1 Short title
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.17
note: Citation of the Act
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1
schema version: 2

1 July 1988;
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.260
curation status: Proposed
has part: 1(2) July 1988;
has part: 1(3) July 1988;
has part: 1(4) July 1988;
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-2
schema version: 2

1(2) July 1988;
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.260
note: The Ombudsman may inspect agency records to ensure compliance with specified sections.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 1 July 1988;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Any period
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1(2) July 1988;

1(3) July 1988;
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.260
note: The Ombudsman may inspect records to ensure compliance with conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 1 July 1988;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Ombudsman's inspection occurs during that period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The inspection occurs during a specific period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The contravention occurred in that period.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Ombudsman may inspect records.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Ombudsman has an obligation to ensure compliance.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
premise text: The chief officer notifies the Ombudsman of a contravention.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The chief officer has permission to notify the Ombudsman.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The chief officer has permission to notify the Ombudsman.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermission
premise text: The chief officer notifies the Ombudsman under subsection 59B(2).

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agency has an obligation to comply with conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The agency has an obligation to comply with conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
premise text: The conditions mentioned in subsection 59B(2) are about Part 5.3 warrants.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Ombudsman has an obligation to ensure compliance.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Ombudsman has an obligation to ensure compliance.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
premise text: The chief officer notifies the Ombudsman of a contravention.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1(3) July 1988;

1(4) July 1988;
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.260
note: Inspect records to ensure compliance with Part 15 of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 1 July 1988;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ... in order to ascertain the extent to which the agency’s officers have complied with Part 15 of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Establish temporal relation between agency's actions and Part 15 of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (b) a Commonwealth agency has records that relate to the performance of that function or the exercise of that power;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ... in order to ascertain the extent to which the agency’s officers have complied with Part 15 of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Construct knowledge graph about agency's compliance with Part 15 of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge graph
premise text: (b) a Commonwealth agency has records that relate to the performance of that function or the exercise of that power;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ... Ombudsman may inspect records.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure compliance with Part 15 of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (4) If: ...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ... in order to ascertain the extent to which the agency’s officers have complied with Part 15 of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuse information about agency's compliance with Part 15 of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: (b) a Commonwealth agency has records that relate to the performance of that function or the exercise of that power;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ... in order to ascertain the extent to which the agency’s officers have complied with Part 15 of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Establish recurring trace between agency's actions and compliance with Part 15 of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (b) a Commonwealth agency has records that relate to the performance of that function or the exercise of that power;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1(4) July 1988;

10 Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.124
curation status: Proposed
has part: 10(1) Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency
has part: 10(1A) Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency
has part: 10(2) Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency
has part: 10(3) Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency
has part: 10(4) Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency
has part: 10(5) Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10
schema version: 2

10(1) Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.124
note: Authorization for warrant issuance under section 9 or 9A
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 10 Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to issue warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (a) the Director-General of Security has forwarded or made a request...

10(1A) Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.124
note: Interception of telecommunications not being accessed as stored communications after they have ceased to pass over a telecommunications system.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-1a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 10 Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits interception of stored communications after they have ceased to pass over a telecommunications system.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-1a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies intercepted communications as not being accessed as stored communications after they have ceased to pass over a telecommunications system.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify

10(2) Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency
type: Concept
description: entry may be made without permission first being sought or demand first being made
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.124
note: Authorization for entry without permission or demand
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 10 Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to enter premises
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

10(3) Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.124
note: Warrant revocation by Attorney-General within 48 hours
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 10 Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The warrant's duration overlaps with the Attorney-General's power to revoke.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between warrant and revocation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3) A warrant under this section shall specify the period for which it is to remain in force, being a period that does not exceed 48 hours,

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Attorney-General can infer their power to revoke from the warrant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Warrant revocation inference
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: (3) A warrant under this section shall specify the period for which it is to remain in force, being a period that does not exceed 48 hours,

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Attorney-General may revoke the warrant at any time before expiration.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits warrant revocation after specified period
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (3) A warrant under this section shall specify the period for which it is to remain in force, being a period that does not exceed 48 hours,

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Attorney-General's power to revoke diffuses from the warrant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Warrant revocation diffuses to Attorney-General
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (3) A warrant under this section shall specify the period for which it is to remain in force, being a period that does not exceed 48 hours,

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The warrant's duration ends before the Attorney-General can revoke.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between warrant and revocation
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (3) A warrant under this section shall specify the period for which it is to remain in force, being a period that does not exceed 48 hours,

10(4) Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency
type: Concept
description: a copy of the warrant and a statement of grounds
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.124
note: Furnishing information to the Attorney-General upon issuing a warrant
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 10 Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imperative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: shall

10(5) Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.124
note: Copy of warrant must be given to Inspector-General within 3 working days
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 10 Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide copy of warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

100 Report to set out how many applications made and warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.276
note: Report on applications and warrants
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-100-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-100-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-100-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-100-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 100 Report to set out how many applications made and warrants

101 Report to contain particulars about duration of warrants
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.279
note: Report must contain particulars about duration of warrants
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-101-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-101-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-101
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-101-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-101-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 101 Report to contain particulars about duration of warrants

102 Report to contain information about effectiveness of warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.281
curation status: Proposed
has part: 102(1) Report to contain information about effectiveness of warrants
has part: 102(2) Report to contain information about effectiveness of warrants
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-102
schema version: 2

102(1) Report to contain information about effectiveness of warrants
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.281
note: Report on arrests and prosecutions must be provided by Commonwealth agencies and authorities.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-102-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-102-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-102-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 102 Report to contain information about effectiveness of warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-102-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-102-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 102(1) Report to contain information about effectiveness of warrants

102(2) Report to contain information about effectiveness of warrants
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.281
note: Report must contain information about effectiveness of warrants
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-102-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-102-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-102-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 102 Report to contain information about effectiveness of warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-102-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-102-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 102(2) Report to contain information about effectiveness of warrants

102A Report regarding interceptions without warrant
type: Concept
description: Number of occasions
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.284
note: Agency must report interceptions without warrant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-102a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-102a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-102a
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-102a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-102a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 102A Report regarding interceptions without warrant

102B Report regarding international requests
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.284
note: Report must provide information on intercepted communications with foreign countries and international courts.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-102b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-102b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-102b
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-102b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-102b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 102B Report regarding international requests

103 Other information to be included in report
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.284
note: Must provide total warrant expenditure, number of warrants, and information about judges and interceptions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-103-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-103-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-103-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-103
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-103-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide required information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-103-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies as a report requirement.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS OF

103B Deferral of inclusion of information in report
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.286
curation status: Proposed
has part: 103B(1) Deferral of inclusion of information in report
has part: 103B(2) Deferral of inclusion of information in report
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-103b
schema version: 2

103B(1) Deferral of inclusion of information in report
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.286
note: The Minister must include certain information in the next report.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-103b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-103b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-103b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 103B Deferral of inclusion of information in report

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-103b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Minister must include certain information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-103b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 103B(1) Deferral of inclusion of information in report

103B(2) Deferral of inclusion of information in report
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.286
note: Chief officer must be satisfied that information is Part 5.3 information or
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-103b-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-103b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 103B Deferral of inclusion of information in report

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-103b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 103B(2) Deferral of inclusion of information in report

104 Annual reports
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.289
curation status: Proposed
has part: 104(1) Annual reports
has part: 104(2) Annual reports
has part: 104(3) Annual reports
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-104
schema version: 2

104(1) Annual reports
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.289
note: Minister must lay a report before each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-104-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-104-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-104-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 104 Annual reports

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-104-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has a duty to lay the report.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

104(2) Annual reports
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.289
note: Annual reports must not enable identification of a person.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-104-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-104-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-104-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 104 Annual reports

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-104-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits reporting that enables identification of a person.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-104-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 104(2) Annual reports

104(3) Annual reports
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.289
note: Deems a report as a periodic report that must be furnished to the Minister.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-104-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-104-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-104-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 104 Annual reports

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-104-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the person to furnish the report.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-104-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 104(3) Annual reports

105 Contravention of section 7 or 63
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.290
curation status: Proposed
has part: 105(1) Contravention of section 7 or 63
has part: 105(2) Contravention of section 7 or 63
has part: 105(3) Contravention of section 7 or 63
has part: 105(4) Contravention of section 7 or 63
has part: 105(5) Contravention of section 7 or 63
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-105
schema version: 2

105(1) Contravention of section 7 or 63
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.290
note: Guilty of an offence against subsection or section
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-105-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 105 Contravention of section 7 or 63

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: guilty of an offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: is

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 105(1) Contravention of section 7 or 63

105(2) Contravention of section 7 or 63
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.290
note: Offence against subsection 7(1) or section 63 is punishable on conviction.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-105-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 105 Contravention of section 7 or 63

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 105(2) Contravention of section 7 or 63

105(3) Contravention of section 7 or 63
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.290
note: Court may hear and determine proceedings in respect of an indictable offence under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-105-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 105 Contravention of section 7 or 63

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court has permission to hear proceedings
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Proceedings brought in name of Attorney-General or Director of Public Prosecutions

105(4) Contravention of section 7 or 63
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.290
note: Imprisonment for a period not exceeding 6 months is prohibited for certain convictions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-105-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 105 Contravention of section 7 or 63

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for a period not exceeding 6 months
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The penalty overlaps with imprisonment for a period not exceeding 6 months.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (4) Where, in accordance with subsection (3), a court of summary jurisdiction convicts a person of an offence against subsection 7(1) or section 63, the penalty that the court may impose is imprisonment for a period not exceeding 6 months.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The penalty is a type of punishment
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifies the penalty as a type of punishment.
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
premise text: (4) Where, in accordance with subsection (3), a court of summary jurisdiction convicts a person of an offence against subsection 7(1) or section 63, the penalty that the court may impose is imprisonment for a period not exceeding 6 months.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for a period not exceeding 6 months is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits imprisonment for a period not exceeding 6 months.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (4) Where, in accordance with subsection (3), a court of summary jurisdiction convicts a person of an offence against subsection 7(1) or section 63, the penalty that the court may impose is imprisonment for a period not exceeding 6 months.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The penalty diffuses to other related penalties
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The penalty diffuses to other related penalties.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (4) Where, in accordance with subsection (3), a court of summary jurisdiction convicts a person of an offence against subsection 7(1) or section 63, the penalty that the court may impose is imprisonment for a period not exceeding 6 months.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The penalty can be imposed multiple times
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The penalty is recurring in the sense that it can be imposed multiple times.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (4) Where, in accordance with subsection (3), a court of summary jurisdiction convicts a person of an offence against subsection 7(1) or section 63, the penalty that the court may impose is imprisonment for a period not exceeding 6 months.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 105(4) Contravention of section 7 or 63

105(5) Contravention of section 7 or 63
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.290
note: Imposes obligation on the state to apply a specific provision of the Criminal Code.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-105-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 105 Contravention of section 7 or 63

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: States an obligation on the state.
modality: Deontic
operator: obliges

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 105(5) Contravention of section 7 or 63

105A Section 105A
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.111
note: Chapter 1 Introduction
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-105a
schema version: 2

106 Obstruction
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.290
curation status: Proposed
has part: 106(1) Obstruction
has part: 106(2) Obstruction
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-106
schema version: 2

106(1) Obstruction
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.290
note: No person shall obstruct or hinder a person acting under a warrant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-106-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-106-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-106-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 106 Obstruction

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-106-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of obstruction
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person shall not obstruct or hinder a person acting under a warrant.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-106-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 106(1) Obstruction

106(2) Obstruction
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.290
note: A reasonable excuse is a valid reason for obstructing or hindering.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-106-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-106-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-106-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-106-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-106-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-106-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-106-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 106 Obstruction

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-106-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The definition is based on the concept of a reasonable excuse.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Definition of a temporal interval for a reasonable excuse.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply if the person obstructing or hindering has a reasonable excuse.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-106-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matter in subsection (2).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide a reasonable excuse.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply if the person obstructing or hindering has a reasonable excuse.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-106-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The state must provide evidence of a reasonable excuse.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State obligation to provide a reasonable excuse.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matter in subsection (2).

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-106-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The diffusion is based on the concept of a reasonable excuse.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information about reasonable excuses.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply if the person obstructing or hindering has a reasonable excuse.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-106-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The recurring trace is based on the concept of a reasonable excuse.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for a reasonable excuse.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matter in subsection (2).

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-106-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 106(2) Obstruction

107 Offences relating to inspections under Part 2-7
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.291
curation status: Proposed
has part: 107(1) Offences relating to inspections under Part 2-7
has part: 107(2) Offences relating to inspections under Part 2-7
has part: 107(3) Offences relating to inspections under Part 2-7
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107
schema version: 2

107(1) Offences relating to inspections under Part 2-7
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.291
note: Refusal or failure to attend, furnish information, or answer questions when required under section 87.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 107 Offences relating to inspections under Part 2-7

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Refusal or failure overlaps with the requirements of section 87.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between refusal or failure and section 87 requirements.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Section 87 requires attendance, furnishing of information, and answering of questions at some point.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Refusal or failure is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of refusal or failure to attend, furnish information, or answer questions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Section 87 requires attendance, furnishing of information, and answering of questions.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person shall attend, furnish information, and answer questions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to attend, furnish information, and answer questions when required under section 87.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Section 87 requires attendance, furnishing of information, and answering of questions.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compliance is required.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of refusal or failure to comply with section 87 requirements.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Section 87 requires attendance, furnishing of information, and answering of questions.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Refusal or failure repeats in relation to the requirements of section 87.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Repeating pattern of refusal or failure in relation to section 87 requirements.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: Section 87 requires attendance, furnishing of information, and answering of questions at some point.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 107(1) Offences relating to inspections under Part 2-7

107(2) Offences relating to inspections under Part 2-7
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.291
note: Prohibition on obstructing or providing false information during inspections.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 107 Offences relating to inspections under Part 2-7

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on obstructing or providing false information.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: None

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 107(2) Offences relating to inspections under Part 2-7

107(3) Offences relating to inspections under Part 2-7
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.291
note: Defendant bears evidential burden in relation to reasonable excuse.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-3-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 107 Offences relating to inspections under Part 2-7

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Defendant's actions are relevant to the matter in subsection (3).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defendant's actions occur within a specific time frame.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: Subsection (3) does not apply if the person has a reasonable excuse.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-3-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Defendant's actions are relevant to the matter in subsection (3).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Defendant's actions are inferred from their belief.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Inference
premise text: Subsection (3) does not apply if the person has a reasonable excuse.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Defendant must provide evidence of reasonable excuse.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defendant bears evidential burden.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Subsection (3) does not apply if the person has a reasonable excuse.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Defendant's belief is relevant to the matter in subsection (3).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Defendant believes they have a reasonable excuse.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
premise text: Subsection (3) does not apply if the person has a reasonable excuse.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Defendant's actions are relevant to the matter in subsection (3).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defendant's actions are part of a recurring pattern.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: Subsection (3) does not apply if the person has a reasonable excuse.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 107(3) Offences relating to inspections under Part 2-7

107A Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.292
curation status: Proposed
has part: 107A(1) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
has part: 107A(2) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
has part: 107A(3) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
has part: 107A(4) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
has part: 107A(5) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
has part: 107A(6) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107a
schema version: 2

107A(1) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.292
note: Prohibition on unlawful interception or communication
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 107A Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No interception allowed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits interception of communications
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Subsection 7(1)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 107A(1) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication

107A(2) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.292
note: Definition of aggrieved person for civil remedies
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 107A Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 107A(2) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication

107A(3) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.292
note: Grant remedial relief in respect of interception
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 107A Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to grant remedial relief
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 107A(3) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication

107A(4) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.292
note: Remedial relief for unlawful interception or communication
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 107A Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Remedial relief
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to grant remedial relief
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: Section 63

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 107A(4) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication

107A(5) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.292
note: Court may grant remedial relief to aggrieved person if convicted of offence against subsection 7(1)
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 107A Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 107A(5) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication

107A(6) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.292
note: Court may grant remedial relief to aggrieved person if defendant is convicted of an offence against section 63
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107a-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 107A Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting remedial relief is an obligation on the court
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 107A(6) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication

107B Limitation periods etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.295
curation status: Proposed
has part: 107B(1) Limitation periods etc.
has part: 107B(2) Limitation periods etc.
has part: 107B(3) Limitation periods etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107b
schema version: 2

107B(1) Limitation periods etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.295
note: Application for remedial relief must be made within 6 years after the end of interception.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 107B Limitation periods etc.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be made within 6 years.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 107B(1) Limitation periods etc.

107B(2) Limitation periods etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.295
note: Application for remedial relief must be made within 6 years after communication.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 107B Limitation periods etc.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be made within 6 years.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 107B(2) Limitation periods etc.

107B(3) Limitation periods etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.295
note: Must be made as soon as practicable after conviction concerned.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 107B Limitation periods etc.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval of application must be contained within the temporal interval of conviction concerned.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: Application made as soon as practicable after conviction concerned.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make application as soon as practicable.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 107B(3) Limitation periods etc.

107C No limitation on other liability
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.295
note: No limitation on liability under other provisions of this Act or laws
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107c
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, no limitation implies no liability under other provisions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No limitation implies no liability under other provisions
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: This Part does not limit any liability

107D Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.296
note: No exclusion or limitation of State/Territory laws
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107d-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107d-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107d
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No exclusion or limitation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

107E State or Territory courts—jurisdictional limits
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.296
note: No remedial relief beyond what the State/Territory law allows
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107e-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107e-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107e
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No remedial relief beyond what the State/Territory law allows
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

107F Extended meaning of conviction—orders under section 19B of
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.296
note: A reference in this Part to the conviction of a person of an offence includes a reference to the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107f-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107f-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107f-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107f-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107f-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107f
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107f-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The making of an order under section 19B is included in the reference.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Includes the making of an order under section 19B in relation to a person in respect of an offence.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
premise text: A reference in this Part to the conviction of a person of an offence includes a reference to the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The making of an order under section 19B is included in the reference.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes the making of an order under section 19B in relation to a person in respect of an offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: A reference in this Part to the conviction of a person of an offence includes a reference to the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107f-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The making of an order under section 19B is included in the reference.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Includes the making of an order under section 19B in relation to a person in respect of an offence.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
premise text: A reference in this Part to the conviction of a person of an offence includes a reference to the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107f-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The making of an order under section 19B is included in the reference.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Includes the making of an order under section 19B in relation to a person in respect of an offence.
modality: LTL
operator: includes
premise text: A reference in this Part to the conviction of a person of an offence includes a reference to the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107f-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 107F Extended meaning of conviction—orders under section 19B of

107G Outline of this Part
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.297
note: Carrier must preserve stored communications upon receipt of preservation notice.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107g-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107g-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107g
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier has a duty to preserve communications.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107g-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 107G Outline of this Part

107H Domestic preservation notices
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.299
curation status: Proposed
has part: 107H(1) Domestic preservation notices
has part: 107H(2) Domestic preservation notices
has part: 107H(3) Domestic preservation notices
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107h
schema version: 2

107H(1) Domestic preservation notices
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.299
note: Carrier must preserve stored communications upon receipt of a domestic preservation notice.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107h-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107h-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 107H Domestic preservation notices

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The carrier must preserve the stored communications.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier must preserve stored communications.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The carrier receives a domestic preservation notice.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107h-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 107H(1) Domestic preservation notices

107H(2) Domestic preservation notices
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.299
note: Agency must give notice only if conditions are satisfied.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107h-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107h-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 107H Domestic preservation notices

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Only if conditions are satisfied.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: onlyIf
premise text: Agency can give notice.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107h-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 107H(2) Domestic preservation notices

107H(3) Domestic preservation notices
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.299
note: Agency can only specify one or more telecommunications services in a notice.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107h-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107h-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107h-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107h-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107h-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 107H Domestic preservation notices

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107h-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: ⊆
premise text: (3) In the notice, the agency can only specify: (a) one person; or (b) one or more telecommunications services; or (c) one person and one or more telecommunications services.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107h-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency's specification is restricted
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (3) In the notice, the agency can only specify: (a) one person; or (b) one or more telecommunications services; or (c) one person and one or more telecommunications services.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107h-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: LTL
operator: ⊆
premise text: (3) In the notice, the agency can only specify: (a) one person; or (b) one or more telecommunications services; or (c) one person and one or more telecommunications services.

107J Conditions for giving domestic preservation notices
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.299
note: Conditions for giving domestic preservation notices
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107j-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107j
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107j-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 107J Conditions for giving domestic preservation notices

107K When a domestic preservation notice is in force
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.301
note: A domestic preservation notice ceases to be in force after 90 days or upon revocation.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107k-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107k-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107k-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107k-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107k-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107k
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107k-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The notice ceases to be in force at the end of the period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During a period of 90 days
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The notice is in force during a period of 90 days.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107k-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The notice ceases to be in force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ceases to be in force
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
premise text: The notice is in force until the end of the period.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107k-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The notice's duration is publicly known.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses information about its duration
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: The notice diffuses information about its duration.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107k-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The notice ceases to be in force at the earliest of the specified times.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Until the revocation or warrant expiration
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: The notice is in force until the revocation or warrant expiration.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107k-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 107K When a domestic preservation notice is in force

107L Revoking a domestic preservation notice
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.301
note: Issuing agency may revoke domestic preservation notice at any time.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107l-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107l-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107l
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107l-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to revoke
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107l-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 107L Revoking a domestic preservation notice

107M Persons who act on the issuing agency’s behalf
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.302
curation status: Proposed
has part: 107M(1) Persons who act on the issuing agency’s behalf
has part: 107M(2) Persons who act on the issuing agency’s behalf
has part: 107M(3) Persons who act on the issuing agency’s behalf
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107m
schema version: 2

107M(1) Persons who act on the issuing agency’s behalf
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.302
note: Only issuing agency's authorized representative can give or revoke historic domestic preservation notice.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107m-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 107M Persons who act on the issuing agency’s behalf

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authorization must be given before historic domestic preservation notice can be issued.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for authorization
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Authorization must be given before historic domestic preservation notice can be issued.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Only authorized representative can give or revoke historic domestic preservation notice.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorization requirement
modality: Deontic
operator: can
premise text: Only authorized representative can act on behalf of issuing agency.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Only authorized representative can give or revoke historic domestic preservation notice if issuing agency is a criminal law-enforcement agency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorization requirement for criminal law-enforcement agencies
modality: Deontic
operator: can
premise text: Only authorized representative can act on behalf of criminal law-enforcement agency.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Only authorized representative can give or revoke historic domestic preservation notice if issuing agency is the Organisation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorization requirement for Organisation
modality: Deontic
operator: can
premise text: Only authorized representative can act on behalf of Organisation.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 107M(1) Persons who act on the issuing agency’s behalf

107M(2) Persons who act on the issuing agency’s behalf
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.302
note: Only authorized officers can act on behalf of the issuing agency.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107m-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 107M Persons who act on the issuing agency’s behalf

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Authorized officers only

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 107M(2) Persons who act on the issuing agency’s behalf

107M(3) Persons who act on the issuing agency’s behalf
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.302
note: Revocation of domestic preservation notice requires specific agency authorization.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107m-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 107M Persons who act on the issuing agency’s behalf

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of revocation authorization.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (3) An ongoing domestic preservation notice may only be revoked on behalf of an issuing agency by: (a) if the issuing agency is a criminal law-enforcement agency that is an interception agency—an authorised officer of the agency; and (b) if the issuing agency is the Organisation—a certifying person. Chapter 3 Preserving and accessing stored communications

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Represents knowledge about revocation authorization.
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
premise text: (3) An ongoing domestic preservation notice may only be revoked on behalf of an issuing agency by: (a) if the issuing agency is a criminal law-enforcement agency that is an interception agency—an authorised officer of the agency; and (b) if the issuing agency is the Organisation—a certifying person. Chapter 3 Preserving and accessing stored communications

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits revocation without proper authorization.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes how revocation authorization spreads through the system.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information Spread
premise text: (3) An ongoing domestic preservation notice may only be revoked on behalf of an issuing agency by: (a) if the issuing agency is a criminal law-enforcement agency that is an interception agency—an authorised officer of the agency; and (b) if the issuing agency is the Organisation—a certifying person. Chapter 3 Preserving and accessing stored communications

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relationship between revocation authorization.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
premise text: (3) An ongoing domestic preservation notice may only be revoked on behalf of an issuing agency by: (a) if the issuing agency is a criminal law-enforcement agency that is an interception agency—an authorised officer of the agency; and (b) if the issuing agency is the Organisation—a certifying person. Chapter 3 Preserving and accessing stored communications

107N When a foreign preservation notice can be given
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.304
curation status: Proposed
has part: 107N(1) When a foreign preservation notice can be given
has part: 107N(2) When a foreign preservation notice can be given
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107n
schema version: 2

107N(1) When a foreign preservation notice can be given
type: Concept
description: Written notice (foreign preservation notice)
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.304
note: Carrier must preserve stored communications upon receipt of foreign preservation notice.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107n-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107n-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 107N When a foreign preservation notice can be given

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier must preserve stored communications.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

107N(2) When a foreign preservation notice can be given
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.304
note: Specify one or more telecommunications services in a foreign preservation notice.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107n-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107n-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 107N When a foreign preservation notice can be given

107P Condition for giving a foreign preservation notice
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.304
curation status: Proposed
has part: 107P(1) Condition for giving a foreign preservation notice
has part: 107P(2) Condition for giving a foreign preservation notice
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107p
schema version: 2

107P(1) Condition for giving a foreign preservation notice
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.304
note: Request for preservation of stored communications
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107p-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107p-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 107P Condition for giving a foreign preservation notice

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must preserve stored communications
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) An entity...

107P(2) Condition for giving a foreign preservation notice
type: Concept
description: a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.304
note: Request for preservation notice must be in writing and specify certain information.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107p-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107p-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 107P Condition for giving a foreign preservation notice

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity must provide certain information in writing.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107p-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 107P(2) Condition for giving a foreign preservation notice

107Q When a foreign preservation notice is in force
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.305
note: Ceases when Chapter 3 is accessed or preserved
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107q-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107q-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107q
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107q-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Chapter 3
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Preservation and access
modality: Deontic
operator: !

107R Revoking a foreign preservation notice
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.306
curation status: Proposed
has part: 107R(1) Revoking a foreign preservation notice
has part: 107R(2) Revoking a foreign preservation notice
has part: 107R(3) Revoking a foreign preservation notice
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107r
schema version: 2

107R(1) Revoking a foreign preservation notice
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.306
note: Revocation of foreign preservation notice after 180 days without access request
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107r-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107r-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 107R Revoking a foreign preservation notice

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: then the Australian Federal Police must, by the third working day after the end of that period, revoke the preservation notice by giving the carrier to whom it was given written notice of the revocation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity must revoke preservation notice after 180 days without access request
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) an entity requests under section 107P the Australian Federal Police to arrange for the preservation of stored communications that are held by a carrier; and (b) in response to the request, the Australian Federal Police gives a foreign preservation notice to the carrier in relation to those stored communications under subsection 107N(1); and (c) during the period of 180 days starting on the day the carrier was given the notice, the entity did not make an access request to the Attorney-General to arrange for access to those communications;

107R(2) Revoking a foreign preservation notice
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.306
note: Must revoke foreign preservation notice within 3 working days after refusal of access request.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107r-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107r-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 107R Revoking a foreign preservation notice

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must revoke foreign preservation notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

107R(3) Revoking a foreign preservation notice
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.306
note: Entity must revoke request for preservation notice revocation within three working days.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107r-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107r-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107r-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 107R Revoking a foreign preservation notice

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Australian Federal Police must revoke notice
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity must revoke request
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: Entity requests preservation notice revocation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107r-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Revocation occurs on third working day
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Revocation within three working days
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Until
premise text: Withdrawal notification given to Australian Federal Police

107S Persons who act on the AFP’s behalf
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.307
note: Must provide foreign preservation notice on behalf of AFP
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107s-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107s-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107s
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107s-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

107T Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.308
curation status: Proposed
has part: 107T(1) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers
has part: 107T(2) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers
has part: 107T(3) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107t
schema version: 2

107T(1) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.308
note: Authorized personnel may issue written certificates
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107t-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107t-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 107T Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to issue certificates
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107t-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 107T(1) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers

107T(2) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.308
note: Exempt proceeding evidence of document purporting to be a certificate issued under subsection (1)
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107t-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107t-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 107T Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to receive document in evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107t-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 107T(2) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers

107T(3) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.308
note: Determination of corporate subsidiary relationship
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107t-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107t-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107t-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 107T Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107t-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is to be determined in the same manner as...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Determines the question whether a body corporate is a subsidiary of another body corporate
modality: Deontic
operator: determines
premise text: (3) For the purposes of this section, the question...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107t-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 107T(3) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers

107U Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by issuing agencies
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.308
curation status: Proposed
has part: 107U(1) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by issuing agencies
has part: 107U(2) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by issuing agencies
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107u
schema version: 2

107U(1) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by issuing agencies
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.308
note: Issuing a written certificate by a certifying official of an issuing agency.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107u-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107u-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 107U Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by issuing agencies

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Issuing a written certificate.
modality: Deontic
operator: issue

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107u-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 107U(1) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by issuing agencies

107U(2) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by issuing agencies
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.308
note: Exempt proceeding evidence of certificate matters
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107u-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107u-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 107U Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by issuing agencies

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107u-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 107U(2) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by issuing agencies

107V Certified copies of preservation notices
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.309
note: Exempt proceedings must receive certified copies of preservation notices as evidence.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107v-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107v-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107v
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107v-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempt proceedings must receive certified copies of preservation notices.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

107W How notices are to be given to carriers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.309
note: Notice must be given to an authorized representative of the carrier.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107w-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107w-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107w
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107w-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits giving notices to carriers without authorization.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: None

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107w-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 107W How notices are to be given to carriers

108 Stored communications not to be accessed
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.310
curation status: Proposed
has part: 108(1) Stored communications not to be accessed
has part: 108(1A) Stored communications not to be accessed
has part: 108(2) Stored communications not to be accessed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-108
schema version: 2

108(1) Stored communications not to be accessed
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.310
note: Accessing stored communications without knowledge of sender and recipient is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-108-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-108-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-108-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-108-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-108-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-108-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-108-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 108 Stored communications not to be accessed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-108-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person: (i) accesses a stored communication; or (ii) authorises, suffers or permits another person to access a stored communication; or (iii) does any act or thing that will enable the person or another person to access a stored communication; and
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Accessing stored communications during knowledge of neither sender nor recipient.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person: (i) accesses a stored communication; or (ii) authorises, suffers or permits another person to access a stored communication; or (iii) does any act or thing that will enable the person or another person to access a stored communication; and

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-108-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person: (i) accesses a stored communication; or (ii) authorises, suffers or permits another person to access a stored communication; or (iii) does any act or thing that will enable the person or another person to access a stored communication; and
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits accessing stored communications without knowledge of sender and recipient.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person: (i) accesses a stored communication; or (ii) authorises, suffers or permits another person to access a stored communication; or (iii) does any act or thing that will enable the person or another person to access a stored communication; and (b) the person does so with the knowledge of neither of the following: (i) the intended recipient of the stored communication; (ii) the person who sent the stored communication.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-108-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person: (i) accesses a stored communication; or (ii) authorises, suffers or permits another person to access a stored communication; or (iii) does any act or thing that will enable the person or another person to access a stored communication; and
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits accessing stored communications without knowledge of sender and recipient.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibits
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person: (i) accesses a stored communication; or (ii) authorises, suffers or permits another person to access a stored communication; or (iii) does any act or thing that will enable the person or another person to access a stored communication; and

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-108-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person: (i) accesses a stored communication; or (ii) authorises, suffers or permits another person to access a stored communication; or (iii) does any act or thing that will enable the person or another person to access a stored communication; and
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses knowledge of neither sender nor recipient.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person: (i) accesses a stored communication; or (ii) authorises, suffers or permits another person to access a stored communication; or (iii) does any act or thing that will enable the person or another person to access a stored communication; and

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-108-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person: (i) accesses a stored communication; or (ii) authorises, suffers or permits another person to access a stored communication; or (iii) does any act or thing that will enable the person or another person to access a stored communication; and
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Accessing stored communications until knowledge of neither sender nor recipient.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person: (i) accesses a stored communication; or (ii) authorises, suffers or permits another person to access a stored communication; or (iii) does any act or thing that will enable the person or another person to access a stored communication; and

108(1A) Stored communications not to be accessed
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.310
note: Prohibition on accessing stored communications without notice
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-108-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-108-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-108-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 108 Stored communications not to be accessed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-108-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits access to stored communications
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

108(2) Stored communications not to be accessed
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.310
note: Exemptions from prohibition on accessing stored communications
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-108-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-108-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-108-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 108 Stored communications not to be accessed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-108-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative of the general prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬

109 Access to stored communications under Part 2-2 warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.314
note: Authorises interception of communications
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-109-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-109-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-109
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-109-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes duty on the state to authorise interception
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-109-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 109 Access to stored communications under Part 2-2 warrants

110 Criminal law-enforcement agencies may apply for stored
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.315
curation status: Proposed
has part: 110(1) Criminal law-enforcement agencies may apply for stored
has part: 110(2) Criminal law-enforcement agencies may apply for stored
has part: 110(3) Criminal law-enforcement agencies may apply for stored
has part: 110(4) Criminal law-enforcement agencies may apply for stored
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110
schema version: 2

110(1) Criminal law-enforcement agencies may apply for stored
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.315
note: Criminal law-enforcement agencies may apply for stored communications warrants.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 110 Criminal law-enforcement agencies may apply for stored

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency may apply
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 110(1) Criminal law-enforcement agencies may apply for stored

110(2) Criminal law-enforcement agencies may apply for stored
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.315
note: Application must be made on behalf of the agency by a person or officer
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 110 Criminal law-enforcement agencies may apply for stored

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be made on behalf of the agency
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

110(3) Criminal law-enforcement agencies may apply for stored
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.315
note: Nomination of office or position for agency management
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 110 Criminal law-enforcement agencies may apply for stored

110(4) Criminal law-enforcement agencies may apply for stored
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.315
note: Nomination under subsection (3) is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 110 Criminal law-enforcement agencies may apply for stored

110A Meaning of criminal law-enforcement agency
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.315
note: Defines criminal law-enforcement agencies
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110a
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 110A Meaning of criminal law-enforcement agency

110B Declarations in relation to the Immigration and Border
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.319
curation status: Proposed
has part: 110B(1) Declarations in relation to the Immigration and Border
has part: 110B(2) Declarations in relation to the Immigration and Border
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110b
schema version: 2

110B(1) Declarations in relation to the Immigration and Border
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.319
note: The Minister may declare certain provisions do not apply to the Immigration and Border Protection Department.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 110B Declarations in relation to the Immigration and Border

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by the Minister.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110b-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 110B(1) Declarations in relation to the Immigration and Border

110B(2) Declarations in relation to the Immigration and Border
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.319
note: The Minister may declare stored communications by legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 110B Declarations in relation to the Immigration and Border

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to declare stored communications.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110b-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 110B(2) Declarations in relation to the Immigration and Border

111 Form of applications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.320
curation status: Proposed
has part: 111(1) Form of applications
has part: 111(2) Form of applications
has part: 111(3) Form of applications
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-111
schema version: 2

111(1) Form of applications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.320
note: Application must be in writing.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-111-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-111-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-111-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 111 Form of applications

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-111-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be in writing.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-111-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 111(1) Form of applications

111(2) Form of applications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.320
note: Telephone application permitted under urgent circumstances
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-111-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-111-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-111-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 111 Form of applications

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-111-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telephone application permitted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits telephone application
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Chief officer authorisation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-111-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 111(2) Form of applications

111(3) Form of applications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.320
note: Authorises persons for purposes of subsection (2)
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-111-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-111-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 111 Form of applications

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-111-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 111(3) Form of applications

112 Contents of written applications
type: Concept
description: yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.320
note: Application must provide agency name and applicant's name.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-112-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-112-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-112
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-112-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must provide agency name and applicant's name.
modality: Deontic
operator: must

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-112-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 112 Contents of written applications

113 Affidavits to accompany written applications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.320
curation status: Proposed
has part: 113(1) Affidavits to accompany written applications
has part: 113(2) Affidavits to accompany written applications
has part: 113(3) Affidavits to accompany written applications
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-113
schema version: 2

113(1) Affidavits to accompany written applications
type: Concept
description: affidavit
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.320
note: Affidavit must be provided with written application
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-113-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-113-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-113-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 113 Affidavits to accompany written applications

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-113-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Affidavit is required
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-113-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 113(1) Affidavits to accompany written applications

113(2) Affidavits to accompany written applications
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.320
note: Affidavits must set out facts and grounds for application
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-113-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-113-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-113-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 113 Affidavits to accompany written applications

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-113-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Affidavits must be provided
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-113-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 113(2) Affidavits to accompany written applications

113(3) Affidavits to accompany written applications
type: Concept
description: Affidavits accompanying written applications
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.320
note: Allow written applications with multiple affidavits
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-113-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-113-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-113-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 113 Affidavits to accompany written applications

