premise text: Contract continues to bind parties if it is capable of operating without the unfair term.
conclusion text: The contract continues to bind the parties using cognitive AI.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23(2A) Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23-ss-2a
part of: 23 Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
note: Contravention of unfair terms in consumer contracts and small business contracts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.128
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2a-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23(2A) Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition of unfair terms in consumer contracts and small business contracts
premise text: (2A) A person contravenes this subsection...
conclusion text: ...the person proposed the unfair term.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between the proposal of an unfair term and its contravention
premise text: (2A) A person contravenes this subsection...
conclusion text: ...the person proposed the unfair term.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal relation between the proposal of an unfair term and its contravention
premise text: (2A) A person contravenes this subsection...
conclusion text: ...the person proposed the unfair term.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional relation between the proposal of an unfair term and its contravention
premise text: (2A) A person contravenes this subsection...
conclusion text: ...the contract is a standard form contract; and...the person proposed the unfair term.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: hasValue
logic summary: Classification of standard form contracts as consumer or small business contracts based on their value
premise text: (2A) A person contravenes this subsection...
conclusion text: ...the contract is a consumer contract or small business contract.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23(2B) Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23-ss-2b
part of: 23 Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
note: Commitment to separate contravention for each unfair term
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.128
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2b-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2b-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2b-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2b-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2b-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23(2B) Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits contravening subsection (2A)
premise text: (2B) A person who contravenes subsection (2A) commits a separate contravention of that subsection in respect of each term that is unfair and that the person proposed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Establishes temporal relation between contraventions
premise text: (2B) A person who contravenes subsection (2A) commits a separate contravention of that subsection in respect of each term that is unfair and that the person proposed.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2b-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Establishes recurring trace for contraventions
premise text: (2B) A person who contravenes subsection (2A) commits a separate contravention of that subsection in respect of each term that is unfair and that the person proposed.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2b-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusive relation
logic summary: Establishes diffusive relation between contraventions
premise text: (2B) A person who contravenes subsection (2A) commits a separate contravention of that subsection in respect of each term that is unfair and that the person proposed.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2b-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
logic summary: Establishes knowledge representation for contraventions
premise text: (2B) A person who contravenes subsection (2A) commits a separate contravention of that subsection in respect of each term that is unfair and that the person proposed.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23(2C) Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23-ss-2c
part of: 23 Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
note: Contravention of unfair terms in consumer contracts and small business contracts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.128
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2c-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2c-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23(2C) Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition of unfair terms
premise text: Contract is a consumer contract or small business contract
conclusion text: Term is unfair
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23(3) Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23-ss-3
part of: 23 Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
note: Definition of a consumer contract
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.128
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23(3) Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: acquisition of the goods, services or interest is wholly or predominantly for personal, domestic or household use
conclusion text: wholly or predominantly for personal, domestic or household use
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of a consumer contract
premise text: (3) A consumer contract is a contract for:
conclusion text: a supply of goods or services; or a sale or grant of an interest in land;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of a consumer contract
premise text: (3) A consumer contract is a contract for:
conclusion text: to an individual whose acquisition of the goods, services or interest is wholly or predominantly for personal, domestic or household use or consumption.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of a consumer contract
premise text: (3) A consumer contract is a contract for:
conclusion text: is wholly or predominantly for personal, domestic or household use or consumption.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23(4) Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23-ss-4
part of: 23 Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
note: Contract is a small business contract if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.128
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23(4) Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Contract is a small business contract.
premise text: The contract satisfies the conditions.
conclusion text: Therefore, it is a small business contract.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23(5) Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23-ss-5
part of: 23 Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
note: Employment count for consumer contracts and small business contracts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.128
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-5-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23(5) Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

23(6) Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23-ss-6
part of: 23 Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
note: Party's turnover for a period is the sum of values of all supplies made during the period, excluding certain types.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.128
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-6-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23(6) Unfair terms of consumer contracts and small business contracts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

24 Meaning of unfair
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-24
has part: 24(1) Meaning of unfair
has part: 24(2) Meaning of unfair
has part: 24(3) Meaning of unfair
has part: 24(4) Meaning of unfair
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.130

24(1) Meaning of unfair
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-24-ss-1
part of: 24 Meaning of unfair
note: A term of a consumer contract or small business contract is unfair if it would cause a significant imbalance in the parties' rights and obligations arising under the contract.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24(1) Meaning of unfair
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes duty
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to ensure fairness in consumer contracts.
premise text: (1) A term of a consumer contract or small business contract is unfair...
conclusion text: The state must ensure fairness in consumer contracts.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: requires temporal relation
logic summary: Requires a temporal relation between the application of the term and its detriment.
premise text: (1) A term of a consumer contract or small business contract is unfair...
conclusion text: The Allen interval requires a temporal relation between the application of the term and its detriment.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: requires ordered trace
logic summary: Requires an ordered trace of the parties' rights and obligations arising under the contract.
premise text: (1) A term of a consumer contract or small business contract is unfair...
conclusion text: The LTL requires an ordered trace of the parties' rights and obligations arising under the contract.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: applies to diffusion logic
logic summary: Applies to diffusion logic for consumer contracts and small business contracts.
premise text: (1) A term of a consumer contract or small business contract is unfair...
conclusion text: The diffusion logic applies to consumer contracts and small business contracts.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: applies to cognitive AI
logic summary: Applies to cognitive AI for consumer contracts and small business contracts.
premise text: (1) A term of a consumer contract or small business contract is unfair...
conclusion text: The cognitive AI applies to consumer contracts and small business contracts.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

24(2) Meaning of unfair
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-24-ss-2
part of: 24 Meaning of unfair
note: Court must consider certain factors when determining if a contract term is unfair.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24(2) Meaning of unfair
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must consider certain factors.
premise text: (2) In determining whether a term of a contract is unfair under subsection (1), a court may take into account such matters as it thinks relevant, but must take into account the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Consider relevant matters within a timeframe.
premise text: but must take into account the following:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Consider relevant matters within a timeframe.
premise text: (2) In determining whether a term of a contract is unfair under subsection (1), a court may take into account such matters as it thinks relevant, but must take into account the following:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must consider certain factors.
premise text: (b) the contract as a whole.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24(3) Meaning of unfair
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-24-ss-3
part of: 24 Meaning of unfair
note: Term must be transparent
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24(3) Meaning of unfair
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be transparent
premise text: (3) A term is transparent if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24(4) Meaning of unfair
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-24-ss-4
part of: 24 Meaning of unfair
note: A term of a contract is presumed not to be reasonably necessary unless proven otherwise.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24(4) Meaning of unfair
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Presumption
logic summary: Presumption of reasonableness
premise text: (4) For the purposes of subsection (1)(b)
conclusion text: A term is presumed not to be reasonably necessary unless proven otherwise.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalInclusion
logic summary: Temporal scope of presumption
premise text: (4) For the purposes of subsection (1)(b)
conclusion text: The presumption applies to all terms in the contract.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Reasonableness as a justification
premise text: (4) For the purposes of subsection (1)(b)
conclusion text: The party who would be advantaged by the term must prove its reasonableness.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Spread of presumption to related terms
premise text: (4) For the purposes of subsection (1)(b)
conclusion text: The presumption applies to all related terms in the contract.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Automated reasoning about reasonableness
premise text: (4) For the purposes of subsection (1)(b)
conclusion text: The system can infer the reasonableness of a term based on the presumption.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

25 Examples of unfair terms
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-25
note: Examples of unfair terms in consumer contracts or small business contracts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.131
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-25-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-25-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits specific terms in consumer contracts or small business contracts
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Terms that define main subject matter of consumer contracts or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-26
has part: 26(1) Terms that define main subject matter of consumer contracts or
has part: 26(2) Terms that define main subject matter of consumer contracts or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.132

26(1) Terms that define main subject matter of consumer contracts or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-26-ss-1
part of: 26 Terms that define main subject matter of consumer contracts or
note: Exemptions from Section 23 of the contract
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.132
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-26-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-26-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-26-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from Section 23
premise text: (1) Section 23 does not apply to a term of a contract...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26(2) Terms that define main subject matter of consumer contracts or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-26-ss-2
part of: 26 Terms that define main subject matter of consumer contracts or
note: The upfront price is the consideration that must be provided or disclosed under a contract.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.132
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-26-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-26-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-26-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-26-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-26-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-26-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-26-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 26(2) Terms that define main subject matter of consumer contracts or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-26-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide upfront price
premise text: The upfront price is the consideration that must be provided or disclosed under a contract.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-26-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Upfront price must be within a certain range
premise text: (a) is provided, or is to be provided, for the supply, sale or grant under the contract;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-26-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Providing upfront price implies compliance with the law
premise text: The upfront price is the consideration that must be provided or disclosed under a contract.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-26-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Upfront price is related to consumer contracts
premise text: The upfront price is the consideration that: (b) is disclosed at or before the time the contract is entered into;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-26-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Upfront price is a type of data
premise text: (2) The upfront price payable under a contract is the consideration that: The Australian Consumer Law Schedule 2
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Standard form contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-27
has part: 27(1) Standard form contracts
has part: 27(2) Standard form contracts
has part: 27(3) Standard form contracts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.133

27(1) Standard form contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-27-ss-1
part of: 27 Standard form contracts
note: Presumption of standard form contract
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.133
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-27-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-27-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-27-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27(1) Standard form contracts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-27-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: presumption
logic summary: Presumption of standard form contract
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27(2) Standard form contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-27-ss-2
part of: 27 Standard form contracts
note: Court must consider specific factors when determining if a contract is standard form.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.133
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-27-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-27-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-27-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27(2) Standard form contracts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-27-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must consider specific factors.
premise text: Section 27(2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27(3) Standard form contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-27-ss-3
part of: 27 Standard form contracts
note: Contract may be determined to be a standard form contract despite certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.133
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-27-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-27-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-27-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Contract classification
premise text: The contract is a standard form contract.
conclusion text: It may be determined to be so despite certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Contracts to which this Part does not apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-28
has part: 28(1) Contracts to which this Part does not apply
has part: 28(2) Contracts to which this Part does not apply
has part: 28(3) Contracts to which this Part does not apply
has part: 28(4) Contracts to which this Part does not apply
has part: 28(5) Contracts to which this Part does not apply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.134

28(1) Contracts to which this Part does not apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-28-ss-1
part of: 28 Contracts to which this Part does not apply
note: Exemptions from the Part's application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.134
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from the Part's application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal interval
logic summary: Temporal intervals for exemptions
premise text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28(2) Contracts to which this Part does not apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-28-ss-2
part of: 28 Contracts to which this Part does not apply
note: Exempts contracts from carriage of goods by ship if covered by a sea carriage document.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.134
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts contracts from carriage of goods by ship.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subclass
logic summary: Subclass of contracts not covered by the amended Hague Rules.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28(3) Contracts to which this Part does not apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-28-ss-3
part of: 28 Contracts to which this Part does not apply
note: Exemptions from the Part's application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.134
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts contracts from the Part's application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subclassOf
logic summary: Subclass of contracts exempted by this section
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28(4) Contracts to which this Part does not apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-28-ss-4
part of: 28 Contracts to which this Part does not apply
note: Exempts small business contracts from this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.134
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts contracts from the scope of this Part.
premise text: A prescribed law applies to the contract.
conclusion text: This Part does not apply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28(5) Contracts to which this Part does not apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-28-ss-5
part of: 28 Contracts to which this Part does not apply
note: Exemptions from the Australian Consumer Law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.134
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-ss-5-logic-ltl-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibits
logic summary: Prohibition of contracts governing payment systems
premise text: (5) This Part does not apply to a contract:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-ss-5-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace for exempt contracts
premise text: or that is made in the course of, or for the purposes of, operating such a system.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28A This Part does not apply to certain contracts connected with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-28a
has part: 28A(1) This Part does not apply to certain contracts connected with
has part: 28A(2) This Part does not apply to certain contracts connected with
has part: 28A(3) This Part does not apply to certain contracts connected with
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.135

28A(1) This Part does not apply to certain contracts connected with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-28a-ss-1
part of: 28A This Part does not apply to certain contracts connected with
note: This Part does not apply to certain contracts connected with
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.135
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28a-ss-1-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28A(1) This Part does not apply to certain contracts connected with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

28A(2) This Part does not apply to certain contracts connected with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-28a-ss-2
part of: 28A This Part does not apply to certain contracts connected with
note: This Part does not apply to certain contracts connected with
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.135
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28a-ss-2-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28A(2) This Part does not apply to certain contracts connected with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

28A(3) This Part does not apply to certain contracts connected with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-28a-ss-3
part of: 28A This Part does not apply to certain contracts connected with
note: Same meaning as in the Corporations Act 2001
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.135
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28a-ss-3-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28A(3) This Part does not apply to certain contracts connected with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

29 False or misleading representations about goods or services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-29
has part: 29(1) False or misleading representations about goods or services
has part: 29(2) False or misleading representations about goods or services
has part: 29(3) False or misleading representations about goods or services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.136

29(1) False or misleading representations about goods or services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-29-ss-1
part of: 29 False or misleading representations about goods or services
note: Making false or misleading representations about goods or services is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.136
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-29-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-29-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-29-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-29-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 29(1) False or misleading representations about goods or services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-29-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making false or misleading representations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-29-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies goods and services as those that can be represented falsely or misleadingly.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29(2) False or misleading representations about goods or services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-29-ss-2
part of: 29 False or misleading representations about goods or services
note: Representation must be true unless evidence is adduced to the contrary.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.136
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-29-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-29-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-29-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 29(2) False or misleading representations about goods or services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-29-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide true representation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29(3) False or misleading representations about goods or services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-29-ss-3
part of: 29 False or misleading representations about goods or services
note: Avoids placing an onus of proving a representation is not misleading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.136
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-29-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-29-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-29-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 29(3) False or misleading representations about goods or services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-29-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
logic summary: Excludes placing an onus of proving a representation is not misleading.
premise text: (2) does not:
conclusion text: (3) To avoid doubt, subsection (2) does not:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

30 False or misleading representations about sale etc. of land
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30
has part: 30(1) False or misleading representations about sale etc. of land
has part: 30(2) False or misleading representations about sale etc. of land
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.138

30(1) False or misleading representations about sale etc. of land
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-ss-1
part of: 30 False or misleading representations about sale etc. of land
note: False or misleading representations about sale etc. of land
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.138
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 30(1) False or misleading representations about sale etc. of land
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on making false or misleading representations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of representations as true or false
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30(2) False or misleading representations about sale etc. of land
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-ss-2
part of: 30 False or misleading representations about sale etc. of land
note: No effect on other provisions regarding supply or acquisition of land interests
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.138
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-ss-2-norm

31 Misleading conduct relating to employment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-31
note: Misleading conduct relating to employment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.138
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-31-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-31-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-31-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 31 Misleading conduct relating to employment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits misleading conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-32
has part: 32(1) Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
has part: 32(2) Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
has part: 32(3) Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.139

32(1) Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-32-ss-1
part of: 32 Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
note: Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc. is prohibited in trade or commerce.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.139
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-32-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-32-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-32-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(1) Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-32-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of goods or services as prohibited
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32(2) Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-32-ss-2
part of: 32 Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
note: Must provide rebate, gift, prize or other free item within specified time.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.139
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-32-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-32-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-32-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(2) Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-32-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasValue
logic summary: Has value within specified time
premise text: (2) If a person offers any rebate, gift, prize or other free item in connection with...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32(3) Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-32-ss-3
part of: 32 Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
note: Exemption from subsection (2) for certain circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.139
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-32-ss-3-norm

33 Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-33
note: Misleading conduct in trade or commerce is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.140
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-33-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-33-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-33-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 33 Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of goods
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits misleading conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-34
note: Misleading conduct in trade or commerce
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.140
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-34-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-34-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-34-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 34 Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of services
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of misleading conduct
premise text: A person must not...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35 Bait advertising
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-35
has part: 35(1) Bait advertising
has part: 35(2) Bait advertising
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.140

35(1) Bait advertising
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-35-ss-1
part of: 35 Bait advertising
note: Advertising goods or services at a specified price if there are reasonable grounds for believing the person will not be able to offer those goods or services at that price is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.140
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-35-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-35-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-35-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-35-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-35-ss-1-logic-shacl-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-35-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 35(1) Bait advertising
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits advertising goods or services at a specified price if there are reasonable grounds for believing the person will not be able to offer those goods or services at that price.
premise text: (1) A person must not, in trade or commerce, advertise goods or services for supply at a specified price
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-35-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval during which the advertising is prohibited.
premise text: (1) A person must not, in trade or commerce, advertise goods or services for supply at a specified price
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-35-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines the recurring trace of prohibited advertising.
premise text: (1) A person must not, in trade or commerce, advertise goods or services for supply at a specified price
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-35-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Represents the knowledge that advertising is prohibited if there are reasonable grounds for believing the person will not be able to offer those goods or services at that price.
premise text: (1) A person must not, in trade or commerce, advertise goods or services for supply at a specified price
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-35-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validation
logic summary: Validates the advertising against the prohibited conditions.
premise text: (1) A person must not, in trade or commerce, advertise goods or services for supply at a specified price
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

35(2) Bait advertising
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-35-ss-2
part of: 35 Bait advertising
note: Offer goods or services at a specified price for a reasonable period and quantity.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.140
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-35-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-35-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 35(2) Bait advertising
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state to ensure goods or services are offered at a specified price.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36 Wrongly accepting payment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-36
has part: 36(1) Wrongly accepting payment
has part: 36(2) Wrongly accepting payment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.141

36(1) Wrongly accepting payment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-36-ss-1
part of: 36 Wrongly accepting payment
note: Accepting payment for goods or services without intention to supply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.141
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-36-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-36-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 36(1) Wrongly accepting payment
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of accepting payment for goods or services without intention to supply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36(2) Wrongly accepting payment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-36-ss-2
part of: 36 Wrongly accepting payment
note: Accepting payment for goods or services that differ materially from those supplied.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.141
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-36-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-36-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 36(2) Wrongly accepting payment
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits accepting payment for goods or services that differ materially from those supplied.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37 Misleading representations about certain business activities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-37
has part: 37(1) Misleading representations about certain business activities
has part: 37(2) Misleading representations about certain business activities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.143

37(1) Misleading representations about certain business activities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-37-ss-1
part of: 37 Misleading representations about certain business activities
note: Making false or misleading representations about business activities is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.143
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-37-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-37-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-37-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-37-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-37-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-37-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 37(1) Misleading representations about certain business activities
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making false or misleading representations.
premise text: A person must not...
conclusion text: ...a representation that is false or misleading in a material particular.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-37-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Business activities must not overlap with those that cannot be carried on at or from a person's place of residence.
premise text: ...a representation that can be, or can be to a considerable extent, carried on at or from a person’s place of residence.
conclusion text: ...a business activity that the person has represented as one...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-37-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Business activities must not repeat those that cannot be carried on at or from a person's place of residence.
premise text: ...a representation that can be, or can be to a considerable extent, carried on at or from a person’s place of residence.
conclusion text: ...a business activity that the person has represented as one...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-37-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spreads
logic summary: False or misleading representations must not spread to other people.
premise text: A person must not, in trade or commerce...
conclusion text: ...make a representation that is false or misleading in a material particular.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-37-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies business activities as those that can be carried on at or from a person's place of residence using AI.
premise text: ...concerns the profitability, risk or any other material aspect of...
conclusion text: ...a representation that concerns the profitability, risk or any other material aspect of...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37(2) Misleading representations about certain business activities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-37-ss-2
part of: 37 Misleading representations about certain business activities
note: Making false or misleading representations about business activities is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.143
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-37-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-37-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 37(2) Misleading representations about certain business activities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of false or misleading representations
premise text: (2) A person must not...
conclusion text: ...is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38 Application of provisions of this Division to information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-38
has part: 38(1) Application of provisions of this Division to information
has part: 38(2) Application of provisions of this Division to information
has part: 38(3) Application of provisions of this Division to information
has part: 38(4) Application of provisions of this Division to information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.144

38(1) Application of provisions of this Division to information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-38-ss-1
part of: 38 Application of provisions of this Division to information
note: Exemptions for publications by information providers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.144
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-38-ss-1-norm

38(2) Application of provisions of this Division to information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-38-ss-2
part of: 38 Application of provisions of this Division to information
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for publications of advertisements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.144
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-38-ss-2-norm

38(3) Application of provisions of this Division to information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-38-ss-3
part of: 38 Application of provisions of this Division to information
note: Exemptions from subsection (1) for certain publications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.144
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-38-ss-3-norm

38(4) Application of provisions of this Division to information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-38-ss-4
part of: 38 Application of provisions of this Division to information
note: Exemptions for publications of publicised interests in land
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.144
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-38-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-38-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-38-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-38-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-38-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-38-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-38-ss-4-logic-deontic-6

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-38-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: The Australian Consumer Law Schedule 2 Specific protections Chapter 3 Unfair practices Part 3-1 Section 38
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-38-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: (4) Subsection (1) does not apply to a publication of matter in connection with the sale or grant, or possible sale or grant, of, or the promotion by any means of the sale or grant of, interests in land (the publicised interests in land), if:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-38-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Obligation to exempt
premise text: (a) the publicised interests in land were interests of a kind sold or granted by the information provider or, if the information provider is a body corporate, by a body corporate that is related to the information provider;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-38-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Obligation to exempt
premise text: (b) the publication was made on behalf of, or pursuant to a contract, arrangement or understanding with, a person who sells or grants interests of the same kind as the publicised interests in land;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-38-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Obligation to exempt
premise text: (c) the publication was made on behalf of, or pursuant to a contract, arrangement or understanding with, a body corporate that is related to a body corporate that sells or grants interests of the same kind as the publicised interests in land.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-38-ss-4-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Obligation to exempt
premise text: The Australian Consumer Law Schedule 2 Specific protections Chapter 3 Unfair practices Part 3-1 Section 38
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39 Unsolicited cards etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-39
has part: 39(1) Unsolicited cards etc.
has part: 39(2) Unsolicited cards etc.
has part: 39(3) Unsolicited cards etc.
has part: 39(4) Unsolicited cards etc.
has part: 39(5) Unsolicited cards etc.
has part: 39(6) Unsolicited cards etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.146

39(1) Unsolicited cards etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-39-ss-1
part of: 39 Unsolicited cards etc.
note: Sending unsolicited credit or debit cards is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.146
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 39(1) Unsolicited cards etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits sending unsolicited credit or debit cards.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39(2) Unsolicited cards etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-39-ss-2
part of: 39 Unsolicited cards etc.
note: Exemption for cards sent by or on behalf of the issuer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.146
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39(3) Unsolicited cards etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-39-ss-3
part of: 39 Unsolicited cards etc.
note: Prohibition on using a credit card as a debit card without permission.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.146
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 39(3) Unsolicited cards etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits the action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39(4) Unsolicited cards etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-39-ss-4
part of: 39 Unsolicited cards etc.
note: No action can enable another person to use a debit card as a credit card without written consent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.146
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 39(4) Unsolicited cards etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of enabling debit card use as credit card without consent.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39(5) Unsolicited cards etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-39-ss-5
part of: 39 Unsolicited cards etc.
note: Definition of a credit card
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.146
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Definition of a credit card
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Article
conclusion text: Credit card
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: Issued to customers
conclusion text: Used for credit
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39(6) Unsolicited cards etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-39-ss-6
part of: 39 Unsolicited cards etc.
note: Definition of a debit card
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.146
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-ss-6-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-ss-6-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 39(6) Unsolicited cards etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines the scope of a debit card
premise text: (6) A debit card is:
conclusion text: (a) an article intended for use by a person in obtaining access to...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of a debit card
premise text: (6) A debit card is:
conclusion text: ...for the purpose of withdrawing or depositing cash or obtaining goods or services;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-ss-6-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: =
logic summary: Establishes the context for a debit card
premise text: (6) A debit card is:
conclusion text: ...for the purpose of withdrawing or depositing cash or obtaining goods or services;
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
logic summary: Describes the application domain of a debit card
premise text: (6) A debit card is:
conclusion text: ...for the purpose of withdrawing or depositing cash or obtaining goods or services;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: =
logic summary: Recognizes the artificial nature of a debit card
premise text: (6) A debit card is:
conclusion text: ...an article intended for use by a person in obtaining access to...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40 Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-40
has part: 40(1) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
has part: 40(2) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
has part: 40(3) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.147

40(1) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-40-ss-1
part of: 40 Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
note: Prohibition on asserting a right to payment for unsolicited goods or services without reasonable cause.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.147
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-40-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-40-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-40-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-40-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-40-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 40(1) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-40-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition of asserting a right to payment without reasonable cause.
premise text: A person must not...
conclusion text: ...assert a right to payment...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-40-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Prohibition applies during trade or commerce.
premise text: A person must not...
conclusion text: ...in trade or commerce...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-40-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Prohibition is in effect until reasonable cause is established.
premise text: (1) A person must not...
conclusion text: ...unless the person has reasonable cause...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40(2) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-40-ss-2
part of: 40 Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
note: Asserting a right to payment for unsolicited services without reasonable cause is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.147
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-40-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-40-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-40-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-40-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-40-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 40(2) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-40-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of asserting a right to payment without reasonable cause.
premise text: A person must not assert a right to payment from another person for unsolicited services unless the person has reasonable cause to believe that there is a right to the payment.
conclusion text: There is no right to payment without reasonable cause.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-40-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
logic summary: The person must have reasonable cause to believe in the existence of a right to payment.
premise text: A person must not assert a right to payment from another person for unsolicited services unless the person has reasonable cause to believe that there is a right to the payment.
conclusion text: There is reasonable cause to believe in the existence of a right to payment.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-40-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: The prohibition applies to recurring traces of asserting a right to payment without reasonable cause.
premise text: A person must not assert a right to payment from another person for unsolicited services unless the person has reasonable cause to believe that there is a right to the payment.
conclusion text: There is no right to payment without reasonable cause in recurring traces.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40(3) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-40-ss-3
part of: 40 Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
note: No invoice or document stating payment for unsolicited goods or services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.147
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-40-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-40-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-40-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-40-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 40(3) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-40-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of sending invoices for unsolicited goods or services
premise text: (3) A person must not...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-40-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between sending documents and prohibition
premise text: (3) A person must not...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41 Liability etc. of recipient for unsolicited goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-41
has part: 41(1) Liability etc. of recipient for unsolicited goods
has part: 41(2) Liability etc. of recipient for unsolicited goods
has part: 41(3) Liability etc. of recipient for unsolicited goods
has part: 41(4) Liability etc. of recipient for unsolicited goods
has part: 41(5) Liability etc. of recipient for unsolicited goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.148

41(1) Liability etc. of recipient for unsolicited goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-41-ss-1
part of: 41 Liability etc. of recipient for unsolicited goods
note: No liability for payment or loss/damage from supplier's wilful act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.148
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-41-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-41-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-41-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-41-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-41-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-41-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-41-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits liability for payment or loss/damage
premise text: (1) If a person, in trade or commerce...
conclusion text: The other person is not liable to make any payment for the goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-41-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with recovery period
premise text: (b) is not liable for loss of or damage to the goods, other than...
conclusion text: The liability for loss/damage occurs during the recovery period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-41-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of supplier's wilful act
premise text: (b) is not liable for loss of or damage to the goods, other than...
conclusion text: The supplier's wilful act recurs during the recovery period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-41-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses liability responsibility
premise text: (b) is not liable for loss of or damage to the goods, other than...
conclusion text: The liability responsibility is diffused from the supplier.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-41-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies goods as unsolicited based on AI
premise text: (1) If a person, in trade or commerce...
conclusion text: The goods are supplied by the supplier to another person.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

41(2) Liability etc. of recipient for unsolicited goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-41-ss-2
part of: 41 Liability etc. of recipient for unsolicited goods
note: Neither sender nor claimant can recover goods after recovery period ends.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.148
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-41-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-41-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-41-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits action for recovery of goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41(3) Liability etc. of recipient for unsolicited goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-41-ss-3
part of: 41 Liability etc. of recipient for unsolicited goods
note: Exemption from liability for unsolicited goods under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.148
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-41-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-41-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-41-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to receive unsolicited goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41(4) Liability etc. of recipient for unsolicited goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-41-ss-4
part of: 41 Liability etc. of recipient for unsolicited goods
note: Recovery period for unsolicited goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.148
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-41-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-41-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-41-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 41(4) Liability etc. of recipient for unsolicited goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-41-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to recover within a specified period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41(5) Liability etc. of recipient for unsolicited goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-41-ss-5
part of: 41 Liability etc. of recipient for unsolicited goods
note: Notice requirements for unsolicited goods
description: name and address of the person who received the goods, address at which possession may be taken of the goods, statement that the goods are unsolicited goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.148
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-41-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-41-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-41-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 41(5) Liability etc. of recipient for unsolicited goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-41-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42 Liability of recipient for unsolicited services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-42
note: No liability for unsolicited services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.149
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-42-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-42-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43 Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-43
note: No assertion of right to payment for unauthorized entries or advertisements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.149
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-43-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-43-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-43-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 43 Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits asserting a right to payment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44 Participation in pyramid schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-44
has part: 44(1) Participation in pyramid schemes
has part: 44(2) Participation in pyramid schemes
has part: 44(3) Participation in pyramid schemes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.152

44(1) Participation in pyramid schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-44-ss-1
part of: 44 Participation in pyramid schemes
note: Participation in pyramid schemes is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-44-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-44-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-44-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 44(1) Participation in pyramid schemes
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-44-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits participation in pyramid schemes.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44(2) Participation in pyramid schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-44-ss-2
part of: 44 Participation in pyramid schemes
note: Prohibits inducing another person to participate in a pyramid scheme.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-44-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-44-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-44-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 44(2) Participation in pyramid schemes
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-44-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits an action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44(3) Participation in pyramid schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-44-ss-3
part of: 44 Participation in pyramid schemes
note: Participating in a pyramid scheme is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-44-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-44-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-44-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 44(3) Participation in pyramid schemes
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-44-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits participation in pyramid schemes.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45 Meaning of pyramid scheme
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-45
has part: 45(1) Meaning of pyramid scheme
has part: 45(2) Meaning of pyramid scheme
has part: 45(3) Meaning of pyramid scheme
has part: 45(4) Meaning of pyramid scheme
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.152

45(1) Meaning of pyramid scheme
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-45-ss-1
part of: 45 Meaning of pyramid scheme
note: Pyramid scheme is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits pyramid schemes.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45(2) Meaning of pyramid scheme
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-45-ss-2
part of: 45 Meaning of pyramid scheme
note: Defines a new participant in a pyramid scheme.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-ss-2-logic-cogai-6

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45(2) Meaning of pyramid scheme
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Classifies participants as part of the scheme.
premise text: (2) A new participant includes a person who has applied, or been invited, to participate in the scheme.
conclusion text: A person is a new participant if they have applied or been invited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is defined as
logic summary: Defines the meaning of 'new participant'.
premise text: (2) A new participant includes a person who has applied, or been invited, to participate in the scheme.
conclusion text: A new participant is defined as someone who has applied or been invited.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Relates to temporal intervals of participation.
premise text: (2) A new participant includes a person who has applied, or been invited, to participate in the scheme.
conclusion text: The interval of participation starts with application or invitation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: includes
logic summary: Relates to temporal intervals of participation.
premise text: (2) A new participant includes a person who has applied, or been invited, to participate in the scheme.
conclusion text: The interval of participation starts with application or invitation.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
logic summary: Relates to information diffusion about participation.
premise text: (2) A new participant includes a person who has applied, or been invited, to participate in the scheme.
conclusion text: Information about participation diffuses through application or invitation.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: includes
logic summary: Relates to artificial intelligence and machine learning in participation.
premise text: (2) A new participant includes a person who has applied, or been invited, to participate in the scheme.
conclusion text: Artificial intelligence is involved in participation through application or invitation.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

45(3) Meaning of pyramid scheme
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-45-ss-3
part of: 45 Meaning of pyramid scheme
note: Definition of pyramid scheme
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits pyramid schemes
premise text: (3) A scheme may be a pyramid scheme:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45(4) Meaning of pyramid scheme
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-45-ss-4
part of: 45 Meaning of pyramid scheme
note: Characteristics of a pyramid scheme
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Scheme may be a pyramid scheme even if...
premise text: (4) A scheme may be a pyramid scheme...
conclusion text: it has any or all of the following characteristics:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between scheme and marketing
premise text: (4) A scheme may be a pyramid scheme even if it involves...
conclusion text: the scheme involves the marketing of goods or services (or both):
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: occursBefore
logic summary: Temporal relationship between scheme and recording
premise text: (4) A scheme may be a pyramid scheme even if arrangements for...
conclusion text: the scheme are not recorded in writing (whether entirely or partly):
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusesInto
logic summary: Spread of scheme characteristics
premise text: (4) A scheme may be a pyramid scheme even if it has any or all of the following characteristics:
conclusion text: the participation payments may (or must) be made after the new participants begin to take part in the scheme:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: hasFeature
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
premise text: (4) A scheme may be a pyramid scheme even if it has any or all of the following characteristics:
conclusion text: the holding out of the prospect of entitlement to recruitment payments does not give any new participant a legally enforceable right:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Marketing schemes as pyramid schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-46
note: Marketing schemes involving goods or services are prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.153
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-46-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-46-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-46-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 46 Marketing schemes as pyramid schemes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits marketing schemes involving goods or services.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47 Multiple pricing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-47
has part: 47(1) Multiple pricing
has part: 47(2) Multiple pricing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.155

47(1) Multiple pricing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-47-ss-1
part of: 47 Multiple pricing
note: Supplying goods with more than one displayed price is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.155
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-47-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-47-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 47(1) Multiple pricing
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplying goods with more than one displayed price.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(2) Multiple pricing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-47-ss-2
part of: 47 Multiple pricing
note: A displayed price for goods is a price for the goods or any representation that may reasonably be inferred to be a representation of a price for the goods.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.155
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-47-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-47-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-47-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47(2) Multiple pricing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-47-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies goods based on representations
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Requires a reasonable inference of price representation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48 Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-48
has part: 48(1) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
has part: 48(2) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
has part: 48(3) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
has part: 48(4) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
has part: 48(4A) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.156

48(1) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-48-ss-1
part of: 48 Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
note: No representation of a part of the consideration for goods or services unless specified in a prominent way and as a single figure.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.156
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 48(1) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of making a representation with respect to an amount that would constitute part of the consideration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of goods or services as those ordinarily acquired for personal, domestic or household use or consumption.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48(2) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-48-ss-2
part of: 48 Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
note: No charge for sending goods must be included in the single price.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.156
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 48(2) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: No obligation to include sending charge.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48(3) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-48-ss-3
part of: 48 Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
note: Specify minimum charge for sending goods
description: minimum amount of a charge in relation to sending the goods from the supplier to the other person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.156
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-ss-3-logic-epistemic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 48(3) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Specify minimum charge
premise text: The person knows, at the time of the representation, the minimum amount of a charge in relation to sending the goods from the supplier to the other person that must be paid by the other person
conclusion text: The person must specify the minimum amount
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Do not make representation without specifying minimum charge
premise text: (a) The person does not include in the single price a charge that is payable in relation to sending the goods from the supplier to the other person; and (b) The person knows, at the time of the representation, the minimum amount of a charge in relation to sending the goods from the supplier to the other person that must be paid by the other person
conclusion text: The person must not make the representation referred to in subsection (1) unless the person also specifies that minimum amount
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-ss-3-logic-epistemic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Knows
logic summary: Person knows minimum charge
premise text: (b) The person knows, at the time of the representation, the minimum amount of a charge in relation to sending the goods from the supplier to the other person that must be paid by the other person
conclusion text: The person knows the minimum amount
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Minimum charge for sending goods is recurring
premise text: (b) The person knows, at the time of the representation, the minimum amount of a charge in relation to sending the goods from the supplier to the other person that must be paid by the other person
conclusion text: The minimum charge is recurring
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Provide
logic summary: Specify minimum amount of charge
premise text: (3) However, if: (a) The person does not include in the single price a charge that is payable in relation to sending the goods from the supplier to the other person; and (b) The person knows, at the time of the representation, the minimum amount of a charge in relation to sending the goods from the supplier to the other person that must be paid by the other person;
conclusion text: The person must specify the minimum amount
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48(4) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-48-ss-4
part of: 48 Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
note: Exemption for corporate bodies from certain representation requirements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.156
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to exempt corporate bodies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48(4A) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-48-ss-4a
part of: 48 Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
note: Exemption from subsection (1) under certain circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.156
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-ss-4a-norm

49 Referral selling
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-49
note: No inducing consumers for benefits in return for assisting others
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.160
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-49-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-49-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-49-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 49 Referral selling
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of inducing consumers
premise text: Section 49 prohibits inducing consumers
conclusion text: No inducing consumers for benefits
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50 Harassment and coercion
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-50
has part: 50(1) Harassment and coercion
has part: 50(2) Harassment and coercion
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.160

50(1) Harassment and coercion
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-50-ss-1
part of: 50 Harassment and coercion
note: Prohibition on using physical force, harassment, or coercion in specified contexts.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.160
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 50(1) Harassment and coercion
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition on specific actions.
premise text: (1) A person must not...
conclusion text: ...must not use physical force...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between actions.
premise text: (1) A person must not...
conclusion text: ...in connection with...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50(2) Harassment and coercion
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-50-ss-2
part of: 50 Harassment and coercion
note: No effect on other provisions regarding supply or acquisition of interests in land.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.160
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-ss-2-norm

51 Guarantee as to title
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-51
has part: 51(1) Guarantee as to title
has part: 51(2) Guarantee as to title
has part: 51(3) Guarantee as to title
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.161

51(1) Guarantee as to title
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-51-ss-1
part of: 51 Guarantee as to title
note: Supplier has a right to dispose of property in goods when it passes to consumer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.161
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-51-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-51-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-51-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-51-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-51-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightToDispose
logic summary: Supplier has a right to dispose of property in goods.
premise text: Supplier supplies goods to consumer.
conclusion text: Supplier has a right to dispose of property in goods when it passes to consumer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-51-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: duringPassageOfGoods
logic summary: Right to dispose of property in goods applies during passage of goods.
premise text: Supplier supplies goods to consumer.
conclusion text: Right to dispose of property in goods applies during passage of goods.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-51-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: duringPassageOfGoods
logic summary: Right to dispose of property in goods applies during passage of goods.
premise text: Supplier supplies goods to consumer.
conclusion text: Right to dispose of property in goods applies during passage of goods.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-51-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: duringPassageOfGoods
logic summary: Right to dispose of property in goods spreads to consumer.
premise text: Supplier supplies goods to consumer.
conclusion text: Right to dispose of property in goods spreads to consumer.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-51-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: hasRightToDispose
logic summary: Supplier has a right to dispose of property in goods.
premise text: Guarantee that supplier will have a right to dispose of property in goods when it passes to consumer.
conclusion text: Supplier has a right to dispose of property in goods when it passes to consumer.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51(2) Guarantee as to title
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-51-ss-2
part of: 51 Guarantee as to title
note: Permits limited title transfer without applying subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.161
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-51-ss-2-norm

51(3) Guarantee as to title
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-51-ss-3
part of: 51 Guarantee as to title
note: Exemption from application of section 51(3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.161
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-51-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-51-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-51-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !=
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: Section does not apply if supply is by way of hire or lease.
conclusion text: No duty to comply with section 51(3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52 Guarantee as to undisturbed possession
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-52
has part: 52(1) Guarantee as to undisturbed possession
has part: 52(2) Guarantee as to undisturbed possession
has part: 52(3) Guarantee as to undisturbed possession
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.161

52(1) Guarantee as to undisturbed possession
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-52-ss-1
part of: 52 Guarantee as to undisturbed possession
note: Guarantee of undisturbed possession for consumers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.161
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-52-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-52-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-52-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-52-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-52-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-52-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-52-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 52(1) Guarantee as to undisturbed possession
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-52-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Obligation exists
premise text: (1) If...
conclusion text: there is a guarantee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-52-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Guarantee during undisturbed possession
premise text: (b) the supply is not a supply of limited title
conclusion text: there is a guarantee that the consumer has the right to undisturbed possession of the goods
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-52-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Guarantee implies right to possession
premise text: (a) a person (the supplier) supplies goods to a consumer
conclusion text: there is a guarantee that the consumer has the right to undisturbed possession of the goods
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-52-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Guarantee diffuses to consumers
premise text: (b) the supply is not a supply of limited title
conclusion text: there is a guarantee that the consumer has the right to undisturbed possession of the goods
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-52-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: asserts
logic summary: Guarantee asserted by supplier
premise text: (a) a person (the supplier) supplies goods to a consumer
conclusion text: there is a guarantee that the consumer has the right to undisturbed possession of the goods
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52(2) Guarantee as to undisturbed possession
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-52-ss-2
part of: 52 Guarantee as to undisturbed possession
note: Disturbment of consumer's undisturbed possession is permitted under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.161
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-52-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-52-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-52-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to disturb consumer's possession
premise text: Consumer's undisturbed possession may be lawfully disturbed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52(3) Guarantee as to undisturbed possession
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-52-ss-3
part of: 52 Guarantee as to undisturbed possession
note: Guarantee as to undisturbed possession
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.161
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-52-ss-3-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-52-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 52(3) Guarantee as to undisturbed possession
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

53 Guarantee as to undisclosed securities etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-53
has part: 53(1) Guarantee as to undisclosed securities etc.
has part: 53(2) Guarantee as to undisclosed securities etc.
has part: 53(3) Guarantee as to undisclosed securities etc.
has part: 53(4) Guarantee as to undisclosed securities etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.162

53(1) Guarantee as to undisclosed securities etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-53-ss-1
part of: 53 Guarantee as to undisclosed securities etc.
note: Guarantee that goods are free from undisclosed security, charge or encumbrance.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.162
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-53-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-53-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-53-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-53-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Guarantee obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-53-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Goods remain free from security, charge or encumbrance until property passes to consumer
premise text: (d) the goods will remain free from such a security, charge or encumbrance until the time when the property in the goods passes to the consumer;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-53-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Supplier's obligation implies guarantee for consumer
premise text: (a) a person (the supplier) supplies goods to a consumer; and (b) the supply is not a supply of limited title;
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-53-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Guarantee propagates to consumer through supply
premise text: (c) the goods are free from any security, charge or encumbrance:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53(2) Guarantee as to undisclosed securities etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-53-ss-2
part of: 53 Guarantee as to undisclosed securities etc.
note: Supplier must comply with guarantee unless floating charge becomes fixed and enforceable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.162
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-53-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-53-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-53-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53(2) Guarantee as to undisclosed securities etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-53-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Supplier has an obligation to comply with the guarantee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53(3) Guarantee as to undisclosed securities etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-53-ss-3
part of: 53 Guarantee as to undisclosed securities etc.
note: Disclosure of securities, charges or encumbrances
description: Disclosure of all known securities, charges or encumbrances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.162
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-53-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-53-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-53-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Supplier has an obligation to disclose
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53(4) Guarantee as to undisclosed securities etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-53-ss-4
part of: 53 Guarantee as to undisclosed securities etc.
note: Exemption from guarantee for supplies by way of hire or lease
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.162
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-53-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-53-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-53-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits application of section to supplies by way of hire or lease
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54 Guarantee as to acceptable quality
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-54
has part: 54(1) Guarantee as to acceptable quality
has part: 54(2) Guarantee as to acceptable quality
has part: 54(3) Guarantee as to acceptable quality
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.163

54(1) Guarantee as to acceptable quality
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-54-ss-1
part of: 54 Guarantee as to acceptable quality
note: Guarantee of acceptable quality for goods supplied to consumers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.163
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-54-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-54-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-54-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54(1) Guarantee as to acceptable quality
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-54-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Guarantee of acceptable quality
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54(2) Guarantee as to acceptable quality
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-54-ss-2
part of: 54 Guarantee as to acceptable quality
note: Goods must be of acceptable quality.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.163
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-54-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-54-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54(2) Guarantee as to acceptable quality
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide goods of acceptable quality.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54(3) Guarantee as to acceptable quality
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-54-ss-3
part of: 54 Guarantee as to acceptable quality
note: Guarantee as to acceptable quality of goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.163
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-54-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-54-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-54-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54(3) Guarantee as to acceptable quality
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-54-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Guarantee obligation on the state
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55 Guarantee as to fitness for any disclosed purpose etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-55
has part: 55(1) Guarantee as to fitness for any disclosed purpose etc.
has part: 55(2) Guarantee as to fitness for any disclosed purpose etc.
has part: 55(3) Guarantee as to fitness for any disclosed purpose etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.165

55(1) Guarantee as to fitness for any disclosed purpose etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-55-ss-1
part of: 55 Guarantee as to fitness for any disclosed purpose etc.
note: Supplier must guarantee goods are reasonably fit for disclosed purpose.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.165
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-55-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-55-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55(1) Guarantee as to fitness for any disclosed purpose etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Supplier has an obligation to guarantee goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55(2) Guarantee as to fitness for any disclosed purpose etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-55-ss-2
part of: 55 Guarantee as to fitness for any disclosed purpose etc.
note: Consumer must disclose purpose for which goods are being acquired.
description: Express or implied knowledge of purpose to supplier, manufacturer, or person conducting prior negotiations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.165
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-55-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-55-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-55-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-55-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-55-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-55-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-55-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55(2) Guarantee as to fitness for any disclosed purpose etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-55-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must disclose purpose
premise text: Consumer makes known purpose to supplier, manufacturer, or person conducting prior negotiations.
conclusion text: Obligation to disclose purpose
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-55-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Purpose must be disclosed within a certain timeframe
premise text: (2) A disclosed purpose is a particular purpose (whether or not that purpose is a purpose for which the goods are commonly supplied) for which the goods are being acquired by the consumer and that:
conclusion text: Timeframe constraint
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-55-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
logic summary: Consumer must disclose purpose at each stage of acquisition
premise text: Consumer makes known, expressly or by implication, to: (i) the supplier; or (ii) a person by whom any prior negotiations or arrangements in relation to the acquisition of the goods were conducted or made;
conclusion text: Recurring obligation
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-55-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Consumer may disclose purpose without obligation
premise text: the consumer makes known, expressly or by implication, to: (i) the supplier; or (ii) a person by whom any prior negotiations or arrangements in relation to the acquisition of the goods were conducted or made;
conclusion text: Permissive disclosure
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-55-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Disclosure of purpose implies a relationship between consumer and supplier
premise text: the consumer makes known, expressly or by implication, to: (i) the supplier; or (ii) a person by whom any prior negotiations or arrangements in relation to the acquisition of the goods were conducted or made;
conclusion text: Relationship established
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

55(3) Guarantee as to fitness for any disclosed purpose etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-55-ss-3
part of: 55 Guarantee as to fitness for any disclosed purpose etc.
note: Consumer reliance on supplier's skill or judgment is not a requirement for this section to apply.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.165
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-55-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-55-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-55-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55(3) Guarantee as to fitness for any disclosed purpose etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-55-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exclusion
logic summary: Exemption from obligation based on circumstances
premise text: Circumstances show that consumer did not rely...
conclusion text: Section does not apply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56 Guarantee relating to the supply of goods by description
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-56
note: Guarantee that goods correspond with the description if supplied by description to a consumer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.165
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-56-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-56-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-56-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56 Guarantee relating to the supply of goods by description
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-56-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide guarantee
premise text: (1) If...
conclusion text: ...there is a guarantee...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57 Guarantees relating to the supply of goods by sample or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-57
has part: 57(1) Guarantees relating to the supply of goods by sample or
has part: 57(2) Guarantees relating to the supply of goods by sample or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.166

57(1) Guarantees relating to the supply of goods by sample or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-57-ss-1
part of: 57 Guarantees relating to the supply of goods by sample or
note: Guarantee that goods supplied by sample or demonstration model correspond with the sample in quality, state or condition.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.166
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-57-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-57-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-57-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-57-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-57-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-57-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-57-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57(1) Guarantees relating to the supply of goods by sample or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-57-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Guarantee obligation
premise text: (1) If...
conclusion text: there is a guarantee that...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-57-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Goods supplied by sample or demonstration model
premise text: (a) a person supplies, in trade or commerce, goods to a consumer by reference to a sample or demonstration model
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-57-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Goods supplied by sample or demonstration model
premise text: (a) a person supplies, in trade or commerce, goods to a consumer by reference to a sample or demonstration model
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-57-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Goods supplied by sample or demonstration model
premise text: (a) a person supplies, in trade or commerce, goods to a consumer by reference to a sample or demonstration model
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-57-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Goods supplied by sample or demonstration model
premise text: (a) a person supplies, in trade or commerce, goods to a consumer by reference to a sample or demonstration model
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57(2) Guarantees relating to the supply of goods by sample or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-57-ss-2
part of: 57 Guarantees relating to the supply of goods by sample or
note: Guarantees apply if goods are supplied by sample or demonstration model as well as by description.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.166
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-57-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-57-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-57-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-57-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-57-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-57-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-57-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57(2) Guarantees relating to the supply of goods by sample or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-57-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Guarantees apply if goods are supplied by sample or demonstration model as well as by description.
premise text: (2) If goods are supplied by reference to a sample or demonstration model as well as by description
conclusion text: the guarantees in section 56 and in this section both apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-57-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Guarantees apply if goods are supplied by sample or demonstration model as well as by description.
premise text: (2) If goods are supplied by reference to a sample or demonstration model as well as by description
conclusion text: the guarantees in section 56 and in this section both apply
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-57-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Guarantees apply if goods are supplied by sample or demonstration model as well as by description.
premise text: (2) If goods are supplied by reference to a sample or demonstration model as well as by description
conclusion text: the guarantees in section 56 and in this section both apply
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-57-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if-then
logic summary: Guarantees apply if goods are supplied by sample or demonstration model as well as by description.
premise text: (2) If goods are supplied by reference to a sample or demonstration model as well as by description
conclusion text: the guarantees in section 56 and in this section both apply
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-57-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Guarantees apply if goods are supplied by sample or demonstration model as well as by description.
premise text: (2) If goods are supplied by reference to a sample or demonstration model as well as by description
conclusion text: the guarantees in section 56 and in this section both apply
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58 Guarantee as to repairs and spare parts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-58
has part: 58(1) Guarantee as to repairs and spare parts
has part: 58(2) Guarantee as to repairs and spare parts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.166