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-113-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allow written applications with multiple affidavits
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-113-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 113(3) Affidavits to accompany written applications

114 Information to be given on telephone applications
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.321
note: Information must be provided on telephone applications.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-114-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-114-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-114
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-114-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-114-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 114 Information to be given on telephone applications

115 Giving further information to Judge
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.321
curation status: Proposed
has part: 115(1) Giving further information to Judge
has part: 115(2) Giving further information to Judge
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-115
schema version: 2

115(1) Giving further information to Judge
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.321
note: Issuing authority may require further information.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-115-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-115-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-115-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 115 Giving further information to Judge

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-115-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-115-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 115(1) Giving further information to Judge

115(2) Giving further information to Judge
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.321
note: Must provide further information on oath or orally as directed
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-115-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-115-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-115-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-115-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 115 Giving further information to Judge

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-115-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide further information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-115-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Knowledge of requirement
modality: Epistemic
operator: K

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-115-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 115(2) Giving further information to Judge

116 Issuing of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.322
curation status: Proposed
has part: 116(1) Issuing of stored communications warrants
has part: 116(2) Issuing of stored communications warrants
has part: 116(2A) Issuing of stored communications warrants
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-116
schema version: 2

116(1) Issuing of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.322
note: Issuing authority must issue warrant if certain conditions met.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-116-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 116 Issuing of stored communications warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Issuing authority must issue warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Division 1 has been complied with in relation to the application

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Issuing authority may issue warrant if certain conditions met.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
premise text: b) ...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 116(1) Issuing of stored communications warrants

116(2) Issuing of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.322
note: Authority must consider privacy impact and investigation methods when issuing stored communications warrants.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-116-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 116 Issuing of stored communications warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Authority considers investigation methods that do not involve stored communications warrant.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (d) to what extent methods of investigating the serious contravention that do not involve the use of a stored communications warrant in relation to the person have been used by, or are available to, the agency;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Authority considers investigation methods that do not involve stored communications warrant.
modality: CogAI
operator: Influences
premise text: (d) to what extent methods of investigating the serious contravention that do not involve the use of a stored communications warrant in relation to the person have been used by, or are available to, the agency;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority has an obligation to consider privacy impact and investigation methods.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) For an application other than an international assistance application, the matters to which the issuing authority must have regard are:

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Authority considers investigation methods that do not involve stored communications warrant.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Influences
premise text: (d) to what extent methods of investigating the serious contravention that do not involve the use of a stored communications warrant in relation to the person have been used by, or are available to, the agency;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Authority considers investigation methods that do not involve stored communications warrant.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
premise text: (d) to what extent methods of investigating the serious contravention that do not involve the use of a stored communications warrant in relation to the person have been used by, or are available to, the agency;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 116(2) Issuing of stored communications warrants

116(2A) Issuing of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.322
note: Authority must have regard for certain matters when issuing stored communications warrants.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-116-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 116 Issuing of stored communications warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority must have regard for certain matters.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST HAVE REGARD FOR
premise text: Chapter 3 Preserving and accessing stored communications

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 116(2A) Issuing of stored communications warrants

117 What stored communications warrants authorise
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.324
note: Authorises access to stored communications under specified conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-117-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-117-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-117
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-117-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-117-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 117 What stored communications warrants authorise

118 Form and content of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.324
curation status: Proposed
has part: 118(1) Form and content of stored communications warrants
has part: 118(2) Form and content of stored communications warrants
has part: 118(3) Form and content of stored communications warrants
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-118
schema version: 2

118(1) Form and content of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.324
note: Stored communications warrant must be in prescribed form and signed by issuing authority.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-118-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 118 Form and content of stored communications warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must be signed by the issuing authority who issues it.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Stored communications warrant has a temporal relationship with the issuing authority.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (1) A stored communications warrant...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must be in accordance with the prescribed form; and must be signed by the issuing authority who issues it.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Stored communications warrant is a type of document that can be analyzed and processed by artificial intelligence.
modality: CogAI
operator: IS-A
premise text: (1) A stored communications warrant...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must be in accordance with the prescribed form; and must be signed by the issuing authority who issues it.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to preserve and access stored communications.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) A stored communications warrant...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must be in accordance with the prescribed form; and must be signed by the issuing authority who issues it.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Stored communications warrant is a type of document that can be accessed and shared.
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS-A
premise text: (1) A stored communications warrant...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must be signed by the issuing authority who issues it.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Stored communications warrant has a temporal relationship with the issuing authority.
modality: LTL
operator: >=
premise text: (1) A stored communications warrant...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 118(1) Form and content of stored communications warrants

118(2) Form and content of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.324
note: Conditions or restrictions for accessing stored communications under the warrant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-118-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 118 Form and content of stored communications warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specifying conditions or restrictions
modality: Deontic
operator: specifies

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 118(2) Form and content of stored communications warrants

118(3) Form and content of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.324
note: Must set out short particulars of serious contraventions or foreign contraventions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-118-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 118 Form and content of stored communications warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the issuing authority.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 118(3) Form and content of stored communications warrants

119 Duration of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.325
curation status: Proposed
has part: 119(1) Duration of stored communications warrants
has part: 119(2) Duration of stored communications warrants
has part: 119(3) Duration of stored communications warrants
has part: 119(4) Duration of stored communications warrants
has part: 119(5) Duration of stored communications warrants
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-119
schema version: 2

119(1) Duration of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.325
note: Stored communications warrant remains in force until executed or 5 days after issuance.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-119-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 119 Duration of stored communications warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Holds true
modality: Deontic
operator: holds

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 119(1) Duration of stored communications warrants

119(2) Duration of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.325
note: Warrant duration for multiple telecommunications services
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-119-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 119 Duration of stored communications warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Temporal limit on warrant duration
modality: Deontic
operator: until
premise text: (2)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 119(2) Duration of stored communications warrants

119(3) Duration of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.325
note: Cannot vary stored communications warrant duration
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-119-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 119 Duration of stored communications warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for warrant duration
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) An issuing authority must not vary a stored communications warrant by extending the period for which it is to be in force.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of varying warrant duration on issuing authority's power
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (3) An issuing authority must not vary a stored communications warrant by extending the period for which it is to be in force.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognize implications of varying warrant duration on issuing authority's power
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (3) An issuing authority must not vary a stored communications warrant by extending the period for which it is to be in force.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of varying warrant duration
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: (3) An issuing authority must not vary a stored communications warrant by extending the period for which it is to be in force.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuse implications of varying warrant duration on issuing authority's power
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (3) An issuing authority must not vary a stored communications warrant by extending the period for which it is to be in force.

119(4) Duration of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.325
note: No prohibition on issuing further warrants.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-119-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 119 Duration of stored communications warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No prohibition on issuing further warrants.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 119(4) Duration of stored communications warrants

119(5) Duration of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.325
note: No new warrant can be issued within 3 days of the previous warrant's execution.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-119-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 119 Duration of stored communications warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No new warrant can be issued within 3 days of the previous warrant's execution.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

11A Telecommunications service warrant for collection of foreign
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.125
note: The Attorney-General must issue a warrant for the collection of foreign intelligence.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11a
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Attorney-General must issue a warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11A Telecommunications service warrant for collection of foreign

11B Named person warrant for collection of foreign intelligence
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.127
curation status: Proposed
has part: 11B(1) Named person warrant for collection of foreign intelligence
has part: 11B(1A) Named person warrant for collection of foreign intelligence
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11b
schema version: 2

11B(1) Named person warrant for collection of foreign intelligence
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.127
note: The Attorney-General may issue a warrant for the collection of foreign intelligence.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11b-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 11B Named person warrant for collection of foreign intelligence

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Attorney-General has an obligation to issue a warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11b-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: The warrant is issued for the collection of foreign intelligence.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11B(1) Named person warrant for collection of foreign intelligence

11B(1A) Named person warrant for collection of foreign intelligence
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.127
note: Authorises interception of telecommunications under specified conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11b-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11b-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11b-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 11B Named person warrant for collection of foreign intelligence

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11b-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation to intercept
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorize

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11b-ss-1a-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11B(1A) Named person warrant for collection of foreign intelligence

11C Foreign communications warrant for collection of foreign
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.129
note: Director-General of Security requests Attorney-General to issue warrant for intercepting communications.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11c
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Attorney-General must issue warrant
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Request for a warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: Director-General of Security gives notice to Attorney-General

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11C Foreign communications warrant for collection of foreign

11D Provisions applying to foreign intelligence warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.133
note: Warrant must state authorized entry times
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11d-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11d-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11d
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Warrant must state authorized entry times
modality: Deontic
operator: must

12 Persons authorised to intercept communications for Organisation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.135
curation status: Proposed
has part: 12(1) Persons authorised to intercept communications for Organisation
has part: 12(2) Persons authorised to intercept communications for Organisation
has part: 12(3) Persons authorised to intercept communications for Organisation
has part: 12(4) Persons authorised to intercept communications for Organisation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12
schema version: 2

12(1) Persons authorised to intercept communications for Organisation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.135
note: Authorizes persons to exercise authority on behalf of the Organisation.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-12-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-12-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Persons authorised to intercept communications for Organisation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...may, by writing under his or her hand...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission.
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorize
premise text: (1) The Director-General of Security...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-12-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the authority conferred by Part 2-2 warrants.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Describes the class of persons authorized.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: ...as persons authorized to exercise...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-12-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12(1) Persons authorised to intercept communications for Organisation

12(2) Persons authorised to intercept communications for Organisation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.135
note: Approval extends to new offices or positions
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-12-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Persons authorised to intercept communications for Organisation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-12-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12(2) Persons authorised to intercept communications for Organisation

12(3) Persons authorised to intercept communications for Organisation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.135
note: No implication on other provisions of the Act
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-12-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Persons authorised to intercept communications for Organisation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-12-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12(3) Persons authorised to intercept communications for Organisation

12(4) Persons authorised to intercept communications for Organisation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.135
note: Must create written records after authority is exercised
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-12-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-12-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Persons authorised to intercept communications for Organisation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-12-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to create written records
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

120 Stored communications warrants issued on telephone
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.326
curation status: Proposed
has part: 120(1) Stored communications warrants issued on telephone
has part: 120(2) Stored communications warrants issued on telephone
has part: 120(3) Stored communications warrants issued on telephone
has part: 120(4) Stored communications warrants issued on telephone
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-120
schema version: 2

120(1) Stored communications warrants issued on telephone
type: Concept
description: warrant terms, signing day, and time
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.326
note: Issuing authority must inform and provide warrant to applicant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-120-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 120 Stored communications warrants issued on telephone

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to inform and provide warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 120(1) Stored communications warrants issued on telephone

120(2) Stored communications warrants issued on telephone
type: Concept
description: affidavit or affidavits, authorisation by the chief officer
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.326
note: Affidavits must be provided by the applicant within one day after a warrant is issued.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-120-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 120 Stored communications warrants issued on telephone

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide affidavit and authorisation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 120(2) Stored communications warrants issued on telephone

120(3) Stored communications warrants issued on telephone
type: Concept
description: inform the person who made the application and give the instrument of revocation
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.326
note: Revocation of warrant issued on telephone application
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-120-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 120 Stored communications warrants issued on telephone

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Revocation occurs within a certain time frame
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval during which issuing authority can revoke warrant
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Revocation must occur within a certain time frame after subsection (2) has not been complied with

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Revocation is prohibited
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits issuing authority from revoking warrant without complying with subsection (2)
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Subsection (2) has not been complied with in relation to the warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Issuing authority is permitted to revoke warrant
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits issuing authority to revoke warrant if subsection (2) has not been complied with
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: Subsection (2) has not been complied with in relation to the warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Issuing authority has an obligation to inform person who made application and give instrument of revocation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on issuing authority to inform person who made application and give instrument of revocation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Issuing authority must inform person who made application and give instrument of revocation upon revocation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Issuing authority has an obligation to comply with subsection (2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on issuing authority to comply with subsection (2) before revoking warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Issuing authority must comply with subsection (2) before revoking warrant

120(4) Stored communications warrants issued on telephone
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.326
note: Inform other agencies of warrant revocation
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-120-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 120 Stored communications warrants issued on telephone

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must inform other agencies of warrant revocation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 120(4) Stored communications warrants issued on telephone

121 What happens when stored communications warrants are
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.327
note: Agency must inform carrier and provide copy of warrant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-121-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-121-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-121
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-121-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency has a duty to inform carrier and provide copy of warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-121-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 121 What happens when stored communications warrants are

122 Revocation of stored communications warrants by chief officers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.327
note: Chief officer must inform and revoke stored communications warrant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-122-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-122-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-122
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-122-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chief officer has an obligation to inform and revoke the warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-122-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 122 Revocation of stored communications warrants by chief officers

123 What happens when stored communications warrants are
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.328
curation status: Proposed
has part: 123(1) What happens when stored communications warrants are
has part: 123(2) What happens when stored communications warrants are
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-123
schema version: 2

123(1) What happens when stored communications warrants are
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.328
note: Chief officer of one agency must inform other agencies of warrant revocation.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-123-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-123-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-123-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 123 What happens when stored communications warrants are

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-123-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to inform
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-123-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 123(1) What happens when stored communications warrants are

123(2) What happens when stored communications warrants are
type: Concept
description: Copy of instrument of revocation
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.328
note: Notify authorized representative of revocation of stored communications warrant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-123-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-123-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-123-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 123 What happens when stored communications warrants are

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-123-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-123-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 123(2) What happens when stored communications warrants are

124 Access to additional telecommunications services under stored
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.328
curation status: Proposed
has part: 124(1) Access to additional telecommunications services under stored
has part: 124(2) Access to additional telecommunications services under stored
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-124
schema version: 2

124(1) Access to additional telecommunications services under stored
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.328
note: Carrier must provide description of telecommunications service to be accessed under warrant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-124-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-124-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-124-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 124 Access to additional telecommunications services under stored

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-124-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier must provide description.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-124-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 124(1) Access to additional telecommunications services under stored

124(2) Access to additional telecommunications services under stored
type: Concept
description: Confirmation in writing
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.328
note: Notify authorized representative of stored communications access revocation
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-124-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-124-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-124-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 124 Access to additional telecommunications services under stored

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-124-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notify authorized representative of stored communications access revocation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-124-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 124(2) Access to additional telecommunications services under stored

125 Entry into force of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.330
note: Entry into force of stored communications warrants
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-125-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-125
schema version: 2

126 Limit on authority conferred by warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.330
note: Stored communications warrant does not authorize access unless notification is received by authorized representative.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-126-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-126-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-126
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-126-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits unauthorized access to stored communications.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-126-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 126 Limit on authority conferred by warrant

127 Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.330
curation status: Proposed
has part: 127(1) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
has part: 127(2) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
has part: 127(3) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-127
schema version: 2

127(1) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.330
note: Authority must be exercised with approval
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-127-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 127 Exercise of authority conferred by warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...by a person in relation to whom an approval under subsection (2) is in force in relation to the warrant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between authority exercise and approval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) The authority conferred by a stored communications warrant may only be exercised...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...by a person in relation to whom an approval under subsection (2) is in force in relation to the warrant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory authority exercise
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: (1) The authority conferred by a stored communications warrant may only be exercised...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...by a person in relation to whom an approval under subsection (2) is in force in relation to the warrant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Authority exercise implies approval
modality: LinearLogic
operator: =>
premise text: (1) The authority conferred by a stored communications warrant may only be exercised...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 127(1) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant

127(2) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.330
note: Approval of persons to exercise authority conferred by warrants
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-127-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 127 Exercise of authority conferred by warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: may approve any of the following persons to exercise the authority conferred by warrants at any time.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap of authority
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) The chief officer of a criminal law-enforcement agency...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: may approve any of the following persons to exercise the authority conferred by warrants.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication from approval
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (2) The chief officer of a criminal law-enforcement agency...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: may approve any of the following persons to exercise the authority conferred by warrants.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of authority delegation
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (2) The chief officer of a criminal law-enforcement agency...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: may approve any of the following persons to exercise the authority conferred by warrants
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow
premise text: (2) The chief officer of a criminal law-enforcement agency...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: staff members (or classes of staff members) of the agency or another criminal law-enforcement agency.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusing authority to staff members
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (b) staff members (or classes of staff members) of the agency or another criminal law-enforcement agency;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 127(2) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant

127(3) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.330
note: Chief officer may appoint an approving officer.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-127-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 127 Exercise of authority conferred by warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 127(3) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant

128 Provision of technical assistance
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.331
curation status: Proposed
has part: 128(1) Provision of technical assistance
has part: 128(2) Provision of technical assistance
has part: 128(3) Provision of technical assistance
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-128
schema version: 2

128(1) Provision of technical assistance
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.331
note: Carrier employees may provide technical assistance to criminal law enforcement officers/staff members with stored communications warrants.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-128-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-128-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-128-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 128 Provision of technical assistance

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-128-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to provide technical assistance
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

128(2) Provision of technical assistance
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.331
note: Provision of technical assistance includes specific acts related to accessing stored communications.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-128-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-128-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-128-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-128-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 128 Provision of technical assistance

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-128-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Provision of technical assistance is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-128-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Technical assistance is a subclass of provision.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-128-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 128(2) Provision of technical assistance

128(3) Provision of technical assistance
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.331
note: Declare persons designated officers for purposes of section.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-128-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-128-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-128-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 128 Provision of technical assistance

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-128-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declare persons
modality: Deontic
operator: declare

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-128-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 128(3) Provision of technical assistance

129 Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.331
note: Authorized personnel may issue written certificates
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-129-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-129-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-129
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-129-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to issue certificates
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-129-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 129 Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers

13 Discontinuance of interception before expiration of warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.135
note: Ensure discontinuation of interception upon warrant expiration
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-13-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imperative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: shall

130 Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by criminal
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.332
curation status: Proposed
has part: 130(1) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by criminal
has part: 130(2) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by criminal
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-130
schema version: 2

130(1) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by criminal
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.332
note: Certifying officer must issue written certificate with relevant facts.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-130-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-130-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-130-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 130 Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by criminal

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-130-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a written certificate.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-130-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 130(1) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by criminal

130(2) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by criminal
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.332
note: Exempt proceeding evidence of certificate matters
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-130-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-130-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-130-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 130 Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by criminal

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-130-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide exempt proceeding evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-130-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 130(2) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by criminal

131 Certified copies of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.333
note: Exempt proceeding must receive certified copy of stored communications warrant as if it were the original.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-131-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-131-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-131
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-131-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on exempt proceedings to receive certified copies of stored communications warrants.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-131-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 131 Certified copies of stored communications warrants

132 Obstruction
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.333
curation status: Proposed
has part: 132(1) Obstruction
has part: 132(2) Obstruction
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-132
schema version: 2

132(1) Obstruction
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.333
note: Obstructing another person acting under a stored communications warrant is an offence.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-132-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-132-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-132-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-132-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-132-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 132 Obstruction

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-132-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits obstructing another person acting under a stored communications warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-132-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation to not obstruct another person acting under a stored communications warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-132-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implicates that obstructing another person acting under a stored communications warrant is an offence if the person commits an offence.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
premise text: Obstruction

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-132-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 132(1) Obstruction

132(2) Obstruction
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.333
note: A reasonable excuse is a valid reason for obstructing or hindering
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-132-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-132-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-132-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 132 Obstruction

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-132-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matter in subsection (2).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide a reasonable excuse
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply if the person obstructing or hindering has a reasonable excuse.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-132-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 132(2) Obstruction

133 No dealing with accessed information etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.334
curation status: Proposed
has part: 133(1) No dealing with accessed information etc.
has part: 133(2) No dealing with accessed information etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-133
schema version: 2

133(1) No dealing with accessed information etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.334
note: No dealing with accessed information etc.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-133-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-133-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-133-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 133 No dealing with accessed information etc.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-133-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and the information is: ...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits accessing or using information
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence...

133(2) No dealing with accessed information etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.334
note: Permitted dealings with accessed information
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-133-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-133-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 133 No dealing with accessed information etc.

134 Dealing in preservation notice information or stored
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.335
note: Communicate preservation notice information or stored communications warrant information.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-134-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-134-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-134
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-134-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to communicate
modality: Deontic
operator: can

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-134-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 134 Dealing in preservation notice information or stored

135 Dealing in information by employees of carriers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.335
curation status: Proposed
has part: 135(1) Dealing in information by employees of carriers
has part: 135(2) Dealing in information by employees of carriers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-135
schema version: 2

135(1) Dealing in information by employees of carriers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.335
note: An employee must communicate information to authorized law enforcement officers.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-135-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-135-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-135-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 135 Dealing in information by employees of carriers

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-135-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must communicate to authorized officers
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Employee accessed stored communications

135(2) Dealing in information by employees of carriers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.335
note: Authorisation of officers to receive information under stored communications warrants.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-135-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-135-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-135-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 135 Dealing in information by employees of carriers

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-135-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Officers are permitted to receive information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorize
premise text: Chief officer may authorise officers to receive information.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-135-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 135(2) Dealing in information by employees of carriers

136 Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.337
note: Permits communication of certain information in connection with Organisation's functions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-136-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-136-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-136
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-136-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits action
modality: Deontic
operator: PERMIT

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-136-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 136 Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions

137 Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.338
curation status: Proposed
has part: 137(1) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
has part: 137(1A) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
has part: 137(1B) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
has part: 137(2) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
has part: 137(3) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
has part: 137(4) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-137
schema version: 2

137(1) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.338
note: Prohibition on communicating certain information
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-137-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 137 Dealing in information obtained by Organisation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...communicate the following to another person:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits communication of certain information
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (1) The Director-General of Security may...

137(1A) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.338
note: Prohibits communication of foreign intelligence information to unauthorized persons.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1a-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-137-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 137 Dealing in information obtained by Organisation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: subject to the conditions (if any) specified by the Attorney-General in writing;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1A) The Director-General of Security may:

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: for the purposes (if any) approved by the Attorney-General in writing;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes means of processing
modality: CogAI
operator: using
premise text: (1A) The Director-General of Security may:

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: communicate foreign intelligence information to another person (the second person), other than a person to whom the Director-General could communicate the information under subsection (1) or 136(2).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits action
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (1A) The Director-General of Security may:

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: communicate foreign intelligence information to another person (the second person), other than a person to whom the Director-General could communicate the information under subsection (1) or 136(2).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes means of transmission
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
premise text: (1A) The Director-General of Security may:

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: communicate foreign intelligence information to another person (the second person), other than a person to whom the Director-General could communicate the information under subsection (1) or 136(2).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (1A) The Director-General of Security may:

137(1B) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.338
note: Communicate accessed information to another person.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-137-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 137 Dealing in information obtained by Organisation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to communicate accessed information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1b-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 137(1B) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation

137(2) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.338
note: Authorisation for communication by Director-General or agent
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-137-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 137 Dealing in information obtained by Organisation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to communicate
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

137(3) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.338
note: A person may communicate and use foreign intelligence information under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-137-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 137 Dealing in information obtained by Organisation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to communicate and use information
modality: Deontic
operator: May
premise text: Attorney-General's approval required

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 137(3) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation

137(4) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.338
note: Dealing in information obtained by Organisation is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-137-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 137 Dealing in information obtained by Organisation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negates the existence of an approval or condition
modality: Deontic
operator: not

138 Employee of carrier may communicate information to criminal
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.339
note: Employee may communicate information to law enforcement agency for investigation purposes
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-138-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-138-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-138
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-138-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authority may receive information
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Employee may communicate information

139 Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.340
curation status: Proposed
has part: 139(1) Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
has part: 139(2) Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
has part: 139(3) Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
has part: 139(4) Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-139
schema version: 2

139(1) Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.340
note: Communication of certain information to another person is allowed for specified purposes.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-139-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 139 Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between permitted purposes
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 139(1) Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.

139(2) Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.340
note: Purposes for which information can be dealt with
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-139-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 139 Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the making by an authority, body or person of a decision whether or not to begin a proceeding to which subsection (4) applies; or
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Purposes occur during investigation purposes
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) In the case of information obtained by the agency other than through the execution of a warrant issued as a result of an international assistance application, the purposes are purposes connected with...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the making by an authority, body or person of a decision whether or not to begin a proceeding to which subsection (4) applies; or
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Making decisions implies authority has permission
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (2) In the case of information obtained by the agency other than through the execution of a warrant issued as a result of an international assistance application, the purposes are purposes connected with...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the making by an authority, body or person of a decision whether or not to begin a proceeding to which subsection (4) applies; or
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Information has a purpose
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPurpose
premise text: (2) In the case of information obtained by the agency other than through the execution of a warrant issued as a result of an international assistance application, the purposes are purposes connected with...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the making by an authority, body or person of a decision whether or not to begin a proceeding to which subsection (4) applies; or
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority has permission to make decisions about information
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermission
premise text: (2) In the case of information obtained by the agency other than through the execution of a warrant issued as a result of an international assistance application, the purposes are purposes connected with...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the making by an authority, body or person of a decision whether or not to begin a proceeding to which subsection (4) applies; or
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Purposes last until investigation purposes end
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (a) an investigation by the agency or by another criminal law-enforcement agency of a contravention to which subsection (3) applies; or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 139(2) Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.

139(3) Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.340
note: Prohibition of serious or punishable offences
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-139-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 139 Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...of at least 12 months;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the time period during which the contravention applies
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) A contravention to which this subsection applies is a contravention of a law...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to pay a pecuniary penalty...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Defines the properties of the contravention
modality: CogAI
operator: hasProperty
premise text: (i) if the contravention were committed by an individual—

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...render the person committing the contravention liable:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids serious or punishable offences
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (3) A contravention to which this subsection applies is a contravention of a law...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or (b) is an offence punishable...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Defines the conditions under which the contravention applies
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
premise text: (a) is a serious offence;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...of at least 12 months;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines the time period until which the contravention remains in effect
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (3) A contravention to which this subsection applies is a contravention of a law...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 139(3) Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.

139(4) Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.340
note: Restricts proceedings for certain offenses
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-139-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 139 Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits certain proceedings
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

139A Dealing for integrity purposes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.343
curation status: Proposed
has part: 139A(1) Dealing for integrity purposes
has part: 139A(4A) Dealing for integrity purposes
has part: 139A(2) Dealing for integrity purposes
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-139a
schema version: 2

139A(1) Dealing for integrity purposes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.343
note: An officer or staff member of a Commonwealth agency may perform certain actions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-139a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 139A Dealing for integrity purposes

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 139A(1) Dealing for integrity purposes

139A(2) Dealing for integrity purposes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.343
note: Permitted purpose for agency or Commonwealth agency
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-139a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 139A Dealing for integrity purposes

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency has permission to deal for integrity purposes
modality: Deontic
operator: has-permission

139A(4A) Dealing for integrity purposes
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.343
note: Must communicate certain information to another person.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139a-ss-4a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139a-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-139a-ss-4a
schema version: 2
part of: 139A Dealing for integrity purposes

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139a-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to communicate
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139a-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 139A(4A) Dealing for integrity purposes

139AA Dealing in connection with Inspector-General’s functions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.342
curation status: Proposed
has part: 139AA(1) Dealing in connection with Inspector-General’s functions
has part: 139AA(2) Dealing in connection with Inspector-General’s functions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-139aa
schema version: 2

139AA(1) Dealing in connection with Inspector-General’s functions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.342
note: Permits communication with an IGIS official in connection with their functions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-139aa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 139AA Dealing in connection with Inspector-General’s functions

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits action
modality: Deontic
operator: may

139AA(2) Dealing in connection with Inspector-General’s functions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.342
note: This section applies despite any other provision of this Part.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-139aa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 139AA Dealing in connection with Inspector-General’s functions

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section applies despite other provisions
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 139AA(2) Dealing in connection with Inspector-General’s functions

139B Dealing for purposes relating to Part 5.3 orders or Part 9.10
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.343
note: Law enforcement officers can access and share information with others for specific purposes.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-139b
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to access information
modality: Deontic
operator: Can

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139b-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 139B Dealing for purposes relating to Part 5.3 orders or Part 9.10

14 Certain records retained by Organisation to be destroyed
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.136
note: Destroy records no longer required for Organisation's functions or powers.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-14-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits destruction of records
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

140 Dealing with information if access suspected to be unlawful
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.344
curation status: Proposed
has part: 140(1) Dealing with information if access suspected to be unlawful
has part: 140(2) Dealing with information if access suspected to be unlawful
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-140
schema version: 2

140(1) Dealing with information if access suspected to be unlawful
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.344
note: Suspected offence reporting obligation
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-140-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-140-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-140-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-140-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 140 Dealing with information if access suspected to be unlawful

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-140-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must report
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reporting suspected offences
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Reasonable grounds exist

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-140-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Believe
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Reasonable grounds for suspicion
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
premise text: Suspected offence

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-140-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 140(1) Dealing with information if access suspected to be unlawful

140(2) Dealing with information if access suspected to be unlawful
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.344
note: Communicating information for investigation or decision-making purposes.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-140-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-140-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-140-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 140 Dealing with information if access suspected to be unlawful

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-140-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to communicate information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

141 Making record for purpose of permitted communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.345
note: A person who is permitted by section 135, 137 or 138 or subsection 140(1) to communicate particular information to another person may make a record of the information.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-141-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-141-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-141
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-141-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a record for permitted communication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Section 141

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-141-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 141 Making record for purpose of permitted communication

142 Further dealing by recipient of certain information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.345
curation status: Proposed
has part: 142(1) Further dealing by recipient of certain information
has part: 142(2) Further dealing by recipient of certain information
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-142
schema version: 2

142(1) Further dealing by recipient of certain information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.345
note: Recipient of information may communicate it to another person or make use of it.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-142-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 142 Further dealing by recipient of certain information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to communicate information.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 142(1) Further dealing by recipient of certain information

142(2) Further dealing by recipient of certain information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.345
note: Exemption for ACC officers performing specific function
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-142-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 142 Further dealing by recipient of certain information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts ACC officers from subsection (1)
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: Paragraph 7A(da) of the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 142(2) Further dealing by recipient of certain information

142A Communicating information obtained as a result of an
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.346
curation status: Proposed
has part: 142A(1) Communicating information obtained as a result of an
has part: 142A(2) Communicating information obtained as a result of an
has part: 142A(3) Communicating information obtained as a result of an
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-142a
schema version: 2

142A(1) Communicating information obtained as a result of an
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.346
note: Restrictions on communication of information obtained through international assistance application
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-142a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 142A Communicating information obtained as a result of an

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restricts communication of information
modality: Deontic
operator: Restriction

142A(2) Communicating information obtained as a result of an
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.346
note: Subsection (1) has effect despite subsection 139(4A) and section 142.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-142a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 142A Communicating information obtained as a result of an

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Despite subsection 139(4A)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continues effect despite subsection 139(4A)
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
premise text: Subsection (1) has effect

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Despite section 142
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continues effect despite section 142
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
premise text: Subsection (1) has effect

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 142A(2) Communicating information obtained as a result of an

142A(3) Communicating information obtained as a result of an
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.346
note: A determination under paragraph (1)(c) is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142a-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-142a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 142A Communicating information obtained as a result of an

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 142A(3) Communicating information obtained as a result of an

143 Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.346
curation status: Proposed
has part: 143(1) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
has part: 143(2) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
has part: 143(3) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143
schema version: 2

143(1) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.346
note: Allowing lawfully accessed information in exempt proceedings.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-143-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 143 Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding

143(2) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.346
note: Determining access in contravention of subsection 108(1) on balance of probabilities.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-143-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-143-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-143-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-143-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-143-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-143-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 143 Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-143-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: on the balance of probabilities
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Access during contravention of subsection 108(1)
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) For the purposes of applying subsection (1) in relation to information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-143-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: on the balance of probabilities
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Access during contravention of subsection 108(1)
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (2) For the purposes of applying subsection (1) in relation to information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-143-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: on the balance of probabilities
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Determining access in contravention of subsection 108(1)
modality: Deontic
operator: determines
premise text: (2) For the purposes of applying subsection (1) in relation to information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-143-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: on the balance of probabilities
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Access during contravention of subsection 108(1)
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (2) For the purposes of applying subsection (1) in relation to information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-143-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: on the balance of probabilities
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Access during contravention of subsection 108(1)
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (2) For the purposes of applying subsection (1) in relation to information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-143-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 143(2) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding

143(3) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.346
note: Giving stored communications warrant information in evidence in exempt proceeding
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-143-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 143 Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding

144 Giving information in evidence if communication unlawfully
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.347
curation status: Proposed
has part: 144(1) Giving information in evidence if communication unlawfully
has part: 144(2) Giving information in evidence if communication unlawfully
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-144
schema version: 2

144(1) Giving information in evidence if communication unlawfully
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.347
note: Allowing access to stored communications in certain circumstances.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-144-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-144-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 144 Giving information in evidence if communication unlawfully

144(2) Giving information in evidence if communication unlawfully
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.347
note: Prohibiting communication of certain information in evidence
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-144-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-144-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-144-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 144 Giving information in evidence if communication unlawfully

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-144-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No communication is allowed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: State prohibits communication of certain information in evidence

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-144-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 144(2) Giving information in evidence if communication unlawfully

145 Evidence that has been given in exempt proceeding
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.347
note: Permits later use of exempt proceeding evidence in other proceedings.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-145-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-145-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-145
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-145-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits action
modality: Deontic
operator: PERMIT

146 Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.348
curation status: Proposed
has part: 146(1) Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
has part: 146(2) Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-146
schema version: 2

146(1) Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.348
note: Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-146-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-146-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-146-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 146 Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-146-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to give information in evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: may

146(2) Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.348
note: Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-146-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-146-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-146-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 146 Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-146-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to give information in evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: may

147 Accessed material inadmissible except as provided
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.349
curation status: Proposed
has part: 147(1) Accessed material inadmissible except as provided
has part: 147(2) Accessed material inadmissible except as provided
has part: 147(3) Accessed material inadmissible except as provided
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-147
schema version: 2

147(1) Accessed material inadmissible except as provided
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.349
note: Accessing stored communication information is generally inadmissible in evidence.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-147-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 147 Accessed material inadmissible except as provided

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits accessing stored communication information in evidence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

147(2) Accessed material inadmissible except as provided
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.349
note: Accessed material is admissible under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-147-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 147 Accessed material inadmissible except as provided

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...stored communication was accessed in contravention of subsection 108(1).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for accessing stored communication.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: interval relation
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) of this section applies...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...stored communication was accessed in contravention of subsection 108(1).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Defines the cognitive agent responsible for accessing stored communication.
modality: CogAI
operator: cognitive agent relation
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) of this section applies...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...stored communication was accessed in contravention of subsection 108(1).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide accessed material under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) of this section applies...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...stored communication was accessed in contravention of subsection 108(1).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Defines the diffusion of information about accessing stored communication.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion relation
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) of this section applies...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...stored communication was accessed in contravention of subsection 108(1).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines the trace for accessing stored communication.
modality: LTL
operator: trace relation
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) of this section applies...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 147(2) Accessed material inadmissible except as provided

147(3) Accessed material inadmissible except as provided
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.349
note: Permits communication, use, recording, or giving in evidence of accessed material
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-147-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 147 Accessed material inadmissible except as provided

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows communication, use, recording, or giving in evidence of accessed material
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow

148 Stored communications warrant information inadmissible
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.349
curation status: Proposed
has part: 148(1) Stored communications warrant information inadmissible
has part: 148(2) Stored communications warrant information inadmissible
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-148
schema version: 2

148(1) Stored communications warrant information inadmissible
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.349
note: Stored communications warrant information is inadmissible in evidence.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-148-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-148-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-148-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 148 Stored communications warrant information inadmissible

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-148-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of stored communications warrant information in evidence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

148(2) Stored communications warrant information inadmissible
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.349
note: Stored communications warrant information inadmissible
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-148-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-148-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-148-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 148 Stored communications warrant information inadmissible

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-148-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits giving stored communications warrant information in evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) For the purpose of determining...

149 Evidence that is otherwise inadmissible
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.350
note: Preserves admissibility of records obtained by accessing stored communications
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-149-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-149-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-149
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-149-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits admissibility of records obtained by accessing stored communications
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

15 How warrants etc. to be dealt with
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.136
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15(1) How warrants etc. to be dealt with
has part: 15(1A) How warrants etc. to be dealt with
has part: 15(1B) How warrants etc. to be dealt with
has part: 15(3) How warrants etc. to be dealt with
has part: 15(4) How warrants etc. to be dealt with
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15
schema version: 2

15(1) How warrants etc. to be dealt with
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.136
note: Inform Director-General of Security about warrant issuance or revocation.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-15-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15 How warrants etc. to be dealt with

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to inform Director-General of Security.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-15-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15(1) How warrants etc. to be dealt with

15(1A) How warrants etc. to be dealt with
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.136
note: Inform carrier about warrant issue and provide copy upon request.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-15-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-15-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 15 How warrants etc. to be dealt with

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-15-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Director-General of Security must inform carrier.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

15(1B) How warrants etc. to be dealt with
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.136
note: Director-General of Security must inform authorized representative of warrant revocation.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-15-ss-1b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-15-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 15 How warrants etc. to be dealt with

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-15-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must inform
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-15-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15(1B) How warrants etc. to be dealt with

15(3) How warrants etc. to be dealt with
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.136
note: The Attorney-General must record a decision on each warrant request.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-15-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-15-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15 How warrants etc. to be dealt with

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-15-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-15-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15(3) How warrants etc. to be dealt with

15(4) How warrants etc. to be dealt with
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.136
note: Where warrants are to be dealt with
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-15-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15 How warrants etc. to be dealt with

150 Destruction of records
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.351
curation status: Proposed
has part: 150(1) Destruction of records
has part: 150(2) Destruction of records
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-150
schema version: 2

150(1) Destruction of records
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.351
note: Destroy records obtained by accessing stored communication if not required for law enforcement purposes.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-150-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-150-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-150-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-150-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-150-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-150-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-150-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 150 Destruction of records

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-150-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Time of destruction is greater than or equal to the time of obtaining information
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Time of destruction must be after time of obtaining information
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Chief officer caused information or record to be destroyed forthwith

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-150-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information or record must be destroyed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must destroy records
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Chief officer satisfied information is not required for law enforcement purposes

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-150-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Chief officer must destroy information or record
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chief officer must cause information or record to be destroyed
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Chief officer satisfied information or record is not likely to be required for a purpose referred in subsection 139(2) or (4A), 139A(2) or 139B(2)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-150-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information or record must be destroyed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Information or record must be destroyed if not required for law enforcement purposes
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Chief officer satisfied information is not likely to be required for a purpose referred in subsection 139(2) or (4A), 139A(2) or 139B(2)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-150-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Time of destruction is less than or equal to the time of requirement for law enforcement purposes
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Time of destruction must be before time of requirement for law enforcement purposes
modality: LTL
operator: <=
premise text: Chief officer satisfied information is not likely to be required for a purpose referred in subsection 139(2) or (4A), 139A(2) or 139B(2)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-150-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 150(1) Destruction of records

150(2) Destruction of records
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.351
note: Chief officer must provide a written report on record destruction within 3 months after June 30th.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-150-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-150-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-150-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 150 Destruction of records

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-150-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to provide a report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-150-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 150(2) Destruction of records

151 Obligation to keep records
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.352
note: The chief officer of a criminal law-enforcement agency must keep certain records.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-151-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-151-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-151-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The chief officer has a duty to keep the records.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-151-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151 Obligation to keep records

158A Functions of the Inspector-General of Intelligence and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.354
curation status: Proposed
has part: 158A(1) Functions of the Inspector-General of Intelligence and
has part: 158A(2) Functions of the Inspector-General of Intelligence and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-158a
schema version: 2

158A(1) Functions of the Inspector-General of Intelligence and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.354
note: The Inspector-General has functions in relation to preservation notices.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-158a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-158a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 158A Functions of the Inspector-General of Intelligence and

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The function is related to preservation notices during a certain period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The function is related to preservation notices during a certain period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) Under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Act 1986, the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security has functions in relation to preservation notices given by the Organisation.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Inspector-General has a function.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Inspector-General has a function.
modality: Deontic
operator: has function
premise text: (1) Under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Act 1986, the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security has functions in relation to preservation notices given by the Organisation.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Inspector-General has a duty to preserve notices.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Inspector-General has a duty to preserve notices.
modality: Deontic
operator: has duty
premise text: (1) Under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Act 1986, the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security has functions in relation to preservation notices given by the Organisation.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Preservation notices are given by the Organisation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Preservation notices are given by the Organisation.
modality: Diffusion
operator: given
premise text: (1) Under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Act 1986, the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security has functions in relation to preservation notices given by the Organisation.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The function is related to preservation notices during a certain period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The function is related to preservation notices during a certain period.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (1) Under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Act 1986, the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security has functions in relation to preservation notices given by the Organisation.

158A(2) Functions of the Inspector-General of Intelligence and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.354
note: Conducting inspections to give effect to the objects of that Act
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-158a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-158a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-158a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 158A Functions of the Inspector-General of Intelligence and

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-158a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: to conduct inspections
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inspector-General has a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security

159 Annual reports regarding applications and warrants under
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.355
note: Annual reports regarding applications and warrants under
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-159-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-159
schema version: 2

16 Additional requirements for named person warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.139
curation status: Proposed
has part: 16(1) Additional requirements for named person warrants
has part: 16(1A) Additional requirements for named person warrants
has part: 16(2) Additional requirements for named person warrants
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16
schema version: 2

16(1) Additional requirements for named person warrants
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.139
note: Certifying person must provide description of service to authorised representative.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-16-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-16-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Additional requirements for named person warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-16-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Service identification
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IDENTITY
premise text: (a) an authorised representative of a carrier has been given a copy of a warrant...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-16-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16(1) Additional requirements for named person warrants

16(1A) Additional requirements for named person warrants
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.139
note: Certifying person must provide description of device to authorised representative.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-16-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-16-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-16-ss-1a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Additional requirements for named person warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-16-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-16-ss-1a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (description)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Device description
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IDENTITY
premise text: (device)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-16-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16(1A) Additional requirements for named person warrants

16(2) Additional requirements for named person warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.139
note: Additional requirements for named person warrants
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-16-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Additional requirements for named person warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-16-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16(2) Additional requirements for named person warrants

160 Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.355
curation status: Proposed
has part: 160(1) Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth
has part: 160(2) Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-160
schema version: 2

160(1) Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.355
note: Minister may request specified information from chief officer of a criminal law-enforcement agency.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-160-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-160-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-160-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 160 Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-160-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to request specified information.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

160(2) Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.355
note: Minister must comply with request for information from Commonwealth.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-160-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-160-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-160-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 160 Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-160-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister must comply with request for information from Commonwealth.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Chief officer must comply with request.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-160-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 160(2) Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth

161 Annual report by Minister about stored communications
type: Concept
description: yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.356
note: Annual report by Minister about stored communications
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-161-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-161-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-161
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-161-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide annual report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

161A Report to contain information about preservation notices
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.356
curation status: Proposed
has part: 161A(1) Report to contain information about preservation notices
has part: 161A(2) Report to contain information about preservation notices
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-161a
schema version: 2

161A(1) Report to contain information about preservation notices
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.356
note: Report must contain statistics about preservation notices given by the agency.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-161a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-161a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-161a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 161A Report to contain information about preservation notices

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-161a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to report statistics
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-161a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 161A(1) Report to contain information about preservation notices

161A(2) Report to contain information about preservation notices
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.356
note: Report must contain statistics about foreign preservation notices and revocation notices.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-161a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-161a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-161a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 161A Report to contain information about preservation notices

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-161a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to report statistics
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

162 Report to set out how many applications made and warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.356
curation status: Proposed
has part: 162(1) Report to set out how many applications made and warrants
has part: 162(2) Report to set out how many applications made and warrants
has part: 162(3) Report to set out how many applications made and warrants
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-162
schema version: 2

162(1) Report to set out how many applications made and warrants
type: Concept
description: Statistics and offence information
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.356
note: Report on stored communications warrants applications
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-162-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-162-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-162-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 162 Report to set out how many applications made and warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-162-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-162-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 162(1) Report to set out how many applications made and warrants

162(2) Report to set out how many applications made and warrants
type: Concept
description: Statistics and information about warrant applications
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.356
note: Report on stored communications warrants applications
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-162-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-162-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-162-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 162 Report to set out how many applications made and warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-162-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-162-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 162(2) Report to set out how many applications made and warrants

162(3) Report to set out how many applications made and warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.356
note: Report on international offences made by an enforcement agency during the year.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-162-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-162-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-162-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-162-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 162 Report to set out how many applications made and warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-162-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Report includes offences committed during the year
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Report must include offences committed during the year
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Enforcement agency made an international assistance application

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-162-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Report on international offences made during the year
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must report on international offences
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: Enforcement agency made an international assistance application

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-162-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 162(3) Report to set out how many applications made and warrants

163 Report to contain information about effectiveness of warrants
type: Concept
description: yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.358
note: Report must contain information about effectiveness of warrants
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-163-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-163-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-163
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-163-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

163A Report regarding international requests
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.358
note: Report must set out number of occasions information was communicated under subsection 139(1) or section 142 to certain entities.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-163a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-163a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-163a
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-163a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-163a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 163A Report regarding international requests

164 Annual reports
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.359
curation status: Proposed
has part: 164(1) Annual reports
has part: 164(2) Annual reports
has part: 164(3) Annual reports
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-164
schema version: 2

164(1) Annual reports
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.359
note: Annual reports must be laid before each House of the Parliament within 15 sitting days.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-164-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 164 Annual reports

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to perform an action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

164(2) Annual reports
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.359
note: Annual reports must not enable identification of a person.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-164-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 164 Annual reports

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must not enable identification of a person
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: Report under Division 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 164(2) Annual reports

164(3) Annual reports
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.359
note: Annual reports must be given to the Minister by a certain date.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-164-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 164 Annual reports

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between June 30th and the due date.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (3) For the purposes of section 34C of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, a report that Division 2 requires to be prepared...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal interval between June 30th and the due date.
modality: CogAI
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (3) For the purposes of section 34C of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, a report that Division 2 requires to be prepared...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide annual reports.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal interval between June 30th and the due date.
modality: Diffusion
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (3) For the purposes of section 34C of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, a report that Division 2 requires to be prepared...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval between June 30th and the due date.
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (3) For the purposes of section 34C of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, a report that Division 2 requires to be prepared...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 164(3) Annual reports

165 Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.360
curation status: Proposed
has part: 165(1) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
has part: 165(2) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
has part: 165(3) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
has part: 165(4) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
has part: 165(5) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
has part: 165(6) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-165
schema version: 2

165(1) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.360
note: Prohibition on unlawful access or communication
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-165-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 165 Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits accessing a stored communication in contravention of subsection 108(1)
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) This section applies to an accessing of a stored communication if the access was in contravention of subsection 108(1).

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the person accessing the communication to comply with subsection 108(1)
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) This section applies to an accessing of a stored communication if the access was in contravention of subsection 108(1).

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the person accessing the communication from disclosing its contents to others
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (1) This section applies to an accessing of a stored communication if the access was in contravention of subsection 108(1).

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Traces the accessed communication back to its originator
modality: LTL
operator: Trace
premise text: (1) This section applies to an accessing of a stored communication if the access was in contravention of subsection 108(1).

165(2) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.360
note: Person is an aggrieved person if they were a party to the communication or the communication was made on their behalf.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-165-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 165 Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...they were a party to the communication or the communication was made on their behalf.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between communication and being a party
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Person is an aggrieved person if...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...they were a party to the communication or the communication was made on their behalf.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Conditional relation between being a party and being an aggrieved person
modality: CogAI
operator: if
premise text: Person is an aggrieved person if...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...they were a party to the communication or the communication was made on their behalf.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of an aggrieved person
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: Person is an aggrieved person if...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...they were a party to the communication or the communication was made on their behalf.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Conditional relation between being a party and being an aggrieved person
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
premise text: Person is an aggrieved person if...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...they were a party to the communication or the communication was made on their behalf.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation between communication and being a party
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: Person is an aggrieved person if...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 165(2) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication

165(3) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.360
note: Grant remedial relief in respect of access by defendant
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-165-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 165 Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to grant remedial relief
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 165(3) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication

165(4) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.360
note: Grant remedial relief against defendant for unlawful access or communication
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-165-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 165 Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to grant remedial relief
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 165(4) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication

165(5) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.360
note: Court may grant remedial relief to an aggrieved person if convicted of unlawful access or communication.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-165-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 165 Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court has an obligation to grant remedial relief.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 165(5) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication

165(6) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.360
note: Remedial relief for unlawful access or communication
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-6-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-6-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-165-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 165 Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the court may, on the application of an aggrieved person...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between access and communication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: (a) information was obtained by accessing the communication;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-6-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the court may, on the application of an aggrieved person...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of conviction on remedial relief
modality: Argumentation
operator: implication
premise text: (c) a court convicts a person (in this subsection called the defendant)...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the court may, on the application of an aggrieved person...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to grant remedial relief
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (6) If...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-6-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the court may, on the application of an aggrieved person...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to grant remedial relief
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
premise text: (c) a court convicts a person (in this subsection called the defendant)...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the court may, on the application of an aggrieved person...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval until remedial relief is granted
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (b) the information was communicated to a person in contravention of section 133;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 165(6) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication

166 Limitation periods etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.363
curation status: Proposed
has part: 166(1) Limitation periods etc.
has part: 166(2) Limitation periods etc.
has part: 166(3) Limitation periods etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-166
schema version: 2

166(1) Limitation periods etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.363
note: Application for remedial relief must be made within 6 years after access took place.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-166-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-166-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-166-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 166 Limitation periods etc.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-166-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be made within 6 years
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-166-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 166(1) Limitation periods etc.

166(2) Limitation periods etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.363
note: Application for remedial relief must be made within 6 years after communication.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-166-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-166-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-166-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 166 Limitation periods etc.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-166-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be made within 6 years.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-166-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 166(2) Limitation periods etc.

166(3) Limitation periods etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.363
note: Application for remedial relief must be made as soon as practicable after conviction.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-166-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-166-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-166-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 166 Limitation periods etc.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-166-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make application as soon as practicable.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-166-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 166(3) Limitation periods etc.

167 No limitation on other liability
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.363
note: No limitation on liability under other provisions or laws
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-167-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-167
schema version: 2

168 Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.364
note: No exclusion or limitation of State/Territory laws
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-168-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-168-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-168-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No exclusion or limitation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

169 State or Territory courts—jurisdictional limits
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.364
note: No remedial relief beyond State/Territory law limits
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-169-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-169-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-169-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-169-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-169-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-169-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-169
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-169-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Remedial relief is part of State/Territory law
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Remedial relief overlaps with State/Territory law
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: State/Territory law defines court's jurisdictional limits

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-169-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Remedial relief is inferred from State/Territory law
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: CogAI infers remedial relief from State/Territory law
modality: CogAI
operator: Inferential
premise text: State/Territory law defines court's jurisdictional limits

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-169-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to follow State/Territory law
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No remedial relief
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Court's jurisdictional limits

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-169-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Remedial relief is diffused into State/Territory law
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Remedial relief diffuses into State/Territory law
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: State/Territory law defines court's jurisdictional limits

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-169-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Remedial relief is contained in State/Territory law
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Remedial relief contains State/Territory law
modality: LTL
operator: Contains
premise text: State/Territory law defines court's jurisdictional limits

17 Reports to be made to Attorney-General on results of
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.140
curation status: Proposed
has part: 17(1) Reports to be made to Attorney-General on results of
has part: 17(2) Reports to be made to Attorney-General on results of
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17
schema version: 2

17(1) Reports to be made to Attorney-General on results of
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.140
note: Report on results of interception under Part 2-2 warrant
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-17-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 17 Reports to be made to Attorney-General on results of

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

17(2) Reports to be made to Attorney-General on results of
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.140
note: Report details of intercepted communication source
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-17-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 17 Reports to be made to Attorney-General on results of

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide report details
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-17-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17(2) Reports to be made to Attorney-General on results of

170 Extended meaning of conviction—orders under section 19B of
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.364
note: A reference in this Part to the conviction of a person of an offence includes a reference to the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-170-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-170-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-170-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-170-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-170-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-170
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-170-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Includes the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
premise text: A reference in this Part to the conviction of a person of an offence includes a reference to...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-170-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: A reference in this Part to the conviction of a person of an offence includes a reference to...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-170-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Includes the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
premise text: A reference in this Part to the conviction of a person of an offence includes a reference to...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-170-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Includes the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.
modality: LTL
operator: includes
premise text: A reference in this Part to the conviction of a person of an offence includes a reference to...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-170-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 170 Extended meaning of conviction—orders under section 19B of

171 Outline of Part
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.365
curation status: Proposed
has part: 171(1) Outline of Part
has part: 171(2) Outline of Part
has part: 171(3) Outline of Part
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-171
schema version: 2

171(1) Outline of Part
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.365
note: Disclosure of information under certain circumstances is permitted.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-171-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-171-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-171-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 171 Outline of Part

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-171-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits disclosure under certain circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Division 3 covers Organisation.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-171-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 171(1) Outline of Part

171(2) Outline of Part
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.365
note: Exemptions from prohibition on use of information or documents
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-171-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-171-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-171-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 171 Outline of Part

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-171-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption

171(3) Outline of Part
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.365
note: Offences for certain disclosures and uses of information and documents created.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-171-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-171-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-171-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 171 Outline of Part

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-171-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits certain disclosures and uses of information and documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

172 No disclosure of the contents or substance of a communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.366
note: No disclosure of communication contents or substance
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-172-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-172-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-172
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-172-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of communication contents or substance
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-172-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 172 No disclosure of the contents or substance of a communication

173 Effect of Divisions 3 to 5
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.366
note: Nothing in Divisions 3 to 5 limits the generality of anything else in those Divisions or in Subdivision A of Division 3 of Part 13 of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-173-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-173
schema version: 2

174 Voluntary disclosure
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.367
curation status: Proposed
has part: 174(1) Voluntary disclosure
has part: 174(2) Voluntary disclosure
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-174
schema version: 2

174(1) Voluntary disclosure
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.367
note: Disclosure of information is permitted in connection with Organisation's functions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-174-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-174-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-174-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 174 Voluntary disclosure

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-174-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to disclose information
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

174(2) Voluntary disclosure
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.367
note: Holder must disclose information or document if requested by ASIO employee or affiliate.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-174-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-174-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-174-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 174 Voluntary disclosure

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-174-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-174-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 174(2) Voluntary disclosure

175 Authorisations for access to existing information or documents
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.367
curation status: Proposed
has part: 175(1) Authorisations for access to existing information or documents
has part: 175(2) Authorisations for access to existing information or documents
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-175
schema version: 2

175(1) Authorisations for access to existing information or documents
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.367
note: Authorisation allows disclosure of information or document
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-175-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-175-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-175-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 175 Authorisations for access to existing information or documents

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-175-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Authorisation in force under subsection (2)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-175-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 175(1) Authorisations for access to existing information or documents

175(2) Authorisations for access to existing information or documents
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.367
note: Authorized disclosure of specified information or documents
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-175-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-175-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-175-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 175 Authorisations for access to existing information or documents

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-175-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to disclose
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

176 Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.368
curation status: Proposed
has part: 176(1) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
has part: 176(2) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
has part: 176(3) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
has part: 176(4) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
has part: 176(5) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
has part: 176(6) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-176
schema version: 2

176(1) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.368
note: Authorisation allows disclosure of information or document under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-176-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 176 Authorisations for access to prospective information or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation permits disclosure.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

176(2) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.368
note: Authorized persons may disclose specified information or documents
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-176-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 176 Authorisations for access to prospective information or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure allowed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to disclose
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Authorized persons

176(3) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.368
note: Authorisation for disclosure of specified information or documents that came into existence before the authorisation comes into force.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-176-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 176 Authorisations for access to prospective information or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorises disclosure of specified information or documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

176(4) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.368
note: Must satisfy condition before authorizing disclosure
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-176-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 176 Authorisations for access to prospective information or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: must

176(5) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.368
note: Authorisation under this section comes into force upon notification and ends at the specified time.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-5-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-176-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 176 Authorisations for access to prospective information or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The time period for authorisation overlaps with the period specified under section 180N.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Time period for authorisation overlaps with the period specified under section 180N.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: (ii) if the authorisation is made under a journalist information warrant—is no later than the end of the period specified under section 180N as the period for which the warrant is to remain in force.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The authorisation holds from the point of notification.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation holds from the point of notification.
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: (a) comes into force at the time the person from whom the disclosure is sought receives notification of the authorisation;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The authorisation ends at the specified time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation ends at the specified time.
modality: Deontic
operator: ends
premise text: (b) unless it is revoked earlier, ends at the time specified in the authorisation;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The authorisation can be revoked earlier than the specified time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation can be revoked earlier than the specified time.
modality: Deontic
operator: revokes
premise text: Revoking the authorisation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-5-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The authorisation is held by the State.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation is held by the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: An authorisation under this section:

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 176(5) Authorisations for access to prospective information or

176(6) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.368
note: Revoke authorisation if disclosure is no longer required or warrant has been revoked.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-176-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 176 Authorisations for access to prospective information or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Revoke authorisation if disclosure is no longer required or warrant has been revoked.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 176(6) Authorisations for access to prospective information or

176A Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.370
curation status: Proposed
has part: 176A(1) Meaning of enforcement agency
has part: 176A(2) Meaning of enforcement agency
has part: 176A(3) Meaning of enforcement agency
has part: 176A(3A) Meaning of enforcement agency
has part: 176A(3B) Meaning of enforcement agency
has part: 176A(4) Meaning of enforcement agency
has part: 176A(4A) Meaning of enforcement agency
has part: 176A(5) Meaning of enforcement agency
has part: 176A(6) Meaning of enforcement agency
has part: 176A(7) Meaning of enforcement agency
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-176a
schema version: 2

176A(1) Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.370
note: Defines enforcement agencies
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-176a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 176A Meaning of enforcement agency

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 176A(1) Meaning of enforcement agency

176A(2) Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.370
note: Request for Minister's declaration of authority as enforcement agency
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-176a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 176A Meaning of enforcement agency

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Minister to declare the authority or body to be an enforcement agency.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Timing of request for declaration
modality: AllenInterval
operator: request timing
premise text: (2) The head of an authority or body may request...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Minister to declare the authority or body to be an enforcement agency.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Justification for request
modality: Argumentation
operator: request justification
premise text: (2) The head of an authority or body may request...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Minister to declare the authority or body to be an enforcement agency.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Analysis of request for declaration
modality: CogAI
operator: request analysis
premise text: (2) The head of an authority or body may request...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the authority or body to be an enforcement agency.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Request for permission
modality: Deontic
operator: request
premise text: (2) The head of an authority or body may request the Minister to declare...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Minister to declare the authority or body to be an enforcement agency.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagation of request for declaration
modality: Diffusion
operator: request propagation
premise text: (2) The head of an authority or body may request...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 176A(2) Meaning of enforcement agency

176A(3) Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.370
note: Minister may declare authority or body as enforcement agency.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-176a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 176A Meaning of enforcement agency

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration of authority
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 176A(3) Meaning of enforcement agency

176A(3A) Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.370
note: Declaration by Minister regarding request under subsection (2)
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-176a-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 176A Meaning of enforcement agency

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to make declaration
modality: Deontic
operator: may

176A(3B) Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.370
note: Minister cannot make declaration without reasonable grounds
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-176a-ss-3b
schema version: 2
part of: 176A Meaning of enforcement agency

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the functions of the authority or body include...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval check for authority or body
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
premise text: (a) enforcement of the criminal law; or (b) administering a law imposing a pecuniary penalty; or (c) administering a law relating to the protection of the public revenue.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the functions of the authority or body include...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recurring trace for authority or body
modality: CogAI
operator: includes
premise text: (a) enforcement of the criminal law; or (b) administering a law imposing a pecuniary penalty; or (c) administering a law relating to the protection of the public revenue.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the Minister is satisfied on reasonable grounds...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of making declaration
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: (3B) The Minister must not make the declaration...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the functions of the authority or body include...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Recurring trace for authority or body
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
premise text: (a) enforcement of the criminal law; or (b) administering a law imposing a pecuniary penalty; or (c) administering a law relating to the protection of the public revenue.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the functions of the authority or body include...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for authority or body
modality: LTL
operator: includes
premise text: (a) enforcement of the criminal law; or (b) administering a law imposing a pecuniary penalty; or (c) administering a law relating to the protection of the public revenue.

176A(4) Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.370
note: The Minister must consider certain factors when deciding whether to make a declaration.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-176a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 176A Meaning of enforcement agency

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The declaration must consider the authority or body's compliance with obligations over time.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (d) whether the authority or body proposes to adopt processes and practices that would ensure its compliance...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: The Minister's decision implies certain conditions about the authority or body's actions.
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (e) whether the Minister considers that the declaration would be in the public interest;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Minister must consider certain factors.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (4) In considering whether to make the declaration, the Minister...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The declaration must consider multiple factors simultaneously.
modality: Diffusion
operator: AND
premise text: (f) any other matter that the Minister considers relevant.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 176A(4) Meaning of enforcement agency

176A(4A) Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
description: comparable protection, mechanism for monitoring compliance, and recourse for mishandled information
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.370
note: Protection of personal information must be comparable to the Australian Privacy Principles.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-4a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-4a-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-176a-ss-4a
schema version: 2
part of: 176A Meaning of enforcement agency

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-4a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for monitoring compliance
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (4A) For the purposes of subparagraphs (4)(c)(ii) and (iii),

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to protect personal information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 176A(4A) Meaning of enforcement agency

176A(5) Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.370
note: Consultation with certain persons or bodies
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-176a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 176A Meaning of enforcement agency

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to consult
modality: Deontic
operator: may

176A(6) Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.370
note: The declaration may be subject to conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-176a-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 176A Meaning of enforcement agency

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 176A(6) Meaning of enforcement agency

176A(7) Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.370
note: Authority or body is not to exercise a power conferred on an enforcement agency.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-176a-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 176A Meaning of enforcement agency

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of exercising a power
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
premise text: (7) Without limiting subsection (6),

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-7-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 176A(7) Meaning of enforcement agency

177 Voluntary disclosure
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.372
curation status: Proposed
has part: 177(1) Voluntary disclosure
has part: 177(2) Voluntary disclosure
has part: 177(3) Voluntary disclosure
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-177
schema version: 2

177(1) Voluntary disclosure
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.372
note: Disclosure of information or document to enforcement agency is reasonably necessary for the enforcement of criminal law.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-177-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-177-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-177-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-177-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 177 Voluntary disclosure

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-177-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Disclosure is reasonably necessary for the enforcement of criminal law
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Disclosures are permitted if reasonably necessary

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-177-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to disclose information or document
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Reasonably necessary for the enforcement of criminal law.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-177-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 177(1) Voluntary disclosure

177(2) Voluntary disclosure
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.372
note: Disclosure of information to enforcement agency is allowed under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-177-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-177-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-177-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-177-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 177 Voluntary disclosure

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-177-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Disclosure is allowed within reasonably necessary limits.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: Disclosure is for enforcement of law or protection of public revenue.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-177-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits disclosure of information to enforcement agency.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Reasonably necessary for enforcement of law or protection of public revenue.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-177-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 177(2) Voluntary disclosure

177(3) Voluntary disclosure
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.372
note: Disclosure not required if requested by enforcement agency staff
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-177-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-177-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 177 Voluntary disclosure

178 Authorisations for access to existing information or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.373
curation status: Proposed
has part: 178(1) Authorisations for access to existing information or
has part: 178(2) Authorisations for access to existing information or
has part: 178(3) Authorisations for access to existing information or
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-178
schema version: 2

178(1) Authorisations for access to existing information or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.373
note: Authorisation allows disclosure of information or document
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-178-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 178 Authorisations for access to existing information or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

178(2) Authorisations for access to existing information or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.373
note: Authorized disclosure of specified information or documents before notification.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-178-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 178 Authorisations for access to existing information or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorizes disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 178(2) Authorisations for access to existing information or

178(3) Authorisations for access to existing information or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.373
note: Authorised officer must not make authorisation unless satisfied disclosure is reasonably necessary for enforcement of criminal law or performance of ACC's function.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-178-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 178 Authorisations for access to existing information or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the disclosure is reasonably necessary for...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: (3) The authorised officer must not make the authorisation unless...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 178(3) Authorisations for access to existing information or

178A Authorisations for access to existing information or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.374
curation status: Proposed
has part: 178A(1) Authorisations for access to existing information or
has part: 178A(2) Authorisations for access to existing information or
has part: 178A(3) Authorisations for access to existing information or
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-178a
schema version: 2

178A(1) Authorisations for access to existing information or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.374
note: Authorisation allows disclosure of information or document
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-178a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 178A Authorisations for access to existing information or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

178A(2) Authorisations for access to existing information or
type: Concept
references: sec-184
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.374
note: Authorisation for disclosure of specified information or documents
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-178a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 178A Authorisations for access to existing information or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation for disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

178A(3) Authorisations for access to existing information or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.374
note: Must not make authorisation unless satisfied disclosure is reasonably necessary
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-178a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 178A Authorisations for access to existing information or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: mustNot

179 Authorisations for access to existing information or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.374
curation status: Proposed
has part: 179(1) Authorisations for access to existing information or
has part: 179(2) Authorisations for access to existing information or
has part: 179(3) Authorisations for access to existing information or
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-179
schema version: 2

179(1) Authorisations for access to existing information or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.374
note: Authorisation allows disclosure of information or document under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-179-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-179-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-179-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 179 Authorisations for access to existing information or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-179-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation allows disclosure of information or document under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

179(2) Authorisations for access to existing information or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.374
note: Authorisation for disclosure of specified information or documents.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-179-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-179-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 179 Authorisations for access to existing information or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-179-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179(2) Authorisations for access to existing information or

179(3) Authorisations for access to existing information or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.374
note: Must not make authorisation unless satisfied disclosure is reasonably necessary
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-179-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-179-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-179-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-179-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-179-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 179 Authorisations for access to existing information or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-179-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: authorised officer must not make authorisation unless during reasonable necessity period
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval condition
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: authorisation must be made during reasonable necessity period

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-179-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: authorised officer must not make authorisation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: mustNot
premise text: authorised officer must make authorisation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-179-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: authorised officer must not make authorisation unless satisfied disclosure is reasonably necessary
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: mustNot
premise text: authorisation unless authorised officer is satisfied disclosure is reasonably necessary

18 Evidentiary certificates
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.140
curation status: Proposed
has part: 18(1) Evidentiary certificates
has part: 18(2) Evidentiary certificates
has part: 18(3) Evidentiary certificates
has part: 18(4) Evidentiary certificates
has part: 18(5) Evidentiary certificates
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18
schema version: 2

18(1) Evidentiary certificates
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.140
note: Employees of carriers may issue written certificates for interception purposes.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Evidentiary certificates

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to issue certificates
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18(1) Evidentiary certificates

18(2) Evidentiary certificates
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.140
note: Conclusive evidence of matters stated in the document
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Evidentiary certificates

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Conclusive evidence of matters stated in the document
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide conclusive evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18(2) Evidentiary certificates

18(3) Evidentiary certificates
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.140
note: Issue written certificate with relevant facts for warrant execution
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Evidentiary certificates

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Certificate issued in connection with warrant execution
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3) The Director-General of Security or the Deputy Director-General of Security may issue a written certificate signed by him or her setting out such facts as he or she considers relevant...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Certificate issuance implies warrant execution
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (3) The Director-General of Security or the Deputy Director-General of Security may issue a written certificate signed by him or her setting out such facts as he or she considers relevant...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Certificate issuance infers warrant execution
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: (3) The Director-General of Security or the Deputy Director-General of Security may issue a written certificate signed by him or her setting out such facts as he or she considers relevant...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Issuing a certificate is an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Certificate issuance propagates to warrant execution
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (3) The Director-General of Security or the Deputy Director-General of Security may issue a written certificate signed by him or her setting out such facts as he or she considers relevant...

18(4) Evidentiary certificates
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.140
note: Issue written certificate with relevant facts about ASIO employee or affiliate activities
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Evidentiary certificates

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to issue certificate
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18(4) Evidentiary certificates

18(5) Evidentiary certificates
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.140
note: Exempt proceeding without Chapter 2 Interception of telecommunications
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Evidentiary certificates

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempt proceeding without Chapter 2 Interception of telecommunications
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18(5) Evidentiary certificates

180 Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.375
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180(1) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
has part: 180(2) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
has part: 180(3) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
has part: 180(4) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180
schema version: 2

180(1) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.375
note: Authorisation allows disclosure of information or document under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 180 Authorisations for access to prospective information or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation permits disclosure.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

180(2) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.375
note: Authorisation for access to specified information or documents.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 180 Authorisations for access to prospective information or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180(2) Authorisations for access to prospective information or

180(3) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.375
note: Authorisation for disclosure of specified information or documents that came into existence before the authorisation comes into force.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 180 Authorisations for access to prospective information or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180(3) Authorisations for access to prospective information or

180(4) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.375
note: Must not make authorisation unless satisfied disclosure is reasonably necessary for investigation of serious offence or imprisonment offence.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 180 Authorisations for access to prospective information or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless he or she is satisfied that the disclosure is reasonably necessary...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for investigation of serious offence
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (4) The authorised officer must not make the authorisation...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless he or she is satisfied that the disclosure is reasonably necessary...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge representation for access to information
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
premise text: (4) The authorised officer must not make the authorisation...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless he or she is satisfied that the disclosure is reasonably necessary...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: (4) The authorised officer must not make the authorisation...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless he or she is satisfied that the disclosure is reasonably necessary...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information for investigation of serious offence
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: (4) The authorised officer must not make the authorisation...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless he or she is satisfied that the disclosure is reasonably necessary...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for investigation of serious offence
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (4) The authorised officer must not make the authorisation...

180A Authorisations for access to existing information or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.377
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180A(1) Authorisations for access to existing information or
has part: 180A(2) Authorisations for access to existing information or
has part: 180A(3) Authorisations for access to existing information or
has part: 180A(4) Authorisations for access to existing information or
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180a
schema version: 2

180A(1) Authorisations for access to existing information or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.377
note: Authorisation allows disclosure of information or document
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 180A Authorisations for access to existing information or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Authorisation is in force under subsection (2)
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (1) Sections 276, 277 and 278 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 do not prevent a disclosure...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Authorisation is in force under subsection (2)
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognise
premise text: (1) Sections 276, 277 and 278 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 do not prevent a disclosure...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (1) Sections 276, 277 and 278 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 do not prevent a disclosure...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Authorisation is in force under subsection (2)
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
premise text: (1) Sections 276, 277 and 278 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 do not prevent a disclosure...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Authorisation is in force under subsection (2)
modality: SHACL
operator: Validate
premise text: (1) Sections 276, 277 and 278 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 do not prevent a disclosure...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180A(1) Authorisations for access to existing information or

180A(2) Authorisations for access to existing information or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.377
note: Authorisation for disclosure of specified information or documents
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 180A Authorisations for access to existing information or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to disclose information
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

180A(3) Authorisations for access to existing information or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.377
note: Must not make authorisation unless satisfied disclosure is reasonably necessary for specified purposes.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 180A Authorisations for access to existing information or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for the specified purposes.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) The authorised officer must not make the authorisation unless he or she is satisfied that the disclosure is reasonably necessary for...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the specified purposes.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Rationality requirement
modality: Argumentation
operator: mustJustify
premise text: (3) The authorised officer must not make the authorisation unless he or she is satisfied that the disclosure is reasonably necessary for...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the specified purposes.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Explainability requirement
modality: CogAI
operator: mustExplain
premise text: (3) The authorised officer must not make the authorisation unless he or she is satisfied that the disclosure is reasonably necessary for...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless he or she is satisfied that the disclosure is reasonably necessary for...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: mustNot
premise text: (3) The authorised officer must not make the authorisation...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the specified purposes.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Transparency requirement
modality: Diffusion
operator: mustInform
premise text: (3) The authorised officer must not make the authorisation unless he or she is satisfied that the disclosure is reasonably necessary for...

180A(4) Authorisations for access to existing information or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.377
note: Authorisation for disclosure of information to foreign law enforcement agency
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 180A Authorisations for access to existing information or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An authorised officer of the Australian Federal Police may authorise the disclosure of the information or documents so disclosed to a foreign law enforcement agency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation for disclosure of information to foreign law enforcement agency
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (4) If specified information or specified documents are disclosed because of an authorisation given under subsection (2)

180B Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.378
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180B(1) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
has part: 180B(2) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
has part: 180B(3) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
has part: 180B(4) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
has part: 180B(5) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
has part: 180B(6) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180b
schema version: 2

180B(1) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.378
note: Authorisation for disclosure of information or document under subsection (2) of this section.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 180B Authorisations for access to prospective information or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between prospective authorisation and disclosure.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (1) Sections 276, 277 and 278 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 do not prevent a disclosure of information or a document if the information or document is covered by an authorisation in force under subsection (2) of this section.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of prospective authorisation and disclosure.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognises
premise text: (1) Sections 276, 277 and 278 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 do not prevent a disclosure of information or a document if the information or document is covered by an authorisation in force under subsection (2) of this section.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to disclose information or document.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (1) Sections 276, 277 and 278 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 do not prevent a disclosure of information or a document if the information or document is covered by an authorisation in force under subsection (2) of this section.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of prospective authorisation and disclosure.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (1) Sections 276, 277 and 278 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 do not prevent a disclosure of information or a document if the information or document is covered by an authorisation in force under subsection (2) of this section.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of prospective authorisation and disclosure.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
premise text: (1) Sections 276, 277 and 278 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 do not prevent a disclosure of information or a document if the information or document is covered by an authorisation in force under subsection (2) of this section.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180B(1) Authorisations for access to prospective information or

180B(2) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.378
note: Authorisation for disclosure of specified information or documents.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 180B Authorisations for access to prospective information or

180B(3) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.378
note: Authorized officer must obtain Attorney-General authorization before making an authorization.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 180B Authorisations for access to prospective information or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The authorized officer must obtain the Attorney-General's authorization.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

180B(4) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
references: sec-184
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.378
note: Authorised officer must revoke authorisation if disclosure is no longer required.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180b-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 180B Authorisations for access to prospective information or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authorised officer must revoke
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must revoke authorisation
modality: Deontic
operator: Revocation
premise text: Disclosure is no longer required

180B(5) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
references: sec-184
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.378
note: Authorisation under subsection (2) comes into force upon notification and ceases after a specified period or is revoked earlier.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180b-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 180B Authorisations for access to prospective information or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The authorisation ceases to be in force during the specified period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: (b) ceases to be in force at the time specified in the authorisation,

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The legal system recognises the authorisation.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognises
premise text: (5) An authorisation under subsection (2):

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation under subsection (2) permits disclosure.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
premise text: (5) An authorisation under subsection (2):

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The authorisation diffuses to the person from whom the disclosure is sought.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (a) comes into force at the time the person from whom the disclosure is sought receives notification of the authorisation;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The authorisation ceases to be in force until the specified period or is revoked earlier.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (b) ceases to be in force at the time specified in the authorisation, which must not be more than 21 days after the day the authorisation is made,

180B(6) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.378
note: Extension of authorisation period
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180b-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 180B Authorisations for access to prospective information or

180C Authorisations to disclose information or documents—
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.380
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180C(1) Authorisations to disclose information or documents—
has part: 180C(2) Authorisations to disclose information or documents—
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180c
schema version: 2

180C(1) Authorisations to disclose information or documents—
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.380
note: Authorise disclosure of information or documents to foreign law enforcement agencies.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180c-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 180C Authorisations to disclose information or documents—

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An authorised officer of the Australian Federal Police may authorise...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (1) If specified information or specified documents are disclosed...