58(1) Guarantee as to repairs and spare parts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-58-ss-1
part of: 58 Guarantee as to repairs and spare parts
note: Guarantee for repair and spare parts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.166
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-58-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-58-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-58-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58(1) Guarantee as to repairs and spare parts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-58-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Guarantee obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58(2) Guarantee as to repairs and spare parts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-58-ss-2
part of: 58 Guarantee as to repairs and spare parts
note: Exemption from guarantee for reasonable action taken by manufacturer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.166
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-58-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Granting permission to manufacturer
premise text: Manufacturer took reasonable action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59 Guarantee as to express warranties
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-59
has part: 59(1) Guarantee as to express warranties
has part: 59(2) Guarantee as to express warranties
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.167

59(1) Guarantee as to express warranties
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-59-ss-1
part of: 59 Guarantee as to express warranties
note: Guarantee for express warranties in trade or commerce
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.167
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-59-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-59-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-59-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 59(1) Guarantee as to express warranties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-59-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Express warranty guarantee
premise text: (1) If...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59(2) Guarantee as to express warranties
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-59-ss-2
part of: 59 Guarantee as to express warranties
note: Guarantee for express warranties in trade or commerce
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.167
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-59-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-59-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-59-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-59-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 59(2) Guarantee as to express warranties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-59-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Guarantee for express warranties
premise text: (2) If...
conclusion text: there is a guarantee that the supplier will comply with any express warranty given or made by the supplier in relation to the goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-59-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval for guarantee application
premise text: (2) If...
conclusion text: the guarantee applies to goods supplied within this temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60 Guarantee as to due care and skill
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-60
note: Guarantee of due care and skill for services supplied to consumers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.168
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-60-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-60-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-60-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60 Guarantee as to due care and skill
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Guarantee of due care and skill
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61 Guarantees as to fitness for a particular purpose etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-61
has part: 61(1) Guarantees as to fitness for a particular purpose etc.
has part: 61(2) Guarantees as to fitness for a particular purpose etc.
has part: 61(3) Guarantees as to fitness for a particular purpose etc.
has part: 61(4) Guarantees as to fitness for a particular purpose etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.168

61(1) Guarantees as to fitness for a particular purpose etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-61-ss-1
part of: 61 Guarantees as to fitness for a particular purpose etc.
note: Guarantee for services supplied to consumers with a particular purpose.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.168
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 61(1) Guarantees as to fitness for a particular purpose etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Guarantee for services supplied to consumers with a particular purpose.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61(2) Guarantees as to fitness for a particular purpose etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-61-ss-2
part of: 61 Guarantees as to fitness for a particular purpose etc.
note: Guarantee for services to achieve a particular result
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.168
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 61(2) Guarantees as to fitness for a particular purpose etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Guarantee for services
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Consumer can request guarantees
premise text: (b) the consumer makes known, expressly or by implication, to: i) the supplier; or ii) a person...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Supplier must provide guarantees
premise text: (2) If: a person (the supplier) supplies, in trade or commerce, services to a consumer; and the consumer makes known...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Guarantee period not specified
premise text: (2) If: a person (the supplier) supplies, in trade or commerce, services to a consumer; and the consumer makes known...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61(3) Guarantees as to fitness for a particular purpose etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-61-ss-3
part of: 61 Guarantees as to fitness for a particular purpose etc.
note: Consumer reliance on supplier's skill or judgment is not a duty.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.168
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 61(3) Guarantees as to fitness for a particular purpose etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exclusion
logic summary: Excluding reliance on supplier's skill or judgment.
premise text: The consumer did not rely on, or it was unreasonable for the consumer to rely on, the skill or judgment of the supplier.
conclusion text: This section does not apply if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Temporal intervals of non-reliance and reasonableness overlap.
premise text: The circumstances show that the consumer did not rely on, or that it was unreasonable for the consumer to rely on, the skill or judgment of the supplier.
conclusion text: This section does not apply if...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: traces
logic summary: Tracing non-reliance and reasonableness.
premise text: The circumstances show that the consumer did not rely on, or that it was unreasonable for the consumer to rely on, the skill or judgment of the supplier.
conclusion text: This section does not apply if...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffusing non-reliance and reasonableness.
premise text: The circumstances show that the consumer did not rely on, or that it was unreasonable for the consumer to rely on, the skill or judgment of the supplier.
conclusion text: This section does not apply if...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Recognizing non-reliance and reasonableness.
premise text: The circumstances show that the consumer did not rely on, or that it was unreasonable for the consumer to rely on, the skill or judgment of the supplier.
conclusion text: This section does not apply if...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61(4) Guarantees as to fitness for a particular purpose etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-61-ss-4
part of: 61 Guarantees as to fitness for a particular purpose etc.
note: Exemption from guarantees for professional services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.168
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 61(4) Guarantees as to fitness for a particular purpose etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exempts
logic summary: Exempts state from guaranteeing fitness for a particular purpose
premise text: (4) This section does not apply to a supply of services of a professional nature by a qualified architect or engineer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implicates
logic summary: Implicates that exemptions from guarantees for professional services are based on the type of service provided
premise text: (4) This section does not apply to a supply of services of a professional nature by a qualified architect or engineer.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: RelatesTo
logic summary: Relates the exemption from guarantees for professional services to the type of service provided
premise text: (4) This section does not apply to a supply of services of a professional nature by a qualified architect or engineer.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Implicates
logic summary: Implicates that the exemption from guarantees for professional services is intended to promote diffusion of professional services
premise text: (4) This section does not apply to a supply of services of a professional nature by a qualified architect or engineer.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classifies
logic summary: Classifies exemptions from guarantees for professional services as a type of exemption
premise text: (4) This section does not apply to a supply of services of a professional nature by a qualified architect or engineer.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62 Guarantee as to reasonable time for supply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-62
note: Guarantee of reasonable time for supply
description: Services to be supplied within a reasonable time
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.169
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-62-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-62-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-62-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 62 Guarantee as to reasonable time for supply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-62-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Guarantee of services
conclusion text: Services must be supplied within a reasonable time
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63 Services to which this Subdivision does not apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-63
has part: 63(1) Services to which this Subdivision does not apply
has part: 63(2) Services to which this Subdivision does not apply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.169

63(1) Services to which this Subdivision does not apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-63-ss-1
part of: 63 Services to which this Subdivision does not apply
note: Exemptions from Subdivision application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.169
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-63-ss-1-norm

63(2) Services to which this Subdivision does not apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-63-ss-2
part of: 63 Services to which this Subdivision does not apply
note: Exemptions from the obligation to carry on a business or trade in relation to goods.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.169
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-63-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-63-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 63(2) Services to which this Subdivision does not apply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: Subsection (1)(a) does not apply if...
conclusion text: The exemption is in effect.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64 Guarantees not to be excluded etc. by contract
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-64
has part: 64(1) Guarantees not to be excluded etc. by contract
has part: 64(2) Guarantees not to be excluded etc. by contract
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.170

64(1) Guarantees not to be excluded etc. by contract
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-64-ss-1
part of: 64 Guarantees not to be excluded etc. by contract
note: Excluding or modifying guarantees under Division applies to a supply of goods or services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.170
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits excluding or modifying guarantees under Division.
premise text: (1) A term of a contract (including a term that is not set out in the contract but is incorporated in the contract by another term of the contract) is void to the extent that the term purports to exclude, restrict or modify, or has the effect of excluding, restricting or modifying:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Terms that exclude or modify guarantees under Division overlap with Division.
premise text: (c) any liability of a person for a failure to comply with a guarantee that applies under this Division to a supply of goods or services.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Containment
logic summary: Terms that exclude or modify guarantees under Division are contained within Division.
premise text: (1) A term of a contract (including a term that is not set out in the contract but is incorporated in the contract by another term of the contract) is void to the extent that the term purports to exclude, restrict or modify, or has the effect of excluding, restricting or modifying:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Influence
logic summary: Terms that exclude or modify guarantees under Division influence the application of Division.
premise text: (a) the application of all or any of the provisions of this Division; or (b) the exercise of a right conferred by such a provision;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Validate
logic summary: Terms that exclude or modify guarantees under Division are validated as void.
premise text: (c) any liability of a person for a failure to comply with a guarantee that applies under this Division to a supply of goods or services.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64(2) Guarantees not to be excluded etc. by contract
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-64-ss-2
part of: 64 Guarantees not to be excluded etc. by contract
note: Term of a contract cannot exclude or restrict the application of provisions in this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.170
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64(2) Guarantees not to be excluded etc. by contract
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on excluding or restricting provisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64A Limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-64a
has part: 64A(1) Limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees
has part: 64A(2) Limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees
has part: 64A(3) Limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees
has part: 64A(4) Limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.170

64A(1) Limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-64a-ss-1
part of: 64A Limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees
note: Limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.170
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64a-ss-1-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64A(1) Limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

64A(2) Limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-64a-ss-2
part of: 64A Limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees
note: Limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.170
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64a-ss-2-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64A(2) Limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

64A(3) Limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-64a-ss-3
part of: 64A Limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees
note: Exempts from liability for non-compliance with guarantees if it is not fair or reasonable to rely on the term.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.170
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64a-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64a-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64a-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64A(3) Limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Exempts from liability for non-compliance with guarantees.
premise text: The person to whom the goods or services were supplied establishes that it is not fair or reasonable for the person who supplied the goods or services to rely on that term of the contract.
conclusion text: This section does not apply in relation to a term of a contract if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalOverlap
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of the exemption.
premise text: The person to whom the goods or services were supplied establishes that it is not fair or reasonable for the person who supplied the goods or services to rely on that term of the contract.
conclusion text: This section does not apply in relation to a term of a contract if...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalRecurring
logic summary: Defines the recurring nature of the exemption.
premise text: The person to whom the goods or services were supplied establishes that it is not fair or reasonable for the person who supplied the goods or services to rely on that term of the contract.
conclusion text: This section does not apply in relation to a term of a contract if...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64a-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Allows for exemption from liability for non-compliance with guarantees.
premise text: The person to whom the goods or services were supplied establishes that it is not fair or reasonable for the person who supplied the goods or services to rely on that term of the contract.
conclusion text: This section does not apply in relation to a term of a contract if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64a-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
logic summary: Provides justification for exemption from liability for non-compliance with guarantees.
premise text: The person to whom the goods or services were supplied establishes that it is not fair or reasonable for the person who supplied the goods or services to rely on that term of the contract.
conclusion text: This section does not apply in relation to a term of a contract if...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64A(4) Limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-64a-ss-4
part of: 64A Limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees
note: Court must consider certain circumstances when determining fairness of reliance on a contract term.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.170
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64a-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64a-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64a-ss-4-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64A(4) Limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must consider certain circumstances.
premise text: Court is to have regard to all the circumstances of the case.
conclusion text: Fairness of reliance on a contract term is determined.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Circumstances include previous course of dealing between parties.
premise text: Having regard, among other things, to any custom of the trade and any previous course of dealing between the parties;
conclusion text: Previous course of dealing is relevant to determining fairness.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64a-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: AND
logic summary: Circumstances include buyer's knowledge of term's existence and extent.
premise text: Whether the buyer knew or ought reasonably to have known of the existence and extent of the term;
conclusion text: Buyer's knowledge is relevant to determining fairness.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64a-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must consider all circumstances when determining fairness.
premise text: A court is to have regard to all the circumstances of the case;
conclusion text: Fairness of reliance on a contract term is determined based on these circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65 Application of this Division to supplies of gas, electricity and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-65
has part: 65(1) Application of this Division to supplies of gas, electricity and
has part: 65(2) Application of this Division to supplies of gas, electricity and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.172

65(1) Application of this Division to supplies of gas, electricity and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-65-ss-1
part of: 65 Application of this Division to supplies of gas, electricity and
note: Exemptions from application of Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.172
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-65-ss-1-norm

65(2) Application of this Division to supplies of gas, electricity and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-65-ss-2
part of: 65 Application of this Division to supplies of gas, electricity and
note: Telecommunications service definition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.172
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-65-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-65-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 65(2) Application of this Division to supplies of gas, electricity and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of telecommunications service
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66 Display notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-66
has part: 66(1) Display notices
has part: 66(2) Display notices
has part: 66(3) Display notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.172

66(1) Display notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-66-ss-1
part of: 66 Display notices
note: Display notices required by the Commonwealth Minister.
description: Notice that meets the requirements of the determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.172
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 66(1) Display notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to display notices.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66(2) Display notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-66-ss-2
part of: 66 Display notices
note: Display notice to consumer before supply
description: notice that meets requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.172
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must display notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66(3) Display notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-66-ss-3
part of: 66 Display notices
note: Specify information about the application of provisions in this Division.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.172
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 66(3) Display notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: Requires notice to include specified information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

67 Conflict of laws
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-67
note: Provisions of this Division apply despite a term substituting foreign law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.173
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-67-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-67-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-67-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-67-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-67-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-67-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 67 Conflict of laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-67-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If the proper law of a contract would be foreign, then this Division applies.
premise text: Proper law of a contract is foreign.
conclusion text: This Division applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-67-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The contract term provides for a different law than the proper law.
premise text: Contract term provides for foreign law.
conclusion text: Proper law of a contract is not the same as the law provided by the contract term.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-67-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: The provisions of this Division apply despite a term substituting foreign law.
premise text: Provisions of this Division apply.
conclusion text: Provisions of this Division repeat despite that term.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-67-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If the proper law of a contract would be foreign, then this Division applies.
premise text: Term substitutes provisions of foreign law.
conclusion text: This Division applies despite that term.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68 Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-68
note: Provisions of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods prevail over Australian provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.173
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-68-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-68-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-68-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 68 Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prevails-over
logic summary: Obligation to prioritize international convention over Australian provisions.
premise text: The Convention prevails over the Division.
conclusion text: The Convention takes precedence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-68-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval of applicability.
premise text: The Convention prevails over the Division to the extent of any inconsistency.
conclusion text: Applicability period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69 Meaning of unsolicited consumer agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-69
has part: 69(1) Meaning of unsolicited consumer agreement
has part: 69(1A) Meaning of unsolicited consumer agreement
has part: 69(2) Meaning of unsolicited consumer agreement
has part: 69(3) Meaning of unsolicited consumer agreement
has part: 69(4) Meaning of unsolicited consumer agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.174

69(1) Meaning of unsolicited consumer agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-69-ss-1
part of: 69 Meaning of unsolicited consumer agreement
note: Definition of unsolicited consumer agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.174
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69(1) Meaning of unsolicited consumer agreement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of an obligation
premise text: (1) An agreement is an unsolicited consumer agreement if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69(1A) Meaning of unsolicited consumer agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-69-ss-1a
part of: 69 Meaning of unsolicited consumer agreement
note: The consumer is not taken to have invited the dealer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.174
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-1a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69(1A) Meaning of unsolicited consumer agreement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: The consumer is taken to have invited the dealer.
conclusion text: The consumer is not taken to have invited the dealer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69(2) Meaning of unsolicited consumer agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-69-ss-2
part of: 69 Meaning of unsolicited consumer agreement
note: No invitation to enter into negotiations for a supply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.174
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits invitations to enter into negotiations
premise text: (2) An invitation merely to quote a price for a supply is not taken, for the purposes of subsection (1)(c), to be an invitation to enter into negotiations for a supply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for negotiation prohibition
premise text: (2) An invitation merely to quote a price for a supply is not taken, for the purposes of subsection (1)(c), to be an invitation to enter into negotiations for a supply.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Defines repetition of negotiation prohibition
premise text: (2) An invitation merely to quote a price for a supply is not taken, for the purposes of subsection (1)(c), to be an invitation to enter into negotiations for a supply.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Establishes obligation to refrain from negotiating
premise text: (2) An invitation merely to quote a price for a supply is not taken, for the purposes of subsection (1)(c), to be an invitation to enter into negotiations for a supply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Rebuttal
logic summary: Rebuts argument that negotiating is permissible
premise text: (2) An invitation merely to quote a price for a supply is not taken, for the purposes of subsection (1)(c), to be an invitation to enter into negotiations for a supply.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69(3) Meaning of unsolicited consumer agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-69-ss-3
part of: 69 Meaning of unsolicited consumer agreement
note: An agreement is also an unsolicited consumer agreement if it meets the regulations' definition.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.174
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of unsolicited consumer agreement.
premise text: The regulations provide a definition for an unsolicited consumer agreement.
conclusion text: An agreement meets the definition if it is of that kind.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between regulation and agreement.
premise text: The regulations provide a temporal relationship for unsolicited consumer agreements.
conclusion text: An agreement is an unsolicited consumer agreement if it occurs during the same time period as the regulations.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: for-all
logic summary: Temporal relationship between regulation and agreement.
premise text: The regulations provide a temporal relationship for unsolicited consumer agreements.
conclusion text: An agreement is an unsolicited consumer agreement if it occurs at all times during the same time period as the regulations.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if-and-only-if
logic summary: Equivalence between regulation and agreement.
premise text: The regulations provide a definition for an unsolicited consumer agreement.
conclusion text: An agreement is an unsolicited consumer agreement if it meets the definition.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: is-a
logic summary: Classification into unsolicited consumer agreements.
premise text: The regulations provide a classification for unsolicited consumer agreements.
conclusion text: An agreement is classified as an unsolicited consumer agreement if it meets the definition.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69(4) Meaning of unsolicited consumer agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-69-ss-4
part of: 69 Meaning of unsolicited consumer agreement
note: An agreement is not an unsolicited consumer agreement if it meets certain regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.174
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-4-norm

70 Presumption that agreements are unsolicited consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-70
has part: 70(1) Presumption that agreements are unsolicited consumer
has part: 70(2) Presumption that agreements are unsolicited consumer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.175

70(1) Presumption that agreements are unsolicited consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-70-ss-1
part of: 70 Presumption that agreements are unsolicited consumer
note: Presumption that agreements are unsolicited consumer agreements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.175
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70(1) Presumption that agreements are unsolicited consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: presumption
logic summary: Presumes agreement is unsolicited consumer
premise text: (1) In a proceeding relating to a contravention or possible contravention of this Division (other than a criminal proceeding), an agreement is presumed to be an unsolicited consumer agreement
conclusion text: if: (a) a party to the proceeding alleges that the agreement is an unsolicited consumer agreement; and (b) no other party to the proceeding proves that the agreement is not an unsolicited consumer agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relation between temporal intervals
logic summary: Defines relation between temporal intervals for commencement
premise text: (1) In a proceeding relating to a contravention or possible contravention of this Division (other than a criminal proceeding), an agreement is presumed to be an unsolicited consumer agreement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ordered trace
logic summary: Defines ordered trace for proceedings
premise text: (1) In a proceeding relating to a contravention or possible contravention of this Division (other than a criminal proceeding), an agreement is presumed to be an unsolicited consumer agreement
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
logic summary: Defines diffusion for proceedings
premise text: (1) In a proceeding relating to a contravention or possible contravention of this Division (other than a criminal proceeding), an agreement is presumed to be an unsolicited consumer agreement
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: cognitive agent
logic summary: Defines cognitive agent for proceedings
premise text: (1) In a proceeding relating to a contravention or possible contravention of this Division (other than a criminal proceeding), an agreement is presumed to be an unsolicited consumer agreement
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

70(2) Presumption that agreements are unsolicited consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-70-ss-2
part of: 70 Presumption that agreements are unsolicited consumer
note: Presumption that agreements are unsolicited consumer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.175
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: presumption
logic summary: Presumption of unsolicited consumer agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

71 Meaning of dealer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-71
note: Defines what constitutes a dealer in trade or commerce.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.176
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-71-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-71-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-71-logic-argumentation-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-71-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 71 Meaning of dealer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Identifies the type of entity being described.
conclusion text: A dealer is a person who, in trade or commerce:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-71-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes the timing relationship between the definition and its application.
conclusion text: with a view to making an agreement for the supply of goods or services to the consumer;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-71-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Establishes a causal relationship between the definition and its application.
conclusion text: for the purpose of entering into such negotiations;
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72 Meaning of negotiation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-72
note: Defines negotiation for an agreement or proposed agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.176
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-72-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-72-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-72-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 72 Meaning of negotiation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes discussion or dealing towards making an agreement.
premise text: A negotiation includes any discussion or dealing...
conclusion text: An agreement or proposed agreement is being negotiated.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-72-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subdivision
logic summary: Defines a subdivision for negotiating unsolicited consumer agreements.
premise text: Subdivision B—Negotiating unsolicited consumer agreements
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73 Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-73
has part: 73(1) Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
has part: 73(2) Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.176

73(1) Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-73-ss-1
part of: 73 Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
note: Dealer cannot call on a person for negotiating an unsolicited consumer agreement at certain times.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.176
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-73-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-73-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-73-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-73-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-73-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-73-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-73-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 73(1) Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-73-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits calling on a person for negotiating an unsolicited consumer agreement at certain times.
premise text: (1) A dealer must not call on a person...
conclusion text: ...or for an incidental or related purpose:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-73-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Specifies the time period during which calling is prohibited.
premise text: (1) A dealer must not call on a person...
conclusion text: ...or for an incidental or related purpose:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-73-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Suggests that the prohibition implies certain conditions.
premise text: (1) A dealer must not call on a person...
conclusion text: ...or for an incidental or related purpose:
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-73-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Suggests that the prohibition diffuses uncertainty.
premise text: (1) A dealer must not call on a person...
conclusion text: ...or for an incidental or related purpose:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-73-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Suggests that the prohibition recognizes certain patterns.
premise text: (1) A dealer must not call on a person...
conclusion text: ...or for an incidental or related purpose:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

73(2) Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-73-ss-2
part of: 73 Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
note: Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.176
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-73-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-73-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-73-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-73-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-73-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-73-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negotiation without consent is prohibited
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if the dealer calls on the person in accordance with consent that was given by the person to the dealer or a person acting on the dealer’s behalf; and was not given in the presence of the dealer or a person acting on the dealer’s behalf.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-73-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >
logic summary: Temporal interval for consent
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if the dealer calls on the person in accordance with consent that was given by the person to the dealer or a person acting on the dealer’s behalf; and was not given in the presence of the dealer or a person acting on the dealer’s behalf.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-73-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <
logic summary: Temporal interval for unsolicited consumer agreement
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if the dealer calls on the person in accordance with consent that was given by the person to the dealer or a person acting on the dealer’s behalf; and was not given in the presence of the dealer or a person acting on the dealer’s behalf.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-73-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ~
logic summary: Dealer's actions are permitted if consent is given
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if the dealer calls on the person in accordance with consent that was given by the person to the dealer or a person acting on the dealer’s behalf; and was not given in the presence of the dealer or a person acting on the dealer’s behalf.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74 Disclosing purpose and identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-74
note: Dealer must disclose purpose and identity before negotiating an unsolicited consumer agreement.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.177
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-74-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-74-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-74-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 74 Disclosing purpose and identity
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-74-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Dealer must disclose purpose and identity.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

75 Ceasing to negotiate on request
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-75
note: Must leave premises immediately on request
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.177
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-75-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-75-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-75-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits leaving premises without permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76 Informing person of termination period etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-76
note: Must inform person of termination period, way to exercise right, and other matters before making unsolicited consumer agreement.
description: Information about termination period, exercising the right, and other prescribed matters
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.178
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-76-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-76-logic-deontic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making unsolicited consumer agreements without providing required information
premise text: Dealer must provide information before making agreement
conclusion text: Cannot make unsolicited consumer agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-76-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Require
logic summary: Requires dealer to provide information before making unsolicited consumer agreement
premise text: Dealer must provide information before making agreement
conclusion text: Must provide required information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77 Liability of suppliers for contraventions by dealers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-77
note: Supplier liable for contraventions by dealers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.179
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-77-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-77-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-77-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-77-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-77-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-77-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-77-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77 Liability of suppliers for contraventions by dealers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-77-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Liability of suppliers for contraventions by dealers
premise text: Supplier of goods or services is also taken to have contravened that provision in relation to the agreement.
conclusion text: Supplier liable for contraventions by dealers
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-77-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Relation to an unsolicited consumer agreement
premise text: If a dealer contravenes a provision of this Subdivision in relation to an unsolicited consumer agreement;
conclusion text: Relation to an unsolicited consumer agreement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-77-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Dealer contravenes a provision of this Subdivision
premise text: If: (a) a dealer contravenes a provision of this Subdivision in relation to an unsolicited consumer agreement;
conclusion text: Dealer contravenes a provision of this Subdivision
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-77-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Contravention by dealer affects supplier
premise text: the supplier of the goods or services is also taken to have contravened that provision in relation to the agreement.
conclusion text: Contravention by dealer affects supplier
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-77-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
logic summary: Classification of liability
premise text: the supplier of goods or services is also taken to have contravened that provision in relation to the agreement.
conclusion text: Classification of liability
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78 Requirement to give document to the consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-78
has part: 78(1) Requirement to give document to the consumer
has part: 78(2) Requirement to give document to the consumer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.179

78(1) Requirement to give document to the consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-78-ss-1
part of: 78 Requirement to give document to the consumer
note: Dealer must provide copy of agreement to consumer after signing.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.179
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-78-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-78-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-78-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 78(1) Requirement to give document to the consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-78-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Dealer must provide copy of agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78(2) Requirement to give document to the consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-78-ss-2
part of: 78 Requirement to give document to the consumer
note: Must provide document to consumer within 5 business days after unsolicited agreement negotiation.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.179
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-78-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a duty obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79 Requirements for all unsolicited consumer agreements etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-79
note: Supplier must comply with specific requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements.
description: The agreement document must set out all terms, including total consideration and postal charges.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.180
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-79-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-79-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-79-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 79 Requirements for all unsolicited consumer agreements etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-79-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Supplier has a duty to comply with the requirements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80 Additional requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-80
note: Supplier must ensure agreement complies with requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.181
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-80-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-80-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-80-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80 Additional requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81 Requirements for amendments of unsolicited consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-81
note: Both parties must sign amendments to unsolicited consumer agreements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.182
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-81-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-81-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-81-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must sign amendments
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82 Terminating an unsolicited consumer agreement during the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-82
has part: 82(1) Terminating an unsolicited consumer agreement during the
has part: 82(2) Terminating an unsolicited consumer agreement during the
has part: 82(3) Terminating an unsolicited consumer agreement during the
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.182

82(1) Terminating an unsolicited consumer agreement during the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-82-ss-1
part of: 82 Terminating an unsolicited consumer agreement during the
note: Consumer may terminate unsolicited consumer agreement
description: Notice to supplier
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.182
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-82-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-82-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-82-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Consumer has the right to terminate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82(2) Terminating an unsolicited consumer agreement during the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-82-ss-2
part of: 82 Terminating an unsolicited consumer agreement during the
note: Right of termination under this section may be exercised despite affirmation by the consumer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.182
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-82-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-82-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-82-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Possibility
logic summary: Right exists
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82(3) Terminating an unsolicited consumer agreement during the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-82-ss-3
part of: 82 Terminating an unsolicited consumer agreement during the
note: Consumer has a right to terminate an unsolicited consumer agreement within a specified period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.182
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-82-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-82-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-82-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-82-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 82(3) Terminating an unsolicited consumer agreement during the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-82-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Consumer has a right to terminate an unsolicited consumer agreement within a specified period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-82-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for termination.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

83 Effect of termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-83
has part: 83(1) Effect of termination
has part: 83(2) Effect of termination
has part: 83(3) Effect of termination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.184

83(1) Effect of termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-83-ss-1
part of: 83 Effect of termination
note: Voiding of related contracts or instruments upon termination of unsolicited consumer agreements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.184
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-83-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-83-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-83-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-83-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-83-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-83-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 83(1) Effect of termination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-83-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of related contracts or instruments.
premise text: (1) If an unsolicited consumer agreement is terminated in accordance with section 82:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-83-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between termination and voiding.
premise text: (1) If an unsolicited consumer agreement is terminated in accordance with section 82:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-83-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of voided contracts or instruments.
premise text: (a) the agreement is taken to have been rescinded by mutual consent;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-83-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Diffusion of voiding to related contracts or instruments.
premise text: (b) any related contract or instrument is void.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

83(2) Effect of termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-83-ss-2
part of: 83 Effect of termination
note: Excludes tied continuing credit contracts and tied loan contracts from the definition of a related contract or instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.184
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-83-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-83-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-83-ss-2-logic-ltl-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-83-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Prohibits tied continuing credit contracts and tied loan contracts from being related to an unsolicited consumer agreement.
premise text: Tied continuing credit contract or tied loan contract
conclusion text: Not a related contract or instrument
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-83-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <>
logic summary: Defines the scope of related contracts and instruments in relation to an unsolicited consumer agreement.
premise text: Related contract or instrument
conclusion text: Excluded from the definition
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

83(3) Effect of termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-83-ss-3
part of: 83 Effect of termination
note: The termination of an unsolicited consumer agreement has effect for the purposes of section 82 and this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.184
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-83-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-83-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-83-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 83(3) Effect of termination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-83-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffect
logic summary: Implies an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84 Obligations of suppliers on termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-84
note: Return consideration upon termination of unsolicited consumer agreement
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.185
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-84-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-84-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-84-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to return consideration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85 Obligations and rights of consumers on termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-85
has part: 85(1) Obligations and rights of consumers on termination
has part: 85(2) Obligations and rights of consumers on termination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.185

85(1) Obligations and rights of consumers on termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-85-ss-1
part of: 85 Obligations and rights of consumers on termination
note: Consumer must return goods or notify supplier within a reasonable time after termination of unsolicited consumer agreement.
description: Goods or notification information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.185
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-85-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to return goods
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85(2) Obligations and rights of consumers on termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-85-ss-2
part of: 85 Obligations and rights of consumers on termination
note: Goods become property of consumer upon notice to supplier.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.185
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-85-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-85-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-85-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85(2) Obligations and rights of consumers on termination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-85-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: becomes
logic summary: Property transfer obligation
premise text: Consumer gives notice to supplier
conclusion text: Goods become property of consumer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86 Prohibition on supplies etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-86
has part: 86(1) Prohibition on supplies etc.
has part: 86(2) Prohibition on supplies etc.
has part: 86(3) Prohibition on supplies etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.187

86(1) Prohibition on supplies etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-86-ss-1
part of: 86 Prohibition on supplies etc.
note: Supplier must not supply goods or services under an unsolicited consumer agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.187
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-86-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-86-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-86-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 86(1) Prohibition on supplies etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-86-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplier from supplying goods or services under an unsolicited consumer agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86(2) Prohibition on supplies etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-86-ss-2
part of: 86 Prohibition on supplies etc.
note: Prohibition on supplies etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.187
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-86-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-86-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 86(2) Prohibition on supplies etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a duty to not supply goods
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86(3) Prohibition on supplies etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-86-ss-3
part of: 86 Prohibition on supplies etc.
note: Prohibition on supplying services in contravention of the section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.187
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-86-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-86-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-86-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 86(3) Prohibition on supplies etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-86-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a prohibition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87 Repayment of payments received after termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-87
note: Supplier must refund payments made after termination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.188
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-87-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-87-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-87-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Supplier has a duty to refund.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88 Prohibition on recovering amounts after termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-88
has part: 88(1) Prohibition on recovering amounts after termination
has part: 88(1A) Prohibition on recovering amounts after termination
has part: 88(2) Prohibition on recovering amounts after termination
has part: 88(3) Prohibition on recovering amounts after termination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.188

88(1) Prohibition on recovering amounts after termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-88-ss-1
part of: 88 Prohibition on recovering amounts after termination
note: Prohibition on recovering amounts after termination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.188
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-88-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-88-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-88-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-88-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-88-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 88(1) Prohibition on recovering amounts after termination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-88-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits actions against the consumer
premise text: (1) If an unsolicited consumer agreement is terminated in accordance with section 82, a person must not...
conclusion text: ...a person must not bring, or assert an intention to bring, legal proceedings against the consumer;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-88-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Specifies the temporal interval during which the prohibition applies
premise text: (1) If an unsolicited consumer agreement is terminated in accordance with section 82, a person must not...
conclusion text: ...a person must not bring, or assert an intention to bring, legal proceedings against the consumer;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-88-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Specifies the temporal interval during which the prohibition applies
premise text: (1) If an unsolicited consumer agreement is terminated in accordance with section 82, a person must not...
conclusion text: ...a person must not bring, or assert an intention to bring, legal proceedings against the consumer;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88(1A) Prohibition on recovering amounts after termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-88-ss-1a
part of: 88 Prohibition on recovering amounts after termination
note: Exemptions from prohibition on recovering amounts after termination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.188
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-88-ss-1a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-88-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-88-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88(2) Prohibition on recovering amounts after termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-88-ss-2
part of: 88 Prohibition on recovering amounts after termination
note: Prohibition on recovering amounts after termination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.188
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-88-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-88-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 88(2) Prohibition on recovering amounts after termination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits actions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88(3) Prohibition on recovering amounts after termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-88-ss-3
part of: 88 Prohibition on recovering amounts after termination
note: Prohibition on recovering amounts after termination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.188
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-88-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-88-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-88-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 88(3) Prohibition on recovering amounts after termination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-88-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits recovery of amounts
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89 Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-89
has part: 89(1) Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
has part: 89(2) Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.189

89(1) Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-89-ss-1
part of: 89 Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
note: Excluding, limiting, modifying or restricting a right of the consumer under the agreement to terminate the agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.189
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-89-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits a provision of an unsolicited consumer agreement
premise text: (1) A provision (however described) of an unsolicited consumer agreement is void if it has the effect of, or purports to have the effect of:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89(2) Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-89-ss-2
part of: 89 Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
note: Supplier must ensure agreement does not include void provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.189
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-89-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-89-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-89-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89(2) Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-89-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Supplier has a duty to ensure agreement does not include void provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90 Waiver of rights
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-90
has part: 90(1) Waiver of rights
has part: 90(2) Waiver of rights
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.190

90(1) Waiver of rights
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-90-ss-1
part of: 90 Waiver of rights
note: Consumer cannot waive rights under unsolicited consumer agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.190
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-90-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-90-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-90-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 90(1) Waiver of rights
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-90-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on waiver of rights
premise text: Consumer agreement
conclusion text: Waiver not permitted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90(2) Waiver of rights
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-90-ss-2
part of: 90 Waiver of rights
note: Supplier cannot induce consumer to waive rights.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.190
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-90-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-90-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-90-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 90(2) Waiver of rights
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-90-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits inducing waiver of rights.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

91 Application of this Division to persons to whom rights of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-91
has part: 91(1) Application of this Division to persons to whom rights of
has part: 91(2) Application of this Division to persons to whom rights of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.190

91(1) Application of this Division to persons to whom rights of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-91-ss-1
part of: 91 Application of this Division to persons to whom rights of
note: This Division applies to persons to whom rights of a consumer under a contract are assigned or transferred.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.190
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-91-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-91-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-91-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 91(1) Application of this Division to persons to whom rights of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-91-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Division applies to persons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

91(2) Application of this Division to persons to whom rights of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-91-ss-2
part of: 91 Application of this Division to persons to whom rights of
note: Division applies to persons with assigned or transferred rights
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.190
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-91-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-91-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-91-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 91(2) Application of this Division to persons to whom rights of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-91-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Division applies to specified persons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92 Application of this Division to supplies to third parties
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-92
note: This Division applies in relation to a contract for the supply of goods or services to a consumer on the order of another person as if the other person were also the consumer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.190
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-92-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-92-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-92-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 92 Application of this Division to supplies to third parties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-92-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes the type of obligation
premise text: The text states 'This Division applies'
conclusion text: There is an obligation to apply this division
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

93 Effect of contravening this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-93
has part: 93(1) Effect of contravening this Division
has part: 93(2) Effect of contravening this Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.191

93(1) Effect of contravening this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-93-ss-1
part of: 93 Effect of contravening this Division
note: Supplier cannot enforce agreement against consumer if provision of Division has been contravened.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.191
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-93-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-93-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-93-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-93-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-93-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-93-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-93-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 93(1) Effect of contravening this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-93-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Cannot enforce obligation
premise text: Provision of Division has been contravened
conclusion text: Supplier cannot enforce agreement against consumer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-93-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval between provision and enforcement
premise text: Provision of Division has been contravened in relation to the agreement
conclusion text: Supplier cannot enforce agreement against consumer
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-93-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: if-then
logic summary: If provision is contravened, then supplier cannot enforce agreement
premise text: Provision of Division has been contravened in relation to the agreement
conclusion text: Supplier cannot enforce agreement against consumer
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-93-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffuse obligation from supplier to consumer
premise text: Provision of Division has been contravened in relation to the agreement
conclusion text: Supplier cannot enforce agreement against consumer
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-93-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: cognizes
logic summary: Cognitive agent recognizes obligation limitation
premise text: Provision of Division has been contravened in relation to the agreement
conclusion text: Supplier cannot enforce agreement against consumer
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93(2) Effect of contravening this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-93-ss-2
part of: 93 Effect of contravening this Division
note: No action prevents under this Schedule in relation to contravention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.191
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-93-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-93-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-93-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 93(2) Effect of contravening this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-93-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

94 Regulations may limit the application of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-94
note: Regulations may limit the application of this Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.191
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-94-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-94-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-94-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 94 Regulations may limit the application of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-94-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibits
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95 Application of this Division to certain conduct covered by the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-95
note: Exempts conduct from Corporations Act 2001 if it is prohibited by section 992A.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.191
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-95-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-95-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-95-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-95-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-95-logic-cogai-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-95-logic-shacl-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-95-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 95 Application of this Division to certain conduct covered by the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-95-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exempts
logic summary: Prohibition exemption
premise text: Section 992A prohibits hawking of financial products.
conclusion text: This Division does not apply to conduct prohibited by section 992A.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-95-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for exemption
premise text: This Division does not apply in relation to conduct to which section 992A applies.
conclusion text: The exemption applies only when section 992A prohibits hawking of financial products.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-95-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for prohibition
premise text: Section 992A prohibits hawking of financial products.
conclusion text: The prohibition is recurring and applies to conduct prohibited by section 992A.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-95-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation for exemption
premise text: This Division does not apply in relation to conduct to which section 992A applies.
conclusion text: The exemption is represented by the knowledge that section 992A prohibits hawking of financial products.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-95-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema validation
logic summary: Schema validation for prohibition
premise text: Section 992A prohibits hawking of financial products.
conclusion text: The prohibition is validated by the schema that section 992A applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

96 Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-96
has part: 96(1) Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
has part: 96(2) Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
has part: 96(3) Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
has part: 96(4) Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.192

96(1) Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-96-ss-1
part of: 96 Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
note: Supplier must ensure agreement is in writing and copy given to consumer.
description: Agreement in writing, copy of agreement for consumer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.192
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-96-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-96-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-96-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Supplier must ensure agreement is in writing and copy given to consumer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96(2) Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-96-ss-2
part of: 96 Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
note: Supplier must ensure lay-by agreement is transparent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.192
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-96-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-96-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-96-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 96(2) Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-96-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to ensure transparency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96(3) Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-96-ss-3
part of: 96 Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
note: Lay-by agreements must be in writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.192
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-96-ss-3-norm

96(4) Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-96-ss-4
part of: 96 Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
note: Deposit paid by consumer is taken to be an instalment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.192
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-96-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-96-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-96-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 96(4) Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-96-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

97 Termination of lay-by agreements by consumers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-97
has part: 97(1) Termination of lay-by agreements by consumers
has part: 97(2) Termination of lay-by agreements by consumers
has part: 97(3) Termination of lay-by agreements by consumers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.192

97(1) Termination of lay-by agreements by consumers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-97-ss-1
part of: 97 Termination of lay-by agreements by consumers
note: Consumer may terminate lay-by agreement at any time before goods delivery.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.192
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-97-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-97-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-97-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Consumer obligation to terminate lay-by agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

97(2) Termination of lay-by agreements by consumers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-97-ss-2
part of: 97 Termination of lay-by agreements by consumers
note: Supplier must not charge termination fee unless consumer terminates agreement or supplier breaches agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.192
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-97-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-97-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-97-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Supplier must not charge termination fee.
premise text: Supplier of goods who is a party to a lay-by agreement
conclusion text: unless consumer terminates agreement or supplier breaches agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

97(3) Termination of lay-by agreements by consumers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-97-ss-3
part of: 97 Termination of lay-by agreements by consumers
note: Supplier must ensure termination charge is reasonable
description: Reasonable costs
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.192
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-97-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-97-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-97-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Supplier has a duty to ensure termination charge is reasonable
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

98 Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-98
note: Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.193
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-98-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-98-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-98-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must not
logic summary: Prohibition of termination
premise text: Supplier must not terminate the agreement
conclusion text: Unless...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

99 Effect of termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-99
has part: 99(1) Effect of termination
has part: 99(2) Effect of termination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.193

99(1) Effect of termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-99-ss-1
part of: 99 Effect of termination
note: Supplier must refund consumer amounts after termination of lay-by agreement.
description: refund
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.193
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 99(1) Effect of termination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Supplier has an obligation to refund consumer amounts.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

99(2) Effect of termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-99-ss-2
part of: 99 Effect of termination
note: Entitlement to recover unpaid termination charge from consumer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.193
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Consumer has a right to recover unpaid termination charge.
premise text: Supplier is entitled to recover any unpaid termination charge from the consumer.
conclusion text: The consumer has a right to recover the unpaid termination charge.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Unpaid termination charge can be recovered during lay-by agreement period.
premise text: The supplier is entitled to recover any unpaid termination charge from the consumer as a debt if the amounts paid by the consumer under the lay-by agreement are not enough to cover the charge.
conclusion text: The unpaid termination charge can be recovered during the lay-by agreement period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Unpaid termination charge can be recovered during lay-by agreement period.
premise text: The supplier is entitled to recover any unpaid termination charge from the consumer as a debt if the amounts paid by the consumer under the lay-by agreement are not enough to cover the charge.
conclusion text: The unpaid termination charge can be recovered during the lay-by agreement period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: Recovery of unpaid termination charge depends on consumer's payment under lay-by agreement.
premise text: The supplier is entitled to recover any unpaid termination charge from the consumer as a debt if the amounts paid by the consumer under the lay-by agreement are not enough to cover the charge.
conclusion text: The recovery of the unpaid termination charge depends on the consumer's payment under the lay-by agreement.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Consumer has a right to recover unpaid termination charge from supplier.
premise text: Supplier is entitled to recover any unpaid termination charge from the consumer as a debt if the amounts paid by the consumer under the lay-by agreement are not enough to cover the charge.
conclusion text: The consumer has a right to recover the unpaid termination charge from the supplier.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

99A Meaning of gift card
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-99a
note: Definition of gift card
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.195
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99a-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 99A Meaning of gift card
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Redeemable for goods or services
premise text: Article
conclusion text: Gift card
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

99B Gift cards to be redeemable for at least 3 years
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-99b
has part: 99B(1) Gift cards to be redeemable for at least 3 years
has part: 99B(2) Gift cards to be redeemable for at least 3 years
has part: 99B(3) Gift cards to be redeemable for at least 3 years
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.195

99B(1) Gift cards to be redeemable for at least 3 years
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-99b-ss-1
part of: 99B Gift cards to be redeemable for at least 3 years
note: Supplying a gift card with an expiration date earlier than 3 years is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.195
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99b-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99b-ss-1-logic-cogai-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99b-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 99B(1) Gift cards to be redeemable for at least 3 years
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of supplying a gift card with an early expiration date.
premise text: The law prohibits supplying a gift card if its expiration date is earlier than 3 years.
conclusion text: Supplying a gift card with an early expiration date is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for the prohibition.
premise text: The prohibition applies to gift cards with an expiration date earlier than 3 years.
conclusion text: The temporal interval for the prohibition is at least 3 years.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of the prohibition.
premise text: The prohibition applies to all supplies of gift cards.
conclusion text: There is a recurring trace of the prohibition in the supply of gift cards.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99b-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation of the provision.
premise text: The provision can be represented using knowledge representation techniques.
conclusion text: The provision can be represented using knowledge representation techniques.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

99B(2) Gift cards to be redeemable for at least 3 years
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-99b-ss-2
part of: 99B Gift cards to be redeemable for at least 3 years
note: Gift card must be redeemable for at least 3 years after supply.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.195
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99b-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 99B(2) Gift cards to be redeemable for at least 3 years
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state.
conclusion text: The state must ensure gift cards are redeemable for at least 3 years after supply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

99B(3) Gift cards to be redeemable for at least 3 years
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-99b-ss-3
part of: 99B Gift cards to be redeemable for at least 3 years
note: Person's liability for alleged contravention of subsection (1) or section 191A is unaffected.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.195
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99b-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Liability unaffected
premise text: Subsection (2) does not affect
conclusion text: Person's liability for alleged contravention of subsection (1) or section 191A is unaffected.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

99C When gift card ceases to be redeemable to appear prominently
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-99c
note: Supplying a gift card without prominent expiry date information is prohibited.
description: (a), (b), (c), or (e)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.196
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99c-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99c-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99c-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 99C When gift card ceases to be redeemable to appear prominently
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of supplying gift card without prominent expiry date information.
premise text: (a), (b), (c), or (e)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

99D Terms and conditions not to allow post-supply fees
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-99d
has part: 99D(1) Terms and conditions not to allow post-supply fees
has part: 99D(2) Terms and conditions not to allow post-supply fees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.196

99D(1) Terms and conditions not to allow post-supply fees
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-99d-ss-1
part of: 99D Terms and conditions not to allow post-supply fees
note: No post-supply fees allowed for gift cards.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.196
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99d-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99d-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 99D(1) Terms and conditions not to allow post-supply fees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of post-supply fees
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

99D(2) Terms and conditions not to allow post-supply fees
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-99d-ss-2
part of: 99D Terms and conditions not to allow post-supply fees
note: Post-supply fees not allowed for gift cards after supply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.196
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99d-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits post-supply fees for gift cards
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

99E Post-supply fees not to be demanded or received
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-99e
note: Demanding or receiving post-supply fees in relation to a gift card is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.196
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99e-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99e-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99e-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 99E Post-supply fees not to be demanded or received
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition of demanding or receiving post-supply fees.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

99F Certain terms and conditions of gift card void
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-99f
has part: 99F(1) Certain terms and conditions of gift card void
has part: 99F(2) Certain terms and conditions of gift card void
has part: 99F(3) Certain terms and conditions of gift card void
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.197

99F(1) Certain terms and conditions of gift card void
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-99f-ss-1
part of: 99F Certain terms and conditions of gift card void
note: Term or condition void if allowing post-supply fee or reducing redeemability period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.197
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99f-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99f-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99f-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99f-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits certain terms and conditions of gift card
premise text: (1) A term or condition (however described) of a gift card is void if...
conclusion text: ...it has the effect of, or purports to have the effect of: ...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Relates to period of redeemability
premise text: (b) reducing the period that the gift card ceases to be redeemable...
conclusion text: ...to a period that ends earlier than 3 years after the day the gift card is supplied to a consumer.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99f-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Relates to period of post-supply fee payment
premise text: (a) allowing or requiring the payment of a post-supply fee in relation to the gift card...
conclusion text: ...it has the effect of, or purports to have the effect of: ...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99f-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: Relates to condition of voiding term or condition
premise text: (1) A term or condition (however described) of a gift card is void if...
conclusion text: ...it has the effect of, or purports to have the effect of: ...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99f-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: if
logic summary: Relates to condition of voiding term or condition
premise text: (1) A term or condition (however described) of a gift card is void if...
conclusion text: ...it has the effect of, or purports to have the effect of: ...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

99F(2) Certain terms and conditions of gift card void
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-99f-ss-2
part of: 99F Certain terms and conditions of gift card void
note: Supplier must ensure gift card terms are not void
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.197
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99f-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 99F(2) Certain terms and conditions of gift card void
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Supplier has a duty to ensure gift card terms are not void
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