180C(2) Authorisations to disclose information or documents—
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.380
note: Must not make authorisation unless satisfied disclosure is appropriate and necessary for specified purposes.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180c-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180c-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 180C Authorisations to disclose information or documents—

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the disclosure is appropriate in all the circumstances and that the disclosure is reasonably necessary for: ...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation to enforcement of foreign criminal law
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) The authorised officer must not make the authorisation unless...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless he or she is satisfied that the disclosure is appropriate...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: mustNot
premise text: (2) The authorised officer must not make the authorisation...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180c-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...he or she is satisfied that the disclosure is appropriate...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of making authorisation without satisfaction
modality: Deontic
operator: mustNot
premise text: (2) The authorised officer must not make the authorisation unless...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the disclosure is appropriate in all the circumstances and that the disclosure is reasonably necessary for: ...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation to investigation or prosecution of crime within ICC jurisdiction
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (2) The authorised officer must not make the authorisation unless...

180D Authorisations to disclose information or documents—
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.381
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180D(1) Authorisations to disclose information or documents—
has part: 180D(2) Authorisations to disclose information or documents—
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180d
schema version: 2

180D(1) Authorisations to disclose information or documents—
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.381
note: Authorisation for disclosure of information or documents
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 180D Authorisations to disclose information or documents—

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: an authorised officer of the Australian Federal Police may authorise the following:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: (1) If specified information or specified documents are disclosed because of an authorisation given under this Division...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An authorised officer of the Australian Federal Police may authorise the following:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (1) If specified information or specified documents are disclosed because of an authorisation given under this Division...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the disclosure of the information or documents to the Organisation or an enforcement agency;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Enabling action
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow
premise text: (1) If specified information or specified documents are disclosed because of an authorisation given under this Division...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the use of the information or documents by the Australian Federal Police.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (1) If specified information or specified documents are disclosed because of an authorisation given under this Division...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the disclosure of the information or documents to the Organisation or an enforcement agency;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal limitation
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (1) If specified information or specified documents are disclosed because of an authorisation given under this Division...

180D(2) Authorisations to disclose information or documents—
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.381
note: Authorised officer must make disclosure only if necessary for Organisation's functions or enforcement of laws.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 180D Authorisations to disclose information or documents—

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Disclosure must be made only if necessary for Organisation's functions or enforcement of laws.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) The authorised officer...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Disclosure is justified only if necessary for Organisation's functions or enforcement of laws.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
premise text: (a) in the case of a disclosure to the Organisation—...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorised officer must make disclosure.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (2) The authorised officer...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Disclosure is necessary for Organisation's functions or enforcement of laws.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Necessity
premise text: (a) in the case of a disclosure to the Organisation—...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Disclosure must be made only if necessary for Organisation's functions or enforcement of laws.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (2) The authorised officer...

180E Disclosing information etc. to foreign countries or foreign law
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.382
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180E(1) Disclosing information etc. to foreign countries or foreign law
has part: 180E(2) Disclosing information etc. to foreign countries or foreign law
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180e
schema version: 2

180E(1) Disclosing information etc. to foreign countries or foreign law
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.382
note: Disclosing information to foreign countries or law enforcement agencies without conditions is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180e-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 180E Disclosing information etc. to foreign countries or foreign law

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosing information to foreign countries or law enforcement agencies.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180e-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180E(1) Disclosing information etc. to foreign countries or foreign law

180E(2) Disclosing information etc. to foreign countries or foreign law
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.382
note: Legislative instrument is not a determination made under paragraph (1)(c)
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180e-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 180E Disclosing information etc. to foreign countries or foreign law

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180E(2) Disclosing information etc. to foreign countries or foreign law

180F Authorised officers to consider privacy
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.383
note: Authorised officers must consider privacy before making an authorisation.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180f-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180f-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180f
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Privacy must be considered
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to consider privacy
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Authorised officers must be satisfied on reasonable grounds

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180f-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180F Authorised officers to consider privacy

180G The Organisation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.384
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180G(1) The Organisation
has part: 180G(2) The Organisation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180g
schema version: 2

180G(1) The Organisation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.384
note: Eligible persons cannot make authorisations that would disclose information about a journalist or their employer.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180g-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180g-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 180G The Organisation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cannot disclose information after a journalist information warrant is in force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal restriction on disclosure
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Restriction
premise text: Disclosure of information before a journalist information warrant is in force

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cannot make authorisation to disclose information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Eligible person knows or reasonably believes the person is a journalist or their employer.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cannot disclose information about a journalist or their employer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restriction on disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: Restrict
premise text: Purpose of making authorisation would be to identify another person

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prohibition justified by knowledge of journalist status.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Justification for prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Justification
premise text: Eligible person knows or reasonably believes the person is a journalist or their employer.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure of information about a journalist or their employer is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Consequence of prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Consequence
premise text: Eligible person must not make authorisation

180G(2) The Organisation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.384
note: Nothing in this section affects by implication the kind of person in relation to whom a warrant may be issued under this Act.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180g-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180g-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180g-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 180G The Organisation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180g-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Describes a class of persons.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
premise text: (2) Nothing in this section affects by implication the kind of person in relation to whom a warrant (other than a journalist information warrant) may be issued under this Act.

180H Enforcement agencies
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.384
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180H(1) Enforcement agencies
has part: 180H(2) Enforcement agencies
has part: 180H(3) Enforcement agencies
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180h
schema version: 2

180H(1) Enforcement agencies
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.384
note: Authorized officer must not make authorization to disclose information about a journalist or their employer.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180h-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 180H Enforcement agencies

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prohibition applies until a journalist information warrant is in force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for disclosure prohibition
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: Authorized officer knows or reasonably believes the person is a journalist.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must not make authorization to disclose information about the journalist.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Inference of prohibition based on knowledge
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: Authorized officer knows or reasonably believes the person is a journalist.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must not make authorization to disclose information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Authorized officer knows or reasonably believes the person is a journalist.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prohibition applies to all employees of the employer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of prohibition to related persons
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: Authorized officer knows or reasonably believes the person is an employer of a journalist.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prohibition applies to all employees of the employer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validation of prohibition against related persons
modality: SHACL
operator: Validate
premise text: Authorized officer knows or reasonably believes the person is an employer of a journalist.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180H(1) Enforcement agencies

180H(2) Enforcement agencies
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.384
note: Authorized officer must not disclose information or documents of a particular person if they are a journalist or their employer.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180h-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 180H Enforcement agencies

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure must not be made within this temporal interval.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for disclosure prohibition
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: Authorized officer knows or reasonably believes person is a journalist or their employer.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authorized officer must not make authorisation under Division 4A.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of disclosure prohibition on authorized officer's actions
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: Authorized officer knows or reasonably believes person is a journalist or their employer.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Journalists and employers are represented in authorized officer's knowledge base.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge representation of journalists and employers in authorized officer's knowledge base
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
premise text: Authorized officer knows or reasonably believes person is a journalist or their employer.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure must not be made.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: Authorized officer knows or reasonably believes person is a journalist or their employer.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure must not be propagated by authorized officer's actions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagation of disclosure prohibition through authorized officer's actions
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: Authorized officer knows or reasonably believes person is a journalist or their employer.

180H(3) Enforcement agencies
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.384
note: Nothing in this section affects by implication the kind of person in relation to whom a warrant may be issued under this Act.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180h-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 180H Enforcement agencies

180J Requesting a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.385
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180J(1) Requesting a journalist information warrant
has part: 180J(2) Requesting a journalist information warrant
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180j
schema version: 2

180J(1) Requesting a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.385
note: Request for issuance of journalist information warrant
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180j-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180j-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 180J Requesting a journalist information warrant

180J(2) Requesting a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.385
note: Request must specify facts and grounds for issuing warrant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180j-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180j-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 180J Requesting a journalist information warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide request details
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180j-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180J(2) Requesting a journalist information warrant

180K Further information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.386
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180K(1) Further information
has part: 180K(2) Further information
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180k
schema version: 2

180K(1) Further information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.386
note: The Attorney-General may require the Director-General of Security to provide further information.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180k-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180k-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 180K Further information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: require

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180k-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180K(1) Further information

180K(2) Further information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.386
note: Refuse to consider or take action on a request if the Director-General breaches the requirement.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180k-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180k-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 180K Further information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Refuse to consider or take action on request
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of action by Attorney-General
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Director-General breaches requirement

180L Issuing a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.386
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180L(1) Issuing a journalist information warrant
has part: 180L(2) Issuing a journalist information warrant
has part: 180L(3) Issuing a journalist information warrant
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180l
schema version: 2

180L(1) Issuing a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.386
note: Attorney-General must issue a journalist information warrant or refuse to issue one.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180l-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180l-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 180L Issuing a journalist information warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Attorney-General must take action.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180l-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180L(1) Issuing a journalist information warrant

180L(2) Issuing a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.386
note: The Attorney-General must satisfy certain conditions before issuing a journalist information warrant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180l-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180l-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180l-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 180L Issuing a journalist information warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Attorney-General has an obligation to satisfy certain conditions before issuing a journalist information warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180l-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: The excerpt classifies the issuance of a journalist information warrant as an obligation.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180l-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180L(2) Issuing a journalist information warrant

180L(3) Issuing a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.386
note: Conditions or restrictions for issuing authorisations under a warrant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180l-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180l-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 180L Issuing a journalist information warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specifying conditions or restrictions
modality: Deontic
operator: specifies

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180l-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180L(3) Issuing a journalist information warrant

180M Issuing a journalist information warrant in an emergency
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.387
note: The Director-General must issue a journalist information warrant in an emergency.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180m-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180m-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180m
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180m-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Director-General must issue a journalist information warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

180N Duration of a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.389
note: A journalist information warrant must specify a duration of up to 6 months.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180n-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180n-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180n
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180n-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a duration
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180n-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180N Duration of a journalist information warrant

180P Discontinuance of authorisations before expiry of a journalist
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.390
note: Ensure discontinuation of authorisations upon warrant expiry
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180p-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180p-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180p
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180p-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to ensure discontinuation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

180Q Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.390
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180Q(1) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
has part: 180Q(2) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
has part: 180Q(3) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
has part: 180Q(4) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
has part: 180Q(5) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180q
schema version: 2

180Q(1) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.390
note: Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information warrant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180q-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180q-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 180Q Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits enforcement agency to apply.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180q-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180Q(1) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information

180Q(2) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.390
note: Application must be made by a person or officer of the agency
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180q-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180q-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 180Q Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be made by a person or officer of the agency
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

180Q(3) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.390
note: Agency chief officer may nominate an office or position for agency management
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180q-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180q-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 180Q Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information

180Q(4) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.390
note: Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180q-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180q-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 180Q Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180q-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180Q(4) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information

180Q(5) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.390
note: Application for journalist information may be made in writing or any other form.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180q-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180q-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 180Q Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180q-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180Q(5) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information

180R Further information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.391
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180R(1) Further information
has part: 180R(2) Further information
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180r
schema version: 2

180R(1) Further information
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.391
note: Agency must provide further information to Part 4-1 issuing authority
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180r-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180r-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 180R Further information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must provide further information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

180R(2) Further information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.391
note: Breaching requirement results in breach of obligation
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180r-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180r-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 180R Further information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the chief officer or other person is in breach of obligation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation breach
modality: Deontic
operator: breach
premise text: (2) If the chief officer or other person breaches the requirement

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180r-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180R(2) Further information

180S Oaths and affirmations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.391
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180S(1) Oaths and affirmations
has part: 180S(2) Oaths and affirmations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180s
schema version: 2

180S(1) Oaths and affirmations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.391
note: Information must be verified on oath or affirmation when applying for Part 4-1 issuing authority.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180s-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180s-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 180S Oaths and affirmations

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to verify information on oath or affirmation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180s-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180S(1) Oaths and affirmations

180S(2) Oaths and affirmations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.391
note: Authority to administer oath or affirmation
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180s-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180s-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180s-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180s-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180s-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180s-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 180S Oaths and affirmations

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180s-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation of oath or affirmation administration method
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: The oath or affirmation may be administered in person, or by telephone, video call, video link or audio link.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180s-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Cognitive AI application of oath or affirmation administration method
modality: CogAI
operator: CogAI
premise text: The oath or affirmation may be administered in person, or by telephone, video call, video link or audio link.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting authority
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, the Part 4-1 issuing authority may:

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180s-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of oath or affirmation administration method
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: The oath or affirmation may be administered in person, or by telephone, video call, video link or audio link.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180s-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of oath or affirmation administration method
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: The oath or affirmation may be administered in person, or by telephone, video call, video link or audio link.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180s-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180S(2) Oaths and affirmations

180T Issuing a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.391
note: Authority must issue a journalist information warrant upon application.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180t-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180t-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180t
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180t-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Warrant issued
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must issue a warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Application under section 180Q

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180t-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180T Issuing a journalist information warrant

180U Form and content of a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.393
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180U(1) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
has part: 180U(2) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
has part: 180U(3) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
has part: 180U(4) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
has part: 180U(5) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180u
schema version: 2

180U(1) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.393
note: A journalist information warrant must be in accordance with the prescribed form and signed by the issuing authority.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180u-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 180U Form and content of a journalist information warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with prescribed form and signature
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180U(1) Form and content of a journalist information warrant

180U(2) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.393
note: Conditions or restrictions for making authorisations under the warrant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180u-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 180U Form and content of a journalist information warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specifies conditions or restrictions.
modality: Deontic
operator: specifies

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180U(2) Form and content of a journalist information warrant

180U(3) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.393
note: Journalist information warrant must specify a period of up to 90 days.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180u-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 180U Form and content of a journalist information warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must specify a period of up to 90 days.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST_SPECIFY

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180U(3) Form and content of a journalist information warrant

180U(4) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.393
note: No variation of a journalist information warrant is allowed.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180u-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 180U Form and content of a journalist information warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (4) A Part 4-1 issuing authority must not vary a journalist information warrant issued under this Subdivision by extending the period for which it is to be in force.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: No variation of a provision is allowed
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (4) A Part 4-1 issuing authority must not vary a journalist information warrant issued under this Subdivision by extending the period for which it is to be in force.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180U(4) Form and content of a journalist information warrant

180U(5) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.393
note: Allows for multiple warrants to be issued under the same Act.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180u-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 180U Form and content of a journalist information warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits further warrants under the same Act.
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180U(5) Form and content of a journalist information warrant

180V Entry into force of a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.393
note: Entry into force of a journalist information warrant
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180v-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180v
schema version: 2

180W Revocation of a journalist information warrant by chief
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.393
note: Prohibits chief officer of an enforcement agency from revoking a journalist information warrant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180w-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180w-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180w
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180w-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits chief officer from revoking warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180w-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180W Revocation of a journalist information warrant by chief

180X Public Interest Advocates
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.394
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180X(1) Public Interest Advocates
has part: 180X(2) Public Interest Advocates
has part: 180X(3) Public Interest Advocates
has part: 180X(4) Public Interest Advocates
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180x
schema version: 2

180X(1) Public Interest Advocates
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.394
note: The Prime Minister must declare one or more persons to be Public Interest Advocates.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180x-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180x-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180x-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 180X Public Interest Advocates

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180x-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a mandatory duty.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180x-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180X(1) Public Interest Advocates

180X(2) Public Interest Advocates
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.394
note: Submit matters relevant to decisions about journalist information warrants.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180x-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180x-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 180X Public Interest Advocates

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Public Interest Advocate must submit matters.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

180X(3) Public Interest Advocates
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.394
note: Regulations may prescribe matters relating to the performance of a Public Interest Advocate.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180x-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180x-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 180X Public Interest Advocates

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180x-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180X(3) Public Interest Advocates

180X(4) Public Interest Advocates
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.394
note: A declaration under subsection (1) is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180x-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180x-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 180X Public Interest Advocates

181 Uses of telecommunications data connected with provision of
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.395
note: Use of telecommunications data for disclosure purposes is permitted.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-181
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to use telecommunications data.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

181A Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.396
curation status: Proposed
has part: 181A(1) Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3
has part: 181A(2) Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3
has part: 181A(3) Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3
has part: 181A(4) Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3
has part: 181A(5) Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-181a
schema version: 2

181A(1) Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.396
note: Disclosing certain information is an offence.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-181a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 181A Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of certain information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person discloses information; (b) the information is about any of the following:

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of certain information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) the information is about any of the following: (i) whether an authorisation under Division 3 has been, or is being, sought; (ii) the making of such an authorisation;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of certain information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) the information is about any of the following: (iii) the existence or non-existence of such an authorisation; (iv) the revocation of such an authorisation;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of certain information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) the information is about any of the following: (v) the notification of such a revocation.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 181A(1) Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3

181A(2) Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.396
note: Disclosing certain documents is an offence.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-181a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 181A Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Imprisonment for 2 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of certain documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if:...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 181A(2) Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3

181A(3) Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.396
note: Disclosure of information or document is permitted under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-181a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 181A Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Indicates permission or prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: !

181A(4) Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.396
note: Using certain information is an offence.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-181a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 181A Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits using certain information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

181A(5) Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.396
note: Using a document with certain authorisations is an offence.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-181a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 181A Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits using a document with certain authorisations.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (5) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person uses a document; and (b) the document consists (wholly or partly) of any of the following:

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 181A(5) Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3

181B Disclosure/use offences: certain authorisations under
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.398
note: Disclosure/use offences: certain authorisations under
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-181b
schema version: 2

182 Secondary disclosure/use offence: disclosures under Division 4
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.401
curation status: Proposed
has part: 182(1) Secondary disclosure/use offence: disclosures under Division 4
has part: 182(2) Secondary disclosure/use offence: disclosures under Division 4
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-182
schema version: 2

182(1) Secondary disclosure/use offence: disclosures under Division 4
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.401
note: Disclosing or using information without permission is an offence.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-182-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 182 Secondary disclosure/use offence: disclosures under Division 4

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval within which disclosure is permitted.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: (a) information or a document is disclosed to the person as permitted by Division 4 or 4A; and (b) the person discloses or uses the information or document.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure or use.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) information or a document is disclosed to the person as permitted by Division 4 or 4A; and (b) the person discloses or uses the information or document.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure or use.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) the person discloses or uses the information or document.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The penalty is Imprisonment for 2 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure or use.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) the person discloses or uses the information or document.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implication from permitted disclosure to committing an offence.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
premise text: (a) information or a document is disclosed to the person as permitted by Division 4 or 4A; and (b) the person discloses or uses the information or document.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 182(1) Secondary disclosure/use offence: disclosures under Division 4

182(2) Secondary disclosure/use offence: disclosures under Division 4
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.401
note: Disclosure of non-missing person information is permitted under certain circumstances.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-182-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 182 Secondary disclosure/use offence: disclosures under Division 4

182A Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.404
curation status: Proposed
has part: 182A(1) Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants
has part: 182A(2) Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-182a
schema version: 2

182A(1) Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.404
note: Disclosing or using journalist information warrants is an offence.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-182a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 182A Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Imprisonment for 2 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure or use of journalist information warrants.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Imprisonment for 2 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implicates that disclosure or use of journalist information warrants is an offence.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 182A(1) Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants

182A(2) Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.404
note: Disclosing or using a journalist information warrant without permission is an offence.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-182a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 182A Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...discloses or uses a document; and (b) the document consists wholly or partly of any of the following: ...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between disclosure/use and journalist information warrant.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...discloses or uses a document; and (b) the document consists wholly or partly of any of the following: ...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge graph representation of disclosure/use and journalist information warrant.
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge graph
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...discloses or uses a document; and (b) the document consists wholly or partly of any of the following: ...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosing or using a journalist information warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...discloses or uses a document; and (b) the document consists wholly or partly of any of the following: ...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of disclosure/use to journalist information warrant.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...discloses or uses a document; and (b) the document consists wholly or partly of any of the following: ...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of disclosure/use and journalist information warrant.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 182A(2) Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants

182B Permitted disclosure or use: journalist information warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.405
note: Disclosure or use of information is permitted under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-182b
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Indicates that disclosure or use is not prohibited.
modality: Deontic
operator: !

183 Form of authorisations and notifications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.406
curation status: Proposed
has part: 183(1) Form of authorisations and notifications
has part: 183(2) Form of authorisations and notifications
has part: 183(3) Form of authorisations and notifications
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-183
schema version: 2

183(1) Form of authorisations and notifications
type: Concept
description: written form or electronic form
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.406
note: Written form or electronic form of authorisation and revocation notifications must comply with requirements.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-183-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-183-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-183-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 183 Form of authorisations and notifications

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-183-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide written form or electronic form
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-183-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 183(1) Form of authorisations and notifications

183(2) Form of authorisations and notifications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.406
note: Determine requirements for purposes of paragraph (1)(f)
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-183-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-183-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 183 Form of authorisations and notifications

183(3) Form of authorisations and notifications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.406
note: Must consult ACMA and Information Commissioner on privacy matters before making a determination.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-183-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-183-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-183-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 183 Form of authorisations and notifications

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-183-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must consult ACMA and Information Commissioner on privacy matters before making a determination.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

184 Notification of authorisations or revocations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.406
curation status: Proposed
has part: 184(1) Notification of authorisations or revocations
has part: 184(2) Notification of authorisations or revocations
has part: 184(3) Notification of authorisations or revocations
has part: 184(4) Notification of authorisations or revocations
has part: 184(5) Notification of authorisations or revocations
has part: 184(6) Notification of authorisations or revocations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-184
schema version: 2

184(1) Notification of authorisations or revocations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.406
note: Notification of authorisations or revocations
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-184-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 184 Notification of authorisations or revocations

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation to authorisation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEGINS
premise text: (1) If a person makes an authorisation under Division 3 of Part 4-1, an ASIO employee or ASIO affiliate must notify the person from whom disclosure is sought.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Relates to authorisation notification
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
premise text: (1) If a person makes an authorisation under Division 3 of Part 4-1, an ASIO employee or ASIO affiliate must notify the person from whom disclosure is sought.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must notify the person from whom disclosure is sought
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation to authorisation
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (1) If a person makes an authorisation under Division 3 of Part 4-1, an ASIO employee or ASIO affiliate must notify the person from whom disclosure is sought.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Relates to authorisation notification
modality: SHACL
operator: IS_A
premise text: (1) If a person makes an authorisation under Division 3 of Part 4-1, an ASIO employee or ASIO affiliate must notify the person from whom disclosure is sought.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 184(1) Notification of authorisations or revocations

184(2) Notification of authorisations or revocations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.406
note: Notification of revocation of authorisation
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-184-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 184 Notification of authorisations or revocations

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An ASIO employee or ASIO affiliate must notify the person who was notified of the authorisation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) If, under subsection 176(6), a person revokes an authorisation

184(3) Notification of authorisations or revocations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.406
note: Staff member must notify person from whom disclosure is sought after authorization.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-184-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 184 Notification of authorisations or revocations

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notification.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

184(4) Notification of authorisations or revocations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.406
note: Notification of revocation of authorisation
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-184-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 184 Notification of authorisations or revocations

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a relevant staff member of the enforcement agency must notify the person who was notified of the authorisation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: (4) If, under subsection 180(7), an authorised officer of a criminal law-enforcement agency revokes an authorisation...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a relevant staff member of the enforcement agency must notify the person who was notified of the authorisation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (4) If, under subsection 180(7), an authorised officer of a criminal law-enforcement agency revokes an authorisation...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a relevant staff member of the enforcement agency must notify the person who was notified of the authorisation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: (4) If, under subsection 180(7), an authorised officer of a criminal law-enforcement agency revokes an authorisation...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a relevant staff member of the enforcement agency must notify the person who was notified of the authorisation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: (4) If, under subsection 180(7), an authorised officer of a criminal law-enforcement agency revokes an authorisation...

184(5) Notification of authorisations or revocations
type: Concept
description: notification
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.406
note: Notification of authorisations or revocations
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-184-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 184 Notification of authorisations or revocations

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

184(6) Notification of authorisations or revocations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.406
note: Notification of revocation of authorisation
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-184-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 184 Notification of authorisations or revocations

185 Retention of authorisations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.407
curation status: Proposed
has part: 185(1) Retention of authorisations
has part: 185(2) Retention of authorisations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-185
schema version: 2

185(1) Retention of authorisations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.407
note: Head of enforcement agency must retain authorisation for 3 years.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-185-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 185 Retention of authorisations

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 185(1) Retention of authorisations

185(2) Retention of authorisations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.407
note: The Commissioner of Police must retain an authorisation made under Division 4A of Part 4-1.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-185-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 185 Retention of authorisations

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to retain authorisation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 185(2) Retention of authorisations

185A Evidentiary certificates relating to acts by carriers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.408
note: Authorized personnel may issue written certificates
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-185a
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to issue certificates
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185a-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 185A Evidentiary certificates relating to acts by carriers

185B Evidentiary certificates relating to acts by the Organisation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.409
curation status: Proposed
has part: 185B(1) Evidentiary certificates relating to acts by the Organisation
has part: 185B(2) Evidentiary certificates relating to acts by the Organisation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-185b
schema version: 2

185B(1) Evidentiary certificates relating to acts by the Organisation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.409
note: Director-General of Security or Deputy Director-General may issue a written certificate setting out relevant facts regarding ASIO employee or affiliate actions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-185b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 185B Evidentiary certificates relating to acts by the Organisation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Director-General of Security or Deputy Director-General may issue a written certificate.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 185B(1) Evidentiary certificates relating to acts by the Organisation

185B(2) Evidentiary certificates relating to acts by the Organisation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.409
note: Exempt proceeding evidence of certificate matters
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-185b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 185B Evidentiary certificates relating to acts by the Organisation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Receives in evidence without proof
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) A document purporting to be a certificate...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 185B(2) Evidentiary certificates relating to acts by the Organisation

185C Evidentiary certificates relating to acts by enforcement
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.409
note: Certifying officer must issue written certificate setting out relevant facts.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-185c
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Certifying officer has an obligation to issue a written certificate.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 185C Evidentiary certificates relating to acts by enforcement

185D Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.410
curation status: Proposed
has part: 185D(1) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
has part: 185D(2) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
has part: 185D(3) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
has part: 185D(4) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
has part: 185D(5) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-185d
schema version: 2

185D(1) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.410
note: Notify Inspector-General and Attorney-General upon issuing a journalist information warrant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-185d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 185D Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notify Inspector-General and Attorney-General
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notification obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: OBLIGATE
premise text: Journalist information warrant issued

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notify Inspector-General and Attorney-General
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Knowledge of warrant issuance
modality: Epistemic
operator: KNOW
premise text: Director-General of Security knows warrant issued

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notify Inspector-General and Attorney-General at time t+1
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation between notification and warrant issuance
modality: LTL
operator: NEXT
premise text: Warrant issued at time t

185D(2) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
type: Concept
description: Copy of authorisation
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.410
note: Must notify Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security after warrant expiry
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-185d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 185D Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

185D(3) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.410
note: Must provide report to Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security upon receiving certain reports from the Inspector-General.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-185d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 185D Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a duty to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

185D(4) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.410
note: Request for briefing from Inspector-General
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-185d-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 185D Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media

185D(5) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.410
note: Chief officer of ACC must notify Minister and Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security upon issuing a journalist information warrant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-185d-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 185D Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chief officer of ACC must notify Minister and Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 185D(5) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media

185E Reports on access to retained data
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.413
note: Reports on access to retained data are required.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185e-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185e-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-185e
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide reports
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185e-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 185E Reports on access to retained data

186 Report to Minister
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.414
note: Agency must report to Minister on authorisations made during the year.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must report to Minister.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186 Report to Minister

186A Obligation to keep records
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.417
note: Agency must keep records of authorisations and revocations.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186a
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must keep records.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186A Obligation to keep records

186B Inspection of records
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.421
curation status: Proposed
has part: 186B(1) Inspection of records
has part: 186B(1A) Inspection of records
has part: 186B(1B) Inspection of records
has part: 186B(2) Inspection of records
has part: 186B(3) Inspection of records
has part: 186B(4) Inspection of records
has part: 186B(5) Inspection of records
has part: 186B(6) Inspection of records
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186b
schema version: 2

186B(1) Inspection of records
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.421
note: The Ombudsman must inspect records of an enforcement agency to determine compliance with Chapter 4 and Chapter 3.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 186B Inspection of records

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to inspect records
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186B(1) Inspection of records

186B(1A) Inspection of records
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.421
note: The Ombudsman may inspect records to determine compliance with Part 15 of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1a-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186b-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 186B Inspection of records

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The records are related to the performance of a function or exercise of power within a certain time frame.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Records must be related to the performance of a function or exercise of power within a certain time frame
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (b) an enforcement agency, except the ACC or any agency, or part of an agency performing any functions, prescribed by regulations made under the Ombudsman Act 1976 for the purposes of subsection (1B) of this section, has records that relate to the performance of that function or the exercise of that power;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The records are related to the performance of a function or exercise of power in order to determine compliance with Part 15 of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Records must be related to the performance of a function or exercise of power in order to determine compliance with Part 15 of the Telecommunications Act 1997
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
premise text: (b) an enforcement agency, except the ACC or any agency, or part of an agency performing any functions, prescribed by regulations made under the Ombudsman Act 1976 for the purposes of subsection (1B) of this section, has records that relate to the performance of that function or the exercise of that power;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is an obligation to provide records.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide records
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
premise text: The Ombudsman may inspect records.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The records are related to the performance of a function or exercise of power and also meet certain conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Records must be related to the performance of a function or exercise of power and also meet certain conditions
modality: Diffusion
operator: AND
premise text: (a) the performance of a function, or the exercise of a power, conferred by Part 15 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 is in connection with...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The records are related to the performance of a function or exercise of power in at least one of two possible ways.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Records must be related to the performance of a function or exercise of power in at least one of two possible ways
modality: LTL
operator: OR
premise text: (a) the performance of a function, or the exercise of a power, conferred by Part 15 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 is in connection with...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186B(1A) Inspection of records

186B(1B) Inspection of records
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.421
note: Regulations may prescribe certain agencies or functions for the purposes of this subsection.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186b-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 186B Inspection of records

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186B(1B) Inspection of records

186B(2) Inspection of records
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.421
note: Ombudsman may enter premises, access records, and require staff information.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 186B Inspection of records

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ombudsman has permission to enter premises.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ombudsman may require staff information.
modality: Deontic
operator: May require

186B(3) Inspection of records
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.421
note: Ombudsman must give reasonable notice before inspecting records.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 186B Inspection of records

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186B(3) Inspection of records

186B(4) Inspection of records
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.421
note: Chief officer must assist Ombudsman with inspection of records.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186b-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 186B Inspection of records

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The assistance provided by the chief officer is contained within the timeframe of the inspection of records.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between actions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: The chief officer must ensure that members of staff of the agency assist the Ombudsman with inspection of records within a reasonable timeframe.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The chief officer's provision of assistance implies that they have met their obligation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Inference from premises to conclusion
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: If the chief officer has a duty to assist the Ombudsman, then they must provide assistance within a reasonable timeframe.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The chief officer's recognition of their responsibility implies that they have met their obligation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of patterns or relationships
modality: CogAI
operator: RECOGNIZES
premise text: The chief officer recognizes their responsibility to assist the Ombudsman.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The chief officer must ensure that members of staff of the agency give the Ombudsman any assistance the Ombudsman reasonably requires.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to assist Ombudsman
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Chief officer has a duty to assist the Ombudsman

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The assistance provided by the chief officer diffuses to the Ombudsman and other relevant parties.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of information or influence
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
premise text: The chief officer's provision of assistance spreads to the Ombudsman and other relevant parties.

186B(5) Inspection of records
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.421
note: No requirement to inspect all records
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186b-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 186B Inspection of records

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186B(5) Inspection of records

186B(6) Inspection of records
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.421
note: The Ombudsman may refrain from inspecting records relevant to the obtaining or execution of a warrant or authorisation.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186b-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 186B Inspection of records

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186B(6) Inspection of records

186C Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.423
curation status: Proposed
has part: 186C(1) Power to obtain relevant information
has part: 186C(2) Power to obtain relevant information
has part: 186C(3) Power to obtain relevant information
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186c
schema version: 2

186C(1) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
description: Information, Attendance
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.423
note: The Ombudsman may require an officer to provide information or attend a meeting.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 186C Power to obtain relevant information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Ombudsman has the power to require an officer to provide information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The officer is required to provide the information or attend the meeting.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: The Ombudsman knows the identity of the officer if required.
modality: Epistemic
operator: KNOWS

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The information must be provided within a specified period.
modality: LTL
operator: AT

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186C(1) Power to obtain relevant information

186C(2) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.423
note: Specify a place and time for attendance under inspection.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 186C Power to obtain relevant information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires specification of a place and time for attendance.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186C(2) Power to obtain relevant information

186C(3) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.423
note: Must attend, give information, and answer questions when required.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 186C Power to obtain relevant information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires attendance during a specific time period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must attend, give information, and answer questions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186C(3) Power to obtain relevant information

186D Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.424
curation status: Proposed
has part: 186D(1) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
has part: 186D(2) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
has part: 186D(3) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
has part: 186D(4) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186d
schema version: 2

186D(1) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.424
note: Must provide information despite other laws or public interest concerns.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 186D Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186D(1) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other

186D(2) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.424
note: Prohibition on using information obtained as a consequence of giving access to a document in certain proceedings.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 186D Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ... except in a proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence against section 133, 181A, 181B or 182, or against Part 7.4 or 7.7 of the Criminal Code.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlaps the information obtained as a consequence of giving access to a document with certain proceedings.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (2) However: (a) ...; (b) ...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ... except in a proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence against section 133, 181A, 181B or 182, or against Part 7.4 or 7.7 of the Criminal Code.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Restricts the use of information obtained as a consequence of giving access to a document in certain proceedings.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Restrict
premise text: (2) However: (a) ...; (b) ...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ... except in a proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence against section 133, 181A, 181B or 182, or against Part 7.4 or 7.7 of the Criminal Code.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of information obtained as a consequence of giving access to a document in certain proceedings.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) However: (a) ...; (b) ...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ... except in a proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence against section 133, 181A, 181B or 182, or against Part 7.4 or 7.7 of the Criminal Code.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Traces the information obtained as a consequence of giving access to a document through its direct and indirect consequences.
modality: LTL
operator: Trace
premise text: (2) However: (a) ...; (b) ...

186D(3) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.424
note: An officer of an enforcement agency must give information to an inspecting officer and access to records.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 186D Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information and access.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186D(3) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other

186D(4) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.424
note: Enforcement agency must provide information to a person upon request.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186d-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 186D Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory provision
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186D(4) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other

186E Application of Ombudsman Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.425
curation status: Proposed
has part: 186E(1) Application of Ombudsman Act
has part: 186E(2) Application of Ombudsman Act
has part: 186E(3) Application of Ombudsman Act
has part: 186E(8) Application of Ombudsman Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186e
schema version: 2

186E(1) Application of Ombudsman Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.425
note: Section 11A of the Ombudsman Act 1976 does not apply in relation to the exercise or proposed exercise of a power, or the performance or the proposed performance of a function, of the Ombudsman under this Chapter.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 186E Application of Ombudsman Act

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the exercise or proposed exercise of a power, or the performance or the proposed performance of a function, of the Ombudsman under this Chapter.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal exclusion of Section 11A application
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalExclusion
premise text: (1) Section 11A of the Ombudsman Act 1976 does not apply in relation to...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the exercise or proposed exercise of a power, or the performance or the proposed performance of a function, of the Ombudsman under this Chapter.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclusion of Section 11A application
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
premise text: (1) Section 11A of the Ombudsman Act 1976 does not apply in relation to...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the exercise or proposed exercise of a power, or the performance or the proposed performance of a function, of the Ombudsman under this Chapter.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to exclude Section 11A application
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (1) Section 11A of the Ombudsman Act 1976 does not apply in relation to...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the exercise or proposed exercise of a power, or the performance or the proposed performance of a function, of the Ombudsman under this Chapter.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to exclude Section 11A application
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) Section 11A of the Ombudsman Act 1976 does not apply in relation to...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the exercise or proposed exercise of a power, or the performance or the proposed performance of a function, of the Ombudsman under this Chapter.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal exclusion of Section 11A application
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalExclusion
premise text: (1) Section 11A of the Ombudsman Act 1976 does not apply in relation to...

186E(2) Application of Ombudsman Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.425
note: Exclusion of inspecting officer's actions from Ombudsman Act reference
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 186E Application of Ombudsman Act

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Ombudsman Act reference does not include inspecting officer's actions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclusion of inspecting officer's actions
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclude
premise text: Section 19 Ombudsman Act 1976

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186E(2) Application of Ombudsman Act

186E(3) Application of Ombudsman Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.425
note: Subject to section 186D of this Act, subsections 35(2), (3), (4) and
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186e-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 186E Application of Ombudsman Act

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsections 35(2), (3), (4) and
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relationship
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: Section 186D of this Act

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsections 35(2), (3), (4) and
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBJECT_TO
premise text: Section 186D of this Act

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186E(3) Application of Ombudsman Act

186E(8) Application of Ombudsman Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.425
note: Application of Ombudsman Act to this Chapter
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186e-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 186E Application of Ombudsman Act

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186E(8) Application of Ombudsman Act

186F Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.426
curation status: Proposed
has part: 186F(1) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
has part: 186F(2) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
has part: 186F(3) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
has part: 186F(4) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186f
schema version: 2

186F(1) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.426
note: Exchange of information with inspecting authority
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186f-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186f-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 186F Exchange of information between Ombudsman or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to share information
modality: Deontic
operator: may

186F(2) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.426
note: Ombudsman must provide information if necessary to perform functions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186f-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186f-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186f-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 186F Exchange of information between Ombudsman or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186f-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: OBLIGES

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186F(2) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or

186F(3) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.426
note: Ombudsman may receive information from inspecting authority
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186f-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186f-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 186F Exchange of information between Ombudsman or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: may

186F(4) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.426
note: Must provide information about performance of functions of an intelligence agency
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186f-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186f-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 186F Exchange of information between Ombudsman or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to provide information
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: IGIS official has obtained information

186G Delegation by Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.427
curation status: Proposed
has part: 186G(1) Delegation by Ombudsman
has part: 186G(2) Delegation by Ombudsman
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186g
schema version: 2

186G(1) Delegation by Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.427
note: The Ombudsman may delegate certain powers.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186g-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186g-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 186G Delegation by Ombudsman

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to delegate
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186g-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186G(1) Delegation by Ombudsman

186G(2) Delegation by Ombudsman
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.427
note: Delegate must provide instrument of delegation upon request.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186g-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186g-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 186G Delegation by Ombudsman

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186g-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186G(2) Delegation by Ombudsman

186H Ombudsman not to be sued
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.428
note: No liability for acts done in good faith while performing a function or power under the Chapter.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186h-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186h-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186h-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186h
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186h-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No liability
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If an act is done in good faith, then no liability.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Act done in good faith

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186h-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No liability
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If an act is done in good faith, then it entails no liability.
modality: Deontic
operator: Entails
premise text: Act done in good faith

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186h-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186H Ombudsman not to be sued

186J Reports
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.428
curation status: Proposed
has part: 186J(1) Reports
has part: 186J(2) Reports
has part: 186J(3) Reports
has part: 186J(4) Reports
has part: 186J(5) Reports
has part: 186J(6) Reports
has part: 186J(7) Reports
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186j
schema version: 2

186J(1) Reports
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.428
note: The Ombudsman must report to the Minister.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186j-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 186J Reports

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Ombudsman must report to the Minister.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186J(1) Reports

186J(2) Reports
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.428
note: Report must be given to Minister after financial year end.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186j-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 186J Reports

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister must receive the report.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The report must be given.

186J(3) Reports
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.428
note: Report must be laid before each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186j-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 186J Reports

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

186J(4) Reports
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.428
note: The Ombudsman must report to the Minister in writing about the results of an inspection.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186j-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 186J Reports

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186J(4) Reports

186J(5) Reports
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.428
note: Ombudsman may include report on contravention in inspection report.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186j-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 186J Reports

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide report on contravention
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186J(5) Reports

186J(6) Reports
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.428
note: The Ombudsman must give a copy of a report to the chief officer of any enforcement agency.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186j-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 186J Reports

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide a copy of a report.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186J(6) Reports

186J(7) Reports
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.428
note: Report cannot include information that could endanger a person's safety, prejudice an investigation or prosecution, or compromise enforcement agency activities.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186j-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 186J Reports

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between report and sensitive activities
modality: AllenInterval
operator: OverlapsWith
premise text: (7) A report under this section must not include information which...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of report content
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: (7) A report under this section must not include information which...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-7-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186J(7) Reports

2 Commencement
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.17
note: Commencement of the Act is conditional on another Act coming into operation.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2
schema version: 2

30 Emergency requests
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.143
note: Request for interception of communication in emergency situations.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-30-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30
schema version: 2

30 June, give to the Minister a written report that sets out such
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.355
note: Must provide written report with specified information by June 30th.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-30-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-30-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-30-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-30-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30 June, give to the Minister a written report that sets out such

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Request interception of communication.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to intercept communication.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (caller is dying, is being seriously injured or has been seriously injured)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-30-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30 Emergency requests

31 Applications for authorisation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.145
curation status: Proposed
has part: 31(1) Applications for authorisation
has part: 31(2) Applications for authorisation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31
schema version: 2

31(1) Applications for authorisation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.145
note: Request for Attorney-General authorization to intercept communications
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 31 Applications for authorisation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authorization granted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Attorney-General must authorize interception
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorize
premise text: Request for authorization

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31(1) Applications for authorisation

31(2) Applications for authorisation
type: Concept
description: Details of development or testing, functions of authority, and grounds for seeking authorisation.
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.145
note: Request for authorisation must include specific details.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 31 Applications for authorisation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Request must include specific details.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31(2) Applications for authorisation

31A Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.146
curation status: Proposed
has part: 31A(1) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
has part: 31A(2) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
has part: 31A(3) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
has part: 31A(4) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
has part: 31A(4A) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
has part: 31A(4B) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
has part: 31A(4C) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
has part: 31A(5) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31a
schema version: 2

31A(1) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.146
note: Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing purposes.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 31A Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Permission granted.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: The Attorney-General may authorise interception.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31A(1) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing

31A(2) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.146
note: Interception of communications passing over a telecommunications system except for the purposes of development or testing of technologies is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 31A Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31A(2) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing

31A(3) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.146
note: Authorisation must be in writing and specify a period not exceeding 6 months.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 31A Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation must be in writing.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify a period not exceeding 6 months.
modality: Deontic
operator: SPECIFY

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31A(3) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing

31A(4) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
type: Concept
description: authorisation
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.146
note: Authority must keep copy of authorisation
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 31A Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: authorisation kept
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must ensure
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31A(4) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing

31A(4A) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.146
note: Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-4a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31a-ss-4a
schema version: 2
part of: 31A Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-4a-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31A(4A) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing

31A(4B) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.146
note: Authorisation for interception for developing technologies or testing capabilities.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-4b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31a-ss-4b
schema version: 2
part of: 31A Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission to intercept information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-4b-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31A(4B) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing

31A(4C) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.146
note: Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing purposes.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-4c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-4c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-4c-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31a-ss-4c
schema version: 2
part of: 31A Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-4c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation is permitted.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-4c-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Includes accessing stored communications.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-4c-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31A(4C) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing

31A(5) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.146
note: Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing purposes.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 31A Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31A(5) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing

31AA Carrier to be notified of authorisation etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.147
note: Carrier must be notified of authorisation.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31aa-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31aa-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31aa
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must notify carrier
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31aa-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31AA Carrier to be notified of authorisation etc.

31AB Access to stored communications under section 31A
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.148
note: Authorises access to stored communications under section 31A authorisation.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31ab-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31ab
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31ab-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31AB Access to stored communications under section 31A

31B Authorisation of employees of a security authority
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.148
curation status: Proposed
has part: 31B(1) Authorisation of employees of a security authority
has part: 31B(2) Authorisation of employees of a security authority
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31b
schema version: 2

31B(1) Authorisation of employees of a security authority
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.148
note: Authorisation of employees for interception purposes
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31b-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 31B Authorisation of employees of a security authority

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for authorisation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: (1)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31b-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Rationale for authorisation
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
premise text: The following persons:

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to authorise employees
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of authorisation
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (1) The following persons:

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31b-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31B(1) Authorisation of employees of a security authority

31B(2) Authorisation of employees of a security authority
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.148
note: Authorisation of employees of a security authority
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 31B Authorisation of employees of a security authority

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to authorise employees
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31b-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31B(2) Authorisation of employees of a security authority

31C Destruction of records
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.149
curation status: Proposed
has part: 31C(1) Destruction of records
has part: 31C(2) Destruction of records
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31c
schema version: 2

31C(1) Destruction of records
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.149
note: Destroy records obtained through interception of communications if no longer required.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31c-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 31C Destruction of records

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must destroy records
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) If...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31C(1) Destruction of records

31C(2) Destruction of records
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.149
note: Prohibition on accessing stored communications after they have ceased to pass over a telecommunications system.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31c-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31c-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31c-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31c-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31c-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 31C Destruction of records

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal inclusion of accessed communications in stored communications.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Include
premise text: (2) The reference in paragraph (1)(a) to interception of communications passing over a telecommunications system includes a reference to the accessing of the communications as stored communications after they have ceased to pass over a telecommunications system.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31c-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Analysis of accessed communications by artificial intelligence.
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
premise text: (2) The reference in paragraph (1)(a) to interception of communications passing over a telecommunications system includes a reference to the accessing of the communications as stored communications after they have ceased to pass over a telecommunications system.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on accessing stored communications.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) The reference in paragraph (1)(a) to interception of communications passing over a telecommunications system includes a reference to the accessing of the communications as stored communications after they have ceased to pass over a telecommunications system.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31c-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of accessed communications as stored communications.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: (2) The reference in paragraph (1)(a) to interception of communications passing over a telecommunications system includes a reference to the accessing of the communications as stored communications after they have ceased to pass over a telecommunications system.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31c-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Prevention of diffusion of accessed communications beyond their temporal scope.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Prevent
premise text: (2) The reference in paragraph (1)(a) to interception of communications passing over a telecommunications system includes a reference to the accessing of the communications as stored communications after they have ceased to pass over a telecommunications system.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31c-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Application of temporal logic to accessed communications.
modality: LTL
operator: Apply
premise text: (2) The reference in paragraph (1)(a) to interception of communications passing over a telecommunications system includes a reference to the accessing of the communications as stored communications after they have ceased to pass over a telecommunications system.

31D Reports to the Attorney-General
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.149
note: Report on authorisation outcome and destruction of information
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31d-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31d-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31d
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31d-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31D Reports to the Attorney-General

31E Employees of security authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.150
curation status: Proposed
has part: 31E(1) Employees of security authorities
has part: 31E(2) Employees of security authorities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31e
schema version: 2

31E(1) Employees of security authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.150
note: Employees of security authorities are taken to be employees of the Organisation.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31e-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 31E Employees of security authorities

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: an ASIO employee is taken to be an employee of the Organisation;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes a relationship between an individual and the Organisation.
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Part:

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31E(1) Employees of security authorities

31E(2) Employees of security authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.150
note: Person is taken to be an employee of the security authority if they are a staff member and the agency is a security authority.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31e-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 31E Employees of security authorities

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31E(2) Employees of security authorities

34 Declaration of an eligible authority of a State as an agency
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.151
note: Declaration of an eligible authority of a State as an agency
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-34-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-34
schema version: 2

35 Preconditions for declaration
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.151
note: The Minister must ensure that a State's law makes satisfactory provision before making a declaration.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-35-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-35-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-35-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-35-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-35-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-35-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The report must be given within 3 months after the warrant ceases to be in force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The report must be given within 3 months after the warrant ceases to be in force.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The Minister is making a declaration under section 34.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The State's law must make satisfactory provision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Minister must ensure that the law makes satisfactory provision.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Minister is making a declaration under section 34.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-35-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The chief officer of the eligible authority must give a written report.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The chief officer of the eligible authority must give a written report.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Minister is making a declaration under section 34.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-35-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The chief officer of the eligible authority must impose requirements corresponding to those imposed on Commonwealth agencies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The chief officer of the eligible authority must impose requirements corresponding to those imposed on Commonwealth agencies.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Minister is making a declaration under section 34.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-35-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The chief officer of the eligible authority must give a report about the use made by the eligible authority of information obtained by interceptions under the warrant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The chief officer of the eligible authority must give a report about the use made by the eligible authority of information obtained by interceptions under the warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Minister is making a declaration under section 34.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-35-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 35 Preconditions for declaration

36 State laws requiring copies of documents to be given to
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.154
curation status: Proposed
has part: 36(1) State laws requiring copies of documents to be given to
has part: 36(2) State laws requiring copies of documents to be given to
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-36
schema version: 2

36(1) State laws requiring copies of documents to be given to
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.154
note: State must provide copies of documents to a specified Minister.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-36-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-36-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 36 State laws requiring copies of documents to be given to

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State has an obligation to provide copies of documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-36-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36(1) State laws requiring copies of documents to be given to

36(2) State laws requiring copies of documents to be given to
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.154
note: State must provide documents to Minister for compliance with requirement.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-36-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-36-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 36 State laws requiring copies of documents to be given to

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State must provide documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-36-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36(2) State laws requiring copies of documents to be given to

37 Revocation of declaration
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.154
curation status: Proposed
has part: 37(1) Revocation of declaration
has part: 37(2) Revocation of declaration
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-37
schema version: 2

37(1) Revocation of declaration
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.154
note: Minister must revoke declaration upon request from Premier of a State.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-37-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-37-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 37 Revocation of declaration

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to revoke declaration.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-37-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 37(1) Revocation of declaration

37(2) Revocation of declaration
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.154
note: The Minister may revoke a declaration in force under section 34 if certain conditions are met.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-37-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-37-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-37-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-37-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 37 Revocation of declaration

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-37-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The extent of compliance with a requirement has been unsatisfactory in so far as the requirement relates to the authority.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: has been unsatisfactory in so far as
premise text: the extent of compliance with a requirement

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Minister may revoke a declaration.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If certain conditions are met, the Minister must revoke the declaration.
modality: Deontic
operator: must revoke

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Minister must provide evidence that certain conditions are met.
modality: Deontic
operator: must provide

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-37-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The extent of compliance with a requirement has been unsatisfactory.
modality: LTL
operator: has been unsatisfactory
premise text: the extent of compliance with a requirement

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-37-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 37(2) Revocation of declaration

38 Effect of revocation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.155
note: Continues to apply in relation to a warrant issued before revocation.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-38
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continues obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: continues

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 38 Effect of revocation

38A Agencies authorised to apply for Part 5.3 warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.155
curation status: Proposed
has part: 38A(1) Agencies authorised to apply for Part 5.3 warrants
has part: 38A(2) Agencies authorised to apply for Part 5.3 warrants
has part: 38A(3) Agencies authorised to apply for Part 5.3 warrants
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-38a
schema version: 2

38A(1) Agencies authorised to apply for Part 5.3 warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.155
note: Authorisation for eligible authorities of a State
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-38a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 38A Agencies authorised to apply for Part 5.3 warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority to apply for warrants
modality: Deontic
operator: has

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 38A(1) Agencies authorised to apply for Part 5.3 warrants

38A(2) Agencies authorised to apply for Part 5.3 warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.155
note: Minister must authorise eligible authority to apply for Part 5.3 warrants.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-38a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 38A Agencies authorised to apply for Part 5.3 warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Declaration made.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must authorise.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Premier requests.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Eligible authority authorised.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister is satisfied.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Section (4) of this section.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 38A(2) Agencies authorised to apply for Part 5.3 warrants

38A(3) Agencies authorised to apply for Part 5.3 warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.155
note: The Minister must amend the declaration to authorise the eligible authority to apply for Part 5.3 warrants.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-38a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 38A Agencies authorised to apply for Part 5.3 warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Minister must amend the declaration.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

38B Agencies authorised to apply for Part 9.10 warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.157
curation status: Proposed
has part: 38B(1) Agencies authorised to apply for Part 9.10 warrants
has part: 38B(2) Agencies authorised to apply for Part 9.10 warrants
has part: 38B(3) Agencies authorised to apply for Part 9.10 warrants
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-38b
schema version: 2

38B(1) Agencies authorised to apply for Part 9.10 warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.157
note: Authorisation for eligible authorities of a State
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-38b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 38B Agencies authorised to apply for Part 9.10 warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority to apply for warrants
modality: Deontic
operator: has

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 38B(1) Agencies authorised to apply for Part 9.10 warrants

38B(2) Agencies authorised to apply for Part 9.10 warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.157
note: Minister must authorise eligible authority to apply for Part 9.10 warrants.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-38b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 38B Agencies authorised to apply for Part 9.10 warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must authorise.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 38B(2) Agencies authorised to apply for Part 9.10 warrants

38B(3) Agencies authorised to apply for Part 9.10 warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.157
note: Minister must amend declaration to authorise eligible authority to apply for Part 9.10 warrants.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-38b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 38B Agencies authorised to apply for Part 9.10 warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must amend declaration
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 38B(3) Agencies authorised to apply for Part 9.10 warrants

39 Agency may apply for warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.160
curation status: Proposed
has part: 39(1) Agency may apply for warrant
has part: 39(2) Agency may apply for warrant
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-39
schema version: 2

39(1) Agency may apply for warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.160
note: Agency may apply for warrant in respect of a telecommunications service or a person.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-39-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-39-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 39 Agency may apply for warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to apply for warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-39-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 39(1) Agency may apply for warrant

39(2) Agency may apply for warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.160
note: An application for a warrant must be made by an authorized person on behalf of the agency.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-39-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-39-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-39-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 39 Agency may apply for warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-39-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The application must be made by an authorized person.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-39-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 39(2) Agency may apply for warrant

4 June 2026
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.1
note: Compilation information and notes on amendments, applications, and modifications.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4
schema version: 2

4 Act binds the Crown
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.17
note: The Act binds the Crown in right of the Commonwealth, States, Australian Capital Territory, and Northern Territory.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the Crown
modality: Deontic
operator: binds

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4 Act binds the Crown

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: No temporal relation specified.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the compilation as a whole.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable

40 Form of application
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.161
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40(1) Form of application
has part: 40(2) Form of application
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40
schema version: 2

40(1) Form of application
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.161
note: Application for warrant must be in writing.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-40-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-40-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40 Form of application

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-40-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide written application.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-40-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40(1) Form of application

40(2) Form of application
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.161
note: Permits telephone application under urgent circumstances.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-40-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-40-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-40-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-40-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-40-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-40-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40 Form of application

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-40-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for telephone application
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) If the person making an application for a warrant on an agency’s behalf: (a) is the chief officer of the agency or a person in relation to whom an authorisation by the chief officer is in force under subsection (3); and (b) thinks it necessary, because of urgent circumstances, to make the application by telephone;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-40-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes classification of telephone application
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
premise text: (2) If the person making an application for a warrant on an agency’s behalf: (a) is the chief officer of the agency or a person in relation to whom an authorisation by the chief officer is in force under subsection (3); and (b) thinks it necessary, because of urgent circumstances, to make the application by telephone;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-40-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows telephone application
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (2) If the person making an application for a warrant on an agency’s behalf:

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-40-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes diffusion of telephone application
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (2) If the person making an application for a warrant on an agency’s behalf: (a) is the chief officer of the agency or a person in relation to whom an authorisation by the chief officer is in force under subsection (3); and (b) thinks it necessary, because of urgent circumstances, to make the application by telephone;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-40-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for telephone application
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (2) If the person making an application for a warrant on an agency’s behalf: (a) is the chief officer of the agency or a person in relation to whom an authorisation by the chief officer is in force under subsection (3); and (b) thinks it necessary, because of urgent circumstances, to make the application by telephone;

41 Contents of application
type: Concept
description: yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.162
note: Agency must provide name and person's name in application.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-41-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-41
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must contain name and person's name.
modality: Deontic
operator: must

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-41-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 41 Contents of application

42 Affidavit to accompany written application
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.162
curation status: Proposed
has part: 42(1) Affidavit to accompany written application
has part: 42(2) Affidavit to accompany written application
has part: 42(3) Affidavit to accompany written application
has part: 42(4) Affidavit to accompany written application
has part: 42(4A) Affidavit to accompany written application
has part: 42(5) Affidavit to accompany written application
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42
schema version: 2

42(1) Affidavit to accompany written application
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.162
note: Agency must provide affidavit with written application.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Affidavit to accompany written application

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide affidavit
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42(1) Affidavit to accompany written application

42(2) Affidavit to accompany written application
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.162
note: Affidavit must set out facts and grounds for application
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Affidavit to accompany written application

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Affidavit is required
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42(2) Affidavit to accompany written application

42(3) Affidavit to accompany written application
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.162
note: Affidavit must specify period and reason for warrant duration
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Affidavit to accompany written application

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Affidavit is required
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42(3) Affidavit to accompany written application

42(4) Affidavit to accompany written application
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.162
note: Must provide information about previous applications and warrants.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Affidavit to accompany written application

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42(4) Affidavit to accompany written application

42(4A) Affidavit to accompany written application
type: Concept
description: Details about the person, telecommunications services, and devices
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.162
note: Affidavit requirements for a named person warrant
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-4a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-4a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42-ss-4a
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Affidavit to accompany written application

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Affidavit must be provided
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-4a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Details must identify the person and services
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IDENTITY

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42(4A) Affidavit to accompany written application

42(5) Affidavit to accompany written application
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.162
note: Allows multiple affidavits with written application
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Affidavit to accompany written application

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between sections
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows multiple affidavits with written application
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

43 Information to be given on telephone application
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.163
note: Provide information on telephone application
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-43-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-43-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-43-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-43-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-43
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-43-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for urgent circumstances
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: (a) shall include particulars of the urgent circumstances because of which the person making the application on the agency's behalf thinks it necessary to make the application by telephone;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-43-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information to ART member
modality: Diffusion
operator: Applicable
premise text: (a) shall include particulars of the urgent circumstances because of which the person making the application on the agency's behalf thinks it necessary to make the application by telephone;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-43-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for matters requiring written application
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: (b) shall include each matter that, if the application had been made in writing, section 41, 42 or 48 would have required;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-43-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 43 Information to be given on telephone application

44 Giving further information to Judge
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.164
curation status: Proposed
has part: 44(1) Giving further information to Judge
has part: 44(2) Giving further information to Judge
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44
schema version: 2

44(1) Giving further information to Judge
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.164
note: A Judge or nominated ART member may require further information.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 44 Giving further information to Judge

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a possibility or permission.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

44(2) Giving further information to Judge
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.164
note: Provide further information on oath or otherwise as directed by the Judge or nominated ART member.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 44 Giving further information to Judge

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the LegalPerson to provide further information.
modality: Deontic
operator: shall

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44(2) Giving further information to Judge

44A Application by interception agency of Victoria
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.164
curation status: Proposed
has part: 44A(1) Application by interception agency of Victoria
has part: 44A(2) Application by interception agency of Victoria
has part: 44A(3) Application by interception agency of Victoria
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44a
schema version: 2

44A(1) Application by interception agency of Victoria
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.164
note: Application by interception agency of Victoria for a warrant in respect of a telecommunications service or a person.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 44A Application by interception agency of Victoria

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application by interception agency of Victoria for a warrant in respect of a telecommunications service or a person.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44A(1) Application by interception agency of Victoria

44A(2) Application by interception agency of Victoria
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.164
note: A Victorian PIM may make submissions to the Judge or nominated ART member about certain matters.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 44A Application by interception agency of Victoria

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: make submissions to the Judge or nominated ART member about certain matters.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make submissions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Victorian PIM may, orally or in writing...

44A(3) Application by interception agency of Victoria
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.164
note: The Victorian PIM may question certain individuals in the presence of an eligible Judge or nominated ART member.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 44A Application by interception agency of Victoria

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to question individuals in the presence of an eligible Judge or nominated ART member
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44A(3) Application by interception agency of Victoria

45 Application by interception agency of Queensland
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.165
curation status: Proposed
has part: 45(1) Application by interception agency of Queensland
has part: 45(2) Application by interception agency of Queensland
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45
schema version: 2

45(1) Application by interception agency of Queensland
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.165
note: Application by interception agency of Queensland for a warrant in respect of a telecommunications service or person.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-45-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 45 Application by interception agency of Queensland

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-45-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45(1) Application by interception agency of Queensland

45(2) Application by interception agency of Queensland
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.165
note: A Queensland PIM may make submissions to the Judge or nominated ART member about specific matters.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-45-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 45 Application by interception agency of Queensland

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Queensland PIM must make submissions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-45-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45(2) Application by interception agency of Queensland

45A State law not affected
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.166
note: Notification requirements for interception agencies
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-45a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-45a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45a
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-45a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notification requirements
modality: Deontic
operator: allows

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-45a-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45A State law not affected

46 Issue of telecommunications service warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.167
note: Issue of warrant for investigation of serious offences
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-46
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Issue of warrant for investigation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Division 3 has been complied with in relation to the application

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 46 Issue of telecommunications service warrant

46A Issue of named person warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.179
note: Issue of named person warrant for serious offences investigation
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46a-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46a-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46a-logic-cogai-5
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46a-logic-shacl-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-46a
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46a-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The warrant authorises interception of communications made to or from any telecommunications service at a later time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: Urgent circumstances necessitated the application by telephone

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The warrant authorises interception of communications made to or from any telecommunications service based on the assessment
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge representation for warrant issuance
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
premise text: The Judge or nominated ART member has assessed the information provided

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A warrant authorising communications to be intercepted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Issuance of warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The Judge or nominated ART member is satisfied that the conditions are met

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The warrant authorises interception of communications made to or from any telecommunications service
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of telecommunications services
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: The person is using or likely to use more than one telecommunications service

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46a-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The warrant authorises interception of communications made to or from any telecommunications service during the ongoing investigation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Ongoing investigation
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: The person is involved in serious offences

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46a-logic-shacl-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The warrant authorises interception of communications made to or from any telecommunications service based on validation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validation of warrant issuance
modality: SHACL
operator: Validation
premise text: The Judge or nominated ART member has validated the application

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 46A Issue of named person warrant

47 Limit on authority conferred by warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.192
note: Limit on warrant authority for telecommunications interception
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-47-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-47-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-47-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Interception prohibited
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits warrant-based interception without carrier notification
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: Notification required for warrant issuance

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-47-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47 Limit on authority conferred by warrant

48 Issue of warrant for entry on premises
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.192
curation status: Proposed
has part: 48(1) Issue of warrant for entry on premises
has part: 48(2) Issue of warrant for entry on premises
has part: 48(3) Issue of warrant for entry on premises
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-48
schema version: 2

48(1) Issue of warrant for entry on premises
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.192
note: Agency may apply for warrant under section 46 that also authorises entry on premises.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-48-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-48-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 48 Issue of warrant for entry on premises

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency may apply for warrant under section 46 that also authorises entry on premises.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-48-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 48(1) Issue of warrant for entry on premises

48(2) Issue of warrant for entry on premises
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.192
note: Affidavit must state why entry on premises is necessary and provide previous application numbers.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-48-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-48-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-48-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-48-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 48 Issue of warrant for entry on premises

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-48-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Affidavit must be provided.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-48-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of warrants based on application numbers.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-48-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 48(2) Issue of warrant for entry on premises

48(3) Issue of warrant for entry on premises
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.192
note: Issue of warrant for entry on premises
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-48-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-48-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-48-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 48 Issue of warrant for entry on premises

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-48-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to issue warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (3) Where...

49 Form and content of warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.194
curation status: Proposed
has part: 49(1) Form and content of warrant
has part: 49(2) Form and content of warrant
has part: 49(2A) Form and content of warrant
has part: 49(3) Form and content of warrant
has part: 49(4) Form and content of warrant
has part: 49(5) Form and content of warrant
has part: 49(6) Form and content of warrant
has part: 49(6A) Form and content of warrant
has part: 49(6B) Form and content of warrant
has part: 49(7) Form and content of warrant
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49
schema version: 2

49(1) Form and content of warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.194
note: Warrant must be signed by Judge or nominated ART member
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 49 Form and content of warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to sign warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49(1) Form and content of warrant

49(2) Form and content of warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.194
note: Conditions or restrictions for warrant interceptions
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 49 Form and content of warrant

49(2A) Form and content of warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.194
note: Warrant does not authorise interception of communications made to or from a specified telecommunications service.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 49 Form and content of warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits interception of communications.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

49(3) Form and content of warrant
type: Concept
description: Period for which warrant is to be in force
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.194
note: Warrant must specify period of force
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 49 Form and content of warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits warrant from being issued without specifying period of force
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

49(4) Form and content of warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.194
note: Cannot vary warrant by extending its period
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 49 Form and content of warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Form and content of warrant
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (4) A Judge or nominated ART member shall not vary a warrant by extending the period for which it is to be in force.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of varying warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot extend warrant period
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: (4) A Judge or nominated ART member shall not vary a warrant by extending the period for which it is to be in force.

49(5) Form and content of warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.194
note: Allows for further warrants in respect of a service or person where previous warrants have been issued.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 49 Form and content of warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows further permits
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

49(6) Form and content of warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.194
note: Definition of warrant
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 49 Form and content of warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49(6) Form and content of warrant

49(6A) Form and content of warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.194
note: Warrant remains in force despite changes to supervisory order.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6a-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6a-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49-ss-6a
schema version: 2
part of: 49 Form and content of warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Warrant remains in force during this period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between warrant and supervisory order.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Warrant issued for period mentioned in subsection (3).

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6a-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Warrant remains in force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implications of warrant remaining in force despite supervisory order change.
modality: Argumentation
operator: implication
premise text: Supervisory order ceases to be in force.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Warrant remains in force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Cognitive implications of warrant remaining in force despite supervisory order change.
modality: CogAI
operator: cognitive
premise text: Supervisory order ceases to be in force.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Warrant remains in force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continues despite change in supervisory order.
modality: Deontic
operator: continuation
premise text: Supervisory order ceases to be in force.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Warrant continues to have effect.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of warrant's effect despite supervisory order change.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
premise text: Warrant issued on basis of supervisory order.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49(6A) Form and content of warrant

49(6B) Form and content of warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.194
note: Warrant remains in force despite changes to community safety supervision order.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6b-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6b-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6b-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49-ss-6b
schema version: 2
part of: 49 Form and content of warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Warrant's temporal scope overlaps with changes to underlying condition.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (6B) To avoid doubt, a warrant issued on the basis that a community safety supervision order is in force remains in force for the period mentioned in subsection (3)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Warrant continues in effect despite changes to underlying condition.
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuity
premise text: (6B) To avoid doubt, a warrant issued on the basis that a community safety supervision order is in force remains in force for the period mentioned in subsection (3)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6b-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Warrant's applicability is not restricted by changes to underlying condition.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permissive
premise text: (6B) To avoid doubt, a warrant issued on the basis that a community safety supervision order is in force remains in force for the period mentioned in subsection (3)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6b-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Warrant's applicability depends on underlying condition's continuation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Conditional
premise text: (6B) To avoid doubt, a warrant issued on the basis that a community safety supervision order is in force remains in force for the period mentioned in subsection (3)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6b-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Warrant's applicability ceases upon underlying condition's termination.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (6B) To avoid doubt, a warrant issued on the basis that a community safety supervision order is in force remains in force for the period mentioned in subsection (3)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49(6B) Form and content of warrant

49(7) Form and content of warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.194
note: Warrant must be issued under specific circumstances
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 49 Form and content of warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Issuing a warrant is an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: ISSUE

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49(7) Form and content of warrant

4A Application of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.17
note: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code applies to all offences against this Act.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4a
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code applies to all offences against this Act.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4A Application of the Criminal Code

4B Application to Norfolk Island
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.18
curation status: Proposed
has part: 4B(1) Application to Norfolk Island
has part: 4B(2) Application to Norfolk Island
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4b
schema version: 2

4B(1) Application to Norfolk Island
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.18
note: Prohibition on application to Norfolk Island
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 4B Application to Norfolk Island

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Act does not apply to Norfolk Island.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Absolute prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (1) This Act does not extend to Norfolk Island.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4b-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4B(1) Application to Norfolk Island

4B(2) Application to Norfolk Island
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.18
note: Ceases to be in force when the Telecommunications Act 1992 (Norfolk Island) is repealed.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 4B Application to Norfolk Island

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ceases to be in force
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) ceases to be in force when the Telecommunications Act 1992 (Norfolk Island) is repealed.