99F(3) Certain terms and conditions of gift card void
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-99f-ss-3
part of: 99F Certain terms and conditions of gift card void
note: Liability for certain sections is not affected by this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.197
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99f-ss-3-norm

99G Regulations may limit application of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-99g
note: Regulations may limit application of this Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.197
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99g-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99g-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 99G Regulations may limit application of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

100 Supplier must provide proof of transaction etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-100
has part: 100(1) Supplier must provide proof of transaction etc.
has part: 100(2) Supplier must provide proof of transaction etc.
has part: 100(3) Supplier must provide proof of transaction etc.
has part: 100(4) Supplier must provide proof of transaction etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.199

100(1) Supplier must provide proof of transaction etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-100-ss-1
part of: 100 Supplier must provide proof of transaction etc.
note: Supplier must provide proof of transaction.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.199
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-100-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-100-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-100-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 100(1) Supplier must provide proof of transaction etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-100-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide proof of transaction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100(2) Supplier must provide proof of transaction etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-100-ss-2
part of: 100 Supplier must provide proof of transaction etc.
note: Consumer must request proof of transaction from supplier if goods/services cost less than $75.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.199
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-100-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-100-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-100-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 100(2) Supplier must provide proof of transaction etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-100-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide proof of transaction
premise text: Supplier supplies goods/services to consumer
conclusion text: Consumer requests proof of transaction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100(3) Supplier must provide proof of transaction etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-100-ss-3
part of: 100 Supplier must provide proof of transaction etc.
note: Supplier must provide proof of transaction within 7 days.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.199
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-100-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-100-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-100-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide proof
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100(4) Supplier must provide proof of transaction etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-100-ss-4
part of: 100 Supplier must provide proof of transaction etc.
note: Supplier must provide proof of transaction etc.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.199
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-100-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-100-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-100-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 100(4) Supplier must provide proof of transaction etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-100-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide proof of transaction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

101 Consumer may request an itemised bill
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-101
has part: 101(1) Consumer may request an itemised bill
has part: 101(2) Consumer may request an itemised bill
has part: 101(3) Consumer may request an itemised bill
has part: 101(4) Consumer may request an itemised bill
has part: 101(5) Consumer may request an itemised bill
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.200

101(1) Consumer may request an itemised bill
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-101-ss-1
part of: 101 Consumer may request an itemised bill
note: Consumer has right to request itemised bill from supplier.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.200
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-101-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-101-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-101-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-101-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
logic summary: Consumer has right to request itemised bill.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-101-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: isA
logic summary: Itemised bill is a description of the services supplied.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

101(2) Consumer may request an itemised bill
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-101-ss-2
part of: 101 Consumer may request an itemised bill
note: Request for itemised bill must be made within 30 days after services are supplied or consumer receives a bill.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.200
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-101-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-101-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-101-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to request itemised bill within 30 days.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

101(3) Consumer may request an itemised bill
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-101-ss-3
part of: 101 Consumer may request an itemised bill
note: Supplier must provide itemised bill within 7 days after request.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.200
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-101-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-101-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-101-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 101(3) Consumer may request an itemised bill
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-101-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Supplier must provide itemised bill.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

101(4) Consumer may request an itemised bill
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-101-ss-4
part of: 101 Consumer may request an itemised bill
note: Supplier cannot charge consumer for itemised bill.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.200
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-101-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-101-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-101-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 101(4) Consumer may request an itemised bill
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-101-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of charging for itemised bill.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

101(5) Consumer may request an itemised bill
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-101-ss-5
part of: 101 Consumer may request an itemised bill
note: Supplier must ensure itemised bill is transparent.
description: Itemised bill
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.200
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-101-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-101-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-101-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 101(5) Consumer may request an itemised bill
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-101-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Supplier must ensure itemised bill is transparent.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102 Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-102
has part: 102(1) Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
has part: 102(2) Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
has part: 102(3) Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.201

102(1) Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-102-ss-1
part of: 102 Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
note: Prescribes requirements for warranties against defects.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.201
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-102-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-102-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-102-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 102(1) Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-102-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prescribe
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102(2) Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-102-ss-2
part of: 102 Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
note: Do not give a document evidencing a warranty against defects that does not comply with the requirements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.201
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-102-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-102-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-102-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 102(2) Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-102-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of giving a non-compliant warranty document.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102(3) Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-102-ss-3
part of: 102 Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
note: Warranty against defects must be unconditional or on specified conditions.
description: Repair, replace, provide again, rectify, or recompense the consumer if goods/services are defective.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.201
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-102-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-102-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-102-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-102-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 102(3) Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-102-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Warranty against defects is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-102-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Class
logic summary: Goods/services are classified as defective if they do not meet certain criteria.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

103 Repairers must comply with prescribed requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-103
note: Repairers must comply with prescribed requirements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.201
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-103-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-103-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-103-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-103-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-103-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-103-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 103 Repairers must comply with prescribed requirements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-103-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a duty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-103-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between regulation and notice.
premise text: (1) The regulations may prescribe requirements relating to the form and content of notices to be given relating to the repair of goods supplied to a consumer.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-103-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between regulation and notice.
premise text: (1) The regulations may prescribe requirements relating to the form and content of notices to be given relating to the repair of goods supplied to a consumer.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-103-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a duty.
premise text: (1) The regulations may prescribe requirements relating to the form and content of notices to be given relating to the repair of goods supplied to a consumer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

104 Making safety standards for consumer goods and product
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-104
has part: 104(1) Making safety standards for consumer goods and product
has part: 104(2) Making safety standards for consumer goods and product
has part: 104(3) Making safety standards for consumer goods and product
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.203

104(1) Making safety standards for consumer goods and product
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-104-ss-1
part of: 104 Making safety standards for consumer goods and product
note: The Commonwealth Minister may make a safety standard for consumer goods or product.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.203
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-104-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-104-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-104-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 104(1) Making safety standards for consumer goods and product
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-104-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Implies an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

104(2) Making safety standards for consumer goods and product
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-104-ss-2
part of: 104 Making safety standards for consumer goods and product
note: Safety standards for consumer goods and product
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.203
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-104-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-104-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-104-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-104-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-104-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-104-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-104-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 104(2) Making safety standards for consumer goods and product
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-104-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires safety standards
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-104-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Applies to testing during or after manufacture
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), a safety standard for consumer goods of a particular kind may consist of requirements about the following matters: (a) the performance, composition, contents, methods of manufacture or processing, design, construction, finish or packaging of consumer goods of that kind;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-104-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Applies to testing during or after manufacture
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), a safety standard for consumer goods of a particular kind may consist of requirements about the following matters: (a) the performance, composition, contents, methods of manufacture or processing, design, construction, finish or packaging of consumer goods of that kind;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-104-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Applies to testing during or after manufacture
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), a safety standard for consumer goods of a particular kind may consist of requirements about the following matters: (a) the performance, composition, contents, methods of manufacture or processing, design, construction, finish or packaging of consumer goods of that kind;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-104-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: hasClass
logic summary: Defines a class of consumer goods
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), a safety standard for consumer goods of a particular kind may consist of requirements about the following matters:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

104(3) Making safety standards for consumer goods and product
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-104-ss-3
part of: 104 Making safety standards for consumer goods and product
note: Safety standards for product-related services may require specific matters such as supply method, personnel skills, and materials.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.203
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-104-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-104-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-104-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 104(3) Making safety standards for consumer goods and product
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-104-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to establish safety standards.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106 Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-106
has part: 106(1) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
has part: 106(2) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
has part: 106(3) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
has part: 106(4) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
has part: 106(5) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
has part: 106(6) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
has part: 106(7) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.204

106(1) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-106-ss-1
part of: 106 Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
note: Supplying non-compliant consumer goods is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.204
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 106(1) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplying non-compliant consumer goods.
premise text: (a) a safety standard for consumer goods of that kind is in force;
conclusion text: (1) A person must not, in trade or commerce, supply consumer goods of a particular kind if:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106(2) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-106-ss-2
part of: 106 Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
note: Offering consumer goods that do not comply with safety is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.204
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 106(2) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of offering non-compliant consumer goods.
premise text: Subsection (1) prohibits the supply of consumer goods that do not comply with safety.
conclusion text: Offering such goods is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of offering non-compliant consumer goods.
premise text: The offer of non-compliant consumer goods is a recurring trace that violates subsection (1).
conclusion text: Offering non-compliant consumer goods is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to not offer non-compliant consumer goods.
premise text: Subsection (1) imposes an obligation on persons to not offer consumer goods that do not comply with safety.
conclusion text: Persons must not offer non-compliant consumer goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of offering non-compliant consumer goods.
premise text: Subsection (1) prohibits the supply of consumer goods that do not comply with safety.
conclusion text: Offering such goods is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to impose pecuniary penalty for contravention.
premise text: Subsection (2) imposes an obligation on persons to impose a pecuniary penalty for contraventions of subsection (1).
conclusion text: Persons must impose a pecuniary penalty for contraventions of subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106(3) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-106-ss-3
part of: 106 Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
note: Manufacturing, possessing or controlling prohibited consumer goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.204
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 106(3) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of manufacturing, possessing or controlling prohibited consumer goods
premise text: (3) A person must not...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106(4) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-106-ss-4
part of: 106 Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
note: Defence for manufacture, possession or control of goods not for export
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.204
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-4-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 106(4) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

106(5) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-106-ss-5
part of: 106 Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
note: Exporting prohibited consumer goods without approval is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.204
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 106(5) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits export of prohibited goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106(6) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-106-ss-6
part of: 106 Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
note: Statement of approval particulars must be tabled in Parliament
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.204
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to provide statement
conclusion text: The Commonwealth Minister must cause a statement...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106(7) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-106-ss-7
part of: 106 Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
note: Supplying non-compliant consumer goods is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.204
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-7-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-7-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-7-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 106(7) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplying non-compliant consumer goods.
premise text: (7) If a person supplies consumer goods in contravention of this section;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for supply of non-compliant goods.
premise text: (7) If: (a) a person supplies consumer goods in contravention of this section;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implies loss or damage for non-compliant goods.
premise text: (7) If: (a) a person supplies consumer goods in contravention of this section;
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Spreads loss or damage for non-compliant goods.
premise text: (7) If: (a) a person supplies consumer goods in contravention of this section;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognizes non-compliant goods.
premise text: (7) If: (a) a person supplies consumer goods in contravention of this section;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107 Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-107
has part: 107(1) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
has part: 107(2) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
has part: 107(3) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.206

107(1) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-107-ss-1
part of: 107 Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
note: Supplying product related services that do not comply with safety standards is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.206
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-107-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-107-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-107-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 107(1) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-107-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplying product related services that do not comply with safety standards.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107(2) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-107-ss-2
part of: 107 Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
note: Offering prohibited product-related services in trade or commerce.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.206
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-107-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-107-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-107-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 107(2) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-107-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of offering prohibited product-related services.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107(3) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-107-ss-3
part of: 107 Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
note: If a person supplies product related services in contravention of this section, and another person suffers loss or damage because of that supply, the other person is taken to have suffered the loss or damage.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.206
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-107-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-107-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-107-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 107(3) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-107-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with safety standard
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

108 Requirements relating to alternative methods of complying
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-108
has part: 108(1) Requirements relating to alternative methods of complying
has part: 108(2) Requirements relating to alternative methods of complying
has part: 108(3) Requirements relating to alternative methods of complying
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.207

108(1) Requirements relating to alternative methods of complying
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-108-ss-1
part of: 108 Requirements relating to alternative methods of complying
note: Safety standard for consumer goods requires alternative methods of complying.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.207
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-108-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-108-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-108-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-108-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-108-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-108-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-108-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 108(1) Requirements relating to alternative methods of complying
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-108-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires compliance with safety standard.
premise text: (a) a safety standard for consumer goods, or product related services, of a particular kind is in force;
conclusion text: (1) This section applies if:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-108-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Compliance must occur during the effective period of the safety standard.
premise text: (a) a safety standard for consumer goods, or product related services, of a particular kind is in force;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-108-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Compliance must occur during the effective period of the safety standard.
premise text: (a) a safety standard for consumer goods, or product related services, of a particular kind is in force;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-108-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: specifies
logic summary: The standard specifies alternative methods of complying.
premise text: (b) the standard specifies, as alternative methods of complying with the standard (or part of the standard), 2 or more sets of requirements;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-108-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: The standard requires compliance with its provisions.
premise text: (a) a safety standard for consumer goods, or product related services, of a particular kind is in force;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

108(2) Requirements relating to alternative methods of complying
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-108-ss-2
part of: 108 Requirements relating to alternative methods of complying
note: Must nominate requirements within a specified period.
description: Written notice nominating one of the sets of requirements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.207
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-108-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-108-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-108-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 108(2) Requirements relating to alternative methods of complying
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-108-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must nominate requirements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

108(3) Requirements relating to alternative methods of complying
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-108-ss-3
part of: 108 Requirements relating to alternative methods of complying
note: Contravening subsection requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.207
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-108-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-108-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-108-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-108-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 108(3) Requirements relating to alternative methods of complying
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-108-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits actions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-108-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Relates to requirements
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

108A Requirement to give information or documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-108a
note: Provide information or documents to a regulator within a specified period.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.208
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-108a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-108a-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-108a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 108A Requirement to give information or documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-108a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information or documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

109 Interim bans on consumer goods or product related services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-109
has part: 109(1) Interim bans on consumer goods or product related services
has part: 109(2) Interim bans on consumer goods or product related services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.209

109(1) Interim bans on consumer goods or product related services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-109-ss-1
part of: 109 Interim bans on consumer goods or product related services
note: Interim ban on consumer goods of a particular kind if it appears to the responsible Minister that they will or may cause injury to any person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.209
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-109-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-109-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-109-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-109-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 109(1) Interim bans on consumer goods or product related services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-109-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a prohibition on consumer goods.
premise text: (1) A responsible Minister may, by written notice published on the internet...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-109-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies consumer goods as potentially hazardous.
premise text: (1) A responsible Minister may, by written notice published on the internet...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

109(2) Interim bans on consumer goods or product related services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-109-ss-2
part of: 109 Interim bans on consumer goods or product related services
note: Interim ban on product related services of a particular kind
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.209
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-109-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-109-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-109-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-109-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 109(2) Interim bans on consumer goods or product related services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-109-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes an interim ban on product related services
premise text: (2) A responsible Minister may, by written notice published on the internet...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-109-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the imposition of the interim ban
premise text: (2) A responsible Minister may, by written notice published on the internet...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110 Places in which interim bans apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-110
has part: 110(1) Places in which interim bans apply
has part: 110(2) Places in which interim bans apply
has part: 110(3) Places in which interim bans apply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.210

110(1) Places in which interim bans apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-110-ss-1
part of: 110 Places in which interim bans apply
note: Interim ban applies in all States and Territories.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.210
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-110-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-110-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-110-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 110(1) Places in which interim bans apply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-110-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110(2) Places in which interim bans apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-110-ss-2
part of: 110 Places in which interim bans apply
note: Interim ban applies in the State.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.210
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-110-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-110-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-110-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 110(2) Places in which interim bans apply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-110-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: (2) An interim ban...
conclusion text: Interim ban applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110(3) Places in which interim bans apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-110-ss-3
part of: 110 Places in which interim bans apply
note: Interim ban applies in the Territory where imposed by a responsible Minister.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.210
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-110-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-110-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-110-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 110(3) Places in which interim bans apply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-110-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Interim ban applies in the Territory.
premise text: (3) An interim ban imposed by a responsible Minister...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

111 Ban period for interim bans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-111
has part: 111(1) Ban period for interim bans
has part: 111(2) Ban period for interim bans
has part: 111(3) Ban period for interim bans
has part: 111(4) Ban period for interim bans
has part: 111(5) Ban period for interim bans
has part: 111(6) Ban period for interim bans
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.210

111(1) Ban period for interim bans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-111-ss-1
part of: 111 Ban period for interim bans
note: Defines the duration of an interim ban.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.210
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-111-ss-1-norm

111(2) Ban period for interim bans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-111-ss-2
part of: 111 Ban period for interim bans
note: Extend ban period by up to 30 days before its end.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.210
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-111-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-111-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-111-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-111-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 111(2) Ban period for interim bans
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-111-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grant permission
premise text: (2) Before the ban period for the interim ban ends...
conclusion text: ...the responsible Minister may, by written notice...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-111-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between two intervals
premise text: (2) Before the ban period for the interim ban ends...
conclusion text: ...by a period of up to 30 days.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

111(3) Ban period for interim bans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-111-ss-3
part of: 111 Ban period for interim bans
note: Request for extension of extended ban period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.210
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-111-ss-3-norm

111(4) Ban period for interim bans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-111-ss-4
part of: 111 Ban period for interim bans
note: Extension of extended ban period for interim ban
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.210
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-111-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-111-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-111-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-111-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Extension of extended ban period for interim ban
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-111-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

111(5) Ban period for interim bans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-111-ss-5
part of: 111 Ban period for interim bans
note: If Commonwealth Minister has not made a decision on request, extend ban period by 30 days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.210
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-111-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-111-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-111-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to extend ban period
premise text: Request made under subsection (3)
conclusion text: Commonwealth Minister is taken to have decided to extend the extended ban period for the ban by a further period of 30 days.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

111(6) Ban period for interim bans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-111-ss-6
part of: 111 Ban period for interim bans
note: Extend extended ban period for interim ban by up to 30 days
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.210
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-111-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-111-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-111-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Grant permission
premise text: (6) If...
conclusion text: the Commonwealth Minister may...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

112 Interaction of multiple interim bans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-112
note: Interaction of multiple interim bans
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.211
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-112-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-112-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 112 Interaction of multiple interim bans
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

113 Revocation of interim bans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-113
note: Responsible Minister may revoke interim ban at any time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.212
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-113-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-113-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-113-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 113 Revocation of interim bans
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-113-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to revoke
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

114 Permanent bans on consumer goods or product related services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-114
has part: 114(1) Permanent bans on consumer goods or product related services
has part: 114(2) Permanent bans on consumer goods or product related services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.212

114(1) Permanent bans on consumer goods or product related services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-114-ss-1
part of: 114 Permanent bans on consumer goods or product related services
note: Permanent ban on consumer goods of a particular kind if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.212
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-114-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-114-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-114-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-114-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-114-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-114-ss-1-logic-shacl-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-114-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 114(1) Permanent bans on consumer goods or product related services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-114-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a prohibition on consumer goods.
premise text: (a) one or more interim bans on consumer goods of that kind are in force;
conclusion text: The Commonwealth Minister may impose a permanent ban on consumer goods of a particular kind.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-114-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with existing interim bans.
premise text: (a) one or more interim bans on consumer goods of that kind are in force;
conclusion text: The permanent ban overlaps with the existing interim bans.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-114-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of consumer goods banned.
premise text: (b) it appears to the Commonwealth Minister that: (i) consumer goods of that kind will or may cause injury to any person;
conclusion text: The recurring trace is based on the potential harm caused by the consumer goods.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-114-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognizes the potential harm caused by consumer goods.
premise text: (ii) a reasonably foreseeable use (including a misuse) of consumer goods of that kind will or may cause injury to any person.
conclusion text: The recognition is based on the potential harm caused by the consumer goods.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-114-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validate
logic summary: Validates the classification of consumer goods.
premise text: (a) one or more interim bans on consumer goods of that kind are in force;
conclusion text: The validation is based on the existing interim bans.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

114(2) Permanent bans on consumer goods or product related services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-114-ss-2
part of: 114 Permanent bans on consumer goods or product related services
note: Permanent ban on product related services of a particular kind if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.212
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-114-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-114-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-114-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-114-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-114-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-114-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-114-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 114(2) Permanent bans on consumer goods or product related services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-114-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a prohibition on product related services.
premise text: one or more interim bans on product related services of that kind (the banned services), or on product related services of a kind that include the banned services, are in force
conclusion text: product related services of that kind are prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-114-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a prohibition on consumer goods of a particular kind if certain conditions are met.
premise text: it appears to the Commonwealth Minister that: as a result of services of that kind being supplied, consumer goods of a particular kind will or may cause injury to any person
conclusion text: consumer goods of a particular kind are prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-114-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Determines when the ban takes effect.
premise text: (2) The Commonwealth Minister may, by written notice published on the internet, impose a permanent ban on product related services of a particular kind if:
conclusion text: the ban overlaps with the interim bans or the services being supplied
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-114-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Determines when the ban is recurring.
premise text: (2) The Commonwealth Minister may, by written notice published on the internet, impose a permanent ban on product related services of a particular kind if:
conclusion text: the ban is recurring if certain conditions are met
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-114-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Determines how the ban spreads.
premise text: (2) The Commonwealth Minister may, by written notice published on the internet, impose a permanent ban on product related services of a particular kind if:
conclusion text: the ban spreads to other product related services if certain conditions are met
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

115 Places in which permanent bans apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-115
note: Permanent ban applies in all States and Territories.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.213
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-115-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-115-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-115-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: A permanent ban applies in all States and Territories.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

116 When permanent bans come into force
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-116
note: Permanent ban comes into force on specified day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.213
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-116-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-116-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-116-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: comes-into-force
logic summary: Deontic logic for permanent ban
premise text: The Commonwealth Minister specifies the day
conclusion text: A permanent ban comes into force
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

117 Revocation of permanent bans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-117
note: Revocation of permanent bans
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.213
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-117-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-117-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 117 Revocation of permanent bans
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

118 Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-118
has part: 118(1) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
has part: 118(2) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
has part: 118(3) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
has part: 118(4) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
has part: 118(5) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
has part: 118(6) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
has part: 118(7) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.214

118(1) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-118-ss-1
part of: 118 Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
note: Supplying consumer goods of a particular kind is prohibited if an interim or permanent ban is in force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.214
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-118-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-118-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-118-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 118(1) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-118-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of supplying consumer goods
premise text: An interim ban on consumer goods is in force.
conclusion text: Supplying consumer goods is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

118(2) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-118-ss-2
part of: 118 Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
note: Prohibits offering consumer goods covered by a ban for supply in trade or commerce.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.214
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-118-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-118-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-118-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 118(2) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-118-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits an action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

118(3) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-118-ss-3
part of: 118 Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
note: Manufacturing, possessing or controlling prohibited consumer goods is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.214
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-118-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-118-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-118-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 118(3) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-118-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of manufacturing, possessing or controlling prohibited consumer goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

118(4) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-118-ss-4
part of: 118 Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
note: Defence for manufacture, possession or control of goods not for export
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.214
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-118-ss-4-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-118-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 118(4) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

118(5) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-118-ss-5
part of: 118 Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
note: Export of prohibited consumer goods without approval is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.214
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-118-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-118-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-118-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 118(5) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-118-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

118(6) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-118-ss-6
part of: 118 Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
note: Statement of approval particulars must be tabled in Parliament
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.214
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-118-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-118-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-118-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide statement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

118(7) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-118-ss-7
part of: 118 Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
note: Liability for supplying consumer goods in contravention of subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.214
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-118-ss-7-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-118-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 118(7) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

119 Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-119
has part: 119(1) Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
has part: 119(2) Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.215

119(1) Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-119-ss-1
part of: 119 Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
note: Supplying product related services of a particular kind is prohibited if an interim or permanent ban is in force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.215
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-119-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-119-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-119-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 119(1) Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-119-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of supplying product related services.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

119(2) Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-119-ss-2
part of: 119 Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
note: Prohibits offering product-related services covered by a ban in trade or commerce.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.215
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-119-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-119-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-119-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 119(2) Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-119-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

120 Temporary exemption under the Trans-Tasman Mutual
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-120
has part: 120(1) Temporary exemption under the Trans-Tasman Mutual
has part: 120(2) Temporary exemption under the Trans-Tasman Mutual
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.216

120(1) Temporary exemption under the Trans-Tasman Mutual
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-120-ss-1
part of: 120 Temporary exemption under the Trans-Tasman Mutual
note: Goods subject to ban are exempted under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.216
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-120-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-120-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-120-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 120(1) Temporary exemption under the Trans-Tasman Mutual
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-120-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

120(2) Temporary exemption under the Trans-Tasman Mutual
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-120-ss-2
part of: 120 Temporary exemption under the Trans-Tasman Mutual
note: Section 46(4) of the Act still applies despite this exemption.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.216
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-120-ss-2-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-120-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 120(2) Temporary exemption under the Trans-Tasman Mutual
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

121 Temporary exemption under the Mutual Recognition Act 1992
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-121
has part: 121(1) Temporary exemption under the Mutual Recognition Act 1992
has part: 121(2) Temporary exemption under the Mutual Recognition Act 1992
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.216

121(1) Temporary exemption under the Mutual Recognition Act 1992
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-121-ss-1
part of: 121 Temporary exemption under the Mutual Recognition Act 1992
note: Goods subject to interim ban are treated as goods of a kind declared under the Mutual Recognition Act 1992.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.216
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-121-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-121-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-121-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-121-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-121-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-121-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-121-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 121(1) Temporary exemption under the Mutual Recognition Act 1992
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-121-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implies that goods subject to interim ban are treated as declared under the Mutual Recognition Act 1992.
premise text: (a) an interim ban on consumer goods of a particular kind is in force; and (b) the interim ban was not imposed by the Commonwealth Minister;
conclusion text: The goods are taken, for the purposes of section 15 of the Mutual Recognition Act 1992, to be goods of a kind that are declared, in the manner provided by section 15(1) of that Act, to be goods to which that section applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-121-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Indicates overlap between the interim ban and the declaration under the Mutual Recognition Act 1992.
premise text: (a) an interim ban on consumer goods of a particular kind is in force; and (b) the interim ban was not imposed by the Commonwealth Minister;
conclusion text: The goods are taken, for the purposes of section 15 of the Mutual Recognition Act 1992, to be goods of a kind that are declared, in the manner provided by section 15(1) of that Act, to be goods to which that section applies.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-121-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Indicates repetition of the declaration under the Mutual Recognition Act 1992 for goods subject to interim ban.
premise text: (a) an interim ban on consumer goods of a particular kind is in force; and (b) the interim ban was not imposed by the Commonwealth Minister;
conclusion text: The goods are taken, for the purposes of section 15 of the Mutual Recognition Act 1992, to be goods of a kind that are declared, in the manner provided by section 15(1) of that Act, to be goods to which that section applies.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-121-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spreads
logic summary: Indicates spread of the declaration under the Mutual Recognition Act 1992 to goods subject to interim ban.
premise text: (a) an interim ban on consumer goods of a particular kind is in force; and (b) the interim ban was not imposed by the Commonwealth Minister;
conclusion text: The goods are taken, for the purposes of section 15 of the Mutual Recognition Act 1992, to be goods of a kind that are declared, in the manner provided by section 15(1) of that Act, to be goods to which that section applies.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-121-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Indicates recognition of the declaration under the Mutual Recognition Act 1992 for goods subject to interim ban.
premise text: (a) an interim ban on consumer goods of a particular kind is in force; and (b) the interim ban was not imposed by the Commonwealth Minister;
conclusion text: The goods are taken, for the purposes of section 15 of the Mutual Recognition Act 1992, to be goods of a kind that are declared, in the manner provided by section 15(1) of that Act, to be goods to which that section applies.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

121(2) Temporary exemption under the Mutual Recognition Act 1992
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-121-ss-2
part of: 121 Temporary exemption under the Mutual Recognition Act 1992
note: Section 15(3) of the Mutual Recognition Act 1992 still applies despite this exemption.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.216
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-121-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-121-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-121-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: still applies
logic summary: Section 15(3) still applies despite this exemption.
premise text: This section does not affect the application of section 15(3)
conclusion text: Section 15(3) still applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

122 Compulsory recall of consumer goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-122
has part: 122(1) Compulsory recall of consumer goods
has part: 122(2) Compulsory recall of consumer goods
has part: 122(3) Compulsory recall of consumer goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.218

122(1) Compulsory recall of consumer goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-122-ss-1
part of: 122 Compulsory recall of consumer goods
note: A responsible Minister must issue a recall notice for consumer goods if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.218
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-122-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-122-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-122-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 122(1) Compulsory recall of consumer goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-122-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Minister must issue the recall notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

122(2) Compulsory recall of consumer goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-122-ss-2
part of: 122 Compulsory recall of consumer goods
note: Minister does not need to know supplier identities for compulsory recall.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.218
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-122-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-122-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-122-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 122(2) Compulsory recall of consumer goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-122-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to know supplier identities.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

122(3) Compulsory recall of consumer goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-122-ss-3
part of: 122 Compulsory recall of consumer goods
note: Recall notice may be issued even if goods have become fixtures.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.218
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-122-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-122-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-122-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-122-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Recall notice may be issued even if goods have become fixtures.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-122-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

123 Contents of a recall notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-123
has part: 123(1) Contents of a recall notice
has part: 123(2) Contents of a recall notice
has part: 123(3) Contents of a recall notice
has part: 123(4) Contents of a recall notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.218

123(1) Contents of a recall notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-123-ss-1
part of: 123 Contents of a recall notice
note: Regulator must take actions to recall goods or disclose information to the public.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.218
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-123-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-123-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-123-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-123-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 123(1) Contents of a recall notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-123-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must take actions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-123-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Recall notice requires one or more suppliers to be notified.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

123(2) Contents of a recall notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-123-ss-2
part of: 123 Contents of a recall notice
note: Specify manner and period for action required by notice.
description: (a) the manner in which the action required to be taken by the notice must be taken; (b) the period within which the action must be taken.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.218
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-123-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-123-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-123-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-123-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 123(2) Contents of a recall notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-123-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Specify manner and period for action required by notice.
premise text: (a) the manner in which the action required to be taken by the notice must be taken; (b) the period within which the action must be taken.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-123-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: WITHIN
logic summary: Specify period for action required by notice.
premise text: (b) the period within which the action must be taken.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

123(3) Contents of a recall notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-123-ss-3
part of: 123 Contents of a recall notice
note: Regulator must retain, destroy or dispose of goods.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.218
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-123-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-123-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-123-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 123(3) Contents of a recall notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-123-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator has a duty to take action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

123(4) Contents of a recall notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-123-ss-4
part of: 123 Contents of a recall notice
note: Supplier must take action if required by notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.218
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-123-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-123-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-123-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 123(4) Contents of a recall notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-123-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

124 Obligations of a supplier in relation to a recall notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-124
has part: 124(1) Obligations of a supplier in relation to a recall notice
has part: 124(2) Obligations of a supplier in relation to a recall notice
has part: 124(3) Obligations of a supplier in relation to a recall notice
has part: 124(4) Obligations of a supplier in relation to a recall notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.220

124(1) Obligations of a supplier in relation to a recall notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-124-ss-1
part of: 124 Obligations of a supplier in relation to a recall notice
note: Supplier must take action upon receipt of recall notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.220
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-124-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-124-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-124-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 124(1) Obligations of a supplier in relation to a recall notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-124-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to take action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

124(2) Obligations of a supplier in relation to a recall notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-124-ss-2
part of: 124 Obligations of a supplier in relation to a recall notice
note: Supplier must repair consumer goods to comply with safety standards and remedy defects.
description: Repair of defective goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.220
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-124-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-124-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-124-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to repair goods
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

124(3) Obligations of a supplier in relation to a recall notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-124-ss-3
part of: 124 Obligations of a supplier in relation to a recall notice
note: Supplier must replace goods with similar consumer goods that do not contain a defect or have a dangerous characteristic.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.220
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-124-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-124-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-124-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-124-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Supplier must replace goods
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-124-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval for replacement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

124(4) Obligations of a supplier in relation to a recall notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-124-ss-4
part of: 124 Obligations of a supplier in relation to a recall notice
note: Supplier must pay for repair or replacement of consumer goods.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.220
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-124-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-124-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-124-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 124(4) Obligations of a supplier in relation to a recall notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-124-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Supplier has an obligation to pay for repair or replacement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125 Notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-125
has part: 125(1) Notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside
has part: 125(2) Notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside
has part: 125(3) Notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside
has part: 125(4) Notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.221

125(1) Notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-125-ss-1
part of: 125 Notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside
note: Person who supplies consumer goods outside Australia must give written notice to the person outside Australia.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.221
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-125-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-125-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-125-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 125(1) Notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-125-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide written notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125(2) Notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-125-ss-2
part of: 125 Notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside
note: Consumer goods supplier must provide specific information in recall notices.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.221
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-125-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-125-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-125-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 125(2) Notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-125-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125(3) Notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-125-ss-3
part of: 125 Notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside
note: Must notify person outside Australia after supply of consumer goods.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.221
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-125-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-125-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-125-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 125(3) Notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-125-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125(4) Notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-125-ss-4
part of: 125 Notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside
note: Provide a copy of notice to responsible Minister within 10 days.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.221
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-125-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-125-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-125-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 125(4) Notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-125-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

126 Interaction of multiple recall notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-126
note: Interaction of multiple recall notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.221
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-126-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-126-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-126-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 126 Interaction of multiple recall notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-126-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: Recall notice issued
conclusion text: Interaction of multiple recall notices
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

127 Compliance with recall notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-127
has part: 127(1) Compliance with recall notices
has part: 127(2) Compliance with recall notices
has part: 127(3) Compliance with recall notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.222

127(1) Compliance with recall notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-127-ss-1
part of: 127 Compliance with recall notices
note: Compliance with recall notices is mandatory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.222
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-127-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-127-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-127-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Mandatory action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

127(2) Compliance with recall notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-127-ss-2
part of: 127 Compliance with recall notices
note: Prohibition on supplying consumer goods with identified defects or dangerous characteristics.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.222
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-127-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-127-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-127-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 127(2) Compliance with recall notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-127-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on supplying consumer goods with identified defects or dangerous characteristics.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

127(3) Compliance with recall notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-127-ss-3
part of: 127 Compliance with recall notices
note: Loss or damage suffered by another person due to contravention of recall notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.222
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-127-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-127-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-127-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 127(3) Compliance with recall notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-127-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide particular information in relation to goods
premise text: (3) If: a person contravenes subsection (1) or (2) in relation to consumer goods; and another person suffers loss or damage:
conclusion text: The other person is taken, for the purposes of this Schedule, to have suffered the loss or damage because of the contravention.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

128 Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-128
has part: 128(1) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
has part: 128(2) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
has part: 128(3) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.223

128(1) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-128-ss-1
part of: 128 Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
note: Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.223
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-128-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-128-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-128-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-128-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-128-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-128-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 128(1) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-128-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notification
premise text: (1) This section applies if a person voluntarily takes action to recall consumer goods of a particular kind...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-128-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEGINS
logic summary: Indicates the start of a period during which notification is required
premise text: (1) This section applies if a person voluntarily takes action to recall consumer goods of a particular kind...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-128-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BUT
logic summary: Indicates an exception to the obligation to provide notification
premise text: (a) the consumer goods will or may cause injury to any other person;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-128-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May take action without providing notification
premise text: (b) a reasonably foreseeable use (including a misuse) of the consumer goods will or may cause injury to any other person;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

128(2) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-128-ss-2
part of: 128 Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
note: Provide written notice to the Commonwealth Minister within 2 days after taking action.
description: written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.223
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-128-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-128-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-128-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 128(2) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-128-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide written notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

128(3) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-128-ss-3
part of: 128 Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
note: Publish a copy of the notice on the internet.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.223
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-128-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-128-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-128-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 128(3) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-128-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish a copy of the notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

129 Safety warning notices about consumer goods and product
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-129
has part: 129(1) Safety warning notices about consumer goods and product
has part: 129(2) Safety warning notices about consumer goods and product
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.225

129(1) Safety warning notices about consumer goods and product
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-129-ss-1
part of: 129 Safety warning notices about consumer goods and product
note: Publish safety warning notices about consumer goods and product
description: written notice containing a statement and a warning
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.225
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-129-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-129-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-129-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-129-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-129-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-129-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 129(1) Safety warning notices about consumer goods and product
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-129-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Publish safety warning notices about consumer goods and product
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-129-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Investigation of consumer goods under investigation implies publication of safety warning notices
premise text: (i) those goods will or may cause injury to any person; or (ii) a reasonably foreseeable use...
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-129-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Possible risks involved in use of consumer goods implies publication of safety warning notices
premise text: (b) a warning of possible risks involved in the use of consumer goods of a kind specified in the notice.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-129-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval for investigation and publication of safety warning notices
premise text: (i) those goods will or may cause injury to any person; or (ii) a reasonably foreseeable use...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

129(2) Safety warning notices about consumer goods and product
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-129-ss-2
part of: 129 Safety warning notices about consumer goods and product
note: Publish a written notice containing warnings about product-related services on the internet.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.225
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-129-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-129-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-129-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-129-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-129-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-129-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-129-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 129(2) Safety warning notices about consumer goods and product
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-129-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Publish a written notice containing warnings about product-related services on the internet.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-129-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for publication of written notice.
premise text: (2) A responsible Minister may publish on the internet a written notice containing one or both of the following:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-129-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Publication of written notice implies investigation into potential risks.
premise text: (2) A responsible Minister may publish on the internet a written notice containing one or both of the following:
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-129-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
logic summary: Publication of written notice spreads information about potential risks.
premise text: (2) A responsible Minister may publish on the internet a written notice containing one or both of the following:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-129-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: RECOGNIZES
logic summary: Artificial intelligence recognizes publication of written notice as a warning.
premise text: (2) A responsible Minister may publish on the internet a written notice containing one or both of the following:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

130 Announcement of the results of an investigation etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-130
note: Announcement of investigation results
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.225
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-130-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-130-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 130 Announcement of the results of an investigation etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

131 Suppliers to report consumer goods associated with the death or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-131
has part: 131(1) Suppliers to report consumer goods associated with the death or
has part: 131(2) Suppliers to report consumer goods associated with the death or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.227

131(1) Suppliers to report consumer goods associated with the death or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-131-ss-1
part of: 131 Suppliers to report consumer goods associated with the death or
note: Supplier must report death or serious injury related to consumer goods within 2 days.
description: written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.227
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-131-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-131-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-131-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 131(1) Suppliers to report consumer goods associated with the death or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-131-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Supplier must report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

131(2) Suppliers to report consumer goods associated with the death or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-131-ss-2
part of: 131 Suppliers to report consumer goods associated with the death or
note: Exemptions from liability for consumer goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.227
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-131-ss-2-norm

132 Suppliers to report product related services associated with the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132
has part: 132(1) Suppliers to report product related services associated with the
has part: 132(2) Suppliers to report product related services associated with the
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.229

132(1) Suppliers to report product related services associated with the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132-ss-1
part of: 132 Suppliers to report product related services associated with the
note: Supplier must report death or serious injury/illness caused by product use.
description: written notice to Commonwealth Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.229
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-132-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-132-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-132-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 132(1) Suppliers to report product related services associated with the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-132-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Supplier must report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132(2) Suppliers to report product related services associated with the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132-ss-2
part of: 132 Suppliers to report product related services associated with the
note: Exemptions from liability for death or serious injury/illness not caused by consumer goods use
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.229
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-132-ss-2-norm

132A Confidentiality of notices given under this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132a
has part: 132A(1) Confidentiality of notices given under this Division
has part: 132A(2) Confidentiality of notices given under this Division
has part: 132A(3) Confidentiality of notices given under this Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.231

132A(1) Confidentiality of notices given under this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132a-ss-1
part of: 132A Confidentiality of notices given under this Division
note: Disclosing confidential notices without consent is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.231
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-132a-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-132a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-132a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 132A(1) Confidentiality of notices given under this Division
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-132a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
premise text: Notice given under Division
conclusion text: Disclosing confidential notices without consent
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132A(2) Confidentiality of notices given under this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132a-ss-2
part of: 132A Confidentiality of notices given under this Division
note: Disclosure is not required under this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.231
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-132a-ss-2-norm

132A(3) Confidentiality of notices given under this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132a-ss-3
part of: 132A Confidentiality of notices given under this Division
note: Disclosure of certain information is not prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.231
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-132a-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-132a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-132a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-132a-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 132A(3) Confidentiality of notices given under this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-132a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Section does not apply to disclosures made by staff in performance of duties.
premise text: (3) This section also does not apply...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-132a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Disclosure is made because it is reasonably necessary to protect public safety.
premise text: ...and is made because it is reasonably necessary...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

133 Liability under a contract of insurance
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133
note: Liability under a contract of insurance not affected by giving information to certain authorities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.233
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-133-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-133-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-133-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 133 Liability under a contract of insurance
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-133-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134 Making information standards for goods and services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134
has part: 134(1) Making information standards for goods and services
has part: 134(2) Making information standards for goods and services
has part: 134(3) Making information standards for goods and services
has part: 134(4) Making information standards for goods and services
has part: 134(5) Making information standards for goods and services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.234

134(1) Making information standards for goods and services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134-ss-1
part of: 134 Making information standards for goods and services
note: The Commonwealth Minister may make an information standard.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.234
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-134-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-134-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-134-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 134(1) Making information standards for goods and services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-134-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to make an information standard.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134(2) Making information standards for goods and services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134-ss-2
part of: 134 Making information standards for goods and services
note: An information standard for goods or services of a particular kind may make provision in relation to the content of information about goods or services of that kind.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.234
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-134-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-134-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-134-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 134(2) Making information standards for goods and services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-134-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May make provision in relation to the content of information about goods or services of that kind.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134(3) Making information standards for goods and services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134-ss-3
part of: 134 Making information standards for goods and services
note: An information standard may also deal with matters incidental or related to the provision of information for goods or services of a particular kind.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.234
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-134-ss-3-norm

134(4) Making information standards for goods and services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134-ss-4
part of: 134 Making information standards for goods and services
note: Defines how an incorporated instrument's provisions apply to the information standard.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.234
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-134-ss-4-norm

134(5) Making information standards for goods and services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134-ss-5
part of: 134 Making information standards for goods and services
note: May make provision in relation to any matter dealt with in the incorporated instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.234
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-134-ss-5-norm

136 Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-136
has part: 136(1) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
has part: 136(1A) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
has part: 136(1B) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
has part: 136(2) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
has part: 136(3) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.235

136(1) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-136-ss-1
part of: 136 Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
note: Supplying goods that do not comply with information standard is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.235
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-136-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-136-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-136-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 136(1) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-136-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplying goods that do not comply with information standard.
premise text: (1) A person must not, in trade or commerce...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136(1A) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-136-ss-1a
part of: 136 Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
note: Compliance with a specified provision of the standard is an exception to the general obligation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.235
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-136-ss-1a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-136-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-136-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 136(1A) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-136-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: EXCEPT
logic summary: Exception to the general obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136(1B) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-136-ss-1b
part of: 136 Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
note: Person bears evidential burden in relation to matter relying on subsection (1A) in proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.235
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-136-ss-1b-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-136-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-136-ss-1b-logic-epistemic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-136-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 136(1B) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-136-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-136-ss-1b-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Evidential burden
logic summary: Person bears evidential burden in relation to matter relying on subsection (1A) in proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136(2) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-136-ss-2
part of: 136 Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
note: Offering goods that do not comply with information is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.235
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-136-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-136-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-136-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 136(2) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-136-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of offering goods that do not comply with information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136(3) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-136-ss-3
part of: 136 Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
note: Manufacturing, possessing or controlling goods not complying with information is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.235
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-136-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-136-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-136-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 136(3) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-136-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

137 Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-137
has part: 137(1) Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
has part: 137(1A) Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
has part: 137(1B) Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
has part: 137(2) Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
has part: 137(3) Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.237

137(1) Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-137-ss-1
part of: 137 Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
note: Prohibition on supplying services that do not comply with information standards.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.237
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 137(1) Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of non-compliance with information standards.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

137(1A) Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-137-ss-1a
part of: 137 Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
note: Compliance with a specified provision of the standard is an exception to subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.237
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137-ss-1a-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 137(1A) Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

137(1B) Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-137-ss-1b
part of: 137 Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
note: Person bears evidential burden in relation to matter relying on subsection (1A) in proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.237
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137-ss-1b-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137-ss-1b-logic-epistemic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 137(1B) Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137-ss-1b-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Evidential burden
logic summary: Person bears evidential burden in relation to matter
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

137(2) Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-137-ss-2
part of: 137 Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
note: Offering prohibited services in trade or commerce
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.237
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 137(2) Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of offering prohibited services
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

137(3) Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-137-ss-3
part of: 137 Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
note: Supplier must provide particular information to avoid liability for loss or damage.
description: particular information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.237
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 137(3) Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Supplier has an obligation to provide particular information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

137AA Other non-compliance with information standards
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-137aa
note: Contravening section if certain conditions met
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.237
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137aa-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137aa-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137aa-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 137AA Other non-compliance with information standards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

137A Safe harbour for complying with information standards about
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-137a
has part: 137A(1) Safe harbour for complying with information standards about
has part: 137A(2) Safe harbour for complying with information standards about
has part: 137A(3) Safe harbour for complying with information standards about
has part: 137A(4) Safe harbour for complying with information standards about
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.238

137A(1) Safe harbour for complying with information standards about
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-137a-ss-1
part of: 137A Safe harbour for complying with information standards about
note: Complying with information standards about labelling or displaying eggs as free range eggs.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.238
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137a-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 137A(1) Safe harbour for complying with information standards about
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obliges
logic summary: Obligation to comply with information standards.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

137A(2) Safe harbour for complying with information standards about
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-137a-ss-2
part of: 137A Safe harbour for complying with information standards about
note: Person bears evidential burden in proceedings
description: Evidence for matters set out in subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.238
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137a-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 137A(2) Safe harbour for complying with information standards about
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

137A(3) Safe harbour for complying with information standards about
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-137a-ss-3
part of: 137A Safe harbour for complying with information standards about
note: Definition of an egg
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.238
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137a-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 137A(3) Safe harbour for complying with information standards about
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition
conclusion text: An egg is an egg laid by a female domestic chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

137A(4) Safe harbour for complying with information standards about
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-137a-ss-4
part of: 137A Safe harbour for complying with information standards about
note: Defines 'free range egg'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.238
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137a-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines a term
conclusion text: Free range egg has the meaning given by the information standard mentioned in paragraph (1)(a).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

137B Requirement to give information or documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-137b
note: Provide information or documents to a regulator within a specified period.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.239
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137b-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137b-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 137B Requirement to give information or documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-137b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information or documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

138 Liability for loss or damage suffered by an injured individual
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-138
has part: 138(1) Liability for loss or damage suffered by an injured individual
has part: 138(2) Liability for loss or damage suffered by an injured individual
has part: 138(3) Liability for loss or damage suffered by an injured individual
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.240

138(1) Liability for loss or damage suffered by an injured individual
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-138-ss-1
part of: 138 Liability for loss or damage suffered by an injured individual
note: Manufacturer liable for compensation if goods have safety defect and cause injury.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.240
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-138-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-138-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-138-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-138-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-138-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-138-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-138-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 138(1) Liability for loss or damage suffered by an injured individual
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-138-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Manufacturer has an obligation to compensate.
premise text: (1) A manufacturer of goods is liable...
conclusion text: ...if the individual suffers injuries because of the safety defect.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-138-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relationship between supply and injury.
premise text: (a) the manufacturer supplies the goods in trade or commerce;
conclusion text: ...and (c) the individual suffers injuries because of the safety defect.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-138-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Supply implies injury if goods have a safety defect.
premise text: (a) the manufacturer supplies the goods in trade or commerce;
conclusion text: ...and (b) the goods have a safety defect.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-138-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Injury propagates from supply to individual if goods have a safety defect.
premise text: (a) the manufacturer supplies the goods in trade or commerce;
conclusion text: ...and (c) the individual suffers injuries because of the safety defect.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-138-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
logic summary: Goods are classified as having a safety defect if they cause injury.
premise text: (a) the manufacturer supplies the goods in trade or commerce;
conclusion text: ...and (b) the goods have a safety defect.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

138(2) Liability for loss or damage suffered by an injured individual
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-138-ss-2
part of: 138 Liability for loss or damage suffered by an injured individual
note: Individual can recover loss or damage from manufacturer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.240
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-138-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-138-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-138-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Ability to recover
premise text: Individual has suffered loss or damage
conclusion text: Manufacturer must provide recovery
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

138(3) Liability for loss or damage suffered by an injured individual
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-138-ss-3
part of: 138 Liability for loss or damage suffered by an injured individual
note: Liability for loss or damage suffered by an injured individual
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.240
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-138-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-138-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-138-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 138(3) Liability for loss or damage suffered by an injured individual
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-138-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obliges
logic summary: States are obligated to provide liability for loss or damage suffered by an injured individual
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

139 Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person other than an
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-139
has part: 139(1) Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person other than an
has part: 139(2) Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person other than an
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.240

139(1) Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person other than an
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-139-ss-1
part of: 139 Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person other than an
note: Manufacturer liable for compensation if goods have safety defects and cause injury or death.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.240
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-139-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-139-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-139-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 139(1) Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person other than an
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-139-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Manufacturer has an obligation to compensate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

139(2) Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person other than an
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-139-ss-2
part of: 139 Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person other than an
note: Person may recover loss or damage from manufacturer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.240
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-139-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-139-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-139-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 139(2) Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person other than an
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-139-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to compensate for loss or damage.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