5 Interpretation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.19
note: Definitions and explanations of terms used in the Act.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5
schema version: 2

50 Issue of warrant on telephone application
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.197
curation status: Proposed
has part: 50(1) Issue of warrant on telephone application
has part: 50(2) Issue of warrant on telephone application
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-50
schema version: 2

50(1) Issue of warrant on telephone application
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.197
note: Inform applicant about warrant terms and signing date.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-50-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-50-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 50 Issue of warrant on telephone application

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Informing applicant about warrant terms and signing date.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-50-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 50(1) Issue of warrant on telephone application

50(2) Issue of warrant on telephone application
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.197
note: Keep a copy of the warrant issued on a telephone application.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-50-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-50-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-50-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 50 Issue of warrant on telephone application

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-50-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to keep a copy of the warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

51 Action by agency after warrant issued on telephone application
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.197
curation status: Proposed
has part: 51(1) Action by agency after warrant issued on telephone application
has part: 51(2) Action by agency after warrant issued on telephone application
has part: 51(3) Action by agency after warrant issued on telephone application
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-51
schema version: 2

51(1) Action by agency after warrant issued on telephone application
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.197
note: Comply with section within one day after warrant issuance
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-51-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-51-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 51 Action by agency after warrant issued on telephone application

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-51-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 51(1) Action by agency after warrant issued on telephone application

51(2) Action by agency after warrant issued on telephone application
type: Concept
description: True
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.197
note: Affidavit requirement for information provided to the Judge or ART member
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-51-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-51-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-51-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 51 Action by agency after warrant issued on telephone application

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-51-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide affidavit
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-51-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 51(2) Action by agency after warrant issued on telephone application

51(3) Action by agency after warrant issued on telephone application
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.197
note: Applicant must provide information to Judge or nominated ART member
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-51-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-51-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-51-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 51 Action by agency after warrant issued on telephone application

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-51-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The applicant must provide information
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
premise text: The applicant shall give to the Judge or nominated ART member

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-51-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 51(3) Action by agency after warrant issued on telephone application

52 Judge or nominated ART member may revoke warrant where
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.198
curation status: Proposed
has part: 52(1) Judge or nominated ART member may revoke warrant where
has part: 52(2) Judge or nominated ART member may revoke warrant where
has part: 52(3) Judge or nominated ART member may revoke warrant where
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-52
schema version: 2

52(1) Judge or nominated ART member may revoke warrant where
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.198
note: Revocation of warrant by Judge or ART member
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-52-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-52-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-52-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 52 Judge or nominated ART member may revoke warrant where

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-52-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on revocation of warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-52-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 52(1) Judge or nominated ART member may revoke warrant where

52(2) Judge or nominated ART member may revoke warrant where
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.198
note: Agency must provide revocation notice to Secretary upon warrant revocation.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-52-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-52-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-52-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 52 Judge or nominated ART member may revoke warrant where

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-52-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

52(3) Judge or nominated ART member may revoke warrant where
type: Concept
description: Copy of instrument of revocation
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.198
note: Inform other agency or Director-General of Security about warrant revocation.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-52-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-52-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-52-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 52 Judge or nominated ART member may revoke warrant where

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-52-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inform other agency or Director-General of Security about warrant revocation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

54 Entry into force of warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.199
note: Entry into force of warrants
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-54-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-54
schema version: 2

55 Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.199
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55(1) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
has part: 55(3) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
has part: 55(4) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
has part: 55(5) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
has part: 55(6) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55
schema version: 2

55(1) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.199
note: Authority must be exercised with approval
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55 Exercise of authority conferred by warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (exercise)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional authority exercise
modality: Deontic
operator: onlyIf
premise text: (warrant)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55(1) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant

55(3) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.199
note: Agency may approve persons to exercise authority conferred by warrants.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55 Exercise of authority conferred by warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to exercise authority
modality: Deontic
operator: May

55(4) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.199
note: Appointment of an approving officer
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 55 Exercise of authority conferred by warrant

55(5) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.199
note: Permission for technical assistance
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 55 Exercise of authority conferred by warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a designated officer, or an employee of a carrier, may provide technical assistance to a person who is exercising the authority conferred by a warrant.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between provision and exercise
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal overlap
premise text: (5) In spite of subsection (1),

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a designated officer, or an employee of a carrier, may provide technical assistance to a person who is exercising the authority conferred by a warrant.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Application of AI in provision and exercise
modality: CogAI
operator: Artificial intelligence application
premise text: (5) In spite of subsection (1),

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a designated officer, or an employee of a carrier, may provide technical assistance to a person who is exercising the authority conferred by a warrant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (5) In spite of subsection (1),

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a designated officer, or an employee of a carrier, may provide technical assistance to a person who is exercising the authority conferred by a warrant.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Sharing information between provision and exercise
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information sharing
premise text: (5) In spite of subsection (1),

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a designated officer, or an employee of a carrier, may provide technical assistance to a person who is exercising the authority conferred by a warrant.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring relationship between provision and exercise
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (5) In spite of subsection (1),

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55(5) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant

55(6) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.199
note: A reference to the doing of an act involved in the interception of a communication under a warrant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 55 Exercise of authority conferred by warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55(6) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant

57 Revocation of warrant by chief officer
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.200
curation status: Proposed
has part: 57(1) Revocation of warrant by chief officer
has part: 57(2) Revocation of warrant by chief officer
has part: 57(3) Revocation of warrant by chief officer
has part: 57(4) Revocation of warrant by chief officer
has part: 57(5) Revocation of warrant by chief officer
has part: 57(6) Revocation of warrant by chief officer
has part: 57(7) Revocation of warrant by chief officer
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57
schema version: 2

57(1) Revocation of warrant by chief officer
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.200
note: Chief officer must revoke warrant if grounds cease to exist.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 57 Revocation of warrant by chief officer

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Revocation must occur
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide revocation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Chief officer has obligation to revoke warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57(1) Revocation of warrant by chief officer

57(2) Revocation of warrant by chief officer
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.200
note: Chief officer must inform other agency or Director-General of Security before revoking warrant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 57 Revocation of warrant by chief officer

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to inform
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57(2) Revocation of warrant by chief officer

57(3) Revocation of warrant by chief officer
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.200
note: Chief officer must inform and provide revocation instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 57 Revocation of warrant by chief officer

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must inform and provide revocation instrument.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57(3) Revocation of warrant by chief officer

57(4) Revocation of warrant by chief officer
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.200
note: Delegation of power by chief officer
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 57 Revocation of warrant by chief officer

57(5) Revocation of warrant by chief officer
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.200
note: Section does not apply in relation to a warrant that has ceased to be in force.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 57 Revocation of warrant by chief officer

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57(5) Revocation of warrant by chief officer

57(6) Revocation of warrant by chief officer
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.200
note: Ground ceases to exist if no Part 5.3 supervisory order is in force.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 57 Revocation of warrant by chief officer

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ground ceases to exist if no Part 5.3 supervisory order is in force.
modality: Deontic
operator: ceasing

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57(6) Revocation of warrant by chief officer

57(7) Revocation of warrant by chief officer
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.200
note: Revocation of warrant by chief officer
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 57 Revocation of warrant by chief officer

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for revocation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (7) For the purposes of the application of subsection (1) to a community safety supervision order warrant issued on the ground that a community safety supervision order was in force, that ground is taken to have ceased to exist if, and only if, neither that community safety supervision order, nor any succeeding community safety supervision order, is in force.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Defines recognition of revocation
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (7) For the purposes of the application of subsection (1) to a community safety supervision order warrant issued on the ground that a community safety supervision order was in force, that ground is taken to have ceased to exist if, and only if, neither that community safety supervision order, nor any succeeding community safety supervision order, is in force.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits revocation of warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Defines diffusion of revocation
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (7) For the purposes of the application of subsection (1) to a community safety supervision order warrant issued on the ground that a community safety supervision order was in force, that ground is taken to have ceased to exist if, and only if, neither that community safety supervision order, nor any succeeding community safety supervision order, is in force.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines temporal relationship for revocation
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (7) For the purposes of the application of subsection (1) to a community safety supervision order warrant issued on the ground that a community safety supervision order was in force, that ground is taken to have ceased to exist if, and only if, neither that community safety supervision order, nor any succeeding community safety supervision order, is in force.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-7-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57(7) Revocation of warrant by chief officer

58 Discontinuance of interceptions under certain warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.201
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58(1) Discontinuance of interceptions under certain warrants
has part: 58(2) Discontinuance of interceptions under certain warrants
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58
schema version: 2

58(1) Discontinuance of interceptions under certain warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.201
note: Agency must take steps to discontinue interceptions upon warrant revocation
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-58-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-58-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58 Discontinuance of interceptions under certain warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-58-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must take action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-58-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58(1) Discontinuance of interceptions under certain warrants

58(2) Discontinuance of interceptions under certain warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.201
note: Agency must take steps to ensure discontinuance of interceptions upon warrant revocation
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-58-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58 Discontinuance of interceptions under certain warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Discontinuance of interceptions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must take action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Revocation of warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-58-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58(2) Discontinuance of interceptions under certain warrants

59 When revocation of certain warrants takes effect
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.201
note: Revocation of warrant does not immediately cease its effect.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-59
schema version: 2

59A Notification to Secretary of the Department
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.202
curation status: Proposed
has part: 59A(1) Notification to Secretary of the Department
has part: 59A(2) Notification to Secretary of the Department
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-59a
schema version: 2

59A(1) Notification to Secretary of the Department
type: Concept
description: copy of the warrant
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.202
note: Agency must notify Secretary of Department upon issuance of warrant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-59a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 59A Notification to Secretary of the Department

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must notify Secretary.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 59A(1) Notification to Secretary of the Department

59A(2) Notification to Secretary of the Department
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.202
note: Chief officer must notify Secretary of Department with description of service sufficient to identify it.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59a-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-59a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 59A Notification to Secretary of the Department

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notification
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59a-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Description of service sufficient to identify it
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IDENTITY

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 59A(2) Notification to Secretary of the Department

59B Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.202
curation status: Proposed
has part: 59B(1) Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of
has part: 59B(2) Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of
has part: 59B(3) Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-59b
schema version: 2

59B(1) Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of
type: Concept
description: Copy of warrant
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.202
note: Chief officer must notify Ombudsman or Inspector-General of warrant issuance within 6 months.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-59b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 59B Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must notify Ombudsman or Inspector-General
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 59B(1) Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of

59B(2) Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.202
note: Notification of contravention to Ombudsman or Inspector-General
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-59b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 59B Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notification required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notification obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Agency officer must notify Ombudsman or Inspector-General of contravention

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 59B(2) Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of

59B(3) Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.202
note: Notification obligation does not affect warrant validity
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-59b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 59B Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: does not affect the validity of the warrant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between failure and warrant validity
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3) A failure to comply...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: does not affect the validity of the warrant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notification obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (3) A failure to comply...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 59B(3) Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of

59C Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.203
curation status: Proposed
has part: 59C(1) Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of
has part: 59C(2) Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-59c
schema version: 2

59C(1) Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.203
note: Chief officer must notify Ombudsman or Inspector-General of warrant issuance within 6 months.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59c-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-59c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 59C Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must notify Ombudsman or Inspector-General of warrant issuance.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 59C(1) Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of

59C(2) Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.203
note: Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General upon contravention
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59c-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-59c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 59C Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notification occurs after contravention
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Notification must occur after contravention
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Contravention occurs before notification

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Chief Officer of the Agency must notify
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notification obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Agency must notify Ombudsman or Inspector-General

5A Communicating etc. certain information
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.75
note: A person who gives, makes use of, or produces a record obtained by interception must provide the relevant record in a proceeding.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5a
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide relevant record
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5A Communicating etc. certain information

5AA Eligible Commonwealth authority declarations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.72
note: The Minister may declare a Royal Commission an eligible authority.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5aa-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5aa-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5aa
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to declare
modality: Deontic
operator: May

5AB Authorised officers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.72
curation status: Proposed
has part: 5AB(1) Authorised officers
has part: 5AB(1A) Authorised officers
has part: 5AB(2) Authorised officers
has part: 5AB(3) Authorised officers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5ab
schema version: 2

5AB(1) Authorised officers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.72
note: Authorises management office or position for enforcement agency purposes.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5ab-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 5AB Authorised officers

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...authorise a management office or management position in the enforcement agency for the purposes of subparagraph (b)(iii)...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for authorisation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1) The head (however described) of an enforcement agency may, by writing...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...authorise a management office or management position in the enforcement agency for the purposes of subparagraph (b)(iii)...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implicates that authorisation is necessary for management office or position.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (1) The head (however described) of an enforcement agency may, by writing...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...authorise a management office or management position in the enforcement agency for the purposes of subparagraph (b)(iii)...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Represents knowledge about authorisation and management offices.
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
premise text: (1) The head (however described) of an enforcement agency may, by writing...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...authorise a management office or management position in the enforcement agency for the purposes of subparagraph (b)(iii)...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission to authorise a management office or position.
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorize
premise text: (1) The head (however described) of an enforcement agency may, by writing...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...authorise a management office or management position in the enforcement agency for the purposes of subparagraph (b)(iii)...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagates the authorisation to the management office or position.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (1) The head (however described) of an enforcement agency may, by writing...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5AB(1) Authorised officers

5AB(1A) Authorised officers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.72
note: Commissioner of Police may authorise AFP employee to be an authorised officer.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5ab-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 5AB Authorised officers

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by the Commissioner of Police.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-1a-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5AB(1A) Authorised officers

5AB(2) Authorised officers
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.72
note: Must provide a copy of authorisation to the Communications Access Coordinator.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5ab-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 5AB Authorised officers

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a copy of authorisation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5AB(2) Authorised officers

5AB(3) Authorised officers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.72
note: An authorisation made under this section is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5ab-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 5AB Authorised officers

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Rejection of legislative instrument status
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (3) An authorisation made under this section is not a legislative instrument.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5AB(3) Authorised officers

5AC Authorisation of certifying officers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.73
curation status: Proposed
has part: 5AC(1) Authorisation of certifying officers
has part: 5AC(2) Authorisation of certifying officers
has part: 5AC(3) Authorisation of certifying officers
has part: 5AC(4) Authorisation of certifying officers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5ac
schema version: 2

5AC(1) Authorisation of certifying officers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.73
note: Authorisation to certify officers
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ac-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5ac-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 5AC Authorisation of certifying officers

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a senior executive AFP employee...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise
premise text: (1) The Commissioner of Police may authorise...

5AC(2) Authorisation of certifying officers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.73
note: Authorisation of certifying officers
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ac-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5ac-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 5AC Authorisation of certifying officers

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting authority
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise

5AC(3) Authorisation of certifying officers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.73
note: Authorisation of certifying officers
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ac-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5ac-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 5AC Authorisation of certifying officers

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ac-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5AC(3) Authorisation of certifying officers

5AC(4) Authorisation of certifying officers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.73
note: Authorises an AFP employee to be a certifying officer of the Police Force of the State.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ac-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ac-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5ac-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 5AC Authorisation of certifying officers

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ac-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ac-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5AC(4) Authorisation of certifying officers

5AD Authorisation of certifying person
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.75
note: Authorisation of certifying person
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ad-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ad-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5ad
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ad-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermission

5AE Authorisation of members of the staff of a Commonwealth
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.75
note: Authorisation of a person to be a member of the staff
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ae-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ae-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5ae
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ae-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise

5B Exempt proceedings
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.76
note: Exempt proceedings defined
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5b
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes various types of proceedings
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5B Exempt proceedings

5C Information or question relevant to inspection by Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.80
curation status: Proposed
has part: 5C(1) Information or question relevant to inspection by Ombudsman
has part: 5C(2) Information or question relevant to inspection by Ombudsman
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5c
schema version: 2

5C(1) Information or question relevant to inspection by Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.80
note: Information or question relevant to inspection by Ombudsman
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5c-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5c-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5c-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 5C Information or question relevant to inspection by Ombudsman

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During inspection under Part 2-7 or Chapter 4A
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, information or a question is relevant to an inspection...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5c-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: About agency's records
modality: Argumentation
operator: about
premise text: (b) in any case—any matter to which any of those records relates;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Relevant information or question
modality: Deontic
operator: relevant_to
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, information or a question is relevant to an inspection...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5c-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: If Ombudsman suspects contravention
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
premise text: if the Ombudsman suspects on reasonable grounds that an officer...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5C(1) Information or question relevant to inspection by Ombudsman

5C(2) Information or question relevant to inspection by Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.80
note: Nothing in subsection (1) limits the generality of a reference to information or a question relevant to an inspection.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5c-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 5C Information or question relevant to inspection by Ombudsman

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5C(2) Information or question relevant to inspection by Ombudsman

5D Serious offences
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.81
note: Defines serious offences
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5d-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5d-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5d-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5d-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5d-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5d
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5d-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: serious offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal intervals for terrorism-related offences
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Division 92A of the Criminal Code

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: serious offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes specific types of crimes
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: Division 307 of the Criminal Code

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5d-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: serious offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes specific types of crimes (continued)
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: Division 83 of the Criminal Code

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5d-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: serious offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes specific types of crimes (continued)
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: Section 104.27 of the Criminal Code

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5d-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5D Serious offences

5E Serious contraventions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.88
curation status: Proposed
has part: 5E(1) Serious contraventions
has part: 5E(2) Serious contraventions
has part: 5E(3) Serious contraventions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5e
schema version: 2

5E(1) Serious contraventions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.88
note: Serious contraventions are defined as contraventions of a law that meet certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 5E Serious contraventions

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This is a serious contravention.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of serious contravention
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: A serious contravention is a contravention of a law...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This contravention must meet the conditions for seriousness.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditions for seriousness
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: The contravention must be an offence punishable by imprisonment...

5E(2) Serious contraventions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.88
note: A contravention is taken to be a contravention if it has been committed or is suspected on reasonable grounds of having been committed.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 5E Serious contraventions

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A contravention is taken to be a contravention if it has been committed or is suspected on reasonable grounds of having been committed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The state takes a contravention to be a contravention if it has been committed or is being committed.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: has been committed or is being committed
premise text: (2) Except so far as the contrary intention appears, a contravention...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A contravention is taken to be a contravention if it has been committed or is suspected on reasonable grounds of having been committed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The state takes a contravention to be a contravention.
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
premise text: (2) Except so far as the contrary intention appears, a contravention...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A contravention is taken to be a contravention if it has been committed or is suspected on reasonable grounds of having been committed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The state takes a contravention to be a contravention if it is suspected on reasonable grounds of having been committed.
modality: Deontic
operator: is suspected on reasonable grounds of having been committed
premise text: (2) Except so far as the contrary intention appears, a contravention...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A contravention is taken to be a contravention if it has been committed or is suspected on reasonable grounds of having been committed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The state takes a contravention to be a contravention if it is being committed.
modality: LTL
operator: is being committed
premise text: (2) Except so far as the contrary intention appears, a contravention...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5E(2) Serious contraventions

5E(3) Serious contraventions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.88
note: Reference to penalty units includes reference to equivalent fine or pecuniary penalty amount.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5e-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 5E Serious contraventions

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Equivalent fine or pecuniary penalty amount
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Equivalent amounts are referenced
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: Section 4AA of the Crimes Act 1914

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Reference to equivalent fine or pecuniary penalty amount
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class/type/subclass hierarchy applied to definitions
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Definition of 'number of penalty units'

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5E(3) Serious contraventions

5F When a communication is passing over a telecommunications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.89
note: A communication is taken to start passing over a telecommunications system when it is sent or transmitted by the person sending the communication.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5f-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5f-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5f
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: takes

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5f-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5F When a communication is passing over a telecommunications

5G The intended recipient of a communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.90
note: Defines intended recipient of communication
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5g-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5g-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5g
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines intended recipient of communication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5g-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5G The intended recipient of a communication

5H When a communication is accessible to the intended recipient
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.90
curation status: Proposed
has part: 5H(1) When a communication is accessible to the intended recipient
has part: 5H(2) When a communication is accessible to the intended recipient
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5h
schema version: 2

5H(1) When a communication is accessible to the intended recipient
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.90
note: Communication is accessible if received or under control of intended recipient
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5h-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5h-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5h-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5h-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5h-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 5H When a communication is accessible to the intended recipient

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The communication occurs during the intended recipient's control
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Communication during intended recipient's control
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (a) has been received by the telecommunications service provided to the intended recipient; or (b) is under the control of the intended recipient; or (c) has been delivered to the telecommunications service provided to the intended recipient.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5h-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The communication is recognized by the AI system
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Communication recognized by AI system
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (a) has been received by the telecommunications service provided to the intended recipient; or (b) is under the control of the intended recipient; or (c) has been delivered to the telecommunications service provided to the intended recipient.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The communication is accessible if it meets one of these conditions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has access to communication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasAccess
premise text: (a) has been received by the telecommunications service provided to the intended recipient; or (b) is under the control of the intended recipient; or (c) has been delivered to the telecommunications service provided to the intended recipient.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5h-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The communication diffuses
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Communication diffuses if received by intended recipient
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (a) has been received by the telecommunications service provided to the intended recipient; or (b) is under the control of the intended recipient; or (c) has been delivered to the telecommunications service provided to the intended recipient.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5h-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The communication has been received
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Communication received by intended recipient
modality: LTL
operator: hasReceived
premise text: (a) has been received by the telecommunications service provided to the intended recipient; or (b) is under the control of the intended recipient; or (c) has been delivered to the telecommunications service provided to the intended recipient.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5h-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5H(1) When a communication is accessible to the intended recipient

5H(2) When a communication is accessible to the intended recipient
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.90
note: No limitation on accessibility for purposes of the Act.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5h-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5h-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 5H When a communication is accessible to the intended recipient

6 Interception of a communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.90
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6(1) Interception of a communication
has part: 6(2A) Interception of a communication
has part: 6(2B) Interception of a communication
has part: 6(2C) Interception of a communication
has part: 6(2D) Interception of a communication
has part: 6(2E) Interception of a communication
has part: 6(2F) Interception of a communication
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6
schema version: 2

6(1) Interception of a communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.90
note: Interception of communication without knowledge is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Interception of a communication

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Forbidden
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Interception without knowledge

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Communication interception
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of interception
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: Interception type

6(2A) Interception of a communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.90
note: Declaration of emergency service facility
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Interception of a communication

6(2B) Interception of a communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.90
note: Minister may declare premises an emergency service facility.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-ss-2b
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Interception of a communication

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6(2B) Interception of a communication

6(2C) Interception of a communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.90
note: Minister's declaration is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-ss-2c
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Interception of a communication

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declares prohibition on Minister's declaration as a legislative instrument.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2c-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6(2C) Interception of a communication

6(2D) Interception of a communication
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.90
note: Specify name of force or service and geographical region.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2d-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2d-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-ss-2d
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Interception of a communication

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must specify information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

6(2E) Interception of a communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.90
note: Revocation of declaration upon disallowance
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2e-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2e-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2e-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2e-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2e-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2e-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-ss-2e
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Interception of a communication

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2e-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The declaration is taken to have been revoked.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between disallowance and revocation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2E) If a House of the Parliament disallows...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2e-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The declaration is taken to have been revoked.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Asserts revocation upon disallowance
modality: CogAI
operator: Asserts
premise text: (2E) If a House of the Parliament disallows...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The declaration is taken to have been revoked.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits revocation of declaration
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2E) If a House of the Parliament disallows...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2e-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The declaration is taken to have been revoked.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses revocation upon disallowance
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (2E) If a House of the Parliament disallows...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2e-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The declaration is taken to have been revoked.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Eventual revocation upon disallowance
modality: LTL
operator: Eventually
premise text: (2E) If a House of the Parliament disallows...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2e-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6(2E) Interception of a communication

6(2F) Interception of a communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.90
note: Duty to intercept and record communications in emergency services
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2f-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2f-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-ss-2f
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Interception of a communication

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to intercept and record communications
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2f-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6(2F) Interception of a communication

60 Notification to authorised representative of carrier of issue or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.204
curation status: Proposed
has part: 60(1) Notification to authorised representative of carrier of issue or
has part: 60(3) Notification to authorised representative of carrier of issue or
has part: 60(4) Notification to authorised representative of carrier of issue or
has part: 60(4A) Notification to authorised representative of carrier of issue or
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60
schema version: 2

60(1) Notification to authorised representative of carrier of issue or
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.204
note: Notify carrier of warrant issue
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 60 Notification to authorised representative of carrier of issue or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notification obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60(1) Notification to authorised representative of carrier of issue or

60(3) Notification to authorised representative of carrier of issue or
type: Concept
description: Copy of instrument of revocation
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.204
note: Notify authorised representative of carrier upon warrant revocation.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 60 Notification to authorised representative of carrier of issue or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notification obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60(3) Notification to authorised representative of carrier of issue or

60(4) Notification to authorised representative of carrier of issue or
type: Concept
description: Description of telecommunications service
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.204
note: Certify service identification to authorised representative
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 60 Notification to authorised representative of carrier of issue or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Certify service identification
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Identify telecommunications service
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60(4) Notification to authorised representative of carrier of issue or

60(4A) Notification to authorised representative of carrier of issue or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.204
note: Notify authorized representative of carrier about issue of named person warrant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-4a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-4a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60-ss-4a
schema version: 2
part of: 60 Notification to authorised representative of carrier of issue or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notification obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: OBLIG
premise text: (4A) Where...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-4a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclass of warrant-related provisions
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS_OF
premise text: (4A) Where...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60(4A) Notification to authorised representative of carrier of issue or

61 Evidentiary certificates
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.206
curation status: Proposed
has part: 61(1) Evidentiary certificates
has part: 61(2) Evidentiary certificates
has part: 61(4) Evidentiary certificates
has part: 61(4A) Evidentiary certificates
has part: 61(5) Evidentiary certificates
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-61
schema version: 2

61(1) Evidentiary certificates
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.206
note: Carrier employees must provide written certificates upon request.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-61-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 61 Evidentiary certificates

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier employees have an obligation to provide written certificates.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

61(2) Evidentiary certificates
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.206
note: Exempt proceeding conclusive evidence of matters stated in document
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-61-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 61 Evidentiary certificates

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Document issued under subsection (1) overlaps with exempt proceeding
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap: Document issued under subsection (1) and exempt proceeding
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Document purporting to be a certificate issued under subsection (1)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: CogAI recognizes document as conclusive evidence
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: CogAI recognizes document as conclusive evidence
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: Document purporting to be a certificate issued under subsection (1)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exempt proceeding conclusive evidence of matters stated in document
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide conclusive evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Document purporting to be a certificate issued under subsection (1)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Document diffuses conclusive evidence in exempt proceeding
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion: Document diffuses conclusive evidence in exempt proceeding
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Document purporting to be a certificate issued under subsection (1)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Document is conclusive evidence in exempt proceeding
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace: Document is conclusive evidence in exempt proceeding
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
premise text: Document purporting to be a certificate issued under subsection (1)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 61(2) Evidentiary certificates

61(4) Evidentiary certificates
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.206
note: Certifying officer must issue written certificate with relevant facts.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-61-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 61 Evidentiary certificates

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A written certificate must be issued.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a written certificate.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Certifying officer has the authority to issue certificates.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 61(4) Evidentiary certificates

61(4A) Evidentiary certificates
type: Concept
description: written certificate signed by certifying person
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.206
note: Certifying person must issue written certificate with relevant facts.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-4a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-61-ss-4a
schema version: 2
part of: 61 Evidentiary certificates

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Certifying person must issue written certificate.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

61(5) Evidentiary certificates
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.206
note: Prohibits issuing a document purporting to be a certificate without proper authorization.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-61-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 61 Evidentiary certificates

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of issuing a document without proper authorization.
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition

61A Certified copy of warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.208
note: A document certified in writing by a certifying officer of an agency is admissible as evidence.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-61a
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision establishes a rule for the admissibility of documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Admissibility

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 61A Certified copy of warrant

62 Application of Part
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.209
note: This Part applies in relation to certain types of information, interceptions, and proceedings.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-62-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-62-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-62
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-62-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Part applies to the specified types of information, interceptions, and proceedings.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-62-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 62 Application of Part

63 No dealing in intercepted information or interception warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.209
curation status: Proposed
has part: 63(1) No dealing in intercepted information or interception warrant
has part: 63(2) No dealing in intercepted information or interception warrant
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63
schema version: 2

63(1) No dealing in intercepted information or interception warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.209
note: No communication with intercepted information after commencement.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 63 No dealing in intercepted information or interception warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...communicate to another person, make use of, or make a record of...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of communication with intercepted information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) Subject to this Part and section 299, a person shall not...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...make use of, or make a record of; or give in evidence in a proceeding...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of use, record, or evidence with intercepted information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) Subject to this Part and section 299, a person shall not...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...give in evidence in a proceeding; lawfully intercepted information or information obtained by intercepting a communication in contravention of subsection 7(1).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of giving evidence with intercepted information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) Subject to this Part and section 299, a person shall not...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63(1) No dealing in intercepted information or interception warrant

63(2) No dealing in intercepted information or interception warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.209
note: No communication, use, or record of interception warrant information after commencement.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 63 No dealing in intercepted information or interception warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) Subject to this Part and section 299, a person must not...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63(2) No dealing in intercepted information or interception warrant

63A Dealing in connection with existing proceeding
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.222
curation status: Proposed
has part: 63A(1) Dealing in connection with existing proceeding
has part: 63A(2) Dealing in connection with existing proceeding
has part: 63A(3) Dealing in connection with existing proceeding
has part: 63A(4) Dealing in connection with existing proceeding
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63a
schema version: 2

63A(1) Dealing in connection with existing proceeding
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.222
note: Communicate with another person for a purpose connected to a proceeding.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 63A Dealing in connection with existing proceeding

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63A(1) Dealing in connection with existing proceeding

63A(2) Dealing in connection with existing proceeding
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.222
note: Prohibition on using defective warrants in proceedings
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 63A Dealing in connection with existing proceeding

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits using defective warrants
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) Nothing in subsection (1)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63A(2) Dealing in connection with existing proceeding

63A(3) Dealing in connection with existing proceeding
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.222
note: A proceeding begins before a commencement if a related proceeding began earlier.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 63A Dealing in connection with existing proceeding

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: Deontic
operator: begins

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63A(3) Dealing in connection with existing proceeding

63A(4) Dealing in connection with existing proceeding
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.222
note: Conditional commencement of a proceeding
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 63A Dealing in connection with existing proceeding

63AA Dealing in interception warrant information for the purposes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.210
note: Communicate interception warrant information, make use of it, record it, or give it in evidence.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63aa-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63aa-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63aa
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to communicate interception warrant information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63aa-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63AA Dealing in interception warrant information for the purposes

63AB Dealing in general computer access intercept information etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.210
curation status: Proposed
has part: 63AB(1) Dealing in general computer access intercept information etc.
has part: 63AB(2) Dealing in general computer access intercept information etc.
has part: 63AB(3) Dealing in general computer access intercept information etc.
has part: 63AB(3A) Dealing in general computer access intercept information etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63ab
schema version: 2

63AB(1) Dealing in general computer access intercept information etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.210
note: Authorizes communication of general computer access intercept information.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63ab-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 63AB Dealing in general computer access intercept information etc.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ab-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63AB(1) Dealing in general computer access intercept information etc.

63AB(2) Dealing in general computer access intercept information etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.210
note: Permitted activities related to telecommunications interception and access
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63ab-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 63AB Dealing in general computer access intercept information etc.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM

63AB(3) Dealing in general computer access intercept information etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.210
note: Permits communication of information to a person or use of information in connection with official functions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ab-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63ab-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 63AB Dealing in general computer access intercept information etc.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits action
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ab-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63AB(3) Dealing in general computer access intercept information etc.

63AB(3A) Dealing in general computer access intercept information etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.210
note: Permits inspection of telecommunications in connection with a function or duty.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ab-ss-3a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ab-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63ab-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 63AB Dealing in general computer access intercept information etc.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ab-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits action
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ab-ss-3a-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63AB(3A) Dealing in general computer access intercept information etc.

63AC Dealing in ASIO computer access intercept information etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.213
curation status: Proposed
has part: 63AC(1) Dealing in ASIO computer access intercept information etc.
has part: 63AC(2) Dealing in ASIO computer access intercept information etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63ac
schema version: 2

63AC(1) Dealing in ASIO computer access intercept information etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.213
note: Authorises communication, use, recording, and evidence provision of ASIO computer access intercept information.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ac-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63ac-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 63AC Dealing in ASIO computer access intercept information etc.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorises action
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ac-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63AC(1) Dealing in ASIO computer access intercept information etc.

63AC(2) Dealing in ASIO computer access intercept information etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.213
note: Allow communication, use, or record of ASIO computer access intercept information.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ac-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63ac-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 63AC Dealing in ASIO computer access intercept information etc.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to communicate, use, or record ASIO computer access intercept information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

63AD Dealing in data disruption intercept information etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.215
note: Authorises communication, use, and recording of data disruption intercept information.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ad-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ad-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63ad
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ad-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation to perform an action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

63AE Dealing in network activity warrant intercept information etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.219
curation status: Proposed
has part: 63AE(1) Dealing in network activity warrant intercept information etc.
has part: 63AE(2) Dealing in network activity warrant intercept information etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63ae
schema version: 2

63AE(1) Dealing in network activity warrant intercept information etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.219
note: Authorizes communication, use, and recording of network activity warrant intercept information.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ae-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63ae-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 63AE Dealing in network activity warrant intercept information etc.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission to perform actions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ae-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63AE(1) Dealing in network activity warrant intercept information etc.

63AE(2) Dealing in network activity warrant intercept information etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.219
note: A person may communicate, make use of, or record network activity warrant intercept information under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ae-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ae-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ae-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63ae-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 63AE Dealing in network activity warrant intercept information etc.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ae-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The information relates to or appears to relate to the involvement during a specific time period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ae-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to perform an action.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

63B Dealing in information by employees of carriers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.223
curation status: Proposed
has part: 63B(1) Dealing in information by employees of carriers
has part: 63B(2) Dealing in information by employees of carriers
has part: 63B(3) Dealing in information by employees of carriers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63b
schema version: 2

63B(1) Dealing in information by employees of carriers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.223
note: Employee may communicate or use information related to carrier operations or services.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 63B Dealing in information by employees of carriers

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The communication or use of information occurs during the employee's duties as an agent of the state.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during performance of duties
premise text: in the performance of his or her duties as such an employee

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: The employee may communicate or use information for a specific purpose.
modality: Argumentation
operator: for
premise text: (1) An employee of a carrier may, in the performance of his or her duties as such an employee

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The communication or use of information is part of the employee's job requirements.
modality: CogAI
operator: as part of job requirements
premise text: (1) An employee of a carrier may, in the performance of his or her duties as such an employee

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by the state for an agent to perform an action.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: The information is related to carrier operations or services.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: related to
premise text: (a) the operation or maintenance of a telecommunications network operated by the carrier; or (b) the supply of services by the carrier by means of a telecommunications network.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The communication or use of information is part of the employee's job requirements.
modality: Diffusion
operator: as part of job requirements
premise text: (1) An employee of a carrier may, in the performance of his or her duties as such an employee

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63B(1) Dealing in information by employees of carriers

63B(2) Dealing in information by employees of carriers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.223
note: Employee may communicate information to another carrier about its telecommunications network operation or service supply.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 63B Dealing in information by employees of carriers

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: May communicate the information
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to communicate information
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Employee has lawful access to the information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Relates to telecommunications network operation or service supply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of communication purpose
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: Communication is for carrying on business relating to service supply

63B(3) Dealing in information by employees of carriers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.223
note: Employee may communicate interception warrant information in performance of duties.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 63B Dealing in information by employees of carriers

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee may communicate interception warrant information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits action under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: May
premise text: Employee has duty to intercept communications.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63B(3) Dealing in information by employees of carriers

63C Dealing in information for network protection purposes etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.224
curation status: Proposed
has part: 63C(1) Dealing in information for network protection purposes etc.
has part: 63C(2) Dealing in information for network protection purposes etc.
has part: 63C(3) Dealing in information for network protection purposes etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63c
schema version: 2

63C(1) Dealing in information for network protection purposes etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.224
note: Prohibits communication of unlawfully intercepted information
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 63C Dealing in information for network protection purposes etc.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: while performing those duties
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the timing of the prohibition
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (3), a person engaged in network protection duties...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: by that person
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes the agent performing the action
modality: CogAI
operator: by
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (3), a person engaged in network protection duties...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: may not communicate or make use of, or cause to be communicated unlawfully intercepted information
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the action
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (3), a person engaged in network protection duties...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: throughout the performance of those duties
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes the scope of the prohibition
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (3), a person engaged in network protection duties...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: until subsection (3) is repealed or revoked
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes the duration of the prohibition
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (3), a person engaged in network protection duties...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63C(1) Dealing in information for network protection purposes etc.

63C(2) Dealing in information for network protection purposes etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.224
note: A person engaged in network protection duties must communicate intercepted information to the responsible person for the network and another person if necessary.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 63C Dealing in information for network protection purposes etc.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must communicate information to the responsible person and another person if necessary.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63C(2) Dealing in information for network protection purposes etc.

63C(3) Dealing in information for network protection purposes etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.224
note: Prohibiting communication of intercepted information in a specific form.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 63C Dealing in information for network protection purposes etc.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits action.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63C(3) Dealing in information for network protection purposes etc.

63D Dealing in information for disciplinary purposes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.225
curation status: Proposed
has part: 63D(1) Dealing in information for disciplinary purposes
has part: 63D(2) Dealing in information for disciplinary purposes
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63d
schema version: 2

63D(1) Dealing in information for disciplinary purposes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.225
note: Duty to engage in network protection duties for certain networks.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63d-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 63D Dealing in information for disciplinary purposes

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to engage in network protection duties.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (1) This section applies...

63D(2) Dealing in information for disciplinary purposes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.225
note: Subject to subsections (3) and (4), the person may communicate or make use of, or cause to be communicated lawfully intercepted information that was obtained by intercepting a communication under paragraph 7(2)(aaa)
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63d-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 63D Dealing in information for disciplinary purposes

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63D(2) Dealing in information for disciplinary purposes

63E Responsible person for a computer network may communicate
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.226
note: Communicate intercepted information to an agency officer under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63e-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63e-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63e-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63e-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63e
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Communicate information
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to communicate information
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Reasonable grounds exist

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63e-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information is relevant
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Suspect relevant information exists
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
premise text: Reasonable grounds exist

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63e-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information is traced
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Trace of intercepted information
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: Intercepted information communicated

64 Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.226
curation status: Proposed
has part: 64(1) Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions
has part: 64(2) Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions
has part: 64(3) Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions
has part: 64(4) Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-64
schema version: 2

64(1) Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.226
note: Communicating intercepted information for security purposes.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-64-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 64 Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows communication of intercepted information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

64(2) Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.226
note: Communication with another person about foreign intelligence information
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-64-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 64 Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions

64(3) Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.226
note: Exemptions from subsections (1) and (2)
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-64-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 64 Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions

64(4) Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.226
note: Allowing communication of information for investigation purposes
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-64-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 64 Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifying the temporal overlap of permitted communication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: for a purpose or purposes connected with the investigation to which the warrant, under which the information was obtained, relates,

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Providing justification for permitted communication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
premise text: and for no other purpose.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to communicate information
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

64A Dealing in connection with Inspector-General’s functions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.227
curation status: Proposed
has part: 64A(1) Dealing in connection with Inspector-General’s functions
has part: 64A(2) Dealing in connection with Inspector-General’s functions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-64a
schema version: 2

64A(1) Dealing in connection with Inspector-General’s functions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.227
note: Permits communication with an IGIS official in connection with their functions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-64a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 64A Dealing in connection with Inspector-General’s functions

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits action
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits use of interception warrant information
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM
premise text: (b) interception warrant information.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 64A(1) Dealing in connection with Inspector-General’s functions

64A(2) Dealing in connection with Inspector-General’s functions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.227
note: This section applies despite any other provision of this Part.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-64a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 64A Dealing in connection with Inspector-General’s functions

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section applies
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section applies despite other provisions
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Other provision

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 64A(2) Dealing in connection with Inspector-General’s functions

65 Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.228
curation status: Proposed
has part: 65(1) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
has part: 65(1A) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
has part: 65(1B) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
has part: 65(2) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
has part: 65(3) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
has part: 65(4) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
has part: 65(5) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65
schema version: 2

65(1) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.228
note: Prohibits communication of intercepted information without authorization.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 65 Dealing in information obtained by Organisation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) The Director-General of Security may, personally, or by a person authorised by the Director-General...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 65(1) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation

65(1A) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.228
note: Prohibits communication of foreign intelligence information to unauthorized persons.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 65 Dealing in information obtained by Organisation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: communicate foreign intelligence information to another person (the second person), other than a person to whom the Director-General could communicate the information under subsection (1) or 64(2).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifies timing of prohibition
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (c) subject to the conditions (if any) specified by the Attorney-General in writing;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: communicate foreign intelligence information to another person (the second person), other than a person to whom the Director-General could communicate the information under subsection (1) or 64(2).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits action
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (1A) The Director-General of Security may...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: communicate foreign intelligence information to another person (the second person), other than a person to whom the Director-General could communicate the information under subsection (1) or 64(2).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits action
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (1A) The Director-General of Security may:

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: communicate foreign intelligence information to another person (the second person), other than a person to whom the Director-General could communicate the information under subsection (1) or 64(2).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits action
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (c) subject to the conditions (if any) specified by the Attorney-General in writing;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: communicate foreign intelligence information to another person (the second person), other than a person to whom the Director-General could communicate the information under subsection (1) or 64(2).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Specifies duration of prohibition
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (b) for the purposes (if any) approved by the Attorney-General in writing;

65(1B) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.228
note: Communicate foreign intelligence information to another person.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 65 Dealing in information obtained by Organisation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

65(2) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.228
note: A person may communicate, use, and make a record of foreign intelligence information under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 65 Dealing in information obtained by Organisation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person may communicate, use, and make a record of the information.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to communicate, use, and make a record of foreign intelligence information.
modality: Deontic
operator: May
premise text: The Attorney-General has approved the purposes and conditions.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 65(2) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation

65(3) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.228
note: Exemptions from subsections (1), (1A), (1B) and (2)
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 65 Dealing in information obtained by Organisation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from certain subsections
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption

65(4) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.228
note: Prohibition on communication of intercepted information to certain staff members
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 65 Dealing in information obtained by Organisation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the communication is for the purpose of the development or testing of technologies, or interception capabilities...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between Organisation's authority and communication of intercepted information
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (4) If lawfully intercepted information was obtained under a section 31A authorisation...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the communication is for the purpose of the development or testing of technologies, or interception capabilities...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits communication of intercepted information to certain staff members
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (4) If lawfully intercepted information was obtained under a section 31A authorisation...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the communication is for the purpose of the development or testing of technologies, or interception capabilities...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits staff members from communicating intercepted information to certain authorities
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (a) a staff member of an authority of the Commonwealth; or (b) a staff member of an authority of a State;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the communication is for the purpose of the development or testing of technologies, or interception capabilities...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits Organisation from communicating intercepted information to certain staff members
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (c) that authority; or (d) the Organisation.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the communication is for the purpose of the development or testing of technologies, or interception capabilities...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between Organisation's authority and communication of intercepted information
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (4) If lawfully intercepted information was obtained under a section 31A authorisation...

65(5) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.228
note: Prohibition on communication of intercepted information to staff members
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 65 Dealing in information obtained by Organisation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ... subsection (1) of this section does not authorise the communication of the information in accordance with subsection 18(4A)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (5) If lawfully intercepted information was obtained under a section 31A authorisation...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ... subsection (1) of this section does not authorise the communication of the information in accordance with subsection 18(4A)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the communication of intercepted information to staff members
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (5) If lawfully intercepted information was obtained under a section 31A authorisation...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ... subsection (1) of this section does not authorise the communication of the information in accordance with subsection 18(4A)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes a relationship between diffusion and the provision
modality: Diffusion
operator: doesNotApplyTo
premise text: (5) If lawfully intercepted information was obtained under a section 31A authorisation...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ... subsection (1) of this section does not authorise the communication of the information in accordance with subsection 18(4A)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (5) If lawfully intercepted information was obtained under a section 31A authorisation...

65A Employee of carrier may communicate information to agency
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.230
curation status: Proposed
has part: 65A(1) Employee of carrier may communicate information to agency
has part: 65A(2) Employee of carrier may communicate information to agency
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65a
schema version: 2

65A(1) Employee of carrier may communicate information to agency
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.230
note: Employee may communicate information to agency for specified purposes.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 65A Employee of carrier may communicate information to agency

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Agency permitted to receive information
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Employee may communicate information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65a-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 65A(1) Employee of carrier may communicate information to agency

65A(2) Employee of carrier may communicate information to agency
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.230
note: Employee of carrier must communicate information to agency under specified circumstances.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 65A Employee of carrier may communicate information to agency

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal intervals for interception
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal intervals for interception and access
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Interception of telecommunications Chapter 2 Dealing with intercepted information etc. Part 2-6

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to provide information
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Employee of carrier may communicate information to agency

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to comply with supervision orders
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with supervision orders
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: The performance of a function or duty, or the exercise of a power, by a person, court or other body under, or in relation to a matter arising under Division 395 of the Criminal Code (community safety orders).

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Recurring trace for compliance
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for community safety supervision orders
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: Determining whether a community safety supervision order has been, or is being, complied with;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 65A(2) Employee of carrier may communicate information to agency

66 Interceptor may communicate to officer who applied for warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.231
curation status: Proposed
has part: 66(1) Interceptor may communicate to officer who applied for warrant
has part: 66(2) Interceptor may communicate to officer who applied for warrant
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-66
schema version: 2

66(1) Interceptor may communicate to officer who applied for warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.231
note: Intercepted communication information may be communicated to the warrant applicant or authorized person.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-66-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-66-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-66-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 66 Interceptor may communicate to officer who applied for warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-66-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Intercepted communication information must be communicated.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

66(2) Interceptor may communicate to officer who applied for warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.231
note: Authorise in writing a person (or class of person) to receive information obtained
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-66-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-66-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 66 Interceptor may communicate to officer who applied for warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-66-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 66(2) Interceptor may communicate to officer who applied for warrant

67 Dealing for permitted purposes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.232
curation status: Proposed
has part: 67(1) Dealing for permitted purposes
has part: 67(1A) Dealing for permitted purposes
has part: 67(1B) Dealing for permitted purposes
has part: 67(1C) Dealing for permitted purposes
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-67
schema version: 2

67(1) Dealing for permitted purposes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.232
note: Permitted communication of intercepted information
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-67-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 67 Dealing for permitted purposes

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 67(1) Dealing for permitted purposes

67(1A) Dealing for permitted purposes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.232
note: Exemptions from subsection (1) of section 67(1A)
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-67-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 67 Dealing for permitted purposes

67(1B) Dealing for permitted purposes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.232
note: Permitted use of information for specified purposes
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1b-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1b-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1b-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-67-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 67 Dealing for permitted purposes

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for a purpose or purposes set out in subsection (1C), and for no other purpose...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal scope of permitted use
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1B) However, an officer or staff member of an agency may...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1b-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for a purpose or purposes set out in subsection (1C), and for no other purpose...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge graph representation
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Graph
premise text: (1B) However, an officer or staff member of an agency may...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for a purpose or purposes set out in subsection (1C), and for no other purpose...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to use information
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (1B) However, an officer or staff member of an agency may...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1b-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for a purpose or purposes set out in subsection (1C), and for no other purpose...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of information to others
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information Spread
premise text: (1B) However, an officer or staff member of an agency may...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1b-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for a purpose or purposes set out in subsection (1C), and for no other purpose...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring use of information
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (1B) However, an officer or staff member of an agency may...

67(1C) Dealing for permitted purposes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.232
note: The purposes are purposes connected with the investigation, achieving a Part 5.3 object, determining compliance, or performing a function/duty related to specific laws.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-67-ss-1c
schema version: 2
part of: 67 Dealing for permitted purposes

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to investigate or comply with specific laws.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 67(1C) Dealing for permitted purposes

68 Chief officer may communicate information obtained by agency
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.235
note: Chief officer may communicate information to Director-General of Security and Chief Executive Officer of ACC under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-68-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-68
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-68-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 68 Chief officer may communicate information obtained by agency

68A Communicating information obtained by the Secretary of the
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.241
curation status: Proposed
has part: 68A(1) Communicating information obtained by the Secretary of the
has part: 68A(2) Communicating information obtained by the Secretary of the
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-68a
schema version: 2

68A(1) Communicating information obtained by the Secretary of the
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.241
note: Obligation to provide information to the Secretary of the Department administered by the Attorney-General.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-68a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 68A Communicating information obtained by the Secretary of the

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 68A(1) Communicating information obtained by the Secretary of the

68A(2) Communicating information obtained by the Secretary of the
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.241
note: Permits communication of information to another person or entity.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-68a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 68A Communicating information obtained by the Secretary of the

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM

69 State authority may ask not to receive information under
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.241
curation status: Proposed
has part: 69(1) State authority may ask not to receive information under
has part: 69(2) State authority may ask not to receive information under
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69
schema version: 2

69(1) State authority may ask not to receive information under
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.241
note: Request not to receive information under section 68.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-69-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 69 State authority may ask not to receive information under

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-69-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69(1) State authority may ask not to receive information under

69(2) State authority may ask not to receive information under
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.241
note: Request revocation of information request
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-69-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-69-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 69 State authority may ask not to receive information under

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-69-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Request remains in force
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the chief officer from revoking the request
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Chief officer of eligible authority

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-69-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69(2) State authority may ask not to receive information under

6A Investigation of an offence
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.94
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6A(1) Investigation of an offence
has part: 6A(2) Investigation of an offence
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6a
schema version: 2

6A(1) Investigation of an offence
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.94
note: Investigation of an offence by specified authorities or agencies
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 6A Investigation of an offence

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specifies the entities that must conduct an investigation
modality: Deontic
operator: refers to

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6A(1) Investigation of an offence

6A(2) Investigation of an offence
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.94
note: A reference in this Act to an investigation, in relation to an offence, is a reference to the investigation of the likely commission of that offence.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 6A Investigation of an offence

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The text refers to an investigation in relation to an offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: refers_to

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6A(2) Investigation of an offence

6AA Accessing a stored communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.94
note: Accessing stored communication without knowledge of recipient is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6aa-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6aa-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6aa-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6aa
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits accessing stored communication without knowledge of recipient.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6aa-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies 'accessing a stored communication' as a prohibited action.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6aa-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6AA Accessing a stored communication

6B Involvement in an offence
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.95
note: A person is taken to be involved in an offence if they have committed or are committing the offence, or are suspected of having committed it.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6b
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The state takes an obligation on the person to be involved in the offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: takes

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6B Involvement in an offence

6C Issue of warrant to agency or eligible authority
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.95
note: Warrant issuance obligation
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6c
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or eligible authority must receive warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

6D Judges
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.96
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6D(1) Judges
has part: 6D(2) Judges
has part: 6D(3) Judges
has part: 6D(4) Judges
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6d
schema version: 2

6D(1) Judges
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.96
note: Definition of eligible Judge and Judge.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-5
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-6
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-7
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 6D Judges

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of eligible Judge and Judge.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The definition of Judge is based on a class hierarchy.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Judges are defined in relation to a warrant applied for by the National Anti-Corruption Commission.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The definition of eligible Judge includes a subclass relationship with the general definition of Judge.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclass relationship
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: A Judge is defined as a person who is a Judge of a court created by the Parliament.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The definition of eligible Judge includes a temporal interval.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: A consent under subsection (2) and a declaration under subsection (3) are in force for an eligible Judge.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The definition of eligible Judge includes a temporal interval.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: A warrant applied for by the National Anti-Corruption Commission is related to a superior Court Judge.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The general definition of Judge is based on a class hierarchy.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: A Judge means a person who is a Judge of a court created by the Parliament.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-7
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The definition of Judge includes a subclass relationship with the general definition of eligible Judge.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: A Judge means a person who is a Judge of a court created by the Parliament.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6D(1) Judges

6D(2) Judges
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.96
note: A Judge may consent to be nominated by the Attorney-General.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 6D Judges

6D(3) Judges
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.96
note: Attorney-General may declare judges eligible for certain purposes.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 6D Judges

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to declare judges eligible
modality: Deontic
operator: may

6D(4) Judges
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.96
note: Protection and immunity for judges
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6d-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 6D Judges

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal relation between functions or powers
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between functions or powers
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relation to
premise text: Eligible Judge has protection and immunity in relation to performance or exercise of a function or power

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Same protection and immunity as a Justice of the High Court
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Same argument for judges as for Justices of the High Court
modality: Argumentation
operator: same
premise text: Protection and immunity for judges

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: CogAI's understanding of protection and immunity for judges
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: CogAI's understanding of protection and immunity for judges
modality: CogAI
operator: relation to
premise text: Eligible Judge has protection and immunity in relation to performance or exercise of a function or power

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Protection and immunity for judges
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: Eligible Judge has protection and immunity

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Diffusion of protection and immunity
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of protection and immunity
modality: Diffusion
operator: relation to
premise text: Eligible Judge has protection and immunity in relation to performance or exercise of a function or power

6DA Nominated ART members
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.96
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6DA(1) Nominated ART members
has part: 6DA(2) Nominated ART members
has part: 6DA(3) Nominated ART members
has part: 6DA(4) Nominated ART members
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6da
schema version: 2

6DA(1) Nominated ART members
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.96
note: The Attorney-General may nominate a person to issue warrants.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6da-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 6DA Nominated ART members

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6DA(1) Nominated ART members

6DA(2) Nominated ART members
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.96
note: Cannot nominate a person without being enrolled as a legal practitioner for at least 5 years.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6da-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 6DA Nominated ART members

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (b) has been so enrolled...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval requirement for enrollment
modality: AllenInterval
operator: for-not-less-than-5-years
premise text: (b) has been so enrolled for not less than 5 years.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) is enrolled as a legal practitioner...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of nomination without proper qualifications
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: (2) Despite subsection (1)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (b) has been so enrolled...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory enrollment requirement for nomination
modality: Deontic
operator: must-be-enrolled-as
premise text: (a) is enrolled as a legal practitioner...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person: (a) is enrolled as a legal practitioner...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Nomination restriction based on enrollment status
modality: Deontic
operator: must-not-nominate-unless
premise text: (2) Despite subsection (1)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (b) has been so enrolled...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval requirement for enrollment
modality: LTL
operator: for-not-less-than-5-years
premise text: (b) has been so enrolled for not less than 5 years.

6DA(3) Nominated ART members
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.96
note: Nomination ceases if nominated ART member ceases to hold appointment or Attorney-General withdraws nomination.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-3-logic-ltl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6da-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 6DA Nominated ART members

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Nomination and ceasing to have effect overlap in time
modality: AllenInterval
operator: OVERLAPS
premise text: (3) A nomination ceases to have effect if... (a) the nominated ART member ceases to hold an appointment...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Nomination ceases
modality: Deontic
operator: CEASES
premise text: (3) A nomination ceases to have effect if...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Attorney-General can withdraw nomination
modality: Deontic
operator: WITHDRAWAL
premise text: (3) A nomination ceases to have effect if... or (b) the Attorney-General, by writing, withdraws the nomination.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Nomination ceases if nominated ART member ceases to hold appointment
modality: Deontic
operator: CEASES_OF_APPOINTMENT
premise text: (3) A nomination ceases to have effect if... (a) the nominated ART member ceases to hold an appointment...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-3-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Nomination is contained in ceasing to have effect
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (3) A nomination ceases to have effect if... (a) the nominated ART member ceases to hold an appointment...

6DA(4) Nominated ART members
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.96
note: Protection and immunity for nominated ART members issuing warrants
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6da-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 6DA Nominated ART members

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: same protection and immunity as a Justice of the High Court
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Performing a function of or connected with issuing a warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: same protection and immunity as a Justice of the High Court
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Protection and immunity
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: ART member performing a function

6DB Issuing authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.97
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6DB(1) Issuing authorities
has part: 6DB(2) Issuing authorities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6db
schema version: 2

6DB(1) Issuing authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.97
note: The Attorney-General may appoint a person as an issuing authority.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6db-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6db-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6db-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 6DB Issuing authorities

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6db-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6db-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6DB(1) Issuing authorities

6DB(2) Issuing authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.97
note: A person who is a judge of a court created by the Parliament or a magistrate must issue an authority.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6db-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6db-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6db-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6db-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6db-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6db-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 6DB Issuing authorities

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6db-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The authority must be issued within a certain time frame.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The authority must be issued within a certain time frame.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: The person is a judge of a court created by the Parliament or a magistrate.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6db-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: They must issue an authority.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must issue an authority.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The person is a judge of a court created by the Parliament or a magistrate.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6db-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: They must be a judge of a court created by the Parliament or a magistrate.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be a judge of a court created by the Parliament or a magistrate.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The person is a judge of a court created by the Parliament or a magistrate.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6db-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The authority must be issued within a certain time frame.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The authority must be issued within a certain time frame.
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: The person is a judge of a court created by the Parliament or a magistrate.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6db-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6DB(2) Issuing authorities

6DC Part 4-1 issuing authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.98
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6DC(1) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
has part: 6DC(2) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
has part: 6DC(3) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
has part: 6DC(4) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6dc
schema version: 2

6DC(1) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.98
note: The Attorney-General may appoint a person as a Part 4-1 issuing authority.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6dc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 6DC Part 4-1 issuing authorities

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6DC(1) Part 4-1 issuing authorities

6DC(2) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.98
note: Consent to be appointed by the Attorney-General
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6dc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 6DC Part 4-1 issuing authorities

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6DC(2) Part 4-1 issuing authorities

6DC(3) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.98
note: Appointment ceases if person is no longer eligible for appointment by Attorney-General.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6dc-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 6DC Part 4-1 issuing authorities

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General, by writing, revokes the appointment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal overlap between appointment and eligibility.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3) A person’s appointment ceases to have effect...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General, by writing, revokes the appointment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits appointment if person is no longer eligible.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (3) A person’s appointment ceases to have effect...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General, by writing, revokes the appointment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes duty on Attorney-General to revoke appointment if person is no longer eligible.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (3) A person’s appointment ceases to have effect...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General, by writing, revokes the appointment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission to Attorney-General to revoke appointment if person is no longer eligible.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (3) A person’s appointment ceases to have effect...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General, by writing, revokes the appointment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines temporal relationship between appointment and eligibility.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (3) A person’s appointment ceases to have effect...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6DC(3) Part 4-1 issuing authorities

6DC(4) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.98
note: Part 4-1 issuing authorities have the same protection and immunity as a Justice of the High Court.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6dc-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 6DC Part 4-1 issuing authorities

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Protection and immunity
modality: Deontic
operator: has

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6DC(4) Part 4-1 issuing authorities

6E Lawfully intercepted information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.99
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6E(1) Lawfully intercepted information
has part: 6E(2) Lawfully intercepted information
has part: 6E(2A) Lawfully intercepted information
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6e
schema version: 2

6E(1) Lawfully intercepted information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.99
note: Lawfully intercepted information is defined as information obtained by intercepting a communication passing over a telecommunications system without contravening subsection 7(1).
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 6E Lawfully intercepted information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the term 'lawfully intercepted information'
modality: Deontic
operator: Definition

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6E(1) Lawfully intercepted information

6E(2) Lawfully intercepted information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.99
note: Lawfully intercepted information must be referred to as obtained through intercepting a communication under a warrant or in accordance with section 65A or 63E.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 6E Lawfully intercepted information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision imposes a duty on the agency or authority to refer to lawfully intercepted information in a specific way.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6E(2) Lawfully intercepted information

6E(2A) Lawfully intercepted information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.99
note: Definition of lawfully intercepted information includes information obtained by accessing a stored communication under a section 31A authorisation.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2a-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2a-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2a-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6e-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 6E Lawfully intercepted information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Lawfully intercepted information
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Definition of lawfully intercepted information includes
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
premise text: Information obtained by accessing a stored communication under a section 31A authorisation.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2a-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Lawfully intercepted information
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Definition of lawfully intercepted information includes
modality: CogAI
operator: includes
premise text: Information obtained by accessing a stored communication under a section 31A authorisation.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Lawfully intercepted information
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of lawfully intercepted information includes
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: Information obtained by accessing a stored communication under a section 31A authorisation.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Lawfully intercepted information
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Definition of lawfully intercepted information includes
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
premise text: Information obtained by accessing a stored communication under a section 31A authorisation.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2a-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Lawfully intercepted information
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Definition of lawfully intercepted information includes
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
premise text: Information obtained by accessing a stored communication under a section 31A authorisation.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2a-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Lawfully intercepted information
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Definition of lawfully intercepted information includes
modality: LTL
operator: includes
premise text: Information obtained by accessing a stored communication under a section 31A authorisation.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6E(2A) Lawfully intercepted information

6EA Interception warrant information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.100
note: Reference to interception warrant information includes details about applications, warrants, and their existence/non-existence.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ea-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ea-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6ea
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ea-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Describes the content of an interception warrant information reference.
modality: Deontic
operator: refers to

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ea-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6EA Interception warrant information

6EB Stored communications warrant information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.101
note: Provides definition for stored communications warrant information
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6eb-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6eb
schema version: 2

6F Offences
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.101
note: Reference to an offence is a reference to an offence that has been committed or is suspected on reasonable grounds of having been committed.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6f-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6f-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6f-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6f
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6f-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The offence occurred during the period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The offence has been committed during the period.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The reference is to the offence of that kind.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reference relation
modality: Deontic
operator: refers to
premise text: An offence is referred to as an offence of that kind.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6f-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6F Offences

6G Officer of the Commonwealth, of a State or of a Territory
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.102
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6G(1) Officer of the Commonwealth, of a State or of a Territory
has part: 6G(2) Officer of the Commonwealth, of a State or of a Territory
has part: 6G(3) Officer of the Commonwealth, of a State or of a Territory
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6g
schema version: 2

6G(1) Officer of the Commonwealth, of a State or of a Territory
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.102
note: Defines who is considered an officer of the Commonwealth
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6g-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 6G Officer of the Commonwealth, of a State or of a Territory

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...an officer who is, or was, employed under a law of the Commonwealth
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for officers
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
premise text: A reference to an officer of the Australian Capital Territory includes...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a person who is, or is a member of, an authority or body established for a public purpose
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes a duty to include certain individuals in the definition
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: A reference to an officer of the Commonwealth includes...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...an officer of the Northern Territory or of an external Territory
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes a duty to exclude certain individuals from the definition
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: A reference to an officer of the Commonwealth does not include...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...an officer of the Australian Capital Territory
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes a duty to include certain individuals in the definition
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: A reference to an officer of the Commonwealth includes...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...an officer of the Northern Territory
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes a duty to exclude certain individuals from the definition
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: A reference to an officer of the Commonwealth does not include...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a person holding an office or appointment
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Identifies a specific class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: An officer of the Commonwealth includes...

6G(2) Officer of the Commonwealth, of a State or of a Territory
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.102
note: Reference to an officer of a State includes references to certain individuals or authorities.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6g-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 6G Officer of the Commonwealth, of a State or of a Territory

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reference to an officer of a State includes references to certain individuals or authorities.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: includes
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: State

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is a member of
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Authority or body
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: authority or body established for a public purpose by or under a law of the State

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6G(2) Officer of the Commonwealth, of a State or of a Territory

6G(3) Officer of the Commonwealth, of a State or of a Territory
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.102
note: Reference to an officer of a Territory includes a person holding or acting in an office or appointment, or employed under a law of the Territory.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-3-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6g-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 6G Officer of the Commonwealth, of a State or of a Territory

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This person is included in the temporal interval of the reference.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
premise text: A reference in this Act to an officer of a Territory includes a person holding or acting in an office or appointment, or employed under a law of the Territory.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This person is subject to the duty of being included in the reference.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty relation
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: A reference in this Act to an officer of a Territory includes a person holding or acting in an office or appointment, or employed under a law of the Territory.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-3-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This person is subject to the duty of being included in the reference.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty relation
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: A reference in this Act to an officer of a Territory includes a person who is or is a member of an authority or body established for a public purpose by or under a law of the Territory.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Reference to an officer of a Territory includes this person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Person holding or acting in an office or appointment, or employed under a law of the Territory.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Reference to an officer of a Territory includes this person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Person who is or is a member of an authority or body established for a public purpose by or under a law of the Territory.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This person is included in the recurring trace of the reference.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace relation
modality: LTL
operator: includes
premise text: A reference in this Act to an officer of a Territory includes a person holding or acting in an office or appointment, or employed under a law of the Territory.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6G(3) Officer of the Commonwealth, of a State or of a Territory

6H Person to whom application relates
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.103
note: Information must be provided to satisfy the Judge or nominated ART member about a particular person.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6h-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6h-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6h
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6h-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6h-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6H Person to whom application relates

6J Proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.103
note: A reference in this Act to a proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence includes a reference to a proceeding with a view to the committal of a person for trial for the offence.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6j-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6j-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6j-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6j-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6j-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6j-logic-deontic-5
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6j-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6j
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6j-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The interval includes a reference to a proceeding with a view to the committal of a person for trial for the offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Includes a reference to a proceeding with a view to the committal of a person for trial for the offence.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
premise text: A proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence includes a proceeding with a view to the committal of a person for trial for the offence.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6j-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The reference includes a proceeding with a view to the committal of a person for trial for the offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes a reference to a proceeding with a view to the committal of a person for trial for the offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: A proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence includes a proceeding with a view to the committal of a person for trial for the offence.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6j-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The obligation includes a reference to a proceeding with a view to the committal of a person for trial for the offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes a reference to a proceeding with a view to the committal of a person for trial for the offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: A proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence includes a proceeding with a view to the committal of a person for trial for the offence.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6j-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The duty includes a reference to a proceeding with a view to the committal of a person for trial for the offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes a reference to a proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: A proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence includes a proceeding with a view to the committal of a person for trial for the offence.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6j-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The description includes a reference to a proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Includes a reference to a proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
premise text: A proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence includes a proceeding with a view to the committal of a person for trial for the offence.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6j-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The trace includes a reference to a proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Includes a reference to a proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence.
modality: LTL
operator: includes
premise text: A proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence includes a proceeding with a view to the committal of a person for trial for the offence.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6j-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6J Proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence

6K Proceeding for confiscation or forfeiture or for pecuniary
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.103
note: Reference to confiscation or forfeiture proceedings includes condemnation or recovery of seized goods.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6k-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6k-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6k-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6k
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6k-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion relation for prohibitions
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6k-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of goods as subject to confiscation
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf

6L Relevant proceeding
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.104
note: A reference to a relevant proceeding is defined as a prosecution, confiscation, forfeiture, pecuniary penalty, taking of evidence, extradition, police disciplinary proceeding, or other proceeding related to alleged misbehaviour.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6l-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6l-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6l
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6l-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The key refers to a relevant proceeding.
modality: Deontic
operator: refers_to

6M Terminating the appointment of an officer
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.107
note: Terminating appointment of officer due to misbehaviour or improper conduct
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6m-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6m-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6m-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6m
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6m-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits terminating appointment of officer
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6m-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies as prohibition
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6m-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6M Terminating the appointment of an officer

6N Declaration of staff members of State Police Forces
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.108
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6N(1) Declaration of staff members of State Police Forces
has part: 6N(2) Declaration of staff members of State Police Forces
has part: 6N(3) Declaration of staff members of State Police Forces
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6n
schema version: 2

6N(1) Declaration of staff members of State Police Forces
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.108
note: This section applies to an agency that is the Police Force of a State.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6n-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6n-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 6N Declaration of staff members of State Police Forces

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section applies to an agency
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6n-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6N(1) Declaration of staff members of State Police Forces

6N(2) Declaration of staff members of State Police Forces
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.108
note: The Minister must make a written declaration about staff members of State Police Forces.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6n-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6n-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6n-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 6N Declaration of staff members of State Police Forces

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Minister has an obligation to make a written declaration.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6n-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Staff members of State Police Forces are included in the specified class of members.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion

6N(3) Declaration of staff members of State Police Forces
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.108
note: Staff members of State Police Forces are referred to as staff members in relation to the agency concerned.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6n-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6n-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6n-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 6N Declaration of staff members of State Police Forces

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Referral of staff members as staff members.
modality: Deontic
operator: refers_to

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6n-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Staff members are a subclass of agency personnel.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is_a

6P Identification of service
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.108
note: Service identification requirements
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6p-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6p
schema version: 2

6Q Identification of telecommunications device
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.108
note: A telecommunications device may be identified by a unique number or factor.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6q-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6q-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6q-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6q
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6q-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between device assignments
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6q-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: A telecommunications device may be identified by a unique number or factor.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6q-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6Q Identification of telecommunications device

6R Communications Access Coordinator
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.108
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6R(1) Communications Access Coordinator
has part: 6R(2) Communications Access Coordinator
has part: 6R(2A) Communications Access Coordinator
has part: 6R(2B) Communications Access Coordinator
has part: 6R(2C) Communications Access Coordinator
has part: 6R(3) Communications Access Coordinator
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6r
schema version: 2

6R(1) Communications Access Coordinator
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.108
note: Definition of Communications Access Coordinator
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6r-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 6R Communications Access Coordinator

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Secretary of the Department...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Communications Access Coordinator means...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a person or body.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: ...if a person or body is covered by an instrument made under subsection (2)—that person or body.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6R(1) Communications Access Coordinator

6R(2) Communications Access Coordinator
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.108
note: Specify persons or bodies for Communications Access Coordinator purposes
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6r-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 6R Communications Access Coordinator

6R(2A) Communications Access Coordinator
type: Concept
description: Functions or powers
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.108
note: Minister must specify APS employees in an instrument
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6r-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 6R Communications Access Coordinator

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must specify APS employees
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Specify certain functions or powers
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SPECIFY

6R(2B) Communications Access Coordinator
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.108
note: Must specify functions or powers of a Communications Access Coordinator
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2b-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6r-ss-2b
schema version: 2
part of: 6R Communications Access Coordinator

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify functions or powers
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2b-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Functions or powers of a Communications Access Coordinator
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SPECIFY

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6R(2B) Communications Access Coordinator

6R(2C) Communications Access Coordinator
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.108
note: Restricts performance of functions or exercise of powers to those specified in an instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2c-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6r-ss-2c
schema version: 2
part of: 6R Communications Access Coordinator

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...may only perform the functions...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limits actions to specific ones.
modality: Deontic
operator: Restrict
premise text: (2C) A person or body...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2c-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or class of persons or bodies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines a class of persons or bodies.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
premise text: (2C) A person or body...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6R(2C) Communications Access Coordinator

6R(3) Communications Access Coordinator
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.108
note: Act done by or in relation to the Coordinator is taken to be an act done on behalf of all agencies.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6r-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 6R Communications Access Coordinator

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: All acts done by or in relation to the Coordinator are acts done on behalf of all agencies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Extension principle
modality: Deontic
operator: extension
premise text: Act done by or in relation to the Coordinator is an act done on behalf of all agencies.

6S Permitted purposes—integrity purposes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.109
note: Permitted purposes for integrity purposes
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6s-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6s
schema version: 2

6T When a Part 5.3 supervisory order is taken to be in force
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.111
note: A Part 5.3 supervisory order is taken to be in force in relation to a person if certain conditions are met.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6t-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6t-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6t-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6t-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6t-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6t-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6t
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6t-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The order is taken to be in force during the period of detention.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for detention
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: ...the person is detained in custody in a prison...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6t-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The order is taken to be in force in relation to the person.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: The order is a control order that has been made but has not yet come into force.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6t-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The order is taken to be in force if the person is detained in custody.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Alternative condition for detention
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: ...the person is detained in custody in a prison...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6t-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The order is taken to be in force if the order is an extended supervision order or an interim supervision order.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Alternative condition for extended supervision order
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: ...the order is an extended supervision order or an interim supervision order...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6t-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The order is taken to be in force until the end of the specified period.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for supervision order
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: ...the period specified in the order under paragraph 105A.7A(4)(d) or...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6t-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6T When a Part 5.3 supervisory order is taken to be in force

6U Succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory orders
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.112
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6U(1) Succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory orders
has part: 6U(2) Succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory orders
has part: 6U(3) Succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6u
schema version: 2

6U(1) Succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory orders
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.112
note: Each later control order is a succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order in relation to each earlier control order.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6u-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 6U Succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory orders

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Confirmed control order overlaps with interim control order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The confirmed control order overlaps with the interim control order.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Interim control order and confirmed control order

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Confirmed control order is inferred from interim control order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The confirmed control order is inferred from the interim control order.
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
premise text: Interim control order

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Confirmed control order is a succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If an interim control order is confirmed, the confirmed control order is a succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order in relation to the interim control order.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implication
premise text: Interim control order confirmed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Confirmed control order diffuses to earlier control order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The confirmed control order diffuses to the earlier control order.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Earlier control order

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Confirmed control order is a succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order until next control order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The confirmed control order is a succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order until the next control order.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: Next control order

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6U(1) Succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory orders

6U(2) Succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory orders
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.112
note: A succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order is a later extended supervision order in relation to an earlier interim supervision order.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6u-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 6U Succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory orders

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order is made during the extended supervision order in relation to the person.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: extended supervision order

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order is recognized by the State as a later extended supervision order in relation to the person.
modality: CogAI
operator: cognizes
premise text: State

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If an interim supervision order is made, a succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order must be made in relation to the person.
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: interim supervision order

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order diffuses the extended supervision order in relation to the person.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: extended supervision order

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order is made until the extended supervision order in relation to the person.
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: extended supervision order

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6U(2) Succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory orders

6U(3) Succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory orders
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.112
note: Each later extended supervision order or interim supervision order is a succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order in relation to each earlier extended supervision order or interim supervision order.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6u-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 6U Succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory orders

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There exists a temporal interval between each pair of these orders.
confidence: 0.7000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The temporal interval between the two or more successive extended supervision orders or interim supervision orders is included in the Allen interval for each earlier order.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalSuccession
premise text: Two or more successive extended supervision orders or interim supervision orders are made

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Each later extended supervision order or interim supervision order is a succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order in relation to each earlier extended supervision order or interim supervision order.
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If two or more successive extended supervision orders or interim supervision orders are made, then each later order is a succeeding supervisory order.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implication
premise text: 2 or more successive extended supervision orders or interim supervision orders are made

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There exists a temporal interval between each pair of these orders.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The diffusion of the supervisory orders is included in the Allen interval for each earlier order.
modality: Diffusion
operator: TemporalSuccession
premise text: Two or more successive extended supervision orders or interim supervision orders are made

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There exists a temporal interval between each pair of these orders.
confidence: 0.6000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The temporal intervals between the two or more successive extended supervision orders or interim supervision orders form an LTL trace.
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalSuccession
premise text: Two or more successive extended supervision orders or interim supervision orders are made

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6U(3) Succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory orders

6UA When a community safety supervision order is taken to be in
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.112
note: Order is in force until specified period begins.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ua-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ua-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6ua
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ua-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Has not yet begun
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Describes the duration of the obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: >
premise text: Period specified in the order

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ua-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6UA When a community safety supervision order is taken to be in

6UB Succeeding community safety supervision orders
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.112
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6UB(1) Succeeding community safety supervision orders
has part: 6UB(2) Succeeding community safety supervision orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6ub
schema version: 2

6UB(1) Succeeding community safety supervision orders
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.112
note: A succeeding community safety supervision order is a succeeding order in relation to an earlier order.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ub-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ub-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6ub-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 6UB Succeeding community safety supervision orders

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ub-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Later order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of 'succeeding'
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: Earlier order

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ub-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6UB(1) Succeeding community safety supervision orders

6UB(2) Succeeding community safety supervision orders
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.112
note: Each later community safety supervision order is a succeeding community safety supervision order if 2 or more successive community safety supervision orders are made in relation to the same person.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ub-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ub-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ub-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ub-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ub-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ub-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6ub-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 6UB Succeeding community safety supervision orders

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ub-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Each later community safety supervision order is a succeeding community safety supervision order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relationship
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: 2 or more successive community safety supervision orders are made in relation to the same person.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ub-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Each later community safety supervision order is a succeeding community safety supervision order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Implication
modality: CogAI
operator: ⊃
premise text: 2 or more successive community safety supervision orders are made in relation to the same person.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ub-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Each later community safety supervision order is a succeeding community safety supervision order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: 2 or more successive community safety supervision orders are made in relation to the same person.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ub-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Each later community safety supervision order is a succeeding community safety supervision order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Universal quantification
modality: Diffusion
operator: ∀
premise text: 2 or more successive community safety supervision orders are made in relation to the same person.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ub-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Each later community safety supervision order is a succeeding community safety supervision order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal equivalence
modality: LTL
operator: <=>
premise text: 2 or more successive community safety supervision orders are made in relation to the same person.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ub-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6UB(2) Succeeding community safety supervision orders

6V Substitution of references to the Attorney-General
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.113
note: Prohibition on making substituted reference orders under certain circumstances.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6v-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6v-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6v-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6v
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6v-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: During exceptional circumstances, the Governor-General must not make a substituted reference order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Relates to exceptional circumstances.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Exceptional circumstances exist.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6v-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Governor-General must not make a substituted reference order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the Governor-General from making substituted reference orders.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: The Prime Minister is satisfied that exceptional circumstances exist.