140 Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person if other goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-140
has part: 140(1) Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person if other goods
has part: 140(2) Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person if other goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.241

140(1) Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person if other goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-140-ss-1
part of: 140 Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person if other goods
note: Manufacturer liable for loss or damage caused by safety defect in goods supplied in trade or commerce.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.241
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-140-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-140-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-140-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-140-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-140-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-140-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 140(1) Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person if other goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-140-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Manufacturer has an obligation to compensate a person for loss or damage caused by safety defect.
premise text: (1) A manufacturer of goods is liable to compensate a person if...
conclusion text: ...the person suffers loss or damage as a result of the destruction or damage.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-140-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
logic summary: The destruction or damage of goods occurs between the time the person uses or consumes, or intends to use or consume, the goods and the time the person suffers loss or damage.
premise text: (d) the person used or consumed, or intended to use or consume,...the destroyed or damaged goods for personal, domestic or household use or consumption;
conclusion text: ...and (e) the person suffers loss or damage as a result of the destruction or damage.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-140-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: The destruction or damage of goods occurs until the time the person suffers loss or damage.
premise text: (c) other goods of a kind ordinarily acquired for personal, domestic or household use or consumption are destroyed or damaged because of the safety defect;
conclusion text: ...and (e) the person suffers loss or damage as a result of the destruction or damage.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-140-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: If the manufacturer supplies goods in trade or commerce, and the goods have a safety defect, then the manufacturer is liable to compensate a person for loss or damage caused by the safety defect.
premise text: (a) the manufacturer supplies the goods in trade or commerce;
conclusion text: ...the person suffers loss or damage as a result of the destruction or damage.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

140(2) Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person if other goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-140-ss-2
part of: 140 Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person if other goods
note: Person may recover loss or damage from manufacturer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.241
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-140-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-140-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-140-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 140(2) Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person if other goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-140-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to compensate for loss or damage.
conclusion text: The person may recover...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

141 Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person if land,
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-141
note: Manufacturer liable for compensation if goods have safety defect and supplied in trade or commerce.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.241
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-141-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-141-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-141-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 141 Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person if land,
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-141-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Liability
logic summary: Obligation to compensate
premise text: Goods have safety defect and supplied in trade or commerce
conclusion text: Manufacturer liable for compensation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

142 Defences to defective goods actions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-142
note: Defence against liability for defective goods actions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.242
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-142-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-142-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-142-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-142-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-142-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-142-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-142-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 142 Defences to defective goods actions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-142-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Liability obligation
premise text: The manufacturer must provide a defence against liability for defective goods actions.
conclusion text: If the defence is established, the liability is discharged.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-142-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defence overlap with liability period
premise text: The defence applies to a period before the goods were supplied by their actual manufacturer.
conclusion text: If the defence overlaps with the liability period, the liability is discharged.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-142-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Defence implication for liability discharge
premise text: If the defence is established, the liability is discharged.
conclusion text: The defence implies a discharge of liability.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-142-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Defence diffusion to other goods
premise text: The safety defect in other goods is attributable only to the design, markings, or instructions of those goods.
conclusion text: The defence diffuses to other goods with the same safety defect.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-142-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Defence recognition by AI
premise text: The defence can be recognized by artificial intelligence systems.
conclusion text: The defence is recognized by AI systems.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143 Time for commencing defective goods actions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-143
has part: 143(1) Time for commencing defective goods actions
has part: 143(2) Time for commencing defective goods actions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.243

143(1) Time for commencing defective goods actions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-143-ss-1
part of: 143 Time for commencing defective goods actions
note: Time for commencing defective goods actions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.243
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-143-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-143-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-143-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-143-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-143-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 143(1) Time for commencing defective goods actions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-143-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Can commence action at any time within 3 years
premise text: (2) does not apply
conclusion text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-143-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: must know
logic summary: Must be aware of loss/damage/safety defect
premise text: (a) and (b)
conclusion text: (c)
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-143-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: within
logic summary: Within 3 years after becoming aware
premise text: (2) does not apply
conclusion text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143(2) Time for commencing defective goods actions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-143-ss-2
part of: 143 Time for commencing defective goods actions
note: Defective goods action must be commenced within 10 years of supply by the manufacturer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.243
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-143-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-143-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-143-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 143(2) Time for commencing defective goods actions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-143-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to commence action within time limit
premise text: Supply by manufacturer
conclusion text: Defective goods action must be commenced
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

144 Liability joint and several
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-144
note: Joint and several liability for multiple persons liable under Division 1.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.243
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-144-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-144-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 144 Liability joint and several
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

145 Survival of actions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-145
note: Survival of actions under this law applies to actions under other laws.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.243
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-145-norm

146 No defective goods action where workers’ compensation law etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-146
note: No defective goods action where workers’ compensation law etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.243
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-146-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-146-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-146-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-146-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-146-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-146-logic-deontic-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-146-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits applying Division 1 to certain losses or damages
premise text: Division 1 does not apply to a loss or damage in respect of which an amount has been, or could be, recovered under a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory that:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-146-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permits recovery under Commonwealth, State, or Territory law for certain losses or damages
premise text: an amount has been, or could be, recovered under a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory that:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-146-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Losses or damages overlap with workers’ compensation and international agreements
premise text: (a) relates to workers’ compensation; or (b) gives effect to an international agreement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-146-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Contains
logic summary: Losses or damages are contained within workers’ compensation and international agreements
premise text: (a) relates to workers’ compensation; or (b) gives effect to an international agreement.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-146-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on Commonwealth, State, or Territory law for certain losses or damages
premise text: an amount has been, or could be, recovered under a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory that:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

147 Unidentified manufacturer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-147
has part: 147(1) Unidentified manufacturer
has part: 147(2) Unidentified manufacturer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.244

147(1) Unidentified manufacturer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-147-ss-1
part of: 147 Unidentified manufacturer
note: Request for manufacturer information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.244
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-147-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-147-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-147-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-147-ss-1-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-147-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-147-ss-1-logic-n3logic-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-147-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 147(1) Unidentified manufacturer
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-147-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to request manufacturer info
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-147-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Request for information within a time frame
premise text: (1) A person who: (a) wishes to institute a defective goods action; but (b) does not know who is the manufacturer of the goods to which the action would relate;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-147-ss-1-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information dissemination
logic summary: Notification of supplier(s)
premise text: (1) A person who: (a) wishes to institute a defective goods action; but (b) does not know who is the manufacturer of the goods to which the action would relate;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-147-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Request for information
logic summary: Request for supplier(s) to provide info
premise text: (1) A person who: (a) wishes to institute a defective goods action; but (b) does not know who is the manufacturer of the goods to which the action would relate;
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-147-ss-1-logic-n3logic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: N3Logic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Identify goods manufacturer using ontology
premise text: (1) A person who: (a) wishes to institute a defective goods action; but (b) does not know who is the manufacturer of the goods to which the action would relate;
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

147(2) Unidentified manufacturer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-147-ss-2
part of: 147 Unidentified manufacturer
note: Supplier must identify manufacturer if person still unknown after 30 days
description: Identification of manufacturer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.244
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-147-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-147-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-147-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Supplier has an obligation to identify manufacturer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148 Commonwealth liability for goods that are defective only
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-148
has part: 148(1) Commonwealth liability for goods that are defective only
has part: 148(2) Commonwealth liability for goods that are defective only
has part: 148(3) Commonwealth liability for goods that are defective only
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.244

148(1) Commonwealth liability for goods that are defective only
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-148-ss-1
part of: 148 Commonwealth liability for goods that are defective only
note: Provide notice and copy of defence in action
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.244
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-148-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-148-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-148-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 148(1) Commonwealth liability for goods that are defective only
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-148-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice and copy of defence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148(2) Commonwealth liability for goods that are defective only
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-148-ss-2
part of: 148 Commonwealth liability for goods that are defective only
note: Commonwealth liable for goods that are defective only
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.244
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-148-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-148-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-148-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 148(2) Commonwealth liability for goods that are defective only
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-148-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice and defence
conclusion text: The Commonwealth is a defendant in the action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148(3) Commonwealth liability for goods that are defective only
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-148-ss-3
part of: 148 Commonwealth liability for goods that are defective only
note: Liability for goods with safety defects
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.244
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-148-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-148-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-148-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Commonwealth is liable to pay for loss or damage caused by safety defect
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

149 Representative actions by the regulator
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-149
has part: 149(1) Representative actions by the regulator
has part: 149(2) Representative actions by the regulator
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.245

149(1) Representative actions by the regulator
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-149-ss-1
part of: 149 Representative actions by the regulator
note: The regulator may commence a defective goods action on behalf of identified persons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.245
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-149-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-149-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-149-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 149(1) Representative actions by the regulator
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-149-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Regulator's power to commence action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

149(2) Representative actions by the regulator
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-149-ss-2
part of: 149 Representative actions by the regulator
note: Regulator must obtain written consent before making an application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.245
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-149-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-149-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-149-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 149(2) Representative actions by the regulator
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-149-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator has a duty to obtain consent.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

150 Application of all or any provisions of this Part etc. not to be
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-150
has part: 150(1) Application of all or any provisions of this Part etc. not to be
has part: 150(2) Application of all or any provisions of this Part etc. not to be
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.246

150(1) Application of all or any provisions of this Part etc. not to be
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-150-ss-1
part of: 150 Application of all or any provisions of this Part etc. not to be
note: Exclusion of provisions is void
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.246
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-150-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-150-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-150-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Exclusion of provisions is prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

150(2) Application of all or any provisions of this Part etc. not to be
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-150-ss-2
part of: 150 Application of all or any provisions of this Part etc. not to be
note: Application of provisions not excluded or modified by contract terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.246
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-150-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-150-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-150-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 150(2) Application of all or any provisions of this Part etc. not to be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-150-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
logic summary: Exclusion of application
premise text: Contract term
conclusion text: Provision applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151 False or misleading representations about goods or services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-151
note: Making false or misleading representations about goods or services is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.247
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-151-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-151-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-151-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-151-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 151 False or misleading representations about goods or services
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-151-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making false or misleading representations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-151-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies goods or services as being of a particular standard, quality, value, grade, composition, style or model.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

152 False or misleading representations about sale etc. of land
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-152
note: Making false or misleading representations about sale etc. of land
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.249
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-152-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-152-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-152-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-152-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 152 False or misleading representations about sale etc. of land
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-152-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making false or misleading representations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-152-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies as a prohibition
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

153 Misleading conduct relating to employment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-153
has part: 153(1) Misleading conduct relating to employment
has part: 153(2) Misleading conduct relating to employment
has part: 153(3) Misleading conduct relating to employment
has part: 153(4) Misleading conduct relating to employment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.250

153(1) Misleading conduct relating to employment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-153-ss-1
part of: 153 Misleading conduct relating to employment
note: Misleading conduct relating to employment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.250
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-153-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-153-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-153-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 153(1) Misleading conduct relating to employment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-153-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits misleading conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

153(2) Misleading conduct relating to employment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-153-ss-2
part of: 153 Misleading conduct relating to employment
note: Misleading conduct relating to employment is an offence of strict liability.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.250
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-153-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-153-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-153-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 153(2) Misleading conduct relating to employment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-153-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits misleading conduct relating to employment
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
conclusion text: Penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

153(3) Misleading conduct relating to employment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-153-ss-3
part of: 153 Misleading conduct relating to employment
note: Offence against subsection (1) committed by a body corporate is punishable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.250
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-153-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-153-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-153-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-153-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-153-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-153-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-153-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits an offence against subsection (1) committed by a body corporate
premise text: (3) An offence against subsection (1) committed by a body corporate is punishable on conviction...
conclusion text: ...is punishable on conviction by a fine of not more than the greater...of (a) or (b) or (c)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-153-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Relates to a specific time period
premise text: ...not more than the greater...of (a) or (b) or (c)
conclusion text: ...is punishable on conviction by a fine of not more than the greater...of (a) or (b) or (c)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-153-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Involves a recurring pattern
premise text: ...not more than the greater...of (a) or (b) or (c)
conclusion text: ...is punishable on conviction by a fine of not more than the greater...of (a) or (b) or (c)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-153-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses responsibility
premise text: (3) An offence against subsection (1) committed by a body corporate...
conclusion text: ...is punishable on conviction by a fine of not more than the greater...of (a) or (b) or (c)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-153-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Involves an implication
premise text: (3) An offence against subsection (1) committed by a body corporate...
conclusion text: ...is punishable on conviction by a fine of not more than the greater...of (a) or (b) or (c)
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

153(4) Misleading conduct relating to employment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-153-ss-4
part of: 153 Misleading conduct relating to employment
note: Offence against subsection (1) punishable by fine not exceeding $2,500,000
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.250
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-153-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-153-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-153-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-153-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-153-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-153-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-153-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 153(4) Misleading conduct relating to employment
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-153-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
premise text: (4) An offence against subsection (1)
conclusion text: punishable on conviction by a fine of not more than $2,500,000.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-153-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Establishes temporal relation between subsections
premise text: (4) An offence against subsection (1)
conclusion text: subsection (1) and section 153(4)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-153-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Establishes recurring trace of conduct
premise text: (4) An offence against subsection (1)
conclusion text: misleading conduct relating to employment
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-153-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses information about conduct
premise text: (4) An offence against subsection (1)
conclusion text: misleading conduct relating to employment
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-153-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies conduct as an offence using AI
premise text: (4) An offence against subsection (1)
conclusion text: misleading conduct relating to employment
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

154 Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-154
note: Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc. is prohibited in trade or commerce.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.251
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-154-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-154-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-154-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-154-logic-alleninterval-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-154-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 154 Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-154-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...the offer is connected with...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-154-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of goods or services as prohibited
premise text: (i) the supply or possible supply of goods or services;
conclusion text: ...or (ii) the promotion by any means...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-154-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for prohibition
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...the offer is connected with...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

155 Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-155
has part: 155(1) Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of goods
has part: 155(2) Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.253

155(1) Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-155-ss-1
part of: 155 Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of goods
note: Misleading conduct in trade or commerce is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.253
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-155-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-155-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-155-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 155(1) Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of goods
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-155-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits misleading conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

155(2) Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-155-ss-2
part of: 155 Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of goods
note: Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of goods is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.253
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-155-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-155-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-155-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-155-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-155-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-155-ss-2-logic-shacl-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-155-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 155(2) Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-155-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
conclusion text: Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of goods is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-155-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for prohibition
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
conclusion text: Subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-155-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for prohibition
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
conclusion text: Subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-155-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Entity Recognition
logic summary: Recognizes entity for prohibition
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
conclusion text: Subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-155-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema Validation
logic summary: Validates schema for prohibition
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
conclusion text: Subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156 Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-156
has part: 156(1) Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of services
has part: 156(2) Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of services
has part: 156(3) Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of services
has part: 156(4) Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.254

156(1) Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-156-ss-1
part of: 156 Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of services
note: Misleading conduct in trade or commerce is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.254
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-156-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-156-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-156-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 156(1) Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of services
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-156-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits misleading conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156(2) Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-156-ss-2
part of: 156 Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of services
note: Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of services is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.254
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-156-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-156-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-156-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 156(2) Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-156-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits misleading conduct
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
conclusion text: Penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156(3) Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-156-ss-3
part of: 156 Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of services
note: Offence punishable by fine not exceeding $100,000,000 or 3 times the value of benefit obtained directly or indirectly.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.254
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-156-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-156-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-156-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits certain conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156(4) Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-156-ss-4
part of: 156 Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of services
note: Offence punishable by fine of up to $2,500,000
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.254
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-156-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-156-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-156-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156(4) Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of services
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-156-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on individuals
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

157 Bait advertising
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-157
has part: 157(1) Bait advertising
has part: 157(2) Bait advertising
has part: 157(3) Bait advertising
has part: 157(3A) Bait advertising
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.255

157(1) Bait advertising
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-157-ss-1
part of: 157 Bait advertising
note: Advertising goods or services at a specified price without reasonable grounds for believing it can be fulfilled.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.255
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-157-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-157-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-157-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-157-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-157-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-157-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-157-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 157(1) Bait advertising
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-157-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits advertising goods or services at a specified price without reasonable grounds.
premise text: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, advertises goods or services for supply at a specified price; and
conclusion text: there is an offence if (b) there are reasonable grounds for believing that the person will not be able to offer for supply those goods or services at that price for a period that is, and in quantities that are, reasonable.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-157-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with the concept of 'reasonable grounds' in terms of temporal intervals.
premise text: (i) the nature of the market in which the person carries on business; and
conclusion text: (ii) the nature of the advertisement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-157-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of advertising goods or services at a specified price without reasonable grounds.
premise text: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, advertises goods or services for supply at a specified price; and
conclusion text: there is an offence if (b) there are reasonable grounds for believing that the person will not be able to offer for supply those goods or services at that price for a period that is, and in quantities that are, reasonable.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-157-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses the concept of 'reasonable grounds' through the market.
premise text: (i) the nature of the market in which the person carries on business; and
conclusion text: (ii) the nature of the advertisement.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-157-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognizes the need for 'reasonable grounds' in advertising.
premise text: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, advertises goods or services for supply at a specified price; and
conclusion text: (b) there are reasonable grounds for believing that the person will not be able to offer for supply those goods or services at that price for a period that is, and in quantities that are, reasonable.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

157(2) Bait advertising
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-157-ss-2
part of: 157 Bait advertising
note: Advertising goods or services at a specified price without offering them for supply at that price is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.255
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-157-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-157-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-157-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-157-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-157-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-157-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-157-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 157(2) Bait advertising
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-157-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of advertising goods or services at a specified price without offering them for supply.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the person fails to offer such goods or services for supply at that price...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-157-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval of the prohibited act.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the person fails to offer such goods or services for supply at that price...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-157-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of the prohibited act.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the person fails to offer such goods or services for supply at that price...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-157-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of the prohibited act.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the person fails to offer such goods or services for supply at that price...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-157-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CogAI
logic summary: Cognitive AI application.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the person fails to offer such goods or services for supply at that price...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

157(3) Bait advertising
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-157-ss-3
part of: 157 Bait advertising
note: Bait advertising is an offence of strict liability.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.255
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-157-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-157-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-157-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 157(3) Bait advertising
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-157-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits bait advertising
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

157(3A) Bait advertising
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-157-ss-3a
part of: 157 Bait advertising
note: Offence against subsection (1) or (2) committed by a body corporate is punishable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.255
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-157-ss-3a-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-157-ss-3a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 157(3A) Bait advertising
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

158 Wrongly accepting payment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-158
has part: 158(1) Wrongly accepting payment
has part: 158(2) Wrongly accepting payment
has part: 158(3) Wrongly accepting payment
has part: 158(4) Wrongly accepting payment
has part: 158(5) Wrongly accepting payment
has part: 158(6) Wrongly accepting payment
has part: 158(7) Wrongly accepting payment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.256

158(1) Wrongly accepting payment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-158-ss-1
part of: 158 Wrongly accepting payment
note: Accepting payment for goods or services without intention to supply is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.256
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-1-logic-shacl-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 158(1) Wrongly accepting payment
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of accepting payment without intention to supply.
premise text: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, accepts payment or other consideration for goods or services; and (b) at the time of the acceptance, the person intends not to supply the goods or services.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between accepting payment and intention to supply.
premise text: (b) at the time of the acceptance, the person intends not to supply the goods or services.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of accepting payment without intention to supply.
premise text: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, accepts payment or other consideration for goods or services; and (b) at the time of the acceptance, the person intends not to supply the goods or services.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation of accepting payment as a prohibited act.
premise text: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, accepts payment or other consideration for goods or services; and (b) at the time of the acceptance, the person intends not to supply the goods or services.
conclusion text: The Australian Consumer Law Schedule 2 Offences Chapter 4 Offences relating to unfair practices Part 4-1 Section 158
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema validation
logic summary: Schema validation of accepting payment as a prohibited act.
premise text: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, accepts payment or other consideration for goods or services; and (b) at the time of the acceptance, the person intends not to supply the goods or services.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

158(2) Wrongly accepting payment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-158-ss-2
part of: 158 Wrongly accepting payment
note: Strict liability applies to subsection (1)(a).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.256
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-2-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 158(2) Wrongly accepting payment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

158(3) Wrongly accepting payment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-158-ss-3
part of: 158 Wrongly accepting payment
note: Accepting payment for goods or services with intention to supply different goods/services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.256
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-3-logic-ltl-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 158(3) Wrongly accepting payment
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of accepting payment for goods or services with intention to supply different goods/services
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, accepts payment or other consideration for goods or services; and (b) at the time of the acceptance, the person intends to supply goods or services materially different from the goods or services in respect of which the payment or other consideration is accepted.
conclusion text: (3) A person commits an offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Trace
logic summary: Tracing the temporal relationship between accepting payment and supplying different goods/services
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, accepts payment or other consideration for goods or services; and (b) at the time of the acceptance, the person intends to supply goods or services materially different from the goods or services in respect of which the payment or other consideration is accepted.
conclusion text: (3) A person commits an offence
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

158(4) Wrongly accepting payment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-158-ss-4
part of: 158 Wrongly accepting payment
note: Strict liability applies to subsection (3)(a).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.256
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 158(4) Wrongly accepting payment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Strict liability obligation
premise text: (4) Strict liability applies to subsection (3)(a).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

158(5) Wrongly accepting payment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-158-ss-5
part of: 158 Wrongly accepting payment
note: Accepting payment without being able to supply goods or services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.256
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-5-logic-deontic-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 158(5) Wrongly accepting payment
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide goods or services
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Temporal interval for supplying goods or services
premise text: (5) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, accepts payment or other consideration for goods or services; and (b) at the time of the acceptance, the person was reckless as to whether he or she would be able to supply the goods or services:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring obligation to provide goods or services
premise text: (5) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, accepts payment or other consideration for goods or services; and (b) at the time of the acceptance, the person was reckless as to whether he or she would be able to supply the goods or services:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on accepting payment without being able to supply goods or services
premise text: (5) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, accepts payment or other consideration for goods or services; and (b) at the time of the acceptance, the person was reckless as to whether he or she would be able to supply the goods or services:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-5-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide goods or services within a reasonable time
premise text: (5) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, accepts payment or other consideration for goods or services; and (b) at the time of the acceptance, the person was reckless as to whether he or she would be able to supply the goods or services:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

158(6) Wrongly accepting payment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-158-ss-6
part of: 158 Wrongly accepting payment
note: Strict liability applies to subsection (5)(a)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.256
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 158(6) Wrongly accepting payment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state
premise text: (6) Strict liability applies to subsection (5)(a)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

158(7) Wrongly accepting payment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-158-ss-7
part of: 158 Wrongly accepting payment
note: Accepting payment without supplying goods or services within the specified time.
description: Supply of goods or services within the specified time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.256
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-7-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 158(7) Wrongly accepting payment
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-158-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to supply goods or services
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

159 Misleading representations about certain business activities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-159
has part: 159(1) Misleading representations about certain business activities
has part: 159(2) Misleading representations about certain business activities
has part: 159(3) Misleading representations about certain business activities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.259

159(1) Misleading representations about certain business activities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-159-ss-1
part of: 159 Misleading representations about certain business activities
note: Making false or misleading representations about business activities is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.259
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-159-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-159-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-159-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-159-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-159-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-159-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-159-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 159(1) Misleading representations about certain business activities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-159-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making false or misleading representations.
premise text: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, makes a representation;
conclusion text: A person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-159-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with representations about material aspects of business activities.
premise text: (c) the representation concerns the profitability, risk or any other material aspect of any business activity that the person has represented as one that can be, or can be to a considerable extent, carried on at or from a person’s place of residence.
conclusion text: The representation is about material aspects of business activities.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-159-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace for representations about business activities.
premise text: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, makes a representation;
conclusion text: The person makes a representation in trade or commerce.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-159-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Spreads to representations about business activities.
premise text: (b) the representation is false or misleading in a material particular;
conclusion text: The representation is false or misleading in a material particular.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-159-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
logic summary: Analyzes representations about business activities.
premise text: (c) the representation concerns the profitability, risk or any other material aspect of any business activity that the person has represented as one that can be, or can be to a considerable extent, carried on at or from a person’s place of residence.
conclusion text: The representation is about material aspects of business activities.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

159(2) Misleading representations about certain business activities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-159-ss-2
part of: 159 Misleading representations about certain business activities
note: Making false or misleading representations about business activities is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.259
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-159-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-159-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-159-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-159-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-159-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-159-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-159-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 159(2) Misleading representations about certain business activities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-159-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of false or misleading representations
premise text: The person makes a representation.
conclusion text: An offence is committed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-159-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between representations and business activities
premise text: The representation requires the performance of work by other persons, or the investment of money by other persons and the performance by them of work associated with the investment.
conclusion text: There is an overlap between the representation and the business activity.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-159-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of false or misleading representations
premise text: The person, in trade or commerce, makes a representation.
conclusion text: A recurring pattern of false or misleading representations is detected.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-159-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Spread of false or misleading information through business activities
premise text: The person invites other persons to engage or participate in, or to offer or apply to engage or participate in the business activity.
conclusion text: False or misleading information is spread through the business activity.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-159-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
logic summary: Analysis of representations and business activities for accuracy
premise text: The representation is false or misleading in a material part.
conclusion text: The representation is inaccurate.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

159(3) Misleading representations about certain business activities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-159-ss-3
part of: 159 Misleading representations about certain business activities
note: Offence of strict liability for misleading representations about certain business activities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.259
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-159-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-159-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-159-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 159(3) Misleading representations about certain business activities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-159-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits actions
premise text: (3) Subsections (1) and (2)
conclusion text: offence of strict liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

160 Application of provisions of this Division to information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-160
has part: 160(1) Application of provisions of this Division to information
has part: 160(2) Application of provisions of this Division to information
has part: 160(3) Application of provisions of this Division to information
has part: 160(4) Application of provisions of this Division to information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.260

160(1) Application of provisions of this Division to information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-160-ss-1
part of: 160 Application of provisions of this Division to information
note: Publication of certain information is prohibited for specific entities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.260
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-160-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-160-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-160-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-160-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-160-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-160-ss-1-logic-ltl-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-160-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (1) Sections 151, 152, 155, 156 and 159 do not apply to a publication of matter by an information provider if:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-160-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Publication of certain information is prohibited for specific entities.
premise text: (a) in any case—the information provider made the publication in the course of carrying on a business of providing information;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-160-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Publication of certain information is prohibited for specific entities.
premise text: (b) if the information provider is the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, the Special Broadcasting Service Corporation or the holder of a licence granted under the Broadcasting Services Act 1992—the publication was by way of a radio or television broadcast by the information provider.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-160-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for prohibition
premise text: (1) Sections 151, 152, 155, 156 and 159 do not apply to a publication of matter by an information provider if:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-160-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for prohibition
premise text: (1) Sections 151, 152, 155, 156 and 159 do not apply to a publication of matter by an information provider if:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

160(2) Application of provisions of this Division to information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-160-ss-2
part of: 160 Application of provisions of this Division to information
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for publications of advertisements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.260
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-160-ss-2-norm

160(3) Application of provisions of this Division to information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-160-ss-3
part of: 160 Application of provisions of this Division to information
note: Exemptions for publications of matter in connection with supply or use of goods or services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.260
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-160-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-160-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-160-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-160-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-160-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-160-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-160-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Exemptions for publications of matter in connection with supply or use of goods or services
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-160-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy for types of publications
premise text: Publication is made on behalf of, or pursuant to a contract, arrangement or understanding with a person who supplies goods or services of the same kind as the publicised goods or services.
conclusion text: The publication is exempt from subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-160-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy for types of publications
premise text: Publication is made on behalf of, or pursuant to a contract, arrangement or understanding with a body corporate that is related to a body corporate that supplies goods or services of the same kind as the publicised goods or services.
conclusion text: The publication is exempt from subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-160-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy for types of publications
premise text: Publication is made by an information provider who supplies goods or services of the same kind as the publicised goods or services.
conclusion text: The publication is exempt from subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-160-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy for types of publications
premise text: Publication is made by a body corporate that supplies goods or services of the same kind as the publicised goods or services.
conclusion text: The publication is exempt from subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

160(4) Application of provisions of this Division to information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-160-ss-4
part of: 160 Application of provisions of this Division to information
note: Exemptions from subsection (1) for certain publications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.260
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-160-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-160-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-160-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-160-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Exemptions from subsection (1) for certain publications
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-160-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: The publicised interests in land are of a kind sold or granted by the information provider.
conclusion text: The exemption applies to publications of matter related to the sale or grant of these interests.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

161 Unsolicited cards etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-161
has part: 161(1) Unsolicited cards etc.
has part: 161(2) Unsolicited cards etc.
has part: 161(3) Unsolicited cards etc.
has part: 161(4) Unsolicited cards etc.
has part: 161(5) Unsolicited cards etc.
has part: 161(6) Unsolicited cards etc.
has part: 161(7) Unsolicited cards etc.
has part: 161(8) Unsolicited cards etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.262

161(1) Unsolicited cards etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-161-ss-1
part of: 161 Unsolicited cards etc.
note: Sending unsolicited credit or debit cards is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.262
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 161(1) Unsolicited cards etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits sending unsolicited credit or debit cards.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

161(2) Unsolicited cards etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-161-ss-2
part of: 161 Unsolicited cards etc.
note: Exemption from liability for unsolicited cards sent under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.262
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to send unsolicited cards
premise text: The person sends the card to the other person pursuant to a written request
conclusion text: No liability applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

161(3) Unsolicited cards etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-161-ss-3
part of: 161 Unsolicited cards etc.
note: Taking action to enable another person to use a credit card as a debit card is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.262
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 161(3) Unsolicited cards etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits taking action to enable another person to use a credit card as a debit card.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if the person takes any action that enables another person who has a credit card to use the card as a debit card.
conclusion text: Taking action to enable another person to use a credit card as a debit card is an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relation between taking action and committing an offence.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if the person takes any action that enables another person who has a credit card to use the card as a debit card.
conclusion text: Taking action before committing an offence is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Establishes a recurring trace of taking action and committing an offence.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if the person takes any action that enables another person who has a credit card to use the card as a debit card.
conclusion text: Taking action repeatedly is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses the prohibition through taking action and committing an offence.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if the person takes any action that enables another person who has a credit card to use the card as a debit card.
conclusion text: The diffusion of the prohibition is established.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
logic summary: Classifies the provision as a prohibition using CogAI.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if the person takes any action that enables another person who has a credit card to use the card as a debit card.
conclusion text: The provision is classified as a prohibition using CogAI.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

161(4) Unsolicited cards etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-161-ss-4
part of: 161 Unsolicited cards etc.
note: Taking action to enable another person to use a debit card as a credit card is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.262
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 161(4) Unsolicited cards etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of enabling debit card use as credit card
premise text: (4) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...the person takes any action...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

161(5) Unsolicited cards etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-161-ss-5
part of: 161 Unsolicited cards etc.
note: Exemption from subsection (3) or (4) if action is taken in accordance with written request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.262
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 161(5) Unsolicited cards etc.
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to take action without subsection (3) or (4) applying.
premise text: (5) Subsection (3) or (4) does not apply...
conclusion text: ...if the person takes the action in accordance with the other person’s written request.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Action taken must overlap with written request.
premise text: (5) Subsection (3) or (4) does not apply...
conclusion text: ...if the person takes the action in accordance with the other person’s written request.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Action taken must repeat the written request.
premise text: (5) Subsection (3) or (4) does not apply...
conclusion text: ...if the person takes the action in accordance with the other person’s written request.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Written request must diffuse to all relevant parties.
premise text: (5) Subsection (3) or (4) does not apply...
conclusion text: ...if the person takes the action in accordance with the other person’s written request.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: System recognizes exemption based on written request.
premise text: (5) Subsection (3) or (4) does not apply...
conclusion text: ...if the person takes the action in accordance with the other person’s written request.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

161(6) Unsolicited cards etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-161-ss-6
part of: 161 Unsolicited cards etc.
note: Offence of strict liability for unsolicited cards etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.262
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-6-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 161(6) Unsolicited cards etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

161(7) Unsolicited cards etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-161-ss-7
part of: 161 Unsolicited cards etc.
note: Offence punishable by fine
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.262
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-7-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-7-logic-argumentation-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits certain conduct
premise text: (7) An offence against subsection (1), (3) or (4)
conclusion text: punishable on conviction by a fine of not more than...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for the breach turnover period
premise text: (c) if the court cannot determine the value of that benefit—30% of the body corporate’s adjusted turnover during the breach turnover period for the offence.
conclusion text: ...for the offence
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines a recurring trace for the breach turnover period
premise text: (c) if the court cannot determine the value of that benefit—30% of the body corporate’s adjusted turnover during the breach turnover period for the offence.
conclusion text: ...for the offence
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses the liability to the related bodies corporate
premise text: (b) if the court can determine the value of the benefit that the body corporate, and any body corporate related to the body corporate, have obtained directly or indirectly...
conclusion text: ...3 times the value of that benefit;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-7-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implies a causal relationship between the breach and the fine
premise text: (a) $100,000,000;
conclusion text: ...the greater of the following:
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

161(8) Unsolicited cards etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-161-ss-8
part of: 161 Unsolicited cards etc.
note: Offence punishable by fine not exceeding $2,500,000
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.262
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-8-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 161(8) Unsolicited cards etc.
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-161-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on individuals
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

162 Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-162
has part: 162(1) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
has part: 162(2) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
has part: 162(3) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.263

162(1) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-162-ss-1
part of: 162 Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
note: Asserting a right to payment for unsolicited goods or services is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.263
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-162-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-162-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-162-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-162-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 162(1) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-162-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits asserting a right to payment for unsolicited goods or services.
premise text: The law prohibits asserting a right to payment for unsolicited goods or services.
conclusion text: Asserting a right to payment for unsolicited goods or services is an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-162-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implies that asserting a right to payment for unsolicited goods or services is an offence.
premise text: The law implies that asserting a right to payment for unsolicited goods or services is an offence.
conclusion text: Asserting a right to payment for unsolicited goods or services is an offence.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

162(2) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-162-ss-2
part of: 162 Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
note: Asserting a right to payment for unsolicited services is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.263
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-162-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-162-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-162-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-162-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-162-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 162(2) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-162-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits asserting a right to payment for unsolicited services.
premise text: The law prohibits asserting a right to payment for unsolicited services.
conclusion text: Asserting a right to payment for unsolicited services is an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-162-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implies that the assertion is an offence if it occurs.
premise text: If asserting a right to payment for unsolicited services occurs, then it implies that the law prohibits such assertions.
conclusion text: Asserting a right to payment for unsolicited services is an offence.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-162-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Occurs during trade or commerce.
premise text: The assertion occurs during trade or commerce.
conclusion text: Asserting a right to payment for unsolicited services is an offence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

162(3) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-162-ss-3
part of: 162 Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
note: Sending unsolicited invoices or documents is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.263
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-162-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-162-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-162-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 162(3) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-162-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of sending unsolicited invoices or documents.
premise text: The text states that sending such documents is an offence.
conclusion text: It is prohibited to send unsolicited invoices or documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

163 Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-163
has part: 163(1) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
has part: 163(2) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
has part: 163(3) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
has part: 163(4) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
has part: 163(5) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
has part: 163(5A) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.264

163(1) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-163-ss-1
part of: 163 Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
note: Asserting a right to payment for unauthorised entries or advertisements is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.264
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-163-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-163-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-163-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits asserting a right to payment for unauthorised entries or advertisements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

163(2) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-163-ss-2
part of: 163 Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
note: Sending false invoices or documents is prohibited without a warning statement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.264
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-163-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-163-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-163-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 163(2) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-163-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

163(3) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-163-ss-3
part of: 163 Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
note: Exemption from subsections (1) and (2) if the person knew or had reasonable cause to believe that another person authorized the placement of the entry or advertisement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.264
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-163-ss-3-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-163-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 163(3) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

163(4) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-163-ss-4
part of: 163 Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
note: Exemption for certain publications from subsections (1) and (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.264
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-163-ss-4-norm

163(5) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-163-ss-5
part of: 163 Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
note: Penalty for offences of strict liability
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.264
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-163-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-163-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-163-ss-5-logic-linearlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-163-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 163(5) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-163-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a duty to penalize
premise text: (5) Subsections (1) and (2) are offences of strict liability.
conclusion text: Penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-163-ss-5-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implies a consequence
premise text: (5) Subsections (1) and (2) are offences of strict liability.
conclusion text: Penalty
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

163(5A) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-163-ss-5a
part of: 163 Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
note: Offence punishable by fine not exceeding $100,000,000
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.264
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-163-ss-5a-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-163-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-163-ss-5a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-163-ss-5a-logic-cogai-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-163-ss-5a-logic-shacl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-163-ss-5a-logic-n3logic-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-163-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits fine exceeding $100,000,000
premise text: (5A) An offence against subsection (1) or (2)
conclusion text: punishable on conviction by a fine of not more than the greater of...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-163-ss-5a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Establishes temporal relation between fine and body corporate
premise text: (5A) An offence against subsection (1) or (2) committed by a body corporate
conclusion text: ...fine of not more than the greater of...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-163-ss-5a-logic-cogai-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Entity recognition
logic summary: Recognizes entity type as 'body corporate'
premise text: (5A) An offence against subsection (1) or (2) committed by a body corporate
conclusion text: ...body corporate is punishable on conviction...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-163-ss-5a-logic-shacl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Constraint validation
logic summary: Validates constraint on fine amount
premise text: (5A) An offence against subsection (1) or (2)
conclusion text: ...fine of not more than the greater of...
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-163-ss-5a-logic-n3logic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: N3Logic
operator: Property graph
logic summary: Establishes property 'punishable' on body corporate
premise text: (5A) An offence against subsection (1) or (2)
conclusion text: ...body corporate is punishable on conviction...
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

164 Participation in pyramid schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-164
has part: 164(1) Participation in pyramid schemes
has part: 164(2) Participation in pyramid schemes
has part: 164(3) Participation in pyramid schemes
has part: 164(4) Participation in pyramid schemes
has part: 164(5) Participation in pyramid schemes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.267

164(1) Participation in pyramid schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-164-ss-1
part of: 164 Participation in pyramid schemes
note: Participation in pyramid schemes is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.267
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-164-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-164-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-164-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 164(1) Participation in pyramid schemes
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-164-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits participation in pyramid schemes.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

164(2) Participation in pyramid schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-164-ss-2
part of: 164 Participation in pyramid schemes
note: Participation in pyramid schemes is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.267
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-164-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-164-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-164-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-164-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-164-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-164-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 164(2) Participation in pyramid schemes
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-164-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits participation in pyramid schemes.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if the person induces another person to participate in a pyramid scheme.
conclusion text: The person is committing an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-164-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits inducing others to participate in pyramid schemes.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if the person induces another person to participate in a pyramid scheme.
conclusion text: The person is committing an offence by inducing others.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-164-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Inducing participation implies committing an offence.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if the person induces another person to participate in a pyramid scheme.
conclusion text: The person is committing an offence by inducing others.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-164-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits participating in pyramid schemes.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if the person induces another person to participate in a pyramid scheme.
conclusion text: The person is committing an offence by participating.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

164(3) Participation in pyramid schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-164-ss-3
part of: 164 Participation in pyramid schemes
note: Participation in pyramid schemes is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.267
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-164-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-164-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-164-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 164(3) Participation in pyramid schemes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-164-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits participation in pyramid schemes.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

164(4) Participation in pyramid schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-164-ss-4
part of: 164 Participation in pyramid schemes
note: Participation in pyramid schemes is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.267
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-164-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-164-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-164-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits participation in pyramid schemes.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

164(5) Participation in pyramid schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-164-ss-5
part of: 164 Participation in pyramid schemes
note: Offence punishable by fine not exceeding $2,500,000
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.267
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-164-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-164-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-164-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 164(5) Participation in pyramid schemes
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-164-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits participation in pyramid schemes
premise text: (5) An offence against subsection (1) or (2)
conclusion text: punishable on conviction by a fine of not more than $2,500,000.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

165 Multiple pricing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-165
has part: 165(1) Multiple pricing
has part: 165(2) Multiple pricing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.268

165(1) Multiple pricing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-165-ss-1
part of: 165 Multiple pricing
note: Supplying goods with more than one displayed price is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.268
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-165-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-165-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-165-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-165-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-165-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-165-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-165-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 165(1) Multiple pricing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-165-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplying goods with more than one displayed price.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the supply takes place for a price that is not the lower, or lowest, of the displayed prices.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-165-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with supply of goods.
premise text: (b) the goods have more than one displayed price;
conclusion text: ...and the supply takes place for a price that is not the lower, or lowest, of the displayed prices.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-165-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring in trade or commerce.
premise text: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, supplies goods;
conclusion text: ...the supply takes place for a price that is not the lower, or lowest, of the displayed prices.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-165-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses to all persons supplying goods.
premise text: (a) if the person is a body corporate—$5,000;
conclusion text: ...or (b) if the person is not a body corporate—$1,000.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-165-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies persons as bodies corporate or natural persons.
premise text: (a) if the person is a body corporate—$5,000;
conclusion text: ...or (b) if the person is not a body corporate—$1,000.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

165(2) Multiple pricing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-165-ss-2
part of: 165 Multiple pricing
note: Strict liability offence for subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.268
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-165-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-165-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-165-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 165(2) Multiple pricing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-165-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Offence of strict liability
premise text: (2) Subsection (1)
conclusion text: offence of strict liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

166 Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-166
has part: 166(1) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
has part: 166(2) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
has part: 166(3) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
has part: 166(4) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
has part: 166(5) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
has part: 166(6) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
has part: 166(7) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
has part: 166(8) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.268

166(1) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-166-ss-1
part of: 166 Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
note: Making false representations about goods or services for personal use
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.268
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-166-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-166-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-166-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-166-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-166-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-166-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-166-ss-1-logic-shacl-6

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-166-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 166(1) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-166-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making false representations
premise text: Making a representation with respect to an amount that, if paid, would constitute part of the consideration for the supply of goods or services.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-166-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies the representation as false
premise text: The representation is with respect to an amount that, if paid, would constitute part of the consideration for the supply of goods or services.
conclusion text: The representation is false
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-166-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with the supply of goods or services
premise text: The person supplies or promotes the supply of goods or services.
conclusion text: There is an overlap between the representation and the supply of goods or services
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-166-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of false representations
premise text: The person makes a false representation repeatedly.
conclusion text: There is a recurring trace of false representations
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-166-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Anomaly
logic summary: Identifies the anomaly in the representation
premise text: The representation is not consistent with the supply of goods or services.
conclusion text: There is an anomaly in the representation
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-166-ss-1-logic-shacl-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validate
logic summary: Validates the representation against a schema
premise text: The representation conforms to a schema.
conclusion text: The representation is valid
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

166(2) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-166-ss-2
part of: 166 Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
note: No charge for sending goods must be included in the single price.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.268
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-166-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-166-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-166-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 166(2) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-166-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits including a charge for sending goods in the single price.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

166(3) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-166-ss-3
part of: 166 Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
note: Exemption from subsection (1) if certain conditions are met
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.268
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-166-ss-3-norm

166(4) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-166-ss-4
part of: 166 Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
note: Exemption for corporate bodies from certain representation requirements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.268
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-166-ss-4-norm

166(5) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-166-ss-5
part of: 166 Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
note: Single price must be at least as prominent as the most prominent part of consideration for supply.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.268
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-166-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-166-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-166-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 166(5) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-166-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be at least as prominent
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

166(6) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-166-ss-6
part of: 166 Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
note: Exemption from subsection (5) for certain contracts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.268
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-166-ss-6-norm

166(7) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-166-ss-7
part of: 166 Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
note: Penalty for offence of strict liability
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.268
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-166-ss-7-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-166-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-166-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-166-ss-7-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 166(7) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-166-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Imposes a penalty
premise text: (7) Subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
conclusion text: Penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-166-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Describes the temporal relation
premise text: (7) Subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
conclusion text: Temporal relation between subsections
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

166(8) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-166-ss-8
part of: 166 Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
note: Offence punishable by fine not exceeding $100,000,000
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.268
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-166-ss-8-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-166-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-166-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits offence against subsection (1)
premise text: (8) An offence...
conclusion text: ...punishable on conviction by a fine...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

167 Referral selling
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-167
has part: 167(1) Referral selling
has part: 167(2) Referral selling
has part: 167(3) Referral selling
has part: 167(4) Referral selling
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.271

167(1) Referral selling
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-167-ss-1
part of: 167 Referral selling
note: Inducing consumers to provide customer information in exchange for benefits is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.271
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-167-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-167-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-167-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-167-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 167(1) Referral selling
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-167-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the action of inducing consumers to provide customer information in exchange for benefits.
premise text: The person induces a consumer to acquire goods or services by representing that the consumer will receive a rebate, commission or other benefit in return for giving the person the names of prospective customers or otherwise assisting the person to supply goods or services to other consumers.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if they induce a consumer to provide customer information in exchange for benefits.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-167-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the action of inducing consumers to provide customer information in exchange for benefits.
premise text: The provision states that a person commits an offence if they induce a consumer to acquire goods or services by representing that the consumer will receive a rebate, commission or other benefit in return for giving the person the names of prospective customers or otherwise assisting the person to supply goods or services to other consumers.
conclusion text: The provision is a prohibition on inducing consumers to provide customer information in exchange for benefits.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

167(2) Referral selling
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-167-ss-2
part of: 167 Referral selling
note: Offence of strict liability for subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.271
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-167-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-167-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-167-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 167(2) Referral selling
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-167-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits an offence of strict liability
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
conclusion text: Penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

167(3) Referral selling
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-167-ss-3
part of: 167 Referral selling
note: Offence punishable by fine
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.271
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-167-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-167-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-167-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits an offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

167(4) Referral selling
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-167-ss-4
part of: 167 Referral selling
note: Offence punishable by fine not exceeding $2,500,000
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.271
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-167-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-167-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-167-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits committing an offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168 Harassment and coercion
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-168
has part: 168(1) Harassment and coercion
has part: 168(2) Harassment and coercion
has part: 168(2A) Harassment and coercion
has part: 168(2B) Harassment and coercion
has part: 168(3) Harassment and coercion
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.272

168(1) Harassment and coercion
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-168-ss-1
part of: 168 Harassment and coercion
note: Using physical force, undue harassment, or coercion in specified contexts is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.272
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-168-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-168-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-168-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-168-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-168-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-168-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-168-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 168(1) Harassment and coercion
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-168-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits specific actions.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the physical force, or undue harassment or coercion is used in connection with...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-168-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Indicates overlap between events.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if:
conclusion text: ...the physical force, or undue harassment or coercion is used in connection with...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-168-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Indicates a temporal relationship.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if:
conclusion text: ...the physical force, or undue harassment or coercion is used in connection with...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-168-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Indicates the spread of information.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if:
conclusion text: ...the supply or possible supply of goods or services; or...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-168-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Indicates recognition by a cognitive agent.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if:
conclusion text: ...the physical force, or undue harassment or coercion is used in connection with...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

168(2) Harassment and coercion
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-168-ss-2
part of: 168 Harassment and coercion
note: Harassment and coercion is an offence of strict liability.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.272
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-168-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-168-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-168-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits harassment and coercion.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168(2A) Harassment and coercion
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-168-ss-2a
part of: 168 Harassment and coercion
note: Offence against subsection (1) committed by a body corporate is punishable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.272
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-168-ss-2a-norm

168(2B) Harassment and coercion
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-168-ss-2b
part of: 168 Harassment and coercion
note: Offence punishable by fine
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.272
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-168-ss-2b-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-168-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-168-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits harassment and coercion
premise text: (2B) An offence against subsection (1) committed by a person other than a body corporate is punishable on conviction by a fine of not more than $2,500,000.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168(3) Harassment and coercion
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-168-ss-3
part of: 168 Harassment and coercion
note: No effect on other provisions regarding supply or acquisition of interests in land.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.272
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-168-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-168-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-168-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-168-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: No effect on other provisions regarding supply or acquisition of interests in land.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-168-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

169 Display notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-169
has part: 169(1) Display notices
has part: 169(2) Display notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.274

169(1) Display notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-169-ss-1
part of: 169 Display notices
note: Failure to display required notices when supplying goods or services to consumers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.274
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-169-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-169-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-169-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-169-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 169(1) Display notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-169-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of failing to display required notices.
premise text: A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...displayed at those premises;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-169-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for the display of notices.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...displayed at those premises;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

169(2) Display notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-169-ss-2
part of: 169 Display notices
note: Offence of strict liability for display notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.274
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-169-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-169-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-169-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-169-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 169(2) Display notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-169-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a duty to prevent
premise text: (2) Subsection (1)
conclusion text: Offence of strict liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-169-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for the offence
premise text: (2) Subsection (1)
conclusion text: Strict liability
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

170 Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-170
has part: 170(1) Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
has part: 170(2) Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
has part: 170(3) Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.275

170(1) Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-170-ss-1
part of: 170 Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
note: Calling on a person for negotiating an unsolicited consumer agreement outside permitted hours is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.275
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-170-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-170-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-170-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-170-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-170-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-170-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-170-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 170(1) Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-170-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of calling on a person for negotiating an unsolicited consumer agreement outside permitted hours.
premise text: (1) A dealer commits an offence if the dealer calls on a person for the purpose of negotiating an unsolicited consumer agreement, or for an incidental or related purpose:
conclusion text: Penalty: (a) if the person is a body corporate—$50,000; or (b) if the person is not a body corporate—$10,000.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-170-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Calling on a person for negotiating an unsolicited consumer agreement outside permitted hours is within the interval of prohibited behavior.
premise text: (1) A dealer commits an offence if the dealer calls on a person for the purpose of negotiating an unsolicited consumer agreement, or for an incidental or related purpose:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-170-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Calling on a person for negotiating an unsolicited consumer agreement outside permitted hours is a recurring trace.
premise text: (1) A dealer commits an offence if the dealer calls on a person for the purpose of negotiating an unsolicited consumer agreement, or for an incidental or related purpose:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-170-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Calling on a person for negotiating an unsolicited consumer agreement outside permitted hours diffuses the prohibited behavior.
premise text: (1) A dealer commits an offence if the dealer calls on a person for the purpose of negotiating an unsolicited consumer agreement, or for an incidental or related purpose:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-170-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Calling on a person for negotiating an unsolicited consumer agreement outside permitted hours implies a violation of the law.
premise text: (1) A dealer commits an offence if the dealer calls on a person for the purpose of negotiating an unsolicited consumer agreement, or for an incidental or related purpose:
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

170(2) Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-170-ss-2
part of: 170 Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
note: Consent is required for dealer to call or telephone the person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.275
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-170-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-170-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-170-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
logic summary: Dealer is permitted to call or telephone with consent.
premise text: Consent was given by the person.
conclusion text: Dealer may call or telephone.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

170(3) Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-170-ss-3
part of: 170 Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
note: Strict liability offence for violating subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.275
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-170-ss-3-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-170-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 170(3) Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

171 Disclosing purpose and identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-171
note: Dealer must not call on a person for negotiating an unsolicited consumer agreement without disclosing purpose and identity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.275
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-171-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-171-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-171-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 171 Disclosing purpose and identity
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-171-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of unsolicited consumer agreements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

172 Ceasing to negotiate on request
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-172
has part: 172(1) Ceasing to negotiate on request
has part: 172(2) Ceasing to negotiate on request
has part: 172(3) Ceasing to negotiate on request
has part: 172(4) Ceasing to negotiate on request
has part: 172(5) Ceasing to negotiate on request
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.276

172(1) Ceasing to negotiate on request
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-172-ss-1
part of: 172 Ceasing to negotiate on request
note: Dealer must leave premises immediately on request of occupier or prospective consumer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.276
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-172-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-172-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-172-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 172(1) Ceasing to negotiate on request
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-172-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (1) A dealer commits an offence...
conclusion text: Dealer must leave premises immediately on request of occupier or prospective consumer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

172(2) Ceasing to negotiate on request
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-172-ss-2
part of: 172 Ceasing to negotiate on request
note: Dealers must not contact prospective consumers for negotiating unsolicited agreements within 30 days after a request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.276
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-172-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-172-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-172-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of contacting prospective consumers for negotiating unsolicited agreements.
premise text: Dealer contacts prospective consumer within 30 days after request.
conclusion text: Offence committed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

172(3) Ceasing to negotiate on request
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-172-ss-3
part of: 172 Ceasing to negotiate on request
note: Dealer must comply with subsection (2) if not the supplier of goods or services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.276
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-172-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-172-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-172-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 172(3) Ceasing to negotiate on request
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-172-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Dealer must comply with subsection (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

172(4) Ceasing to negotiate on request
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-172-ss-4
part of: 172 Ceasing to negotiate on request
note: Dealer may contact prospective consumer under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.276
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-172-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-172-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-172-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to contact
premise text: (4) Subsection (2) does not apply...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

172(5) Ceasing to negotiate on request
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-172-ss-5
part of: 172 Ceasing to negotiate on request
note: Offences of strict liability for ceasing to negotiate on request
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.276
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-172-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-172-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-172-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 172(5) Ceasing to negotiate on request
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-172-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits ceasing to negotiate on request
premise text: (5) Subsections (1) and (2)
conclusion text: Offences of strict liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

173 Informing person of termination period etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-173
note: Dealers must inform consumers about termination periods and procedures.
description: Information about termination period, exercise of right, and other prescribed matters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.277
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-173-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-173-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-173-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Dealer commits an offence if they fail to provide required information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

174 Requirement to give document to the consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-174
has part: 174(1) Requirement to give document to the consumer
has part: 174(2) Requirement to give document to the consumer
has part: 174(3) Requirement to give document to the consumer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.278

174(1) Requirement to give document to the consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-174-ss-1
part of: 174 Requirement to give document to the consumer
note: Dealer must give consumer a copy of the agreement immediately after signing.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.278
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-174-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-174-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-174-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 174(1) Requirement to give document to the consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-174-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Dealer commits an offence if not providing the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

174(2) Requirement to give document to the consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-174-ss-2
part of: 174 Requirement to give document to the consumer
note: Dealer must provide agreement document within 5 business days after negotiation.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.278
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-174-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-174-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-174-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 174(2) Requirement to give document to the consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-174-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits dealer from failing to provide agreement document.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

174(3) Requirement to give document to the consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-174-ss-3
part of: 174 Requirement to give document to the consumer
note: Requirement to give document to the consumer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.278
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-174-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-174-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-174-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 174(3) Requirement to give document to the consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-174-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Strict liability for failure to provide document
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

175 Requirements for all unsolicited consumer agreements etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-175
note: Supplier commits an offence if unsolicited consumer agreement does not comply with requirements.
description: Full terms of the agreement, including total consideration and postal charges.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.279
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-175-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-175-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-175-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-175-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-175-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-175-logic-diffusion-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-175-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 175 Requirements for all unsolicited consumer agreements etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-175-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Supplier commits an offence if unsolicited consumer agreement does not comply with requirements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-175-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Agreement must be made before a certain date.
premise text: (1) The supplier under an unsolicited consumer agreement commits an offence if the agreement, or (if the agreement was negotiated by telephone) the agreement document, does not comply with the following requirements:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-175-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Agreement must be made before a certain date.
premise text: (1) The supplier under an unsolicited consumer agreement commits an offence if the agreement, or (if the agreement was negotiated by telephone) the agreement document, does not comply with the following requirements:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-175-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Supplier commits an offence if unsolicited consumer agreement does not comply with requirements.
premise text: (1) The supplier under an unsolicited consumer agreement commits an offence if the agreement, or (if the agreement was negotiated by telephone) the agreement document, does not comply with the following requirements:
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-175-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Agreement must be made before a certain date.
premise text: (1) The supplier under an unsolicited consumer agreement commits an offence if the agreement, or (if the agreement was negotiated by telephone) the agreement document, does not comply with the following requirements:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

176 Additional requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-176
has part: 176(1) Additional requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements
has part: 176(2) Additional requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements
has part: 176(3) Additional requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.280

176(1) Additional requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-176-ss-1
part of: 176 Additional requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements
note: Unsolicited consumer agreement must comply with specific requirements.
description: Consumer signature, supplier's name and business address, email address (if applicable)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.280
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-176-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-176-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-176-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 176(1) Additional requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-176-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Supplier commits an offence if agreement does not comply with requirements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

176(2) Additional requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-176-ss-2
part of: 176 Additional requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements
note: Strict liability offence for subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.280
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-176-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-176-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-176-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 176(2) Additional requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-176-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Offence
premise text: (2) Subsection (1)
conclusion text: offence of strict liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

176(3) Additional requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-176-ss-3
part of: 176 Additional requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements
note: This section does not limit the operation of section 175.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.280
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-176-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-176-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-176-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-176-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Section 176(3) implies that section 175 operates independently.
premise text: Section 176(3)
conclusion text: Section 175 operates independently.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-176-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: Section 176(3) implies that section 175 operates independently.
premise text: Section 176(3)
conclusion text: Section 175 operates independently.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

177 Requirements for amendments of unsolicited consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-177
has part: 177(1) Requirements for amendments of unsolicited consumer
has part: 177(2) Requirements for amendments of unsolicited consumer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.281

177(1) Requirements for amendments of unsolicited consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-177-ss-1
part of: 177 Requirements for amendments of unsolicited consumer
note: Amendments to unsolicited consumer agreements must be signed by both parties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.281
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-177-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-177-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-177-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 177(1) Requirements for amendments of unsolicited consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-177-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must sign amendments to unsolicited consumer agreements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

177(2) Requirements for amendments of unsolicited consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-177-ss-2
part of: 177 Requirements for amendments of unsolicited consumer
note: Offence of strict liability for subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.281
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-177-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-177-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-177-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 177(2) Requirements for amendments of unsolicited consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-177-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Strict liability offence
premise text: (2) Subsection (1)
conclusion text: Offence of strict liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

178 Obligations of suppliers on termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-178
has part: 178(1) Obligations of suppliers on termination
has part: 178(2) Obligations of suppliers on termination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.282

178(1) Obligations of suppliers on termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-178-ss-1
part of: 178 Obligations of suppliers on termination
note: Supplier must return consideration upon termination of unsolicited consumer agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.282
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-178-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-178-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-178-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Supplier has a duty to return consideration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

178(2) Obligations of suppliers on termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-178-ss-2
part of: 178 Obligations of suppliers on termination
note: Strict liability for offence on termination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.282
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-178-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-178-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-178-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 178(2) Obligations of suppliers on termination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-178-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: strict liability
logic summary: Obligation to pay
premise text: (2) Subsection (1)
conclusion text: Offence of strict liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179 Prohibition on supplies etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-179
has part: 179(1) Prohibition on supplies etc.
has part: 179(2) Prohibition on supplies etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.282

179(1) Prohibition on supplies etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-179-ss-1
part of: 179 Prohibition on supplies etc.
note: Prohibition on supplies etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.282
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-179-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-179-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-179-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-179-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-179-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 179(1) Prohibition on supplies etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-179-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplier from supplying goods or services under unsolicited consumer agreement
premise text: (1) The supplier under an unsolicited consumer agreement commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...if the person is a body corporate—$50,000; or (b) if the person is not a body corporate—$10,000.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-179-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for prohibition
premise text: (1) The supplier under an unsolicited consumer agreement commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...if the agreement was not negotiated by telephone—the period starting on the day on which the agreement was made and ending at the end of the tenth business day after the day on which the agreement was made;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-179-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for prohibition
premise text: (1) The supplier under an unsolicited consumer agreement commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...if the agreement was negotiated by telephone—the period starting on the day on which the agreement was made and ending at the end of the tenth business day after the day on which the consumer was given the agreement document relating to the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

179(2) Prohibition on supplies etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-179-ss-2
part of: 179 Prohibition on supplies etc.
note: Prohibition on supplies etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.282
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-179-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-179-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-179-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a prohibition
premise text: (2) Strict liability applies to subsection (1)(a)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180 Repayment of payments received after termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-180
has part: 180(1) Repayment of payments received after termination
has part: 180(2) Repayment of payments received after termination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.283

180(1) Repayment of payments received after termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-180-ss-1
part of: 180 Repayment of payments received after termination
note: Supplier must refund payments made after termination of unsolicited consumer agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.283
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-180-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-180-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-180-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-180-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-180-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-180-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-180-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplier from not refunding payments.
premise text: Supplier under an unsolicited consumer agreement commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...supplier does not immediately refund to the consumer...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-180-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for refund.
premise text: (1) The supplier under an unsolicited consumer agreement commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...supplier does not immediately refund to the consumer...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-180-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Establishes implication between supplier's action and penalty.
premise text: Penalty: ...if the person is a body corporate—$50,000; or...
conclusion text: ...supplier does not immediately refund to the consumer...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-180-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses penalty across different types of persons.
premise text: Penalty: ...if the person is a body corporate—$50,000; or...
conclusion text: ...supplier does not immediately refund to the consumer...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-180-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognizes supplier's obligation.
premise text: The supplier under an unsolicited consumer agreement commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...supplier does not immediately refund to the consumer...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

180(2) Repayment of payments received after termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-180-ss-2
part of: 180 Repayment of payments received after termination
note: Strict liability offence for repayment of payments received after termination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.283
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-180-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-180-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-180-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180(2) Repayment of payments received after termination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-180-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Offence classification
premise text: (2) Subsection (1)
conclusion text: offence of strict liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

181 Prohibition on recovering amounts after termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-181
note: Recovering amounts after termination is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.283
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-181-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-181-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-181-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 181 Prohibition on recovering amounts after termination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-181-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits recovering amounts after termination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

182 Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-182
has part: 182(1) Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
has part: 182(2) Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
has part: 182(3) Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.284

182(1) Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-182-ss-1
part of: 182 Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
note: Supplier commits an offence if agreement includes void provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.284
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-182-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-182-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-182-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-182-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 182(1) Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-182-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of supplier committing an offence
premise text: Supplier under unsolicited consumer agreement commits an offence
conclusion text: Supplier must not commit the offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-182-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of provision as void
premise text: Provision is described as void because of section 89(1)
conclusion text: Provision is classified as void
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

182(2) Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-182-ss-2
part of: 182 Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
note: Supplier commits an offence attempting to enforce void provision under unsolicited consumer agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.284
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-182-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-182-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-182-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 182(2) Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-182-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of enforcing void provision
premise text: Section 89(1) makes the provision void
conclusion text: Supplier commits an offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

182(3) Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-182-ss-3
part of: 182 Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
note: Offences of strict liability
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.284
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-182-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-182-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-182-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 182(3) Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-182-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits offences of strict liability
premise text: (3) Subsections (1) and (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

183 Waiver of rights
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-183
has part: 183(1) Waiver of rights
has part: 183(2) Waiver of rights
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.285

183(1) Waiver of rights
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-183-ss-1
part of: 183 Waiver of rights
note: Supplier commits an offence for inducing consumer to waive rights.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.285
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-183-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-183-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-183-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 183(1) Waiver of rights
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-183-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of waiving rights
premise text: Supplier induces consumer to waive right
conclusion text: Offence committed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

183(2) Waiver of rights
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-183-ss-2
part of: 183 Waiver of rights
note: Strict liability offence for subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.285
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-183-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-183-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-183-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 183(2) Waiver of rights
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-183-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Offence classification
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
conclusion text: Subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

184 Application of this Division to persons to whom rights of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-184
note: This Division applies in relation to a person to whom the rights of a consumer under a contract for the supply of goods or services are assigned or transferred, as if the person were the original consumer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.285
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-184-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-184-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-184-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 184 Application of this Division to persons to whom rights of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-184-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: The provision applies to persons with assigned or transferred rights.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

185 Application of this Division to supplies to third parties
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-185
note: Division applies in relation to contracts for supplies to third parties
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.286
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-185-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-185-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-185-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 185 Application of this Division to supplies to third parties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-185-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Division applies in relation to contracts for supplies to third parties
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186 Regulations may limit the application of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-186
note: Regulations may limit the application of this Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.286
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-186-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-186-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-186-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-186-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 186 Regulations may limit the application of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-186-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibits
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-186-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Excludes
logic summary: Temporal exclusion
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

187 Application of this Division to certain conduct covered by the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-187
note: Section 992A of the Corporations Act 2001 prohibits hawking of financial products.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.286
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-187-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-187-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-187-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-187-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-187-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-187-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-187-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 187 Application of this Division to certain conduct covered by the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-187-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibits
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: Section 992A of the Corporations Act 2001 prohibits hawking of financial products.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-187-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Relation to temporal intervals
premise text: Section 992A of the Corporations Act 2001 applies to hawking of financial products at all times.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-187-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation to section 992A
premise text: Section 992A of the Corporations Act 2001 applies to hawking of financial products at all times.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-187-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion through the Corporations Act 2001
premise text: Section 992A of the Corporations Act 2001 prohibits hawking of financial products.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-187-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation in the Corporations Act 2001
premise text: Section 992A of the Corporations Act 2001 defines 'hawking'
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

188 Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-188
has part: 188(1) Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
has part: 188(2) Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.287

188(1) Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-188-ss-1
part of: 188 Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
note: Lay-by agreements must be in writing.
description: copy of the agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.287
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-188-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-188-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-188-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 188(1) Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-188-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits lay-by agreements without written consent.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

188(2) Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-188-ss-2
part of: 188 Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
note: Lay-by agreements must be in writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.287
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-188-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-188-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-188-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 188(2) Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-188-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be in writing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

189 Termination charges
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-189
has part: 189(1) Termination charges
has part: 189(2) Termination charges
has part: 189(3) Termination charges
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.287

189(1) Termination charges
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-189-ss-1
part of: 189 Termination charges
note: Commitment to pay termination charge is an offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.287
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-189-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-189-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-189-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-189-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of paying termination charge
premise text: Agreement requires consumer to pay termination charge
conclusion text: Offence committed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-189-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between supplier and consumer
premise text: Consumer must pay termination charge at a specific time
conclusion text: Time of payment
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

189(2) Termination charges
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-189-ss-2
part of: 189 Termination charges
note: Consumer is not liable for termination charge if supplier breaches agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.287
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-189-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-189-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-189-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 189(2) Termination charges
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-189-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
logic summary: Negation of liability
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply
conclusion text: Consumer is not liable for termination charge.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

189(3) Termination charges
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-189-ss-3
part of: 189 Termination charges
note: Supplier commits an offence if termination charge exceeds reasonable costs.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.287
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-189-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-189-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-189-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-189-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-189-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-189-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-189-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 189(3) Termination charges
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-189-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Supplier has a duty to pay termination charge.
premise text: (3) A supplier of goods who is a party to a lay-by agreement commits an offence if:
conclusion text: the supplier must pay the termination charge.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-189-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
logic summary: The excerpt permits the supplier to dispute the termination charge.
premise text: (3) A supplier of goods who is a party to a lay-by agreement commits an offence if:
conclusion text: the supplier may dispute the termination charge.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-189-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: trace
logic summary: The excerpt requires a trace of the supplier's costs.
premise text: (3) A supplier of goods who is a party to a lay-by agreement commits an offence if:
conclusion text: the supplier must provide evidence of their costs.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-189-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: right
logic summary: The excerpt creates a right for the consumer to claim termination charge.
premise text: (3) A supplier of goods who is a party to a lay-by agreement commits an offence if:
conclusion text: the consumer has a right to claim the termination charge.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-189-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: undertaking
logic summary: The excerpt requires the supplier to undertake to pay the termination charge.
premise text: (3) A supplier of goods who is a party to a lay-by agreement commits an offence if:
conclusion text: the supplier undertakes to pay the termination charge.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

190 Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-190
has part: 190(1) Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers
has part: 190(2) Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers
has part: 190(3) Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.288

190(1) Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-190-ss-1
part of: 190 Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers
note: Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.288
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-190-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-190-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-190-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 190(1) Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-190-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

190(2) Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-190-ss-2
part of: 190 Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers
note: Consumer breach, supplier cessation, or unavailability of goods exempt from lay-by agreement termination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.288
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-190-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-190-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-190-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 190(2) Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-190-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

190(3) Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-190-ss-3
part of: 190 Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers
note: Strict liability offence for termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.288
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-190-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-190-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-190-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 190(3) Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-190-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Offence is a strict liability
premise text: (3) Subsection (1)
conclusion text: offence of strict liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

191 Refund of amounts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-191
has part: 191(1) Refund of amounts
has part: 191(2) Refund of amounts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.288

191(1) Refund of amounts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-191-ss-1
part of: 191 Refund of amounts
note: Failure to refund consumer amounts under lay-by agreement is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.288
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191-ss-1-logic-shacl-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 191(1) Refund of amounts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of failing to refund consumer amounts.
premise text: Supplier commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...refund all the amounts paid by the consumer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between lay-by agreement termination and supplier's obligation to refund.
premise text: (1) A supplier of goods who is a party to a lay-by agreement commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...and the supplier fails to refund...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of consumer's payment under lay-by agreement.
premise text: (1) A supplier of goods who is a party to a lay-by agreement commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...and the supplier fails to refund all the amounts paid by the consumer.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation of lay-by agreement termination and supplier's obligation to refund.
premise text: (1) A supplier of goods who is a party to a lay-by agreement commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...and the supplier fails to refund all the amounts paid by the consumer.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validation
logic summary: Validation of lay-by agreement termination and supplier's obligation to refund against a schema.
premise text: (1) A supplier of goods who is a party to a lay-by agreement commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...and the supplier fails to refund all the amounts paid by the consumer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

191(2) Refund of amounts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-191-ss-2
part of: 191 Refund of amounts
note: Strict liability offence for subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.288
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 191(2) Refund of amounts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Offence classification
premise text: Subsection (1) is an offence.
conclusion text: Strict liability offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

191A Gift cards to be redeemable for at least 3 years
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-191a
has part: 191A(1) Gift cards to be redeemable for at least 3 years
has part: 191A(2) Gift cards to be redeemable for at least 3 years
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.289

191A(1) Gift cards to be redeemable for at least 3 years
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-191a-ss-1
part of: 191A Gift cards to be redeemable for at least 3 years
note: Supplies gift card to consumer before it ceases to be redeemable within 3 years is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.289
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191a-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 191A(1) Gift cards to be redeemable for at least 3 years
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplying gift card to consumer before it ceases to be redeemable within 3 years.
premise text: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, supplies a gift card to a consumer;
conclusion text: A person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Requires that the day the gift card ceases to be redeemable is within 3 years after the day of supply.
premise text: (b) the day the gift card ceases to be redeemable is earlier than 3 years after the day of that supply.
conclusion text: The day the gift card ceases to be redeemable must be within 3 years after the day of supply.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Requires that the supply of gift cards is recurring.
premise text: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, supplies a gift card to a consumer;
conclusion text: The supply of gift cards must be recurring.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the supplier to ensure that the gift card ceases to be redeemable within 3 years after supply.
premise text: (b) the day the gift card ceases to be redeemable is earlier than 3 years after the day of that supply.
conclusion text: The supplier must ensure that the gift card ceases to be redeemable within 3 years after supply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implies that supplying a gift card to a consumer before it ceases to be redeemable within 3 years is an offence.
premise text: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, supplies a gift card to a consumer;
conclusion text: A person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

191A(2) Gift cards to be redeemable for at least 3 years
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-191a-ss-2
part of: 191A Gift cards to be redeemable for at least 3 years
note: Strict liability offence for not making gift cards redeemable for at least 3 years.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.289
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191a-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 191A(2) Gift cards to be redeemable for at least 3 years
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

191B When gift card ceases to be redeemable to appear prominently
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-191b
note: Gift card must appear prominently with certain information
description: (i) the date the gift card ceases to be redeemable; (ii) the month and year the gift card ceases to be redeemable; (iii) the date the gift card is supplied and a statement that identifies the period during which the gift card is redeemable; (iv) the month and year the gift card is supplied and a statement that identifies the period during which the gift card is redeemable; (v) the words “no expiry date” or words to that effect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.289
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191b-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191b-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191b-logic-cogai-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191b-logic-shacl-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191b-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 191B When gift card ceases to be redeemable to appear prominently
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Gift card must appear prominently with certain information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Date and month/year of expiration
premise text: (i) the date the gift card ceases to be redeemable; (ii) the month and year the gift card ceases to be redeemable;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191b-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Gift card must appear prominently with certain information
premise text: (i) the date the gift card ceases to be redeemable; (ii) the month and year the gift card ceases to be redeemable; (iii) the date the gift card is supplied and a statement that identifies the period during which the gift card is redeemable; (iv) the month and year the gift card is supplied and a statement that identifies the period during which the gift card is redeemable; (v) the words “no expiry date” or words to that effect.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191b-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Identify required information on gift cards
premise text: (i) the date the gift card ceases to be redeemable; (ii) the month and year the gift card ceases to be redeemable; (iii) the date the gift card is supplied and a statement that identifies the period during which the gift card is redeemable; (iv) the month and year the gift card is supplied and a statement that identifies the period during which the gift card is redeemable; (v) the words “no expiry date” or words to that effect.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191b-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema Validation
logic summary: Validate gift card information
premise text: (i) the date the gift card ceases to be redeemable; (ii) the month and year the gift card ceases to be redeemable; (iii) the date the gift card is supplied and a statement that identifies the period during which the gift card is redeemable; (iv) the month and year the gift card is supplied and a statement that identifies the period during which the gift card is redeemable; (v) the words “no expiry date” or words to that effect.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

191C Terms and conditions not to allow post-supply fees
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-191c
has part: 191C(1) Terms and conditions not to allow post-supply fees
has part: 191C(2) Terms and conditions not to allow post-supply fees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.290

191C(1) Terms and conditions not to allow post-supply fees
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-191c-ss-1
part of: 191C Terms and conditions not to allow post-supply fees
note: Prohibits post-supply fees for gift cards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.290
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191c-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191c-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 191C(1) Terms and conditions not to allow post-supply fees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

191C(2) Terms and conditions not to allow post-supply fees
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-191c-ss-2
part of: 191C Terms and conditions not to allow post-supply fees
note: An offence against subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.290
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191c-ss-2-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 191C(2) Terms and conditions not to allow post-supply fees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

191D Post-supply fees not to be demanded or received
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-191d
has part: 191D(1) Post-supply fees not to be demanded or received
has part: 191D(2) Post-supply fees not to be demanded or received
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.290

191D(1) Post-supply fees not to be demanded or received
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-191d-ss-1
part of: 191D Post-supply fees not to be demanded or received
note: Demanding or receiving post-supply fees is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.290
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191d-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191d-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 191D(1) Post-supply fees not to be demanded or received
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of demanding or receiving post-supply fees.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

191D(2) Post-supply fees not to be demanded or received
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-191d-ss-2
part of: 191D Post-supply fees not to be demanded or received
note: Post-supply fees not to be demanded or received
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.290
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191d-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits demanding post-supply fees
premise text: (2) An offence against subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
conclusion text: An offence against subsection (1) is not an offence of strict liability if post-supply fees are demanded or received.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

191E Regulations may limit the application of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-191e
note: Regulations may limit the application of this Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.290
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191e-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191e-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191e-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 191E Regulations may limit the application of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-191e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Regulations may limit the application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

192 Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-192
has part: 192(1) Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
has part: 192(2) Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.292

192(1) Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-192-ss-1
part of: 192 Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
note: Giving false warranty documents or representations to consumers is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.292
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-192-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-192-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-192-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-192-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-192-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 192(1) Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-192-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of false warranty documents or representations.
premise text: The person gives to the consumer a document that evidences a warranty against defects and that does not comply with the requirements prescribed for the purposes of section 102(1); or represents directly to the consumer that the goods or services are goods or services to which such a warranty against defects relates.
conclusion text: An offence is committed if the person, in connection with the supply, in trade or commerce, of goods or services to a consumer: ...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-192-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Representation to consumers is prohibited.
premise text: The person represents directly to the consumer that the goods or services are goods or services to which such a warranty against defects relates.
conclusion text: An offence is committed if the person, in connection with the supply, in trade or commerce, of goods or services to a consumer: ...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-192-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implication of false warranty documents or representations.
premise text: The person gives to the consumer a document that evidences a warranty against defects and that does not comply with the requirements prescribed for the purposes of section 102(1); or represents directly to the consumer that the goods or services are goods or services to which such a warranty against defects relates.
conclusion text: An offence is committed if the person, in connection with the supply, in trade or commerce, of goods or services to a consumer: ...
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

192(2) Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-192-ss-2
part of: 192 Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
note: Offence of strict liability for non-compliance with warranty requirements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.292
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-192-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-192-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-192-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 192(2) Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-192-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Strict Liability Obligation
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

193 Repairers must comply with prescribed requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-193
has part: 193(1) Repairers must comply with prescribed requirements
has part: 193(2) Repairers must comply with prescribed requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.292

193(1) Repairers must comply with prescribed requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-193-ss-1
part of: 193 Repairers must comply with prescribed requirements
note: Accepting goods for repair without proper notice is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.292
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-193-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-193-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-193-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 193(1) Repairers must comply with prescribed requirements
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-193-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of accepting goods for repair without notice.
premise text: Accepting goods for repair without proper notice.
conclusion text: Offence committed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

193(2) Repairers must comply with prescribed requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-193-ss-2
part of: 193 Repairers must comply with prescribed requirements
note: Repairers must comply with prescribed requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.292
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-193-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-193-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-193-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 193(2) Repairers must comply with prescribed requirements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-193-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

194 Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-194
has part: 194(1) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
has part: 194(2) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
has part: 194(3) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
has part: 194(4) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
has part: 194(5) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.293

194(1) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-194-ss-1
part of: 194 Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
note: Supplying non-compliant consumer goods is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.293
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-194-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-194-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-194-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-194-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 194(1) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-194-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of supplying non-compliant goods.
premise text: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, supplies consumer goods...
conclusion text: ...an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-194-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of supplying non-compliant goods.
premise text: (c) those goods do not comply with the standard.
conclusion text: ...an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

194(2) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-194-ss-2
part of: 194 Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
note: Offering non-compliant consumer goods is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.293
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-194-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-194-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-194-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 194(2) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-194-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: Offering non-compliant consumer goods is an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

194(3) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-194-ss-3
part of: 194 Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
note: Manufacturing, possessing or controlling non-compliant consumer goods is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.293
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-194-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-194-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-194-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-194-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-194-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-194-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-194-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 194(3) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-194-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits manufacturing, possessing or controlling non-compliant consumer goods.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...those goods do not comply with the standard.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-194-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: The provision applies to consumer goods manufactured, possessed or controlled at any time after the safety standard came into force.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...a particular kind; and...those goods do not comply with the standard.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-194-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: The provision applies to consumer goods manufactured, possessed or controlled at any time after the safety standard came into force.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...a particular kind; and...those goods do not comply with the standard.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-194-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: >=
logic summary: The provision applies to consumer goods manufactured, possessed or controlled at any time after the safety standard came into force.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...a particular kind; and...those goods do not comply with the standard.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-194-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: >=
logic summary: The provision applies to consumer goods manufactured, possessed or controlled at any time after the safety standard came into force.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...a particular kind; and...those goods do not comply with the standard.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

194(4) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-194-ss-4
part of: 194 Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
note: Exemption from subsection (3) for non-export purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.293
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-194-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-194-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-194-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 194(4) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-194-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts from subsection (3)
premise text: (4) Subsection (3) does not apply...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

194(5) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-194-ss-5
part of: 194 Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
note: Committing an offence for supplying non-compliant consumer goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.293
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-194-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-194-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-194-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 194(5) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-194-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits supplying non-compliant consumer goods
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

195 Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-195
has part: 195(1) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
has part: 195(2) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
has part: 195(3) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
has part: 195(4) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
has part: 195(5) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.294

195(1) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-195-ss-1
part of: 195 Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
note: Supplying product related services that do not comply with safety standards is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.294
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 195(1) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits supplying product related services that do not comply with safety standards.
premise text: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, supplies product related services of a particular kind;
conclusion text: An offence is committed if those services do not comply with the standard.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on individuals to supply product related services that comply with safety standards.
premise text: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, supplies product related services of a particular kind;
conclusion text: The provision imposes an obligation on individuals to supply product related services that comply with the standard.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Indicates that supplying product related services that do not comply with safety standards overlaps with the definition of an offence.
premise text: (c) those services do not comply with the standard;
conclusion text: The provision indicates that supplying product related services that do not comply with safety standards overlaps with the definition of an offence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits individuals from supplying product related services that do not comply with safety standards.
premise text: (c) those services do not comply with the standard;
conclusion text: The provision prohibits individuals from supplying product related services that do not comply with the standard.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

195(2) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-195-ss-2
part of: 195 Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
note: Offering non-compliant product-related services is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.294
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 195(2) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of non-compliant services
premise text: Safety standard for services is in force
conclusion text: Offering non-compliant services is an offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

195(3) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-195-ss-3
part of: 195 Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
note: Penalty for supplying product related services that do not comply with regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.294
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 195(3) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Imposes a prohibition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

195(4) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-195-ss-4
part of: 195 Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
note: Offence punishable by fine
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.294
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits certain conduct
premise text: (4) An offence against subsection (1) or (2)
conclusion text: punishable on conviction by a fine of not more than...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for the breach turnover period
premise text: (c) if the court cannot determine the value of that benefit—30% of the body corporate’s adjusted turnover during the breach turnover period for the offence.
conclusion text: ...for the offence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implies a causal relationship between the breach and the fine
premise text: (b) if the court can determine the value of the benefit that the body corporate, and any body corporate related to the body corporate, have obtained directly or indirectly...
conclusion text: ...3 times the value of that benefit;
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Spreads the fine across related bodies corporate
premise text: (b) if the court can determine the value of the benefit that the body corporate, and any body corporate related to the body corporate, have obtained directly or indirectly...
conclusion text: ...3 times the value of that benefit;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
logic summary: Analyzes the financial impact of the breach on the body corporate
premise text: (a) $100,000,000;
conclusion text: ...not more than...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

195(5) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-195-ss-5
part of: 195 Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
note: Offence punishable by fine
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.294
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-5-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-5-logic-argumentation-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 195(5) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: punishable_by
logic summary: Imposes obligation on individuals
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-5-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: known
logic summary: States the fine amount is known
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ordered
logic summary: Describes a sequence of events
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-195-ss-5-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: justification
logic summary: Provides justification for the fine amount
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

196 Requirement to nominate a safety standard
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-196
has part: 196(1) Requirement to nominate a safety standard
has part: 196(2) Requirement to nominate a safety standard
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.295

196(1) Requirement to nominate a safety standard
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-196-ss-1
part of: 196 Requirement to nominate a safety standard
note: Refusal to comply with a request is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.295
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-196-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-196-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-196-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-196-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-196-ss-1-logic-ltl-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-196-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 196(1) Requirement to nominate a safety standard
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-196-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with a request.
premise text: Request given under subsection 108(2)
conclusion text: Refusal or failure to comply is an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-196-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on refusing or failing to comply with a request.
premise text: Request given under subsection 108(2)
conclusion text: Refusal or failure to comply is an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-196-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between request and refusal/failure to comply.
premise text: Request given under subsection 108(2)
conclusion text: Refusal or failure to comply is an offence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-196-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of refusal or failure to comply as an offence.
premise text: Request given under subsection 108(2)
conclusion text: Refusal or failure to comply is an offence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

196(2) Requirement to nominate a safety standard
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-196-ss-2
part of: 196 Requirement to nominate a safety standard
note: Offence of strict liability for failing to nominate a safety standard.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.295
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-196-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-196-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-196-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 196(2) Requirement to nominate a safety standard
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-196-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Strict Liability Obligation
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

197 Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-197
has part: 197(1) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
has part: 197(2) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
has part: 197(3) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
has part: 197(4) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
has part: 197(5) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
has part: 197(6) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
has part: 197(7) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
has part: 197(8) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
has part: 197(9) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.296

197(1) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-197-ss-1
part of: 197 Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
note: Supplying consumer goods covered by a ban is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.296
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 197(1) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplying consumer goods covered by a ban.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...an interim ban on goods of that kind is in force in the place where the supply occurs; or...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

197(2) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-197-ss-2
part of: 197 Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
note: Supplying consumer goods covered by a ban is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.296
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 197(2) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplying consumer goods covered by a ban.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, offers for supply (other than for export) consumer goods of a particular kind; and (b) the supply would be prohibited by subsection (1).
conclusion text: The supply is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Identifies recurring trace in supplying consumer goods covered by a ban.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, offers for supply (other than for export) consumer goods of a particular kind; and (b) the supply would be prohibited by subsection (1).
conclusion text: The supply is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation to not supply consumer goods covered by a ban.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, offers for supply (other than for export) consumer goods of a particular kind; and (b) the supply would be prohibited by subsection (1).
conclusion text: The person has an obligation to not supply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Identifies temporal interval in prohibiting supplying consumer goods covered by a ban.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, offers for supply (other than for export) consumer goods of a particular kind; and (b) the supply would be prohibited by subsection (1).
conclusion text: The prohibition is temporal.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses obligation to not supply consumer goods covered by a ban.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, offers for supply (other than for export) consumer goods of a particular kind; and (b) the supply would be prohibited by subsection (1).
conclusion text: The obligation is diffused.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

197(3) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-197-ss-3
part of: 197 Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
note: Manufacturing, possessing or controlling consumer goods of a particular kind is prohibited if supply would be prohibited by subsection (1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.296
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-3-logic-deontic-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 197(3) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits the manufacture, possession or control of consumer goods.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person, in or for the purposes of trade or commerce, manufactures, possesses or has control of consumer goods of a particular kind; and (b) supply of the goods would be prohibited by subsection (1).
conclusion text: (3) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person, in or for the purposes of trade or commerce, manufactures, possesses or has control of consumer goods of a particular kind; and (b) supply of the goods would be prohibited by subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: If supply is prohibited, then manufacturing, possessing or controlling is prohibited.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person, in or for the purposes of trade or commerce, manufactures, possesses or has control of consumer goods of a particular kind; and (b) supply of the goods would be prohibited by subsection (1).
conclusion text: (3) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person, in or for the purposes of trade or commerce, manufactures, possesses or has control of consumer goods of a particular kind; and (b) supply of the goods would be prohibited by subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Manufacturing, possessing or controlling is an obligation to comply with subsection (1).
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person, in or for the purposes of trade or commerce, manufactures, possesses or has control of consumer goods of a particular kind; and (b) supply of the goods would be prohibited by subsection (1).
conclusion text: (3) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person, in or for the purposes of trade or commerce, manufactures, possesses or has control of consumer goods of a particular kind; and (b) supply of the goods would be prohibited by subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

197(4) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-197-ss-4
part of: 197 Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
note: Exemption from subsection (3) for non-export purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.296
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-4-norm

197(5) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-197-ss-5
part of: 197 Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
note: Exporting consumer goods of a particular kind is prohibited if supply would be prohibited by subsection (1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.296
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 197(5) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Exporting is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

197(6) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-197-ss-6
part of: 197 Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
note: Approval required for export of goods under section 118(5)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.296
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to export goods
premise text: Commonwealth Minister approval required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

197(7) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-197-ss-7
part of: 197 Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
note: Offences of strict liability for supplying consumer goods covered by a ban
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.296
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-7-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-7-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-7-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 197(7) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplying consumer goods covered by a ban
premise text: (7) Subsections (1), (2), (3) and (5)
conclusion text: Offences of strict liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for offences of strict liability
premise text: (7) Subsections (1), (2), (3) and (5)
conclusion text: Offences of strict liability
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for offences of strict liability
premise text: (7) Subsections (1), (2), (3) and (5)
conclusion text: Offences of strict liability
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses definition of offences of strict liability
premise text: (7) Subsections (1), (2), (3) and (5)
conclusion text: Offences of strict liability
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies offences of strict liability using CogAI
premise text: (7) Subsections (1), (2), (3) and (5)
conclusion text: Offences of strict liability
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

197(8) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-197-ss-8
part of: 197 Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
note: Offence punishable by fine
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.296
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-8-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits certain conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

197(9) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-197-ss-9
part of: 197 Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
note: Fine for committing an offence by a natural person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.296
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-9-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-9-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 197(9) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-197-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on individuals
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

198 Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-198
has part: 198(1) Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
has part: 198(2) Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
has part: 198(3) Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.297

198(1) Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-198-ss-1
part of: 198 Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
note: Supplying product related services of a particular kind is prohibited when an interim or permanent ban is in force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.297
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-198-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-198-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-198-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 198(1) Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-198-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

198(2) Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-198-ss-2
part of: 198 Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
note: Offering product-related services covered by a ban is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.297
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-198-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-198-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-198-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-198-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-198-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-198-ss-2-logic-shacl-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-198-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 198(2) Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-198-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of offering product-related services covered by a ban.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the supply would be prohibited by subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-198-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for offering product-related services covered by a ban.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the supply would be prohibited by subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-198-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of offering product-related services covered by a ban.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the supply would be prohibited by subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-198-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation of product-related services as covered by a ban.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the supply would be prohibited by subsection (1).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-198-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validation
logic summary: Validation of product-related services covered by a ban.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the supply would be prohibited by subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

198(3) Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-198-ss-3
part of: 198 Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
note: Offences of strict liability for supplying product related services covered by a ban
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.297
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-198-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-198-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-198-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 198(3) Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-198-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits supplying product related services covered by a ban
premise text: (3) Subsections (1) and (2)
conclusion text: Offences of strict liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

199 Compliance with recall orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-199
has part: 199(1) Compliance with recall orders
has part: 199(2) Compliance with recall orders
has part: 199(3) Compliance with recall orders
has part: 199(4) Compliance with recall orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.299

199(1) Compliance with recall orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-199-ss-1
part of: 199 Compliance with recall orders
note: Refusal to comply with recall notice is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.299
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-199-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-199-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-199-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-199-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 199(1) Compliance with recall orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-199-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with recall notice.
premise text: (a) a recall notice for consumer goods is in force; and (b) the notice requires the person...
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-199-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on refusing to comply with recall notice.
premise text: (c) the person refuses or fails to comply with the notice.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

199(2) Compliance with recall orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-199-ss-2
part of: 199 Compliance with recall orders
note: Supplies consumer goods with identified defects or dangerous characteristics.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.299
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-199-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-199-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-199-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-199-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-199-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-199-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-199-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 199(2) Compliance with recall orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-199-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplying consumer goods with identified defects or dangerous characteristics.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) a recall notice for consumer goods is in force; and (b) the person, in trade or commerce:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-199-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Supplies are prohibited during the period of the recall notice.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) a recall notice for consumer goods is in force; and (b) the person, in trade or commerce:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-199-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Supplies are prohibited during the period of the recall notice.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) a recall notice for consumer goods is in force; and (b) the person, in trade or commerce:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-199-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Recall notices spread to all suppliers of consumer goods.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) a recall notice for consumer goods is in force; and (b) the person, in trade or commerce:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-199-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Detect
logic summary: Recall notices detect defects or dangerous characteristics in consumer goods.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) a recall notice for consumer goods is in force; and (b) the person, in trade or commerce:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

199(3) Compliance with recall orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-199-ss-3
part of: 199 Compliance with recall orders
note: Penalty for non-compliance with recall orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.299
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-199-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-199-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-199-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 199(3) Compliance with recall orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-199-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Imposes a penalty for non-compliance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

199(4) Compliance with recall orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-199-ss-4
part of: 199 Compliance with recall orders
note: Offence against subsection (1) or (2) committed by a body corporate is punishable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.299
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-199-ss-4-norm

200 Notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-200
has part: 200(1) Notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside
has part: 200(2) Notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.300

200(1) Notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-200-ss-1
part of: 200 Notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside
note: Refusal to provide required notice results in an offence.
description: copy of notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.300
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-200-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-200-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-200-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of refusal to provide required notice.
premise text: Section 125(4) requires giving a copy of notice.
conclusion text: Refusal results in an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

200(2) Notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-200-ss-2
part of: 200 Notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside
note: Strict liability offence for notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.300
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-200-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-200-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-200-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 200(2) Notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-200-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Strict liability offence
premise text: (2) Subsection (1)
conclusion text: offence of strict liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

201 Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-201
has part: 201(1) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
has part: 201(2) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
has part: 201(3) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.300

201(1) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-201-ss-1
part of: 201 Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
note: Refusal to provide notice in a voluntary recall of consumer
description: Notice to the Commonwealth Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.300
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-201-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-201-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-201-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-201-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-201-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-201-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-201-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on refusing notice
premise text: Section 128(2) requires notice to the Commonwealth Minister
conclusion text: Refusal of notice is an offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-201-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between refusal and notice requirement
premise text: Section 128(2) requires notice to the Commonwealth Minister at some point
conclusion text: Refusal of notice occurs before or after the notice requirement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-201-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of refusal and notice requirement
premise text: Section 128(2) requires notice to the Commonwealth Minister repeatedly
conclusion text: Refusal of notice is part of a recurring pattern
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-201-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of refusal through the system
premise text: Refusal of notice affects the entire system
conclusion text: Refusal of notice has a diffusive effect on the system
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-201-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation of refusal and notice requirement
premise text: Section 128(2) requires notice to the Commonwealth Minister in knowledge representation
conclusion text: Refusal of notice is represented in knowledge representation
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

201(2) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-201-ss-2
part of: 201 Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
note: Refusal to provide required notice for voluntary recall of consumer goods
description: Notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.300
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-201-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-201-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-201-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-201-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-201-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-201-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-201-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on refusing to provide required notice
premise text: Section 128(6) requires giving a copy of the notice
conclusion text: Refusal to comply is an offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-201-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between required notice and refusal to provide it
premise text: Section 128(6) requires giving a copy of the notice before a certain date
conclusion text: The person's refusal to provide the notice overlaps with the required period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-201-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Refusal to provide notice implies an offence
premise text: Section 128(6) requires giving a copy of the notice
conclusion text: If the person refuses, they commit an offence
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-201-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Implication
logic summary: Refusal to provide notice affects others who rely on it
premise text: Section 128(6) requires giving a copy of the notice to the Commonwealth Minister
conclusion text: The person's refusal to comply affects others who may rely on the notice
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-201-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Implication
logic summary: Refusal to provide notice has consequences for AI systems that rely on it
premise text: Section 128(6) requires giving a copy of the notice
conclusion text: The person's refusal to comply may impact AI systems that use the notice
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

201(3) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-201-ss-3
part of: 201 Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
note: Offences of strict liability for notification requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.300
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-201-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-201-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-201-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 201(3) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-201-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Strict liability offence
premise text: (3) Subsections (1) and (2)
conclusion text: offence of strict liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

202 Suppliers to report consumer goods etc. associated with the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-202
has part: 202(1) Suppliers to report consumer goods etc. associated with the
has part: 202(2) Suppliers to report consumer goods etc. associated with the
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.302

202(1) Suppliers to report consumer goods etc. associated with the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-202-ss-1
part of: 202 Suppliers to report consumer goods etc. associated with the
note: Refusal to give notice as required by section 131 or 132 is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.302
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-202-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-202-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-202-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of refusal to give notice
premise text: Section 131 or 132 requires notice
conclusion text: Refusal is an offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

202(2) Suppliers to report consumer goods etc. associated with the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-202-ss-2
part of: 202 Suppliers to report consumer goods etc. associated with the
note: Strict liability offence for reporting consumer goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.302
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-202-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-202-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-202-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 202(2) Suppliers to report consumer goods etc. associated with the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-202-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Reporting obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

203 Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-203
has part: 203(1) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
has part: 203(2) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
has part: 203(3) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
has part: 203(4) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
has part: 203(5) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.303

203(1) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-203-ss-1
part of: 203 Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
note: Supplying goods that do not comply with information standard is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.303
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-203-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-203-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-203-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-203-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 203(1) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-203-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplying goods that do not comply with information standard.
premise text: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, supplies goods of a particular kind; and (b) an information standard for goods of that kind is in force; and (c) the person has not complied with the standard in relation to the goods.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-203-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implies that supplying goods that do not comply with information standard is an offence.
premise text: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, supplies goods of a particular kind; and (b) an information standard for goods of that kind is in force; and (c) the person has not complied with the standard in relation to the goods.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

203(2) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-203-ss-2
part of: 203 Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
note: Offering goods that do not comply with information standard is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.303
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-203-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-203-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-203-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 203(2) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-203-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits offering goods that do not comply with information standard.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, offers for supply goods of a particular kind; and (b) an information standard for goods of that kind is in force; and (c) the person has not complied with the standard in relation to the goods.
conclusion text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, offers for supply goods of a particular kind; and (b) an information standard for goods of that kind is in force; and (c) the person has not complied with the standard in relation to the goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

203(3) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-203-ss-3
part of: 203 Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
note: Manufacturing, possessing or controlling goods without complying with a standard is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.303
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-203-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-203-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-203-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-203-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-203-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-203-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-203-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 203(3) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-203-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits action
premise text: Manufacturing, possessing or controlling goods without complying with a standard.
conclusion text: An offence is committed if the person has not complied with the standard in relation to the goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-203-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes duty to comply with standards
premise text: The person manufactures, possesses or has control of goods of a particular kind.
conclusion text: The person must comply with the standard in relation to the goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-203-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Identifies temporal overlap between actions and standards
premise text: An information standard for goods of that kind is in force.
conclusion text: The person's actions (manufacturing, possessing or controlling) overlap with the standard.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-203-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Identifies recurring trace between actions and standards
premise text: An information standard for goods of that kind is in force.
conclusion text: The person's actions (manufacturing, possessing or controlling) repeat with the standard.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-203-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Grants permission to comply with standards
premise text: An information standard for goods of that kind is in force.
conclusion text: The person is permitted to comply with the standard in relation to the goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

203(4) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-203-ss-4
part of: 203 Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
note: Exemption from subsection (3) if goods are not manufactured, possessed or controlled for supply.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.303
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-203-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-203-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-203-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 203(4) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-203-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Exempts from subsection (3)
premise text: (4) Subsection (3) does not apply...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