7 Telecommunications not to be intercepted
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.114
curation status: Proposed
has part: 7(1) Telecommunications not to be intercepted
has part: 7(2) Telecommunications not to be intercepted
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7
schema version: 2

7(1) Telecommunications not to be intercepted
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.114
note: No one can intercept or enable interception of communications.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-7-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 7 Telecommunications not to be intercepted

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits interception.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person shall not:

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-7-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7(1) Telecommunications not to be intercepted

7(2) Telecommunications not to be intercepted
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.114
note: Exemptions from interception prohibition for certain employees and authorized persons
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-7-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 7 Telecommunications not to be intercepted

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from interception prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Reasonably necessary for employee to perform duties effectively

70 Communicating information obtained by interception under
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.242
note: Prohibition on communicating information obtained by interception under certain circumstances
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-70-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-70
schema version: 2

71 Dealing with information where interception suspected to be
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.242
curation status: Proposed
has part: 71(1) Dealing with information where interception suspected to be
has part: 71(2) Dealing with information where interception suspected to be
has part: 71(3) Dealing with information where interception suspected to be
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-71
schema version: 2

71(1) Dealing with information where interception suspected to be
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.242
note: Intercepted information may establish a suspected offence if reasonable grounds exist.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-71-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-71-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-71-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 71 Dealing with information where interception suspected to be

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-71-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The succeeding provisions of this section have effect.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishing a suspected offence is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Reasonable grounds exist for suspecting the offence.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-71-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 71(1) Dealing with information where interception suspected to be

71(2) Dealing with information where interception suspected to be
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.242
note: Who can be informed about suspected interception of information
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-71-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-71-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-71-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 71 Dealing with information where interception suspected to be

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-71-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: inform the specified authorities
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to communicate
modality: Deontic
operator: can
premise text: The person may...

71(3) Dealing with information where interception suspected to be
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.242
note: Communicating relevant information for specific purposes.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-71-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-71-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-71-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 71 Dealing with information where interception suspected to be

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-71-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to communicate relevant information.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-71-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 71(3) Dealing with information where interception suspected to be

72 Making record for purpose of permitted communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.243
note: Making record for permitted communication
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-72-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-72
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make a record
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-72-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 72 Making record for purpose of permitted communication

73 Section 73
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.84
note: List of sections prohibited from prosecution
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-73-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-73-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-73
schema version: 2

73 Further dealing by recipient of certain information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.243
note: Recipient of certain information must comply with subsections (1A), (2) and (3)
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-73-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-73-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-73-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-73-2-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-73-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-73-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Communicated for a certain period of time
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Received communication

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-73-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply with subsections
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-73-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of communication
modality: LTL
operator: RECURRING
premise text: Received communication

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-73-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 73 Further dealing by recipient of certain information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-73-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits listed sections from prosecution
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

74 Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.244
curation status: Proposed
has part: 74(1) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
has part: 74(2) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
has part: 74(3) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-74
schema version: 2

74(1) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.244
note: Permits giving lawfully intercepted information in evidence in exempt proceeding.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-74-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-74-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-74-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 74(1) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding

74(2) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.244
note: Determine question whether communication was intercepted in contravention of subsection 7(1) on balance of probabilities.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-74-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-74-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-74-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 74(2) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding

74(3) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.244
note: Giving interception warrant information in evidence in exempt proceeding
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-74-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-74-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-74-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-74-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to give interception warrant information
modality: Deontic
operator: may

75 Giving information in evidence where defect in connection with
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.245
curation status: Proposed
has part: 75(1) Giving information in evidence where defect in connection with
has part: 75(2) Giving information in evidence where defect in connection with
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-75
schema version: 2

75(1) Giving information in evidence where defect in connection with
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.245
note: Provide information obtained by interception in evidence if certain conditions are met.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-75-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-75-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-75-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 75 Giving information in evidence where defect in connection with

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-75-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-75-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 75(1) Giving information in evidence where defect in connection with

75(2) Giving information in evidence where defect in connection with
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.245
note: Prohibition on issuing a document purporting to be a warrant with an irregularity.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-75-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-75-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-75-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-75-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-75-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-75-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 75 Giving information in evidence where defect in connection with

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-75-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in connection with the execution of a warrant, or the purported execution of a document purporting to be a warrant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the timing of the prohibited action.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) A reference in subsection (1) to an irregularity is a reference to a defect or irregularity...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-75-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or the purported execution of a document purporting to be a warrant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits issuing a document purporting to be a warrant with an irregularity.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (2) A reference in subsection (1) to an irregularity is a reference to a defect or irregularity...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-75-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in, or in connection with the issue of, a document purporting to be a warrant; or
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits connection with issuing a document purporting to be a warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (2) A reference in subsection (1) to an irregularity is a reference to a defect or irregularity...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-75-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or the purported execution of a document purporting to be a warrant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes the duration of the prohibited action.
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (2) A reference in subsection (1) to an irregularity is a reference to a defect or irregularity...

75A Evidence that has been given in exempt proceeding
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.245
note: Permits later use of exempt proceeding evidence in other proceedings.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-75a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-75a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-75a
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-75a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows later use of exempt proceeding evidence.
modality: Deontic
operator: PERMIT

76 Giving information in evidence in criminal proceedings under
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.246
curation status: Proposed
has part: 76(1) Giving information in evidence in criminal proceedings under
has part: 76(2) Giving information in evidence in criminal proceedings under
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76
schema version: 2

76(1) Giving information in evidence in criminal proceedings under
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.246
note: Giving information obtained by intercepting a communication in contravention of subsection 7(1) in evidence in a proceeding.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 76 Giving information in evidence in criminal proceedings under

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: in evidence in a proceeding
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to give information obtained by intercepting a communication in contravention of subsection 7(1) in evidence in a proceeding.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (1) A person may give information obtained by intercepting a communication in contravention of subsection 7(1)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to authorise, suffer or permit, or do any act or thing to enable the interception.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (a) an offence against subsection 7(1) constituted by the interception, or by authorising, suffering or permitting, or doing any act or thing to enable, the interception;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to communicate to a person, making use of, making a record of, or giving in evidence in a proceeding, information obtained by the interception.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (b) an offence against section 63 constituted by communicating to a person, making use of, making a record of, or giving in evidence in a proceeding, information obtained by the intercepted

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to do any act or thing to enable, the interception.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (c) an ancillary offence relating to an offence of a kind referred to in paragraph (a) or (b) of this subsection.

76(2) Giving information in evidence in criminal proceedings under
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.246
note: Allowing interception warrant information in evidence in criminal proceedings under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 76 Giving information in evidence in criminal proceedings under

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76(2) Giving information in evidence in criminal proceedings under

76A Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.246
curation status: Proposed
has part: 76A(1) Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
has part: 76A(2) Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76a
schema version: 2

76A(1) Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.246
note: Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76a-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 76A Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to give information obtained by intercepting a communication in contravention of subsection 7(1)
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (1) A person may give information obtained by intercepting a communication in contravention of subsection 7(1)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allowance to provide evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow
premise text: (1) A person may give information obtained by intercepting a communication in contravention of subsection 7(1)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
premise text: (1) A person may give information obtained by intercepting a communication in contravention of subsection 7(1)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76a-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on providing evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person may give information obtained by intercepting a communication in contravention of subsection 7(1)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Tracing the provision to its application in civil proceedings for remedial
modality: LTL
operator: Trace
premise text: (1) A person may give information obtained by intercepting a communication in contravention of subsection 7(1)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76a-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76A(1) Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial

76A(2) Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.246
note: Allowing person to give interception warrant information in evidence
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 76A Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

77 Intercepted material and interception warrant information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.247
curation status: Proposed
has part: 77(1) Intercepted material and interception warrant information
has part: 77(2) Intercepted material and interception warrant information
has part: 77(3) Intercepted material and interception warrant information
has part: 77(4) Intercepted material and interception warrant information
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77
schema version: 2

77(1) Intercepted material and interception warrant information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.247
note: Information obtained by interception is admissible in evidence under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-77-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-77-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 77 Intercepted material and interception warrant information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-77-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information in evidence under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-77-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77(1) Intercepted material and interception warrant information

77(2) Intercepted material and interception warrant information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.247
note: Prohibition on using intercepted material without permission from relevant sections
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-77-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-77-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 77 Intercepted material and interception warrant information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-77-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits using intercepted material without permission
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-77-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77(2) Intercepted material and interception warrant information

77(3) Intercepted material and interception warrant information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.247
note: Exclusion of interception warrant information from evidence
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-77-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 77 Intercepted material and interception warrant information

77(4) Intercepted material and interception warrant information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.247
note: A person may communicate interception warrant information to another person.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-77-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-77-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 77 Intercepted material and interception warrant information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-77-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to communicate
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-77-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77(4) Intercepted material and interception warrant information

78 Where evidence otherwise inadmissible
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.248
note: No part of this Act renders information or a restricted record admissible in evidence to a greater extent than it would have been admissible if this Part had not been enacted.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-78-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-78
schema version: 2

79 Destruction of restricted records that are not likely to be
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.248
curation status: Proposed
has part: 79(1) Destruction of restricted records that are not likely to be
has part: 79(2) Destruction of restricted records that are not likely to be
has part: 79(3) Destruction of restricted records that are not likely to be
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-79
schema version: 2

79(1) Destruction of restricted records that are not likely to be
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.248
note: Destruction of restricted records not likely to be required for a permitted purpose.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-79-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 79 Destruction of restricted records that are not likely to be

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the chief officer shall cause the restricted record to be destroyed forthwith.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for destruction of records.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (b) the chief officer of the agency is satisfied that the restricted record is not likely to be required for a permitted purpose in relation to the agency;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the chief officer shall cause the restricted record to be destroyed forthwith.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence reasoning about record destruction.
modality: CogAI
operator: Reasoning
premise text: (b) the chief officer of the agency is satisfied that the restricted record is not likely to be required for a permitted purpose in relation to the agency;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the chief officer shall cause the restricted record to be destroyed forthwith.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of destruction of restricted records.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) a restricted record (whether made before or after the commencement of this section) is in the possession of an agency...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the chief officer shall cause the restricted record to be destroyed forthwith.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of knowledge about record destruction.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
premise text: (b) the chief officer of the agency is satisfied that the restricted record is not likely to be required for a permitted purpose in relation to the agency;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the chief officer shall cause the restricted record to be destroyed forthwith.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal trace of record destruction.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
premise text: (b) the chief officer of the agency is satisfied that the restricted record is not likely to be required for a permitted purpose in relation to the agency;

79(2) Destruction of restricted records that are not likely to be
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.248
note: Destroying restricted records without permission is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-79-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 79 Destruction of restricted records that are not likely to be

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of destroying restricted records.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

79(3) Destruction of restricted records that are not likely to be
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.248
note: Exemption from destruction of intercepted records
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-79-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 79 Destruction of restricted records that are not likely to be

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts restricted records from destruction
modality: Deontic
operator: Exempts

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 79(3) Destruction of restricted records that are not likely to be

79A Responsible person for a computer network must ensure
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.250
curation status: Proposed
has part: 79A(1) Responsible person for a computer network must ensure
has part: 79A(2) Responsible person for a computer network must ensure
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-79a
schema version: 2

79A(1) Responsible person for a computer network must ensure
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.250
note: Responsible person for a computer network must ensure
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-79a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 79A Responsible person for a computer network must ensure

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) This section applies if:

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 79A(1) Responsible person for a computer network must ensure

79A(2) Responsible person for a computer network must ensure
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.250
note: Responsible person must ensure restricted record is destroyed
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-79a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 79A Responsible person for a computer network must ensure

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must cause the restricted record to be destroyed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must destroy restricted record
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Responsible person for a computer network

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 79A(2) Responsible person for a computer network must ensure

79AA Destruction of restricted records—information obtained
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.249
note: Prohibition on possessing restricted records without authorization.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79aa-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79aa-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-79aa
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Possession is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits possession of restricted records.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: Agency possesses restricted record.

79AB Destruction of restricted records—information obtained
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.249
note: Prohibition on destroying restricted records obtained before a community safety supervision order came into force.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79ab-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79ab-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-79ab
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79ab-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cannot destroy record
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on destroying records
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: Restricted record in possession of agency

80 Commonwealth agencies to keep documents connected with issue
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.252
note: Commonwealth agencies must keep documents connected with issue.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-80-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-80
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide documents
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-80-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 80 Commonwealth agencies to keep documents connected with issue

81 Other records to be kept by Commonwealth agencies in
type: Concept
description: Particulars of each telephone application for a Part 2-5 warrant, statement as to whether the application was withdrawn or refused, particulars of each interception under the warrant, etc.
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.252
note: Commonwealth agencies must keep records of interceptions and telecommunications.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide records
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81 Other records to be kept by Commonwealth agencies in

81A General Register of Warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.255
curation status: Proposed
has part: 81A(1) General Register of Warrants
has part: 81A(2) General Register of Warrants
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81a
schema version: 2

81A(1) General Register of Warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.255
note: The Secretary of the Department must keep a General Register of Warrants.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 81A General Register of Warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to keep a General Register of Warrants
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81A(1) General Register of Warrants

81A(2) General Register of Warrants
type: Concept
description: Particulars of warrant issuance
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.255
note: Record particulars of warrant issuance in the General Register.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 81A General Register of Warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to record particulars
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81A(2) General Register of Warrants

81AA Organisation to record particulars in relation to eligible
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.254
note: Organisation must exercise authority conferred by a certain entity.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81aa-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81aa
schema version: 2

81B Regular submission of General Register to Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.256
curation status: Proposed
has part: 81B(1) Regular submission of General Register to Minister
has part: 81B(2) Regular submission of General Register to Minister
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81b
schema version: 2

81B(1) Regular submission of General Register to Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.256
note: The Secretary of the Department must deliver the General Register to the Minister for inspection.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 81B Regular submission of General Register to Minister

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81B(1) Regular submission of General Register to Minister

81B(2) Regular submission of General Register to Minister
type: Concept
description: Information recorded since the last delivery
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.256
note: Regular submission of General Register to Minister
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 81B Regular submission of General Register to Minister

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to submit information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81B(2) Regular submission of General Register to Minister

81C Special Register of Warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.256
curation status: Proposed
has part: 81C(1) Special Register of Warrants
has part: 81C(2) Special Register of Warrants
has part: 81C(3) Special Register of Warrants
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81c
schema version: 2

81C(1) Special Register of Warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.256
note: The Secretary of the Department must keep a Special Register of Warrants.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81c-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 81C Special Register of Warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to keep the register
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81C(1) Special Register of Warrants

81C(2) Special Register of Warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.256
note: Record particulars in relation to each registrable expired warrant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81c-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 81C Special Register of Warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide particulars
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81C(2) Special Register of Warrants

81C(3) Special Register of Warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.256
note: Duty to maintain a special register of warrants
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81c-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 81C Special Register of Warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to maintain a special register
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81C(3) Special Register of Warrants

81D Regular submission of Special Register to Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.259
curation status: Proposed
has part: 81D(1) Regular submission of Special Register to Minister
has part: 81D(2) Regular submission of Special Register to Minister
has part: 81D(3) Regular submission of Special Register to Minister
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81d
schema version: 2

81D(1) Regular submission of Special Register to Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.259
note: Regular submission of Special Register to Minister
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81d-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 81D Regular submission of Special Register to Minister

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81D(1) Regular submission of Special Register to Minister

81D(2) Regular submission of Special Register to Minister
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.259
note: Regular submission of Special Register to Minister
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81d-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 81D Regular submission of Special Register to Minister

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81D(2) Regular submission of Special Register to Minister

81D(3) Regular submission of Special Register to Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.259
note: Ensure timely delivery of Special Register with General Register
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81d-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 81D Regular submission of Special Register to Minister

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to ensure timely delivery
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81D(3) Regular submission of Special Register to Minister

81E Provision of information by eligible authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.259
note: Eligible authorities must provide information when applicable.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81e-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81e-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81e
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81e-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81E Provision of information by eligible authorities

83 Inspections
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.260
note: Inspections of Commonwealth agencies, except ACC, are undertaken by the Ombudsman.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-83-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-83-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-83
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-83-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to inspect records
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

84 Reports
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.261
curation status: Proposed
has part: 84(1) Reports
has part: 84(1A) Reports
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-84
schema version: 2

84(1) Reports
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.261
note: The Ombudsman must report to the Minister within 3 months after each financial year.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-84-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-84-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 84 Reports

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-84-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 84(1) Reports

84(1A) Reports
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.261
note: The Ombudsman must include specific information in each report.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-84-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-84-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-84-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 84 Reports

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-84-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide specific information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-84-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 84(1A) Reports

85 Ombudsman may report on other breaches of this Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.262
curation status: Proposed
has part: 85(1) Ombudsman may report on other breaches of this Act
has part: 85(2) Ombudsman may report on other breaches of this Act
has part: 85(3) Ombudsman may report on other breaches of this Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85
schema version: 2

85(1) Ombudsman may report on other breaches of this Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.262
note: Ombudsman may report on other breaches of this Act
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-85-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 85 Ombudsman may report on other breaches of this Act

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May report on contravention
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-85-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85(1) Ombudsman may report on other breaches of this Act

85(2) Ombudsman may report on other breaches of this Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.262
note: Contravention of a condition or restriction is also a contravention of the Act.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-85-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-85-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 85 Ombudsman may report on other breaches of this Act

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-85-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: X is an obligation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: =

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-85-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85(2) Ombudsman may report on other breaches of this Act

85(3) Ombudsman may report on other breaches of this Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.262
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for certain sections
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-85-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 85 Ombudsman may report on other breaches of this Act

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-85-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85(3) Ombudsman may report on other breaches of this Act

85A Annual report may cover notified breaches in relation to
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.262
note: Annual report may cover notified breaches in relation to
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-85a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85a
schema version: 2

85B Annual report may cover notified breaches in relation to
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.263
note: Annual report must cover notified breaches.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-85b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-85b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85b
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-85b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide annual report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-85b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85B Annual report may cover notified breaches in relation to

86 Ombudsman’s general powers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.263
note: Ombudsman's general powers for inspection of agency records
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-86-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86
schema version: 2

87 Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.264
curation status: Proposed
has part: 87(1) Power to obtain relevant information
has part: 87(2) Power to obtain relevant information
has part: 87(3) Power to obtain relevant information
has part: 87(4) Power to obtain relevant information
has part: 87(5) Power to obtain relevant information
has part: 87(6) Power to obtain relevant information
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87
schema version: 2

87(1) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.264
note: The Ombudsman can compel an officer to provide relevant information.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 87 Power to obtain relevant information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: can

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87(1) Power to obtain relevant information

87(2) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.264
note: The Ombudsman may require an officer to provide information.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 87 Power to obtain relevant information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The officer must provide the information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
premise text: The Ombudsman may require an officer to provide information.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87(2) Power to obtain relevant information

87(3) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.264
note: The Ombudsman may require an officer to attend for inspection.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 87 Power to obtain relevant information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Ombudsman may require an officer to attend.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87(3) Power to obtain relevant information

87(4) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.264
note: The Ombudsman may require the chief officer to attend an inspection.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 87 Power to obtain relevant information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87(4) Power to obtain relevant information

87(5) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.264
note: The requirement must be reasonable having regard to the circumstances in which it is made.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 87 Power to obtain relevant information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The time and day specified in a requirement under this section overlap with the circumstances.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The time and day specified in a requirement under this section overlap with the circumstances.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The period or time and day specified in a requirement under this section are reasonable having regard to the circumstances in which the requirement is made.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The AI system infers the requirements from the circumstances.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The AI system infers the requirements from the circumstances.
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: The place, and the period or the time and day, specified in a requirement under this section shall be reasonable having regard to the circumstances in which the requirement is made.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The requirement is reasonable.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The requirement must be reasonable.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The place and period specified in a requirement under this section shall be reasonable.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The information about the requirements diffuses to the circumstances.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The information about the requirements diffuses to the circumstances.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: The place, and the period or the time and day, specified in a requirement under this section shall be reasonable having regard to the circumstances in which the requirement is made.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The period or time and day specified in a requirement under this section until the circumstances.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The period or time and day specified in a requirement under this section until the circumstances.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: The place, and the period or the time and day, specified in a requirement under this section shall be reasonable having regard to the circumstances in which the requirement is made.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87(5) Power to obtain relevant information

87(6) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.264
note: Must attend, give information, and answer questions when required.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 87 Power to obtain relevant information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must attend, give information, and answer questions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87(6) Power to obtain relevant information

88 Ombudsman to be given information and access notwithstanding
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.266
curation status: Proposed
has part: 88(1) Ombudsman to be given information and access notwithstanding
has part: 88(2) Ombudsman to be given information and access notwithstanding
has part: 88(3) Ombudsman to be given information and access notwithstanding
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-88
schema version: 2

88(1) Ombudsman to be given information and access notwithstanding
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.266
note: Must provide information and access to documents upon request.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-88-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-88-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-88-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 88 Ombudsman to be given information and access notwithstanding

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-88-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information and access.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-88-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 88(1) Ombudsman to be given information and access notwithstanding

88(2) Ombudsman to be given information and access notwithstanding
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.266
note: An officer of an agency must provide information to an inspecting officer.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-88-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-88-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 88 Ombudsman to be given information and access notwithstanding

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-88-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 88(2) Ombudsman to be given information and access notwithstanding

88(3) Ombudsman to be given information and access notwithstanding
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.266
note: An officer of an agency must make a record of information for the purposes of giving it to a person.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-88-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-88-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-88-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 88 Ombudsman to be given information and access notwithstanding

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-88-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-88-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 88(3) Ombudsman to be given information and access notwithstanding

89 Dealing with information for the purposes of inspection and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.267
note: Inspecting officer may communicate information to another inspecting officer for inspection purposes.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-89-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-89-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-89
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-89-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits action
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-89-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89 Dealing with information for the purposes of inspection and

9 Issue of telecommunications service warrants by Attorney-General
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.119
note: Attorney-General may issue warrant for interception of communications under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to intercept communications under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Telecommunications service warrants issued by Attorney-General.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classifies

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9 Issue of telecommunications service warrants by Attorney-General

90 Ombudsman not to be sued
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.267
note: No liability for acts done in good faith
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-90-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-90-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-90
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-90-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No liability
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If an act is done in good faith, then no liability
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Act done in good faith

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-90-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 90 Ombudsman not to be sued

91 Delegation by Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.267
curation status: Proposed
has part: 91(1) Delegation by Ombudsman
has part: 91(2) Delegation by Ombudsman
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-91
schema version: 2

91(1) Delegation by Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.267
note: The Ombudsman may delegate powers to another inspecting officer.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-91-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-91-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-91-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 91 Delegation by Ombudsman

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-91-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to delegate
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-91-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 91(1) Delegation by Ombudsman

91(2) Delegation by Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.267
note: Delegation of power by Ombudsman
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-91-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-91-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 91 Delegation by Ombudsman

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-91-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 91(2) Delegation by Ombudsman

92 Application of Ombudsman Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.268
curation status: Proposed
has part: 92(1) Application of Ombudsman Act
has part: 92(2) Application of Ombudsman Act
has part: 92(3) Application of Ombudsman Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92
schema version: 2

92(1) Application of Ombudsman Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.268
note: Section 11A of the Ombudsman Act 1976 does not apply in relation to the exercise or proposed exercise of a power, or the performance or the proposed performance of a function, of the Ombudsman under this Part.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 92 Application of Ombudsman Act

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 11A is excluded from the Ombudsman's powers and functions during certain periods.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Section 11A does not apply during the exercise or proposed exercise of a power, or the performance or the proposed performance of a function, of the Ombudsman under this Part.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Exclusion
premise text: The Ombudsman Act 1976

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 11A does not apply.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section 11A is excluded from the Ombudsman's powers and functions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
premise text: The Ombudsman Act 1976

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 11A does not prohibit the Ombudsman from exercising or performing a power or function.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Ombudsman may exercise or perform a power or function despite Section 11A.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: The Ombudsman Act 1976

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 11A does not relieve the Ombudsman of its obligations.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Ombudsman is obligated to exercise or perform a power or function despite Section 11A.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The Ombudsman Act 1976

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 11A is excluded from the Ombudsman's powers and functions during certain periods.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Section 11A does not apply during the exercise or proposed exercise of a power, or the performance or the proposed performance of a function, of the Ombudsman under this Part.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Exclusion
premise text: The Ombudsman Act 1976

92(2) Application of Ombudsman Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.268
note: Exclusion of inspecting officer's actions from Ombudsman Act reference
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 92 Application of Ombudsman Act

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An inspection officer's actions are excluded from the Ombudsman Act reference
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excluding inspecting officer's actions from Ombudsman Act reference
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclude
premise text: (2) A reference in section 19 of the Ombudsman Act 1976 to the Ombudsman’s operations does not include a reference to anything that an inspecting officer has done or omitted to do under this Part.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exclusion is justified as an obligation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Justification of exclusion as an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Justify
premise text: (2) A reference in section 19 of the Ombudsman Act 1976 to the Ombudsman’s operations does not include a reference to anything that an inspecting officer has done or omitted to do under this Part.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exclusion is justified as a prohibition
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Justification of exclusion as a prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Justify
premise text: (2) A reference in section 19 of the Ombudsman Act 1976 to the Ombudsman’s operations does not include a reference to anything that an inspecting officer has done or omitted to do under this Part.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exclusion implies that the Ombudsman Act reference does not include the inspection officer's actions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implication of exclusion on Ombudsman Act reference
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
premise text: (2) A reference in section 19 of the Ombudsman Act 1976 to the Ombudsman’s operations does not include a reference to anything that an inspecting officer has done or omitted to do under this Part.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 92(2) Application of Ombudsman Act

92(3) Application of Ombudsman Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.268
note: Application of Ombudsman Act
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 92 Application of Ombudsman Act

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ombudsman Act applies to this Part
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: (3) Subject to section 88 of this Act

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 92(3) Application of Ombudsman Act

92A Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.268
curation status: Proposed
has part: 92A(1) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
has part: 92A(2) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
has part: 92A(3) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
has part: 92A(4) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
has part: 92A(5) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92a
schema version: 2

92A(1) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.268
note: Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State inspecting authorities
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 92A Exchange of information between Ombudsman or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State agency must exchange information
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of State agencies and inspecting authorities
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Class
premise text: State agency means an eligible authority of a State that is an agency.

92A(2) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.268
note: The Ombudsman must provide information to the State inspecting authority.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 92A Exchange of information between Ombudsman or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 92A(2) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or

92A(3) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.268
note: Ombudsman must provide information to authority under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 92A Exchange of information between Ombudsman or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
premise text: The Ombudsman may only give information...

92A(4) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.268
note: Exchange of information between IGIS and State inspecting authorities.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 92A Exchange of information between Ombudsman or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 92A(4) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or

92A(5) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.268
note: Must provide information about a State agency obtained under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Act 1986.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 92A Exchange of information between Ombudsman or

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Act 1986
modality: AllenInterval
operator: under
premise text: (5) The Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security may give information that: (a) relates to a State agency; and (b) was obtained by an IGIS official under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Act 1986;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information about a State agency
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (5) The Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security may give information that: (a) relates to a State agency; and (b) was obtained by an IGIS official under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Act 1986;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Act 1986
modality: LTL
operator: under
premise text: (5) The Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security may give information that: (a) relates to a State agency; and (b) was obtained by an IGIS official under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Act 1986;

93 Annual reports to Minister about interceptions under Part 2-3
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.271
note: Annual report on interceptions by employees
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-93-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-93-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-93-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-93-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for report submission
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: 30 June

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-93-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

94 Annual reports regarding applications and warrants under
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.271
note: Annual reports regarding applications and warrants under
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-94
schema version: 2

94A Reports regarding emergency interception action
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.272
curation status: Proposed
has part: 94A(1) Reports regarding emergency interception action
has part: 94A(2) Reports regarding emergency interception action
has part: 94A(3) Reports regarding emergency interception action
has part: 94A(4) Reports regarding emergency interception action
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-94a
schema version: 2

94A(1) Reports regarding emergency interception action
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.272
note: Chief officer must provide written report to Minister regarding emergency interception actions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-94a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 94A Reports regarding emergency interception action

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 94A(1) Reports regarding emergency interception action

94A(2) Reports regarding emergency interception action
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.272
note: Report must be given within 3 months after specified events.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-94a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 94A Reports regarding emergency interception action

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

94A(3) Reports regarding emergency interception action
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.272
note: Report requirements for emergency interception action
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-94a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 94A Reports regarding emergency interception action

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide report information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 94A(3) Reports regarding emergency interception action

94A(4) Reports regarding emergency interception action
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.272
note: Defines emergency interception action
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94a-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-94a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 94A Reports regarding emergency interception action

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 94A(4) Reports regarding emergency interception action

94B Reports regarding named person warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.273
curation status: Proposed
has part: 94B(1) Reports regarding named person warrants
has part: 94B(2) Reports regarding named person warrants
has part: 94B(3) Reports regarding named person warrants
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-94b
schema version: 2

94B(1) Reports regarding named person warrants
type: Concept
description: Written report
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.273
note: Agency must report to Minister on action taken under warrant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-94b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 94B Reports regarding named person warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Report to Minister
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must take action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 94B(1) Reports regarding named person warrants

94B(2) Reports regarding named person warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.273
note: Chief officer must give a report within 3 months after warrant ceases to be in force.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-94b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 94B Reports regarding named person warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 94B(2) Reports regarding named person warrants

94B(3) Reports regarding named person warrants
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.273
note: Must provide information about intercepted communication
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-94b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 94B Reports regarding named person warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 94B(3) Reports regarding named person warrants

95 Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.274
curation status: Proposed
has part: 95(1) Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth
has part: 95(2) Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95
schema version: 2

95(1) Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.274
note: Minister may request specified information from Commonwealth agencies or authorities.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-95-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-95-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 95 Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-95-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to request specified information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

95(2) Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.274
note: Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-95-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-95-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 95 Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-95-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May comply with request
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-95-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95(2) Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth

96 Annual reports by State authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.274
curation status: Proposed
has part: 96(1) Annual reports by State authorities
has part: 96(1A) Annual reports by State authorities
has part: 96(2) Annual reports by State authorities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-96
schema version: 2

96(1) Annual reports by State authorities
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.274
note: Annual reports by State authorities must be provided to the Minister within 3 months after each June 30th.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-96-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-96-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-96-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 96 Annual reports by State authorities

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-96-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide annual reports
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-96-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 96(1) Annual reports by State authorities

96(1A) Annual reports by State authorities
type: Concept
description: Total expenditure (including capital nature) incurred during the year
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.274
note: Annual report must include statement of total expenditure incurred by eligible authority
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-96-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-96-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-96-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 96 Annual reports by State authorities

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-96-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

96(2) Annual reports by State authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.274
note: Chief officer need not give report to Minister if Minister has received written report from Minister.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-96-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-96-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-96-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 96 Annual reports by State authorities

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-96-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Chief officer need not give report to Minister
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemption from reporting duty
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: Minister has received written report

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-96-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 96(2) Annual reports by State authorities

97 Reports by Managing Directors about acts done in connection
type: Concept
description: within 3 months after warrant ceases to be in force
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.275
note: Report on acts done in connection with warrant
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-97-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-97-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-97
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-97-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-97-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 97 Reports by Managing Directors about acts done in connection

99 Annual report by Minister about warrants under Part 2-5
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.276
note: Annual report by Minister about warrants under Part 2-5
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-99-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-99-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-99
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-99-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide annual report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

9A Issue of named person warrants by Attorney-General
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.120
curation status: Proposed
has part: 9A(1) Issue of named person warrants by Attorney-General
has part: 9A(1A) Issue of named person warrants by Attorney-General
has part: 9A(1B) Issue of named person warrants by Attorney-General
has part: 9A(1C) Issue of named person warrants by Attorney-General
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9a
schema version: 2

9A(1) Issue of named person warrants by Attorney-General
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.120
note: Attorney-General must issue a warrant under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 9A Issue of named person warrants by Attorney-General

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Attorney-General MUST issue a warrant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Attorney-General MUST issue a warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) Upon receiving a request by the Director-General of Security for the issue of a warrant under this section in respect of a person, the Attorney-General may, under his or her hand, issue a warrant...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Attorney-General MUST be satisfied that certain conditions are met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Attorney-General MUST be satisfied that certain conditions are met.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) Upon receiving a request by the Director-General of Security for the issue of a warrant under this section in respect of a person, the Attorney-General may, under his or her hand, issue a warrant...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Director-General of Security MUST request the issue of a warrant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Director-General of Security must request the issue of a warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) Upon receiving a request by the Director-General of Security for the issue of a warrant under this section in respect of a person, the Attorney-General may, under his or her hand, issue a warrant...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Attorney-General MUST be satisfied that certain conditions are met before issuing a warrant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Attorney-General must be satisfied that certain conditions are met before issuing a warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) Upon receiving a request by the Director-General of Security for the issue of a warrant under this section in respect of a person, the Attorney-General may, under his or her hand, issue a warrant...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Director-General of Security MUST reasonably suspect the person is engaged in activities prejudicial to security.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Director-General of Security must reasonably suspect the person is engaged in activities prejudicial to security.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) Upon receiving a request by the Director-General of Security for the issue of a warrant under this section in respect of a person, the Attorney-General may, under his or her hand, issue a warrant...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Attorney-General MUST be satisfied that relying on a telecommunications service warrant would be ineffective.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Attorney-General must be satisfied that relying on a telecommunications service warrant would be ineffective.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) Upon receiving a request by the Director-General of Security for the issue of a warrant under this section in respect of a person, the Attorney-General may, under his or her hand, issue a warrant...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9A(1) Issue of named person warrants by Attorney-General

9A(1A) Issue of named person warrants by Attorney-General
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.120
note: Authorises interception of communications under specified conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9a-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 9A Issue of named person warrants by Attorney-General

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorises interception of communications.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies communications to be intercepted.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1a-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9A(1A) Issue of named person warrants by Attorney-General

9A(1B) Issue of named person warrants by Attorney-General
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.120
note: Authorises entry on premises for equipment installation, maintenance, use or recovery.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9a-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 9A Issue of named person warrants by Attorney-General

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (1B) The warrant may authorise entry...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1b-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9A(1B) Issue of named person warrants by Attorney-General

9A(1C) Issue of named person warrants by Attorney-General
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.120
note: Requires Attorney-General to issue named person warrants for interception of communications.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1c-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9a-ss-1c
schema version: 2
part of: 9A Issue of named person warrants by Attorney-General

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Attorney-General has an obligation to issue named person warrants.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1c-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: The Attorney-General is responsible for issuing named person warrants.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9A(1C) Issue of named person warrants by Attorney-General

9B Provisions applying to warrants issued under section 9 or 9A
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.123
curation status: Proposed
has part: 9B(1) Provisions applying to warrants issued under section 9 or 9A
has part: 9B(2) Provisions applying to warrants issued under section 9 or 9A
has part: 9B(3) Provisions applying to warrants issued under section 9 or 9A
has part: 9B(3A) Provisions applying to warrants issued under section 9 or 9A
has part: 9B(4) Provisions applying to warrants issued under section 9 or 9A
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9b
schema version: 2

9B(1) Provisions applying to warrants issued under section 9 or 9A
type: Concept
description: request in writing
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.123
note: Request for warrant must be in writing and forwarded to Attorney-General
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 9B Provisions applying to warrants issued under section 9 or 9A

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide request in writing
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

9B(2) Provisions applying to warrants issued under section 9 or 9A
type: Concept
description: entry hours, measures
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.123
note: Warrant must state entry hours and may authorise measures without permission.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 9B Provisions applying to warrants issued under section 9 or 9A

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits entry without permission.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9B(2) Provisions applying to warrants issued under section 9 or 9A

9B(3) Provisions applying to warrants issued under section 9 or 9A
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.123
note: Warrant revocation by Attorney-General before specified period ends
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 9B Provisions applying to warrants issued under section 9 or 9A

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The warrant may be revoked by the Attorney-General at any time before the end of the specified period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifies temporal overlap between warrant revocation and specified period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3) A warrant under section 9 or 9A must specify the period for which it is to remain in force.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The warrant may be revoked by the Attorney-General at any time before the end of the specified period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits warrant revocation without Attorney-General's discretion
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (3) A warrant under section 9 or 9A must specify the period for which it is to remain in force.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The warrant may be revoked by the Attorney-General at any time before the end of the specified period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits Attorney-General's discretion over warrant revocation
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (3) A warrant under section 9 or 9A must specify the period for which it is to remain in force.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The warrant may be revoked by the Attorney-General at any time before the end of the specified period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Specifies temporal relationship between warrant revocation and specified period
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (3) A warrant under section 9 or 9A must specify the period for which it is to remain in force.

9B(3A) Provisions applying to warrants issued under section 9 or 9A
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.123
note: Maximum duration for warrant issuance
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-3a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9b-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 9B Provisions applying to warrants issued under section 9 or 9A

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifies temporal interval for warrant duration
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Contains
premise text: (3A) The specified period must not exceed:

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits exceeding maximum duration
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (3A) The specified period must not exceed:

9B(4) Provisions applying to warrants issued under section 9 or 9A
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.123
note: Issue of further warrant despite previous warrants
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9b-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 9B Provisions applying to warrants issued under section 9 or 9A

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows issue of further warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (3) does not prevent the issue of a further warrant

Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979
type: Document
date: 4 June 2026
identifier: No. 114 of 1979
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
category: AU