203(5) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-203-ss-5
part of: 203 Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
note: Goods intended for use outside Australia are exempt from certain provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.303
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-203-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-203-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-203-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-203-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Goods intended for use outside Australia are exempt from certain provisions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-203-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

204 Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-204
has part: 204(1) Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
has part: 204(2) Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
has part: 204(3) Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
has part: 204(4) Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.305

204(1) Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-204-ss-1
part of: 204 Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
note: Supplying services that do not comply with information standards is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.305
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 204(1) Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplying services that do not comply with information standards.
premise text: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, supplies services of a particular kind; and (b) an information standard for services of that kind is in force;
conclusion text: the person has not complied with the standard in relation to the services.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Supplies services during a time when an information standard is in force.
premise text: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, supplies services of a particular kind; and (b) an information standard for services of that kind is in force;
conclusion text: the person has not complied with the standard in relation to the services.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Supplies services until an information standard is no longer in force.
premise text: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, supplies services of a particular kind; and (b) an information standard for services of that kind is in force;
conclusion text: the person has not complied with the standard in relation to the services.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Through
logic summary: Supplies services through a process that involves an information standard.
premise text: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, supplies services of a particular kind; and (b) an information standard for services of that kind is in force;
conclusion text: the person has not complied with the standard in relation to the services.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Through
logic summary: Supplies services through a process that involves an information standard.
premise text: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, supplies services of a particular kind; and (b) an information standard for services of that kind is in force;
conclusion text: the person has not complied with the standard in relation to the services.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

204(2) Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-204-ss-2
part of: 204 Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
note: Offering services that do not comply with an information standard is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.305
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 204(2) Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of non-compliance with an information standard.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...the person has not complied with the standard in relation to the services.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval of non-compliance with an information standard.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...the person has not complied with the standard in relation to the services.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of non-compliance with an information standard.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...the person has not complied with the standard in relation to the services.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of non-compliance with an information standard.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...the person has not complied with the standard in relation to the services.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
logic summary: Classification of non-compliance as a prohibited act by CogAI.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...the person has not complied with the standard in relation to the services.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

204(3) Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-204-ss-3
part of: 204 Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
note: Penalty for non-compliance with information services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.305
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Imposes a penalty for non-compliance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

204(4) Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-204-ss-4
part of: 204 Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
note: Offence punishable by fine
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.305
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-4-logic-cogai-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-4-logic-shacl-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits certain conduct
premise text: (4) An offence against subsection (1) or (2)
conclusion text: punishable on conviction by a fine of not more than...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for the breach turnover period
premise text: (4) An offence against subsection (1) or (2) committed by a body corporate is punishable on conviction...
conclusion text: ...by a fine of not more than...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines the recurring trace for the adjusted turnover during the breach turnover period
premise text: (4) An offence against subsection (1) or (2) committed by a body corporate is punishable on conviction...
conclusion text: ...by a fine of not more than...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-4-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Entity Recognition
logic summary: Recognizes the entity (body corporate) liable for the fine
premise text: (4) An offence against subsection (1) or (2) committed by a body corporate is punishable on conviction...
conclusion text: ...by a fine of not more than...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-204-ss-4-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema Validation
logic summary: Validates the schema for the fine amount
premise text: (4) An offence against subsection (1) or (2) committed by a body corporate is punishable on conviction...
conclusion text: ...by a fine of not more than...
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

205 Compliance with substantiation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-205
has part: 205(1) Compliance with substantiation notices
has part: 205(2) Compliance with substantiation notices
has part: 205(3) Compliance with substantiation notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.307

205(1) Compliance with substantiation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-205-ss-1
part of: 205 Compliance with substantiation notices
note: Refusal to comply with substantiation notice within specified period is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.307
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-205-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-205-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-205-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 205(1) Compliance with substantiation notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-205-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with substantiation notice
premise text: Given a substantiation notice
conclusion text: Refusal to comply is an offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

205(2) Compliance with substantiation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-205-ss-2
part of: 205 Compliance with substantiation notices
note: Refusal to provide information or document in compliance with substantiation notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.307
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-205-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-205-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-205-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 205(2) Compliance with substantiation notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-205-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits refusal to provide information or document
premise text: State issues substantiation notice
conclusion text: Refusal is prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

205(3) Compliance with substantiation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-205-ss-3
part of: 205 Compliance with substantiation notices
note: Offence of strict liability for non-compliance with substantiation notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.307
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-205-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-205-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-205-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 205(3) Compliance with substantiation notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-205-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Strict liability obligation
premise text: (3) Subsection (1)
conclusion text: Offence of strict liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

206 False or misleading information etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-206
note: Giving false or misleading information to the regulator is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.307
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-206-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-206-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-206-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 206 False or misleading information etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-206-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of false or misleading information
premise text: Regulator substantiation notice
conclusion text: Offence committed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

207 Reasonable mistake of fact
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-207
has part: 207(1) Reasonable mistake of fact
has part: 207(2) Reasonable mistake of fact
has part: 207(3) Reasonable mistake of fact
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.309

207(1) Reasonable mistake of fact
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-207-ss-1
part of: 207 Reasonable mistake of fact
note: Defence for reasonable mistake of fact in prosecution
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.309
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-207-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-207-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-207-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-207-ss-1-logic-epistemic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-207-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-207-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-207-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes duty on the prosecution to prove facts
premise text: Prosecution must prove facts
conclusion text: Defence available if mistake of fact is reasonable
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-207-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes duty on the defendant to correct mistake of fact
premise text: Defendant must correct mistake of fact
conclusion text: Defence available if mistake of fact is reasonable
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-207-ss-1-logic-epistemic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
logic summary: Relies on information supplied by another person
premise text: Information supplied by another person
conclusion text: Mistake of fact is reasonable if reliance is reasonable
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-207-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for mistake of fact
premise text: Mistake of fact occurred within a temporal interval
conclusion text: Defence available if mistake of fact is within the interval
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-207-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permits defence for reasonable mistake of fact
premise text: Defence available if mistake of fact is reasonable
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

207(2) Reasonable mistake of fact
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-207-ss-2
part of: 207 Reasonable mistake of fact
note: Defendant is not liable if information relied upon was supplied by another person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.309
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-207-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-207-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-207-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 207(2) Reasonable mistake of fact
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-207-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defendant's liability is obligation-based.
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply.
conclusion text: Defendant is not liable.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

207(3) Reasonable mistake of fact
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-207-ss-3
part of: 207 Reasonable mistake of fact
note: Court permission required for reliance on information from another person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.309
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-207-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-207-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-207-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-207-ss-3-logic-epistemic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-207-ss-3-logic-ltl-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-207-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Court permission is required.
premise text: Defendant must obtain court leave to rely on information from another person.
conclusion text: Defendant is not entitled to rely on the defence unless court gives leave.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-207-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Court permission is required for reliance on information from another person.
premise text: Defendant must serve notice on the person who instituted the proceeding within 7 days before the hearing commences.
conclusion text: Defendant is not entitled to rely on the defence unless they have served notice on the person who instituted the proceeding.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-207-ss-3-logic-epistemic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
logic summary: Defendant must believe that they had information that would identify or assist in identifying the other person.
premise text: Defendant has not provided sufficient evidence to rely on the defence unless they have served notice on the person who instituted the proceeding.
conclusion text: Defendant is not entitled to rely on the defence unless they have served notice on the person who instituted the proceeding.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-207-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Interval
logic summary: The interval between serving notice and the hearing commences must be considered.
premise text: Defendant has not provided sufficient evidence to rely on the defence unless they have served notice on the person who instituted the proceeding within 7 days before the hearing commences.
conclusion text: Defendant is not entitled to rely on the defence unless they have served notice on the person who instituted the proceeding within 7 days before the hearing commences.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

208 Act or default of another person etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-208
note: Defence in prosecution for contravention of Chapter provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.309
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-208-norm

209 Publication of advertisements in the ordinary course of business
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-209
note: Defendant must prove they are a business publisher and received advertisement in ordinary course of business to avoid prosecution for contravention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.310
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-209-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-209-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-209-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 209 Publication of advertisements in the ordinary course of business
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-209-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defendant has an obligation to prove they are a business publisher and received advertisement in ordinary course of business.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

210 Supplying goods acquired for the purpose of re-supply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-210
has part: 210(1) Supplying goods acquired for the purpose of re-supply
has part: 210(2) Supplying goods acquired for the purpose of re-supply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.310

210(1) Supplying goods acquired for the purpose of re-supply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-210-ss-1
part of: 210 Supplying goods acquired for the purpose of re-supply
note: Defence for supplying goods in contravention of section 194 or 203
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.310
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-210-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-210-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-210-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-210-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-210-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-210-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 210(1) Supplying goods acquired for the purpose of re-supply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-210-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defence for supplying goods in contravention of section 194 or 203
premise text: The defendant proves that...
conclusion text: it is a defence if the defendant proves...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-210-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between defendant's acquisition and re-supply
premise text: (a) the goods were acquired by the defendant for the purpose of re-supply;
conclusion text: the defendant had not complied with the information standard to which the contravention relates;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-210-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of defendant's actions
premise text: (i) did not know, and could not with reasonable diligence have ascertained...
conclusion text: the defendant relied in good faith on a representation by the person from whom the defendant acquired the goods that there was no safety standard for such goods;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-210-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permitted actions of the defendant
premise text: (ii) relied in good faith on a representation by the person from whom the defendant acquired the goods that there was no safety standard for such goods;
conclusion text: the defendant did not know, and could not with reasonable diligence have ascertained...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

210(2) Supplying goods acquired for the purpose of re-supply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-210-ss-2
part of: 210 Supplying goods acquired for the purpose of re-supply
note: Notice requirement for defendant to rely on defence
description: Written notice within 7 days before proceeding commences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.310
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-210-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-210-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-210-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-210-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-210-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Defendant needs permission to rely on defence
premise text: Court gives leave or defendant provides notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-210-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Knowledge
logic summary: Defendant must know about notice requirement
premise text: Notice provided within 7 days before proceeding commences
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-210-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Notice must be recurring trace of defendant's actions
premise text: Notice provided within 7 days before proceeding commences
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

211 Supplying services acquired for the purpose of re-supply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-211
has part: 211(1) Supplying services acquired for the purpose of re-supply
has part: 211(2) Supplying services acquired for the purpose of re-supply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.312

211(1) Supplying services acquired for the purpose of re-supply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-211-ss-1
part of: 211 Supplying services acquired for the purpose of re-supply
note: Defence for supplying services acquired for re-supply in contravention of sections 195 or 204.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.312
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-211-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-211-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-211-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-211-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-211-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-211-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 211(1) Supplying services acquired for the purpose of re-supply
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-211-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defence for supplying services acquired for re-supply in contravention of sections 195 or 204.
premise text: Section 211(1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.9000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-211-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
logic summary: Defence relies on good faith representation about lack of safety standard or information standard.
premise text: (a) and (c)(ii)
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-211-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defence for supplying services acquired for re-supply in contravention of sections 195 or 204.
premise text: (a) and (c)(i)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.7000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-211-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Inference
logic summary: Defence for supplying services acquired for re-supply in contravention of sections 195 or 204.
premise text: (a) and (c)
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

211(2) Supplying services acquired for the purpose of re-supply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-211-ss-2
part of: 211 Supplying services acquired for the purpose of re-supply
note: Notice requirement for defendant to rely on defence
description: Written notice within 7 days before proceeding commences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.312
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-211-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-211-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-211-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 211(2) Supplying services acquired for the purpose of re-supply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-211-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defendant must provide written notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

212 Prosecutions to be commenced within 3 years
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-212
note: Prosecution must be commenced within 3 years after commission of offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.313
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-212-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-212-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-212-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 212 Prosecutions to be commenced within 3 years
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-212-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide prosecution within 3 years
premise text: Commission of offence
conclusion text: Prosecution commenced
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

213 Preference must be given to compensation for victims
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-213
note: Court must give preference to making an order for compensation if defendant cannot pay fine and compensation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.313
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-213-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-213-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-213-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 213 Preference must be given to compensation for victims
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-213-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must give preference to making an order for compensation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

214 Penalties for contraventions of the same nature etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-214
has part: 214(1) Penalties for contraventions of the same nature etc.
has part: 214(2) Penalties for contraventions of the same nature etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.314

214(1) Penalties for contraventions of the same nature etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-214-ss-1
part of: 214 Penalties for contraventions of the same nature etc.
note: Maximum fine for multiple contraventions of the same provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.314
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-214-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-214-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-214-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-214-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-214-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits exceeding maximum fine for multiple contraventions
premise text: (a) and (b)
conclusion text: Fines must not exceed the maximum fine
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-214-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between contraventions
premise text: (b) (i) and (b) (ii)
conclusion text: The contraventions occur at or about the same time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-214-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Describes a recurring pattern of contraventions
premise text: (a) and (b)
conclusion text: The person is subject to multiple contraventions
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

214(2) Penalties for contraventions of the same nature etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-214-ss-2
part of: 214 Penalties for contraventions of the same nature etc.
note: Penalties for contraventions of the same nature etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.314
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-214-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-214-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-214-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 214(2) Penalties for contraventions of the same nature etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-214-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Holds true
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

215 Penalties for previous contraventions of the same nature etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-215
has part: 215(1) Penalties for previous contraventions of the same nature etc.
has part: 215(2) Penalties for previous contraventions of the same nature etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.314

215(1) Penalties for previous contraventions of the same nature etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-215-ss-1
part of: 215 Penalties for previous contraventions of the same nature etc.
note: Cannot impose a fine exceeding the difference between maximum and previous fines.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.314
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-215-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-215-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-215-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-215-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-215-ss-1-logic-ltl-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-215-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Cannot impose a fine exceeding the difference between maximum and previous fines.
premise text: (a) a person is convicted of an offence constituted by, or relating to, a contravention of a provision of this Chapter;
conclusion text: The court must not, in respect of the offence mentioned in paragraph (a), impose on the person a fine that exceeds the amount...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-215-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: If previous fines exceed the difference between maximum and previous fines, then the court cannot impose a higher fine.
premise text: (c) the contravention, or each of the contraventions, mentioned in paragraph (b) appear to the court:
conclusion text: The court must not, in respect of the offence mentioned in paragraph (a), impose on the person a fine that exceeds the amount...
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-215-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Fines exceed the difference between maximum and previous fines.
premise text: (b) a fine has, or fines have, previously been imposed on the person by the court for an offence or offences constituted by, or relating to, another contravention or other contraventions of the same provision;
conclusion text: The amount of the fine, or the sum of the amounts of the fines, referred to in paragraph (b)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-215-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Fines exceed the difference between maximum and previous fines.
premise text: (c) the contravention, or each of the contraventions, mentioned in paragraph (b) appear to the court:
conclusion text: The court must not, in respect of the offence mentioned in paragraph (a), impose on the person a fine that exceeds the amount...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

215(2) Penalties for previous contraventions of the same nature etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-215-ss-2
part of: 215 Penalties for previous contraventions of the same nature etc.
note: Fine for previous contraventions of the same nature etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.314
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-215-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-215-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-215-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 215(2) Penalties for previous contraventions of the same nature etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-215-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216 Granting of injunctions etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-216
note: Granting of injunctions in proceedings for contravention
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.315
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-216-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-216-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-216-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216 Granting of injunctions etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-216-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to grant injunctions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

217 Criminal proceedings not to be brought for contraventions of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-217
note: Criminal proceedings not allowed for contraventions of Chapter 2 or 3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.315
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-217-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-217-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-217-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits criminal proceedings for contraventions of Chapter 2 or 3
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

218 Regulator may accept undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-218
has part: 218(1) Regulator may accept undertakings
has part: 218(2) Regulator may accept undertakings
has part: 218(3) Regulator may accept undertakings
has part: 218(4) Regulator may accept undertakings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.317

218(1) Regulator may accept undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-218-ss-1
part of: 218 Regulator may accept undertakings
note: Regulator may accept a written undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.317
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-218-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-218-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-218-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: accepts
logic summary: Acceptance of undertakings
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

218(2) Regulator may accept undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-218-ss-2
part of: 218 Regulator may accept undertakings
note: Regulator may accept undertakings with consent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.317
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-218-ss-2-norm

218(3) Regulator may accept undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-218-ss-3
part of: 218 Regulator may accept undertakings
note: Regulator may apply to court for an order if undertaking is breached.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.317
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-218-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-218-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-218-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 218(3) Regulator may accept undertakings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-218-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Regulator has obligation to apply for court order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

218(4) Regulator may accept undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-218-ss-4
part of: 218 Regulator may accept undertakings
note: Court orders to comply with breach of undertaking terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.317
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-218-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-218-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-218-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-218-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-218-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-218-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-218-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 218(4) Regulator may accept undertakings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-218-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with breach of undertaking terms
premise text: (4) If the court is satisfied that the person has breached a term of the undertaking...
conclusion text: The court may make all or any of the following orders:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-218-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval for breach of undertaking terms
premise text: (4) If the court is satisfied that the person has breached a term of the undertaking...
conclusion text: The court may make all or any of the following orders:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-218-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implication
logic summary: Implication of breach of undertaking terms on court orders
premise text: (4) If the court is satisfied that the person has breached a term of the undertaking...
conclusion text: The court may make all or any of the following orders:
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-218-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuse
logic summary: Diffusion of breach of undertaking terms to other parties
premise text: (4) If the court is satisfied that the person has breached a term of the undertaking...
conclusion text: The court may make all or any of the following orders:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-218-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: infer
logic summary: Inference of breach of undertaking terms from court satisfaction
premise text: (4) If the court is satisfied that the person has breached a term of the undertaking...
conclusion text: The court may make all or any of the following orders:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

219 Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-219
has part: 219(1) Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
has part: 219(2) Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
has part: 219(3) Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
has part: 219(4) Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
has part: 219(5) Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
has part: 219(6) Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.318

219(1) Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-219-ss-1
part of: 219 Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
note: Regulator may require claims to be substantiated.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.318
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-219-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-219-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-219-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 219(1) Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-219-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires substantiation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

219(2) Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-219-ss-2
part of: 219 Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
note: Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
description: information and/or documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.318
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-219-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-219-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-219-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 219(2) Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-219-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator requires claims to be substantiated
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

219(3) Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-219-ss-3
part of: 219 Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
note: Regulator may require substantiation of claims or representations.
description: (a) substantiating or supporting the claim or representation; (b) if the claim or representation relates to a supply, or possible supply, of goods or services by the person or another person—substantiating the quantities in which, or the period for which, the person or other person is or will be able to make such a supply.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.318
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-219-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-219-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-219-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-219-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 219(3) Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-219-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must require substantiation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-219-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Claims or representations are substantiated.
premise text: (a) substantiating or supporting the claim or representation;
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

219(4) Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-219-ss-4
part of: 219 Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
note: Regulator must provide notice with specific details.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.318
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-219-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-219-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-219-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 219(4) Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-219-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulatory obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

219(5) Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-219-ss-5
part of: 219 Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
note: Regulator may require substantiation of claims.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.318
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-219-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-219-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-219-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 219(5) Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-219-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

219(6) Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-219-ss-6
part of: 219 Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
note: Exemptions for information providers making claims on behalf of another person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.318
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-219-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-219-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-219-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 219(6) Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-219-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

220 Extending periods for complying with substantiation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-220
note: A person must comply with a substantiation notice within 21 days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.319
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-220-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-220-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-220-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 220 Extending periods for complying with substantiation notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-220-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with a substantiation notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

221 Compliance with substantiation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-221
has part: 221(1) Compliance with substantiation notices
has part: 221(2) Compliance with substantiation notices
has part: 221(3) Compliance with substantiation notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.320

221(1) Compliance with substantiation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-221-ss-1
part of: 221 Compliance with substantiation notices
note: Comply with substantiation notice within specified period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.320
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-221-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-221-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-221-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 221(1) Compliance with substantiation notices
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-221-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

221(2) Compliance with substantiation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-221-ss-2
part of: 221 Compliance with substantiation notices
note: Compliance period for substantiation notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.320
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-221-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-221-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-221-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-221-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 221(2) Compliance with substantiation notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-221-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with notice within specified period
premise text: (2) The substantiation notice compliance period for a substantiation notice is:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-221-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Classifies as obligation to comply with notice
premise text: The substantiation notice compliance period for a substantiation document is:
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

221(3) Compliance with substantiation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-221-ss-3
part of: 221 Compliance with substantiation notices
note: Refusal to provide information or document in response to substantiation notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.320
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-221-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-221-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-221-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 221(3) Compliance with substantiation notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-221-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with substantiation notices
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

222 False or misleading information etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-222
has part: 222(1) False or misleading information etc.
has part: 222(2) False or misleading information etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.320

222(1) False or misleading information etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-222-ss-1
part of: 222 False or misleading information etc.
note: Give false or misleading information to the regulator.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.320
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-222-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-222-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-222-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-222-ss-1-logic-deontic-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-222-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 222(1) False or misleading information etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-222-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of providing false or misleading information.
premise text: The regulator has issued a substantiation notice.
conclusion text: A person must not give false or misleading information to the regulator.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-222-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of producing documents with false or misleading information.
premise text: The regulator has issued a substantiation notice.
conclusion text: A person must not produce documents that contain false or misleading information to the regulator.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-222-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of giving false or misleading information in compliance with a substantiation notice.
premise text: The regulator has issued a substantiation notice.
conclusion text: A person must not give false or misleading information to the regulator in compliance with a substantiation notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

222(2) False or misleading information etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-222-ss-2
part of: 222 False or misleading information etc.
note: Exemptions from the prohibition on providing false or misleading information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.320
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-222-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-222-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-222-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 222(2) False or misleading information etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-222-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from the obligation to provide true information
premise text: The provision does not apply to information that the person could not have known was false or misleading.
conclusion text: The exemption applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

223 Regulator may issue a public warning notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-223
has part: 223(1) Regulator may issue a public warning notice
has part: 223(2) Regulator may issue a public warning notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.322

223(1) Regulator may issue a public warning notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-223-ss-1
part of: 223 Regulator may issue a public warning notice
note: Regulator may issue a public warning notice about suspected contravention of Chapter 2, 3 or 4.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.322
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-223-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-223-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-223-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-223-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-223-ss-1-logic-epistemic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-223-ss-1-logic-epistemic-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-223-ss-1-logic-epistemic-6

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-223-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 223(1) Regulator may issue a public warning notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-223-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Regulator must prohibit conduct.
premise text: (a) the regulator has reasonable grounds to suspect that the conduct may constitute a contravention of a provision of Chapter 2, 3 or 4;
conclusion text: The regulator must issue a public warning notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-223-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Regulator must prohibit conduct.
premise text: (b) the regulator is satisfied that one or more other persons has suffered, or is likely to suffer, detriment as a result of the conduct;
conclusion text: The regulator must issue a public warning notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-223-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Regulator must prohibit conduct.
premise text: (c) the regulator is satisfied that it is in the public interest to issue the notice;
conclusion text: The regulator must issue a public warning notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-223-ss-1-logic-epistemic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Believe
logic summary: Regulator believes conduct may constitute contravention of Chapter 2, 3 or 4.
premise text: (a) the regulator has reasonable grounds to suspect that the conduct may constitute a contravention of a provision of Chapter 2, 3 or 4;
conclusion text: The regulator must issue a public warning notice.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-223-ss-1-logic-epistemic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Believe
logic summary: Regulator believes conduct may cause detriment to others.
premise text: (b) the regulator is satisfied that one or more other persons has suffered, or is likely to suffer, detriment as a result of the conduct;
conclusion text: The regulator must issue a public warning notice.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-223-ss-1-logic-epistemic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Believe
logic summary: Regulator believes it is in public interest to issue notice.
premise text: (c) the regulator is satisfied that it is in the public interest to issue the notice;
conclusion text: The regulator must issue a public warning notice.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

223(2) Regulator may issue a public warning notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-223-ss-2
part of: 223 Regulator may issue a public warning notice
note: Refusal to respond to substantiation notice may result in public warning notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.322
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-223-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-223-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-223-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 223(2) Regulator may issue a public warning notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-223-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of refusing to respond to substantiation notice.
premise text: Regulator may issue a public warning notice if person refuses to respond.
conclusion text: Person's refusal is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

224 Pecuniary penalties
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-224
note: Court may impose pecuniary penalties for contravening certain provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.323
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-224-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-224-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-224-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-224-logic-argumentation-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-224-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 224 Pecuniary penalties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-224-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes prohibition on conduct.
premise text: (1) If a court is satisfied...
conclusion text: ...a person must not contravene the provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-224-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for court's satisfaction.
premise text: (1) If a court is satisfied...
conclusion text: ...that a person has contravened any of the following provisions.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-224-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implies that court's satisfaction implies prohibition.
premise text: (1) If a court is satisfied...
conclusion text: ...a person must not contravene the provision.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

225 Pecuniary penalties and offences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-225
has part: 225(1) Pecuniary penalties and offences
has part: 225(2) Pecuniary penalties and offences
has part: 225(3) Pecuniary penalties and offences
has part: 225(4) Pecuniary penalties and offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.327

225(1) Pecuniary penalties and offences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-225-ss-1
part of: 225 Pecuniary penalties and offences
note: Court must not make an order against a person convicted of an offence constituting substantially the same conduct as a consumer protection breach.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.327
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-225-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-225-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-225-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 225(1) Pecuniary penalties and offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-225-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Court must not make an order
premise text: Section 224(1)(a)
conclusion text: Obligation to refrain from making an order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

225(2) Pecuniary penalties and offences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-225-ss-2
part of: 225 Pecuniary penalties and offences
note: Proceedings for an order under section 224 are stayed if criminal proceedings are started or have already been started against the person for an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.327
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-225-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-225-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-225-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-225-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-225-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-225-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-225-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 225(2) Pecuniary penalties and offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-225-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits proceedings under section 224 if criminal proceedings are started or have already been started.
premise text: (2) Proceedings for an order under section 224 against a person in relation to a consumer protection breach are stayed...
conclusion text: ...the proceedings are dismissed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-225-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between criminal proceedings and proceedings under section 224
premise text: (2) Proceedings for an order under section 224 against a person in relation to a consumer protection breach are stayed...
conclusion text: ...if the person is not convicted of the offence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-225-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Describes the repetition of proceedings under section 224 if criminal proceedings are started or have already been started
premise text: (2) Proceedings for an order under section 224 against a person in relation to a consumer protection breach are stayed...
conclusion text: ...the proceedings are dismissed.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-225-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Describes the diffusion of information about criminal proceedings and proceedings under section 224
premise text: (2) Proceedings for an order under section 224 against a person in relation to a consumer protection breach are stayed...
conclusion text: ...if the person is not convicted of the offence.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-225-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
logic summary: Describes the inference of conclusions from premises about criminal proceedings and proceedings under section 224
premise text: (2) Proceedings for an order under section 224 against a person in relation to a consumer protection breach are stayed...
conclusion text: ...the proceedings may be resumed if the person is not convicted of the offence.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

225(3) Pecuniary penalties and offences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-225-ss-3
part of: 225 Pecuniary penalties and offences
note: Criminal proceedings can be started against a person for conduct substantially the same as a consumer protection breach.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.327
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-225-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-225-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-225-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 225(3) Pecuniary penalties and offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-225-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: starts-with
logic summary: Criminal proceedings can be started
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

225(4) Pecuniary penalties and offences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-225-ss-4
part of: 225 Pecuniary penalties and offences
note: Evidence of certain information is not admissible in criminal proceedings against the individual.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.327
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-225-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-225-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-225-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits evidence from being used in criminal proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

226 Defence
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-226
note: Court may relieve person from liability to pecuniary penalty if they acted honestly and reasonably.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.328
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-226-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-226-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-226-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-226-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-226-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-226-logic-deontic-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-226-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 226 Defence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-226-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Relief
logic summary: Court may relieve person from liability.
premise text: Person has engaged in conduct that relates to a contravention of a provision.
conclusion text: Court relieves person from liability.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-226-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Excuse
logic summary: Court may excuse person's conduct if they acted honestly and reasonably.
premise text: Person has engaged in conduct that relates to a contravention of a provision.
conclusion text: Court excuses person's conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-226-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Excerpt mentions a temporal interval (proceedings under section 224).
premise text: Proceedings under section 224.
conclusion text: Person's conduct occurred during proceedings under section 224.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-226-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Court may relieve person from liability if they acted honestly and reasonably.
premise text: Person has engaged in conduct that relates to a contravention of a provision.
conclusion text: Court permits person's relief.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-226-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Court is obligated to relieve person from liability if they acted honestly and reasonably.
premise text: Person has engaged in conduct that relates to a contravention of a provision.
conclusion text: Court must relieve person from liability.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

227 Preference must be given to compensation for victims
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-227
note: Court must give preference to making an order for compensation if defendant cannot pay both penalty and compensation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.328
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-227-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-227-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-227-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-227-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-227-logic-diffusion-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-227-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 227 Preference must be given to compensation for victims
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-227-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must give preference to making an order for compensation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-227-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: The court must give preference to making an order for compensation between the time the defendant is ordered to pay the penalty and the time the defendant is able to pay the compensation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-227-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IF-THEN
logic summary: If the defendant does not have sufficient financial resources, then the court must give preference to making an order for compensation.
premise text: The defendant does not have sufficient financial resources.
conclusion text: The court must give preference to making an order for compensation.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-227-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS-TO
logic summary: The obligation to give preference to making an order for compensation spreads to all courts that have jurisdiction over the defendant.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

228 Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-228
has part: 228(1) Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties
has part: 228(2) Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.329

228(1) Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-228-ss-1
part of: 228 Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties
note: Regulator may institute a proceeding for recovery of pecuniary penalties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.329
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-228-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-228-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-228-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Regulator may institute a proceeding.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

228(2) Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-228-ss-2
part of: 228 Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties
note: Commencement of proceeding within 6 years after contravention or conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.329
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-228-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-228-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-228-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-228-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-228-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 228(2) Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-228-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to commence proceeding within 6 years.
premise text: (2) A proceeding under subsection (1) may be commenced at any time within 6 years after the contravention or conduct.
conclusion text: A proceeding must be commenced within 6 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-228-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Temporal interval within which proceeding must commence.
premise text: (2) A proceeding under subsection (1) may be commenced at any time within 6 years after the contravention or conduct.
conclusion text: The proceeding must occur within a temporal interval of 6 years.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-228-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of commencement.
premise text: (2) A proceeding under subsection (1) may be commenced at any time within 6 years after the contravention or conduct.
conclusion text: The commencement is part of a recurring trace.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

229 Indemnification of officers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-229
has part: 229(1) Indemnification of officers
has part: 229(2) Indemnification of officers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.329

229(1) Indemnification of officers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-229-ss-1
part of: 229 Indemnification of officers
note: Indemnification of officers against certain liabilities is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.329
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-229-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-229-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-229-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-229-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-229-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-229-ss-1-logic-shacl-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-229-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 229(1) Indemnification of officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-229-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-229-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for indemnification
premise text: (1) A body corporate (the first body), or a body corporate related to the first body, commits an offence if it indemnifies a person...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-229-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of indemnification
premise text: (1) A body corporate (the first body), or a body corporate related to the first body, commits an offence if it indemnifies a person...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-229-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation of officers' indemnification
premise text: (1) A body corporate (the first body), or a body corporate related to the first body, commits an offence if it indemnifies a person...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-229-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validation
logic summary: Validation of officers' indemnification
premise text: (1) A body corporate (the first body), or a body corporate related to the first body, commits an offence if it indemnifies a person...
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

229(2) Indemnification of officers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-229-ss-2
part of: 229 Indemnification of officers
note: Outcome of proceedings is the outcome of proceedings and any appeal in relation to the proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.329
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-229-ss-2-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-229-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 229(2) Indemnification of officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

230 Certain indemnities not authorised and certain documents void
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-230
has part: 230(1) Certain indemnities not authorised and certain documents void
has part: 230(2) Certain indemnities not authorised and certain documents void
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.329

230(1) Certain indemnities not authorised and certain documents void
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-230-ss-1
part of: 230 Certain indemnities not authorised and certain documents void
note: Section 229 is not authorized.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.329
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-230-ss-1-norm

230(2) Certain indemnities not authorised and certain documents void
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-230-ss-2
part of: 230 Certain indemnities not authorised and certain documents void
note: Anything that purports to indemnify a person against a liability is void if it contravenes section 229.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.329
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-230-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-230-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-230-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits indemnification against liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

232 Injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-232
has part: 232(1) Injunctions
has part: 232(2) Injunctions
has part: 232(4) Injunctions
has part: 232(5) Injunctions
has part: 232(6) Injunctions
has part: 232(7) Injunctions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.330

232(1) Injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-232-ss-1
part of: 232 Injunctions
note: Granting of injunctions for contravention of provisions in Chapters 2, 3 or 4.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.330
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 232(1) Injunctions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of conduct
premise text: (a) a contravention of a provision...
conclusion text: ...contravene such a provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Trace
logic summary: Tracing of contraventions and attempts to contravene provisions
premise text: (f) conspiring with others to contravene...
conclusion text: ...contravene such a provision.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring conduct
premise text: (c) aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring...
conclusion text: ...contravene such a provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of inducing or attempting to induce conduct
premise text: (d) inducing, or attempting to induce...
conclusion text: ...contravene such a provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of being knowingly concerned in contravention
premise text: (e) being in any way, directly or indirectly...
conclusion text: ...contravene such a provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

232(2) Injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-232-ss-2
part of: 232 Injunctions
note: Court may grant injunction on application by regulator or any other person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.330
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-2-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 232(2) Injunctions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

232(4) Injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-232-ss-4
part of: 232 Injunctions
note: Court power to grant injunction without intent or previous conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.330
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-4-logic-epistemic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-4-logic-ltl-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Restriction
logic summary: Restricts court power to grant injunction based on intent and previous conduct
premise text: (a) whether or not it appears to the court that the person intends to engage again, or to continue to engage, in conduct of a kind referred to in that subsection;
conclusion text: The court may only grant an injunction if the person intends to engage again or continues to engage in such conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Restriction
logic summary: Restricts court power to grant injunction based on previous conduct
premise text: (b) whether or not the person has previously engaged in conduct of that kind;
conclusion text: The court may only grant an injunction if the person has previously engaged in such conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Restriction
logic summary: Restricts court power to grant injunction based on imminent danger
premise text: (c) whether or not there is an imminent danger of substantial damage to any other person if the person engages in conduct of that kind.
conclusion text: The court may only grant an injunction if there is an imminent danger of substantial damage.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-4-logic-epistemic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Possibility
logic summary: Court power to grant injunction depends on possibility of imminent danger
premise text: (c) whether or not there is an imminent danger of substantial damage to any other person if the person engages in conduct of that kind.
conclusion text: The court may only grant an injunction if it is possible that such damage will occur.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-4-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Court power to grant injunction until imminent danger occurs
premise text: (c) whether or not there is an imminent danger of substantial damage to any other person if the person engages in conduct of that kind.
conclusion text: The court may only grant an injunction until such time as it becomes possible that such damage will occur.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

232(5) Injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-232-ss-5
part of: 232 Injunctions
note: Restraining a person from carrying on a business or supplying goods or services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.330
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits carrying on a business or supplying goods or services.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

232(6) Injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-232-ss-6
part of: 232 Injunctions
note: Granting of injunctions to require specific actions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.330
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-6-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of certain actions
premise text: (6) Without limiting subsection (1)
conclusion text: the court may grant an injunction under that subsection requiring a person to do any of the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relations between actions and injunctions
premise text: (6) Without limiting subsection (1), the court may grant an injunction under that subsection requiring a person to do any of the following:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring traces between actions and injunctions
premise text: (6) Without limiting subsection (1), the court may grant an injunction under that subsection requiring a person to do any of the following:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of injunctions to require specific actions
premise text: (6) Without limiting subsection (1), the court may grant an injunction under that subsection requiring a person to do any of the following:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation of actions subject to injunctions
premise text: (a) refund money;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

232(7) Injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-232-ss-7
part of: 232 Injunctions
note: Court power to grant injunction regardless of person's intentions or previous actions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.330
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-7-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-7-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-7-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-7-logic-epistemic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-7-logic-ltl-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 232(7) Injunctions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Court can grant injunction regardless of person's intentions.
premise text: (7) The power of the court to grant an injunction under subsection (1)
conclusion text: The court can grant an injunction regardless of the person's intentions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-7-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Court must grant injunction if there is imminent danger of substantial damage.
premise text: (7) The power of the court to grant an injunction under subsection (1)
conclusion text: The court must grant an injunction if there is imminent danger of substantial damage.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-7-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Court can grant injunction regardless of person's previous actions.
premise text: (7) The power of the court to grant an injunction under subsection (1)
conclusion text: The court can grant an injunction regardless of the person's previous actions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-7-logic-epistemic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: knows
logic summary: Court knows that there is imminent danger of substantial damage if it grants an injunction.
premise text: (7) The power of the court to grant an injunction under subsection (1)
conclusion text: The court knows that there is imminent danger of substantial damage if it grants an injunction.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-232-ss-7-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Injunction can be granted until the person does the act or thing.
premise text: (7) The power of the court to grant an injunction under subsection (1)
conclusion text: The injunction can be granted until the person does the act or thing.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

233 Consent injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-233
note: Court may grant injunction by consent of all parties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.331
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-233-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-233-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-233-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to grant injunction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

234 Interim injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-234
has part: 234(1) Interim injunctions
has part: 234(2) Interim injunctions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.331

234(1) Interim injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-234-ss-1
part of: 234 Interim injunctions
note: Grant interim injunction under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.331
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-234-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-234-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-234-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 234(1) Interim injunctions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-234-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Granting of interim injunction
premise text: Application under section 232
conclusion text: Interim injunction granted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

234(2) Interim injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-234-ss-2
part of: 234 Interim injunctions
note: Court must not require applicant or any person to provide something if a responsible Minister or regulator made the application under section 232.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.331
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-234-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-234-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-234-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 234(2) Interim injunctions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-234-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNotRequire
logic summary: Court must not require applicant or any person to provide something.
premise text: Responsible Minister or regulator made the application under section 232.
conclusion text: Court must not require applicant or any person to provide something.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

235 Variation and discharge of injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-235
note: Court may vary or discharge an injunction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.332
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-235-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-235-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-235-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 235 Variation and discharge of injunctions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-235-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to vary or discharge an injunction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

236 Actions for damages
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-236
has part: 236(1) Actions for damages
has part: 236(2) Actions for damages
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.333

236(1) Actions for damages
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-236-ss-1
part of: 236 Actions for damages
note: Claimant may recover loss or damage from another person involved in contravention of Chapter 2 or 3 provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.333
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-236-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-236-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-236-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-236-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 236(1) Actions for damages
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-236-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide compensation for loss or damage.
premise text: (1) If...
conclusion text: ...recover the amount of the loss or damage.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-236-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval between conduct and loss or damage.
premise text: (1) If...
conclusion text: ...because of the conduct of another person;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

236(2) Actions for damages
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-236-ss-2
part of: 236 Actions for damages
note: Action for damages can be commenced within 6 years after the day on which the cause of action accrued.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.333
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-236-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-236-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-236-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 236(2) Actions for damages
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-236-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Permission to commence an action within a time limit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

237 Compensation orders etc. on application by an injured person
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-237
has part: 237(1) Compensation orders etc. on application by an injured person
has part: 237(2) Compensation orders etc. on application by an injured person
has part: 237(3) Compensation orders etc. on application by an injured person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.334

237(1) Compensation orders etc. on application by an injured person
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-237-ss-1
part of: 237 Compensation orders etc. on application by an injured person
note: Court may make order against person who engaged in conduct contravening a provision of Chapter 2, 3 or 4.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.334
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-237-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-237-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-237-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 237(1) Compensation orders etc. on application by an injured person
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-237-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

237(2) Compensation orders etc. on application by an injured person
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-237-ss-2
part of: 237 Compensation orders etc. on application by an injured person
note: Compensation orders must compensate or prevent loss/damage
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.334
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-237-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-237-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-237-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 237(2) Compensation orders etc. on application by an injured person
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-237-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide compensation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

237(3) Compensation orders etc. on application by an injured person
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-237-ss-3
part of: 237 Compensation orders etc. on application by an injured person
note: Application for compensation order can be made within 6 years of the cause of action accruing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.334
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-237-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-237-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-237-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Application can be made
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

238 Compensation orders etc. arising out of other proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-238
has part: 238(1) Compensation orders etc. arising out of other proceedings
has part: 238(2) Compensation orders etc. arising out of other proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.334

238(1) Compensation orders etc. arising out of other proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-238-ss-1
part of: 238 Compensation orders etc. arising out of other proceedings
note: Court may make order against person engaging in conduct contravening a provision of Chapter 2, 3 or 4.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.334
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-238-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-238-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-238-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 238(1) Compensation orders etc. arising out of other proceedings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-238-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

238(2) Compensation orders etc. arising out of other proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-238-ss-2
part of: 238 Compensation orders etc. arising out of other proceedings
note: Compensation order must compensate or prevent loss/damage
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.334
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-238-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-238-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-238-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 238(2) Compensation orders etc. arising out of other proceedings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-238-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must compensate or prevent loss/damage
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

239 Orders to redress etc. loss or damage suffered by non-parties
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-239
note: If a person engages in contravening conduct, the state may take action.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.335
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-239-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-239-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-239-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 239 Orders to redress etc. loss or damage suffered by non-parties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-239-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: State has an obligation to take action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

240 Determining whether to make a redress order etc. for
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-240
has part: 240(1) Determining whether to make a redress order etc. for
has part: 240(2) Determining whether to make a redress order etc. for
has part: 240(3) Determining whether to make a redress order etc. for
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.336

240(1) Determining whether to make a redress order etc. for
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-240-ss-1
part of: 240 Determining whether to make a redress order etc. for
note: Court may consider conduct of person and non-parties in relation to contravention when determining whether to make an order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.336
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-240-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-240-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-240-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 240(1) Determining whether to make a redress order etc. for
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-240-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
logic summary: Consideration of conduct in obligation determination
premise text: Obligation to follow law
conclusion text: Court may consider conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

240(2) Determining whether to make a redress order etc. for
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-240-ss-2
part of: 240 Determining whether to make a redress order etc. for
note: Court may consider conduct of person and non-parties in relation to declared term when determining whether to make a redress order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.336
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-240-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-240-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-240-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-240-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-240-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-240-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-240-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 240(2) Determining whether to make a redress order etc. for
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-240-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
logic summary: Consideration of conduct
premise text: Court may have regard to the conduct of the person, and of the non-parties in relation to the declared term.
conclusion text: Obligation to consider conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-240-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval during which conduct is considered
premise text: The court may have regard to the conduct of the person, and of the non-parties in relation to the declared term since the declaration was made.
conclusion text: Conduct during declaration period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-240-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval during which conduct is considered
premise text: The court may have regard to the conduct of the person, and of the non-parties in relation to the declared term since the declaration was made.
conclusion text: Conduct during declaration period
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-240-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May consider conduct
premise text: The court may have regard to the conduct of the person, and of the non-parties in relation to the declared term.
conclusion text: Obligation to consider conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-240-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Must consider conduct
premise text: The court may have regard to the conduct of the person, and of the non-parties in relation to the declared term.
conclusion text: Obligation to consider conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

240(3) Determining whether to make a redress order etc. for
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-240-ss-3
part of: 240 Determining whether to make a redress order etc. for
note: Court does not need to make a finding about certain matters when determining whether to make an order under section 239(1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.336
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-240-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-240-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-240-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemption from finding about certain matters
premise text: Court need not make a finding
conclusion text: Obligation to provide information waived
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

241 When a non-party is bound by a redress order etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-241
has part: 241(1) When a non-party is bound by a redress order etc.
has part: 241(2) When a non-party is bound by a redress order etc.
has part: 241(3) When a non-party is bound by a redress order etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.337

241(1) When a non-party is bound by a redress order etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-241-ss-1
part of: 241 When a non-party is bound by a redress order etc.
note: Non-party bound by redress order if loss or damage is redressed, prevented, or reduced.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.337
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-241-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-241-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-241-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-241-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-241-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-241-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 241(1) When a non-party is bound by a redress order etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-241-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to redress loss or damage.
premise text: (a) the loss or damage suffered, or likely to be suffered...
conclusion text: The non-party is bound by the order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-241-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Redress order applies during period of contravening conduct.
premise text: (a) the loss or damage suffered, or likely to be suffered...
conclusion text: The non-party is bound by the order if it occurs during the period of contravening conduct.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-241-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Redress order applies during period of contravening conduct.
premise text: (a) the loss or damage suffered, or likely to be suffered...
conclusion text: The non-party is bound by the order if it occurs during the period of contravening conduct.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-241-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to prevent loss or damage.
premise text: (b) the non-party has accepted the redress, prevention or reduction.
conclusion text: The non-party is bound by the order if it accepts the redress, prevention, or reduction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

241(2) When a non-party is bound by a redress order etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-241-ss-2
part of: 241 When a non-party is bound by a redress order etc.
note: No effect on non-party in relation to order made under section 239(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.337
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-241-ss-2-norm

241(3) When a non-party is bound by a redress order etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-241-ss-3
part of: 241 When a non-party is bound by a redress order etc.
note: No claim can be made against a non-party in relation to a loss or damage.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.337
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-241-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-241-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-241-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making claims against a non-party
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

243 Kinds of orders that may be made
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-243
note: List of orders that a court may make against a person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.337
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 243 Kinds of orders that may be made
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

243A Orders made in favour of party to contract containing unfair
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-243a
has part: 243A(1) Orders made in favour of party to contract containing unfair
has part: 243A(2) Orders made in favour of party to contract containing unfair
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.339

243A(1) Orders made in favour of party to contract containing unfair
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-243a-ss-1
part of: 243A Orders made in favour of party to contract containing unfair
note: Court may make orders to redress loss or damage caused by declared term.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.339
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243a-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 243A(1) Orders made in favour of party to contract containing unfair
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Court may make orders.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

243A(2) Orders made in favour of party to contract containing unfair
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-243a-ss-2
part of: 243A Orders made in favour of party to contract containing unfair
note: Refusal to enforce contract provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.339
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243a-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 243A(2) Orders made in favour of party to contract containing unfair
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits enforcement of contract provisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

243B Orders made on application of the regulator to prevent and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-243b
has part: 243B(1) Orders made on application of the regulator to prevent and
has part: 243B(2) Orders made on application of the regulator to prevent and
has part: 243B(3) Orders made on application of the regulator to prevent and
has part: 243B(4) Orders made on application of the regulator to prevent and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.340

243B(1) Orders made on application of the regulator to prevent and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-243b-ss-1
part of: 243B Orders made on application of the regulator to prevent and
note: Prevents a term from being included in future contracts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.340
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243b-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits a term from being included in future contracts
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

243B(2) Orders made on application of the regulator to prevent and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-243b-ss-2
part of: 243B Orders made on application of the regulator to prevent and
note: Injunctions and orders to prevent future contracts or enforce existing contract provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.340
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243b-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243b-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243b-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243b-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243b-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243b-ss-2-logic-cogai-6

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243b-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 243B(2) Orders made on application of the regulator to prevent and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prevents future contracts.
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), the orders that a court may make...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243b-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Describes contract types.
premise text: (a) an injunction restraining the respondent from making any future contract that is of the kind referred to in paragraph (1)(a)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243b-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Restriction
logic summary: Restricts contracts to specific dates.
premise text: (ii) if the court thinks fit—to have been void ab initio or void at all times on and after such date as is specified in the order
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243b-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Injunctions imply contract restrictions.
premise text: (a) an injunction restraining the respondent from making any future contract that is of the kind referred to in paragraph (1)(a)
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243b-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Orders propagate to collateral arrangements.
premise text: (c) an order declaring the whole or any part of any existing contract of the kind referred to in paragraph (1)(b), or of a collateral arrangement relating to such a contract:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243b-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Entity Recognition
logic summary: Identifies entities involved.
premise text: (a) an injunction restraining the respondent from making any future contract that is of the kind referred to in paragraph (1)(a)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

243B(3) Orders made on application of the regulator to prevent and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-243b-ss-3
part of: 243B Orders made on application of the regulator to prevent and
note: Application can be made within 6 years of declaration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.340
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243b-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 243B(3) Orders made on application of the regulator to prevent and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Application can be made within 6 years of declaration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

243B(4) Orders made on application of the regulator to prevent and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-243b-ss-4
part of: 243B Orders made on application of the regulator to prevent and
note: An order made under this section binds a person affected by the order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.340
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243b-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243b-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243b-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243b-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243b-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: binding effect
logic summary: The order has a binding effect on the person affected
premise text: The regulator may make an order under this section
conclusion text: The order binds the person affected
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243b-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps with
logic summary: The order overlaps with other orders made by the regulator in time
premise text: The regulator may make an order under this section
conclusion text: The order overlaps with other orders made by the regulator in time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243b-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: overlaps with
logic summary: The order overlaps with other orders made by the regulator in time
premise text: The regulator may make an order under this section
conclusion text: The order overlaps with other orders made by the regulator in time
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243b-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses to
logic summary: The order diffuses to other persons affected by the order
premise text: The person affected is a party to the proceedings
conclusion text: The order diffuses to other persons affected by the order
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-243b-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes binding effect
logic summary: The regulator recognizes the binding effect of the order on the person affected
premise text: The regulator may make an order under this section
conclusion text: The regulator recognizes the binding effect of the order on the person affected
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

245 Interaction with other provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-245
has part: 245(1) Interaction with other provisions
has part: 245(2) Interaction with other provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.341

245(1) Interaction with other provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-245-ss-1
part of: 245 Interaction with other provisions
note: Allow application under multiple sections despite non-institution of enforcement proceeding.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.341
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-245-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-245-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-245-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

245(2) Interaction with other provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-245-ss-2
part of: 245 Interaction with other provisions
note: Court may make an order under a provision of this Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.341
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-245-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-245-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-245-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 245(2) Interaction with other provisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-245-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to make an order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

246 Non-punitive orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-246
has part: 246(1) Non-punitive orders
has part: 246(2) Non-punitive orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.343

246(1) Non-punitive orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-246-ss-1
part of: 246 Non-punitive orders
note: Court may make non-punitive orders against individuals who contravene provisions of Chapters 2, 3 or 4.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.343
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-246-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-246-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-246-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 246(1) Non-punitive orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-246-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

246(2) Non-punitive orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-246-ss-2
part of: 246 Non-punitive orders
note: Order to perform a service for the benefit of the community or a section of the community.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.343
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-246-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-246-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-246-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-246-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-246-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-246-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-246-ss-2-logic-cogai-6

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-246-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 246(2) Non-punitive orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-246-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must perform a service for the benefit of the community or a section of the community.
premise text: (2) The court may make the following orders...
conclusion text: The person must perform a service...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-246-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS-A
logic summary: Service for the benefit of the community or a section of the community.
premise text: (a) an order directing the person to perform a service...
conclusion text: The service is for the benefit of the community or a section of the community.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-246-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Service must be performed within 3 years.
premise text: (b) an order for the purpose of ensuring that...
conclusion text: The service must be performed within 3 years.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-246-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Establishing a compliance program or education and training program is required.
premise text: (i) an order directing the person to establish...
conclusion text: Establishing a compliance program or education and training program implies that the service must be performed.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-246-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: AND
logic summary: Service is related to conduct for the benefit of the community or a section of the community.
premise text: (a) an order directing the person to perform a service...
conclusion text: The service is related to conduct for the benefit of the community or a section of the community.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-246-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS-A
logic summary: Service is a program designed to ensure awareness and obligations.
premise text: (i) another person specified in the order; or (ii) another person in a class of persons specified in the order;
conclusion text: The service is a program designed to ensure awareness and obligations.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

247 Adverse publicity orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-247
has part: 247(1) Adverse publicity orders
has part: 247(2) Adverse publicity orders
has part: 247(3) Adverse publicity orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.344

247(1) Adverse publicity orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-247-ss-1
part of: 247 Adverse publicity orders
note: Prohibition on adverse publicity orders for certain individuals
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.344
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-247-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-247-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-247-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-247-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-247-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-247-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 247(1) Adverse publicity orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-247-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making adverse publicity orders
premise text: (1) A court may, on application of the regulator...
conclusion text: ...make an adverse publicity order in relation to a person...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-247-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for adverse publicity orders
premise text: (1) A court may, on application of the regulator...
conclusion text: ...make an adverse publicity order in relation to a person...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-247-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for adverse publicity orders
premise text: (b) has committed an offence against Chapter 4.
conclusion text: ...who: (b) has committed an offence...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-247-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on regulators to make adverse publicity orders
premise text: (1) A court may, on application of the regulator...
conclusion text: ...make an adverse publicity order in relation to a person...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

247(2) Adverse publicity orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-247-ss-2
part of: 247 Adverse publicity orders
note: Requires disclosure and publication of information by a person in possession or access to it.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.344
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-247-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-247-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-247-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 247(2) Adverse publicity orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-247-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires the person to disclose and publish information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

247(3) Adverse publicity orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-247-ss-3
part of: 247 Adverse publicity orders
note: Court's powers not limited by this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.344
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-247-ss-3-norm

248 Order disqualifying a person from managing corporations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-248
note: Court may disqualify a person from managing corporations for a period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.345
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-248-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-248-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-248-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 248 Order disqualifying a person from managing corporations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-248-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Court may disqualify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

249 Privilege against exposure to penalty or forfeiture—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-249
has part: 249(1) Privilege against exposure to penalty or forfeiture—
has part: 249(2) Privilege against exposure to penalty or forfeiture—
has part: 249(3) Privilege against exposure to penalty or forfeiture—
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.346

249(1) Privilege against exposure to penalty or forfeiture—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-249-ss-1
part of: 249 Privilege against exposure to penalty or forfeiture—
note: Must answer questions or provide information in a proceeding.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.346
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-249-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-249-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-249-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 249(1) Privilege against exposure to penalty or forfeiture—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-249-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to answer questions or provide information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

249(2) Privilege against exposure to penalty or forfeiture—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-249-ss-2
part of: 249 Privilege against exposure to penalty or forfeiture—
note: Privilege against exposure to penalty or forfeiture—
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.346
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-249-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-249-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-249-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 249(2) Privilege against exposure to penalty or forfeiture—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-249-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

249(3) Privilege against exposure to penalty or forfeiture—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-249-ss-3
part of: 249 Privilege against exposure to penalty or forfeiture—
note: Must answer questions or provide information when required by law.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.346
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-249-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-249-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-249-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 249(3) Privilege against exposure to penalty or forfeiture—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-249-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must answer questions or provide information when required by law.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

250 Declarations relating to consumer contracts and small business
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-250
has part: 250(1) Declarations relating to consumer contracts and small business
has part: 250(2) Declarations relating to consumer contracts and small business
has part: 250(3) Declarations relating to consumer contracts and small business
has part: 250(4) Declarations relating to consumer contracts and small business
has part: 250(5) Declarations relating to consumer contracts and small business
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.347

250(1) Declarations relating to consumer contracts and small business
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-250-ss-1
part of: 250 Declarations relating to consumer contracts and small business
note: The Court may declare a term of a consumer contract as unfair on application by a party or the regulator.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.347
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-250-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-250-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-250-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 250(1) Declarations relating to consumer contracts and small business
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-250-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Declaration of unfair term is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

250(2) Declarations relating to consumer contracts and small business
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-250-ss-2
part of: 250 Declarations relating to consumer contracts and small business
note: Court may declare a term of a small business contract as unfair on application by a party or the regulator.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.347
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-250-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-250-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-250-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 250(2) Declarations relating to consumer contracts and small business
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-250-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Declaration of unfair term is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

250(3) Declarations relating to consumer contracts and small business
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-250-ss-3
part of: 250 Declarations relating to consumer contracts and small business
note: Contract must be a standard form contract to apply subsections (1) and (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.347
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-250-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-250-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-250-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 250(3) Declarations relating to consumer contracts and small business
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-250-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: Contract is a standard form contract
conclusion text: Subsections (1) and (2) apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

250(4) Declarations relating to consumer contracts and small business
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-250-ss-4
part of: 250 Declarations relating to consumer contracts and small business
note: Exemption from subsections (1) and (2) under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.347
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-250-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-250-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-250-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-250-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-250-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-250-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-250-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exempts
logic summary: Implies exemption from subsections (1) and (2)
premise text: (4) Subsections (1) and (2) do not apply if Part 2-3 does not apply to the contract.
conclusion text: If Part 2-3 does not apply, then exemptions apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-250-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: RelatesTo
logic summary: Relates to temporal interval of exemption
premise text: (4) Subsections (1) and (2) do not apply if Part 2-3 does not apply to the contract.
conclusion text: Exemption relates to Part 2-3
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-250-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RelatesTo
logic summary: Relates to trace of exemption
premise text: (4) Subsections (1) and (2) do not apply if Part 2-3 does not apply to the contract.
conclusion text: Exemption relates to Part 2-3
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-250-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: RelatesTo
logic summary: Relates to diffusion of exemption
premise text: (4) Subsections (1) and (2) do not apply if Part 2-3 does not apply to the contract.
conclusion text: Exemption relates to Part 2-3
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-250-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: RelatesTo
logic summary: Relates to cognitive processing of exemption
premise text: (4) Subsections (1) and (2) do not apply if Part 2-3 does not apply to the contract.
conclusion text: Exemption relates to Part 2-3
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

250(5) Declarations relating to consumer contracts and small business
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-250-ss-5
part of: 250 Declarations relating to consumer contracts and small business
note: Court power to make declarations not limited by subsections (1) and (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.347
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-250-ss-5-norm

251 Publication of advertisement in the ordinary course of business
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-251
has part: 251(1) Publication of advertisement in the ordinary course of business
has part: 251(2) Publication of advertisement in the ordinary course of business
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.348

251(1) Publication of advertisement in the ordinary course of business
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-251-ss-1
part of: 251 Publication of advertisement in the ordinary course of business
note: Publication of advertisement in the ordinary course of business is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.348
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-251-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-251-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-251-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 251(1) Publication of advertisement in the ordinary course of business
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-251-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of publication of advertisement in the ordinary course of business.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

251(2) Publication of advertisement in the ordinary course of business
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-251-ss-2
part of: 251 Publication of advertisement in the ordinary course of business
note: Defence for defendant in proceeding regarding publication of advertisement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.348
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-251-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-251-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-251-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 251(2) Publication of advertisement in the ordinary course of business
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-251-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defence for defendant in proceeding regarding publication of advertisement.
premise text: (2) In the proceeding, it is a defence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

252 Supplying consumer goods for the purpose of re-supply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-252
has part: 252(1) Supplying consumer goods for the purpose of re-supply
has part: 252(2) Supplying consumer goods for the purpose of re-supply
has part: 252(3) Supplying consumer goods for the purpose of re-supply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.348

252(1) Supplying consumer goods for the purpose of re-supply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-252-ss-1
part of: 252 Supplying consumer goods for the purpose of re-supply
note: Prohibition on supplying non-compliant consumer goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.348
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-252-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-252-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-252-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-252-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-252-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-252-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-252-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 252(1) Supplying consumer goods for the purpose of re-supply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-252-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplying non-compliant consumer goods
premise text: (a) the supplying of consumer goods that did not comply with a safety standard for such goods;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-252-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplying non-compliant consumer goods by a supplier who did not comply with an information standard for such goods.
premise text: (b) the supplying of consumer goods by a supplier who did not comply with an information standard for such goods;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-252-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of the obligation.
premise text: (1) This section applies to a proceeding under this Part in relation to a contravention of a provision of Part 2-1 or 2-2 or Chapter 3 committed by:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-252-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Establishes a recurring trace of non-compliant consumer goods.
premise text: (1) This section applies to a proceeding under this Part in relation to a contravention of a provision of Part 2-1 or 2-2 or Chapter 3 committed by:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-252-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses the obligation to supply compliant consumer goods.
premise text: (1) This section applies to a proceeding under this Part in relation to a contravention of a provision of Part 2-1 or 2-2 or Chapter 3 committed by:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

252(2) Supplying consumer goods for the purpose of re-supply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-252-ss-2
part of: 252 Supplying consumer goods for the purpose of re-supply
note: Defence for defendant in proceeding regarding consumer goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.348
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-252-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-252-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-252-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-252-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-252-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 252(2) Supplying consumer goods for the purpose of re-supply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-252-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defence obligation
premise text: The defendant proves that...
conclusion text: the defence is established
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-252-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap
premise text: The defendant did not know, and could not with reasonable diligence have ascertained...
conclusion text: the time period of the defendant's knowledge overlaps with the time period of the goods' non-compliance
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-252-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Inference
logic summary: Inference from representation
premise text: The defendant relied in good faith on a representation by the person...
conclusion text: the defendant's reliance is justified
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

252(3) Supplying consumer goods for the purpose of re-supply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-252-ss-3
part of: 252 Supplying consumer goods for the purpose of re-supply
note: Defendant may rely on defence unless court gives leave or defendant provides notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.348
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-252-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-252-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-252-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Defendant is permitted to rely on defence unless court gives leave or defendant provides notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

253 Supplying product related services for the purpose of re-supply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-253
has part: 253(1) Supplying product related services for the purpose of re-supply
has part: 253(2) Supplying product related services for the purpose of re-supply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.349

253(1) Supplying product related services for the purpose of re-supply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-253-ss-1
part of: 253 Supplying product related services for the purpose of re-supply
note: Prohibition on supplying product related services that do not comply with safety standards or information standards.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.349
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-253-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-253-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-253-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 253(1) Supplying product related services for the purpose of re-supply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-253-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

253(2) Supplying product related services for the purpose of re-supply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-253-ss-2
part of: 253 Supplying product related services for the purpose of re-supply
note: Defence for product related services acquired for re-supply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.349
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-253-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-253-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-253-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 253(2) Supplying product related services for the purpose of re-supply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-253-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defence obligation
premise text: (2) In the proceeding, it is a defence...
conclusion text: ...the defendant proves that...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

254 Overview
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-254
note: No country of origin representations contravene certain sections.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.351
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-254-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-254-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-254-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 254 Overview
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-254-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits country of origin representations from contravening certain sections.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

255 Country of origin representations do not contravene certain
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-255
note: A person does not contravene section 18, 29(1)(a) or (k) or 151(1)(a) or (k) only by making a representation of a kind referred to in an item in the first column of this table, if the requirements of the corresponding item in the second column are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.351
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-255-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-255-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 255 Country of origin representations do not contravene certain
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

258 Proceedings relating to false, misleading or deceptive conduct or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-258
note: Evidential burden on person seeking to rely on provision of Part or regulation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.353
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-258-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-258-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-258-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 258 Proceedings relating to false, misleading or deceptive conduct or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-258-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide evidence
premise text: Person seeking to rely on provision bears evidential burden.
conclusion text: Must provide evidence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

259 Action against suppliers of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-259
has part: 259(1) Action against suppliers of goods
has part: 259(2) Action against suppliers of goods
has part: 259(3) Action against suppliers of goods
has part: 259(4) Action against suppliers of goods
has part: 259(5) Action against suppliers of goods
has part: 259(6) Action against suppliers of goods
has part: 259(7) Action against suppliers of goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.354

259(1) Action against suppliers of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-259-ss-1
part of: 259 Action against suppliers of goods
note: Action against suppliers of goods if guarantee not complied with
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.354
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-259-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-259-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-259-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with guarantee
premise text: Supplier supplies goods
conclusion text: Consumer may take action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

259(2) Action against suppliers of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-259-ss-2
part of: 259 Action against suppliers of goods
note: Consumer may require supplier to remedy failure within a reasonable time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.354
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-259-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-259-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-259-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 259(2) Action against suppliers of goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-259-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Consumer has an obligation to require supplier to remedy failure.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

259(3) Action against suppliers of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-259-ss-3
part of: 259 Action against suppliers of goods
note: Consumer may recover compensation for goods below market value if supplier fails to comply with guarantee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.354
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-259-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-259-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-259-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 259(3) Action against suppliers of goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-259-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Consumer has an obligation to recover compensation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

259(4) Action against suppliers of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-259-ss-4
part of: 259 Action against suppliers of goods
note: Consumer may recover damages for loss or damage due to supplier's failure to comply with guarantee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.354
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-259-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-259-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-259-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 259(4) Action against suppliers of goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-259-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Consumer has a right to recover damages.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

259(5) Action against suppliers of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-259-ss-5
part of: 259 Action against suppliers of goods
note: Exemption from liability for causes independent of human control
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.354
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-259-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-259-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-259-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 259(5) Action against suppliers of goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-259-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from liability
premise text: Subsection (4) does not apply
conclusion text: Failure to comply with the guarantee is exempted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

259(6) Action against suppliers of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-259-ss-6
part of: 259 Action against suppliers of goods
note: Clarifies application of subsections (4), (2), and (3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.354
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-259-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-259-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-259-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-259-ss-6-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-259-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-259-ss-6-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-259-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 259(6) Action against suppliers of goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-259-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: AND
logic summary: Clarifies application of obligation
premise text: Subsection (4) applies in addition to subsections (2) and (3)
conclusion text: Obligation clarified
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-259-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: AND
logic summary: Clarifies temporal application of obligation
premise text: Subsection (4) applies in addition to subsections (2) and (3)
conclusion text: Temporal application clarified
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-259-ss-6-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: AND
logic summary: Clarifies argument structure of obligation
premise text: Subsection (4) applies in addition to subsections (2) and (3)
conclusion text: Argument structure clarified
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-259-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: AND
logic summary: Clarifies diffusion of obligation
premise text: Subsection (4) applies in addition to subsections (2) and (3)
conclusion text: Diffusion clarified
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-259-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: AND
logic summary: Clarifies cognitive application of obligation
premise text: Subsection (4) applies in addition to subsections (2) and (3)
conclusion text: Cognitive application clarified
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

259(7) Action against suppliers of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-259-ss-7
part of: 259 Action against suppliers of goods
note: Consumer may take action under this section regardless of packaging
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.354
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-259-ss-7-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-259-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-259-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Obligation to take action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

260 When a failure to comply with a guarantee is a major failure
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-260
note: Failure to comply with a guarantee is a major failure if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.355
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-260-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-260-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-260-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-260-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-260-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-260-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 260 When a failure to comply with a guarantee is a major failure
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-260-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Failure to comply implies obligation.
premise text: The goods would not have been acquired by a reasonable consumer fully acquainted with the nature and extent of the failure.
conclusion text: There is an obligation to comply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-260-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within-a-reasonable-time
logic summary: The goods cannot be remedied within a reasonable time.
premise text: The goods depart in one or more significant respects: (c) the goods are substantially unfit for a purpose for which goods of the same kind are commonly supplied and they cannot, easily and within a reasonable time, be remedied to make them fit for such a purpose;
conclusion text: There is an interval within a reasonable time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-260-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ordered-trace
logic summary: The goods depart in one or more significant respects.
premise text: (b) the goods depart in one or more significant respects: (i) if they were supplied by description—from that description; or (ii) if they were supplied by reference to a sample or demonstration model—from that sample or demonstration model;
conclusion text: There is an ordered trace.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-260-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Failure to comply implies obligation.
premise text: (a) the goods would not have been acquired by a reasonable consumer fully acquainted with the nature and extent of the failure;
conclusion text: There is an obligation to comply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

261 How suppliers may remedy a failure to comply with a guarantee
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-261
note: Supplier must remedy a failure to comply with a guarantee.
description: Repair, replace, or refund goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.356
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-261-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-261-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-261-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 261 How suppliers may remedy a failure to comply with a guarantee
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-261-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Supplier must comply with the requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

262 When consumers are not entitled to reject goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-262
has part: 262(1) When consumers are not entitled to reject goods
has part: 262(2) When consumers are not entitled to reject goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.357

262(1) When consumers are not entitled to reject goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-262-ss-1
part of: 262 When consumers are not entitled to reject goods
note: Consumer cannot notify supplier of rejected goods under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.357
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-262-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-262-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-262-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits notification
premise text: (a) the rejection period for the goods has ended; or (b) the goods have been lost, destroyed or disposed of by the consumer; or (c) the goods were damaged after being delivered to the consumer for reasons not related to their state or condition at the time of supply; or (d) the goods have been attached to, or incorporated in, any real or personal property and they cannot be detached or isolated without damaging them.
conclusion text: (1) A consumer is not entitled, under section 259, to notify a supplier of goods that the consumer rejects the goods if: ...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

262(2) When consumers are not entitled to reject goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-262-ss-2
part of: 262 When consumers are not entitled to reject goods
note: Rejection period for goods is the time from supply to when failure becomes apparent
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.357
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-262-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-262-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-262-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-262-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 262(2) When consumers are not entitled to reject goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-262-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide reasonable rejection period
premise text: (2) The rejection period for goods...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-262-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of goods based on type, use, and length of time
premise text: (a) the type of goods...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

263 Consequences of rejecting goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-263
has part: 263(1) Consequences of rejecting goods
has part: 263(2) Consequences of rejecting goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.357

263(1) Consequences of rejecting goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-263-ss-1
part of: 263 Consequences of rejecting goods
note: Consumer must notify supplier of rejected goods.
description: Notification
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.357
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-263-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-263-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-263-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 263(1) Consequences of rejecting goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-263-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

263(2) Consequences of rejecting goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-263-ss-2
part of: 263 Consequences of rejecting goods
note: Must return goods to supplier unless certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.357
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-263-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-263-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-263-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: The consumer must return the goods.
conclusion text: Unless certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

264 Replaced goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-264
note: Supplier must provide replacement goods under certain conditions.
description: replacement goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.358
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-264-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-264-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-264-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 264 Replaced goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-264-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Supplier must provide replacement goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

265 Termination of contracts for the supply of services that are
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-265
has part: 265(1) Termination of contracts for the supply of services that are
has part: 265(2) Termination of contracts for the supply of services that are
has part: 265(3) Termination of contracts for the supply of services that are
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.359

265(1) Termination of contracts for the supply of services that are
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-265-ss-1
part of: 265 Termination of contracts for the supply of services that are
note: Consumer may terminate contract for supply of services if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.359
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-265-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-265-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-265-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Expresses a permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

265(2) Termination of contracts for the supply of services that are
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-265-ss-2
part of: 265 Termination of contracts for the supply of services that are
note: Termination of contracts for the supply of services that are
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.359
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-265-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-265-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-265-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-265-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 265(2) Termination of contracts for the supply of services that are
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-265-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Consumer's obligation to terminate the contract
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-265-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Class
logic summary: Classification of termination conditions
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

265(3) Termination of contracts for the supply of services that are
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-265-ss-3
part of: 265 Termination of contracts for the supply of services that are
note: Consumer's right to recover refund of money and consideration for services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.359
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-265-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-265-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-265-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Consumer has a right to recover refund.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

266 Rights of gift recipients
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-266
note: Recipient of a gift has certain rights against the supplier
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.359
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-266-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-266-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-266-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has_right
logic summary: Recipient has right to claim against supplier
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

267 Action against suppliers of services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-267
has part: 267(1) Action against suppliers of services
has part: 267(2) Action against suppliers of services
has part: 267(3) Action against suppliers of services
has part: 267(4) Action against suppliers of services
has part: 267(5) Action against suppliers of services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.360

267(1) Action against suppliers of services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-267-ss-1
part of: 267 Action against suppliers of services
note: Action against suppliers of services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.360
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-267-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-267-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-267-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-267-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-267-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-267-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Consumer has obligation to take action
premise text: Consumer is affected by the guarantee
conclusion text: Consumer must take action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-267-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Failure to comply with guarantee occurred after services were supplied
premise text: Failure to comply with guarantee did not occur only because of...
conclusion text: Failure to comply with guarantee occurred during the supply period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-267-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Consumer's action implies a right to take action
premise text: Consumer takes action under this section
conclusion text: Consumer has a right to take action
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-267-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Action diffuses to supplier
premise text: Consumer takes action against supplier
conclusion text: Supplier is affected by the consumer's action
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

267(2) Action against suppliers of services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-267-ss-2
part of: 267 Action against suppliers of services
note: Consumer may require supplier to remedy failure within a reasonable time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.360
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-267-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-267-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-267-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 267(2) Action against suppliers of services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-267-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Consumer has an obligation to require supplier to remedy failure.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

267(3) Action against suppliers of services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-267-ss-3
part of: 267 Action against suppliers of services
note: Failure to comply with guarantee is a major failure, and consumer may recover compensation or terminate contract.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.360
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-267-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-267-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-267-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits failure to comply with guarantee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

267(4) Action against suppliers of services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-267-ss-4
part of: 267 Action against suppliers of services
note: Consumer may recover damages for loss or damage due to supplier's failure to comply with guarantee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.360
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-267-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-267-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-267-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 267(4) Action against suppliers of services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-267-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Consumer has a right to recover damages.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

267(5) Action against suppliers of services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-267-ss-5
part of: 267 Action against suppliers of services
note: Clarifies application of subsections (4), (2), and (3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.360
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-267-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-267-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-267-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 267(5) Action against suppliers of services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-267-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: AND
logic summary: Clarifies application of subsections
premise text: (4) applies in addition to (2) and (3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

268 When a failure to comply with a guarantee is a major failure
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-268
note: Failure to comply with a guarantee is a major failure if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.361
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-268-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-268-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-268-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-268-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 268 When a failure to comply with a guarantee is a major failure
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-268-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Failure to comply with a guarantee is a major failure if certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-268-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

269 Termination of contracts for the supply of services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-269
has part: 269(1) Termination of contracts for the supply of services
has part: 269(2) Termination of contracts for the supply of services
has part: 269(3) Termination of contracts for the supply of services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.362

269(1) Termination of contracts for the supply of services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-269-ss-1
part of: 269 Termination of contracts for the supply of services
note: Consumer must terminate contract for supply of services under section 267.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.362
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-269-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-269-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-269-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 269(1) Termination of contracts for the supply of services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-269-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide termination notice
premise text: Section 267 requires consumer to terminate contract
conclusion text: Consumer must terminate contract
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

269(2) Termination of contracts for the supply of services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-269-ss-2
part of: 269 Termination of contracts for the supply of services
note: Termination of contracts for the supply of services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.362
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-269-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-269-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-269-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-269-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Consumer's obligation to terminate contract
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-269-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Termination takes effect at the time of termination notification
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

269(3) Termination of contracts for the supply of services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-269-ss-3
part of: 269 Termination of contracts for the supply of services
note: Consumer's right to recover refund of money and consideration for services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.362
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-269-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-269-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-269-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Consumer has a right to recover refund
premise text: Consumer is entitled to recover
conclusion text: Supplier must provide refund
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

270 Termination of contracts for the supply of goods that are
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-270
has part: 270(1) Termination of contracts for the supply of goods that are
has part: 270(2) Termination of contracts for the supply of goods that are
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.363

270(1) Termination of contracts for the supply of goods that are
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-270-ss-1
part of: 270 Termination of contracts for the supply of goods that are
note: Consumer must return goods to supplier and refund money and consideration.
description: Goods, Money, Consideration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.363
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-270-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-270-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-270-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Consumer has a duty to return goods and refund money.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

270(2) Termination of contracts for the supply of goods that are
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-270-ss-2
part of: 270 Termination of contracts for the supply of goods that are
note: Supplier must collect goods at their expense if subsection (1)(d)(ii) applies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.363
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-270-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-270-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-270-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Supplier has a duty to collect goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

271 Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-271
has part: 271(1) Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
has part: 271(2) Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
has part: 271(3) Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
has part: 271(4) Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
has part: 271(5) Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
has part: 271(6) Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
has part: 271(7) Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.364

271(1) Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-271-ss-1
part of: 271 Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
note: Manufacturer must provide damages for non-compliance with guarantee.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.364
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-271-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-271-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-271-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Manufacturer has an obligation to provide damages.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

271(2) Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-271-ss-2
part of: 271 Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
note: Exemption from liability for damages due to factors beyond human control or manufacturer's actions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.364
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-271-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-271-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-271-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 271(2) Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-271-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Exemption from liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

271(3) Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-271-ss-3
part of: 271 Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
note: Manufacturer liable for damages if guarantee not complied with
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.364
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-271-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-271-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-271-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide damages
premise text: Guarantee not complied with
conclusion text: Manufacturer liable for damages
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

271(4) Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-271-ss-4
part of: 271 Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
note: Exemption from liability for non-compliance with guarantee due to external factors
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.364
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-271-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-271-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-271-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 271(4) Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-271-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from liability
premise text: Subsection (3) does not apply if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

271(5) Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-271-ss-5
part of: 271 Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
note: Manufacturer must provide damages for non-compliance with guarantee.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.364
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-271-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-271-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-271-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Manufacturer has an obligation to provide damages.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

271(6) Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-271-ss-6
part of: 271 Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
note: Manufacturer must remedy failure to comply with guarantee within a reasonable time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.364
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-271-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-271-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-271-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 271(6) Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-271-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Manufacturer has an obligation to remedy failure.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

271(7) Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-271-ss-7
part of: 271 Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
note: May commence an action under this section regardless of packaging
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.364
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-271-ss-7-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-271-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-271-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-271-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 271(7) Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-271-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-271-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during the time period of ownership
logic summary: Temporal condition
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

272 Damages that may be recovered by action against
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-272
note: Entitlement to recover damages for goods manufactured by a manufacturer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.365
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-272-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-272-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-272-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272 Damages that may be recovered by action against
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-272-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Obligation to provide damages for goods manufactured by a manufacturer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

273 Time limit for actions against manufacturers of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-273
note: Time limit for actions against manufacturers of goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.366
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-273-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-273-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-273-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Guarantee compliance obligation
premise text: The guarantee to which the action relates has not been complied with.
conclusion text: An affected person may commence an action for damages under this Division at any time within 3 years after the day on which the affected person first became aware, or ought reasonably to have become aware, that the guarantee to which the action relates has not been complied with.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

274 Indemnification of suppliers by manufacturers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-274
has part: 274(1) Indemnification of suppliers by manufacturers
has part: 274(2) Indemnification of suppliers by manufacturers
has part: 274(3) Indemnification of suppliers by manufacturers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.367

274(1) Indemnification of suppliers by manufacturers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-274-ss-1
part of: 274 Indemnification of suppliers by manufacturers
note: Manufacturer must indemnify supplier if liable to pay damages under section 259(4) or section 271.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.367
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-274-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-274-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-274-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-274-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-274-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-274-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-274-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 274(1) Indemnification of suppliers by manufacturers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-274-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Manufacturer has an obligation to indemnify supplier.
premise text: (1) A manufacturer of goods is liable to indemnify a person (the supplier) who supplies the goods to a consumer if: (a) the supplier is liable to pay damages under section 259(4) to the consumer for loss or damage suffered by the consumer; and (b) the manufacturer is or would be liable under section 271 to pay damages to the consumer for the same loss or damage.
conclusion text: Manufacturer must indemnify supplier if liable to pay damages under section 259(4) or section 271.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-274-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal interval of liability overlaps with temporal interval of payment.
premise text: (1) A manufacturer of goods is liable to indemnify a person (the supplier) who supplies the goods to a consumer if: (a) the supplier is liable to pay damages under section 259(4) to the consumer for loss or damage suffered by the consumer; and (b) the manufacturer is or would be liable under section 271 to pay damages to the consumer for the same loss or damage.
conclusion text: Temporal interval of liability overlaps with temporal interval of payment.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-274-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Liability is recurrent over time.
premise text: (1) A manufacturer of goods is liable to indemnify a person (the supplier) who supplies the goods to a consumer if: (a) the supplier is liable to pay damages under section 259(4) to the consumer for loss or damage suffered by the consumer; and (b) the manufacturer is or would be liable under section 271 to pay damages to the consumer for the same loss or damage.
conclusion text: Liability is recurrent over time.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-274-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Liability diffuses from manufacturer to supplier.
premise text: (1) A manufacturer of goods is liable to indemnify a person (the supplier) who supplies the goods to a consumer if: (a) the supplier is liable to pay damages under section 259(4) to the consumer for loss or damage suffered by the consumer; and (b) the manufacturer is or would be liable under section 271 to pay damages to the consumer for the same loss or damage.
conclusion text: Liability diffuses from manufacturer to supplier.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-274-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Legislative excerpt recognizes concept of indemnification.
premise text: (1) A manufacturer of goods is liable to indemnify a person (the supplier) who supplies the goods to a consumer if: (a) the supplier is liable to pay damages under section 259(4) to the consumer for loss or damage suffered by the consumer; and (b) the manufacturer is or would be liable under section 271 to pay damages to the consumer for the same loss or damage.
conclusion text: Legislative excerpt recognizes concept of indemnification.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

274(2) Indemnification of suppliers by manufacturers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-274-ss-2
part of: 274 Indemnification of suppliers by manufacturers
note: Manufacturer must indemnify supplier for certain costs.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.367
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-274-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-274-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-274-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 274(2) Indemnification of suppliers by manufacturers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-274-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Manufacturer has an obligation to indemnify supplier.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

274(3) Indemnification of suppliers by manufacturers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-274-ss-3
part of: 274 Indemnification of suppliers by manufacturers
note: Supplier may bring action against manufacturer for indemnification
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.367
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-274-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-274-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-274-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 274(3) Indemnification of suppliers by manufacturers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-274-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Supplier has obligation to seek legal relief
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

275 Limitation of liability etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-275
note: Failure to comply with a guarantee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.368
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-275-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-275-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-275-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 275 Limitation of liability etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-275-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: failure
logic summary: Non-compliance with obligation
premise text: Guarantee applies
conclusion text: Obligation not fulfilled
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

276 This Part not to be excluded etc. by contract
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-276
has part: 276(1) This Part not to be excluded etc. by contract
has part: 276(2) This Part not to be excluded etc. by contract
has part: 276(3) This Part not to be excluded etc. by contract
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.368

276(1) This Part not to be excluded etc. by contract
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-276-ss-1
part of: 276 This Part not to be excluded etc. by contract
note: Excluding or modifying provisions of this Part is void.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.368
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-276-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-276-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-276-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits exclusion or modification of provisions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

276(2) This Part not to be excluded etc. by contract
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-276-ss-2
part of: 276 This Part not to be excluded etc. by contract
note: Term in contract cannot exclude or modify Part provisions without explicit statement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.368
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-276-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-276-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-276-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 276(2) This Part not to be excluded etc. by contract
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-276-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on excluding or modifying Part provisions.
premise text: Term in contract
conclusion text: Obligation to apply Part provisions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

276(3) This Part not to be excluded etc. by contract
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-276-ss-3
part of: 276 This Part not to be excluded etc. by contract
note: Contract term exception
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.368
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-276-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-276-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-276-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 276(3) This Part not to be excluded etc. by contract
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-276-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Excluded from this section
premise text: Section 276A(4)
conclusion text: Term not referred to in section 276A(4)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

276A Limitation in certain circumstances of liability of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-276a
has part: 276A(1) Limitation in certain circumstances of liability of
has part: 276A(2) Limitation in certain circumstances of liability of
has part: 276A(3) Limitation in certain circumstances of liability of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.369

276A(1) Limitation in certain circumstances of liability of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-276a-ss-1
part of: 276A Limitation in certain circumstances of liability of
note: Manufacturer's liability to a supplier is limited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.369
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-276a-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-276a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-276a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 276A(1) Limitation in certain circumstances of liability of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-276a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Limitation
logic summary: Limits manufacturer's liability.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

276A(2) Limitation in certain circumstances of liability of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-276a-ss-2
part of: 276A Limitation in certain circumstances of liability of
note: Limitation in certain circumstances of liability of manufacturer's liability
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.369
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-276a-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-276a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-276a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-276a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 276A(2) Limitation in certain circumstances of liability of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-276a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
logic summary: Exclusion from limitation
premise text: (1) does not apply
conclusion text: does not apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-276a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval during which limitation does not apply
premise text: (2) does not apply in relation to particular goods if
conclusion text: does not apply
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

276A(3) Limitation in certain circumstances of liability of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-276a-ss-3
part of: 276A Limitation in certain circumstances of liability of
note: Court must consider certain circumstances when determining fairness of liability limitation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.369
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-276a-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-276a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-276a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 276A(3) Limitation in certain circumstances of liability of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-276a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes
logic summary: Excerpt imposes an obligation on the court
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

277 Representative actions by the regulator
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-277
has part: 277(1) Representative actions by the regulator
has part: 277(2) Representative actions by the regulator
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.370

277(1) Representative actions by the regulator
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-277-ss-1
part of: 277 Representative actions by the regulator
note: Regulator may commence action on behalf of identified persons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.370
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-277-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-277-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-277-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 277(1) Representative actions by the regulator
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-277-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

277(2) Representative actions by the regulator
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-277-ss-2
part of: 277 Representative actions by the regulator
note: Regulator must obtain written consent before making an application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.370
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-277-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-277-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-277-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 277(2) Representative actions by the regulator
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-277-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator has a duty to obtain written consent.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

278 Liability of suppliers and linked credit providers relating to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-278
has part: 278(1) Liability of suppliers and linked credit providers relating to
has part: 278(2) Liability of suppliers and linked credit providers relating to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.371

278(1) Liability of suppliers and linked credit providers relating to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-278-ss-1
part of: 278 Liability of suppliers and linked credit providers relating to
note: Joint liability for loss or damage suffered by consumer due to misrepresentation, breach, or failure to comply with guarantee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.371
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-278-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-278-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-278-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-278-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-278-ss-1-logic-ltl-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-278-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Joint liability for loss or damage
premise text: Linked credit provider and supplier of related supply are jointly and severally liable to the consumer.
conclusion text: The linked credit provider and supplier of related supply must provide compensation to the consumer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-278-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Joint liability for loss or damage
premise text: The linked credit provider and supplier of related supply are jointly and severally liable to the consumer.
conclusion text: The linked credit provider and supplier of related supply must provide compensation to the consumer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-278-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between liability and loss or damage
premise text: The linked credit provider and supplier of related supply are jointly and severally liable to the consumer for the amount of the loss or damage.
conclusion text: The liability for loss or damage occurs at the same time as the loss or damage.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-278-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace between liability and loss or damage
premise text: The linked credit provider and supplier of related supply are jointly and severally liable to the consumer for the amount of the loss or damage.
conclusion text: There is a recurring trace between the liability for loss or damage and the loss or damage itself.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

278(2) Liability of suppliers and linked credit providers relating to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-278-ss-2
part of: 278 Liability of suppliers and linked credit providers relating to
note: Linked credit contract definition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.371
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-278-ss-2-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-278-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 278(2) Liability of suppliers and linked credit providers relating to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

279 Action by consumer to recover amount of loss or damage
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-279
has part: 279(1) Action by consumer to recover amount of loss or damage
has part: 279(2) Action by consumer to recover amount of loss or damage
has part: 279(3) Action by consumer to recover amount of loss or damage
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.372

279(1) Action by consumer to recover amount of loss or damage
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-279-ss-1
part of: 279 Action by consumer to recover amount of loss or damage
note: Consumer can recover amount of loss or damage from liable parties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.372
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-279-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-279-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-279-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Expresses a permission or ability.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

279(2) Action by consumer to recover amount of loss or damage
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-279-ss-2
part of: 279 Action by consumer to recover amount of loss or damage
note: Must bring action against linked credit provider and supplier jointly.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.372
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-279-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-279-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-279-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to bring action jointly
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

279(3) Action by consumer to recover amount of loss or damage
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-279-ss-3
part of: 279 Action by consumer to recover amount of loss or damage
note: No action can be taken if the supplier has been dissolved or winding up has commenced.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.372
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-279-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-279-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-279-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No action can be taken
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

280 Cases where a linked credit provider is not liable
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-280
has part: 280(1) Cases where a linked credit provider is not liable
has part: 280(2) Cases where a linked credit provider is not liable
has part: 280(3) Cases where a linked credit provider is not liable
has part: 280(4) Cases where a linked credit provider is not liable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.372

280(1) Cases where a linked credit provider is not liable
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-280-ss-1
part of: 280 Cases where a linked credit provider is not liable
note: Consumer must approach credit provider before liability under section 278 applies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.372
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 280(1) Cases where a linked credit provider is not liable
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on consumer to approach credit provider.
premise text: Consumer must approach credit provider before liability under section 278 applies.
conclusion text: Consumer is obligated to approach credit provider.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for consumer's approach to credit provider.
premise text: Consumer must approach credit provider before liability under section 278 applies.
conclusion text: Temporal interval for consumer's approach is defined as the time before liability under section 278 applies.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines recurring trace of consumer's actions towards credit provider.
premise text: Consumer must approach credit provider before liability under section 278 applies.
conclusion text: Recurring trace of consumer's actions is defined as the sequence of approaches to credit provider.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusive Process
logic summary: Describes diffusive process of consumer's approach towards credit provider.
premise text: Consumer must approach credit provider before liability under section 278 applies.
conclusion text: Diffusive process of consumer's approach is defined as the spread of consumer's actions towards credit provider.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Represents knowledge about consumer's obligations towards credit provider.
premise text: Consumer must approach credit provider before liability under section 278 applies.
conclusion text: Knowledge representation of consumer's obligations is defined as the set of rules governing consumer's actions towards credit provider.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

280(2) Cases where a linked credit provider is not liable
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-280-ss-2
part of: 280 Cases where a linked credit provider is not liable
note: Credit provider must establish good reputation of supplier before becoming linked credit provider.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.372
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 280(2) Cases where a linked credit provider is not liable
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Establishes a condition for the credit provider's liability
premise text: The credit provider must establish that...
conclusion text: ...the consumer might be entitled to recover an amount of loss or damage suffered as a result of a misrepresentation, breach, failure of consideration, failure to comply with a guarantee, or breach of a warranty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <
logic summary: Establishes a temporal condition for the credit provider's liability
premise text: The credit provider must establish that...
conclusion text: ...the credit provider had not had cause to suspect that...after becoming a linked credit provider of the supplier, the credit provider had not had cause to suspect...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <
logic summary: Establishes a temporal condition for the credit provider's liability
premise text: The credit provider must establish that...
conclusion text: ...the supplier might be unable to meet the supplier’s liabilities as and when they fall due.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: <
logic summary: Establishes a condition for the credit provider's liability
premise text: The credit provider must establish that...
conclusion text: ...the supplier might be unable to meet the supplier’s liabilities as and when they fall due.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

280(3) Cases where a linked credit provider is not liable
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-280-ss-3
part of: 280 Cases where a linked credit provider is not liable
note: Linked credit provider not liable to consumer under section 278 if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.372
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 280(3) Cases where a linked credit provider is not liable
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Linked credit provider has an obligation to not be liable to consumer under section 278.
premise text: The linked credit provider was satisfied that the supplier's reputation was good before becoming a linked credit provider.
conclusion text: Therefore, the linked credit provider is not liable to consumer under section 278.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

280(4) Cases where a linked credit provider is not liable
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-280-ss-4
part of: 280 Cases where a linked credit provider is not liable
note: Consumer under section 278 is not entitled to claim against a linked credit provider.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.372
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 280(4) Cases where a linked credit provider is not liable
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: Linked credit provider is not liable to a consumer under section 278.
conclusion text: Consumer under section 278 is not entitled to claim against a linked credit provider.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval of joint liability proceedings
premise text: Joint liability proceedings occur during the same period as section 278.
conclusion text: Linked credit provider is not liable to a consumer under section 278 if the proceeding occurs during the same period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval of linked credit provider's liability
premise text: Linked credit provider is not liable to a consumer under section 278 if the proceeding occurs during the same period.
conclusion text: Linked credit provider's liability ends when the proceeding ends.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional diffusion of linked credit provider's liability
premise text: Linked credit provider is not liable to a consumer under section 278 if the proceeding is joint and occurs during the same period.
conclusion text: Consumer under section 278 may claim against a linked credit provider if the proceeding is not joint or does not occur during the same period.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-280-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional liability of linked credit provider
premise text: Linked credit provider is not liable to a consumer under section 278 if the proceeding is joint and occurs during the same period.
conclusion text: Consumer under section 278 may claim against a linked credit provider if the proceeding is not joint or does not occur during the same period.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

281 Amount of liability of linked credit providers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-281
note: Limits liability of linked credit providers to a consumer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.374
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-281-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-281-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-281-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 281 Amount of liability of linked credit providers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-281-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Indicates an upper limit on liability.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

282 Counter-claims and offsets
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-282
has part: 282(1) Counter-claims and offsets
has part: 282(2) Counter-claims and offsets
has part: 282(3) Counter-claims and offsets
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.375

282(1) Counter-claims and offsets
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-282-ss-1
part of: 282 Counter-claims and offsets
note: Consumer cannot make counter-claim or exercise right in relation to liability under section 278(1) unless claims against supplier.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.375
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-282-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-282-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-282-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits counter-claim or exercise of right.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

282(2) Counter-claims and offsets
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-282-ss-2
part of: 282 Counter-claims and offsets
note: Exemption from liability for supplier dissolution or winding up
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.375
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-282-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-282-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-282-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 282(2) Counter-claims and offsets
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-282-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

282(3) Counter-claims and offsets
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-282-ss-3
part of: 282 Counter-claims and offsets
note: Consumer may offset liability against credit provider's liability under section 278(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.375
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-282-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-282-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-282-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permits consumer to offset liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

283 Enforcement of judgments etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-283
note: Judgment cannot be enforced against linked credit provider unless written demand is made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.375
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-283-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-283-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-283-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-283-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-283-logic-cogai-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-283-logic-shacl-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-283-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 283 Enforcement of judgments etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-283-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of enforcement against linked credit provider.
premise text: (1) If, in joint liability proceedings, judgment is given against a supplier and a linked credit provider...
conclusion text: ...the judgment must not be enforced against the credit provider unless a written demand made
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-283-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for enforcement provision.
premise text: (1) If, in joint liability proceedings, judgment is given against a supplier and a linked credit provider...
conclusion text: ...the judgment must not be enforced against the credit provider unless a written demand made
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-283-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for enforcement provision.
premise text: (1) If, in joint liability proceedings, judgment is given against a supplier and a linked credit provider...
conclusion text: ...the judgment must not be enforced against the credit provider unless a written demand made
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-283-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation for enforcement provision.
premise text: (1) If, in joint liability proceedings, judgment is given against a supplier and a linked credit provider...
conclusion text: ...the judgment must not be enforced against the credit provider unless a written demand made
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-283-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema Validation
logic summary: Schema validation for enforcement provision.
premise text: (1) If, in joint liability proceedings, judgment is given against a supplier and a linked credit provider...
conclusion text: ...the judgment must not be enforced against the credit provider unless a written demand made
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

284 Award of interest to consumers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-284
has part: 284(1) Award of interest to consumers
has part: 284(2) Award of interest to consumers
has part: 284(3) Award of interest to consumers
has part: 284(4) Award of interest to consumers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.377

284(1) Award of interest to consumers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-284-ss-1
part of: 284 Award of interest to consumers
note: Award interest to consumer if judgment is given against supplier and linked credit provider.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.377
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-284-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-284-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-284-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 284(1) Award of interest to consumers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-284-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to award interest to consumers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

284(2) Award of interest to consumers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-284-ss-2
part of: 284 Award of interest to consumers
note: Award of interest to consumers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.377
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-284-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-284-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-284-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 284(2) Award of interest to consumers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-284-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Consumer must be awarded interest
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

284(3) Award of interest to consumers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-284-ss-3
part of: 284 Award of interest to consumers
note: Court must consider payments made by supplier or linked credit provider when determining good cause for awarding interest.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.377
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-284-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-284-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-284-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-284-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-284-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-284-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-284-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 284(3) Award of interest to consumers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-284-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider payments
premise text: Court must take into account any payment made into court...
conclusion text: Good cause is shown against awarding interest
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-284-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Payment consideration implies a temporal relationship with interest awarding
premise text: Court must consider payments made into court by supplier or linked credit provider...
conclusion text: Temporal relationship between payment and interest awarding exists
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-284-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ⊆
logic summary: Payment consideration is a subset of good cause determination
premise text: Court must consider payments made by supplier or linked credit provider...
conclusion text: Good cause determination implies payment consideration
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-284-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: ⊕
logic summary: Payment consideration is not a necessary condition for good cause determination
premise text: Court must take into account any payment made into court by supplier or linked credit provider...
conclusion text: Good cause determination does not require payment consideration
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-284-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: ⊥
logic summary: Payment consideration is not a relevant factor in good cause determination
premise text: Court must consider payments made by supplier or linked credit provider...
conclusion text: Good cause determination does not depend on payment consideration
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

284(4) Award of interest to consumers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-284-ss-4
part of: 284 Award of interest to consumers
note: This section applies despite any other law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.377
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-284-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-284-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-284-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 284(4) Award of interest to consumers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-284-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

285 Liability of suppliers to linked credit providers, and of linked
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-285
has part: 285(1) Liability of suppliers to linked credit providers, and of linked
has part: 285(2) Liability of suppliers to linked credit providers, and of linked
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.378

285(1) Liability of suppliers to linked credit providers, and of linked
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-285-ss-1
part of: 285 Liability of suppliers to linked credit providers, and of linked
note: Supplier liability to linked credit providers and suppliers under section 278.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.378
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-285-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-285-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-285-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 285(1) Liability of suppliers to linked credit providers, and of linked
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-285-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Supplier liability obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

285(2) Liability of suppliers to linked credit providers, and of linked
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-285-ss-2
part of: 285 Liability of suppliers to linked credit providers, and of linked
note: Supplier liability limit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.378
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-285-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-285-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-285-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 285(2) Liability of suppliers to linked credit providers, and of linked
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-285-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ≤
logic summary: Upper bound on liability
premise text: Maximum amount of linked credit provider's liability under section 281
conclusion text: Supplier liability limit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

286 Joint liability proceedings and recovery under section 135 of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-286
has part: 286(1) Joint liability proceedings and recovery under section 135 of the
has part: 286(2) Joint liability proceedings and recovery under section 135 of the
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.378

286(1) Joint liability proceedings and recovery under section 135 of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-286-ss-1
part of: 286 Joint liability proceedings and recovery under section 135 of the
note: Recovery of amounts under section 135 of the National Credit Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.378
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-286-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-286-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-286-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-286-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-286-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-286-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Consumer owes credit provider amount under section 135 of the National Credit Code
premise text: (a) a consumer is seeking, in joint liability proceedings, to recover an amount under section 279...
conclusion text: ...the following amounts may be recovered in the joint liability proceedings (to the extent that they have not been recovered under section 135 of the National Credit Code):
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-286-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between contract and termination
premise text: (b) the contract has been rescinded or discharged (whether under this Schedule or any other law);
conclusion text: ...the consumer terminates the linked credit contract under that section;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-286-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of joint liability proceedings
premise text: (a) a consumer is seeking, in joint liability proceedings, to recover an amount under section 279...
conclusion text: ...the following amounts may be recovered in the joint liability proceedings (to the extent that they have not been recovered under section 135 of the National Credit Code):
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-286-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Credit provider owes consumer amount under section 135 of the National Credit Code
premise text: (f) any amount that the credit provider is entitled under section 135 of the National Credit Code to recover from:...
conclusion text: ...the supplier.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

286(2) Joint liability proceedings and recovery under section 135 of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-286-ss-2
part of: 286 Joint liability proceedings and recovery under section 135 of the
note: Ceases to be recoverable under section 135 of the National Credit Code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.378
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-286-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-286-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-286-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-286-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
logic summary: Ceases to be recoverable
premise text: Recovered under subsection (1)
conclusion text: No longer recoverable
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-286-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Ceases to be recoverable during subsection (1)
premise text: Subsection (1)
conclusion text: Ceased to be recoverable during subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

287 Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-287
has part: 287(1) Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
has part: 287(2) Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
has part: 287(3) Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
has part: 287(4) Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
has part: 287(5) Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.380

287(1) Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-287-ss-1
part of: 287 Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
note: Credit provider not liable for consumer loss or damage due to non-compliance with guarantee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.380
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-287-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-287-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-287-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 287(1) Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-287-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits liability for credit provider
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

287(2) Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-287-ss-2
part of: 287 Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
note: Consumer can recover amount by action against supplier
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.380
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-287-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-287-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-287-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-287-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-287-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-287-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-287-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 287(2) Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-287-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Ability to perform an action
conclusion text: Consumer can recover amount by action against supplier
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-287-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between actions
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not prevent the consumer from recovering that amount by action against the supplier of the goods or services to which the contract relates.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-287-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between actions
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not prevent the consumer from recovering that amount by action against the supplier of the goods or services to which the contract relates.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-287-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between actions
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not prevent the consumer from recovering that amount by action against the supplier of the goods or services to which the contract relates.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-287-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between actions
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not prevent the consumer from recovering that amount by action against the supplier of the goods or services to which the contract relates.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

287(3) Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-287-ss-3
part of: 287 Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
note: No liability for breach of warranty in non-linked credit contracts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.380
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-287-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-287-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-287-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-287-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-287-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-287-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-287-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 287(3) Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-287-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: No liability for breach of warranty
premise text: Section 12ED of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001
conclusion text: Supplier not under liability to consumer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-287-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for breach of warranty
premise text: Section 12ED of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001
conclusion text: Breach of warranty occurs within a specific time frame
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-287-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for breach of warranty
premise text: Section 12ED of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001
conclusion text: Breach of warranty recurs over time
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-287-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of liability for breach of warranty
premise text: Section 12ED of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001
conclusion text: Liability diffuses to supplier
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-287-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
logic summary: Classification of goods or services using AI
premise text: Section 12ED of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001
conclusion text: Goods or services classified as subject to warranty
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

287(4) Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-287-ss-4
part of: 287 Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
note: Consumer can recover amount from credit provider
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.380
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-287-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-287-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-287-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 287(4) Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-287-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Obligation to provide recovery
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

287(5) Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-287-ss-5
part of: 287 Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
note: Non-linked credit contracts are prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.380
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-287-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-287-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-287-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits non-linked credit contracts.
premise text: (5) A non-linked credit contract is a contract that a consumer enters into...
conclusion text: The provision of non-linked credit contracts is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

288 Application of amendments relating to lay-by agreements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-288
note: Amendments apply to lay-by agreements entered into on or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.382
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-288-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-288-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-288-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 288 Application of amendments relating to lay-by agreements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-288-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: The amendments apply to the specified agreements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

289 Application of amendment relating to repairs
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-289
note: Amendment applies to notices given in relation to repair of goods accepted on or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.382
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-289-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-289-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-289-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 289 Application of amendment relating to repairs
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-289-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Obligation applies to notices given in relation to repair of goods accepted on or after commencement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

290 Saving of regulations relating to repairs
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-290
note: Saving of regulations relating to repairs
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.382
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-290-norm

290A Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-290a
has part: 290A(1) Application
has part: 290A(2) Application
has part: 290A(3) Application
has part: 290A(4) Application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.383

290A(1) Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-290a-ss-1
part of: 290A Application
note: Amendments apply to contracts entered into on or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.383
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-290a-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-290a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-290a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-290a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-290a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-290a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-290a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 290A(1) Application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-290a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
logic summary: Applicability of amendments
premise text: Schedule 1 applies to Treasury Legislation Amendment (Small Business and Unfair Contract Terms) Act 2015
conclusion text: Amendments apply to contracts entered into on or after commencement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-290a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal applicability of amendments
premise text: Schedule 1 commences on a specified date
conclusion text: Amendments apply to contracts entered into on or after commencement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-290a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Implication of amendments on contract applicability
premise text: Schedule 1 applies to Treasury Legislation Amendment (Small Business and Unfair Contract Terms) Act 2015
conclusion text: Amendments apply to contracts entered into on or after commencement.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-290a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of amendments through contract applicability
premise text: Schedule 1 applies to Treasury Legislation Amendment (Small Business and Unfair Contract Terms) Act 2015
conclusion text: Amendments apply to contracts entered into on or after commencement.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-290a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: appliesTo
logic summary: Applicability of amendments to contracts using AI
premise text: Schedule 1 applies to Treasury Legislation Amendment (Small Business and Unfair Contract Terms) Act 2015
conclusion text: Amendments apply to contracts entered into on or after commencement.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

290A(2) Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-290a-ss-2
part of: 290A Application
note: Amendments do not apply to contracts entered into before the commencement of Schedule 2.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.383
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-290a-ss-2-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-290a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 290A(2) Application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

290A(3) Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-290a-ss-3
part of: 290A Application
note: If paragraph (2)(b) of this section applies to a term of a contract, subsection 23(2) and section 27 apply.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.383
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-290a-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-290a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-290a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-290a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 290A(3) Application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-290a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: (2)(b) of this section applies to a term of a contract
conclusion text: subsection 23(2) and section 27 apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-290a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval application
premise text: (2)(b) of this section applies to a term of a contract
conclusion text: subsection 23(2) and section 27 apply
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

290A(4) Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-290a-ss-4
part of: 290A Application
note: Amendments do not apply to contracts or terms of contracts where acquisition of property would result in an unfair outcome.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.383
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-290a-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-290a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-290a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-290a-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-290a-ss-4-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-290a-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 290A(4) Application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-290a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prevents acquisition of property on unfair terms.
premise text: (4) Despite paragraphs (2)(a) and (b) and subsection (3) of this section,
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-290a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap with acquisition of property.
premise text: (4) Despite paragraphs (2)(a) and (b) and subsection (3) of this section,
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-290a-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Repeating pattern of unfair outcomes.
premise text: (4) Despite paragraphs (2)(a) and (b) and subsection (3) of this section,
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-290a-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation to ensure fair outcomes.
premise text: (4) Despite paragraphs (2)(a) and (b) and subsection (3) of this section,
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

291 Application of amendments relating to confidentiality of notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-291
note: Amendment applies in relation to disclosures made on or after commencement of Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.384
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-291-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-291-logic-alleninterval-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-291-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between temporal intervals
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

292 Application of amendments relating to prohibition on supplies
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-292
note: Amendments apply to unsolicited consumer agreements made on or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.384
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-292-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-292-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-292-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits unsolicited consumer agreements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295 Application of amendments
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-295
note: Amendments apply after commencement of Schedule.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.385
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-295-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-295-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-295-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 295 Application of amendments
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-295-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes duty on State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

296 Application—listed public companies
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-296
note: Amendments apply after commencement day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.386
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-296-norm

297 Application—unsolicited supplies
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-297
note: Application of amendments made by Schedule 3 to the Treasury Laws Amendment (Australian Consumer Law Review) Act 2018
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.386
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-297-norm

298 Application—unsolicited consumer agreements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-298
note: Application of amendment to unsolicited consumer agreements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.386
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-298-norm

299 Application—single price
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-299
note: Amendments apply in relation to acts or omissions on or after a specified date.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.386
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-299-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-299-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-299-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 299 Application—single price
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-299-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: after
logic summary: Temporal relation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

300 Application—non-punitive orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-300
note: Application of amendments made by Schedule 8 to the Treasury Laws Amendment (Australian Consumer Law Review) Act 2018
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.386
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-300-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-300-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-300-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 300 Application—non-punitive orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-300-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Applicable deontic logic
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

301 Application—guarantees relating to the supply of services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-301
note: Amendments apply in relation to services supplied under a contract entered into on or after the commencement day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.387
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-301-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-301-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-301-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 301 Application—guarantees relating to the supply of services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-301-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Holds true
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

302 Application of amendments relating to gift cards
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-302
note: Amendments apply to gift cards supplied on or after November 1, 2019.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.388
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-302-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-302-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-302-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 302 Application of amendments relating to gift cards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-302-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Holds true
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

303 Application of amendments relating to multiple non-major
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-303
has part: 303(1) Application of amendments relating to multiple non-major
has part: 303(2) Application of amendments relating to multiple non-major
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.389

303(1) Application of amendments relating to multiple non-major
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-303-ss-1
part of: 303 Application of amendments relating to multiple non-major
note: Commences on a specified day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.389
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-303-ss-1-norm

303(2) Application of amendments relating to multiple non-major
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-303-ss-2
part of: 303 Application of amendments relating to multiple non-major
note: Conditional commencement of amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.389
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-303-ss-2-norm

304 Application of amendments relating to penalties
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-304
note: Application of amendments relating to penalties
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.390
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-304-norm

305 Application of amendments relating to unfair contract terms
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-305
has part: 305(1) Application of amendments relating to unfair contract terms
has part: 305(2) Application of amendments relating to unfair contract terms
has part: 305(3) Application of amendments relating to unfair contract terms
has part: 305(4) Application of amendments relating to unfair contract terms
has part: 305(5) Application of amendments relating to unfair contract terms
has part: 305(6) Application of amendments relating to unfair contract terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.390

305(1) Application of amendments relating to unfair contract terms
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-305-ss-1
part of: 305 Application of amendments relating to unfair contract terms
note: This section applies to the amendments of this Schedule made by Schedule 2 (the amending Schedule) to the Treasury Laws Amendment (More Competition, Better Prices) Act 2022.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.390
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-305-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-305-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-305-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 305(1) Application of amendments relating to unfair contract terms
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-305-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: The section applies to the amendments made by Schedule 2.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

305(2) Application of amendments relating to unfair contract terms
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-305-ss-2
part of: 305 Application of amendments relating to unfair contract terms
note: Amendments apply to contracts made at or after commencement, but not before.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.390
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-305-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-305-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-305-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 305(2) Application of amendments relating to unfair contract terms
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-305-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Amendments apply to contracts made at or after commencement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

305(3) Application of amendments relating to unfair contract terms
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-305-ss-3
part of: 305 Application of amendments relating to unfair contract terms
note: Prohibits conduct occurring on or after the renewal day for existing contracts renewed at or after the relevant commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.390
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-305-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-305-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-305-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
premise text: (3) If an existing contract is renewed...
conclusion text: ...in relation to conduct that occurs on or after the renewal day.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

305(4) Application of amendments relating to unfair contract terms
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-305-ss-4
part of: 305 Application of amendments relating to unfair contract terms
note: Amendments apply to a contract on and from the variation day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.390
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-305-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-305-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-305-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 305(4) Application of amendments relating to unfair contract terms
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-305-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to apply amendments
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

305(5) Application of amendments relating to unfair contract terms
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-305-ss-5
part of: 305 Application of amendments relating to unfair contract terms
note: Applicable to persons proposing terms in contracts made or renewed after the relevant commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.390
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-305-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-305-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-305-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 305(5) Application of amendments relating to unfair contract terms
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-305-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on states to apply section 23(2A)(e) in relation to persons proposing contract terms.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

305(6) Application of amendments relating to unfair contract terms
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-305-ss-6
part of: 305 Application of amendments relating to unfair contract terms
note: Exemptions from amendments to unfair contract terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.390
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-305-ss-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-305-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-305-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-305-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-305-ss-6-logic-cogai-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-305-ss-6-logic-shacl-5

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-305-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prevents acquisition of property on just terms
premise text: (6) Despite subsections (3) to (5) of this section, the amendments do not apply...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-305-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal scope of exemptions
premise text: (6) Despite subsections (3) to (5) of this section, the amendments do not apply...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-305-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Identifies recurring pattern in exemptions
premise text: (6) Despite subsections (3) to (5) of this section, the amendments do not apply...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-305-ss-6-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Entity Recognition
logic summary: Recognizes entities involved in exemptions
premise text: (6) Despite subsections (3) to (5) of this section, the amendments do not apply...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-305-ss-6-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema Validation
logic summary: Validates schema for exemptions
premise text: (6) Despite subsections (3) to (5) of this section, the amendments do not apply...
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306 Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-306
note: Definition of amending Schedule
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.392
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-306-norm

307 Saving—safety standards declared by the Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-307
note: Safety standards continue in force despite repeal of section 105.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.392
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-307-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-307-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-307-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-307-logic-deontic-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-307-logic-deontic-4

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-307-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During the period from repeal to commencement
premise text: Repeal of section 105 by amending Schedule
conclusion text: Safety standard continues in force during this period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-307-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: and
logic summary: Combines two conditions
premise text: Safety standard declared for purposes of section 105 and safety standard in force immediately before commencement of Part 1 of amending Schedule
conclusion text: Safety standard continues in force as if made for purposes of section 104
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-307-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obliges
logic summary: Obliges the Minister to declare safety standards
premise text: Section 105 repealed by amending Schedule
conclusion text: Minister obliged to declare safety standards for purposes of section 104
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-307-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obliges
logic summary: Obliges the Minister to enforce safety standards
premise text: Section 105 repealed by amending Schedule
conclusion text: Minister obliged to enforce safety standards for purposes of section 104
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

308 Application—nomination and compliance with safety standards
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-308
has part: 308(1) Application—nomination and compliance with safety standards
has part: 308(2) Application—nomination and compliance with safety standards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.392

308(1) Application—nomination and compliance with safety standards
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-308-ss-1
part of: 308 Application—nomination and compliance with safety standards
note: Continues to apply section 108 despite repeal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.392
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-308-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-308-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-308-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 308(1) Application—nomination and compliance with safety standards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-308-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
logic summary: Section 108 obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

308(2) Application—nomination and compliance with safety standards
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-308-ss-2
part of: 308 Application—nomination and compliance with safety standards
note: Safety standards application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.392
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-308-ss-2-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-308-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 308(2) Application—nomination and compliance with safety standards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

309 Application—requests for information or documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-309
note: Safety standards and information standards made before, on or after commencement of Part 1 of amending Schedule apply.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.393
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-309-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-309-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 309 Application—requests for information or documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

310 Application of amendments relating to penalties
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-310
note: Amendments apply to offences committed or acts/omissions on or after commencement of Schedule.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.394
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-310-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-310-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-310-logic-descriptionlogic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-310-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Amendments apply to offences committed or acts/omissions on or after commencement of Schedule.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-310-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Schedule applies to offences committed or acts/omissions on or after commencement.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Aug
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-24-2
note: Conditional commencement and transitional provisions for the Postal and Telecommunications Commissions Act 1975
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.398
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-2-norm

12 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-12-2
note: Commencement of Trade Practices Act 1975
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.398
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-2-norm

19 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.398
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-2-norm

19 June 1975 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19-3
note: Trade Practices Amendment Act 1976
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.398
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-3-norm

31 Aug
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-31-2
note: Prohibition on certain actions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.398
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-31-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-31-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-31-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids certain actions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Dec 1976
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9-2
note: Trade Practices Amendment Act 1977
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.398
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-2-norm

16 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16-2
note: Prohibition on certain actions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.398
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 16 June
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits actions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-28-2
note: Trade Practices Amendment Act (No. 2) - Section 18, 19(2), and 19(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.399
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-2-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28 Oct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

10 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.399
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-2-norm

10 Nov 1977 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-3
note: Trade Practices Amendment Act 1978, s 6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.399
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-3-norm

6 Dec 1978
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.399
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-6-2-norm

6 Dec 1978 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6-3
note: Trade Practices Amendment Act (No. 2) - s 8(2), 20
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.399
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-6-3-norm

6 Dec 1978
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.399
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-6-4-norm

6 Dec 1978 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6-5
note: Trade Practices (Boycotts) Amendment Act 1980
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.399
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-6-5-norm

29 May
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-29-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.399
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-29-2-norm

29 May 1980 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-29-3
note: Revision of Statute Law Act 1980
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.399
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-29-3-norm

12 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-12-3
note: Conditional commencement of Statute Law (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act 1981
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.399
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-3-logic-alleninterval-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Dec 1981
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2-2
note: Statute Law (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act (No. 2) 1982
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.399
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-2-norm

22 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-22-2
note: Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (No. 1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.399
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-2-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22 Sept
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

20 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20-2
note: List s 7(1), (3), (4) of sch 1.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.399
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-20-2-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-20-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20 June
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

18 July 1983 (s 2(1))
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-18-2
note: Public Service Reform Act 1984, s 7(1), (3), (4)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.399
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-18-2-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-18-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18 July 1983 (s 2(1))
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

25 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-25-2
note: Compliance with s 151(9) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 on 1 July 1984.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.399
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-25-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-25-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-25-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 25 June
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-25-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-25-3
note: Conditional commencement of a statute
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.400
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-25-3-norm

25 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-25-4
note: Amendment of s 2(32)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.400
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-25-4-norm

13 May
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13-2
note: Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (No. 1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.400
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-2-norm

5 June 1985
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-5-2
note: Trade Practices (Transfer of Market Dominance) Amendment Act 1986
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.400
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-5-2-norm

1 May 1986
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.400
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-2-norm

1 June 1986 (s 2 and gaz
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.400
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-3-norm

13 May
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13-3
note: Conditional commencement on specific dates
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.400
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-3-logic-alleninterval-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals
premise text: Dates specified require relation to time
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 May 1986 (s 2(1))
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13-4
note: List of sections subject to commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.400
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-4-norm

18 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-18-3
note: Jurisdiction of Courts (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act 1987
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.400
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-18-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-18-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-18-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18 Dec
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-18-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction
logic summary: Establishes jurisdiction of courts
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 May
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-26-2
note: May be cited
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.400
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-26-2-norm

18 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-18-4
note: Duty to provide information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.401
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-18-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-18-4-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-18-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18 Dec
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-18-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Apr 1988
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-5-3
note: Conditional commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.401
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-5-3-norm

14 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-14-2
note: Conditional commencement of Trade Practices Amendment Act 1988
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.401
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-14-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-14-2-logic-alleninterval-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-14-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 May
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-11-2
note: Prohibition on certain conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.401
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-11-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-11-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-11-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Nov 1988
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8-2
note: Amendment by Industrial Relations Legislation Amendment Act (No. 2) 1990
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.401
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-2-logic-alleninterval-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-18-5
note: Conditional commencement of Circuit Layouts Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.401
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-18-5-norm

22 May
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-22-3
note: Trade Practices (International Liner Cargo Shipping) Amendment Act 1989
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.401
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-3-norm

30 May
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.401
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-2-norm

1 Aug 1989 (s 2(1) and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.401
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-4-norm

17 Jan 1990
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-17-2
note: End of legislation history
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.401
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-17-2-norm

16 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16-3
note: Conditional commencement on July 1, 1990
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.402
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-3-logic-alleninterval-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
premise text: Conditional commencement on July 1, 1990
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-24-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.402
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-3-norm

21 Dec 1990 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-21-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.402
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-21-2-norm

27 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-27-2
note: Conditional commencement of Law and Justice Legislation Amendment Act 1991
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.402
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-27-2-norm

12 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-12-4
note: Conditional commencement of Transport and Communications Legislation Amendment Act 1991
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.402
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-4-logic-alleninterval-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-25-5
note: Special Broadcasting Service Act 1991 commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.402
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-25-5-norm

25 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-25-6
note: Law and Justice Legislation Amendment Act 1992
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.402
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-25-6-norm

13 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13-5
note: Territories Law Reform Act 1992
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.402
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-5-norm

30 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-3
note: Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments Act 1992
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.402
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-3-logic-alleninterval-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
premise text: June commencement
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 July 1992
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9-3
note: Trade Practices Amendment Act 1992
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.402
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-3-norm

9 July 1992
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.402
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-4-norm

9 July 1992 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9-5
note: Trade Practices Legislation Amendment Act 1992
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.402
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-5-norm

24 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-24-4
note: Date of commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.402
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-4-norm

22 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-22-4
note: Conditional commencement of Insurance Laws Amendment Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.403
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-4-logic-alleninterval-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Apr 1994
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-7-2
note: Conditional commencement of Law and Justice Legislation Amendment Act (No. 2) 1994
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.403
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Conditional Commencement
logic summary: Conditional commencement of legislation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-28-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.403
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-3-norm

28 Nov 1994 (s 2(1))
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-28-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.403
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-4-norm

20 July
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20-3
note: Statute Law Revision Act 1996
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.403
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-20-3-norm

25 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-25-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.403
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-25-7-norm

25 Oct 1996 (s 2(1))
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-25-8
note: Conditional commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.403
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-25-8-norm

25 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-25-9
note: Amendment of section 17
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.403
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-25-9-norm

19 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19-4
note: Trade Practices Amendment (Industry Access Codes) Act 1997
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.403
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-4-norm

10 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.403
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-4-norm

10 Apr 1997 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-5
note: Legislation history
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.403
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-5-norm

30 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.404
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-4-norm

30 Apr 1997 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-5
note: Amendment Act 1997
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.404
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-5-norm

24 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-24-5
note: Commencement of Telecommunications Legislation Amendment Act 1997
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.404
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-5-logic-alleninterval-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-5-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
premise text: Date range specified (1 Jan 1998)
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.404
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-4-norm

30 Apr 1997 (s 2(4))
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-6
note: Trade Practices Amendment (Fair Trading) Act 1998
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.404
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-6-norm

22 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-22-5
note: Consequential Amendments Act 1998
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.404
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-5-norm

29 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-29-4
note: Commences on July 1, 1998
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.404
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-29-4-norm

30 July
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.404
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-7-norm

30 July 1998 (s 2(1))
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-8
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.404
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-8-norm

30 July 1998 (s 2(3))
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-9
note: Trade Practices Amendment (Country of Origin Representations) Act 1998
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.404
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-9-norm

30 July
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-10
note: Remains in force on July 30, 1998
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.404
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-10-norm

5 July 1999
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-5-4
note: Commencement dates for certain sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.404
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-5-4-norm

1 July 1999 (s 2(6))
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-5
note: Legislation history for Competition and Consumer Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.404
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-5-norm

8 July 1999
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.405
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-3-norm

9 July 1999 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9-6
note: Consequential and Transitional Amendment Act 1999
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.405
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-6-norm

11 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-11-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.405
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-11-3-norm

5 Dec 1999 (s 2(1), (2))
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-5-5
note: Dec 1999 (s 2(1), (2))
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.405
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-5-5-norm

22 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-22-6
note: Consequential Amendments Act 1999
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.405
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-6-norm

23 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23-2
note: Jurisdiction of Courts Legislation Amendment Act 2000
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.405
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-2-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction
logic summary: Establishes jurisdiction of courts
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 May
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-11
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.405
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-11-norm

30 May 2000 (s 2(1))
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-12
note: A New Tax System (Trade Practices Amendment) Act 2000
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.405
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-12-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-12-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-22-7
note: Conditional commencement of Trade Practices Amendment (International Liner Cargo Shipping) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.405
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-7-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-7-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-7-logic-ltl-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-7-logic-deontic-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-7-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Remainder: 22 June 2000 (s 2(1))
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-7-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires ordered or recurring trace for conditional commencement
premise text: 6 Nov 1995 (s 2(2)) and 10 Apr 1997 (s 2(3))
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-7-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as Undertaking
premise text: No clear duty, ban, grant permission, or create a right
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Oct 2000
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-5-6
note: Remainder of section 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.405
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-5-6-norm

21 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-21-3
note: Commencement of Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.405
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-21-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-21-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-21-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: begins
logic summary: Starts on December 21, 2000
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-28-5
note: Amended by Statute Law Revision Act 2002
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.406
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: AMENDED_BY
logic summary: Amended by Statute Law Revision Act 2002
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 July 2002
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3-2
note: Communications and the Arts Legislation Amendment Act 2001
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.406
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-2-norm

5 June 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-5-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.406
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-5-7-norm

5 June 2001 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-5-8
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.406
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-5-8-norm

28 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-28-6
note: Conditional commencement of Trade Practices Amendment Act (No. 1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.406
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-6-norm

28 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-28-7
note: Conditional commencement of certain provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.406
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-7-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-7-logic-alleninterval-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-7-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 July 2002
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3-3
note: Application of Criminal Code Act (No. 3) 2001
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.406
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-3-norm

18 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-18-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.406
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-18-6-norm

15 Dec 2001 (s 2(1), (4))
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15-2
note: Consequential Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.406
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15-2-norm

27 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-27-3
note: Trade Practices Amendment (Telecommunications) Act 2001
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.406
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-27-3-norm

27 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-27-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.406
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-27-4-norm

27 Sept 2001 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-27-5
note: Endnotes and legislation history for Competition and Consumer Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.406
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-27-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-27-5-logic-alleninterval-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-27-5-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires temporal intervals for endnotes
premise text: Endnote 3—Legislation history
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Oct 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-6
note: Statute Law Revision Act 2002
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.407
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-6-norm

3 July 2002
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.407
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-4-norm

1 July 1999 s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-7
note: List items 27 and 29
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.407
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-7-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-7-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 July 1999 s 2(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: inclusion
logic summary: Membership in list
premise text: Item is in the list
conclusion text: Obligation to include item
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 July 2002 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3-5
note: Trade Practices Amendment Act (No. 1) - July 2002
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.407
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-5-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 July 2002 (s 2(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

11 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-11-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.407
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-11-4-norm

11 Dec 2002 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-11-5
note: List of items in Schedule 1, section 11
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.407
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-11-5-norm

19 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19-5
note: Liability for Recreational Services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.407
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19 Dec
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.407
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-6-norm

19 Dec 2002 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.407
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-7-norm

19 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19-8
note: Conditional commencement of Industry, Tourism and Resources Legislation Amendment Act 2003
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.407
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-8-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-8-logic-alleninterval-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-8-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-11-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.407
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-11-6-norm

12 Apr 2003 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-12-5
note: Trade Practices Legislation Amendment Act 2003
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.407
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-5-norm

17 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-17-3
note: Gazetted notice of commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.407
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-17-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-17-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-17-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17 Dec
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-17-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-22-8
note: June 2004 (s 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.407
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-8-norm

30 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-13
note: Conditional commencement on specific date
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.408
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-13-norm

30 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-14
note: Trade Practices Amendment (Personal Injuries and Death) Act (No. 2) 2004
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.408
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-14-norm

13 July
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.408
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-6-norm

13 July 2004 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13-7
note: July 2004 (s 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.408
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-7-norm

13 July
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13-8
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.408
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-8-norm

13 July 2004 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13-9
note: Consequential and transitional provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.408
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-9-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-9-logic-alleninterval-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-9-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for commencement
premise text: July 2004 (s 2)
conclusion text: Temporal interval requirement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Apr 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-8
note: Amendment of sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.408
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-8-norm

16 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16-5
note: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.408
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-5-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Must provide commencement date
premise text: Section 2(1) item 2
conclusion text: Commencement date
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23-3
note: Schedule 4, items 1-28, and Schedule 7, items 1-19, 21-28, 5-12, 14-19, 23 March 2006.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.409
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-3-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23 Sept
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23-4
note: Repeals and consequential amendments to the Offshore Petroleum (Repeals and Consequential Amendments) Act 2006
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.409
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-4-norm

29 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-29-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.409
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-29-5-norm

1 July 2008 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-9
note: Jurisdiction of the Federal Magistrates Court Legislation Amendment Act 2006
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.409
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-9-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-9-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 July 2008 (s 2(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction
logic summary: Establishes jurisdiction of the Federal Magistrates Court Legislation Amendment Act 2006
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Apr 2006
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6-6
note: Conditional commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.409
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-6-6-norm

22 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-22-9
note: Conditional commencement on specific dates
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.409
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-9-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-9-logic-alleninterval-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-9-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires temporal intervals for commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement on specific dates
conclusion text: Temporal interval required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Aug
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-18-7
note: Compliance with certain items is required.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.409
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-18-7-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-18-7-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-18-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires compliance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-14-3
note: Maritime Transport and Offshore Facilities Security Amendment (Security Plans and Other Measures) Act 109, 2006
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.410
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-14-3-norm

27 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-27-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.410
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-27-6-norm

27 Sept 2006 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-27-7
note: Trade Practices Legislation Amendment Act (No. 1) 2006
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.410
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-27-7-norm

6 Nov 2006
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6-7
note: Commences on specific dates for certain schedules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.410
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-6-7-norm

10 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.410
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-6-norm

1 July 2008 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-10
note: Broadcasting Legislation Amendment (Digital Radio) Act 2007
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.410
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-10-norm

28 May
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-28-8
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.410
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-8-norm

29 May 2007 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-29-6
note: Conditional commencement of Corporations (NZ Closer Economic Relations) and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2007
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.410
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-29-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-29-6-logic-alleninterval-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-29-6-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: 19 July 2007 (s 2(1) item 3)
conclusion text: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-21-4
note: Commencement date of Water (Consequential Amendments) Act 2007
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.410
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-21-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-21-4-logic-alleninterval-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-21-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Sept 2007
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3-6
note: Trade Practices Legislation Amendment Act (No. 1) 2007
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.411
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-6-norm

24 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-24-6
note: Trade Practices Amendment (Access Declarations) Act 2008
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.411
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-6-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24 Sept
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.411
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-20-4-norm

20 Mar 2008 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20-5
note: Australian Energy Market Amendment (Minor Amendments) Act 2008
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.411
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-20-5-norm

30 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-15
note: Conditional commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.411
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-15-norm

21 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-21-5
note: Offshore Petroleum Amendment (Greenhouse Gas Storage) Act 2008
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.411
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-21-5-norm

21 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-21-6
note: Trade Practices Amendment (Clarity in Pricing) Act 2008
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.411
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-21-6-norm

25 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-25-10
note: Conditional commencement of Water Amendment Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.411
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-25-10-norm

8 Dec 2008
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8-4
note: Conditional commencement of Australian Energy Market Amendment (AEMO and Other Measures) Act 2009
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.411
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-4-logic-alleninterval-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-26-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.411
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-26-3-norm

27 Mar 2009 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-27-8
note: Items 4 and 6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.411
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-27-8-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-27-8-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-27-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Item inclusion
premise text: Items 4 and 6
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-25-11
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.412
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-25-11-norm

1 July 2009 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-11
note: Trade Practices Amendment (Cartel Conduct and Other Measures) Act 2009
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.412
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-11-norm

26 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-26-4
note: References sections in Schedule 1 and Schedule 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.412
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-26-4-norm

24 July 2009 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-24-7
note: List items 2, 3, 5 under section 24(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.412
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-7-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-7-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24 July 2009 (s 2(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: inclusion
logic summary: List items
premise text: Section 24(1)
conclusion text: Items 2, 3, 5
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 June 2009 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-27-9
note: Part of June 2009 (s 2(1)) section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.412
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-27-9-norm

16 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16-6
note: Commencement of Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.412
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-6-logic-alleninterval-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-6-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: No temporal relation specified
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Feb
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19-9
note: Conditional commencement of Statute Law Revision Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.412
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-9-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-9-logic-alleninterval-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-9-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Mar 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-12
note: Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 1) 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.412
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-12-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-12-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-12-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Mar 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-14-4
note: Conditional commencement on 1 July 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.412
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-14-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-14-4-logic-alleninterval-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-14-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: 15 Apr 2010 (s 2(1) items 3, 13)
conclusion text: 15 Apr 2010
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 July
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13-10
note: Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2) 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.413
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-10-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-10-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the legislative body to amend the Act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 July
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13-11
note: July 1, 2011 (s 2(1) items 2, 8)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.413
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-11-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-11-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-11-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 13 July
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Holds
logic summary: July 1, 2011
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Dec 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6-8
note: Statute Law Revision Act 2012
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.413
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-6-8-norm

22 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-22-10
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.413
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-10-norm

12 Apr 2012 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-12-6
note: Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Safeguards) Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.413
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-6-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12 Apr 2012 (s 2(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15-3
note: Commencement details for certain items in Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.413
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15-3-norm

6 Mar 2012 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6-9
note: Item 4 of Financial Framework Legislation Amendment Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.413
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-6-9-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-6-9-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-6-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6 Mar 2012 (s 2(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-6-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPartOf
logic summary: Part of Financial Framework Legislation Amendment Act 2010
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-17-4
note: Statute Law Revision Act 2011
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.413
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-17-4-norm

22 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-22-11
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.413
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-11-norm

19 Apr 2011 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19-10
note: Endnote 3—Legislation history
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.413
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-10-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-10-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19 Apr 2011 (s 2(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

12 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-12-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.414
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-7-norm

13 Apr 2011 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13-12
note: Part of a long provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.414
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-12-norm

12 Apr 2012 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-12-8
note: Amendment of section 83 by Statute Law Revision Act 2012
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.414
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-8-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-8-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: amends
logic summary: Amendment of a provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-22-12
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.414
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-12-norm

12 Apr 2012 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-12-9
note: Acts Interpretation Amendment Act 2011
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.414
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-9-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12 Apr 2012 (s 2(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

27 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-27-10
note: Carbon Credits (Consequential Amendments) Act 2011
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.414
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-27-10-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-27-10-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-27-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15-4
note: Conditional commencement of Australian Energy Market Amendment (National Energy Retail Law) Act 2011
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.414
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15-4-logic-alleninterval-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-14-5
note: Consequential Amendments Act 2011
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.414
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-14-5-norm

18 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-18-8
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.414
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-18-8-norm

2 Apr 2012 (s 2(1) item 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.414
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-3-norm

1 July 2012 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-13
note: Competition and Consumer Legislation Amendment Act 2011
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.414
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-13-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-13-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 July 2012 (s 2(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

6 Dec 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6-10
note: Conditional commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.414
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-6-10-norm

6 Dec 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6-11
note: Legislation history for Competition and Consumer Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.414
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-6-11-norm

16 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16-7
note: Conditional commencement of Consumer Credit Legislation Amendment (Enhancements) Act 2012
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.415
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-7-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-7-logic-alleninterval-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-7-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
premise text: The text mentions a specific date (1 July 2012)
conclusion text: The provision requires an AllenInterval application
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-17-5
note: Statute Law Revision Act 2012
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.415
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-17-5-norm

22 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-22-13
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.415
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-13-norm

22 Sept 2012 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-22-14
note: Consequential and Transitional Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.415
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-14-norm

3 Dec 2012
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.415
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-7-norm

3 Dec 2012 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3-8
note: Never commenced
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.415
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-8-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-8-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: NEVER
logic summary: Prohibition of commencement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-14-6
note: Statute Law Revision Act 2013
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.415
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-14-6-norm

29 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-29-7
note: References sections in Schedule 1 and Schedule 3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.415
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-29-7-norm

29 June 2013 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-29-8
note: Items 2 and 16, section 343 of Competition and Consumer Amendment Act 2013
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.415
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-29-8-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-29-8-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-29-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes items 2 and 16
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-29-9
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.415
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-29-9-norm

30 June 2013 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-16
note: Consequential and transitional provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.415
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-16-norm

30 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-17
note: References specific items in schedules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.415
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-17-norm

1 July 2014 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-14
note: List of items
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.415
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-14-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-14-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: inclusion
logic summary: Listing items
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13-13
note: Reference to schedule 2, items 7-9, and schedule 7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.416
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-13-norm

14 Apr 2015 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-14-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.416
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-14-7-norm

10 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-7
note: Conditional commencement of Act 2015
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.416
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-7-norm

10 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-8
note: Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Act 2014
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.416
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-8-norm

17 July
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-17-6
note: Competition and Consumer Amendment (Industry Code Penalties) Act 2014
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.416
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-17-6-norm

24 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-24-8
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.416
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-8-norm

1 Jan 2015 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-15
note: Omnibus Repeal Day (Autumn 2014) Act 2014
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.416
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-15-norm

16 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16-8
note: Framework Reform Act 2015
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.416
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-8-norm

5 Mar 2015
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-5-9
note: Legislation history for Competition and Consumer Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.416
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-5-9-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-5-9-logic-n3logic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-5-9-logic-n3logic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: N3Logic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines compilation date and act details
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13-14
note: Consequential Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.417
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-14-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-14-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits Framework Reform Act 2015
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-9
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.417
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-9-norm

5 Mar 2016 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-5-10
note: Item 2 of Treasury Legislation Amendment (Small Business and Unfair Contract Terms) Act 2015
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.417
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-5-10-norm

12 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-12-10
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.417
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-10-norm

12 Nov 2016 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-12-11
note: Statute Law Revision Act (No. 1) 2016
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.417
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-11-norm

11 Feb
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-11-7
note: Competition and Consumer Amendment (Payment Surcharges) Act 2016
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.417
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-11-7-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-11-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11 Feb
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

25 Feb
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-25-12
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.417
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-25-12-norm

25 Feb 2016 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-25-13
note: Legislation Amendment Act 2016
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.417
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-25-13-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-25-13-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-25-13-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 25 Feb 2016 (s 2(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-25-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-18-9
note: Conditional commencement on July 1, 2016
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.417
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-18-9-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-18-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-18-9-logic-deontic-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-18-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18 Mar
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-18-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Conditional Commencement
logic summary: Commences on July 1, 2016
premise text: s 2(1) item 7
conclusion text: s 2(1) item 9
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-18-9-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Conditional Commencement
logic summary: Commences on March 18, 2016
premise text: s 2(1) item 9
conclusion text: s 33, 2016
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

23 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.417
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-5-norm

1 July 2016 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-16
note: Statute Update Act 2016
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.417
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-16-norm

23 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23-6
note: Mandatory compliance with certain items in schedules 1 and 3.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.417
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-6-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-6-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23 Sept
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a mandatory requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Feb
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-22-15
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.417
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-15-norm

23 Feb 2017 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23-7
note: Legislation history
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.417
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-7-norm

23 Aug
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23-8
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.418
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-8-norm

6 Nov 2017 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6-12
note: Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.418
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-6-12-norm

23 Aug
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23-9
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.418
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-9-norm

24 Aug 2017 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-24-9
note: Public Governance and Resources Legislation Amendment Act (No. 1) 92, 2017
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.418
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-9-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24 Aug 2017 (s 2(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

23 Aug
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23-10
note: Mandatory provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.418
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-10-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-10-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a mandatory requirement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-27-11
note: List of items and sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.418
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-27-11-norm

30 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-18
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.418
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-18-norm

31 Oct 2017 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-31-3
note: Amendment (Asia Region Funds Passport) Act 2018
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.418
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-31-3-norm

29 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-29-10
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.418
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-29-10-norm

18 Sept 2018 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-18-10
note: Endnote 3—Legislation history
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.418
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-18-10-norm

31 Aug
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-31-4
note: Conditional commencement of Treasury Laws Amendment (Australian Consumer Law Review) Act 2018
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.419
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-31-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-31-4-logic-alleninterval-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-31-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-25-14
note: Conditional commencement on 26 Oct 2018 (s 2(1) item 1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.419
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-25-14-norm

25 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-25-15
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.419
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-25-15-norm

26 Oct 2018 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-26-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.419
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-26-5-norm

1 Mar 2019
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-17
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.419
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-17-norm

1 Apr 2019 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-18
note: Item 11 of Schedule 8, item 22
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.419
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-18-norm

12 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-12-12
note: Conditional commencement of Treasury Laws Amendment (2019 Measures No. 1) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.419
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-12-norm

5 Apr 2019
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-5-11
note: Conditional commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.419
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-5-11-norm

12 Aug
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-12-13
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.419
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-13-norm

13 Aug 2019 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13-15
note: Item 1 of section 13 of the Treasury Laws Amendment (2019 Measures No. 2) Act 94, 2019
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.419
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-15-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-15-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 13 Aug 2019 (s 2(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

28 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-28-9
note: Prohibition on energy market misconduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.419
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-9-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-9-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-9-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 28 Oct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits energy market misconduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-10
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.420
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-10-norm

10 June 2020 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-11
note: June 2020 (s 2(1))
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.420
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-11-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-11-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Dec 2019
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-12-14
note: Mandatory provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.420
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-14-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-14-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a mandatory requirement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 May 2020
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-25-16
note: References sections in Schedule 1 and 4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.420
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-25-16-norm

26 May 2020 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-26-6
note: Conditional commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.420
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-26-6-norm

25 Aug 2020 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-25-17
note: Conditional commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.420
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-25-17-norm

1 July 2020 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-19
note: July 2020 (s 2(1))
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.420
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-19-norm

22 June 2020
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-22-16
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.420
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-16-norm

23 June 2020 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23-11
note: Legislation history
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.420
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-11-norm

10 Nov 2020
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-12
note: Consequential Amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.421
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-12-norm

15 Dec 2020
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.421
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15-5-norm

16 Dec 2020 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16-9
note: Financial Sector Reform (Hayne Royal Commission Response) Act 2020
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.421
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-9-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-9-logic-alleninterval-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-9-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking, not Prohibition
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Dec 2020
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-17-7
note: Requirement for certain items in Schedule 5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.421
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-17-7-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-17-7-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-17-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17 Dec 2020
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-17-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires certain items
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Dec 2020
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-17-8
note: References sections in Schedule 2 and 4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.421
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-17-8-norm

18 Dec 2020 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-18-11
note: Dec 2020 (s 2(1))
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.421
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-18-11-norm

28 Feb 2021 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-28-10
note: Item 4 of section 28(1) of the Legislation Amendment (Reform and Modernisation) Act 2020
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.421
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-10-norm

17 Dec 2020
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-17-9
note: Territories Legislation Amendment Act 2020
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.421
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-17-9-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-17-9-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-17-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17 Dec 2020
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-17-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Dec 2020
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-17-10
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.421
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-17-10-norm

18 Dec 2020 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-18-12
note: Endnote 3—Legislation history
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.421
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-18-12-norm

1 Mar 2021
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-20
note: Mandatory bargaining code for news and digital platforms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.422
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-20-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-20-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-20-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Mar 2021
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Mar 2021
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.422
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-4-norm

3 Mar 2021 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3-9
note: Items 1 and 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.422
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-9-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Mar 2021 (s 2(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

24 June 2021
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-24-10
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.422
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-10-norm

1 July 2022 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-21
note: Consequential and Transitional Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.422
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-21-norm

29 June 2021
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-29-11
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.422
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-29-11-norm

30 June 2021 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-19
note: Item 2 of Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No. 6) Act 2021
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.422
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-19-norm

13 Sept 2021
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13-16
note: Conditional commencement of Telstra Corporation and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2021
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.422
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-16-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-16-logic-alleninterval-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-16-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified
conclusion text: Temporal interval required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Dec 2021
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13-17
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.422
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-17-norm

11 Apr 2023
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-11-8
note: Item 4 of Schedule 1 (Treasury Laws Amendment (More Competition, Better Prices) Act 2022)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.423
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-11-8-norm

9 Nov 2022
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9-7
note: Treasury Laws Amendment (Energy Price Relief Plan) Act 2022
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.423
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-7-norm

16 Dec 2022
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16-10
note: Dec 2022 section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.423
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-10-norm

14 Sept 2023
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-14-8
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.423
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-14-8-norm

1 Jan 2024 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-22
note: Statute Law Amendment (Prescribed Forms and Other Updates) Act 2023
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.423
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-22-norm

20 Sept 2023
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.423
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-20-6-norm

20 Mar 2024 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20-7
note: Item 2 of Schedule 1, item 19
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.423
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-20-7-norm

20 Sept 2023
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20-8
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.424
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-20-8-norm

21 Sept 2023 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-21-7
note: Conditional commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.424
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-21-7-norm

20 Oct 2023 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20-9
note: Treasury Laws Amendment (2023 Law Improvement Package No. 1) Act 2023
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.424
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-20-9-norm

20 Sept 2023
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20-10
note: Water Amendment (Restoring Our Rivers) Act 2023
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.424
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-20-10-norm

7 Dec 2023
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-7-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.424
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-3-norm

1 July 2025 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-23
note: Awaiting commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.424
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-23-norm

14 Dec 2023
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-14-9
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.424
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-14-9-norm

1 Apr 2024 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-24
note: Competition and Consumer Amendment (Fair Go for Consumers and Small Business) Act 2024
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.424
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-24-norm

8 Apr 2024
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.424
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-5-norm

1 May 2024 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-25
note: Digital ID (Transitional and Consequential Provisions) Act 2024 commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.424
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-25-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-25-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Commencement condition
premise text: Assent
conclusion text: Commencement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 May 2024
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-20
note: Enhancing Consumer Safeguards and Other Measures
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.425
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-20-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-20-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-20-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30 May 2024
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 May 2024
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-31-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.425
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-31-5-norm

1 June 2024 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-26
note: Consequential and Transitional Provisions No. 1 Act 2024
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.425
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-26-norm

31 May 2024
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-31-6
note: Treasury Laws Amendment (Consumer Data Right) Act 2024
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.425
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-31-6-norm

26 Aug 2024
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-26-7
note: Aug 2024, page 425
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.425
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-26-7-norm

10 Dec 2024
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-13
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.425
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-13-norm

11 Dec 2024 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-11-9
note: Item 6 of Treasury Laws Amendment (Fairer for Families and Farmers and Other Measures) Act 2024
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.425
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-11-9-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-11-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11 Dec 2024 (s 2(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

10 Dec 2024
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-14
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.425
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-14-norm

11 Dec 2024 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-11-10
note: Mandatory items 5 and 6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.425
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-11-10-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-11-10-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-11-10-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11 Dec 2024 (s 2(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-11-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide items 5 and 6
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Dec 2024
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-15
note: Conditional commencement on December 11, 2024 (s 2(1) items 2,6)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.426
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-15-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-15-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-15-logic-ltl-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-15-logic-deontic-3

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-15-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: December 11, 2024 (s 2(1) items 2,6)
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-15-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires ordered or recurring trace for conditional commencement
premise text: December 11, 2024 (s 2(1) items 2,6)
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-15-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as Undertaking
premise text: No explicit duty, ban conduct, grant permission, or create a right
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 July 2025 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-27
note: Administrative Review Tribunal (Miscellaneous Measures) Act 2025
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.426
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-27-norm

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-27-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 July 2025 (s 2(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

20 Feb 2025
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20-11
note: Conditional commencement of Scams Prevention Framework Act 2025
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.426
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-20-11-norm

20 Feb 2025
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20-12
note: Conditional commencement of Treasury Laws Amendment (Payments System Modernisation) Act 2025
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.426
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-20-12-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-20-12-logic-alleninterval-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-20-12-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Sept 2025
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19-11
note: Payday Superannuation Act 2025
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.426
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-11-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-11-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-11-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19 Sept 2025
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Nov 2025
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6-13
note: Commencement of Competition and Consumer Amendment (Australian Energy Regulator Separation) Act 2025
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.426
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-6-13-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-6-13-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-6-13-logic-alleninterval-2

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-6-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Commencement
logic summary: Act comes into force on specified date
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-6-13-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Act commences on specified date, overlaps with existing provisions
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Nov 2025
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6-14
note: Section heading
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.426
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-6-14-norm

1 July 2026 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-28
note: July 2026 commencement provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.426
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-28-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-28-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-28-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Imposes a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Dec 2025
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4-2
note: Classification of schedules and items
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.427
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-2-norm

27 Mar 2026
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-27-12
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.427
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-27-12-norm

28 Mar 2026 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-28-11
note: Competition and Consumer Amendment (Responding to Exceptional Circumstances) Act 2026
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.427
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-11-norm

26 May 2026
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-26-8
note: Registration requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.427
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-26-8-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-26-8-logic-deontic-1

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-26-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 26 May 2026
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-26-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide registration information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Mar 2006
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-17-11
note: Endnote 4—Amendment history
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: competition-and-consumer-act-2010.pdf, p.427
asserts: competition-and-consumer-act-2010-sch-2-sec-17-11-norm